s38: project healthdesign round 1-lessons and models
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
1/66
Kevin B. Johnson (Vanderbilt)Steve Ross (U. Colorado Denver)
Lisa Nugent (Johnson & Johnson)
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
2/66
We need to go from this
Project HealthDesign: Mission
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
3/66
To this!
Project HealthDesign: Mission
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
4/66
Project HealthDesign $9.5 Million National Program
Created in 2006
Funded by the Robert Wood JohnsonFoundation Through its Pioneer Portfolio
National Program Office: University of Wisconsin - Madison School of Nursing
Project HealthDesign: About the Project
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
5/66
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
6/66
Common PlatformA common technology platform
for PHR applications:
Accelerates development
Increases interoperability
Improves security
Can support a variety of personal healthapplication tools
Reduces implementation time
Project HealthDesign: What Weve Learned
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
7/66
Users ethical, legal, and socialconcerns about sharing PHR
information are real, butsurmountable
Top three concerns:
Control over access to information
Managing privacy rights
Shifting shared decision-making tothe patient
Project HealthDesign: What Weve Learned
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
8/66
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
9/66
http://www.projecthealthdesign.org/overview-phr/projects/190928 -
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
10/66
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
11/66
Age(yrs)
completed / enrolled (%)
Avg #meds
Comments
7 3/3 (100%) 7 Child did well with pager, took to school and was very helpful with bolus feeding reminders. Parent was surprised.Child kept up with pages and med, was intermittent about reporting pages to parent. Child was in and out of parentshome who completed surveys.Everything was OK with me. I liked it. She wore it except I didnt let her take it outside--didnt want to have her lose it.One time alert went off while she was sleeping and scared her; became reluctant to keep pager at bedside.Lost interest at first because didnt get any pages for a couple of days. Found really helpful to remember enzymes whenaway from home but child is generally disinterested in keeping up with meds.
8 5/6 (83%) 7 DisinterestedStopped on Saturday. She said she did not want to do it any more when she went to her cousins house.Child was engaged and reported all pages.
What helped was Cephalexin not in daily routine. Daily routine didnt really need. Very helpful for added doses. Would begreat for outside school.Child was hospitalized when first enrolled, so study time was extended. Child kept up with pager and experienced somedifficulty in reading pages but would bring to parent to get help. Parent happy with childs ability to keep up with pager.At first was reporting pages but had trouble keeping up with pager. During week 3, child put pager away and stated shedid not want to carry it anymore.Got embarrassed first day or two of wearing pager at school.Parent was really surprised child kept up with pager, lost it once but found it. Was good about reading pages but did notreport them always to parent.Left at school one night because put in desk and forgot. Child loved responsibility of pager, did not always report toparent, but kept up with pages and meds.
9 4/4 (100%) 7 Parent wasnt sure how interested the child was in the pager, but he did report getting pages and carried the pagerChild was engaged and enthusiastic about pager and remembering meds. This child is generally cooperative about meds.It really helped her a lot to remember during school. Bolus feeding lose track of time, teacher and child. Really helped herand teacher to remember. When she got a message remembered to take medicine (surprised me.)
10 2/3(66%) 5 Does not like it, sees it as a nuisance-dropped out during week one. Teacher and med system very efficient at school,child did not see a reason to continue. Doesnt like carrying it. Doesnt like friends asking her about it.I think it has helped him grow up some. At Christmas he had several comments about how he has grown up. Noproblems with the pager. No surprisesChild is diligent, kept up with meds and pager. Pager went off a couple of times when child was sleeping
Parents surprised by childs ability to use pager Children kept up with pager if they found it
valuable
Not all children needed reminders after a while
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
12/66
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
13/66
This is a missed dose. Red dots areearly, Green dots are on time doses
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
14/66
Is this interface sufficient to conveyinformation needed for decision support?Should patients be able to filter data beforepublishing?How do we combine these automaticallygenerated items with annotations?
Will prescribers or nurses want to review this?
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
15/66
LIVING PROFILESProject HealthDesign funded by RWJF
personal health records
for teenagers
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
16/66
LIVING PROFILESA collaboration between designers, healthcare
providers, and patientsArt Center College of Design (through May 2008)Childrens Hospital of Orange County
Stanford University
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
17/66
As teens with chronic healthproblems transition from
pediatric care to adult medicine,they face a number of
challenges that can impact theirphysical and emotional health.
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
18/66
We knew teenagers would be adifficult population to reach.
We wanted to discover: what would engage them
what they felt was meaningful how to sustain their interest
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
19/66
32 patients volunteered
14- to 18-years-old
CHOCs Hematology Clinic
10 males and 6 females
Stanford Pediatric Rheumatology
11 females and 5 males
We conducted in-home interviews andengaged teens in probe activities.
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
20/66
Cultural probesRanging from highly directed to very interpretative
activities, 8 unique probes were distributed tosolicit responses that are difficult or impossible toobtain in an interview or clinical setting.
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
21/66
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
22/66
We discovered disconnections and designopportunities
Teen patients consistently define theirquality of life through engagement with theirsocial networks and mood not by illness.
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
23/66
Teens greatly respect and admire theirparents (albeit not while in clinic).
She helps mewith stuff I cant do
and shows me
new stuff I didnt knowabout
Hes a good friend whocares about me
Should we be thinking about
transition is a new way?3 in 4 think their parents understand the problems and
situations they face as teens very or somewhat well.Teens & Parents USA WEEKEND Survey Results
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
24/66
Teens define and chart their future withoutreferencing their condition .
Wheres the kidney transplant?
The hospitalizations? The pills?
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
25/66
The definition of private is changing inthe networked world.
Q: So youve set [your Myspace page] for Private.
Irene: Yes.
Q: So how many friends are in your private circle?
Irene: I have 50 friends.
Q: Out of your 50 friends and family how many are active?
Irene: the majority of them are active. But not all are close People
that I am kind of close to, but not as close as my friends (at my
new school).
Q: Good to know.
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
26/66
Teens when asked if they have anyquestionstheyll say no.
Teens when asked if they would like toknow more about something will open up.
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
27/66
Take away!The communication gap between teens and
caregivers can be bridged moreimportantly teens with
chronic health conditionswant to bridge it.
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
28/66
Teens are highly
engaged in their health They just define quality of lifedifferently. Their measurements?social network & mood.
Teens may be more holistic
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
29/66
Whats meaningful for
teens is often meaningful
for caregivers too. They just use a different
language to express it. Improve quality of care
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
30/66
PHRs that use the
lanaguage of teens will
sustain their interest teen language includes music,
pictures, emotion, networktechnology, and self expression
emotional connections
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
31/66
LIVING PROFILES
Primary goal and innovation is to designa new communication space for teens andtheir caregivers.
HypothesisTools that increase self awarenessand spark meaningful conversationwill empower a healthy transition.
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
32/66
LIVING PROFILESPrototype PHR and
mood meter
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
33/66
LIVING PROFILESPrototype PHR and
mood meter
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
34/66
Summary
Start with the patients perspective Design research is a powerful methodology
Co-create with end users
New channels of communication are key
Its a behavior change for all of us
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
35/66
Resources
Demohttp://living-profiles.net/qolt/w/jill.html#ShowVisualView
Probe downloadshttp://livingprofiles.net/?page_id=60
RWJF linkhttp://www.projecthealthdesign.org/projects/overview-2006_2008/405828
http://living-profiles.net/qolt/w/jill.htmlhttp://livingprofiles.net/?page_id=60http://livingprofiles.net/?page_id=60http://living-profiles.net/qolt/w/jill.htmlhttp://living-profiles.net/qolt/w/jill.htmlhttp://living-profiles.net/qolt/w/jill.html -
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
36/66
LIVING PROFILES
design researchProject HealthDesign, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Lisa NugentGlobal Creative DirectorCross-Sector Innovation & Design
JOHNSON & JOHNSONConsumer & Personal Products WorldwideDivision of Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
GLOBAL STRATEGIC DESIGN OFFICE
601 W 26th StreetNew York, NY 10001Tel 212.462 7015
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
37/66
Project HealthDesign Part 1Lessons and Models
Colorado Care TabletSteve Ross MD
2010 AMIA Now!May 2010
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
38/66
Care Transitions: A Major Challenge
Care transition: Moving fromone setting of care to another(esp. hospital home)
Abrupt: information overload
Risk of readmission or worse Wrong meds taken Wrong care of wounds, catheters,
intravenous lines Not sure what to look out for Not sure who to follow up with
and when
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
39/66
Scope of the Problem
Prescribing errors (7.6% of Rxs) and potential adversedrug events (3% of Rxs) are common in the outpatientsetting 1
Medication discrepancies after discharge are common,and lead to preventable readmissions 2
1Gandhi TK, J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20:837-8412Coleman EA, Arch Intern Med 2005; 165:1842-1847
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
40/66
Proven Value: Standalone PHR + Coach
Eric Coleman Care Transitions Intervention Goal: Reduce inappropriate readmission Four pillars
1. Medication self-management2. Patient-centered record3. Primary care and specialist followup4. Knowing red flags
Intervention: Coach + Personal Health Record RCT: 90 day rehosp 16.7% vs 22.5%, p=.04
Coleman EA, Arch Intern Med 2006; 166:1822-1828
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
41/66
PHR: Care Transitions Intervention
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
42/66
PHR: Care Transitions Intervention
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
43/66
Care Transitions Intervention PHR
Possible keys to effectiveness Intuitive user interface Driven by a detailed model of quality improvement
Directive: patient knew what to do with it Well integrated into medical system
Clear value to patient But use still dropped off substantially months later
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
44/66
Limitations of Paper PHR
Many patients identify medications by shape, size, and color,not name
Drug names are redundant and inscrutable: easy tounintentionally duplicate medications
Tiazac and Cardizem are the same ingredient Norvasc and Plendil are slightly different ingredients in the same
class Authoritative drug information isnt accessible
For individual medications For drug regimen
Intended medication list isnt always clear
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
45/66
Benefits of an Electronic PHR
Provide pictures Prevent duplication of medications Make it easy to get authoritative information
Help patients build and reconcile medication lists bylinking to sources of personal medication information
Care transitions may be the ideal use case of interoperable PHRs
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
46/66
Design Phase Methods
13 Home interviews with 20 participants (olderpatients +/- caregiver) Taped and transcribed
Photographed methods for managing medicationsand medication information 4 group interviews with 13 participants (2 exploratory,
2 confirmatory)
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
47/66
Patients: Unmet Information Needs
Common concerns: Will this medication cause a side effect? Im not feeling wellcould it be one of my medications? Will it hurt my body to take so many medications? Are the medications safe to take together? What about non-prescription meds, herbals, vitamins, and
supplements?
Common barriers: Medication names are confusing and duplicative May identify medications by color and shape, not name
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
48/66
Proposed Functional Specifications
Form factor: touch screen tablet Mobile to accommodate distributed meds (WWAN) Simplified interface, large fonts
Bar code scanning of pill bottles Accommodate voice input?
Contextual links to medication information
Allow import / comparison of medication lists frompharmacies, doctors, & hospitals
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
49/66
Technical Issues
l d
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
50/66
Using RxNorm to Normalizing Medsand Link to Pictures and Consumer Info
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
51/66
Sources of Medication ListsPrescribed Med Data
Dispensed Med DataReal
MedicationList
No real listin inter-operable
world
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
52/66
Different Sources, Different Utilities
DISPENSED / FULFILLED From pharmacy systems
(SureScripts / RxHub)
Can assess adherence Cant tell if active or not Includes NDC code
Med Hx only available if electronic prescribing used
PRESCRIBED From electronic medical
records
Cant assess adherence Can tell if active Uses abstract medication
identifier, or arbitrary NDC
code Med Hx only available if
EMR used
Li i d A il bili f M d Li
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
53/66
Limited Availability of Med Lists:EMR
Many ambulatory doctors dont keep electronic medlist (but more will with eRx incentives)
Even hospitals with EMR dont necessarily encode (ortransmit) the discharge medication list Just the last state of the MAR (med administration
record) Surescripts will only provide medication history to
doctors/institutions who eRx
Li i d A il bili f M d Li
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
54/66
Limited Availability of Med Lists:Surescripts
Surescripts is the primary gateway for eRx SureScripts (retail pharmacies) merged with RxHub
(PBMs)
Nearly all chain pharmacies and main independents Provides 13 months of fulfillment data in 2 forms:
Web accessible clinician app: Prescription History EMRs can receive data
No fee for these services for eRx adopters
Li i d A il bili f M d Li
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
55/66
Limited Availability of Med Lists:Surescripts
BUT Some practices using certified EHRs decline to pay for full eRx
(for connectivity to the Surescripts network) Medications paid for by cash to independent pharmacies. Some sources dont provide Rx data for HIV-related meds Claims data often have a 30 day lag Few Medicaid programs provide fulfillment data Contractually, certified EMRs may only request the Prescription
History within a certain time period of a scheduled clinic visit; itcannot be requested ad hoc
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
56/66
User Interface Issues
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
57/66
Unexpected User Interface Issues
For these older users Building the medication list
Older users didnt like the idea of selective input
from various doctors electronic medication lists Preferred that medications be pooled Would have really liked help from pharmacist!
Maintaining the medication list Great concern that they might corrupt the doctors
list
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
58/66
Addressing UI Challenges
Simplify, simplify, simplify! Minimize options Keep linear wizard structure within options (step 1
step 2 step 3)
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
59/66
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
60/66
Use of Tablet PC and Scanner
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
61/66
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
62/66
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
63/66
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
64/66
Testing of Prototype
Pictures greatly appreciated Older users definitely liked the size of the tablet
much more than small type on mobile devices
Touch screen issues Sometimes balky Keyboard less easy than mechanical
Common med tasks easier with CCT than GoogleHealth Patients in their 70s found it appealing, but patients in
their 80s said I smell computerand I say no
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
65/66
Conclusions
Care transitions are still a perilous time, with greatpotential for patient empowerment
More true eRx more prescribing and fulfillment data
But lots of data from multiple sources noise For older users, keep it simple and test your
assumptions Dont forget the pharmacist Tablet: great pseudo-mobile platform for older users Future: Will iPad provide even friendlier platform?
TRUE Research Foundation &Diabetes Institute at Walter ReedProject HealthDesign: Round 1 What the 9 Teams Demonstrated
Vanderbilt University
-
8/9/2019 S38: Project HealthDesign Round 1-Lessons and Models
66/66
Diabetes Institute at Walter ReedArmy Medical Center
University of Colorado at Denver &
Health Sciences Center
University of California, SanFrancisco
University of Rochester
Stanford University
RTI International & The Cooper
Institute
University of MassachusettsMedical School
University of Washington