STaR chart

BCJH

Technology assessment for you

• 1. What are the STaR charts?

• 2. Campus data from 2006-2007 and 2009-2010

• 3. Campus ranking

• 4. Summary and discussion of STaR chart data

• The STaR chart is the Texas Education Agency’s evaluation tool for school district and campus technology progress. It is required every year to be completed by all school staff. It measures the campus in four areas:

• Teaching and Learning• Infrastructure• Educator Preparation and Development• Leadership, Administration and Instructional

Support

• 2006-2007 STaR Chart

• Grading scale

• 1 beginning level

• 2 developing level

• 3 advanced level

• 4 target level

TL1 TL2 Tl3 Tl4 Tl5 Tl6 Total

Patterns ofClassroom Use

Frequency/Design ofInstructionalSetting

Content AreaConnections

TechologyApplications(TA) TEKSImplemention

StudentMastery ofTechnologyApplications

Online learning

4 3 4 4 3 3 21

Educator Preperation and Development

EP1 EP2 EP3 EP4 EP5 EP6 TOTAL

ProfessionalDevelopmentExperiences

Models ofProfessionalDevelopment

Capabilities ofEducators

Access toProfessionalDevelopment

Levels ofUnderstandingand Patterns ofUse

ProfessionalDevelopmentfor OnlineLearning

2 3 3 2 2 2 14

Leadership, Administration and Instructural Support

L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 Total

Leadership andVision

Planning Nstructural support

CommunicationandCollaboration

Budget Leadership andSupport forOnline Learning

4 3 3 3 4 3 20

Leadership, Administration and Instructural Support

L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 Total

Leadership andVision

Planning Nstructural support

CommunicationandCollaboration

Budget Leadership andSupport forOnline Learning

3 2 3 3 3 3 17

Infastructure

INF1 INF2 INF3 INF4 INF5 INF6 TOTAL

Students per computer

Internet AccessConnectivitySpeed

OtherClassroomTechnology

Technological support

local AreaNetwork WideArea Network

Distance learning capacity

2 4 3 2 3 3 17

STaR chart2009-2010

2006-2007Final Evaluation

• KEY AREA SUMMARY• Key Area Key Area Total Key Area STaR Classification• I. Teaching and Learning 21 Target Tech• II. Educator Preparation and Development 19 advanced tech• III. LeaderShip, Admin., Instructional Support 20 advanced tech• Support• IV. Infrastructure for Technology 17 advanced tech

• Principal: Brandon Hood• Email: bhood@bcblackcats.net• Completed Date: 5/1/2007

Star Chart 2009-2010

Teaching and Learning

Educator Preperation and Development

EP1 EP2 EP3 EP4 EP5 EP6 TOTAL

ProfessionalDevelopmentExperiences

Models ofProfessionalDevelopment

Capabilities ofEducators

Access toProfessionalDevelopment

Levels ofUnderstandingand Patterns ofUse

ProfessionalDevelopmentfor OnlineLearning

3 4 4 3 4 1 19

TL1 TL2 Tl3 Tl4 Tl5 Tl6 Total

Patterns ofClassroom Use

Frequency/Design ofInstructionalSetting

Content AreaConnections

TechologyApplications(TA) TEKSImplemention

StudentMastery ofTechnologyApplications

Online learning

3 3 3 3 3 3 18

Educator Preperation and Development

EP1 EP2 EP3 EP4 EP5 EP6 TOTAL

ProfessionalDevelopmentExperiences

Models ofProfessionalDevelopment

Capabilities ofEducators

Access toProfessionalDevelopment

Levels ofUnderstandingand Patterns ofUse

ProfessionalDevelopmentfor OnlineLearning

2 3 3 2 2 2 14

Leadership, Administration and Instructural Support

L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 Total

Leadership andVision

Planning Nstructural support

CommunicationandCollaboration

Budget Leadership andSupport forOnline Learning

3 2 3 3 3 3 17

Infrastructure

INF1 INF2 INF3 INF4 INF5 INF6 TOTAL

Students per computer

Internet AccessConnectivitySpeed

OtherClassroomTechnology

Technological support

local AreaNetwork WideArea Network

Distance learning capacity

2 3 2 2 3 3 15

2009-2010 final evaluation

• KEY AREA SUMMARY• Key Area Key Area Total Key Area STaR Classification• I. Teaching and Learning 18

advanced tech• II.. Educator Preparation and Development 14

developing• III. LeaderShip, Admin., Instructional Support 17

advanced tech • IV. Infrastructure for Technology 15

advanced tech

• http://starchart2.esc12.net/

• Type district name in the blank and click on Simple Search

• Then find your campus and click on it. The report should appear.

Comparison of the BCJH campus surveys for 2006-07 and 2009-10

1 2006-2007 2009-2010 difference

TL1 4 3 -1

TL2 3 3 0

TL3 4 3 -1

TL4 4 3 -1

TL5 3 3 0

TL6 3 3 0

TOTAL 21 18 -3

Educator Preparation and Development

2006-2007 2009-2010 Difference

EP1 3 2 -1

EP2 4 3 -1

EP3 4 3 -1

EP4 3 2 -1

EP5 4 2 -2

EP6 1 2 +1

Total 19 14 -5

Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support

2006-2007 2009-2010 difference

L1 4 3 -1

L2 3 2 -1

L3 3 3 0

L4 3 3 0

L5 4 3 -1

L6 3 3 0

Total 20 17 -3

Infastructure

2006-2007 2009-2010 difference

INF1 2 2 0

INF2 4 3 -1

INF3 3 2 -1

INF4 2 2 0

INF5 3 3 0

INF6 3 3 0

Total 17 15 -2

Conclusions

• As the charts and data indicates the Bay City Junior High has a long way to go in the Campus technology fields. The campus has lost ground in all four area of technology. We as a campus must strive to improvestudent learning through technological advances