scott county audit, fy 2013-2014

188
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEE FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

Upload: ben-garrett

Post on 24-Dec-2015

28 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

The Tennessee Comptroller's audit of Scott County finances for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEE

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

Page 2: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEE

FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY JUSTIN P. WILSON

DIVISION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUDIT JAMES R. ARNETTE

Director

STEPHEN ALRED BRYAN W. BURKLIN, CPA, CGFM ANDREW WAY, CPA Audit Manager MARK FAWVER ASHLEY ROOKARD AMY SOSVILLE, CPA DOUG SANDIDGE, CISA, CFE Auditor 4 State Auditors

This financial report is available at www.comptroller.tn.gov

2

Page 3: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit Page(s)

Summary of Audit Findings 6-7

INTRODUCTORY SECTION 8

Scott County Officials 9

FINANCIAL SECTION 10

Independent Auditor's Report 11-14BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: 15

Government-wide Financial Statements:Statement of Net Position A 16-17Statement of Activities B 18-19

Fund Financial Statements:Governmental Funds:

Balance Sheet C-1 20-25Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds

to the Statement of Net Position C-2 26Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in

Fund Balances C-3 27-30Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures,

and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Fundsto the Statement of Activities C-4 31

Statements of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in FundBalances - Actual (Budgetary Basis) and Budget:

General Fund C-5 32-34Ambulance Service Fund C-6 35Highway/Public Works Fund C-7 36

Proprietary Funds:Statement of Net Position D-1 37Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position D-2 38Statement of Cash Flows D-3 39

Fiduciary Funds:Statement of Fiduciary Assets and Liabilities E 40

Index and Notes to the Financial Statements 41-84REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 85

Schedule of Funding Progress – Pension Plans – Primary Government andDiscretely Presented Scott County School Department F-1 86

Schedule of Funding Progress – Other Postemployment BenefitsPlans – Primary Government and Discretely Presented Scott CountySchool Department F-2 87

Notes to the Required Supplementary Information 88

SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEETABLE OF CONTENTS

3

Page 4: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit Page(s)

COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND FINANCIALSTATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES: 89

Nonmajor Governmental Funds: 90-91Combining Balance Sheet G-1 92-95Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes

in Fund Balances G-2 96-97Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund

Balances – Actual and Budget:Solid Waste/Sanitation Fund G-3 98Drug Control Fund G-4 99General Capital Projects Fund G-5 100

Major Governmental Funds: 101Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund

Balances – Actual and Budget:General Debt Service Fund H-1 102Rural Debt Service Fund H-2 103

Fiduciary Funds: 104Combining Statement of Fiduciary Assets and Liabilities I-1 105Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities –

All Agency Funds I-2 106-108Component Unit:

Discretely Presented Scott County School Department: 109Statement of Activities J-1 110Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds J-2 111-112Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds

to the Statement of Net Position J-3 113Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund

Balances – Governmental Funds J-4 114-115Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures,

and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Fundsto the Statement of Activities J-5 116

Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in FundBalances – Actual (Budgetary Basis) and Budget:

General Purpose School Fund J-6 117-118School Federal Projects Fund J-7 119Central Cafeteria Fund J-8 120

4

Page 5: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit Page(s)

Miscellanous Schedules: 121Schedule of Changes in Long-term Notes, Other Loans, Capital

Leases, and Bonds K-1 122-124Schedule of Long-term Debt Requirements by Year K-2 125-126Schedule of Notes Receivable K-3 127Schedule of Transfers – Primary Government and Discretely

Presented Scott County School Department K-4 128Schedule of Salaries and Official Bonds of Principal Officials –

Primary Government and Discretely Presented ScottCounty School Department K-5 129

Schedule of Detailed Revenues – All Governmental Fund Types K-6 130-139Schedule of Detailed Revenues – All Governmental Fund Types –

Discretely Presented Scott County School Department K-7 140-142Schedule of Detailed Expenditures – All Governmental Fund Types K-8 143-159Schedule of Detailed Expenditures – All Governmental Fund Types –

Discretely Presented Scott County School Department K-9 160-167Schedule of Detailed Receipts, Disbursements, and Changes in

Cash Balances – City Agency Funds K-10 168

SINGLE AUDIT SECTION 169

Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and onCompliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of FinancialStatements Performed in Accordance With GovernmentAuditing Standards 170-172

Auditor's Report on Compliance for Each Major Program; Report onInternal Control Over Compliance; and Report on the Schedule ofExpenditures of Federal Awards Required by OMB Circular A-133 173-175

Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Grants 176-177Schedule of Audit Findings Not Corrected 178Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 179-187Auditee Reporting Responsibilities 188

5

Page 6: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Summary of Audit Findings Annual Financial Report Scott County, Tennessee

For the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Scope We have audited the basic financial statements of Scott County as of and for the year ended June 30, 2014.

Results

Our report on Scott County’s financial statements is unmodified. Our audit resulted in eight findings and recommendations, which we have reviewed with Scott County management. Detailed findings, recommendations, and management’s responses are included in the Single Audit section of this report.

Findings The following are summaries of the audit findings: OFFICES OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS ♦ The School Federal Projects Fund had a deficit in unassigned fund balance at

June 30, 2014.

OFFICES OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND COUNTY MAYOR ♦ Some purchase orders were issued after the purchases were made. ♦ Expenditures exceeded appropriations.

OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT ♦ A Highway Department employee obtained county fuel for personal use. ♦ The Highway Department had purchasing deficiencies. ♦ Vehicles were not labeled as property of the Highway Department.

6

Page 7: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

OFFICES OF CIRCUIT AND GENERAL SESSIONS COURTS CLERK, CLERK AND MASTER, AND REGISTER OF DEEDS ♦ Duties were not segregated adequately. OFFICE OF REGISTER OF DEEDS ♦ Multiple employees operated from the same cash drawer.

7

Page 8: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

INTRODUCTORY SECTION

8

Page 9: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Scott County Officials June 30, 2014 Officials Jeff Tibbals, County Mayor Donald Sexton, Superintendent of Roads Billy Hall, Director of Schools Jimmy Byrd, Trustee Steve Thompson, Assessor of Property Patricia Phillips, County Clerk Donnie Phillips, Circuit and General Sessions Courts Clerk Jane Lloyd, Clerk and Master Porter Rector, Jr., Register of Deeds Ronnie Phillips, Sheriff Brian Strunk, Director of Finance Board of County Commissioners Jeff Tibbals, County Mayor, Chairman Brian Armstrong June Jeffers Ronnie Blevins Sam Lyles Willie Boyatt Kenny Morrow Harold Chambers Ernest Phillips David Day Dennis Sexton Hertis Phillips Mike Slaven David Jeffers Paul Strunk Financial Management Committee Mike Slaven, Chairman Kenny Morrow Jeff Tibbals, County Mayor Paul Strunk Donald Sexton, Superintendent of Roads Hertis Phillips Billy Hall, Director of Schools Board of Education James Sexton, Chairman Randy Henry Tony Sexton John Thompson Brian Strunk Richard Smith Esther Abbott Audit Committee Jerry Slaven Melvin Stephens Dave Cross

9

Page 10: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

FINANCIAL SECTION

10

Page 11: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

STATE OF TENNESSEE COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY

DEPARTMENT OF AUDIT DIVISION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUDIT

SUITE 1500 JAMES K. POLK STATE OFFICE BUILDING

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-1402 PHONE (615) 401-7841

Independent Auditor's Report

Scott County Mayor and Board of County Commissioners Scott County, Tennessee To the County Mayor and Board of County Commissioners: Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of Scott County, Tennessee, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2014, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the county’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements of the Scott County Emergency Communications District, which represent 4.9 percent, 6.4 percent, and 1.4 percent, respectively, of the assets, net position, and revenues of the aggregate discretely presented component units. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for the Scott County Emergency Communications District, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. We

11

Page 12: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Opinions In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of Scott County, Tennessee, as of June 30, 2014, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof and the respective budgetary comparisons for the General, Ambulance Service, and Highway/Public Works funds for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Change in Accounting Principle As described in Note V.B., Scott County has adopted the provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 67, Financial Reporting for Pension Plans and GASB Statement No. 70, Accounting and Reporting for Nonexchange Financial Guarantees, which have an effective date of June 30, 2014. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Management has omitted the management’s discussion and analysis that accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require to be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such missing information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic

12

Page 13: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. Our opinion on the basic financial statements is not affected by this missing information. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the schedules of funding progress – pension plan and other postemployment benefits plan on pages 86 - 88 be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Supplementary and Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise Scott County’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements, budgetary comparison schedules of nonmajor governmental funds and the General Debt Service and Rural Debt Service funds, combining and individual fund financial statements of the Scott County School Department (a discretely presented component unit), and miscellaneous schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements, budgetary comparison schedules of nonmajor governmental funds and the General Debt Service and Rural Debt Service funds, combining and individual fund financial statements of the Scott County School Department (a discretely presented component unit), and miscellaneous schedules are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, based on our audit and the procedures performed as described above, the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements, budgetary comparison schedules of nonmajor governmental funds and the General Debt Service and Rural Debt Service funds, combining and individual fund financial statements of the Scott County School Department (a discretely presented component unit), and miscellaneous schedules are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.

13

Page 14: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

The introductory section has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements, and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 17, 2015, on our consideration of Scott County’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering Scott County’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Very truly yours,

Justin P. Wilson Comptroller of the Treasury Nashville, Tennessee February 17, 2015 JPW/yu

14

Page 15: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

15

Page 16: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit A

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Net

Pos

ition

June

30,

201

4

Scot

tEm

erge

ncy

Coun

tyCo

mm

unic

a-G

over

nmen

tal

Busi

ness

-typ

eSc

hool

tions

Activ

ities

Activ

ities

Tota

lD

epar

tmen

tD

istr

ict

ASSE

TS

Cash

$14

7,40

0$

0$

147,

400

$8,

517

$1,

405,

688

Equi

ty in

Poo

led

Cash

and

Inve

stm

ents

2,63

8,83

48,

790

2,64

7,62

46,

958,

308

0In

vent

orie

s44

,161

17,3

2061

,481

00

Acco

unts

Rec

eiva

ble

1,96

3,94

85,

780

1,96

9,72

81,

128

17,0

04Al

low

ance

for

Unc

olle

ctib

les

(1,4

57,1

59)

0(1

,457

,159

)0

0D

ue fr

om O

ther

Gov

ernm

ents

979,

352

097

9,35

21,

168,

719

0D

ue fr

om C

ompo

nent

Uni

ts5,

279

05,

279

00

Prop

erty

Tax

es R

ecei

vabl

e4,

736,

029

04,

736,

029

2,13

9,99

70

Allo

wan

ce fo

r U

ncol

lect

ible

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

(344

,587

)0

(344

,587

)(1

55,2

74)

0Pr

epai

d It

ems

00

00

5,35

4N

otes

Rec

eiva

ble

- Lon

g-te

rm78

,076

078

,076

00

Capi

tal A

sset

s: A

sset

s N

ot D

epre

ciat

ed:

La

nd

1,96

4,88

50

1,96

4,88

591

0,56

10

Ass

ets

Net

of A

ccum

ulat

ed D

epre

ciat

ion:

Bu

ildin

gs a

nd Im

prov

emen

ts13

,551

,676

013

,551

,676

18,2

92,4

780

O

ther

Cap

ital A

sset

s2,

251,

367

02,

251,

367

1,32

2,41

815

0,82

3

Infr

astr

uctu

re3,

400,

950

03,

400,

950

00

Tota

l Ass

ets

$29

,960

,211

$31

,890

$29

,992

,101

$30

,646

,852

$1,

578,

869

DEF

ERRE

D O

UTF

LOW

S O

F RE

SOU

RCES

Def

erre

d Ch

arge

on

Refu

ndin

g$

348

$0

$34

8$

0$

0To

tal D

efer

red

Out

flow

s of

Res

ourc

es$

348

$0

$34

8$

0$

0

(Con

tinue

d)

Com

pone

nt U

nits

Prim

ary

Gov

ernm

ent

16

Page 17: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit A

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Net

Pos

ition

(Con

t.)

Scot

tEm

erge

ncy

Coun

tyCo

mm

unic

a-G

over

nmen

tal

Busi

ness

-typ

eSc

hool

tions

Activ

ities

Activ

ities

Tota

lD

epar

tmen

tD

istr

ict

LIAB

ILIT

IES

Acco

unts

Pay

able

$34

9,62

4$

31,8

30$

381,

454

$14

,915

$0

Accr

ued

Payr

oll

51,0

140

51,0

142,

724,

819

0Ac

crue

d In

tere

st P

ayab

le27

,555

027

,555

00

Payr

oll D

educ

tions

Pay

able

89,3

7560

89,4

3522

1,23

31,

269

Due

to S

tate

of T

enne

ssee

4,91

90

4,91

96,

510

0D

ue to

Pri

mar

y G

over

nmen

t0

00

5,27

90

Oth

er C

urre

nt L

iabi

litie

s0

00

299,

430

0N

oncu

rren

t Lia

bilit

ies:

Due

With

in O

ne Y

ear

2,45

2,80

70

2,45

2,80

70

17,6

70 D

ue in

Mor

e Th

an O

ne Y

ear

(net

of u

nam

ortiz

ed p

rem

ium

on

debt

)36

,282

,032

036

,282

,032

2,82

7,10

40

Tota

l Lia

bilit

ies

$39

,257

,326

$31

,890

$39

,289

,216

$6,

099,

290

$18

,939

DEF

ERRE

D IN

FLO

WS

OF

RESO

URC

ES

Def

erre

d Cu

rren

t Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

$4,

184,

667

$0

$4,

184,

667

$1,

891,

924

$0

Tota

l Def

erre

d In

flow

s of

Res

ourc

es$

4,18

4,66

7$

0$

4,18

4,66

7$

1,89

1,92

4$

0

NET

PO

SITI

ON

Net

Inve

stm

ent i

n Ca

pita

l Ass

ets

$7,

979,

267

$0

$7,

979,

267

$20

,525

,457

$15

0,82

3Re

stri

cted

for:

Gen

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

3,17

40

3,17

40

0 A

dmin

istr

atio

n of

Jus

tice

12,6

650

12,6

650

0 P

ublic

Saf

ety

95,7

400

95,7

400

0 S

ocia

l, Cu

ltura

l, an

d Re

crea

tion

530

530

0 H

ighw

ay/P

ublic

Wor

ks62

0,59

10

620,

591

00

Deb

t Ser

vice

701,

422

070

1,42

20

0 C

apita

l Pro

ject

s29

8,25

50

298,

255

00

Oth

er P

urpo

ses

16,5

220

16,5

220

0 E

duca

tion

00

094

6,67

30

Unr

estr

icte

d(2

3,20

9,12

3)0

(23,

209,

123)

1,18

3,50

81,

409,

107

Tota

l Net

Pos

ition

$(1

3,48

1,43

4)$

0$

(13,

481,

434)

$22

,655

,638

$1,

559,

930

The

note

s to

the

finan

cial

sta

tem

ents

are

an

inte

gral

par

t of t

his

stat

emen

t.

Com

pone

nt U

nits

Prim

ary

Gov

ernm

ent

17

Page 18: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit B

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Act

iviti

esFo

r th

e Ye

ar E

nded

Jun

e 30

, 201

4

Scot

tEm

erge

ncy

Ope

ratin

gCa

pita

lCo

unty

Com

mun

ica-

Char

ges

for

Gra

nts

and

Gra

nts

and

Gov

ernm

enta

lBu

sine

ss-t

ype

Scho

oltio

nsFu

nctio

ns/P

rogr

ams

Expe

nses

Serv

ices

Cont

ribu

tions

Cont

ribu

tions

Activ

ities

Activ

ities

Tota

lD

epar

tmen

tD

istr

ict

Prim

ary

Gov

ernm

ent:

Gov

ernm

enta

l Act

iviti

es:

G

ener

al G

over

nmen

t$

3,55

0,60

7$

423,

687

$14

4,84

2$

78,4

58$

(2,9

03,6

20)$

0$

(2,9

03,6

20)

$0

$0

F

inan

ce87

3,26

050

4,27

50

0(3

68,9

85)

0(3

68,9

85)

00

A

dmin

istr

atio

n of

Jus

tice

782,

205

524,

536

64,7

830

(192

,886

)0

(192

,886

)0

0

Pub

lic S

afet

y3,

758,

292

1,29

9,03

417

4,20

00

(2,2

85,0

58)

0(2

,285

,058

)0

0

Pub

lic H

ealth

and

Wel

fare

2,39

1,72

82,

239,

044

235,

361

235,

000

317,

677

031

7,67

70

0

Soc

ial,

Cultu

ral,

and

Recr

eatio

nal

Serv

ices

106,

224

08,

760

0(9

7,46

4)0

(97,

464)

00

A

gric

ultu

re a

nd N

atur

al R

esou

rces

25,9

980

00

(25,

998)

0(2

5,99

8)0

0

Hig

hway

s2,

591,

515

10,2

952,

453,

017

466,

242

338,

039

033

8,03

90

0

Edu

catio

n2,

166,

477

00

0(2

,166

,477

)0

(2,1

66,4

77)

00

In

tere

st o

n Lo

ng-t

erm

Deb

t1,

108,

956

00

0(1

,108

,956

)0

(1,1

08,9

56)

00

Tota

l Gov

ernm

enta

l Act

iviti

es$

17,3

55,2

62$

5,00

0,87

1$

3,08

0,96

3$

779,

700

$(8

,493

,728

)$0

$(8

,493

,728

)$

0$

0

Busi

ness

-typ

e Ac

tiviti

es:

P

ublic

Util

ity -

Sew

er$

274,

599

$17

9,37

5$

0$

0$

0$

(95,

224)

$(9

5,22

4)$

0$

0To

tal B

usin

ess-

type

Act

iviti

es$

274,

599

$17

9,37

5$

0$

0$

0$

(95,

224)

$(9

5,22

4)$

0$

0

Tota

l Pri

mar

y G

over

nmen

t$

17,6

29,8

61$

5,18

0,24

6$

3,08

0,96

3$

779,

700

$(8

,493

,728

)$(9

5,22

4)$

(8,5

88,9

52)

$0

$0

Com

pone

nt U

nits

: S

cott

Cou

nty

Scho

ol D

epar

tmen

t$

25,0

88,1

80$

315,

069

$4,

522,

941

$2,

159,

560

$0

$0

$0

$(1

8,09

0,61

0)$

0 E

mer

genc

y Co

mm

unic

atio

ns D

istr

ict

260,

597

150,

814

142,

860

00

00

033

,077

Tota

l Com

pone

nt U

nits

$25

,348

,777

$46

5,88

3$

4,66

5,80

1$

2,15

9,56

0$

0$

0$

0$

(18,

090,

610)

$33

,077

(Con

tinue

d)

Net

(Exp

ense

) Rev

enue

and

Cha

nges

in N

et P

ositi

onCo

mpo

nent

Uni

tsPr

ogra

m R

even

ues

Prim

ary

Gov

ernm

ent

18

Page 19: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit B

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Act

iviti

es (C

ont.)

Scot

tEm

erge

ncy

Ope

ratin

gCa

pita

lCo

unty

Com

mun

ica-

Char

ges

for

Gra

nts

and

Gra

nts

and

Gov

ernm

enta

lBu

sine

ss-t

ype

Scho

oltio

nsFu

nctio

ns/P

rogr

ams

Expe

nses

Serv

ices

Cont

ribu

tions

Cont

ribu

tions

Activ

ities

Activ

ities

Tota

lD

epar

tmen

tD

istr

ict

Gen

eral

Rev

enue

s: T

axes

:

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

Levi

ed fo

r G

ener

al P

urpo

ses

$2,

477,

860

$0

$2,

477,

860

$1,

914,

605

$0

P

rope

rty

Taxe

s Le

vied

for

Gen

eral

Deb

t Ser

vice

s40

4,08

60

404,

086

00

P

rope

rty

Taxe

s Le

vied

for

Rura

l Deb

t Ser

vice

686,

462

068

6,46

20

0

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

Levi

ed fo

r Ca

pita

l19

2,29

10

192,

291

00

L

ocal

Opt

ion

Sale

s Ta

xes

354,

316

035

4,31

61,

249,

434

0

Whe

el T

ax57

9,41

90

579,

419

00

L

itiga

tion

Taxe

s12

8,15

90

128,

159

00

B

usin

ess

Taxe

s13

8,23

70

138,

237

00

O

ther

Tax

es14

1,41

60

141,

416

2,20

70

Gra

nts

and

Cont

ribu

tions

Not

Res

tric

ted

to S

peci

fic P

rogr

ams

2,82

5,66

70

2,82

5,66

716

,873

,395

71,1

30 U

nres

tric

ted

Inve

stm

ent I

ncom

e97

,164

097

,164

849

5,22

4 M

isce

llane

ous

37,8

6115

,626

53,4

8729

,442

0To

tal G

ener

al R

even

ues

$8,

062,

938

$15

,626

$8,

078,

564

$20

,069

,932

$76

,354

Tran

sfer

s$

(625

,820

) $62

5,82

0$

0$

0$

0Sp

ecia

l Ite

m -

Cont

ribu

tion

of C

apita

l Ass

ets

to T

own

of H

unts

ville

0(3

,386

,481

)(3

,386

,481

)0

0Ch

ange

in N

et P

ositi

on$

(1,0

56,6

10) $

(2,8

40,2

59)$

(3,8

96,8

69)

$1,

979,

322

$10

9,43

1N

et P

ositi

on, J

uly

1, 2

013

(12,

424,

824)

2,84

0,25

9(9

,584

,565

)20

,676

,316

1,45

0,49

9

Net

Pos

ition

, Ju

ne 3

0, 2

014

$(1

3,48

1,43

4)$

0$

(13,

481,

434)

$22

,655

,638

$1,

559,

930

The

note

s to

the

finan

cial

sta

tem

ents

are

an

inte

gral

par

t of t

his

stat

emen

t.

Prog

ram

Rev

enue

sPr

imar

y G

over

nmen

t

Net

(Exp

ense

) Rev

enue

and

Cha

nges

in N

et P

ositi

onCo

mpo

nent

Uni

ts

19

Page 20: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

C-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeB

alan

ce S

heet

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

dsJu

ne 3

0, 2

014

Hig

hway

/G

ener

alR

ural

Am

bula

nce

Publ

icD

ebt

Deb

tG

ener

alSe

rvic

eW

orks

Serv

ice

Serv

ice

ASS

ETS

Cas

h$

100

$0

$0

$0

$0

Equ

ity in

Poo

led

Cas

h an

d In

vest

men

ts82

0,07

771

,074

20,3

551,

182,

483

37,1

77In

vent

orie

s44

,161

00

00

Acc

ount

s R

ecei

vabl

e16

5,91

51,

725,

155

6,44

214

,412

0A

llow

ance

for

Unc

olle

ctib

les

0(1

,457

,159

)0

00

Due

from

Oth

er G

over

nmen

ts10

1,91

40

875,

211

00

Due

from

Oth

er F

unds

1,28

20

00

0D

ue fr

om C

ompo

nent

Uni

ts5,

279

00

00

Prop

erty

Tax

es R

ecei

vabl

e3,

288,

952

00

335,

538

795,

821

Allo

wan

ce fo

r U

ncol

lect

ible

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

(234

,912

)0

0(2

9,74

0)(5

9,14

7)N

otes

Rec

eiva

ble

- Lon

g-te

rm0

00

78,0

760

Tota

l Ass

ets

$4,

192,

768

$33

9,07

0$

902,

008

$1,

580,

769

$77

3,85

1

LIA

BIL

ITIE

S

Acc

ount

s Pa

yabl

e$

177,

571

$60

,805

$10

7,42

8$

0$

0A

ccru

ed P

ayro

ll0

19,2

2631

,788

00

Payr

oll D

educ

tions

Pay

able

50,6

8028

,220

9,27

70

0D

ue to

Oth

er F

unds

00

00

0D

ue to

Sta

te o

f Ten

ness

ee0

4,25

266

70

0To

tal L

iabi

litie

s$

228,

251

$11

2,50

3$

149,

160

$0

$0

DE

FER

RE

D IN

FLO

WS

OF

RE

SOU

RC

ES

Def

erre

d C

urre

nt P

rope

rty

Taxe

s$

2,91

6,38

2$

0$

0$

284,

063

$70

0,15

9

(Con

tinue

d)

Maj

or F

unds

20

Page 21: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

C-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeB

alan

ce S

heet

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

ds (C

ont.)

Hig

hway

/G

ener

alR

ural

Am

bula

nce

Publ

icD

ebt

Deb

tG

ener

alSe

rvic

eW

orks

Serv

ice

Serv

ice

DE

FER

RE

D IN

FLO

WS

OF

RE

SOU

RC

ES

(Con

t.)

Def

erre

d D

elin

quen

t Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

$12

2,91

7$

0$

0$

19,3

82$

31,7

77O

ther

Def

erre

d/U

nava

ilabl

e R

even

ue25

,265

153,

749

156,

857

78,0

760

Tota

l Def

erre

d In

flow

s of

Res

ourc

es$

3,06

4,56

4$

153,

749

$15

6,85

7$

381,

521

$73

1,93

6

FUN

D B

ALA

NC

ES

Non

spen

dabl

e:In

vent

ory

$44

,161

$0

$0

$0

$0

Res

tric

ted:

Res

tric

ted

for

Gen

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

3,17

40

00

0R

estr

icte

d fo

r A

dmin

istr

atio

n of

Jus

tice

12,6

650

00

0R

estr

icte

d fo

r Pu

blic

Saf

ety

15,4

130

00

0R

estr

icte

d fo

r So

cial

, Cul

tura

l, an

d R

ecre

atio

nal S

ervi

ces

530

00

0R

estr

icte

d fo

r H

ighw

ays/

Publ

ic W

orks

00

463,

734

00

Res

tric

ted

for

Deb

t Ser

vice

00

067

7,81

80

Res

tric

ted

for

Cap

ital P

roje

cts

00

00

0R

estr

icte

d fo

r O

ther

Pur

pose

s16

,522

00

00

Com

mitt

ed:

Com

mitt

ed fo

r G

ener

al G

over

nmen

t25

,698

00

00

Com

mitt

ed fo

r Pu

blic

Hea

lth a

nd W

elfa

re0

72,8

180

00

Com

mitt

ed fo

r O

ther

Ope

ratio

ns4,

433

00

00

Com

mitt

ed fo

r H

ighw

ays/

Publ

ic W

orks

00

132,

257

00

Com

mitt

ed fo

r D

ebt S

ervi

ce0

00

521,

430

41,9

15A

ssig

ned:

Ass

igne

d fo

r G

ener

al G

over

nmen

t6,

530

00

00

Ass

igne

d fo

r Fi

nanc

e1,

238

00

00

(Con

tinue

d)

Maj

or F

unds

21

Page 22: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

C-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeB

alan

ce S

heet

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

ds (C

ont.)

Hig

hway

/G

ener

alR

ural

Am

bula

nce

Publ

icD

ebt

Deb

tG

ener

alSe

rvic

eW

orks

Serv

ice

Serv

ice

FUN

D B

ALA

NC

ES

(Con

t.)

Ass

igne

d (C

ont.)

:A

ssig

ned

for

Adm

inis

trat

ion

of J

ustic

e$

5,07

9$

0$

0$

0$

0A

ssig

ned

for

Publ

ic S

afet

y45

,589

00

00

Ass

igne

d fo

r Pu

blic

Hea

lth a

nd W

elfa

re43

00

00

Ass

igne

d fo

r So

cial

, Cul

tura

l, an

d R

ecre

atio

nal S

ervi

ces

944

00

00

Ass

igne

d fo

r A

gric

ultu

re a

nd N

atur

al R

esou

rces

15,5

280

00

0A

ssig

ned

for

Oth

er O

pera

tions

386

00

00

Una

ssig

ned

702,

497

00

00

Tota

l Fun

d B

alan

ces

$89

9,95

3$

72,8

18$

595,

991

$1,

199,

248

$41

,915

Tota

l Lia

bilit

ies,

Def

erre

d In

flow

s of

Res

ourc

es, a

nd F

und

Bal

ance

s$

4,19

2,76

8$

339,

070

$90

2,00

8$

1,58

0,76

9$

773,

851

(Con

tinue

d)

Maj

or F

unds

22

Page 23: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

C-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeB

alan

ce S

heet

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

ds (C

ont.)

Oth

erG

over

n-To

tal

men

tal

Gov

ernm

enta

lFu

nds

Fund

s

ASS

ETS

Cas

h$

147,

300

$14

7,40

0E

quity

in P

oole

d C

ash

and

Inve

stm

ents

507,

668

2,63

8,83

4In

vent

orie

s0

44,1

61A

ccou

nts

Rec

eiva

ble

52,0

241,

963,

948

Allo

wan

ce fo

r U

ncol

lect

ible

s0

(1,4

57,1

59)

Due

from

Oth

er G

over

nmen

ts2,

227

979,

352

Due

from

Oth

er F

unds

01,

282

Due

from

Com

pone

nt U

nits

05,

279

Prop

erty

Tax

es R

ecei

vabl

e31

5,71

84,

736,

029

Allo

wan

ce fo

r U

ncol

lect

ible

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

(20,

788)

(344

,587

)N

otes

Rec

eiva

ble

- Lon

g-te

rm0

78,0

76

Tota

l Ass

ets

$1,

004,

149

$8,

792,

615

LIA

BIL

ITIE

S

Acc

ount

s Pa

yabl

e$

3,82

0$

349,

624

Acc

rued

Pay

roll

051

,014

Payr

oll D

educ

tions

Pay

able

1,19

889

,375

Due

to O

ther

Fun

ds1,

282

1,28

2D

ue to

Sta

te o

f Ten

ness

ee0

4,91

9To

tal L

iabi

litie

s$

6,30

0$

496,

214

DE

FER

RE

D IN

FLO

WS

OF

RE

SOU

RC

ES

Def

erre

d C

urre

nt P

rope

rty

Taxe

s$

284,

063

$4,

184,

667

(Con

tinue

d)

Non

maj

or

Fund

s

23

Page 24: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

C-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeB

alan

ce S

heet

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

ds (C

ont.)

Oth

erG

over

n-To

tal

men

tal

Gov

ernm

enta

lFu

nds

Fund

sD

EFE

RR

ED

INFL

OW

S O

F R

ESO

UR

CE

S (C

ont.)

Def

erre

d D

elin

quen

t Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

$9,

706

$18

3,78

2O

ther

Def

erre

d/U

nava

ilabl

e R

even

ue0

413,

947

Tota

l Def

erre

d In

flow

s of

Res

ourc

es$

293,

769

$4,

782,

396

FUN

D B

ALA

NC

ES

Non

spen

dabl

e:In

vent

ory

$0

$44

,161

Res

tric

ted:

Res

tric

ted

for

Gen

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

03,

174

Res

tric

ted

for

Adm

inis

trat

ion

of J

ustic

e0

12,6

65R

estr

icte

d fo

r Pu

blic

Saf

ety

80,3

2795

,740

Res

tric

ted

for

Soci

al, C

ultu

ral,

and

Rec

reat

iona

l Ser

vice

s0

53R

estr

icte

d fo

r H

ighw

ays/

Publ

ic W

orks

046

3,73

4R

estr

icte

d fo

r D

ebt S

ervi

ce0

677,

818

Res

tric

ted

for

Cap

ital P

roje

cts

288,

549

288,

549

Res

tric

ted

for

Oth

er P

urpo

ses

016

,522

Com

mitt

ed:

Com

mitt

ed fo

r G

ener

al G

over

nmen

t0

25,6

98C

omm

itted

for

Publ

ic H

ealth

and

Wel

fare

334,

820

407,

638

Com

mitt

ed fo

r O

ther

Ope

ratio

ns0

4,43

3C

omm

itted

for

Hig

hway

s/Pu

blic

Wor

ks0

132,

257

Com

mitt

ed fo

r D

ebt S

ervi

ce0

563,

345

Ass

igne

d:A

ssig

ned

for

Gen

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

06,

530

Ass

igne

d fo

r Fi

nanc

e0

1,23

8

(Con

tinue

d)

Non

maj

or

Fund

s

24

Page 25: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

C-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeB

alan

ce S

heet

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

ds (C

ont.)

Oth

erG

over

n-To

tal

men

tal

Gov

ernm

enta

lFu

nds

Fund

s

FUN

D B

ALA

NC

ES

(Con

t.)

Ass

igne

d (C

ont.)

:A

ssig

ned

for

Adm

inis

trat

ion

of J

ustic

e$

0$

5,07

9A

ssig

ned

for

Publ

ic S

afet

y38

445

,973

Ass

igne

d fo

r Pu

blic

Hea

lth a

nd W

elfa

re0

43A

ssig

ned

for

Soci

al, C

ultu

ral,

and

Rec

reat

iona

l Ser

vice

s0

944

Ass

igne

d fo

r A

gric

ultu

re a

nd N

atur

al R

esou

rces

015

,528

Ass

igne

d fo

r O

ther

Ope

ratio

ns0

386

Una

ssig

ned

070

2,49

7To

tal F

und

Bal

ance

s$

704,

080

$3,

514,

005

Tota

l Lia

bilit

ies,

Def

erre

d In

flow

s of

Res

ourc

es, a

nd F

und

Bal

ance

s$

1,00

4,14

9$

8,79

2,61

5

The

note

s to

the

finan

cial

sta

tem

ents

are

an

inte

gral

par

t of t

his

stat

emen

t.

Non

maj

or

Fund

s

25

Page 26: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit C-2

Scott County, TennesseeReconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net PositionJune 30, 2014

Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position (Exhibit A) are different because:

Total fund balances - balance sheet - governmental funds (Exhibit C-1) $ 3,514,005

(1) Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and therefore are not reported inthe governmental funds. Add: land $ 1,964,885 Add: infrastructure net of accumulated depreciation 3,400,950 Add: buildings and improvements net of accumulated depreciation 13,551,676 Add: other capital assets net of accumulated depreciation 2,251,367 21,168,878

(2) Long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current periodand therefore are not reported in the governmental funds. Less: notes payable $ (1,978,648) Less: other loans payable (22,995,538) Less: bonds payable (10,685,000) Add: deferred amount on refunding 348 Less: compensated absences payable (184,240) Less: landfill postclosure care costs (2,520,869) Less: other postemployment benefits liability (188,154) Less: accrued interest on bonds, notes, and capital leases (27,555) Less: unamortized premium on debt (182,390) (38,762,046)

(3) Other long-term assets are not available to pay forcurrent-period expenditures and therefore are deferredin the governmental funds. 597,729

Net position (deficit) of governmental activities (Exhibit A) $ (13,481,434)

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

26

Page 27: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit C

-3

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Chan

ges

in F

und

Bala

nces

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

dsFo

r the

Yea

r End

ed J

une

30, 2

014

Hig

hway

/G

ener

alRu

ral

Ambu

lanc

ePu

blic

Deb

tD

ebt

Gen

eral

Serv

ice

Wor

ksSe

rvic

eSe

rvic

e

Reve

nues

Loca

l Tax

es$

3,72

6,03

7$

0$

235

$1,

094,

425

$89

2,14

6Li

cens

es a

nd P

erm

its27

,581

00

940

0Fi

nes,

For

feitu

res,

and

Pen

altie

s15

3,39

90

00

0Ch

arge

s fo

r Cur

rent

Ser

vice

s33

5,90

31,

797,

113

00

0O

ther

Loc

al R

even

ues

307,

967

10,7

7288

,966

132,

343

0Fe

es R

ecei

ved

from

Cou

nty

Offi

cial

s84

7,65

60

00

0St

ate

of T

enne

ssee

2,31

9,86

60

2,32

5,66

90

0Fe

dera

l Gov

ernm

ent

86,2

1723

5,00

047

6,99

20

0O

ther

Gov

ernm

ents

and

Citi

zens

Gro

ups

97,9

090

028

,600

351,

092

Tota

l Rev

enue

s$

7,90

2,53

5$

2,04

2,88

5$

2,89

1,86

2$

1,25

6,30

8$

1,24

3,23

8

Expe

nditu

res

Curr

ent:

Gen

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

$1,

153,

560

$0

$0

$0

$0

Fina

nce

848,

630

00

00

Adm

inis

trat

ion

of J

ustic

e77

0,68

10

00

0Pu

blic

Saf

ety

3,57

0,63

80

00

0Pu

blic

Hea

lth a

nd W

elfa

re25

9,50

52,

109,

782

00

0So

cial

, Cul

tura

l, an

d Re

crea

tiona

l Ser

vice

s12

9,58

10

00

0Ag

ricu

lture

and

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es25

,998

00

00

Oth

er O

pera

tions

1,17

1,66

90

00

0H

ighw

ays

235

03,

076,

257

00

Deb

t Ser

vice

:Pr

inci

pal o

n D

ebt

00

350,

152

1,12

6,74

01,

027,

903

Inte

rest

on

Deb

t0

059

,909

136,

220

389,

307

Oth

er D

ebt S

ervi

ce0

00

301,

807

207,

839

Tota

l Exp

endi

ture

s$

7,93

0,49

7$

2,10

9,78

2$

3,48

6,31

8$

1,56

4,76

7$

1,62

5,04

9

(Con

tinue

d)

Maj

or F

unds

27

Page 28: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit C

-3

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Chan

ges

in F

und

Bala

nces

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

ds (C

ont.)

Hig

hway

/G

ener

alRu

ral

Ambu

lanc

ePu

blic

Deb

tD

ebt

Gen

eral

Serv

ice

Wor

ksSe

rvic

eSe

rvic

e

Exce

ss (D

efic

ienc

y) o

f Rev

enue

sO

ver E

xpen

ditu

res

$(2

7,96

2)$

(66,

897)

$(5

94,4

56)

$(3

08,4

59)

$(3

81,8

11)

Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)N

otes

Issu

ed$

0$

0$

1,02

2,20

5$

0$

0Re

fund

ing

Deb

t Iss

ued

00

01,

490,

000

8,12

0,00

0Pr

emiu

ms

on D

ebt I

ssue

d0

00

21,5

4215

2,32

0Tr

ansf

ers

In85

,271

00

48,4

240

Tran

sfer

s O

ut(5

,780

)(5

0,00

0)(4

8,42

4)(3

6,02

0)0

Paym

ents

to R

efun

ded

Deb

t Esc

row

Age

nt0

00

(1,4

58,5

16)

(8,1

00,3

99)

Tota

l Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)$

79,4

91$

(50,

000)

$97

3,78

1$

65,4

30$

171,

921

Net

Cha

nge

in F

und

Bala

nces

$51

,529

$(1

16,8

97)

$37

9,32

5$

(243

,029

)$

(209

,890

)Fu

nd B

alan

ce, J

uly

1, 2

013

848,

424

189,

715

216,

666

1,44

2,27

725

1,80

5

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jun

e 30

, 201

4$

899,

953

$72

,818

$59

5,99

1$

1,19

9,24

8$

41,9

15

(Con

tinue

d)

Maj

or F

unds

28

Page 29: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit C

-3

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Chan

ges

in F

und

Bala

nces

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

ds (C

ont.)

Oth

erG

over

n-To

tal

men

tal

Gov

ernm

enta

lFu

nds

Fund

s

Reve

nues

Loca

l Tax

es$

209,

270

$5,

922,

113

Lice

nses

and

Per

mits

028

,521

Fine

s, F

orfe

iture

s, a

nd P

enal

ties

44,4

8119

7,88

0Ch

arge

s fo

r Cur

rent

Ser

vice

s19

1,37

22,

324,

388

Oth

er L

ocal

Rev

enue

s28

,031

568,

079

Fees

Rec

eive

d fr

om C

ount

y O

ffici

als

084

7,65

6St

ate

of T

enne

ssee

111,

961

4,75

7,49

6Fe

dera

l Gov

ernm

ent

079

8,20

9O

ther

Gov

ernm

ents

and

Citi

zens

Gro

ups

047

7,60

1To

tal R

even

ues

$58

5,11

5$

15,9

21,9

43

Expe

nditu

res

Curr

ent:

Gen

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

$49

,003

$1,

202,

563

Fina

nce

22,1

3187

0,76

1Ad

min

istr

atio

n of

Jus

tice

30,4

7880

1,15

9Pu

blic

Saf

ety

82,3

893,

653,

027

Publ

ic H

ealth

and

Wel

fare

140,

648

2,50

9,93

5So

cial

, Cul

tura

l, an

d Re

crea

tiona

l Ser

vice

s0

129,

581

Agri

cultu

re a

nd N

atur

al R

esou

rces

025

,998

Oth

er O

pera

tions

108,

151

1,27

9,82

0H

ighw

ays

16,4

543,

092,

946

Deb

t Ser

vice

:Pr

inci

pal o

n D

ebt

02,

504,

795

Inte

rest

on

Deb

t0

585,

436

Oth

er D

ebt S

ervi

ce0

509,

646

Tota

l Exp

endi

ture

s$

449,

254

$17

,165

,667

(Con

tinue

d)

Non

maj

or

Fund

s

29

Page 30: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit C

-3

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Chan

ges

in F

und

Bala

nces

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

ds (C

ont.)

Oth

erG

over

n-To

tal

men

tal

Gov

ernm

enta

lFu

nds

Fund

s

Exce

ss (D

efic

ienc

y) o

f Rev

enue

sO

ver E

xpen

ditu

res

$13

5,86

1$

(1,2

43,7

24)

Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)N

otes

Issu

ed$

0$

1,02

2,20

5Re

fund

ing

Deb

t Iss

ued

09,

610,

000

Prem

ium

s on

Deb

t Iss

ued

017

3,86

2Tr

ansf

ers

In0

133,

695

Tran

sfer

s O

ut(3

5,27

1)(1

75,4

95)

Paym

ents

to R

efun

ded

Deb

t Esc

row

Age

nt0

(9,5

58,9

15)

Tota

l Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)$

(35,

271)

$1,

205,

352

Net

Cha

nge

in F

und

Bala

nces

$10

0,59

0$

(38,

372)

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jul

y 1,

201

360

3,49

03,

552,

377

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jun

e 30

, 201

4$

704,

080

$3,

514,

005

The

note

s to

the

finan

cial

sta

tem

ents

are

an

inte

gral

par

t of t

his

stat

emen

t.

Non

maj

or

Fund

s

30

Page 31: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit C-4

Scott County, TennesseeReconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of ActivitiesFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities (Exhibit B) are different because:

Net change in fund balances - total governmental funds (Exhibit C-3)$ (38,372)

(1) Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However,in the statement of activities, the cost of these assets is allocated over their useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. The difference between capital outlays and depreciation is itemized asfollows: Add: capital assets purchased in the current period $ 1,257,674 Less: current-year depreciation expense (1,097,628) 160,046

(2) The net effect of various miscellaneous transactions involving capital assets(sales, trade-ins, and donations) is to increase net position. Add: assets donated and capitalized $ 1,088,517 Less: net book value of disposed assets (616,307) 472,210

(3) Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide currentfinancial resources are not reported as revenues in the funds. Add: deferred delinquent property taxes and other deferred June 30, 2014 $ 597,729 Less: deferred delinquent property taxes and other deferred June 30, 2013 (611,870) (14,141)

(4) The issuance of long-term debt (e.g., bonds, notes, other loans, leases) providescurrent financial resources to governmental funds, while the repaymentof the principal of long-term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, hasany effect on net position. Also, governmental funds report the effectof premiums, discounts, and similar items when debt isfirst issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in thestatement of activities. This amount is the effect of these differencesin the treatment of long-term debt and related items: Add: change in premium on debt issuances $ (160,997) Less: capital outlay note proceeds (1,022,205) Less: refunding debt proceeds (9,610,000) Add: principal payments on notes 807,948 Add: principal payments on other loans 771,000 Add: principal payments on bonds 854,000 Add: principal payments on capital leases 71,847 Less: contributions from the School Department for capital leases (71,847) Less: debt assumed from the enterprise fund (584,021) Add: principal amount of debt refunded 9,477,430 Less: refunding debt proceeds contributed to the School Department (2,166,477) Less: change in deferred amount on refunding debt (801) (1,634,123)

(5) Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not requirethe use of current financial resources and therefore are not reportedas expenditures in the governmental funds. Change in accrued interest payable $ 55,548 Change in compensated absences payable (10,608) Change in other postemployment benefits liability (10,567) Change in landfill postclosure care costs (36,603) (2,230)

Change in net position of governmental activities (Exhibit B) $ (1,056,610)

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

31

Page 32: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit C

-5

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Cha

nges

in F

und

Bala

nce

- Act

ual (

Budg

etar

y Ba

sis)

and

Bud

get

Gen

eral

Fun

dFo

r th

e Ye

ar E

nded

Jun

e 30

, 201

4

Actu

alVa

rian

ceRe

venu

es/

with

Fin

alAc

tual

Add:

Expe

nditu

res

Budg

et -

(GAA

PEn

cum

bran

ces

(Bud

geta

ryPo

sitiv

eBa

sis)

6/30

/201

4Ba

sis)

Ori

gina

lFi

nal

(Neg

ativ

e)

Reve

nues

Loca

l Tax

es$

3,72

6,03

7$

0$

3,72

6,03

7$

3,56

8,83

2$

3,59

3,98

2$

132,

055

Lice

nses

and

Per

mits

27,5

810

27,5

8125

,000

25,0

002,

581

Fine

s, F

orfe

iture

s, a

nd P

enal

ties

153,

399

015

3,39

913

0,00

013

0,00

023

,399

Char

ges

for

Curr

ent S

ervi

ces

335,

903

033

5,90

338

5,00

038

5,00

0(4

9,09

7)O

ther

Loc

al R

even

ues

307,

967

030

7,96

736

4,50

029

2,28

615

,681

Fees

Rec

eive

d fr

om C

ount

y O

ffici

als

847,

656

084

7,65

681

5,00

081

5,00

032

,656

Stat

e of

Ten

ness

ee2,

319,

866

02,

319,

866

1,91

3,30

62,

452,

930

(133

,064

)Fe

dera

l Gov

ernm

ent

86,2

170

86,2

1717

,000

106,

956

(20,

739)

Oth

er G

over

nmen

ts a

nd C

itize

ns G

roup

s97

,909

097

,909

094

,209

3,70

0To

tal R

even

ues

$7,

902,

535

$0

$7,

902,

535

$7,

218,

638

$7,

895,

363

$7,

172

Expe

nditu

res

Gen

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

Coun

ty C

omm

issi

on$

154,

855

$1,

638

$15

6,49

3$

166,

958

$16

6,95

8$

10,4

65Co

unty

May

or/E

xecu

tive

150,

362

177

150,

539

152,

165

152,

165

1,62

6Co

unty

Att

orne

y55

,054

055

,054

55,2

1255

,212

158

Elec

tion

Com

mis

sion

183,

899

2,97

118

6,87

016

7,15

120

7,25

320

,383

Regi

ster

of D

eeds

159,

890

164

160,

054

160,

298

160,

298

244

Coun

ty B

uild

ings

449,

500

1,58

045

1,08

041

0,91

145

7,16

16,

081

Fina

nce

Acco

untin

g an

d Bu

dget

ing

272,

291

2827

2,31

927

5,15

027

5,15

02,

831

Prop

erty

Ass

esso

r's O

ffice

201,

803

020

1,80

320

1,52

720

1,52

7(2

76)

Coun

ty T

rust

ee's

Offi

ce15

5,23

425

415

5,48

816

0,58

216

0,58

25,

094

Coun

ty C

lerk

's O

ffice

219,

302

956

220,

258

226,

587

226,

587

6,32

9Ad

min

istr

atio

n of

Jus

tice

Circ

uit C

ourt

247,

201

1,27

324

8,47

427

6,39

426

3,05

614

,582

Gen

eral

Ses

sion

s Co

urt

315,

212

3,80

631

9,01

830

0,87

831

9,67

866

0

(Con

tinue

d)

Budg

eted

Am

ount

s

32

Page 33: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit C

-5

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Cha

nges

in F

und

Bala

nce

- Act

ual (

Budg

etar

y Ba

sis)

and

Bud

get

Gen

eral

Fun

d (C

ont.)

Actu

alVa

rian

ceRe

venu

es/

with

Fin

alAc

tual

Add:

Expe

nditu

res

Budg

et -

(GAA

PEn

cum

bran

ces

(Bud

geta

ryPo

sitiv

eBa

sis)

6/30

/201

4Ba

sis)

Ori

gina

lFi

nal

(Neg

ativ

e)

Expe

nditu

res

(Con

t.)Ad

min

istr

atio

n of

Jus

tice

(Con

t.)Ch

ance

ry C

ourt

$13

8,20

1$

0$

138,

201

$13

8,22

5$

138,

225

$24

Dis

tric

t Att

orne

y G

ener

al45

,466

045

,466

40,0

0045

,500

34O

ffice

of P

ublic

Def

ende

r24

,601

024

,601

12,0

0033

,995

9,39

4Pu

blic

Saf

ety

Sher

iff's

Dep

artm

ent

1,50

9,17

43,

191

1,51

2,36

51,

540,

713

1,56

7,76

255

,397

Adm

inis

trat

ion

of th

e Se

xual

Offe

nder

Reg

istr

y0

200

200

03,

000

2,80

0Ja

il1,

787,

081

29,3

441,

816,

425

1,43

4,35

51,

924,

680

108,

255

Juve

nile

Ser

vice

s21

6,97

71,

675

218,

652

233,

278

233,

278

14,6

26Fi

re P

reve

ntio

n an

d Co

ntro

l2,

000

02,

000

2,00

02,

000

0Ci

vil D

efen

se41

,445

041

,445

30,0

5043

,242

1,79

7Re

scue

Squ

ad8,

000

08,

000

8,00

08,

000

0Co

unty

Cor

oner

/Med

ical

Exa

min

er5,

961

05,

961

6,00

26,

002

41Pu

blic

Hea

lth a

nd W

elfa

reLo

cal H

ealth

Cen

ter

67,1

2843

67,1

7161

,058

84,2

5817

,087

Oth

er L

ocal

Hea

lth S

ervi

ces

192,

172

019

2,17

219

8,04

719

8,04

75,

875

Gen

eral

Wel

fare

Ass

ista

nce

144

014

42,

250

2,25

02,

106

Oth

er L

ocal

Wel

fare

Ser

vice

s61

061

244

244

183

Soci

al, C

ultu

ral,

and

Recr

eatio

nal S

ervi

ces

Seni

or C

itize

ns A

ssis

tanc

e80

,727

080

,727

75,5

7980

,779

52Li

brar

ies

48,8

5494

449

,798

52,8

2552

,825

3,02

7Ag

ricu

lture

and

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

esAg

ricu

ltura

l Ext

ensi

on S

ervi

ce25

,998

15,5

2841

,526

42,6

5243

,852

2,32

6O

ther

Ope

ratio

nsTo

uris

m52

,084

386

52,4

7058

,550

58,5

506,

080

Airp

ort

360,

065

036

0,06

529

1,56

832

4,46

8(3

5,59

7)Ve

tera

ns' S

ervi

ces

45,4

010

45,4

0145

,501

45,5

0110

0

(Con

tinue

d)

Budg

eted

Am

ount

s

33

Page 34: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit C

-5

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Cha

nges

in F

und

Bala

nce

- Act

ual (

Budg

etar

y Ba

sis)

and

Bud

get

Gen

eral

Fun

d (C

ont.)

Actu

alVa

rian

ceRe

venu

es/

with

Fin

alAc

tual

Add:

Expe

nditu

res

Budg

et -

(GAA

PEn

cum

bran

ces

(Bud

geta

ryPo

sitiv

eBa

sis)

6/30

/201

4Ba

sis)

Ori

gina

lFi

nal

(Neg

ativ

e)

Expe

nditu

res

(Con

t.)O

ther

Ope

ratio

ns (C

ont.)

Cont

ribu

tions

to O

ther

Age

ncie

s$

84,5

43$

0$

84,5

43$

52,0

00$

84,5

99$

56M

isce

llane

ous

629,

576

062

9,57

649

3,24

263

6,79

37,

217

Hig

hway

sH

ighw

ay a

nd B

ridg

e M

aint

enan

ce23

50

235

235

235

0To

tal E

xpen

ditu

res

$7,

930,

497

$64

,158

$7,

994,

655

$7,

372,

187

$8,

263,

712

$26

9,05

7

Exce

ss (D

efic

ienc

y) o

f Rev

enue

sO

ver

Expe

nditu

res

$(2

7,96

2)$

(64,

158)

$(9

2,12

0)$

(153

,549

)$

(368

,349

)$

276,

229

Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)N

otes

Issu

ed$

0$

0$

0$

50,0

00$

50,0

00$

(50,

000)

Tran

sfer

s In

85,2

710

85,2

7116

0,00

018

2,00

0(9

6,72

9)Tr

ansf

ers

Out

(5,7

80)

0(5

,780

)0

(5,7

80)

0To

tal O

ther

Fin

anci

ng S

ourc

es$

79,4

91$

0$

79,4

91$

210,

000

$22

6,22

0$

(146

,729

)

Net

Cha

nge

in F

und

Bala

nce

$51

,529

$(6

4,15

8)$

(12,

629)

$56

,451

$(1

42,1

29)

$12

9,50

0Fu

nd B

alan

ce, J

uly

1, 2

013

848,

424

084

8,42

459

7,00

059

7,00

025

1,42

4

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jun

e 30

, 201

4$

899,

953

$(6

4,15

8)$

835,

795

$65

3,45

1$

454,

871

$38

0,92

4

The

note

s to

the

finan

cial

sta

tem

ents

are

an

inte

gral

par

t of t

his

stat

emen

t.

Budg

eted

Am

ount

s

34

Page 35: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

C-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Cha

nges

in F

und

Bal

ance

- A

ctua

l (B

udge

tary

Bas

is) a

nd B

udge

tA

mbu

lanc

e Se

rvic

e Fu

ndFo

r the

Yea

r End

ed J

une

30, 2

014

Act

ual

Var

ianc

eR

even

ues/

with

Fin

alA

ctua

lA

dd:

Exp

endi

ture

sB

udge

t -(G

AA

PE

ncum

bran

ces

(Bud

geta

ryPo

sitiv

eB

asis

)6/

30/2

014

Bas

is)

Ori

gina

lFi

nal

(Neg

ativ

e)

Rev

enue

sC

harg

es fo

r Cur

rent

Ser

vice

s$

1,79

7,11

3$

0$

1,79

7,11

3$

2,05

7,23

1$

2,05

7,23

1$

(260

,118

)O

ther

Loc

al R

even

ues

10,7

720

10,7

720

010

,772

Fede

ral G

over

nmen

t23

5,00

00

235,

000

023

3,96

31,

037

Tota

l Rev

enue

s$

2,04

2,88

5$

0$

2,04

2,88

5$

2,05

7,23

1$

2,29

1,19

4$

(248

,309

)

Exp

endi

ture

sPu

blic

Hea

lth a

nd W

elfa

reA

mbu

lanc

e/E

mer

genc

y M

edic

al S

ervi

ces

$2,

109,

782

$22

,144

$2,

131,

926

$1,

902,

231

$2,

236,

440

$10

4,51

4To

tal E

xpen

ditu

res

$2,

109,

782

$22

,144

$2,

131,

926

$1,

902,

231

$2,

236,

440

$10

4,51

4

Exc

ess

(Def

icie

ncy)

of R

even

ues

Ove

r Exp

endi

ture

s$

(66,

897)

$(2

2,14

4)$

(89,

041)

$15

5,00

0$

54,7

54$

(143

,795

)

Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)Tr

ansf

ers

Out

$(5

0,00

0)$

0$

(50,

000)

$(1

55,0

00)

$(1

55,0

00)

$10

5,00

0To

tal O

ther

Fin

anci

ng S

ourc

es$

(50,

000)

$0

$(5

0,00

0)$

(155

,000

)$

(155

,000

)$

105,

000

Net

Cha

nge

in F

und

Bal

ance

$(1

16,8

97)

$(2

2,14

4)$

(139

,041

)$

0$

(100

,246

)$

(38,

795)

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jul

y 1,

201

318

9,71

50

189,

715

231,

413

231,

413

(41,

698)

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jun

e 30

, 201

4$

72,8

18$

(22,

144)

$50

,674

$23

1,41

3$

131,

167

$(8

0,49

3)

The

note

s to

the

finan

cial

sta

tem

ents

are

an

inte

gral

par

t of t

his

stat

emen

t.

Bud

gete

d A

mou

nts

35

Page 36: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit C-7

Scott County, TennesseeStatement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes

in Fund Balance - Actual and BudgetHighway/Public Works FundFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Variancewith FinalBudget -Positive

Actual Original Final (Negative)

RevenuesLocal Taxes $ 235 $ 235 $ 235 $ 0Other Local Revenues 88,966 2,000 77,044 11,922State of Tennessee 2,325,669 2,237,040 2,465,465 (139,796)Federal Government 476,992 0 161,287 315,705

Total Revenues $ 2,891,862 $ 2,239,275 $ 2,704,031 $ 187,831

ExpendituresHighways

Administration $ 114,218 $ 112,397 $ 113,447 $ (771)Highway and Bridge Maintenance 1,706,914 942,574 1,749,274 42,360Operation and Maintenance of Equipment 392,450 300,611 425,127 32,677Other Charges 123,433 64,843 127,937 4,504Employee Benefits 60,111 74,872 64,329 4,218Capital Outlay 679,131 300,000 761,812 82,681

Principal on DebtHighways and Streets 350,152 350,151 354,302 4,150

Interest on DebtHighways and Streets 59,909 45,403 79,208 19,299

Total Expenditures $ 3,486,318 $ 2,190,851 $ 3,675,436 $ 189,118

Excess (Deficiency) of RevenuesOver Expenditures $ (594,456) $ 48,424 $ (971,405) $ 376,949

Other Financing Sources (Uses)Notes Issued $ 1,022,205 $ 0 $ 1,019,829 $ 2,376Transfers Out (48,424) (48,424) (48,424) 0

Total Other Financing Sources $ 973,781 $ (48,424) $ 971,405 $ 2,376

Net Change in Fund Balance $ 379,325 $ 0 $ 0 $ 379,325Fund Balance, July 1, 2013 216,666 171,079 171,079 45,587

Fund Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 595,991 $ 171,079 $ 171,079 $ 424,912

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

Budgeted Amounts

36

Page 37: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit D-1

Scott County, TennesseeStatement of Net PositionProprietary FundJune 30, 2014

PublicUtilityFund

ASSETS

Current Assets:Equity in Pooled Cash and Investments $ 8,790Accounts Receivable 17,320Due from Other Funds 5,780

Total Assets $ 31,890

LIABILITIES

Current Liabilities:Accounts Payable $ 31,830Payroll Deductions Payable 60

Total Liabilities $ 31,890

NET POSITION

Unrestricted Net Position $ 0

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

Business-type Activities -

Major Enterprise Fund

37

Page 38: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit D-2

Scott County, TennesseeStatement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes

in Net PositionProprietary FundFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

PublicUtilityFund

Operating RevenuesCharges for Services $ 179,375Miscellaneous Refunds 15,626

Total Operating Revenue $ 195,001

Operating ExpensesSalaries $ 24,916Fringe Benefits 3,630Accounting Services 5,677Communication 829Postal Charges 111Permits 892Other Contracted Services 40,520Diesel Fuel 267Electricity 31,725Equipment and Machinery Parts 61,207Gasoline 137Water and Sewer 598Other Supplies and Materials 864Vehicle and Equipment Insurance 1,680Workers' Compensation Insurance 845Trustee's Commission 1,775Depreciation 75,125

Total Operating Expenses $ 250,798Operating Income (Loss) $ (55,797)

Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses)Interest on Debt $ (23,802)

Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) $ (23,802)

Income Before Contributions and Transfers $ (79,599)Transfers In 41,800Contribution by County - Assumption of Enterprise Fund Long-term Debt 584,021Special Item - Contribution of Capital Assets to Town of Huntsville (3,386,481)

Change in Net Position $ (2,840,259)Net Position, July 1, 2013 2,840,259

Net Position, June, 30, 2014 $ 0

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

Business-type Activities -

Major Enterprise

Fund

38

Page 39: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit D-3

Scott County, TennesseeStatement of Cash FlowsProprietary FundFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

PublicUtilityFund

Cash Flows from Operating Activities Receipts from Customers and Users $ 177,501 Other Operating Income 8,126 Salaries and Fringe Benefits (28,998) Payments to Vendors (125,244)Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities $ 31,385

Cash Flows from Capital and Related Financing Activities Purchase of Capital Assets $ (19,412) Principal Paid on Bonds (23,258) Interest Paid on Bonds (25,193)Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Capital and Related Financing Activities $ (67,863)

Cash Flows from Noncapital Financing Activities Transfers from Other Funds $ 36,020Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Noncapital Financing Activities $ 36,020

Increase (Decrease) in Cash $ (458)Cash, July 1, 2013 9,248

Cash, June 30, 2014 $ 8,790

Reconciliation of Net Operating Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities Operating Income (Loss) $ (55,797) Adjustments to Reconcile Net Operating Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities: Depreciation 75,125 Changes in Assets and Liabilities: (Increase) Decrease in Current Operating Receivables (1,874) Increase (Decrease) in Current Operating Liabilities 13,931

Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities $ 31,385

Non-cash Capital and Financing Transactions Assumption of Debt by County Governmental Activities $ 584,021 Contribution of Capital Assets to City of Huntsville (3,386,481)

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

Business-type Activities -

Major Enterprise

Fund

39

Page 40: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit E

Scott County, TennesseeStatement of Fiduciary Assets and LiabilitiesFiduciary FundsJune 30, 2014

ASSETS

Cash $ 548,906Equity in Pooled Cash and Investments 318,793Accounts Receivable 1,140Due from Other Governments 359,068Property Taxes Receivable 1,479,092Allowance for Uncollectible Taxes (101,268)

Total Assets $ 2,605,731

LIABILITIES

Accounts Payable $ 15,986Payroll Deductions Payable 891Due to Other Taxing Units 1,786,152Due to Litigants, Heirs, and Others 570,066Due to Joint Ventures 232,636

Total Liabilities $ 2,605,731

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

AgencyFunds

40

Page 41: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Note Page(s)

I. Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesA. Reporting Entity 43B. Government-wide and Fund Financial Statements 44C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial

Statement Presentation 45D. Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources, and

Net Position/Fund Balance1. Deposits and Investments 482. Receivables and Payables 493. Inventories 494. Capital Assets 505. Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources 506. Compensated Absences 517. Long-term Obligations 518. Net Position and Fund Balance 52

II. Reconciliation of Government-wide and Fund Financial StatementsA. Explanation of Certain Differences Between the Governmental Fund

Balance Sheet and the Government-wide Statement of Net Position 54B. Explanation of Certain Differences Between the Governmental Fund

Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balancesand the Government-wide Statement of Activities 54

III. Stewardship, Compliance, and AccountabilityA. Budgetary Information 54B. Fund Deficit 55C. Expenditures Exceeded Appropriations 55

IV. Detailed Notes on All FundsA. Deposits and Investments 56B. Notes Receivable 57C. Capital Assets 57D. Interfund Receivables, Payables, and Transfers 61E. Income from Operating Lease Commitments 62F. Capital Lease 62G. Long-term Obligations 63H. Pledges of Future Revenues 69I. On-Behalf Payments 69J. Short-term Debt 69

SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEEIndex of Notes to the Financial Statements

41

Page 42: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Note Page(s)

V. Other InformationA. Risk Management 70B. Accounting Changes 70C. Subsequent Events 71D. Contingent Liabilities 71E. Change in Administration 71F. Landfill Closure and Postclosure Care Costs 71G. Joint Venture 71H. Jointly Goverened Organization 72I. Retirement Commitments 72J. Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) 75K. Termination Benefits 78L. Office of Central Accounting, Budgeting, and Purchasing 78M. Purchasing Laws 78

VI. Other Notes - Discretely Presented Scott County EmergencyCommunications District 79

SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEEIndex of Notes to the Financial Statements (Cont.)

42

Page 43: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

43

SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEE NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Year Ended June 30, 2014

I. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Scott County’s financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is responsible for establishing GAAP for state and local governments. The following are the more significant accounting policies of Scott County:

A. Reporting Entity

Scott County is a public municipal corporation governed by an elected 14-member board. As required by GAAP, these financial statements present Scott County (the primary government) and its component units. The component units discussed below are included in the county's reporting entity because of the significance of their operational or financial relationships with the county.

Blended Component Unit – The Scott County Airport Authority was established by the Scott County Commission to provide oversight of the county’s airport operations. The County Commission appoints all members of the authority’s board. All revenues generated by the authority’s projects have been assigned to the county for payment of obligations of the airport authority, and most financial transactions are accounted for through the county’s General Fund. Long-term debt of the authority was assumed by the county and refinanced as general obligation debt of the county. That debt is retired through the General Debt Service Fund.

Discretely Presented Component Units – The following entities meet the criteria for discretely presented component units of the county. They are reported in separate columns in the government-wide financial statements to emphasize that they are legally separate from the county.

The Scott County School Department operates the public school system in the county, and the voters of Scott County elect its board. The School Department is fiscally dependent on the county because it may not issue debt, and its budget and property tax levy are subject to the County Commission’s approval. The School Department’s taxes are levied under the taxing authority of the county and are included as part of the county’s total tax levy.

The Scott County Emergency Communications District provides a simplified means of securing emergency services through a uniform emergency number for the residents of Scott County, and the County Commission appoints its governing body. The district is funded primarily through a service charge

Page 44: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

44

levied on telephone services. Before the issuance of most debt instruments, the district must obtain the County Commission’s approval. The Scott County School Department does not issue separate financial statements from those of the county. Therefore, basic financial statements of the School Department are included in this report as listed in the table of contents. Complete financial statements of the Scott County Emergency Communications District can be obtained from its administrative office at the following address:

Administrative Office:

Scott County Emergency Communications District P.O. Box 406 Huntsville, TN 37756

Related Organization – The Scott County Industrial Development Board is a related organization of Scott County. The County Commission appoints the board members, but the county’s accountability for the organization does not extend beyond making the appointments.

B. Government-wide and Fund Financial Statements The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the primary government and its component units. For the most part, the effect of interfund activity has been removed from these statements. However, when applicable, interfund services provided and used between functions are not eliminated in the process of consolidation in the Statement of Activities. Governmental activities are normally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues. Business-type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges, are required to be reported separately from governmental activities in government-wide financial statements. Likewise, the primary government is reported separately from certain legally separate component units for which the primary government is financially accountable. The Scott County School Department component unit only reports governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. The Statement of Activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function. Program revenues include (1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function and (2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues.

Page 45: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

45

Scott County issues all debt for the discretely presented Scott County School Department. There were no debt issues contributed by the county to the School Department during the year ended June 30, 2014, except for proceeds from the refunding debt issue discussed in Note IV.G.

Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds (enterprise), and fiduciary funds. The fiduciary funds are excluded from the government-wide financial statements. Major individual governmental funds and the major enterprise fund are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements.

C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation

The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund and fiduciary funds financial statements, except for agency funds, which have no measurement focus. Revenues are recorded when earned, and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Fund financial statements of Scott County are organized into funds, each of which is considered to be a separate accounting entity. Each fund is accounted for by providing a separate set of self-balancing accounts that constitute its assets, deferred outflow of resources, liabilities, deferred inflow of resources, fund equity, revenues, and expenditures/expenses. Funds are organized into three major categories: governmental, proprietary, and fiduciary. An emphasis is placed on major funds within the governmental and proprietary categories. Scott County only reports one proprietary fund, an enterprise fund. It has no internal service funds to report. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds. Major individual governmental funds and the major enterprise fund are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. All other governmental funds are aggregated into a single column on the fund financial statements. The fiduciary funds in total are reported in a single column. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they become both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the county considers revenues other than grants to be available if they are collected within 30 days after year-end. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as

Page 46: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

46

all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met and the revenues are available. Scott County considers grants and similar revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days after year-end. Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred. Principal and interest on long-term debt are recognized as fund liabilities when due or when amounts have been accumulated in the debt service funds for payments to be made early in the following year. Property taxes for the period levied, in-lieu-of tax payments, sales taxes, interest, and miscellaneous taxes are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and have been recognized as revenues of the current period. Applicable business taxes, litigation taxes, state-shared excise taxes, fines, forfeitures, and penalties are not susceptible to accrual since they are not measurable (reasonably estimable). All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when the county receives cash.

Proprietary and fiduciary funds financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus, except for agency funds, which have no measurement focus, and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when earned, and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Scott County reports the following major governmental funds:

General Fund – This is the county’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Ambulance Service Fund – This special revenue fund accounts for the transactions of the Scott County Ambulance Service. Patient charges are the foundational revenues of this fund. Highway/Public Works Fund – This special revenue fund accounts for transactions of the county’s Highway Department. Local and state gasoline/fuel taxes are the foundational revenues of this fund.

General Debt Service Fund – This fund accounts for the resources accumulated and payments made for principal and interest on long-term general obligation debt of governmental funds. Rural Debt Service Fund – This fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, long-term debt principal, interest, and related cost for debt issued that benefit the areas of Scott County outside the Special School District (Oneida).

Page 47: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

47

Scott County reports the following major proprietary fund: Public Utility Fund – This fund was used to account for the operation of the county-owned wastewater treatment facility. This fund was closed during the year. The county donated the capital assets of the system to the Town of Huntsville.

Additionally, Scott County reports the following fund types:

Capital Projects Funds – These funds are used to account for financial resources to be used in the acquisition or construction of major capital projects.

Agency Funds – These funds account for amounts collected in an agency capacity by the constitutional officers, local sales taxes received by the state to be forwarded to the various cities in Scott County, the city school system’s share of educational revenues, state grants and other restricted revenues held for the benefit of the Judicial District Drug Task Force, and restricted revenues held for the benefit of the Office of District Attorney General. Agency funds are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not involve measurement of results of operations. They do, however, use the accrual basis of accounting to recognize receivables and payables.

The discretely presented Scott County School Department reports the following major governmental funds:

General Purpose School Fund – This fund is the primary operating fund for the School Department. It is used to account for general operations of the School Department. School Federal Projects Fund – This special revenue fund is used to account for restricted federal revenues, which must be expended on specific education programs. Central Cafeteria Fund – This special revenue fund is used to account for the cafeteria operations in each of the schools. Service charges and federal grants are the foundational revenues of this fund.

Amounts reported as program revenues include (1) charges to customers or applicants for goods, services, or privileges provided; (2) operating grants and contributions; and (3) capital grants and contributions. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. The county has one proprietary fund, an enterprise fund, used to account for the county’s wastewater facility. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services in connection with the

Page 48: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

48

fund’s principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the county’s enterprise fund are charges for services. Operating expenses for the enterprise fund include various operational expenses for wastewater treatment.

D. Assets, Liabilities, Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources, and Net Position/Fund Balance

1. Deposits and Investments

For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, cash includes cash on deposit with the county trustee. State statutes authorize the government to make direct investments in bonds, notes, or treasury bills of the U.S. government and obligations guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies; deposit accounts at state and federal chartered banks and savings and loan associations; repurchase agreements; the State Treasurer’s Investment Pool; bonds of any state or political subdivision rated A or higher by any nationally recognized rating service; nonconvertible debt securities of certain federal government sponsored enterprises; and the county’s own legally issued bonds or notes. The county trustee maintains a cash and internal investment pool that is used by all funds and the discretely presented Scott County School Department. Each fund’s portion of this pool is displayed on the balance sheets or statements of net position as Equity in Pooled Cash and Investments. Income from these pooled investments is assigned to various funds based on budgetary allocations. Scott County and the School Department have adopted a policy of reporting U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. agency obligations, and repurchase agreements with maturities of one year or less when purchased on the balance sheet at amortized cost. Certificates of deposit are reported at cost. Investments in the State Treasurer’s Investment Pool are reported at fair value. The State Treasurer’s Investment Pool is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an investment company, but nevertheless has a policy that it will, and does, operate in a manner consistent with the SEC’s Rule 2a7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Accordingly, the pool qualifies as a 2a7-like pool and is reported at the net asset value per share (which approximates fair value) even though it is calculated using the amortized cost method. State statutes require the state treasurer to administer the pool under the same terms and conditions, including collateral requirements, as prescribed for other funds invested by the state treasurer. All other investments are reported at fair value. No investments required to be reported at fair value were held at the balance sheet date.

Page 49: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

49

2. Receivables and Payables

Activity between funds for unremitted current collections outstanding at the end of the fiscal year are referred to as due to/from other funds. All ambulance and property tax receivables are shown with an allowance for uncollectibles. The allowance for uncollectible property taxes is equal to four percent of total taxes levied. The allowance for ambulance receivables is comprised of estimated amounts of write-offs involving Medicare and Medicaid and estimated amounts of other collections based on historical collection data. Property taxes receivable are recognized as of the date an enforceable legal claim to the taxable property arises. This date is January 1 and is referred to as the lien date. However, revenues from property taxes are recognized in the period for which the taxes are levied, which is the ensuing fiscal year. Since the receivable is recognized before the period of revenue recognition, the entire amount of the receivable, less an estimated allowance for uncollectible taxes, is reported as a deferred inflow of resources as of June 30.

Property taxes receivable are also reported as of June 30 for the taxes that are levied, collected, and reported as revenue during the current fiscal year. These property taxes receivable are presented on the balance sheet as a deferred inflow of resources to reflect amounts not available as of June 30. Property taxes collected within 30 days of year-end are considered available and accrued. The allowance for uncollectible taxes represents the estimated amount of the receivable that will be filed in court for collection. Delinquent taxes filed in court for collection are not included in taxes receivable since they are neither measurable nor available.

Property taxes are levied as of the first Monday in October. Taxes become delinquent and begin accumulating interest and penalty the following March 1. Suit must be filed in Chancery Court between the following February 1 to April 1 for any remaining unpaid taxes. Additional costs attach to delinquent taxes after a court suit has been filed. Most payables are disaggregated on the face of the financial statements. Other current liabilities in the discretely presented Scott County School Department represent amounts due for health insurance premiums, which will be drawn by the insurance pool during July and August.

3. Inventories

Inventories of Scott County are recorded at cost, determined on the first-in, first-out method. Inventories of governmental funds are

Page 50: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

50

recorded as expenditures when consumed rather than when purchased. Inventories are offset in the nonspendable fund balance account in governmental funds.

4. Capital Assets

Governmental funds do not capitalize the cost of capital outlays; these funds report capital outlays as expenditures upon acquisition. Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and infrastructure assets (e.g., roads, bridges, and similar items), are reported in the governmental and business-type columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial, individual cost of $5,000 or more and an estimated useful life of more than three years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets’ lives are not capitalized. Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as projects are constructed. Property, plant, equipment, and infrastructure of the primary government and the discretely presented School Department are depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Assets Years

Buildings and Improvements 40Other Capital Assets 5 - 15Infrastructure 20 - 50

5. Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources

In addition to assets, the Statement of Net Position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. The government only has one item that qualifies for reporting in this category. It is the deferred charge on refunding reported in the government-wide Statement of Net Position. A deferred charge on refunding results from the difference in the carrying value of refunded debt and its reacquisition price. This

Page 51: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

51

amount is deferred and amortized over the shorter of the life of the refunded or refunding debt. In addition to liabilities, the Statement of Net Position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred inflows of resources, represents an acquisition of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The government has items that qualify for reporting in this category. Accordingly, the items are reported in the government-wide Statement of Net Position and the governmental funds balance sheet. These revenues are from the following sources: current and delinquent property taxes and various receivables for revenues, which do not meet the availability criteria in governmental funds. These amounts are deferred and recognized as an inflow of resources in the period that the amounts become available.

6. Compensated Absences It is the primary government’s policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. The discretely presented School Department’s policy allows employees to accumulate sick pay benefits but not vacation benefits. There is no liability for unpaid accumulated sick leave since there is no policy to pay any amounts when employees separate from service with the government, except upon retirement as discussed in Note V.I. All vacation pay is accrued when incurred in the government-wide financial statements for the county. A liability for vacation pay is reported in governmental funds only if amounts have matured, for example, as a result of employee resignations and retirements. Vacation benefits are accrued when earned in the enterprise fund.

7. Long-term Obligations In the government-wide financial statements and the proprietary fund in the fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities or proprietary fund type Statement of Net Position. Debt premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the new debt using the straight-line method. Debt issuance costs are expensed in the period incurred. In refunding transactions, the difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the old debt is reported as a deferred outflow of resources or a deferred inflow of resources and recognized as a component of interest expense in a systematic and rational manner over the remaining life of the refunded debt or the life of the new debt issued, whichever is shorter.

Page 52: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

52

In the fund financial statements, governmental funds recognize debt premiums and discounts, as well as debt issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources, while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures. Only the matured portion (the portion that has come due for payment) of long-term indebtedness, including bonds payable, is recognized as a liability and expenditure in the governmental fund financial statements. Liabilities and expenditures for other long-term obligations, including compensated absences, landfill postclosure care costs, and other postemployment benefits, are recognized to the extent that the liabilities have matured (come due for payment) each period.

8. Net Position and Fund Balance

In the government-wide financial statements and the proprietary fund in the fund financial statements, equity is classified as net position and displayed in three components:

a. Net investment in capital assets – Consists of capital assets,

including restricted capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation and reduced by the outstanding balances of any bonds, mortgages, notes, or other borrowings that are attributable to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets.

b. Restricted net position – Consists of net position with constraints

placed on the use either by (1) external groups such as creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments or (2) law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.

c. Unrestricted net position – All other net position that does not

meet the definition of restricted or net investment in capital assets.

As of June 30, 2014, Scott County had $22,499,297 in outstanding debt for capital purposes of the discretely presented Scott County School Department. In accordance with state statutes, certain county school debt proceeds must be shared with other public school systems in the county, the Oneida Special School District, based on an average daily attendance proration. The debt is a liability of Scott County, but the capital assets acquired are reported in the financial statements of the other entities. Therefore, Scott County has incurred a liability significantly decreasing its unrestricted net position with no corresponding increase in the county’s capital assets.

Page 53: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

53

It is the county’s policy that restricted amounts would be reduced first followed by unrestricted amounts when expenditures are incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available. Also, it is the county’s policy that committed amounts would be reduced first, followed by assigned amounts, and then unassigned amounts when expenditures are incurred for purposes for which amounts in any of these unrestricted fund balance classifications could be used. In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that comprise a hierarchy based primarily on the extent to which the government is bound to honor constraints on the specific purposes for which amounts in these funds can be spent. These classifications may consist of the following:

Nonspendable Fund Balance – includes amounts that cannot be spent because they are either (a) not in spendable form or (b) legally or contractually required to be maintained intact. Restricted Fund Balance – includes amounts that have constraints placed on the use of the resources that are either (a) externally imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors or laws and regulations of other governments or (b) imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Committed Fund Balance – includes amounts that can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal resolutions of the County Commission, the county’s highest level of decision-making authority and the Board of Education, the School Department’s highest level of decision-making authority, and shall remain binding unless removed in the same manner. Assigned Fund Balance – includes amounts that are constrained by the county’s intent to be used for specific purposes, but are neither restricted nor committed (excluding stabilization arrangements). The County Commission has by resolution authorized the county’s Financial Management Committee to make assignments for the general government. The Board of Education makes assignments for the School Department. Unassigned Fund Balance – the residual classification of the General and General Purpose School funds. This classification represents fund balance that has not been assigned to other funds and that has not been restricted, committed, or assigned to specific purposes within the General and General Purpose School funds.

Page 54: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

54

II. RECONCILIATION OF GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

A. Explanation of certain differences between the governmental fund

balance sheet and the government-wide Statement of Net Position Primary Government Exhibit C-2 includes explanations of the nature of individual elements of items required to reconcile the balance sheet of governmental funds with the government-wide Statement of Net Position. Discretely Presented Scott County School Department Exhibit J-3 includes explanations of the nature of individual elements of items required to reconcile the balance sheet of governmental funds with the government-wide Statement of Net Position.

B. Explanation of certain differences between the governmental fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances and the government-wide Statement of Activities

Primary Government Exhibit C-4 includes explanations of the nature of individual elements of items required to reconcile the net changes in fund balances – total governmental funds with the change in net position of governmental activities reported in the government-wide Statement of Activities. Discretely Presented Scott County School Department Exhibit J-5 includes explanations of the nature of individual elements of items required to reconcile the net change in fund balances – total governmental funds with the change in net position of governmental activities reported in the government-wide Statement of Activities.

III. STEWARDSHIP, COMPLIANCE, AND ACCOUNTABILITY

A. Budgetary Information

Annual budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for all governmental funds except the Constitutional Officers – Fees Fund (special revenue fund), which is not budgeted, and the capital projects funds (except for the General Capital Projects Fund), which adopt project length budgets. All annual appropriations lapse at fiscal year-end.

Page 55: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

55

The county is required by state statute to adopt annual budgets. Annual budgets are prepared on the basis in which current available funds must be sufficient to meet current expenditures. Expenditures and encumbrances may not legally exceed appropriations authorized by the County Commission and any authorized revisions. Unencumbered appropriations lapse at the end of each fiscal year. The budgetary level of control is at the major category level established by the County Uniform Chart of Accounts, as prescribed by the Comptroller of the Treasury of the State of Tennessee. Major categories are at the department level (examples of General Fund major categories: County Commission, Board of Equalization, County Mayor/Executive, County Attorney, etc.). Management may make revisions within major categories, but only the County Commission may transfer appropriations between major categories. During the year, several supplementary appropriations were necessary.

The county’s budgetary basis of accounting is consistent with GAAP, except instances in which encumbrances are treated as budgeted expenditures. The difference between the budgetary basis and GAAP basis is presented on the face of each budgetary schedule.

B. Fund Balance Deficit The School Federal Projects Fund (special revenue fund) of the discretely presented Scott County School Department had a deficit in unassigned fund balance of $54,799 at June 30, 2014. This deficit resulted from the failure to request reimbursements through federal grants on a timely basis. The deficit in unassigned fund balance was liquidated when revenues were recognized after June 30, 2014.

C. Expenditures Exceeded Appropriations Total expenditures exceeded total appropriations approved by the County Commission in the General Capital Projects Fund by $11. Expenditures exceeded appropriations approved by the County Commission in certain major appropriations categories (the legal level of control) of the following funds:

Page 56: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

56

AmountFund/Major Appropriation Category Overspent

General: Finance: Property Assessor's Office $ 276 Other Operations: Airport 35,597

Highway/Public Works: Highways: Administration 771

Expenditures that exceed appropriations are a violation of state statutes. These expenditures in excess of appropriations were funded by greater than anticipated revenues and by available fund balances.

IV. DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS

A. Deposits and Investments Scott County and the Scott County School Department participate in an internal cash and investment pool through the Office of Trustee. The county trustee is the treasurer of the county and in this capacity is responsible for receiving, disbursing, and investing most county funds. Each fund’s portion of this pool is displayed on the balance sheets or statements of net position as Equity in Pooled Cash and Investments. Cash reflected on the balance sheets or statements of net position represents nonpooled amounts held separately by individual funds. Deposits Legal Provisions. All deposits with financial institutions must be secured by one of two methods. One method involves financial institutions that participate in the bank collateral pool administered by the state treasurer. Participating banks determine the aggregate balance of their public fund accounts for the State of Tennessee and its political subdivisions. The amount of collateral required to secure these public deposits must equal at least 105 percent of the average daily balance of public deposits held. Collateral securities required to be pledged by the participating banks to protect their public fund accounts are pledged to the state treasurer on behalf of the bank collateral pool. The securities pledged to protect these accounts are pledged in the aggregate rather than against each account. The members of the pool may be required by agreement to pay an assessment to cover any deficiency. Under this additional assessment agreement, public fund accounts covered by the pool are considered to be insured for purposes of custodial credit risk disclosure.

Page 57: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

57

For deposits with financial institutions that do not participate in the bank collateral pool, state statutes require that all deposits be collateralized with collateral whose market value is equal to 105 percent of the uninsured amount of the deposits. The collateral must be placed by the depository bank in an escrow account in a second bank for the benefit of the county. Investments Legal Provisions. Counties are authorized to make direct investments in bonds, notes, or treasury bills of the U.S. government and obligations guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies; deposits at state and federal chartered banks and savings and loan associations; bonds of any state or political subdivision rated A or higher by any nationally recognized rating service; nonconvertible debt securities of certain federal government sponsored enterprises; and the county’s own legally issued bonds or notes. These investments may not have a maturity greater than two years. The county may make investments with longer maturities if various restrictions set out in state law are followed. Counties are also authorized to make investments in the State Treasurer’s Investment Pool and in repurchase agreements. Repurchase agreements must be approved by the state Comptroller’s Office and executed in accordance with procedures established by the State Funding Board. Securities purchased under a repurchase agreement must be obligations of the U.S. government or obligations guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies. When repurchase agreements are executed, the purchase of the securities must be priced at least two percent below the fair value of the securities on the day of purchase. The county had no pooled and nonpooled investments as of June 30, 2014.

B. Notes Receivable Notes receivable are reflected in the General Debt Service Fund for amounts due from the sale of the Scott County Hospital to Pioneer Health Services, Inc., which occurred in November 2013. Terms of the sales agreement included a sale price of $106,676, which was the amount necessary to retire the county’s outstanding debt on the hospital. Pioneer paid $28,600 of this amount in January 2014, and agreed to pay the balance of $78,076 in three equal annual installments due December 2014 through December 2016. The amount of the receivable not expected to be received within one year is $52,050. In the fund financial statements, the receivable is offset by deferred revenues since none of the amounts due meet the availability criteria for revenue recognition in governmental funds.

C. Capital Assets Capital assets activity for the year ended June 30, 2014, was as follows:

Page 58: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

58

Primary Government Governmental Activities

Balance Balance7-1-13 Increases Decreases 6-30-14

Capital Assets Not Depreciated:Land $ 1,983,885 $ 0 $ (19,000) $ 1,964,885Total Capital Assets Not Depreciated $ 1,983,885 $ 0 $ (19,000) $ 1,964,885

Capital Assets Depreciated:Buildings and Improvements $ 21,624,430 $ 535,959 $ (2,950,630) $ 19,209,759Infrastructure 3,380,223 543,826 0 3,924,049Other Capital Assets 4,438,786 1,266,406 (310,599) 5,394,593Total Capital Assets Depreciated $ 29,443,439 $ 2,346,191 $ (3,261,229) $ 28,528,401

Less Accumulated Depreciation For:Buildings and Improvements $ 7,589,158 $ 475,005 $ (2,406,080) $ 5,658,083Infrastructure 447,322 75,777 0 523,099Other Capital Assets 2,854,222 546,846 (257,842) 3,143,226Total Accumulated Depreciation $ 10,890,702 $ 1,097,628 $ (2,663,922) $ 9,324,408

Total Capital Assets Depreciated, Net $ 18,552,737 $ 1,248,563 $ (597,307) $ 19,203,993

Governmental Activities Capital Assets, Net $ 20,536,622 $ 1,248,563 $ (616,307) $ 21,168,878

Decreases include hospital assets with an estimated original cost of $2,969,630 and accumulated depreciation of $2,406,080, which were sold to Pioneer Health Services. See Note IV.B. for further discussion of this sale. Business-type Activities

Balance Balance7-1-13 Increases Decreases 6-30-14

Capital Assets Not Depreciated:Land $ 10,000 $ 0 $ (10,000) $ 0Total Capital Assets Not Depreciated $ 10,000 $ 0 $ (10,000) $ 0

Page 59: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

59

Business-type Activities (Cont.)

Balance Balance7-1-13 Increases Decreases 6-30-14

Capital Assets Depreciated:Buildings and Improvements $ 349,487 $ 0 $ (349,487) $ 0Infrastructure 2,088,680 0 (2,088,680) 0Other Capital Assets 1,966,448 19,412 (1,985,860) 0Total Capital Assets Depreciated $ 4,404,615 $ 19,412 $ (4,424,027) $ 0

Less Accumulated Depreciation For:Buildings and Improvements $ 121,122 $ 10,152 $ (131,274) $ 0Infrastructure 334,520 25,524 (360,044) 0Other Capital Assets 516,779 39,449 (556,228) 0Total Accumulated Depreciation $ 972,421 $ 75,125 $ (1,047,546) $ 0

Total Capital Assets Depreciated, Net $ 3,432,194 $ (55,713) $ (3,376,481) $ 0

Business-type Activities Capital Assets, Net $ 3,442,194 $ (55,713) $ (3,386,481) $ 0

During the year, Scott County discontinued operations of its business-type activities, which consisted of the Public Utility Fund. Capital assets of the fund were donated to the Town of Huntsville. By interlocal agreement, the Town of Huntsville agreed to assume operations of the utility. Depreciation expense was charged to functions of the primary government as follows: Governmental Activities:

General Government $ 574,099Administration of Justice 2,208Public Safety 226,970Public Health and Welfare 126,685Social, Cultural, and Recreational Services 5,243Highways 162,423

Total Depreciation Expense - Governmental Activities $ 1,097,628

Business-type Activities:

Sewer $ 75,125Total Depreciation Expense - Business-type Activities $ 75,125

Page 60: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

60

Discretely Presented Scott County School Department Capital assets activity for the year ended June 30, 2014, was as follows: Governmental Activities:

Balance Balance7-1-13 Increases 6-30-14

Capital Assets Not Depreciated:Land $ 910,561 $ 0 $ 910,561Total Capital Assets Not Depreciated $ 910,561 $ 0 $ 910,561

Capital Assets Depreciated:Buildings and Improvements $ 28,833,306 $ 38,483 $ 28,871,789Other Capital Assets 4,785,862 323,082 5,108,944Total Capital Assets Depreciated $ 33,619,168 $ 361,565 $ 33,980,733

Less Accumulated Depreciation For:Buildings and Improvements $ 9,877,684 $ 701,627 $ 10,579,311Other Capital Assets 3,498,168 288,358 3,786,526

Total Accumulated Depreciation $ 13,375,852 $ 989,985 $ 14,365,837

Total Capital Assets Depreciated, Net $ 20,243,316 $ (628,420) $ 19,614,896

Governmental Activities Capital Assets, Net $ 21,153,877 $ (628,420) $ 20,525,457

The School Department had no decreases in capital assets to report for the year ended June 30, 2014. Depreciation expense was charged to functions of the discretely presented Scott County School Department as follows:

Page 61: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

61

Governmental Activities:

Instruction $ 6,004Support Services 934,057Operation of Non-instructional Services 49,924

Total Depreciation Expense - Governmental Activities $ 989,985

D. Interfund Receivables, Payables, and Transfers The composition of interfund balances as of June 30, 2014, was as follows: Due to/from Other Funds: Receivable Fund Payable Fund Amount

Primary Government: General Nonmajor governmental $ 1,282 Public Utility General 5,780

These balances resulted from the time lag between the dates that interfund goods and services are provided or reimbursable expenditures occur and payments between funds are made. The balance in the Public Utility Fund totaling $5,780 was in-transit from the General Fund at June 30, 2014. Due to/from Primary Government and Component Units: Receivable Fund Payable Fund Amount

Component Unit:Primary Government: School Department: General General Purpose School $ 5,279

Interfund Transfers: Interfund transfers for the year ended June 30, 2014, consisted of the following amounts:

Page 62: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

62

Primary Government

General PublicGeneral Debt Service Utility

Transfers Out Fund Fund Fund

General Fund 0 0 $ 5,780Ambulance Service Fund $ 50,000 $ 0 $ 0Highway/Public Works Fund 0 48,424 0General Debt Service Fund 0 0 36,020Nonmajor governmental funds 35,271 0 0

Total $ 85,271 $ 48,424 $ 41,800

Transfers In

Discretely Presented Scott County School Department

GeneralPurposeSchool

Transfer Out Fund

School Federal Projects Fund $ 26,000

Transfer In

Transfers are used to move revenues from the fund that statute or budget requires to collect them to the fund that statute or budget requires to expend them and to use unrestricted revenues collected in the General Fund to finance various programs accounted for in the other funds in accordance with budgetary authorizations.

E. Income from Operating Lease Commitments Scott County has leased operations of its nursing home to Preferred Health Services. The initial lease agreement expired August 31, 2013; however, the lease has been extended for a period of five years and will now expire August 31, 2018. Terms of the agreement call for Preferred Health Services to assume most of the current assets and liabilities of the nursing home and to pay Scott County a monthly fee. The current payments under this agreement are $103,226 annually. The agreement includes a cancellation clause; therefore, a schedule of future income is not presented for this agreement.

F. Capital Lease

On May 15, 2008, Scott County entered into a 19-year lease-purchase agreement on behalf of the School Department for energy efficiency upgrades

Page 63: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

63

and equipment for school facilities. The terms of the agreement require total lease payments of $2,499,652 plus interest of 4.62 percent. Lease payments were scheduled to be made through 2027. The General Purpose School Fund was making contributions to the primary government for the lease payments. However, on June 30, 2014, the leased equipment was purchased with proceeds from the Refunding Bond Series 2014B discussed in Note IV.G., thereby terminating this lease-purchase agreement.

G. Long-term Obligations

Primary Government General Obligation Bonds, Notes, and Other Loans Scott County issues general obligation bonds and other loans to provide funds for the acquisition, construction, and renovation of major capital facilities for the primary government and the discretely presented School Department. In addition, general obligation bonds have been issued to refund other general obligation bonds. Capital outlay notes are also issued to fund capital facilities and other capital outlay purchases, such as equipment. General obligation bonds, capital outlay notes, and other loans are direct obligations and pledge the full faith and credit of the government. General obligation bonds, capital outlay notes, and other loans outstanding were issued for original terms of up to 21 years for bonds, up to 12 years for notes, and up to 27 years for other loans. Repayment terms are generally structured with increasing amounts of principal maturing as interest requirements decrease over the term of the debt. Outstanding notes totaling $1,922,351 will be retired from the Highway/Public Works Fund. All other notes, bonds, and other loans outstanding will be retired from the debt service funds. General obligation bonds, capital outlay notes, and other loans outstanding as of June 30, 2014, for governmental activities are as follows:

OriginalInterest Final Amount Balance

Type Rate Maturity of Issue 6-30-14

General Obligation Bonds 3 to 4.5 % 6-1-28 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,075,000General Obligation Bonds - Refunding 2 to 3.4 6-1-35 9,610,000 9,610,000Capital Outlay Notes 2.94 to 4.99 6-30-17 3,695,777 1,978,648Other Loans Variable 5-25-35 27,594,938 22,995,538

Scott County has entered into loan agreements with the Montgomery County Public Building Authority and the City of Clarksville Public Building Authority (PBAs). These loan agreements provide for the PBAs to loan funds to Scott County for various renovation and construction projects on an as needed basis. These loans are repayable at interest rates that are tax-exempt

Page 64: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

64

variable rates determined by the remarketing agent daily or weekly, depending on the particular program. In addition, the county pays various other fees (administrative, letter of credit, debt remarketing, etc.) in connection with these loans. The following table summarizes loan agreements outstanding at June 30, 2014:

OtherOriginal Interest Fees onAmount Outstanding Rates Variableof Loan Principal Interest as of Rate

Description Agreement 6-30-14 Type 6-30-14 Debt

Montgomery County Public Building Authority

Building and Equipment $ 1,000,000 $ 410,600 Variable .12% 1.23%Various School Projects 3,000,000 1,642,000 Variable .45% .63Justice Center 10,000,000 8,261,938 (1) Variable .07% 1.07%

City of Clarksville Public Building Authority

School Renovations and Improvements 13,940,000 12,681,000 Variable .11% 1.02%

Total $ 22,995,538

(1) Total available at June 30, 2014, for future draws under this loan agreement is $345,062.

The annual requirements to amortize all general obligation bonds, notes, and other loans outstanding as of June 30, 2014, including interest and other loan fees, are presented in the following tables: Year EndingJune 30 Principal Interest Total

2015 $ 665,000 $ 268,447 $ 933,4472016 630,000 273,526 903,5262017 640,000 259,826 899,8262018 595,000 245,826 840,8262019 595,000 232,726 827,7262020-2024 3,230,000 952,262 4,182,2622025-2029 4,100,000 409,251 4,509,2512030-3034 190,000 24,990 214,9902035 40,000 1,360 41,360

Total $ 10,685,000 $ 2,668,214 $ 13,353,214

Bonds

Page 65: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

65

Year EndingJune 30 Principal Interest Total

2015 $ 747,184 $ 63,936 $ 811,1202016 832,398 32,620 865,0182017 399,066 8,062 407,128

Total $ 1,978,648 $ 104,618 $ 2,083,266

Notes

Year EndingJune 30 Principal Interest Other Fees Total

2015 $ 807,400 $ 27,614 $ 227,153 $ 1,062,1672016 845,000 26,270 219,665 1,090,9352017 883,600 24,872 211,818 1,120,2902018 924,400 23,419 203,604 1,151,4232019 967,300 21,910 195,000 1,184,2102020-2024 5,122,900 84,926 832,513 6,040,3392025-2029 5,363,000 53,915 581,261 5,998,1762030-3034 6,846,000 26,106 278,706 7,150,8122035 1,235,938 1,242 12,447 1,249,627

Total $ 22,995,538 $ 290,274 $ 2,762,167 $ 26,047,979

Other Loans

There is $1,241,163 available in the debt service funds to service long-term debt. Debt per capita, including notes, bonds, and other loans totaled $1,163, for residents living inside the Oneida Special School District and $1,694, for residents living outside the Oneida Special School District. Changes in Long-term Obligations Long-term obligations activity for the year ended June 30, 2014, was as follows:

Page 66: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

66

Governmental Activities:

OtherBonds Notes Loans

Balance, July 1, 2013 $ 7,879,000 $ 2,541,323 $ 23,766,538Additions (1) 9,610,000 1,022,205 0Reductions (6,804,000) (1,584,880) (771,000)

Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 10,685,000 $ 1,978,648 $ 22,995,538

Balance Due Within One Year $ 665,000 $ 747,184 $ 807,400

Capital CompensatedLeases Absences

Balance, July 1, 2013 $ 2,238,324 $ 173,632Additions 0 162,256Reductions (2,238,324) (151,648)

Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 0 $ 184,240

Balance Due Within One Year $ 0 $ 147,392

LandfillClosure/ Other

Postclosure PostemploymentCare Costs Benefits

Balance, July 1, 2013 $ 2,484,266 $ 177,587Additions 47,003 13,117Reductions (10,400) (2,550)

Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 2,520,869 $ 188,154

Balance Due Within One Year $ 90,831 $ 0

(1) Includes amounts to refund debt, which was previously reflected as business-type activity debt as discussed in the Public Utility Fund (enterprise fund) section of this note.

Page 67: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

67

Analysis of Noncurrent Liabilities Presented on Exhibit A:

Total Noncurrent Liabilities, June 30, 2014 $ 38,552,449Less: Balance Due Within One Year (2,457,807)Add: Unamortized Premium on Debt 182,390

Noncurrent Liabilities - Due in More Than One Year - Exhibit A $ 36,277,032 During the year, the discretely presented Scott County School Department contributed $351,092 to the primary government’s Rural Debt Service Fund for the retirement of debt issued for school purposes. Compensated absences and other postemployment benefits will be paid from the employing funds, primarily the General, Ambulance Service, and Highway/Public Works funds. Landfill closure/postclosure care costs will be paid from the Solid Waste/Sanitation Fund. Current Refunding During the year, Scott County issued $1,490,000 of General Obligation Refunding Bonds Series 2014A to provide resources for a current refunding of the 2003 General Obligation Refunding Bond, the 2004 General Obligation Bonds, the 2007 Revenue and Tax Bonds, and a capital outlay note. As a result, the refunded debt was redeemed and the liabilities have been removed from the governmental activities column of the Statement of Net Position. The transaction resulted in a decrease of $219,806 in future debt service payments and an economic gain (difference between the present value of the debt service payments of the refunded and refunding debt) of $147,344 was obtained. The decrease in future debt service payments is a result of lower interest rates on the refunding debt. During the year, Scott County issued $8,120,000 of Rural School Refunding Bonds Series 2014B to provide resources for a current refunding of the 2004 Rural School Refunding Bonds, the 2004 Rural School Bonds, four capital outlay notes, and the 2008 Energy Efficiency upgrades capital lease. As a result, the refunded notes and bonds were redeemed and the liabilities have been removed from the governmental activities column of the Statement of Net Position. The transaction resulted in a decrease of $1,223,130 in future debt service payments and an economic gain (difference between the present value of the debt service payments of the refunded and refunding debt) of $1,078,884 was obtained. The decrease in future debt service payments is a result of lower interest rates on the refunding debt.

Page 68: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

68

Public Utility Fund (enterprise fund) During the year, Scott County discontinued operation of the Public Utility Fund (enterprise fund). Long-term debt that was associated with the Public Utility Fund was refunded by proceeds from the refunding Bond Series 2014A on June 30, 2014. The refunding bond is reflected as debt of the governmental operations. Changes in Long-term Obligations Long-term obligations activity for the Public Utility Fund for the year ended June 30, 2014, was as follows: Business-type Activities:

Balance, July 1, 2013 $ 607,279Reductions (principal retirement) (23,258)Reductions (refunded by governmental activities debt) (584,021)

Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 0

Fund

PublicUtility

Bonds

Discretely Presented Scott County School Department

Changes in Long-term Obligations Long-term obligations activity for the discretely presented Scott County School Department for the year ended June 30, 2014, was as follows: Governmental Activities:

Postemployment

Balance, July 1, 2013 $ 2,532,391Additions 499,609Reductions (204,896)

Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 2,827,104

Balance Due Within One Year $ 0

Other

Benefits

Page 69: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

69

Analysis of Noncurrent Liabilities Presented on Exhibit A:

Total Noncurrent Liabilities, June 30, 2014 $ 2,827,104Less: Balance Due Within One Year 0

Noncurrent Liabilities - Due in More Than One Year - Exhibit A $ 2,827,104

Other postemployment benefits will be paid from the employing funds, primarily the General Purpose School and School Federal Projects funds.

H. Pledges of Future Revenues In March 2012, the citizens of Scott County voted to levy a motor vehicle privilege tax totaling $30 for each motor-driven vehicle. The county pledged the tax collections to repay $13,940,000 in variable rate Public Building Authority Loans issued in December 2009 to finance the construction of Robbins Elementary, Burchfield Elementary, and Oneida schools. Upon payment and retirement of this debt, the tax will terminate. The principal, estimated interest, and estimated fee requirements for the loans totaled $14,456,581, payable monthly through May 2035. For the current year, total principal, interest, and fees paid on the loan and motor vehicle privilege tax generated were $478,276 and $579,419, respectively. A portion of restricted fund balance in the General Debt Service Fund ($157,612) represents the cumulative amount that these pledged revenues have exceeded the debt service requirements for the bonds since the inception of the wheel tax.

I. On-Behalf Payments – Discretely Presented Scott County School Department The State of Tennessee pays health insurance premiums for retired teachers on-behalf of the Scott County School Department. These payments are made by the state to the Local Education Group Insurance Plan and the Medicare Supplement Plan. Both of these plans are administered by the State of Tennessee and reported in the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Payments by the state to the Local Education Group Insurance Plan and the Medicare Supplement Plan for the year ended June 30, 2014, were $98,656 and $29,494, respectively. The School Department has recognized these on-behalf payments as revenues and expenditures in the General Purpose School Fund.

J. Short-term Debt

Scott County issued tax anticipation notes in the form of interfund loans in advance of revenue collections. These loans were necessary to provide cash for operations. Short-term debt activity for the year ended June 30, 2014, was as follows:

Page 70: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

70

Balance Balance7-1-13 Issued Paid 6-30-14

Primary Government: From General Debt Service Fund to General Fund $ 0 $ 400,000 $ (400,000) $ 0

V. OTHER INFORMATION

A. Risk Management

Scott County and the discretely presented Scott County School Department participate in the Tennessee Risk Management Trust (TN-RMT), which is a public entity risk pool created under the auspices of the Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act to provide governmental insurance coverage. The county and School Department pay annual premiums to the TN-RMT for their general liability, property, casualty, and workers’ compensation insurance coverage. The creation of the TN-RMT provides for it to be self-sustaining through member premiums. The Scott County School Department participates in the Local Education Group Insurance Fund (LEGIF), a public entity risk pool established to provide a program of health insurance coverage for employees of local education agencies. In accordance with Section 8-27-301, Tennessee Code Annotated (TCA), all local education agencies are eligible to participate. The LEGIF is included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the State of Tennessee, but the state does not retain any risk for losses by this fund. Section 8-27-303, TCA, provides for the LEGIF to be self-sustaining through member premiums. It is the policy of the Scott County general government to purchase commercial insurance for employee health insurance. Settled claims have not exceeded this commercial coverage in any of the past three fiscal years.

B. Accounting Changes Provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 67, Financial Reporting for Pension Plans and Statement No. 70, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Nonexchange Financial Guarantees became effective for the year ended June 30, 2014. GASB Statement No. 67, replaces the requirements of Statements No. 25 and No. 50 related to pension plans that are administered through trusts or equivalent arrangements. The requirements of Statements No. 25 and No. 50 remain applicable to pension plans that are not administered through trusts or equivalent arrangements.

Page 71: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

71

GASB Statement No. 70 relates to accounting and financial reporting by state and local governments that extend and receive nonexchange financial guarantees.

C. Subsequent Events On August 18, 2014 the County Commission approved tax anticipation notes loaned from the General Debt Service Fund to the General and Ambulance Service funds for $308,769 and $115,586, respectively. On August 31, 2014, Jeff Tibbals left the Office of County Mayor and was succeeded by Dale Perdue.

D. Contingent Liabilities The county is involved in several pending lawsuits. Management believes the outcome of any lawsuits not covered by insurance will not materially affect the financial statements of the primary government or the discretely presented Scott County School Department.

E. Change in Administration On December 8, 2013, Sheriff Michael Cross died, and on January 22, 2014, Ronnie Phillips was appointed sheriff.

F. Landfill Closure and Postclosure Care Costs Scott County has an active permit on file with the state Department of Environment and Conservation for a sanitary landfill. The county has provided financial assurances for estimated postclosure liabilities as required by the State of Tennessee. These financial assurances are on file with the state Department of Environment and Conservation. State and federal laws and regulations require the county to place a final cover on its landfill site when it stops accepting waste and to perform certain maintenance and monitoring functions at the site for 30 years after closure. Although closure and postclosure care costs will be paid only near of after the date that the landfill stops accepting waste, the county reports a portion of these closure and postclosure care costs as an operating expense in each period based on landfill capacity used as of each balance sheet date. Scott County closed its sanitary landfill in 2007. The $2,520,869 reported as postclosure care liability at June 30, 2014, represents amounts based on what it would cost to perform all postclosure care in 2014. Actual cost may be different due to inflation, changes in technology, or changes in regulations.

G. Joint Venture The Eighth Judicial District Drug Task Force (DTF) is a joint venture formed by an interlocal agreement between the district attorney general of the

Page 72: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

72

Eighth Judicial District; Campbell, Claiborne, Fentress, Scott, and Union counties; and various cities within these counties. The purpose of the DTF is to provide multi-jurisdictional law enforcement to promote the investigation and prosecution of drug-related activities. Funds for the operation of the DTF come primarily from federal grants, drug fines, and the forfeiture of drug-related assets to the DTF. The DTF is overseen by the district attorney general and is governed by a board of directors including the district attorney general, sheriffs, and police chiefs of participating law enforcement agencies within each judicial district. Scott County made no contributions to the DTF for the year ended June 30, 2014, and does not have any equity interest in this joint venture. Complete financial statements for the DTF can be obtained from its administrative office at the following address:

Administrative Office:

Office of the District Attorney General Eighth Judicial District P.O. Box 10 Huntsville, TN 37756

H. Jointly Governed Organization

The Northeast Tennessee Railroad Authority is jointly operated by Scott County in conjunction with Anderson and Campbell counties. The authority’s board consists of the county mayor of each county and one member selected by the governing body of each county; however, the counties do not have any ongoing financial interest or responsibility for the entity. Scott County did not contribute to the operations of the Northeast Tennessee Railroad Authority during the year ended June 30, 2014.

I. Retirement Commitments Plan Description Employees of Scott County are members of the Political Subdivision Pension Plan (PSPP), an agent multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan administered by the Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS). TCRS provides retirement benefits as well as death and disability benefits. Benefits are determined by a formula using the member’s high five-year average salary and years of service. Members become eligible to retire at the age of 60 with five years of service or at any age with 30 years of service. A reduced retirement benefit is available to vested members at the age of 55. Disability benefits are available to active members with five years of service who become disabled and cannot engage in gainful employment. There is no service requirement for disability that is the result of an accident or injury occurring while the member was in the performance of duty. Members joining the system after July 1, 1979, become vested after five years of service, and members joining prior to July 1, 1979, were vested after four years of service. Benefit provisions are established in state statute found in Title 8, Chapters

Page 73: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

73

34-37 of Tennessee Code Annotated. State statutes are amended by the Tennessee General Assembly. Political subdivisions such as Scott County participate in the TCRS as individual entities and are liable for all costs associated with the operation and administration of their plan. Benefit improvements are not applicable to a political subdivision unless approved by the chief governing body. The TCRS issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for the PSPP. That report may be obtained by writing to the Tennessee Treasury Department, Consolidated Retirement System, 10th Floor, Andrew Jackson Building, Nashville, TN 37243-0230 or can be accessed at http://www.tn.gov/treasury/tcrs/PS/. Funding Policy Scott County requires employees to contribute five percent of their earnable compensation to the plan. The county is required to contribute at an actuarially determined rate; the rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, was 6.83 percent of annual covered payroll. The contribution requirement of plan members is set by state statute. The contribution requirement for the county is established and may be amended by the TCRS Board of Trustees. Annual Pension Cost For the year ended June 30, 2014, Scott County’s annual pension cost of $599,915 to TCRS was equal to the county’s required and actual contributions. The required contribution was determined as part of the July 1, 2011, actuarial valuation using the frozen entry age actuarial cost method. Significant actuarial assumptions used in the valuation include (a) rate of return on investment of present and future assets of 7.5 percent a year compounded annually, (b) projected three percent annual rate of inflation, (c) projected salary increases of 4.75 percent (graded) annual rate (no explicit assumption is made regarding the portion attributable to the effects of inflation on salaries), (d) projected 3.5 percent annual increase in the Social Security wage base, and (e) projected post-retirement increases of 2.5 percent annually. The actuarial value of assets was determined using techniques that smooth the effect of short-term volatility in the market value of total investments over a ten-year period. The county’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability is being amortized as a level dollar amount on a closed basis. The remaining amortization period at July 1, 2011, was seven years. An actuarial valuation was performed as of July 1, 2011, which established contribution rates effective July 1, 2012.

Page 74: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

74

Trend Information

Fiscal Year

Ended

Annual Pension

Cost (APC)

Percentage of APC

Contributed

Net Pension

Obligation

6-30-14 $599,915 100% $0 6-30-13 590,905 100 0 6-30-12 603,924 100 0

Funded Status and Funding Progress As of July 1, 2013, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the plan was 95.13 percent funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $24.22 million, and the actuarial value of assets was $23.04 million, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of $1.18 million. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was $7.99 million, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 14.76 percent. The Schedule of Funding Progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, presents multi-year trend information about whether the actuarial values of plan assets are increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liability for benefits. SCHOOL TEACHERS Plan Description The Scott County School Department contributes to the State Employees, Teachers, and Higher Education Employees Pension Plan (SETHEEPP), a cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan administered by the Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS). TCRS provides retirement benefits as well as death and disability benefits to plan members and their beneficiaries. Benefits are determined by a formula using the member’s high five-year average salary and years of service. Members become eligible to retire at the age of 60 with five years of service or at any age with 30 years of service. A reduced retirement benefit is available to vested members who are at least 55 years of age or have 25 years of service. Disability benefits are available to active members with five years of service who become disabled and cannot engage in gainful employment. There is no service requirement for disability that is the result of an accident or injury occurring while the member was in the performance of duty. Members joining the plan on or after July 1, 1979, are vested after five years of service. Members joining prior to July 1, 1979, are vested after four years of service. Benefit provisions are established in state statute found in Title 8, Chapters 34-37 of Tennessee Code Annotated. State statutes are amended by

Page 75: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

75

the Tennessee General Assembly. A cost of living adjustment (COLA) is provided to retirees each July based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) during the previous calendar year. No COLA is granted if the CPI increases less than one-half percent. The annual COLA is capped at three percent. The TCRS issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for the SETHEEPP. That report may be obtained by writing to the Tennessee Treasury Department, Consolidated Retirement System, 10th Floor, Andrew Jackson Building, Nashville, TN 37243-0230 or can be accessed at www.tn.gov/treasury/tcrs/Schools. Funding Policy Most teachers are required by state statute to contribute five percent of their salaries to the plan. The employer contribution rate for the School Department is established at an actuarially determined rate. The employer rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, was 8.88 percent of annual covered payroll. The employer contribution requirement for the School Department is established and may be amended by the TCRS Board of Trustees. The employer’s contributions to TCRS for the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013, and 2012, were $971,075, $963,739, and $966,694, respectively, equal to the required contributions for each year.

J. Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) Plan Description The primary government has a policy that allows retirees with 40 or more years of service to continue to participate in the county’s commercial health insurance plan until age 65. However, the amount of the liability for that benefit has not been determined and recorded in the financial statements due to the limited number of individuals expected to attain 40 years of service with the county prior to age 65, and also due to the limited number of years that any qualifying individual would be expected to be on the plan before reaching age 65. The liability for this postemployment benefit is not considered material to the financial statements. No retirees were receiving benefits under this policy as of June 30, 2014. Scott County and the School Department participate in the state-administered Medicare Supplement Plan and the School Department participates in the state-administered Local Education Group Insurance Plan for health care benefits. For accounting purposes, the plans are agent multiple-employer defined benefit OPEB plans. Benefits are established and amended by an insurance committee created by Section 8-27-302, Tennessee Code Annotated (TCA), for teachers and Section 8-27-701, TCA, for the Medicare Supplement Plan. Prior to reaching the age of 65, all members have

Page 76: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

76

the option of choosing between the standard or partnership preferred provider organization (PPO) plan for health care benefits. Subsequent to age 65, members who are also in the state’s retirement system may participate in a state-administered Medicare Supplement Plan that does not include pharmacy. The plans are reported in the State of Tennessee Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The CAFR is available on the state’s website at http://tn.gov/finance/act/cafr.html. Funding Policy The premium requirements of plan members are established and may be amended by the insurance committee. The plans are self-insured and financed on a pay-as-you-go basis with the risk shared equally among the participants. Claims liabilities of the plan are periodically computed using actuarial and statistical techniques to establish premium rates. The employers in each plan develop their own contribution policy in terms of subsidizing active employees or retired employees’ premiums since the committee is not prescriptive on that issue. The state does not provide a subsidy for local government participants; however, the state does provide a partial subsidy to Local Education Agency pre-65 teachers and a full subsidy based on years of service for post-65 teachers in the Medicare Supplement Plan. Retirees in the Local Education Group Insurance Plan contribute $51 to $850 per month depending on years of service and type of coverage. During the year ended June 30, 2014, the discretely presented Scott County School Department contributed $204,896 for post-employment benefits, and the primary government contributed $2,550. Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation

LocalEducation

Group Primary SchoolPlan Government Department

ARC $ 427,000 $ 13,000 $ 70,000Interest on the NOPEBO 87,317 7,104 13,978Adjustment to the ARC (85,068) (6,987) (13,618)Annual OPEB cost $ 429,249 $ 13,117 $ 70,360Amount of contribution (199,946) (2,550) (4,950)Increase/decrease in NOPEBO $ 229,303 $ 10,567 $ 65,410Net OPEB obligation, 7-1-13 2,182,933 177,587 349,458

Net OPEB obligation, 6-30-14 $ 2,412,236 $ 188,154 $ 414,868

Medicare Supplement Plan

Page 77: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

77

PercentageFiscal Annual of Annual Net OPEBYear OPEB OPEB Cost Obligation

Ended Plans Cost Contributed at Year End

6-30-12 Local Education Group $ 578,490 35 % $ 1,801,826 6-30-13 " 583,569 35 2,182,9336-30-14 " 429,249 47 2,412,236

6-30-12 Medicare Supplement-Primary Government 45,773 6 134,831

6-30-13 " 45,668 6 177,587 6-30-14 " 13,117 19 188,154

6-30-12 Medicare Supplement- School Department 76,492 6 278,092

6-30-13 " 76,316 6 349,458 6-30-14 " 70,360 7 414,868

Funded Status and Funding Progress The funded status of the plan as of July 1, 2013, was as follows:

LocalEducation

Group Primary SchoolPlan Government Department

Actuarial valuation date 7-1-13 7-1-13 7-1-13Actuarial accrued liability (AAL) $ 3,849,000 $ 157,000 $ 1,019,000Actuarial value of plan assets $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) $ 3,849,000 $ 157,000 $ 1,019,000Actuarial value of assets as a % of the AAL 0% 0% 0%Covered payroll (active plan members) $ 10,287,444 $ N/A $ N/AUAAL as a % of covered payroll 37% N/A N/A

Medicare Supplement Plan

Actuarial valuations involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of events far into the future, and actuarially determined amounts are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared to past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The Schedule of Funding Progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, presents multi-year trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liability for benefits. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Calculations are based on the types of benefits provided under the terms of the substantive plan at the time of each valuation and on the pattern of

Page 78: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

78

sharing of costs between the employer and plan members to that point. Actuarial calculations reflect a long-term perspective. Consistent with that perspective, actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets. In the July 1, 2013, actuarial valuation for the Local Government Plan and the Local Education Plan, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method was used, and the actuarial assumptions included a four percent investment rate of return (net of administrative expenses) and an annual health care cost trend rate was 7.5 percent for fiscal year 2014. The trend rate will decrease to seven percent in fiscal year 2015 and then be reduced by decrements to an ultimate rate of 4.7 percent by fiscal year 2044. The annual health care cost trend rate for the Medicare Supplement Plan was two percent for fiscal year 2014. The trend will increase to six percent in fiscal year 2015 and then will be reduced by decrements to an ultimate rate of 4.2 percent by fiscal year 2044. Both rates include a 2.5 percent inflation assumption. The unfunded actuarial accrued liability is being amortized as a level percentage of payroll on a closed basis over a 30-year period beginning with July 1, 2007.

K. Termination Benefits

The Scott County Board of Education adopted a policy to pay certified employees $50 for each sick leave day that they had accumulated at the time of their retirement. Since payments will be calculated and made at the actual time of retirement, the amount of future payments was not measurable at June 30, 2014. Payments totaling $31,275 were paid to three individuals who retired during the year ending June 30, 2014.

L. Office of Central Accounting, Budgeting, and Purchasing Scott County operates under provisions of the County Financial Management System of 1981. This act provides for a central system of accounting, budgeting, and purchasing for all county departments. The act also provides for the creation of a Finance Department operated under the direction of the finance director.

M. Purchasing Law

The County Financial Management System of 1981 provides for the finance director or a deputy appointed by him to serve as the county purchasing agent. The finance director serves as the purchasing agent for Scott County. All purchase orders are issued by the Finance Department. Purchases exceeding $10,000 for the Offices of County Mayor, Superintendent of Roads, and Director of Schools are required to be competitively bid.

Page 79: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

79

VI. OTHER NOTES – DISCRETELY PRESENTED SCOTT COUNTY EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT A. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The Financial Reporting Entity – The Scott County Emergency Communications District was formed under Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 7, Section 86, Emergency Communications Districts. The district is a component unit of Scott County, Tennessee, because the district is legally separate, the County Commission appoints the members of the board of directors of the district and can impose its will by changing the telephone surcharge rate, and the County Commission can impose its will on the district by the approval of debt and borrowings. Method of Accounting – The accompanying financial statements have been prepared using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting and reflect transactions on behalf of the district, the reporting entity. Revenues are recorded when earned, and expenses are recorded when incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows.

Income Taxes – The district is exempt from federal income taxes because of its creation by the Scott County government. Revenue – Operating revenues consist primarily of Highland Telephone Cooperative charging residents of Scott County $.65 and businesses $2 per month. As of June 30, 2014, the district had 5,502 residential customers and 1,773 business customers. Wireless communications income is from a share of state collected revenues from cell phone usage based upon population. All other revenues and expenses are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. Cash – The organization treats as cash; checking account balances, savings accounts, certificates of deposit with original maturities of less than three months, and cash on hand. Cash Management – Cash temporarily idle during the year was invested in a savings account and certificates of deposit. The certificates of deposit have maturities of 12 months. The district earned $5,224 on all investments for the year ended June 30, 2014. Deposits and Investments – All deposits with financial institutions must be secured by one of two methods. One method involves financial institutions that participate in the bank collateral pool administered by the state treasurer. Participating banks determine the aggregate balance of their public fund accounts for the State of Tennessee and its political subdivisions. The amount of collateral required to secure the debt of these public deposits must equal at least 105 percent of the average daily balance of public deposits held. Collateral securities are required to be pledged by the participating banks to protect these accounts that are pledged in the

Page 80: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

80

aggregate rather than against each account. The members of the pool may be required by agreement to pay an assessment to cover any deficiency. Under this additional assessment agreement, public fund accounts covered by the pool are considered to be insured for the purpose of credit risk disclosure. For deposits with financial institutions that do not participate in the bank collateral pool, the state statutes require that all deposits be collateralized with collateral whose market value is equal to 105 percent of the uninsured amount of the deposits. The collateral must be placed by the depository bank in an escrow account in a second bank for the benefit of the entity. Scott County Emergency Communications District has an agreement with one bank for balances above FDIC limits. The carrying value of the district’s deposits was $1,405,688, and the bank balance was $1,416,717. Of that amount, $851,520 was insured by the FDIC, and the remainder was collateralized by a third-party in the district’s name. Compensated Absences – It is the district’s policy to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. No liability is reported for unpaid accumulated sick leave since the district does not have a policy to pay any amount when employees separate from service with the district. Accumulated vacation pay is reported as an expenditure and a liability of the fund when material and accumulated. Capital Assets – Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $1,000 and an estimated life in excess of one year. Such assets are recorded at historical costs or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated assets are recorded at the estimated fair market value at the date of donation. The straight-line method of depreciation is used to calculate depreciation over a five-year period. Depreciation expense for the current year was $53,532. Although mapping expenses have a useful life of more than one year, the life is very difficult to measure. Mapping expenses, therefore, are treated as expenses as incurred.

Balance Balance7-1-13 Additions Dispositions 6-30-14

EquipmentMapping Equipment $ 116,102 $ 0 $ 0 $ 116,102 Communication Equipment 240,859 0 0 240,859 Vehicles 24,500 0 0 24,500

$ 381,461 $ 0 $ 0 $ 381,461 Accumulated DepreciationMapping Equipment $ (91,885) $ (12,885) $ 0 $ (104,770) Communication Equipment (60,721) (40,647) 0 (101,368) Vehicles (24,500) 0 0 (24,500)

$ (177,106) $ (53,532) $ 0 $ (230,638) Net Investment in Capital Assets $ 204,355 $ (53,532) $ 0 $ 150,823

Page 81: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

81

Risk Management – The district is exposed to various risks of losses related to tort; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors or omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. The district has obtained commercial insurance to manage these risks. Management does not believe any claims will exceed the insurance amount. Software coverage is $250,000; auto coverage includes collision and comprehensive coverage with deductibles of $250 and $500, respectively, and general liability of $2,000,000 each occurrence and $5,000,000 aggregate with $5,000 medical payments. The settlements have not exceeded insurance amounts in the past three years. Budgets – Annual budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. All annual appropriations lapse at fiscal year-end. On or before May 31 of each year, the proposed budget is prepared and presented to the board for review. The board adopts the budget and amends the budget throughout the year as needed. The district is required by state statute to adopt the annual budget. The annual budget is prepared on the basis in which current available funds must be sufficient to meet current expenditures. Expenditures and encumbrances may not legally exceed appropriations authorized by the board of directors and any authorized revisions. Unencumbered appropriations lapse at the end of each year. The budgetary level of control is at the line-item level established by the County Uniform Chart of Accounts, as prescribed by the Comptroller of the Treasury of the State of Tennessee. The district’s budgetary basis of accounting is on the modified cash basis. Reconciliation to GAAP is presented on the face of the budgetary schedule. Net Position and Fund Balance – In the financial statements, equity is classified as net position and is displayed in three components:

a. Net investment in capital assets – Consists of capital assets, including restricted capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation.

b. Restricted net position – Consists of net position with constraints

placed on the use either by (1) external groups such as creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments or (2) law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.

c. Unrestricted net position – All other net position that does not

meet the definition of restricted or invested in capital assets.

It is the district’s policy that restricted amounts would be reduced first followed by unrestricted amounts when expenditures are incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available.

Page 82: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

82

Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could be different from those estimates.

B. The Officers’ and Employees’ Bonds of the District

The district maintains an insurance policy against officers and employee forgery or alteration as required by Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 7-86-119, with a policy limit of $12,500; theft of money and securities with a policy limit of $100,000; employee dishonesty with a policy limit of $250,000; and counterfeit United States or Canadian paper currency with a policy limit of $100,000.

C. Pension Plan Plan Description Employees of the district are members of the Political Subdivision Pension Plan (PSPP), an agent multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan administered by the Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS). TCRS provides retirement benefits as well as death and disability benefits. Benefits are determined by a formula using the member’s high five-year average salary and years of service. Members become eligible to retire at the age of 60 with five years of service or at any age with 30 years of service. A reduced retirement benefit is available to vested members at the age of 55. Disability benefits are available to active members with five years of service who become disabled and cannot engage in gainful employment. There is no service requirement for disability that is the result of an accident or injury occurring while the member was in the performance of duty. Members joining the system after July 1, 1979, become vested after five years of service, and members joining prior to July 1, 1979, were vested after four years of service. Benefit provisions are established in state statute found in Title 8, Chapters 34-37 of Tennessee Code Annotated. State statutes are amended by the Tennessee General Assembly. Political subdivisions such as the district participate in the TCRS as individual entities and are liable for all costs associated with the operation and administration of their plan. Benefit improvements are not applicable to a political subdivision unless approved by the chief governing body. The TCRS issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for the PSPP. That report may be obtained by writing to the Tennessee Treasury Department, Consolidated Retirement System, 10th Floor, Andrew Jackson Building, Nashville, TN 37243-0230 or can be accessed at www.tn.gov/treasury/tcrs/PS.

Page 83: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

83

Funding Policy The district requires employees to contribute five percent of their earnable compensation. The district is required to contribute at an actuarially determined rate; the rate for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, was 2.65 percent of covered payroll. The contribution requirement of plan members is set by state statute. The contribution requirement for the district is established and may be amended by the TCRS Board of Trustees. For the year ending June 30, 2014, the district’s annual pension cost of $954 to TCRS was equal to the district’s required and actual contributions. The required contribution was determined as part of the July 1, 2011, actuarial valuation using the frozen entry age actuarial cost method. Significant actuarial assumptions used in the valuation include (a) rate of return on investment of present and future assets of 7.5 percent a year compounded annually, (b) projected three percent annual rate of inflation, (c) projected salary increases of 4.75 percent (graded) annual rate (no explicit assumption is made regarding the portion attributable to the effects of inflation on salaries), (d) projected 3.5 percent annual increases in the Social Security wage base, and (e) projected post retirement increases of 2.5 percent annually. The actuarial value of assets was determined using techniques that smooth the effect of short-term volatility in the market of total investments over a ten-year period. The district’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability is being amortized as a level dollar amount on a closed basis. The remaining amortization period at July 1, 2011, was zero years. An actuarial valuation was performed as of July 1, 2011, which established contribution rates effective July 1, 2012.

Trend Information

Fiscal Annual Pension Percentage of Net PensionYear Ended Cost (APC) APC Contributed Obligation

6-30-14 $ 954 100% $ 06-30-13 1,312 100 06-30-12 70,052 100 0

Funded Status and Funding Progress As of July 1, 2013, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the plan was 100 percent funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $98,000, and the actuarial value of assets was $98,000, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of zero. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was $30,000, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was zero percent. The Schedule of Funding Progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements presents

Page 84: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

84

multi-year trend information about whether the actuarial values of plan assets are increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liability for benefits.

Page 85: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

85

Page 86: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit F-1

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Funding Progress – Pension PlanPrimary Government and Discretely Presented Scott County School DepartmentJune 30, 2014

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

ActuarialAccrued

Actuarial LiabilityValue of (AAL) Unfunded

Actuarial Plan Frozen AAL Covered Valuation Assets Entry Age (UAAL) Payroll

Date (a) (b) (b)-(a) (c)

7-1-13 $ 23,038 $ 24,218 $ 1,180 95.13 % $ 7,991 14.76 %7-1-11 20,688 22,919 2,231 90.27 7,521 29.66 7-1-09 17,461 19,804 2,343 88.17 7,606 30.81

((b-a)/c)(a/b)

Funded

UAAL as a Percentage

Ratioof Covered

Payroll

86

Page 87: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

F-2

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Fun

ding

Pro

gres

s –

Oth

er P

oste

mpl

oym

ent B

enef

its P

lans

Prim

ary

Gov

ernm

ent a

nd D

iscr

etel

y Pr

esen

ted

Scot

t Cou

nty

Scho

ol D

epar

tmen

tJu

ne 3

0, 2

014

(Dol

lar a

mou

nts

in th

ousa

nds)

Act

uari

alA

ccru

ed

Liab

ility

(AA

L)A

ctua

rial

Proj

ecte

dU

nfun

ded

Act

uari

alV

alue

of

Uni

tA

AL

Fund

edC

over

ed

Val

uatio

n A

sset

sC

redi

t(U

AA

L)R

atio

Payr

oll

Plan

sD

ate

(a)

(b)

(b)-(

a)(a

/b)

(c)

PRIM

AR

Y G

OV

ER

NM

EN

T

Med

icar

e Su

pple

men

t7-

1-10

$0

$43

7$

437

0%

$N

/AN

/A%

"7-

1-11

038

438

4 0

N/A

N/A

"7-

1-13

015

715

7 0

N/A

N/A

DIS

CR

ETE

LY P

RE

SEN

TED

SC

OTT

CO

UN

TY S

CH

OO

L D

EPA

RTM

EN

T

Loca

l Edu

catio

n G

roup

7-1-

100

4,38

94,

389

010

,570

42"

7-1-

110

4,94

44,

944

010

,064

49"

7-1-

130

3,84

93,

849

010

,287

37M

edic

are

Supp

lem

ent

7-1-

100

960

960

0N

/AN

/A"

7-1-

110

960

960

0N

/AN

/A"

7-1-

130

1,01

91,

019

0N

/AN

/A

UA

AL

as a

Pe

rcen

tage

of C

over

edPa

yrol

l((b

-a)/c

)

87

Page 88: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEE NOTES TO THE REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

For the Year Ended June 30, 2014

NONE

88

Page 89: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

89

Page 90: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Nonmajor Governmental Funds

Special Revenue Funds _______________________

Special Revenue Funds are used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditure for specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects.

_______________________

Solid Waste/Sanitation Fund – The Solid Waste/Sanitation Fund is used to account for transactions associated with the operations of the county’s convenience centers. Drug Control Fund – The Drug Control Fund is used to account for revenues received from drug-related fines, forfeitures, and seizures. Constitutional Officers - Fees Fund – The Constitutional Officers - Fees Fund is used to account for operating expenses paid directly from the fee and commission accounts of the trustee, clerks, register of deeds, and sheriff.

90

Page 91: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Capital Projects Funds ________________________

Capital Projects Funds are used to account for and report financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditure for capital outlays, including the acquisition or construction of capital facilities and other capital assets.

________________________

General Capital Projects Fund – The General Capital Projects Fund is used to account for various capital expenditures of the county. Community Development/Industrial Park Fund – The Community Development/ Industrial Park Fund is used to account for the activities related to community development and industrial park projects. Education Capital Projects Fund – The Education Capital Projects Fund is used to account for capital expenditures made on behalf of the Scott County School Department. Other Capital Projects Fund – The Other Capital Projects Fund is used to account for the activities related to road resurfacing.

91

Page 92: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit G

-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeCo

mbi

ning

Bal

ance

She

etN

onm

ajor

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

dsJu

ne 3

0, 2

014

Cons

titu

-So

lidtio

nal

Gen

eral

Was

te /

Dru

gO

ffice

rs -

Capi

tal

Sani

tatio

nCo

ntro

lFe

esTo

tal

Proj

ects

ASSE

TS

Cash

$0

$0

$1,

282

$1,

282

$0

Equi

ty in

Poo

led

Cash

and

Inve

stm

ents

283,

863

80,7

110

364,

574

140,

570

Acco

unts

Rec

eiva

ble

51,9

390

051

,939

85D

ue fr

om O

ther

Gov

ernm

ents

2,22

70

02,

227

0Pr

oper

ty T

axes

Rec

eiva

ble

00

00

315,

718

Allo

wan

ce fo

r U

ncol

lect

ible

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

00

00

(20,

788)

Tota

l Ass

ets

$33

8,02

9$

80,7

11$

1,28

2$

420,

022

$43

5,58

5

LIAB

ILIT

IES

Acco

unts

Pay

able

$2,

011

$0

$0

$2,

011

$1,

809

Payr

oll D

educ

tions

Pay

able

1,19

80

01,

198

0D

ue to

Oth

er F

unds

00

1,28

21,

282

0To

tal L

iabi

litie

s$

3,20

9$

0$

1,28

2$

4,49

1$

1,80

9

DEF

ERRE

D IN

FLO

WS

OF

RESO

URC

ES

Def

erre

d Cu

rren

t Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

$0

$0

$0

$0

$28

4,06

3D

efer

red

Del

inqu

ent P

rope

rty

Taxe

s0

00

09,

706

Tota

l Def

erre

d In

flow

s of

Res

ourc

es$

0$

0$

0$

0$

293,

769

(Con

tinue

d)

Spec

ial R

even

ue F

unds

Capi

tal

Proj

ects

Fun

ds

92

Page 93: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit G

-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeCo

mbi

ning

Bal

ance

She

etN

onm

ajor

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

ds (C

ont.)

Cons

titu

-So

lidtio

nal

Gen

eral

Was

te /

Dru

gO

ffice

rs -

Capi

tal

Sani

tatio

nCo

ntro

lFe

esTo

tal

Proj

ects

FUN

D B

ALAN

CES

Rest

rict

ed:

Rest

rict

ed fo

r Pu

blic

Saf

ety

$0

$80

,327

$0

$80

,327

$0

Rest

rict

ed fo

r Ca

pita

l Pro

ject

s0

00

014

0,00

7Co

mm

itted

:Co

mm

itted

for

Publ

ic H

ealth

and

Wel

fare

334,

820

00

334,

820

0As

sign

ed:

Assi

gned

for

Publ

ic S

afet

y0

384

038

40

Tota

l Fun

d Ba

lanc

es$

334,

820

$80

,711

$0

$41

5,53

1$

140,

007

Tota

l Lia

bilit

ies,

Def

erre

d In

flow

s of

Res

ourc

es, a

nd F

und

Bala

nces

$33

8,02

9$

80,7

11$

1,28

2$

420,

022

$43

5,58

5

(Con

tinue

d)

Spec

ial R

even

ue F

unds

Capi

tal

Proj

ects

Fun

ds

93

Page 94: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit G

-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeCo

mbi

ning

Bal

ance

She

etN

onm

ajor

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

ds (C

ont.)

Tota

lEd

ucat

ion

Non

maj

orCa

pita

lG

over

nmen

tal

Proj

ects

Tota

lFu

nds

ASSE

TS

Cash

$14

6,01

8$

146,

018

$14

7,30

0Eq

uity

in P

oole

d Ca

sh a

nd In

vest

men

ts2,

524

143,

094

507,

668

Acco

unts

Rec

eiva

ble

085

52,0

24D

ue fr

om O

ther

Gov

ernm

ents

00

2,22

7Pr

oper

ty T

axes

Rec

eiva

ble

031

5,71

831

5,71

8Al

low

ance

for

Unc

olle

ctib

le P

rope

rty

Taxe

s0

(20,

788)

(20,

788)

Tota

l Ass

ets

$14

8,54

2$

584,

127

$1,

004,

149

LIAB

ILIT

IES

Acco

unts

Pay

able

$0

$1,

809

$3,

820

Payr

oll D

educ

tions

Pay

able

00

1,19

8D

ue to

Oth

er F

unds

00

1,28

2To

tal L

iabi

litie

s$

0$

1,80

9$

6,30

0

DEF

ERRE

D IN

FLO

WS

OF

RESO

URC

ES

Def

erre

d Cu

rren

t Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

$0

$28

4,06

3$

284,

063

Def

erre

d D

elin

quen

t Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

09,

706

9,70

6To

tal D

efer

red

Inflo

ws

of R

esou

rces

$0

$29

3,76

9$

293,

769

(Con

tinue

d)

Capi

tal P

roje

cts

Fund

s (C

ont.)

94

Page 95: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit G

-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeCo

mbi

ning

Bal

ance

She

etN

onm

ajor

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

ds (C

ont.)

Tota

lEd

ucat

ion

Non

maj

orCa

pita

lG

over

nmen

tal

Proj

ects

Tota

lFu

nds

FUN

D B

ALAN

CES

Rest

rict

ed:

Rest

rict

ed fo

r Pu

blic

Saf

ety

$0

$0

$80

,327

Rest

rict

ed fo

r Ca

pita

l Pro

ject

s14

8,54

228

8,54

928

8,54

9Co

mm

itted

:Co

mm

itted

for

Publ

ic H

ealth

and

Wel

fare

00

334,

820

Assi

gned

:As

sign

ed fo

r Pu

blic

Saf

ety

00

384

Tota

l Fun

d Ba

lanc

es$

148,

542

$28

8,54

9$

704,

080

Tota

l Lia

bilit

ies,

Def

erre

d In

flow

s of

Res

ourc

es, a

nd F

und

Bala

nces

$14

8,54

2$

584,

127

$1,

004,

149

Capi

tal P

roje

cts

Fund

s (C

ont.)

95

Page 96: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit G

-2

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeCo

mbi

ning

Sta

tem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Chan

ges

in F

und

Bala

nces

Non

maj

or G

over

nmen

tal F

unds

For

the

Year

End

ed J

une

30, 2

014

Cons

titu

-Co

mm

unity

Solid

tiona

lG

ener

alD

evel

opm

ent/

Was

te /

Dru

gO

ffice

rs -

Capi

tal

Indu

stri

alSa

nita

tion

Cont

rol

Fees

Tota

lPr

ojec

tsPa

rk

Reve

nues

Loca

l Tax

es$

0$

0$

0$

0$

209,

270

$0

Fine

s, F

orfe

iture

s, a

nd P

enal

ties

044

,481

044

,481

00

Char

ges

for

Curr

ent S

ervi

ces

190,

222

01,

150

191,

372

00

Oth

er L

ocal

Rev

enue

s3,

238

10,5

450

13,7

8313

,969

0St

ate

of T

enne

ssee

39,5

030

039

,503

72,4

580

Tota

l Rev

enue

s$

232,

963

$55

,026

$1,

150

$28

9,13

9$

295,

697

$0

Expe

nditu

res

Curr

ent:

Gen

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

$0

$0

$0

$0

$49

,003

$0

Fina

nce

00

00

22,1

310

Adm

inis

trat

ion

of J

ustic

e0

01,

150

1,15

029

,328

0Pu

blic

Saf

ety

00

00

82,3

890

Publ

ic H

ealth

and

Wel

fare

137,

861

00

137,

861

2,78

70

Oth

er O

pera

tions

015

,693

015

,693

92,4

580

Hig

hway

s11

,539

00

11,5

394,

915

0To

tal E

xpen

ditu

res

$14

9,40

0$

15,6

93$

1,15

0$

166,

243

$28

3,01

1$

0

Exce

ss (D

efic

ienc

y) o

f Rev

enue

sO

ver

Expe

nditu

res

$83

,563

$39

,333

$0

$12

2,89

6$

12,6

86$

0

Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)Tr

ansf

ers

Out

$0

$(2

7,00

0)$

0$

(27,

000)

$0

$(5

,858

)To

tal O

ther

Fin

anci

ng S

ourc

es (U

ses)

$0

$(2

7,00

0)$

0$

(27,

000)

$0

$(5

,858

)

Net

Cha

nge

in F

und

Bala

nces

$83

,563

$12

,333

$0

$95

,896

$12

,686

$(5

,858

)Fu

nd B

alan

ce, J

uly

1, 2

013

251,

257

68,3

780

319,

635

127,

321

5,85

8

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jun

e 30

, 201

4$

334,

820

$80

,711

$0

$41

5,53

1$

140,

007

$0

(Con

tinue

d)

Spec

ial R

even

ue F

unds

Capi

tal P

roje

cts

Fund

s

96

Page 97: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit G

-2

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeCo

mbi

ning

Sta

tem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Chan

ges

in F

und

Bala

nces

Non

maj

or G

over

nmen

tal F

unds

(Con

t.)

Tota

lEd

ucat

ion

Oth

erN

onm

ajor

Capi

tal

Capi

tal

Gov

ernm

enta

lPr

ojec

tsPr

ojec

tsTo

tal

Fund

s

Reve

nues

Loca

l Tax

es$

0$

0$

209,

270

$20

9,27

0Fi

nes,

For

feitu

res,

and

Pen

altie

s0

00

44,4

81Ch

arge

s fo

r Cu

rren

t Ser

vice

s0

00

191,

372

Oth

er L

ocal

Rev

enue

s27

90

14,2

4828

,031

Stat

e of

Ten

ness

ee0

072

,458

111,

961

Tota

l Rev

enue

s$

279

$0

$29

5,97

6$

585,

115

Expe

nditu

res

Curr

ent:

Gen

eral

Gov

ernm

ent

$0

$0

$49

,003

$49

,003

Fina

nce

00

22,1

3122

,131

Adm

inis

trat

ion

of J

ustic

e0

029

,328

30,4

78Pu

blic

Saf

ety

00

82,3

8982

,389

Publ

ic H

ealth

and

Wel

fare

00

2,78

714

0,64

8O

ther

Ope

ratio

ns0

092

,458

108,

151

Hig

hway

s0

04,

915

16,4

54To

tal E

xpen

ditu

res

$0

$0

$28

3,01

1$

449,

254

Exce

ss (D

efic

ienc

y) o

f Rev

enue

sO

ver

Expe

nditu

res

$27

9$

0$

12,9

65$

135,

861

Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)Tr

ansf

ers

Out

$0

$(2

,413

)$

(8,2

71)

$(3

5,27

1)To

tal O

ther

Fin

anci

ng S

ourc

es (U

ses)

$0

$(2

,413

)$

(8,2

71)

$(3

5,27

1)

Net

Cha

nge

in F

und

Bala

nces

$27

9$

(2,4

13)

$4,

694

$10

0,59

0Fu

nd B

alan

ce, J

uly

1, 2

013

148,

263

2,41

328

3,85

560

3,49

0

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jun

e 30

, 201

4$

148,

542

$0

$28

8,54

9$

704,

080

Capi

tal P

roje

cts

Fund

s (C

ont.)

97

Page 98: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit G-3

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes

in Fund Balance - Actual and BudgetSolid Waste/Sanitation FundFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Variancewith FinalBudget -Positive

Actual Original Final (Negative)

RevenuesCharges for Current Services $ 190,222 $ 102,271 $ 121,788 $ 68,434Other Local Revenues 3,238 3,000 4,206 (968)State of Tennessee 39,503 45,000 45,000 (5,497)

Total Revenues $ 232,963 $ 150,271 $ 170,994 $ 61,969

ExpendituresPublic Health and Welfare

Recycling Center $ 127,461 $ 108,271 $ 146,241 $ 18,780Postclosure Care Costs 10,400 30,000 16,485 6,085

HighwaysLitter and Trash Collection 11,539 12,000 12,000 461

Total Expenditures $ 149,400 $ 150,271 $ 174,726 $ 25,326

Excess (Deficiency) of RevenuesOver Expenditures $ 83,563 $ 0 $ (3,732) $ 87,295

Net Change in Fund Balance $ 83,563 $ 0 $ (3,732) $ 87,295Fund Balance, July 1, 2013 251,257 251,257 251,257 0

Fund Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 334,820 $ 251,257 $ 247,525 $ 87,295

Budgeted Amounts

98

Page 99: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit G

-4

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Cha

nges

in F

und

Bala

nce

- Act

ual (

Budg

etar

y Ba

sis)

and

Bud

get

Dru

g Co

ntro

l Fun

dFo

r the

Yea

r End

ed J

une

30, 2

014

Actu

alVa

rian

ceRe

venu

es/

with

Fin

alAc

tual

Add:

Expe

nditu

res

Budg

et -

(GAA

PEn

cum

bran

ces

(Bud

geta

ryPo

sitiv

eBa

sis)

6/30

/201

4Ba

sis)

Ori

gina

lFi

nal

(Neg

ativ

e)

Reve

nues

Fine

s, F

orfe

iture

s, a

nd P

enal

ties

$44

,481

$0

$44

,481

$32

,500

$32

,500

$11

,981

Oth

er L

ocal

Rev

enue

s10

,545

010

,545

00

10,5

45To

tal R

even

ues

$55

,026

$0

$55

,026

$32

,500

$32

,500

$22

,526

Expe

nditu

res

Oth

er O

pera

tions

Mis

cella

neou

s$

15,6

93$

384

$16

,077

$27

,500

$27

,500

$11

,423

Tota

l Exp

endi

ture

s$

15,6

93$

384

$16

,077

$27

,500

$27

,500

$11

,423

Exce

ss (D

efic

ienc

y) o

f Rev

enue

sO

ver E

xpen

ditu

res

$39

,333

$(3

84)

$38

,949

$5,

000

$5,

000

$33

,949

Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)Tr

ansf

ers

Out

$(2

7,00

0)$

0$

(27,

000)

$(5

,000

)$

(27,

000)

$0

Tota

l Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

$(2

7,00

0)$

0$

(27,

000)

$(5

,000

)$

(27,

000)

$0

Net

Cha

nge

in F

und

Bala

nce

$12

,333

$(3

84)

$11

,949

$0

$(2

2,00

0)$

33,9

49Fu

nd B

alan

ce, J

uly

1, 2

013

68,3

780

68,3

7868

,378

68,3

780

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jun

e 30

, 201

4$

80,7

11$

(384

)$

80,3

27$

68,3

78$

46,3

78$

33,9

49

Budg

eted

Am

ount

s

99

Page 100: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit G-5

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes

in Fund Balance - Actual and BudgetGeneral Capital Projects FundFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Variancewith FinalBudget -Positive

Actual Original Final (Negative)

RevenuesLocal Taxes $ 209,270 $ 208,716 $ 235,373 $ (26,103)Other Local Revenues 13,969 0 13,960 9State of Tennessee 72,458 0 84,500 (12,042)

Total Revenues $ 295,697 $ 208,716 $ 333,833 $ (38,136)

ExpendituresGeneral Government

County Buildings $ 49,003 $ 0 $ 46,250 $ (2,753)Finance

Accounting and Budgeting 20,299 0 20,370 71Property Assessor's Office 1,572 0 1,600 28County Clerk's Office 260 0 260 0

Administration of JusticeCircuit Court 12,023 0 12,050 27General Sessions Court 4,253 0 4,300 47Chancery Court 13,052 0 13,060 8

Public SafetySheriff's Department 76,794 0 76,810 16Juvenile Services 5,595 0 5,595 0

Public Health and WelfareAmbulance/Emergency Medical Services 2,787 0 2,800 13

Other OperationsAirport 92,458 0 92,500 42

HighwaysCapital Outlay 4,915 152,000 7,405 2,490

Total Expenditures $ 283,011 $ 152,000 $ 283,000 $ (11)

Excess (Deficiency) of RevenuesOver Expenditures $ 12,686 $ 56,716 $ 50,833 $ (38,147)

Net Change in Fund Balance $ 12,686 $ 56,716 $ 50,833 $ (38,147)Fund Balance, July 1, 2013 127,321 237,935 237,935 (110,614)

Fund Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 140,007 $ 294,651 $ 288,768 $ (148,761)

Budgeted Amounts

100

Page 101: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Major Governmental Funds

Debt Service Funds ________________________

Debt Service Funds are used to account for and report financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditure for principal and interest.

________________________

General Debt Service Fund – The General Debt Service Fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, debt principal, interest, and related costs. Rural Debt Service Fund – The Rural Debt Service Fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, long-term debt principal, interest, and related costs for debt issued that benefit the areas of Scott County outside the Special School District (Oneida).

101

Page 102: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit H-1

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes

in Fund Balance - Actual and BudgetGeneral Debt Service FundFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Variancewith FinalBudget -Positive

Actual Original Final (Negative)

RevenuesLocal Taxes $ 1,094,425 $ 1,009,431 $ 1,009,431 $ 84,994Licenses and Permits 940 800 800 140Other Local Revenues 132,343 150,000 150,000 (17,657)Other Governments and Citizens Groups 28,600 28,600 28,600 0

Total Revenues $ 1,256,308 $ 1,188,831 $ 1,188,831 $ 67,477

ExpendituresPrincipal on Debt

General Government $ 1,126,740 $ 856,950 $ 1,133,950 $ 7,210Interest on Debt

General Government 136,220 195,937 179,917 43,697Other Debt Service

General Government 301,807 265,087 318,114 16,307Total Expenditures $ 1,564,767 $ 1,317,974 $ 1,631,981 $ 67,214

Excess (Deficiency) of RevenuesOver Expenditures $ (308,459) $ (129,143) $ (443,150) $ 134,691

Other Financing Sources (Uses)Refunding Debt Issued $ 1,490,000 $ 0 $ 1,490,000 $ 0Premiums on Debt Issued 21,542 0 21,542 0Transfers In 48,424 48,424 48,424 0Transfers Out (36,020) 0 (36,020) 0Payments to Refunded Debt Escrow Agent (1,458,516) 0 (1,458,516) 0

Total Other Financing Sources $ 65,430 $ 48,424 $ 65,430 $ 0

Net Change in Fund Balance $ (243,029) $ (80,719) $ (377,720) $ 134,691Fund Balance, July 1, 2013 1,442,277 1,423,270 1,423,270 19,007

Fund Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 1,199,248 $ 1,342,551 $ 1,045,550 $ 153,698

Budgeted Amounts

102

Page 103: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit H-2

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes

in Fund Balance - Actual and BudgetRural Debt Service FundFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Variancewith FinalBudget -Positive

Actual Original Final (Negative)

RevenuesLocal Taxes $ 892,146 $ 928,237 $ 928,237 $ (36,091)Other Local Revenues 0 65,000 65,000 (65,000)Other Governments and Citizens Groups 351,092 185,773 351,092 0

Total Revenues $ 1,243,238 $ 1,179,010 $ 1,344,329 $ (101,091)

ExpendituresPrincipal on Debt

Education $ 1,027,903 $ 956,057 $ 1,027,904 $ 1Interest on Debt

Education 389,307 300,598 394,070 4,763Other Debt Service

Education 207,839 46,800 218,721 10,882Total Expenditures $ 1,625,049 $ 1,303,455 $ 1,640,695 $ 15,646

Excess (Deficiency) of RevenuesOver Expenditures $ (381,811) $ (124,445) $ (296,366) $ (85,445)

Other Financing Sources (Uses)Refunding Debt Issued $ 8,120,000 $ 0 $ 8,120,000 $ 0Premiums on Debt Issued 152,320 0 152,320 0Payments to Refunded Debt Escrow Agent (8,100,399) 0 (8,100,399) 0

Total Other Financing Sources $ 171,921 $ 0 $ 171,921 $ 0

Net Change in Fund Balance $ (209,890) $ (124,445) $ (124,445) $ (85,445)Fund Balance, July 1, 2013 251,805 243,416 243,416 8,389

Fund Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 41,915 $ 118,971 $ 118,971 $ (77,056)

Budgeted Amounts

103

Page 104: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Fiduciary Funds __________________________

Agency Funds are used to account for assets held by the county as an agent for individuals, private organizations, other governments, and/or other funds. Agency funds are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not involve measurement of results of operations.

__________________________ Cities - Sales Tax Fund – The Cities - Sales Tax Fund is used to account for the second half of the sales tax revenues collected inside incorporated areas of the county. These revenues are received by the county from the State of Tennessee and forwarded to the various cities on a monthly basis. Special School District Fund – The Special School District Fund is used to account for the tax levy for the Special School District (Oneida). These revenues are received by Scott County and remitted to the Special School District on a monthly basis. City School ADA - Oneida Fund – The City School ADA - Oneida Fund is used to account for the city school system’s share of education revenues collected by the county that must be apportioned between the various school systems on an average daily attendance basis. These collections are remitted to the city school system on a monthly basis. Constitutional Officers - Agency Fund – The Constitutional Officers - Agency Fund is used to account for amounts collected in an agency capacity by the county clerk, circuit and general sessions courts clerk, clerk and master, register of deeds, and sheriff. Such collections include amounts due the state, cities, other county funds, litigants, heirs, and others. Judicial District Drug Fund – The Judicial District Drug Fund is used to account for amounts held in an agency capacity for the Eighth Judicial District Drug Task Force. District Attorney General Fund – The District Attorney General Fund is used to account for restricted revenue held for the benefit of the Office of District Attorney General.

104

Page 105: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit I

-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeCo

mbi

ning

Sta

tem

ent o

f Fid

ucia

ry A

sset

s an

d Li

abili

ties

Fidu

ciar

y Fu

nds

June

30,

201

4

City

Cons

titu-

Citie

s -

Spec

ial

Scho

oltio

nal

Judi

cial

Dis

tric

tSa

les

Scho

ol

ADA

-O

ffice

rs -

Dis

tric

tAt

torn

eyTa

xD

istr

ict

One

ida

Agen

cyD

rug

Gen

eral

Tota

l

ASSE

TS

Cash

$0

$0

$0

$54

8,90

6$

0$

0$

548,

906

Equi

ty in

Poo

led

Cash

and

Inve

stm

ents

04,

597

49,7

190

232,

387

32,0

9031

8,79

3Ac

coun

ts R

ecei

vabl

e0

00

01,

140

01,

140

Due

from

Oth

er G

over

nmen

ts25

7,33

00

96,6

820

05,

056

359,

068

Prop

erty

Tax

es R

ecei

vabl

e0

548,

114

930,

978

00

01,

479,

092

Allo

wan

ce fo

r U

ncol

lect

ible

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

0(3

3,46

1)(6

7,80

7)0

00

(101

,268

)

Tota

l Ass

ets

$25

7,33

0$

519,

250

$1,

009,

572

$54

8,90

6$

233,

527

$37

,146

$2,

605,

731

LIAB

ILIT

IES

Acco

unts

Pay

able

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$15

,986

$15

,986

Payr

oll D

educ

tions

Pay

able

00

00

891

089

1D

ue to

Oth

er T

axin

g U

nits

257,

330

519,

250

1,00

9,57

20

00

1,78

6,15

2D

ue to

Liti

gant

s, H

eirs

, and

Oth

ers

00

054

8,90

60

21,1

6057

0,06

6D

ue to

Joi

nt V

entu

re0

00

023

2,63

60

232,

636

Tota

l Lia

bilit

ies

$25

7,33

0$

519,

250

$1,

009,

572

$54

8,90

6$

233,

527

$37

,146

$2,

605,

731

Agen

cy F

unds

105

Page 106: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit I-2

Scott County, TennesseeCombining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - All Agency FundsFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Beginning Ending Balance Additions Deductions Balance

Cities - Sales Tax Fund Assets Equity in Pooled Cash and Investments $ 0 $ 1,354,384 $ 1,354,384 $ 0 Due from Other Governments 252,401 257,330 252,401 257,330

Total Assets $ 252,401 $ 1,611,714 $ 1,606,785 $ 257,330

Liabilities Due to Other Taxing Units $ 252,401 $ 1,611,714 $ 1,606,785 $ 257,330

Total Liabilities $ 252,401 $ 1,611,714 $ 1,606,785 $ 257,330

Special School District Assets Equity in Pooled Cash and Investments $ 1,297 $ 323,484 $ 320,184 $ 4,597 Property Taxes Receivable 407,828 548,114 407,828 548,114 Allowance for Uncollectible Taxes (23,726) (33,461) (23,726) (33,461)

Total Assets $ 385,399 $ 838,137 $ 704,286 $ 519,250

Liabilities Due to Other Taxing Units $ 385,399 $ 838,137 $ 704,286 $ 519,250

Total Liabilities $ 385,399 $ 838,137 $ 704,286 $ 519,250

City School ADA - Oneida Fund Assets Equity in Pooled Cash and Investments $ 57,439 $ 1,400,766 $ 1,408,486 $ 49,719 Due from Other Governments 103,171 96,682 103,171 96,682 Property Taxes Receivable 943,789 930,978 943,789 930,978 Allowance for Uncollectible Taxes (51,467) (67,807) (51,467) (67,807)

Total Assets $ 1,052,932 $ 2,360,619 $ 2,403,979 $ 1,009,572

Liabilities Due to Other Taxing Units $ 1,052,932 $ 2,360,619 $ 2,403,979 $ 1,009,572

Total Liabilities $ 1,052,932 $ 2,360,619 $ 2,403,979 $ 1,009,572

(Continued)

106

Page 107: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit I-2

Scott County, TennesseeCombining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - All Agency Funds (Cont.)

Beginning Ending Balance Additions Deductions Balance

Constitutional Officers - Agency Fund Assets Cash $ 562,817 $ 4,149,347 $ 4,163,258 $ 548,906

0 Total Assets $ 562,817 $ 4,149,347 $ 4,163,258 $ 548,906

Liabilities Due to Litigants, Heirs, and Others $ 562,817 $ 4,149,347 $ 4,163,258 $ 548,906

Total Liabilities $ 562,817 $ 4,149,347 $ 4,163,258 $ 548,906

Judicial District Drug Assets Equity in Pooled Cash and Investments $ 120,860 $ 509,593 $ 398,066 $ 232,387 Accounts Receivable 2,717 1,140 2,717 1,140 Due from Other Governments 83,762 0 83,762 0 Due from Other Funds 24,230 0 24,230 0

Total Assets $ 231,569 $ 510,733 $ 508,775 $ 233,527

Liabilities Accounts Payable $ 1,455 $ 0 $ 1,455 $ 0 Payroll Deductions Payable 2,168 891 2,168 891 Due to Joint Venture 227,946 509,842 505,152 232,636

Total Liabilities $ 231,569 $ 510,733 $ 508,775 $ 233,527

District Attorney General Assets Equity in Pooled Cash and Investments $ 11,391 $ 71,184 $ 50,485 $ 32,090 Due from Other Governments 4,483 5,056 4,483 5,056

Total Assets $ 15,874 $ 76,240 $ 54,968 $ 37,146

Liabilities Accounts Payable $ 1,720 $ 15,986 $ 1,720 $ 15,986 Due to Litigants, Heirs and Others 14,154 60,254 53,248 21,160

Total Liabilities $ 15,874 $ 76,240 $ 54,968 $ 37,146

(Continued)

107

Page 108: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit I-2

Scott County, TennesseeCombining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - All Agency Funds (Cont.)

Beginning Ending Balance Additions Deductions Balance

Totals - All Agency Funds Assets Cash $ 562,817 $ 4,149,347 $ 4,163,258 $ 548,906 Equity in Pooled Cash and Investments 190,987 3,659,411 3,531,605 318,793 Account Receivables 2,717 1,140 2,717 1,140 Due from Other Governments 443,817 359,068 443,817 359,068 Due from Other Funds 24,230 0 24,230 0 Property Taxes Receivable 1,351,617 1,479,092 1,351,617 1,479,092 Allowance for Uncollectible Taxes (75,193) (101,268) (75,193) (101,268)

Total Assets $ 2,500,992 $ 9,546,790 $ 9,442,051 $ 2,605,731

Liabilities Accounts Payable $ 3,175 $ 15,986 $ 3,175 $ 15,986 Payroll Deductions Payable 2,168 891 2,168 891 Due to Other Taxing Units 1,690,732 4,810,470 4,715,050 1,786,152 Due to Litigants, Heirs, and Others 576,971 4,209,601 4,216,506 570,066 Due to Joint Venture 227,946 509,842 505,152 232,636

Total Liabilities $ 2,500,992 $ 9,546,790 $ 9,442,051 $ 2,605,731

108

Page 109: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Scott County School Department ____________________________

This section presents combining and individual fund financial statements for the Scott County School Department, a discretely presented component unit. The School Department uses a General Fund and two Special Revenue Funds.

____________________________ General Purpose School Fund – The General Purpose School Fund is used to account for general operations of the School Department. School Federal Projects Fund – The School Federal Projects Fund is used to account for restricted federal revenues, which must be expended on specific education programs. Central Cafeteria Fund – The Central Cafeteria Fund is used to account for cafeteria operations in each of the schools.

109

Page 110: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit J

-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Act

iviti

esD

iscr

etel

y Pr

esen

ted

Scot

t Cou

nty

Scho

ol D

epar

tmen

tFo

r th

e Ye

ar E

nded

Jun

e 30

, 201

4

Net

(Exp

ense

)Re

venu

e an

dCh

ange

s in

Net

Pos

ition

Ope

ratin

gCa

pita

lTo

tal

Char

ges

for

Gra

nts

and

Gra

nts

and

Gov

ernm

enta

lFu

nctio

ns/P

rogr

ams

Expe

nses

Serv

ices

Cont

ribu

tions

Cont

ribu

tions

Activ

ities

Gov

ernm

enta

l Act

iviti

es:

Ins

truc

tion

$14

,564

,064

$41

,437

$1,

450,

516

$2,

159,

560

$(1

0,91

2,55

1) S

uppo

rt S

ervi

ces

7,72

0,22

00

412,

976

0(7

,307

,244

) O

pera

tion

of N

on-in

stru

ctio

nal S

ervi

ces

2,80

3,89

627

3,63

22,

659,

449

012

9,18

5To

tal G

over

nmen

tal A

ctiv

ities

$25

,088

,180

$31

5,06

9$

4,52

2,94

1$

2,15

9,56

0$

(18,

090,

610)

Gen

eral

Rev

enue

s: T

axes

:

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

Levi

ed fo

r G

ener

al P

urpo

ses

$1,

914,

605

L

ocal

Opt

ion

Sale

s Ta

xes

1,24

9,43

4

Oth

er L

ocal

Tax

es2,

207

Gra

nts

and

Cont

ribu

tions

Not

Res

tric

ted

to S

peci

fic P

rogr

ams

16,8

73,3

95 U

nres

tric

ted

Inve

stm

ent I

ncom

e84

9 M

isce

llane

ous

29,4

42To

tal G

ener

al R

even

ues

$20

,069

,932

Chan

ge in

Net

Pos

ition

$1,

979,

322

Net

Pos

ition

, Jul

y 1,

201

320

,676

,316

Net

Pos

ition

, Jun

e 30

, 201

4$

22,6

55,6

38

Prog

ram

Rev

enue

s

110

Page 111: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit J

-2

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeBa

lanc

e Sh

eet -

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

dsD

iscr

etel

y Pr

esen

ted

Scot

t Cou

nty

Scho

ol D

epar

tmen

tJu

ne 3

0, 2

014

Gen

eral

Scho

olTo

tal

Purp

ose

Fede

ral

Cent

ral

Gov

ernm

enta

lSc

hool

Proj

ects

Cafe

teri

aFu

nds

ASSE

TS

Cash

$0

$0

$8,

517

$8,

517

Equi

ty in

Poo

led

Cash

and

Inve

stm

ents

6,20

3,13

614

,619

740,

553

6,95

8,30

8Ac

coun

ts R

ecei

vabl

e50

449

712

71,

128

Due

from

Oth

er G

over

nmen

ts75

0,44

139

4,10

324

,175

1,16

8,71

9Pr

oper

ty T

axes

Rec

eiva

ble

2,13

9,99

70

02,

139,

997

Allo

wan

ce fo

r U

ncol

lect

ible

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

(155

,274

)0

0(1

55,2

74)

Tota

l Ass

ets

$8,

938,

804

$40

9,21

9$

773,

372

$10

,121

,395

LIAB

ILIT

IES

Acco

unts

Pay

able

$11

,100

$3,

544

$27

1$

14,9

15Ac

crue

d Pa

yrol

l2,

324,

343

288,

835

111,

641

2,72

4,81

9Pa

yrol

l Ded

uctio

ns P

ayab

le19

3,53

120

,648

7,05

422

1,23

3D

ue to

Pri

mar

y G

over

nmen

t5,

279

00

5,27

9D

ue to

Sta

te o

f Ten

ness

ee4,

479

942

1,08

96,

510

Oth

er C

urre

nt L

iabi

litie

s26

4,16

031

,555

3,71

529

9,43

0To

tal L

iabi

litie

s$

2,80

2,89

2$

345,

524

$12

3,77

0$

3,27

2,18

6

DEF

ERRE

D IN

FLO

WS

OF

RESO

URC

ES

Def

erre

d Cu

rren

t Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

$1,

891,

924

$0

$0

$1,

891,

924

Def

erre

d D

elin

quen

t Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

82,8

440

082

,844

Oth

er D

efer

red/

Una

vaila

ble

Reve

nue

586,

388

18,4

940

604,

882

Tota

l Def

erre

d In

flow

s of

Res

ourc

es$

2,56

1,15

6$

18,4

94$

0$

2,57

9,65

0

(Con

tinue

d)

Maj

or F

unds

111

Page 112: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit J

-2

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeBa

lanc

e Sh

eet -

Gov

ernm

enta

l Fun

dsD

iscr

etel

y Pr

esen

ted

Scot

t Cou

nty

Scho

ol D

epar

tmen

t (Co

nt.)

Gen

eral

Scho

olTo

tal

Purp

ose

Fede

ral

Cent

ral

Gov

ernm

enta

lSc

hool

Proj

ects

Cafe

teri

aFu

nds

FUN

D B

ALAN

CES

Rest

rict

ed:

Rest

rict

ed fo

r Ed

ucat

ion

$29

7,07

1$

0$

649,

602

$94

6,67

3Co

mm

itted

:Co

mm

itted

for

Educ

atio

n0

100,

000

010

0,00

0As

sign

ed:

Assi

gned

for

Educ

atio

n72

,537

00

72,5

37U

nass

igne

d3,

205,

148

(54,

799)

03,

150,

349

Tota

l Fun

d Ba

lanc

es$

3,57

4,75

6$

45,2

01$

649,

602

$4,

269,

559

Tota

l Lia

bilit

ies,

Def

erre

d In

flow

s of

Res

ourc

es, a

nd F

und

Bala

nces

$8,

938,

804

$40

9,21

9$

773,

372

$10

,121

,395

Maj

or F

unds

112

Page 113: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit J-3

Scott County, TennesseeReconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net PositionDiscretely Presented Scott County School DepartmentJune 30, 2014

Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position (Exhibit A) are different because:

Total fund balances - balance sheet - governmental funds (Exhibit J-2) $ 4,269,559

(1) Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and therefore are not reported inthe governmental funds. Add: land $ 910,561 Add: building and improvements net of accumulated depreciation 18,292,478 Add: other capital assets net of accumulated depreciation 1,322,418 20,525,457

(2) Long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current periodand therefore are not reported in the governmental funds. Less: other postemployment benefits liability (2,827,104)

(3) Other long-term assets are not available to pay forcurrent-period expenditures and therefore are deferredin the governmental funds. 687,726

Net position of governmental activities (Exhibit A) $ 22,655,638

113

Page 114: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit J

-4

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Chan

ges

in F

und

Bala

nces

- G

over

nmen

tal F

unds

Dis

cret

ely

Pres

ente

d Sc

ott C

ount

y Sc

hool

Dep

artm

ent

For

the

Year

End

ed J

une

30, 2

014

Gen

eral

Scho

olTo

tal

Purp

ose

Fede

ral

Cent

ral

Gov

ernm

enta

lSc

hool

Proj

ects

Cafe

teri

aFu

nds

Reve

nues

Loca

l Tax

es$

3,20

3,98

9$

0$

0$

3,20

3,98

9Li

cens

es a

nd P

erm

its57

60

057

6Ch

arge

s fo

r Cu

rren

t Ser

vice

s41

,437

027

3,63

231

5,06

9O

ther

Loc

al R

even

ues

80,9

910

2,14

583

,136

Stat

e of

Ten

ness

ee17

,423

,737

017

,167

17,4

40,9

04Fe

dera

l Gov

ernm

ent

02,

342,

943

1,58

1,72

13,

924,

664

Tota

l Rev

enue

s$

20,7

50,7

30$

2,34

2,94

3$

1,87

4,66

5$

24,9

68,3

38

Expe

nditu

res

Curr

ent:

Inst

ruct

ion

$12

,155

,046

$2,

108,

301

$0

$14

,263

,347

Supp

ort S

ervi

ces

6,14

1,45

534

6,70

20

6,48

8,15

7O

pera

tion

of N

on-in

stru

ctio

nal S

ervi

ces

1,01

7,71

40

2,04

9,34

03,

067,

054

Capi

tal O

utla

y58

,930

00

58,9

30D

ebt S

ervi

ce:

Oth

er D

ebt S

ervi

ce36

6,32

30

036

6,32

3To

tal E

xpen

ditu

res

$19

,739

,468

$2,

455,

003

$2,

049,

340

$24

,243

,811

Exce

ss (D

efic

ienc

y) o

f Rev

enue

sO

ver

Expe

nditu

res

$1,

011,

262

$(1

12,0

60)

$(1

74,6

75)

$72

4,52

7

Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)In

sura

nce

Reco

very

$6,

253

$0

$0

$6,

253

Tran

sfer

s In

26,0

000

026

,000

Tran

sfer

s O

ut0

(26,

000)

0(2

6,00

0)To

tal O

ther

Fin

anci

ng S

ourc

es (U

ses)

$32

,253

$(2

6,00

0)$

0$

6,25

3

(Con

tinue

d)

Maj

or F

unds

114

Page 115: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit J

-4

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSt

atem

ent o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Chan

ges

in F

und

Bala

nces

- G

over

nmen

tal F

unds

Dis

cret

ely

Pres

ente

d Sc

ott C

ount

y Sc

hool

Dep

artm

ent (

Cont

.)

Gen

eral

Scho

olTo

tal

Purp

ose

Fede

ral

Cent

ral

Gov

ernm

enta

lSc

hool

Proj

ects

Cafe

teri

aFu

nds

Net

Cha

nge

in F

und

Bala

nces

$1,

043,

515

$(1

38,0

60)

$(1

74,6

75)

$73

0,78

0Fu

nd B

alan

ce, J

uly

1, 2

013

2,53

1,24

118

3,26

182

4,27

73,

538,

779

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jun

e 30

, 201

4$

3,57

4,75

6$

45,2

01$

649,

602

$4,

269,

559

Maj

or F

unds

115

Page 116: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit J-5

Scott County, TennesseeReconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of ActivitiesDiscretely Presented Scott County School DepartmentFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities (Exhibit B) are different because:

Net change in fund balances - total governmental funds (Exhibit J-4) $ 730,780

(1) Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However,in the statement of activities, the cost of these assets is allocated over their useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. The difference between capital outlays and depreciation is itemized asfollows: Add: capital assets purchased in the current period $ 361,565 Less: current-year depreciation expense (989,985) (628,420)

(2) Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide currentfinancial resources are not reported as revenues in the funds. Add: deferred delinquent property taxes and other deferred June 30, 2014 $ 687,726 Less: deferred delinquent property taxes and other deferred June 30, 2013 (754,375) (66,649)

(3) The contribution by the primary government of long-term debt (e.g., bonds, notes, other loans, leases) provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long-term debt consumes currentfinancial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, hasany effect on net position. Add: principal contributions on leases to the primary government 71,847

(4) The primary government's refunding of debt, which was serviced by theSchool Department, will be serviced by the primary government,represents a contribution to the School Department on the government-widestatements and an increase in net assets. 2,166,477

(5) Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require theuse of current financial resources and therefore are not reported asexpenditures in the governmental funds. Change in other postemployment benefits liability (294,713)

Change in net position of governmental activities (Exhibit B) $ 1,979,322

116

Page 117: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit J

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Cha

nges

in F

und

Bala

nce

- Act

ual (

Budg

etar

y Ba

sis)

and

Bud

get

Dis

cret

ely

Pres

ente

d Sc

ott C

ount

y Sc

hool

Dep

artm

ent

Gen

eral

Pur

pose

Sch

ool F

und

For

the

Year

End

ed J

une

30, 2

014

Actu

alVa

rian

ceRe

venu

es/

with

Fin

alAc

tual

Less

:Ad

d:Ex

pend

iture

sBu

dget

-(G

AAP

Encu

mbr

ance

sEn

cum

bran

ces

(Bud

geta

ryPo

sitiv

eBa

sis)

7/1/

2013

6/30

/201

4Ba

sis)

Ori

gina

lFi

nal

(Neg

ativ

e)

Reve

nues

Loca

l Tax

es$

3,20

3,98

9$

0$

0$

3,20

3,98

9$

3,32

9,78

0$

3,32

9,78

0$

(125

,791

)Li

cens

es a

nd P

erm

its57

60

057

650

050

076

Char

ges

for

Curr

ent S

ervi

ces

41,4

370

041

,437

57,0

0057

,000

(15,

563)

Oth

er L

ocal

Rev

enue

s80

,991

00

80,9

910

74,7

146,

277

Stat

e of

Ten

ness

ee17

,423

,737

00

17,4

23,7

3716

,943

,439

17,4

94,9

42(7

1,20

5)Fe

dera

l Gov

ernm

ent

00

00

5,50

05,

500

(5,5

00)

Tota

l Rev

enue

s$

20,7

50,7

30$

0$

0$

20,7

50,7

30$

20,3

36,2

19$

20,9

62,4

36$

(211

,706

)

Expe

nditu

res

Inst

ruct

ion

Regu

lar

Inst

ruct

ion

Prog

ram

$10

,360

,760

$0

$0

$10

,360

,760

$10

,556

,260

$10

,885

,213

$52

4,45

3Al

tern

ativ

e In

stru

ctio

n Pr

ogra

m17

,639

00

17,6

3978

,115

78,1

1560

,476

Spec

ial E

duca

tion

Prog

ram

1,24

7,38

30

01,

247,

383

1,29

8,44

81,

298,

448

51,0

65Vo

catio

nal E

duca

tion

Prog

ram

529,

264

00

529,

264

636,

509

636,

509

107,

245

Supp

ort S

ervi

ces

Atte

ndan

ce86

,889

00

86,8

8990

,679

90,6

793,

790

Hea

lth S

ervi

ces

257,

972

084

425

8,81

615

1,77

627

6,97

318

,157

Oth

er S

tude

nt S

uppo

rt29

8,44

50

029

8,44

532

8,99

532

8,99

530

,550

Regu

lar

Inst

ruct

ion

Prog

ram

619,

869

081

619,

950

690,

663

675,

663

55,7

13Sp

ecia

l Edu

catio

n Pr

ogra

m18

5,42

20

018

5,42

219

5,47

019

5,47

010

,048

Oth

er P

rogr

ams

128,

150

00

128,

150

012

8,15

00

Boar

d of

Edu

catio

n43

5,80

50

043

5,80

546

1,38

946

1,38

925

,584

Dir

ecto

r of

Sch

ools

299,

327

00

299,

327

303,

184

305,

701

6,37

4O

ffice

of t

he P

rinc

ipal

851,

302

00

851,

302

921,

060

923,

460

72,1

58O

pera

tion

of P

lant

1,44

0,42

90

01,

440,

429

1,52

6,68

31,

572,

683

132,

254

Mai

nten

ance

of P

lant

196,

852

013

196,

865

266,

888

226,

888

30,0

23Tr

ansp

orta

tion

1,07

9,31

70

01,

079,

317

1,09

7,48

41,

111,

984

32,6

67Ce

ntra

l and

Oth

er26

1,67

60

026

1,67

624

5,95

326

4,45

32,

777

(Con

tinue

d)

Budg

eted

Am

ount

s

117

Page 118: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit J

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Cha

nges

in F

und

Bala

nce

- Act

ual (

Budg

etar

y Ba

sis)

and

Bud

get

Dis

cret

ely

Pres

ente

d Sc

ott C

ount

y Sc

hool

Dep

artm

ent

Gen

eral

Pur

pose

Sch

ool F

und

(Con

t.)

Actu

alVa

rian

ceRe

venu

es/

with

Fin

alAc

tual

Less

:Ad

d:Ex

pend

iture

sBu

dget

-(G

AAP

Encu

mbr

ance

sEn

cum

bran

ces

(Bud

geta

ryPo

sitiv

eBa

sis)

7/1/

2013

6/30

/201

4Ba

sis)

Ori

gina

lFi

nal

(Neg

ativ

e)

Expe

nditu

res

(Con

t.)O

pera

tion

of N

on-in

stru

ctio

nal S

ervi

ces

Com

mun

ity S

ervi

ces

$48

,896

$0

$0

$48

,896

$50

,000

$50

,000

$1,

104

Earl

y Ch

ildho

od E

duca

tion

968,

818

(594

)1,

118

969,

342

1,06

1,34

01,

061,

340

91,9

98Ca

pita

l Out

lay

Regu

lar

Capi

tal O

utla

y58

,930

08,

789

67,7

1925

5,55

090

,000

22,2

81O

ther

Deb

t Ser

vice

Educ

atio

n36

6,32

30

036

6,32

318

5,77

336

6,32

30

Tota

l Exp

endi

ture

s$

19,7

39,4

68$

(594

)$

10,8

45$

19,7

49,7

19$

20,4

02,2

19$

21,0

28,4

36$

1,27

8,71

7

Exce

ss (D

efic

ienc

y) o

f Rev

enue

sO

ver

Expe

nditu

res

$1,

011,

262

$59

4$

(10,

845)

$1,

001,

011

$(6

6,00

0)$

(66,

000)

$1,

067,

011

Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)In

sura

nce

Reco

very

$6,

253

$0

$0

$6,

253

$0

$0

$6,

253

Tran

sfer

s In

26,0

000

026

,000

56,0

0056

,000

(30,

000)

Tota

l Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

$32

,253

$0

$0

$32

,253

$56

,000

$56

,000

$(2

3,74

7)

Net

Cha

nge

in F

und

Bala

nce

$1,

043,

515

$59

4$

(10,

845)

$1,

033,

264

$(1

0,00

0)$

(10,

000)

$1,

043,

264

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jul

y 1,

201

32,

531,

241

(594

)0

2,53

0,64

72,

987,

271

2,98

7,27

1(4

56,6

24)

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jun

e 30

, 201

4$

3,57

4,75

6$

0$

(10,

845)

$3,

563,

911

$2,

977,

271

$2,

977,

271

$58

6,64

0

Budg

eted

Am

ount

s

118

Page 119: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit J

-7

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res,

and

Cha

nges

in F

und

Bala

nce

- Act

ual (

Budg

etar

y Ba

sis)

and

Bud

get

Dis

cret

ely

Pres

ente

d Sc

ott C

ount

y Sc

hool

Dep

artm

ent

Scho

ol F

eder

al P

roje

cts

Fund

For t

he Y

ear E

nded

Jun

e 30

, 201

4

Actu

alVa

rian

ceRe

venu

es/

with

Fin

alAc

tual

Less

:Ex

pend

iture

sBu

dget

-(G

AAP

Encu

mbr

ance

s(B

udge

tary

Posi

tive

Basi

s)7/

1/20

13Ba

sis)

Ori

gina

lFi

nal

(Neg

ativ

e)

Reve

nues

Fede

ral G

over

nmen

t$

2,34

2,94

3$

0$

2,34

2,94

3$

1,97

8,33

6$

2,96

1,21

4$

(618

,271

)To

tal R

even

ues

$2,

342,

943

$0

$2,

342,

943

$1,

978,

336

$2,

961,

214

$(6

18,2

71)

Expe

nditu

res

Inst

ruct

ion

Regu

lar I

nstr

uctio

n Pr

ogra

m$

1,44

3,33

1$

(52)

$1,

443,

279

$98

7,65

1$

1,62

4,99

4$

181,

715

Spec

ial E

duca

tion

Prog

ram

615,

116

061

5,11

656

2,83

172

8,38

811

3,27

2Vo

catio

nal E

duca

tion

Prog

ram

49,8

54(1

08)

49,7

4643

,559

51,5

591,

813

Supp

ort S

ervi

ces

Oth

er S

tude

nt S

uppo

rt22

,789

022

,789

20,5

8946

,751

23,9

62Re

gula

r Ins

truc

tion

Prog

ram

275,

837

(3,8

42)

271,

995

292,

525

422,

342

150,

347

Spec

ial E

duca

tion

Prog

ram

12,5

970

12,5

9711

,500

24,4

3211

,835

Voca

tiona

l Edu

catio

n Pr

ogra

m54

90

549

2,70

055

01

Tran

spor

tatio

n34

,930

034

,930

36,2

0036

,200

1,27

0To

tal E

xpen

ditu

res

$2,

455,

003

$(4

,002

)$

2,45

1,00

1$

1,95

7,55

5$

2,93

5,21

6$

484,

215

Exce

ss (D

efic

ienc

y) o

f Rev

enue

sO

ver E

xpen

ditu

res

$(1

12,0

60)

$4,

002

$(1

08,0

58)

$20

,781

$25

,998

$(1

34,0

56)

Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

(Use

s)Tr

ansf

ers

Out

$(2

6,00

0)$

0$

(26,

000)

$(2

0,78

1)$

(26,

000)

$0

Tota

l Oth

er F

inan

cing

Sou

rces

$(2

6,00

0)$

0$

(26,

000)

$(2

0,78

1)$

(26,

000)

$0

Net

Cha

nge

in F

und

Bala

nce

$(1

38,0

60)

$4,

002

$(1

34,0

58)

$0

$(2

)$

(134

,056

)Fu

nd B

alan

ce, J

uly

1, 2

013

183,

261

(4,0

02)

179,

259

65,8

7365

,873

113,

386

Fund

Bal

ance

, Jun

e 30

, 201

4$

45,2

01$

0$

45,2

01$

65,8

73$

65,8

71$

(20,

670)

Budg

eted

Am

ount

s

119

Page 120: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit J-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes

in Fund Balance - Actual and BudgetDiscretely Presented Scott County School DepartmentCentral Cafeteria FundFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Variancewith FinalBudget -Positive

Actual Original Final (Negative)

RevenuesCharges for Current Services $ 273,632 $ 259,500 $ 259,500 $ 14,132Other Local Revenues 2,145 1,800 1,800 345State of Tennessee 17,167 17,500 17,500 (333)Federal Government 1,581,721 1,410,000 1,526,633 55,088

Total Revenues $ 1,874,665 $ 1,688,800 $ 1,805,433 $ 69,232

ExpendituresOperation of Non-instructional Services

Food Service $ 2,049,340 $ 1,938,800 $ 2,055,433 $ 6,093Total Expenditures $ 2,049,340 $ 1,938,800 $ 2,055,433 $ 6,093

Excess (Deficiency) of RevenuesOver Expenditures $ (174,675) $ (250,000) $ (250,000) $ 75,325

Net Change in Fund Balance $ (174,675) $ (250,000) $ (250,000) $ 75,325Fund Balance, July 1, 2013 824,277 826,635 826,635 (2,358)

Fund Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 649,602 $ 576,635 $ 576,635 $ 72,967

Budgeted Amounts

120

Page 121: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

MISCELLANEOUS SCHEDULES

121

Page 122: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

K-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Cha

nges

in L

ong-

term

Not

es, O

ther

Loa

ns, C

apita

l Lea

ses,

and

Bon

dsFo

r the

Yea

r End

ed J

une

30, 2

014

Ori

gina

l D

ate

Last

Issu

ed

Am

ount

Inte

rest

ofM

atur

ity

Out

stan

ding

Dur

ing

Deb

tO

utst

andi

ngD

escr

iptio

n of

Inde

bted

ness

of Is

sue

Rat

eIs

sue

Dat

e7-

1-13

Peri

odR

efun

ded

6-30

-14

GO

VE

RN

ME

NTA

L A

CTI

VIT

IES

NO

TES

PAYA

BLE

Pay

able

thro

ugh

Hig

hway

/Pub

lic W

orks

Fun

d

Equ

ipm

ent

$30

1,81

23.

7%

5-20

-03

5-20

-15

$50

,301

$0

$25

,151

$0

$25

,150

B

ridg

e R

epla

cem

ent/E

quip

men

t30

0,00

04.

998-

30-0

56-

30-1

710

0,00

00

25,0

000

75,0

00

Roa

d R

esur

face

30

0,00

03.

9812

-5-0

712

-1-1

613

3,33

00

33,3

340

99,9

96

Asp

halt

200,

000

3.33

1-9-

091-

10-1

566

,667

033

,333

033

,334

R

oad

Res

urfa

ce60

0,00

03.

578-

31-0

98-

28-1

540

0,00

00

66,6

670

333,

333

R

oad

Res

urfa

ce50

0,00

02.

9410

-15-

1210

-15-

1550

0,00

00

166,

667

033

3,33

3

Asp

halt

Zipp

er12

2,20

52.

949-

25-1

38-

21-1

60

122,

205

00

122,

205

B

ridg

e Im

prov

emen

ts60

0,00

03.

579-

25-1

38-

21-1

60

600,

000

00

600,

000

C

apita

l Out

lay

300,

000

3.55

12-1

6-13

12-1

6-16

030

0,00

00

030

0,00

0 T

otal

Pay

able

thro

ugh

Hig

hway

/Pub

lic W

orks

Fun

d$

1,25

0,29

8$

1,02

2,20

5$

350,

152

$0

$1,

922,

351

Pay

able

thro

ugh

Gen

eral

Deb

t Ser

vice

Fun

d

Ble

ache

rs/O

ther

Sch

ool P

roje

cts

325,

000

55-

17-0

65-

30-1

8$

135,

417

$0

$13

5,41

7$

0$

0

Hig

hway

Equ

ipm

ent

212,

300

4.9

6-19

-07

6-19

-19

106,

148

010

6,14

80

0

Avi

atio

n Pr

ojec

ts43

4,10

33.

192-

9-10

2-5-

1632

5,57

80

36,1

7528

9,40

30

Tot

al P

ayab

le th

roug

h G

ener

al D

ebt S

ervi

ce F

und

$56

7,14

3$

0$

277,

740

$28

9,40

3$

0

Pay

able

thro

ugh

Rur

al D

ebt S

ervi

ce F

und

T

rans

port

atio

n E

quip

men

t47

1,76

04.

058-

29-0

58-

29-1

4$

110,

355

$0

$54

,058

$0

$56

,297

W

infie

ld C

onst

ruct

ion

Proj

ect

388,

182

4.99

8-24

-05

6-24

-17

129,

394

032

,349

97,0

450

W

infie

ld C

onst

ruct

ion

Proj

ect

278,

277

4.74

11-3

0-05

11-3

0-17

115,

947

023

,190

92,7

570

T

rans

port

atio

n E

quip

men

t51

8,09

64.

888-

28-0

68-

28-1

825

9,04

60

43,1

7321

5,87

30

H

unts

ville

Ele

men

tary

and

Tec

hnol

ogy

Cen

ter R

oof P

roje

cts

245,

570

3.72

6-2-

086-

2-17

109,

140

027

,286

81,8

540

Tot

al P

ayab

le th

roug

h R

ural

Deb

t Ser

vice

Fun

d$

723,

882

$0

$18

0,05

6$

487,

529

$56

,297

Tota

l Not

es P

ayab

le$

2,54

1,32

3$

1,02

2,20

5$

807,

948

$77

6,93

2$

1,97

8,64

8

(Con

tinue

d)

Pai

d an

d/or

Mat

ured

Dur

ing

Peri

od

122

Page 123: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

K-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Cha

nges

in L

ong-

term

Not

es, O

ther

Loa

ns, C

apita

l Lea

ses,

and

Bon

ds (C

ont.)

Ori

gina

l D

ate

Last

Issu

ed

Am

ount

Inte

rest

ofM

atur

ity

Out

stan

ding

Dur

ing

Deb

tO

utst

andi

ngD

escr

iptio

n of

Inde

bted

ness

of Is

sue

Rat

eIs

sue

Dat

e7-

1-13

Peri

odR

efun

ded

6-30

-14

GO

VE

RN

ME

NTA

L A

CTI

VIT

IES

(CO

NT.

)

OTH

ER

LO

AN

S PA

YAB

LE P

ublic

Bui

ldin

g A

utho

rity

Loa

n A

gree

men

t

Pay

able

thro

ugh

Gen

eral

Deb

t Ser

vice

Fun

d

B

uild

ing

and

Equ

ipm

ent

$1,

000,

000

V

arie

s%

3-1-

1995

5-25

-21

$45

8,60

0$

0$

48,0

00$

0$

410,

600

Just

ice

Cen

ter a

nd H

ighw

ay P

roje

cts

(1)

Var

ies

2-27

-07

5-25

-34

8,49

0,93

80

229,

000

08,

261,

938

Scho

ol R

enov

atio

ns a

nd Im

prov

emen

ts13

,940

,000

V

arie

s12

-15-

095-

25-3

513

,019

,000

033

8,00

00

12,6

81,0

00

Tot

al P

ayab

le th

roug

h G

ener

al D

ebt S

ervi

ce F

und

$21

,968

,538

$0

$61

5,00

00

$21

,353

,538

P

ayab

le th

roug

h R

ural

Deb

t Ser

vice

Fun

d

Var

ious

Sch

ools

Pro

ject

s3,

000,

000

V

arie

s10

-2-0

35-

25-2

3$

1,79

8,00

0$

0$

156,

000

0$

1,64

2,00

0

Tot

al P

ayab

le th

roug

h R

ural

Deb

t Ser

vice

Fun

d$

1,79

8,00

0$

0$

156,

000

0$

1,64

2,00

0

Tota

l Oth

er L

oans

Pay

able

$23

,766

,538

$0

$77

1,00

0$

0$

22,9

95,5

38

CA

PITA

L LE

ASE

S PA

YAB

LE P

ayab

le b

y Sc

hool

Dep

artm

ent t

hrou

gh G

ener

al P

urpo

se S

choo

l Fun

d

Ene

rgy

Effi

cien

cy U

pgra

des

2,49

9,65

24.

625-

15-0

85-

15-2

7$

2,23

8,32

4$

0$

71,8

472,

166,

477

$0

Tot

al P

ayab

le b

y Sc

hool

Dep

artm

ent t

hrou

gh G

ener

al P

urpo

se S

choo

l Fun

d$

2,23

8,32

4$

0$

71,8

47$

2,16

6,47

7$

0

Tota

l Cap

ital L

ease

s Pa

yabl

e$

2,23

8,32

4$

0$

71,8

47$

2,16

6,47

7$

0

BO

ND

S PA

YAB

LE P

ayab

le th

roug

h G

ener

al D

ebt S

ervi

ce F

und

G

ener

al O

blig

atio

n B

onds

50

0,00

05

11-1

-197

91-

1-17

$10

4,00

0$

0$

104,

000

$0

$0

R

efun

ding

3,09

3,78

41.

1 to

3.5

510

-21-

036-

1-15

115,

000

065

,000

50,0

000

G

ener

al O

blig

atio

n B

onds

, Ser

ies

2004

650,

000

4 to

4.7

12-3

0-04

5-1-

3554

0,00

00

15,0

0052

5,00

00

G

ener

al O

blig

atio

n B

onds

, Ser

ies

2008

1,25

0,00

0

3 to

4.5

2-14

-08

6-1-

281,

125,

000

050

,000

01,

075,

000

R

efun

ding

Bon

ds, S

erie

s 20

14A

1,49

0,00

0

2 to

3.4

6-30

-14

6-1-

350

1,49

0,00

00

01,

490,

000

Tot

al P

ayab

le th

roug

h G

ener

al D

ebt S

ervi

ce F

und

$1,

884,

000

$1,

490,

000

$23

4,00

0$

575,

000

$2,

565,

000

Pay

able

thro

ugh

Rur

al D

ebt S

ervi

ce F

und

R

efun

ding

6,63

0,00

03.

65 to

4.5

11-1

-199

84-

1-14

$62

0,00

0$

0$

620,

000

$0

$0

R

efun

ding

4,57

0,00

03.

75 to

4.5

12-3

0-04

5-1-

294,

570,

000

00

4,57

0,00

00

R

ural

Sch

ool B

onds

, Ser

ies

2004

805,

000

3.75

to 4

.512

-30-

045-

1-29

805,

000

00

805,

000

0

Rur

al S

choo

l Ref

undi

ng B

onds

, Ser

ies

2014

B8,

120,

000

2 to

3.2

56-

30-1

46-

1-29

08,

120,

000

00

8,12

0,00

0 T

otal

Pay

able

thro

ugh

Rur

al D

ebt S

ervi

ce F

und

$

5,99

5,00

0$

8,12

0,00

0$

620,

000

$5,

375,

000

$8,

120,

000

Tota

l Bon

ds P

ayab

le$

7,87

9,00

0$

9,61

0,00

0$

854,

000

$5,

950,

000

$10

,685

,000

(Con

tinue

d)

Pai

d an

d/or

Mat

ured

Dur

ing

Peri

od

123

Page 124: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

K-1

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Cha

nges

in L

ong-

term

Not

es, O

ther

Loa

ns, C

apita

l Lea

ses,

and

Bon

ds (C

ont.)

Ori

gina

l D

ate

Last

Issu

ed

Am

ount

Inte

rest

ofM

atur

ity

Out

stan

ding

Dur

ing

Deb

tO

utst

andi

ngD

escr

iptio

n of

Inde

bted

ness

of Is

sue

Rat

eIs

sue

Dat

e7-

1-13

Peri

odR

efun

ded

6-30

-14

BU

SIN

ESS

-TYP

E A

CTI

VIT

IES

BO

ND

S PA

YAB

LE P

ayab

le th

roug

h Pu

blic

Util

ity F

und

R

even

ue a

nd T

ax B

onds

$25

5,00

04.

25

%

9-28

-07

8-31

-45

$23

7,27

9$

$0

$3,

258

$23

4,02

1(2

)$

0

Gen

eral

Obl

igat

ion

Bon

ds -

Ref

undi

ng49

0,00

01.

1 to

4.7

10-2

1-03

6-1-

2737

0,00

00

20,0

0035

0,00

0(2

)0

Tota

l Bon

ds P

ayab

le$

607,

279

$$

0$

23,2

58$

584,

021

$0

(1) T

he to

tal a

mou

nt a

ppro

ved

for d

raw

s un

der t

his

loan

agr

eem

ent i

s $1

0 m

illio

n, o

f whi

ch $

345,

062

had

not b

een

draw

n as

of J

une

30, 2

014.

(2) D

urin

g th

e ye

ar, t

he co

unty

clos

ed it

's bu

sine

ss-ty

pe a

ctiv

ities

(the

Pub

lic U

tility

Fun

d).

Out

stan

ding

deb

t for

this

fund

was

refu

nded

.

Pai

d an

d/or

Mat

ured

Dur

ing

Peri

od

124

Page 125: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-2

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Long-term Debt Requirements by Year

GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES

YearEndingJune 30 Principal Interest Total

2015 $ 747,184 $ 63,936 $ 811,1202016 832,398 32,620 865,0182017 399,066 8,062 407,128

Total $ 1,978,648 $ 104,618 $ 2,083,266

YearEndingJune 30 Principal Interest Other Fees Total

2015 $ 807,400 $ 27,614 $ 227,153 $ 1,062,1672016 845,000 26,270 219,665 1,090,9352017 883,600 24,872 211,818 1,120,2902018 924,400 23,419 203,604 1,151,4232019 967,300 21,910 195,000 1,184,2102020 1,013,400 20,338 185,988 1,219,7262021 1,059,500 18,701 176,537 1,254,7382022 1,038,000 17,002 166,643 1,221,6452023 1,087,000 15,320 156,821 1,259,1412024 925,000 13,565 146,524 1,085,0892025 970,000 12,697 137,081 1,119,7782026 1,019,000 11,787 127,179 1,157,9662027 1,071,000 10,831 116,777 1,198,6082028 1,123,000 9,826 105,844 1,238,6702029 1,180,000 8,774 94,380 1,283,1542030 1,239,000 7,665 82,334 1,328,9992031 1,301,000 6,503 69,686 1,377,1892032 1,366,000 5,282 56,405 1,427,6872033 1,434,000 4,000 42,460 1,480,4602034 1,506,000 2,656 27,821 1,536,4772035 1,235,938 1,242 12,447 1,249,627

Total $ 22,995,538 $ 290,274 $ 2,762,167 $ 26,047,979

(Continued)

Notes

Other Loans

125

Page 126: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-2

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Long-term Debt Requirements by Year (Cont.)

GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES (CONT.)

YearEndingJune 30 Principal Interest Total

2015 $ 665,000 $ 268,447 $ 933,4472016 630,000 273,526 903,5262017 640,000 259,826 899,8262018 595,000 245,826 840,8262019 595,000 232,726 827,7262020 580,000 219,201 799,2012021 605,000 205,726 810,7262022 580,000 191,201 771,2012023 615,000 176,314 791,3142024 850,000 159,820 1,009,8202025 885,000 136,870 1,021,8702026 920,000 110,583 1,030,5832027 970,000 82,226 1,052,2262028 700,000 51,439 751,4392029 625,000 28,133 653,1332030 55,000 7,820 62,8202031 30,000 5,950 35,9502032 35,000 4,930 39,9302033 35,000 3,740 38,7402034 35,000 2,550 37,5502035 40,000 1,360 41,360

Total $ 10,685,000 $ 2,668,214 $ 13,353,214

Bonds

126

Page 127: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

K-3

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Not

es R

ecei

vabl

eJu

ne 3

0, 2

014

Ori

gina

lD

ate

Amou

ntof

In

tere

stBa

lanc

eD

escr

iptio

nD

ebto

rof

Not

esM

atur

ityRa

te6-

30-1

4

Gen

eral

Deb

t Ser

vice

Fun

dSa

le o

f Hos

pita

l Ass

ets

Pion

eer

Hea

lth S

ervi

ces

$10

6,67

612

-1-1

60%

$78

,076

Tota

l Not

es R

ecei

vabl

e$

78,0

76

127

Page 128: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exh

ibit

K-4

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Tra

nsfe

rsPr

imar

y G

over

nmen

t and

Dis

cret

ely

Pres

ente

d Sc

ott C

ount

y Sc

hool

Dep

artm

ent

For t

he Y

ear E

nded

Jun

e 30

, 201

4

From

Fun

dTo

Fun

dPu

rpos

eA

mou

nt

PRIM

AR

Y G

OV

ER

NM

EN

T

Gen

eral

Publ

ic U

tility

Deb

t Ret

irem

ent

$5,

780

Am

bula

nce

Gen

eral

Ope

ratio

ns50

,000

Dru

g C

ontr

ol"

Veh

icle

Pur

chas

e27

,000

Hig

hway

/Pub

lic W

orks

Gen

eral

Deb

t Ser

vice

Deb

t Ret

irem

ent

48,4

24 G

ener

al D

ebt S

ervi

cePu

blic

Util

ity"

36,0

20 C

omm

unity

Dev

elop

men

t/Ind

ustr

ial P

ark

Gen

eral

Clo

se F

und

5,85

8 O

ther

Cap

ital P

roje

cts

""

2,41

3

Tota

l Tra

nsfe

rs P

rim

ary

Gov

ernm

ent

$17

5,49

5

DIS

CR

ETE

LY P

RE

SEN

TED

SC

OTT

C

OU

NTY

SC

HO

OL

DE

PAR

TME

NT

Sch

ool F

eder

al P

roje

cts

Gen

eral

Pur

pose

Sch

ool

Indi

rect

Cos

ts$

26,0

00

Tota

l Tra

nsfe

rs D

iscr

etel

y Pr

esen

ted

Scot

t C

ount

y Sc

hool

Dep

artm

ent

$26

,000

128

Page 129: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-5

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Sal

arie

s an

d O

ffici

al B

onds

of P

rinc

ipal

Offi

cial

sPr

imar

y G

over

nmen

t and

Dis

cret

ely

Pres

ente

d Sc

ott C

ount

y Sc

hool

Dep

artm

ent

For

the

Year

End

ed J

une

30, 2

014

Offi

cial

Auth

oriz

atio

n of

Sal

ary

Sure

ty

Coun

ty M

ayor

Sect

ion

8-24

-102

, TC

A$

71,1

84

$50

,000

RLI I

nsur

ance

Com

pany

Supe

rint

ende

nt o

f Roa

dsSe

ctio

n 8-

24-1

02, T

CA

67,7

9510

0,00

0"

Dir

ecto

r of

Sch

ools

Stat

e Bo

ard

of E

duca

tion

and

83,5

17(1

)50

,000

" C

ount

y Bo

ard

of E

duca

tion

Trus

tee

Sect

ion

8-24

-102

, TC

A61

,632

909,

400

"As

sess

or o

f Pro

pert

ySe

ctio

n 8-

24-1

02, T

CA

61,6

3250

,000

"Co

unty

Cle

rkSe

ctio

n 8-

24-1

02, T

CA

61,6

3250

,000

"Ci

rcui

t and

Gen

eral

Ses

sion

s Co

urts

Cle

rkSe

ctio

n 8-

24-1

02, T

CA,

and

61,6

32(2

)50

,000

" C

ircu

it Ju

dge

Cler

k an

d M

aste

rSe

ctio

n 8-

24-1

02, T

CA,

and

61

,632

(3)

50,0

00"

Cha

ncer

y Co

urt J

udge

Regi

ster

of D

eeds

Sect

ion

8-24

-102

, TC

A61

,632

25,0

00"

Sher

iff:

Mic

hael

Cro

ss (7

-1-1

3 th

roug

h 12

-8-1

3)Se

ctio

n 8-

24-1

02, T

CA

31,2

9050

,000

" R

onni

e Ph

illip

s (1

-22-

14 th

roug

h 6-

30-1

4)Se

ctio

n 8-

24-1

02, T

CA

28,6

8250

,000

"D

irec

tor

of F

inan

ceBo

ard

of C

ount

y Co

mm

issi

oner

s61

,631

50,0

00"

Empl

oyee

Bla

nket

Bon

ds:

Tru

stee

25,0

00"

Fin

ance

Dep

artm

ent

50,0

00"

Cou

nty

Cler

k25

,000

" C

ircu

it an

d G

ener

al S

essi

ons

25,0

00"

Cle

rk a

nd M

aste

r25

,000

" R

egis

ter

of D

eeds

25,0

00"

She

riff

4,00

0"

(1)

Incl

udes

a c

hief

exe

cutiv

e of

ficer

trai

ning

sup

plem

ent o

f $1,

000

and

a co

achi

ng s

uppl

emen

t of $

2,51

7.(2

) D

oes

not i

nclu

de s

peci

al c

omm

issi

oner

fees

of $

900.

(3)

Doe

s no

t inc

lude

spe

cial

com

mis

sion

er fe

es o

f $25

0.

Bond

Sala

ryPa

idD

urin

gPe

riod

129

Page 130: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

sFo

r th

e Ye

ar E

nded

Jun

e 30

, 201

4

Cons

titu

-So

lidtio

nal

Hig

hway

/W

aste

/Am

bula

nce

Dru

gO

ffice

rs -

Publ

icG

ener

alSa

nita

tion

Serv

ice

Cont

rol

Fees

Wor

ks

Loca

l Tax

esCo

unty

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

Curr

ent P

rope

rty

Tax

$2,

314,

025

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Dis

coun

t on

Prop

erty

Tax

es(1

7,04

3)0

00

00

Trus

tee's

Col

lect

ions

- Pr

ior

Year

130,

156

00

00

0Ci

rcui

t/Cle

rk a

nd M

aste

r Co

llect

ions

- Pr

ior

Year

s48

,726

00

00

0In

tere

st a

nd P

enal

ty26

,081

00

00

0Pa

ymen

ts in

-Lie

u-of

Tax

es -

T.V.

A.90

00

00

0Pa

ymen

ts in

-Lie

u-of

Tax

es -

Loca

l Util

ities

338,

476

00

00

0Pa

ymen

ts in

-Lie

u-of

Tax

es -

Oth

er16

3,83

60

00

00

Coun

ty L

ocal

Opt

ion

Taxe

sLo

cal O

ptio

n Sa

les

Tax

255,

919

00

00

0H

otel

/Mot

el T

ax54

,520

00

00

0W

heel

Tax

00

00

00

Litig

atio

n Ta

x - G

ener

al30

,708

00

00

0Li

tigat

ion

Tax

- Spe

cial

Pur

pose

97,4

510

00

00

Busi

ness

Tax

138,

002

00

00

235

Min

eral

Sev

eran

ce T

ax8,

226

00

00

0St

atut

ory

Loca

l Tax

esBa

nk E

xcis

e Ta

x58

,886

00

00

0W

hole

sale

Bee

r Ta

x76

,360

00

00

0In

ters

tate

Tel

ecom

mun

icat

ions

Tax

1,61

80

00

00

Tota

l Loc

al T

axes

$3,

726,

037

$0

$0

$0

$0

$23

5

Lice

nses

and

Per

mits

Lice

nses

Mar

riag

e Li

cens

es$

0$

0$

0$

0$

0$

0Ca

ble

TV F

ranc

hise

27,2

010

00

00

(Con

tinue

d)

Spec

ial R

even

ue F

unds

130

Page 131: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

s (C

ont.)

Cons

titu

-So

lidtio

nal

Hig

hway

/W

aste

/Am

bula

nce

Dru

gO

ffice

rs -

Publ

icG

ener

alSa

nita

tion

Serv

ice

Cont

rol

Fees

Wor

ks

Lice

nses

and

Per

mits

(Con

t.)Pe

rmits

Beer

Per

mits

$38

0$

0$

0$

0$

0$

0To

tal L

icen

ses

and

Perm

its$

27,5

81$

0$

0$

0$

0$

0

Fine

s, F

orfe

iture

s, a

nd P

enal

ties

Circ

uit C

ourt

Fine

s$

19,1

12$

0$

0$

0$

0$

0O

ffice

rs C

osts

6,96

90

00

00

Dru

g Co

ntro

l Fin

es0

00

17,1

260

0D

ata

Entr

y Fe

e - C

ircu

it Co

urt

782

00

00

0Cr

imin

al C

ourt

DU

I Tre

atm

ent F

ines

285

00

00

0G

ener

al S

essi

ons

Cour

tFi

nes

89,0

940

00

00

Offi

cers

Cos

ts15

,790

00

00

0G

ame

and

Fish

Fin

es62

60

00

00

Dru

g Co

ntro

l Fin

es0

00

19,5

320

0D

rug

Cour

t Fee

s6,

648

00

00

0Ja

il Fe

es3,

201

00

00

0D

ata

Entr

y Fe

e - G

ener

al S

essi

ons

Cour

t4,

072

00

00

0Ch

ance

ry C

ourt

Offi

cers

Cos

ts5,

270

00

00

0D

ata

Entr

y Fe

e - C

hanc

ery

Cour

t1,

550

00

00

0Ju

dici

al D

istr

ict D

rug

Prog

ram

Dru

g Ta

sk F

orce

For

feitu

res

and

Seiz

ures

00

07,

823

00

Tota

l Fin

es, F

orfe

iture

s, a

nd P

enal

ties

$15

3,39

9$

0$

0$

44,4

81$

0$

0

(Con

tinue

d)

Spec

ial R

even

ue F

unds

131

Page 132: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

s (C

ont.)

Cons

titu

-So

lidtio

nal

Hig

hway

/W

aste

/Am

bula

nce

Dru

gO

ffice

rs -

Publ

icG

ener

alSa

nita

tion

Serv

ice

Cont

rol

Fees

Wor

ks

Char

ges

for

Curr

ent S

ervi

ces

Gen

eral

Ser

vice

Cha

rges

Conv

enie

nce

Was

te C

ente

rs C

olle

ctio

n Ch

arge

$0

$9,

506

$0

$0

$0

$0

Surc

harg

e - H

ost A

genc

y0

180,

716

00

00

Patie

nt C

harg

es0

01,

797,

113

00

0O

ther

Gen

eral

Ser

vice

Cha

rges

4,18

30

00

00

Fees Ai

rpor

t Fee

s28

4,80

10

00

00

Spec

ial C

omm

issi

oner

Fee

s/Sp

ecia

l Mas

ter

Fees

00

00

1,15

00

Dat

a Pr

oces

sing

Fee

- Re

gist

er5,

866

00

00

0Pr

obat

ion

Fees

32,2

950

00

00

Sexu

al O

ffend

er R

egis

trat

ion

Fee

- She

riff

6,90

00

00

00

Dat

a Pr

oces

sing

Fee

- Co

unty

Cle

rk1,

858

00

00

0To

tal C

harg

es fo

r Cu

rren

t Ser

vice

s$

335,

903

$19

0,22

2$

1,79

7,11

3$

0$

1,15

0$

0

Oth

er L

ocal

Rev

enue

sRe

curr

ing

Item

sIn

vest

men

t Inc

ome

$96

,885

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Leas

e/Re

ntal

s15

9,53

90

00

00

Sale

of M

ater

ials

and

Sup

plie

s0

00

10,2

950

0Co

mm

issa

ry S

ales

17,1

660

00

00

Sale

of M

aps

225

00

00

0Sa

le o

f Rec

ycle

d M

ater

ials

02,

032

00

00

Mis

cella

neou

s Re

fund

s20

,007

1,20

610

,772

250

012

,436

Non

recu

rrin

g It

ems

Sale

of E

quip

men

t3,

885

00

00

0Co

ntri

butio

ns a

nd G

ifts

10,2

600

00

076

,530

Tota

l Oth

er L

ocal

Rev

enue

s$

307,

967

$3,

238

$10

,772

$10

,545

$0

$88

,966

(Con

tinue

d)

Spec

ial R

even

ue F

unds

132

Page 133: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

s (C

ont.)

Cons

titu

-So

lidtio

nal

Hig

hway

/W

aste

/Am

bula

nce

Dru

gO

ffice

rs -

Publ

icG

ener

alSa

nita

tion

Serv

ice

Cont

rol

Fees

Wor

ks

Fees

Rec

eive

d fr

om C

ount

y O

ffici

als

Fees

in-L

ieu-

of S

alar

yCo

unty

Cle

rk$

204,

499

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Circ

uit C

ourt

Cle

rk94

,925

00

00

0G

ener

al S

essi

ons

Cour

t Cle

rk11

2,47

20

00

00

Cler

k an

d M

aste

r43

,523

00

00

0Re

gist

er78

,979

00

00

0Sh

eriff

16,2

800

00

00

Trus

tee

296,

978

00

00

0To

tal F

ees

Rece

ived

from

Cou

nty

Offi

cial

s$

847,

656

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Stat

e of

Ten

ness

eeG

ener

al G

over

nmen

t Gra

nts

Solid

Was

te G

rant

s$

0$

5,79

4$

0$

0$

0$

0Pu

blic

Wor

ks G

rant

sSt

ate

Aid

Prog

ram

00

00

038

9,71

2Li

tter

Pro

gram

033

,709

00

00

Oth

er S

tate

Rev

enue

sIn

com

e Ta

x6,

537

00

00

0Be

er T

ax17

,806

00

00

0Al

coho

lic B

ever

age

Tax

53,3

630

00

00

Stat

e Re

venu

e Sh

arin

g - T

.V.A

.54

2,10

10

00

00

Cont

ract

ed P

riso

ner

Boar

ding

1,25

8,68

80

00

00

Gas

olin

e an

d M

otor

Fue

l Tax

00

00

01,

739,

778

Petr

oleu

m S

peci

al T

ax0

00

00

16,0

38Re

gist

rar's

Sal

ary

Supp

lem

ent

15,1

640

00

00

Oth

er S

tate

Gra

nts

261,

536

00

00

86,7

04

(Con

tinue

d)

Spec

ial R

even

ue F

unds

133

Page 134: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

s (C

ont.)

Cons

titu

-So

lidtio

nal

Hig

hway

/W

aste

/Am

bula

nce

Dru

gO

ffice

rs -

Publ

icG

ener

alSa

nita

tion

Serv

ice

Cont

rol

Fees

Wor

ks

Stat

e of

Ten

ness

ee (C

ont.)

Oth

er S

tate

Rev

enue

s (C

ont.)

Oth

er S

tate

Rev

enue

s$

164,

671

$0

$0

$0

$0

$93

,437

Tota

l Sta

te o

f Ten

ness

ee$

2,31

9,86

6$

39,5

03$

0$

0$

0$

2,32

5,66

9

Fede

ral G

over

nmen

tFe

dera

l Thr

ough

Sta

teCo

mm

unity

Dev

elop

men

t$

0$

0$

235,

000

$0

$0

$0

Dis

aste

r Re

lief

00

00

047

6,99

2H

omel

and

Secu

rity

Gra

nts

13,9

830

00

00

Oth

er F

eder

al th

roug

h St

ate

64,8

810

00

00

Dir

ect F

eder

al R

even

ueO

ther

Dir

ect F

eder

al R

even

ue7,

353

00

00

0To

tal F

eder

al G

over

nmen

t$

86,2

17$

0$

235,

000

$0

$0

$47

6,99

2

Oth

er G

over

nmen

ts a

nd C

itize

ns G

roup

sO

ther

Gov

ernm

ents

Cont

ribu

tions

$97

,909

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Tota

l Oth

er G

over

nmen

ts a

nd C

itize

ns G

roup

s$

97,9

09$

0$

0$

0$

0$

0

Tota

l$

7,90

2,53

5$

232,

963

$2,

042,

885

$55

,026

$1,

150

$2,

891,

862

(Con

tinue

d)

Spec

ial R

even

ue F

unds

134

Page 135: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

s (C

ont.)

Gen

eral

Rura

lG

ener

alEd

ucat

ion

Deb

tD

ebt

Capi

tal

Capi

tal

Serv

ice

Serv

ice

Proj

ects

Proj

ects

Tota

l

Loca

l Tax

esCo

unty

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

Curr

ent P

rope

rty

Tax

$36

5,39

8$

621,

562

$18

1,52

2$

0$

3,48

2,50

7D

isco

unt o

n Pr

oper

ty T

axes

(4,7

28)

(397

)(5

27)

0(2

2,69

5)Tr

uste

e's C

olle

ctio

ns -

Prio

r Ye

ar67

,976

51,5

231,

161

025

0,81

6Ci

rcui

t/Cle

rk a

nd M

aste

r Co

llect

ions

- Pr

ior

Year

s20

,731

24,0

590

093

,516

Inte

rest

and

Pen

alty

12,0

2410

,089

429

048

,623

Paym

ents

in-L

ieu-

of T

axes

- T.

V.A.

00

00

90Pa

ymen

ts in

-Lie

u-of

Tax

es -

Loca

l Util

ities

53,6

0585

,310

26,6

850

504,

076

Paym

ents

in-L

ieu-

of T

axes

- O

ther

00

00

163,

836

Coun

ty L

ocal

Opt

ion

Taxe

sLo

cal O

ptio

n Sa

les

Tax

010

0,00

00

035

5,91

9H

otel

/Mot

el T

ax0

00

054

,520

Whe

el T

ax57

9,41

90

00

579,

419

Litig

atio

n Ta

x - G

ener

al0

00

030

,708

Litig

atio

n Ta

x - S

peci

al P

urpo

se0

00

097

,451

Busi

ness

Tax

00

00

138,

237

Min

eral

Sev

eran

ce T

ax0

00

08,

226

Stat

utor

y Lo

cal T

axes

Bank

Exc

ise

Tax

00

00

58,8

86W

hole

sale

Bee

r Ta

x0

00

076

,360

Inte

rsta

te T

elec

omm

unic

atio

ns T

ax0

00

01,

618

Tota

l Loc

al T

axes

$1,

094,

425

$89

2,14

6$

209,

270

$0

$5,

922,

113

Lice

nses

and

Per

mits

Lice

nses

Mar

riag

e Li

cens

es$

940

$0

$0

$0

$94

0Ca

ble

TV F

ranc

hise

00

00

27,2

01

(Con

tinue

d)

Deb

t Ser

vice

Fun

dsCa

pita

l Pro

ject

s Fu

nds

135

Page 136: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

s (C

ont.)

Gen

eral

Rura

lG

ener

alEd

ucat

ion

Deb

tD

ebt

Capi

tal

Capi

tal

Serv

ice

Serv

ice

Proj

ects

Proj

ects

Tota

l

Lice

nses

and

Per

mits

(Con

t.)Pe

rmits

Beer

Per

mits

$0

$0

$0

$0

$38

0To

tal L

icen

ses

and

Perm

its$

940

$0

$0

$0

$28

,521

Fine

s, F

orfe

iture

s, a

nd P

enal

ties

Circ

uit C

ourt

Fine

s$

0$

0$

0$

0$

19,1

12O

ffice

rs C

osts

00

00

6,96

9D

rug

Cont

rol F

ines

00

00

17,1

26D

ata

Entr

y Fe

e - C

ircu

it Co

urt

00

00

782

Crim

inal

Cou

rtD

UI T

reat

men

t Fin

es0

00

028

5G

ener

al S

essi

ons

Cour

tFi

nes

00

00

89,0

94O

ffice

rs C

osts

00

00

15,7

90G

ame

and

Fish

Fin

es0

00

062

6D

rug

Cont

rol F

ines

00

00

19,5

32D

rug

Cour

t Fee

s0

00

06,

648

Jail

Fees

00

00

3,20

1D

ata

Entr

y Fe

e - G

ener

al S

essi

ons

Cour

t0

00

04,

072

Chan

cery

Cou

rtO

ffice

rs C

osts

00

00

5,27

0D

ata

Entr

y Fe

e - C

hanc

ery

Cour

t0

00

01,

550

Judi

cial

Dis

tric

t Dru

g Pr

ogra

mD

rug

Task

For

ce F

orfe

iture

s an

d Se

izur

es0

00

07,

823

Tota

l Fin

es, F

orfe

iture

s, a

nd P

enal

ties

$0

$0

$0

$0

$19

7,88

0

(Con

tinue

d)

Deb

t Ser

vice

Fun

dsCa

pita

l Pro

ject

s Fu

nds

136

Page 137: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

s (C

ont.)

Gen

eral

Rura

lG

ener

alEd

ucat

ion

Deb

tD

ebt

Capi

tal

Capi

tal

Serv

ice

Serv

ice

Proj

ects

Proj

ects

Tota

l

Char

ges

for

Curr

ent S

ervi

ces

Gen

eral

Ser

vice

Cha

rges

Conv

enie

nce

Was

te C

ente

rs C

olle

ctio

n Ch

arge

$0

$0

$0

$0

$9,

506

Surc

harg

e - H

ost A

genc

y0

00

018

0,71

6Pa

tient

Cha

rges

00

00

1,79

7,11

3O

ther

Gen

eral

Ser

vice

Cha

rges

00

00

4,18

3Fe

es Airp

ort F

ees

00

00

284,

801

Spec

ial C

omm

issi

oner

Fee

s/Sp

ecia

l Mas

ter

Fees

00

00

1,15

0D

ata

Proc

essi

ng F

ee -

Regi

ster

00

00

5,86

6Pr

obat

ion

Fees

00

00

32,2

95Se

xual

Offe

nder

Reg

istr

atio

n Fe

e - S

heri

ff0

00

06,

900

Dat

a Pr

oces

sing

Fee

- Co

unty

Cle

rk0

00

01,

858

Tota

l Cha

rges

for

Curr

ent S

ervi

ces

$0

$0

$0

$0

$2,

324,

388

Oth

er L

ocal

Rev

enue

sRe

curr

ing

Item

sIn

vest

men

t Inc

ome

$0

$0

$0

$27

9$

97,1

64Le

ase/

Rent

als

132,

343

00

029

1,88

2Sa

le o

f Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

uppl

ies

00

00

10,2

95Co

mm

issa

ry S

ales

00

00

17,1

66Sa

le o

f Map

s0

00

022

5Sa

le o

f Rec

ycle

d M

ater

ials

00

00

2,03

2M

isce

llane

ous

Refu

nds

00

13,9

690

58,6

40N

onre

curr

ing

Item

sSa

le o

f Equ

ipm

ent

00

00

3,88

5Co

ntri

butio

ns a

nd G

ifts

00

00

86,7

90To

tal O

ther

Loc

al R

even

ues

$13

2,34

3$

0$

13,9

69$

279

$56

8,07

9

(Con

tinue

d)

Deb

t Ser

vice

Fun

dsCa

pita

l Pro

ject

s Fu

nds

137

Page 138: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

s (C

ont.)

Gen

eral

Rura

lG

ener

alEd

ucat

ion

Deb

tD

ebt

Capi

tal

Capi

tal

Serv

ice

Serv

ice

Proj

ects

Proj

ects

Tota

l

Fees

Rec

eive

d fr

om C

ount

y O

ffici

als

Fees

in-L

ieu-

of S

alar

yCo

unty

Cle

rk$

0$

0$

0$

0$

204,

499

Circ

uit C

ourt

Cle

rk0

00

094

,925

Gen

eral

Ses

sion

s Co

urt C

lerk

00

00

112,

472

Cler

k an

d M

aste

r0

00

043

,523

Regi

ster

00

00

78,9

79Sh

eriff

00

00

16,2

80Tr

uste

e0

00

029

6,97

8To

tal F

ees

Rece

ived

from

Cou

nty

Offi

cial

s$

0$

0$

0$

0$

847,

656

Stat

e of

Ten

ness

eeG

ener

al G

over

nmen

t Gra

nts

Solid

Was

te G

rant

s$

0$

0$

0$

0$

5,79

4Pu

blic

Wor

ks G

rant

sSt

ate

Aid

Prog

ram

00

00

389,

712

Litt

er P

rogr

am0

00

033

,709

Oth

er S

tate

Rev

enue

sIn

com

e Ta

x0

00

06,

537

Beer

Tax

00

00

17,8

06Al

coho

lic B

ever

age

Tax

00

00

53,3

63St

ate

Reve

nue

Shar

ing

- T.V

.A.

00

00

542,

101

Cont

ract

ed P

riso

ner

Boar

ding

00

00

1,25

8,68

8G

asol

ine

and

Mot

or F

uel T

ax0

00

01,

739,

778

Petr

oleu

m S

peci

al T

ax0

00

016

,038

Regi

stra

r's S

alar

y Su

pple

men

t0

00

015

,164

Oth

er S

tate

Gra

nts

00

72,4

580

420,

698

(Con

tinue

d)

Deb

t Ser

vice

Fun

dsCa

pita

l Pro

ject

s Fu

nds

138

Page 139: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-6

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

s (C

ont.)

Gen

eral

Rura

lG

ener

alEd

ucat

ion

Deb

tD

ebt

Capi

tal

Capi

tal

Serv

ice

Serv

ice

Proj

ects

Proj

ects

Tota

l

Stat

e of

Ten

ness

ee (C

ont.)

Oth

er S

tate

Rev

enue

s (C

ont.)

Oth

er S

tate

Rev

enue

s$

0$

0$

0$

0$

258,

108

Tota

l Sta

te o

f Ten

ness

ee$

0$

0$

72,4

58$

0$

4,75

7,49

6

Fede

ral G

over

nmen

tFe

dera

l Thr

ough

Sta

teCo

mm

unity

Dev

elop

men

t$

0$

0$

0$

0$

235,

000

Dis

aste

r Re

lief

00

00

476,

992

Hom

elan

d Se

curi

ty G

rant

s0

00

013

,983

Oth

er F

eder

al th

roug

h St

ate

00

00

64,8

81D

irec

t Fed

eral

Rev

enue

Oth

er D

irec

t Fed

eral

Rev

enue

00

00

7,35

3To

tal F

eder

al G

over

nmen

t$

0$

0$

0$

0$

798,

209

Oth

er G

over

nmen

ts a

nd C

itize

ns G

roup

sO

ther

Gov

ernm

ents

Cont

ribu

tions

$28

,600

$35

1,09

2$

0$

0$

477,

601

Tota

l Oth

er G

over

nmen

ts a

nd C

itize

ns G

roup

s$

28,6

00$

351,

092

$0

$0

$47

7,60

1

Tota

l$

1,25

6,30

8$

1,24

3,23

8$

295,

697

$27

9$

15,9

21,9

43

Deb

t Ser

vice

Fun

dsCa

pita

l Pro

ject

s Fu

nds

139

Page 140: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-7

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

sD

iscr

etel

y Pr

esen

ted

Scot

t Cou

nty

Scho

ol D

epar

tmen

tFo

r th

e Ye

ar E

nded

Jun

e 30

, 201

4

Gen

eral

Scho

olPu

rpos

eFe

dera

lCe

ntra

lSc

hool

Proj

ects

Cafe

teri

aTo

tal

Loca

l Tax

esCo

unty

Pro

pert

y Ta

xes

Curr

ent P

rope

rty

Tax

$1,

544,

763

$0

$0

$1,

544,

763

Dis

coun

t on

Prop

erty

Tax

es(1

9,80

7)0

0(1

9,80

7)Tr

uste

e's C

olle

ctio

ns -

Prio

r Ye

ar12

7,49

00

012

7,49

0Ci

rcui

t/Cle

rk a

nd M

aste

r Co

llect

ions

- Pr

ior

Year

s44

,568

00

44,5

68In

tere

st a

nd P

enal

ty27

,347

00

27,3

47Pa

ymen

ts in

-Lie

u-of

Tax

es -

Loca

l Util

ities

228,

371

00

228,

371

Coun

ty L

ocal

Opt

ion

Taxe

sLo

cal O

ptio

n Sa

les

Tax

1,24

9,43

40

01,

249,

434

Min

eral

Sev

eran

ce T

ax14

30

014

3St

atut

ory

Loca

l Tax

esCo

al S

ever

ance

Tax

104

00

104

Inte

rsta

te T

elec

omm

unic

atio

ns T

ax1,

576

00

1,57

6To

tal L

ocal

Tax

es$

3,20

3,98

9$

0$

0$

3,20

3,98

9

Lice

nses

and

Per

mits

Lice

nses

Mar

riag

e Li

cens

es$

576

$0

$0

$57

6To

tal L

icen

ses

and

Perm

its$

576

$0

$0

$57

6

Char

ges

for

Curr

ent S

ervi

ces

Educ

atio

n Ch

arge

sLu

nch

Paym

ents

- Ch

ildre

n$

0$

0$

164,

607

$16

4,60

7Lu

nch

Paym

ents

- Ad

ults

00

35,0

5435

,054

Inco

me

from

Bre

akfa

st0

021

,369

21,3

69

(Con

tinue

d)

Spec

ial R

even

ue F

unds

140

Page 141: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-7

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

sD

iscr

etel

y Pr

esen

ted

Scot

t Cou

nty

Scho

ol D

epar

tmen

t (Co

nt.)

Gen

eral

Scho

olPu

rpos

eFe

dera

lCe

ntra

lSc

hool

Proj

ects

Cafe

teri

aTo

tal

Char

ges

for

Curr

ent S

ervi

ces

(Con

t.)Ed

ucat

ion

Char

ges

(Con

t.)Sp

ecia

l Milk

Sal

es$

0$

0$

4,99

0$

4,99

0A

la c

arte

Sal

es0

026

,755

26,7

55O

ther

Cha

rges

for

Serv

ices

Oth

er C

harg

es fo

r Se

rvic

es41

,437

020

,857

62,2

94To

tal C

harg

es fo

r Cu

rren

t Ser

vice

s$

41,4

37$

0$

273,

632

$31

5,06

9

Oth

er L

ocal

Rev

enue

sRe

curr

ing

Item

sIn

vest

men

t Inc

ome

$53

$0

$79

6$

849

E-Ra

te F

undi

ng59

,714

00

59,7

14M

isce

llane

ous

Refu

nds

21,1

000

1,34

922

,449

Oth

er L

ocal

Rev

enue

sO

ther

Loc

al R

even

ues

124

00

124

Tota

l Oth

er L

ocal

Rev

enue

s$

80,9

91$

0$

2,14

5$

83,1

36

Stat

e of

Ten

ness

eeG

ener

al G

over

nmen

t Gra

nts

On-

beha

lf Co

ntri

butio

ns fo

r O

PEB

$12

8,15

0$

0$

0$

128,

150

Stat

e Ed

ucat

ion

Fund

sBa

sic

Educ

atio

n Pr

ogra

m15

,525

,000

00

15,5

25,0

00Ea

rly

Child

hood

Edu

catio

n1,

001,

337

00

1,00

1,33

7Sc

hool

Foo

d Se

rvic

e0

017

,167

17,1

67En

ergy

Effi

cien

t Sch

ool I

nitia

tive

11,0

490

011

,049

Dri

ver

Educ

atio

n18

,455

00

18,4

55

(Con

tinue

d)

Spec

ial R

even

ue F

unds

141

Page 142: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhi

bit K

-7

Scot

t Cou

nty,

Ten

ness

eeSc

hedu

le o

f Det

aile

d Re

venu

es -

All G

over

nmen

tal F

und

Type

sD

iscr

etel

y Pr

esen

ted

Scot

t Cou

nty

Scho

ol D

epar

tmen

t (Co

nt.)

Gen

eral

Scho

olPu

rpos

eFe

dera

lCe

ntra

lSc

hool

Proj

ects

Cafe

teri

aTo

tal

Stat

e of

Ten

ness

ee (C

ont.)

Stat

e Ed

ucat

ion

Fund

s (C

ont.)

Oth

er S

tate

Edu

catio

n Fu

nds

$42

4,84

6$

0$

0$

424,

846

Care

er L

adde

r Pr

ogra

m10

4,00

90

010

4,00

9Ca

reer

Lad

der

- Ext

ende

d Co

ntra

ct16

,870

00

16,8

70O

ther

Sta

te R

even

ues

Mix

ed D

rink

Tax

384

00

384

Stat

e Re

venu

e Sh

arin

g - T

.V.A

.10

4,00

00

010

4,00

0O

ther

Sta

te G

rant

s89

,637

00

89,6

37To

tal S

tate

of T

enne

ssee

$17

,423

,737

$0

$17

,167

$17

,440

,904

Fede

ral G

over

nmen

tFe

dera

l Thr

ough

Sta

teU

SDA

Scho

ol L

unch

Pro

gram

$0

$0

$1,

024,

073

$1,

024,

073

USD

A - C

omm

oditi

es0

011

6,63

311

6,63

3Br

eakf

ast

00

381,

110

381,

110

USD

A - O

ther

00

59,9

0559

,905

Voca

tiona

l Edu

catio

n - B

asic

Gra

nts

to S

tate

s0

54,4

850

54,4

85Ti

tle I

Gra

nts

to L

ocal

Edu

catio

n Ag

enci

es0

1,20

9,87

80

1,20

9,87

8Sp

ecia

l Edu

catio

n - G

rant

s to

Sta

tes

058

4,95

90

584,

959

Spec

ial E

duca

tion

Pres

choo

l Gra

nts

09,

458

09,

458

Rura

l Edu

catio

n0

29,6

970

29,6

97Ei

senh

ower

Pro

fess

iona

l Dev

elop

men

t Sta

te G

rant

s0

174,

816

017

4,81

6Ra

ce-to

-the-

Top

- ARR

A0

279,

650

027

9,65

0To

tal F

eder

al G

over

nmen

t$

0$

2,34

2,94

3$

1,58

1,72

1$

3,92

4,66

4

Tota

l$

20,7

50,7

30$

2,34

2,94

3$

1,87

4,66

5$

24,9

68,3

38

Spec

ial R

even

ue F

unds

142

Page 143: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund TypesFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

General FundGeneral Government

County CommissionBoard and Committee Members Fees $ 88,497Social Security 5,487State Retirement 2,152Employer Medicare 1,283Audit Services 6,668Contributions 2,520Dues and Memberships 9,862Evaluation and Testing 2,509Legal Notices, Recording, and Court Costs 144Travel 54Other Contracted Services 23,332Other Supplies and Materials 1,835Other Charges 10,512

Total County Commission $ 154,855

County Mayor/ExecutiveCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 71,184Secretary(ies) 31,483Clerical Personnel 10,975Social Security 7,012State Retirement 7,012Employer Medicare 1,640Communication 9,250Legal Notices, Recording, and Court Costs 1,407Travel 1,406Other Contracted Services 5,483Office Supplies 2,101Other Charges 1,409

Total County Mayor/Executive 150,362

County AttorneyCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 46,000Social Security 2,852State Retirement 3,142Employer Medicare 667Communication 2,000Other Supplies and Materials 393

Total County Attorney 55,054

Election CommissionCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 55,468Deputy(ies) 20,097Election Commission 18,000Social Security 5,212State Retirement 5,161Employer Medicare 1,219Communication 3,113

(Continued)

143

Page 144: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

General Fund (Cont.)General Government (Cont.)

Election Commission (Cont.)Data Processing Services $ 11,757Dues and Memberships 225Legal Notices, Recording, and Court Costs 858Maintenance and Repair Services - Office Equipment 70Postal Charges 666Printing, Stationery, and Forms 94Travel 8,162Other Contracted Services 310Office Supplies 3,030Other Supplies and Materials 332Other Charges 50,125

Total Election Commission $ 183,899

Register of DeedsCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 61,632Deputy(ies) 28,659Part-time Personnel 1,608Other Salaries and Wages 24,681Social Security 6,862State Retirement 7,855Employer Medicare 1,605Communication 3,082Dues and Memberships 407Maintenance and Repair Services - Buildings 4,721Maintenance and Repair Services - Office Equipment 6,946Printing, Stationery, and Forms 4,148Other Contracted Services 2,587Office Supplies 2,654Other Supplies and Materials 2,443

Total Register of Deeds 159,890

County BuildingsMechanic(s) $ 24,752Custodial Personnel 41,480Overtime Pay 74Other Salaries and Wages 18,007Social Security 4,906State Retirement 5,310Employer Medicare 1,147Maintenance and Repair Services - Buildings 42,492Maintenance and Repair Services - Equipment 5,179Maintenance and Repair Services - Office Equipment 1,674Maintenance and Repair Services - Vehicles 6,051Other Contracted Services 7,748Custodial Supplies 14,105Electricity 136,995Gasoline 7,156

(Continued)

144

Page 145: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

General Fund (Cont.)General Government (Cont.)

County Buildings (Cont.)Natural Gas $ 55,271Office Supplies 1,000Road Signs 773Water and Sewer 69,687Other Supplies and Materials 931Other Charges 4,762

Total County Buildings $ 449,500

FinanceAccounting and Budgeting

Supervisor/Director $ 61,631Data Processing Personnel 154,120Social Security 13,117State Retirement 14,736Employer Medicare 3,068Communication 3,373Data Processing Services 11,193Travel 101Office Supplies 10,561Other Charges 195Office Equipment 196

Total Accounting and Budgeting 272,291

Property Assessor's OfficeCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 61,632Assistant(s) 52,282Deputy(ies) 28,659Part-time Personnel 1,903Board and Committee Members Fees 3,700Social Security 8,601State Retirement 9,738Employer Medicare 2,012Communication 3,868Data Processing Services 13,511Dues and Memberships 1,470Maintenance and Repair Services - Buildings 1,512Maintenance and Repair Services - Vehicles 293Travel 2,985Other Contracted Services 6,625Office Supplies 2,286Other Supplies and Materials 726

Total Property Assessor's Office 201,803

County Trustee's OfficeCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 61,632Deputy(ies) 28,659Other Salaries and Wages 22,908

(Continued)

145

Page 146: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

General Fund (Cont.)Finance (Cont.)

County Trustee's Office (Cont.)Social Security $ 6,453State Retirement 7,731Employer Medicare 1,509Communication 1,732Contracts with Other Public Agencies 7,958Data Processing Services 6,591Dues and Memberships 792Travel 1,325Office Supplies 2,469Data Processing Equipment 4,835Office Equipment 640

Total County Trustee's Office $ 155,234

County Clerk's OfficeCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 61,632Assistant(s) 53,096Deputy(ies) 28,659Temporary Personnel 184Other Salaries and Wages 24,756Social Security 9,988State Retirement 11,484Employer Medicare 2,336Communication 4,471Dues and Memberships 507Maintenance and Repair Services - Buildings 4,990Printing, Stationery, and Forms 3,089Other Contracted Services 9,094Office Supplies 3,316Office Equipment 1,700

Total County Clerk's Office 219,302

Administration of JusticeCircuit Court

County Official/Administrative Officer $ 61,632Assistant(s) 28,645Deputy(ies) 96,377Part-time Personnel 10,579Jury and Witness Expense 2,518Social Security 11,958State Retirement 12,748Employer Medicare 2,797Communication 3,548Data Processing Services 7,162Dues and Memberships 407Printing, Stationery, and Forms 1,191Office Supplies 3,820Other Charges 1,551Data Processing Equipment 2,268

Total Circuit Court 247,201

(Continued)

146

Page 147: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

General Fund (Cont.)Administration of Justice (Cont.)

General Sessions CourtJudge(s) $ 112,103Assistant(s) 57,355Salary Supplements 9,512Secretary(ies) 22,331Clerical Personnel 18,238Part-time Personnel 15,903Board and Committee Members Fees 6,000Social Security 14,351State Retirement 14,470Employer Medicare 3,485Communication 5,745Data Processing Services 4,048Travel 2,072Other Contracted Services 4,400Office Supplies 717Other Supplies and Materials 24,482

Total General Sessions Court $ 315,212

Chancery CourtCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 61,632Deputy(ies) 28,659Other Salaries and Wages 25,259Social Security 7,036State Retirement 7,892Employer Medicare 1,646Communication 2,797Data Processing Services 1,067Dues and Memberships 407Maintenance and Repair Services - Office Equipment 104Printing, Stationery, and Forms 422Office Supplies 1,280

Total Chancery Court 138,201

District Attorney GeneralOther Contracted Services $ 3,297Other Supplies and Materials 9,899Other Charges 32,270

Total District Attorney General 45,466

Office of Public DefenderContributions $ 581Other Contracted Services 9,576Other Supplies and Materials 12,157Other Charges 2,287

Total Office of Public Defender 24,601

(Continued)

147

Page 148: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

General Fund (Cont.)Public Safety

Sheriff's DepartmentCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 59,972Deputy(ies) 821,543Secretary(ies) 42,812Overtime Pay 2,611Social Security 55,348State Retirement 61,624Employer Medicare 12,944Communication 40,633Dues and Memberships 1,500Licenses 600Maintenance and Repair Services - Buildings 491Maintenance and Repair Services - Equipment 1,020Maintenance and Repair Services - Vehicles 55,258Towing Services 1,610Travel 11,186Tuition 7,223Other Contracted Services 8,699Gasoline 140,463Law Enforcement Supplies 21,861Office Supplies 7,035Tires and Tubes 11,552Uniforms 6,961Other Supplies and Materials 6,676Liability Insurance 37,390Workers' Compensation Insurance 54,110Other Charges 16,465Motor Vehicles 21,587

Total Sheriff's Department $ 1,509,174

JailDeputy(ies) $ 585,810Dispatchers/Radio Operators 257,002Social Security 50,551State Retirement 57,295Employer Medicare 11,822Medical and Dental Services 554,490Travel 4,154Other Contracted Services 4,204Food Supplies 191,637Office Supplies 1,504Uniforms 1,402Other Supplies and Materials 67,210

Total Jail 1,787,081

Juvenile ServicesSupervisor/Director $ 29,414Deputy(ies) 83,347

(Continued)

148

Page 149: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

General Fund (Cont.)Public Safety (Cont.)

Juvenile Services (Cont.)Youth Service Officer(s) $ 5,528Part-time Personnel 41,340Social Security 9,691State Retirement 7,595Employer Medicare 2,266Communication 4,669Maintenance and Repair Services - Vehicles 436Travel 2,747Other Contracted Services 1,515Electricity 1,101Food Supplies 13,278Gasoline 572Natural Gas 2,017Office Supplies 461Other Supplies and Materials 6,543Workers' Compensation Insurance 4,457

Total Juvenile Services $ 216,977

Fire Prevention and ControlContributions $ 2,000

Total Fire Prevention and Control 2,000

Civil DefenseSupervisor/Director $ 24,747Social Security 1,512State Retirement 930Employer Medicare 354Communication 551Dues and Memberships 50Travel 1,093Office Supplies 305Utilities 11,854Other Charges 49

Total Civil Defense 41,445

Rescue SquadContributions $ 8,000

Total Rescue Squad 8,000

County Coroner/Medical ExaminerCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 5,538Social Security 343Employer Medicare 80

Total County Coroner/Medical Examiner 5,961

(Continued)

149

Page 150: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

General Fund (Cont.)Public Health and Welfare

Local Health CenterSocial Security $ 1,647State Retirement 1,313Employer Medicare 385Contributions 49,095Other Charges 14,443Building Improvements 245

Total Local Health Center $ 67,128

Other Local Health ServicesMedical Personnel $ 157,365Social Security 9,559State Retirement 8,815Medical Insurance 5,701Employer Medicare 2,236Travel 2,811Liability Insurance 108Workers' Compensation Insurance 5,577

Total Other Local Health Services 192,172

General Welfare AssistanceMaintenance and Repair Services - Buildings $ 144

Total General Welfare Assistance 144

Other Local Welfare ServicesPauper Burials $ 61

Total Other Local Welfare Services 61

Social, Cultural, and Recreational ServicesSenior Citizens Assistance

Deputy(ies) $ 28,600Part-time Personnel 19,178Social Security 2,882State Retirement 1,953Employer Medicare 674Communication 2,750Contributions 1,350Dues and Memberships 6,000Maintenance and Repair Services - Vehicles 4,929Travel 5,929Utilities 6,464Other Supplies and Materials 18

Total Senior Citizens Assistance 80,727

LibrariesOther Salaries and Wages $ 26,487Social Security 1,643Employer Medicare 384

(Continued)

150

Page 151: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

General Fund (Cont.)Social, Cultural, and Recreational Services (Cont.)

Libraries (Cont.)Communication $ 3,205Postal Charges 90Library Books/Media 9,216Office Supplies 1,715Periodicals 492Utilities 4,941Other Charges 681

Total Libraries $ 48,854

Agriculture and Natural ResourcesAgricultural Extension Service

Assistant(s) $ 4,428Supervisor/Director 7,100Secretary(ies) 5,599Social Security 1,062State Retirement 2,351Employer Medicare 248Communication 2,543Travel 1,467Other Charges 1,200

Total Agricultural Extension Service 25,998

Other OperationsTourism

Supervisor/Director $ 25,418Clerical Personnel 10,970Social Security 2,256State Retirement 1,736Employer Medicare 528Contributions 11,176

Total Tourism 52,084

AirportSupervisor/Director $ 28,600Part-time Personnel 20,151Social Security 2,875State Retirement 1,953Employer Medicare 672Communication 3,621Maintenance and Repair Services - Equipment 6,061Maintenance and Repair Services - Vehicles 4,382Travel 5,844Other Contracted Services 3,928Diesel Fuel 149,491Electricity 17,429Gasoline 90,221Natural Gas 1,057

(Continued)

151

Page 152: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

General Fund (Cont.)Other Operations (Cont.)

Airport (Cont.)Office Supplies $ 123Water and Sewer 831Other Supplies and Materials 1,117Liability Insurance 3,250Workers' Compensation Insurance 2,163Other Charges 16,296

Total Airport $ 360,065

Veterans' ServicesSupervisor/Director $ 37,440Social Security 2,321State Retirement 2,557Employer Medicare 543Contracts with Other Public Agencies 399Travel 1,781Other Supplies and Materials 360

Total Veterans' Services 45,401

Contributions to Other AgenciesContributions $ 84,543

Total Contributions to Other Agencies 84,543

MiscellaneousLife Insurance $ 6,270Medical Insurance 188,468Unemployment Compensation 17,014Other Fringe Benefits 2,550Postal Charges 20,337Other Supplies and Materials 291Liability Insurance 97,070Trustee's Commission 77,726Workers' Compensation Insurance 13,473Other Charges 206,377

Total Miscellaneous 629,576

HighwaysHighway and Bridge Maintenance

Transfers to Other Funds $ 235Total Highway and Bridge Maintenance 235

Total General Fund $ 7,930,497

Solid Waste/Sanitation FundPublic Health and Welfare

Recycling CenterLaborers $ 49,437Social Security 2,840

(Continued)

152

Page 153: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

Solid Waste/Sanitation Fund (Cont.)Public Health and Welfare (Cont.)

Recycling Center (Cont.)State Retirement $ 3,377Life Insurance 680Medical Insurance 6,271Employer Medicare 664Communication 2,180Maintenance and Repair Services - Buildings 308Maintenance and Repair Services - Equipment 485Maintenance and Repair Services - Vehicles 30Travel 1,223Other Contracted Services 28,899Diesel Fuel 1,018Electricity 3,425Equipment and Machinery Parts 5,020Gasoline 4,059Natural Gas 3,347Propane Gas 20Tires and Tubes 1,013Uniforms 1,477Water and Sewer 509Other Supplies and Materials 2,207Trustee's Commission 1,843Vehicle and Equipment Insurance 237Workers' Compensation Insurance 3,825Other Charges 3,067

Total Recycling Center $ 127,461

Postclosure Care CostsOther Contracted Services $ 10,400

Total Postclosure Care Costs 10,400

HighwaysLitter and Trash Collection

Other Supplies and Materials $ 11,539Total Litter and Trash Collection 11,539

Total Solid Waste/Sanitation Fund $ 149,400

Ambulance Service FundPublic Health and Welfare

Ambulance/Emergency Medical ServicesSupervisor/Director $ 48,025Medical Personnel 797,457Part-time Personnel 6,231Overtime Pay 169,712Social Security 66,112State Retirement 59,549Life Insurance 1,023

(Continued)

153

Page 154: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

Ambulance Service Fund (Cont.)Public Health and Welfare (Cont.)

Ambulance/Emergency Medical Services (Cont.)Medical Insurance $ 50,830Unemployment Compensation 3,333Employer Medicare 15,461Communication 11,123Contracts with Other Public Agencies 164,088Dues and Memberships 510Licenses 3,000Maintenance and Repair Services - Buildings 575Maintenance and Repair Services - Equipment 1,179Maintenance and Repair Services - Vehicles 21,077Postal Charges 46Printing, Stationery, and Forms 265Towing Services 350Travel 645Tuition 10,013Other Contracted Services 8,607Custodial Supplies 2,337Diesel Fuel 92,632Drugs and Medical Supplies 43,681Electricity 4,785Equipment and Machinery Parts 37,302Gasoline 2,537Natural Gas 4,059Office Supplies 1,963Propane Gas 10,404Tires and Tubes 3,783Uniforms 2,235Water and Sewer 923Other Supplies and Materials 12,146Refunds 7,994Trustee's Commission 19,146Vehicle and Equipment Insurance 18,229Workers' Compensation Insurance 110,388Other Charges 15,035Motor Vehicles 280,992

Total Ambulance/Emergency Medical Services $ 2,109,782

Total Ambulance Service Fund $ 2,109,782

Drug Control FundOther Operations

MiscellaneousConfidential Drug Enforcement Payments $ 4,500Veterinary Services 411Animal Food and Supplies 403Other Supplies and Materials 2,870Trustee's Commission 465

(Continued)

154

Page 155: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

Drug Control Fund (Cont.)Other Operations (Cont.)

Miscellaneous (Cont.)Other Charges $ 6,016Motor Vehicles 1,028

Total Miscellaneous $ 15,693

Total Drug Control Fund $ 15,693

Constitutional Officers - Fees FundAdministration of Justice

General Sessions CourtSpecial Commissioner Fees/Special Master Fees $ 900

Total General Sessions Court $ 900

Chancery CourtSpecial Commissioner Fees/Special Master Fees $ 250

Total Chancery Court 250

Total Constitutional Officers - Fees Fund 1,150

Highway/Public Works FundHighways

AdministrationCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 67,795Clerical Personnel 28,589Overtime Pay 261Social Security 6,009State Retirement 6,857Employer Medicare 1,405Dues and Memberships 2,759Postal Charges 91Custodial Supplies 50Office Supplies 402

Total Administration $ 114,218

Highway and Bridge MaintenanceSupervisor/Director $ 12,651Equipment Operators 20,098Truck Drivers 60,999Laborers 315,272Overtime Pay 50,982Social Security 27,693State Retirement 31,661Unemployment Compensation 4,308Employer Medicare 6,476Rentals 148Other Contracted Services 21,739Asphalt - Cold Mix 94,275Asphalt - Hot Mix 534,344

(Continued)

155

Page 156: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

Highway/Public Works Fund (Cont.)Highways (Cont.)

Highway and Bridge Maintenance (Cont.)Concrete $ 5,896Crushed Stone 263,860Other Road Materials 225,723Pipe - Metal 30,789

Total Highway and Bridge Maintenance $ 1,706,914

Operation and Maintenance of EquipmentForemen $ 53,497Mechanic(s) 35,848Social Security 5,051State Retirement 6,336Unemployment Compensation 518Employer Medicare 1,181Maintenance and Repair Services - Equipment 14,818Towing Services 450Other Contracted Services 3,175Diesel Fuel 116,546Equipment and Machinery Parts 91,250Garage Supplies 235Gasoline 28,999Lubricants 5,109Propane Gas 1,786Small Tools 696Tires and Tubes 19,442Other Supplies and Materials 7,513

Total Operation and Maintenance of Equipment 392,450

Other ChargesCommunication $ 5,875Electricity 8,311Natural Gas 1,973Water and Sewer 432Trustee's Commission 18,423Vehicle and Equipment Insurance 23,843Workers' Compensation Insurance 49,994Other Charges 14,582

Total Other Charges 123,433

Employee BenefitsEmployee and Dependent Insurance $ 48,437Life Insurance 11,674

Total Employee Benefits 60,111

Capital OutlayBridge Construction $ 543,826Highway Equipment 123,305Motor Vehicles 12,000

Total Capital Outlay 679,131

(Continued)

156

Page 157: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

Highway/Public Works Fund (Cont.)Principal on Debt

Highways and StreetsPrincipal on Notes $ 350,152

Total Highways and Streets $ 350,152

Interest on DebtHighways and Streets

Interest on Notes $ 59,909Total Highways and Streets 59,909

Total Highway/Public Works Fund $ 3,486,318

General Debt Service FundPrincipal on Debt

General GovernmentPrincipal on Bonds $ 234,000Principal on Notes 277,740Principal on Other Loans 615,000

Total General Government $ 1,126,740

Interest on DebtGeneral Government

Interest on Bonds $ 68,164Interest on Notes 13,875Interest on Other Loans 54,181

Total General Government 136,220

Other Debt ServiceGeneral Government

Trustee's Commission $ 16,768Underwriter's Discount 13,580Other Debt Issuance Charges 39,447Other Debt Service 232,012

Total General Government 301,807

Total General Debt Service Fund 1,564,767

Rural Debt Service FundPrincipal on Debt

EducationPrincipal on Bonds $ 620,000Principal on Notes 180,056Principal on Capital Leases 71,847Principal on Other Loans 156,000

Total Education $ 1,027,903

Interest on DebtEducation

Interest on Bonds $ 261,919

(Continued)

157

Page 158: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

Rural Debt Service Fund (Cont.)Interest on Debt (Cont.)

Education (Cont.)Interest on Notes $ 29,513Interest on Capital Leases 93,472Interest on Other Loans 4,403

Total Education $ 389,307

Other Debt ServiceEducation

Trustee's Commission $ 16,558Underwriter's Discount 66,052Other Debt Issuance Charges 105,869Other Debt Service 19,360

Total Education 207,839

Total Rural Debt Service Fund $ 1,625,049

General Capital Projects FundGeneral Government

County BuildingsMaintenance and Repair Services - Buildings $ 5,181Other Contracted Services 23,600Road Signs 738Other Supplies and Materials 14,084Maintenance Equipment 5,400

Total County Buildings $ 49,003

FinanceAccounting and Budgeting

Other Contracted Services $ 2,998General Construction Materials 9,859Other Charges 5,069Office Equipment 2,373

Total Accounting and Budgeting 20,299

Property Assessor's OfficeOffice Equipment $ 1,572

Total Property Assessor's Office 1,572

County Clerk's OfficeMaintenance and Repair Services - Buildings $ 260

Total County Clerk's Office 260

Administration of JusticeCircuit Court

Other Supplies and Materials $ 3,045Other Charges 8,978

Total Circuit Court 12,023

(Continued)

158

Page 159: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-8

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund Types (Cont.)

General Capital Projects Fund (Cont.)Administration of Justice (Cont.)

General Sessions CourtOther Supplies and Materials $ 4,253

Total General Sessions Court $ 4,253

Chancery CourtOther Supplies and Materials $ 753Other Charges 12,299

Total Chancery Court 13,052

Public SafetySheriff's Department

Motor Vehicles $ 66,991Other Equipment 9,803

Total Sheriff's Department 76,794

Juvenile ServicesMaintenance and Repair Services - Buildings $ 5,595

Total Juvenile Services 5,595

Public Health and WelfareAmbulance/Emergency Medical Services

Maintenance and Repair Services - Buildings $ 2,787Total Ambulance/Emergency Medical Services 2,787

Other OperationsAirport

Airport Improvement $ 20,000Maintenance Equipment 72,458

Total Airport 92,458

HighwaysCapital Outlay

Other Contracted Services $ 22Trustee's Commission 4,893

Total Capital Outlay 4,915

Total General Capital Projects Fund $ 283,011

Total Governmental Funds - Primary Government $ 17,165,667

159

Page 160: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-9

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund TypesDiscretely Presented Scott County School DepartmentFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

General Purpose School FundInstruction

Regular Instruction ProgramTeachers $ 6,435,291Career Ladder Program 53,296Career Ladder Extended Contracts 17,000Educational Assistants 385,475Other Salaries and Wages 228,009Certified Substitute Teachers 144,254Social Security 422,557State Retirement 618,572Life Insurance 9,401Medical Insurance 1,136,792Unemployment Compensation 16,238Employer Medicare 98,820Other Fringe Benefits 5,363Travel 564Instructional Supplies and Materials 164,185Textbooks 140,348Other Charges 5,712Regular Instruction Equipment 478,883

Total Regular Instruction Program $ 10,360,760

Alternative Instruction ProgramEducational Assistants $ 13,061Social Security 599State Retirement 893Medical Insurance 2,882Unemployment Compensation 64Employer Medicare 140

Total Alternative Instruction Program 17,639

Special Education ProgramTeachers $ 733,824Career Ladder Program 8,001Homebound Teachers 37,002Educational Assistants 132,038Certified Substitute Teachers 25,584Social Security 54,513State Retirement 79,850Medical Insurance 107,070Unemployment Compensation 1,981Employer Medicare 12,749Other Contracted Services 24,281Instructional Supplies and Materials 14,395Other Supplies and Materials 14,921Other Charges 180Special Education Equipment 994

Total Special Education Program 1,247,383

(Continued)

160

Page 161: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-9

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund TypesDiscretely Presented Scott County School Department (Cont.)

General Purpose School Fund (Cont.)Instruction (Cont.)

Vocational Education ProgramTeachers $ 367,600Career Ladder Program 3,000Educational Assistants 39,183Social Security 24,198State Retirement 35,685Medical Insurance 47,041Unemployment Compensation 880Employer Medicare 5,659Instructional Supplies and Materials 879Other Supplies and Materials 5,139

Total Vocational Education Program $ 529,264

Support ServicesAttendance

Supervisor/Director $ 56,502Career Ladder Program 3,000Social Security 3,480State Retirement 5,300Medical Insurance 10,339Unemployment Compensation 72Employer Medicare 814Travel 2,098Other Supplies and Materials 5,284

Total Attendance 86,889

Health ServicesMedical Personnel $ 91,828Other Salaries and Wages 93,556Social Security 11,037State Retirement 13,471Medical Insurance 9,715Unemployment Compensation 507Employer Medicare 2,581Travel 13,489Other Supplies and Materials 18,332Other Charges 3,456

Total Health Services 257,972

Other Student SupportCareer Ladder Program $ 3,000Guidance Personnel 198,531Secretary(ies) 19,544Social Security 12,831State Retirement 19,285Medical Insurance 30,314Unemployment Compensation 360

(Continued)

161

Page 162: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-9

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund TypesDiscretely Presented Scott County School Department (Cont.)

General Purpose School Fund (Cont.)Support Services (Cont.)

Other Student Support (Cont.)Employer Medicare $ 3,001Evaluation and Testing 9,796Travel 1,783

Total Other Student Support $ 298,445

Regular Instruction ProgramSupervisor/Director $ 63,468Career Ladder Program 9,000Librarians 321,430Secretary(ies) 13,298Social Security 23,297State Retirement 36,111Medical Insurance 53,013Unemployment Compensation 611Employer Medicare 5,449Travel 21,487Other Contracted Services 10,428Library Books/Media 26,203In Service/Staff Development 5,915Other Charges 27,209Other Equipment 2,950

Total Regular Instruction Program 619,869

Special Education ProgramSupervisor/Director $ 63,528Career Ladder Program 1,000Psychological Personnel 43,350Secretary(ies) 29,337Social Security 8,017State Retirement 11,613Medical Insurance 10,339Unemployment Compensation 216Employer Medicare 1,875Travel 16,147

Total Special Education Program 185,422

Other ProgramsOn-behalf Payments to OPEB $ 128,150

Total Other Programs 128,150

Board of EducationSecretary to Board $ 29,337Board and Committee Members Fees 39,900Social Security 4,266State Retirement 2,783Medical Insurance 1,960

(Continued)

162

Page 163: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-9

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund TypesDiscretely Presented Scott County School Department (Cont.)

General Purpose School Fund (Cont.)Support Services (Cont.)

Board of Education (Cont.)Unemployment Compensation $ 163Employer Medicare 998Audit Services 5,850Dues and Memberships 10,264Travel 23,659Other Contracted Services 44,796Other Supplies and Materials 6,331Liability Insurance 762Trustee's Commission 85,636Workers' Compensation Insurance 157,776Other Charges 21,324

Total Board of Education $ 435,805

Director of SchoolsCounty Official/Administrative Officer $ 82,517Assistant(s) 81,039Career Ladder Program 1,000Secretary(ies) 29,337Social Security 11,060State Retirement 14,008Medical Insurance 21,926Unemployment Compensation 215Employer Medicare 2,587Communication 43,980Postal Charges 701Travel 5,679Office Supplies 4,374Other Charges 904

Total Director of Schools 299,327

Office of the PrincipalPrincipals $ 470,879Career Ladder Program 7,000Assistant Principals 66,052Secretary(ies) 125,294Social Security 39,139State Retirement 57,066Medical Insurance 51,819Unemployment Compensation 1,061Employer Medicare 9,154Communication 21,225Travel 2,613

Total Office of the Principal 851,302

Operation of PlantSupervisor/Director $ 28,115

(Continued)

163

Page 164: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-9

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund TypesDiscretely Presented Scott County School Department (Cont.)

General Purpose School Fund (Cont.)Support Services (Cont.)

Operation of Plant (Cont.)Custodial Personnel $ 362,232Social Security 23,888State Retirement 26,168Medical Insurance 2,651Unemployment Compensation 1,733Employer Medicare 5,589Disposal Fees 20,896Other Contracted Services 3,346Electricity 543,890Natural Gas 119,288Water and Sewer 60,802Other Supplies and Materials 69,668Building and Contents Insurance 153,365Other Charges 18,798

Total Operation of Plant $ 1,440,429

Maintenance of PlantMaintenance Personnel $ 98,521Social Security 5,943State Retirement 6,732Medical Insurance 9,336Unemployment Compensation 277Employer Medicare 1,390Other Supplies and Materials 72,037Other Charges 2,616

Total Maintenance of Plant 196,852

TransportationSupervisor/Director $ 28,125Mechanic(s) 68,615Bus Drivers 519,865Social Security 38,053State Retirement 38,384Unemployment Compensation 3,031Employer Medicare 8,899Contracts with Vehicle Owners 1,275Travel 765Diesel Fuel 220,774Gasoline 2,422Tires and Tubes 21,280Vehicle Parts 80,999Other Supplies and Materials 13,074Other Charges 28,736Transportation Equipment 5,020

Total Transportation 1,079,317

(Continued)

164

Page 165: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-9

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund TypesDiscretely Presented Scott County School Department (Cont.)

General Purpose School Fund (Cont.)Support Services (Cont.)

Central and OtherSupervisor/Director $ 51,658Other Salaries and Wages 164,947Social Security 12,579State Retirement 18,514Medical Insurance 10,605Unemployment Compensation 431Employer Medicare 2,942

Total Central and Other $ 261,676

Operation of Non-instructional ServicesCommunity Services

Supervisor/Director $ 29,911Social Security 1,871State Retirement 2,729Medical Insurance 5,750Unemployment Compensation 35Employer Medicare 438Travel 3,272Instructional Supplies and Materials 4,700Other Charges 190

Total Community Services 48,896

Early Childhood EducationTeachers $ 452,450Bus Drivers 695Educational Assistants 127,374Other Salaries and Wages 18,520Certified Substitute Teachers 14,775Social Security 36,432State Retirement 50,338Medical Insurance 57,783Unemployment Compensation 1,442Employer Medicare 8,521Travel 16,630Instructional Supplies and Materials 179,031Other Charges 4,827

Total Early Childhood Education 968,818

Capital OutlayRegular Capital Outlay

Building Improvements $ 58,930Total Regular Capital Outlay 58,930

Other Debt ServiceEducation

Debt Service Contribution to Primary Government $ 366,323Total Education 366,323

Total General Purpose School Fund $ 19,739,468

(Continued)

165

Page 166: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-9

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund TypesDiscretely Presented Scott County School Department (Cont.)

School Federal Projects FundInstruction

Regular Instruction ProgramTeachers $ 739,467Educational Assistants 157,236Other Salaries and Wages 14,900Non-certified Substitute Teachers 35,448Social Security 53,973State Retirement 78,212Medical Insurance 136,398Unemployment Compensation 2,266Employer Medicare 12,623Instructional Supplies and Materials 61,389Other Charges 25,414Regular Instruction Equipment 126,005

Total Regular Instruction Program $ 1,443,331

Special Education ProgramTeachers $ 147,412Educational Assistants 281,558Social Security 25,712State Retirement 32,331Medical Insurance 30,130Unemployment Compensation 1,584Employer Medicare 6,013Other Contracted Services 87,682Instructional Supplies and Materials 383Other Supplies and Materials 2,311

Total Special Education Program 615,116

Vocational Education ProgramInstructional Supplies and Materials $ 49,854

Total Vocational Education Program 49,854

Support ServicesOther Student Support

Travel $ 5,891Other Charges 16,898

Total Other Student Support 22,789

Regular Instruction ProgramSupervisor/Director $ 57,030Secretary(ies) 13,298Other Salaries and Wages 95,400Social Security 9,857State Retirement 14,485Medical Insurance 14,723Unemployment Compensation 240Employer Medicare 2,305

(Continued)

166

Page 167: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-9

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Expenditures -

All Governmental Fund TypesDiscretely Presented Scott County School Department (Cont.)

School Federal Projects Fund (Cont.)Support Services (Cont.)

Regular Instruction Program (Cont.)Travel $ 41,364Other Supplies and Materials 4,277In Service/Staff Development 22,858

Total Regular Instruction Program $ 275,837

Special Education ProgramTravel $ 3,402Other Contracted Services 4,940In Service/Staff Development 4,255

Total Special Education Program 12,597

Vocational Education ProgramTravel $ 549

Total Vocational Education Program 549

TransportationBus Drivers $ 30,388Social Security 1,884State Retirement 2,077Unemployment Compensation 140Employer Medicare 441

Total Transportation 34,930

Total School Federal Projects Fund $ 2,455,003

Central Cafeteria FundOperation of Non-instructional Services

Food ServiceSupervisor/Director $ 57,442Cafeteria Personnel 540,652Other Salaries and Wages 22,628In-service Training 3,885Social Security 37,275State Retirement 40,189Medical Insurance 20,944Unemployment Compensation 3,130Employer Medicare 8,717Travel 9,006Food Preparation Supplies 26,847Food Supplies 710,964USDA - Commodities 116,633Other Supplies and Materials 100,409Food Service Equipment 350,619

Total Food Service $ 2,049,340

Total Central Cafeteria Fund 2,049,340

Total Governmental Funds - Scott County School Department $ 24,243,811

167

Page 168: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Exhibit K-10

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Detailed Receipts, Disbursements, and Changes in Cash Balances - City Agency FundsFor the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Cities - Special CitySales School SchoolTax District ADA - Oneida

Fund Fund Fund Total

Cash Receipts Current Property Taxes $ 0 $ 306,145 $ 778,789 $ 1,084,934 Discounts on Property Taxes 0 (10,872) (7,930) (18,802) Trustee's Collections - Prior Years 0 22,114 55,818 77,932 Circuit/Clerk and Master Collections - Prior Years 0 3,232 19,045 22,277 Interest and Penalty 0 2,867 9,801 12,668 Payments in-Lieu-of-Taxes - Local Utilities 0 0 517 517 Local Option Sales Tax 1,354,384 0 543,477 1,897,861 Coal Severance Tax 0 0 45 45 Interstate Telecommunications Tax 0 0 682 682 Marriage Licenses 0 0 276 276 Other Local Revenues 0 0 93 93 Mixed Drink Tax 0 0 153 153Total Cash Receipts $ 1,354,384 $ 323,486 $ 1,400,766 $ 3,078,636

Cash Disbursements Remittance of Revenue Collected $ 1,339,840 $ 313,448 $ 1,385,388 $ 3,038,676 Trustee's Commission 14,544 6,738 23,098 44,380Total Cash Disbursements $ 1,354,384 $ 320,186 $ 1,408,486 $ 3,083,056

Excess of Cash Receipts Over (Under) Cash Disbursements $ 0 $ 3,300 $ (7,720) $ (4,420)Cash Balance, July 1, 2013 0 1,297 57,439 58,736

Cash Balance, June 30, 2014 $ 0 $ 4,597 $ 49,719 $ 54,316

168

Page 169: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

SINGLE AUDIT SECTION

169

Page 170: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

STATE OF TENNESSEE COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY

DEPARTMENT OF AUDIT DIVISION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUDIT

SUITE 1500 JAMES K. POLK STATE OFFICE BUILDING

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-1402 PHONE (615) 401-7841

Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in

Accordance With Government Auditing Standards

Independent Auditor's Report Scott County Mayor and Board of County Commissioners Scott County, Tennessee To the County Mayor and Board of County Commissioners: We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of Scott County, Tennessee, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2014, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise Scott County’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated February 17, 2015. Our report includes a reference to other auditors who audited the financial statements of the Scott County Emergency Communications District, as described in our report on Scott County’s financial statements. This report does not include the results of the other auditors testing of internal control over financial reporting or compliance and other matters that are reported on separately by those auditors. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered Scott County’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on

170

Page 171: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

the effectiveness of Scott County’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of Scott County’s internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and therefore, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. We did identify certain deficiencies in internal control, described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs that we consider to be significant deficiencies: 2014-001, 2014-002, 2014-005, 2014-007, and 2014-008. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether Scott County’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards and are described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs as items: 2014-003, 2014-004, and 2014-006. Scott County’s Responses to Findings Scott County’s responses to the findings identified in our audit are described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. Scott County’s responses were not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on them. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the result of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering

171

Page 172: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Scott County’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. Very truly yours,

Justin P. Wilson Comptroller of the Treasury Nashville, Tennessee February 17, 2015 JPW/yu

172

Page 173: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

STATE OF TENNESSEE COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY

DEPARTMENT OF AUDIT DIVISION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUDIT

SUITE 1500 JAMES K. POLK STATE OFFICE BUILDING

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-1402 PHONE (615) 401-7841

Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program; Report on Internal Control Over Compliance; and Report on the Schedule of Expenditures of

Federal Awards Required by OMB Circular A-133

Independent Auditor's Report Scott County Mayor and Board of County Commissioners Scott County, Tennessee To the County Mayor and Board of County Commissioners: Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program We have audited Scott County’s compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of Scott County’s major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2014. Scott County’s major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs.

Management's Responsibility Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to its federal programs. Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for each of Scott County’s major federal programs based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and

173

Page 174: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about Scott County’s compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of Scott County’s compliance. Opinion on Each Major Federal Program In our opinion, Scott County complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2014. Report on Internal Control Over Compliance Management of Scott County is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered Scott County’s internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of Scott County’s internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified.

174

Page 175: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of OMB Circular A-133. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Report on Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by OMB Circular A-133 We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of Scott County, Tennessee, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2014, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise Scott County’s basic financial statements. We issued our report thereon dated February 17, 2015, which contained unmodified opinions on those financial statements. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the basic financial statements. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by OMB Circular A-133 and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. Very truly yours,

Justin P. Wilson Comptroller of the Treasury Nashville, Tennessee February 17, 2015 JPW/yu

175

Page 176: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Grants (1)For the Year Ended June 30, 2014

Federal Pass-throughFederal/Pass-through Agency/State CFDA Entity IdentifyingGrantor Program Title Number Number Expenditures

U.S. Department of Agriculture:Passed-through State Department of Agriculture:

National School Lunch Program (Commodities - Noncash Assistance) 10.555 N/A $ 116,633 (3)Passed-through State Department of Education:

Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program 10.582 N/A 59,905Child Nutrition Cluster:

School Breakfast Program 10.553 N/A 381,110National School Lunch Program 10.555 N/A 1,024,073 (3)

Total U.S. Department of Agriculture $ 1,581,721

U.S. Department of Defense:Passed-through State Department of General Services: Section 1033 Excess Property Program 12.UNKNOWN N/A $ 222,000

Total U.S. Department of Defense $ 222,000

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development:Passed-through State Department of Economic and Community Development:

Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants 14.218 N/A $ 235,000Total U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development $ 235,000

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior:Direct Program:

Payments in-Lieu-of Taxes 15.226 N/A $ 163,836Total Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior $ 163,836

U.S. Department of Justice:Direct Program:

Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program 16.738 N/A $ 11,143Total U.S. Department of Justice $ 11,143

U.S. Department of Education:Passed-through State Department of Education:

Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies 84.010 N/A $ 1,274,805Special Education Cluster:

Special Education - Grants to States 84.027 N/A 647,475Special Education - Preschool Grants 84.173 N/A 15,168

Career and Technical Education - Basic Grants to States 84.048 N/A 53,913Rural Education 84.358 N/A 33,510Improving Teacher Quality State Grants 84.367 N/A 193,412State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) - Race-to-the-Top Incentive Grants, Recovery Act 84.395 N/A 262,722

Total U.S. Department of Education $ 2,481,005

(Continued)

176

Page 177: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Scott County, TennesseeSchedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Grants (1) (Cont.)

Federal Pass-throughFederal/Pass-through Agency/State CFDA Entity IdentifyingGrantor Program Title Number Number Expenditures

U.S. Election Assistance Commission:Passed-through State Department of Elections:

Help America Vote Act Requirements Payments 90.401 (2) $ 46,114Total U.S. Election Assistance Commission $ 46,114

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Passed-through East Tennessee Human Resource Agency:

Special Programs for the Aging - Title III, Part B - Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers 93.044 (2) $ 7,624

Total U.S. Department of Health and Human Services $ 7,624

U.S. Department of Homeland Security:Passed-through State Department of Military:

Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) 97.036 (2) 476,992Emergency Management Performance Grants 97.042 (2) 13,983

Total U.S. Department of Homeland Security $ 490,975

Total Expenditures of Federal Awards $ 5,239,418

ContractState Grants Number

Litter Program - State Department of Transportation N/A (2) $ 37,518Airport Maintenance Program - State Department of Transportation N/A (2) 72,458Health Department Programs - State Department of Health N/A (2) 186,765Appalachian Life Quality Initiative Grant - State Department of Education N/A (2) 39,203Drug Court Grant - State Office of Criminal Justice Programs N/A (2) 64,783Technology Funding - State Department of Education N/A (2) 238,918Coordinated School Health - State Department of Education N/A (2) 98,864Family Resource Center - State Department of Education N/A (2) 29,611Save the Children - State Department of Education N/A (2) 45,123Early Childhood Education - State Department of Education N/A (2) 979,210Waste Tire Option Grant - State Department of Environment and Conservation N/A (2) 7,350

Total State Grants $ 1,799,803

CFDA = Catalog of Federal Domestic AssistanceN/A = Not Applicable

(1) Presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles using the modified accrual basis of accounting.(2) Information not available.(3) Total for CFDA No. 10.555 is $1,140,706.

177

Page 178: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

Scott County, Tennessee Schedule of Audit Findings Not Corrected June 30, 2014 Government Auditing Standards require auditors to report the status of uncorrected findings from prior audits. Presented below are the findings from the Annual Financial Report for Scott County, Tennessee, for the year ended June 30, 2013, which have not been corrected. OFFICES OF CIRCUIT AND GENERAL SESSIONS COURTS CLERK, CLERK AND MASTER, AND REGISTER OF DEEDS Finding Page Number Number Subject_____________________________________________ 2013-002 173 Duties were not segregated adequately OFFICE OF REGISTER OF DEEDS Finding Page Number Number Subject_____________________________________________ 2013-003 174 Multiple employees operated from the same cash drawer

178

Page 179: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEE

SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS

For the Year Ended June 30, 2014

PART I, SUMMARY OF AUDITOR’S RESULTS

1. Our report on the financial statements of Scott County is unmodified.

2. The audit of the financial statements of Scott County disclosed significant

deficiencies in internal control. None of these deficiencies was considered to be a material weakness.

3. The audit disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are material to the financial

statements of Scott County. 4. The audit disclosed no significant deficiencies in internal control over major

programs. 5. An unmodified opinion was issued on compliance for major programs. 6. The audit revealed no findings that are required to be reported under Section 510(a)

of OMB Circular A-133. 7. The Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch

Program (CFDA Nos. 10.553 and 10.555), Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (CFDA No. 84.010), and State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) – Race-to-the-Top Incentive Grants, Recovery Act (CFDA No. 84.395) were determined to be major programs.

8. A $300,000 threshold was used to distinguish between Type A and Type B federal

programs. 9. Scott County did not qualify as a low-risk auditee.

179

Page 180: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

PART II, FINDINGS RELATING TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Findings and recommendations, as a result of our examination and an investigation by the Comptroller’s Division of Investigation - Financial and Compliance Unit on the Highway Department, are presented below. We and/or the investigators reviewed these findings and recommendations with management to provide an opportunity for their response. The director of finance and the superintendent of roads provided written responses on certain findings, which are paraphrased in this report. Other management officials did not provide responses for inclusion in this report. OFFICES OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS FINDING 2014-001 THE SCHOOL FEDERAL PROJECTS FUND HAD A

DEFICIT IN UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2014

(Internal Control – Significant Deficiency Under Government Auditing Standards)

The School Federal Projects Fund had a deficit in unassigned fund balance of $54,799 at June 30, 2014. Sound business practices dictate that expenditures should be held within available funds, and requests for reimbursements from grant funds should be made on a current basis. This deficit occurred because School Department personnel had not requested reimbursements from grant funds on a timely basis. Grant funds were requested subsequent to June 30, 2014, and this deficit will be liquidated when the grant funds are received. RECOMMENDATION Officials should liquidate the deficit in unassigned fund balance and should request reimbursements from grant funds in a timely manner. Officials should ensure that adequate funding is provided to prevent the recurrence of a deficit. MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE – DIRECTOR OF FINANCE This was a timing issue between the end of the county fiscal year and the federal fiscal year and the timely request of funds through E-Plan. Funds should have been requested sooner. Internal controls will assure funds are requested in a timely manner between central office staff and finance staff.

__________________________

180

Page 181: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

OFFICES OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND COUNTY MAYOR FINDING 2014-002 SOME PURCHASE ORDERS WERE ISSUED AFTER

PURCHASES WERE MADE (Internal Control – Significant Deficiency Under Government Auditing Standards)

As part of our audit procedures for determining whether the purchasing process was operating as designed, we selected a sample of 60 disbursements totaling $181,507 from a population of approximately 7,110 vendor checks totaling $15,904,186. Our sample revealed that in seven instances, purchase orders were issued after purchases were made. This practice defeats the purpose of the purchase order and makes it an approval of payment rather than an approval of the purchase. This deficiency is the result of a lack of management oversight. RECOMMENDATION To strengthen internal controls over purchasing procedures and to document purchasing commitments, the office should issue purchase orders for all applicable purchases before purchases are made. MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE – DIRECTOR OF FINANCE The county Finance Department strives to work with all departments to follow the established financial management policies of the county, which also extend to the school system. One of the issues on schools was for maintenance materials and miscommunication on the required protocol. The food service deficiency was based upon commodity pricing and the difficulty in determining the pricing for the purchase. The property assessor was in the process of office remodeling and failed to acquire a purchase order number before receipt of the materials, and the Tourism Department routinely fails to follow established purchasing requirements. The Finance Department has discussed these findings with each department and will continue to strive to work with each department to follow established guidelines and procedures. Overall, given the diverse nature of county operations with emergency work, and some operations working 24/7, all departments strive to follow established guidelines and generally do a very good job.

__________________________ FINDING 2014-003 EXPENDITURES EXCEEDED APPROPRIATIONS

(Noncompliance Under Government Auditing Standards) Total expenditures exceeded appropriations in the General Capital Projects Fund by $11. Expenditures exceeded appropriations approved by the County Commission in the following funds’ major appropriation categories (the legal level of control):

181

Page 182: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

AmountFund/Major Appropriation Category Overspent

General: Finance: Property Assessor's Office $ 276 Other Operations: Airport 35,597

Highway/Public Works: Highways: Administration 771

Section 5-9-401, Tennessee Code Annotated, states that “All funds from whatever source derived, including, but not limited to taxes, county aid funds, federal funds, and fines, that are to be used in the operation and respective programs of the various departments, commissions, institutions, boards, offices and agencies of county governments shall be appropriated to such use by the county legislative bodies.” These deficiencies exist because management failed to stay within the spending limits authorized by the County Commission, which resulted in unauthorized expenditures, and management failed to correct the finding noted in the prior-year audit report. RECOMMENDATION Expenditures should be held within appropriations approved by the County Commission. MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE – DIRECTOR OF FINANCE This finding is directly tied to finding 2014-002 and the failure to acquire a purchase order. The property assessor’s budget overage is tied to the explanation noted above involving office modifications. The airport purchased fuel to accommodate increased air traffic coming to Scott County to pay final respects to Senator Howard Baker. Unfortunately, this purchase occurred on June 30th, and the County Commission had approved all final budget amendments on June 16, 2014. The county buildings budget overage was due to invoices being submitted for payment for remodeling at the courthouse where a purchase order number had not been assigned. One corrective action intended for FY2014-15 is to move the June County Commission meeting to June 29th, which will allow final budget amendments to be approved at the end of the fiscal year. This will be done in conjunction with reminding departments to obtain a purchase order number prior to the purchase.

__________________________

182

Page 183: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF ROADS FINDING 2014-004 A HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE OBTAINED

COUNTY FUEL FOR PERSONAL USE (Noncompliance Under Government Auditing Standards)

Subsequent to June 30, 2014, a Highway Department employee admitted to improperly pumping approximately 20 gallons of diesel fuel worth $59.60 from a county-owned mobile storage fuel tank into his personal vehicle. Also, further examination of the Highway Department’s fuel records and the employee’s time sheets disclosed that this employee had obtained some fuel while being off work. However, we were unable to determine the amounts of additional fuel the employee obtained for personal use since management did not require the employee to log his vehicle’s odometer mileage during fueling at county pumps. Also, monthly reports for fuel usage were not reviewed by management to determine that the fuel card system was accounting for all fuel pumped properly.

RECOMMENDATION Management should seek restitution from the employee for the cost of the diesel fuel ($59.60) improperly obtained for personal use. County officials should perform an internal risk assessment to determine ways to strengthen internal controls over the use of the county’s fuel card system. Fuel purchased for county use should not be used in private vehicles. The Finance Department should review and reconcile monthly reports for fuel usage with amounts pumped for the various vehicles maintained by county departments. Any significant variances should be investigated for propriety. MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE – SUPERINTENDENT OF ROADS The employee was cleaning out a fuel tank that is used to haul fuel to equipment at job sites, and the employee had asked the superintendent of roads what to do with the old fuel that was in the tank. The superintendent advised him to do anything with the fuel other than pour it on the ground or put it in any of the department’s equipment because the tank was dirty and very rusty. The employee has been required to write a check payable to the Highway Department for $59.60 to reimburse the department for the fuel. Fuel reports are maintained at the county’s Finance Office until the end of the month, and a printout for that particular month is given to the superintendent of roads to review. This report contains the last four digits of the employee’s social security number, the date, time, equipment number, and how many gallons of fuel pumped. It is required that each employee enter the last four digits of his/her social security number and the odometer reading of the vehicle for which fuel is being obtained. However, for the vehicle in question, the odometer does not work; therefore, the employee cannot enter an odometer reading. The odometer for this vehicle will be fixed. Cards that are used for large equipment such as the loader, track-hoe, backhoes, and graders do not require mileage to be recorded since they do not have odometers. They use hour meters. For this type of fuel purchase, the employee is only required to enter the last four digits of his/her social security number. Fuel may be purchased after hours or on the weekend when department employees are called out for snow, downed trees, dead animals, flooding, etc.

183

Page 184: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

INVESTIGATOR’S COMMENT When we initially spoke to the superintendent of roads about this matter, he did not mention anything regarding the cleaning out of an old fuel tank, but did say he was not aware of the employee taking fuel. When we met with the superintendent to review our findings and recommendations, the superintendent informed us about the cleaning of the old fuel tank, but indicated he wasn’t sure if this was the instance where fuel was offered to any employees. During our interview with the employee, he advised us that he knew it was wrong to remove fuel belonging to the county for his personal vehicle, no county official had approved it, and he would be willing to reimburse the county. The employee never stated he removed the fuel while cleaning out a county fuel tank. In addition, the employee stated the county fuel pumps do not require him to enter his mileage when receiving county fuel.

__________________________ FINDING 2014-005 THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT HAD PURCHASING

DEFICIENCIES (Internal Control – Significant Deficiency Under Government Auditing Standards)

The following deficiencies were noted in the department’s purchasing process:

A. In most instances, invoices for vehicle repair parts did not identify the

vehicles for which the parts were purchased. Therefore, we were unable to determine if all of these purchases were for Highway Department vehicles.

B. In October 2014, the Highway Department was billed for a set of brake pads

($54.87) that was purchased for an employee’s personal use. Purportedly, while purchasing parts for the Highway Department from a local vendor, an employee also purchased brake pads for his personal use that were mistakenly charged as a county purchase by the vendor. This mistake was not detected until the end of the month when the employee received his personal statement from the vendor and determined that he had not been billed for the part. Subsequently, the employee had the vendor credit the department’s account for the amount of the part, and charge his personal account.

C. In some instances, purchase orders were issued after the purchases were

made. We noted several instances where the Finance Department approved the purchase order after the purchase was made. This practice defeats the purpose of the purchase order and makes it an approval of payment rather than an approval of the purchase. In addition, the dollar amounts and description of purchases were not listed on some purchase orders.

RECOMMENDATION Highway Department personnel should ensure that a notation is included on charge tickets and/or invoices to identify the vehicle for which a part was purchased. The finance director, as purchasing agent for the county, should ensure purchasing procedures are effective and

184

Page 185: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

comply with the county’s purchasing system. To strengthen internal controls over purchasing procedures and to document purchasing commitments, the office should issue purchase orders for all applicable purchases before purchases are made and should include the dollar amounts and descriptions of items to be purchased.

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE – SUPERINTENDENT OF ROADS A. In the future, invoices will contain the vehicle description and/or the equipment

number for parts being purchased.

B. The employee caught the mistake when he went to pay his bill and had the vendor credit the amount of the brake pads back to the Highway Department. The employee paid for the brake pads out of his personal funds.

C. During the regular work week, purchasing parts may take place after hours, on Fridays when the Highway Department office is closed, or on the weekend when the office is closed; therefore, a purchase order number cannot be issued. This happens because employees may have to work on the equipment during these times. However, a purchase order is issued the following Monday morning.

INVESTIGATOR’S COMMENTS We noted purchase orders were approved after purchases were made in numerous instances during the Highway Department’s normal work hours. Purchase orders should be issued for all applicable purchases before purchases are made to strengthen internal controls over purchasing procedures and to document purchasing commitments.

__________________________ FINDING 2014-006 VEHICLES WERE NOT LABELED AS PROPERTY OF

THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT (Noncompliance Under Government Auditing Standards)

Highway Department-owned trucks assigned to the highway superintendent and other employees were not labeled as property of the Highway Department. The County Uniform Road Law, Section 54-7-112, Tennessee Code Annotated, requires that “all machinery, equipment, and tools shall be plainly marked as property of the county.” RECOMMENDATION Department-owned trucks assigned to county employees should be plainly labeled as property of the county as required by state statute. MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSE – SUPERINTENDENT OF ROADS The signs/stickers for these vehicles have been ordered, and we are waiting for them to arrive. These stickers will be placed on the superintendent of road’s truck, the supervisor's truck, and a pine green truck.

__________________________

185

Page 186: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

OFFICES OF CIRCUIT AND GENERAL SESSIONS COURTS CLERK, CLERK AND MASTER, AND REGISTER OF DEEDS FINDING 2014-007 DUTIES WERE NOT SEGREGATED ADEQUATELY

(Internal Control – Significant Deficiency Under Government Audit Standards)

Duties were not segregated adequately among the officials and employees in the Offices of Circuit and General Sessions Courts Clerk, Clerk and Master, and Register of Deeds. Employees responsible for maintaining accounting records were also involved in receipting, depositing, and/or disbursing funds. Accounting standards provide that internal controls be designed to provide reasonable assurance of the reliability in financial reporting and of the effectiveness and efficiency of operations. This lack of segregation of duties is the result of management’s decisions based on the availability of financial resources and is a significant deficiency in internal controls that increases the risk of unauthorized transactions. Also, this deficiency exists due to the failure of management to correct the finding noted in the prior-year audit report. RECOMMENDATION Officials should segregate duties to the extent possible using available resources.

____________________________ OFFICE OF REGISTER OF DEEDS FINDING 2014-008 MULTIPLE EMPLOYEES OPERATED FROM THE SAME

CASH DRAWER (Internal Control – Significant Deficiency Under Government Auditing Standards)

Multiple employees operated from the same cash drawer in the Office of Register of Deeds. Good internal controls dictate that each employee have their own cash drawer, start the day with a standard fixed amount of cash, and remove all but that beginning amount at the end of the day. This amount should be verified to the employee’s receipts at the end of each day. Failure to adhere to this control regimen greatly increases the risk that a cash shortage may not be detected in a timely manner. Furthermore, in the event of a cash shortage, the official would not be able to determine who was responsible for the shortage because multiple employees were working from one cash drawer. This deficiency has been a management decision by the official resulting in a loss of control over assets. RECOMMENDATION Officials should assign each employee their own cash drawer.

186

Page 187: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

PART III, FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS

There were no findings and questioned costs for federal awards.

187

Page 188: Scott County Audit, FY 2013-2014

SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEE AUDITEE REPORTING RESPONSIBILITIES

For the Year Ended June 30, 2014 There were no audit findings relative to federal awards presented in the prior- or current-years’ Schedules of Findings and Questioned Costs.

188