school report cards: considerations and state examples va board of education committee on school and...
TRANSCRIPT
School Report Cards: Considerations and State Examples
Va Board of EducationCommittee on School and Division Accountability Feb. 25 2015
Laurie McCulloughExecutive Director, VaASCD
Chair, Accountability Subcommittee of the SOL Innovation Committee
Sources:• Rating States, Grading Schools, Aug. 2014 Report of the Education Commission of the States• Key Elements for Accountability, 2010 Report from CCSSO• ASCD Policy Positions• Innovation Committee discussions• And MANY THANKS to Melany Stowe!
1. Report card considerations:PurposeContentDesign
2. Features and examples of report cards
Purpose
Student measures: To assess progress toward important learning goals.
Educator measures: To target professional development needs.
School measures: To support improvement and inform the public.
Content:
HB 1672 / SB 727No later than July 1, 2016, the Board of Education, in consultation with the Standards of Learning Innovation Committee, shall redesign the School Performance Report Card so that it is more effective in communicating to parents and the public the status and achievements of the public schools and local school divisions in the Commonwealth. The Board, in redesigning the School Performance Report Card, may consider (i) the standards of accreditation, (ii) state and federal accountability requirements, (iii) state-mandated assessments, (iv) any alternative assessments developed or approved for use by the relevant local school board, (v) student growth indicators, (vi) student mobility, (vii) the experience and qualifications of school staff, (viii) total cost and funding per pupil, (ix) school safety, and (x) any other factors that the Board deems necessary to produce a full and accurate statement of performance for each public elementary and secondary school and local school division in the Commonwealth.
Content: Two questions1. What should we measure and how?– Ex: College and Career Readiness • state test scores? • nationally-normed test scores? • % of students who are test takers?• 9th graders on track for graduation? • graduation rate?
– Ex: School Climate• student surveys?• staff surveys?• discipline incidents?
Choose valid
measures and
ensure reliable
results
Report Card
Data Collection
Teacher LicensurePupil-Teacher RatioSalary Information
“Counts” for accreditation:Test dataGrad RatesEtc.
Test data in “off”yearsStrengths and OFIsFamily Engagement
Content: Two questions2. What gets measured vs. what gets reported?
9
Socioeconomic & demographicdata
Growth of highest achievers
Class size
Attendance rate
What Could Be Reported
?
9th Graderson track to graduate
Studentsurvey results
Parent & community involvement
% taking higher level coursework
RevenuesExpenditures
School climate
Counseling, support services
Health and wellness programs
Design: Interpreting and Communicating
Things like• A rating or estimate of school quality.• Comparisons to……..state averages or
composites?...... peer groups?• Format for ease of use.• Annual static snapshot or dynamic interface?
Design: Interpreting and Communicating
Online Accessibility
Ability to Print
Emphasis of Ranking (if any)
Peer Rankings within State
Graphics
Explanations
Ability to Drill Down
Tabs (Dashboard)
Design: Interpreting and Communicating
Stars (3)
ECS Database & Online Research
Currently 30 Different Rating Systems
#
A-F
?Number Variations(9)
Colors (1)
None (5)
Letters (13)
Descriptors (18)
Sample Descriptors
• Excelling, Progressing, Transitioning, Review, Focus, and Turnaround (Connecticut)
• Recognition, Continuous Improvement, Focus, Priority, Superintendent’s Zone
(Hawaii)
• Exemplary, Exceeds Standard, Meets Standard, Approaches Standard, Academic
Warning (Kansas)
• Distinguished, Proficient, Needs Improvement, Progressing School (Kentucky)
• Reward, Celebration Eligible, Continuous Improvement, Focus, Priority
(Minnesota)
• Accredited with Distinction, Accredited Provisionally, Accredited, Unaccredited
(Missouri)
• Fully Accredited, Provisionally Accredited-Graduation Rate, Accredited with
Warning, Accreditation Denied, Conditionally Accredited (Virginia)
• Exemplary, Very Good, Good, Fair, Struggling (Washington)
• Exceeding Expectations, Meeting Expectations, Partially Meeting Expectations,
Not Meeting Expectations (Wyoming)
• Accredited with Distinction, Accredited Provisionally, Accredited,
Unaccredited (Missouri)
• Exceeds Standards, Meets Standards, Below Standards (Nebraska)
• Reward School, Good Standing, Local Assistance Plan, Focus, Priority
(New York)
Sample Descriptors
Recommend that the Board of Education and the General Assembly
revise the Standards of Accreditation to add accreditation ratings
which
1) recognize the progress of schools that do not meet the
accreditation benchmarks but have significantly improved their
pass rates, and
2) recognize schools that did not meet accreditation benchmarks but
have demonstrated significant growth for the majority of students.
Innovation Committee, Interim Recommendation
August 2014 Report: Rating States, Grading Schools
Education Commission of the States (ECS)
RESEARCHERS
Are the report cards easy to find?
PARENTS
Are they easy to understand?
EXPERTS
What indicators are essential for measuring performance?
Top Three According to Researchers
• Easy to understand• Did not like printable (pdf) version
Arizona• Good use of graphics• Data points are explained well• Use of tabs• Noted “data coming”
Ohio• Good use of graphics• Links to data drill down• Inclusion of survey results
Illinois
According to ECS researchers, based upon the following criteria: findable, readable, understandable, and graphics.
8 Report Cards Ranked Above Average in all 4 Categories:Arizona, Delaware, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maine, and Ohio
• Ability to explore data
District of Columbia• Fast facts• Clear graphics
Illinois
Parents also ranked the following report cards above average:Delaware, Arkansas, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Note: There were inconsistencies: one parent ranked a report card excellent (5) and another ranked the same
report card unacceptable (1).
According to ECS selected parents, based upon the following criteria: easy to read, useful, provides sufficient data.
Top Two According to Parents
2
1. Student Achievement
5 Essential Indicators from ExpertsAccording to ECS Report
2. Student Academic Growth
3. Achievement Gap Closure
4. Graduation Rates
5. Postsecondary and Career Readiness
23 states currently include
these 5 indicators,
including Virginia.
Louisiana: Interesting Features
https://www.louisianabelieves.com/data/reportcards/2014/
• A snapshot, but shows improvement
• One static page, with access to backup data
• Jena High School in LaSalle Parish
Ohio: Interesting Features
Madison South Elementary
• A-F system (2015)
• Achievement vs. Progress
• Early Literacy
• Madison South Elementary
Illinois: Interesting Features
ILLINOIS REPORT CARD
• No rating system, yet highly ranked by parents in ECS study.
• User survey
• 1 ½ minute video
• Mather High School
http://www.ecs.org/html/educationissues/accountability/stacc_intro.asp