schools first desoto isds report on texas education agencys first financial integrity rating system...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Schools FIRSTDeSoto ISD’s Report on
Texas Education Agency’sFinancial Integrity Rating System of
TexasFor the Year Ended
August 31, 2011
1
![Page 2: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Determination of Ratings• If a district answers NO to Indicators 1, 2,
3 or 4 – Or to BOTH 5 & 6 – It is an automatic Substandard Achievement.
• Indicators 7-22 are awarded a point value based on performance.• 64-70 = Superior Achievement• 58-63 = Above Standard Achievement• 52-57 = Standard Achievement• <52 or No to 1 default = Substandard
Achievement2
![Page 3: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1 of 20 INDICATORS
1.Was the Total Fund Balance less Nonspendable and Restricted Fund Balance > 0 in the General Fund?“Does the DeSoto ISD have funds set aside for a rainy day?” YES - $6,005,876 - $329,663 = $5,676,213 > 0
General Fund Balance
Restricted Fund
Balance
3
![Page 4: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2 of 20 INDICATORS
2.Was the Total Unrestricted Net Asset Balance In the Governmental Activities Column in the Statement of Net Assets Greater than Zero?
“Do total assets exceed total liabilities?”
YES – $62,912,689 > 04
![Page 5: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3 of 20 INDICATORS3. Were there No Disclosures in the Annual Financial Report and/or Other Sources of information concerning Default on Bond Obligations?
“Does the DeSoto ISD make Bond Payments on time?”
YES – Never Late On Bond Payments
5
![Page 6: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
4 of 20 INDICATORS
4. Was the Annual Financial Report filed within One Month of the January 28th Deadline?
“Was the audit filed on time?”
YES – January 11, 2011
6
![Page 7: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
5 of 20 INDICATORS
5. Was there an Unqualified Opinion in the Annual Financial Report?
A “qualified opinion” means that the district needs to correct something in its reporting or financial controls.
YES – Unqualified Opinion
7
![Page 8: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
6 of 20 INDICATORS
6. Did the Annual Financial Report NOT Disclose any instance(s) of Material Weaknesses in Internal Controls?
“Did the DeSoto ISD have a clean audit?”
YES – No Material Weaknesses
8
![Page 9: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
7 of 20 INDICATORS
7. Was the Three-Year Average Percent of Total Tax Collections (Including Delinquent) Greater than 98%?
“Is DeSoto ISD keeping up with tax collections?”
Yes - 100.008%>98%
![Page 10: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
8 of 20 INDICATORS8.Did the comparison of PEIMS data to like information in Annual Financial Report result in an aggregate variance of less than 3 percent?
“Does the district PEIMS submitted information match the Audit Report?”
YES – There was ZERO variance – 5 Points
10
![Page 11: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
9 of 20 INDICATORS
9.Were debt related expenditures (Net of EDA Allotment) < $350 per student? (If the district’s 5 year % change in students ≥7%, or, if Property Taxes Collected Per Penny > $200,000)
“Is DeSoto ISD spending money on education or fancy buildings?”
Continued Next Page 11
![Page 12: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
9 of 20 INDICATORS continued
9. (cont.)
NO - Debt related expenditures = $968.26 not < $350.00
NO - Five year percent change in students 6.16% not > 7%
YES - Property taxes per penny of tax effort $210,029.68 > $200,000
5 - Points12
![Page 13: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
10 of 20 INDICATORS10.Was there NO disclosure in the Annual Financial Report of Material Noncompliance?
“Did the district comply with the laws, rules, and regulations for a government entity?”
Yes – No Material Noncompliance - 5 points
13
![Page 14: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
11 of 20 INDICATORS continued
11.Did the district have Full Accreditation Status in relation to financial management practices?
“TEA did not take control of the district due to financial issues such as fraud or a negative fund balance.”
YES – Full Financial Accreditation – 5 Points14
![Page 15: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
12 of 20 INDICATORS
12.Was the Aggregate of Budgeted Expenditures < Aggregate of Total Revenues, and Fund Balance?
“Did the district not budget more than it could afford to spend?”
$64,199,061 + $5,823,231 - $67,061,811YES - $2,960,481 > 0 – 5 Points
Budgeted Revenue Fund Balance
Budgeted Appropriations
15
![Page 16: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
13 of 20 INDICATORS13.Were construction projects adequately financed? (To avoid creating or adding to the fund balance deficit.)
“Can the DeSoto ISD build new facilities without damaging the fund balance?”
$6,005,876 + $14,964,759 = $20,970,635YES - $20,970,635 > 0 – 5 Points
General Fund Balance
Construction Fund Balance
Aggregate Fund Balance
16
![Page 17: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
14 of 20 INDICATORS
14.Was the ratio of Cash and Investments to Deferred Revenues (Excluding Net of Delinquent Taxes Receivable) in the General Fund = or > 1:1? (If Deferred Revenues Are Less Than Net Delinquent Taxes Receivable)
“Does the district have sufficient cash and investments to balance fund balance monies such as TEA overpayments (deferred revenue)? Continued Next Page 17
![Page 18: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
14 of 20 INDICATORS continued
14. (cont.)
$1,695,917 - $1,674,121 = $21,796 > 0
YES - $5,647,502 ÷ $21,796 = 259.11 ≥ 1
5 Points
Deferred Revenue
Property Tax Receivable
18
Cash in General Fund
![Page 19: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
15 of 20 INDICATORS
15.Was the Administrative Cost Ratio < the Threshold Ratio?
“Did the DeSoto ISD stay under the cap of 12.5% as prescribed for a district of its size?”
YES – 8.88% < 12.5% - 5 Points
19
![Page 20: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
16 of 20 INDICATORS16.Was the Ratio of Students to Teachers within the ranges shown below?
*Range for ratio for districts with student population 5000-9999. Low 13 High 22.
9,165 ÷ 637.63 = 14.3735YES – 13 ≤ 14.3735 ≤ 22 – 5 Points
StudentsFTE
Teachers
20
![Page 21: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
17 of 20 INDICATORS
17.Was the Ratio of Student to Total Staff within the ranges shown below?
*Range for ratio for districts with student population 5000-9999. Low 6.8 High 14.
9,165 ÷ 1,151.8497 = 7.9568YES – 6.8 ≤ 7.9568 ≤ 14 - 5 Points
Students FTE Total Staff
21
![Page 22: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
18 of 20 INDICATORS18.Was the decrease in Undesignated Fund Balance < 20% Over 2 fiscal years or if Total Revenue > Operating Expenditures in the General Fund. AMENDED INDICATOR
Is the district not “feeding off its fund balance” for things like salaries and operating costs?
22
![Page 23: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
18. (cont.)
23
18 of 20 INDICATORS continued
General Fund Balance 2 Years Ago
General Fund August 31, 2009
Two Year Percentage Change
$9,664,698 - $5,676,213 = 41.27%NO – 47.27% ≥20%
Total Revenues Expenditures in DifferenceGeneral Fund General Fund
$59,098,716 - $58,992,195 = $106,521YES - $106,521 ≥ 0 - 5 Points
![Page 24: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
19 of 20 INDICATORS
19.Was the Aggregate Total of Cash and Investments in the General Fund > $0?
“Does DeSoto ISD have money in the bank or investments?”
YES - $5,647,502 > 0 – 5 Points
24
![Page 25: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
20 OF 20 INDICATORS
20.Were Investment Earnings in All Funds (Excluding Debt Service and Capital Projects) Meet or Exceed the 3-month Treasury Bill Rate? AMENDED INDICATOR“Is DeSoto ISD optimizing its cash and reserve funds?”
YES – 0.3584% 0.095% 0.3584% ≥ 0.095%5 Points
Interest Earnings
3-Month T-bill
25
![Page 26: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
DESOTO ISD
SUPERIOR ACHIEVEMENT
70 POINTS
26
![Page 27: Schools FIRST DeSoto ISDs Report on Texas Education Agencys FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas For the Year Ended August 31, 2011 1](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103111/55165e3c5503469d698b5061/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
QUESTIONS• Questions about 20 Indicators• Questions about additional disclosure
information in packet• Questions about narrative
information in packet• Questions about any other
information related to FIRST rating or System
27