school name
DESCRIPTION
SCHOOL NAME. The Story of Our School. November 1, 2005. The School Story. Why is it important to tell the story of your school? What do you already know about the story of your school?. 44 students 43% females 57% male 9% ESL 14% special needs - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
SCHOOL NAME
The Story of Our School
November 1, 2005
The School Story
Why is it important to tell the story of your school?
What do you already know about the story of your school?
44 students 43% females 57% male 9% ESL 14% special needs 1 student attended 3 or
more schools since gr. 1 2 students received
accommodations 7 students exempted
from all 3 assessments
Grade 3
Describing The School Community
31 students 55% female 45% male 10% ESL 6% special needs 6 students attended 3 or
more schools since gr.1 0 students received
accommodations 2 students exempted
from all 3 assessments
Grade 6
Johnson CD Howe Stats:Signposts of Success 2005
Percent recent immigrants 3%Percent without a secondary school diploma 34%Percent with some university education 41%Percent born outside Canada US and UK 18%Percent with English or French as home
language 94%Single parent families 20%Unemployment rate 6%
Johnson CD Howe Stats:Signposts of Success 2005 continues…
Unemployment rate if there are children in the household 5%
Average household income $80,068Percent of households that moved in the last 5 years
31% Percent of dwellings that are detached homes 76%Total enrolment-average over three years of ostal
code data 331Proportion of total enrolment that are boys-from
postal code data .56
JK-Kindergarten
14
3 50
10
20
30
40
50
'02-03 '03-04 '04-05
% a
t Ris
k
8
18 181511 11
0
10
20
30
40
50
'02-03 '03-04 '04-05
referred monitored
JK-4 year oldsSpeech and Language Screening
K-5 year oldsEarly Identification
%
Tracking PM Benchmarks
PM Benchmarks Grade 1: Term 3 2003-04 (35 students) & 2004-05 (33 students)
90
1724
4052
173
1721
0
20
40
60
80
100
2 to 5 10 to 13 14 to 19 20 to 23 24 to 30
2003-2004 2004-2005
Benchmark in grade 1 is 14-15
PM Benchmarks Grade 2-Term 3 2003-04 (47 students) & 2004-05 (34 students)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2 to 5 10 to 13 14 to 19 20 to 23 24 to 30
2003-04 2004-05
Benchmark in grade 2 is 20
PM Benchmarks Grade 3-Term 3 2004-05 ( 39 students)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2 to 5 10 to 13 14 to 19 20 to 23 24 to 30
Benchmark in grade 3 is 24-25
READING
Making Sense of…
Grade 3 & 6 Report Card Distribution 2003-2004 Reading
0
10
20
30
40
R D- D D+ C- C C+ B- B B+ A- A A+
Grade 3 Grade 6
% o
f stu
d en t
s
At level 3 and 4…
90% Grade 3 84% Grade 6
CCAT (Abilities: Grade 4 Fall)
Ave
rage
Per
cent
ile
63 6466 61 6360
52 4752 59 46
61
0
20
40
60
80
100
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05
verbal quantitative non-verbal
EQAO GRADE 3 and 6 Reading Trend
46
74
30
5862
5964
74
0
20
40
60
80
100
'01-02 '02-03 '03-04 '04-05
Primary Junior
% A
chi e
ving
l eve
ls 3
& 4 75%
EQAO Reading Cohorts
52
7471
5864
59
46
74
0
20
40
60
80
100
98-99: 01-02 99-00: 2002-03 2000-01:2003-04 2001-02:2004-05
Primary Junior
% A
chi e
ving
l eve
ls 3
& 4
75%
CAT/3 Reading Achievement (Grade 5 Fall)
59 5750
72 6661 63
0
20
40
60
80
100
'98-99 '99-00 '00-01 '01-02 '02-03 '03-04 '04-05
Nat
iona
l Pe r
c ent
i le R
ank
WRITING
Making Sense of…
EQAO GRADE 3 and 6 Writing Trend
6974
43
6879
6175
58
0
20
40
60
80
100
'01-02 '02-03 '03-04 '04-05
Primary Junior
% A
chi e
ving
l eve
ls 3
& 4 75%
EQAO Writing Cohort
55
74 69 68 7261
6958
0
20
40
60
80
100
98-99: 01-02 99-00: 02-03 00-01: 03-04 01-02: 04-05
Primary Junior
% A
chie
ving
l eve
ls 3
& 4
75%
CAT/3 Writing (Grade 5 Fall)
56
7165
58 60 57
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004
Spelling Vocabulary Writing Conventions
Nat
i ona
l Pe r
c ent
i le R
ank
Grade 6 THIS yearGraduated
Grade 3 & 6 Report Card Distribution 2003-2004 Writing
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
R D- D D+ C- C C+ B- B B+ A- A A+
Grade 3 Grade 6
% o
f stu
d en t
s
Grade 3 (86%) at levels 3 and 4 Grade 6 (75%) at levels 3 and 4.
MATH
Making Sense of…
EQAO GRADE 3 and 6 Math Trend
5651
36 39
62
37
6152
0
20
40
60
80
100
'01-02 '02-03 '03-04 '04-05
Primary Junior
% A
chie
ving
l eve
ls 3
& 4 75%
EQAO Math Cohort Data
48 51
75
39
58
37
56 52
0
20
40
60
80
100
1998-99:2001-02
1999-00:2002-03
2000-01:2003-04
2001-02:2004-05
Primary Junior
% A
c hie
v in g
l eve
ls 3
& 4
75%
EQAO Math Categories Over Time for Grade 3
8
50
16 1122
34
11
41
2131
53
34
21
44
13
0
20
40
60
80
100
N&N G&S M P&A DM
1998-00 1999-00 2000-01
EQAO Math Categories Over Time for Grade 3 continues…
1412 14 12 12 12 13 13 13 11
0
6
12
18
24
N&N G&S Meas P&A DM
2001-02 2002-03
EQAO Math Strands Over Time for Grade 3 continues…
23
50
26 24 22
4235
4132
2712
35
0
20
40
60
80
100
ProbSol Under Con Applic Commun
1998-99 1999-00 2000-01
EQAO Math Strands Over Time for Grade 3 continues….
10 9 118
12 119 8
0
6
12
18
24
ProbSol Under Con Applic Commun
2001-02 2002-03
CAT/3 Math (Grade 5 Fall)
62
4658
26
0
20
40
60
80
100
2003 2004
Mathematics Computation & Numerical Estimation
Nat
iona
l Pe r
c ent
i le R
ank
In Grade 6 THIS yearGraduated
Grade 3 Report Card Distribution 2003-04 Math
0
20
40
60
R D- D D+ C- C C+ B- B B+ A- A A+
number sense measurement geometrypatterning data management
% o
f stu
den t
s
Overall 85% at levels 3 & 4
Grade 6 Report Card Distribution 2003-04 Math
0
20
40
60
R D- D D+ C- C C+ B- B B+ A- A A+
number sense measurement geometrypatterning data management
% o
f stu
den t
s
Overall 74% at levels 3 & 4
… So how does the data inform you about your school?
Where are your strengths?
What are the areas of concern?
What other information do you need to see the big picture?