seismic upgrade of factory buildings

20
POST-EARTHQUAKE INTERVENTIONS : PREVENTION AND SAFETY TECHNIQUES FACTORY BUILDINGS: THE MAIN FEATURES, THE  Author: Anna Marzo Worki ng group: Aless andr a Gugliandolo Maurizio Indirli Giuseppe Marghella Maria-Anna Segreto INEFFICIENCIES AND THE SUITABLE INTERVENTIONS ACCORDING TO THE EUROPEAN REGULATIONS

Upload: abdul-hakkim

Post on 03-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 1/20

POST-EARTHQUAKE INTERVENTIONS :PREVENTION AND SAFETY TECHNIQUES

FACTORY BUILDINGS:

THE MAIN FEATURES, THE

 Author: Anna Marzo

Working group: Alessandra GugliandoloMaurizio Indirli 

Giuseppe MarghellaMaria-Anna Segreto

INEFFICIENCIES AND THE

SUITABLE INTERVENTIONS

ACCORDING TO THE EUROPEAN

REGULATIONS

Page 2: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 2/20

ENEA ACTIVITIES FOR SEISMIC PROTECTION

Supporting the Italian Civil Protection

L’Aquila earthquake (2009) - 6.3 Richter

damage/safety evaluation for cultural heritage

Emilia Romagna earthquake (2012) – 5.9 Richter

damage/safety evaluation for several typologies of 

constructions

Page 3: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 3/20

ENEA ACTIVITIES FOR SEISMIC PROTECTION

Research activity: innovative seismic protection devices

SEISMIC ISOLATION OF VALUABLE OBJECTS

 

   T

ERCOLANO SHIP

Springs and hydraulic system

BASE ISOLATION OF BUILDINGS

   O    E

   U

   S   P   A   C   E   P   R   O   J   E

 Rolling element

Page 4: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 4/20

EUROPEAN SEISMIC MAPS

Distribution of the seismicity on the European territory 

form the highest (red) to the lowest (bleu) seismic areas 

The reduction of the seismicity from south to north due to the plates localization. The more seismic countries are located along the Italy is located on the plate limitation 

The earthquakes occur along the plate perimeter, when they move 

Page 5: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 5/20

Page 6: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 6/20

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Surveyed multi storey typologies

Two levels

Alveolar panels

Notes: 

Precasted buildings 

Realization: 1960-2000 

Reinfoced Prestressed 

Concrete 

Two-three levels 

Precasted slab 

 ree eve s

Tile TT

Page 7: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 7/20

 Horizontal precast panels

FACTORY BUILDINGS : Cladding typologies

Vertical precast panels Notes: 

Precasted vertical/horizontal panels 

Panels-structure connections realized by steel anchorages 

Regular opening 

Claddings façades are very commonin industrial buildings. In these cases

it is very important to check the

fixing system to the buildingstructure taking into account thevertical force distributed on thesingle panel.The seismic action may beevaluated by considering a force

applied to the center of gravity of the

 Brick masonry claddings

Notes: 

Traditional brick masonry 

claddings 

Cladding fill the empties between the structures 

Traditional mortar 

element.

Page 8: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 8/20

Connections among structural and completion elements

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Connections

Ad omega

CONNECTION TYPOLOGIES 

Tiles simply supported by the beams 

Beams simply supported by the pillars 

Pillars fixed to foundation 

Cladding panels connected to the structures by means of steel brackets 

Beam

Mortar or rubber layer

Pillars

Beam

Pillar

Fork 

Page 9: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 9/20

Connections among structural and completion elements

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Connection cladding-beam and cover-beam

Ad omega CONNECTION TYPOLOGIES 

✔Tiles simply supported by the beams 

✔Beams simply supported by the pillars 

✔ Pillars fixed to foundation 

✔Cladding panels connected to the structures by means of steel brackets 

weldingL shapedplate

ScrewΦ16 with washer

and nut

steel ancor plate

L SHAPED PLATE 130x65x10L=75mm

hole Φ17

buttonhole

steel ancor plate

Page 10: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 10/20

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Current rules

UNI ENV 1992-1-3 30-09-1995. Eurocode 2. Design of concrete structures . General rules and rules forbuildings

Connections 

• Damage due to cyclic deformation in plastic field should be considered; the strength design of the connections should be reduced in order to

taken into account of seismic stress, if it is required;

•in case of panel-bearing structures both r.c. and welded joints effectiveness should be experimentally tested;

•beam-pillar connections should guarantee the matching of both vertical and horizontal displacements and the stress should be transferred by

means of mechanical devices;•it is consented the realization of a sliding support at one end of the beam, but the sliding surface should be more extended then the seismic

displacement required;

•in case of connection between non monolithic parts ad hoc design criteria should be considered (three types are possible);

•Pillar-horizontal elements connection should be fix (rigid or elastic) when the pillars are isostatic elements;

•In general, the connections between both structural and completion elements should be guarantee the transmission of both static and seismic

The main requirements for structural elements and connections

UNI ENV 1998-1-4 31-10-1999. Eurocodice 8 - Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General

rules, seismic actions and rules for building.

stress in the safe side, therefore simply friction connections are not permitted.

Beams 

•The beam width should be greater then 20 cm, while for small beams (namely “flat beams”) it should not exceed the pillar width, increased on

both sides by the half height of the same beam;

•The ratio between transversal dimension of the beam (width/height) should not exceed 0.25;

•Axes of both beam and pillars supported (namely “in false”) should be aligned; in addition the beams should have at least two supports (pillars or

shell); the shell can not be supported on beam or plate “in false”;

•The critic zones are extended to 1 or 1,5 times the beam height for slow ductility class or high ductility class, respectively. In case of beam which

supports “in false” pillars the critic zone should be extended for two times of the beam high, starting from the beam-pillar node in all cases.

Pillars 

•The pillar transversal section should be grater then 25 cm, while for small beams it should not exceed the pillar width, increased on both sides by

the half height of the same beam.

•In addition, the codes provide same limitation about reinforcement, which are evaluated case by case.

Page 11: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 11/20

Buildings with double inclined beams: Lack of the support and collapse of the cover 

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Damages surveyed after the sesmic events(may 20th and 29th)

Page 12: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 12/20

Lack of support due to the break of the upper forks of the pillars: collapse of the cover 

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Damages observed after the sesmic eventsin Emilia Romagna region (May 20th and 29th, 2012)

Page 13: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 13/20

Collapse of the cladding panels

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Damages observed after the sesmic events inEmilia Romagna region (May 20th and 29th, 2012)

Connession panel-pillar 

Page 14: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 14/20

Collapse of the beam: separation of the two composing parts of the 2-body beam

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Damages observed after the sesmic events inEmilia Romagna region (May 20th and 29th, 2012)

Page 15: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 15/20

Mixed precast reinforced concrete structures: Shear collapse of the masonry pears

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Damages observed after the sesmic events inEmilia Romagna region (May 20th and 29th, 2012)

Beneficial effects of the metallic ties

Page 16: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 16/20

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Damages observed after the sesmic events inEmilia Romagna region (May 20th and 29th, 2012)

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTIVE DETAILS: These building are not collapsed thanks to the realization of good connections

Page 17: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 17/20

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Reduction of the seismic vulnerability

PILLAR-BEAM 

- Evaluation of the damages and of their

mechanisms;

- Evaluation of mechanical properties of the

constitutive materials;

- Evaluation and upgrading of stiffness,

strength and ductility against the design

stresses, by considering the suitable static

scheme (usually cantilever);

-

CONNECTIONS 

Laboratorio LAERTE Anna Marzo ENEA - UNITA' UTSISM 

FOUNDATION - Assessment of any damage and identification of its mechanisms;

- Knowledge of the type of soil for the characterization of the seismic

response with appropriate investigations (spreading seismic);

- Evaluation of the possibility of differentiated sags;

- Stiffness against rotation, such as to guarantee the joint at the base

of the pillars;

- Resistance against lateral actions, transmitted from the pillar (in thecontext of a hierarchy of resistors, the resistance of this element

should be oversized with respect to the superstructure)

beams and roof elements must not introduce significant bending

moments at the end of the connected elements since they are not

sized to absorb it;

-Simple supports must be transformed into hinges, in order to not

change the original static scheme;

- Sliding may also be permitted, but it should be, in any case,

limited by properly-sized restraints.

- Torsion rotation of the beams must be tackled ;

- The strength hierarchy should be considered whendimensioning the connections (links ductile and weaker than

the connected elements);

- The used fasteners (typically wall plugs) shall be more resistant

than the connecting devices set by them.

Page 18: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 18/20

Beam

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Reduction of the seismic vulnerability

It has been providing some suggestions for professional engineers, suitable to evaluate quickly seismic safety and set upreasonable anti-seismic strengthening interventions for simple-storey. Reinforced prestressed precast concrete construction,taking into account both the safeguard of human life and the recovery of serviceability conditions, saving machinery andequipment.

Guideline for both local and global interventions on factory buildings developed by Eurocode.

SLIDING SUPPORTS  • Evaluation of the section features and of the related forks (reinforcement, transversal

sections, and so on ;• Realization of constraint elements, when any fork is present 

Pillar

Fork 

Beam

Pillar

Sliding plain(teflon)

Page 19: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 19/20

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Reduction of the seismic vulnerability

CONNECTIONS BETWEEN STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

CONNECTION WITH COLD FORMED PROFILES

Beam

Pillar

• Evaluation of the section features and of the related forks (reinforcement,

transversal sections, etc)

• Any substitution of the forks with other support system in order to avoid the

beam overturning

Pre-existing hole

Steel pin

Supporting steel plate

Ancor steel bars

Page 20: Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

7/28/2019 Seismic Upgrade of Factory Buildings

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-upgrade-of-factory-buildings 20/20

FOUNDATIONS 

FACTORY BUILDINGS: Reduction of the seismic vulnerability

Ringing with concrete

Forks for both bars and brackets

connectionBars which connect the

concrete ring

Brackets

 Requirements for foundation elements:

•  Adequate stiffness against rotation, sufficient to ensure the joint at the base of the pillars.

•  Adequate resistance against lateral actions transmitted from the pillar 

 Intervention’s category

• Connecting the plinth with the industrial floor 

Improvement of the mechanical

properties of the soil

Connection steel bar

Additional concrete

cast

Industrial floor

Hole in the industrial

floorInjection with water-

concrete mixture