rye city school district athletic field presentation · rye city school district athletic field...
TRANSCRIPT
Rye City School District
Athletic Field Presentation
Jeffery F. Budrow, P.E.Weston & Sampson PE, LS, LA, PC
Tuesday, November 12, 2019
Agenda
• Existing Field, Design Considerations
• Limitations and Constraints
• Turf Field Basics
• Health & Environmental
• Field Design
Map
History
• Constructed early 2000’s, again in 2004
• Reconstructed again in 2006 by FEMA
• At the end of its useful life – 12 years avg.
• Subject to periodic flooding
– Floodplain vs. Floodway
• Need for Replacement
Limitations/Constraints
• Limited Area
o Not enough space for fields – no equivalent space on site
o Field used for multiple sports, Physical Education, Graduation
o Constant usage, rain or shine, 1000 students, HS, MS, club,
community, games, practice, recess, striped for 5 sports
o Grass field cannot stand up to the usage
• Floodplain/Floodway
o Scour Velocity a design consideration
o Infill materials are limited
o Major regulatory and design hurdles to raising field
• Need for Replacement
o 13 years old, 12 is the average lifespan
o Track, field, and tarping system included in bond referendum
o A tarping system will improve its lifespan
Why Synthetic Turf?Synthetic Turf System Components
Rubber | Plastic Natural | Organic Minerals/Coated
Minerals
Wide use, best performance +
resiliency
Organic Longest life before replacement
Some recycled Prone to migrating, more
maintenance
Less resiliency, harder surface
Perception of toxicity Requires shock pad*, higher
cost
Requires shock pad*, higher
cost
Heavy metals in trace amounts,
not releasable
Moisture required to retain
resiliency, can freeze
Can be abrasive
Shock pad required with some
products
May contain pesticides, heavy
metals in trace amounts that
are releasable
Synthetic Turf Field Infill Options
* Cannot be used due to environmental conditions
Synthetic Turf Field Infill Options
Environmental Obstacles
Recycled
Virgin
Pad Req’d
Floats
Floats
Scours
Environmental
• Floodplain Permit from City
– No increase in elevation or fill in the project
• Wetland Permit from NYSDEC – Buffer
– No work in the wetlands
• Stormwater and Erosion Control
Old Concerns
• Crumb Rubber Issue
– Trace Amounts of metals, perceived toxicity
– Not releasable, “bound within the matrix”
– Most levels below standards and background levels in
soil
– Meets CA Prop 65, European REACH, and ASTM
F3188-16 (Toys)
• Heat (due to black color)
– Coating reduces this
• Injury, Playability
Regulatory Input
• NYSED
• NYS DOH – 2009 Memo
New Concerns
• PFAS/PFOA
– Compounds are a concern in drinking water only
– Are related to Teflon, used in manufacturing
– Compounds were reported found in and around
discarded turf
– There is no science on this yet
– Most manufacturers don’t use PFAS/PFOA in
manufacturing
– PFAS/PFOA don’t meet CA Proposition 65 Standard
therefore cannot be present in fields we specify
Field Design
• New Field will support multiple sports. Striped for 5 sports.
• Specified EPDM over crumb rubber (lower scour potential). SG
= 1.24
• EPDM – crosslinked thermoset rubber – chemicals not
releasable
• Specified coated EPDM (Heat Reduction).
• All materials to meet CA Proposition 65/ European Reach
Standards.
• Meets all constraints for playability, drainage, weather
• We will secure CA Proposition 65 certifications from
manufacturers
• We are developing a lightweight, easily deployable tarping
system
Applicable Standards
• California Proposition 65
• European Reach Standard
• Reviewed and approved by NYSED
• All necessary permits
– City of Rye
– NYSDEC
Thank Youwestonandsampson.com