secretariat report - unesco€¦ · the total budget approved by the committee for activities...
TRANSCRIPT
1
SECRETARIAT REPORT
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF EGYPTIAN CIVILIZATION 3
Museum project design 3
Museum consultation (experts missions) 4
SUMMARY OF THE UNESCO EXPERTS MISSION TO NMEC, APRIL 15-28 2002 5
INTRODUCTION 5
OBJECTIVES 5
OUTCOMES OF THE MISSION 6
POLICIES 7
SITE/LANDSCAPE 9
Assessment 9
Proposals 10
ARCHITECTURE 11
MUSEOLOGICAL PROGRAMME 12
Assessment 12
Proposals 12
EDUCATIONAL ISSUES 16
NMEC PROJECT TIMETABLE 18
MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS 18
OCTOBER 2002 MISSION OBJECTIVES AND ACTION PLAN 20
NUBIA MUSEUM IN ASWAN 23
Training 2001 23
Regional Assessment and Training 2001 23
Regional Training 2002 23
2
Equipment and Documentation 24
Language Course 24
Needs Assessment 24
Nubia Museum Staff Scholarship in Museum Studies 24
Documentation on the Nubia Campaign 25
Museum Catalogue 25
Promotion 25
Bibliography and Library 25
Landscaping 28
Collection Database 28
Museum Website/training 28
Study for the preparation of a GIS survey of the Nubia region 28
Site-Management Course 28
ASSISTANCE TO SECRETARIAT 29
PREPARATION OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS 29
Annex 1 - Timetable
Annex 2 - Approved budget and expenditures
3
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF EGYPTIAN CIVILIZATION
The total budget approved by the Committee for activities concerning the establishment
of the National Museum of Egyptian Civilization (NMEC) since the 11th Session of the
Executive Committee is US$300,000. A total of US$121,446 has been spent since the 11th
Executive Committee Meeting (November 2000). A list of activities carried out from the 11th
Session of the Committee to end July 2002 follows, together with their budgetary
implications.
Museum project design
The 11th Session of the Executive Committee approved the sum of US$250,000 for the
development of the NMEC project, and up to July 2002 the sum of US$121,446 has been
spent, as follows:
US$25,165 - UNESCO expert and staff mission to Cairo, April 2001 (experts: Monier,
Brunoni, Dorn, Thompson, Sheehan, Pedregal and Paolini);
US$584 - Mission by Secretariat (A. Paolini) to Geneva in June 2001 to complete the
Bureau report on architecture and discuss the compilation of the Nubia bibliography with
Prof. Valloggia, former Chairman of the Committee;
US$3,000 - Translation from English into French of the experts’ reports (mission to Cairo
in April 2001) used to prepare the Secretariat report of the Bureau meeting;
US$55,850 - UNESCO expert and staff mission to Cairo, October 2001 (experts:
Sheehan, Thompson, Pedregal, Monier, Ricci and Paolini);
US$858 - Mission by Secretariat (A. Paolini) to London in October 2001 as follow-up to
the mission to Cairo to complete the draft report on museology;
US$1,844 - UNESCO experts meeting at UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, in December
2001 (Travel of Brunoni and Dorn);
US$32,849 - UNESCO expert and staff mission to Cairo, April 2002 (experts: Sheehan,
Ricci, Brunoni, Thompson, Dorn and Paolini);
US$1,296 - UNESCO expert meeting on museology, UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, July
2002 (Travel of Thompson).
4
Museum consultation (experts missions)
According to Recommendation 1 of the 12th Session of the Executive Committee,
which recalls Recommendation 7 adopted at the 10th session, the sum of US$50,000 was
agreed to be used for experts or consultancy missions organized by UNESCO in conjunction
with SCA and in cooperation with international advisory bodies, including ICCROM, ICOM,
ICOMOS and IFLA.
Thus far, this budget has not been used since consultancy missions have been carried
out using the budget approved for the museum design project. One of the experts on the
project, the landscape architect, is also a member of IFLA.
Proposal
Appointment of a UNESCO project officer in Cairo (El Fustat NMEC office) to
follow up the NMEC construction project. This project officer should be Arabic-speaking and
should have experience in project management and possibly also in museum organization.
The project officer would be the link between the UNESCO Secretariat of the Committee and
the Egyptian Authorities during the implementation of the project. Initial appointment would
be for one or two years, at P4 or P5 grade. The proposed budget for a two years contract
(2003-04) based on UNESCO consultant fee would be (excluding travels) :
if local senior consultant = 4,908 $ x 24 months = 117,792 $
if International consultant = 7,000 $ x 24 months = 168,000 $
5
SUMMARY OF THE UNESCO EXPERTS MISSION TO
NMEC, APRIL 15-28 2002
INTRODUCTION
The team of UNESCO experts carried out a two-week mission from April 15th
to April
28th
2002 to advance and develop the programme of the NMEC, following the results of the
October 2001 mission and the recommendations of the 12th Executive Committee held in
Cairo in January 2002.
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the mission were the following:
1. to discuss with the Egyptian authorities their reaction to the previous reports of the
expert group (sent in March 2001), to receive any constructive criticism, and, in the
light of any such criticism, to review any amendments needed;
2. to meet representatives of a counterpart team to include:
- curators and archaeologists already working on the project;
- a historian (covering all periods of Egyptian history);
- an educationalist;
- a tourism specialist;
- a cultural events specialist.
3. to meet members of the design team, including the architect, exhibition designer and
an urban planner, in order to resolve a number of outstanding architectural and land-
use issues, including the relationship between the outdoor space and specifications for
the exhibition areas;
4. to receive precise options from the Egyptian authorities about the proposed policies
for the NMEC in collecting, storing, and exhibiting the collections, and the importance
of each activity in terms of staffing levels and space requirements, in order to arrive at
surface specifications for the NMEC building;
5. to meet members of the curatorial team formed at the SCA to discuss the main themes
of the NMEC permanent exhibition and to receive information about the objects to be
included, in order to define the organization and content of each theme and other
graphic and interactive elements;
6. to consider, with the curatorial team, how the contemporary period is to be represented
in the permanent display;
6
7. to examine comparable museums to the NMEC throughout the world with the
curatorial team via the World Wide Web (www) as a stimulus to further ideas on the
content of the NMEC. Examples included the Civilisation Museum, Quebec, and the
Tjibaou Art and Cultural Centre, New Caledonia;
8. to relate the proposed NMEC to other museums within the overall museumscape of
Cairo and Egypt by studying the activities and functional spaces of the various
museums in Egypt;
9. to visit key sites and museums to advance the UNESCO expert team’s understanding
of Egyptian civilization and the issues involved in creating the NMEC;
10. to inspect the Collection Centre recently established at Fustat to facilitate the
movement and preparation of objects for the NMEC.
OUTCOMES OF THE MISSION
In order for the NMEC to fulfill the requirements of a major international museum of
Egyptian civilization a number of important adaptations to the original scheme and project
(rules of the architectural competition of 1984) had already been requested as a result of the
October 2001 mission. Following two weeks of joint consultations with the Egyptian
representatives and the architect, agreement was reached on :
General Outcomes :
Architecture. Modify the present layout of the building in order to obtain a more flexible
building and therefore to advance to the construction stage subject to some revisions and
adaptations of the architectural programme;
Museology and display guidelines. Revisions and adaptations to the museological
programme will progress in parallel with the construction phases as a result of the
improved flexibility of the architecture of the building;
The museological programme outlined by UNESCO will be developed by the Egyptian
team and will define all the functions and activities of NMEC, such as permanent and
temporary displays, cultural activities, educational programmes, conservation and
research, visitor services, reception, orientation, shops, catering, and so on. Space
requirements were reviewed during the mission;
Policies guidelines. The definition of policies and functional requirements to be further
developed by the Egyptian counterpart team/managerial group and representatives in
consultation with the UNESCO experts;
A timetable will be proposed by the UNESCO team, taking into consideration the
timeframe proposed by the Egyptian authorities.
Specific Outcomes :
Further discussion with the curatorial group and visits to archaeological sites during the
mission convinced the expert group that the inclusion of an Archaeology Gallery within
the NMEC is an essential requirement.
7
Further visits to the site of El Fustat during the April Mission convinced the team of the
huge potential of the NMEC in creating physical and intellectual links with the
archaeological site of Fustat and indeed with Old Cairo as a whole.
The October 2001 workshop identified a requirement for the NMEC to play an active role
in developing a collection to represent the contemporary civilization of Egypt, since at present
no museum in Egypt has a collection of contemporary material other than contemporary fine
and decorative art, as far as the expert team could see. In accordance with its agreed
objectives, it is appropriate for the NMEC to represent contemporary Egyptian civilization.
POLICIES
The October 2001 workshop between representatives of the Egyptian authorities and
UNESCO made substantial progress in determining the objectives of the NMEC and in
defining the resources, in terms of personnel and functional requirements, that will be needed
to fulfil its objectives.
During the April 2002 mission a great deal of progress was made with the curatorial team
in developing the contents of the displays, but it was not possible to consider policy
guidelines for the NMEC as a whole, except in general terms, with the Egyptian authorities.
However, there was a consensus that the NMEC is a developing project and, in this spirit,
policies can be prepared on an incremental basis. The UNESCO expert team therefore
initiated a series of suggested Policy Guidelines for consideration and development by the
counterpart team.
A pragmatic approach to the development of the NMEC would appear to represent the
most effective way forward in the light of the overriding concern of the Egyptian authorities
to proceed to the tender and construction stage following the meeting in Paris in September
2002. An approach based on MBO (Management by Objectives) is an appropriate tool for
preparing action plans and critical path planning.
The expert team has already drawn up policy guidelines and forwarded them to the
counterpart team (objectives, requirements and action), in order to achieve the following
objectives:
Objective 1: To be an essential introduction for visitors to the heritage of Egypt and the
Nile;
Objective 2: To be a world wide communications centre for Egyptian Heritage, past and
present;
Objective 3: To provide a comprehensive educational programme to support life-long
learning;
Objective 4: To organize a cultural and scientific programme featuring contemporary and
traditional presentations;
Objective 5: To facilitate the collection and curation of the evidence of civilization in
Egypt and to ensure recognized standards of conservation and curation consistent with a
national museum.
All policies need to be reviewed and updated to reflect changes in professional practice
and in response to society’s changing needs for museums and the services they provide. Some
policies, such as Health and Safety at Work, need to be kept under constant review, perhaps
8
through a Health and Safety Committee in the Museum formed from staff members; others,
such as the collecting policy, might be reviewed no more frequently than at three-year
intervals.
Policies guidelines to be developed
The following specific policies should be developed by the Egyptian counterpart team in
co-operation with UNESCO experts:
Objects collecting policy:
Periods
Subjects
Themes
Materials
Exhibitions policy:
Special and loan exhibitions
Programming
Visitor-services policy:
Reception
Information
Orientation
Disabilities access
Educational policy:
Programmes
Children and adults
Resource centre
Library
Research policy:
Programme
Academic and Museology
Library
Cultural programmes policy:
Music
Dance
Performance
Installations
Arts and Crafts
Communication and exchange programmes
Commercial policies:
Shops
Restaurants, cafés
Room hire
Publications
9
Collection management policies:
Remedial and preventive conservation
Storage
Movement, Transports
Documentation
Environmental policy:
The building
The landscape
The activities of the museum
Training and personnel policies:
Staff
Volunteers
Other policies to be defined, such as:
Health and safety at work
General procedures
Opening hours
Admission fees, Concessions, Free days
SITE/LANDSCAPE
Assessment
The Museum land has been fenced off. On the Museum site in El Fustat, new offices and
a temporary storage building are being prepared. This is a two-storey building, with a
floorspace of about 400sqm.
The first floor will be used as working space for the Museum committee and team, while
the ground floor will be used as storage and laboratory space. Furniture, equipment and IT
connections are still missing.
Two main remarks should be made:
Size of the plot
The size of the plot is smaller than that indicated during the last Committee meeting. It is
recommended that the former size be restored, particularly if outdoor exhibition and energy-
saving measures are to be undertaken. The building should also be placed within an adequate
and sufficiently large landscape context.
The proposed energy-saving measures were not accepted by the local authorities,
although water resources are limited and electricity has to be saved wherever possible. The
use of these energy-saving measures is highly recommended by the team of experts.
10
Vegetation
The vegetation of phragmites (reeds) around the lake has largely disappeared, resulting in
a loss of ecological quality, in particular concerning the natural purification of the water and
the vanishing of bird life in the area. The vegetation that used to be present on the eastside of
the lake, forming a natural border for the plot, has also disappeared.
The traffic on the east road is fully visible, and the situation needs improvement.
Proposals
Entrance
1. The proposal for a large paved staircase/platform at the entrance of the building by the
Egyptian architect should be reduced in size, moved towards the private service road to
the south and integrated with the gently sloping terrain.
2. Avenues or lines of plants or trees are not recommended.
3. (Proposal from the landscape architect) After further investigation of the topographic,
archaeological and geological situation, bus parking might be situated one floor
underground but separated from the underground car park under the Museum. Bus
parking could be placed in the area in front of the Museum, but it should be connected
with the service road, which will also be partially underground. The roof of the parking
area could be covered with inert and rocky material and planted with desert vegetation.
The service road could be partially covered by a pergola. The vegetation should increase
and become of a different type approaching the lake.
4. The terrain should be modulated. From the main entrance to the building the visitor
should be able to overlook the lake and the proposed theatre and performance stage. It is
also suggested that there will be a pool in front of the entrance to the Museum, which
would be blended with the vegetation.
5. It is also proposed to have water basins, or small pools, scattered in the area and oriented
towards the lake.
6. The new service road to the underground parking area linking two major streets of El
Fustat should be totally dedicated to the Museum.
7. On the western side of the site, the new service road should have low vegetation, such as
a few trees and low bushes, to preserve the visual connection with Old Cairo and the
Pyramids.
8. The main entrance from El Fustat street should be paved with the natural stone to be
found in the region.
Lake
1. The vegetation to the east and south of the lake should be enhanced and supported by
biological and bio-dynamic measures.
2. The natural landscape in the south and eastern part of the lake should be preserved.
11
3. Islands of different sizes to serve as breeding and rest-places for birds should be planned
in the lake.
4. An artificial cataract near the lake will enhance the quality of the water and attract
visitors towards the outdoor exhibition.
5. The unattractive lake banks should be replaced by a more natural solution.
Energy-saving measurements
1. Due to the decrease in the size of the Museum site, the northern area at the back of the
Museum is not now large enough to host the proposed phragmites seedling beds for water
purification or the storage battery for the solar-cells. This issue has to be carefully
considered, in particular in connection with the running costs of the Museum.
2. Energy-saving means having a water-recycling system, introducing an ecological
engineering system with planted soil-filters in built wet lands, and applying vacuum
sewage technology in connection with vacuum toilets, in order to make the Museum self-
sufficient from the point of view of infrastructure. These measures should be considered
by the responsible authorities, technicians, architects and engineers, and approved by
politicians and decision-makers.
ARCHITECTURE
The architectural and museum design guidelines agreed by the UNESCO team and the
Egyptian authorities are:
Mark the entrance to the garden (create a constructed threshold as a transition between
the NMEC parking areas and the urban space);
(Proposal from the architect) Place the parking area underneath the building (integration
of the ramps and parking space for 1,000 – 1,500 cars and 40 buses under the Museum
building, in order to free the large archaeological area around the site. This is of historical
importance and should be preserved for the future);
Modify the position and reorient the Museum building (The Museum should be
reoriented in order to suite the topography, and it should be linked with the essential
elements of the site, in order to emphasize the character of the landscape);
Mark the approach to the Museum building with reception and services buildings (These
should be differentiated from the Museum);
Emphasize the forms of the building and facades;
Redesign the connecting road to reduce the distance between the Museum building and
the reception/services building;
The connection between the Museum building and the reception/services building should
be experienced as transitional, not having a visual link with the external area (Reduce the
distance between the Museum building and the reception/services building. The
connection between these two buildings should be transitional, without views to the
outside. The proposed glass tube should be excluded.);
Re-alignment of façade and creation of openings according to functional needs;
12
All facades should be flat with structure hidden; local, untreated stone should be used;
The structural grid of the building should be modified in order to gain flexibility in use
and allow larger areas and double levels for exhibitions, display flexibility, and so on (On
the ground and upper levels of the museum, provide ‘mezzanines’ within the structures);
Rationalize the ground-floor layout and open up to lake view;
The roof pyramid should have external access and side views (Possible use of the raised
roof terrace above the core);
Locate technical supplies (eg. air conditioning, cables, electricity) beneath floors for easy
access and maintenance;
Eliminate the 1st floor internal perimeter corridor, so as to integrate it into the building;
Plan for future extensions of functional and exhibition/display space;
Add service lifts to minimize object movement (lifts to be located in the four corners of
the building.);
Enlarge storage, conservation and research laboratories areas;
Use of double height in the storage area for large objects and/or future extensions (add
specialized areas, as mezzanines, when needed);
Minimize hard landscaping (platforms, walls, pathways, paved areas, etc.);
Leave free space for access to lakeside, ethno-botanic gardens and route, archaeological
route and outdoor area, to be further defined.
MUSEOLOGICAL PROGRAMME
Assessment
The Egyptian workshop team in charge of the Museum’s collections is progressing with
the selection of objects and has regular meetings every Tuesday. By April 2002, 8,671 objects
had been selected, which are being kept in the original locations (museum, storage, etc.) for
the moment.
The computerized inventory of the first selection of objects is progressing: 3,800 objects
are now on computerized record forms (including 250 with photos). Since only one person is
working on the computerized inventory, the completion date is estimated for the middle of
2003.
The first selection of objects needs to be revised and completed and the final selection
will consider objects illustrating themes.
Proposals
The following aspects of the museological programme have been revised by the
UNESCO team and the following proposals advanced:
13
- Museum space definition and revision of space requirement from the 1982 programme. A
general distribution of floor areas is proposed by the museologist according to comparable
recent museum programmes for the reception/services building and Museum building, as
percentage rates of the total floor area of 16,000 sqm, from the 1982 programme. The
relative areas attributed to the thematic units should reflect the importance of the themes,
and not in any way depend on the large size or quantity of the objects on display.
- Visitor access and circulation in terms of different level of accessibility and the security of
the main Museum areas, such as reception, services and exhibition areas, should be
allowed.
- Thematic organization. The most relevant themes in Egyptian civilization need to be
identified and developed by the Egyptian scientific committees, before defining the
themes’ organization and the contents of each theme (objects and other graphic and
interactive elements).
- Structure of the exhibition. The large use of information and signs is recommended in the
connecting and orientation areas. Basic information, captions and maps should be near to
the objects, but they should not overwhelm them. More information should be available in
the documentation-interpretation areas, such as audiovisual programmes, books, digital
documents, films, and so on.
- Choice of objects and their display. The first selection of objects needs to be revised and
completed. The final selection will consider objects illustrating the themes. Other objects
and iconography can be collected from different institutional or private sources.
- Material and Technical requirements.
The above can be further specified as follows:
Visitor access and circulation
The following issues need to be taken into account in order to leave maximum flexibility
for the museography:
- Easy connections between the building and the site;
- Views and easy access to the lake and to the outdoor routes (archaeological route and
ethno-botanic route). The proposals for outdoor-performance areas, and the archaeological
route and ethno-botanic route and gardens in the surrounding areas, will be defined as part
of the museological and exhibition programme;
- The increased flexibility of the building in terms of heights, double levels, larger
exhibition rooms and free circulation through the spaces will allow more freedom to
install the thematic units, specialized areas, workshops, documentation areas, and so on;
- Reception and public services accessible outside Museum opening hours (outdoor-
performance areas, public auditorium for large public performances to seat 1,000
persons);
- The orientation area is central and gives direct access to all exhibition areas;
- Free circulation, or with guidance, through the highlights route, the thematic units, the
didactic area, the craft and techniques area, the documentation area, the special exhibitions
galleries, the visible storage areas, and the outdoor exhibition in the courtyard gardens;
14
- The plan should also allow easy and independent circulation for staff and objects, as well
as short distances between storage areas, working areas and laboratories, and exhibition
areas. The appropriate height, light and climatic conditions for spaces containing large
elements should be ensured;
- The positioning of an outdoor exhibition in the building (interior/courtyard gardens)
should not restrain free circulation;
- There should be a distinction between public (free and paying areas) and restricted spaces
(object-related areas and non-object related areas).
Thematic organization
The permanent exhibition space is organized in main areas corresponding to general and
specific themes illustrating Egyptian civilization from prehistory to today.
The following themes were identified during the October 2001 workshop as describing
the main aspects of Egyptian civilization, and these were further defined during the April
2002 mission to Cairo:
Environment (Exploration/settlements, Agriculture, Hunting, Irrigation, Ecosystem);
Science & technology (Manufacture, Industry, Arts and crafts, Architecture, Design);
Life of man (Mankind, Gender/race, Religion, Rituals, Birth/death, Marriage);
Power & Society (Community, Education, Wars, Conflict, Weapons);
Body & Mind (Medicine, Food, Sports/games, Clothing/fashion, Music/dance);
Communication (Transport, Trade, Commerce, Writing, Printing, Press, TV/IT, Internet);
Heritage (Archaeology, Discoveries, Preservation and Museum methods, Old Cairo).
The following need to be developed by the Egyptian counterpart team in co-operation
with UNESCO experts:
Revision of themes and thematic organization, as well as of grids and diagrams;
Identification and development of the most relevant themes of Egyptian civilization;
Selection and listing of objects for display by themes;
Production of short texts according to themes;
Selection of the most important artifacts and significant achievements of Egyptian
civilization for the highlights route;
Completion of collections database by categories, including themes, periods, materials
and size;
Completion of the collection of objects and materials, especially for the modern and
contemporary periods (eg: sound archives, films and recorded interviews);
Description of thematic development;
Integration of graphic, audio-visual and interactive elements;
Definition of the objects on display related to type and condition (eg: outdoor/indoor,
cases, lights, etc.).
15
Structure of the exhibition
From the central orientation area, four main routes could guide the public through the
permanent exhibition areas, according to time and the specific interests of the visitors.
Highlights Route (Fast visit, 1-2 hours)
- Chronological display of masterpieces and exceptionally representative objects and main
achievements of Egyptian civilization;
- Access to any period from the central orientation area without restrictions and no
compulsory path.
Thematic Units (Long visit, 4-5 hours)
- Thematic units, representing the main trends of the development of Egyptian civilization;
- Connections to highlights and didactic routes, as well as the crafts & techniques route, and
the documentation areas;
- A central permanent reference area displays main objects illustrating themes and
developments;
- Exhibitions areas (50sqm) equipped with special showcases and panel supports to allow
easy installation of changing exhibitions, presenting the results of research and
discoveries;
- Didactic and chronological routes (school visits 2-4 hours; specialist visits by periods, no
time limit);
- Chronological display of examples from each historical period;
- Display and open-storage area, for typology and series of objects and showcases.
Crafts and Techniques areas
- These areas, connected with the thematic areas, should present series of objects of special
interest from the design and technical point of view, highlighting traditions and present
skills in crafts and techniques, and therefore promoting the reflection of contemporary
designers and encourage the development of current and future crafts production.
Documentation and interpretation area
Attached to the thematic units the interpretation areas could offer:
- Multimedia individual and group access;
- Seated areas for consulting books and catalogues.
“Break-out” areas
- These areas propose rest facilities, small coffee counters and multi-use spaces with places
for story telling and children’s activities
16
Special exhibition areas
Special exhibition areas include the temporary exhibition galleries and feature:
- Separate rooms with independent access to be used for separate exhibitions or to
communicate with larger exhibitions;
- Flexible organization of museography, including movable supports and bases;
- Showcases, audio-visual and multimedia material, etc.;
- Easy connections with the loading-unloading and storage areas.
Choice of objects and their display
After the final selection of objects and other items is completed, choices on how to
display the collections should be made according to the conservation and environment
experts’ guidelines, following requirements for display conditions and related to the type and
conservation needs of the objects, as follows:
- Outdoor or indoor exhibition, related to conservation conditions of objects;
- Interior or exterior gardens, related to dangers of decay or theft;
- In or out of showcases, related to the size and fragility of objects;
- Light requirements, related to acceptable lighting levels;
- Climatic control requirements, for objects requiring special conditions.
Materials and Technical requirements
- The architectural and exhibition design should take into account the sustainable
development and respect of the environment, by the use of recyclable and non-polluting
materials.
- The materials in the exhibition and storage areas should allow easy cleaning and
maintenance.
- New materials and advanced technologies can be used with appropriate staff training.
- The air conditioning and lighting systems for the exhibition areas, as well as for the
storage areas and exhibition cases, should be studied to create an energy saving system
and to ensure easy maintenance.
- The use of natural ventilation and light is recommended, as long as the comfort of visitors
and the conservation needs of the objects are satisfied.
- The fire alarm and security systems should be studied in order to respond to damage and
theft, as well as possible terrorist attack and decay, without causing damage to the objects
on display or in storage.
EDUCATIONAL ISSUES
Accommodation and facilities for educational services at the NMEC should match the
needs of people at all stages of learning, and for all age groups, from pre-school children to
those in secondary, tertiary (higher education) and continuing education (life-long learning).
17
The Museum’s central area should be designed and equipped to cater for a range of
activities from booked visits from schools to the needs of individual students and researchers.
The different functional areas will need to be carefully designed and located to meet the
requirements of the different user groups, as defined below:
Pre-school groups;
School groups (primary and secondary);
Students in higher and further education;
Special education groups (visitors with learning or physical difficulties);
Adult clubs and associations;
Teachers in training;
Family groups (mixed ages);
Individual visitors;
Researchers, academics and heritage professionals.
Clear demarcation is needed between the various user groups for their own comfort, as
well as for the safety and quality of the experience.
The programme of use of the Museum’s central area will need effective management
through a visitor-management system. As the primary and secondary school sector is likely to
be the largest user group, adult and family groups may need to be accommodated principally
during out-of-term holiday periods. This is a matter for local management decision.
The educational services at the NMEC will not be confined to the central area alone.
However, the permanent displays and special exhibitions will always provide the main source
of inspiration for visitors, and there should be some areas adjacent to the main galleries that
can be used interactively to extend the learning experience, such as a games area, a computer
terminal area and a dressing-up corner, all related to some theme or idea from Egyptian
civilization.
Finally, the educational role of the NMEC could be extended beyond the confines of the
Museum to the adjoining communities and to constituencies and groups prevented by
distance, poor health or other circumstances from visiting the Museum on the basis that the
NMEC will want to explore and develop new audiences.
Outreach services can take many forms. This report proposes accommodation needs to
meet a relatively ambitious programme consistent with a national museum. These, and the
other proposed facilities for education, will ultimately reflect the realities of the demand for
educational services at NMEC, and the ability of the Museum’s management team to promote
learning through the Museum to the community at large.
The accommodation and facilities requirement is composed of the following areas:
1. Learning Advice and Schools Reception Area. This is the first contact point situated in
the public reception area for students of all ages to introduce them to the educational
resources available at the NMEC and to give initial advice on how they can best access
the services available.
2. Assembly Area. There will be a section for each school party or study group.
3. Educational Rooms, comprising Classrooms/seminar rooms x 2, Studios x 2 (each for a
capacity of 30 to 35 persons), ICT Room x 1.
18
4. Lecture Theatres x 2 with facilities to present public lectures, films and performances for
varying sizes of audience.
5. Resource Centre, offering a range of educational resources to be used in the
classroom/studio areas: Furniture, Equipment, Publications, Replicas/Models and
Original objects/specimens.
6. Handling/Demonstration Collection, designed for educational use in the Museum. Most
educationalists would agree that students gain maximum educational value from being
able to ‘experience’ objects through tactile appreciation, and a wider range of material
can be made available for this purpose. There is the need for a secure, environmentally
controlled area for the handling collection and for defined responsibility for the care and
organization of this facility.
7. Children’s Play Area offering a range of exploratory situations. Trained supervisors and
helpers (volunteers) required throughout opening hours. The Play Area should have
adjoining catering, washroom and baby-care facilities within a safe and secure
environment. Staff accommodation would be needed for the Play/Learning Supervisor
and assistants.
8. Exhibition Area for mounting small-scale exhibitions formed from the results of the
educational programme. This could include examples of creative work by schools in
response to the themes of Egyptian civilization, photographs of performances in the
Education Centre by visiting dancers and musicians, and exhibitions by local art,
photographic and local history groups having links with the NMEC.
9. Collections Research Centre and Reading Room, providing facilities for higher education
students, researchers and scholars of Egyptian civilization (study centre combining a
reading room with computer access to the NMEC collection information database). This
facility should be limited to bona fide students and readers on proof of identity.
10. Inter-Activity throughout the Exhibitions and Displays of the NMEC. Whilst the
Education Centre is primarily for pre-booked educational visits and public lectures and
events, learning activities on an informal basis will also be available within the areas
linked to permanent displays.
11. Outreach Service as a way of extending the NMEC into the community to serve
individuals and groups unable to visit the Museum in person. This service would be
especially valuable in reaching people in hospitals, penal institutions, care homes, remote
rural communities, and the most disadvantaged sections of society.
NMEC PROJECT TIMETABLE
All actions needed to advance the project up to and including the opening of the NMEC,
presently planned for 2005, in the form of a plan and schedule of activities have been
synthesized in the attached timetable. Please see Annex 1.
MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS
At the end of the mission the UNESCO expert team agreed on the following
recommendations:
19
1) Select and equip a suitable building to be used as a collection/restoration/training centre
in addition to the one already existing in Fustat to host the objects selected for the NMEC
The reasons for this request are the need for larger premises and for suitable conditions
for the conservation of objects and for their preventive treatment. Due to the very limited
space available for storage and laboratories, it was agreed that the present building should
only be used for the storage and treatment of small objects. Therefore, there is a need for
additional space either at the site or elsewhere to achieve the above.
2) Appointment of a UNESCO project officer, who should be Arabic-speaking and have
experience in project management and possibly also in museum organization. This project
officer would be the link between the UNESCO Secretariat of the Committee and the
Egyptian authorities during the implementation of the project.
3) Furnishing by the Egyptian authorities of the list of the members of the Egyptian
Project Management Group/UNESCO counterpart team, with their positions:
Such a list has already been requested, but unfortunately the request has only in part
been satisfied by the appointment of a project manager.
The Managerial Group will be charged with advancing all aspects of the planning of
the NMEC, including:
1. Research and development stage;
2. Construction stage;
3. Operational stage (over the first two to three years).
Positions already defined are the following:
Project General Manager (Mr A. Abdel Moneim), Architect (El Ghazali Kosseiba) and
Exhibition Designer (A. Isozaki), the last two being the winners of the architectural
competition.
Positions still pending appointments:
- Scientific Committee (historians (all periods), contemporary cultural figures, such as
journalists, teachers and researchers);
- Specialists Committee (educationalists, tourism specialists and cultural events
specialists);
- Curatorial Team (Chief-Curator, curators and archaeologists from the October 2001
and April 2002 workshops);
- Design Team (Landscape Designer).
Moreover, the SCA has formed a committee for the choice of objects, which is carrying
out work that will eventually be entrusted to the curatorial team.
4) Definition of museum policy and activities by the above teams
20
The study of existing museums will define the position and activities of NMEC in the
museumscape of Cairo and Egypt, and specify its connections with other museums in areas
such as:
- type and quantity of visitors;
- type of collections;
- total floor area;
- exhibition floor area;
- public services;
- equipment;
- human resources.
The study will also develop a co-ordinated strategic planning framework for museums in
Cairo and Egypt. The study of the policies and activities of large museums, for example,
of the Metropolitan Museum in New York, the Louvre and the British Museum, and/or
comparable museums of civilization (Musée de la Civilization), will provide information
and help for decisions by the specialist committees.
The Egyptian authorities have been asked for precise options about general museum
policy and activities in order to get specifications for each activity in terms of staff and
actions involved, especially regarding exhibition policies for collecting, storage and
exhibiting.
OCTOBER 2002 MISSION OBJECTIVES AND ACTION PLAN
UNESCO expert mission to Cairo, 11-18 October 2002 (proposed to the Egyptian
authorities in July 2002)
Participants:
Dr Thompson, Arch Ricci, Prof Brunoni and Mr Sheehan (additional expertise to be
defined during a technical meeting to be held in Paris in September to discuss the final
modifications to the architectural design before the Committee meeting).
Objectives:
To review progress by the Egyptian authorities in advancing the NMEC project, and to
advise and assist the Counterpart Team as needed, in particular by:
Receiving comments and feedback from the Project Director and Counterpart Team
on the circulated reports and timetable of the UNESCO expert team;
Establishing and agreeing upon the proposed timetable and Action Plan for the NMEC
for 2002-2005;
21
Reviewing the work of the Counterpart Team in advancing the NMEC project;
Defining and confirming outline policies for the NMEC with the Project Director and
Counterpart Team;
Reviewing the work of the Curatorial Team on object selection and theme
development, and giving assistance and advice as needed;
Reviewing amendments to the architectural scheme as agreed during the April 2002
mission.
Counterpart Project Team (requested during the October 2001 mission)
Project General Manager: Mr A. Abdel Moneim
Academic Committee:
Historians (all periods)
Contemporary cultural figures, such as journalists, teachers and researchers
Specialists Committee
Educationalists
Tourism specialists
Cultural events specialists
Curatorial Team
Chief-Curator,
Curators and archaeologists from the October 2001 & April 2002 workshops
Design Team
Urban planner
Architect – El Ghazali Kosseiba
Exhibition designer – A.Isozaki
Draft working programme
1st day
Preliminary meeting with Project Manager and Counterpart Team: briefing on progress on the
NMEC project from the Egyptian side and comments on Experts Reports from the April 2002
mission.
Following days
o General meeting with Academic and Specialists Committee.
Discussion of project timetable and all reports in order to agree on an Action Plan
during the mission.
o General meeting with the Curatorial Team and follow up of their work.
22
o Separate work for the experts and counterparts, one group on the architectural
programme with the Design Team, one group on the museological programme with
the Academic and Specialists team.
Final day
Final meeting with Experts
Draft outputs of the mission
Revision of the NMEC Project timetable
Other meetings
New Director of SCA
Nubia Fund Director
New UNESCO Office Director
23
NUBIA MUSEUM IN ASWAN
The total budget approved for activities concerning the establishment of the Nubia
Museum since the 11th Session of the Executive Committee is US$892,500, of which a total
of US$330,298 has been used. A list of activities carried out from the 11th
Session of the
Committee to end July 2002 follows, together with their budgetary implications.
Training 2001
According to Recommendation 1 of the 11th Session of the Executive Committee, ICOM
was entrusted with the organization of three workshops for the staff of the Nubia Museum in
Aswan between 1 March and 31 December 2001. The workshops were on training for
trainers, museum management and collection management.
The sum of US$59,540 was approved for this purpose during the 11th Session of the
Executive Committee. The full budget was used for the organization of the above workshops,
which were successfully carried out by ICOM.
Regional Assessment and Training 2001
The sum of US$110,460 was approved at the 11th Session of the Executive Committee
for the organization of a regional training course on museology (US$70,270) and of a regional
museums survey (US$40,228).
ICOM has been entrusted with the preparation of the survey, which has not yet been
completed. Therefore the regional training course has not yet been organized.
Regional Training 2002
The sum of US$132,500 was approved at the 11th Session of the Executive Committee
for the organization of a regional training course on documentation (US$70,270) and
collections management (US$62,270).
Since ICOM has not completed the regional survey of museums (see Regional
Assessment and Training), it is not appropriate to start any training activity involving
personnel from the rest of the Arab and African regions. Until the regional museums survey
has been completed it will not be possible to organize a course targeting the real needs of
museums in the region.
Moreover, according to Resolution 4/11 of the 21st Session of the UNESCO General
Conference it should be remembered that the Fund was created “for the establishment of the
24
Nubia Museum in Aswan and the new national Museum of Egyptian Antiquities in Cairo, as
well for training facilities for their staff.” No provision was made for training activities to be
expanded to staff from other museums.
Equipment and Documentation
In order to develop a functional research centre on conservation issues at the Nubia
Museum in Aswan, ICOM has been charged with identifying and purchasing the necessary
documentation in the field of conservation, restoration and museum management and the
material/equipment for the centre. In collaboration with the Egyptian authorities (SCA and the
Nubia Museum), key museological documents have been selected and are being translated
into Arabic.
A total amount of US$125,000 for the years 2001-2002 has been approved for this
purpose. The sum of US$94,460 has been used by ICOM to purchase and ship to the Nubia
Museum the relevant documentation and to translate the documents. This activity is still on-
going. The remaining budget of US$30,500 will be used to purchase computers and
equipment for the Nubia Museum. A budget estimate has already been received by ICOM and
SCA.
Language Course
The sum of US$20,000 was approved for this purpose at the Bureau meeting in June
2001, and a proposal from the Egyptian authorities in this field is awaited.
Needs Assessment
According to Recommendation 1 of the 12th Session of the Executive Committee, the
sum of US$17,000 was to be used to send an assessment mission to the Nubia Museum in
order to evaluate the results of 10 years of ICOM training in the field of museology and the
state of the laboratories.
Two experts have been identified, but the Recommendation has not yet been
implemented.
Nubia Museum Staff Scholarship in Museum Studies
Recommendation 2 made at the 12th Session of the Executive Committee recommended
upgrading Nubia Museum senior staff by awarding two scholarships for a Masters and PhD
degree programme abroad in Museum Studies, and the sum of US$40,000 was approved for
this purpose.
Mr Ossama Abdel Meguid, director of the Nubia Museum, has been selected for the
programme and was admitted to the Masters Degree Programme in Museology at Reinwardt
Academy.
25
Until the end of July 2002, the sum of 3,000 Euros has been used to cover his tuition fees
(admission and full-time programme for three semesters).
.
Documentation on the Nubia Campaign
According to Recommendation 3 of the 12th Session of the Executive Committee, an
expert has been identified to assess and prepare a detailed computerized inventory of the
documentation (photos, drawings, etc.) that exist in Egypt at the Supreme Council of
Antiquities and at the foreign archaeological centres and local institutions. The sum of
US$25,000 was approved at the 12th Session of the Executive Committee for this purpose.
Until the end of July 2002, US$9,000 has been used to cover the expenses (three-month
contract) of an international expert in Nubian Studies to prepare the above.
Museum Catalogue
Recommendation 4 of the 12th Session of the Executive Committee recommended the
finalization of the printing of the Museum catalogue and approved an additional sum of
US$30,500 for this purpose. The 11th Session of the Executive Committee had previously
approved a budget of US$20,000, and Recommendation 3 of the Bureau meeting added the
sum of US$60,000.
The budget was decentralized to the UNESCO Cairo Office and receipt of detailed
specifications for the use of the funds is still pending.
Promotion
At the 11th Session of the Committee (November 2000), the sum of US$5,000 was
approved for promotional activities. This budget was to be used by the Promotion Section of
the Division of Cultural Heritage, but activities have not yet been implemented. No additional
funds were approved at the 12th Session of the Executive Committee.
The sum of US$12,500 was requested by the Egyptian Authorities in September 2001 for
the preparation of an exhibition on Cultural Diversity to be held at UNESCO Headquarters.
Funds from the Campaign were required for this activity. The budget was decentralized by the
Sector to the UNESCO Cairo Office and receipt of detailed specifications on the use of the
funds is still pending.
Bibliography and Library
Recommendation 5 of the 12th Session of the Executive Committee recommended the
following activities:
a) Further research to be undertaken on available documentation and also contacts to be
established with institutions dealing with Egyptology worldwide.
26
Several institutions and scholars have been contacted. 37 institutions and scholars have
answered these contacts, providing references about their publications. 25 have offered copies
of their publications to the Documentation Centre, which has thus far received some 100
donated publications. These are currently at UNESCO Headquarters, and they will be shipped
with the rest of the purchased publications.
In order to increase contacts with scholars and institutions in the field of Nubian Studies
and to ensure future updates of the publications at the Documentation Centre in Aswan, a note
will be distributed at the Nubian Studies International Meeting, to be held in September 2002
in Rome, in order to launch an appeal for contributions.
b) Bibliography of the existing documents at the Supreme Council of Antiquities or at the
Nubia Museum to be made available.
Mr. Ossama Abdel Megid, Director of the Nubia Museum, submitted a list of
publications available at the Museum.
c) Budget of US$ 70,000 already approved for 2000-2001 will be used for the further
purchase and duplication of bibliographic material.
Of the US$ 70,000 approved, US$21,070 has so far been spent, as follows:
3929,56 Euros: 25 publications and reviews already purchased and received at UNESCO
Headquarters in July 2002;
US$15,965: International consultant fee (preparation of Nubia bibliography and list of
off-prints, research of publications to be acquired and photocopies, contact with foreign
institutions and scholars for the donation of publications, etc.);
US$1,188: Two missions to specialized libraries in Europe (Geneva and London) by the
above-mentioned consultant to update the Nubia bibliography and to meet with Prof. M.
Valloggia, who is in charge of the editing, and with the proof-reader of the final Nubia
bibliography, in order to establish the criteria to be followed in the editing.
Some 95 publications have already been ordered. These publications comprise general
and essential references for Nubian and Egyptological studies, archaeological reports, works
of history and culture, epigraphical studies and proceedings of conferences, etc. Such
purchases were decided after comparison with publications at the Nubia Museum. An
essential access database (author, title and references, year, format, source, number of
volumes, date of acquisition) is under preparation, and this will be forwarded with the
publications sent to the Nubia Museum.
At this stage, the following are still pending:
Receive from Oxbow Ltd. (Oxford) the detailed price list of available out-of-print
publications;
Receive information from the authors contacted about the availability of their out-of-print
publications;
Photocopy non-available out-of-print publications.
27
d) Allocation of a further budget of US$5,000 for the duplication of the documents on the
Campaign existing in the UNESCO archives
The Secretariat identified a person for this task, who unfortunately refused it at the last
minute.
e) Completion of the editing of the bibliography.
The 12th Executive Committee approved the sum of US$10,000 for the editing of the
bibliography.
The compilation of a comprehensive and updated bibliography of publications from the
19th Century until 2000, Nubian Bibliography to 2000 - List of Archaeological Missions in
Nubia, has been successfully completed under the supervision of Prof. Valloggia and other
scholars and revised by Prof. Valloggia. The bibliography has been updated with publications
by Christophe, Hendrickx, and other publications before 1975, such as Bailicher-Seeber and
the Etudes et Travaux published in the review Orientalia from 1960 to 1975. The
bibliography was submitted to UNESCO in July 2002.
The document is organized in three sections:
Section One: Alphabetical list of authors, provided with an identification number (ID),
titles, place of publication (or publisher) and year of publication. The location of abstracts
is put in parentheses: AEB (Annual Egyptological Bibliography), BA (Bailicher-Seeber
1998), CH (Christophe 1977), Hendrickx and Orientalia number.
Section Two: List of archaeological missions that operated, or are operating, in Nubia by
geographical order. For each site, the publications contained in the first section are listed
by identification number. For easy reference, an index of sites in alphabetical order is
given at the end of the section.
Section Three: Addresses of archaeologists who worked, or who are working, in the
Nubia area.
A meeting between Prof. Valloggia, and the proof-reader is planned at the end of October
or the beginning of November 2002 to start editing the book.
Proposal
Upon completion of the purchase of the main documentation both on the Nubia region
and on the conservation issues and its shipment to the Nubia Museum, it would be advisable
to engage the consultancy services of a librarian to organize the library and database and to
train personnel on its use and updating.
The sum of US$6,000 is requested for this purpose.
28
Landscaping
At the 11th Session of the Executive Committee the sum of US$15,000 was approved for
consultation missions to be carried out by ICOM/ICCROM/IFLA. These missions have not
yet been undertaken.
Collection Database
Recommendation 6 of the 12th Session of the Executive Committee recommended the
compilation of a database on Nubian archaeological artifacts in the Nubia Museum and
approved the sum of US$50,000 for this purpose.
However, the Secretariat was informed of the existence of a database of the Nubia
Museum’s collections at the Supreme Council of Antiquities during a mission to Egypt in
April 2002, only after the approval of the Recommendation. An International expert has been
identified to revise the existing computerized database and provide a budget estimate for its
improvement.
Museum Website/training
Recommendation 7 of the 12th Session of the Executive Committee approved the sum of
US$60,000 for the preparation of the Museum Website and training. An expert, who is both a
museologist and a Web designer, has been identified to prepare the project document for the
Website and submit it to the Secretariat. The expert mission is foreseen in early October to
Cairo and Aswan for the above. Bidding among three Egyptian Web provider companies will
be launched as follow-up.
Study for the preparation of a GIS survey of the Nubia region
Recommendation 8 of the 12th Session of the Executive Committee recommended that a
study be carried out for the preparation of a GIS (Geographic Information System) survey of
the Nubia region, and the sum of US$8,000 was approved for this purpose.
This budget will be used for consultancy services. An assessment of the existing GIS
survey made by SCA will be carried out and a schedule of needs for its improvement
prepared.
Site-Management Course
Recommendation 9 of the 12th Session of the Executive Committee recommended the
organization of a workshop targeting the management of sites in the Nubia region. The sum of
US$30,000 was approved for this purpose.
This Recommendation has not yet been implemented.
29
ASSISTANCE TO SECRETARIAT
The sum of US$24,000 was approved at the 12th Session of the Committee for
assistance to the Secretariat, but this has not yet been used since no office space for a
consultant has been found at UNESCO HQ.
PREPARATION OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS
The Committee has not approved a budget to be used for the organization of
Committee/Bureau meetings, although it is within its mandate to do so.
UNESCO received a request in May 2001 for budgetary decentralization from the
Trust Fund (301EGY72) to the UNESCO Cairo Office from the SCA Secretary-General, who
is also Chairman of the Committee. The sum of US$23,000 was decentralized by the Sector to
the UNESCO Cairo Office to cover the missions to Paris of Dr. Gaballa, Dr. Barakat and Ms.
Ibrachi to attend the Bureau meeting in June 2001.
Proposal
It is proposed that the Committee approves the sum of US$20,00 for expenses linked
to the organization of the next Committee and/or Bureau meeting.
30
ANNEX 1
31
ANNEX 2