s. li 1,2, y. liu 1 e. monnier 2, z. zhao 1 center of particle physics and technology, university of...
TRANSCRIPT
1
WW event selection with new Electron ID in 2011
data
S. Li1,2, Y. Liu1
E. Monnier2, Z. Zhao1
Center of Particle Physics and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China1
& Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille, CNRS/IN2P32
2
No need to apply Electron Energy rescale for 2011 data (Rel 16.6):
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/EnergyScaleResolutionRecommendations#2011_data_Release_16_6
No need to apply Jet OffsetEtaJES correction for 2011 data if >16.6.1 release, no new JetUserGuide available. Jet_*OriginEM yielding 0 value for both 2011 data and mc10, need consulting the latest MC10 approximation in the latest JetUserGuide version:
https://svnweb.cern.ch/trac/atlasgrp/browser/CombPerf/JetETMiss/JetUserGuide/tags/JetUserGuide-00-01-01/AtlasJetUserGuide.pdf
New WW baseline heading for pLHC using 2011 data only:
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/BaslinecutsforWWatPLHC
NEWS FOR 2011 ANALYSIS
3
Both tight and medium+iso+Blayer electron ID spotted the same 9 events in black Green colored: events came up when increasing the jet pt threshold for tight Yellow colored: events came up when increasing the jet pt threshold for medium
New Events in 2011 data by WW baseline selection
ch RunNumber
EventNumber
LB METrel/GeV
pT(ll)/GeV
Inv.M(ll)/GeV
ee 178044 31696531 335 44.6 19.0 254.9
eµ 178044 26558144 292 76.3 71.6 95.3
eµ 178044 7409347 143 71.0 53.7 17.5
eµ 178109 57534414 664 22.4 30.0 94.5
µµ 178044 10718887 170 43.2(MET=52.5)
6.7 75.9
µµ 178044 10796683 171 53.8 52.1 80.1
µµ 178044 46488279 477 75.8 69.8 104.1
µµ 178109 57138213 659 51.0 63.5 78.8
µµ 178109 66584945 765 66.2 72.7 44.9
eµ 178109 58498409 674 25.2(MET=30.9)
12.8 53.8
µµ 178109 48377288 566 117.5 122.2 31.9
eµ 178044 34058470 357 43.6 35.0 79.2
eµ 178109 69695548 801 48.2 27.2 46.3
4
ee eµ µµ All ch
T M T M T M T M
Data 1 2 5 9 2 2 8 13
WW→ll 0.84 1.22 4.81 5.74 1.84 1.84 7.49±0.06
8.80±0.07
DiBoson 0.04 0.43 0.50 2.10 0.12 0.12 0.65±0.05
2.64±0.17
Top 0.11 0.16 0.43 0.54 0.15 0.15 0.69±0.05
0.85±0.05
Wjets 0. 1.59 0.17 6.30 0.09 0.09 0.26±0.15
7.97±0.95
Zjets 0. 0. 0.68 1.45 0.09 0.09 0.77±0.27
1.54±0.39
DrellYan 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW→l+tau 0.05 0.08 0.43 0.56 0.13 0.13 0.61±0.01
0.77±0.02
JF17 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW selection on 2010 reprocessed data and MC10 with bunch train pile-up: new caloIso (caloIso98), reweight NOT applied
5
ee eµ µµ All ch
T M T M T M T M
Data 1 1 5 6 2 2 8 9
WW→ll 0.84 0.89 4.81 4.90 1.84 1.84 7.49±0.06
7.64±0.06
DiBoson 0.04 0.06 0.50 0.60 0.12 0.12 0.65±0.05
0.78±0.07
Top 0.11 0.12 0.43 0.43 0.15 0.15 0.69±0.05
0.70±0.05
Wjets 0. 0. 0.17 0.64 0.09 0.09 0.26±0.15
0.73±0.30
Zjets 0. 0. 0.68 0.68 0.09 0.09 0.77±0.27
0.77±0.27
DrellYan 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW→l+tau 0.05 0.05 0.43 0.45 0.13 0.13 0.61±0.01
0.63±0.02
JF17 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW selection on 2010 reprocessed data and MC10 with bunch train pile-up: Medium++ + old Isolation(etcone30<6GeV)
6
ee eµ µµ All ch
T M T M T M T M
Data 1 1 5 5 2 2 8 8
WW→ll 0.84 0.91 4.81 4.93 1.84 1.84 7.49±0.06
7.67±0.06
DiBoson 0.04 0.07 0.50 0.63 0.12 0.12 0.65±0.05
0.81±0.07
Top 0.11 0.14 0.43 0.45 0.15 0.15 0.69±0.05
0.73±0.05
Wjets 0. 0. 0.17 0.73 0.09 0.09 0.26±0.15
0.81±0.31
Zjets 0. 0. 0.68 0.68 0.09 0.09 0.77±0.27
0.77±0.27
DrellYan 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW→l+tau 0.05 0.06 0.43 0.45 0.13 0.13 0.61±0.01
0.64±0.02
JF17 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW selection on 2010 reprocessed data and MC10 with bunch train pile-up: Medium++ + new caloIso (caloIso98)
17
Sample fake factor
Electron Tight ID
Medium+ Iso+ Bayer
Medium+++new iso
Medium+++old iso
Data 0.032 0.364 0.055 0.035
JF17 0.016 0.225 0.026 0.017Data with MC subtraction
0.023 0.343 0.041 0.026
Data-driven Wjets background estimation: fake factor estimation
ElecID
Channels
WW Events
(1fakeable +1ID)
WW Events
(1fakeable +1ID)With MC
subtracted
WW Events
(2ID leptons)
Expected Wjets
background
Tightee 6 5.03 1 0.12
eµ 24 18.08 5 0.41
Medium+ Iso + Bayer
ee 3 2.64 2 0.91
eµ 13 10.64 9 3.65
Medium+++new iso
ee 3 2.19 1 0.09
eµ 13 7.52 5 0.31
Medium+++old iso
ee 5 4.11 1 0.11
eµ 23 17.32 6 0.46
29
ee channel: Di-lepton pT
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
30
ee channel: Di-lepton inv. mass
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
32
eµ channel: Di-lepton pT
TIGHTMEDIUM + ISO
+ BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
34
eµ channel: Di-lepton inv. mass
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
35
All with bunch train pile-up MC10 samples with no reweighting applied
An impression of dramatic background enriching due to the medium+iso+Blayer for Electron ID mainly from Wjets, more intensive study needed to be done as soon as possible(Medium++? Need to be cross-checked with John Alison)
Accurate estimation needs to be done using data-driven(Wjets, DY background etc.)
Summary and Future work
37
µµ channel: Di-lepton pT
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
38
µµ channel: Di-lepton inv. massTIGHT MEDIUM + ISO
+ BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
39
Using New Medium+iso+Blayer Electron ID study presented by Jochen Hartert:
https://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=1&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=117360
New Electron ID selection introduced recently(not optimized): egammaPID::ElectronMedium_WithTrackMatch
(*Note that: el_loose, el_medium, el_tight available for 2011 egamma D3PD) New Electron Isolation correction applied:
(OLD: etcone20_pt_corrected<4GeV, not in d3pd, need to be re-calculated) https://svnweb.cern.ch/trac/atlasusr/export/30076/mfiascar/WjetsD3PDskimming/trunk/IsoCorrectio
n.h
(NEW: caloIso98, using dedicated el_isIso mask (based on etcone30/ET, bin-by-bin tuned, flatter efficiency, better QCD rejection power)
http://alxr.usatlas.bnl.gov/lxr-stb5/source/atlas/Reconstruction/egamma/egammaInterfaces/egammaInterfaces/egammaIsolationMVATopToolDefs.h
egammaPID::TrackBlayer_Electron as Blayer requirement instead of simply NBLHits>0 if any hits are expected
Electron/Muon MC10 smearing applied(Job Running, ~100 MC samples!) Using the same random seeding policy for electron and muon:
Rndm_seed = 680049+EventNumber+index*100 Using ERescaler Tool for Electron smearing and refer to MCP release 16 smearing recommendation: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/MCPAnalysisGuidelinesRel16#AnchorResolutions
PileUp reweighting for mc10? Not yet, currently using non-pileup MC.o Different reweighting for e and µ, need to be discussed (mainly due to period difference)o Tested w/ and w/o rel15 reweighting, no dramatic impact!o Running on bunch train pile-up samples also, not yet finished https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/WZGroupInclusiveMeasurement
Status
40
OffsetEtaJES correction required for both data and MC suggested by Jet experts:(Toshi Sumida & Caterina Doglioni)
https://svnweb.cern.ch/trac/atlasgrp/browser/CombPerf/JetETMiss/JetUserGuide/tags/JetUserGuide-00-01-01/AtlasJetUserGuide.pdf
Not optimal especially for bunch train pile-up MC Negative Energy *full scaled* jets need to be cleaned
due to a D3PDmaker level bug. (Mainly in forward region?)
EtaOriginEM, PhiOriginEM, MOriginEM mostly(?) yield 0 in current MC samples as well as in 2011 data(?), should refer to the latest ATLAS Jet User guide so as to approximately recover them(the one on Jet/Etmiss twiki is obsolete!)
Some words about Jet selection in Rel.16
41
Jet Multiplicities from data w/ tight w/medium Electron ID
7 new candidates spotted w/ old Iso, 2 disappeared w/
new caloIso98
42
ch RunNumber
EventNumber
LB METrel/GeV
pT(ll)/GeV
Inv.M(ll)
/GeV
ee 165732 33113849
182 40.3 37.1 33.8
eµ 161948 33730728
587 59.1 57.1 37.4
eµ 166924 30210310
149 61.5 62.5 54.8
eµ 167607 64786413
260 20.5 17.9 85.8
eµ 167607 70365957
275 62.4 46.1 36.9
eµ 167607 126511969
423 56.2 49.9 47.1
eµ 167680 32578107
120 36.3 45.5 156.2
Interesting New Candidates
Yellow: killed with NEW caloIso98 Electron ID!
46
ee eµ µµ All ch
T M T M T M T M
Data 1 2 5 11 2 2 8±2.83 15±3.87
WW→ll 0.84 1.27 5.13 6.15 1.84 1.84 7.80±0.10
9.26±0.11
DiBoson 0.07 0.65 0.51 2.49 0.14 0.14 0.72±0.08
3.28±0.32
Top 0.22 0.40 0.44 0.62 0.24 0.24 0.90±0.17
1.26±0.20
Wjets 0. 4.37 0.88 9.05 0. 0. 0.88±0.88
13.42±3.79
Zjets 0. 0. 0. 2.26 0. 0. 0. 2.26±1.42
DrellYan 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW→l+tau 0.05 0.08 0.45 0.58 0.15 0.15 0.65±0.03
0.81±0.03
JF17 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
Some preliminary results from MC10:with OLD caloIso (etcone20_pt_corrected)
47
ee eµ µµ All ch
T M T M T M T M
Data 1 2 5 9 2 2 8±2.83 13±3.61
WW→ll 0.84 1.26 5.13 6.12 1.84 1.84 7.80±0.10
9.22±0.11
DiBoson 0.07 0.65 0.51 2.53 0.14 0.14 0.72±0.08
3.31±0.32
Top 0.22 0.38 0.44 0.61 0.24 0.24 0.90±0.17
1.23±0.20
Wjets 0. 3.50 0.88 8.17 0. 0. 0.88±0.88
11.67±3.58
Zjets 0. 0. 0. 2.26 0. 0. 0. 2.26±1.42
DrellYan 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW→l+tau 0.05 0.08 0.45 0.59 0.15 0.15 0.65±0.03
0.82±0.03
JF17 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
Some preliminary results from MC10:with new caloIso (caloIso98)