school questionnaire
DESCRIPTION
School Questionnaire. National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008. Content of the presentation. Field trial participation Field trial results Draft questionnaire for the MS. FT participation. Schools in survey 718 Schools with quest. data 682 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
School Questionnaire
National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Content of the presentation
• Field trial participation• Field trial results• Draft questionnaire for the MS
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
FT participation
• Schools in survey 718
• Schools with quest. data 682
• NA 36
[DPC data]
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
FT participation
• 26 countries > 85%
• 2 countries 85-80%
• 3 countries < 80%
[FT Analysis Report Part II, Table 25]
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Principal characteristics
• Gender– Overall percentage: males 65%.– Gender distribution varies across
countries (male principals from 25% to 100%)
[T 29]
• Age– Two first categories collapsed
[T 28]
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Pooled sample
• School autonomy (Q4)– Two dimensions confirmed (EFA)– SCAUTMAN1 α .81 – SCAUTEDU α .79– Increased reliability: item a dropped – Item j to be reworded
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Participation in school governance (Q5)
– Only one dimension (EFA)
– SCTPART α .85
– Increased reliability: item e dropped
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Student opportunity for participation in community STOPACT (Q6) α .82– To report single items for descriptive
purposes
• Parents participation - (Q8) α .73 – To report selected single items
instead of scale scores
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Importance given to student opinion CSTUDIMP (Q10)
α .82 – To be deleted: not appropriate to
target grade students (also in TcQ)
• Student respect for school’s rules CSTURULE (Q11)
α .86– Minor changes in wording
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Sense of belonging to the school (Q12)– Three-dimensional structure confirmed
(EFA)– TCBELONG α .85 – STBELONG α .84 – NTBELONG α .88
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Scale reliability
• Issues of social tension – local area COMSOCT (Q14)
α .89
- changes in wording
- two items added (from Q15)
• Issues of social tension – inside the school SCHPROB (Q15)
α .81
[to be added to the TcQ]
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Other questions
• Students’ participation in school elections (Q 7)– High percentages of missing answers– However important – keep in– Minor changes in wording
• Resources available in the local area (Q13)– Items to be reported as single items– Minor changes in wording
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
• Implementation of CCE at school (Q16) [T 30]– Overlapping between answers– Consistency with NCS
• Aims of CCE (Q17) [T 31]– Different patterns across countries– Proposal: same as in TcQ (ex Q23-24)
• Responsibility for CCE (Q18) [T 32]– Differences across and within
countries
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Proposed ScQ for the MS
• Same sections
• Same number of questions (22 instead of 23)
• Minor changes based on FT results
• Changes in wording according to NRCs comments (NAFs)
• Additional explanatory notes included
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Proposed ScQ for the MS
• Some additional changes– Q5 and Q6 (MS draft): order of the
categories to be reversed
NRCMeetingWindsor
June 2008
Questions or comments?