seismic design of bridges ice istructe part1

21
Eur Ing Athanasios Bistolas, Member of Technical Chamber of Greece Principal Engineer Seismic Design of Bridges-An Overview

Upload: fethi42

Post on 04-Jun-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 1/21

Eur Ing Athanasios Bistolas, Member of Technical Chamber of Greece

Principal Engineer

Seismic Design of Bridges-An Overview

Page 2: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 2/21

The devastation

Christchurch2010

Page 3: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 3/21

The devastation

Sandiago,Chile 2010

Page 4: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 4/21

Risk to Structures

Risk=Seismic Hazard x Vulnerability

DSHA or PSHA bySeismologistsMajority depends on

nature. Human Beings areobservers.

Page 5: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 5/21

Risk to Structures

Seismicity and Seismic Hazard Evaluation

Deterministic ApproachIts objective is to DETERMINE theMAXIMUM earthquake shaking.

Advantage- Easy to apply

Disadvantages

-Conservative

-Does not treat uncertainty well

-No info on the likelihood of the controlearthquake

-No info on the level of shaking duringthe lifespan of the structure

Page 6: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 6/21

Risk to Structures

Seismicity and Seismic Hazard Evaluation

Probabilistic ApproachRectifies a number of problemsinherent in DSHA by quantifyinguncertainty and the probability ofearthquake occurrence. Its objective is

to DETERMINE the MOST probablelevel of earthquake shaking during thelifetime o a structure on the particularsite.

Page 7: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 7/21

Risk to Structures

Risk=Seismic Hazard x Vulnerability

DSHA or PSHA bySeismologistsMajority depends on

nature. Human Beings areobservers.

Depends on engineers.Set of rules to address theseismic hazard. The main

purpose of the Antiseismicrules in Codes of Practice

Page 8: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 8/21

The Past-1920s-70s

• Seismic Loads 2-10% of dead loads

• Loads applied as static• Elastic Design-Stiffness based on gross section properties

• No account of the dynamic behaviour of structures

• No differentiation of response due to various soil conditions

• No account of inelastic behaviour and ductility

RESULT?

Page 9: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 9/21

The Past-1920s-70sThe wrong approach which lead to poor performance 

• Seismic Loads 2-10% of dead loads

• Loads applied as static• Elastic Design-Stiffness based on gross section properties

• No account of the dynamic behaviour of structures

• No differentiation of response due to various soil conditions

• No account of inelastic behaviour and ductility

RESULT?

Page 10: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 10/21

Elastic ApproachWhere have we got it wrong? 

Vertical Loads  Transverse Response  Combined Response 

Specified Rebar

ActualStrength

Page 11: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 11/21

Displacement damages

Unseating 

San Fernando,1971 Kobe, 1995

Page 12: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 12/21

Displacement damages

Unseating-Skewed spans 

Chile, 2010

Page 13: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 13/21

Displacement damages

Unseating - Use of Restrainers and shock absorbers 

Cable restrainers and buffer stops

Shock absorbers

Page 14: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 14/21

Displacement/Foundation damages

Dynamic Amplification-Soft soils

Costa Rica,1990

Liquefaction

Page 15: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 15/21

Displacement/Foundation damages

Lateral Spread 

Page 16: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 16/21

Displacement/Foundation damages

Liquefaction and Lateral Spread-Soil Improvements 

Stone Columns Compaction Grouting

Page 17: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 17/21

Displacement damages

Pounding 

Northridge, 1994 Loma Prieta,1989

Page 18: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 18/21

Displacement/Foundation damages

Abutment Slumping 

Page 19: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 19/21

Displacement/Foundation damages

Abutment Slumping 

Costa Rica earthquake,1990

Page 20: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 20/21

Column failures

Very common type of failure with

dramatic consequences for the

majority of the cases. Mainly due to:

•Inadequate Flexural Strength•Undependable Flexural Strength

•Premature Termination of Laps

•Shear Brittle Failures

Page 21: Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

8/13/2019 Seismic Design of Bridges ICE IStructE Part1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/seismic-design-of-bridges-ice-istructe-part1 21/21

Column Failures

Undependable flexural strength 

Loma Prieta, 1989 Kobe, 1995