segmenting major donors versus planned givers
DESCRIPTION
I offered this talk in October 2009 at the International Catholic Stewardship Conference in Dallas, TexasTRANSCRIPT
Segmenting Diocesan Database for Major Givers
vs. Planned Givers
James S. Friend, Jr.Director, Office of Stewardship and Development
Diocese of Allentown
Who Are Your Donors? What are their Philanthropic priorities? What are their personal needs?
Who Are Your Donors?
Matching their Needs with Our Mission
Bequests
IRA Gifts
Gift AnnuityGift of Property
Unitrust
Lead Gifts
Transformational Gift
NamingOpportunity
Segmentation Segmentation defined: classify groups and
target messages based on profile attributes, participation, or other defined metrics.
Starts with good data – Information is power!
Gathering the proper data Parish Census Raiser’s Edge
Elements of a Major and Planned Gift Development system
1. Base Development Program2. Prospect identification3. Feeding and maintaining an active
prospect pipeline4. Major and planned gift cultivation5. Donor relations and stewardship
Base DevelopmentParishioner program Entering the system as a donor is the beginning of
prospecting Tracking donor behavior
Giving consecutively Increasing in amount
Building donor awareness at the diocesan level Encouraging involvement at the diocesan level
Goal of Prospect IdentificationFrom To
How do we get there?
Identify and PrioritizeWho are my best prospects for…??
Major Major GivinGivingg
High end High end EngagementEngagement
Volunteering
Planned Giving
Diocesan Initiatives
CatholicEducation
Education of Seminarians
CatholicCharities
DiocesanEndowment
Getting Started What question(s) are you trying to answer?
Examples: Who are my underperforming annual fund prospects? Which of my constituents has the capacity to make a major gift? Who is a good candidate for a planned gift?
What will my final result look like (segmentation vs. prioritization)?
What data points do I have that I can use in my prospecting project? (Diocesan Appeal / Stock Gifts / Access to Diocesan ParishSoft / Previous Campaigns / ?)
Identifying Prospects for Major and Planned Gifts. Prioritization is the key. Major and planned giving involves one-to-
one relationships, with different strategies for engagement applied to each individual. Optimizing your donor list helps create efficiency and a good return on your investment.
Previous giving behavior Outright giving vs. cumulative giving RFM: Analyze how Recent, Frequent
and Monetary (Giving Amount):How recently a donor givesHow frequently they give and for how longHow much a donor gives both
cumulatively and outright
RFM is Nothing New… Has been used by direct marketers for over 40 years as a
segmentation tool to increase marketing Return On Investment (ROI).
The basic premise of RFM is that customers who have purchased more recently, more frequently and have spent more with your company are your best prospects for future direct marketing campaigns.
The goal of RFM is to increase marketing ROI by communicating only with customers that are likely to respond. What do you do with a limited budget to communicate with Major/Planned Donors?
Capacity Indicators Geodemographics
PRIZM or other scores available via vendors Zip codes Census tract
Employment Title What sector do they work in? Employer Name
Capacity Indicators (cont.) Demographic
Family characteristics (partnered/married vs. single, presence of children)
Age Giving
Amounts Methods (Cash vs. Stock)
Volunteer Board Positions with other organizations ?
Inclination Indicators Giving
Years of giving Total giving Frequency of giving Last gift date
Inclination Indicators (cont.)
Engagement (with your diocese / other orgs) Special event attendance Volunteer roles
Boards Other volunteer activities
Survey responses Other activities with your diocese
WARNING:The following methods are not statistically
significant, but they are superior to drawing
names from a hat.
What Do You Do With the Data? Simple searches
Who has X data point in their record? Analysis
Which groups do X behavior? Scoring
Rank your constituents by the presence of particular attributes.
Mapping Visually represent geodemographic data.
Simple Searches Geodemography
Who lives in wealthy areas? In which Metropolitan Areas are my major givers
located?
Which clusters give the most to my organization? Employment
Who has a title or employer that indicates wealth?
Who is in a sector that is performing well (or not)?
Simple Searches (cont.)
Which local companies have the most employees who donate to your organization? Which clusters give the most to my organization?
Demographic Who is married? Who does not have children?
Giving Who has given the most (money and/or frequency)? Who gives stock gifts?
Simple Searches (cont.)
Inclination Who has given the most? Who gives most frequently? Who has given for many years?
Engagement Who attends the events? Who volunteers the most? Who has responded favorably toward your diocese
in surveys? Demographic
Who is related to other constituents in our database?
How do we get there?A process of filtering or refinement, based on: Previous giving behavior The ability or “capacity” to give at a major
level The likelihood or “propensity” to give to your
diocese or specific ministry Interests aligning to the mission and impact of
your ministries
Digging Deeper: Exploring their Capacity to Give Individual electronic screening, exploring
significant career exploits, other donations Specifically: Find actual assets and income held
by a constituent Database screening Peer evaluation Prospect research
Evaluate and validate this research with a Team Approach
Digging Deeper: Exploring their Propensity to Give Personal Visits / Surveys Peer evaluation Incorporate “Likelihoods” or “Propensity
Ratings” into Team Approach
*Source: www.fundraisingresearch.inf
Your Introspective vs. Their Interest Define and internalize the impact of your diocese Align interest characteristics to these impact areas Create custom surveys for constituents to self
identify an area of interest Align ministry preferences to interests Use the depth of Team Approach to code
constituent interests
Profile of one Planned Giving Donor John Jones – Age 62
Recently chose early retirement from management level job at manufacturing plant
Has given consistently to the Diocesan Appeal at a moderate giving level of $150 per year.
Attends Catholic Charities functions with some regularity Gave $5,000 to the Diocesan Capital Campaign, paid out over 5
years. Was active in his parish before his wife passed away Widower 3 grown children Chose Charitable Gift Annuity OptionChose Charitable Gift Annuity Option
Sample Profile of Major Donor Joe and Kristin Jackson – Ages 41/38
Dual career family Have given sporadically over the years to the Diocesan Appeal,
usually with an outright gift of 1,000 Attends no diocesan activities that we’re aware of Made a one time gift of $5,0000 to the Diocesan Capital
Campaign Not active in their parish Have 2 small children Kristin is on the Board of a local nonprofit Made $10,000 Gift to last year’s Appeal
Questions for the Group
What are the characteristics of our major and planned giving donors?
What distinguishes our lifelong donors from our top outright donors?
Our major donors tend to be of a generation that is passing; what is different about the next generation?
Which types of people do your gift officers cultivate most efficiently and effectively?