sdm® assessments in practice
DESCRIPTION
SDM® Assessments in Practice. Reunification reassessment Purpose and structure Talking with clients about reunification Importance of contact with parents What progress looks like Court reports and the reunification reassessment Supervising and the SDM reunification reassessment. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
SDM® Assessments in Practice
Reunification reassessment• Purpose and structure• Talking with clients about reunification• Importance of contact with parents• What progress looks like• Court reports and the reunification reassessment
Supervising and the SDM reunification reassessment
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Reunification Reassessment: Purpose
1. Routinely monitor critical case factors that affect permanency goal achievement;
2. Help structure the case review process; and
3. Expedite permanency for children in care.
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Reunification Reassessment: Structure
1. Riska) Initial risk levelb) New substantiated incidentc) Case plan progress
2. Visitation plan evaluationa) Supervised or notb) Consistency in attending scheduled visitsc) Interaction with child during visits
Remember to use definitions!
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Reunification Reassessment: Structure
3. Safety
a)Identification of any new/current safety threatsb)Document resolution of safety threats that led to removalc)Safety decision
• Safe (no current safety threats)
• Conditionally safe (current safety threats are controlled with interventions)
• Unsafe
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
4. Permanency plan recommendation guidelines• Reunification to parent (removal or non-removal)• Maintain in care• Change permanency goal
» Adoption» Long-term foster care» Care, custody, and control to relative
Reunification Reassessment: Structure
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Permanency Goal Recommendation
• Answer yes or no until reaching a permanency goal
• If an override to the recommended goal is warranted, indicate the final goal recommendation and provide justification for the override.
» Case documentation must support risk, visitation, safety, and final permanency goal recommendation.
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Reunification Assessment Starts on
DAY 1
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Family Perception of the Reunification Decision
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Talking About the Reunification Decision
• Start as soon as possible• Lay out the components of the reunification decision
» Risk» Visitation» Safety» Length of time in care
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Talking About Risk at Reunification
New substantiated investigationRefuse services/no progress
Progress toward case plan goals
Improve chance of
reunification
Reduce chance of
reunification
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Talking About Visitation
• Maintain connection
• Stay involved
• Opportunity to demonstrate change
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Talking About Visits: Visitation Plan
• How often• How long• Where• Other contact options (phone calls, email)• What worker is looking for
» Connect to case plan goals» If supervised, what needs to happen for unsupervised
Hess & Proch. (1988). Family visiting in out-of-home care: A guide to practice. CWLA; Rose Wendt.
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Talking About Visits
Missing visitsLimited or destructive parent-child interactions
Keep scheduled visitsConsistently demonstrate positive parent-child interactions
Improve chance of
reunification
Reduce chance of
reunification
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Talking About Safety
Original safety threat not resolved
New safety threats
Original safety threat resolved
Create a safe home environment
Improvechance of
reunification
Reduce chance of
reunification
Importance of Contact With Parents
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Relationship Between Social Worker Visits and Improved Federal Reporting Outcomes
CFSR
Item 4
• Assessment of safety and risk to children
CFSR
Item 17
• Assessment of the needs of children, parents, and foster parents and provision of the appropriate services
CFSR
Item 18
• Child and parent involvement in case planning
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2004). Findings from the Initial 2001–2004 Child and Family Services Reviews. Retrieved December 13, 2005, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/cwmonitoring/results/index.htm
CFSR Items 19 and 20: Caseworker visits with children and parents
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Other Significant Associations Between Visits and CFSR Indicators
Caseworker visits with parents and children were also strongly associated with the following:
• Services to protect children at home• Timely permanency goals• Timely reunification• Child’s visits with parents and siblings• Relative placements
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2004). Findings from the Initial 2001–2004 Child and Family Services Reviews. Retrieved December 13, 2005, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/cwmonitoring/results/index.htm
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Contact Content
1. Assess progress toward case plan objectives:» Participation in services» Demonstration of change
2. Assess change in needs (identification of new needs/needs reduction)
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Assessing for Demonstration of Change
• Ask client to describe any change• Look for evidence of observable change• Change is a process; recognize small steps• Recognize sustained improvement
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Visits Between Parents and Children
• Involvement is more than just showing up» Verbal and nonverbal engagement» Age-appropriate activities
• When possible, include parents in school meetings, doctor appointments, and other parenting activities
• Be creative with visit setting and activities
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Negotiating Connections With SDM® Assessments
• What needs does this family have?• What strengths can we use to address those needs?
Assessment of Family Functioning Reassessment
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Court Report
• Progress toward case plan goals• Current risk• Visitation results• Status of initial safety threat• Current safety/safety plan
Using SDM® Assessments in Case Conferences
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Types of Case Conferences
• Informal» “Have you got a minute?”» In the hallway or on the phone
• Formal» 1:1 case specific» 1:1 supervision» Internal group» Multidisciplinary group
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Supervisory Leadership
• Keep focus on central question.
• If there are disagreements in final decision, review relevant SDM tool completion.» Which items have agreement? (move on)» Which items have disagreement?
Look at facts and definition FOCUS discussion here!
• If everyone agrees, STILL review tool completion!
Your name is on it!Approving Assessments
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
How extensively do you review?
How often? What?
ALWAYS• Overall consistency with what you know• Obvious item inconsistency• Overrides• Bottom line compared to action planned/taken
Spot check • Initial risk level score • Random item scores vs. narrative
Small random sample Case review for timeliness and accuracy
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
How extensively do you spot check?
Worker Status Spot Check Level
• In training• Has not demonstrated competency• Struggling with workload, personal issues
Weekly
Most workers Monthly
• Demonstrated competency through previous and current spot checks and supervisory case reading• No extenuating pressures
Quarterly
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
When You Spot a Problem
• Meet with worker to discuss» Explain issue» Ask for worker’s perspective» Use SDM policy and/or definition
• Change together, if needed
• Use opportunity to build competence
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
Building Toward the SDM® Model’s Goal
Completing the tools
Completing tools accurately, supported by narrative evidence
Using tools to guide decisions
Reduced harm
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved
For more information, please contact:
Deirdre O’Connor, Senior ResearcherChildren’s Research Center