ryan bricker jeremy simanteleconomics.uoregon.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/... · jeremy simantel...
TRANSCRIPT
The Land Premium in Eugene/Springfield:
Determining the price differentials of brownfield and greenfield parcels and the impact of the
enterprise zone
Ryan Bricker Jeremy Simantel
Community Values
• Eugene seems to value infill
• Vacant buildings
• Urban Growth Boundary – Established in 1970’s to limit sprawl
Land Types
• Greenfield – Free of use, no improvements to the land
• Brownfield – Contamination Risks
• Grayfield – Not contaminated with a building on it
Enterprise Zone
• West Eugene Enterprise Zone – Very selective area of coverage – Active years: 1987-1997 and 2005-Present
• Gap is useful in determining price effects
• Springfield Enterprise Zone – Wide area of coverage
– Difficult to statistically analyze
Past Research • No relationship between contamination and vacancy rates • After remediation of known contaminated properties the price goes
back up to match comparable uncontaminated properties • Parcels of land that are known to be contaminated do sell but at a
discount to comparable properties • Study in Baltimore found that only 5% of properties didn’t sell over a
10 year study window • A general conclusion that under-used land is not being driven by
contamination but by other factors – Such as the land not fitting current use demands – Outdated infrastructure – Characteristics of the city itself detracting from redevelopment
Our study will determine the…
• Eugene/Springfield greenfield premiums
• Eugene/Springfield brownfield effect
• West Eugene Enterprise Zone's effect on market value
Statistical Analysis
• Market value through observed prices – Hedonic pricing model
• Control for characteristics of the industrial property that would influence selling price
• Price = f(characteristics of land)
Shortcomings of the Data
• 1) Time Mismatch – The data set includes historical prices but
does not include historical characteristics – For instance a property selling in 1990 we
would have the accurate selling price but that parcels characteristics would be as they are today
Data Shortcomings
• 2) Property Values and Land Values – We don’t have an accurate measure for building
characteristics so we ran two regressions to look at strictly the selling price and then the selling price proportioned to the land
– Used the improvement ratio which was the % of the improvements to the land relative to the land value
– Both measures came from data the tax assessors put together
Statistical Analysis (continued)
• Price Depends on Acreage Intensity of development (Improvement Ratio) Distance to Eugene Center Distance to Closest HWY On-Ramp Distance to Closest I-5 On-Ramp West Eugene Enterprise Zone
Brownfield Greenfield Eugene City Limits
Industrial Zoning Year Sold
Two Models
• Sales price = f(characteristics of land) • Portion of sales price attributed to land
= f(characteristics of land) • Derived by:
Sales Price * (land ratio)
Main Determinants of Land Prices (Acres) • Ln(Acres) – measures elasticity
• 1% increase in acreage = coefficient % increase in price
Variable Coefficient Significant Standard Error
-- Sales Prices -- Ln(Acres) +0.6% Yes 0.023
Ln(Acres)2 -0.05% Yes 0.016
-- Land Prices -- Ln(Acres) +0.57% Yes 0.024
Ln(Acres)2 -0.043% Yes 0.0166
Main Determinants of Land Prices (Improvement Ratio)
• ln[(improvements) / (improvements + land value)] – measures elasticity of improvements
• 1% increase in improvements relative to lot value increases sales price by coefficient
Variable Coefficient Significant Standard Error
– Sales Prices – Ln(ratio) +0.38% Yes 0.0787
Ln(ratio)2 +0.0475% Yes 0.0155
Could not be Used in Land Prices Model (Endogeniety)
Main Determinants of Land Prices (Distance Variables) • Enterprise Zone – Measures the effect of the nearest distance to
Eugene City Center, Highway and I5 on ramp
Variable Coefficient Significant Standard Error
– Sales Prices – Eugene Center -0.445% Yes 0.0639
Highway OnRamp +0.026% No 0.0458
I5 On Ramp +0.127% Yes 0.07439
– Land Prices – Eugene Center -0.303% Yes 0.07155
Highway OnRamp +0.053% No 0.049
I5 On Ramp +0.082% No 0.082
Main Determinants of Land Prices (Zoning) • Zoning Classification – Measures what, if any, industrial zoning lot is under
• Depending upon the zoning of the site, the logarithm of the price will be increase/decrease by the coefficient
Variable Coefficient Significant Standard Error
– Sales Prices – Zoning i1 +0.45 No 0.686
Zoning i2 -0.64 No 0.665
Zoning i3 -0.65 No 0.664
– Land Prices – Zoning i1 +0.168 No 0.622
Zoning i2 -0.594 No 0.621
Zoning i3 -0.598 No 0.620
Main Determinants of Land Prices (Zoning) • Zoning Classification – Measures what, if any, industrial zoning lot is under
• Depending upon the zoning of the site, the logarithm of the price will be increase/decrease by the coefficient
Variable Coefficient Significant Standard Error
– Sales Prices (2000-2006) – Zoning i1 +1.516 Yes 0.329
Zoning i2 +0.611 Yes 0.179
Zoning i3 +0.527 Yes 0.156
– Land Prices (2000-2006) – Zoning i1 +1.047 Yes 0.304
Zoning i2 +0.504 Yes 0.177
Zoning i3 +0.395 Yes 0.156
Main Determinants of Land Prices (Greenfield) • Brownfield – measures whether or not parcel experienced
• If site was at one time a brownfield, the logarithm of the price will be increase/decrease by the coefficient
Variable Coefficient Significant Standard Error
– Sales Prices – Greenfield -0.998 Yes 0.0857
Accounts for approximately 62.8% of an average plot’s price
– Land Prices – Greenfield +0.16 Yes 0.07333
Accounts for approximately 17% of the an average plot’s price
Main Determinants of Land Prices (Brownfield) • Brownfield – measures whether or not parcel experienced
contamination at one point or another • If site was at one time a brownfield, the logarithm of the
price will be increase/decrease by the coefficient
Variable Coefficient Significant Standard Error
– Sales Prices – Brownfield -0.239 No 0.385
Would be -$6,500 impact on average lot’s price
– Land Prices – Brownfield -0.199 No 0.397
Would be -$3,250 impact on average parcel’s land’s price
Main Determinants of Land Prices (Eugene and Enterprise Zone)
• Enterprise Zone – Measures the effect of being in Eugene and the Enterprise Zone
Variable Coefficient Significant Standard Error
– Sales Prices – Eugene +0.33 No 0.67
EZ Effective -0.1995 Yes 0.0973
EZ Property +0.16 Yes 0.0988
– Land Prices – Eugene +0.496 No 0.635
EZ Effective -0.268 Yes 0.102
EZ Property +0.097 No 0.105
Base Regression
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Coe
ffici
ent
Land Price
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2005 2006
Year
Coe
ffici
ent
Future Research • Examine more closely the “value” buildings
hold in relation to the types of firms entering
• Control for historical attributes
• West Eugene Enterprise Zone’s on things other than prices
Wish List
• Historical Characteristics (Greenfield, Zoning, etc.)
• Data on building attributes (Age, Square Feet, etc.)
• Other indicators of what some would call brownfields (besides contamination data)
– Land use codes (vacant structures)
• Length of time on the market
Recap • Enterprise Zone seems to have a negative
effect • Greenfields create premiums in land price • Contamination’s effect is not clear in Eugene
due to small amounts of recorded contamination
Questions? • Questions/comments on anything?