sec b group 3
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
1/19
Amity Business School
CASE STUDY
GROUP 3
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
2/19
Amity Business School
CONTENTS1. INTRODUCTION
2. ANALYSIS
3. CONCLUSION
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
3/19
Amity Business School
INTRODUCTION
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
4/19
Amity Business School
Devesh was quite enthusiastic and thrilled after
receiving his MBA degree
He was not a professional qualified cost accountantbut was appointed for the same job at ABC
Engineering Works
Immediate boss was chief accountant(CA)
GM looks after all production and technical matters
DGM looks after all administrative matters including
purchases, stores, accounts, legal and personnel
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
5/19
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
6/19
Amity Business School
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
7/19
Amity Business School
SWOT ANALYSIS
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
8/19
Amity Business School
STRENGHTS
1) The organizational structure is well defined and there is less ambiguity in the roles
and responsibilities defined.
2) The top management was aware that there were some problems in the organization
and was thinking in direction of facing them.
3) The company is in a position to hire qualified professionals and is profitable.
WEAKNESSES
1) Though the company is well structured, the structure has become rigid and resistant
to change.
2) Many employees have gone lethargic and are not fulfilling their duties.
3) There are many faults in the materials issue and various other processes.4) There is a lack of a Personnel department, and thus proper training and development
of employees is absent. Also this leads to high attrition rates.
5) Lack of effective vertical communication channels in the organizations.
6) Creativity and innovation are not encouraged in the organization.
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
9/19
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
10/19
Amity Business School
ANALYSIS
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
11/19
Amity Business School
COMPANY ANALYSIS
The loopholes of the company were :
Absence of personnel departmentThe top management was ineffective n inefficient
Feedback was not considered
Inefficient mentoring/leadership
Communication gap
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
12/19
Amity Business School
The generalprinciplesofmanagementwhich were
lacking in this organization:
Authority and responsibilityDiscipline
Centralisation
Initiatives
Espirit de corps
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
13/19
Amity Business School
DEVESH SHARMAHe possessed the following positive qualities :
Enthusiasm
Analytical thinkerResponsibility
Working hard on his innovation and creativity and
other skills
Believer of Perseverance
Interpersonal skills
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
14/19
Amity Business School
Some of the negative qualitieshe possessed :
An overconfident person that could be attributed to
his IIMA degree
he overlooked the authorityHis lack of patience, over enthusiast behaviour and
his dream organisation perception led him dissatisfied
in his job
Unable to adapt in the rigid organisational structure
Should have taken a pragmatic approach and
initiated corrective measures at his own level
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
15/19
Amity Business School
The generalprinciplesofmanagementwhich
were violated by Devesh Sharma:
Unity of command
Scalar chain
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
16/19
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
17/19
Amity Business School
CONCLUSION
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
18/19
Amity Business School
There was a learning experience for us a futuremanagers, we learned for healthy work environment
Adaptability and understanding is a prerequisite
Mere planning on paper is not sufficient, a true
manager is one who leads by being part of thesystem and execution
Hierarchicalstructureis important for smooth
functioning
Feedbacksystem should exist
Properplatform should be given to employees for
innovativelatentthink
-
8/8/2019 Sec B Group 3
19/19
Amity Business School
THANK YOU