san angelo preliminary performance review

38
Development of the Citizens’ Report Card is a collaborative effort led by Paul Alexander in conjunction with Angelo State University students Aaron Ervin Patrick Killingsworth Thinh Nguyen Anna-Marie Parker Chris Stegall Citizens’ Report Card 2009

Upload: paul-alexander

Post on 13-Apr-2017

497 views

Category:

Business


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Development of the Citizens’ Report Card is a collaborative effort led by

Paul Alexander

in conjunction with Angelo State University students

Aaron Ervin

Patrick Killingsworth

Thinh Nguyen

Anna-Marie Parker

Chris Stegall

all under the guidance of Dr. Sudhir Chawla.

Citizens’ Report Card 2009

Page 2: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Introduction

Objective: To set a foundation for an official Citizens’ Report Card for the City of San Angelo

Problem:San Angelo does not currently have any means to measure actual performance as perceived by the citizens

Solution:Extensive data collection through focus groups and surveys and analysis through SPSS

Page 3: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Indicators of Sustainability Environment

Economy

Society

Page 4: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Focus Groups

Contributors to San Angelo

Community Life

Police and Crime

Health Care

Job Market

Page 5: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Survey DesignMajor Categories

Safety City Utility Services

Parks and RecreationMaintenance

CommunicationEducation

Healthcare Overall Rating of the City

Page 6: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Demographics

Page 7: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Demographics

MaleFemale

Page 8: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Demographics

18-24

25-34

35-44

44-54

54-64

65-74

Page 9: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Demographics

Under $25K

$50Kor more

$40K+

$35K+$32K+

$25K+

Page 10: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Grading System• Grading is determined by a score between

0.00 and 4.00.• 0.00-0.99 is an F• 1.00-1.99 is a C• 2.00-2.99 is a B• 3.00-4.00 is an A• *.00-*.33 denotes a “-”• *.67-*.99 denotes a “+”• Example: 2.87 is a B+, 3.32 is an A-

Page 11: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Number Score• The Number score is determined by survey

results.• Very Satisfied % x 4 Ex. 8.7% x 4 = .348• Satisfied % x 3 Ex. 42.9% x 3 =

1.287• Neutral % x 2 Ex. 29.4% x 2

= .588• Dissatisfied % x 1 Ex. 14.7% x 1

= .147• Very Dissatisfied (Does not add to score)• In this example, the number score is 2.37• Thus the Grade is a “B”

Page 12: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

B NeutralSatisfied

Dissatisfied

2.37

Page 13: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

B+Satisfied

Very Satisfied

2.92

Neutral

Page 14: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

BVery Satisfied

2.56 NeutralSatisfied

Page 15: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

C1.56Neutral

Satisfied

Dissatisfied

VeryDissatisfied

Page 16: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

C1.50Neutral

Satisfied

Dissatisfied

VeryDissatisfied

Page 17: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

B-2.15

Neutral

SatisfiedDissatisfied

Page 18: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

B-2.02

Neutral

SatisfiedDissatisfied

Page 19: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

B-2.27

NeutralSatisfied

Dissatisfied

Page 20: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

C+

1.86

Neutral

SatisfiedDissatisfied

VeryDissatisfied

Page 21: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

B2.64

Neutral

Satisfied

VerySatisfied

Page 22: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Qua

lity

of P

olic

e Se

rvic

e

Mai

nt o

n C

ity S

tree

ts

Qua

lity

of C

ity W

ater

Util

ities

Traf

fic

Park

s

Fire

Page 23: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

B-2.12

Neutral

SatisfiedDissatisfied

Page 24: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

C+

1.97

Neutral

SatisfiedDissatisfied

VeryDissatisfied

Page 25: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

C+

195

Neutral

Satisfied Dissatisfied

Page 26: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

B+

2.91

Neutral

Satisfied

VerySatisfied

Page 27: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

B+

2.87

Neutral

Good

Excellent

Page 28: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

B+

2.98

Neutral

Good

Excellent

Page 29: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

C+

1.80

Neutral

Good

Excellent

Below Average

Poor

Page 30: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

B2.59

Neutral

Good

Excellent

Below Average

Poor

Page 31: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Statistical Analysis

TESTING T-Test

ANOVA

Chi-Square

GenderEthnicity

Married or SingleYears in San AngeloRegistered to Vote

Age Income

Rent or Own

Correlations

Page 32: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Factor Analysis

Factor Analysis was conducted to find correlations between questions within the categories.

Page 33: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

T-TEST

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

In the Downtown Areas

MaleFemale

Significant

Significant

Significant

Page 34: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

T-TEST

Significant

Significant

Page 35: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

ANOVA

Page 36: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

ANOVA

Page 37: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Chi-Square

Not Significant

Page 38: San Angelo Preliminary Performance Review

Citizens’ Report Card 2009

www.citizensreportcard.com