7/31/2019 SB CI ROL

1/5

REFERENCES

1B. Gibbin KP, Raine CH, Summerfield AQ. Cochlear implantation - United Kingdom and

Ireland surgical survey. Cochlear Implants International. 2003; 4: 10-21. Chapter 239c

Cochlear implants I 3657

3B. Otte J, Schuknecht HF, Kerr AG. Ganglion cell populationsLaryngology and Otology.1998; 112: 533-6. in normal and pathological human cochleae: Implications

5B. Nadol Jr JB. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human utilizing the Hong Kong

vascularised temporalis fascia flap cochlea and auditory nerve: Implications for cochlear

technique.Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 1997; 52:implantation. Otolaryngology -

Head and Neck Surgery. 151-4.1997; 117: 220-8.

6B. Linthicum Jr FH, Fayad J, Ottor SR, Galey FR, House WF. graft obliteration of mastoid

cavities for cochlear Cochlear implant histopathology.American Journal of implants.Journal

ofLaryngology and Otology. 1999; 113: Otology. 1991; 12: 245-311. 881-4.

23B. Phelps PD, Proops DW. Imaging for cochlear implants. Cochlear implant

histopathologic findings related toJournal ofLaryngology and Otology. 1999; 24: 21-3.

performance in 16 human temporal bones.Annals of24B. Frau GN, Luxford WM, Lo WW, Berliner KI, Telischi FF. High Otology, Rhinology

and Laryngology. 1991; 100: 807-11. resolution computed tomography in evaluation of

cochlear

28B. Arriaga MA, Carrier D. MRI and clinical decisions in D, Craddock L et al. Evaluation

of bilaterally implanted cochlear implantation.American Journal ofOtology. 1996; adult

subjects with the nucleus 24 cochlear implant 17: 547-53. system. Otology and Neurotology.

2005; 26: 988-98.

29B. Murugasu E, Hans P, Jackson A, Ramsden RT. The application of three-dimensional

magnetic resonance O'Driscoll M. Auditory localization abilities in bilateral imaging

rendering of the inner ear in assessment for cochlear implant recipients. Otology and

Neurotology. cochlear implantation.American Journal ofOtology. 1999;2005; 26: 965-71.

20: 752-7.

15. Das S, Buchman CA. Bilateral cochlear implantation: 30. Hans P, Grant AJ, Laitt RD,

Ramsden RT, Kassner A, Jackson

Current concepts. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology andA. Comparison of three

dimensional visualisation

Head and Neck Surgery. 2005; 13: 290-3. techniques for depicting the scala vestibuli and

scala

* 16. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW. Preservation of tympani of the cochlea

by using high resolution MR

hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of imaging.American Journal ofNeuroradiology. 1999; 20:

combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. 1197-206.

Laryngoscope. 2005; 115: 796-802. 31. Ellul S, Shelton C, Davidson HC, Harnsberger HR.

17. Bench J, Bamford J. Speech-hearing tests and the spoken Preoperative cochlear implant

imaging: Is magnetic

language ofhearing-impaired children. London: Academic "" resonance imaging enough?

American Journal ofOtology.

Press, 1979. 2000; 21: 528-33.

~ ..

3658 I PART 19 THE EAR, HEARING AND BALANCE

...,

7/31/2019 SB CI ROL

2/5

32. Knutson JF, Murray KT, Husarek S, Westerhouse K,International Journal ofPediatric

Otorhinolaryngology.

Woodworth G, Gantz BJ et al. Psychological change over 2001; 59: 207-15.

54 months of cochlear implant use.Ear and Hearing. 48. Gibson W, Lam P, Screvener B.

The operative and

1998; 19: 191-201. postoperative complications encountered in 100 cochlear33. Clark G, Lawrence D. Technical Features of the Nucleus, implant surgeries. The Sydney

experience.Journal ofthe

Med-EL and Clarion cochlear implants.Australian Journal Otological Society ofAustralia.

1991; 6: 399-404.

ofOtolaryngology. 2000; 3: 516-22. 49. Hoffmann RA, Cohen NL. Complications of

cochlear

34. Shepherd RK, Franz BK-HG, Clark GM. The biocompatibility implant surgery.Annals of

Otology, Rhinology and

and safety of cochlear prostheses. In: Clark GM, Tong YC,Laryngology. 1995; 104: 420-2.

Patrick JF (eds). Cochlear prostheses. London: Churchill 50. Rubinstein JT, Gantz BJ,

Parkinson WS. Management ofLivingstone, 1990: 69-98. cochlear implant complications.American Journal of

35. Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Carner M, Pacini L. Basal turn Otology. 1999; 20: 46-9.

cochleostomy via the middle fossa route for cochlear 51. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler

RS, Gantz BJ. Residual

implant insertion.American Journal ofOtology. 1998; 19: speech recognition and cochlear

implant performance:

778-84. Effects of implantation criteria.American Journal of

36. Webb RL, Lehnhardt E, Clark GM, Laszig R, Pyman BC, Otology. 1999; 20: 445-52.

Franz BK-HG. Surgical complications with the cochlear 52. Cohen NL, Hoffmann RA,

Stroschein M. Medical or surgical

multi-channel intracochlear implant: Experience at complications related to the Nucleus

multichannel

Hannover and Melbourne.Annals ofOtology, Rhinology cochlear implant.Annals ofOtology

Rhinology and

and Laryngology. 1991; 100: 131-6.Laryngology. 1988; 135: 8-13.

37. Haberkamp TJ, Schwaber MK. Management of flap 53. Wang RC, Parisier SC, Weiss

MH, Chute PM, Hellman SA,

necrosis in cochlear implantation.Annals ofOtology, Sauris E. Cochlear implant flap

complications.Annals of

Rhinology, and Laryngology. 1992; 101: 38-41. Otology Rhinology and Laryngology. 1990;

99: 791-5.38. Cohen NL, Hoffman RA. Complications of cochlear implant 54. Kelsall DC, Shallop JK,

Brammeier TG, Prenger EC. Facial

surgery in adults and children.Annals ofOtology, nerve stimulation after Nucleus 22-channel

cochlear

Rhinology and Laryngology. 1991; 100: 708-11. implantation.American Journal ofOtology.

1997; 18:

39. O'Donoghue GM, Nikolopoulos TP. Minimal access surgery 336-41.

for paediatric cochlear implantation. Otology and55. Ruckenstein MJ, Rafter KO, Montes

AM, Bigelow DC.

Neurotology. 2002; 23: 891-4. Management of far advanced otosclerosis in the era of

40. Collins MM, Hawthorne MH, EI-Hmd K. Cochlear cochlear implantation. Otology andNeurotology. 2001;

7/31/2019 SB CI ROL

3/5

implantation in a district general hospital: Problems and 22: 471-4.

complications in the first five years.Journal of 56. Marshall AH, Fanning N, Symons S,

Shipp 0, Chen JM,

Laryngology and Otology. 1997; 111: 325-33. Nedzelski JM. Cochlear implantation in

cochlear

41. Green KMJ, Bhatt YM, Ramsden RT. Complications otosclerosis.Laryngoscope. 2005;115: 1728-33.

following adult cochlear implantation: Experience in 57. Lassig AA, Zwolan TA, Telian SA.

Cochlear implant failures

Manchester.Journal ofLaryngology and Otology. 2004; and revision. Otology and

Neurotology. 2005; 26: 624-34.

118: 417-20. 58. Woolford TJ, Saeed SR, Boyd P, Hartley C, Ramsden RT.

42. Cunningham CD, Slattery WH, Luxford WM. Postoperative Cochlear reimplantation.

Annals ofOtology, Rhinology and

infection in cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngology - Laryngology. 1995; 166: 449-53.

Head and Neck Surgery. 2004; 131: 109-14. 59. Henson AM, Slattery 3rd WH, Luxford WM,

Mills OM.43. Balkany T, Gantz BJ, Steenerson RL, Cohen NL. A Cochlear implant performance after

reimplantation: A

systematic approach to electrode insertion in the ossified multicenter study.American

Journal ofOtology. 1999; 20:

cochlea. Otolaryngology -Head and Neck Surgery. 1996; 56-64.

114: 4-11. 60. Steenerson RL, Cronin GW, Gary LB. Vertigo after cochlear

44. Bredberg G, Lindstrom B, Lopponen H, Skarzynski H, Hyodo implantation. Otology and

Neurotology. 2001; 22: 842-3.

M, Sato H. Electrodes for ossified cochleas.American 61. Vibert 0, Hausler R, Kompis M,

Vischer M. Vestibular

Journal ofOtology. 1997; 18: 542-3. function in patients with cochlear implantation.Acta

Oto-

45. Lenarz T, Bettner RD, Lesinski A, Parker J. Nucleus doubleLaryngologica. 2001; 545:

29-34.

array: A new approach for ossified cochleas.American 62. Limb CJ, Francis HF, Lustig LR,

Niparko JK, Jammal H.

Journal ofOtology. 1997; 18: 39-42. Benign positional vertigo after cochlear implantation.

46. Lenarz T, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Weber BP, Issing PR, Frohne Otolaryngology -Head and

Neck Surgery. 2005; 132:

C, Bucner A et al. The nucleus double array cochlear 741-5.

implant: a new concept for the obliterated cochlea. 63. MDA. Risk of penumococcalmeningitis in non-vaccinated

Otology and Neurotology. 2001; 22: 24-32. cochlear implant patients, DA2002(09). August,

2002.

47. Fahy CP, Carney AS, Nikolopoulis TP, Ludman CP, Gibbin KP. 64. Cohen NL, Roland

T, Marrinan M. Meningitis in cochlear

Cochlear implantation in children with large vestibular implant recipients: The North

American Experience.

aqueduct syndrome and a review of the syndrome. Otology and Neurotology. 2004; 25: 275-

81.

65. Kirk KI. Investigation of implant performance. In: Niparko

J, Kirk KI, Mellon NK, Robbins A, Tucci DL, Wilson BS (eds).Cochlear implants. Principles and practice. Philadelphia:

7/31/2019 SB CI ROL

4/5

Lipincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000: 225-67.

66. Harris JP, Anderson JP, Novak R. An outcomes study of

cochlear implants in deaf patients: Audiologic, economic,

and quality-of-life changes.Archives ofOtolaryngology -

Head and Neck Surgery. 1995; 121: 398-404.

67. Hogan A, Stewart M, Giles E. It's a whole new ball game!Employment experiences of people with a cochlear

implant. Cochlear Implants International. 2002; 3: 54-67.

68. Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH. Cochlear implantation in

the UK. Report by the MRC Institute ofHearing Research

on the evaluation ofthe National Cochlear Implant

Programme. Main report. London: H MSO, 1995.

69. Waltzman SB. A comprehensive evaluation of cochlear

implants in adults. Seminars in Hearing. 1992; 13: 3.

70. Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J,

Facer G et 01. Factors affecting auditory performance of

postlingually deaf adults using cochlear implants.Audiology and Neuro-otology. 1996; 1: 293-306.

71. Blamey PJ, Pyman BC, Gordon M, Clark GM, Brown AM,

Dowell RC et al. Factors predicting post-operative

sentence scores in postlingually deaf adult cochlear

implant patients.Annals ofOtology, Rhinology and

Laryngology. 1992; 101: 342-8.

72. Francis HW, Chee N, Yeagle J, Cheng A, Niparko JK. Impact

of cochlear implants on the functional health status of

older adults.Laryngoscope. 2002; 112: 1482-8.

73. Buchman CA, Fucci MJ, Luxford WM. Cochlear implants in

the geriatric popuation: Benefits outweigh risks.Ear, Nose

and Throat Journal. 1999; 78: 489-94.

74. Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Knutson JF, Abbas PJ, Tyler RS.

Multivariate predictors of audiological success with

multichannel cochlear implants.Annals ofOtology,

Rhinology and Laryngology. 1993; 102: 909-16.

75. Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM. Prognostic indicators of speech

recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users:

A prospective analysis.Annals ofOtology, Rhinology and

Laryngology. 1995; 166: 194-6.

76. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH, Hoffman RA. Theprognostic value of round window electrical stimulation in

cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngology -Head and

Neck Surgery. 1990; 103: 102-6.

77. Waltzman SB, Fisher SG, Niparko JK, Cohen NL. Predictors

of postoperative performance with cochlear implants.

Chapter 239c Cochlear implants I 3659

Annals ofOtology, Rhinology and Laryngology. 1995; 165:

15-18.

78. Fraysse B, Dillier N, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M,

Perez CM et 01. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining

marginal benefit from acoustic amplification. A Europeanstudy. The American Journal ofOtology. 1998; 19: 591-7.

7/31/2019 SB CI ROL

5/5

79. Nadol Jr JB, Young Y-S, and Glynn RJ. Survival of spiral

ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss:

implications for cochlear implantation.Annals ofOtology,

Rhinology and Laryngology. 1989; 98: 411-6.

80. David EE, Ostroff JM, Shipp D, Nedzelski JM, Chen JM,

Parnes LS et al. Speech coding strategies and revisedcochlear implant candidacy: an analysis of post-implant

performance. Otology and Neurotology. 2003; 24: 228-33.

81. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group. Criteria of candidature

for unilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually

deafened adults. I: Theory and measures of effectiveness.

Ear and Hearing. 2004; 25: 310-35.

82. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group. Criteria of candidature

for unilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually

deafened adults. II: Cost-effectiveness analysis.Ear and

Hearing. 2004; 25: 336-60.

83. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group. Criteria of candidaturefor unilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually

deafened adults. III: Prospective evaluation of an actuarial

approach to defining a criterion.Ear and Hearing. 2004;

25: 361-74.

84. Summerfield Q, Barton G, Cirstea S. Criteria of candidature

for implantable auditory prostheses in post-lingually

deafened adults. Last updated September 28, 2005.

Available from: http://www.ihr.mrc.ac.uk/research/

prostheses/outcomes/criteria_ca nd i datu re.ph p

85. Niparko JK, Cheng AK, Francis HW. Outcomes of cochlear

implantation: Assessment of quality of life impact and

economic evaluation of the benefits of cochlear implant in

relation to costs. In: Niparko J, Kirk KI, Mellon NK, Robbins

A, Tucci DL, Wilson BS (eds). Cochlear implants. Principles

and practice. Philadelphia: Lipincott Williams and Wilkins,

2000: 269-88. * 86. Cheng AK, Niparko JK. Cost-utility of the cochlear implant

in adults: a meta-analysis.Archives ofOtolaryngology -

Head and Neck Surgery. 1999; 125: 1214-8.

87. Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Wuyts FL, Cochet E, Hofkens A, Van

de Heyning PH. Quality of life benefit from cochlear

implantation in the elderly. Otology and Neurotology.2005; 26: 188-95.