school of computing and it assignment 2 its 60103 system...
TRANSCRIPT
Taylor’s University and University of West England
SCHOOL OF COMPUTING AND IT Assignment 2
ITS 60103 System Analysis and Design
HAND OUT DATE: 19th Oct 2015 HAND IN DATE: 23rd Nov 2015 WEIGHTAGE: 20% Instructions to student: • This is a Group Assignment.
• Complete this cover sheet and attach all your findings, reports and etc.
Student declaration: I declare that: § I understand what is meant by plagiarism § The implication of plagiarism have been explained to me by our lecturer This assignment is our own work. Name (Student ID) Signature 1. PRISHTEE SEEWOOCHURN (Leader) [0324451] 2. NAZLYN AMELIA BT AHMAD NAZRI [0326036] 3. NISA ANGELINA [0323308] 4. HENG HIAN WEE [0321343]
Taylor’s University and University of West England
CONTENTS
Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................1
Part I: System Project .......................................................................................................3 Brief Explanation of System ...................................................................................................... 3 Business Functions ...................................................................................................................... 5 Organization Chart .................................................................................................................... 6
Part II: System Planning ...................................................................................................7 Library Mission Statement ........................................................................................................ 7
Part III: System Analysis ..................................................................................................8 Fact-Finding Techniques ........................................................................................................... 8
Survey ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Observation .............................................................................................................................. 8
Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 9 Data Flow Diagrams ................................................................................................................. 10
Current System: Context Diagram ......................................................................................... 10 Current System: Level 0 DFD ................................................................................................ 11 Current System: Level 1 DFD (Process 1) ............................................................................. 12 Current System: Level 1 DFD (Process 2) ............................................................................. 13 Current System: Level 1 DFD (Process 3) ............................................................................. 14 Proposed System: Context Diagram ...................................................................................... 15 Proposed System: Level 0 DFD ............................................................................................. 16 Proposed System: Level 1 DFD (Process 1) .......................................................................... 17 Proposed System: Level 1 DFD (Process 2) .......................................................................... 18 Proposed System: Level 1 DFD (Process 3) .......................................................................... 19
Part IV: System Design ...................................................................................................20 Entity-Relationship Diagram .................................................................................................. 20 Network Diagram ..................................................................................................................... 21 Costs and Benefits ..................................................................................................................... 22
Costs ....................................................................................................................................... 22 Benefits .................................................................................................................................. 22
Schedules on Gantt Chart ........................................................................................................ 24 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 25
Conclusion ........................................................................................................................26
References .........................................................................................................................27
List of Appendices ............................................................................................................28
Taylor’s University and University of West England 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report examines a current system that we have analyzed in detail, and a
recommendation of how the system can be implemented better in the future for the
convenience of the user. The system is no other than the Taylor's University Lakeside
Campus Library Borrowing System.
From our observation and experiences ourselves, we have noticed that the library is
always fully occupied by staff, lecturers and students. Majority of users in the library are
students, and the minority are usually the staff. Lecturers come by often to use the media,
and borrow books for personal and lecture use. On the other hand, students who drop by
would occupy its spaces for self and group studies.
One of the library functions of the library are the lending services. Students, lecturers and
staff may come by to borrow books and resources. Other than that, the lending services
deals with those related to fines, lost and damaged items, and the personal library account
access.
Furthermore, the library provides delivery services for resources from other libraries, and
providers inter- and intra-library loan. This means that the library is connected to other
libraries for resource sharing when the item is not available in the Taylor's Library
Collection. Intra-Library Loan on the other hand provides delivery services for resource
lending within Taylor's libraries.
The library is also open up to suggestions and recommendations for items to purchase
when the resources available are not sufficient. There is also a Liaison Librarian for each
Faculty and Program in Taylor's University. These liaisons would be readily available to
help and answer any questions related to the respective subject area, information literacy
classes and collection development.
The Taylor's Library system itself can be broken down to a few subsystems. For example,
the borrowing system, the returning system, the Print-On-Demand (POD) system, and the
finance system. This report will focus more on the library's borrowing system.
Taylor’s University and University of West England 2
The team, consisting of the four of us, namely Prishtee Seewoochurn as the leader as well
as the other group members Nisa Angelina, Nazlyn Amelia Ahmad Nazri and Heng Hian
Wee, decided to name ourselves as 'Yackitory'. Having said so, we chose this name in
reference to a line in the recently released movie "Minions". We understand that this is a
very weird name, but to have the courage of choosing this name would be relatable to
how the courage system analysts would need in order to propose a new system and
implement them. Also, we also understand that system analysts are known as the 'agents
of change'; therefore, we want to make a change to the norm of how we students name
our groups for assignments by using a name that stands out well among the rest.
We have conducted a few surveys, and done a few open interviews to students, lecturers
and staffs to ask on their personal and discrete view about Taylor's Library borrowing
system. We had also gone around to investigate a few flaws or problems the library's
borrowing system currently has. We as a team, have dedicated our time, and had drawn
out each of our skills to figure out on how they can improve the current system to become
a better one.
This report will portray an in depth view of how the library is functioning, and how the
borrowing system is currently being used. This report will also propose an idea on how the
borrowing system can be utilized more effectively for all users.
Taylor’s University and University of West England 3
PART 1: SYSTEM PROJECT
Brief Explanation of Our System The Taylor's Library system consists of a few other subsystems, like the Borrowing
System, the Returning System, the Print-On-Demand (POD) System, and the Finance
System. All the subsystems depend on one another to work fully as a library system.
The environment of the Library System is strategic in terms of location. The Library is
situated at the second floor, Block C, where it is convenient for all users. Other than that,
the library has a total of four floors for sufficient use in terms of the placing of bookshelves
and study tables. It also faces the calming lake, and an awing view of the campus. The
library is usually open as from 8.00 a.m. to 9.00 p.m. from Mondays to Fridays, and from
9.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. on Saturdays.
The subsystems work differently among one another; hence it will have different
characteristics. Bringing more focus to the borrowing system, it plays its role when the
borrower wants to borrow a book. The borrower would need to bring the book to the kiosk.
The kiosk will scan the borrower's ID before the book is placed for it to be scanned too. A
receipt would finally be printed for the user to keep. Hence, the inputs clearly stated are
the book and the borrower's ID, whereas the outputs are the receipt and the book.
There are a few components of the borrowing system such as the due date renewal,
finance department and fine collection. These components relate to one another in such
a way that the due date renewal is used when the borrower wishes to renew the due date
of the book borrowed. Meanwhile, the fine collection and finance department is related in
a way such that a fine has to be paid to the finance department when the borrower exceeds
the number of days given to possess the book.
The different resources available in the library system are as follows:
• Main collection
• Reference collection
• Reserve collection
• Graduate collection
Taylor’s University and University of West England 4
• Malaysian collection
• Teaching resources
• Audio visual/Multimedia
The lending services are mostly concerned with borrowing and returning items such as
CDs, DVDs and multimedia; the medias. The medias have a different borrowing duration.
Constraints are all about the limitations of a system. Here, we can find a number of
constraints imposed by the library borrowing system:
• The loan entitlement is 10 items for the main collection for undergraduate and
postgraduate students.
• The loan entitlement is 1 item for reserve collection and media resources for
undergraduate and postgraduate students.
• The loan entitlement is 5 items for the graduate collection.
• The loan period for the main collection is 14 days for undergraduate students and
30 days for postgraduate students.
• The loan period for the reserve collection is 2 hours for undergraduate and
postgraduate students.
• The loan period for media resources is 4 hours in the library only for undergraduate
and postgraduate students.
• The loan period for the graduate collection is 30 days.
• In case of late renewal, the fine is RM1.00 per day for the main and graduate
collections, and, RM0.50 per hour for reserve collection and media resources.
• Full time academic staff can take 20 items from the main collection for 6 months,
10 items from teaching resources for 6 months, 5 items from the graduate
collection for 1 month, and 5 items from the media resources for 7 days.
• Part-time staff can take 4 items from the main collection for 3 months, 2 items from
teaching resources for 3 months, and 2 items from media resources for 7 days.
• Users are allowed to borrow items up to 15 minutes before the library closes.
Taylor’s University and University of West England 5
Business Functions A business function is a process or operation that is performed routinely to carry out a part
of the mission of an organization.
The following are the business functions of Taylor's University's Lakeside Campus Library:
Lending
Services
Reading List, Fines, Lost and Damaged Items, My Account Access
Document
Delivery
Services
To provide delivery services for resources from other libraries
Inter-Library
Loan
Resource sharing from other libraries for books not available in
Taylor's Library Collection
Intra-Library
Loan
To provide delivery services for lending of resources within Taylor's
Libraries
Feedback and
Suggestions
To provide feedback on the services and facilities
Request a
Purchase
To recommend an item for purchase
Contact your
Liaison
Librarians
For help on information in a subject area, information, literacy
classes and collection development
Taylor’s University and University of West England 6
Organization Chart An organization chart is a diagram that outlines the internal structure of a company. An
organizational chart is the most common visual depiction of how an organization is
structured. It outlines the roles, responsibilities and relationships between individuals
within an organization. An organizational chart can be used to depict the structure of an
organization as a whole, or broken down by department or unit.
The following is the organization chart of the library:
Chief Librarian
Lending Services & User Education
Lending Services
Document Delivery Services
Information Services & Collection Development
Intra-Library Loan
Inter-Library Loan
UCM & Information Literacy
Request a Purchase
Contact your Liaison Librarians
Graduate School & Postgraduate Programs
School of Architectre, Building & Design &
Taylor's Design School
Hospitality, Tourism & Culinary Arts Degree
Programmes
School of Computing and IT & School of Engineering
School of Medicine, School of Pharmacy & School of Biosciences
Taylor's Clinical School
School of Liberal Arts and Sciences & Taylor's Law
School
School of Communication & School of Education
Taylor's Business School(Degree Programmes)
Foundation Programmes
Feedback & Suggestions
Taylor’s University and University of West England 7
PART 2: SYSTEM PLANNING
Library Mission Statement The library's mission is to provide comprehensive resources and services in support of the
research, teaching and learning needs of the university community. To fulfill this mission,
the library commits to:
• understand the research, teaching, and learning needs of its users;
• build collections and create tools to support research, teaching and learning;
• provide access to and promote the discovery and use of local and external
information resources;
• ensure the preservation and long-lasting availability of library collections and
resources;
• create hospitable physical and virtual environments for study, teaching and
research;
• collaborate with other members of the university to enrich the research and
learning community;
• advance local, national, and international library and information initiatives; and
• develop, encourage, and sustain staff expertise, skill, and commitment and an
innovative spirit in its staff.
Taylor’s University and University of West England 8
PART 3: SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Fact-Finding Techniques Two types of fact-finding methods were used; they are:
1. Surveys
2. Observation
Survey
In order to gather information about the library borrowing system, we prepared a short
survey. 50 copies were made and distributed to people in proximity to the library. A fairly
good response was obtained and the results of the survey were then analyzed. A sample
of the survey along with its result are given in Appendix I and Appendix II respectively.
Observation
Another fact-finding method we used was observation. This technique was really useful
as we were able to have a detailed view of the different business processes of the library.
We could see how the users were required to possess their ID to enter the library, and
then how they go about through the borrowing process.
After choosing the book(s) of their choice, borrowers usually go to the counter machine
where their ID and the barcode of the books are scanned. Then, a receipt is issued. As
per our observation, we realized that the borrowers sometimes forget to collect their
transaction slip.
Another point to be considered is that multimedia items are not usually borrowed similarly
to how books are borrowed. Borrowers have to go to the Lending Services to borrow these
items manually.
In order to obtain more information regarding the payment of fines, we questioned people
around the university and we eventually learnt that in the usual case, when borrowers
exceed the due date limit, they are to be summoned by the finance department to settle
the outstanding payment. However, the finance department sometimes gives less
attention to this matter. This may cause confusion to the students, especially those who
Taylor’s University and University of West England 9
have just started their courses in Taylor's University regarding how they should handle
this issue, some leaving it unsettled for a very, very long time.
Improvements After analyzing the results obtained, we came up with the following ideas in order to
improve the current system:
1. Both books and multimedia items are to be borrowed at the computerized counter
machines implemented at the gates.
2. Transaction slips will be sent to borrowers online.
3. Payment of fines will also be carried out via online.
4. An alarm system will be installed at the gates, which are connected to the counter
machines in order to prevent any unauthorized access.
5. A video recording system will be set up to monitor the activities going on in the
library.
Taylor’s University and University of West England 10
Data Flow Diagrams Note: The Gane & Larson symbols were used in creating the context diagrams and data-
flow diagrams (DFDs).
Current System: Context Diagram
Taylor’s University and University of West England 11
Current System: Level 0 DFD
Taylor’s University and University of West England 12
Current System: Level 1 DFD (Process 1)
Taylor’s University and University of West England 13
Current System: Level 1 DFD (Process 2)
Taylor’s University and University of West England 14
Current System: Level 1 DFD (Process 3)
Taylor’s University and University of West England 15
Proposed System: Context Diagram
Taylor’s University and University of West England 16
Proposed System: Level 0 DFD
Taylor’s University and University of West England 17
Proposed System: Level 1 DFD (Process 1)
Taylor’s University and University of West England 18
Proposed System: Level 1 DFD (Process 2)
Taylor’s University and University of West England 19
Proposed System: Level 1 DFD (Process 3)
Taylor’s University and University of West England 20
PART 4: SYSTEM DESIGN
Entity-Relationship Diagram (ERD)
Taylor’s University and University of West England 21
Network Diagram
Taylor’s University and University of West England 22
Costs and Benefits Costs
In order to implement this new project, the economical and operational feasibilities should
be taken into consideration to ensure profit-making. Let us have a look at the costs to be
incurred first.
Basically, we will have four LCD monitors at the gates. Capital will also be required to
install modems and make provisions for wireless connection. Moreover, they will be
connected to an alarm system which will be triggered in the case where an unauthorized
person tries to obtain access.
Funds will also be required to install application servers, the database server and the
interface servers, all of which backups are included as well. Furthermore, card access
control will be introduced for the server room and a video camera will be installed as well.
Last but not least, maintenance cost is also to be considered. All of these are categorized
under tangible costs.
Benefits
After implementing the new system with the improvements mentioned before, a number
of benefits will be obtained, hence leading to profit-making. The benefits can be classified
as tangible and intangible benefits.
Tangible Benefits:
• Online payment of fines eliminates the need of the Finance Department. This
means that less money is needed to be given away as salaries.
• Since a soft-copy of the transaction details will be sent via online, the system will
save on paper, thus proving itself to be eco-friendlier.
• Eco-friendliness of the system is again shown through promoting e-books, which
requires less paper and printing.
Intangible Benefits:
• The new system provides a better way of keeping track of fines as reliance will be
on computers instead of people.
Taylor’s University and University of West England 23
• The new system also provides better and faster customer service (also considering
the larger number of computers at the gates).
The table below shows the Return on Investment (ROI) Analysis.
Year Costs Cumulative Costs Benefits Cumulative Benefits
Year 0 RM 60,000.00 RM 60,000.00 RM 0.00 RM 0.00
Year 1 RM 17,000.00 RM 77,000.00 RM 31,000.00 RM 31,000.00
Year 2 RM 18,500.00 RM 95,500.00 RM 31,000.00 RM 62,000.00
Year 3 RM 19,200.00 RM 114,700.00 RM 34,000.00 RM 96,000.00
Year 4 RM 21,000.00 RM 135,700.00 RM 36,000.00 RM 132,000.00
Year 5 RM 22,000.00 RM 157,700.00 RM 39,000.00 RM 171,000.00
Year 6 RM 23,300.00 RM 181,000.00 RM 42,000.00 RM 213,000.00
The chart below shows that the project break-even point will be around Year 4.
RM0.00
RM50,000.00
RM100,000.00
RM150,000.00
RM200,000.00
RM250,000.00
Year0 Year1 Year2 Year3 Year4 Year5 Year6
CummulativeCosts CummulativeBenefits
Taylor’s University and University of West England 24
Schedules on Gantt Chart Note: A full view of the Gantt chart is available in Appendix III.
The figure above previews the Gantt chart throughout the duration of this project as viewed
in Microsoft Office Project Professional 2016.
Taylor’s University and University of West England 25
Recommendations
Some improvements that could be made into the system might be that we can notify user
of the due date into their phones. There will be an application specifically for this purpose
that is downloadable from the store. This application will be a mobile-go library portal that
will show all the items borrowed and their respective due dates. If there is a due date that
is approaching, users will be notified via this application.
Taylor’s University and University of West England 26
CONCLUSION
Throughout the duration of finishing this assignment, the four of us in our team have learnt
so much about how the Taylor's Library Borrowing System works, finding any problems
found within the system, as well as generating ideas to fix those problems and spruce up
the system, which we believe are marvelous ideas. It is not very common to find most
students in Taylor's University who would know a lot about the library's borrowing system,
let alone admit so regardless. Having said that, now that we have done a lot of research
regarding this system, we should be capable of knowing the library's borrowing system as
thoroughly as how much we have discovered.
In addition to that, we have also been able to learn how to work cooperatively and closely
with one another throughout the course. We have learnt invaluable management skills
while preparing everything that was needed to complete the assignment. We believe that
these management skills will prove to be useful to all of us in our future assignments and
in the working world. We hope that this will mean that we have a higher chance to obtain
the upper hand when that time comes.
We have also been able to utilize what we have learnt, including whatever that was taught
in our lecture and tutorial classes throughout the duration of this assignment. Thus, we
have a deeper understanding of certain theories, topics and real life situations. This
includes creating data flow diagrams, entity-relationship diagrams and Gantt charts, as
well as carrying out the Return on Investment (ROI) Analysis.
Not only that, we were able to sharpen whatever skills we possess. Opportunities were
spread evenly, not only to complete each part of the assignment we were designated to
complete, but also help each other whenever we spot mistakes in each other's work.
Opportunities as such will be able to make us more vigilant when dealing with problems
similar to those we have faced throughout the duration of this assignment. We are also
grateful to have our module lecturer, Ms Sukhminder Kaur, who would help us get back
on track should any of us get stuck with a certain problem or go astray with anything wrong.
Taylor’s University and University of West England 27
REFERENCES
Hoffer, J. A., George, J., Valacich, J. (2010). Modern Systems Analysis and Design.
Pearson Education (6th Edition).
Kendall, K. E., Kendall, J. E. (2010). Systems Analysis and Design. Pearson Education
(8th Education).
Shelley, G. B. (2010). Systems Analysis and Design (Shelley Cashman). Course
Technology.
Taylor’s University and University of West England 28
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix I: Survey Form
Appendix II: Results of Survey
Appendix III: Gantt Chart
Appendix IV: Mock-up Interface of Form
Appendix V: Minutes of Meetings
Appendix VI: Assessment Forms
APPENDIX I
Survey We are students from Taylor's University's School of Computing and Information Technology
(SoCIT) and we are carrying out this survey to better understand the Taylor's Library
Borrowing System from different perspectives, as required by our assignment for the Systems
Analysis and Design (ITS 60103) module. Our aim is to further improve the system so as to
provide a better service to the users.
SECTION A: Tick as appropriate.
Question 1: Tell us who you are.
o Student
o Lecturer
o Administrative Staff
o Others, please specify: ______________________
Question 2: How often do you borrow books from the library?
o Every week
o Every two weeks
o Every month
o Others, please specify: _______________________
Question 3: How often do you borrow multimedia items (CDs, DVDs) from the library?
o Every week
o Every two weeks
o Every month
o Others, please specify: _______________________
Question 4: Do you think the library borrowing system has any drawbacks?
o Yes
o No
APPENDIX I
SECTION B: Circle as appropriate.
Question 1: How useful is the library borrowing system to you?
NOT USEFUL EXTREMELY
AT ALL USEFUL
1 2 3 4 5
Question 2: How far would you recommend others to use the library borrowing system?
WOULD NOT STRONGLY
RECOMMEND RECOMMEND
1 2 3 4 5
SECTION C: Kindly give us your views.
Question 1: What are the problems that you find in Taylor's Library Borrowing System?
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
Question 2: What would you suggest to improve Taylor's Library Borrowing System?
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
THANK YOU
APPENDIX II
Results of Survey
SECTION A
Question 1:
Question 2:
86%
10%
4%
0%
Student Lecturer Administrative Staff Others
8%
52%
36%
4%
Every week Every two weeks Every month Others: Rarely
APPENDIX II
Question 3:
Question 4:
0% 6%24%
70%
Every week Every two weeks Every month Others: Rarely
20%
80%
Yes No
APPENDIX II
SECTION B
Question 1:
Question 2:
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 2 3 4 5
Percentage Rating (%)
Percentage Rating (%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 2 3 4 5
Percentage Rating (%)
Percentage Rating (%)
APPENDIX II
SECTION C
Question 1: For this part, the answers were mostly the same, all of which indicates that there are no major
problems in Taylor's Library Borrowing System. The most significant problem that we could
identify was that the alarm is often triggered without any valid reason when borrowers pass
through the gates to leave the library after borrowing books.
Question 2: A relatively poor response was obtained as far as this part is concerned. Most people left this
question unanswered.
APPENDIX III
Gantt Chart
APPENDIX IV
Mock-up of Proposed System – Borrower's Form
APPENDIX V
Minutes of MeetingDate: 26.10.15
Time: 13:00-14:00
Location: E-quarium
Attendees:1. Prishtee Seewoochurn
2. Henry Heng Hian Wee
3. Nazlyn Amelia Ahmad Nazri
4. Nisa Angelina
Agenda:
Task Time duration
Context Diagram-Current System 13:00-13:20
Identifying Problems in the current system 13:20-13:35
Delegating tasks 13:35-14:00
Task plan:
Name Task Allocated
Henry Heng Hian Wee Report Writing SkillsStructured Report
● report well structured, detailed, balanced, uses
impersonal language, good interpretation of terms
of reference, submitted on time
● research is comprehensive, relevant, variety of
sources acknowledged through references and
bibliography
● key issues discussed and explained with clarity,
objectivity, evidence of original thinking
● findings presented clearly and in own words,
recommendations/ conclusions show evidence of
critical thinking and analysis
● fluent writing, well expressed, extensive
APPENDIX V
vocabulary, freedom from minor errors in spelling,
grammar and punctuation
Formatting Requirements
● The report needs to be constructed professionally.
● Students should follow the assessment format.
● You must use the cover page with all students'
Details.
● Font: Times New Roman 12, or ARIAL 11, 1.5
spaced
● Headings:
1st Heading font size 14
2nd Heading font size 13
3rd Heading font size 12
● Figures and Tables: All figures and Tables should
be reported in the body and should be named
appropriately
● References: All quotations, important points
should be referenced using standard referencing
methods. (Author name, year, Page number)
Nazlyn Amelia Ahmad Nazri Name your organization and team.
Executive summary (a paragraph summary).
Part 1: System project:a) Briefly explain the system.
b) business functions that the system support
Organization Chart:
a) Create an organization chart of your company by using
Microsoft Word or a similar program, or you can draw it by
hand.
Part II - System Planning:1- Use the Internet to find an example of cooperate mission
statement.
APPENDIX V
List at least three different mission statements.
Prishtee Seewoochurn Part III - System Analysis: 1- Choose any TWO types of Fact Finding method.
Examples if select Questionnaire Techniques, list
the Q & A.
2- Write a brief memo describing the results of your
visit and the result from the Fact Findings.
2- Part IV - System Design:
3- Network Plan:
a) Draw the Network Plan.
4-
5- Costs and benefits
a) List benefits - estimates of tangible and intangible
benefits
b) List costs of items
c) Comparison of costs versus benefits
Nisa Angelina 6- Part IV - System Design:
7- Draw a prototype of your new system.
Schedules on:
a) Gantt/PERT chart
Recommendations
a) That you will want to proceed to the next stages!
Henry Heng Hian Wee
Nazlyn Amelia Ahmad Nazri
Prishtee Seewoochurn
Part III - System Analysis: 3- Draw a context diagram, a diagram 0, and 1st
level diagram that represent the current &
APPENDIX V
Nisa Angelina proposed system.
4- Draw ERD for the system
APPENDIX V
Minutes of Meeting Date: 4.11.15
Time: 10:00-11:30
Location: E-quarium
Attendees:
1. Prishtee Seewoochurn
2. Henry Heng Hian Wee
3. Nazlyn Amelia Ahmad Nazri
4. Nisa Angelina
Agenda:
Task Time duration
Level 0 DFD-Current System 10:00-10:30
Level 1 DFD-Current System 10:30-11:30
APPENDIX V
Minutes of Meeting Date: 13.11.15
Time: 16:30-17:30
Location: E-quarium
Attendees:
1. Prishtee Seewoochurn
2. Henry Heng Hian Wee
3. Nazlyn Amelia Ahmad Nazri
Absentee: Nisa Angelina (Reason – She was back to Indonesia due to the Semester Break.)
Agenda:
Task Time duration
Improvements on the Current System 16:30-17:30
APPENDIX VI
Taylor’s University and University of West England
ITS 60103 SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
CASESTUDYANALYSIS
ASSESSMENTFORM
StudentName:PRISHTEESEEWOOCHURN
StudentID:0324451
Assessmentbreakdown:
Topic Breakdown AssessmentContextdiagramsforcurrentand
improvedsystems
Level0diagramsforcurrentand
improvedsystems
Level1diagramsforcurrentand
improvedsystems
ERD
Networkplan
CostsandBenefitsAnalysis
Fact-findingtechniques
Total
Note: All students need to fill up for their own task breakdown. Marks are based on this.
APPENDIX VI
Taylor’s University and University of West England
ITS 60103 SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
CASESTUDYANALYSIS
ASSESSMENTFORMStudentName:HENGHIANWEEStudentID:0321343Assessmentbreakdown:Topic Breakdown AssessmentContextDiagrams Level0DataFlowDiagrams Level1DataFlowDiagrams Entity-RelationshipDiagram ReportCompilation PresentationSlides Total
Note: All students need to fill up for their own task breakdown. Marks are based on this.
APPENDIX VI
Taylor’s University and University of West England
ITS 60103 SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
CASESTUDYANALYSIS
ASSESSMENTFORMStudentName:NAZLYNAMELIABINTIAHMADNAZRIStudentID:0326036Assessmentbreakdown:Topic Breakdown AssessmentExecutiveSummary SystemProject BusinessFunctions OrganizationChart MissionStatements Context,Level0,Level1Diagram Total
Note: All students need to fill up for their own task breakdown. Marks are based on this.
APPENDIX VI
Taylor’s University and University of West England
ITS 60103 SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
CASESTUDYANALYSIS
ASSESSMENTFORMStudentName:NISAANGELINAStudentID:0323308Assessmentbreakdown:Topic Breakdown AssessmentPrototypeofnewsystem Recommendationonthenewprototypeofthesystem
DrawContextdiagramscurrentandproposedsystem
DrawDFDlevel0currentandproposedsystem
DrawDFDlevel1currentandproposedsystem
DrawERDofthesystem Ganttchart Total
Note: All students need to fill up for their own task breakdown. Marks are based on this.