section 2.5 hydrology and water quality · draft final environmental impact report agriculture...

28
  Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.51 February 2017 ICF 0054.15  Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality This section describes the hydrology and water quality conditions in the County and the regulatory framework applicable to hydrology and water quality. It also assesses the potential impacts on hydrology and surface and groundwater quality that could result from project implementation, and presents mitigation measures that would reduce potentially significant impacts. Water resources can be classified into two categories: (1) surface water, which collects in streams, rivers, lakes, and reservoirs; and (2) groundwater, which resides in subsurface aquifers. This section deals with surface water. Groundwater resources are discussed in Section 2.8, Water Supply and Groundwater. Topics related to floods, levees, or dams, and seiche, tsunami, or mudflow are discussed in Chapter 3, Environmental Effects Found Not to be Significant. 2.5.1 Existing Conditions 2.5.1.1 Surface Water Hydrology  Surface water bodies in the County (e.g., estuaries, lagoons, bays, lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and creeks) capture the flow of the region’s water runoff, often combining natural runoff with imported water. Many of these water bodies support natural habitat and recreational areas, and serve as storage reservoirs for the County’s water supply. The San Diego region is divided into two hydrologic basins (the South Coast Basin and the Colorado River Basin) by the northwest‐trending Peninsular Range. The County is divided into two hydrologic regions: (1) the San Diego Hydrologic Region, which drains in a westerly direction toward the Pacific Ocean and encompasses most of the County, parts of southwestern Riverside County, and southwestern Orange County; and (2) the Colorado Hydrologic Region, which drains in an easterly direction toward the desert and Colorado River basin. Watersheds are areas into which surface runoff, streams, creeks, and rivers drain. Within the San Diego Hydrologic Region, the South Coast Basin supports 11 major watersheds (or hydrologic units) and is governed by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) (Region 9). The Carlsbad, San Dieguito, Penasquitos, San Diego, Pueblo San Diego, Sweetwater, and Otay watersheds are located entirely within the San Diego region. Portions of the San Juan and Santa Margarita watersheds are shared with Orange and Riverside Counties, and the Tijuana watershed with Mexico (San Diego Association of Governments 2015). Within the Colorado Hydrologic Region, the Colorado River Basin supports portions of five watersheds and is governed by the Colorado RWQCB (Region 7). The Anza‐Borrego, Clark, Whitewater, West Salton, and Imperial watersheds are in the eastern part of the County. These watersheds are shown on Figure 2.5‐1. From north to south, the 13 principal stream systems include Aliso Creek, San Juan Creek, San Mateo Creek, San Onofre Creek, Santa Margarita River, San Luis Rey River, San Marcos Creek, Escondido Creek, San Dieguito River, San Diego River, Sweetwater River, Otay River, and the Tijuana River (San Diego RWQCB 2011). Major lakes and lagoons include Lake O’Neil, Santa Margarita Lagoon, Lake Henshaw, Buena Vista Lagoon, Aqua Hedionda Lagoon, Batiquitos Lagoon, Lake Wohlford, San Elijo Lagoon, Lake Sutherland, Lake Hodges, San Dieguito Lagoon, Los Penasquitos Lagoon, Lake Jennings,

Upload: others

Post on 12-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality 

ThissectiondescribesthehydrologyandwaterqualityconditionsintheCountyandtheregulatoryframeworkapplicabletohydrologyandwaterquality.Italsoassessesthepotentialimpactsonhydrologyandsurfaceandgroundwaterqualitythatcouldresultfromprojectimplementation,andpresentsmitigationmeasuresthatwouldreducepotentiallysignificantimpacts.

Waterresourcescanbeclassifiedintotwocategories:(1)surfacewater,whichcollectsinstreams,rivers,lakes,andreservoirs;and(2)groundwater,whichresidesinsubsurfaceaquifers.Thissectiondealswithsurfacewater.GroundwaterresourcesarediscussedinSection2.8,WaterSupplyandGroundwater.Topicsrelatedtofloods,levees,ordams,andseiche,tsunami,ormudflowarediscussedinChapter3,EnvironmentalEffectsFoundNottobeSignificant.

2.5.1 Existing Conditions 

2.5.1.1 Surface Water Hydrology  

SurfacewaterbodiesintheCounty(e.g.,estuaries,lagoons,bays,lakes,reservoirs,rivers,andcreeks)capturetheflowoftheregion’swaterrunoff,oftencombiningnaturalrunoffwithimportedwater.Manyofthesewaterbodiessupportnaturalhabitatandrecreationalareas,andserveasstoragereservoirsfortheCounty’swatersupply.

TheSanDiegoregionisdividedintotwohydrologicbasins(theSouthCoastBasinandtheColoradoRiverBasin)bythenorthwest‐trendingPeninsularRange.TheCountyisdividedintotwohydrologicregions:(1)theSanDiegoHydrologicRegion,whichdrainsinawesterlydirectiontowardthePacificOceanandencompassesmostoftheCounty,partsofsouthwesternRiversideCounty,andsouthwesternOrangeCounty;and(2)theColoradoHydrologicRegion,whichdrainsinaneasterlydirectiontowardthedesertandColoradoRiverbasin.

Watershedsareareasintowhichsurfacerunoff,streams,creeks,andriversdrain.WithintheSanDiegoHydrologicRegion,theSouthCoastBasinsupports11majorwatersheds(orhydrologicunits)andisgovernedbytheSanDiegoRegionalWaterQualityControlBoard(RWQCB)(Region9).TheCarlsbad,SanDieguito,Penasquitos,SanDiego,PuebloSanDiego,Sweetwater,andOtaywatershedsarelocatedentirelywithintheSanDiegoregion.PortionsoftheSanJuanandSantaMargaritawatershedsaresharedwithOrangeandRiversideCounties,andtheTijuanawatershedwithMexico(SanDiegoAssociationofGovernments2015).WithintheColoradoHydrologicRegion,theColoradoRiverBasinsupportsportionsoffivewatershedsandisgovernedbytheColoradoRWQCB(Region7).TheAnza‐Borrego,Clark,Whitewater,WestSalton,andImperialwatershedsareintheeasternpartoftheCounty.ThesewatershedsareshownonFigure2.5‐1.

Fromnorthtosouth,the13principalstreamsystemsincludeAlisoCreek,SanJuanCreek,SanMateoCreek,SanOnofreCreek,SantaMargaritaRiver,SanLuisReyRiver,SanMarcosCreek,EscondidoCreek,SanDieguitoRiver,SanDiegoRiver,SweetwaterRiver,OtayRiver,andtheTijuanaRiver(SanDiegoRWQCB2011).MajorlakesandlagoonsincludeLakeO’Neil,SantaMargaritaLagoon,LakeHenshaw,BuenaVistaLagoon,AquaHediondaLagoon,BatiquitosLagoon,LakeWohlford,SanElijoLagoon,LakeSutherland,LakeHodges,SanDieguitoLagoon,LosPenasquitosLagoon,LakeJennings,

Page 2: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐2 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

LakeMurray,PaloVerdeLake,MorenaLake,andBarrettLake(CountyofSanDiego2007d).Streamsystemsandtheirreceivingwaters(lakes,bays,lagoons,andocean)supportavarietyofbeneficialusesthataredesignatedintheSanDiegoRegionBasinPlan.Beneficialusesaredefinedasthosewaterusesnecessaryforthesurvivalandwell‐beingofpeople,plants,andwildlife(SanDiegoRWQCB1994).Theseusesincludecleanandavailabledrinkingwater;agricultural,commercial,industrial,recreational,residential,andmilitaryuses;andwildlifeandhabitatuses.

Mostoftheregion’sstreamshaveperennialandephemeralsegmentsduetotheseasonalnatureofrainfallandtherelativelylowyearlyrainfall,orduetoeffectsfromdamsorotherhuman‐madeblockages.Surfacewaterimpoundmentscaptureflowfromnearlyalltheregion’smajorstreams,andrunofffromtheCounty’swatershedssupplies25reservoirswithacombinedcapacityofabout747,000acre‐feet(SanDiegoCountyWaterAuthority2015;SanDiegoRWQCB2011).Localrainrunoffintothesereservoirscontributestothewatersupplyfortheregion.ThereservoirsalsostorewaterimportedfromtheColoradoRiverandnorthernCalifornia.AsubstantialamountofthewaterdeliveredtohomesandbusinessesintheCity’sserviceareaiswaterthathasbeenimpoundedinthereservoirs.CountyreservoirsareshownonFigure2.5‐2.

2.5.1.2 Surface Water Quality  

SeveralwaterbodysegmentsinSanDiegoCountyareonthefederalCleanWaterAct(CWA)Section303(d)listforimpairedwaterquality(seeSection2.5.2.1,FederalRegulations),andanycontributionofsubstantialadditionalpollutantsmayfurtherimpairthereceivingwaterbody.Atotalof72inlandsurfacewaterbodiesarecurrentlydesignatedasnotattainingapplicablewaterqualityobjectiveswithintheSanDiegoHydrologicRegion(SanDiegoIntegratedRegionalWaterManagementPlan2013).Section303(d)‐listedimpairedinlandsurfacewatersarefoundineachoftheregion’swatersheds.Additionally,eachoftheregion’swatershedscontainsatleastonecoastalwaterorbeachsegmentthatiscurrentlylistedasimpaired.Examplesofthetypesofpollutants/stressorsforwhichthesewaterbodiesareimpairedincludesedimentation,totaldissolvedsolids,bacteriaindicators,fecalcoliform,phosphorus,cadmium,copper,anddiazinon(CountyofSanDiego2007e).

Water Quality Contaminants 

Commonwaterqualitycontaminantsintheregionaredescribedbelow(CountyofSanDiego2011a).

Metals 

Metalscanaffectsurfacewaterqualitybyaccumulatinginsedimentsandfishtissues.Thisposesrisksoftoxicitysuchasloweringthereproductiveratesandlifespansofaquaticanimalsandanimalsupthefoodchain.Metalscanalsoalterphotosynthesisinaquaticplantsandformdepositsinpipes.Metalsinurbanrunoffcanresultfromautomobileuse,industrialactivities,watersupplyinfrastructurecorrosion,mining,orpesticideapplication.Atmosphericdepositioncanalsocontributemetalstowaterbodies.

Nutrients (Phosphorous and Nitrogen) 

Highlevelsofnitrogenandphosphorusinsurfacewaterscanproduceharmfulalgalblooms.Inturn,thesebloomscanproducedeadzonesinwaterbodieswheredissolvedoxygenlevelsaresolowthatmostaquaticlifecannotsurvive.Typicalsourcesofnutrientsinsurfacewatersareimproper

Page 3: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

Figure 2.5-1Watersheds

County of San Diego Agriculture Promotion Program

K:\S

an D

iego

\pro

ject

s\C

ount

y_of

_San

Die

go\0

0054

_15_

Ag_

Pro

mot

ion\

map

doc\

Wat

erS

uppl

y_H

ydro

195

42 (0

1/19

/201

6)

Source: SanGIS, May 2009.

Desert

North Mountain

Mountain Empire

Central Mountain

Alpine

Ramona

Pendleton-De Luz

Jamul-Dulzura

Pala-PaumaValley

Otay

Julian

Lakeside

Valley Center

Fallbrook

Bonsall

San Dieguito

Crest-Dehesa-Harbison Canyon-

Granite Hills

Rainbow

Valle De Oro

NorthCountyMetro

Sweetwater

SpringValley

Pine Valley

Boulevard

Borrego Springs

Cuyamaca

Palomar Mountain

Potrero

Lake Morena / CampoJacumba

Descanso

Tecate

TwinOaks Valley

HiddenMeadows

PA

CI

FI

C

OC

EA

N

ME

XI

CO

WHITEWATERSAN JUAN

SANTAMARGARITA

CLARK

SAN LUIS REY

WEST SALTON

SAN DIEGUITOCARLSBAD

SAN DIEGOPENASQUITOS

SWEETWATERPUEBLO

SAN DIEGO

SAN DIEGO BAYOTAY

ANZA-BORREGO

IMPERIALTIJUANA

0 2 4 6 8 10Miles

LEGEND

Watersheds - Hydrological Units

Incorporated Area

Community/SubregionalPlanning Area Boundary

Subregional GroupBoundary

Tribal/State/Federal Lands

Lakes

Rivers

IM

PE

RI

AL

C

OU

NT

Y

R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y

OR

AN

GE

C O U N TY

Page 4: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water
Page 5: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

Figure 2.5-2Reservoirs

County of San Diego Agriculture Promotion Program

K:\S

an D

iego

\pro

ject

s\C

ount

y_of

_San

Die

go\0

0054

_15_

Ag_

Pro

mot

ion\

map

doc\

Wat

erS

uppl

y_H

ydro

195

42 (0

1/19

/201

6)

Source: San Diego County Water Authority, January 2016.

Page 6: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water
Page 7: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐3 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

fertilizerusage(bothagriculturalandresidential),dischargesfromfailingorimproperlymaintainedsepticsystems,andaccidentalsanitaryseweroverflows.Nitrate,whichiscomposedofnitrogenandoxygen,occursnaturallyinsoilandwater.Nitrateisanimportantconstituentinfertilizersusedforagriculturalpurposesandispresentinhumanandanimalwastes.

Petroleum Products (Gasoline, Diesel, Oil, and Grease) 

Gasoline,diesel,oil,andgreasearecharacterizedashighmolecularweightorganiccompounds.Primarysourcesofgasoline,diesel,oil,andgreasecontaminantsaremotorproductsfromleakingvehiclesandundergroundstoragefacilitiesandtanks.Petroleumhydrocarbonproductscommonlyfoundingasoline,includingbenzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,xylene,andmethyltert‐butylether(MTBE),areconsideredcommonpetroleumcontaminantstosurfacewaterandgroundwater.Benzeneisusedasagasolineadditiveandindustrialsolventandisusedintheproductionofdrugs,plastics,rubber,anddyes.Tolueneiswidelyusedasanindustrialfeedstockandasasolvent.Ethylbenzeneisusedintheproductionofplastic,whilexyleneisusedasasolventintheprinting,rubber,andleatherindustries.MTBEisagasolineadditivethathashistoricallycausedgroundwatercontaminationfromspillsorleaksatgasstations.Introductionofpetroleumpollutantstowaterbodiesistypicallyduetothewidespreaduseandapplicationoftheseproductsinmunicipal,residential,commercial,industrial,andconstructionareas.

Additionalsourcesofoilandgreaseincludeesters,oils,fats,waxes,andhighmolecular‐weightfattyacids.Introductionofthesepollutantstowaterbodiesistypicalduetothewidespreaduseandapplicationoftheseproductsinmunicipal,residential,commercial,industrial,andconstructionareas.Elevatedoilandgreasecontentcandecreasetheaestheticvalueofawaterbody,aswellasitswaterquality.

Pathogens (Bacteria and Viruses) 

Watercontaminatedwithpathogenssuchasbacteriaandvirusescanintroducediseasestohumansandanimals.Thiscanhavesignificantpublichealthimplications,particularlyrelatedtowaterusedfordrinking,recreationsuchasswimmingandsurfing,andshellfishharvesting.Commonsourcesofpathogensinsurfacewaterincludewildanddomesticatedanimals,urbanandagriculturalactivities,andaccidentalsanitaryseweroverflows.

Pesticides and Herbicides 

Pesticidesandherbicidescanentersurfacewaterandgroundwaterfrombothagriculturalandurbanareas.Typicalimpactsincludeaccumulationinsedimentsandbioaccumulationinthefoodchain.Pesticidesandherbicidescanbetoxictobothaquaticlifeandhumans.

Sediments 

Increasedsedimentation,overandabovetheamountthatentersthewatersystembynaturalerosion,cancausemanyadverseimpactsonaquaticorganisms,watersupply,andwetlands.Sedimentationcandecreasetransmissionoflight,whichaffectsplantproductionandleadstolossoffoodandcoverforaquaticorganisms.Itcanchangebehavioralactivities(nesting,feeding,mating),andadverselyaffectrespiration,digestion,andreproduction.Contaminantsandtoxicsubstancescanalsobetransportedinsediments.Sedimentscandamagewatertreatmentequipment,increasingtreatmentcosts.Theycanreducereservoirvolumeandfloodstorageandincreasepeakdischarges.

Page 8: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐4 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

Total Dissolved Solids 

Totaldissolvedsolids(TDS)refertothetotalconcentrationofallminerals,salts,metals,cations,oranionsthataredissolvedinwater.TDSiscomposedofinorganicsalts(principallycalcium,magnesium,potassium,sodium,bicarbonate,carbonate,chloride,andsulfate)andsomesmallamountsoforganicmatterthataredissolvedinwater.Increasedsaltsinregionalfreshwaterresourcesfrommining,urbanrunoff,andconstructioncancreatestressfulenvironmentsandevendestroyhabitatandfoodsourcesforwetlandanimalsinaquaticandwetlandhabitats,aswellasfavoringsalt‐tolerantspecies;reducethequalityofdrinkingwater;andmaycauseskinoreyeirritationsinpeople.AnelevatedTDSconcentrationisnotahealthhazard;however,itcancausethewatertohaveasaltyorbrackishtaste,andtobecorrosive,andresultsinscaleformationonpipes,pumps,waterheaters,etc.BecauseoftheseasonalnatureofprecipitationwithintheSanDiegoregion,surfacinggroundwaterandrunofffromappliedwater(agriculturalandurban)representtheprimarycontributorstodryseasonstreamflows.Theinterchangebetweensurfacewaterandgroundwater,andtheextremeseasonalvariabilityofflow,evaporation,andwaterqualityinSanDiegoCountyallcontributetoawiderangeofTDSintheregion’ssurfacewaters.ItisalsoofnotethatmuchofthewaterimportedtotheSanDiegoregionisrelativelyhighinTDScontent.

2.5.1.3 Groundwater Quality  

GroundwaterobtainedfromSanDiegoCountyaquifershastraditionallybeenofhighquality.However,naturallyoccurringand,morerecently,man‐madesourcesofcontaminationhaveadverselyaffectedthegroundwaterqualityinlocalizedareas.Themostcommonman‐madesourcesofgroundwatercontaminationincludingleakingundergroundfueltanks,sewerandsepticsystems,agriculturalapplications,andfacilitiesproducinganimalwastes.ThemostcommoncontaminantsingroundwaterwithinSanDiegoCountyincludeelevatednitratelevels,naturallyoccurringradionuclides,TDS,andbacteria.Groundwatercontaminantsofconcernthatmayresultfromagriculturaloperationsmayinclude:herbicides,pesticidesandothercomplexorganics;petroleumproductsincludingMTBEandvolatileorganiccompounds;andmetals.

2.5.1.4 Soil Erosion  

AsdiscussedaboveunderSediments,soilerosioncanleadtowaterqualityproblemsassociatedwithincreasedturbidityandsedimentation.Soilerosionisdependentonanumberoffactors,suchassoilproperty,levelofforce,andlandscapecharacteristics.Erosionisanaturalprocesscausedbywater,wind,mechanical,orchemicalforcesactingonexposednaturallandforms.Thissectiondescribeserosionbywater.

Soilsandsedimentarecomposedofsmallpiecesofdecomposedrockmaterialsuchassand,gravel,loam,clay,orsiltthatalsocontainvaryingamountsoforganicmaterials.Erosionremovessoil,sediment,androckfromexposedareasandtransportstheresultingtopsoilandsediment.Theresultsincludespreadingofcontaminantsandthereducedabilityofsoiltostorewaterandsupportplantgrowth,therebyreducingitsabilitytosupportbiodiversity.Erodedmaterialsfillreservoirs,ponds,anddrainageditchesandsiltupharbors,streams,andrivers.

Measuring Soil Erosion 

Therateoferosionisdependentonthetypeofmaterialthatiseroded,thetypeandamountoferosiveforces,andtheshapeofthelandforminvolved.Soilshaveuniquepropertiesthatmakethemmoreorlesssusceptibletoerosion.Forexample,soilaggregatematerialsuchasveryfinesand,silt,

Page 9: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐5 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

clay,andorganicmattercanbeeasilyremovedbyraindropsplashandrunoffwater;greaterraindropenergyorrunoffamountsmightberequiredtomovethelargersandandgravelparticles.Thetypeandamountoferosionalforceaffectstheerosionalrateandisprimarilyaffectedbythedurationandintensityofaprecipitationeventandbytheslopeofthesite.

Runoffoccurswheneverexcesswateronaslopecannotbeabsorbedintothesoilortrappedonthesurface.Theamountofrunoffcanbeincreasedifinfiltrationisreducedduetosoilcompaction.Runofffromagriculturallandmaybegreatestduringspringmonthswhensoilsmaybesaturatedandvegetativecoverisminimal.

TheU.S.DepartmentofAgriculture’sSoilSurveyfortheSanDiegoAreaconductedin1973ratedandclassifiedeachsoil’sleveloferodibilitytypicalofthatclass.Aratingofslight,moderate,orseverewasappliedtoeachclassificationbasedonthecriteriashowninTable2.5‐1.Thetableidentifiesfourfactorsthataffecttheerodibilityofasoiltype.Notethatclimate,plantcover,andphysiographicfeaturesarenotapartoftheratingsystemforerodibilityasthesefactorsvaryindependentofthesoilclassificationtype(CountyofSanDiego2007e).MostoftheexistingagriculturaluseinSanDiegoCountyoccursinnon‐primesoils.SanDiegoCountyhasgenerallysteepterrainanderodiblesoils,andlowrankingsgenerallyresultfromtheimportanceofslopeanderodibilityintheformulasthatdeterminethesoilratings(CountyofSanDiego2002).

2.5.1.5 Stormwater Drainage Systems 

Stormwaterdrainagesystemsconveyurbanrunoffandarerelatedtowaterqualityconditions.Thesesystemsaredesignedtopreventfloodingbytransportingwaterawayfromdevelopedareas.AvastamountoftheunincorporatedSanDiegoareaisrurallandthatdoesnotsupportorrequirestormwaterdrainagefacilities.Inmoreruralandremoteareasstormwaterdrainagefacilitiesaremainlylimitedtoroadsideditchesandculverts.Incontrast,moredevelopedareashavearangeofstormwaterdrainagefacilitiessuchasstormdrains,concretedrainagepipes,improvedchannels,culverts,guttersandditches,anddetentionbasins.

Changestostormwaterflows(suchasincreasedvolumeoralteredpaths)cancausesiltation,flooding,and/orerosion,whichinturncanleadtopropertylossandenvironmentaldamage.Unfilteredanduntreatedstormwatercancontainanumberofpollutantsthatmayeventuallyflowtosurfacewaters.Stormwaterdischargesthatenterthereceivingwaterscanbepollutedbyeitherpointsourcesornon‐pointsources.Pointsourcesaredefinedaswaterpollutioncomingfromasinglepoint,suchasasewage‐outflowpipe.Non‐pointsourcesaredefinedaspollutiondischargedoverawidelandare,notfromonespecificlocation(U.S.GeologicalSurvey2015a).

2.5.2 Regulatory Setting 

Hydrologicalresourcesandwaterqualityconditionsaresubjecttoregulatoryoversightatthreelevels:federal,state,andregional/local.

2.5.2.1 Federal Regulations 

Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) 

IncreasingpublicawarenessandconcernforcontrollingwaterpollutionledtoenactmentoftheFederalWaterPollutionControlActAmendmentsof1972.Asamendedin1977,thislawbecamecommonlyknownastheCWA.TheCWAestablishedbasicguidelinesforregulatingdischargesof

Page 10: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐6 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

pollutantsintothewatersoftheUnitedStates,andrequiresthatstatesadoptwaterqualitystandardstoprotectpublichealth,enhancethequalityofwaterresources,andensureimplementationoftheCWA(U.S.Code,Title33,Section1251etseq.)inthefollowingways.

Section401requiresanapplicationforafederalpermit,suchasfortheconstructionoroperationofafacilitythatmayresultinthedischargeofapollutant,toobtaincertificationofthoseactivitiesfromthestateinwhichthedischargeoriginates.Thisprocessisknownaswaterqualitycertification.ForprojectsintheCounty,theRWQCBissuesSection401permits.

Section402establishedtheNationalPollutantDischargeEliminationSystem(NPDES)tocontrolwaterpollutionbyregulatingpointsourcesthatdischargepollutantsintowatersoftheUnitedStates.IntheStateofCalifornia,theU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)hasauthorizedtheStateWaterResourcesControlBoard(SWRCB)permittingauthoritytoimplementtheNPDESprogram.Ingeneral,theSWRCBissuestwobaselinegeneralpermits:oneforindustrialdischargesandoneforconstructionactivities.ThePhaseIIRulethatbecamefinalonDecember8,1999,expandedtheexistingNPDESprogramtoaddressstormwaterdischargesfromconstructionsitesthatdisturblandequaltoorgreaterthan1acre.

Section404establishedapermittingprogramtoregulatethedischargeofdredgedorfillmaterialintowatersoftheUnitedStates.ThedefinitionofwatersoftheUnitedStatesincludeswetlandsadjacenttonationalwaters.ThispermittingprogramisadministeredbytheU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineersandisenforcedbyEPA.

Section303(d)requiresSWRCBtodevelopalistofwaterqualitylimitedsegmentsforjurisdictionalwatersoftheUnitedStates.TheRWQCBsareresponsibleforestablishingpriorityrankingsanddevelopingactionplans,referredtoastotalmaximumdailyloads(TMDLs),toimprovethewaterqualityofwaterbodiesincludedinthe303(d)list.Themostrecent303(d)listapprovedbyEPAisfrom2010.Thelistincludespollutantscausingimpairmenttoreceivingwatersor,insomecases,theconditionleadingtoimpairment.

Federal Maximum Contaminant Levels 

Toprotectpublichealthrelatedtoknowncontaminantsindrinkingwatersupplies,EPAsetsthehighestlevelofacontaminantforarangeofcontaminants,includingmicroorganisms,disinfectantsanddisinfectionbyproducts,andchemicals,amongothers.Therearetwotiers:primaryandsecondarystandards.NationalPrimaryDrinkingWaterRegulations(primarystandards)areenforceablestandards.NationalSecondaryDrinkingWaterRegulations(secondarystandards)areguidelinesrelatedtocontaminantsthatcouldcauseaestheticeffects(suchastaste,odor,orcolor)orcosmeticeffects(suchasskinortoothdiscoloration).

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 

EPAhasdelegatedresponsibilityforimplementingportionsoftheCWAtoSWRCBandtheRWQCBs,includingwaterqualityplanningandcontrolprograms,suchastheNPDESprogram.TheNPDESprogramisbasedonpermitsdesignedtoimplementtheCWA;thesepermitsapplytovariousactivitiesthatgeneratepollutantswiththepotentialtoimpactwaterquality,aswellasstormwaterdischargesassociatedwithurbanareasandcertainindustrialactivities.EPAhasdevelopedatwo‐phasedNPDESpermittingprogram(PhaseIandPhaseII)thatrequirescitiesandotherlocalentitiestoobtainmunicipalstormwaterNPDESpermitsthatmandatetheimplementationofstormwatermanagementprograms,includingmethodstoreducepollutantsinstormwaterrunoff.

Page 11: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐7 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

PhaseIregulatesstormwaterdischargesfrommediumandlargemunicipalseparatestormsewersystems(MS4s),constructionactivitiesinvolvingareas5acresorlarger(orlessthan5acresifpartofacommonplanofdevelopmentorsale),andindustrialactivities.PhaseIIextendstheregulationstostormwaterdischargesfromsmallMS4sandconstructionactivitiesthatdisturbareasequaltoorgreaterthan1acreofland(orlessthan1acreifpartofacommonplanofdevelopmentorsale).ThroughtheuseofNPDESpermits,PhaseIIalsoexpandsthePhaseIprogrambyrequiringoperatorsofMS4sinurbanizedareasandoperatorsofsmallconstructionsitestoimplementprogramsandpracticestocontrolpollutedstormwaterrunoff.

2.5.2.2 State Regulations 

Section 303(d) List of Water Quality Limited Segments 

Section303(d)oftheCWArequiresstatestoidentifywatersthatdonotmeetwaterqualitystandardsafterapplyingcertainrequiredtechnology‐basedeffluentlimits.Thesearereferredtoasimpairedwaterbodies.The2010CWA303(d)ListofWaterQualityLimitedSegments(CaliforniaEnvironmentalProtectionAgency2015)classifiestheimpairedwaterbodieslocatedintheCounty.Thecomplete2010EPA‐approvedlistfortheSanDiegoRegionisavailablefromtheSanDiegoRWQCBatthefollowingwebaddress:http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/sandiego/water_issues/programs/303d_list/index.shtml.

Oncelistedasimpaired,waterbodysegmentsaretargetedforaTMDLrestorationplantoimprovewaterquality.ATMDLisaquantitativeassessmentofwaterqualityproblems,contributingsources,andloadreductionsorcontrolactionsneededtorestoreandprotectbodiesofwater.TMDLsareadoptedasamendmentstotheBasinPlan(SanDiegoRWQCB2011).

Waste Discharge Requirements 

Ingeneral,theState’sWasteDischargeRequirements(WDRs)Program(sometimesalsoreferredtoasthe“NonChapter15[Non15]Program”)regulatespointdischargesthatareexemptpursuanttoSubsection20090ofTitle27andnotsubjecttotheCWA.ExemptionsfromTitle27maybegrantedforninecategoriesofdischarges(e.g.,sewage,wastewater)thatmeet,andcontinuetomeet,thepreconditionslistedforeachspecificexemption.ThescopeoftheWDRsProgramalsoincludesthedischargeofwastesclassifiedasinert,pursuanttoSection20230ofTitle27.

OneofthecoreregulatoryelementsistheIrrigatedLandsRegulatoryProgram,whichregulatesdischargesfromirrigatedagriculturallandstopreventagriculturaldischargesfromimpairingthewatersthatreceivethesedischarges.ThisisdonebyissuingWDRsorconditionalwaiversofWDRs(Orders)togrowers.TheseOrderscontainconditionsrequiringwaterqualitymonitoringofreceivingwatersandcorrectiveactionswhenimpairmentsarefound.ThereareaboutsixmillionagriculturalacresenrolledintheIrrigatedLandsRegulatoryProgramandapproximately40,000growers(SWRCB2015b).

Porter‐Cologne Water Quality Control Act 

ThePorter‐CologneWaterQualityControlAct(CaliforniaWaterCode,Division7)providesultimateauthoritytotheSWRCBtoadopt,review,andrevisepoliciesforallwatersoftheState(includingbothsurfacewatersandgroundwaters).NineRWQCBswereestablishedtoprovideoversightonwaterqualityissuesataregionalandlocallevel.Section13170oftheCaliforniaWaterCodealsoauthorizesSWRCBtoadoptwaterqualitycontrolplansonitsowninitiative.TheWaterQuality

Page 12: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐8 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

ControlPlanfortheSanDiegoBasin(Region9)isdesignedtopreserveandenhancethequalityofwaterresourcesintheSanDiegoRegionforthebenefitofpresentandfuturegenerations.ThepurposeoftheplanistodesignatebeneficialusesoftheRegion’ssurfacewatersandgroundwaters,designatewaterqualityobjectivesforthereasonableprotectionofthoseuses,andestablishanimplementationplantoachievetheobjectives.

Streambed Alteration Agreement 

Sections1601–1603oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCoderequireanagreementbetweentheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeandapublicagencyproposingtosubstantiallydivertorobstructthenaturalfloworaffectchangestothebed,channel,orbankofanyriver,stream,orlake.Theagreementisdesignedtoprotectthefishandwildlifevaluesofariver,lake,orstream.

2.5.2.3 Regional/Local Regulations 

San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plan 

TheSanDiegoRWQCBBasinPlanwasapprovedbySWRCBin1994andwasmostrecentlyrevisedin2011.TheRWQCBdesignatesbeneficialusesintheBasinPlanunderCaliforniaWaterCodeSection13240.Beneficialusesaredefinedaswaterusesnecessaryforthesurvivalorwell‐beingofhumans,plants,andwildlife.Designatedbeneficialusesininlandsurfacewaters,coastalwaters,reservoirsandlakes,andgroundwaterintheCountyareidentifiedinTables2‐2through2‐5oftheBasinPlan.

San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. R9‐2007‐0104, Conditional Waiver No. 4 

ConditionalWaiverNo.4isfordischargesfromagriculturalandnurseryoperations,whichcontainpollutantsthatcanpercolatetogroundwaterorrunofftosurfacewaters.Dischargesfromagriculturalandnurseryoperationsincludedischargesresultingfromgrowingoperations,irrigationreturnflows,andstormwaterrunoffthatcantransportpollutantsfromagriculturalandnurseryoperationstosurfacewatersandgroundwater.AgriculturalandnurseryoperationsthatcomplywiththewaiverconditionsarenotexpectedtoposeathreattothequalityofwatersoftheState.

ThefollowingtypesofdischargearenotregulatedorauthorizedunderWDRsandmaybeeligibleforaConditionalWaiverNo.4.

Dischargesofplantcropresiduestoland

Dischargesofstormwaterrunoff

Discharge/applicationofamendmentsormulchestosoil

Dischargesofagriculturalirrigationreturnwater

Dischargesofnurseryirrigationreturnwater

ConditionalWaiverNo.4wasadoptedinOctober2007andexpiredinFebruary2014.TheSanDiegoRWQCBisdevelopingTentativeGeneralWasteDischargeRequirementsforDischargesofWastesfromCommercialAgriculturalandNurseryOperationswithintheSanDiegoRegion(GeneralAgriculturalOrder)toreplacetheexpiredAgriculturalWaiver.TheSanDiegoRWQCBistentativelyscheduledtoconsideradoptionoftheTentativeGeneralOrderin2016.Therewere50,000

Page 13: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐9 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

agriculturalacresandbetween2,200and2,500agriculturaloperationsenrolled(SWRCB2015c;Pulverpers.comm.).

San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Regional MS4 Permit 

TheRegionalMS4PermitisusedtoregulatedischargesfromPhaseIMS4sintheSanDiegoRegion.TheRegionalMS4Permitcovers39municipal,countygovernment,andspecialdistrictentities(referredtojointlyasCopermittees)locatedinSanDiegoCounty,southernOrangeCounty,andsouthwesternRiversideCountywhoownandoperatelargeMS4swhichdischargestormwater(wetweather)runoffandnon‐stormwater(dryweather)runofftosurfacewatersthroughouttheSanDiegoRegion(SanDiegoRWQCB2015).Underthispermit,eachmunicipalitymustdevelopastormwatermanagementprogramdesignedtocontrolthedischargeofpollutantsintoandfromtheMS4(orfrombeingdischargeddirectlyintotheMS4).Thepurposeistoprotectlocalwaterbodiessincestormdrainstypicallydischargetheirwaterintostreams,bays,and/ortheoceanwithouttreatment.OrderNo.R9‐2013‐0001,asamendedbyOrderNos.R9‐2015‐0001andR9‐2015‐0100,presentsguidelinerequirementsforthecontrolofpollutantsresultingfromstormwaterandurbanrunoff.

County of San Diego Code of Regulatory Ordinances, Sections 67.801–67.814, Watershed Protection, Stormwater Management, and Discharge Control Ordinance 

TheCountyWatershedProtection,StormwaterManagement,andDischargeControlOrdinance(WPO)wasadoptedinMarch2008andrevisedinJune2015.ThepurposeoftheWPOistoprotectwaterresourcesandimprovewaterqualitybycontrollingthenon‐stormwaterconveyancesystemandreceivingwaters,torequiretheuseofmanagementpracticesbytheCountyanditscitizensthatwillreducetheadverseeffectsofpollutedrunoffdischargesonwatersoftheState,tosecurebenefitsfromtheuseofstormwaterasaresource,andtoensuretheCountyiscompliantwithstateandfederallaw.TheWPOestablishesstandardsandrequirementsthatarelegallyenforceablebytheCountywithintheCounty’sjurisdiction.Projectsthatrequireapermit(e.g.,AdministrativePermit,MajorUsePermit,GradingPermit)arerequiredtodemonstratecompliancewiththeWPO.Section67.804,forexample,specificallyaddresseswastedischargeandprohibitsthedischargeofpollutantstothestormwatersystemunlesspermittedthroughtheNPDESProgram.

Aspartoftherevisedordinance,prioritydevelopmentprojectsarerequiredtoincorporateLowImpactDevelopment(LID)techniques.Adoptedin2008,theLIDHandbookwasprovidedtocomplementtheWPObyprovidingguidanceregardingLIDtechniquesandpractices.LIDdesignconsiderationsforproposedprivateprojectsmayincludethefollowing:(1)drainingrunofffromimperviousareasintoperviousareasbasedonthecapacitytotreat/holdrunoff;(2)designingperviousareastoreceiveandtreatrunoffbyusingswales,detention,and/orbioretention,andusingamendedsoilstoincreaseinfiltration;(3)usingporouspavementswhereappropriate;(4)conservingnaturalareas,trees,vegetation,andsoils;(5)constructingstreets,sidewalks,andparkingareastotheminimumwidthsnecessaryforpublicsafety,therebyretainingperviousareas;(6)minimizingtheimperviousfootprintoftheprojectanddisconnectingimpervioussurfaces;(7)minimizingsoilcompaction(underplannedgreen/openareas);and(8)minimizingdisturbancetonaturaldrainages.

Page 14: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐10 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

County Code of Regulations Related to Groundwater Well Water Quality 

Section67.401oftheCountyCodeofRegulationsprovidesrestrictionsandregulationsforwells.Thestandardsinthecodeapplytotheconstructionandmaintenanceofwellstoensurethatgroundwaterwillnotbepollutedorcontaminated.PrivatedrinkingwaterwellsrequireapermitfromtheCountyDepartmentofEnvironmentalHealth.Aspartofthisprocess,newwellsaresampledforbacteriologicalconstituentsandnitrate.

Forprojectswithpoorgroundwaterquality,twomitigationmeasureshavebeenidentifiedbytheCountyinadditiontoimportingwatertotheprojectsite.Thefirststatesthatforprojectswhereanyconstituentexceedsitsprimarymaximumcontaminantlevelandadiscretionarypermitrequiresapotablegroundwatersupply,mitigationcouldbeimplementedbyprovidingawatertreatmentsystemthatreducesimpactstobelowthemaximumcontaminantlevel.ToensureproperwatertreatmentinaccordancewiththeCaliforniaSafeDrinkingWaterAct,theCountyrequiresdiscretionarypermitsthatrequiretreatmenttoformormergewithawatersystemregulatedbytheCountyDepartmentofEnvironmentalHealth(upto200serviceconnections)orthestate(greaterthan200serviceconnections).Thisensurespropertreatmentofconstituentsanddoesnotplacetheresponsibilityoftreatmentonprivateindividuals.AlthoughtheCountywillallowpoint‐of‐useorpoint‐of‐entrytreatmentforcontaminantsinwellsonexistinglegallots,itwillnotapprovediscretionarypermitsforprivatewellsdependentonwatertreatment.Thesecondmitigationmeasurestatesthatadditionalwellsandtestingcanbeconductedinanattempttofindonsitepotablewater.Drillingandtestingadditionalwellsisexpensiveandtime‐consuming,andtherearenoguaranteesthatthenewwell(s)willhaveapotablewatersupply(CountyofSanDiego2011a).

County of San Diego Grading Ordinance 

ThepurposeoftheGradingOrdinanceistocombineregulationsaffectingthegradingandclearingoflandandactivitiesaffectingwatercourseswithintheunincorporatedpartsoftheCounty.Chapter6(Sections87.601–87.608)oftheordinancecoverswatercoursesandisintendedtoprotectpersonsandpropertyagainstfloodhazardsbyidentifyingprohibitedactsinwatercoursesandactsthatareprohibitedunlessapermitisobtained.Theordinancerequiresthatprojectsinvolvingmorethan200cubicyardsofgrading,clearing,and/orremovalofnaturalvegetationobtainaGradingPermit(seeSection1.5.1,MatrixofProjectApprovals/Permits).GradingPermitsarediscretionaryandrequirecompliancewithCEQA.

Pesticide Regulation Program 

TheCounty’sPesticideRegulationProgramisthelocalprogramoverseenbytheCountyAgriculturalCommissionerandDepartmentofAgriculture,Weights,andMeasures.Permitsarerequiredanytimepesticidesareappliedtoagriculturallands,whetherbyanowner/operatororacontractedentity.Whenapplyingforapermit,theapplicantmustprovideinformationincludingthelocationandacreageofthepropertytobetreated,andknownlocationsnearbythatcouldbeadverselyaffectedbythepesticideusesuchaslakes,waterways,andreservoirs.IftheAgriculturalCommissionerdeterminesthatthepermitwouldlikelycauseasubstantialadverseimpact,thecommissionermustdetermineifthereisafeasiblealternative(includingnopesticideapplication)orafeasiblemitigationmeasurethatwouldsubstantiallyreducetheadverseimpact.Ifthereisnofeasiblealternativeormitigationmeasure,thecommissionermustdenythepermit.TheDepartmentofAgriculture,Weights,andMeasuresmaintainsadatabaseofpesticideapplicationsintheCounty

Page 15: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐11 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

thatincludesthenameandaddressoftheapplicant,dateofapplication,croptype,andtypeofpesticideused.

San Diego County Hydrology Manual  

ThepurposeofthismanualistoprovideauniformprocedureforfloodandstormwateranalysiswithinSanDiegoCounty.ItprovidesaguideforpoliciesandproceduresbaseduponthescienceanddataavailabletoattainreasonablestandardizationofhydrologystudiesthroughouttheCounty.

San Diego County Drainage Design Manual 

ThismanualestablishesdesignstandardsandproceduresforstormwaterdrainageandfloodmanagementfacilitiesinSanDiegoCounty.Thesedesignstandardsandproceduresprovideguidanceforjurisdictionsintheselection,design,construction,andmaintenanceofstormwaterdrainageandfloodmanagementfacilities.

2.5.3 Analysis of Project Effects and Determination of Significance  

TheproposedprojectconsistsofanamendmenttotheZoningOrdinancerelatedtoaccessoryagriculturalusesinunincorporatedportionsoftheCountyoverwhichtheCountyhaslandusejurisdictions(seeSection1.4,ProjectDescription,forfurtherdetails).Specifically,theproposedprojectappliestopropertieswhereactiveagricultureexistswithintheCountyorpropertieswhereagriculturalusesareallowed.DuringtheInitialStudypreparationandscopingprocessforthisproject,whichconsideredpotentiallysignificantenvironmentalimpactsandinvolveda30‐daypubliccommentperiod,itwasdeterminedthattheproposedprojectwouldnotresultinasignificantimpactrelatedtoplacinghousingwithina100‐yearfloodhazardarea,asmappedonafederalFloodHazardBoundaryorFloodInsuranceRateMaporotherfloodhazarddelineationmap,orplacewithina100‐yearfloodhazardareastructuresthatwouldimpedeorredirectfloodflows.Therewouldalsobenopotentialfortheproposedprojecttoresultinasignificantimpactrelatedtoexposingpeopleorstructurestoasignificantriskofloss,injury,ordeathinvolvingflooding,includingfloodingasaresultofthefailureofaleveeordam,orcontributionstoinundationbyseiche,tsunami,ormudflow.Assuch,potentialimpactsrelatedtofloodhazardsandinundationarenotevaluatedbelow.FurtherdiscussionisavailableintheInitialStudypreparedfortheproposedproject,whichisprovidedasAppendixB.

Threecommentlettersthatarerelevanttohydrologyandwaterqualitywerereceivedduringthe30‐daycommentperiod.EricMarchofStarBBuffaloRanch&HopFarmrequestedinformationonhydrologytestingrequirements.TheCityofSanDiegoindicatedthatwaterqualityisofconcernparticularlybecauseofthedrinkingwaterreservoirsthatitownsintheCounty.TheClevelandNationalForestindicatedthatwaterqualityisofparticularconcernfortheagencyandrequestedthattheEIRconsidereffectsofintensifiedlandusesontheforest.

Page 16: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐12 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

2.5.3.1 Water Quality 

Guidelines for the Determination of Significance 

ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinesfromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesapplytoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldoccuriftheproposedprojectwould:

Violateanywaterqualitystandardsorwastedischargerequirements.

Otherwisesubstantiallydegradewaterquality.

Analysis 

Oneoftheprimaryobjectivesoftheproposedprojectistostreamlineandclarifytheapproval/permittingforaccessoryagriculturaloperationswithintheCounty,whileensuringcompliancewithlocal,state,andfederalregulationswhereappropriateandutilizingsoundmanagementpractices.Thisobjectivewouldprovideincreasedopportunitiesforagriculturalventuresandtourismthatareaccessorytoexistingagriculturaloperations.Thus,theproposedprojectwouldpromoteandencourageadditionallanduseactivitiesonactiveagriculturallandthroughoutunincorporatedSanDiegoCountyforsuchoperationsasmicrobreweries,cheese‐makinganddairyoperations,onsitefoodproduction,mobilebutchering,packingandprocessing,onsiteretailhorticulturesales,animalraising,roadsidesalesofagriculturalproducts,agriculturaltourism,andagriculturalhomestays.AlthoughtheactionofamendingtheZoningOrdinancewouldnotdirectlyresultinhydrologyandwaterqualityimpacts,theusesthatitencouragesmay.Thesepotentialimpactscangenerallybegroupedintotwomajorcategories—construction‐relatedandoperationalimpacts—whicharediscussedfurtherinthefollowingsections.Followingthisdiscussion,theanticipatedimpactsspecifictotheaccessoryagriculturaloperationspromotedbytheproposedprojectareaddressed.

General Construction Related Impacts 

Theproposedprojectwouldpromoteandencourageadditionallanduseactivitiesonactiveagriculturalland.Anindirectresultofthiscouldbeincreasedconstructionanddevelopmentonsomeagriculturalproperties.Constructionanddevelopmentactivitiessuchasdemolition,clearingandgrading,excavationofundocumentedfillmaterials,stockpilingofsoilsandmaterials,concretepouring,painting,andasphaltsurfacing,havethepotentialtoresultinadditionalsourcesofpollutedrunoffwhichcouldhaveshort‐termimpactsonsurfacewaterquality.Typically,constructionactivitiesinvolvevarioustypesofequipmentsuchasdozers,scrapers,graders,loaders,compactors,dumptrucks,cranes,watertrucks,andconcretemixers.Duringconstruction,soilsaretypicallystockpiledoutdoors,asareotherconstructionmaterialsforlateruse.Pollutantsassociatedwithsuchactivitiesthatmaydegradewaterqualityincludesoils,debris,othermaterialsgeneratedduringdemolitionandclearing;fuelsandotherfluidsassociatedwiththeequipmentusedforconstruction;paints;otherhazardousmaterials;concreteslurries;andasphaltmaterials.Pollutantsassociatedwithconstructionwoulddegradewaterqualityiftheyarewashedbystormwaterornon‐stormwaterintosurfacewaters.

Sedimentisoftenthemostcommonpollutantassociatedwithconstructionsitesbecauseoftheassociatedearth‐movingactivitiesandareasofexposedsoil.Sedimentthatiswashedoffsitecanresultinturbidityinsurfacewaters,whichcanaffectaquaticspecies.Inaddition,whensedimentisdepositedintoreceivingwateritcansmotherspecies,alterthesubstrateandhabitat,andalterthe

Page 17: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐13 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

drainagecourse.Hydrocarbonssuchasfuels,asphaltmaterials,oils,andhazardousmaterialssuchaspaintsandconcreteslurriesdischargedfromconstructionsitescouldalsoaffectaquaticplantsandanimalsdownstream.Debrisandtrashcouldbewashedintoexistingstormdrainagechannelstodownstreamsurfacewatersandcouldaffectwildlifeaswellasaestheticvalue.Contaminantscouldalsoenterthesoilandcontaminategroundwaterthroughsedimentsthataretransportedbyautomobilesonroadways.

UndertheNPDESProgram,StormwaterPollutionPreventionPlans(SWPPPs)areprepared,andbestmanagementpractices(BMPs)identifiedintheSWPPPsareimplementedforconstructionsitesgreaterthan1acre,inordertoreducetheoccurrenceofpollutantsinsurfacewater.Additionally,anyconstructionrequiringaGradingPermitfromtheCountymust,ataminimum,identifystandardBMPsthatwouldbeimplementedthroughaStormWaterManagementPlan.TheseregulatoryprogramswouldensurethatmostconstructionactivitiescontinuetoimplementBMPsthatminimizedisturbance,protectslopes,reduceerosion,andlimitorpreventvariouspollutantsfromenteringsurfacewaterrunoff.Whilethesemeasureshelppreventdegradationofwaterqualityassociatedwithmostconstructionprojects,smallerconstructionactivities(orthoseconductedillegallywithoutpermits)wouldstillhavethepotentialtocontributepollutantssuchassoils,debris,andothermaterialsinquantitiesthatwouldexceedwaterqualitystandardsandotherwisesignificantlydegradewaterquality.

TillingofnativeorfallowlandforagriculturalproductionwouldbesubjecttotheGradingOrdinanceandwouldrequireanAdministrativePermitforclearingiftheareawasnotinagriculturalproductionatleast1oftheprevious5years.ThispermitisdiscretionaryandissubjecttoreviewunderbothCEQAandtheWPO.AmongthemanyrequirementsthatmustbecompletedbeforeanAdministrativePermitcanbeissuediscompliancewithPartF.3,StandardsApplicabletoDiscretionaryPermitActivitiesoftheCountyStormwaterStandardsManual.PartF.3providesperformancestandards,includingalistofBMPoptions,anumberofwhichmustbeincorporatedfromthefollowingcategories:(1)erosioncontrol,(2)sedimentcontrol,(3)offsitesedimentcontrol,(4)velocityreduction,(5)materialsmanagement,and(6)structuralBMPs.However,landthatwasinagriculturalproductionforatleast1ofthepreceding5yearsisconsideredactiveagricultureandwouldnotrequireaclearingpermit.

General Operational Impacts  

Therearemanypotentialsourcesofpollutantsfromnormalusesofland,and,astheproposedprojectsupportstheexpandeduseofagriculturalproperties,ithasthepotentialtoincreasepollutant‐generatingactivities.Someofthestandardpollutantsourcesaresedimentdischargeduetoareasoflandleftbare;nutrientsfromfertilizers;householdhazardouswastethatisimproperlydisposedof,includingheavymetalsandorganiccompounds;trashanddebrisimproperlydisposedof;oilandgrease;byproductsresultingfromvehicleuse,includingheavymetals;bacteriaandviruses;andpesticidesfromlandscapingandagriculture.Generally,theseconstituentscanbereferredtoasnon‐pointsourcepollutants.

Increaseduseofagriculturalpropertiesasaresultoftheprojectwouldresultinthecontributionofnon‐pointsourcepollutionintosurfaceandgroundwaterbodies.Althoughitisnotexpectedthatnon‐pointsourcepollutantscausedfromthedevelopmentassociatedwiththeproposedprojectwouldviolatewaterqualitystandards,theseconstituentswouldbeexpectedtootherwisedegradewaterquality.

Page 18: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐14 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

Regulatoryprogramsareinplacetocontrolnon‐pointsourcepollutants.Projectsthatrequirediscretionaryreviewwouldbeassessedforpotentialimpacts,andthosethathaveagreaterpotentialtoresultinpollutantsmayberequiredtopreparepost‐constructionstormwatermanagementplans.LargerconstructionprojectsarealsorequiredtoimplementtreatmentBMPsthatremovepollutantsfromstormwaterdischarges.

TheCountyofSanDiegoWPOprohibitsnon‐stormwaterdischargesandthedischargeofpollutantsfrompropertiesintheunincorporatedareasoftheCounty.Theuseofpesticides(whichincludeherbicides,insecticides,fungicides,androdenticides)inagriculturaloperationsisregulatedbytheCaliforniaDepartmentofPesticideRegulation.Intheprocessofreviewingapplicationsforpesticideuse,theDepartmentofPesticideRegulationmustdetermineeitherthatnoadverseimpactswouldresultorthatfeasiblemitigationwouldsubstantiallyreducetheadverseimpacts.Ifthereisnofeasiblealternativeormitigationmeasure,thepesticideapplicationpermitwouldbedenied.

Inaddition,pursuanttotheSanDiegoRWQCBResolutionNo.R9‐2007‐0104(ConditionalWaivers),allagriculturaloperationsintheCountyarerequiredtoimplementBMPstoensurethatnopollutantsleavethefarminirrigationorstormwaterdischarges,andaresubjecttoenrollment,monitoring,andreportingrequirementsintheRWQCBsConditionalWaiverNo.4(Resolution).TheResolutionallowsfortwooptionsforagriculturalandnurseryoperations:(1)operationsmayconducttestingandreportingasagroup,and(2)operationsmayactindividuallytosubmitplansandtestingresultsdirectlytotheRWQCB.Theresolutionappliestoallfutureagriculturaloperationsrelatedtotheproposedprojectbecausetheseusesarerequiredtogrowatleastaportionoftheirproductsonthepremisesoftheoperation.

Despitealltheseprograms,containmentofpollutantstoapropertyisnotguaranteed,andtheincreasedactivitiesthatwilllikelyresultfromtheproposedprojectwouldhavepotentialtoresultinpollutantdischarges.

Groundwater Quality Impacts 

Groundwatercontaminationcanresultwhenman‐madeproductssuchasgasoline,oil,andchemicalsreachundergroundreservoirs,knownasaquifers.Whenthisoccurs,groundwatermayberenderedunsafeandunfitforhumanuse,andthelevelofgroundwateravailableforpotableusewouldlower.Theprimarycontaminantsofconcernthatcouldleachintogroundwatersuppliesasaresultofagriculturaloperationswouldbefromuseoffertilizers,herbicides,pesticides,petroleumproducts,volatileorganiccompounds,andorganicwastes.

Similartosurfacewaterquality,potentialcontaminantsfromfutureaccessoryagriculturaloperationswouldberequiredtocomplywithregulatoryprogramsinplacethatcontrolnon‐pointsourcepollutants.Projectsthatrequirediscretionaryreviewwouldbeassessedforpotentialimpacts,andthosethathaveagreaterpotentialtoresultinpollutantsmayberequiredtopreparepost‐constructionstormwatermanagementplans.LargerconstructionprojectsarealsorequiredtoimplementtreatmentBMPsthatremovepollutantsfromstormwaterdischarges.Furthermore,futureprojectswouldberequiredtocomplywiththeCountyofSanDiegoWPOandimplementBMPsinaccordancewiththeRWQCB’sConditionalWaivers.TheseregulationsrestrictthepollutantsandwaterthataredischargedfromanysiteandallowtheRWQCBtoenforcerestrictionsifnecessary.Therefore,potentialcontaminantsrelatedtotheproposedprojectarenotanticipatedtoreachgroundwatersuppliesandwouldnotsignificantlycontributetogroundwaterqualityissues.Impactsongroundwaterqualitywouldbelessthansignificant.

Page 19: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐15 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

Accessory Agricultural Use Impacts  

Thissectionisintendedtoprovideaconnectionfurtherdetailsbetweenthegeneralhydrologyandwaterqualityimpactsthataredescribedaboveandthespecificactivitiesthatmightbeanticipatedtooccurwiththeaccessoryagriculturalusescoveredbytheproposedproject.

Agricultural Homestay 

Preparationforanagriculturalhomestayoperationcouldinvolveanexistinghomewithextraroomsandnogrounddisturbance,oritcouldincludeground‐disturbingactivitiessuchasgradingandtillinglandtoincreaseusableareaonaproperty,addingsignage,andexpandingbuildingstoaccommodateadditionalpeople.MostoftheseconstructionactivitieswouldtriggerbuildingorgradingpermitsandwouldrequireBMPstoaddressconstructionwaterqualityimpacts.However,somesmallerimprovementprojectswouldbeallowedwithoutpermitsandwouldnothavereviewforwaterqualityprotectionmeasures.Potentialpollutantsassociatedwithoperationofahomestaywouldbethosetypicalofresidentialandagriculturalpropertiessuchastrashanddebris,householdchemicals,andoilsandgreasefromvisitingvehiclesandotherequipment.AsdiscussedunderGeneralOperationalImpactsabove,thesesourcesofpollutantsaregenerallyunregulated,withtheexceptionoftheWPO,whichprohibitsthedischargeofanypollutants.

Agricultural Stores 

Theproposedprojectwouldmaketheprocessforhavinganagriculturestorelessrestrictive.Ordinancesetbacks(Section4810),commercialbuildingcodes,andDepartmentofEnvironmentalHealthcompliancewouldstillberequired,whichwouldhelpguaranteesuchstoresarestillincompliancewithbuildingandhealthcoderequirements.TheimplementationoflargeandsmallagriculturalstorescouldincreasetheamountofimperviousbuildingcoverageintheunincorporatedCountybutwouldtypicallyrequirebuildingpermitsandaMinorStormWaterManagementPlan(SWMP).Aswithagriculturaltourismactivities,increasedvisitorsandassociatedpollutantswouldbeexpected.

Agricultural Tourism 

Agriculturaltourismactivitiesaresimilartoagriculturalhomestaysinthattheycanoccurwithinthefootprintofexistingbuildingsoroutsideonopenfarmland,andoperationcouldincludeaddingsignage,expandingoralteringbuildings,anddemolitiontoaccommodateadditionalpeople.However,inthecaseofagriculturaltourism,theexpectationisthattheoperationwouldbeattractingagreaternumberofvisitors.Therefore,fromaconstructionperspectivetheremaybehigherdemandformoreusableareathusnecessitatinglargerconstructionprojects.Ontheoperationalperspective,morevisitorsgenerallymeansmorevehiclesandpeople,whichcanincreasethepotentialfortheirassociatedpollutantssuchastrash,debris,oils,andgrease.

Animal Raising 

Theproposedprojectwouldamendthecurrentanimalscheduletoallowcertainanimalraisingprojectsunderalessrestrictiveadministrativepermit.Assuch,itislikelytheproposedprojectwouldcauseanincreaseofanimalsonagriculturallands,whichwouldsubsequentlyincreaseanimalwaste,whichcouldintroducesourcesofbacteriologicalcontaminationandelevatednitrates.

Page 20: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐16 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

Aquaponics 

AquaponicswouldbeallowedunderSection6913oftheZoningOrdinanceunderaSpecialtyAnimalRaisingproject.Aquaponicswouldallowforfishfarminginasymbioticfishtank‐likeenvironmentandcouldinvolvegrounddisturbanceduringconstructionofabuildingtohousetheaquaponicscomponents.SuchabuildingwouldrequireabuildingpermitfromtheCountyandataminimumwouldtriggertherequirementsforaMinorSWMP.Aquaponicsoperateinaclosedloopsystem;therefore,thepotentialfornon‐stormwaterdischargesislow.Additionally,astheoperationwouldprimarilyconsistofacombinationofgrowingplantsandraisingfish,itwouldnotinvolvepollutantsintypesorquantitiesthatwouldbeofconcernwhencomparedtootheragriculturaloperations.

Creameries/Dairies 

Implementationoftheproposedcreamery/dairyusescouldresultinindividualdevelopmentprojectsinvolvinglandclearingtosupportuptoa4,000‐square‐footbuilding;constructionofancillaryparkingareas,driveways,fences,andoutdoorseating;andanincreaseinsiteactivityrelatedtoadditionalvisitorsandnewemployees.Dependingonthesizeofthesubjectlotandthedesiredfacilitysize,acreamery/dairycouldproposeeithertheconstructionofanewbuildingoralterationofanexistingbuildingtohousetheequipmentforacreamery.Soildisturbanceresultingfromsoilclearing,grading,cutandfilloperations,andgeneralgrounddisturbancecouldincreasethepotentialforerosion,sedimentation,andnon‐permitteddischargesofmaterialsduringconstruction.However,mostconstructionactivitieswouldrequireabuildingorgradingpermitandataminimumwouldtriggertheneedforaMinorSWMP.Increasedvisitationtosuchafacilitywouldbesimilartoagriculturaltourism.

Fishermen’s Markets 

Fishermen’smarketswouldallowthesaleoftheaquaponicallyraisedfishbyrightonpublicproperty,schoolpropertywithaschooluseorwithinC31,C32,C34,C35,C36,C37,C40,C42,orS88zones.Noconstructionwouldbeinvolvedwiththefishermen’smarkets.Thebiggestwaterqualityconsiderationwithfishermen’smarkets(oranyopenairmarket)iswithtrashanddebrisgeneratedbypatronsandvendors,improperdisposalofwaterormeltedice,orimproperwashingoftheusablearea.OrganizersofsuchmarketsareremindedoftheWPOprohibitionoftheseactivitiesandpollutantdischargesfromtheireventsiftheyneedtoobtainaspecialeventpermit.

Microbreweries, Cideries, and Micro‐distilleries 

Agriculturalmicrobrewery,cidery,andmicro‐distilleryusescouldincludethefuturedevelopmentofbuildingstosupportstructuresupto5,000squarefeetinsize.Forsmalleroperationsthatproducenomorethan2,000barrelsor62,000gallonsperyear,aministerialpermitcouldbeobtained.Foroperationsupto8,000barrelsand124,000gallonsperyear,adiscretionarypermitwouldberequired.Constructionofanewmicrobrewery,cidery,andmicro‐distilleryfacilitycouldrequiregradingandgrounddisturbance,whichwoulddisturbexistingsoilconditions.Theresultingsoildisturbancecouldincreasethepotentialforerosionandtheamountofsedimententeringstormwaterconveyancesystemsduringastormevent.However,mostconstructionactivitieswouldrequireabuildingorgradingpermitandataminimumwouldtriggertheneedforaMinorSWMP.Similartotheagriculturaltourismactivitiesdiscussedabove,microbreweries,cideries,andmicro‐distillerieswouldalsobeexpectedtoattractvisitorswithincreasedpotentialforpollutantgeneration.

Page 21: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐17 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

Mobile Butchering 

MobilebutcheringwouldbeallowedundertheproposedprojectbyrightwherePackingandProcessing:LimitedGeneraliscurrentlyallowed.CommercialbutcheringwouldalsoincludeaFoodandBeverageRetailSalesusetype.Mobilebutcheringwouldoperateoutofaself‐containedfacilityandwouldnotinvolveconstructionorgrounddisturbance.Itisanticipatedthatmobilebutcheringcouldproduceasubstantialamountofwastewaterfromwashingprocessedmeat,workareas,andequipment.Statelawpreventsthatwaterfrombeingdischargedtotheground,stormwaterconveyance,orawaterbody.Therefore,operationswouldberequiredtodischargetoasewersystemorcollectedfordisposalataproperfacility.

Wineries 

Theproposedprojectwouldallowforanaccessorystructure,upto5,000squarefeettobepermittedforwineries.TheexpansionofwineryusesinS92zonescouldexpandonsitewaterandwastewaterfacilitiesinexistingbuildingsandstructurestoaccommodateadditionalvisitors.Furthermore,wineriescouldrequirenewconstruction,orpromoteground‐disturbingactivitiessuchasgrading,tilling,andplanting,whichcouldpotentiallyresultinanincreaseinpollutants.Similartomicrobreweries,mostconstructionwouldrequirepermitsfromtheCountyandsomeoversightforwaterqualitycontrols.

Summary 

Ingeneral,theproposedordinanceamendmentislikelytofacilitateadditionalagriculturalproductionintheCounty.Theseadditionalagriculturaloperationshavethepotentialtocontributepollutantssuchasfertilizers,herbicides,orinsecticidesintosurfacewaterbodies.Pollutantsenteringsurfacewaterbodiesfromagriculturaloperationscouldpotentiallyviolatewaterqualitystandards.Also,somefutureaccessoryoperationscouldoccuralongunpavedruralroads.Dependingonarangeoffactorsincluding,butnotlimitedto,roadconditions,absorptionrates,slope,andthefrequencyanddurationofstormevents,increasedtrafficonunimprovedroadsfromtheadditionofaccessoryoperationscoulddegradethequalityoftheroadsurface.Increasederosionandsedimentationcouldresultinadverseimpactsonsurfacewatersanddrainagesnearunimprovedroads.Contaminantsrelatedtoautomobilesonroadwayscanalsobetransportedinsediments.WhileSWMPsand/orSWPPPswouldoftenbepreparedforsiteswherenewdevelopmentisproposed,theseplansseldomcovertheuseofoffsiteroads.

Insummary,theproposedprojectpromotesanumberofaccessoryagriculturalusesthatmayresultinthegenerationofadditionalpollutantsthroughconstructionactivities,operations,andincreasedvisitation.ThesepollutantsourcesarecommontoruralresidentialandagriculturalpropertiesanddonotposeasubstantiallygreaterrisktotheenvironmentthantheusesthatarealreadyfoundintheunincorporatedareasoftheCounty.Avarietyofregulationsareinplacetoprovideoversightofwaterqualitycontrolsandtoprotectagainstpollutantdischarges.However,evenwiththeseregulations,dischargesofpollutantswouldbeexpectedtooccurbecausesomeactivitieswouldnothaveoversightandBMPsarenotalways100%effectiveateliminatingpollutantdischarges.TheincreaseofaccessoryagriculturalusesintheunincorporatedareasofSanDiegoCountywouldresultinadditionalpollutantdischargesandsuchdischargesmayviolatesurfacewaterqualitystandardsorotherwisesubstantiallydegradewaterquality;therefore,itisconcludedthatimpactsfromtheprojectonsurfacewaterqualitywouldbepotentiallysignificant(ImpactHY‐1).

Page 22: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐18 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

2.5.3.2 Soil Erosion 

Guidelines for the Determination of Significance 

ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldoccuriftheproposedprojectwould:

Substantiallyaltertheexistingdrainagepatternofthesiteorarea,includingthroughthealterationofthecourseofastreamorriver,inamannerwhichwouldresultinsubstantialerosionorsiltationon‐oroff‐site.

Analysis 

Thenaturalprocessoferosionremovessoil,sediment,androckfromexposedareasandtransportstheresultingsediment.Therateoferosionisdependentonthetypeofmaterialthatiseroded,thetypeandamountoferosiveforces,andtheshapeofthelandforminvolved.Land‐disturbingactivitiesassociatedwiththeconstructionofneworexpandedagricultureoperationsmayresultinthealterationofdrainagepatternsthatcouldcausesubstantialerosionorsiltationonoroffsite.ThepotentialforgradingandconstructiontooccuraspartofaccessoryagriculturalusesisdiscussedaboveunderSection2.5.3.1,WaterQuality.

However,ground‐disturbingactivitiesaresubjecttoCountypermittingrequirementswhenexceedingcertainlimitations.Discretionarygradingpermitsmaybeneededforearthworkinvolving200cubicyardsofsoilimportorexport,orinvolvingmorethan2,500cubicyardsofgrading.ThesepermitstriggeradditionalenvironmentalreviewpursuanttoCEQA.Asmentionedinthesurfacewaterqualitydiscussionabove,issuanceofaGradingPermitisadiscretionaryactionthatrequiresenvironmentalreview.ThesepermitsalsorequireadherencetotheWPOandPartF.3.1oftheStormwaterStandardsManual,whichincludesprovisionsforerosioncontrolBMPs.TheseBMPswouldhelppreventerosion/siltationimpactsensurethaterosion/sedimentationimpactsareavoided.Thus,theproposedordinanceamendmentwouldnotcouldpotentiallyresultinasignificantlyincreaseintheamountoferosionthroughexpandedagricultureoperations.AlthoughsomestructuresmaynottriggertheneedforGradingPermits,BuildingPermitswouldoftenberequiredthatincludeMinorSWMPrequirements.TheGradingandBuildingPermitprocesswouldensurethatapplicantsdemonstratecompliancewithregulationsestablishedintheCountyGradingOrdinancethatprohibit,inpart,anyground‐disturbingactivitiesthatreducethecapacityofawatercourseorimpairtheflowofwaterinawatercourse,andrequireerosionandsedimentcontrols.

Theproposedzoningchangesintheproposedprojectcouldresultinconstructionofnewstructures,parking,landscaping,accessimprovements,andotherfeatureswithinunincorporatedSanDiegoCounty.Newfacilitiescouldresultinpermanentalterationstoexistingdrainagepatternsbyconvertingareasfrompervioussurfacestoimpervioussurfaces.Theseadditionalimpervioussurfacescouldincreaserunoffandpotentiallyresultinnewerosionproblemsortheworseningofexistingerosionproblems.Increasedvehicletripsandmaintenanceactivitiesondirtroadsleadingtotheagriculturaloperationsalsohavethepotentialtoincreaseerosionandsiltation,especiallyduringthewetseasonwhenmuddyconditionsrequireextramaintenancetokeeptheroadsinsatisfactorycondition.FutureagriculturaloperationswouldberequiredbytheWPOtoimplementsitedesignmeasures,sourcecontrol,and/ortreatmentcontrolBMPstoreducepotentialpollutants,includingsedimentfromerosionorsiltation,tothemaximumextentpracticablefromentering

Page 23: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐19 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

stormwaterrunoff.TheseBMPsforerosioncontrolareapartoftherequirementforabuildingpermitandareregulatedandenforcedaspartofthebuildinginspectionprocess.Inaddition,theWPOandPartF.4.7.1oftheStormWaterStandardsManualrequirethatallgrading,evengradingthatisexemptfromaGradingPermitrequirement,implementsBMPstoavoidimpacts.CompliancewiththeWPOandPartF.4andPartF.4.7.1oftheStormWaterStandardsManualwillensurethatdevelopmentoffacilitieswouldnotresultinsubstantialerosionorsiltationonsite.

FutureprojectsthatinvolvestructureslargerthantheallowablebyrightsizeundertheZoningOrdinancewouldrequireapermitandbesubjecttotheWPO,includingpreparationofaSWPPPandsite‐specificBMPsandLIDtechniquestoreduceimpactsonwaterquality.Aswiththeexpansionofagriculturaloperations,shouldtheconstructionofnewstructuresandtastingroomsrequireclearingorgradingthatexceeds200cubicyards,adiscretionaryGradingand/orAdministrativePermitforclearingwouldberequired.TheseactivitieswouldbesubjecttotheNPDESconstructionstormwatergeneralpermitprogram,whichrequiresaSWPPPtobepreparedandBMPstobeidentifiedforconstructionsitesgreaterthan1acre.TheimplementationofappropriateBMPswouldreduceerosionbyminimizingsitedisturbanceandcontrollinginternalconstructionerosion.

Muchlikethewaterqualitydiscussion(Section2.5.3.1above),thereareseverallayersofprotectionavailablethatwouldhelppreventerosion/siltationimpacts,suchastheBMPsrequiredinconjunctionwithabuildingpermit,GradingPermit,orAdministrativePermitforground‐disturbingactivities.However,aswithwaterquality,evenwithalltheseregulationsitisimpossibletoprovideoversightofallactivitiesandtoensureadequacyofallBMPs.Therefore,impactsrelatedtosubstantialerosionorsiltationfromagriculturaloperationswouldbepotentiallysignificant(ImpactHY‐2).

2.5.3.3 Drainage 

Guidelines for the Determination of Significance 

ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Significantimpactswouldoccuriftheproposedprojectwould:

Createorcontributerunoffwaterthatwouldexceedthecapacityofexistingorplannedstormwaterdrainagesystems.

Analysis 

Constructionofimpervioussurfaces,suchashorsestables,buildings,parkinglots,anddriveways,reducestheamountofrainfallthatcaninfiltratethegroundsurfaceandmovetothesubsurface.Asaresult,thevolumeofsurfacewaterrunoffincreaseswithinawatershed;subsequently,artificialconveyancessuchasgutters,stormpipes,andnaturalchannelimprovementstoaccommodateadditionalvolumeacceleratetherateofflowofwaterinthewatershed.Thisfaster‐moving,highervolumeofsurfacewaterrunoffwithinawatershedresultsinahigherprobabilityandincreasedseverityoffloodingwithinawatershedifdrainagefacilitiesarenotadequatelymaintainedorconstructedtocarrypeakflowcapacity.Accessoryagriculturalusesmayresultinthedevelopmentofimpervioussurfaces,suchasstorageareas,buildings,parkinglots,anddrivewaysthatcouldaffectexistingorplannedstormwaterdrainagesystems.

Page 24: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐20 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

Ifafutureaccessoryuserequiresthebuildingorremovalofastructure,abuildingpermitwouldberequired,anddevelopmentofthefacilitywouldbesubjecttothepreparationofaMinorSWMPandsite‐specificBMPsandLIDtechniquestomaintainexistingdrainagepatternsandrunofflevelstothegreatestextentpossible.ConformancetotheWPOandotherlocalrequirementswouldensurethatfuturefacilitiesdonotsubstantiallyaltertheexistingdrainagepatternsorcontributerunoffwaterthatwouldpotentiallyexceedthecapacityofexistingorplannedstormwaterdrainagesystems.

ProjectstriggeringGradingPermitsorotherdiscretionaryapprovalswouldbeevaluatedunderCEQAandwouldberequiredtoimplementmeasurestominimizealterationstoexistingdrainagepatterns,asnecessary.CEQArequiresproposedprojectstoprovidedetailedinformationonthepotentiallysignificantenvironmentaleffectstheyarelikelytohave,listwaysinwhichthesignificantenvironmentaleffectswouldbeminimized,possiblyidentifyalternativesthatwouldreduceoravoidthesignificantimpactsidentifiedfortheproject,andproposemitigationforsignificantimpacts.

Thediscretionaryreviewprocessrequiresthesubmittalofpre‐andpost‐constructiondrainageinformationtoensurethatprojectsdonotsubstantiallyalterdrainagepatternsandincreaserunoff.TheCountymayalsorequirethepreparationofaDrainageReportinaccordancewiththeCountyHydrologyManual,whichprovidesuniformproceduresforstormwateranalysis(CountyofSanDiego2003a).PrioritydevelopmentprojectsarealsosubjecttotheCountyHydromodificationManagementPlan.Althoughfocusedonerosionprotection,hydromodificationcontrolmeasuresalsoassistinthemanagementofrunoffvolumesandrates.Theselocalregulationsensurethatprojectsaredesignedtomeetthecapacityofexistingstormwatersystems,orarerequiredtoretrofitstormwaterdrainagesystemssothattheywouldnotcauseflooding.

Becauseofthelevelofoversightprovidedbyexistingregulationswhenthereareadditionalimperviousareas,theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinsignificantimpactsrelatedtoexceedingthecapacityofstormwatersystems.

2.5.4 Cumulative Impacts Analysis 

Thegeographicscopeofcumulativeimpactanalysisvariesdependingonthetypeofresourcewithpotentialtobeaffected.Hydrologyandwaterqualityonacumulativelevelincludeallagriculturaloperationsthatmaycontributerunofforpollutants,ormayotherwisedegradewaterresourcesintheCounty.Developmentofrelatedagriculturaloperationsthatinvolvesoildisturbanceandtheadditionofimpervioussurfacesthatcouldleadtochangesinsoilerosionanddrainagepatternsarealsoincluded.However,thepotentialforcombiningimpactsislimitedtowatersheds.Assuch,thegeographicscopeforthecumulativeanalysisincludesthosewatershedsthatcovertheunincorporatedareas,includingtheportionsofthewatershedsthatincludesurroundingcitiesandcounties.

2.5.4.1 Surface Water Quality 

Overallwaterqualityintheregionhasdegradedovertimeasnaturalhabitathasbeenconvertedanddevelopedforotheruses,andtheseuseshaveresultedinrunoffofvariouspollutantsintoregionalsurfacewaterbodiesandtheirtributaries.Avarietyofprogramshavebeenimplementedwiththegoalofhaltingdegradationofwaterqualityandreversingthistrend.Severalstateandfederalagenciesareinvolvedintheseprograms,manyofwhichcomefromthefederalCWA.Nonetheless,acumulativeadversewaterqualityconditionexists.

Page 25: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐21 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

Constructionoftheproposedprojectaswellasconstructionoftherelatedprojectswouldresultinsurfacedisturbancethroughgroundscraping,grading,trenching,andcompactionassociatedwithtypicaldevelopmentactivities.Insomecases,existingvegetationwouldberemoved,therebyincreasingthepotentialforerosion.Operationalactivitiesandproposedlanduses(e.g.,crops,parkingareas)wouldgeneratecontaminantdischarges,suchasfertilizers,pesticides,petroleumproducts,andvolatileorganiccompounds,whichwouldbecarriedinstormwaterrunoff.Theseconstituentscouldenterthestormdrainagesystemandadverselyaffectwaterquality.Althoughavarietyofregulationsareinplacetoreducepollutantdischarges,somedischargesareexpectedtooccur.Whenthepotentiallysignificantproject‐levelimpactonsurfacewaterquality(ImpactHY‐1)isconsideredatthecumulativelevel,theproject’scontributiontoacumulativeimpactisconsideredtoalsobepotentiallysignificant(ImpactHY‐3).

2.5.4.2 Soil Erosion 

TheWPOandtheStormWaterStandardsManualrequirethatallgradingmustimplementBMPstoavoidimpactsfromerosionorsiltationonsite.Thisensuresthatallfuturedevelopmentisrequiredtocomplywithmeasuresthatreducecumulativeimpactsfromerosionorsiltationtoaless‐than‐significantlevel.

Futuredevelopment,whencombinedwithfutureagricultureprojects,couldincreasetrafficonunimprovedroads,andthesedimentationanderosionthatcouldresultmightcontributetosurfacewaterqualityimpactsthatmightexceedtheBasinPlan’swaterqualityobjectiveforsedimentinsomelocations;therefore,theseindirectandoffsiteimpactscouldcausesurfacewaterqualityimpactsthatwouldbecumulativelyconsiderable.FutureagricultureprojectswouldbeexpectedtofollowregulationssuchasNPDESorothersapplicable.Proposedaccessoryagriculturaloperationsthatdonotrequirediscretionaryreviewmaystillrequireabuildingpermitifanystructuresareproposedtobeconstructedordemolished,andthereforewouldbesubjecttopreparationofaMinorSWMP,whichincludesrequirementsforconstructionBMPs,LID,andpost‐constructionBMPs.However,evenwithseverallayersofprotectionavailabletohelppreventerosion/siltationimpacts,suchastheBMPsrequiredinconjunctionwithvariouspermitsforground‐disturbingactivities,theproject‐levelimpactrelatedtosubstantialerosionorsiltationfromagriculturaloperationsispotentiallysignificant.Whenthepotentiallysignificantproject‐levelimpactonsoilerosion(ImpactHY‐2)isconsideredatthecumulativelevel,theproject’scontributiontoacumulativeimpactisconsideredtobepotentiallysignificant(ImpactHY‐4).

2.5.4.3 Drainage 

Developmentoftheproposedprojectincombinationwithdevelopmentoftherelatedprojectswouldresultintheadditionofimpervioussurfaces,whichcouldincreasestormwaterrunoff.However,inaccordancewithfederalandstatestormwaterregulations,newconstructionandsignificantredevelopmentmustmaintainpre‐projecthydrologyandincorporateproperpollutantsourcecontrols,minimizepollutantexposureoutdoors,andtreatstormwaterrunoffthroughproperpost‐constructionBMPswhensourcecontrolorexposureprotectionareinsufficientforreducingpollutantloads.Therefore,beforeanyconstruction‐relatedgrounddisturbance,finaldrainageplanswouldberequiredtodemonstratethatallrunoffwouldbeappropriatelyconveyedandnotleavetheprojectsitesatratesexceedingpre‐projectrunoffconditions.Consequently,theproposedprojectwouldnothaveaconsiderablecontributiontocumulativedrainageimpactssuchthatanewcumulativeimpactwouldoccur.Thiswouldbealess‐than‐significantcumulativeimpact.

Page 26: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐22 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

2.5.5 Significance of Impacts Prior to Mitigation 

Theproposedprojectwouldresultinpotentiallysignificantimpactsassociatedwithhydrologyandwaterresourcesinvolvingwaterquality,includingsurfacewaterquality(ImpactsHY‐1,direct/indirect,andHY‐3,cumulative)andsoilerosion(ImpactsHY‐2,direct/indirect,andHY‐4,cumulative).Theproposedprojectwouldnotresultinpotentiallysignificantimpactsondrainagerelatedtoexceedanceofstormwatersystemscapacity.

2.5.6 Mitigation Measures 

Theproposedprojectwouldallowfordevelopmentofaccessoryusestoagriculturallands.Futuredevelopmentfosteredbytheproposedproject,suchasagriculturalandhorticultureretail(large),agriculturalmicrobreweries,cideries,andmicro‐distilleries(large),andanimalraisingwouldberequiredtoobtainadiscretionarypermit,whichwouldtriggerdiscretionaryenvironmentalreviewandfeasiblemitigationwouldbeproposed.Typicalmitigationmeasuresfortheseprojectscouldincluderequirementsforprojectapplicantsto:demonstratewastedischargerequirementshavebeenmetinaccordancewithRWQCBNPDESpermitconditions;implementprojectdesignmeasuressuchasconstructionstormwaterBMPsforerosionandsedimentcontrol,roadimprovementandpaving,runoffcatchment,andfiltration;andlimituseoftoxiccompounds(fertilizersandpesticides)tominimizeimpacts.Asaresult,specificimpactsonwaterqualitywouldbeanalyzedandmitigatedforthesetypesofdiscretionaryprojects.

Atthesametime,theremayalsobefutureby‐rightprojectsforwhichrelateddiscretionarypermitsarerequiredbutforwhichmitigationwouldnotbefeasible,orforwhichnorelateddiscretionarypermitisrequired(e.g.,wheregradingisallowedundertheby‐rightuse,butwhichwouldimpactnativeorfallowland).Forsuchby‐rightprojects,CEQAreviewwouldnotberequired,andappropriatemitigationwouldnotbepossible.

Additionally,thefollowingfeasiblemitigationmeasureswouldapplytofutureprojectsundertheAgriculturePromotionProjectthatwouldberequiredtoundergoenvironmentalreview.Asitcannotbeconcludedatthisstagethatimpactsonwaterqualityfromallfutureagriculturalprojectsallowedbytheordinanceamendmentwouldbeavoidedormitigated,impactswouldremainsignificantandunmitigated.

2.5.6.1 Water Quality 

Theproposedprojectwouldamendcurrentregulationsrelatedtoaccessoryagriculturalprojectsthatmaydirectlyorindirectlyresultinaviolationofwaterqualitystandardsorwastedischargerequirements,orotherwisesubstantiallydegradewaterquality(ImpactsHY‐1,direct/indirectandHY‐3,cumulative).Mitigationmeasuresdescribedbelowhavebeenidentifiedthatwouldreducewaterqualityimpactsduringconstructionandoperation,butnotbelowasignificantlevel.Therefore,theseimpactswouldremainsignificantandunavoidable.Chapter4,ProjectAlternatives,providesadiscussionofalternativestotheproposedprojectthatwouldresultinsomereducedimpactsassociatedwithwaterqualityascomparedtotheproposedproject.

Mitigation Measures 

M‐HY‐1:Duringtheenvironmentalreviewprocessforfuturediscretionarypermitsforaccessoryagriculturaluses,theCountyGuidelinesforDeterminingSignificanceforHydrology

Page 27: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water

County of San Diego  Section 2.5. Hydrology and Water Quality 

 

Draft Final Environmental Impact Report 

Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐23 

February 2017

ICF 0054.15

 

andWaterQualityResourcesshallbeapplied.Whenimpactsonhydrologyaredeterminedtobesignificant,feasibleandappropriateproject‐specificmitigationmeasuresshallbeincorporated.

M‐HY‐2:ComplywiththeNPDES,RWQCB’sConditionalWaivers,CountyofSanDiegoWPO,andtheCountyGradingOrdinance,requirepreparationofstormwatermanagementplansasapplicable,andimplementBMPs.

2.5.6.2 Soil Erosion 

Theproposedprojectwouldamendcurrentregulationsrelatedtoaccessoryagriculturalprojectsthatmaydirectlyorindirectlyresultinsoilerosionimpacts(ImpactsHY‐2,direct/indirect,andHY‐4,cumulative).MitigationmeasuresM‐HY‐1andM‐HY‐2wouldreducesoilerosionimpactsduringconstructionandoperation,butnotbelowasignificantlevel.Therefore,theseimpactswouldremainsignificantandunavoidable.Chapter4,ProjectAlternatives,providesadiscussionofalternativestotheproposedprojectthatwouldresultinsomereducedimpactsassociatedwithsoilerosionascomparedtotheproposedproject.

2.5.7 Conclusion 

Becausefuturedevelopmentofanunknownnumberofneworexpandedagriculturaloperationsatunknownlocationscouldcauseimpactstosurfacewaterqualityanderosion/siltation,adoptionoftheproposedordinanceamendmentcouldresultinpotentiallysignificantdirect,indirect,andcumulativeimpacts(ImpactsHY‐1,HY‐2,HY‐3,andHY‐4).By‐rightuseswouldnotbesubjecttodiscretionaryapproval,and,thus,noadditionalenvironmentalreviewwouldbeconducted.Therefore,theseimpactsaresignificantandunmitigatedbecausetherewouldbenoenforcementmechanismtoguaranteeavoidanceorcompliancewithenvironmentalregulations.CompliancewithallapplicableregulationsincludingtheWPOandGradingOrdinancewouldensurethatdrainageimpactsareaddressedandarelessthansignificant.

Table 2.5‐1. Criteria for Rating Soil Erodibility 

SoilPropertiesAffectingErodibility

Erodibility

Slight Moderatea Severeb,c

SurfaceLayerTexture(sedimentcomposition)c

Clay Clayloam,sandyloams,loam

Sands,orloamysands

Gradeofgranular,crumb,orblockystructureinthesurfacelayer(particlesizeandstrength)

Strong Moderate Weakandmassiveandsinglegrain

Depthtomaterialthatrestrictspermeability

Morethan40inches 20–40inches Lessthan20inches

Slope Lessthan15% 15–30% Morethan30%

Source:Table12fromU.S.DepartmentofAgriculture’sSoilSurveyfortheSanDiegoAreaPartII;CountyofSanDiego2007e.aRatingisslightforclayloam,sandyloams,loam,sands,andloamysandsifcoarsefragmentscovermorethan75%ofsurface.bRatingismoderateforsandsandloamysandsifcoarsefragmentscover25to75%ofsurface.cRatingisaccordingtosurfacelayertextureifcoarsefragmentscoveronly1to25%ofsurface.

Page 28: Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality · Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project 2.5‐1 February 2017 ICF 0054.15 Section 2.5 Hydrology and Water