school improvement planning

24
School Improvement Planning Mid Year Review, 2012 “The price of doing the same ’ ole thing is far greater than the price of change.” Unknown

Upload: zocha

Post on 10-Jan-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

School Improvement Planning. Mid Year Review, 2012 “The price of doing the same ’ ole thing is far greater than the price of change.” Unknown. Outcomes. Participants will: I dentify the characteristics of an effective professional learning community - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: School Improvement Planning

School Improvement PlanningMid Year Review, 2012

“The price of doing the same ’ ole thing is far greater than the price of change.” Unknown

Page 2: School Improvement Planning

Outcomes

Participants will:• Identify the characteristics of an effective

professional learning community•Review relevant data sources, including

MAP-R, mClass, Fluency Rates, IRIs, and Discipline

•Reflect on and update current SIP action plans

•Discuss next steps for continuous school improvement

Page 3: School Improvement Planning

Professional Learning Community•According to Learning Forward’s recently

released 2011 Standards for Professional Learning, professional learning communities:▫Engage in continuous school improvement,▫Promote collective responsibility, and▫Support alignment of individual, team,

school, and school system goals

Page 4: School Improvement Planning

Professional Learning Community•Powerful PLCs effectively respond to the

four critical questions:▫What do students need to know and/or be

able to do?▫How will we know they have learned it?▫What will we do when they haven’t?▫What will we do when they already know

it?

Page 5: School Improvement Planning

Professional Learning Community•Effective PLCs have 6 key characteristics:

▫Focus on Learning/Results▫Shared Values and Vision▫Supportive and Shared Leadership▫Culture of Collaboration▫Collective Inquiry and Learning▫Mutual Trust and Respect

•Dr. Starr has a vision for all schools to engage in a PLC by September 2012

Page 6: School Improvement Planning

Focus on Learning/Results

•Essential outcomes/focus•Use of common formative assessments or

monitoring tools•Regular monitoring of student

performance•Systemic response when students do not

learn or targets are not met

Page 7: School Improvement Planning

Data Review

•MAP-R, grades 3-5•mClass, grades K-2•IRIs, grades 3-5•Intervention data, fluency, grades 3-5•Discipline data, K-5 O

Objective Level 

RReflective Level

 

IInterpretive Level

 

DDecisional Level

 

Page 8: School Improvement Planning

MAP-R: Grade 3

Page 9: School Improvement Planning

MAP-R: Grade 4

Page 10: School Improvement Planning

MAP-R: Grade 5

Page 11: School Improvement Planning

mClass, Grades K-2

Page 12: School Improvement Planning

mClass, Grades K-2

Page 13: School Improvement Planning

IRI Data, Grades 3-5

74767880828486889092

% Met Benchmark

Fall

Win

ter

Fall

Win

ter

Fall

Win

ter

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5

Students Meeting Reading Benchmark Gr. 3-5

Page 14: School Improvement Planning

QuickReads Fluency, Grade 3

Page 15: School Improvement Planning

QuickReads Fluency, Grade 4

Page 16: School Improvement Planning

QuickReads Fluency, Grade 5

Page 17: School Improvement Planning

Discipline Data-Office Referrals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Quarter 1 Quarter 2

Total

Page 18: School Improvement Planning

Discipline Data-By Grade

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Total

Total 15 7 3 5 5 6 1

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th LFI0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Total

Total 1 6 0 5 2 0 0

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th LFI

Quarter 1 Quarter 2

Page 19: School Improvement Planning

Discipline Data-By Location

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Total

Total 1 11 5 0 5

Bus Classroom Recess Lunch Other0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Total

Total 1 19 9 2 12

Bus Classroom Recess Lunch Other

Quarter 1 Quarter 2

Page 20: School Improvement Planning

Discipline Data-By ReasonOffice Referrals

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Weapon

Fig

hting

Inapp.

Conta

ct

Inapp.

Lang.

Non-

Com

plia

nce

Ste

alin

g

Weapon

Fig

hting

Inapp.

Conta

ct

Inapp.

Lang.

Non-

Com

plia

nce

Ste

alin

g

Quarter 1 Quarter 2

Reasons

Nu

mb

er

of

Occu

ren

ces

Page 21: School Improvement Planning

Discipline Data-By Gender

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Total

Total 13 29

Girls Boys0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Total

Total 17 7

Girls Boys

Quarter 1 Quarter 2

Page 22: School Improvement Planning

Action Plan Analysis

•In pairs or triads, work together to review the assigned action plan. Think about:▫What have we done so far?▫What is working? Successes?▫What is not working? Challenges?▫Where should we go next?

•Record your thoughts on the chart paper provided.

•Be prepared to share.

Page 23: School Improvement Planning

Professional Learning Community•Take another look at the characteristics of

effective PLCs---▫What do we already have in place?▫In what areas are we already enjoying

success?▫In what area should we focus to ensure

continuous school improvement?

Page 24: School Improvement Planning

Next Steps

•Update action plans, send to OSP•Identify students for intervention exit•Revisit positive behavior interventions

and discipline plan; refocus efforts•Set up walk-through to gather feedback

on differentiated small group instruction in reading and math