2010 MoS results achieved

Exchange 1123 Members 1756 Leaders 276 X+L 44 Entities 31

2010 STATISTICS REPORT

AIESEC RUSSIA

January - December

Global Ranking Exchange

Rank GN Country TN RE Rank GN Country EP RE Rank GN Country X RE

1 AP INDIA 2391 1 AP MAINLAND CHINA 1567 1 AP INDIA 3025

2 CEE TURKEY 1157 2 IGN BRAZIL 846 2 AP MAINLAND CHINA 2458

3 AP MAINLAND CHINA 891 3 CEE POLAND 768 3 CEE POLAND 1419

4 CEE RUSSIA 653 4 AP INDIA 634 4 IGN BRAZIL 1395

5 CEE POLAND 651 5 WENA UNITED STATES 470 5 CEE TURKEY 1389

6 IGN BRAZIL 549 6 CEE RUSSIA 470 6 CEE RUSSIA 1123

7 CEE UKRAINE 487 7 CEE UKRAINE 444 7 CEE UKRAINE 931

8 AP INDONESIA 411 8 WENA GERMANY 426 8 WENA GERMANY 733

9 AP MALAYSIA 354 9 IGN COLOMBIA 385 9 AP INDONESIA 622

10 AP PHILIPPINES 325 10 AP JAPAN 370 10 IGN COLOMBIA 566 We have finished 2010 being #4 globally in TN side, #6 in EP side and #6 totally with 1123 exchanges realized going after India, China, Poland, Brazil and Turkey. Our last year competitor Ukraine left far behind with 931 exchanges realized. By absolute country ranking Russia is #5 with absolute growth of 599 exchanges compared to previous year. By relative growth we are #24 globally with the growth of 114%. As for the LC ranking, congratulations to SPUEF and Moscow for being #14 and #19 globally, looking forward to see more Russian LCs in TOP 20, and even TOP 10 ranking among the Local Committees worldwide.

National Ranking

2010 goal TN Re GAP % of plan 2010 goal EP re GAP % of plan 2010 goal

Exchange

realized GAP % of plan

SPUEF 201 143 58 71% 174 66 108 38% 375 209 166 56%

Moscow 248 80 168 32% 143 97 46 68% 391 177 214 45%

E&G 114 82 32 72% 96 63 33 66% 210 145 65 69%

Ufa 151 66 85 44% 92 33 59 36% 243 99 144 41%

Samara 152 68 84 45% 20 16 4 80% 172 84 88 49%

NSTU 117 34 83 29% 146 48 98 33% 263 82 181 31%

NSU 165 33 132 20% 40 26 14 65% 205 59 146 29%

Chelyabinsk 57 34 23 60% 37 23 14 62% 94 57 37 61%

Saratov 65 29 36 45% 40 13 27 33% 105 42 63 40%

Krasnoyarsk 33 15 18 45% 37 18 19 49% 70 33 37 47%

Izhevsk 37 10 27 27% 25 19 6 76% 62 29 33 47%

Omsk 32 17 15 53% 33 11 22 33% 65 28 37 43%

Tomsk 30 18 12 60% 25 3 22 12% 55 21 34 38%

Kaliningrad 15 6 9 40% 25 12 13 48% 40 18 22 45%

Kazan 30 7 23 23% 25 7 18 28% 55 14 41 25%

N. Chelny 25 6 19 24% 40 5 35 13% 65 11 54 17%

Khabarovsk 7 7

Togliatti 3 -3 3

Perm 2 2

Volgograd 1 1

SSTU 1 -1 1 -1

MC 1 -1 1

Total 1472 653 820 44% 998 470 538 47% 2470 1123 1358 45%

LCTN EP Total

Congratulations LC SPUEF for being #1 Local Committee in Russia with absolute exchange realization 209! Only 3 LCs crossed the line of 100 exchanges in the last year – SPUEF, Moscow and E&G. Hopefully this year there will be new heights for each LC in Russia. Highest plan realization reached E&G with 69% of plan realization.

Relative and absolute growth

LC 2009 2010 Rel.growth Abs.growth

SPUEF 67 209 212% 142

Moscow 59 177 200% 118

E&G 47 145 209% 98

Ufa 58 99 71% 41

Samara 25 84 236% 59

NSTU 64 82 28% 18

NSU 38 59 55% 21

Chelyabinsk 37 57 54% 20

Saratov 21 42 100% 21

Krasnoyarsk 6 33 450% 27

Izhevsk 25 29 16% 4

Omsk 20 28 40% 8

Tomsk 0 21 2100% 21

Kaliningrad 22 18 -18% -4

Kazan 13 14 8% 1

Nab.Chelny 14 11 -21% -3

Khabarovsk 0 7 700% 7

Togliatti 0 3 300% 3

Perm 0 2 200% 2

SSTU 0 1 100% 1

Volgograd 0 1 100% 1

MC 8 1 -88% -7

Total 516 1123 118% 607 By relative growth in exchange highest number has LC Krasnoyarsk with 450% and a good start had LC Tomsk going from 0 to 21 exchanges. In absolute numbers SPUEF and Moscow are leading the ranking nationally.

0

50

100

150

200

250

SPU

EF

Mo

sco

w

E&G

Ufa

Sam

ara

NST

U

NSU

Ch

elya

bin

sk

Sara

tov

Kra

sno

yars

k

Izh

evsk

Om

sk

Tom

sk

Kal

inin

grad

Kaz

an

Nab

.Ch

eln

y

Kh

abar

ovs

k

Togl

iatt

i

Per

m

SSTU

Vo

lgo

grad M

C

Exchange growth by LCs

2009

2010

ICX

Realization by pools

LC DT ET MT TT Total

SPUEF 135 4 4 143

E&G 78 2 2 82

Moscow 71 6 3 80

Samara 66 1 1 68

Ufa 62 3 1 66

Chelyabinsk 21 13 34

NSTU 33 1 34

NSU 17 2 14 33

Saratov 29 29

Tomsk 18 18

Omsk 12 5 17

Krasnoyarsk 12 1 2 15

Izhevsk 7 2 1 10

Kazan 7 7

N. Chelny 5 1 6

Kaliningrad 5 1 6

Togliatti 3 3

Volgograd 1 1

SSTU 1 1

Total 583 41 28 1 653 In ICX the leading LC is SPUEF with 143 realizations. Biggest amount of corporate exchanges has reached LC NSU – 14 MT TN realized in 2010. As for the pool distribution still there is a prevalence of DT internships – 89% of whole ICX in Russia.

89%

6%5%

0%

ICX POOLS DISTRIBUTION

DT

ET

MT

TT

ICX DIVERSITY

COUNTRY DT ET MT TT Total

BRAZIL 92 2 2 96

CHINA, MAINLAND 75 5 2 1 83

INDIA 66 13 79

POLAND 41 1 12 54

TURKEY 27 2 1 30

UKRAINE 30 30

TAIWAN 23 23

UNITED STATES 8 8 2 18

INDONESIA 17 1 18

SLOVAKIA 16 1 17

EGYPT 16 16

ITALY 14 1 15

BULGARIA 15 15

ROMANIA 12 1 13

COLOMBIA 10 1 11

JAPAN 10 1 11

SERBIA 9 1 10

UNITED KINGDOM 8 2 10

SINGAPORE 9 9

GERMANY 9 9 There is a huge diversity of countries interns come to Russia from. You can see here just TOP 20 countries split by pools. The TOP EP provider for Russia last year was Brazil with 96 exchanges realized. Afterwards goes China and India. BRIC relevance is seen as never. We grew a lot with Poland, Turkey and Ukraine – our CEE neighbors.

15%

13%

12%

8%5%

5%4%3%

3%

3%

2%

2%

2%

2%

2%2%

2%2%

1% 1%13%

COUNTRIES DIVERSITYBRAZILCHINA, MAINLANDINDIAPOLANDTURKEYUKRAINETAIWANUNITED STATESINDONESIASLOVAKIAEGYPTITALYBULGARIAROMANIACOLOMBIAJAPANSERBIAUNITED KINGDOMSINGAPOREGERMANYOTHERS

ICX DIVERSITY

EP LC DT ET MT TT Total

CHANDIGARH 23 10 33

CAMPINAS 14 14

WROCLAW UE 13 1 14

SYSU 13 13

DELHI IIT 9 3 12

GDUFS 12 12

PKU 8 1 1 1 11

NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY 10 10

UNDIP 9 9

PORTO ALEGRE 9 9

BURSA 7 1 8

SANTA MARIA 8 8

KRAKOW 6 1 7

AAST IN CAIRO 7 7

BLAGOEVGRAD 7 7

ESPM 7 7

BUCURESTI 7 7

SZCZECIN 5 2 7

BRATISLAVA 7 7

IVANO-FRANKIVSK 7 7 We have TOP EP providing LCs from diverse countries: India, Brazil, Poland, Mainland China, Indonesia, Taiwan, Turkey etc. A lot of realizations with Chandigarh and Campinas came through LC2LC cooperations (e.g. Moscow, Ufa) – it means this is one of the key growth points for realization in this year

05

101520253035

CH

AN

DIG

AR

H

CA

MP

INA

S

WR

OC

LAW

UE

SYSU

DEL

HI I

IT

GD

UFS

PK

U

NTU

UN

DIP

PO

RTO

ALE

GR

E

BU

RSA

SAN

TA M

AR

IA

KR

AK

OW

AA

ST IN

CA

IRO

BLA

GO

EVG

RA

D

ESP

M

BU

CU

RES

TI

SZC

ZEC

IN

BR

ATI

SLA

VA

IVA

NO

-FR

AN

KIV

SK

TOP 20 EP providing LCs

ICX ICX Non-Corporate

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

REALIZED 9 8 12 21 41

MATCHED 11 7 16 26 37

RAISED 4 5 23 30 50

0102030405060

Exch

ange

re

sult

ET ICX DYNAMICS

Our growth in DT was 274% more than in a previous year! Amazing growth. 3 peaks out of 5 planned already passed and all of them happened though with a lower realization than we have planned

ICX ICX Corporate

Global Ranking CICX CEE Ranking CICX

Ranking Country TN RE

1 INDIA 726

2 GERMANY 305

3 BRAZIL 170

4 TURKEY 168

5 POLAND 164

6 CHINA, MAINLAND 141

7 NETHERLANDS 108

8 BELGIUM 87

9 JAPAN 78

10 HUNGARY 77

30 RUSSIAN FEDERATION 29

Ranking Country TN RE

1 TURKEY 168

2 POLAND 164

3 HUNGARY 77

4 CZECH REPUBLIC 63

5 TUNISIA 45

6 SLOVAKIA 37

7 RUSSIAN FEDERATION 29

The missing point to bring Russia on the top in the categories we still need to work on our corporate exchange

Realized and raised corporate TNs in 2010 Raised and realized TNs by pools

We grew in number of raised TN forms but due low activity in corporate matching we haven’t been able to turn the raised TN forms into realized. The highest number of realized corporate TN forms (36) still belongs to 2005 year.

2925

14

19

73

3428

26

9

29

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

RA

RE

Raised

TT

MT

Realized

TT

MT

ICX ICX Corporate

Available and realized TNs by LC

Due above mentioned reasons only 4 of our 16 LCs could realize corporate ICX during 2010. Sadly many of LCs that are providing top results in DT ICX are not delivering any results in corporate pools. On the other hand we can see that to raise TNs is becoming easy even in very short time as it proved for example Engec-Guap LC in the autumn of 2010.

Realization peaks in corporate TNs Raising peaks corporate TNs

02468

10121416

Available

Realized

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

t

Oct

No

v

Dec

Average 2006-2010

2010

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

t

Oct

No

v

Dec

Average 2006-2010

2010

ICX ICX Corporate

Top 10 Backgrounds Most Demanded by TN Takers

MT TT

International Marketing 18 Software Development and Programming 9

Advertising + Public Relations 13 Web development and management 9

Retail + Sales Marketing 12 Systems analysis and design 6

Market Evaluation and Research 10 Database management 5

Project Management 10 Network management & data transmission 5

Import - Export 9 Project Management 4

Product Planning, Development & Control 8 Introductory Engineering 3

Introductory Marketing 7 Introductory Education 2

Consumer + Buyer Behaviour 6 Training and development 2

Introductory HR management 4 Advertising + Public Relations 1

Rejected vs. realized corporate TNs in years

From 2006 till 2010 we register in total 225 MT and 33 TT rejected TNs. Now the only question is whether we manage to match and realize our currently available forms and make the real historical breakthrough or we just end up putting them on rejected status as it was happening long years of Russian corporate history.

83

61

53

30 3128 25 24

9

28

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Rejected

Realized

11

4

0 1

6

2 1 1

64

2 1 1 0 0 0 002468

1012

NSU

Spu

ef

Kal

inin

grad

Izh

evsk

Mo

sco

w

Ufa

Kra

sno

yars

k

Ch

elya

bin

sk EG

Sam

ara

Sara

tov

NST

U

Togl

iatt

i

Nab

Ch

eln

y

Kaz

an

Tom

sk

Om

sk

Available corporate TNs

OGX

Realization by pools

LC EP Re LC DT LC ET LC MT LC TT

Moscow 97 Moscow 54 Moscow 7 Moscow 34 Ufa 6

SPUEF 66 SPUEF 38 NSTU 7 E&G 28 SPUEF 5

E&G 63 E&G 26 E&G 6 NSTU 26 NSTU 3

NSTU 48 Ufa 17 Omsk 6 SPUEF 19 E&G 3

Ufa 33 Krasnoyarsk 15 Ufa 5 NSU 19 Tomsk 2

NSU 26 NSTU 12 Izhevsk 5 Chelyabinsk 12 Kaliningrad 2

Chelyabinsk 23 Samara 8 Chelyabinsk 5 Izhevsk 8 Moscow 2

Izhevsk 19 Saratov 6 SPUEF 4 Saratov 5 Chelyabinsk 1

Krasnoyarsk 18 Izhevsk 6 Samara 4 Ufa 5 Saratov 1

Samara 16 Kaliningrad 5 Krasnoyarsk 3 Samara 4 Kazan 1

Saratov 13 NSU 5 Kaliningrad 2 Kazan 4 Total 26

Kaliningrad 12 Chelyabinsk 5 NSU 2 Kaliningrad 3

Omsk 11 Khabarovsk 4 Chelny 1 Khabarovsk 3

Kazan 7 Omsk 2 Saratov 1 Omsk 3

Khabarovsk 7 Perm 2 Tomsk 1 Chelny 2

Nab. Chelny 5 Kazan 2 Total 59 MC 1

Tomsk 3 Chelny 2 Total 176

Perm 2 Total 209

MC 1

Total 470 In OGX the absolute leader is LC Moscow with 97 EPs realized in 2010. Good dynamics has SPUEF and E&G, being along with Moscow one of the TOP DT EP providers in Russia. Ufa is first in TT EP realizations having 6 EPs last year. Totally we reached 470 OGX realizations.

OGX DIVERSITY

TURKEY 46 INDIA 12 INDIA 45 INDIA 11

INDIA 42 CHINA 11 TURKEY 19 SWEDEN 2

CHINA 29 POLAND 10 GERMANY 17 BRAZIL 2

POLAND 9 TURKEY 9 CHINA, MAINLAND 11

SERBIA 8 COLOMBIA 7 POLAND 10

INDONESIA 8 FRANCE 6

ITALY 7 CROATIA 5

BRAZIL 6 AUSTRIA 5

TAIWAN 5 BRAZIL 5

MALAYSIA 5 ITALY 4

Main DT partners Main ET partners Main MT partners Main TT partners

India is our absolute leading TN taker. In TOP partners there are also Turkey, China, Germany, Poland.

59

209

176

26

0

50

100

150

200

250

ET DT MT TT

Eps Re by pools

Eps Re

First time in our history we have DT pool realization bigger than MT. Congratulations to the whole country with that level up achievement! 209 DT internships realized in 2010! Still we are one of the TOP providers of qualified MT EPs worldwide.

Members | Leaders | X+L

Plan realization Members growth by years

Membership Growth Factors: Growth in scale of operations leads to growth in membership and big scale recruitments. % of members in region correlate with X results

Global Ranking by Members completing leadership experience

101304

3000

44276

1759

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

X+L Leadership opportunities

Membership

Goal

Re

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

180300 350

822

1312

Membership

Membership

59% growth!

Members | Leaders | X+L

Membership distribution by regions

Leadership Role Growth Factors: • The leadership roles have becoming one of the most important experiences we provide and continued rapid growth. • Operations has increased, so more leaders are needed to manage it on the ground. • More applicants per full time leadership role than in the past. More people striving for prominent roles.

49%

30%

21%

46%

28% 26%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

West Center East

% of X in region

% of members per region

46%

28%

26%

% of members per region

West Centre East

3600

29842680 2650

1966 1877 1759 1578

0500

1000150020002500300035004000

Membership (with EPs)

Members | Leaders | X+L

We have experienced a speeded up growth in Q4 2010 compared with the previous quarter. 1. More leadership roles are provided both to general membership and exchange participants. Thus we have successfully increased the

ratio of members who can have leadership experiences.

2. Step to short term leadership roles in 2010 to increase number of leadership XP generated by AIESEC Russia

44

110

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

2010 Q4

2009 Q4

Leadership role assignments

leadership role assignments

150% growth!

Members | Leaders | X+L

X+L ranking nationally

Entity 2009 2010 Growth X after L L after X

AIESEC SPUEF 0 6 600% 4 2

AIESEC CHELYABINSK 3 5 67% 4 1

AIESEC MOSCOW 1 5 400% 3 2

AIESEC SARATOV 0 4 400% 3 1

AIESEC IZHEVSK 1 4 300% 4 0

AIESEC NSU 1 4 300% 4 0

AIESEC OMSK 4 3 -25% 2 1

AIESEC ENGEC-GAAP 2 2 0% 2 0

AIESEC NSTU 3 2 -33% 2 0

AIESEC KRASNOYARSK 0 2 100% 2 0

AIESEC UFA 2 2 0% 2 0

AIESEC KAZAN 0 1 100% 1 0

AIESEC SAMARA 0 1 100% 0 1

AIESEC KALININGRAD 3 1 -67% 0 1

AIESEC NABEREZHNYIE CHELNY 1 1 0% 1 0

MC 0 1 100% 1 0

Total 21 44 110% 35 9

X+L growth came from

1. X after L initiatives for Alumni and current EB and OCP members.

2. Returnees involvement for leadership positions

0

10

20

30

40

50

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

X+L growth

X+L (2009) X+L (2010)

91% growth!

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

SEE YOU AT THE NEXT LEVEL!