scientific investigations map 3183 u.s. department of the ... · la belle basinger wauchula...

1
A A A A A A A A A " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " H H H H H Ona Tampa Ocala Venus DeLand Venice Bartow Ruskin Brandon Parrish Palatka Tavares Orlando Seville Placida Dunedin Bronson Gardner Arcadia Sebring Sarasota Lorraine Bushnell Oklawaha Leesburg Lakeland Mulberry Pineland Suwannee Palmdale La Belle Basinger Wauchula Englewood Bradenton Chiefland Inverness Homosassa Kissimmee Polk City Davenport Dade City Avon Park Fort Myers Clearwater Cross City Fort McCoy Rock Ridge Plant City Fort Ogden Frostproof Lake Wales Fort Meade Cape Coral Punta Gorda Myakka Head Myakka City Saint Cloud Lake Alfred Citrus Park Zephyrhills San Antonio Brooksville Port Richey Gainesville Lake Placid Winter Haven Daytona Beach Fort Lonesome Crystal River Tarpon Springs Port Charlotte St. Petersburg Altamonte Springs STARKEY DUNEDIN CROSS BAR RANCH BELLEAIR CYPRESS CREEK MORRIS BRIDGE SOUTH CENTRAL NW HILLSBOROUGH DISPERSED EAST LAKE VERNA ELDRIDGE WILDE NORTH PASCO ODESSA COSME SOUTH PASCO LAKELAND SECTION 21 PINE ISLAND SOUND CHAR L O T T E H A R B O R CA L O O S AHAT C HEE R I V E R LAKE OKEECHOBEE S h e l l Cr e e k Prairie Creek Horse Creek Peace River Big Slough Canal Deer Prairie Creek Myakka River LAKE ISTOKPOGA Lake Jackson Lake Placid Lake June in Winter Br a den River M a n at ee River Li t tl e M a n a te e Riv er S. Prong Reedy Lake Lake Livingston Lake Clinch Crooked Lake Buffum Lake P e a c e R i v e r Lake Arbuckle Lake Wechyokapka Lake Rosalie Tiger Lake LAKE KISSIMMEE Lake Marian TAMPA BAY HILLSBOROUGH BAY OLD TAMPA BAY Alafia River N. Prong Lake Hancock Lake Garfield Lake Pierce Lake Jackson Cypress Lake Lake Gentry Alligator Lake Lake Preston East Lake Tohopekaliga Lake Hart Lake Tohopekaliga Lake Conway Lake Hamilton Lake Marion Lake Juliana Lake Mattie Lake Parker Lake Thonoiosassa Blackwater Creek River Hi l l s bo ro ug h W ith l a c o o c h e e R iv e r Lake Tarpon A n c l o t e River Pithlachascoiee River Crews Lake Lake Monroe Lake Jessup Lake Harney LAKE APOPKA LAKE HARRIS Lake Dora Lake Griffin Lake Eustis Lake Dorr Lake Norris Lake Weir Lake Panasoffkee Wekiva River Lake Louisa Lake Minnehaha TSALA APOPKA LAKE Crystal River Springs Group LAKE GEORGE Lake Woodruff Lake Disston Lake Kerr ST. JOHNS RIVER Oklawaha River Orange Lake Lake Stafford CRESCENT LAKE Lochloosa Lake Newmans Lake ST. JOHNS RIVER Wekiva River River Waccasassa G U L F O F M E XI C O ATLANTIC OCEAN Lithia Springs Sulphur Springs Rainbow Springs Homosassa Springs WeekiWachee Springs Warm Mineral Springs Chassahowitzka Springs Crystal Springs Crystal River Springs LEE POLK LAKE DIXIE TAYLOR HENDRY GLADES ORANGE CITRUS MARION PUTNAM DE SOTO OSCEOLA VOLUSIA FLAGLER ALACHUA SARASOTA SEMINOLE ST JOHNS CHARLOTTE HIGHLANDS GILCHRIST OKEECHOBEE PASCO HARDEE SUMTER MANATEE PINELLAS HERNANDO HILLSBOROUGH LEVY 30 20 40 60 50 70 10 80 0 90 100 110 120 80 40 50 10 20 40 50 70 10 10 50 50 40 30 20 60 70 80 90 100 40 70 60 10 10 110 30 8 5 0 7 1 4 5 6 5 8 1 3 3 2 2 9 2 2 2 9 7 4 6 6 1 9 2 3 4 2 3 4 4 7 6 7 8 5 5 6 7 5 5 8 2 0 8 8 9 5 9 7 0 2 6 9 9 6 3 5 8 1 2 2 7 6 1 1 3 4 1 49 49 42 42 43 45 46 45 69 41 13 69 17 46 13 50 44 66 42 25 55 43 38 45 42 45 45 -8 57 74 66 65 71 58 60 50 28 25 32 27 25 27 10 22 51 45 40 40 46 10 41 36 22 34 33 51 33 27 30 69 34 36 44 49 50 10 41 38 14 36 31 44 48 36 46 45 39 26 17 62 39 11 13 48 38 39 32 41 38 52 15 57 76 75 58 77 76 75 38 42 19 80 61 34 38 40 50 71 84 65 49 93 88 53 96 66 63 68 68 72 88 76 30 57 71 56 88 37 64 44 43 29 60 35 71 77 39 57 48 60 45 19 27 21 42 48 19 12 38 90 26 53 51 41 85 40 29 28 25 20 24 24 17 90 94 20 45 92 37 16 38 89 86 14 19 78 81 23 21 79 73 16 17 88 14 65 14 15 44 11 55 10 92 12 31 98 94 97 11 21 62 46 15 14 10 42 12 92 84 61 77 61 76 78 76 21 10 11 60 61 28 10 11 79 23 14 56 43 18 73 43 11 55 -7 77 12 -4 35 30 13 15 39 13 33 14 18 36 32 37 65 42 42 45 18 34 16 41 43 41 13 21 20 17 25 22 22 26 88 34 49 84 79 94 69 63 76 63 11 10 32 13 13 36 12 15 25 38 24 56 41 58 31 55 58 67 24 52 70 68 70 86 115 118 109 102 108 108 101 122 125 124 100 124 125 126 110 6 7 8 1 5 6 6 16 67 44 29 16 10 13 24 -3 -4 58 57 81° 81° 82° 82° 83° 83° 84° 84° 29° 29° 28° 28° 27° 27° SCALE 1:500,000 MILES KILOMETERS 5 0 5 10 15 20 5 0 5 10 15 20 A T L A N T I C O C E A N G UL F O F M E X I C O STUDY AREA MAP AREA ALABAMA GEORGIA FLORIDA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with the SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Scientific Investigations Map 3183 A.G. Ortiz , 2011, Potentiometric surface of the upper Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, May 2011 POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE UPPER FLORIDAN AQUIFER, WEST-CENTRAL FLORIDA, MAY 2011 By A.G. Ortiz Base from Southwest Florida Water Management District digital data, 1992, State Plane Florida East projection, NAD83 Copies of this map can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, Colorodo 80225-0286 Figure 1. Change in potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer from May 2010 to May 2011 in west-central Florida. Positive values indicate an increase in water-level altitudes. Negative values indicate a decrease in water-level altitudes. EXPLANATION MUNICIPAL WELL FIELD POTENTIOMETRIC CONTOUR -- Shows altitude at which water would have stood in tightly cased wells. Contour interval is 10 feet. National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929. Hachures indicate depressions. Dashed where approximately located. BOUNDARY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OBSERVATION WELL -- Number is altitude of water level in feet above or below NGVD of 1929. SPRING " CITY OR TOWN OBSERVATION WELL -- Number is altitude of water level in feet above or below NGVD of 1929. Bold number indicates water levels corrected for salinity. VERNA A 20 16 20 EXPLANATION Change in the potentiometric surface, in feet (Positive values indicate an increase in water-level altitudes) -5 to -9.99 >0 to 4.99 0 to -4.99 <= -10.00 HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS IN WEST-CENTRAL FLORIDA The Floridan aquifer system consists of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers separated by the middle confining unit. The middle confining unit and the Lower Floridan aquifer in west-central Florida generally contain highly mineralized water. The water-bearing units containing fresh water are herein referred to as the Upper Floridan aquifer. The Upper Floridan aquifer is the principal source of water in the Southwest Florida Water Management District and is used for major public supply, domestic use, irrigation, and brackish water desalination in coastal communities (Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2000). This map report shows the potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer measured in May 2011. The potentiometric surface is an imaginary surface connecting points of equal altitude to which water will rise in tightly-cased wells that tap a confined aquifer system (Lohman, 1979). This map represents water-level conditions near the end of the dry season, when groundwater levels usually are at an annual low and withdrawals for agricultural use typically are high. The cumulative average rainfall of 45.74 inches for west-central Florida (from June 2010 through May 2011) was 6.85 inches below the historical cumulative average of 52.59 inches (Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2011). Historical cumulative averages are calculated from regional rainfall summary reports (1915 to most recent complete calendar year) and are updated monthly by the Southwest Florida Water Management District. This report, prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Southwest Florida Water Management District, is part of a semi-annual series of Upper Floridan aquifer potentiometric-surface map reports for west-central Florida. Potentiometric-surface maps have been prepared for January 1964, May 1969, May 1971, May 1973, May 1974, and for each May and September from 1975 through 2010. Water-level data are collected in May and September each year to show the approximate annual low and high water-level conditions, respectively. Most of the water-level data for this map were collected by the U.S. Geological Survey during the period May 23-27, 2011. Supplemental water-level data were collected by other agencies and companies. Most water-level measurements were made during a 5-day period; therefore, measurements do not represent a "snapshot" of conditions at a specific time, nor do they necessarily coincide with the seasonal low water-level condition. WATER-LEVEL CHANGES Water levels in about 95 percent of the wells measured in May 2011 were lower than the May 2010 water levels (Ortiz, 2010). Data from 399 wells indicate the May 2011 water levels ranged from about 12 feet below to about 2.5 feet above the May 2010 water levels (fig. 1). The largest water level increase occurred in northeast Pinellas County. The largest water level declines occurred in east-central Hillsborough County and south-central Polk County (fig. 1). Water levels in about 99 percent of the wells measured in May 2011 were lower than the September 2010 water levels (Ortiz, 2011). Data from 400 wells indicate the May 2011 water levels ranged from about 25 feet below to about 0.5 feet above the September 2010 water levels. The largest water level decline was in west-central Pasco County and the largest rise in water levels was in east-central Manatee County. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author thanks Tampa Bay Water and CF Industries for their assistance with the collection of data used to prepare this report. SELECTED REFERENCES Lohman, S. W., 1979, Ground-water hydraulics: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 708, 72 p. Ortiz, A.G., 2010, Potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, May 2010: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3139, 1 sheet. Ortiz, A.G., 2011, Potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, September 2010: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3148, 1 sheet. Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2000, Aquifer characteristics within the Southwest Florida Water Management District: Brooksville, FL, 123 p. Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2011, Hydrologic conditions for the month of May 2011: Brooksville, FL, 84 p.

Upload: others

Post on 14-May-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

""

"

"

""

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

H

H

HH

H

Ona

Tampa

Ocala

Venus

DeLand

Venice

Bartow

Ruskin

Brandon

Parrish

Palatka

Tavares

Orlando

Seville

Placida

Dunedin

Bronson

Gardner

Arcadia

Sebring

Sarasota

Lorraine

Bushnell

Oklawaha

Leesburg

Lakeland

Mulberry

Pineland

Suwannee

Palmdale

La Belle

Basinger

Wauchula

Englewood

Bradenton

Chiefland

Inverness

Homosassa

Kissimmee

Polk City

Davenport

Dade City

Avon Park

Fort Myers

Clearwater

Cross City

Fort McCoy

Rock Ridge

Plant City

Fort Ogden

Frostproof

Lake Wales

Fort Meade

Cape

Coral

Punta Gorda

Myakka Head

Myakka City

Saint Cloud

Lake AlfredCitrus Park

Zephyrhills

San Antonio

Brooksville

Port Richey

Gainesville

Lake Placid

Winter Haven

Daytona Beach

Fort Lonesome

Crystal River

Tarpon Springs

Port Charlotte

St. Petersburg

Altamonte Springs

STARKEY

DUNEDIN

CROSS BARRANCH

BELLEAIR

CYPRESS CREEK

MORRISBRIDGE

SOUTH CENTRAL

NW HILLSBOROUGH DISPERSED

EASTLAKE

VERNA

ELDRIDGEWILDE

NORTHPASCO

ODESSACOSME

SOUTH PASCO

LAKELAND

SECTION 21

PIN

E IS

LAN

D S

OU

ND

CHAR LO TTE

HA

RB

OR

CALOOSAHATCHEERIVER

LAKE

OKEECHOBEE

Shel

lCreek

Prairie

Creek

Hor

se C

reek

Pea

ce R

iver

Big

Slo

ugh

Can

al

Dee

r P

rair

ie

Creek

Myakka River

LAKE

ISTOKPOGA

Lake

Jackson

Lake

Placid

Lake June

in Winter

Braden River

Manatee

River

Little

Manatee River

S. Prong

Reedy

Lake

Lake

Livingston

Lake

Clinch

Crooked

LakeBuffum

Lake

Peac

eR

iver

Lake

Arbuckle

Lake

Wechyokapka

Lake

Rosalie

Tiger

Lake

LAKE KISSIM

MEE

Lake Marian

TAMPA

BAY

HILLS

BO

RO

UG

H

BA

Y

OLD TAMPA

BAY

Alafia

RiverN. P

rong

Lake

Hancock

Lake

Garfield

Lake

Pierce

Lake

Jackson

Cypress

Lake

Lake

Gentry

Alligator

Lake

Lake

PrestonEast Lake

Tohopekaliga

Lake

Hart

Lake Tohopekaliga

Lake

Conway

Lake

Hamilton

Lake

Marion

Lake

Juliana

Lake

Mattie

Lake

ParkerLake

Thonoiosassa

Blackwater

Creek

Riv

er

Hillsborough

Withla

cooc

he

e

River

Lake

Tarpon

An c l ote

River

Pithlachascoiee

River

Crews

Lake

Lake

Monroe

Lake

Jessup

Lake

Harney

LAKE

APOPKA

LAKE

HARRIS

LakeDora

Lake

Griffin

LakeEustis

Lake

Dorr

Lake

Norris

LakeWeir

Lake

Panasoffkee

We

kiva

River

Lake

Louisa

Lake

Minnehaha

TSALA

APOPKA

LAKE

Crystal River

Springs Group

LAKE

GEORGE

Lake

Woodruff

Lake

Disston

Lake

Kerr

ST. JOHNS RIVER

Okl

awah

a Riv

er

Orange

Lake

Lake

Stafford

CRESCENT

LAKE

Lochloosa

Lake

Newmans

Lake

ST.

JOHNS RIVER

Wekiva

River

Riv

er

Wa

cc

asa

ssa

GU

LF

OF

ME

XI

CO

AT

LAN

TIC

OC

EA

N

Lithia

Springs

Sulphur

Springs

Rainbow

Springs

Homosassa

Springs

WeekiWachee

Springs

WarmMineralSprings

Chassahowitzka

Springs

Crystal

Springs

Crystal River Springs

L E E

P O L K

L A K E

D I X I E

TAYLOR

H E N D R Y

G L A D E S

O R A N G E

C I T R U S

M A R I O N

P U T N A M

D E S O T O

O S C E O L A

V O L U S I A

F L A G L E R

A L A C H U A

S A R A S O T A

S E M I N O L E

S T J O H N S

C H A R L O T T E

H I G H L A N D S

G I L C H R I S T

O K E E C H O B E E

P A S C O

H A R D E E

S U M T E R

M A N A T E E

P I N E L L A S

H E R N A N D O

H I L L S B O R O U G H

L E V Y

30

20

40

60

50

70

10

80

0

90

100

110

120

80

4050

10

20

40

50

70

10

10

50

50

40

30

20

60

7080

90

100

40

70

60

10

10

110

30

8

5

0

7

1

4

5

6

5

8

1

332

2

9

22

29

7

4

6

6

1

92

3

42

3 4 4

7

67

8

5

5

6

7

5 5

8

20 88

95

9

7

0

2

69

9

6

3

5

8

1

2

2

76

1

13

4

1

4949

42

42

43

45

46

45

69

41

13

69

1746

1350

44

66

42

25

55

43

38

45

42

45

45

-8

57

74

66

65 71

5860

50

28

2532

2725

27

10

22

51

4540

40

46

10

413622

34

33

51

33

27

3069 34

36 444950

10

41

38

14 36

31

44 48

364645

392617

62

39

11

13 483839

32

41

3852

15

5776

7558

77

76

7538 4219

80613438

40

5071

84

65

49 938853 9666

63

68

68 72

88

7630

5771

568837

64444329

6035 71 7739

57

4860

4519

27

21

4248

19

12

38

90

26535141

8540

2928

25

20 2424

1790

9420 45 92

3716 38 8986

14 1978

812321

797316 17

8814

6514

15 4411

55109212

319894

9711

216246

15

1410 42

1292

84

61

7761

7678

762110

11

60 61

28

1011

7923

14

5643

18 73

4311

55-7

77

12

-4

353013

15

3913

3314 1836

32

37

65

42

4245

18

34

16

41

4341

13

21

2017

25

22

22

26

88

34

49

84

79

94

69

63 76

63

11

10

3213

13

3612 1525

3824

5641

58

31

5558

672452

706870

86

115

118109

102108

108

101

122

125

124100

124125126

110

6

7

8

1

5

6

6

16 67

44

29

16

10

13 24

-3

-4

5857

81°

81°

82°

82°

83°

83°

84°

84°

29°

29°

28°

28°

27°

27°

SCALE 1:500,000MILES

KILOMETERS

5 0 5 10 15 20

5 0 5 10 15 20

AT

LA

NT

ICO

CE

AN

G U L FO

F

ME

XI C

O

STUDY AREA

MAP AREA

ALABAMA GEORGIA

FLORIDA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Prepared in cooperation with the

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

Scientific Investigations Map 3183

A.G. Ortiz , 2011, Potentiometric surface of the upper

Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, May 2011

POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE UPPER FLORIDAN AQUIFER,

WEST-CENTRAL FLORIDA, MAY 2011

By A.G. Ortiz

Base from Southwest Florida Water Management District digital data, 1992,

State Plane Florida East projection, NAD83Copies of this map can be purchased from:

U.S. Geological Survey

Branch of Information Services

Box 25286

Denver, Colorodo 80225-0286

Figure 1. Change in potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer from May 2010 to

May 2011 in west-central Florida. Positive values indicate an increase in water-level altitudes.

Negative values indicate a decrease in water-level altitudes.

EXPLANATION

MUNICIPAL WELL FIELD

POTENTIOMETRIC CONTOUR -- Shows altitude at which water would have stood in tightly cased wells. Contour interval is 10 feet.

National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929. Hachures indicate depressions. Dashed where approximately located.

BOUNDARY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

OBSERVATION WELL -- Number is altitude of water level in feet above or below NGVD of 1929.

SPRING

" CITY OR TOWN

OBSERVATION WELL -- Number is altitude of water level in feet above or below NGVD of 1929.

Bold number indicates water levels corrected for salinity.

VERNA

A

20

16

20

EXPLANATION

Change in the potentiometric

surface, in feet

(Positive values indicate an

increase in water-level altitudes)

-5 to -9.99

>0 to 4.99

0 to -4.99

<= -10.00

HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS IN WEST-CENTRAL FLORIDA

The Floridan aquifer system consists of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers separated by the

middle confining unit. The middle confining unit and the Lower Floridan aquifer in west-central

Florida generally contain highly mineralized water. The water-bearing units containing fresh

water are herein referred to as the Upper Floridan aquifer. The Upper Floridan aquifer is the

principal source of water in the Southwest Florida Water Management District and is used for

major public supply, domestic use, irrigation, and brackish water desalination in coastal

communities (Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2000).

This map report shows the potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer measured in

May 2011. The potentiometric surface is an imaginary surface connecting points of equal

altitude to which water will rise in tightly-cased wells that tap a confined aquifer system

(Lohman, 1979). This map represents water-level conditions near the end of the dry season,

when groundwater levels usually are at an annual low and withdrawals for agricultural use

typically are high. The cumulative average rainfall of 45.74 inches for west-central Florida (from

June 2010 through May 2011) was 6.85 inches below the historical cumulative average of 52.59

inches (Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2011). Historical cumulative averages

are calculated from regional rainfall summary reports (1915 to most recent complete calendar

year) and are updated monthly by the Southwest Florida Water Management District.

This report, prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Southwest Florida

Water Management District, is part of a semi-annual series of Upper Floridan aquifer

potentiometric-surface map reports for west-central Florida. Potentiometric-surface maps have

been prepared for January 1964, May 1969, May 1971, May 1973, May 1974, and for each May

and September from 1975 through 2010. Water-level data are collected in May and September

each year to show the approximate annual low and high water-level conditions, respectively.

Most of the water-level data for this map were collected by the U.S. Geological Survey during

the period May 23-27, 2011. Supplemental water-level data were collected by other agencies

and companies. Most water-level measurements were made during a 5-day period; therefore,

measurements do not represent a "snapshot" of conditions at a specific time, nor do they

necessarily coincide with the seasonal low water-level condition.

WATER-LEVEL CHANGES

Water levels in about 95 percent of the wells measured in May 2011 were lower than the May

2010 water levels (Ortiz, 2010). Data from 399 wells indicate the May 2011 water levels ranged

from about 12 feet below to about 2.5 feet above the May 2010 water levels (fig. 1). The largest

water level increase occurred in northeast Pinellas County. The largest water level declines

occurred in east-central Hillsborough County and south-central Polk County (fig. 1).

Water levels in about 99 percent of the wells measured in May 2011 were lower than the

September 2010 water levels (Ortiz, 2011). Data from 400 wells indicate the May 2011 water

levels ranged from about 25 feet below to about 0.5 feet above the September 2010 water levels.

The largest water level decline was in west-central Pasco County and the largest rise in water

levels was in east-central Manatee County.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author thanks Tampa Bay Water and CF Industries for their assistance with the collection

of data used to prepare this report.

SELECTED REFERENCES

Lohman, S. W., 1979, Ground-water hydraulics: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 708,

72 p.

Ortiz, A.G., 2010, Potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, May

2010: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3139, 1 sheet.

Ortiz, A.G., 2011, Potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida,

September 2010: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3148, 1 sheet.

Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2000, Aquifer characteristics within the

Southwest Florida Water Management District: Brooksville, FL, 123 p.

Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2011, Hydrologic conditions for the month of

May 2011: Brooksville, FL, 84 p.