salinization of melaleuca - university of florida · 2012. 6. 22. · salinization of...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Paul Boon
Institute for Sustainability & Innovation
Victoria University, Melbourne
Salinization of Melaleuca-
dominated wetlands of the
Gippsland Lakes, Australia
-
Australian distribution of Melaleuca
Gippsland Lakes
-
The Gippsland Lakes
Lakes Entrance
Opened in 1889
Melbourne
Dowd Morass study site
-
Lakes Entrance
-
Gippsland Sustainable Water Strategy (2010)
Lakes Entrance
LaTrobe Rv & Dowd Morass Melaleuca wetlands
Saltmarshes
-
LaTrobe Rv – Dowd
Morass estuary
Early 1950s RAAF photo from Eric Bird
November 2010
Phragmites beds
Retreat of Phragmites australis
Consequences of
artificial opening
-
Death of Eucalyptus camaldulesis
-
Death of Melaleuca ericifolia
-
Within Dowd Morass:
Death of adult plants
Little floristic diversity
-
Loss of sexual reproduction
Root suckers
-
Morass kept full to prevent saline
intrusions since 1992
Year
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Wa
ter
Dep
th (
m)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Parks Victoria drawdown
Full even over drought
-
But salinity is still very high
PV’s salinity goal (< 4000 EC)
½ seawater salinity
-
Rehabilitation predictions
Re-instating a dry phase in Dowd Morass would
• Improve condition of adult Melaleuca
• Allow Melaleuca to recruit sexually
• Increase floristic diversity of understorey
Risks included
• Activating acid sulfate soils
• Increasing water-column and sediment salinity
• Being too short to achieve desired outcomes
• Too ambitious with too little resources
-
Experimental manipulations
Lake Wellington
LaTrobe River
Big Drain
Little Drain
1 km
N
Pre-existing levees
-
Lake
Wellington
Beyond-BACI experimental design
Control (Flooded)
Impact
(Drawdown)
Heywood’s
levee
Reference
Water in
Water out
-
Passive draw-down 2003-2004
-
Going well – then vandalism
Duck season
vandalism
-
2nd intervention: active draw-down 2005
Response to
2004 vandalism
in 2005: Pumping!
• 1 x 12” pump
• 1 x 10” pump
Pumped continuously for 28 days in early 2005
-
Active draw-down
2005
-
Beyond-BACI vegetation assessment
45 x 100-m long transects across wetland
• 20 in Control (flooded) sites
• 20 in Impact (drawdown) sites
• 5 in Reference (shoreline) sites
Dates: April 2003 (B), June 2004 (D), April 2005 (D), April 2006 (A)
Variables:
• Continuous water depth and salinity (data loggers)
• Water depth along transects every 0.5 m (36,000 data pts)
• Vegetation floristics and structure (overstorey &
understorey cover and floristics etc) (>120,000 data pts)
-
Wate
r le
vel (m
AH
D)
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Impact
Control
Impact (Interpolated)
Apr 0
3
Jul 0
3
Oct 0
3
Jan
04
Apr 0
4
Jul 0
4
Oct 0
4
Jan
05
Apr 0
5
Jul 0
5
Oct 0
5
Jan
06
Apr 0
6
Jul 0
6
Oct 0
6
Survey 3 Survey 4
Impact
Control
Vandalism
Pumpingcommences
Survey 1 Survey 2
Drawdown 2 commences
Drawdown 1 commences
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Storm Storm Storm
Ele
ctr
ical conductivity (
mS
cm
-1)
No big difference
between Control
and Impact water
levels
B) Salinity
A) Water level
2003 2004 2005 2006
Impact
Control
Confounding
variability in
salinity between
Control and
Impact sites
Results
-
Alternative: non-BACI (gradient) analysis
Instead of ANOVA,
use gradient analysis
Classification of the hydrology as per
Brownlow et al. (1994)
Four water regimes In Dowd Morass
1
2
3
4
Permanently wet
Driest sites
-
Gradient analysis much better than
original BACI-ANOVA approach
Water regimes 1 (dry) – 4 (wet)
Species richness
Raulings, Morris & Boon (2010) Freshwater Biology 55: 701-715
Raulings, Morris & Boon (2011) Freshwater Biology 56: 2347-2369
Projective
cover
wet
dry
wet
dry
-
What causes the diversity of
hydrologies? Microtopographic relief
Caused by Melaleuca, Phragmites
and Paspalum humps
-
Photo by Matt Hatton
-
Implications for wetland rehabilitation
Success after 1 year
-
Large-scale hummock creation, 2006
-
Results after 4 years
July 2010
-
More information?
Copies of two technical handbooks (2005, 2007)
Summary hand-out of papers to date
Over some beers tonight