rural spatial development framework/land development plan · the rural spatial development...
TRANSCRIPT
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
1
KAROO HOOGLAND MUNICIPALITY
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT
FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2010
Prepared by:
Approved in terms of Council Resolution _______ dated _________2010
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
2
The Rural Spatial Development Framework/Land Development Plan for Karoo Hoogland
Municipality prepared in terms of the Northern Cape Planning and Development Act, 1998 (Act
7 of 1998) is hereby approved by Karoo Hoogland Council in terms of:
Council Resolution _______ dated ____________
_____________________________________________
(Duly authorized representative of the Municipality)
Prepared by:
Umsebe Development Planners
______________________________
B.J.L. VAN DER MERWE TRP(SA)
Reg. no 1259
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
3
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 ..............................................................................................................................14
1 Forward by the Executive Mayor ........................................................................................15
2 Background ........................................................................................................................15
3 Legislative overview ...........................................................................................................15
4 Institutional framework .......................................................................................................20
5 Public participation strategy ...............................................................................................21
6 Acronyms ...........................................................................................................................22
CHAPTER 2 ..............................................................................................................................25
7 PHASE 1............................................................................................................................26
8 Municipality in context ........................................................................................................26
8.1 Contextual overview ....................................................................................................26
8.2 Population ...................................................................................................................27
8.3 Resources ..................................................................................................................28
8.4 Infrastructure ...............................................................................................................31
9 Pressing needs ..................................................................................................................34
9.1 District needs ..............................................................................................................34
9.2 Local needs ................................................................................................................34
10 Vision .............................................................................................................................35
10.1 District municipality vision ...........................................................................................35
10.2 Local municipality vision..............................................................................................35
10.3 Proposed revised municipal vision ..............................................................................36
10.4 Interrelationship of visions ...........................................................................................36
11 Spatial implication of municipal vision .............................................................................36
12 Spatial translation of IDP principles & strategies .............................................................40
13 IDP and other projects ....................................................................................................41
14 Spatial interpretation of IDP ............................................................................................46
15 Phase 1 synopsis ...........................................................................................................48
CHAPTER 3 ..............................................................................................................................54
16 PHASE 2 ........................................................................................................................55
17 Karoo Hoogland Municipality IDP in context ...................................................................55
18 Institutional analysis .......................................................................................................55
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4
18.1 Institutional background ..............................................................................................55
18.1.1 South African Constitution and Principles of Sustainable Development ...............56
18.1.2 Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, Act 117 of 1998 .............................56
18.1.3 Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 ........................................57
18.1.4 Municipal Planning and Performance Management Regulations, 2001 ................57
18.1.5 The Development Facilitation Act 67 of 1995 .......................................................58
18.1.6 The Land Use Management Bill, 2001 .................................................................60
18.1.7 Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (AsgiSA) ....................61
18.1.8 Transformation of Certain Rural Areas Act (1998) ...............................................61
18.1.9 Northern Cape Planning and Development Act, 1998 (Act 7 of 1998) ..................62
18.2 Alignment with national development perspectives .....................................................63
18.3 Alignment with provincial perspectives ........................................................................74
18.4 Alignment with district development perspectives .......................................................81
18.5 Alignment with local development perspectives ..........................................................85
18.6 Other initiatives ...........................................................................................................87
18.6.1 Square Kilometre Array (SKA) .............................................................................87
18.6.2 SKA Development implications ............................................................................88
18.6.3 South African Large Telescope (S.A.L.T) Development Implications ...................89
18.6.4 Succulent Karoo Ecosystem Programme (SKEP) ................................................90
18.6.5 Namakwa District Biodiversity Sector Plan ...........................................................91
19 Spatial analysis and implication ......................................................................................95
19.1 Regional context .........................................................................................................95
19.2 Environment................................................................................................................96
19.2.1 Climate ................................................................................................................96
19.2.2 Topography .........................................................................................................99
19.2.3 Geology ............................................................................................................. 100
19.2.4 Agriculture potential ........................................................................................... 102
19.2.5 Conservation areas ............................................................................................ 106
19.3 Demographic characteristics ..................................................................................... 107
19.3.1 Population size .................................................................................................. 108
19.3.2 Population dependency ratio .............................................................................. 109
19.3.3 Employment sector ............................................................................................ 111
19.3.4 Household income ............................................................................................. 112
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
5
19.3.5 Population age and gender composition ............................................................ 113
19.3.6 Impact of HIV/Aids ............................................................................................. 114
19.4 Movement and linkages ............................................................................................ 116
19.5 Development trends .................................................................................................. 117
19.5.1 Structuring elements .......................................................................................... 117
19.5.2 Land use and settlement patterns ...................................................................... 118
19.5.3 Proposed future projects/land uses .................................................................... 122
19.5.4 Vacant land analysis .......................................................................................... 124
19.5.5 Urban-rural spatial relationship .......................................................................... 125
19.5.6 Heritage features ............................................................................................... 125
19.6 Economic activity ...................................................................................................... 126
19.6.1 Agriculture ......................................................................................................... 126
19.6.2 Tourism .............................................................................................................. 126
19.6.3 Mining potential .................................................................................................. 127
19.6.4 Investment patterns ........................................................................................... 127
19.7 Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 129
19.7.1 Water ................................................................................................................. 129
19.7.2 Sanitation ........................................................................................................... 130
19.7.3 Electricity ........................................................................................................... 132
19.7.4 Waste management ........................................................................................... 132
19.8 Land ownership ........................................................................................................ 133
19.8.1 Land tenure and ownership ................................................................................ 133
19.8.2 Municipal land .................................................................................................... 134
19.8.3 Land reform ....................................................................................................... 134
20 Relationship between IDP and Current Reality ............................................................. 136
20.1 Relationship between spatial issues and vision ......................................................... 136
21 Strategic Development Concept ................................................................................... 139
21.1 Nodal development ................................................................................................... 139
21.2 Corridor development ............................................................................................... 140
21.3 Precincts ................................................................................................................... 140
22 Phase 2 synopsis ......................................................................................................... 140
CHAPTER 4 ............................................................................................................................ 145
23 PHASE 3 ...................................................................................................................... 146
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
6
24 Spatial goal & objectives .............................................................................................. 146
24.1 Spatial goal ............................................................................................................... 147
24.2 Spatial objectives ...................................................................................................... 147
24.3 Spatial strategies ...................................................................................................... 147
25 Strategic Development Concept ................................................................................... 148
25.1 Structuring elements ................................................................................................. 148
25.2 Development opportunities ....................................................................................... 149
25.3 Rural environment..................................................................................................... 149
26 Macro Strategic Development Concept ........................................................................ 150
26.1 Nodal development ................................................................................................... 150
26.2 Corridor development ............................................................................................... 151
26.3 Tourism development ............................................................................................... 152
26.4 Environmental conservation ...................................................................................... 154
26.5 Mining development .................................................................................................. 154
26.6 Agriculture ................................................................................................................ 155
26.6.1 Comprehensive Rural Development Programme ............................................... 155
26.6.2 Rural development ............................................................................................. 156
26.6.3 Agrarian transformation ..................................................................................... 156
26.6.4 Land reform ....................................................................................................... 156
26.7 Planned projects ....................................................................................................... 157
26.7.1 Wind farm .......................................................................................................... 157
26.7.2 Gas exploration .................................................................................................. 158
27 Departure points ........................................................................................................... 158
27.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................. 158
27.2 Limitations and assumptions ..................................................................................... 159
27.3 Sutherland ................................................................................................................ 159
27.3.1 Interpretation of Table 35 ................................................................................... 160
27.3.2 Interpretation of Table 36 ................................................................................... 161
27.3.3 Development phases ......................................................................................... 161
27.4 Fraserburg ................................................................................................................ 162
27.4.1 Interpretation of Table 39 ................................................................................... 163
27.4.2 Development phases ......................................................................................... 163
27.5 Williston .................................................................................................................... 164
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
7
27.5.1 Interpretation of Table 41 ................................................................................... 165
27.5.2 Interpretation of Table 42 ................................................................................... 165
27.5.3 Development phases ......................................................................................... 166
28 Micro Strategic Development Concept ......................................................................... 167
28.1 Spatial planning tools ................................................................................................ 167
28.2 Sutherland ................................................................................................................ 168
28.2.1 Structuring elements .......................................................................................... 168
28.2.2 Mixed use .......................................................................................................... 169
28.2.3 Residential development .................................................................................... 170
28.2.4 Industrial development ....................................................................................... 170
28.2.5 Urban agriculture ............................................................................................... 170
28.2.6 Open space ....................................................................................................... 170
28.2.7 Sports and recreation ......................................................................................... 170
28.2.8 Tourism and accommodation ............................................................................. 170
28.2.9 Other land uses ................................................................................................. 170
28.3 Fraserburg ................................................................................................................ 171
28.3.1 Structuring elements .......................................................................................... 171
28.3.2 Mixed uses ........................................................................................................ 171
28.3.3 Residential development .................................................................................... 172
28.3.4 Industrial development ....................................................................................... 172
28.3.5 Heritage area ..................................................................................................... 172
28.3.6 Open space ....................................................................................................... 172
28.3.7 Sports and recreation ......................................................................................... 172
28.3.8 Tourism and accommodation ............................................................................. 173
28.3.9 Other land uses ................................................................................................. 173
28.4 Williston .................................................................................................................... 173
28.4.1 Structuring elements .......................................................................................... 173
28.4.2 Mixed use .......................................................................................................... 174
28.4.3 Residential development .................................................................................... 174
28.4.4 Industrial development ....................................................................................... 174
28.4.5 Open space ....................................................................................................... 174
28.4.6 Sports & recreation ............................................................................................ 175
28.4.7 Tourism and accommodation ............................................................................. 175
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
8
28.4.8 Other land uses ................................................................................................. 175
29 Intervention areas ......................................................................................................... 176
29.1 Priority investment areas........................................................................................... 176
29.1.1 Investment requirements ................................................................................... 176
29.1.2 Strategic areas for Thusong Service Centres ..................................................... 177
29.2 Policy intervention areas ........................................................................................... 178
30 Phase 3 synopsis ......................................................................................................... 179
CHAPTER 5 ............................................................................................................................ 185
31 Phase 4 ........................................................................................................................ 186
32 Capital Expenditure Framework ................................................................................... 187
33 Implementation Policies ................................................................................................ 187
33.1 Nodal policy .............................................................................................................. 188
33.1.1 Nodal hierarchy .................................................................................................. 188
33.1.2 Nodal interdependence ...................................................................................... 189
33.1.3 Nodal development guidelines ........................................................................... 189
33.2 Movement policy ....................................................................................................... 190
33.2.1 Regional linkages .............................................................................................. 191
33.2.2 Internal municipal access ................................................................................... 191
33.2.3 Road access in towns ........................................................................................ 191
33.3 Urban edge policy ..................................................................................................... 191
33.4 Residential densification policy ................................................................................. 192
33.5 Urban integration policy ............................................................................................ 194
33.6 Infrastructure policy ................................................................................................... 195
33.7 Heritage policy .......................................................................................................... 196
33.8 Sustainability policy ................................................................................................... 196
34 Land Use Management System Guidelines .................................................................. 197
34.1 Environmental conservation ...................................................................................... 198
34.1.1 Water bodies...................................................................................................... 198
34.1.2 Topography ....................................................................................................... 199
34.1.3 Geotechnical considerations .............................................................................. 199
34.2 Tourism development ............................................................................................... 199
34.3 Mining development .................................................................................................. 200
34.4 Agricultural development........................................................................................... 200
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
9
34.4.1 Agri-village ......................................................................................................... 201
34.4.2 Agri-industry ...................................................................................................... 201
34.5 Residential ................................................................................................................ 201
34.5.1 Affordable housing ............................................................................................. 202
34.6 Industrial ................................................................................................................... 202
34.7 cemeteries ................................................................................................................ 203
34.8 Open space .............................................................................................................. 203
34.8.1 Primary open space network .............................................................................. 203
34.8.2 Secondary open space network ......................................................................... 203
35 Sector plan alignment ................................................................................................... 204
36 Monitoring tools ............................................................................................................ 205
37 Marketing strategy ........................................................................................................ 207
37.1 Establishment of an SDF committee ......................................................................... 207
37.2 Establishment of a trade and investment agency or directorate ................................ 207
37.2.1 District business support unit ............................................................................. 208
37.2.2 Proactive direct sector marketing ....................................................................... 208
37.2.3 Marketing to other sources of funding ................................................................ 208
37.2.4 Marketing of agricultural produce ....................................................................... 208
37.3 Establishment of a Tourism Marketing Directorate or Agency ................................... 209
37.3.1 Developing the plan ........................................................................................... 210
37.3.2 Strategic objectives ............................................................................................ 210
38 List of References ........................................................................................................ 214
39 ANNEXURE A: CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK ........................................... 216
40 ANNEXURE B: MAPS .................................................................................................. 217
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
10
LIST OF PLANS
PLAN 1: PROVINCIAL CONTEXT
PLAN 2: DISTRICT CONTEXT
PLAN 3: URBAN/RURAL CONTEXT
PLAN 4: MAIN RESOURCES
PLAN 5: SETTLEMENT PATTERNS & POPULATION DISTRIBUTION
PLAN 6: INFRASTRUCTURE
PLAN 7: PRESSING NEEDS VERSUS FUNDED PROJECTS
PLAN 8: NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCIAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
PLAN 9: WESTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
PLAN 10: DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
PLAN 11: SQUARE KILOMETER ARRAY (SKA)
PLAN 12: SUCCULENT KAROO ECOSYSTEM PROGRAM (SKEP)
PLAN 13: REGIONAL CRITICAL BIODIVERSITY AREAS (CBA)
PLAN 14: CRITICAL BIODIVERSITY AREAS (CBA)
PLAN 15: REGIONAL LINKAGES
PLAN 16: ANNUAL RAINFALL
PLAN 17: SLOPE ANALYSIS
PLAN 18: GEOLOGY
PLAN 19: DISTRICT ECONOMIC GEOLOGY
PLAN 20: ECONOMIC GEOLOGY
PLAN 21: MINING LAND
PLAN 22: AGRICULTURAL LAND CAPABILITY
PLAN 23: AGRICULTURAL SOIL POTENTIAL
PLAN 24: CONSERVATION AREAS
PLAN 25: PROSOPIS DISTRIBUTION
PLAN 26: MUNICIPAL LAND COVER
PLAN 27: LAND USES (WILLISTON - 01)
PLAN 28: LAND USES (WILLISTON - 02)
PLAN 29: LAND USES (SUTHERLAND - 01)
PLAN 30: LAND USES (SUTHERLAND - 02)
PLAN 31: LAND USES (FRASERBURG - 01)
PLAN 32: LAND USES (FRASERBURG - 02)
PLAN 33: HERITAGE SITES DISTRICT CONTEXT
PLAN 34: HERITAGE SITES
PLAN 35: WATER INFRASTRUCTURE
PLAN 36: WATER BODIES
PLAN 37: SANITATION INFRASTRUCTURE
PLAN 38: ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
PLAN 39: LANDFILL SITES
PLAN 40: LAND OWNERSHIP
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
11
PLAN 41: LAND REFORM DISTRICT CONTEXT
PLAN 42: LAND REFORM
PLAN 43: KAROO HOOGLAND STRUCTURING ELEMENTS
PLAN 44: KAROO HOOGLAND MACRO STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
PLAN 45: SUTHERLAND STRUCTURING ELEMENTS
PLAN 46: SUTHERLAND MICRO STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
PLAN 47: FRASERBURG STRUCTURING ELEMENTS
PLAN 48: FRASERBURG MICRO STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
PLAN 49: WILLISTON STRUCTURING ELEMENTS
PLAN 50: WILLISTON MICRO STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
LIST OF TABLES PAGE NO.
TABLE 1: CONTEXTUAL OVERVIEW 26
TABLE 2A: HOUSEHOLD AND POPULATION FIGURES PER URBAN AREA 27
TABLE 2B: POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD TRENDS 27
TABLE 3: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE STANDARDS - ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURE 33
TABLE 4: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE STANDARDS – SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 33
TABLE 5: INTERRELATIONSHIP OF VISIONS 36
TABLE 6: VISION ANALYSIS 37 – 40
TABLE 7: KPA’S AND KEY OBJECTIVES 40 – 41
TABLE 8: PROJECTS 45 – 45
TABLE 9: INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS 63 – 86
TABLE 10: CRITICAL BIODIVERSITY AREAS 92 – 94
TABLE 11: REGIONAL CONTEXT 95
TABLE 12: AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFALL 96
TABLE 13: SLOPE ANALYSIS 99
TABLE 14: GEOLOGY TYPES 100
TABLE 15: AGRICULTURAL LAND CAPABILITY CATEGORIES 102
TABLE 16: AGRICULTURAL SOIL POTENTIAL CATEGORIES 103
TABLE 17: SOILS HIGHLY SUITED TO ARABLE AGRICULTURE WHERE CLIMATE PERMITS 103 – 105
TABLE 18: HOUSEHOLD INCOME 112
TABLE 19: NORTHERN CAPE HIV/AIDS STATISTICS 114
TABLE 20: DISTANCES AND TRAVEL TIMES 116
TABLE 21: MODES OF TRANSPORT PER PERSON 116
TABLE 22: LAND COVER 118 – 119
TABLE 23: SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 122
TABLE 24: FUNDED PROJECTS AND LOCATION 122 – 123
TABLE 25: INVESTMENT PATTERNS 127
TABLE 26: WATER ACCESS PER HOUSEHOLD IN 2001 129
TABLE 27: SANITATION ACCESS PER HOUSEHOLD IN 2001 130
TABLE 28: STATUS OF OXIDATION PONDS 131
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
12
TABLE 29: ELECTRICITY PROVISION PER HOUSEHOLD 132
TABLE 30: STATUS OF LANDFILL SITES 133
TABLE 31: MUNICIPAL PROPERTY 134
TABLE 32: KAROO HOOGLAND STRUCTURING ELEMENTS 149
TABLE 33: FUNCTIONALITY TYPE 150
TABLE 34: POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS 159
TABLE 35: SUTHERLAND LAND DEMAND 159 – 160
TABLE 36: SUTHERLAND INFRASTRUCTURE DEMAND 160
TABLE 37: SUTHERLAND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PHASES 161
TABLE 38: FRASERBURG LAND DEMAND 162
TABLE 39: FRASERBURG INFRASTRUCTURE DEMAND 163
TABLE 40: FRASERBURG PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PHASES 163
TABLE 41: WILLISTON LAND DEMAND 164
TABLE 42: WILLISTON INFRASTRUCTURE DEMAND 165
TABLE 43: WILLISTON PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PHASES 166
TABLE 44: SPATIAL PLANNING TOOLS 167 – 168
TABLE 45: SUTHERLAND STRUCTURING ELEMENTS 169
TABLE 46: FRASERBURG STRUCTURING ELEMENTS 171
TABLE 47: WILLISTON STRUCTURING ELEMENTS 173 – 174
TABLE 48: NODAL CLASSIFICATION 188
TABLE 49: STATUS OF SECTOR PLANS 205
LIST OF FIGURES PAGE NO.
FIGURE 1: SEQUENCE OF PROCESSES 40
FIGURE 2: AVERAGE TEMPERATURES 98
FIGURE 3: AVERAGE RAINFALL 98
FIGURE 4: WIND ROSE DIAGRAM 99
FIGURE 5: POPULATION DISTRIBUTION IN THE NAMAKWA DISTRICT PER MUNICIPALITY 108
FIGURE 6: HOUSEHOLDS PER TOWN 108
FIGURE 7: POPULATION COMPARISON 2001 VS 2007 109
FIGURE 8: EMPLOYMENT STATUS PER PERSON 109
FIGURE 9: EMPLOYMENT STATUS COMPARISON 2001 VS 2007 110
FIGURE 10: EMPLOYMENT DISTRIBUTION PER PERSON 111
FIGURE 11: EMPLOYMENT SECTOR COMPARISON 2001 VS 2007 111
FIGURE 12: AGE AND GENDER PER PERSON 113
FIGURE 13: AGE TREND 2001 TO 2007 113
FIGURE 14: ACCESS TO WATER COMPARISON BETWEEN 2001 AND 2007 130
FIGURE 15: ACCESS TO SANITATION COMPARISON BETWEEN 2001 AND 2007 131
FIGURE 16: ACCESS TO ELECTRICITY FOR LIGHTING COMPARISON BETWEEN 2001 AND 2007
131
FIGURE 17: HOME OWNERSHIP AND TENURE PER HOUSEHOLD 133
FIGURE 18: ORGANISATION 147
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
13
FIGURE 19: SPATIAL STRATEGIES 148
FIGURE 20: COMPREHENSIVE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 155
FIGURE 21: THE SIX-BLOCK SERVICE MODEL 178
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
14
CHAPTER 1
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
15
1 Forward by the Executive Mayor
NOTE: The forward by the Executive Mayor will be included in the final document.
2 Background
The Department of Rural Development and Land Reform has invited bids from Service
Providers to develop a Rural Spatial Development Framework (RSDF) for the Karoo Hoogland
Local Municipality.
Umsebe Development Planners was appointed by the aforementioned department with the
main objective to:
“To develop a rural-specific SDF for Karoo Hoogland Local Municipality to address spatial,
environmental and socio-economic issues confronting rural areas, to develop a SDF that will
facilitate the implementation of the Integrated Development Plan and all government programs
or intentions to fight poverty and facilitate rural development”
3 Legislative overview
There are various legislative frameworks at national, provincial and local government level that
influence spatial development. Relevant pieces of legislation are discussed in more detail in
Phase 2 of this report.
The focus of this section is however on the Municipal Systems Act of 2000, the Local
Government: Municipal Planning and Performance Management Regulations, 2001 and the
Land Use Management Bill as published in 2001 that specifically governs the compilation of a
spatial development framework.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT: MUNICIPAL SYSTEMS ACT, 2000
The Municipal Systems Act (Act 32, 2000) obligates all municipalities to prepare an integrated
Development Plan (IDP) as the primary and overriding management tool. As an integral
component of the IDP the SDF must also adhere to the requirements of the Local Government:
Municipal Planning and Performance Management Regulations, 2001.
The Local Government Municipal Planning and Performance Regulations (2001) stipulate the
content of the SDF. In terms of Section 4 of the Regulations the SDF is required to:
• give effect to principles contained in Chapter 1 of the Development Facilitation Act,
1995;
• set out objectives that reflect desired spatial form of the Municipality;
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
16
• contain strategies and policies regarding the manner in which to achieve the objectives
which must:
o indicate the desired pattern of land use
o indicate the direction of growth
• provide strategic guidance in respect to location and nature of development;
• set out basic guidelines for a land use management system;
• set out a capital investment framework for development programmes;
• incorporate a strategic assessment of the environmental impact of land within the
Municipality;
• identify programmes and projects for development of land within the Municipality;
• be aligned with neighbouring municipal SDF's;
• provide visual representation of the desired spatial form which:
o must indicate areas in which the intensity of land development could be either
increased or reduced;
o must indicate desired and undesired utilisation of land in an area;
o indicate conservation of both the built and natural environment;
o must indicate where public and private land development and infrastructure
investment should take place;
o may delineate the urban edge;
o must identify areas where strategic intervention is required; and
o must indicate where priority spending is required.
THE LAND USE MANAGEMENT BILL, 2001
The main objective of this Bill is to provide a legislative and policy framework that enables local
government to formulate policies, plans and strategies for land use and development in order to
address spatial, economic, social and environmental issues. It attempts to provide uniform land
use management in the Republic of South Africa.
The Land Use Bill is based on the general principle that spatial planning, land use management
and land development must:
• be environmentally friendly;
• enhance equality;
• be efficient;
• be integrated; and
• be based on fair and good governance.
The key subject is that the Land Use Management Bill makes reference to Section 26(e) of the
Municipal Systems Act, 2000. It provides clarity on issues related to the content of the SDF and
it clearly explains that one of the functions of the SDF is to inform development and the
application of new land use management systems.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
17
LEGISLATIVE STATUTE
In terms of Section 35 of the Municipal Systems Act, Act 32 of 2000, the Integrated
Development , of which the SDF forms part:
• Is the principal planning instrument which guides and informs all planning and
development; and
• Binds the municipality in the exercising of its executive authority
Furthermore, in terms of Section 35 and 36 of Act 32 of 2000, the SDF prevails over any plan
prepared in terms of the Physical Planning Act, Act 125 of 1991, and the municipality must give
effect to the IDP and conduct its affairs in a manner which is consistent with the IDP.
As the SDF is a legally required document forming the foundation of a municipality’s IDP, all
planning decisions on land development applications must be based on the extent the
application conforms and gives effect to the SDF/IDP.
In terms of Section 106 of Act 32 of 2000, a municipality and officials within that municipality can
be prosecuted for maladministration, fraud or malpractice should it be found that the
municipality or an official has not conformed to the statutory obligation imposed in terms of
Section 35 of Act 32 of 2000.
NORTHERN CAPE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT
Chapter IV of the Northern Cape Planning and Development Act, Act 7 of 1988, requires that a
municipality prepare a Land Development Plan which in essence is exactly the same as the
requirement for a Spatial Development Framework as required in terms of the Municipal
Systems Act. The approval and adoption of this SDF therefore constitutes to be a Land
Development Plan in terms of the provisions of the Northern Cape Planning and Development
Act.
The compilation of the RSDF is done in terms of Sections 27-29 of the said act, with specific
adherence to Section 29 as indicated in the table below:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
18
A Land Development Plan shall consist of the following components:
(1) A contextual framework, the scope and contents of which shall include the following: Page/s Plan/s
a) The identification, spatial location and evaluation of elements and areas of the natural environment, including environmental resources of ecological, biological, topographical, geological, agricultural and scenic significance; marine systems including marine sanctuaries, dunes, reefs, and estuaries; catchment areas including mountains and valleys, river corridors, wetlands, vleis, flood plains to the 50 year flood line and areas with a high water table, mineral deposits; damaged land, unstable soils, scenic drives and panoramic views; areas of indigenous vegetation including indigenous forests, habitats and nature reserves;
96-106 12, 14, 16-26
b) The identification and assessment of the current and predicted role and need for a public open space system and the provision of recreational, sporting and other public facilities, including libraries, museums and community halls;
117-125 27-32
c) The identification and assessment of the current and future economic trends by sector, including the mining, manufacturing, processing, service and informal sectors, together with their spatial distribution relative to their resource base, infrastructure needs, markets and labour;
26-34, 126-127
1-7, 15, 19-21
d) The identification and assessment of the existing and future social trends, including a demographic and spatial analysis in terms of population composition, its distribution and access to health, education and training, employment, housing, potable water, electricity, public transport and any other indicators of social benefit;
107-114 1-7, 15
e) The identification and assessment of the current and future capacity and spatial distribution of bulk infrastructure, including sewerage, water and electricity reticulation, roads and public transport provision; and
129-132 35, 37-39
f) An evaluation of the historical and cultural built and natural environment. 96-106, 117-125
27-34
(2) A development framework shall consist of a set of co-ordinated and integrated policies, objectives and strategies:
a) Elaborating on and aimed at implementing the Principles referred to in Chapter 1 as well as any other policies, objectives, strategies or programmes prescribed in the Provincial Plan and the District Council Plan or any other initiatives impacting on land development, either at a provincial or national level;
55-91 8-11
b) Informed by the projected future demographic growth and change both within the area of jurisdiction of the local or representative council or as a result of immigration;
146-156, 167-178
44, 46, 48, 50
c) Informed by the projected future economic growth, by sector, within the area of jurisdiction of the local or representative council, as well as any economic activities operation beyond its area of jurisdiction which may have a secondary impact on the local or representative council, together with the infrastructural requirements
146-156, 167-178
44, 46, 48, 50
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
19
needed to service that growth;
d) Informed by a set of identified and projected social needs, and where appropriate, quantifiable standards in relation to people’s access to health, education and training, public transport, employment, recreational facilities (both active and passive) housing, potable water, electricity and any other indicators of social benefit;
158-166 N/a
e) Informed by the projected future infrastructural needs and costs required to service growth and development, as identified in paragraphs c) and (d), within the area of jurisdiction of the local or representative council;
158-166 N/a
f) Informed by a land availability assessment, identifying local government, provincial and national owned land, including any commonage, together with an analysis of its development potential relative to the meeting of the development needs of the local or representative council as identified in subsections c) and (d);
124-125, 133
40-42
g) Informed by the environmental context as provided for in subsection (1) (a). 96-106 44
3. An implementation framework, consisting of prioritized programmes and projects aimed at implementing the policies, objectives and strategies referred to in subsection (2) through):
a) Defining targets based on projected needs, which shall, where appropriate, be informed by the measurable and quantifiable social, economic, health and service related indicators and standards referred to in subsection (2) (d);
187, 216
44
b) Prioritized three-to five-year capital expenditure programmes informing the annual capital and operational budget allocation of the local or representative council;
187, 216
N/a
c) Motivating, revering and securing funding from district council, provincial and national sources; 207-210 N/a
d) Motivating, revering and securing funding from any other funding related agencies; 207-210 N/a
e) Partnership arrangements with the private sector; and 207-210 N/a
f) Any other implementational mechanisms including zoning schemes and land development procedures and regulations, urban renewal programmes and strategic site development.
187-203 N/a
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
20
4 Institutional framework
The compilation of the Karoo Hoogland Local Municipality Rural Spatial Development
Framework (RSDF)/Land Development Plan has involved various role-players, municipal
officials, elected representatives, government departments and key stakeholders through
regular consultative meetings. The RSDF was steered, managed and approved within the
following institutional framework:
PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE (PSC)
A Project Steering Committee was established to ensure overall management of the project.
This committee consisted of representatives from the following organisations:
1. Office of the Premier
2. Department of Rural Development and Land Reform
3. Development Bank of South Africa
4. Relevant Local and respective District Municipalities
5. Provincial Department of Local Government and Housing or Traditional Affairs
6. Department of Local Economic Development, Environment and Tourism
7. Department of Agriculture
8. Department of Roads and Transport
9. Department of Health and Social Development
10. Department of Water Affairs
11. House of Traditional Leaders
PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM (PMT)
A Project Management Team was established to carry out the day to day management of the
project. This team consisted of representatives from the following organizations:
1. Department of Rural Development and Land Reform
2. Development Bank of South Africa
3. Local Municipality
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
The Spatial Development Framework comes into effect upon approval by the Project Steering
Committee as well as the adoption by the Karoo Hoogland Municipal Council by means of a
Council Resolution.
Consultative meetings were held regularly during the course of the project as indicated in the
diagram below. More information on the consultative meetings is available in a separate Public
Participation Report.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
21
5 Public participation strategy
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
22
6 Acronyms
General Acronyms
ABET Adult Basic Education and Training
ASGISA Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa
BBBEE Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment
BEE Black Economic Empowerment
CA Conservation Areas
CASP Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme
CBA Critical Biodiversity Areas
CBD Central Business District
CIP Comprehensive Infrastructure Plan
CRDP Comprehensive Rural Development Programme
CSIR Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
DBSA Development Bank of South Africa
DFA Development Facilitation Act
DSDF District Spatial Development Framework
EFA Emerging Farmers Association
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EPWP Expanded Public Works Programme
FET Further Education and Training
GEAR Growth, Employment and Redistribution
IDC Industrial Development Corporation
IDP Integrated Development Plan
ISRDS Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Strategy
JIPSA Joint Initiative for Priority Skills Acquisition
KPA Key Performance Areas
LED Local Economic Development
LRAD Land Re-distribution for Agricultural Development
LUMS Land Use Management System
MEC Member of Executive Council
MIG Municipal Infrastructure Grant
MPCC Multi Purpose Community Centre (Thusong Service Centre
MSA Municipal Systems Act
MSTA Municipal Structures Act
NC Northern Cape
NDM Namakwa District Municipality
NGO Non-Governmental Organization
NLTSF National Land Transport Strategic Framework
NMC National Monument Council
NSDP National Spatial Development Perspective
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 23
ONA Other Natural Areas
PA Protected Areas
PGDS Provincial Growth and Development Strategy
RBM Results Based Management
RIDS Regional Industrial Development Strategy
SAAO South African Astronomical Observatory
SAHRA South African Heritage Resources Agency
SALT South African Large Telescope
SDF Spatial Development Framework
SEDA Small Enterprise Development Agency
SKA Square Kilometer Array
SKEP Succulent Karoo Ecosystem Programme
SLAG Settlement Land Acquisition Grant
SMME Small Medium and Micro Enterprises
SPP Surplus Peoples Project
SWOT Strength Weakness Opportunities Threats
VIP Ventilated Improved Pit
WCPGDS Western Cape Provincial Growth and Development Strategy
Acronyms of Departments
CISA Conservation International South Africa
COGHSTA
Department of Cooperative Governance, Human Settlements and
Traditional Affairs
DAFF Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
DALRRD Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development
DE Department of Energy
DEA Department of Environmental Affairs
DEAT Northern Cape Department of Economic Affairs and Tourism
DED&T Department of Economic Development and Tourism
DENC Department of Environmenand Nature Conservation
DH Department of Health
DIRC Department of International Relations and Cooperatioin
DMR Department of Mineral Resources
DoT Department of Transport
DRDLR Department of Rural Development and Land Reform
DRPW Department of Roads and Public Works
DSAC Departmetn of Sport, Arts and Culture
DSSPD Department of Social Services and Population Development
DST Department of Science and Technology
DTI Department of Trade and Industry
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 24
DTSL Department of Transport, Safety and Liaison
DWA Departmetn of Water Affairs
FAMDA Northern Capet Fishing and Mariculture Development Association
KHLM Karoo Hooglande Local Municipality
NCTA Northern Cape Tourism Authority
NDM Namwakwa District Municipality
NT National Treasury
SANBI South African National Biodiversity Institute
SANPARKS South African National Parks
SPP Surplus Peoples Project
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 25
CHAPTER 2
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 26
7 PHASE 1
The Integrated Development Plan (IDP) constitutes the blueprint of the municipality’s strategies
in addressing the socio-economic development needs of the communities (Local Government:
Municipal Systems Act, Act 32 of 2000). The IDP reflects the key development focus areas
agreed upon with communities and stakeholders and the Spatial Development Framework
(SDF) in turn guides and informs land development and management.
In other words, the SDF gives spatial effect to multi-sectoral projects identified in the IDP and
assists the municipality in coordinating the implementation of the various sector plans.
Therefore, the SDF cannot operate in isolation but is directly linked to the IDP to ensure
consistency and harmony.
This chapter focuses on the spatial interpretation of the Karoo Hoogland draft IDP 2009-2011.
The purpose is to spatially interpret the municipal vision and strategy to ensure the alignment
thereof with national and provincial planning requirements and to identify key intervention areas
possibly not catered for in the municipal area.
8 Municipality in context
8.1 Contextual overview
Table 1: Contextual overview
ATTRIBUTES DESCRIPTION PLAN
NATIONAL
CONTEXT: Located in the Northern Cape Province, South Africa. Plan 1.1
PROVINCIAL
CONTEXT:
Located in the Namakwa district, one of 5 district municipalities in the
Northern Cape Province Plan 1.2
DISTRICT
CONTEXT:
Karoo Hoogland local municipality is the most southern municipality, one
of 8 municipalities in the Namakwa district municipality. It is bordered by
the Western Cape to the south and by the Pixley ka Seme district
municipality to the east.
Karoo Hoogland local municipality stands to gain additional areas from
the redistribution of the District Management Areas in terms of Northern
Cape Provincial Gazette Notice 120 of 2007, with the proposed inclusion
of the southern portion of NCDMA06, south of R357.
Plan 1.3
WARDS: 4 Plan 1.4
URBAN NODES: Fraserburg, Sutherland, Williston. Plan 1.4
POPULATION: 12 116 Plan 1.6
SIZE (km2): 34 038 km2
BUDGET (R/c): R27 475 562 (Budget Speech, 2010/11).
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 27
8.2 Population
The population of the Karoo Hoogland based on 2005 data is 12 116. Karoo Hoogland has a
small population living in a large region which has resulted in a low population density of 2.8
people per km² (Karoo Hoogland IDP, 2001).
77.3% of the population of Karoo Hoogland are resident in urban areas with the balance of
22.7% residing in the rural areas. The majority of residents, approximately 94.8%, are
permanent residents and reside as follows throughout the four wards:
Table 2A: Household and population figures per urban area
Towns Population Current Households
Ward 1 – Williston 3 072 648
Ward 2 – Fraserburg 2 642 544
Ward 3 – Rural areas 2 754 1 030
Ward 4 - Sutherland 3 648 1 051
TOTALS 12 116 3 273
(Source: Karoo Hoogland IDP 2001-2005)
Table 2B: Population and household trends
Karoo Hoogland
Population Households
1996
Statistics
SA
2001
Statistics
SA
2007
Community
Survey
1996
Statistics
SA
2001
Statistics
SA
2007
Community
Survey
12 116 10 513 10 420 3 271 3 168 2 982
% Increase/Decrease n/a -13.23% -0.88% n/a -3.15% -5.87%
(Source: Stats SA 1996 & 2001 and Community Survey 2007)
The Karoo Hoogland municipality has experienced a steady decline in population and number of
households over the 10 year period from 1996-2007. The population has declined by 14% over
that period with the number of households having decreased by 8.8%.
Sutherland Williston
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 28
8.3 Resources
The availability and accessibility of resources (natural or human) determines the potential for
economic development of a specific area. The main economic sectors of the Karoo Hoogland
Municipality are agriculture and tourism.
The largely rural area of the Karoo Hoogland is characterised by sheep farms and small towns
with agriculture forming the backbone of the Karoo Hoogland economy.
With the amalgamation of the three towns of Williston, Fraserburg and Sutherland into one
municipal area, a strategy has to be devised to link these towns economically and to ensure an
integrated approach in the economic rejuvenation of these towns.
Extensive Land
Historically, this area is dominated by farming, in
particular sheep farming, with the climate, vegetation
and large tracts of grazing land ideally suited to this
economic pursuit. Large areas of this municipal area
are still dedicated to sheep farming and, as a result,
the towns are characterised by limited infrastructure
development, low population density and large-scale
poverty due to limited employment opportunities
(www.karoohoogland.co.za).
Pristine Natural Environment
Karoo Hoogland has a number of unique tourist attractions. For lovers of wide open spaces,
4x4 trails, scenic walks and, of course, sky watching, this municipal area offers the ideal
destination.
Tourism is not highly developed and the typical definition of a tourist, namely a person who
spends two or more nights in one town, may not necessarily be applicable at this stage. It is
anticipated that the majority of tourists or visitors to the region may be passing through and may
therefore be of the “Stop and Drop” variety, spending money on lunch or dinner and local curios
and perhaps staying overnight for one night (www.karoohoogland.co.za).
In regions such as Karoo Hoogland where distances between towns are far, this type of tourism
could be exploited by providing good restaurants which offer quality, local fare and small
guesthouses for the occasional overnight visitors. A small tourist hub could be generated
around restaurants so that visitors can access all tourist facilities within a small radius.
Fraserburg
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 29
Uniqueness of Karoo Hoogland
Astronomy has the unique ability to spark the imagination of young
and old and it provides the Karoo Hoogland Municipality with unique
tourism opportunities associated with astronomy
(www.karoohoogland.co.za).
South African Large Telescope (SALT)
Sutherland boasts one of the most powerful telescopes in the world, hence its claim to be the
gateway to the universe. The lack of light pollution and the largely cloudless nights, make this
the ideal location for stargazing.
For this reason, South Africa has been shortlisted to host the Square Kilometre Array (SKA), the
most powerful radio telescope ever built. South Africa is building an SKA technology pathfinder
telescope, the Karoo Array Telescope (known as MeerKAT), which is situated near Williston.
Sutherland, which was established in 1858, is renowned for its brilliant night skies and cold,
biting winters. Sutherland is also well-known for the world-renowned South African Astronomical
Observatory (SAAO). SAAO has operated telescopes in this region since the early 1970’s and
the South African Largest Telescope (SALT) is the largest single optical telescope in the
southern hemisphere (www.karoohoogland.co.za).
Aside from the telescope, Sutherland has many other attractions for visitors including the
Brackenroof Houses (commonly known as clay houses), the Dutch Reformed Church, historic
graves, indigenous flora, the Louw Museum, Salpeterkop which is the last active volcano south
of the equator, the Planetarium Highway, also known as the Mile of Stars, and numerous hiking
and 4x4 trails (www.karoohoogland.co.za).
Fraserburg is an authentic, well-preserved Karoo town and is a quiet, peaceful place. It offers
breathtaking scenery and a number of challenging 4x4 trails. Visitors will also see the unique
Corbelled houses which are not found elsewhere in the southern hemisphere.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 30
Corbelled houses – regarded as the first
architectural style of the north-west Karoo.
The symbol of Fraserburg is “The Pepperpot” which is a
hexagonal structure unique to South Africa. It is a national
monument, situated in the centre of town and is a stone
construction approximately 9 metres in height
(www.karoohoogland.co.za).
Other attractions are “The Old Vicarage Museum” which was
erected in 1856 to accommodate the first reverend of the newly
founded congregation and which now exhibits a museum display.
For those intrigued by dinosaurs and prehistoric life, the Karoo
Hoogland will be a wonderful destination. Therapsida,
considered one of the earliest land animals, once roamed this area and left their tracks in the
mudstone. Scattered, but fossilised remains of these magnificent beasts can be seen in this
area. Through archaeological evidence, it is indicated that species such as Diictoton and
Bradysauras once lived in this area (www.karoohoogland.co.za).
Other Fraserburg attractions are the Powder Magazine, Power Station and the Walking Route.
Williston, also a town rich in cultural history, boasts the Blockhouse which dates back to the
Anglo-Boer war, the NG and Rhenish Church and a museum. A rather eerie but fascinating
attraction in Williston is the Tombstone Route which showcases an exceptional art form –
stonecutting. Tombstone-making became a form of folk art as tombstones were chiseled out of
local sandstone and these beautiful and fascinating tombstones can be viewed
here(www.karoohoogland.co.za).
Each of the 3 major towns of the Karoo Hoogland offers unique tourism opportunities and ideally
a tourism strategy linking these towns should be envisaged.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 31
The rich cultural heritage of this area and the appeal of the beautiful scenery should be
exploited to attract visitors to the Karoo Hoogland region (www.karoohoogland.co.za).
Karoo Hoogland lies within the Succulent Karoo Biome which is one of 25 internationally
recognised biodiversity hotspots. It is rich in biodiversity and is significant because it is the only
hotspot that is entirely arid. Arid lands are usually poor in species, however the Succulent
Karoo is an exception. It has the richest succulent flora in the world supporting 4 849 vascular
plant species of which 40% are found nowhere else in the world. It is therefore important for
Karoo Hoogland to preserve and promote this wonderful region and all that it has to offer its
local residents and visitors (Namakwa District Biodiversity Sector Plan Draft Plan, 2008).
8.4 Infrastructure
Development and increased growth in the tourism market will only be realised if the necessary
infrastructure is developed or installed to support these initiatives. It is a priority of the Karoo
Hoogland Municipality (refer to Plan 1.7) to ensure that the upgrade and provision of
infrastructure for proper service delivery takes place. Refer to Table 3: Basic Infrastructure
Standards.
Williston, which constitutes the main centre of Ward 1, was established in 1845 as a mission
station, known as Amandelboom, which was renamed to its current name in 1919. It is an
agricultural town which supports approximately 90 occupied farms. It includes a few small
businesses, 4 educational facilities ranging from pre-school to secondary school level, police
station, a medical clinic and mobile medical unit, churches and sports clubs. It is also the home
of the Karoo Array Telescope (MeerKAT) which is currently being built.
Fraserburg, which lies within the boundaries of Ward 2, was established in 1851 as an
agricultural centre for the surrounding sheep farming community. The facilities include a
number of co-operatives and small businesses, 4 educational facilities which range from pre-
school to secondary school level, police station and medical clinic with a mobile medical unit,
churches and sports clubs. Fraserburg is also promoted as a tourism destination and offers
visitors the viewing of dinosaur footprints and fossils.
Sutherland, which is situated in Ward 4, is characterised by typical Karoo vegetation which
includes various protected species. Renowned for astronomy and for being the home of one of
the world’s largest telescopes, this town supports a number of small businesses, 3 educational
facilities ranging from pre-school to secondary school level, a medical unit, police station,
churches and sports clubs.
Engineering infrastructure
The IDP 2001-2005 confirms the following statistics on engineering infrastructure:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 32
Water
• In Wards 1 and 2, 100% of households have access to water on site.
• In Wards 3 and 4 this number is significantly less at 42.4% and 39% respectively. Sanitation
• 55.3% of households in Ward 1 have sanitation in the form of flush toilets.
• In Ward 2, 64.9% of households have access to sanitation and in Ward 4, 34%. • There are no sanitation figures provided for Ward 3.
Electricity
• 100% of households in Wards 1 and 2 have access to electricity. • In Ward 3, 37.3% of households have electricity and in Ward 4 this figure is 63.7%.
Roads
Roads linking the 3 towns are all gravel roads with the shortest distance between two of these
towns being 80km.
• Ward 1: Williston is situated approximately 120 km to the east of Calvinia. The main access roads are as follows:
o R63 to Calvinia in the west and to Carnarvon in the east; o R353 to Fraserburg; and o R353 to Brandvlei.
• Ward 2: Fraserburg lies approximately 215 km south east of Calvinia and main traffic routes linking Fraserburg to surrounding towns are as follows:
o R353 to Williston; o R356 to Sutherland; o R353 to the N1; o R356 to Loxton; and o R361 to Carnarvon.
• Ward 4: The main routes through Sutherland which link it with the surrounding towns are as follows:
o R354 to Matjiesfontein (N12); and o R356 to Fraserburg.
(Karoo Hoogland IDP, 2001)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 33
Table 3: Basic Infrastructure Standards - Engineering Infrastructure BASIC ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURE STANDARDS
Engineering Infrastructure
Water 25 litres per person per day;
Maximum distance a person should have to cart water to their dwelling is 200
metres;
The flow rate of water from the outlet should not be less than 10 litres per
minute.
Sanitation Ventilated Improved Pit toilet (VIP) per household, if constructed to agreed
standards and maintained properly provides an appropriate and adequate
basic level of sanitation service. Bucket system of sanitation is not
considered an adequate service.
(Source: Water Supply and Sanitation Policy White Paper, 1994)
Table 4: Basic Infrastructure Standards - Social Infrastructure BASIC SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE STANDARDS
Social Infrastructure
Land Use Stand Size Standard
Crèches/nursery Schools Minimum size for facility
130m² 1/5 000 pers.
Primary schools 2,4ha 1/3 000 – 4 000 pers.
Secondary schools 4,6ha 1/6 000 - 10 000 pers.
Tertiary facilities No specifics N/A
Mobile clinics No specifics 1/5 000 pers.
Clinic 0,1ha 1/5 000 pers.
Hospitals No specifics N/A
Libraries Minimum size for facility
130m² 1/5 000 – 50 000 pers.
Community centres 5 000m² 1/10 000 pers.
Religious centres
(churches, mosques,
etc.)
150m² – 3 000m² 1/2 000 pers.
Municipal offices/pay
points 3 000m² 1/50 000 pers.
Fire stations 1.2ha 1/60 000 pers.
Post office
500m² generally incorporated
into commercial shopping
nodes
1/11 000 pers.
Police station 0,1ha to 1,0ha 1/25 000 pers.
(Source: Guidelines for human settlement planning and design, 2000)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 34
9 Pressing needs
9.1 District needs
The Namakwa District IDP (2006) identifies the following needs:
1. Efficient and effective maintenance of existing infrastructure.
2. Plan and improve bulk water supply to municipal areas (Hantam, Kamiesberg, Richtersveld).
3. Minimise existing infrastructure backlogs.
4. The development of additional or alternative water sources.
5. Increased maintenance investment for roads in order to maximise economic benefits e.g.
tourism and agriculture.
6. Achieve and maintain developmental balance between infrastructure and social economic
development.
7. Eradication of bucket system.
8. Housing – unblock projects and address existing backlog.
9. Effective use of resources including government owned property that can be released to
local government to assist development.
10. Improve economic development.
11. Institutional capacity improvement of municipalities.
12. Development of the West Coast gas fields and coastline.
13. Mari culture expansion.
14. Maximum utilisation of the Orange River (e.g. dam, water rights).
15. SKA/DSNA.
9.2 Local needs
The Karoo Hoogland draft IDP 2009 identifies the following key intervention areas:
1. Lack of infrastructure for proper service delivery. 2. Roads linking the towns are all gravel and distances between towns are far (minimum
80km). 3. Towns are characterised by limited infrastructure development (gravel roads), low
population density and serious levels of poverty due to limited job opportunities. 4. Biodiversity priority areas and environmentally sensitive areas require special intervention in
order to maintain the environmental integrity of Karoo Hoogland. 5. One of the most serious problems facing Karoo Hoogland as a tourism destination is the
quality and quantity of accommodation in the area. 6. Sutherland is in need of basic community facilities that can also cater for visiting school
groups and tourism in general. 7. There are currently 880 names on the housing waiting list for the municipal area.
(Fraserburg 340, Williston 300 and Sutherland 240). 8. The biggest need for subsidised housing is in Fraserburg with a housing backlog of 116
houses followed by Williston (60) and Sutherland (39). 9. The severe levels of poverty and the resultant social problems such as alcohol and drug
abuse and the increase in crime and domestic violence needs to be addressed.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 35
10. There are numerous problems linked to the youth of the community which need to be addressed, namely the high rate of teenage pregnancies, the lack of basic life skills, and the low levels of education and literacy.
11. Health issues need to be addressed, in particular the containment of the spread of HIV/AIDS and Tuberculosis.
12. The three towns have had separate initiatives in the past in respect to developing a tourism industry on an isolated and limited scale. Strategies need to be put in place to link the existing towns (Framework for the development of a Tourism industry in Karoo Hoogland, 2002; Karoo Hoogland Draft IDP 2009).
10 Vision
One of the core components of an IDP is the municipal council’s vision for the long term
development of the municipality with special emphasis on the municipality’s most critical
development needs and internal transformation needs (Municipal Systems Act, Act 32 of 2000).
A municipal vision, informed by national legislation, policies and strategies, will ultimately
determine what strategies, plans, projects and programmes the municipality will implement in
order to attain its vision.
10.1 District municipality vision
“The establishment of a development orientated and economically viable district through
sustainable growth.”
10.2 Local municipality vision
“Karoo Hoogland will be an economical growth node in the Northern Cape, earmarked by active
community participation. Council must create an environment that will enhance economic
development with specific focus on poverty alleviation and the creation of direct and indirect job
opportunities. Residents will have direct access to basic minimum services and a culture of
“pay for services” must be promoted. Special focus on the development of life skills,
infrastructure and education will add to economical growth. A safe and healthy environment
must be ensured for the communities of Karoo Hoogland.”
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 36
10.3 Proposed revised municipal vision
To provide the citizens of Karoo Hoogland with a safe, healthy and economically sustainable
environment with the benefits of basic services provided to all citizens. All citizens should
benefit from an adequate social infrastructure.
10.4 Interrelationship of visions
Central concerns that underpin the vision and mission of the municipalities are reflected in the
table below:
Table 5: Interrelationship of visions
District Municipality Local Municipality
• Development orientated • Sustainable development
• Economic viability • Economic stability and growth
• Sustainable growth • Develop all resources • High quality service delivery
• Human resource development
The Namakwa District and Karoo Hoogland local municipality’s visions correspond in terms of
socio-economic stability and growth; however the district municipality values environmental
harmony and economic viability, whereas the local municipality stresses service delivery,
creating an economical growth node, developing its people and safe environment for all.
The minor divergence between the district and local municipality’s visions can be ascribed to the
roles and responsibilities mandated to these municipalities in terms of the Municipal Structures
Act, 1998 (Act 117 of 1998).
11 Spatial implication of municipal vision
This section serves to unpack the vision of Karoo Hoogland municipality to determine what is
spatially required to achieve its vision.
Vision:
Five (5) key aspects transpire from the vision, namely:
1. Sustainable economic growth
2. Community participation
3. Basic services
4. Life skills
5. Health and safety
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 37
Table 6: Vision Analysis
Key Aspect
1. Sustainable economic growth
Definition/Description
Sustainable: “Refers to activities that utilise resources and build capacity in a way which
ensures that the activity can be maintained over time” (Source: White Paper on Environment
Policy for South Africa, 1998).
Economic growth: “A positive change in the level of production of goods and services by a
country over a certain period of time. Nominal growth is defined as economic growth including
inflation, while real growth is nominal growth minus inflation. Economic growth is usually brought
about by technological innovation and positive external forces” (Source:
www.investorwords.com).
Spatial Requirements
• Create environment conducive to investment.
• Job creation to alleviate poverty – utilising local labour force for temporary employment
opportunities.
• Agriculture
� Small scale farming zones to be identified in close proximity to settlements and
existing services.
� Beneficiation of agricultural products (wool processing, tanning of hides, etc).
• Tourism
� Karoo Hoogland Tourism Route – (Sutherland, Williston, Fraserburg).
� Edu-Tourism Route (geology, paleontology, astronomy, biology).
� Gateway to the Universe – exploit Edu-Tourism in Sutherland and Williston.
• Skills development and training/tourism centres – (tour guides, include optimal utilisation of
libraries, training, communication, internet facilities in settlements) – in Sutherland, Williston
and Fraserburg.
• Maximum utilisation of resources within reasonable limits – sensitivity to/awareness of light
pollution.
• Tourism awareness, combined tourism strategy – linkage between towns to create a tourism
route.
Key Aspect
2. Community participation
Definition/Description
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 38
“Community participation can be loosely defined as the involvement of people in a community in
projects to solve their own problems. People cannot be forced to “participate” in projects which
affect their lives but should be given the opportunity where possible. This is held to be a basic
human right and a fundamental principle of democracy” (Source: www.who.or.id)
Spatial Requirements
• Communication between all settlements through public meetings, information sessions,
documents in libraries for access by the public.
• Access to community halls/MPCC’s in all sustainable settlements.
• Community notice board in all settlements
• Create electronic links between MPCC’s, libraries and municipal offices.
Key Aspect
3. Basic services
Definition/Description
“Basic municipal services” means a municipal service that is necessary to ensure
an acceptable and reasonable quality of life and, if not provided, would endanger
public health or safety or the environment” (Source: Local Government Municipal Systems Act,
Act 32 of 2000).
Spatial Requirements
• Densification of the existing settlements for maximum utilisation of existing services.
• Define urban edge to prevent urban sprawl.
• Employment and residential opportunities close to bulk engineering infrastructure (water,
sanitation, electricity).
• Address service backlogs in all settlements.
• Waste management – identify and establish waste collection points per settlement to be
situated away from residential areas – regular collection service must be maintained.
• Provision of sports and recreation facilities in proximity to residential areas.
• Multi-purpose sport and recreational facilities/maximum use of existing facilities including
schools.
• Provision of MPCC’s per settlement (pension/grant payout points, banking facilities/ATM’s,
satellite municipal facilities – water & electricity pay points, basic communication facilities,
skills development, home-based care and municipal human resource capacity).
Housing:
• Integrate commercial and residential land uses, close to bulk engineering infrastructure.
• Densification or compacting of settlements for optimal utilisation of existing services.
• Define urban edge to discourage urban sprawl.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 39
• Integration of old and new development – structuring new development along movement
connections to increase viability and efficiency of public transport.
• Close proximity to social service centres (schools and clinics) and employment
opportunities.
• Encourage formal housing and prevent informal housing settlements.
Key Aspect
4. Life skills
Definition/Description
UNICEF defines life skills as “a behaviour change or behaviour development
approach designed to address a balance of three areas: knowledge, attitude and
skills” (Source: www.unodc.org).
Spatial Requirements (DFA related)
• Establish MPCC: also used for implementation of social development programmes (HIV
awareness, prevention against abusive substances, skills development and training).
• Clinics/mobile clinics to service all settlements and to be utilised for HIV testing and
education (teenage pregnancies, HIV, TB, alcohol & drug abuse).
• Social infrastructure – utilising schools for ABET and provision of community sports facilities.
• Mobilise churches in all settlements to fulfill their role in the community in the creation of
moral awareness.
• Education
o primary & secondary schools – provide sufficient educational facilities in all centres.
o use libraries to create opportunities for further education training (FET) in sustainable
settlements.
o SETA learnerships at MPCC’s – identify employers, both private sector and
municipal, who can empower unskilled, local residents through SETA
learnerships/apprenticeships to assist in the eradication of unemployment.
Key Aspect
5. Health and safety
Definition/Description
“Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and is not merely the
absence of disease or infirmity” (Source: www.who.int).
“Safety is the condition or state of being safe, freedom from danger or hazard, exemption from
hurt, injury or loss” (Source: www.arcdictionary.com).
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 40
Spatial Requirements (DFA related)
• Hierarchy and location of primary health care facilities.
• Properly planned waste disposal sites.
• Properly planned cemeteries.
• Potable water and safe sanitation.
• Police presence close to communities - represented in all towns.
• Centralised disaster management centre with satellite support system in other settlements.
12 Spatial translation of IDP principles & strategies
A municipal vision, directed by national legislation, policies and strategies, will ultimately
determine the objectives, strategies and projects to be implemented to achieve its vision and to
address its most critical development needs. The sequence of processes is illustrated in the
figure below:
Figure 1: Sequence of processes
Deriving from its vision, Karoo Hoogland Municipality has developed key objectives and
strategies in the following Key Performance Areas (KPA’s):
Table 7: KPA’s & key objectives
KPA KEY OBJECTIVE
1 Spatial development: Revision of spatial development framework once the IDP has been
approved to ensure that all new projects are contained in the SDF.
2
Municipal
transformation and
organisational
development:
Implementation of the 2009/10 Skills Development Plan.
3 Basic service delivery:
To enhance sustainable service delivery through infrastructure
development and to ensure proper operation and maintenance of
existing infrastructure and equipment while developing appropriate
skills for efficient service delivery.
Projects
Strategies
Objectives
Vision
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 41
KPA KEY OBJECTIVE
4 Local economic
development:
To identify areas of economic development and to establish
partnerships with relevant stakeholders in the development of the
LED strategy.
Develop a tourism strategy with a focus on skills development,
tourism infrastructure and the marketing of Karoo Hoogland as a
tourism destination.
To address social challenges such as drug and alcohol abuse, by
implementing social upliftment programmes, youth empowerment
programmes and by developing infrastructure to support social
welfare programmes.
To engage with schools and relevant stakeholders regarding the
upgrading of education facilities and with regard to training and
skills development programmes.
To stimulate the local economy through incentive programmes,
development of basic infrastructure and by enhancing skills and
SMME development.
To provide a safe and affordable haven for visitors and residents
through the development of public facilities, engaging with the local
business sector to ensure affordability of goods, implementing a
crime prevention strategy and providing sufficient health services
and public transport facilities.
5
Municipal financial
viability and
management:
To seek the commitment of provincial treasury to assist with the
development of a financial plan.
To convert to GAMAP/GRAP standards.
To have a continuous focus on credit control.
6 Good governance and
public participation:
To actively involve the public in local government management and
to monitor and evaluate the performance of Council in terms of its
PMS.
7 Turn-around strategy: To give effect to the National TAS objectives of government to
ensure effective service delivery.
13 IDP and other projects
Karoo Hoogland Municipality has identified projects in the draft IDP 2009-2011 to achieve its
objectives in the aforementioned Key Performance Areas. These IDP projects and other
government projects that have a spatial dimension are listed in the table hereunder and shown
on Plan 1.8 – Pressing Needs versus Funded Projects.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
42
Table 8 Projects
Projects - Municipal and District
Karoo Hoogland Local Municipality Multi-sectoral Projects
Key
Performance
Area (KPA)
No Project Locality
Fund
ed or
not
(Yes/
No)
Funding
Source
Impleme
nting
Date
No Project Locality
Funde
d or
not
(Yes/
No)
Funding
Source
Implementin
g Date
Basic Service
Delivery
So
cia
l In
fra
stru
ctu
re
1
225 sites to be serviced;
225 top structures to be
erected; Rectification of
167 houses (pre 1994)
Fraserburg Yes Unconfirmed 09/10 68 Sutherland sports
facilities Sutherland No NDM
2
Develop 200 erven;
Build 100 houses;
Rectification of 80 houses
Williston No
09/10 69 Construction of new
Williston CHC Williston No NDM 10/11
3
Develop 200 erven;
Rectification of 150 RDP
houses
Sutherland No
09/10 70 Renovation and repair of
Williston Police Station Williston No NDM
4 Amandelboom sport facility Williston No
09/10
5 Ammerville sport facility Fraserburg No
09/10
6 Sports festivals Rural No
09/10
7 Rebelskop sport facility Sutherland No
09/10
8 Upgrade of sport facility KH All wards No
09/10
En
gin
ee
rin
g I
nfr
ast
ruct
ure
9 Fraserburg water network Fraserburg Yes MIG 09/10 71 Fraserburg electrification Fraserburg No NDM
10 Oxidation ponds eradication
internal sewerage networks Williston Yes MIG 09/10 72
Upgrading of waste water
treatment works Sutherland Yes
MIG/KH
M 10/11
11 Oxidation ponds internal
sewerage networks Sutherland Yes MIG 09/10 73
Rehabilitated water
network Fraserburg Yes MIG 10/11
12 Eradication of Prosopis trees All wards Yes EPWP 09/10 74 Oxidation ponds Williston Yes MIG/ND
M 09/10
13 Upgrade of streets All wards Yes EPWP 09/10
14 Water purifier Fraserburg No
09/10
15 Bulk water supply Fraserburg No
09/10
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 43
16 Upgrade Williston water
network Williston No
09/10
17 New reservoir Sutherland No
09/10
18 Water network upgrading Sutherland No
09/10
19 New boreholes and
pipelines Sutherland No
09/10
Key
Performance
Area (KPA)
No Project Locality
Funded
or not
(Yes/No)
Fundin
g
Source
Implementing
Date No Project Locality
Funded
or not
(Yes/No)
Fundin
g
Source
Implementin
g Date
20 Phase 2 of oxidation ponds
internal sewerage networks Fraserburg No
09/10
En
gin
ee
rin
g I
nfr
ast
ruct
ure
21 Establishment of irrigation land All towns No
09/10
22 Eradication of buckets (sanitation) All towns No
07/08
23 Eradication of UDS toilets All towns No
09/10
24 Free-flow sewerage system All towns No
09/10
25 Upgrade of Berg street Williston No
09/10
26 Upgrade major roads between
wards All wards No
09/10
27 Cleaning and greening All towns No
09/10
28 Storm water system Sutherland No
09/10
29 Storm water system Fraserburg No
09/10
30 Storm-water system Williston No
09/10
31 EIA - cemeteries Williston No
09/10
32 EIA - cemeteries Fraserburg No
09/10
33 Licensing and upgrade of refuse
removal site Williston No
09/10
34 Upgrading of refuse removal site Fraserburg No
09/10
35 Licensing and upgrade of refuse
removal site Sutherland No
09/10
36 Public lighting (downward facing
lights to avoid light pollution) Williston No
09/10
37 Public lighting (downward facing
lights to avoid light pollution) Fraserburg No
09/10
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 44
38 Public lighting (downward facing
lights to avoid light pollution) Sutherland No
09/10
Local Economic
Development
39 Upgrade of learner hostel facilities Sutherland Yes DST 09/10 75
Wind farms with
capacity to
generate 200
mega watt energy
within 3
municipalities
Karoo
Hoogland No
10/11
Key
Performance
Area (KPA)
No Project Locality
Funde
d or
not
(Yes/N
o)
Funding
Source
Implementin
g Date No Project Locality
Funded
or not
(Yes/No)
Fundin
g
Source
Implementi
ng Date
Local Economic
Development 40
Community computer training
centre for K-H Sutherland Yes DST 09/10 76
Plant for gas
exploitation
Karoo
Hooglan
d
No
10/11
41 Karoo Highlands Tourism Route All wards Yes Open
Africa 09/10 77
MOU with investors
on biomass, waste
recycling, wave,
hydro and solar
energy to start
within Namakwa
region
Karoo
Hooglan
d
No
10/11
42 Develop a LED strategy All wards Yes DBSA 09/11
43 Museum upgrade Williston No
09/10
44 Construction of Corbel House Williston No
09/10
45 Protection for Paleo surface Fraserburg No
09/10
46 Upgrade museum Fraserburg No
09/10
47 Stage and amphitheatre Fraserburg No
09/10
48 Shuttle service All wards No
09/10
49
Agricultural tourism route -
feasibility study Rural No
09/10
50
Edu-tourism route (geology,
biology, palaeontology,
astronomy)
Rural No
09/10
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page 45
51 Williston Nature Reserve Williston No
09/10
52 Shared school bus / shuttle All wards No
09/10
53
Outdoor community recreational
facility Sutherland No
09/10
54 Renovation of tourism office Sutherland No
09/10
55
Tourism marketing (incl.
Brochures) All wards No
09/10
56
Astronomy themed miniature
golf Sutherland No
09/10
57 Walking with Ancestors All wards No
09/10
Key
Performance
Area (KPA)
No Project Locality
Funded
or not
(Yes/No)
Funding
Source
Implementing
Date No Project Locality
Funded
or not
(Yes/No)
Funding
Source
Implementing
Date
Local
Economic
Development
58 Tourism training and awareness All wards No
09/10
59 Establishment of Tourism
Associations
Fraserburg
/ Williston
/
Sutherland
No
09/10
60 Develop and assist festivals in KHM All wards No
09/11
61 Indigenous Plants poster All wards No
09/11
62 Karoo Stars Indigenous Knowledge
poster All wards No
09/11
63 Spinning and weaving Williston No
09/11
64 Tourism signage All wards No
09/11
65 Develop a crime prevention strategy All wards No
09/11
66 Gateway to the universe - MEERKAT
& SKA framework (Phase II) All wards No
09/11
67 Establish community development
centres All wards No
09/11
(Source: Karoo Hoogland Draft IDP 2009; Namakwa District IDP 2006)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
46
14 Spatial interpretation of IDP
Through its vision Karoo Hoogland local municipality strives to provide its residents with a safe,
healthy and economically sustainable environment as well as ensuring access to basic
engineering and adequate social infrastructure.
Throughout the IDP document the municipality has succeeded in highlighting its pressing
needs, development objectives, strategies and projects that will address these needs. Most of
these projects have to be implemented within the municipal space, which the municipality has to
manage in terms of use, development and planning. This section summarises the
implementation of the municipal IDP in relation to the municipal space and how it relates to the
municipal vision.
The implementation of the projects has been grouped according to the two key performance
areas, namely basic service delivery, which includes social and engineering services and local
economic development.
Provision of basic engineering services/infrastructure
The provision of basic engineering services projects is mostly limited to the land parcels
earmarked for residential purposes. In implementing these projects the municipality seems to be
spatially concentrating on upgrading the existing services, thereby ensuring the maximum
utilisation of these services within these settlements to fulfill its vision. What is not indicated in
the IDP is the capacity of these services in terms of sustainability and future demand.
Taking into account the spatial constraints and opportunities of the municipal area the
compilation of the municipal SDF will have to indicate whether the capacity of these services will
be sustainable enough to meet the municipal vision.
Provision of social infrastructure
Most of the settlements are under pressure for growth. In two of the three urban settlements
there is a need for expansion or development of more erven. The IDP does not indicate whether
the development of the additional erven is in line with the DFA principles and is taking all the
development constraints of the municipal area into consideration. The IDP also does not
indicate whether the addition of more erven in these areas will ensure the sustainability of the
settlements in terms of future basic service provision.
The municipal SDF will have to provide guidelines as to whether any future expansion of these
settlements will be guaranteed with access to sustainable basic services and adherence to the
principles of the DFA.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
47
Sustainable local economic growth
In its vision the municipality aspires to be economically sustainable and enhance economic
development thereby creating job opportunities. In order to achieve this vision, the municipality
must have a full understanding of the local economic opportunities of its area and then support
all projects that capitalise on its unique advantages.
The municipality has identified the development of its Local Economic Development Strategy as
a key project that would unlock the economic opportunities of its total area. This project covers
all the municipal wards and will unlock opportunities that could create sustainable job
opportunities for the community. In addition to the development of the LED strategy, through the
process of the compilation of the municipal SDF, the local economic opportunities of the
municipal area will be further exposed. The outcome of this exercise will provide a baseline
through which the municipality could attract investment to its area of jurisdiction.
The municipality has identified a number of tourism related projects that are scattered
throughout its area of jurisdiction. Unfortunately most of these projects lack funding and have
little prospect of providing job opportunities to the communities. Although the entire municipal
area seems to be rich in eco-tourism opportunities, it seems little effort has been made to attract
potential investors for eco-tourism. There is no tourism development strategy that has been
developed for the entire municipal area. The IDP does not indicate whether the municipality
sees the development of eco-tourism as an economic advantage that could be exploited to
enhance its economic opportunities. The compilation of the municipal SDF will ensure that the
tourism potential of the municipal area is exposed for further investigation.
The next phase of this document will deal extensively with the analysis of the natural resources
of this municipality and how they relate spatially in terms of meeting the pressing needs of the
communities as expressed in the IDP.
Linkages between the three urban centres are critical to the economic development of the entire
municipal area. In terms of the IDP the roads connecting these areas are still gravel but are not
prioritised for tarring. As long as accessibility to these areas remains a challenge, it will be
difficult for the municipality to achieve its vision of making this area conducive for investment.
The SDF will have to indicate the key road links that could be developed to improve the linkages
between urban centres and rural areas.
Providing a healthy and safe environment
Through the provision, upgrading and extension of existing basic services infrastructure as well
as the provision of social services within the urban settlements the municipality is seen as
meeting the spatial requirements in terms of health and safety. The municipality is developing
new landfill sites, upgrading sewerage treatment plants and is engaged in cleaning and
greening projects thereby ensuring a healthy and safe environment for its residents.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
48
The communities in this municipality seem to have been provided with basic health facilities.
Through the compilation of the municipal SDF all the spatial health and safety risk areas of the
municipal areas will be exposed with the aim of providing some mitigating solutions.
15 Phase 1 synopsis
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
49
KAROO HOOGLAND PHASE 1 SUMMARY TABLE - SPATIAL INTERPRETATION OF MUNICIPAL IDP
NO SPATIAL REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPMENT IMPERATIVES
1 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH
1.1 Economic Development
1.1.1 Create an environment conducive to investment. Address the lack of infrastructure, housing and tourism accommodation and unemployment.
1.1.2 Job creation to alleviate poverty, utilising the local labour force for temporary employment opportunities.
Serious poverty levels due to limited job opportunities must be addressed.
1.1.3 Skills development and training / tourism centres (allow for optimal utilisation of libraries as training, communication and internet centres). None
1.1.4 Maximum utilisation of resources within reasonable limits and with sensitivity to light pollution.
Maintain the environmental integrity of Karoo Hoogland and preserve biodiversity priority areas and environmentally sensitive areas.
1.1.5 Tourism awareness and a combined tourism strategy - linkage between towns to create a tourism route.
Roads linking towns are gravel and distances are great. Road upgrades must be considered.
1.2 Agriculture
1.2.1 Identify small scale farming zones in close proximity to settlements and existing services. None
1.2.2 Beneficiation of agricultural products such as wool processing, tanning, etc.
Alleviate unemployment by establishing industries associated with agriculture. This will also stimulate the local economy.
1.3 Tourism
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
50
KAROO HOOGLAND PHASE 1 SUMMARY TABLE - SPATIAL INTERPRETATION OF MUNICIPAL IDP
NO SPATIAL REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPMENT IMPERATIVES
1 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH
1.3.1 Develop the Karoo Hoogland Tourism Route (Sutherland, Williston, Fraserburg)
Consider a combined tourism strategy for Sutherland, Williston and Fraserburg. Address the lack of tourism accommodation. Consider accommodation for individuals/families and large groups (i.e. schools).
1.3.2 Develop an Edu-Tourism Route (geology, palaeontology, astronomy, biology)
1.3.3 Gateway to the Universe - exploit Edu-tourism in Sutherland and Williston.
2 ENCOURAGE ACTIVE COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
2.1 Community Communication
2.1.1 Encourage active communication between all settlements through public meetings, information sessions, documents in libraries for public access, etc. None
2.1.2 Ensure access to community halls / MPCC's in all sustainable settlements. Address the need for community facilities for residents and visitors.
2.1.3 Community notice boards in all settlements. None
2.1.4 Create economic links between MPCC's, libraries and municipal offices. None
KAROO HOOGLAND PHASE 1 SUMMARY TABLE - SPATIAL INTERPRETATION OF MUNICIPAL IDP
NO SPATIAL REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPMENT IMPERATIVES
3 ENSURE PROVISION OF BASIC SERVICES
3.1 Basic Service Delivery
3.1.1 Densification of existing settlements for maximum utilisation of existing services. Address the critical housing backlog.
3.1.2 Define the urban edge to prevent urban sprawl. None
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
51
KAROO HOOGLAND PHASE 1 SUMMARY TABLE - SPATIAL INTERPRETATION OF MUNICIPAL IDP
NO SPATIAL REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPMENT IMPERATIVES
1 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH
3.1.3 Develop employment and residential opportunities close to bulk engineering infrastructure. None
3.1.4 Address service backlogs in all settlements. Address the lack of infrastructure for proper service delivery.
3.1.5 Identify and establish waste collection points, per settlement, situated away from residential areas, with regular collection service. None
3.1.6 Provision of sports and recreation facilities in proximity to residential areas. Utilise and promote the use of existing facilities such as schools
3.1.7 Provision of multi-purpose sport and recreation facilities, making maximum use of existing facilities including schools. None
3.1.8
Provision of MPCC's per settlement to function as pension/grant payout points, banking facilities, satellite municipal facilities, basic communication facilities, skills development centres, home-based care provision and for municipal human resource capacity. None
3.2 Housing
3.2.1 Integrate commercial and residential land uses close to bulk engineering infrastructure. Address the critical housing backlog.
3.2.2 Densification or compacting of urban settlements for optimal utilisation of existing services. None
3.2.3 Define the urban edge to prevent urban sprawl. None
3.2.4 Integration of old and new development - structure new development along movement connects to increase the viability and efficiency of public transport. None
3.2.5 Development must be in close proximity to social service centres such as schools and clinics and close to employment opportunities. None
3.2.6 Encourage formal housing and prevent further informal housing settlement development. None
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
52
KAROO HOOGLAND PHASE 1 SUMMARY TABLE - SPATIAL INTERPRETATION OF MUNICIPAL IDP
NO SPATIAL REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPMENT IMPERATIVES
1 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH
4 FOCUS ON DEVELOPMENT OF LIFE SKILLS
4.1 Social Development
4.1.1
Establish MPCC's which can be utilised for implementation of social development programmes such as HIV/AIDS awareness, abuse prevention programmes, skills development and training.
Address the problems of the youth in the community by teaching basic life skills and addressing the low levels of education and literacy. Address social problems in the community such as alcohol and drug abuse and high levels of crime and domestic violence.
4.1.2
Clinics/mobile clinics to service all settlements and to be utilised for HIV testing and education to prevent teenage pregnancy, alcohol and drug abuse and spread of HIV/AIDS.
Address health issues, particularly the high levels of HIV/Aids and Tuberculosis. Need to curb high levels of teenage pregnancy and alcohol and drug abuse.
4.1.3 Social infrastructure to be developed - utilise schools for ABET and provision of community sports facilities. None
4.1.4 Mobilise churches to fulfil their community role in the creation of moral awareness.
Assist in addressing the social problems in the community, particularly high rate of teenage pregnancy, domestic violence and alcohol and drug abuse.
4.2 Education
4.2.1 Primary and secondary schools - provide sufficient educational facilities in all centres.
Need to address and improve the low levels of literacy
4.2.2 Utilise libraries to create opportunities for further education training (FET). None
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
53
KAROO HOOGLAND PHASE 1 SUMMARY TABLE - SPATIAL INTERPRETATION OF MUNICIPAL IDP
NO SPATIAL REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPMENT IMPERATIVES
1 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH
4.2.3
Utilise MPCC's for SETA learnerships - identify employers in private and public sector who can empower unskilled, local residents through SETA learnerships / apprenticeships to assist with reduction in unemployment.
Promote SETA learnerships to alleviate unemployment and to provide skills to previously unskilled workers.
5 PROVISION OF A SAFE AND HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT
5.1 Health and Safety
5.1.1 Hierarchy and location of primary health care facilities. Address health issues particularly HIV/AIDS and TB.
5.1.2 Properly planned waste disposal sites. None
5.1.3 Properly planned cemeteries. None
5.1.4 Potable water and safe sanitation. Address lack of basic infrastructure.
5.1.5 Police presence close to communities and represented in all towns.
Address high levels of crime and domestic violence. Introduce "neighbourhood watch" principles to improve safety within neighbourhoods.
5.1.6 Centralised disaster management centre with satellite support systems in other settlements. None
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
54
CHAPTER 3
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
55
16 PHASE 2
The chapter consists of two parts:
a) Institutional Analysis – to assess the institutional arrangements in order to understand
the implications of the national, provincial and local development objectives and priorities
for the spatial development framework.
b) Spatial Analysis - to investigate the spatial context of Karoo Hoogland Municipality to
determine national, regional and local economic, social and service delivery
environments and the impact that it has on the development potential of the municipal
area.
The purpose of this chapter is to assess whether Karoo Hoogland Local Municipality is spatially
conducive for the delivery of its Integrated Development Plan and the relevant sector plans.
17 Karoo Hoogland Municipality IDP in context
The main objectives of the Karoo Hoogland Municipality’s IDP are to achieve the main goals of
service delivery and dealing with the backlog of housing and access to water. The focus on
additional economic activities, primarily based on tourism potential of the area, is a more viable
approach to improve the local economy than to try and build the supply from within existing
structures.
The Spatial Development Plan must, at a minimum, address these concerns and how best to
utilise the Municipality’s limited resources and less than ideal space to achieve the best possible
outcome for its population, particularly those that are currently under-served in terms of their
access to basic services. Further, however, it needs to take into account the relevant policy and
planning frameworks that will influence its ability to deliver and how these can be used
effectively to improve its performance as an agent of development. This analysis is covered in
the following sections.
18 Institutional analysis
18.1 Institutional background
As noted in the Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Strategy published in November
2000, “communities, if appropriately empowered, can often manage their own local
development efforts, and sometimes considerably better than any agency of the state. The
report finds that a properly worked through system of participation and decentralisation holds
the promise to provide mechanisms for empowering communities appropriately, though this
process is by no means guaranteed.” (Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Strategy,
2000)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
56
In order to test the compatibility of the Karoo Hoogland Municipality’s execution and/or adoption
of its Rural Spatial Development Framework, there are a number of policies, legislations and
planning documents that should either be used as guides or, by law, must be followed. These
include in the main, and as such are not limited to, the following:
Legislation
1. The South African Constitution and Principles of Sustainable Development 2. Local Government Municipal Structures Act, Act 117 of 1998 3. Local Government Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 4. Municipal Planning and Performance Management Regulations 2001 5. The Development Facilitation Act 67 of 1995 6. The Land Use Management Bill, 2001 7. Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (AsgiSA) 8. Transformation of Certain Rural Areas Act (1998) 9. Northern Cape Planning and Development Act, 1998 (Act 7 of 1998).
18.1.1 South African Constitution and Principles of Sustainable Development
The Constitution of South Africa protects human rights and promotes democratic governance.
Part of the Constitution is dedicated to define the role and function of government at national,
provincial and local level:
Part B of Schedule 4 identifies municipal planning as a local governmental matter. Aspects
influencing spatial planning are local tourism, municipal airports, municipal health services,
municipal public transport, water and sanitation services.
Part B of Schedule 5 does not specifically mention any planning function but identifies the
aspects of cemeteries, municipal parks and recreation, public places, municipal roads, traffic
and parking, which have an influence on spatial planning.
18.1.2 Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, Act 117 of 1998
The Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (MSTA) assigns and divides powers to and between district
and local municipalities.
The MSTA requires that Local Municipalities “must seek to achieve integrated, sustainable and
equitable social and economic development of its area as a whole”. It also assigns powers and
functions to Local Municipalities that includes, inter alia:
• Integrated development planning for the Local Municipality as a whole,
• Bulk supply of water, sewerage, electricity and solid waste disposal,
• Municipal roads that form an integral part of a road transport system for the area of the
Local Municipality;
• Promotion of local tourism for its area, etc.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
57
The aforementioned powers and exercise of such powers by Karoo Hoogland Municipality have
an impact on the spatial development pattern of the local municipal area and district municipal
area. It is therefore essential that horizontal (between local municipalities) and vertical (between
district and local municipalities) alignment takes place during the drafting of the Spatial
Development Framework.
18.1.3 Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000
In terms of chapter 5 of the Municipal Systems Act 2000, (Act 32 of 2000) every local
Municipality should prepare an Integrated Development Plan (IDP). In terms of the act the IDP
is a single, inclusive and strategic plan for the development of a Municipality that operates as a
strategic planning instrument which guides and informs all decisions with regard to the planning
and development in a municipal area.
Section 26(e) of the MSA stipulates that the local Municipality should prepare a SDF which must
include basic guidelines for a Land Use Management System (LUMS) as part of the IDP. The
SDF shall act as a forward plan that illustrates the intended nature of spatial development and
shall take precedence over any other plan approved by the Municipality. Furthermore the SDF
shall be the first point of reference for decision-makers when seeking guidance on specific land
development issues.
18.1.4 Municipal Planning and Performance Management Regulations, 2001
The Local Government Municipal Planning and Performance Regulations (2001) stipulate the
content of the SDF. In terms of Section 4 of the Regulations the SDF is required to:
• give effect to principles contained in Chapter 1 of the Development Facilitation Act,
1995;
• set out objectives that reflect desired spatial form of the Municipality;
• contain strategies and policies regarding the manner in which to achieve the objectives
which must:
o Indicate the desired pattern of land use
o Indicate the direction of growth
• provide strategic guidance in respect to location and nature of development;
• set out basic guidelines for a land use management system;
• set out a capital investment framework for development programmes;
• incorporate a strategic assessment of the environmental impact of land within the
Municipality;
• identify programmes and projects for development of land within the Municipality;
• be aligned with neighbouring municipal SDF's;
• provide visual representation of the desired spatial form which:
o must indicate areas in which the intensity of land development could be either
increased or reduced;
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
58
o must indicate desired and undesired utilisation of land in an area;
o indicate conservation of both the built and natural environment;
o must indicate where public and private land development and infrastructure
investment should take place;
o may delineate the urban edge;
o must identify areas where strategic intervention is required;
o must indicate where priority spending is required.
18.1.5 The Development Facilitation Act 67 of 1995
The Development Facilitation Act (DFA) moves away from a control-based planning system to a
principle planning approach and it establishes measures that facilitate and speed up the
implementation of reconstruction and development programmes and projects relating to land
development. The principles of the DFA are uniform throughout the country and regulate the
subdivision and development of land in both urban and rural areas to promote speedy provision
and development of land for residential, small scale farming and other purposes.
Chapter 1 of the Act lays down principles that apply to all types of land planning and
development. These principles are vital to establish a more equitable and development planning
system for Karoo Hoogland. In order to realize this objective, the following general principles
apply to all land development:
• Policy, administrative practice and laws should make provision for urban and rural land
development plus should facilitate the development of formal and informal, existing and
new settlements.
• Policy, administrative practice and laws should discourage illegal occupation of land,
with due recognition of informal land development processes.
• Policy, administrative practice and laws should promote efficient and integrated land
development if they:
o promote the integration of the social, economic, institutional and physical aspects
of land development;
o promote integrated land development in rural and urban areas in support of each
other;
o promote the availability of residential and employment opportunities in close
proximity to or integrated with each other;
o optimise the use of existing resources including such resources relating to
agriculture, land, minerals, bulk infrastructure, roads, transportation and social
facilities;
o promote a diverse combination of land uses, also at the level of individual erven
or subdivisions of land;
o discourage the phenomenon of "urban sprawl" in urban areas and contribute to
the development of more compact towns and cities;
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
59
o contribute to the correction of the historically distorted spatial patterns of
settlement in the Republic and to the optimum use of existing infrastructure in
excess of current needs ; and
o Encourage environmentally sustainable land development practices and
processes.
• Members of communities affected by land development should actively participate in the
process of land development.
• The skills and capacities of disadvantaged persons involved in land development should
be developed.
• Policy, administrative practice and laws should encourage and optimise the contributions
of all sectors of the economy (government and non-governmental) to land development
so as to maximise the Republic's capacity to undertake land development and to this
end, and without derogating from the generality of this principle:
o national, provincial and local governments should strive clearly to define and
make known the required functions and responsibilities of all sectors of the
economy in relation to land development as well as the desired relationship
between such sectors; and
o a competent authority in national, provincial or local government responsible for
the administration of any law relating to land development shall provide
particulars of the identity of legislation administered by it, the posts and names of
persons responsible for the administration of such legislation and the addresses
and locality of the offices of such persons to any person who requires such
information.
• Laws, procedures and administrative practice relating to land development should:
o be clear and generally available to those likely to be affected thereby;
o in addition to serving as regulatory measures, also provide guidance and
information to those affected thereby;
o be calculated to promote trust and acceptance on the part of those likely to be
affected thereby; and
o give further content to the fundamental rights set out in the Constitution.
• Policy, administrative practice and laws should promote sustainable land development at
the required scale in that they should:
o promote land development which is within the fiscal, institutional and
administrative means of the Republic;
o promote the establishment of viable communities;
o promote sustained protection of the environment;
o meet the basic needs of all citizens in an affordable way; and
o ensure the safe utilisation of land by taking into consideration factors such as
geological formations and hazardous undermined areas.
• Policy, administrative practice and laws should promote speedy land development.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
60
• Each proposed land development area should be judged on its own merits and no
particular use of land, such as residential, commercial, conservational, industrial,
community facility, mining, agricultural or public use, should in advance or in general be
regarded as being less important or desirable than any other use of land.
• Land development should result in security of tenure, provide for the widest possible
range of tenure alternatives, including individual and communal tenure, and in cases
where land development takes the form of upgrading an existing settlement, not deprive
beneficial occupiers of homes or land or, where it is necessary for land or homes
occupied by them to be utilised for other purposes, their interests in such land or homes
should be reasonably accommodated in some other manner.
• A competent authority at national, provincial and local government level should co-
ordinate the interests of the various sectors involved in or affected by land development
so as to minimise conflicting demands on scarce resources.
• Policy, administrative practice and laws relating to land development should stimulate
the effective functioning of a land development market based on open competition
between suppliers of goods and services.
Five central concerns underpin the Chapter 1 principles:
1. The need to create new forms and structures for South African settlements to improve
their performance,
2. The need to work harmoniously with nature,
3. The need to speed up the pace of development,
4. The need to promote a better planning system and
5. The need to promote security of tenure.
18.1.6 The Land Use Management Bill, 2001
The main objective of this Bill is to provide a legislative and policy framework that enables local
government to formulate policies, plans and strategies for land use and development in order to
address spatial, economic, social and environmental issues. It attempts to provide uniform land
use management in the Republic of South Africa.
The Land Use Bill is based on the general principle that spatial planning, land use management
and land development must:
• be environmentally friendly;
• enhance equality;
• be efficient;
• be integrated; and
• be based on fair and good governance.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
61
The key subject is that the Land Use Management Bill makes reference to Section 26(e) of the
Municipal Systems Act, 2000. It provides clarity on issues related to the content of the SDF and
it clearly explains that one of the functions of the SDF is to inform development and the
application of new land use management systems.
18.1.7 Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (AsgiSA)
Investigations by government indicate that the growth rate needed to achieve its social
objectives between 2004 and 2014 is around 5%, on average.
In order to achieve this objective the following interventions/initiatives were identified:
• Significant investment in infrastructure, including provincial and local roads, bulk water
infrastructure and water supply networks, energy distribution, housing, schools and
clinics, business centres, sports facilities, and multi-purpose government service
centres, including police stations, courts and correctional facilities;
• Targeting economic sectors with good growth potential, in this regard two sectors have
been identified namely Business Process Outsourcing and Tourism. A third sector, bio-
fuels, is being finalised. What these industries have in common is that they are labour-
intensive, growing rapidly worldwide, are suited to South African circumstances, and
open to opportunities for Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) and
small business development;
• Skills development;
• Eliminating the Second Economy - Building up small businesses to bridge the gap
between the formal and informal economies; and
• Governance and Institutional Interventions - Beefing up public administration and
creating a macro-economic environment that is more conducive to economic growth.
Karoo Hoogland Spatial Development Framework needs to be conducive to the implementation
of the AsgiSA initiatives.
18.1.8 Transformation of Certain Rural Areas Act (1998)
The purpose of this Act is to provide for the transfer of certain land to municipalities and certain
other legal entities, the removal of restrictions on the alienation of land, matters with regard to
mineral, the repeal of the Rural Areas Act, and related laws; and to provide for matters
connected therewith (Source: Transformation of Certain Rural Areas Act, 94 (Act 94 of 1998).
With the Transformation of Certain Rural Areas Act process, the Minister of Land Affairs granted
approval for five areas in Namakwa to be transferred to the legal entities of the communities’
choice.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
62
18.1.9 Northern Cape Planning and Development Act, 1998 (Act 7 of 1998)
The purpose of this Act is to provide for a single set of procedures and regulations to complement the accelerated development procedures as provided for in the Development Facilitation Act, 1995; and to thereby ensure effective and co-operative planning and land development within the provincial and local spheres of government of the Province of the Northern Cape, through a set of principles that will guide the preparation and implementation of integrated land development plans, the management of rural and urban land and its development through land-use management mechanisms, subdivisions and matters incidental thereto. (Source: Northern Cape Planning and Development Act) In this regard specific reference is made to the provisions in Sections 29 and 30 that relates to the content of a Land Development Plan/Rural Spatial Development Framework and the procedures to be followed for the approval of the Land Development Plan/Rural Spatial Development Framework by the Member of the Executive Council (MEC) of the Province of the Northern Cape. Policies and Strategies What is addressed at this stage is the extent to which the following policies and strategies can advance the spatial plan for Karoo Hoogland. See table below.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
63
18.2 Alignment with national development perspectives
Table 9: Institutional analysis
NATIONAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description/Intention Implications
Rural Development
Framework (1997)
The key document providing the leading perspective
on rural development is the Rural Development
Framework, which was borne out of the no longer
active RDP. It highlights the RDP’s role as embodying
the commitment of government to the eradication of
poverty in a rapidly growing economy and in the
context of an open, peaceful and democratic society.
Policies must be orientated towards the provision of
basic needs, the development of human resources and
a growing economy, which contribute to the objective
of generating sustainable livelihoods in rural as well as
urban areas.
Growth, Employment and
Redistribution (GEAR) (1996)
The Growth, Employment and Redistribution
(GEAR) strategy took this perspective further,
pronouncing an economic reform programme directed
towards:
• a competitive fast-growing economy that
creates sufficient jobs for all job seekers;
• a redistribution of income opportunities in
favour of the poor;
• a society capable of ensuring that sound
health, education and other services are
available to all; and
• an environment in which homes are safe
and places of work are productive.
These principles went on to form the macro-economic
framework within which the Rural Development
Framework was drafted.
For rural areas, however, the challenge remains to
achieve their development objectives with limited
resources. This requires striking a balance between
basic service delivery on the one hand and on the
other, stimulating economic development that will help
to pay for these services.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
64
NATIONAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description/Intention Implications
Integrated Sustainable Rural
Development Strategy (2000)
The Integrated Sustainable Rural Development
Strategy (ISRDS) provides a framework for rural
municipalities to attain socially cohesive and stable
communities with viable institutions, sustainable
economies and universal access to social amenities,
able to attract skilled and knowledgeable people, and
equipped to contribute to their own and the nation’s
growth and development.
The strategic intent of the ISRDS is to transform rural
South Africa into an economically viable, socially stable
and harmonious sector that makes a significant
contribution to the nation’s GDP.
A successful strategy to achieve integrated sustainable
rural development will reflect each of its three key
elements: i.e., integrated, sustainable, and rural
development.
The goals of integration, sustainability and
development are high on the Karoo Hoogland
Municipality’s agenda, but challenged by the distinct
development approaches that were pursued by the
individual towns. This is further challenged by the
need to rely on outside investment to prosper, as well
as integration with other municipalities and districts in
order to align development to related, and probably
stronger, regional initiatives elsewhere (e.g., along the
N1).
The focus on economic development activities,
primarily based on the tourism potential of the area, is
also a more viable approach to improve the money
supply into towns than to try to build the supply from
within. The challenge will be to source sufficient
capital to finance the capital projects, such as
museums and space, eco- or heritage tourism sites,
while financing the backlogs in basic services with
minimum allocations from government.
National Spatial Development
Perspective (2006)
The National Spatial Development Perspective
(NSDP) reflects on the need to address first that the
provision of basic services is a constitutional right and
that government spending should focus on localities of
economic growth and/or economic potential.
The NSDP’s five normative principles are:
1. Rapid economic growth that is sustained and
It is pertinent to point out that the document cites that
different regions have different economic potential and
the spatial variations in the incidence of poverty are
also vastly different. Hence, in areas of low or no
economic potential, the path of development and
poverty reduction should be through a focus on
investment in human capital development (education,
training, social welfare, sound rural development
planning, aggressive land and agrarian reform,
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
65
NATIONAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description/Intention Implications
inclusive is a pre-requisite for the achievement of
other policy objectives, along with poverty
alleviation is key.
2. Government has a constitutional obligation to
provide basic services to all citizens (e.g., water,
energy, health and educational facilities)
wherever they reside.
3. Beyond the constitutional obligation identified in
Principle 2 above, government spending on
fixed investment should be focused on
localities of economic growth and/or
economic potential in order to gear up
private sector investment, to stimulate
sustainable economic activities and to create
long-term employment opportunities.
4. Efforts to address past and current social
inequalities should focus on people, not places.
In localities where there are both high levels of
poverty and low demonstrated economic
potential, government should, beyond the
provision of basic services, concentrate primarily
on human capital development by providing
education and training, social transfers such as
grants and poverty-relief programmes. It should
also reduce migration costs by providing labour-
market intelligence to give people better
information, opportunities and capabilities to
enable them to gravitate, if they choose to, to
localities that are more likely to provide
sustainable employment and economic
expansion of agricultural extension services, etc.)
This suggests, however, that where agriculture is not
an economic driver of further development, but
primarily a stabiliser of existing development, such as
in the Karoo Hoogland area, the approach to
development must be even more differentiated to
include more creative ones focusing on the space
research and historical value of the settlements, but
which would also include such things as tarred and un-
tarred roads and the natural vegetation that is unique
to the more arid environment. It is interesting to note in
this context that the NSDP sees two spatial and
settlement patterns, (1) concentrated areas of high
economic growth, high population densities and high
levels of poverty; and (2) areas with low economic
growth, high population densities and high levels of
poverty.
This leaves from the definition vast geographic areas
that characterise municipalities like Karoo Hoogland
and that fit neither pattern, except on a micro-scale,
where no real urban centre exists, only agricultural or
tourism support towns that have no economic basis
other than to supply goods and labour to the
commercial entities that have no real roots in the
community itself.
In fact, throughout the document, areas in the west of
South Africa virtually do not feature at all in terms of
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
66
NATIONAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description/Intention Implications
opportunities.
5. In order to overcome the spatial distortions of
Apartheid, future settlement and economic
development opportunities should be channelled
into activity corridors and nodes that are
adjacent to or that link the main growth centres.
Infrastructure investment should primarily
support localities that will become major growth
nodes in South Africa and the SADC region to
create regional gateways to the global economy.
the development perspective.
Draft Regional Industrial
Development Strategy (RIDS)
2006
The main intentions of the draft RIDS is to:
1. help to achieve the national industrial
development objectives as set out in the NSDP
2. further the goals of the Accelerated and
Shared Growth Initiative of South Africa
(ASGISA)
3. conform to the principles of the Integrated
Manufacturing Strategy, the Microeconomic
Reform Strategy and the draft National
Industrial Policy Framework
4. enhance the capacities and potentials that
seek to address spatial constraints and
opportunities related to industrial development
in municipalities
5. conform to the principles of enterprise
development and Black Economic
Empowerment
6. conform to the government’s environmental
and other policies.
The implication of the draft RIDS it that it should:
1. Attempt to reduce economic disparities
between regions, addresses the needs of both
the first and the second economies and narrow
the gap between them.
2. pay attention to the needs of those regions
which are lagging behind the national norms,
3. enhance current regional strengths and lead
sectors of the economy
4. promote sustainable economic growth and
employment in provinces and municipalities
and
5. build regional competitive capacities and firm–
level support measures
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
67
NATIONAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description/Intention Implications
White Paper on Spatial
Planning and Land Use
Management (2001)
The White Paper on Spatial Planning and Land Use
Management (2001) is based on the general principles
of the DFA and attempts to cement the normative
approach to land use and planning.
• Sustainability – The principle requires the
sustainable management and use of resources
making up the natural and built environment.
• Equality – The principle requires that everyone
affected by spatial planning, land use
management and land development actions or
decisions must enjoy equal protection and
benefits.
• Efficiency – The principle requires the
development of land uses with the minimum
expenditure of resources by means of the
discouragement of urban sprawl through
densification policies to provide compact towns
and cities.
• Integration – The principle requires that the
separate and diverse elements involved in
development planning and land uses should be
combined and coordinated into a more
complete and harmonious whole. The
principle also calls for spatial integration and
corrections of historically distorted spatial
patterns.
The overall aim of the principles and norms is to
The inclusion of the Rural Spatial Development
Framework for Karoo Hoogland, with a direct legal link
to the land use management scheme, is an essential
step towards integrated and coordinated planning for
sustainable and equitable growth and development.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
68
NATIONAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description/Intention Implications
achieve planning outcomes that:
• restructure spatially inefficient settlements;
• promote the sustainable use of the land
resources in the country;
• channel resources to areas of greatest need
and development potential, thereby redressing
the inequitable historical treatment of
marginalised areas;
• take into account the fiscal, institutional and
administrative capacities of role players, the
needs of communities and the environment;
• stimulate economic development opportunities
in rural and urban areas; and
• support an equitable protection of rights to and
in land.
Rural Transport Strategy for
South Africa (2007)
The strategy provides strategic direction and proposes
direct facilitating actions to address service delivery
priorities by developing the requisite planning and
implementation capacity in the provincial and local
spheres of government. The rural transport strategy
maps out sustainable programmes of action for the
short, medium and long term (i.e. up to 20 years), while
the National Land Transport Strategic Framework
(NLTSF) is only focused on the next five years (2006-
2011). The Rural Transport Strategy outlines the
government’s stated commitments and interventions to
uplifting the material conditions of rural communities
through the National Spatial Development Perspective
The rural transport interventions will be coordinated
with and will incorporate the objectives of the ISRDS
and Municipal IDP’s. This is thus a point of reference
for the Karoo Hoogland Municipality to ensure that its
roads form part of the overarching rural development
strategy in the region.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
69
NATIONAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description/Intention Implications
(NSDP), Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP),
Joint Initiative for Priority Skills Acquisition (JIPSA) and
Accelerated Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa
(ASGISA). It also highlights the need to improve
transport efficiency and sustainability by way of policy,
institutional reform, capacity building and monitoring
within the ambit of the Integrated Sustainable Rural
Development Strategy (ISRDS).
NATPLAN
Comprehensive Rural
Development Programme
(2009)
The Comprehensive Rural Development Programme
(CRDP) is deemed “strategic priority number 3” within
the government’s current Medium Term Strategic
Framework. The strategic objective of the CRDP is to
facilitate integrated development and social cohesion
through participatory approaches in partnership with all
sectors of society. The vision of the CRDP is to create
vibrant, equitable and sustainable rural communities
with a view to contributing to the redistribution of 30%
of the country’s agricultural land; improving food
security of the rural poor; creation of business
opportunities, de-congesting and rehabilitation of over-
crowded former homeland areas; and expanding
opportunities for women, youth, people with disabilities
and older persons who stay in rural areas. Jacob Zuma
announced that the CRDP is “our national collective
strategy in our joint fight against poverty, hunger,
unemployment and lack of development in our rural
areas.” He said that over the medium term,
The CRDP holds perhaps the most promise for rural
areas in that it has clearly defined principles of
intervention and support from which areas like Karoo
Hoogland are eligible to benefit. The District
Municipalities that hold responsibility for the
development of the constituent Local Municipalities
need to play a strong role in facilitating access to the
CRDP. As and when budgets are in place and
allocations to rural municipalities are determined,
Districts such as Namakwa and Pixley ka Seme will
need to be ready with proposed plans and projects that
can utilise the funds according to the approved
activities and desired outcomes.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
70
NATIONAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description/Intention Implications
“government has pledged over R2.6 billion in
conditional grants to provinces. This will be used for
agricultural infrastructure, training and advisory
services and marketing, and for upgrading agricultural
colleges.” “One of our priorities,” he said, “is to ensure
that land reform through redistribution and restitution,
is more coherently linked to the creation of livelihoods
for the poor.”
The Department of Rural Development will use
spatially targeted grants, such as the neighbourhood
development grant programme, to help support
revitalisation and development of rural towns.
Following this approach, it believes, will give more
impetus to making rural towns serve as service centres
of rural economies. As part of the overall strategy,
government will also support initiatives that promote
other forms of economic potential of rural areas
including tourism, light manufacturing and cultural
work. Various cultural activities such as traditional
music, arts and crafts and traditional sports can be
useful income generating activities in our rural areas
and should be harnessed. The first leg of the strategy
is to ensure that economic and social (infrastructure
development takes place in South Africa's rural
communities. This will be done through a proactive
strategy of upgrading infrastructure, some of which
would also serve as a tool of social transformation, by
providing roads, electricity, water and
telecommunications to support sustainable economic
development.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
71
NATIONAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description/Intention Implications
The types of projects and priorities cited include, but
are not limited to the following:
• Agrarian transformation:
o livestock farming and related value
chain development (exploring all
possible species for food and
economic activity); and
o cropping and related value chain
development (exploring all possible
species, especially indigenous plants,
for food economic activity.
• Rural development:
o the establishment of business
initiatives, agro-industries,
cooperatives, cultural initiatives and
vibrant local markets in rural settings;
o the empowerment of rural
communities, especially women and
the youth, through facilitating and
mediating strong organisational and
institutional capabilities and abilities to
take full charge of their collective
destiny;
o capacity building initiatives, where
rural communities are trained in
technical skills, combining them with
indigenous knowledge to mitigate
community vulnerability to, especially
climate change, soil erosion, adverse
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
72
NATIONAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description/Intention Implications
weather conditions and natural
disasters, hunger and food insecurity;
and
o revitalisation and revamping of old,
and the creation of new economic,
social and information communication
infrastructure and public amenities and
facilities in villages and small rural
towns.
The Department of Rural Development and Land
Reform will act as an initiator, facilitator, coordinator
and catalyst in rural development interventions.
Projects must be undertaken in a manner consistent
with the integrated development plans, provincial
growth and development strategies, area-based plans
and other planning frameworks. Projects must be
undertaken within a participatory community-based
planning approach. Projects must be packaged and
coordinated at provincial level in consultation with local
level structures. Beneficiaries of the CRDS will be
stratified into five categories to target those with proven
interest and skills in farming so as to create
developmental pathways appropriate to different target
categories. The proposed categories are as follows:
• Category 1: Landless households – those who
have no space even for subsistence production
and seek land for small-scale subsistence
purposes, with or without settlement; including
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
73
NATIONAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description/Intention Implications
rights-based applicants such as farm dwellers.
• Category 2: Commercial-ready subsistence
producers – those who wish and are capable
of having a more commercial focus but need
land and support, mostly on part-time basis;
including rights-based applicants such as farm
dwellers.
• Category 3: Expanding commercial
smallholders – those who have already been
farming commercially at a small scale and with
aptitude to expand, but are constrained by land
and other resources.
• Category 4: Well-established black commercial
farmers – those who have been farming at a
reasonable scale, but are disadvantaged by
location and other circumstances, and with real
potential to become large-scale commercial
farmers.
• Category 5: Financially capable, aspirant black
commercial farmers – established
businesspeople who aspire to expand into
commercial agriculture and who by and large
will be part-time farmers.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
74
18.3 Alignment with provincial perspectives
PROVINCIAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description Implications
Provincial Growth and
Development Strategy, 2004-
2014
Plan 8: PGDS
Development Strategies
In terms of the PGDS, development in the Northern
Cape is focused on:
• Sector specific strategies defining where
public and private sector intervention is
necessary and justifiable;
• Key macro-level interventions and
support required from relevant national
line ministries to reinforce provincial
initiatives;
• Programme and project level
opportunities and interventions;
• A comprehensive provincial spatial
development framework and strategy;
• Leveraging adequate financial resources
to finance growth and development;
• Identifying appropriate institutional
delivery mechanisms; and
• Monitoring and evaluation systems and
procedures.
The hierarchy includes:
Established Growth Centres, which are regarded
as major established growth centres located in the
In the case of the Karoo Hoogland Local Municipality,
what is particularly striking and relevant in terms of
the PGDS is the recognition that the region does
contain a development node of importance, but it is
also a region that requires stabilization of its resource
base to serve the existing population and to provide
for the best possible basic services, given the limited
resources. It recognizes, too, that finance for
development is limited, but that areas like Karoo
Hoogland should take advantage of those institutional
support mechanisms that it can access on its own
merits. In addition, the PGDS suggests that the
private sector, and to a limited extent, the donor
community, should be lobbied to bring development
funds to these marginalized areas.
While the PGDS defines corridors according to
existing paved, national routes, there is no mention of
the minor routes, some of which are paved and
others that are still gravel but providing sometimes
the only access to towns that have economic
potential in their own right, e.g., Sutherland. In the
case of the Karoo Hoogland Municipality, its main
towns lie on no real important corridors, other than
the minor one leading from Calvinia to Carnarvon and
then to nowhere significant, and the route to
Sutherland. In order to develop an integrated
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
75
PROVINCIAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description Implications
Kimberley-Postmasburg sub-region and which are
likely to remain the main-economic driving force in
the province for the foreseeable future. These areas
also represent a major reception area for rural to
urban migrants but often this influx exceeds formal
sector growth rates resulting in an increasing number
of people seeking livelihoods in the informal sector.
Most notably for areas such as this, the growth in
population often exceeds the rate of growth in service
provision raising backlogs in these areas, as opposed
to an area like Karoo Hoogland, which suffers
backlogs for lack of resources and capacity to deliver.
Emerging Growth Centres are primarily those areas
around Upington and Springbok where agriculture
and mining have been the sources of new economic
growth. A key strategic issue here is how to maintain
growth in the face of downscaling of mining in the
Springbok vicinity and the deteriorating contribution of
the export grape industry around Upington. The
report finds that there may be a significant rural-urban
shift with some stepwise (onward and outward)
migration to other major centres both inside and
outside the province. This will place a greater
demand for services on local authorities that will have
to consider more explicitly the spatial distribution of
service provision.
Stagnating Small Towns, which are mainly in the
Karoo and Namaqua Districts where the erosion of
approach to the municipal area, it may be worth
considering connecting roads that may lead to a
tourism strategy linked to the mutual histories of the
towns; on the other hand, it may be that the municipal
area is too disconnected to attempt such an
association and better to have different development
approaches to each town.
The Sutherland development potential is large
compared to the other towns, given the existence of
the telescope and related activities. For towns like
Williston and Fraserburg, to fund development, the
province suggests that alternative sources may be
available through other means, which through aligned
and strategic approaches should result in funding not
directly available from the Province. The PGDS does
however note that the major portion of national
government transfers to the province takes the form
of an “equitable share,” which provinces may use at
their discretion in accordance with their constitutional
obligations. Thus, Karoo Hoogland may still want to
petition the Province to redirect funds to its area to
promote development. Otherwise, the region may
want to consider other sources of funding.
Karoo Hoogland should look to other revenue
generating activities to supplement its income. Since
the existing population in the municipal area is
primarily poor and under-resourced, this alternative
source of income would probably be best raised from
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
76
PROVINCIAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description Implications
the economic base of the area has resulted in severe
contraction of the local economies. These areas
have been the source of out-migration to other
centres in the Northern Cape and other parts of
South Africa. Interestingly, the report points out that
a significant number of people continue to reside in
these towns and typically these populations have
shown an increasing dependence on remittances and
social grants. Levels of affordability for services have
been falling threatening the sustainability of local
government structures and systems. This will
inevitably force a consideration of the options on the
part of government in so far as a future level of
service provision is concerned
Land Reform Areas, which have resulted from land
restitution and land re-distribution cases that have
been settled where people have moved back onto
ancestral and other land. In addition, land tenure and
ownership arrangements have changed in the former
Act 9 areas. In most cases, this has led to the need
to provide services in previously under or non-
serviced areas. From a spatial development
perspective the locality of these areas will be a critical
determinant of their future viability. Most of them are
in areas in relatively close proximity to the Kimberley-
Postmasburg and Upington areas. In as much as this
provides proximity to economic activity, this is
beneficial. However, in many cases the economic
potential of the land in question is inadequate as a
outside. This can come through a form of levy on
tourism activities, tolls, or other fund-raising initiatives
that can help to bring both attention to the
development needs of the area, as well as generating
more interest in the activities surrounding or internal
to the towns.
The document, however, points to the area along the
west coast between Alexander Bay and Hondeklip
Bay, where it sees significant potential for mariculture
and related industry development, based on the
adjacent marine resource. The area is also the
location of the Ibhubesi natural gas field, which, if
exploited, could be landed on-shore in the Northern
Cape either for transport by pipeline to the Western
Cape and/or Gauteng as part of the development of a
national gas grid.
The PGDS notes another special resource area along
the Orange River, where it views the expansion of
irrigated agricultural production possible, based on
new water allocations. A third special resource area
are the small number of major eco-tourism and
conservation initiatives around the Kgalagadi
Transfrontier Park, the Ai Ais-Richtersveld
Transfrontier Park, the Bushmanland Conservation
Initiative, and the expanded Namaqua National Park
and adjacent Marine Protected Area.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
77
PROVINCIAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description Implications
source of economic livelihoods and this will have to
be addressed in any consideration of future
infrastructure investment and development
expenditure.
Development Corridors and Special Resource
Areas. Within the province, the PGDS identifies four
discernible development/transport corridors. First, is
the corridor from Springbok through Upington to
Kimberley (and the Free State and Gauteng), which
links the major economic centres in the province. The
second corridor links Namibia to Upington, passing
through De Aar to the Eastern Cape. The third
corridor links Gauteng through the North West
province to Kimberley and Cape Town. A fourth
corridor links Cape Town through Springbok in
Namaqualand to Namibia and potentially Angola.
While these corridors are regarded as vital lifelines
from a transport perspective, the PGDS regards each
area as having relatively high economic development
potential, which it feels could benefit the region
enormously in terms of their proximity to established
related transport infrastructure, e.g., airports and rail
lines.
Western Cape Provincial Growth
and Development Strategy
(Plan 9: Western Cape PGDS)
The Western Cape Provincial Growth and
Development Strategy identifies four spatial
components which are key areas of economic and
growth opportunity in the province:
1. Regional nodes – Saldanha/Vredenburg and
The WCPGDS holds little economic prospects for
Karoo Hoogland Municipality, other than the N1
highway passing the Municipality in the south, being
the main link between Cape Town and Sutherland.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
78
PROVINCIAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description Implications
Southern Cape
2. Regional development corridors:
- Minor Regional Development Corridor
Olifants River Valley
- Major Regional Development Corridor
Breede River Valley
3. Regional transport corridors:
- R27 and N7
4. Leader Towns
The PGDS further indentifies 5 different investment
categories for the towns in the province based on
growth potential (to ensure high leverage for
expenditure) and need (to ensure greatest social
benefit including:
Town Investment - High development potential
and low need
Betty’s Bay, Bredasdorp, Brenton-on-Sea, Caledon,
Franskraal, Groot Brak River, Hawston, Herold’s Bay,
Jacobsbaai, Jamestown, Keurbooms River,
Kylemore, Langebaan, Malmesbury and
Moorreesburg
Social investment - Low need and high
development potential
Bitterfontein, Bot River, Calitzdorp, Clanwilliam, De
Doorns, De Rust, Doringbaai, Dysselsdorp,
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
79
PROVINCIAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description Implications
Eendekuil, Elandsbaai, Friemersheim, Genadendal,
Goedverwacht, Gouda, Graafwater
Social and town investment -High development
potential and high need
Cape Town, Ashton, Beaufort West, Ceres, Elim,
Franschhoek, Gansbaai
George, Grabouw, Hermanus, Kalbaskraal,
Klapmuts, Knysna, Oudtshoorn, Paarl, Plettenberg
Bay
Leader Towns - Highest growth potential
Cape Town, Beaufort West, George, Hermanus,
Knysna, Malmesbury, Mossel Bay, Oudtshoorn,
Paarl, Stellenbosch, Swellendam, Vredenburg,
Saldanha, Vredendal, Wellington, Worcester
Minimal Investment - Low development potential and
low need
Agulhas/Struisbaai, Albertinia, Arniston, Aurora,
Barrydale, Bonnievale, Buffelsbaai, Citrusdal, Darling,
Dwarskersbos, Ebenhaeser, Gouritsmond, Greyton,
Hopefield, Jongensfontein
Provincial Land Transport
Framework Final Draft, 2003
In the document it says that, “embedded in the
national and provincial programme on sustainable
rural development and urban is a call for our
department to respond accordingly. In responding
we must effectively address the following needs of
our people:
Again, this does not address the Karoo Hoogland Municipality and its development needs, which will rely, in the future, on the state of the access roads and inter-leaders that run through or to the towns, which are “turn-offs” from the key route between Cape Town and Johannesburg. Interestingly, it points to the need for land strategies in the Spatial
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
80
PROVINCIAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation/Strategies Description Implications
• rural land transport;
• accessibility of communities;
• empowerment of the historically
disadvantaged;
• road safety;
• improving the services provided by the taxi
industry;
• supporting private entities;
• ensuring interaction with stakeholders.
At present, the Provincial Spatial Framework is being
compiled. The framework will focus on Development
areas in existing towns and the agricultural areas as
follows:
• agricultural development along the Vaal and
Orange Rivers;
• infrastructure for fishing activities along the
Port Nolloth coast;
• mining activities in the Kgalagadi District
Municipality; and
• game farming in the area of the Van der Kloof
Dam, Phillipstown, Colesberg and
Norvalspont.
Framework to be described in terms of projects and schedules for the various economic sectors (e.g. Infrastructure, Services, Education, Housing, Health etc). It states that in this way the spatial framework will become a list of projects and budgets linked to budgets for timeous implementation at the local or provincial level. Only with inputs from the local transport planning process, can the integration of transport and land use planning be enhanced. The Karoo Hoogland Municipality should direct attention to the key roads within its boundaries and the need to develop these in the interest of creating local economic development opportunities for its population.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
81
18.4 Alignment with district development perspectives
DISTRICT LEVEL
Policy/Legislation
/Strategies Description Implications
Namakwa District
Municipality Local
Economic
Development
Strategy (2009)
Following from the PGDS is the Namakwa District Municipality
Local Economic Development Strategy (2009), which is a
comprehensive plan (216 pages) relating to the opportunities for
development in the District, focusing on the region’s comparative
advantages and the need to adopt strategies that can maximize
the benefits for the citizens of the District.
The SWOT analysis shows potential for energy production,
diamond mining and beneficiation, scientific research and
development, particularly in the fields of biodiversity and astronomy
(star gazing) and tourism and conservation initiatives. Value-chain
development in the mining, mariculture, research and development
and tourism industries can be used to expand productivity within
the district. Projects that it felt may be developed in the District
include:
• Agricultural potential projects:
o hoodia farming and processing (manufacturing);
o expansion of mariculture projects;
o hydroponic production (Orange River area);
o organic farming production (Orange River area);
o skills, facilities and service provision for small
emerging farmers (CASP/LRAD); and
o Working-for-Water bi-products (e.g. charcoal,
biomass).
• Mining potential projects:
o One-Stop Mining Centre;
In the main, however, the document has very little to say for
marginalised towns such as Williston and Fraserburg, with a limited
focus on developments that can realistically take place within the
region’s space.
Very few of these projects are relevant to the Karoo Hoogland
Local Municipality, which again speaks to the need for the
Municipality to focus on (a) basic service delivery, and (b)
economic development through other means, either outside
funding of development activities or encouraging more focus on the
tourism traffic that may flow from leader routes from other areas,
like the N1 and other cross-route channels.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
82
DISTRICT LEVEL
Policy/Legislation
/Strategies Description Implications
o copper beneficiation and products
(manufacturing); and
o diamond cutting and polishing.
• Manufacturing:
o recycling depot(s); and
o manufacturing linked to mining, agro-tourism,
energy and space opportunities.
• Tourism potential projects:
o cultural villages and events – N7 Tourism Hub
(north/south);
o techno-tourism (space, energy);
o eco-tourism;
o flower mapping (can link with biodiversity
research); and
o Tourism Skills Institute.
• Transport and Communication potential projects:
o upgrade of roads ; and
o increase in transport services in NDM.
• Energy Production:
o Wind
o Solar
o Natural Gas
o Wave
o Biogas
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
83
DISTRICT LEVEL
Policy/Legislation
/Strategies Description Implications
Namakwa Integrated
Development Plan
(2006-2011)
Plan: District
Development
Strategy
The Namakwa strategy is based on national policies, such as the
National Spatial Development Plan and the Regional Industrial
Development Strategy, and was further guided by the Northern
Cape Provincial Growth and Development Strategy. Consultation
with stakeholders at all levels resulted in two very distinct
development possibilities:
1. The Namakwa District is the only district in the Northern
Cape with a major stretch of coastline for development;
2. The Orange River presents the District with unique
development potential and this needs to be fully exploited.
The main strategic intervention areas identified for the Namakwa
District were:
• improve economic development.
• maintain and upgrade road infrastructure.
• improve service delivery in terms of housing, water,
sanitation, electricity.
• ensure financially viable municipalities.
The following long term development targets were set for the
Namakwa District:
• to construct a dam in the lower Orange River before 2014;
• to establish and implement an operational Mariculture Park
before 2010;
• to increase road maintenance funding and implementation
of a structured Road Maintenance Plan before 2010; and
• to develop the human potential through a Training-
The following two key performance areas have a spatial dimension
and therefore considered applicable:
1. Basic Service Delivery and Infrastructure:
• Maintenance and upgrading of existing road infrastructure.
• Plan and improve bulk water supply to municipal areas
(Hantam, Kamiesberg, and Richtersveld).
• Housing – unlock projects and addressing existing
backlog.
• Eradication of the bucket system at the end of 2007.
• Upgrading and maintenance of existing municipal
infrastructure.
2. Local Economic Development:
• Identification of mega development projects and
implementation thereof.
• Implementation of project identified in the PGDS/ASGI-SA.
• Beneficiation of raw minerals products.
• Development of West Coast gas fields and coast line.
• Mari culture expansion.
• Maximum utilisation of the Orange River (e.g. dam, water
rights).
• SKA (square kilometre array)/DSNA.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
84
DISTRICT LEVEL
Policy/Legislation
/Strategies Description Implications
Retaining Plan before 2010.
Namakwa Growth &
Development
Strategy, 2009
The Namakwa District Growth and Development Strategy emerged
from a Presidential Directive (2007) asking each of the 52 District
municipalities to develop such a strategy. This pronouncement
was made against the backdrop of issues identified through
ASGISA, which pointed to the need for increasing the levels of
growth, investment, job creation and people-centred development.
The NDGDS focuses on the following sectors for development:
1. Tourism
a. Unique geography and vegetation
b. Eco-tourism
c. Adventure tourism
d. Mining tourism
e. Stargazing and astronomy
f. Coastal tourism
g. Cultural tourism
2. Fishing and Mariculture
a. Rejuvenating the fishing industry
b. Promoting mariculture as an industry
3. Manufacturing strategy
a. Implementing a strategy in line with the RIDP
b. Producing input to the mining and agricultural
industries
c. Mineral beneficiation
d. Mariculture Park
e. Agro-processing
f. SME development
g. Financial support to SMEs
h. Finding solutions to making finance more
accessible to SMEs by working with banks
i. Developing a local Enterprise Development Fund
j. Promoting non-financial support mechanisms for
SMEs
k. Developing incubators
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
85
DISTRICT LEVEL
Policy/Legislation
/Strategies Description Implications
l. Working more closely with SEDA
m. Developing business skills and access to training
4. Agriculture Strategy
a. Transfer 30% of agricultural land to BEE farmers
b. Involve 30 upcoming farmers in the
Comprehensive Agriculture Support Programme
(CASP)
c. Arrange a land-care workshop in the region
d. Promote an integrated food security programme
5. Energy Strategy
a. Wind energy programme
b. Nuclear energy and gas developments
6. Safety and Liaison Strategy
a. Deal with crime and community safety
7. ICT Strategy
a. Develop a BPO sector strategy
b. Improve ICT as an enabler for business
development in the region
c. Promote “e-government”
8. Social Sector Strategy
18.5 Alignment with local development perspectives
LOCAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation
/Strategies Description Implications
Alignment with
Surrounding
Due to the location of the Municipality adjacent to Kareeberg and
the potential spill-over from tourism from that Municipality’s visitors
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
86
LOCAL LEVEL
Policy/Legislation
/Strategies Description Implications
Municipalities to the telescope, (where tourists may wish to continue north after
visiting the Sutherland telescope or SKA development), there may
be a need to develop the Spatial Plan with a view to promoting a
northward passage to Upington along roads passing through
Kareeberg (which would require tarring).
To a more limited extent, the Municipality could be linked to Kai
Garib in the Siyanda District due to the R27 route to Upington from
Cape Town. Planning to develop the route from a tourism
perspective may be very advantageous for Karoo Hoogland.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
87
18.6 Other initiatives
18.6.1 Square Kilometre Array (SKA)
The Karoo Array Telescope (MeerKAT) project involves the construction of a world-class radio telescope, which is being built by the Department of Science and Technology and the National Research Foundation near the towns of Carnarvon and Williston. The construction of the SKA is expected to cost about 1.5 billion Euros. The operations and maintenance of a large telescope normally cost about 10% of the capital costs per year. This means the international SKA consortium, if approved, will be spending approximately 100 to 150 million Euros per year on the telescope. It is expected that a significant portion of the capital, operations and maintenance costs would be spent in the host country, but not necessarily in Karoo Hoogland.
South Africa's Astronomy Geographic Advantage Act (2007) declares the entire Northern Cape
Province, with the exception of the Sol Plaatje Municipality (Kimberley) as an astronomy
advantage area. Within that, an area of 12.5 million hectares is the main protected area - or
radio astronomy reserve - for the SKA. This area is also referred to as the Karoo Central
Astronomy Advantage Area.
Other benefits of the proposed SKA South Africa site include:
• low levels of radio frequency interference and certainty of future radio quiet zone; • very little light pollution; • basic infrastructure of roads, electricity and communication in place; • ideal geographical location, sky coverage and topography; • safe and stable area with very few people and no conflicting economic activities; • required land, labour and services available and very affordable; • excellent academic infrastructure to support SKA science and technology; and • the astronomical "richness" of the southern skies and strong tradition of astronomy.
Hosting the SKA in South Africa will boost the development of high level skills and cutting edge
technology infrastructure in Africa, and will also attract expertise and collaborative projects to
the continent. In contrast, however, the limitations for development in terms of the area declared
an advantage area could have long-term implications for the region. In particular, concerns may
be raised later where light, population density, etc., may outstrip that of the SKA requirements.
Clarity around the kind of academic infrastructure required to support SKA science and
technology would also need to be unpacked and understood in terms of the local population’s
access to this education and how this will be facilitated at a provincial or national government
level, wherever such education or training may take place. Certainly, the local population,
through a proper academic selection process, should have first right of reservation of those
academic opportunities.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
88
18.6.2 SKA Development implications
Once an area has been declared an astronomy advantage area, measures for protection from
detrimental radio interference will be applied as provided in the regulations. Protection levels
shall be enforced on any new radio frequency service operating within specific frequency ranges
and existing radio frequency services with the proviso that concessions may be granted.
The implementation of protection will be carried out in two phases:
1. Existing transmissions need to be authorised by the management authority, including
any existing new requirements for transmission or upgrading.
2. An ongoing process to deal with new requirements and upgrading of radio frequency.
Karoo Core Radio Astronomy Advantage Areas Regulations
1. Radio communications with transmitters located within the Karoo Core Radio Astronomy
Advantage area which operate within the frequency band from 70 MHz to 25.5 GHz are
declared activities that may only be undertaken as prescribed in these regulations.
2. No fixed transmitting stations operation within the frequency spectrum from 70 MHz to
25.5 GHz maybe located in the Karoo Core Radio Advantage Area.
3. Any existing transmitter stations operating within the frequency spectrum from 70 MHZ
to 25GHz within the Karoo Core Radio Advantage Area will have to be relocated to a
location outside the Karoo Core Radio Astronomy Advantage Area.
Karoo Central Radio Astronomy Advantage Areas Regulations
1. Radio communications with transmitters located within the Karoo Core Radio Astronomy
Advantage area which operate within the frequency band from 70 MHz to 25.5 GHz are
declared activities that may only be undertaken as prescribed in these regulations.
2. Frequency bands within the radio astronomy band from 70 MHz to 25.5 GHz to be
authorised for radio communication within the Karoo Central Radio Astronomy
Advantage Area will be determined by the management authority in consultation with the
entities involved according to prescribed procedures.
3. The geographical extent of the Karoo Central Radio Astronomy areas are defined in the
declaration are the areas beyond the declared Karoo Core Radio Astronomy Advantage
Area and within the outer boundaries of the areas referred to as Karoo Central Radio
Astronomy Areas 1, 2 and 3: (See Plan 11: Square Kilometer Array)
� Karoo Central Astronomy Radio Astronomy area 1 shall apply to the frequency band
70 to 1710 MHZ.
� Karoo Central Astronomy Radio Astronomy area 2 shall apply to the frequency band
1710 to 6000 MHZ.
� Karoo Central Astronomy Radio Astronomy area 3 shall apply to the frequency band
6000 MHz to 25.5 GHZ.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
89
Karoo Coordinated Radio Astronomy Advantage Areas Regulations
1. Radio communications with transmitters located within the Karoo Coordinated Radio
Astronomy Advantage area which operate within the frequency band from 70 MHz to
6000 MHz are declared activities that may only be undertaken as prescribed in these
regulations.
2. The geographical extent of the Karoo Coordinated Radio Astronomy Advantage areas
are defined in the declaration and are the areas:
� Between Karoo Central Radio Astronomy area 1 outer boundary and Karoo Central
Radio Astronomy area 1 outer boundary for the frequency band from 70 to 1710 MHz
and for transmissions with an effective radiated power exceeding 60dBm.
� Between Karoo Central Radio Astronomy area 2 outer boundary and the borders of
the Northern Cape, excluding Sol Plaatje, for the frequency band from 1710 to 6000
MHz and for transmissions with an effective radiated power exceeding 60dBm.
18.6.3 South African Large Telescope (S.A.L.T) Development Implications
Once an area has been declared an astronomy advantage area for the purpose of optical
astronomy and related scientific endeavours, it will be protected from detrimental optical
interference.
Core Optical Astronomy Advantage Areas
1. Astronomical Activities on the site and adjacent areas within 3 kilometres radius are
controlled by the operating institution, with the adjacent area covered by cooperative
agreements.
2. Activities of those admitted to the site will e under the control of the management
authority in coordination with the operating institution, these activities shall include but
not be limited to-
(a) Light emissions
(b) Any activity that produces dust, smoke or equivalent pollution s may be determined
by the management authority.
3. For the protection of optical astronomy, no additional outdoor lighting may be may be
installed in the core astronomy advantage area without the permission of the
management authority in coordination with the operating institution.
4. Monitoring of sky brightness and transparency will be carried out on the observing
plateau of the site, using the 0.5m telescope and photometer and a standard telescope
provided through the International Dark-sky Association
Central Optical Astronomy Advantage Areas
1. All developments including industrial, domestic, sporting, cultural and tourism shall be
subject to standards determined by the management authority to assess potential impact
on the observing conditions at the core site.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
90
2. All new outdoor light fittings and fixtures to be converted to lower power, full cut-off
devices so as to minimise night sky pollution.
3. The lighting should not permit more than 0.8% of the total flux to be emitted in the upper
hemisphere for illuminations less than 15000 lumens.
4. Outdoor light fixtures or arrays of light fixtures, emitting more than 80 lumens should not
emit more than 0.8% of the total flux in the upper hemisphere.
5. Lighting should be low pressure sodium.
6. Conversion of existing outdoor lighting facilities will be coordinated with the management
authority through the relevant municipalities.
7. Open cast mining is prohibited.
8. Other mining and constructing activities shall be agreed to with the management
authority after the receipt of assessment.
9. All outdoor light fittings and fixtures to be converted to full cut off devices conforming in
the case of street lighting to illumination levels higher than those specified by SANA
10998-1, so as to minimise night sky pollution.
Coordinated Optical Astronomy Advantage Areas
1. Municipalities shall develop plans to reduce lighting by moving to lower power, high
efficiency public lighting with lower impact on sky brightness.
2. Municipalities shall develop plans to minimise external sporting, cultural and advertising
lighting by using the full cut off fixtures. Billboards and structures may not be lit from
below if more than 5% of the light will reach the sky.
3. The management authority and Municipality shall develop regulations requiring
commercial and security lighting to use cut-off fixtures, in cooperation with the
management authority.
4. The management authority and municipalities shall develop regulations requiring
commercial and security lighting to use cut-off fixtures, in cooperation with the
management authority.
5. The management authority and municipalities shall develop plans to minimise large
scale dust and smoke pollution that might reach the Sutherland Core Optical Astronomy
Advantage Area.
18.6.4 Succulent Karoo Ecosystem Programme (SKEP)
The purpose of the Karoo Succulent Ecosystem Programme (SKEP) is to provide guidelines for
the conservation of the biome known as the Succulent Karoo. This biome covers approximately
116 000 km² and stretches from the south-west to the north-west of South Africa and southern
Namibia. It is considered an international biodiversity hotspot, comprising a diverse range of
flora, reptiles and invertebrates, many of which are endemic to the region. However, only 3.5%
of this biome falls under formal conservation areas and there is pressure on the environment
from humans in the form of mining, crop agriculture, ostrich farming, overgrazing, illegal
collection of fauna and flora, and climate change. In response to these threats, the SKEP
programme was developed.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
91
One of the outcomes of the programme was the delineation of nine geographic priority areas
within the Succulent Karoo biome. The delineation process undertaken was as follows, ”These
areas were delimited based on agglomerations of high irreplaceability planning units (few
conservation options), medium to high land-use pressures, and the incorporation of spatial
components of key ecological processes. Where the priority areas bordered one another the
boundaries were defined on the basis of biotic discontinuities, e.g. fundamental differences
between the biota of the sandy coastal plain compared to the granite Namaqualand uplands.
Within each of these geographic priority areas, finer scale conservation planning will be required
to guide local land-use planning and decision-making and for reserve design.”
These 9 geographic regions are listed as follows: (Plan 12: SKEP)
1. Bushmanland Inselbergs
3. Central Breede Valley
4. Central Little Karoo
5. Central Namaqualand Coast
6. Greater Richtersveld
7. Bokkeveld-Hantam-Roggeveld
8. Knersvlaktes
9. Namaqua Uplands
10. Sperrgebiet
A portion of the Karoo Hoogland is covered by the Bokkeveld-Hantam-Roggeveld geographic
priority area and must be considered in terms of planning and conservation initiatives.
18.6.5 Namakwa District Biodiversity Sector Plan
It is important to ensure that long term environmental sustainability is promoted through the
planning process. The biodiversity principle and land use guidelines proposed for Karoo
Hoogland in terms of the Namakwa District Biodiversity Sector Plan 2008 are therefore
supported with regard to long term sustainable planning (Plan 13: Regional Critical
Biodiversity Areas).
The Biodiversity Sector Plan, 2008 identifies Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBA’s) in terms of the
landscapes terrestrial and aquatic features that are critical for retaining biodiversity. The
categories and recommended land use activities are briefly discussed hereunder. (Plan 14:
Critical Biodiversity Areas)
At present, these are broad advisory statements to guide planners and provide better informed
Spatial Development Frameworks and Integrated Development Plans. The situation on the
grounds should still be verified by an ecologist before a decision on land use is taken.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
92
Table 10: Critical Biodiversity Areas Land Use Category
Biodiversity criteria Land Management Objective Recommended appropriate land use
PA: Protected Areas
1. Protected areas (PA's) are recognised entities in the Protected Areas Act and include South African National Parks, Northern Cape Provincial Nature Reserves and Municipal Reserves.
2. Conservation areas (CA’s) are not recognised in the Protected Areas Act (e.g. conservancies, private nature reserves).
1. Natural landscapes to be managed in order to maintain their natural state with limited or no biodiversity loss.
1. Conserve landscapes where biodiversity conservation is a primary management objective.
2. Protected Areas: - PA’s to be managed as such with
a management plan, a designated management authority and appropriate management resources such as budget and staff.
- Private land preferably to be designated in some way e.g. stewardship agreements with audited management plan.
3. Livestock: - Preferably no livestock grazing.
Grazing by indigenous ungulates permitted.
4. Tourism: - Suitable for tourism development
subject to EIA and provided impact area does not fall into the CBA1 category.
5. Other: - Strictly no mining, agricultural or
urban development. Hard development is permitted within protected areas subject to an EIA and impact area does not fall within a CBA1 area.
- Suitable for scientific research, religious ceremonies and environmental education.
- Priority areas for restoration and rehabilitation.
CBA1: Irreplaceable Sites Any area that is irreplaceable in terms of meeting biodiversity pattern targets. i.e. if these areas are not retained in a natural state then conservation targets will not be met. These are core biodiversity areas either with the highest biodiversity value (species richness, endemism, unique habitats, etc.) or areas that
Terrestrial CBA’s: 1. Critical Vegetation Types:
ecosystem status – critically endangered ecosystems.
2. Critical Terrestrial Habitats: experts areas.
3. Irreplaceable Sites: Bokkeveld Cape fine-scale plan.
4. Critical sites for species.
Aquatic CBA’s: 1. Critical Aquatic Habitats (fine-
scale assessment): Bokkeveld critical wetlands and rivers.
2. Critical Aquatic Habitats (fine-scale assessment): Lower Orange River experts areas.
3. Critical Aquatic Habitats (fine-scale assessment): Kamiesberg wetland study.
1. Natural landscapes are to be managed to maintain in a natural state with biodiversity loss.
1. Conservation landscape with potential multiple uses where biodiversity conservation is one of the primary management objectives.
2. Protected Areas: - Suitable and a priority for statutory
protected area development. - Private land preferably to be
designated in some way e.g. stewardship agreements with audited management plan.
3. Livestock: - No permanent livestock grazing.
Seasonal grazing permissible. - Strictly no kraals, stock posts or
artificial water points. - Maintain stock within
recommended stocking rates. - Adopt and implement the Grazing
Management Guidelines developed for the NDM.
4. Tourism: - No large scale or intensive tourism
development or construction of permanent tourism infrastructure.
- Suitable for scientific research. 5. No biodiversity offsets possible for
developments that result in the transformation of natural habitat (e.g. cropping and mining) irrespective of
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
93
Land Use Category
Biodiversity criteria Land Management Objective Recommended appropriate land use
have been so transformed to other land uses (mining and croplands) that all of what remains is required to meet conservation targets. The most important areas for biodiversity conservation in the Municipality.
anticipated restoration success. 6. Priority areas for restoration and
rehabilitation.
CBA2: Important Areas Other areas known to be of high biodiversity value. Important areas for ecological processes and climate change adaptation.
Terrestrial CBA’s: 1. Critical Vegetation Types:
Ecosystem Status – Endangered and Vulnerable Ecosystems.
2. Important Terrestrial Habitats: Quartz Patches.
3. Important Terrestrial Habitats: South facing slopes.
4. Important Terrestrial Habitats: Kloofs.
5. Important Terrestrial Habitats: Riverine Rabbit.
6. Important Terrestrial Habitats: Experts Areas.
Aquatic CBA’s: 1. Important Aquatic Habitats (fine-
scale assessment): Lower Orange River Experts Areas.
2. Important Aquatic Habitats (fine-scale assessment): Kamiesberg wetland study.
1. To be managed to maintain near natural landscapes with some loss in ecosystem integrity and functioning.
1. Multi use landscapes where biodiversity conservation is preferred but is not the only land use activity.
2. Biodiversity compatible land uses strongly encouraged and industries encouraged to adopt and implement industry accepted biodiversity management plans.
3. Protected Areas: - Suitable and a priority for statutory
protected area development. - Private land preferably to be
designated in some way e.g. stewardship agreements with audited management plan.
4. Livestock: - Stock farming permissible. - Adopt and implement the Grazing
Management. Guidelines developed for the NDM.
5. Tourism: - No large scale or intensive tourism
development or construction of permanent tourism infrastructure.
- Suitable for low impact recreation tourism and construction of temporary infrastructure, subject to an EIA.
6. Other: - Suitable for scientific research,
religious ceremonies, environmental education.
- Restrict further expansion of surface-mining, agricultural crops and urban development – i.e. avoid further loss of natural habitat and where possible utilise existing transformed or degraded areas for hard developments.
7. Biodiversity offsets required where development impacts on land management objective.
ESA: Ecological Support Areas Areas meeting ecological
1. Biodiversity Corridors 2. Richtersveld Springs 3. Kamiesberg wetland buffer areas 4. Bokkeveld critical wetland and
river buffers 5. Wilderness areas (not included)
1. To be managed to maintain near natural landscapes with minimal loss in ecosystem integrity and functionality.
1. Multi use landscapes where land-use management focuses on maintaining connectivity within the natural landscape.
2. Biodiversity compatible land uses strongly encouraged and industries
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
94
Land Use Category
Biodiversity criteria Land Management Objective Recommended appropriate land use
process targets or achieving biodiversity persistence objectives. Areas not explicitly targeted for biodiversity pattern or process, but that support key resources (e.g. water) or features in the landscape whose basic structure and ecological function require protection such as large areas with no permanent human structures (roads, housing etc.), away from stock posts for maintaining large-scale ecological processes such as free ranging wildlife.
2. Spatially explicit corridors must be managed to maintain function and structure, especially for aquatic systems.
3. To be managed to maintain near natural landscapes with minimal loss in ecosystem integrity and functionality.
4. Buffers to be managed to limit transformation, with particular emphasis on maintaining ecological processes that require large areas.
encouraged to adopt and implement industry accepted biodiversity management plans
3. Protected Areas: - Priority areas for the promotion of
stewardship. 4. Livestock:
- Stock farming permissible. - Adopt and implement the Grazing
Management Guidelines developed for the NDM.
5. Tourism: - Suitable for tourism development.
6. Other: - Suitable for scientific research,
religious ceremonies, environmental education.
- Where possible, restrict further expansion of surface mining, agricultural crops and urban development – i.e. avoid further loss of natural habitat and where possible utilise existing transformed or degraded areas for hard developments.
7. Biodiversity offsets are required where development impacts on land management objectives.
ONA: Other Natural Areas All remaining natural areas containing vulnerable and least threatened vegetation.
1. All remaining natural vegetation. 1. Functional landscapes: manage land to maintain basic ecosystem processes despite expecting significant loss in natural vegetation cover.
2. Biodiversity maintain in critical patches and ecosystem corridors.
3. Management guidelines are dependent on specific features such as vegetation type status and special species or habitats. These are often protected by specific legislation such as that relating to the maintenance of riparian buffers.
1. Production landscapes where land use management focuses on maintaining connectivity within the natural landscape.
2. Biodiversity compatible land uses strongly encouraged and industries encouraged to adopt and implement industry acceptable biodiversity management plans.
3. Livestock production should adopt and implement “Grazing Guidelines” development for the NDM.
4. Development of extensive tourism facilities (e.g. visitor’s centres, villages).
5. Transformation by mining, agricultural or urban development conditionally allowed subject to EIA.
6. Developments do not necessarily require biodiversity offsets.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
95
19 Spatial analysis and implication
19.1 Regional context
From a regional perspective Karoo Hoogland is located in the southern part of the Northern
Cape and is bordered by the Western Cape Province on its southern borders. To the north it
abuts the Hantam municipal area. It is far removed from large economic centres and metropoles
as shown in the table below:
Table 11: Regional Context
Urban Centres Distance from Williston
(approximate)
Main centres
Springbok 416 km
Upington 385 km
Kimberley 563 km
Metropoles
Cape Town 447 km
Johannesburg 1050 km
Pretoria 1099 km
Other towns
Fraserburg 98 km
Sutherland 144 km
Calvinia 129 km
Beaufort West 235 km
Laingsburg 266 km
(Source: www.saexplorer.co.za/south-africa/distance/travel_distance_calculator.asp)
The towns of Karoo Hoogland are fairly isolated from other major centres that offer a larger
variety of functions and services such as Upington and Springbok. Kimberley is the capital and
government seat of the Northern Cape Province and is located approximately 563 km from
Williston (See Plan 15: Regional Linkages).
• Karoo Hoogland has no existing airport facilities. The nearest national and international
airport is Cape Town International.
• The closest major port is Saldanha Bay in the Western Cape and the closest small scale
harbour is Hondeklipbaai along the west coast.
• The N1 bypasses Karoo Hoogland to the south with a direct link, the R354 tarred
surface, linking it to Sutherland. The R63 tarred surface is the connection between
Williston, Calvinia and Carnarvon. Approximately 80% of roads within Karoo Hoogland
have gravel surfaces.
• There is a railway connection linking Williston with Calvinia in the west and Carnarvon in
the east.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
96
Spatial Implication
The economic development of Karoo Hoogland depends substantially on its regional
accessibility via road and railway. Economic development is particularly constrained by the lack
of tarred roads with 80% of the roads currently having gravel surfaces. Large distances
between local towns and major economic centres (Kimberley and Cape Town) reduce the
competitiveness of this region.
The spatial implication of the remoteness is that people of Karoo Hoogland travel far distances
to educational and health facilities, shopping centres and markets, which is costly and tedious
and results in expenditure outside the Karoo Hoogland economy. Other centres in the country
are also more attractive in terms of the conveniences which they offer.
19.2 Environment
19.2.1 Climate
Karoo Hoogland is characterised by cool summer and extremely cold winter temperatures with temperature fluctuations that vary from an average low of 3⁰C to an average high of 20.25˚C. In
Sutherland, sub-zero temperatures are often experienced with frost occurring on an average of 88 nights per year. (Karoo Hoogland Local Municipality IDP, 2009-2011)
Sutherland is situated in the Roggeveld mountain range at a height of 1 450 m above sea level on the south-western escarpment of the inland plateau. At this height the area is exposed to all the cold air coming from the south-west. Due to the low moisture levels and thin air, heat radiation at night is high. The heavy cold air flows down to the lower valley where Sutherland is situated. Sutherland is regarded as the coldest place in South Africa.
Rainfall occurs mostly in the summer with between 100-300 mm expected per year. (Namakwa
Biodiversity Plan, 2008) (Plan 16: Annual Rainfall)
Table 12: Average Annual Rainfall
Average Rainfall (mm) Area (ha) %
0 0 0
100-200 2 076 348 69.12
200-300 662 380 22.05
300-400 254 757 8.48
400-600 10 412 0.35
TOTAL 3 003 897 100
DISCLAIMER: In terms of the municipal are (ha), it must be noted that the source data collected from
the Municipal Demarcation Board differs from the sourced data provided by the Department of Water
Affairs and Forestry
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
97
±70% of Karoo Hoogland has an average annual rainfall of between 100-200 mm; ±22% of the
area has an average annual rainfall of between 200-300 mm.
Spatial Implication
Climate change impacts significantly on settlement planning and population development in the
Northern Cape.
Notwithstanding the substantial uncertainties around rainfall projects, there is a tendency to
suggest a decrease in rainfall over the western part of southern Africa in the coming decades.
Based on these projections, the most severe impacts are likely to occur in this region, where
small towns and subsistence farmers are most vulnerable. Available literature suggests that it
would be prudent to account for climate change in water resource planning to meet the
development objectives of this region.
Water is a limiting resource for development in South Africa and a change in water supply could
have major implications in most sectors of the economy, especially in the agriculture sector.
Factors that contribute to vulnerability in water systems in southern Africa include seasonal and
inter-annual variations in rainfall, which are amplified by high run-off production and evaporation
rates.
With this in mind, the adaptive capacity of small towns in Karoo Hoogland to climate variability,
specifically drought, must be considered.
From an analysis of climate data and projections for the Northern Cape, an increase in
temperature over the entire region can be expected. With this, an increase in evaporation could
be expected. However, no clear trends for rainfall in this region can be attributed to climate
change. What can be observed, however, is that with climate change rainfall is likely to change
and become variable.
Recommendations:
• Given the possible implications of climate change on local water resources, it is
important that the impact be monitored as a precautionary measure.
• Strict groundwater management systems should be put in place, with early warning
mechanisms to report depleted groundwater reserves.
• A climate change awareness programme should be developed.
• Aggressively investigate the possibilities of alternative water resources.
• Reduce water losses in distributing and storage of water.
• Training and capacity building programmes to communities to ensure effective water
usage.
• Training for farmers to prevent bad farming practices that contributes to desertification
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
98
Climate conditions for Fraserburg are discussed in more detail below:
Fraserburg
Figure 2: Average temperatures
Source: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, SA Weather Bureau.
Evident from the figure above is that the maximum average day temperature (30.9 ⁰C) is in
January and the minimum average night temperature (-0.5⁰C) is in July.
Figure 3: Average rainfall
Source: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, SA Weather Bureau.
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Jan Maart Mei Jul Sept Nov
Ave Temperature
(1960 - 2007)
Mak
Min
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Jan Maart Mei Jul Sept Nov
mm
Average Rainfall
(1960 - 2007)
Series1
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
99
Fraserburg is situated within a summer rainfall region with an average of 203mm per year. The
highest rainfall is in March (38.6mm) and lowest in August (7.9mm).
Figure 4: Wind rose diagram
The dominant wind direction is from a south-easterly direction (35%) and an average of 28.7%
of all winds are calm.
19.2.2 Topography
Table 13: Slope Analysis
Slopes (%) Area (ha) %
0-9 2 892 556 96.52
9-15 88 008 2.94
15-25 16 280 0.54
>25 99 0
TOTAL 2 996 943 100
Source: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry
DISCLAIMER: In terms of the municipal area (ha), it must be noted that the source data collected from
the Municipal Demarcation Board differs from the sourced data provided by Enpat 2001
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
100
Topographical Features
• The greater extent of the Municipality consists of a flat, undulating landscape dotted with
mesas. (Plan 17: Slope Analysis)
• 96.52% of the total topography of the region has a gradient of less than 9%.
• The Bokkeveld-Hantam-Roggeveld corridor traverses the southern part of the Karoo Hoogland region, encompassing Sutherland.
• Numerous non-perennial streams traverse the Municipality however there are no
perennial rivers in the Karoo Hoogland municipal area.
• Runoff is generally high after heavy rainfall.
Spatial Implication - Basic Management Guidelines
• Land where the gradient is steeper than 20% is not suitable for development in terms of
environmental regulations and guidelines.
• The provision of engineering services is expensive in areas with steep slopes.
• Areas presenting topographical constraints should be carefully assessed in any land use
management decision.
• Environmental legislation requires the protection of granite or rocky outcrops due to the
diverse and sensitive vegetation types associated with these features.
• Areas regarded not suitable for development due to topographical constraints should
form part of a municipal open space system.
19.2.3 Geology
Table 14: Geology Types
Geology Area (ha) %
Adelaide 1 792 657 59.65
ECCA 986 176 32.82
Suurberg, Drakensberg, Lebombo 226 355 7.53
TOTAL 3 005 188 100
(Source: Council for Geoscience)
DISCLAIMER: In terms of the municipal are (ha), it must be noted that the source data collected from
the Municipal Demarcation Board differs from the sourced data provided by the Council for Geosciences
Geology Types
The most dominant geology type in the Karoo Hoogland (approximately 60%) is Adelaide,
followed by ECCA at approximately 33%. The Suurberg, Drakensberg, Lebombo Group
constitutes only 7% of the geological make-up (See Plan 18: Geology).
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
101
The Adelaide Group comprises of mudstones and sandstones and requires standard foundation
for building construction, but can have fabric, requiring deeper foundations to competent
materials.
The Ecca Group was deposited in a marine environment and comprises of selected intrusive
dykes/sills which can be expected, with associated increase in clays and shrink-&-swell
properties.
Spatial Implication - Basic Management Guidelines
• Caution must be taken when developing on less ideal geological terrain with specific
reference to risks and costs.
• From a geological perspective “no development areas” include areas affected by
undermining, dolomite and areas where heavy clays are present. These features are
not present in Karoo Hoogland.
• Areas underlain by geology types not suitable for development must be excluded from
development and included into a conservation zone or an open space system.
Any township development should be headed by a geotechnical investigation to determine
whether the soils are likely to cause foundation problems, especially when densification or
multiple storey development is proposed which impact heavily on underlying soils.
Economic Geology
Economic geology is concerned with earth materials that can be used for economic and/or
industrial purposes. These include precious and base metals, non-metallic mineral, construction
grade stone, petroleum minerals, coal and water. (Wikipedia, 2010,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_geology) (See Plan 19: District Economic Geology).
The economic geology of Karoo Hoogland is briefly discussed below: (See Plan 20: Economic
Geology).
The geological composition does not allow for numerous mining opportunities. The only
identified mining area is along the southern boundary of Karoo Hoogland and a central portion
between Williston and Fraserburg, where uranium deposits are found. Limited gypsum deposits
are found in the northern part of the Municipality and to the west of Sutherland (Plan 21:
Mining Land).
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
102
Other economic geological resources include:
• Molybdenum is to be found with uranium – molybdenum lubricants are for the use of any
mechanical moving part to reduce friction, reduce wear and tear, is heat and water
resistant, maintains a constant velocity, results in smooth running parts and eliminates
squeaking.
• Copper and silver are to found on Klein Witkraal op Kapgat 724, Klein Kookfontein 137,
Droogfoots Fontein 356 and Arbeiders Fontein 150.
• Calcite is found on the farms Annex Kransfontein 721 and Arbeiders Fontein 150.
Calsite is use in cements and mortars, production of lime, limestone is used in the steel
industry; glass industry, ornamental stone, chemical and optical uses and as mineral
specimens.
• Aggregate and building material are to be found on the farms Brassefontein 371 and Wit
Klip 372.
Scattered fossil remains form part of the geological composition and is an important attraction to
those intrigued by dinosaurs and prehistoric life and therefore a meaningful contributor to the
local economy. Therapsida, one of the earliest land animals left tracks in the mudstone near
Fraserburg. Archaeological evidence indicates that species such as Diictoton and Bradysauras
once lived in this area.
19.2.4 Agriculture potential
Agricultural Land Capability
Table 15: Agricultural Land Capability Categories
Category Area (ha) %
Non-arable, low potential grazing land 2 517 908 83.79
Non-arable, low to moderate potential
grazing land 0 0
Non-arable, moderate potential grazing land 0 0
Wilderness 487 281 16.21
Water 0 0
TOTAL 3 005 189 100
(Source: Enpat 2001)
DISCLAIMER: In terms of the municipal area (ha), it must be noted that the source data collected from
the Municipal Demarcation Board differs from the sourced data provided by Enpat 2001
Karoo Hoogland consists largely of non-arable, low potential grazing land (approximately 84%)
and is ideally suited for sheep farming. There is no arable land in this region largely due to the
scarcity of water combined with the soil conditions. (Plan 22: Agricultural Land Capability)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
103
Agricultural Soil Potential
Table 16: Agricultural Soil Potential Categories
Category Area (ha) %
Soils of poor suitability for arable agriculture
where climate permits 187 149 6.24
Not suitable for agriculture or commercial
forestry, suitable for conservation,
recreation or water catchments
773 741 25.81
Soils not suitable for arable agriculture,
suitable for forestry or grazing where
climate permits
1 679 192 56.03
Soils highly suited to arable agriculture
where climate permits 43 693 1.46
Soils of intermediate suitability for arable
agriculture where climate permits 149 800 5
Water bodies 0 0
No dominant class 163 508 5.46
TOTAL 2 997 083 100
(Source: Council of Geoscience)
DISCLAIMER: In terms of the municipal are (ha), it must be noted that the source data collected from
the Municipal Demarcation Board differs from the sourced data provided by Enpat 2001
Accordingly, 56% of the total municipal area is suitable for forestry or grazing where the climate
permits. Only 1.5% of soils in the region are highly suitable for arable agriculture. (Plan 23:
Agricultural Soil Potential)
Table 17: Soils highly suited to arable agriculture where climate permits
FARM NAME PORTION AREA (Ha) FARM NAME PORTION AREA (Ha)
TONTELBOSCH KOLK 35 RE/36 281.6774121 ENGLISHMANS KRAAL 59 3/59 300.8218344
WYGE-VLAKTE 375 300 203.3234044 DE BAD NO. 155 3/84 111.6527877
WITFONTEIN 299 375 39.68716629 BRUINSKOP 114 4/114 397.124722
STINKFONTEIN 461 381 642.1676871 PAARDE GRASS VALLEY 241 4/241 14.19125447
WELTEVREDEN 2 1/1 82.26619629 TABAKS FONTEIN 242 4/242 0.697080431
WELTEVREDEN 2 3/1 117.5087409 HOL PADS KEEGTE 32 4/32 37.12547149
BRUINSKOP 114 1/114 630.110089 GRASVLAKTE 1162 4/376 382.2830363
SPRINGERSBAY 155 1/115 67.91904411 LANG KUILEN 142 5/142 78.55085684
PAARDE KRAAL 141 1/141 691.877542 LEKKERLEG 179 5/179 229.1181899
LANG KUILEN 142 1/142 2.575301603 PAARDE GRASS VALLEY 241 5/241 119.5534561
ELIAS ZYFER 144 1/144 88.84885791 HOL PADS KEEGTE 32 5/32 32.74320676
ZAK-FONTEIN 148 1/148 15.6457064 LEKKERLEG 179 6/179 40.79537142
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
104
FARM NAME PORTION AREA (Ha) FARM NAME PORTION AREA (Ha)
KAFFERS KRAAL 149 1/149 7.407285217 PAARDE GRASS VALLEY 241 6/241 30.43777602
WINDHOEK 168 1/168 65.88288164 LANGERKUILEN 6/337 478.6473929
GOEDEVERWACHTING 175 1/175 21.60972579 LEKKERLEG 179 7/179 37.53094699
AMANDELBOOMS WINKELHAAK 176 1/176 0.424862669 PAARDE GRASS VALLEY 241 7/241 44.24328218
LEKKERLEG 179 1/179 322.5889956 TABAKS FONTEIN 242 7/242 1.011145919
PAARDE GRASS VALLEY 241 1/241 505.4358469 LANGERKUILEN 7/337 933.9283355
TABAKS FONTEIN 242 1/242 21.5195411 LANG KUILEN 142 8/142 36.36393162
STOFKRAAL 243 1/243 594.7488858 PAARDE GRASS VALLEY 241 8/241 12.05651809
JACKKALSFONTEIN 247 1/247 494.6731352 LANGERKUILEN 8/337 69.40147261
KERK PLAATS 251 1/251 484.8438984 KARREEKAP 112 RE/112 15.60321483
LEENDERTS RIVIER 272 1/272 318.4995033 ELIAS LEEGTE 113 RE/113 360.3085871
SEEKOEIGAT 277 1/277 342.0251264 BRUINSKOP 114 RE/114 485.5996172
RIET POORT 275 1/279 637.3891371 SPRINGERSBAY 115 RE/115 486.4413395
NELLS WERFE 376 1/299 1020.547686 LEEUW KRANTZ 134 RE/134 52.08272272
GROOTWAMAKERSVLEI 304 1/304 275.5781998 KLIP DRIFT 139 RE/139 844.3182737
GOEDEVERWACHTING 305 1/305 333.1077752 PAARDE KRAAL 141 RE/141 368.3728958
ZAAIFONTEIN 322 1/322 138.041915 ELIAS ZYFER 144 RE/144 93.92916894
DE KRUIS VAN BLOEM FONTEIN 323 1/323 405.2698916 ZAK-FONTEIN 148 RE/148 983.7081796
LUDIGS GRAF 324 1/324 76.19825896 KAFFERS KRAAL 149 RE/149 589.9922455
ENKEL-DOORN SOUTH 37 1/37 52.14525095 VLOKS WERVEN 152 RE/152 258.3317996
GRASBULT 381 1/373 61.02018814 PALMIET-FINTAIN 171 RE/171 38.60982724
DAMS FONTEIN 396 1/396 117.5685115 DE KRUIS 174 RE/174 178.4615843
WALKRAAL A 500 1/500 271.2218266 GOEDVERWACHTING 175 RE/175 92.18280642
ENGLISHMANS KRAAL 59 1/59 1811.274364
AMANDELBOOMS WINKELHAAK 176
RE/176 60.87885143
GRAS KRAAL 83 1/83 271.6938281 LUNS KLOOF 177 RE/177 0.08388192
BRUINSKOP 114 2/114 46.98214119 LEKKERLEG 179 RE/179 89.64540638
LANG KUILEN 142 2/142 209.3578412 PAARDE GRASS VALLEY 241 RE/241 38.53100508
WALKRAAL 147 2/147 270.3095526 STOFKRAAL 243 RE/243 337.1488654
KAFFERS KRAAL 149 2/149 799.6911008 SEEKOEIGAT 277 RE/277 411.5852754
WINDHOEK 168 2/168 365.0713654 RIET POORT 75 RE/279 393.9830294
DE KRUIS 174 2/174 41.8618687 NELLS WERFE 376 RE/299 385.1221853
AMANDELBOOMS WINKELHAAK 176 2/176 23.61255141 GROOTWAMAKERSVLEI 304 RE/304 2034.59131
PAARDE GRASS VALLEY 241 2/241 197.0270718 GOEDVERWACHTING 305 RE/305 525.973393
TABAKS FONTEIN 242 2/242 21.42970055 ZAAIFONTEIN 322 RE/322 294.4326314
STOFKRAAL 243 2/243 235.5986922
DE KRUIS VAN BLOEM FONTEIN 323
RE/323 331.0088162
JACKKALSFONTEIN 247 2/247 424.3618814 LUDIGS GRAF 324 RE/324 510.7611208
RIET POORT 275 2/279 225.6337738 MOSQUITO KRAAL 33 RE/33 1288.746887
NELLS WERFE 376 2/299 553.3817933 RIETPOORT 330 RE/330 39.50719658
GROOTWAMAKERSVLEI 304 2/304 16.57645723 ROBERTSKRAAL 331 RE/331 618.3628576
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
105
FARM NAME PORTION AREA (Ha) FARM NAME PORTION AREA (Ha)
GOEDEVERWACHTING 305 2/305 80.18914626 GROF GESCHUD 34 RE/34 1012.366754
HOL PADS KEEGTE 32 2/32 3.267811419 NELS KOP SOUTH 245 RE/35 381.7688639
BOSHOF 346 2/346 77.23156159 ENKEL-DOORN SOUTH 37 RE/37 250.5548412
ENKEL-DOORN SOUTH 37 2/37 63.08489025 WIT KLIP 372 RE/372 1323.6912
GRASVLAKTE 1162 2/376 260.9710746 GRASBULT 381 RE/373 1736.433107
ENGLISHMANS KRAAL 59 2/59 0.545570986 WATERFALL 398 RE/398 6.07388879
GRAS KRAAL 83 2/83 6.968921703 SLINGERS FONTEIN 491 RE/491 754.9980266
BRUINSKOP 114 3/114 553.6418486 LANGKUILEN 494 RE/494 215.0739037
PAARDE KRAAL 141 3/141 16.7119885 WALKRAAL A 500 RE/500 414.7420536
LANG KUILEN 142 3/142 146.5245755 FARM 503 RE/503 132.8765781
WINDHOEK 168 3/168 32.35881507 ENGLISHMANS KRAAL 59 RE/59 134.3069945
DE KRUIS 174 3/174 7.293127938 GRAS KRAAL 83 RE/83 324.5271826
LEKKERLEG 179 3/179 120.4967135 DE BAD NO. 155 RE/84 3025.92373
PAARDE GRASS VALLEY 241 3/241 19.69333907 GOEDVERWACHTING 305 3/305 438.3412801
TABAKS FONTEIN 242 3/242 15.47526741 ENKEL-DOORN SOUTH 37 3/37 20.89162978
MATJES VALLEY 245 3/245 71.11006005 GRASVLAKTE 1162 3/376 131.7865513
The agricultural potential of land in Karoo Hoogland allows for livestock (sheep, goat and a few
cattle).
Criteria for identifying prime and unique agricultural land: (Department of Agriculture,
www.agis.agric.za – June 2010)
• absence of restrictions on cultivation (i.e. slopes and distance from watercourses).
• present irrigation (land under permanent or seasonal irrigation is deemed to qualify as
prime agricultural land).
• moisture availability.
• the scarcity factor.
• soil type, soil texture and soil depth (soil depths deeper than 750mm within access of a
water source need to be regarded as worthy of protection as a scarce resource).
These criteria are used as guidelines when evaluating an area. Areas that do not meet the
criteria are not automatically available for development or change in land use i.e. areas with a
low potential for crop production might have a high potential for grazing, making it an area of
high agricultural value.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
106
Spatial Implication
• It is important to classify, map and protect high potential agricultural land for agricultural
production purposes only.
• The soil potential map should be used as a land use management guideline only. Site
specific information needs to be acquired in determining the agricultural potential of any
land parcel.
• The specific situation or scenario of each application is also considered, i.e. size of area,
availability of water, economic viability and sustainable agricultural use and external
factors such as political influences, development trends etc.
• Land under permanent or seasonal irrigation should be regarded as high potential
agricultural land and be managed accordingly.
• The protection of agricultural land against uncontrolled “urban sprawl” and “leap frog”
development is essential.
• Fragmentation of farms should be prevented. Each subdivided portion should remain an
economical viable agricultural farming unit.
• The potential of agricultural land should be carefully assessed prior to the subdivision or
change thereof to any other land use.
• Currently the retention of productive agricultural land is administrated through the
Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act, 1970 (Act 70 of 1970) which controls the subdivision
of agricultural land and its use for purposes other than agriculture.
19.2.5 Conservation areas
The only statutory protected area of Karoo Hoogland is the Tanqua Karoo National Park, of
which only 0.24% is located within the municipal boundary (Plan 24: Conservation Areas).
The park was established in 1986 and has been enlarged to incorporate new farms along its
boundary. It experiences both summer and winter rainfall. Current threats include alien plants
located upon the newly acquired sections. (Source: Namakwa Biodiversity Sector Plan, 2008)
The Karoo Hoogland Local Municipality contains 14 of the 93 recognised vegetation types found
in the Namakwa District Municipal area, three of which are entirely endemic to the Municipality.
This municipal region is home to a wide variety of bulbous species and contains a host of other
charismatic plants, including:
• Indigenous rye grass (Secale strictum subsp.africanum) which is classified as Critically
Endangered in the Red Data Plant List. There is some experimentation to try and
domesticate this unique grass. This species could become a significant global food crop
in the future and it occurs only in the Karoo Hoogland.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
107
• It is the only plant species within the whole Namakwa District Municipality and Karoo
ecosystems that has good potential to become a commercial grain food crop and is
therefore a very special species indeed. (Namakwa Biodiversity Sector Plan, 2008)
• Daubenis (Daubenya aurea) which is a bulb plant bearing golden yellow flowers at
ground level and which is restricted to the Roggeveld Mountains is classified as
Vulnerable in the Red Data Plant List.
• Roggeveld Koekoemakranka (Gethyllis roggeveldensis) is restricted to this municipal
area but little is known about this plant’s distribution and habitat.
Ten plant species are considered Threatened and four Near-threatened in the Red Data list, as
indicated in the Namakwa District Biodiversity Plan, 2008. It is anticipated that an updated Red
Data list will become available during 2010 and this should be consulted in the review of the
SDF.
The region also contains populations of the severely threatened Riverine Rabbit and the
Visagies Golden Mole, which are entirely unique to the area. Both of these are included in the
Red Data List and are two of the ten most threatened faunal species in South Africa. Our faunal
features include rare nomadic larks and a remarkable diversity of insect life which act as key
pollinators for the regions many bulbous plants.
Spatial Implication
The incursion of alien plants along water courses is a major threat to the health of the
ecosystem in Karoo Hoogland. Effective control and eradication strategies are required to
mitigate the loss of water and ecosystem integrity that results from the continual encroachment
of invasive species. The Municipality has recognised the importance of this and has planned
projects for the removal of the alien Prosopis tree but it is vitally important that these eradication
projects are implemented.
Effective veld management plans and practices, in particular around catchment areas located in
the high-lying regions of the Roggeveld mountains, are critical if sustainability of land use is to
be achieved in the Karoo Hoogland municipal area.
19.3 Demographic characteristics
Statistics SA Census 2001 and the Statistics SA Community Survey 2007 are currently the only
two official population data sources used for planning purposes.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
108
19.3.1 Population size
Figure 5: Population Distribution in the Namakwa District per Municipality
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001 & Community Survey 2007)
The 2007 Community Survey confirms the following statistics:
• The total number of households in Namakwa District Municipality is 36 437.
• 8.18% of the Namakwa population is located in the Karoo Hoogland Local Municipality.
• Households are mainly located in the towns of Williston, Fraserburg and Sutherland.
• Approximately 31% of the population of Karoo Hoogland is resident in rural areas in
comparison with a high concentration of urban dwellers which constitute 69% of
households.
Figure 6: Households per town
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001)
10.85%
42.97%
10.65%
15.97%
8.18%
10.39%0.99%
Population distribution
Richtersveld
Nama Khoi
Kamiesberg
Hantam
Karoo Hoogland
Khai Ma
DMA
648
544
1051
1030
Households per town
Williston
Fraserburg
Sutherland
Rural Areas
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
109
Figure 7: Population Comparison 2001 vs. 2007
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001 & Community Survey 2007)
There is a slight decrease of 93 people in the population statistics when viewed over the six
year period from 2001 to 2007.
19.3.2 Population dependency ratio
Figure 8: Employment Status per person
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Karoo Hoogland
Po
pu
lati
on
Karoo Hoogland Population Comparison 2001
vs 2007
Census 2001
Community Survey 2007
2933
1171
2375
Employment Status
Employed
Unemployed
Economically inactive
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/
Figure 9: Employment status comparison 2001 vs
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001 & Community Survey 2007)
• The dependency ratio (% economically inactive people depending on the economically
active people) for Karoo Hoogland was
• Unemployment is an ongoing concern in the Karoo Hoogland
decrease indicated in the 2007 Community Survey figures. The distortion of the figures
can be ascribed to additional categories surveyed, namely unspecified and institution
2007.
• High unemployment is a serious concern as it leads to so
as alcohol abuse, crime, early pregnancy, etc.
• The Karoo Hoogland IDP 2001
Hoogland as receiving subsidies for basic services.
• Currently, the unemployed and economically
population but the portion of this sector which is indigent is not identified in the current
IDP 2009-2011.
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Nu
mb
er
of
Ind
ivid
ua
ls
Karoo Hoogland Municipality Employment Status
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
110
: Employment status comparison 2001 vs. 2007
Statistics SA Census 2001 & Community Survey 2007)
The dependency ratio (% economically inactive people depending on the economically
active people) for Karoo Hoogland was ±68% in 2001.
Unemployment is an ongoing concern in the Karoo Hoogland Municipality
decrease indicated in the 2007 Community Survey figures. The distortion of the figures
can be ascribed to additional categories surveyed, namely unspecified and institution
High unemployment is a serious concern as it leads to socio-economic problems such
as alcohol abuse, crime, early pregnancy, etc.
The Karoo Hoogland IDP 2001-2005 identifies 40.2% of the total households in Karoo
ing subsidies for basic services.
Currently, the unemployed and economically inactive sector makes up 57% of the
population but the portion of this sector which is indigent is not identified in the current
Employment Status
Karoo Hoogland Municipality Employment Status
Comparison
LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The dependency ratio (% economically inactive people depending on the economically
Municipality in spite of the
decrease indicated in the 2007 Community Survey figures. The distortion of the figures
can be ascribed to additional categories surveyed, namely unspecified and institution in
economic problems such
40.2% of the total households in Karoo
inactive sector makes up 57% of the
population but the portion of this sector which is indigent is not identified in the current
Karoo Hoogland Municipality Employment Status
Census 2001
Community Survey 2007
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/
19.3.3 Employment sector
Figure 10: Employment Distribution
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001)
Figure 11: Employment sector comparison 2001 vs
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001 and Community Survey 2007)
Agriculture; hunting; forestry and
Manufacturing
Construction
Transport; storage and
Community; social and personal
Private Households
Industry & population
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Ag
ricu
ltu
re;
hu
nti
ng
, …
Min
ing
an
d q
ua
rry
ing
Ma
nu
fact
uri
ng
Ele
ctri
city
; g
as
an
d …
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Wh
ole
sale
an
d r
eta
il …
Nu
mb
er
of
Ind
ivid
ua
ls
Employment Sector
Karoo Hoogland Municipality
Employment Sector Comparison
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
111
ector
: Employment Distribution per Person
rce: Statistics SA Census 2001)
: Employment sector comparison 2001 vs. 2007
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001 and Community Survey 2007)
0 200 400 600 800 100012001400
Agriculture; hunting; forestry and …
Manufacturing
Construction
Transport; storage and …
Community; social and personal …
Private Households
Industry & population
Population
Wh
ole
sale
an
d r
eta
il …
Tra
nsp
ort
, st
ora
ge
an
d …
Fin
an
cia
l …
Co
mm
un
ity
; so
cia
l a
nd
…
Oth
er
an
d n
ot …
Un
de
term
ine
d
Employment Sector
Karoo Hoogland Municipality
Employment Sector Comparison
Census 2001
Community Survey 2007
LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Population
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
112
• In 2001, the majority of the population was involved in agricultural activities followed by
community (social and personal services) and private households and to a lesser extent
wholesale and retail trade.
• From 2001 to 2007, an alarming decrease is reflected in the agricultural sector with
manufacturing showing only slight compensation for this.
19.3.4 Household income
Table 18: Household Income
Income Level (monthly) Population Number
No income 102
R 1 - R 400 976
R 401 - R 800 758
R 801 - R 1600 359
R 1601 - R 3200 273
R 3201 - R 6400 232
R 6401 - R 12800 157
R 12801 - R 25600 35
R 25601 - R 51200 23
R 51201 - R 102400 10
R 102401 - R 204800 3
R 204801 or more 5
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001)
• Current confirmed figures indicate 40.2% of households are considered indigent
(Source: Karoo Hoogland IDP 2001-2005).
• The high poverty level directly affects the Municipality’s financial ability to provide and
maintain services.
• Main sources of income are the agricultural sector throughout the entire municipal area
and tourism predominantly in Sutherland.
• Commercial farmers depend on income generated from their farms, while others make a
living by rendering services to the agricultural sector.
• Many residents depend on government grants, while others earn a living by providing
housekeeping or gardening services.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
113
19.3.5 Population age and gender composition
Figure 12: Age and Gender per person
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001)
• The gender ratios are almost equal, at 52.4% female and 47.6% male.
• The younger age structure implies a population explosion resulting in additional strain on
social and engineering infrastructure (i.e. health care facilities, schools, water, sanitation,
electricity etc.).
• A fairly young population requires skills development programmes matched with
appropriate jobs to ensure that this group does not immigrate to other parts of the
country in search of tertiary education and employment or rely on grants to survive.
Figure 12: Age trend 2001 to 2007
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001 and Community Survey)
• 62.9% of the population, numbering 6 551 people, of Karoo Hoogland is in the age group
15-64 and is therefore able to contribute to the economic base of the Municipality.
• The decrease in the younger age groups, aged 0-9, may result in a further population
decrease over the next few years.
0
200
400
600
Male
Female
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
0-4
10-14
20 - 24
30 - 34
40 - 44
50 - 54
60 - 64
70 - 74
80 - 84
Census 2001 vs Community Survey 2007
Ag
e
Karoo Hoogland Municipality Age Trend
Community Survey 2007
Census 2001
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
114
19.3.6 Impact of HIV/Aids
South Africa
According to projections, about 5.4 million people out of a total of nearly 48 million South
Africans were HIV positive in the middle of 2006, giving a total population prevalence rate of a
little over 11%. Around 600 000 are sick with AIDS (11% of the HIV infected) (Source
Demographic Impact of HIV/Aids in South Africa: National and Provincial Indicators for 2006)
Northern Cape
Table 19: Northern Cape HIV/AIDS statistics
Whole population 7% 1. The NC has the lowest number of HIV
positive people living in any single
province (67 000).
2. Around 7% of the population and one in
every 10 adults are estimated to be HIV
positive in 2008.
3. The epidemic in the NC has not reached
a mature phase yet and is still growing
with new infections almost double the
number of Aids related deaths.
4. An estimated 11 000 people are in need
of antiretroviral treatment in 2008 with
around 53% having taken up treatment.
Antenatal cline estimate 21%
Adults (ages 20-64 12%
People living with HIV 67 000
New HIV infections (over the year) 7 000
AIDS deaths (over the year) 4 000
Total people in need of ART (mid-
year)
11 000
Total people accessing ART (mid-
year)
6 000
Accumulated Aids deaths 22 000
New infections per day 19
New deaths per day 11
Source: Summary of Provincial HIV/Aids Statistics for South Africa: Nathea Nicolay, Metropolitan,
October 2008.
Namakwa District
The total population of Namakwa District is estimated at ±125 000 people, 5% of the total
population has HIV/AIDS, growing rapidly - in 2007, 5.1% of the population was infected, which
is an 8.68% increase from 2006.
According to the Northern Cape Antenatal HIV & Syphilis Sero-Prevalence Survey, in 2008 the
HIV prevalence amongst pregnant women attending antenatal care in Namakwa decreased
significantly from 7.3% in 2007 to 2.2%. This indicates a very low HIV prevalence amongst
pregnant women.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
115
Karoo Hoogland Municipality
According to the HIV/Aids statistics above, 11 persons die per day in the Northern Cape. This
rate is projected for Namakwa District Municipality and for Karoo Hoogland Local Municipality
according to the % of people living in Namakwa District and the % thereof living in Karoo
Hoogland.
11.65% of the people in the Northern Cape live in Namakwa District Municipality.
8.18% of the people in Namakwa District live in Hantam Municipality.
Projections:
330 (11 x 30) persons die each month in the Northern Cape.
38 (330 x 11.65%) persons die each month in Namakwa District Municipality.
3 (38 x 15.97%) persons die each month in Karoo Hoogland.
Karoo Hoogland Municipality has to make provision for the effects of HIV/Aids with regard to
lowered productivity, increased need for health services, increasing number of orphans,
cemetery sites, etc. Other challenging health issues include Tuberculosis and substance abuse.
Mortality rate
38 deaths were recorded in hospitals during the 2009-2010 period, which equates to 0.33% of
the total population. The cause of death is unknown.
Spatial Implication
The three main towns of Karoo Hoogland all have an indigent population comprised as follows:
Williston: 48.5%
Fraserburg: 41%
Sutherland: 41%
This provides a clear indication that the poverty stricken population of the Karoo Hoogland
Municipality is equally distributed amongst the three settlements.
High unemployment levels, low income and the high number of indigents render the Municipality
unable to generate sufficient financial resources for the adequate provision of services. The
spatial implication thereof is that the planning for provision of basic services must be driven by
densification, sustainability and cost-effectiveness.
The high levels of unemployment and resultant social problems such as alcohol and drug abuse
and the increase in crime and domestic violence need to be addressed in the disadvantaged
areas.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
116
Social information programmes are needed to address HIV/AIDS and the high rate of teen
pregnancies. A municipal condom distribution project could be considered to promote
“prevention” awareness. Economic opportunities need to be identified in close proximity to
disadvantaged areas.
Community upliftment and skills development programmes, social support structures, food
security (soup kitchens) and proper health care facilities need to be prioritised in disadvantaged
areas by clustering these in multi-purpose community centres.
19.4 Movement and linkages
Movement linkages in Karoo Hoogland are indicated in the table below:
Table 20: Distances and Travel Times
Access Distance (km) Travel Time (min)
Road Status
Williston – Fraserburg 100 75 Gravel surface (R353) Williston – Sutherland 182 136 Gravel surface (R353 & R356)
Fraserburg - Sutherland
82 62 Gravel surface (R356)
Note: Travel time is calculated by using an average travel speed of 80km/h on gravel roads and
120km/h on tar roads.
In terms of Stats SA, 2001, the usage of different modes of transport in Karoo Hoogland is
indicated in the table below:
Table 21: Modes of Transport per person
Modes of transport People %
On foot 4469 42.49
By bicycle 86 0.01
By motorcycle 19 0.01
By car as a driver 490 0.04
By car as a passenger
243
0.02
By minibus / taxi 59 0.01
By bus 30 0.01
By train 10 0.01
Other 27 0.01
Not applicable 5084 57.39
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001)
• The main mode of transport is walking, with approximately 42% of the population
commuting to work or school by foot.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
117
• Since 2001, the Department of Transport has developed a strategy called the Shova
Kalula Bicycle Project (2007), which aims at addressing transport challenges in rural
communities by distributing bicycles. It is anticipated that the number of bicycle users
has increased since the inception of the Shova Kalula Bicycle Project.
• Passenger vehicles are the next most common mode of transport in Karoo Hoogland.
• Taxis operate within the municipal boundary in the informal sector on a very small scale.
• Due to the lack of major routes in Karoo Hoogland, external thoroughfare will be limited
to the R63 (Calvinia, Williston, Carnarvon) and the main tarred road linking Sutherland to
the N1 (Cape Town – Johannesburg route).
Spatial Implication
Given the challenging transport situation, both in terms of distance between towns and the state
of roads, which are 80% gravel, attention must be given to reducing travel times to limit the
frustrations of local residents and to attract tourists and investors. Upgrading of existing
transport routes is essential for the future economic development of this region.
Furthermore, each of these towns should be developed as a fully functional, self-sufficient
service node to limit the need to travel from town to town.
With increased economic growth in the region, facilitated by improved roads, attention can be
given to improving public transport facilities.
The provision of public transport services as addressed in the Provincial Land Transport
Framework does not address the Karoo Hoogland Municipality and its development needs,
which will rely, in the future, on the state of the access roads and inter-leaders that run through
or to the towns which are turn offs from the key route between Cape Town and Johannesburg.
The Karoo Hoogland Municipality should direct attention to the key roads within its boundaries
and the need to develop these in the interests of the local economic development opportunities
available to its population.
19.5 Development trends
19.5.1 Structuring elements
There are numerous factors that influence where and how people settle and organise
themselves in space. The following structuring elements impact directly on the formation and
development of settlements in South Africa:
• environmental factors such as resources, climate, landforms (topography) and water
features i.e. agriculture, availability of minerals and metals.
• spatial characteristics and location of, for example, the distance between activities, i.e.
where people stay and where they work.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
118
• other factors including cultural factors, economies of scale, political and economic
systems.
The following structuring elements mainly influenced the spatial form of Karoo Hoogland
Municipality as it exists today:
Past Political Ideologies
During the apartheid era “Rural Coloured Reserves” were created on land that was not
considered valuable agricultural or mining land.
Main Roads
The N1 (Cape Town – Johannesburg) passes the area to the south with a link road to the R354
to Sutherland. The R353 gravel road is a second link to the N1 from Fraserburg to Leeu Gamka.
These arteries played an important role in the development of towns located along these routes.
Rivers
There are no perennial rivers traversing the Karoo Hoogland Municipality. Non-perennial
watercourses, such as the Sak River passing through Williston, Sout River passing through
Fraserburg and the Dorp River passing through Sutherland play an significant role in the
formation of these towns.
Climate
Low rainfall and restricted water resources confine economic opportunities for extensive
agriculture. A further decrease in rainfall resulting in a significant decrease in livestock carrying
capacity of agricultural land will necessitate the investigation of alternative economic
opportunities.
19.5.2 Land use and settlement patterns
Municipal Land Cover
The different land cover categories for Karoo Hoogland, are indicated in the table below: (Plan
26: Municipal Land Cover)
Table 22: Land Cover
Land Cover Category ha %
Bare rock and eroded land 1 980 0.0661
Bare rock and soil 14 194 0.4736
Built up land : commercial 10 0.0003
Built up land : residential 339 0.0113
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
119
Land Cover Category ha %
Cultivated land : commercial 7 620 0.2543
Degraded : shrub land and fynbos 76 0.0025
Indigenous forest 27 0.0009
Shrub land / fynbos 2 946 609 98.3236
Thicket and bushland 7 498 0.2502
Waterbody 3 259 0.1088
Wetland 15 236 0.5084
TOTAL 2 996 848 100%
(Source: Namakwa District Biodiversity Plan, 2008)
DISCLAIMER: In terms of the municipal are (ha), it must be noted that the source data collected from
the Municipal Demarcation Board differs from the sourced data provided by Namakwa District
Biodiversity Plan, 2008
The majority of Karoo Hoogland is covered by shrub and fynbos (98%), followed by wetlands
(0.5%) and then bare rock and soil (0.47%). The built up areas cover 0.01% of the municipal
area.
Land Use Analysis
Herewith a broad land use breakdown per settlement:
1. Williston
In 1845, Johann Heinrich Lutz established a mission station at Amandelboom. In 1833 this
settlement was renamed Williston in honour of the British Cape Colony Colonel Secretary,
Colonel H Williston.
The residential areas of Williston can be divided into separate segments due to the locality
of certain land uses, hindrances and main routes. The low density residential component is
situated in the western area of the town and this portion is situated directly west of the CBD
and also includes zonings such as churches and schools. This area is bordered by existing
sports facilities and a golf course and in the south by a railway line and station.
Directly north east and south east of the CBD another low density residential component
exists. This area is bordered to the east by the flood valley of the dry riverbed which divides
the town into two clear segments. This dry riverbed carries a high flood risk which must be
borne in mind for future developments.
Amandelboom lies directly to the east of the dry riverbed and forms the eastern segment of
Williston. The residential development in Amandelboom is formed around the school, sports
facilities and cemetery. It also consists of varying density residential developments.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
120
The intersection between Reinecke and Lutz can be seen as the centre of the CBD with
development spreading along these two routes.
Local dry streams traverse the whole of Williston and, to a certain extent, pose a restriction
on future development. (Plan 27 & 28: Land Uses Williston 1 & 2)
Welcome to Town Williston town from a distance
Main road from Carnarvon to Calvinia Main Road with Business Activity
WILLISTON
2. Sutherland
Sutherland was established in 1858 by the Reverend Henry Sutherland. Rev Sutherland was
a minister who visited the area annually and who decided to start a congregation in 1855.
By 1858 30 plots had been sold and the settlement of Sutherland was born.
The residential component of Sutherland is not clearly divided into two settlements by virtue
of any identifying landmarks, but there is a visible difference between the northern and
southern residential areas.
The southern segment is characterised by low density residential areas surrounding the
CBD. Several, clearly defined, differing land uses are scattered throughout and around this
southern segment. The southern residential component is bordered by a dry riverbed to the
east which is also susceptible to flooding.
The northern residential segment of Sutherland is characterised by high density residential
development and a local storm water sluice traverses this area.
The area to the far north is clearly demarcated by a koppie which lies to the north-west and
the main road (R354) to the east.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
121
The CBD is centrally located between the southern and northern sections of town and
emanates from the intersection between the R354 to Calvinia to the north and Matjiesfontein
to the south and the R356 to Fraserburg. (Plan 29 & 30: Land Uses Sutherland 1 & 2)
Church in Sutherland Sutherland Hotel
Municipal Offices Primary School
SUTHERLAND
3. Fraserburg
The town of Fraserburg was established in 1851 and was named after Reverend Fraser and
a church elder, Meyburg. It was originally established on the farm, Rietfontein.
The residential component of Fraserburg is comprised of low density erven around the CBD
in the southern section of the town. The portions to the south and east of the main road are
of a lower density than those to the north and west. The largest of these erven borders the
agricultural holdings.
Several different land uses are identified in the CBD in this segment of town. This area is
bordered by the golf course and in the south and south west by low lying areas
characterised by flooding.
The residential area in the northern segment of Fraserburg is in a crescent shape
surrounding central land uses which include the school, church and cemetery. This area is
also characterised by a low density residential component with some higher density erven in
the northern portion.
The CBD of Fraserburg was established one block from the main road, Voortrekker Street.
The area surrounding the town hall can be seen as the centre of the CBD area. (Plan 31 &
32: Land Uses Fraserburg 1 & 2)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
122
Guest House in Town Banking Facilities
Public Library Municipal Offices
FRASERBURG
Social Services
Table 23: Social Infrastructure
Williston Sutherland Fraserburg
Crèche 1 1 1
Primary school 1 1 1
Secondary school 1 1 1
Private school 1 1
Police station 1 1 1
Hospital
Clinic 1 1 1
Mobile clinic 1 1
Libraries 1 1 1
Cemeteries 2 2 2
Sports & recreation 1 3
(Source: Karoo Hoogland IDP 2001-2005)
Note: All cemetery sites in Karoo Hoogland have permits.
19.5.3 Proposed future projects/land uses
From the projects identified in the Phase 1, the following are considered notable from a land use
perspective.
Table 24: Funded Projects & Location
Projects Location
225 sites to be serviced and top structures to
be erected.
Rectification of 167 houses.
Fraserburg
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
123
Projects Location
Develop 200 erven and build 100 houses.
Rectification of 80 houses.
Williston
Develop 200 erven.
Rectification of 150 houses.
Sutherland
Oxidation ponds. Williston & Sutherland
New reservoir. Sutherland
EIA studies for identification of new cemetery
sites.
Williston & Fraserburg
Community computer training centre. Sutherland
Stage and amphitheatre. Fraserburg
Nature reserve. Williston
Astronomy themed miniature golf. Sutherland
Community centres. All wards
(Source: Karoo Hoogland IDP, 2009-2011)
The location of new land uses and projects requires careful planning, firstly, to ensure effective
and sustainable human settlements and secondly, to conserve the environment. From a
planning perspective the following criteria needs to be considered for identifying specific
locations:
Housing units: availability of bulk services, ownership of land, access to social amenities and
economic opportunities, integration with urban structure.
Community centres: as these provide a variety of services to a number of residential
communities, they should be easily accessible to these communities, preferably on a main
thoroughfare in close proximity to public transport stops.
Business development centres: the same criteria as for a community centre are applicable.
New cemetery sites: cemeteries should not be located near riverbanks, springs or boreholes
used by the communities as potable water. Inappropriately located cemeteries could impact on
the water quality, causing health problems such as diarrhoea. Cemeteries located in areas with
unstable riverbanks, erodible soils, unstable slopes or floodplains could be damaged through
floods or heavy rainfall and storms.
Nature reserves: should ensure that the natural landscape is managed in such a way that the
natural state is maintained with limited or no biodiversity loss.
Astronomy themed miniature golf: ensure compliance with the Astronomy Geographic
Advantage Act, 2007 which provides for, amongst others, the preservation and protection of
areas that are uniquely suited for optical and radio astronomy. In addition, general guidelines for
golf courses should be adhered to such as the following:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
124
o Compliance with department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) and other
relevant authority regulations for such developments.
o The water demand for the golf course should be in accordance with the
Municipality’s water services plan and that there is no risk of stress being placed on
the municipal water supply.
o The area where the golf course will be located is not high or medium value
agricultural land as defined by the Department of Agriculture.
o The golf course will not negatively impact on habitats or ecosystems that are defined
as being of critically endangered status in terms of the National, Provincial and
Municipal Biodiversity Assessment or Plans and/or applicable fine-scale biodiversity
plans.
19.5.4 Vacant land analysis
Vacant land parcels is a common feature throughout the Karoo Hoogland Municipal Area and
could ideally be used as a catalyst for densification, integration and mixed land use orientated
development in both the residential and typically non-residential earmarked areas.
1. Fraserburg
Fraserburg has a large number of vacant land parcels. These land parcels are well diversified
and scattered throughout Fraserburg providing the opportunity for mixed use and residential
developments.
2. Sutherland
Sutherland has a few vacant erven, mainly located in the eastern part of town. Accessibility and
visibility of these erven are determining factors of its future development potential.
3. Williston
Williston favours very few to no vacant land parcels and the harsh topography of the immediate
surroundings renders the area less suitable for future development prospects.
From the Public Participation Initiative it was indicated that potential to expand in the Karoo
Hoogland is very limited and that vacant land parcels in town be developed fully prior to
considering development on alternate land parcels.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
125
19.5.5 Urban-rural spatial relationship
The three main towns of Karoo Hoogland are basically rural service centres which provide
services to the surrounding farming community. All three towns have similar levels of
development in terms of infrastructure and facilities offered with the only distinction between
them being that Williston is the main seat of the Municipality.
It is important that all three towns within the Municipality are developed to the same level of
infrastructure to service their communities with additional capacity to accommodate tourism-
related ventures. From a tourism perspective, it is essential that all three towns are developed
and promoted as an entity (tourism route) to link spatially with surrounding municipalities.
Currently these three towns do not share an economic link.
In order to strengthen the urban-rural relationship it is critical to comply with the principles of the
National Development Perspective, whereby economic development opportunities should be
channeled into activity corridors and nodes. Strict regulations need to be developed for
settlement on land that is made available for emerging farmers.
19.5.6 Heritage features
National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999), provides for the establishment of the
South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), and a Provincial Heritage Resources
Authority in each province, which replaced the National Monuments Council (NMC). The
Northern Cape Heritage Resources Authority is Ngwao Boswa Kapa Bokoni (Heritage Northern
Cape), commonly known as Boswa. SAHRA and Boswa are obliged to identify those places that
respectively have special national and or provincial significance in terms of heritage assessment
criteria. A heritage resource is protected by law from certain actions (alteration, subdivision, and
change in land use) without the necessary consents from relevant authority (Plan 33: Heritage
Sites District Context & Plan 34: Heritage Sites).
In terms of types of protection of heritage resources, the well-known category of ‘national
monument’ has replaced or modified by a category of ‘provincial heritage site’ for sites of
outstanding national importance. The new scope of the act allows members of the public to
identify places with qualities that are of special national or provincial significance to be declared
national or provincial heritage sites.
In Karoo Hoogland there are several identified heritage sites with one heritage house identified
in Sutherland. Fraserburg has a heritage grid in the town which consists largely of heritage
houses and the Parsonga Church. Williston has in excess of 10 houses identified with heritage
characteristics and the bulk of these are the corbelled houses which are unique to this area.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
126
19.6 Economic activity
The main economic sectors of Karoo Hoogland are:
• Agriculture
• Tourism
• Mining potential
19.6.1 Agriculture
Due to the lack of arable land and given the generally poor soil conditions, this area is ideally
suited for grazing. The lack of perennial water also makes this area unsuitable for large scale
irrigation farming. As a result, the main source of agricultural income in the area is from sheep
farming which is also the main economic driver in Karoo Hoogland.
A possible future economic consideration for Karoo Hoogland should therefore be beneficiation
of raw materials, e.g., meat production, wool processing.
The climate of Sutherland is ideally suited for tulip growing and the cultivation opportunities
should be exploited for supply to local and international markets.
The climate and carrying capacity of land in the Karoo Hoogland does not allow for high potential agricultural activity and transport costs do not justify any attempt to farm products other than the existing successful ones (Public Participation Initiative).
19.6.2 Tourism
Tourism is not considered as a sector on its own, however it spans across different economic
sectors ranging from accommodation, catering, retail, manufacturing (arts & craft), transport and
communication, etc.
Each of the three main settlements offers unique tourism attractions, namely:
• Sutherland is the home of the South African Largest Telescope (SALT) and this coupled
with the clear, night skies makes this area very attractive to star gazers and
astronomers.
• Fraserburg, in addition to its Heritage grid and numerous historical sites, is home to the
spectacular paleo surface which was deposited some 250 million years ago.
• Williston also has heritage significance and boasts the Corbelled houses unique to this
region. In addition, it has an interesting “tombstone route” which has become a form of
folk art.
In order to promote the economy through capacity building initiatives, it is necessary that the
training initiatives correlate with the existing economic sectors mentioned above.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
127
19.6.3 Mining potential
Currently there is no active mining activity in the Karoo Hoogland municipal area and there are
no individuals employed in the mining sector according to the Statistics SA Census of 2001 and
the Community Survey of 2007.
However, vast areas of uranium deposits have been identified in the southern area of the
Municipality and uranium permits have been sold to overseas mining conglomerates. With this
huge uranium potential, there is little doubt that with proper planning the mining industry in this
area could become a major employer in years to come.
The Public Participation Initiative indicates that although Sutherland has a healthy tourism sector, guest houses in Williston and Fraserburg do not have tourists. It was indicated that some guest houses have not housed tourist for up to six months (Public Participation Initiative).
Spatial Implication
It is of utmost importance that the mobility links between areas with low and higher economic
potential be strengthened. As mentioned previously, the towns of Karoo Hoogland previously
developed tourism strategies independent of each other. It is essential that a combined tourism
strategy is identified with a possible tourist route between the three towns which all have unique
tourism features.
The three towns mentioned must be able to absorb the impact of and cope with the influx of
tourists whether of a “stop and drop” nature or longer-term visit by upgrading accommodation,
services and infrastructure.
If one considers the future mining potential of this area through the exploitation of the identified
uranium deposits, it is important to realise that this may have a negative environmental
implication.
19.6.4 Investment patterns
Distinction is made between urban and rural investment patterns in terms of funded municipal
and multi-sectoral projects:
Table 25: Investment patterns
Rural Urban
Municipal (MIG) 0 ±R 6,300 000
Multi-sectoral ±R1,300 000 ±R9,000 000
Total R1,300 000 ±R15,300 000
(Source: Karoo Hoogland budget, 2010/2011)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
128
It is evident from the Karoo Hoogland IDP 2010/2011 that several more projects have been
identified for the municipal area than is depicted in the table above. However at the time of this
report no funds had been obtained for the implementation of these projects. Table 15 above
depicts only projects for which funding has been approved for the financial year of 2010/2011.
The funds granted from the Municipal Infrastructure Grant are allocated to the upgrade of the
water network at Fraserburg, which amounts to R6,300 000. The total amount was put aside for
the completion of this project.
The multi sectoral funds of R10,300,000 are allocated to all three towns in the municipal area as
well as some funds for the rural areas of the Karoo Hoogland. The projects identified in the area
are as follows:
• Curbing project in all three towns – R600 000
• Upgrade of Berg Street in Williston – R1,500 000
• Upgrade of Fraserburg electricity network – R1,300 000
• Housing project (servicing of stands) in Fraserburg – R5,600 000
In addition to the above, the project for the oxidation pond in Sutherland is still in process and
will be completed in August 2010. The funds for this project are an overflow of the 2009/2010
financial year.
An amount of R1,300 000 is allocated for the eradication of the Prosopis trees in the rural area.
This project is an ongoing project that will assist in the creation of job opportunities in the Karoo
Hoogland Municipal area.
Further money needed for the allocation to urban areas will mainly include the upgrade,
extension and maintenance of engineering infrastructure (water, sanitation, roads, electricity,
refuse sites, etc.) and provision of social infrastructure requirements (community halls, sports
facilities, etc.) and projects to promote local economic development.
It is evident that substantially more money is allocated to the towns of Karoo Hoogland than the
rural parts. Municipal funds allocated to rural areas are for removal of the alien Prosopis trees.
Municipal funds allocated to urban areas includes the upgrade, extension and maintenance of
engineering infrastructure (Fraserburg water network, oxidation ponds for Williston and
Sutherland and upgrade of streets in all wards) and provision of social infrastructure
requirements (housing issues addressed in Fraserburg). A substantially smaller amount is
allocated to promote local economic development (upgrade of the learner hostel and provision
of a community computer training centre in Sutherland).
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
129
External funded projects are all related to engineering infrastructure, specifically the upgrading
of waste water treatment works in Sutherland, rehabilitation of the water network in Fraserburg
and oxidation ponds in Williston.
19.7 Infrastructure
Statistics SA Census 2001 and the Community Survey 2007 are used as data sources, unless
more recent statistics are available from the Karoo Hoogland IDP 2009-2011.
19.7.1 Water
• There are no perennial rivers in Karoo Hoogland and groundwater is the main water
source for this region.
• There are 12 groundwater sources in Karoo Hoogland with zero surface water sources.
• Water is a scarce commodity in Karoo Hoogland and effective water management must
be a priority.
• All three main settlements in Karoo Hoogland have internal reticulation networks.
• The scarcity of water in South Africa must be addressed at a national level and could be
addressed through desalination plants along the coast and a possible lower Orange
River dam. (Plans 35 & 36: Water Infrastructure and Water Bodies)
Table 26: Water Access per household in 2001
Williston Sutherland Fraserburg Total
% of
Total
Piped water inside dwelling 317 283 114 714 43%
Piped water inside yard 358 354 83 795 48%
Piped water on community
stand: distance less than
200m from dwelling
4
1
69
74 5%
Piped water on community
stand: distance greater
than 200m from dwelling
6
0
9
15 1%
Borehole 2 0 10 12 1%
Spring 0 0 2 2 0%
Rain-water tank 0 2 0 2 0%
Dam/pool/stagnant water 0 0 3 3 0%
River/stream 0 0 4 4 0%
Water vendor 0 0 0 0 0%
Other 16 6 0 22 1%
Not applicable (homeless) 0 0 0 0 0%
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/
Figure 14: Access to water
(Source : Statistics SA Census 2001 and Community survey 2007
• Since 2001, provision of water in Karoo Hoogland has been successfully met with piped
water inside the property (either inside a dwelling or inside a yard) showing a substantial
increase.
19.7.2 Sanitation
Table 27: Sanitation Access per household in 2001
Williston
Flush toilet (connected to
sewerage system)
214
Flush toilet (with septic tank) 208
Chemical toilet 5
Pit latrine with ventilation (VIP)
0
Pit latrine without ventilation 2
Bucket latrine 272
None 2
Not applicable 0
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001
0200400600800
1000120014001600
Nu
mb
er
of
ho
use
ho
lds
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
130
: Access to water comparison between 2001 and 2007
Statistics SA Census 2001 and Community survey 2007
Since 2001, provision of water in Karoo Hoogland has been successfully met with piped
water inside the property (either inside a dwelling or inside a yard) showing a substantial
per household in 2001
Williston Sutherland Fraserburg Total
214
74
285
573
208 232 18 458
5 0 0 5
0
1
21
22
2 15 1 18
272 318 208 798
2 4 14 20
0 0 0 0
Source: Statistics SA Census 2001)
Pip
ed
wa
ter …
Pip
ed
wa
ter …
Pip
ed
wa
ter …
Bo
reh
ole
Sp
rin
g
Da
m/p
oo
l
Riv
er/
stre
am
Wa
ter
ven
do
r
Ra
in w
ate
r ta
nk
Oth
er
Source of water
Access to water
LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
comparison between 2001 and 2007
Statistics SA Census 2001 and Community survey 2007)
Since 2001, provision of water in Karoo Hoogland has been successfully met with piped
water inside the property (either inside a dwelling or inside a yard) showing a substantial
% of
Total
30%
24%
0%
1%
1%
42%
1%
0%
2001
2007
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/
Figure 15: Access to
Source: Statistics SA Census 2001 and Community survey 2007
• In 2001, 22 households h
access above VIP standards.
• In 2001, 44% of households
the bucket system and 20 households ha
Sanitation Infrastructure)
• A large percentage of households have access to flush toilets connected to the
sewerage system. At the time of the Community Survey in 2007, there were a small
number of buckets in use.
• However, currently the bucket system has been completely eradicated and all
households in Karoo Hoogland have access to sanitation that meet or exceed basic
sanitation standards.
Table 28: Status of oxidation ponds
Town Design Capacity
Average flow
Frazerburg undetermined
undetermined
Sutherland 0.19Ml/day 0.19Ml/day
Williston 0.17Ml/day 0.17Ml/day
Source: Department of Water Affairs Northern Cape
0200400600800
1000120014001600
Nu
mb
er
of
ho
use
ho
lds
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
131
: Access to sanitation comparison between 2001 and 2007
: Statistics SA Census 2001 and Community survey 2007
22 households had access to VIP toilets and 1 037 households (55%) ha
access above VIP standards.
44% of households had access to below VIP standards, 7
the bucket system and 20 households had no access to sanitation facilities.
Sanitation Infrastructure)
A large percentage of households have access to flush toilets connected to the
tem. At the time of the Community Survey in 2007, there were a small
number of buckets in use.
However, currently the bucket system has been completely eradicated and all
households in Karoo Hoogland have access to sanitation that meet or exceed basic
: Status of oxidation ponds
Average
License Status
License Expired Discharge
undetermi
ELU1804B 31-12-2003 into the field
0.19Ml/day ELU1803B 31-12-2003 into the field
0.17Ml/day ELU1802B 31-12-2003 into the fieldSource: Department of Water Affairs Northern Cape
Sanitation type
Access to sanitation
LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
access to VIP toilets and 1 037 households (55%) had
below VIP standards, 798 households used
no access to sanitation facilities. (Plan 37:
A large percentage of households have access to flush toilets connected to the
tem. At the time of the Community Survey in 2007, there were a small
However, currently the bucket system has been completely eradicated and all
households in Karoo Hoogland have access to sanitation that meet or exceed basic
Discharge Type of Auth
into the field undetermined
into the field GA
into the field GA
2001
2007
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
132
19.7.3 Electricity
• Electricity is provided by Eskom to Karoo Hoogland Municipality
• 87% of households have electricity.
Table 29: Electricity Provision per household
Electricity Gas Paraffin Candles Solar Other
Williston 674 0 2 26 1 0
Sutherland 608 2 2 27 1 4
Fraserburg 358 0 3 185 - -
Total 1640 2 7 238 2 4
(Source: Statistics SA Census 2001)
Figure 16: Access to electricity for lighting comparison between 2001 and 2007
Source : Statistics SA Census 2001 and Community survey 2007
Provision of electricity for lighting purposes has shown an increase from 2001 to 2007 and only
candles, and to a lesser extent solar power, are alternative sources at this stage. (Plan 38:
Electrical Infrastructure)
19.7.4 Waste management
• Wards 1 and 2, Williston and Fraserburg respectively, have 100% access to waste
management services.
• Ward 4, Sutherland has just below 50% access to waste management services with no
waste management services in the rural areas.
• Projects for the upgrading of refuse removal sites in all main settlements have been
identified.( Karoo Hoogland IDP, 2001-2005) (Plan 39: Landfill Sites)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
133
Table 30: Status of landfill sites
Nr Town Permit no Permit Holder Status
1 Sutherland Not permitted Operating 2 Fraserburg P318 Municipality of Fraserburg Operating 3 Williston Not permitted Operating
Source: Namakwa District Municipality
19.8 Land ownership
Property ownership and land tenure are key elements in land use management in that it will
reveal the right the holder of the land has and therefore the procedures the holder of the land
has to follow to effect land use change.
In areas where private ownership is the predominant form of land ownership, land use
regulation and tenure are two separate but linked processes. Where land is held in communal
ownership, land use rights and tenure are closely linked.
19.8.1 Land tenure and ownership
The ownership of land in Karoo Hoogland is as follows:
1. Most land in Karoo Hoogland is privately owned and is use mainly for commercial
farming purposes.
2. Transnet owns a small percentage of land to the south of Sutherland.
3. Municipal owned land also constitutes a small percentage of the total area and is
scattered throughout the region. (Plan 40: Land Ownership)
The table below reflects home ownership and tenure:
Figure 17: Home Ownership & Tenure per household
(Source: Community Survey, 2007)
• 18% of Karoo Hoogland households currently occupy homes rent-free.
• Almost 65% of households own and have paid off their homes.
0
20
40
60
80
Owned
and fully
paid off
Owned
but not
yet paid
off
Rented Occupied
rent-free
Other
Census 2001
CS 2007
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
134
19.8.2 Municipal land
Municipal property is preferred for affordable housing provision, because the purchase and
transfer of privately owned land is often both tedious and expensive.
The following farm portions are owned by Karoo Hoogland Municipality:
Table 31: Municipal Property
Property Description Size (ha)
Re/83 Graskraal 4 595 1/175 Wagen Drift 35 Re/265 Verjaagfontein 4 731 2/32 79 1/40 Body Zyn Dam 2 779 Re/55 De Riet 8 379 1/57 Erfdeel 5 191 3/174 Lange Huis 15 2/34 Piet Kuil 981
1/55 Kleinfontein 1 992 1/41 Eendekuil 1 920 2/163 Jongenshoek 1 005 Total 31 702
(Source: Karoo Hoogland Municipality Valuation Roll)
Municipal land in Karoo Hoogland is rented to emerging farmers, better known as municipal
commonages. This land is intended for communal farming activities, supported by the
Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme (CASP).
In the current political and economic climate, it is especially important as a method of bringing
previously disadvantaged local people into the farming sector. Commonage land is mainly used
for livestock farming.
19.8.3 Land reform
The democratic government in 1994 opted for a three-pronged land reform policy to redress the
historical injustice of land dispossession, denial of access to land and forced removals: (Plan
41: Land Reform District Context)
1. Land Restitution to restore land or provide financial compensation for people
dispossessed of the land after 1913
2. Land Redistribution
3. Land Tenure reform
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
135
Land Restitution
The Restitution of Land Rights Act, applicable in both rural and urban areas, addresses the
restitution of land rights lost by any South African as the result of racially discriminatory laws
passed since 1913, to establish a Commission on Restitution of Land Rights and a Land Claims
Court.
The Act invites persons or communities who lost their property as a result of apartheid laws
after 1913 to submit claims for restitution or compensation. The cut-off date was March 1999.
Land Redistribution
Land redistribution is about making land available for:
• agricultural production
• settlement and
• non-agricultural enterprises
a) The Settlement Land Acquisition Grant (SLAG)
SLAG was a R16 000 cash grant for which poor and landless black South Africans could
form a group to apply to buy and develop farm land.
b) Land Re-distribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD)
The SLAG programme ended in 2000, and the LRAD was introduced later that year. Its
major difference from SLAF was that beneficiaries do not have to be poor to apply for
the minimum of R20 000 land grant and those who have more savings can raise bigger
loans.
Land Tenure Reform
Laws were introduced after 1994 to give people security of tenure, over houses and land where
they work and stay (especially farm workers and labour tenants).
Land Reform Projects and Land Claims in Karoo Hoogland are indicated on Plan 42: Land
Reform. Land claim status and information related thereto may be outdated and must be
verified with the Land Claims Commissioner.
There are currently three farms in Karoo Hoogland which have been transferred to communities.
The affected farms are:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
136
• Verjaagfontein 265 situated on the R353 between Williston and Fraserburg;
• Klipfontein 434 situated to the west of the R353 from Fraserburg to Leeu Gamka; and
• Kuilenburg 96 traversed by the R356 from Sutherland to Fraserburg.
Spatial Implication
People have moved back onto ancestral and other land which resulted from land restitution and
land re-distribution cases that have been settled. In most cases, this has led to the need to
provide services in previously under or non-serviced areas.
From a spatial development perspective, the locality of these areas will be a critical determinant
of their future viability. Areas close to economic activity are beneficial, but in many cases the
economic potential of the land in question is inadequate as a source of economic livelihoods
In addition to the considerations above, strict settlement regulations need to apply to land that is
purchased by government and made available to emerging farmers. In this regard, specific
reference must be made to number of families allowed on a farm.
20 Relationship between IDP and Current Reality
20.1 Relationship between spatial issues and vision
The following issues and opportunities are evident from the spatial analysis:
1. Karoo Hoogland is fairly removed from economic centres and metropoles such as Cape
Town, Johannesburg and Pretoria.
2. It is important to account for climate change in water resource planning to meet the
development objectives of the region. A further expected water shortage in an already
water scare area require smarter settlement planning and resource management
techniques.
3. Karoo Hoogland has limited mining potential, other than the uranium deposits located
along the southern boundary and central between Williston and Fraserburg.
4. The Municipality consists largely of non-arable, low potential grazing land ideally suited
for sheep farming. Small patches of soils highly suited to arable agriculture occur along
the R353 and around Fraserburg, soils of intermediate suitability for arable agriculture
are located in the northern part of the Municipality.
5. Karoo Hoogland has a unique environment in terms of its biodiversity (plants species
endemic to the area) and landscape (wide open spaces, lack of air pollution and
cloudless nights, ideal for sky watching) that attracts tourists and nature lovers.
6. The Bokkeveld-Hantam-Roggeveld geographic region traverses the Municipality in the
south-western part. This is an important conservation area consisting of various critical
biodiversity areas.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
137
7. Spatial initiatives need to plan for a population characterised by a high unemployment
level, low household income, high dependency ratio, a fairly young age structure and
few tertiary qualified people. Land use planning needs to attend to:
- the provision of engineering services considering that the costs cannot be recovered,
- social infrastructure and services need to be accessible and efficient due to an
expected increase in social problems and
- reduce travel time between employment areas and place of residence considering
most people travel to work or school by foot.
8. The distance between towns and the state of roads is a frustration to local residents as
well as to tourists and investors that visit the Municipality. Traffic is limited to the R63 tar
road between Calvinia, Williston and Carnarvon.
9. The majority of people in Karoo Hoogland walk to work or school. Existing public
transport (taxi’s) operate informally within the Municipality on a very small scale.
10. Karoo Hoogland’s spatial structure as it exists today is the result of nodal development
at main road intersections, limited railway infrastructure and climate conditions offering
restricted agricultural possibilities due to low rainfall.
11. The legacy of apartheid is evident in the towns of Karoo Hoogland indicating a visible
separation between advantaged and disadvantaged areas.
12. The availability and capacity of engineering and social infrastructure is critical for existing
or new development in Karoo Hoogland. A sustainable water source (quantity and
quality) hinders further development, sanitation access need to be improved and the
provision of electricity is problematic in rural areas.
13. Large farm portions owned by the Municipality are made available to emerging farmers.
These areas need to be well managed to ensure sustainable communities, i.e., impose
grazing management guidelines, capacity building programmes, settlement densities
and the provision of services and business support.
Key perspectives transpiring from the institutional analysis and relevant to Karoo Hoogland
Municipality are:
1. A balance must be reached between basic service delivery on the one hand and
stimulating economic development on the other to help to pay for these services –
GEAR.
2. The goals of integration, sustainability and development are challenged by the need to
rely on outside investment, as well as integration with other municipalities and districts to
align development with stronger regional initiatives elsewhere – ISRDS.
3. Karoo Hoogland’s approach to development should be creative by focusing on space
research and historical value of the settlements, also include tarred and untarred roads
and the natural vegetation that is unique to the arid environment.
4. The first leg of the CRDP strategy is to ensure that economic and social development
infrastructure takes place in rural communities with projects such as agrarian
transformation and rural development.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
138
5. The PGDS recognizes that Karoo Hoogland does contain a development node of
importance (Sutherland), but it is also a region that requires stabilisation of its resource
base to serve the existing population.
6. The Provincial Land Transport Framework, 2003 does not address Karoo Hoogland’s
development needs, which is to have proper access from the key routes such as the
road between Cape Town and Johannesburg.
7. Numerous projects have been identified in the Namakwa District Local Economic
Development Strategy (2009), very few of these projects are relevant to the Karoo
Hoogland.
8. Key interventions or development targets identified in the Namakwa District IDP, other
than basic service delivery, are the implementation of a Road Master Plan and the SKA
project.
9. The NDGDS focuses on tourism, fishing and mariculture, agriculture, energy, safety and
liaison, ICT and social strategies.
There are thus three key perspectives underlying the institutional analysis of Karoo Hoogland:
1. The need to develop the economy for the benefit of its residents and to alleviate the
societal problems, such as substance abuse and problems among youth, as well as to
provide it with its basic needs;
2. The need to manage the resources of the area in order that these are sustainable for
future generations that may choose to stay there; and
3. The need to protect natural resources, which if over-exploited, may result in damage to
other biospheres and irreversibly upset the ecology of the environment.
Relationship with IDP
The IDP for Karoo Hoogland is aimed at achieving the main goals of service delivery and
dealing with the backlog of housing and access to water. The focus on additional economic
activities, primarily based on the tourism potential of the area, is a more viable approach to
improve the local economy than to try to build the supply from within existing structures.
The 2010/11 IDP outlines a long list of projects that address these issues; the question remains,
however, whether the projects, particularly those aimed at economic development and job
creation, are feasible, given both the capacity and infrastructure of the towns within the
Municipality.
Karoo Hoogland suffers from poor infrastructure and the lack of good tarred roads, which
inhibits local economic development. There is also a backlog of service delivery associated with
housing and health, all of which impact on the region’s social fabric, which is regarded as
worrisome due to the high rate of substance abuse and the number of troubling youth issues. It
can be argued that the acceleration in one objective, e.g., economic development, can help to
obviate the challenges in the other, e.g., alcohol abuse and teen pregnancies, but each requires
a firm development thrust to have a corresponding impact.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
139
Karoo Hoogland lies in a uniquely difficult development position. It is remote, has insufficient
resources to adequately provide basic services to its existing population, while at the same time
the surrounding environment holds little potential for development other than tourism and
agriculture.
21 Strategic Development Concept
The strategic development concept for Karoo Hoogland, which is elaborated on in Phase 3,
should be based on nodes, corridors and precincts. The aim is to reconstruct and integrate the
urban and rural landscape of Karoo Hoogland into a more rational, cost effective and
manageable structure.
21.1 Nodal development
Sutherland, to its credit, is favoured as a strategic node due to the existence of the Southern
African Large Telescope (SALT), which is the largest single optical telescope in the southern
hemisphere. The region was selected because of its clear and dark night skies, due to its
remote and arid location. Its altitude of over 1400 metres above sea level also makes it one of
the coldest areas in the country, with winter snow a frequent occurrence. Both of these
attributes make Sutherland an attractive tourist destination and have resulted in more tourism
opportunities than in other areas.
Unfortunately, Williston does not have the same to offer and is further disconnected from the
rest of the Municipality by the lack of tarred roads reaching it from the south and not having
much to recommend it other than its German mission heritage, which resulted in some
interesting architecture (corbel houses) and unusual looking tombstones in the local cemetery.
Fraserburg, like Williston, has an interesting settlement history, which makes the town more
attractive from an architectural standpoint, but it is also far from the main cities, presenting a
sense of sereneness and a feeling of “getting away from the crowds.” It borrows from its sister
city, Sutherland, offering dark skies and sparkling lights. Unfortunately, however, Fraserburg is a
town that must be a destination on its own, as it does not feature on any main or even
secondary route to any place of consequence.
Neither Williston nor Fraserburg would be regarded as strategic development areas as they
would have little potential to contribute significantly or even marginally to the GDP of the
country. There would thus be little likelihood that the Province or the District would support any
capital-intensive development projects that could lead to significant economic development and
job creation. In this regard, while certain policies were conceived to advance the development
of disadvantaged communities, this is not likely to be extended to these two marginalized
communities. Overall, however, the municipal area is also not likely to be a part of any
government-led industrial development strategy or programme, nor any agricultural initiatives
due to the scarcity of water. Development of a catalyst nature is most likely to be associated
with the private sector, leaving the Municipality to concentrate on the delivery of basic services.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
140
21.2 Corridor development
The main towns of Karoo Hoogland lie on no real important corridors, other than the minor one
leading from Calvinia to Carnarvon and then to nowhere significant, and the route to Sutherland.
In order to develop an integrated approach to the municipal area, it may be worth considering
connecting roads that may lead to a tourism strategy linked to the mutual histories of the towns
In fact, the development orientation of the Municipality needs to be more closely aligned with the
“corridors of development” identified in the IDP of the District. Possibly, more direction and
strategic planning needs to take place with other municipalities and the District to better
enhance Karoo Hoogland’s strategic position.
21.3 Precincts
Precincts are areas with common identifying characteristics and usually have a homogenous
land use associated with it. They comprise medium to large sections of the spatial environment,
i.e., mixed land use districts, neighbourhood districts, industrial districts, agricultural districts,
institutional districts, office districts and historical precincts.
22 Phase 2 synopsis
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
141
KAROO HOOGLAND MUNICIPALITY PHASE 2 SUMMARY TABLE - SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF CURRENT REALITY
NO
VISION: KEY ASPECTS (FROM PHASE 1) SPATIAL INSTITUTIONAL
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IDP & CURRENT REALITY
OPPORTUNITIES LIMITATIONS PERSPECTIVES IMPLICATION
1 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH
Agriculture and beneficiation of agricultural products (wool processing, tanning of hides, etc)
Limited water resource. Limited infrastructure and poor roads. Limited resources for training / skilling in beneficiation industries.
ISRDS - the goals of integration, sustainability and development are challenged by the need to rely on outside investment as well as integration with other municipalities and districts to align development with stronger regional initiatives elsewhere. The Provincial Land Transport Framework (2003) does not address Karoo Hoogland's development needs, which is to have proper access from key routes such as the road between Cape Town and Johannesburg. Namakwa District Local Economic Development Strategy (2009) identifies very few projects relevant to Karoo Hoogland.
Lack of funding from external departments for road infrastructure and bulk services hinders economic development and steers the municipality towards private sector partnerships to obtain investment.
While the IDP identifies a number of projects aimed at economic development and job creation, one must question the feasibility of these given the capacity and infrastructure of the towns within the municipality. Backlogs in housing and service delivery, poor infrastructure and a lack of tarred roads all inhibit local economic development.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
142
KAROO HOOGLAND MUNICIPALITY PHASE 2 SUMMARY TABLE - SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF CURRENT REALITY
NO
VISION: KEY ASPECTS (FROM PHASE 1) SPATIAL INSTITUTIONAL
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IDP & CURRENT REALITY
OPPORTUNITIES LIMITATIONS PERSPECTIVES IMPLICATION
Exploit tourism opportunities (Karoo Hoogland Tourism Route, Edu-Tourism Route, Gateway to the Universe)
Lack of tourism facilities and tourism guides. Previously separate tourism policies for each settlement (Sutherland, Williston and Fraserburg). Limited infrastructure. Distance between towns and the poor condition of roads.
ISRDS - the goals of integration, sustainability and development are challenged by the need to rely on outside investment as well as integration with other municipalities and districts to align development with stronger regional initiatives elsewhere. The Provincial Land Transport Framework (2003) does not address Karoo Hoogland's development needs which is to have proper access from key routes such as the road between Cape Town and Johannesburg. Namakwa District Local Economic Development Strategy (2009) identifies very few projects relevant to Karoo Hoogland.
Lack of funding from external departments for road infrastructure and bulk services hinders economic development and steers the municipality towards private sector partnerships to obtain investment.
The IDP recognises that tourism development has great potential in this area but is limited by poor infrastructure, bad roads, a lack of tourism facilities and lack of support from provincial and national government in resolving these issues.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
143
KAROO HOOGLAND MUNICIPALITY PHASE 2 SUMMARY TABLE - SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF CURRENT REALITY
NO
VISION: KEY ASPECTS (FROM PHASE 1) SPATIAL INSTITUTIONAL
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IDP & CURRENT REALITY
OPPORTUNITIES LIMITATIONS PERSPECTIVES IMPLICATION
2 ACTIVE COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Establish MPCC's to create a communication forum. Lack of funding. None None
The IDP recognises the need for community involvement in future projects but does not currently have the resources to establish MPCC's.
3 PROVISION OF BASIC SERVICES
Address housing and service backlogs.
Lack of a sustainable water source. Lack of funding. Lack of capacity in existing services infrastructure.
GEAR - a balance must be reached between basic service delivery and stimulating economic development to help pay for these services. The PGDS recognises that Karoo Hoogland does contain a development node (Sutherland) but that it is also a region that requires stabilisation of its resource base to serve the existing population.
Lack of funding from external departments for road infrastructure and bulk services hinders economic development.
The IDP aims to address existing housing and service delivery backlogs as well as the lack of a sustainable water source. Karoo Hoogland currently has poor infrastructure and a lack of good roads.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
144
KAROO HOOGLAND MUNICIPALITY PHASE 2 SUMMARY TABLE - SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF CURRENT REALITY
NO
VISION: KEY ASPECTS (FROM PHASE 1) SPATIAL INSTITUTIONAL
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IDP & CURRENT REALITY
OPPORTUNITIES LIMITATIONS PERSPECTIVES IMPLICATION
4 FOCUS ON DEVELOPMENT OF LIFE SKILLS
Establish a social infrastructure to address the needs of residents (MPCC's, social development programmes, community centres for training and skills development).
Limited funding and lack of existing facilities. None None
The IDP identifies projects aimed at improving social infrastructure but these are limited by lack of funding.
5 CREATE A SAFE AND HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT
Provide health facilities
Limited funding. Strain on existing health facilities due to high rate of HIV/AIDS and Tuberculosis, teenage pregnancy and substance abuse. High poverty levels. None None
The IDP highlights the worrisome rate of substance abuse and the number of troubling youth issues. Economic development and job creation may assist in reducing these problems but currently this is not the focus of the IDP.
Provide a police presence in all settlements.
Limited resources. High crime rate linked to alcohol and drug abuse that exists in these settlements due to high unemployment rates. None None
The IDP highlights the crime rate and the issues of troublesome youth but is limited by lack of funding to alleviate these problems.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
145
CHAPTER 4
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
146
23 PHASE 3
The purpose of this chapter is to sketch the desired spatial pattern for Karoo Hoogland Local
Municipality taking into account the provisions of its Integrated Development Plan, the
institutional requirements of different government spheres (institutional analysis) and the
inherent spatial opportunities the municipality offers.
This section endeavors to develop:
1. Spatial goal and objectives
2. Spatial strategies
3. Strategic development concept
4. Priority intervention areas
As indicated in the previous sections, other than Sutherland, Karoo Hoogland hosts few towns
with an economic base from which to grow. In most cases, Karoo Hoogland must consider its
limited resources, particularly water, in terms of its scope for development. Clearly, the
municipality simply does not have funds at its disposal to catalyse substantive economic
development. Investment in the region’s resources thus tends to fall upon existing or external
commercial stakeholders who compete with the existing communities for the limited resources
of the municipality to supply them with electricity, sanitation, water, etc., to make their business
investments viable. While this typically results in much needed job creation, as a result of the
new economic developments, it leaves the municipality with an increasing backlog of housing,
basic services, etc., to fulfill the needs of its population.
Alongside these challenges are the biodiversity imperatives of the region, which restrict
development in tourism, mining and agriculture. This chapter therefore looks at the overall
spatial pattern of the municipality, given its strengths and opportunities, and makes
recommendations that take into account the underlying threats and weaknesses in its
developmental options. The proposed set of project priorities will lend themselves to facilitating
the best possible development scenario for the municipality, given the limited financial
resources available to it. Some possible solutions to overcoming the challenges faced by these
potential developments will also be offered.
For purposes of clarity, the municipality’s spatial goals and objectives are restated here:
24 Spatial goal & objectives
Karoo Hoogland Municipality needs to organise and manage its people, resources and
infrastructure in such a manner as to ensure a safe, healthy, sustainable and economically
viable environment.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/
Figure 18
The spatial vision describes what Karoo Hoogland Municipality wants to achieve with the
physical environment in the long term.
realistic future state.
24.1 Spatial goal
“To optimally develop our inherent economic opportunities such as our natural beauty and clear
night skies, to protect and utilis
enjoyment of all and to develop sustainable settlements where residents can lead enriched,
healthy and convenient lives”.
24.2 Spatial objectives
The development objectives derived from the
• To exploit economic opportunities in a sustainable manner;
• To protect the sensitive natural environment and resources from inappropriate and opportunistic development; and
• To create sustainable urban and rural settlements.
Spatial strategies that can facilitate the achievement of these goals and objectives are set forth
in the next section.
24.3 Spatial strategies
The spatial strategies indicate how the objectives can be achieved through a series of
interventions that are designed to address the op
Spatial strategies can address different facets of a region’s development. These are captured in
the table below:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
147
18: Organisation
The spatial vision describes what Karoo Hoogland Municipality wants to achieve with the
environment in the long term. The vision must therefore be based on a desired, yet
To optimally develop our inherent economic opportunities such as our natural beauty and clear
, to protect and utilise our rich and diverse natural and cultural heritage for the
and to develop sustainable settlements where residents can lead enriched,
healthy and convenient lives”.
The development objectives derived from the municipality’s spatial vision include:
To exploit economic opportunities in a sustainable manner;
To protect the sensitive natural environment and resources from inappropriate and opportunistic development; and
To create sustainable urban and rural settlements.
at can facilitate the achievement of these goals and objectives are set forth
The spatial strategies indicate how the objectives can be achieved through a series of
interventions that are designed to address the opportunities in the municipality.
Spatial strategies can address different facets of a region’s development. These are captured in
People
Resources
Infrastructure
LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The spatial vision describes what Karoo Hoogland Municipality wants to achieve with the
The vision must therefore be based on a desired, yet
To optimally develop our inherent economic opportunities such as our natural beauty and clear
cultural heritage for the
and to develop sustainable settlements where residents can lead enriched,
include:
To protect the sensitive natural environment and resources from inappropriate and
at can facilitate the achievement of these goals and objectives are set forth
The spatial strategies indicate how the objectives can be achieved through a series of
portunities in the municipality.
Spatial strategies can address different facets of a region’s development. These are captured in
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
148
Figure 19: Spatial Strategies
25 Strategic Development Concept
The Strategic Development Concept identifies how the spatial form of Karoo Hoogland
Municipality should be shaped, based on the identified spatial objectives and strategies. The
strategic development concept is basically informed by the following:
25.1 Structuring elements
Structuring elements, to a large extent, dictate the location of development and direction for
growth.
(Refer to Plan 43: Karoo Hoogland Structuring Elements)
Exploit economic opportunities
•Strengthen mobility & economic links between Sutherland, Fraserburg and Willison
•Development of cross border Tourism Corridors
•Promote development of Sutherland astronomy tourism hub
•Support sustainable mining exploration
•Promote renewable energy generation
Create sustainable urban and rural settlements
•Strengthen hierarchy of activity nodes
•Eradicate basic services backlogs
•Conservation of ground water as raw water supply
Protect the natural and built environment
•Conservation of natrual environment
•Protection of heritage features
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
149
Table 32: Karoo Hoogland Structuring Elements
Spatial Element Specific Character Location Implications for
Development
Existing Physical
Natural elements that
cannot be moved or
changed
Mountains Baster, Roggeveld,
Kamsberg and
Nuweveldberge
Escarpment view, too
steep for development,
environmental sensitive
Rivers Vis River West, Riet,
Sout, Sak and Renoster
Rivers
Risks of flooding,
environmental sensitive
areas, potential for
arable agriculture if
water is available
Wetlands Non-perennial pans
located in the north
western part
No development areas
Conservation Areas Tankwa Karoo National
Park
Restricted development
Existing major
movement infrastructure
playing a vital role in
commuting goods and
services between towns
and on a regional level
Main Roads R63, R353, R356, R354 Restricted access due
to poor road conditions
Railway lines and
stations
Calvinia – Williston –
Carnarvon rail links and
station in Calvinia
Improve mobility
Airfields Airfield in Sutherland Improve mobility
Built-up areas Existing settlements Fraserburg, Sutherland
and Williston
Focus development to
towns
Development areas None None
At the outset, it should be stated that any further growth to the towns in the region will need to
be predicated on the supply of water. In this regard, both Fraserburg and Williston are likely to
have significant limits to their expansion potential and thus will need to contain their
development plans to limit expansion or additional demand for water.
25.2 Development opportunities
Key areas of opportunity that transpired from the institutional and contextual analysis are:
• Tourism development through improved road linkages and marketing techniques.
• Agricultural development through diversification and beneficiation of agricultural
products.
• Possible mining development (uranium, gypsum and gas/oil), if proven to be feasible.
25.3 Rural environment
The rural environment is not a “development area”, so the interventions in this area should be
minimised to:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
150
• Utilising high potential agricultural land to promote intensive agriculture and
environmental assets to promote tourism;
• Creating rural service centres where rural communities can access day-to-day services
and to provide housing opportunities for people who are involved in the rural economy;
and
• Ensure sufficient linkages between the rural and urban environments.
A Macro Strategic Development Concept is developed for Karoo Hoogland for the entire
Municipality and Micro Strategic Development Concepts for the respective nodal points.
26 Macro Strategic Development Concept
The development rationale for Karoo Hoogland is based on:
• Nodal development
• Corridor development
• Tourism development
• Environmental conservation
• Mining development
• Agricultural development
26.1 Nodal development
Refer to Plan 44: Karoo Hoogland Macro Strategic Development Concept
Settlements can be classified into various functionality types according to the number and types
of commercial, industrial and service functions provided by each.
The towns of Karoo Hoogland are classified into the following functionality type:
Table 33: Functionality type
Activity nodes: Sutherland, Williston, Fraserburg
Although the three towns have more or less the same population size and provide similar
services and functions to their surrounding areas, Sutherland is identified as an astronomy hub
that should focus on tourism. Sutherland is strategic located in proximity of the N1 and the
Cape Town metropole.
Williston is strategically located on the R63 road and is identified as the administration centre of
Karoo Hoogland. Further growth and development of Williston will significantly depend on the
realisation of the SKA project. The development of Fraserburg depends on the possibility of
uranium mining in the area and the improvement of road access.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
151
The aim should be to attract private and public investments to these nodes to increase
economic and social opportunities, to aggressively market the cultural-historical importance of
these towns and to provide an effective service to the surrounding rural areas and to tourists.
These nodes need to form the focus areas to which catalyst development projects are directed
providing for sustainable communities involving:
• Urban renewal initiatives and economic regeneration;
• Human resources development;
• Neighbourhood development;
• The upgrading and restructuring of engineering and social infrastructure;
• Urban management; and
• Transportation and roads.
26.2 Corridor development
Corridor development in Karoo Hoogland does not necessarily imply that development is
supported along identified corridors, but rather that these routes should function as regional
linkages with the focus on transport mobility.
Urban development should be focused within the urban edges of identified nodes. Refer to
Micro Strategic Development Concepts for more detail regarding land use proposals.
The identified transport corridors include:
1. Calvinia-Williston-Carnarvon corridor consisting of the R63 tar road and railway link
between Carnarvon, Williston, Calvinia and to the N7.
2. Sutherland-Matjiesfontein-N1 corridor consisting of the R354 tar road linking
Sutherland with the N1 highway via Matjiesfontein, which is the main link between Karoo
Hoogland and Cape Town.
North-south integration between the two corridors is recommended through improved road
linkages between:
• Sutherland and Calvinia by tarring this section
• Sutherland and Fraserburg by tarring the R356 road
• Fraserburg and Williston by tarring the R353 road (approximately 35km)
• Sutherland and Williston by upgrading this section
Improved connectivity within Karoo Hoogland Municipality will improve its regional accessibility
which is important to:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
152
- unlock the tourism potential
- ensure functional urban and rural integration
- to enhance inter and intra municipal accessibility
Connectivity between the nodes and rural areas needs to be improved to ensure accessibility to
goods and services provided at these nodes.
26.3 Tourism development
Opportunities exist for tourism facilities and should be developed as such. Each of the three
towns offers unique tourism attractions, namely:
1. The town of Sutherland is the home of the South African Large Telescope (SALT) which
makes it popular to star gazers and astronomers. SALT is situated ±15 km out of town
on the R356 road to Fraserburg. Sufficient accommodation facilities need to be provided
to tourists visiting Sutherland.
Cluster of domes near Sutherland – Photo taken by W Koorts
Salpeterkop – photo taken by W. Koorts
2. Fraserburg is home to the spectacular paleo surface and attracts archeologists and
those intrigued by dinosaurs and prehistoric life. The paleo surface is situated on the
farm Gansfontein, approximately 5km out of town. The paleo surface needs to be
protected and marketed as a tourist destination.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
153
Example of a Corbel house in the park opposite the Paleo Surface
Old Rectory Museum
3. The town of Williston has heritage significance and is known for the Corbelled houses
located in the region, the “tombstone route” linking the farms of Koega, Oest and
Dassiekloof and the Meerkat site to the north east.
Photos of the Meerkat Site
The Roggeveld, Kamsberg and Nuweveld mountains are ideal for eco- and adventure-tourism.
Numerous guest farms are situated in the Roggeveld Mountains indicating the popularity of this
area to tourists as it offers unique natural flora and spectacular views.
The tourism of Karoo Hoogland should be promoted and marketed through a well-developed
tourism strategy. Such a strategy should focus on the inherent tourism potential of the three
towns, tourism attractions in their surrounds and proper tourism routes linking these tourist
attractions.
More importantly for this strategy to succeed is that the roads be improved between the towns,
proper signage be erected on the roads and that sufficient infrastructure be developed in the
towns, i.e., tourist accommodation, restaurants, internet facilities, etc.
Tourism routes/corridors
• Nieuwoudtville-Calvinia-Sutherland is identified as an eco-tourism corridor.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
154
• Sutherland-Fraserburg-Williston is identified as the Highlands Tourism Corridor – it is
essential that the unique features of the different towns be combined into one strategy.
For example edu-tourism should focus on the geology and paleontology at Fraserburg,
astronomy and biodiversity at Sutherland and radiology and cultural tourism at Williston.
• “Walking with Ancestors” is an important tourism initiative and enjoys high priority.
The most suitable form of tourism in rural areas is eco-tourism which aims to balance the needs
of people with the need to protect the environment. It is low impact tourism, which means that it
aims to disturb the environment as little as possible.
Refer to Land Use Management Guidelines in Phase 4
26.4 Environmental conservation
The environmental conservation zone should include all ecologically sensitive natural open
spaces with conservation value i.e. mountain ranges, proclaimed nature reserves,
conservancies, river environments, wetlands, biodiversity corridors etc.
The following areas form part of the environmental conservation zone:
1. The Bokkeveld-Hantam-Roggeveld corridor including the Bokkeveld-, Hantam-,
Roggeberge, Kamsberg and Basterberge forming a continuous ecological unit that is
situated in the southern part of the Municipality. This corridor also includes the Tankwa
National Park to the north.
2. Mountainous areas along the southern boundary stretching from Kamsberg to the
Nuweveldberge, linking with the Karoo National Park to the south east.
3. Major river systems include the Vis-, Riet-, Sout- and Sak Rivers, which flow periodically
every few years. Rivers and associated riparian vegetation form important biodiversity
corridors and should therefore be protected from human settlement.
4. The wetlands in the northern part of the Municipality that links with the Sak River.
5. A biodiversity corridor linking mountainous areas between Williston and the
Meerkat/SKA Site, continuing into Kareeberg Local Municipality.
6. Fraserburg and surrounding area due to distribution of Riverine Rabbits.
Refer to Land Use Management Guidelines in Phase 4
26.5 Mining development
The mining industry in Karoo Hoogland could become an employer in years to come,
considering the huge uranium deposits. Possibilities of uranium mining have been identified,
mainly in the southern part of the Municipality:
1. South-east (Damfontein se River) and south west of Fraserburg (Klein Riet River)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
155
2. South-east of Sutherland, close to Salpeterkop and on the banks of the Riet River
Other mining opportunities include:
- Copper and silver are found on Klein Witkraal op Kapgat 724, Klein Kookfontein 137,
Droogfoots Fontein 356 and Arbeiders Fontein 150.
- Calcite is found on the farms Annex Kransfontein 721 and Arbeiders Fontein 150.
- Aggregate and building material is found on the farms Brassefontein 371 and Wit
Klip 372.
Refer to Land Use Management Guidelines in Phase 4
26.6 Agriculture
The larger extent of Karoo Hoogland consists of agricultural land with low potential grazing
mainly used for sheep and game farming. There is an increasing interest in commercial game
farming, hunting safaris and holiday farms in the municipal area.
Only 1.5% of soils are highly suitable for arable agriculture, where climate permits. Possibilities
for small-scale intensive irrigation farming exist on the banks of the Sak, Riet, Sout, Brak and
Damfontein Rivers.
26.6.1 Comprehensive Rural Development Programme
The key thrust of the Comprehensive Rural Development Programme (CRDP) is an integrated
programme of rural development, agrarian change and land reform. The vision of the CRDP is
to create vibrant, equitable and sustainable rural communities and to improve the livelihoods of
the rural poor and to revitalise and develop rural towns.
Figure 20: Comprehensive Rural Development Programme
CRDP
Rural Development
Infrastructure
Agrarian Transformation
Agri-industries
Agri-villages
Land Reform
Land Restitution
Land Redistribution
Land Tenure Reform
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
156
26.6.2 Rural development
With regard to rural development in Karoo Hoogland the following is proposed:
1. Development of human resources – capacity building and skills development in livestock
farming, game farming, tourism, possible mining and arable agriculture.
2. Development and upgrade basic infrastructure – focus on farmers and farm workers
living on privately owned farms or subsistence and emerging farmers located on
commonage land owned by the Municipality.
26.6.3 Agrarian transformation
Little attention has been paid to the value chain through which agricultural commodities and
products reach the final consumers within the country and abroad. This neglect results in
enormous potential losses of value added and employment opportunities.
Agro-industries in Karoo Hoogland should focus on:
• Development of supply chains for primary agricultural product to increase efficiencies to
main markets in to the key economic centres i.e. Kimberley, Johannesburg, Cape Town
• The possibility of growing and processing ‘indigenous rye grass’, which occur only in
Karoo Hoogland, to become a commercial grain food crop.
• Organic farming – the Organics SA organisation claims that it is inundated with enquiries
from restaurants, supermarkets, wholesalers and food processing businesses wanting to
know where they can source supplies of organically produced foodstuffs and vegetables.
• The Working for Water Programme has added a Secondary Industries Programme to
add value to Alien Invasive Plants clearance, in particular Prosopis. The cutting of
Prosopis trees is taking place around Fraserburg and Williston.
26.6.4 Land reform
Status Quo
Surplus Peoples Project (SPP) is the organisation appointed to facilitate land reform processes
in Namakwaland and according to the Annual SPP Report (2009) the following is noted for
Karoo Hoogland Municipality:
• Applications were submitted by the Sutherland Emerging Farmers Association (EFA) for
additional commonage land on the farms Jackalsvalley (2005ha), Nooitgedacht
(6000ha), Beerfontein (6000ha) and Huiseman (2500ha). These applications are still in
process.
• Commonage land (±21 236ha) around the towns of Williston, Sutherland and
Fraserburg, is mainly used by emerging farmers for sheep farming; other activities
include, vegetables, poultry, pig farming and tourism.
• Four farms have been transferred to the community.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
157
Locational criteria
The following locational criteria are considered important in identifying areas for land reform
purposes:
1. Ownership and land prices;
2. Resource potential (agricultural potential, mineral deposits, tourism potential etc.);
3. Available infrastructure on the land i.e. water, fencing, roads, shelter; and
4. Proximity of the market.
Proposals
The following areas are considered suitable for land reform projects.
• Small land parcels located along the R353 and around Fraserburg consisting of soils
that are suitable for arable agriculture, if water is available.
• Land along the southern boundary, around Sutherland and a band to the north of
Fraserburg where uranium deposits can be exploited. This may offer mining possibilities
to small-scale mining companies.
• Municipal and commonage land around the towns of Williston, Sutherland and
Fraserburg.
Land reform success
In order to make a success of land reform, the following should be noted:
• The development of management skills must form an integral part of all projects,
especially if lower rainfall is expected that will result in a decrease in livestock carrying
capacity.
• Focus must be on commercial ventures, rather than subsistence farming due to the
importance of the agricultural sector in Karoo Hoogland.
• A feasibility or land potential study needs to be undertaken prior to purchasing land for
land reform purposes.
• Access to agricultural support programmes are important i.e. Comprehensive
Agricultural Support Programme (CASP), Land Care Programme, Land Redistribution
for Agricultural Development Programme (LRAD), Household Food Production, Food
Security and Starter Packs and Irrigation, Rehabilitation and Development Programme.
26.7 Planned projects
26.7.1 Wind farm
Two separate wind farms are proposed: (Refer to Plan 44: Karoo Hoogland Macro Strategic
Development Concept)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
158
a) Roggeveld Wind Farm development is proposed in the Roggeveld Mountains.
The facility will utilise wind turbines to generate electricity that will be fed into the Nation Power
Grid. The facility will have an energy generation capacity of up to 750MW and will consist of the
following:
• ± 250 wind turbines
• electrical connections
• substation (single storey of approximately 2500m² in size)
• access roads and site access and
• additional project infrastructure
b) Suurplaat Wind Energy Facility lies 50km south-east of Sutherland and 41km north of the
N1 national road.
The study area measures approximately 10 874 hectares. The electricity generated will be fed
into the National Power Grid and will consist of 140 wind turbines and associated infrastructure
(i.e. substations, access roads and distribution power lines.
26.7.2 Gas exploration
Gas exploration is currently being investigated in close proximity to Fraserburg. The extent and
location of the project is yet to be confirmed.
27 Departure points
The purpose of this section is to estimate
1. the need for land (ha) for housing development,
2. the demand for social infrastructure facilities; and
3. engineering services (water, sanitation and electricity)
27.1 Methodology
The following basic steps were followed to estimate the demand for these facilities:
• Population and household projections to determine the number of people that needs to
be planned for during the planning horizon 2010-2030, based on Stats SA 2001 and the
2007 Community Survey.
• Apply a density of 10-15 dwelling units per hectare to the projected households to
determine the land required for housing.
• Apply the standards contained in the “Guidelines for Human Settlement Planning and
Design” (known as the Red Book) to the projected population and households to
determine:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
159
- the need for social infrastructure facilities and
- the need for engineering services (water, sanitation and electricity)
Table 34: Population and household projections
Karoo Hoogland 2001 2007 Increase over 6 years (%) Annual increase (%)
Total Households 3168 2982 -5.9% -0.98%
Total Population 10513 10420 -0.9% -0.14%
27.2 Limitations and assumptions
The methodology has the following limitations:
• The projections are based on two data sources only, being Stats SA 2001 and the
Community Survey 2007 and therefore not necessarily accurate.
• It is accepted that the % increase/decrease in households for the entire municipality
during the period 2001-2007 (-5.9%) is the same for each town and the rural area
(equating to an annual decrease of 0.98%)
• It is accepted that the % increase/decrease in population for the entire municipality over
the period 2001-2007 (-0.9%) is the same for each town and the rural area (equating to
an annual decrease of 0.14%)
• The increasing impact of HIV/Aids and related deaths on population growth after 2007
has not been included in these projections.
• Migration trends and associated population figures are difficult to determine and not
readably available.
• The attractiveness of Karoo Hoogland in terms of future economic development and
associated employment opportunities is not considered in these projections.
Cognisance should be taken, this is essentially a quantitative assessment, and therefore, does
not achieve a qualitative assessment, which relates to the realism of meeting determined needs.
27.3 Sutherland
Table 35: Sutherland Land demand
Sutherland 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Projected households (-) 0.98% households 582 554 527 502 478
Projected housing demand
houses 240 -28 -27 -25 -24
Land size (@15du/ha)
ha 16 -1.9 -1.8 -1.7 -1.6
Location (see plan)
A B C D E
Projected population (-) 0.14% 1957 1943 1930 1916 1903
Social infrastructure
Existing 2010 Required
Crèche/nursery school 1/5000 pers. 0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Primary schools 1/3000 pers. 1 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
160
Sutherland 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Secondary schools 1/6000 pers. 1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Tertiary facilities No specs 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mobile clinics 1/5000 pers. 0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Clinic 1/5000 pers. 0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Hospitals No specs 1
Projected population (-) 0.14% 1957 1943 1930 1916 1903
Libraries 1/5000 pers. 0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Community centres 1/10000 pers. 0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Religious centres 1/2000 pers. 4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Municipal offices/pay points 1/50 000 pers. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Fire stations 1/60 000 pers. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Post office 1/11000 pers. 1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Police station 1/25000 pers. 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Sports facilities 1
27.3.1 Interpretation of Table 35
Housing
• Currently the housing backlog stands at 240 houses requiring ±16ha of land to be
developed at a density of 15 units/ha.
• No provision is made for additional houses due to a negative population growth between
2001 and 2007.
Social infrastructure
• Currently there is no shortfall of social infrastructure facilities.
Table 36: Sutherland Infrastructure demand
Sutherland 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Projected housing demand 240 -28 -27 -25 -24
Bulk water & sanitation
Water demand - high income 1250l/stand
300000 -35000 -33750 -31250 -30000
Water demand - low income 750l/stand
180000 -21000 -20250 -18750 -18000
Existing capacity
Additional bulk required
Electricity demand
Electricity demand-average
household 1100kWh/month 264000 -30800 -29700 -27500 -26400
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
161
27.3.2 Interpretation of Table 36
Bulk water & sanitation
• An additional 0.18 Ml/day is required to service the immediate housing backlog of 240
houses – 2010 (at 750l/day).
Electricity
• The immediate electricity demand for 240 houses is 264000kWh/month – 2010.
27.3.3 Development phases
Table 37: Sutherland Proposed Development Phases
Sutherland
Development
Phase Period
Plan
Notation
Housing
Demand
Land
Required
(Hectares)
Land
Identified
on Plan
(Hectares)
Road
Linkages
and
Upgrades
A Current backlog A 240 16 26 1
B 2011-2015 - - - - 2 & 3
C 2016-2020 - - - - 4
D 2021-2025 - - - - -
E 2025-2030 - - - - -
Phase A is the eradication of the existing housing backlog of 240 houses.
• Development Phase A requirements will be met by utilising 7 hectares of densification
land (14 hectares at 50% utilisation) and 19 hectares of new development land.
• Due to the negative growth forecast, no future provision is being made for housing.
Should this negative growth forecast be reversed, an additional 8 hectares of new development
land is available. No further phases have been identified due to the negative population growth
rate.
Road linkages and road upgrades are prioritised on Plan 46: Sutherland Micro Strategic
Development Concept. It must be stressed, however, that although new road linkages and
upgrades are discussed, it should remain a priority of the municipality to maintain all existing
roads.
In considering proposed future expansion and densification to cater for calculated housing
growth, an escalation in the demand for bulk water, sewer and electrical services must be taken
into account. Table 36 highlights the demand for bulk infrastructure.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
162
27.4 Fraserburg
Table 38: Fraserburg Land demand
Fraserburg 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Projected households (-) 0.98% households 518 493 469 447 425
Projected housing demand
houses 340 -25 -24 -22 -22
Land size (@15du/ha)
ha 22.7 -1.7 -1.6 -1.5 -1.5
Location (see plan)
A B C D E
Projected population (-) 0.14% 2373 2356 2340 2324 2307
Social infrastructure
Existing 2010 Required
Crèche/nursery school 1/5000 pers. 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Primary schools 1/3000 pers. 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Secondary schools 1/6000 pers. 1 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Tertiary facilities No specs 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mobile clinics 1/5000 pers. 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Clinic 1/5000 pers. 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Hospitals No specs 1
Libraries 1/5000 pers. 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Community centres 1/10000 pers. 0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Religious centres 1/2000 pers. 3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Municipal offices/pay points 1/50 000 pers. 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Fire stations 1/60 000 pers. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Projected population (-) 0.14% 2373 2356 2340 2324 2307
Post office 1/11000 pers. 1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Police station 1/25000 pers. 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Sports facilities 3
Housing
• Currently the housing backlog stands at 340 houses requiring ±23ha of land to be
developed at a density of 15 units/ha.
• No provision is made for additional houses due to a negative population growth between
2001 and 2007.
Social infrastructure
• There is no shortfall of social infrastructure facilities.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
163
Table 39: Fraserburg Infrastructure demand
Fraserburg 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Projected housing demand 340 -25 -24 -22 -22
Bulk water & sanitation
Water demand - high income 1250l/stand
425000 -31250 -30000 -27500 -27500
Water demand - low income 750l/stand
255000 -18750 -18000 -16500 -16500
Existing capacity
Additional bulk required
Electricity demand
Electricity demand-average
household 1100kWh/month 374000 -27500 -26400 -24200 -24200
27.4.1 Interpretation of Table 39
Bulk water & sanitation
• An additional 0.25 Ml/day is required to service the immediate housing backlog of 340
houses – 2010 (at 750l/day).
Electricity
• The immediate electricity demand for 340 houses is 374000kWh/month – 2010.
27.4.2 Development phases
Table 40: Fraserburg Proposed Development Phases
Fraserburg
Development
Phase Period
Plan
Notation
Housing
Demand
Land
Required
(Hectares)
Land
Identified
on Plan
(Hectares)
Road
Linkages
and
Upgrades
A Current backlog A 340 22.7 26 1
B 2011-2015 - - - - 2 & 3
C 2016-2020 - - - - 4
D 2021-2025 - - - - -
E 2025-2030 - - - - -
Phase A is the eradication of the existing housing backlog of 340 houses.
• Development Phase A requirements will be met by utilising 8 hectares of densification
land (16 hectares at 50% utilisation) and 18 hectares of new development land.
• Due to the negative growth forecast, no future provision is being made for housing.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
164
Should this negative growth forecast be reversed, an additional 3 hectares of new development
land is available. No further phases have been identified due to the negative population growth
rate.
Road linkages and road upgrades are prioritised on Plan 48: Fraserburg Micro Strategic
Development Concept. It must be stressed, however, that although new road linkages and
upgrades are discussed, it should remain a priority of the municipality to maintain all existing
roads.
In considering proposed future expansion and densification to cater for calculated housing
growth, an escalation in the demand for bulk water, sewer and electrical services must be taken
into account. Table 39 highlights the demand for bulk infrastructure.
27.5 Williston
Table 41: Williston Land demand
Williston 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Projected households (-) 0.98% households 610 581 553 526 501
Projected housing demand
houses 300 -29 -28 -27 -25
Land size (@15du/ha)
ha 20.0 -1.9 -1.9 -1.8 -1.7
Location (see plan)
A B C D E
Projected population (-) 0.14% 2801 2781 2762 2743 2724
Social infrastructure
Existing 2010 Required
Crèche/nursery school 1/5000 pers. 0 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5
Primary schools 1/3000 pers. 1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
Secondary schools 1/6000 pers. 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Tertiary facilities No specs 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mobile clinics 1/5000 pers. 0 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5
Clinic 1/5000 pers. 2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5
Hospitals No specs 0
Libraries 1/5000 pers. 0 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5
Community centres 1/10000 pers. 3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Religious centres 1/2000 pers. 7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
Municipal offices/pay points 1/50 000 pers. 2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Fire stations 1/60 000 pers. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Post office 1/11000 pers. 1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2
Police station 1/25000 pers. 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Sports facilities 3
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
165
27.5.1 Interpretation of Table 41
Housing
• Currently the housing backlog stands at 300 houses requiring ±20ha of land to be
developed at a density of 15 units/ha.
• No provision is made for additional houses due to a negative population growth between
2001 and 2007.
Social infrastructure
• There is a need for a crèche/nursery school.
• No demand for other social infrastructure facilities.
Table 42: Williston Infrastructure demand
Williston 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Projected housing demand 300 -29 -28 -27 -25
Bulk water & sanitation
Water demand - high income 1250l/stand
375000 -36250 -35000 -33750 -31250
Water demand - low income 750l/stand
225000 -21750 -21000 -20250 -18750
Existing capacity
Additional bulk required
Electricity demand
Electricity demand-average
household 1100kWh/month 330000 -31900 -30800 -29700 -27500
27.5.2 Interpretation of Table 42
Bulk water & sanitation
• An additional 0.22 Ml/day is required to service the immediate housing backlog of 300
houses – 2010 (at 750l/day).
Electricity
• The immediate electricity demand for 300 houses is 330000kWh/month – 2010.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
166
27.5.3 Development phases
Table 43: Williston Proposed Development Phases
Williston
Development
Phase Period
Plan
Notation
Housing
Demand
Land
Required
(Hectares)
Land
Identified
on Plan
(Hectares)
Road
Linkages
and
Upgrades
A Current backlog A 300 20 20.5 1
B 2011-2015 - - - - 2 & 3
C 2016-2020 - - - - 4 & 5
D 2021-2025 - - - - -
E 2025-2030 - - - - -
Phase A is the eradication of the existing housing backlog of 300 houses.
• Development Phase A requirements will be met by utilising 3.5 hectares of densification
land (7 hectares at 50% utilisation) and 17 hectares of new development land.
• Due to the negative growth forecast, no future provision is being made for housing.
Road linkages and road upgrades are prioritised on Plan 50: Williston Micro Strategic
Development Concept. It must be stressed, however, that although new road linkages and
upgrades are discussed, it should remain a priority of the municipality to maintain all existing
roads.
In considering proposed future expansion and densification to cater for calculated housing
growth, an escalation in the demand for bulk water, sewer and electrical services must be taken
into account. Table 42 highlights the demand for bulk infrastructure.
General Remarks
• The towns of Karoo Hoogland may not qualify for a certain facility in terms of its
population size and prescribed standards for social services.
• The reality however is that the towns are situated far apart and due to lack of transport
services necessitate the provision of certain services
• The proportionate increase in the rural population and expected increase in rural-urban
migration will put additional strain on existing engineering and social infrastructure
facilities in towns.
• There may not be a need for social infrastructure facilities in terms quantity, but a need
for the improvement or upgrade of existing facilities.
• A shortage of medicine and qualified personnel, limited funding and lack of maintenance
of buildings and equipment are common problems experienced by health care facilities.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
167
• Other factors such as the learner-teacher ratio (1 teacher: 40 learners), the condition of
schools and the availability of teaching materials/equipment may also be hampering the
delivery of education to communities.
28 Micro Strategic Development Concept
Micro Strategic Development Concepts are formulated for the three nodes:
• Sutherland
• Williston
• Fraserburg
The key objectives of the micro strategic development concept is to achieve objectives such as
functional integration of different neighbourhoods (communities), improved access to social
amenities and work opportunities and optimising existing infrastructure and engineering services
These objectives can be achieved by applying the following tools.
28.1 Spatial planning tools
The spatial planning tools most appropriate to municipalities such as Karoo Hoogland tend to
require more attention to curbing urban spread, which enables the municipality to maximize
economies of scale in the distribution of basic services.
Table 44: Spatial planning tools
Tool Definition Location Why
Urban edge
(Refer to
guidelines in
Phase 4)
The urban growth boundary
indicates the interface between
urban and rural environments. It
therefore indicated the area where
urban growth should not be
allowed
As indicated on Micro
Development Concept
Plan
A major spatial problem
is uncontrolled, low-
density sprawling of
settlements into the
surrounding rural area.
This has a number of
disadvantages:
• It results in a
settlement pattern
that has neither
urban nor rural
advantages.
• In terms of
infrastructure
investment it is
impossibly
expensive to serve.
• It could compromise
valuable natural
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
168
Tool Definition Location Why
environments and
high potential
agricultural land
Densification Densification is the process
whereby densities, i.e. the number
of dwelling units per hectare,
increase in a planned and
sustainable manner.
It can take place by means of:
• Apartment buildings (flats)
• Cluster housing (group housing)
• Subdivision and second dwelling
As indicated on Micro
Development Concept
Plan
Densification creates
more compact
environments that
improve access to work,
services. It also
provides for more
efficient use of
infrastructure
Infill/Extension Is the process whereby vacant
land, within the urban edge, is
used for infill development.
It can take place by means of:
• Development of vacant erven
that are already surveyed
• “Greenfields” development,
being the natural extension of
town.
As indicated on Micro
Development Concept
Plan
Infill development
creates more compact
environments that
improve access to work,
services. It also
provides for more
efficient use of
infrastructure
Mixed use The mixing of different land uses
within a specific location or
precinct. Mixed uses can comprise
a combination of residential
(mostly higher density residential),
businesses, offices and community
facilities. Mixed uses can either
comprise different land uses on
different erven but within the same
locality or mixed use in the same
building
As indicated on Micro
Development Concept
Plan
Nodes are important
urban elements which
can be used to
restructure areas where
activity is disperse and
where there is no sense
of place legibility or
special focus.
28.2 Sutherland
Sutherland experienced growth during recent years. Small businesses established along Piet
Retief and Sarel Cilliers Streets and an increase in short-stay accommodation developments
(guest houses) are noted. Residential densification through subdivisions (minimum erf size of
1000m²) is evident throughout Sutherland.
28.2.1 Structuring elements
The following structuring elements play a significant role in the existing and future development
of Sutherland (Refer to Plan 45: Sutherland Structuring Elements)
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
169
Table 45: Sutherland Structuring Elements
Movement infrastructure
Sutherland developed around the intersection between R356 to
Fraserburg and R354 to Calvinia in the north and Matjiesfontein
in the south. Main roads through Sutherland provide good
access and visual exposure to adjacent land uses.
Physical natural elements
Sutherland has little available land for extension in any direction
due to the surrounding mountainous areas, koppies, the Dorp
River and its tributaries traversing town, which is subject to
flooding after heavy rainfall. The oblong north-south
configuration of Sutherland can be ascribed to these natural
elements.
Built-up area
The built-up area of Sutherland will largely dictate the location of
future land uses. Business uses tend to locate around the R353
and R356 intersection, higher density subsidised housing occurs
to the north, with lower residential densities to the south. The
golf course is situated further south, industrial development and
oxidation ponds are located to the south east.
The observatories outside Sutherland further restrict
development within the town due to the possible negative
impact it could have on air and light quality.
See Plan 46: Sutherland Micro Strategic Development Concept
28.2.2 Mixed use
The focus of this precinct must be to confine and protect economic development by creating an
enabling environment.
• Support and promote mix use developments within the mix use area including business,
offices, community facilities and social services.
• Support and promote residential densification.
• Support facilities that attract expenditure from the increasing traffic flow on the main
roads.
• Limit informal trade to predefined and allocated areas
• Improve accessibility and functionality of the mixed use precinct through the provision of
proper road linkages and pedestrian friendly areas.
The grid road network of Sutherland provides good access to the business strip that developed
along the main access road. This presents an ideal opportunity to confine mixed land uses,
improve legibility and initiate urban renewal strategies.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
170
28.2.3 Residential development
Residential extension and infill development is proposed to the north, centre and south of town.
Residential densification is encouraged between the mixed use precinct and secondary school.
The development of a residential component as part of the golf course is currently being
investigated.
28.2.4 Industrial development
Non noxious industries should be limited to dedicated area due to the possible negative impacts
it could have on the observatories in terms of air and light pollution.
28.2.5 Urban agriculture
Support small scale agricultural opportunities within this area i.e. communal food gardens.
28.2.6 Open space
The Dorp River, its tributaries and associated riparian vegetation and surrounding mountainous
areas are environmentally sensitive with conservation value.
28.2.7 Sports and recreation
The sports fields are located to the south and north of town which are easily accessed by all
communities. The location of these facilities will not hamper any integration efforts.
It is proposed that the existing facilities be improved and developed rather than to identify new
areas for recreational purposes. The upgrade of the Rebelskop sports facilities is a priority and
an outdoor community recreational facility is proposed for Sutherland.
28.2.8 Tourism and accommodation
Sutherland has insufficient short-stay accommodation facilities to cater for larger tourist- and
school groups that visit SALT. Tourist accommodation and associated amenities is supported in
town and on surrounding farms.
A tourist attraction centre (community science and technology centre) is planned in the centre of
town. The aim is to provide employment opportunities and to train local people to perform basic
maintenance tasks on the telescopes. This centre should provide good restaurants, local curios
and an information centre with internet facilities etc.
28.2.9 Other land uses
Oxidation ponds
Upgrade oxidation ponds and internal sewerage reticulation networks.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
171
Landfill Site
Upgrade and licensing of landfill site.
28.3 Fraserburg
A notable trend in Fraserburg is the increase in holiday homes. City dwellers tend to purchase
residential properties in rural towns such as Fraserburg in order to escape the urban “rat race”
and to enjoy the peace and tranquility of the Karoo.
28.3.1 Structuring elements
The following structuring elements play a significant role in the existing and future development
of Fraserburg. (Refer to Plan 47 Fraserburg Structuring Elements)
Table 46: Fraserburg Structuring Elements
Movement infrastructure
Fraserburg developed around the convergence of the R353 to
Williston in the north and Leeu Gamka in the south and the
R356 to Sutherland in the west and Loxton in the east. Main
roads through Fraserburg provide good access and visual
exposure to adjacent land uses.
Physical natural elements
The Sout River passes Sutherland to the east curbing natural
extension in that direction. The low-lying areas to the south and
south east in proximity of the golf course are subject to periodic
flooding. Further extension to the north is limited by
mountainous areas that present steep slopes.
Built-up area
Fraserburg consists mainly of residential with various densities,
a CBD which developed around the R353 and R356
intersection, a golf course to the south, informal settlement and
oxidation ponds to the far north and sports fields in the northern
and southern part.
28.3.2 Mixed uses
The focus of this area must be to confine and protect economic development within a heritage
sensitive area.
• Support and promote mix use developments within the mix use area including business,
offices, community facilities and social services.
• Support and promote residential densification.
• Support facilities that attract expenditure from the increasing traffic flow on the main
roads.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
172
• Improve accessibility and functionality of the mixed use precinct through the provision of
proper road linkages and pedestrian friendly areas.
The grid road network of Fraserburg provides good access to the business strip that developed
along the main access road. This presents an ideal opportunity to confine mixed land uses,
improve legibility and initiate urban renewal strategies.
28.3.3 Residential development
Residential extension is proposed on the land situated between the more established part of
town and Amerville. This presents an ideal opportunity to integrate the northern and southern
sections of Fraserburg. Formalisation is a priority in the northern part of Amerville.
Residential densification is suggested in the area to the south of the main road consisting of
very large erven.
28.3.4 Industrial development
Industrial development is not prominent in Karoo Hoogland Municipality. Industrial type
developments should be supported adjacent north of the show grounds.
28.3.5 Heritage area
As part of the need for economic revitalisation this heritage area must be developed in such a
manner that the heritage elements remain. Development should focus on the enhancement and
sustainability of the heritage qualities of the node.
The heritage area needs to be developed in accordance with an approved heritage protection
framework containing guidelines for development and alterations to existing buildings.
28.3.6 Open space
The Sout River, its tributaries, flood plain areas located to the south and south-east of town and
the undevelopable mountainous areas to the north must form part of a continuous open space
system forming of the broader municipal open space system.
These areas are considered environmentally sensitive with conservation value.
28.3.7 Sports and recreation
The sports facilities of Fraserburg are located in the southern (golf course), central and northern
parts of town (Amerville) and are easily accessible to communities. It is proposed that the
existing facilities be improved and developed rather than to identify new areas for recreational
purposes. The upgrade of the sports facility in Amerville is a priority.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
173
28.3.8 Tourism and accommodation
It is suggested by the community that a tourist attraction centre be developed between Amerville
and Fraserburg. The museum needs to be upgraded.
28.3.9 Other land uses
Oxidation ponds
Phase 2 of oxidation ponds and internal sewerage reticulation networks.
Landfill Site
The land fill site needs to be upgraded.
Cemetery
A cemetery site is proposed adjacent south of the show grounds. The necessary professional
studies need to be conducted to determine the feasibility of this area for purposes of a
cemetery.
28.4 Williston
28.4.1 Structuring elements
The following structuring elements play a significant role in the existing and future development
of Williston. (Refer to Plan 49: Williston Structuring Elements):
Table 47: Williston Structuring Elements
Movement infrastructure
The main R63 and R353 routes divide Williston into clear
segments. Business uses tend to be located at the intersection
of these main roads. The railway line and station restricts
natural future development to the south.
Physical natural elements
The Sak River passes Williston in the south. A tributary of the
Sak River divides the town into two segments. Development on
the riverbanks should not be allowed due to the risk of flooding.
An east-west ridge hampers development in a northerly
direction.
Built-up area
The CBD developed around the intersection between Lutz and
Reinecke Streets, higher density subsidised housing is to be
found in the eastern part and lower density development in the
western part of town. A golf course and sports fields are located
to the west, industrial type uses to the south of the railway line
and station as well as along the main road. Oxidation ponds are
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
174
to be found to the south on the banks of the Sak River.
28.4.2 Mixed use
A mix of retail, commercial, office, residential and institutional uses should be developed within
a well defined grid around the intersection of the R353 and R63 road as these roads provide
good access and visual exposure to passing traffic and local communities.
The focus of this area must be to confine and protect economic development within the mixed
use precinct and to:
• Support and promote mix use developments including business, offices, community
facilities and social services.
• Support and promote residential densification.
• Support facilities that attract expenditure from the increasing traffic flow on the main
roads.
• Improve accessibility and functionality of the mixed use precinct through the provision of
proper road linkages and pedestrian friendly areas.
The extension of the neigbourhood centre of Amandelboom should be confined to the street
block located adjacent east of the cemetery site.
28.4.3 Residential development
Residential infill development must be supported between to the south of Amandelboom and the
mixed use precinct. Densification should be permitted in the lower density areas located in the
western part of Williston, in proximity to the CBD, schools and sports fields.
28.4.4 Industrial development
Industrial uses should be located to the south of the railway line in proximity of the railway
station. This is to minimise the possible negative impacts on residents.
28.4.5 Open space
The Sak River, its tributaries and the undevelopable mountainous areas to the north must form
part of a continuous open space system that forms part of the broader municipal open space
system. These areas are considered environmentally sensitive with conservation value.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
175
28.4.6 Sports & recreation
Sufficient sports and recreation facilities exist in Williston. It is proposed that the existing
facilities be improved and developed rather than to identify new areas for such purposes. The
sports facility in Amandelboom requires upgrade.
28.4.7 Tourism and accommodation
The following tourism attractions require attention:
• The museum needs to be upgraded
• Development of Williston Nature Reserve and associated tourist facilities
Williston museum - Photo taken by J. Amira
28.4.8 Other land uses
Oxidation Ponds
Upgrade oxidation ponds and internal sewerage reticulation networks.
Landfill Site
Upgrade and licensing of landfill site is urgently required.
Medical centre
A medical centre is proposed to the west of the cemetery site in Amandelboom and a Thusong
Service Centre south thereof.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
176
29 Intervention areas
Intervention areas are seen as those areas that require internal or external assistance to
prevent further deterioration or to maintain or to improve the current state of affairs.
Karoo Hoogland Hantam Municipality needs to focus on:
(a) basic service delivery,
(b) economic development by focusing on space research (SKA and SALT) and historical value
of settlements and (c) the conservation of the natural vegetation that is unique to the arid
environment.
The focus on economic development, primarily based on the tourism potential of the area, is a
more viable approach to improve the money supply into towns than to try to build the supply
from within. The Municipality should direct attention to the key roads within its boundaries for
these to be developed in the interest of the local economic development opportunities available
to its population.
Distinction is made between Priority Investment Areas, including those areas that require capital
investment and Policy Intervention Areas, being those areas that need to be regulated through
strict management guidelines to achieve desirable outcomes.
29.1 Priority investment areas
The towns of Karoo Hoogland are the priority investment areas as these are the places where
the people are concentrated.
29.1.1 Investment requirements
The following 3 investment requirements are identified:
Priority 1: Investment in infrastructure to provide a basic level of infrastructure services
This investment entails the provision of a basic level of infrastructure services in an area,
independent of the growth potential of the area or town:
1. The provision of a basic level of services in all towns.
2. To develop basic services in rural areas (farms).
3. There is a need for a total of 880 houses, with Fraserburg needing 340, Williston 300
and Sutherland 240, with the biggest need for subsidised housing in Fraserburg,
followed by Williston and Sutherland.
4. Community facilities in Sutherland to cater for visiting school groups and tourists.
5. Roads between the towns need to be upgraded or tarred.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
177
Priority 2: Investment in human capital to promote economic growth
This investment refers to the development of human and social capital in order to promote and
grow the economic potential of the individual.
This strategy needs to be aligned with the capacity building and training initiatives identified for
the CRDP focus areas.
• A community computer training centre is suggested for Sutherland
Priority 3: Investment in human capital to promote general welfare
This investment refers to the support given to vulnerable groups and communities, as well as
the development of basic life skills to:
• Improve primary health care in all towns.
• Ensure food security, especially for the elderly and infants – promote the establishment
of community gardens in all towns.
• Development of life skills in the most important areas.
• Increase access to government services throughout the municipal area through Thusong
Service Centres in all towns.
29.1.2 Strategic areas for Thusong Service Centres
Definition
Thusong Service Centres are one-stop, integrated community development centres, with
community participation and services relevant to people’s needs. They aim to empower the
poor and disadvantaged through access to information, services and resources from
government, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), parastatal, business, etc. enabling them
to engage in government programmes for the improvement of their lives (Source:
http://www.thusong.gov.za/about/what/index.htm).
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/
Figure 21: The Six-Block Service Model
The infrastructure is influenced by the services offered, population size and distances between
access points in an area. This results in the establishment of
permanent services including, government, economic, community and private sector services,
education and skills development, telecommunication, communication and information.
Satellite centres and mobiles
services according to demand.
It is suggested that a satellite
Fraserburg. These centres should be easily accessible to communities, preferably on a main
thoroughfare in close proximity to public transport stops.
29.2 Policy intervention a
Generally, a policy is required for an area where the potential exist that undesirable
circumstances may be created. A policy is developed to provide clear guidelines as to what
desirable and intended for a certain area/s.
•Grants
•Personal documents
•Housing applications
1. Government social and administrative services
•Phone, fax, scan, copy, print
•Desktop publishing
•Postal services
2. Office services
•Adult basic education and training
•Further education and training
•Specialised training
3. Education and skills development services
•Small business advice and development
4. Local Economic Development (LED) services
•Small, medium and micro enterprises
•Other private sector services such as retail and ATMs
5. Business services and community opportunities
•Government information and on
•Community information and awareness
6. Information and communication activities
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
178
ck Service Model
The infrastructure is influenced by the services offered, population size and distances between
access points in an area. This results in the establishment of hub centres
permanent services including, government, economic, community and private sector services,
education and skills development, telecommunication, communication and information.
Satellite centres and mobiles which are extensions of the hub centre offer some of the above
services according to demand.
satellite service centres be provided in Sutherland
Fraserburg. These centres should be easily accessible to communities, preferably on a main
lose proximity to public transport stops.
areas
Generally, a policy is required for an area where the potential exist that undesirable
circumstances may be created. A policy is developed to provide clear guidelines as to what
desirable and intended for a certain area/s.
Government social and administrative services
Phone, fax, scan, copy, print
Adult basic education and training
Further education and training
Education and skills development services
Small business advice and development
Local Economic Development (LED) services
Small, medium and micro enterprises
Other private sector services such as retail and ATMs
Business services and community opportunities
Government information and on-site guidance regarding services
Community information and awareness
Information and communication activities
LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The infrastructure is influenced by the services offered, population size and distances between
hub centres which offer
permanent services including, government, economic, community and private sector services,
education and skills development, telecommunication, communication and information.
offer some of the above
be provided in Sutherland, Williston and
Fraserburg. These centres should be easily accessible to communities, preferably on a main
Generally, a policy is required for an area where the potential exist that undesirable
circumstances may be created. A policy is developed to provide clear guidelines as to what is
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
179
The following areas in Karoo Hoogland Municipality may require policy intervention:
1. Proposed heritage areas/sites in the towns of Fraserburg and Williston.
2. The protection of the paleo surface near Fraserburg.
3. Development types in Sutherland considering the proximity of the observatories.
4. A policy for the subdivision of farm portions to prevent the creation of uneconomical
farming units.
5. A densification policy indicating the type of residential densities (units/ha) applicable to
certain urban areas.
6. Land use management guidelines in the Bokkeveld-Hantam-Roggeveld ecological
corridor.
7. Biodiversity priority areas and environmentally sensitive areas require special
intervention in order to maintain the environmental integrity of Karoo Hoogland.
8. A policy for the development of guest houses and guest farms.
30 Phase 3 synopsis
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
180
KAROO HOOGLAND PHASE 3 SUMMARY TABLE - DESIRED SPATIAL GOAL AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
NO SPATIAL STRATEGIES
STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT LINK
PROGRAM PROJECTS PROJECT BENEFITS
LOCATION
PROJECT ADDRESSING:
SPATIAL OPPORTUNITIES
SPATIAL LIMITATIONS
1 SPATIAL OBJECTIVE: EXPLOIT ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES
1.1
Strengthen mobility & economic links between Sutherland, Fraserburg and Williston
Corridor Development
Roads upgrade
Paving of R353 and R356 Routes linking Sutherland, Fraserburg and Williston
Enhances access to R63 route to northerly destinations and promotes nodal developments at key towns on route
Karoo Hoogland
Improved road links would unlock tourism potential of region
Length of road requiring paving is long and costly
1.2
Development of cross border Tourism Corridors Tourism Corridor
Roads upgrade
Paving of R354 from Sutherland to Calvinia as alternate Cape Town/Upington route
Enhances nodal developments at Sutherland, Calvinia and Brandvlei; enhances regional accessibility through improved road links; promotes tourism opportunities
Karoo Hoogland/ Hantam
Length of road requiring paving is long and costly
1.3
Promote development of "Gateway to the Universe" astronomy Tourism Zone
Astronomy Hub
Develop "Gateway to the Universe" Tourism marketing strategy
Job creation through tourism development; improve standard of
Karoo Hoogland None
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
181
KAROO HOOGLAND PHASE 3 SUMMARY TABLE - DESIRED SPATIAL GOAL AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
NO SPATIAL STRATEGIES
STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT LINK
PROGRAM PROJECTS PROJECT BENEFITS
LOCATION
PROJECT ADDRESSING:
SPATIAL OPPORTUNITIES
SPATIAL LIMITATIONS
1 SPATIAL OBJECTIVE: EXPLOIT ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES
tourism hub focusing on astronomy-tourism & edu-tourism
living
1.4
Support sustainable mining exploration Activity node
Mining development
Feasibility study on uranium mining
Fraserburg rural
Substantial uranium deposits occur
Could negatively effect Conservation zone between Tankwa Karoo & Karoo National Parks
1.5
Promote renewable energy generation Activity node Wind energy
Development of wind energy facilities
Job creation, sustainable use of natural resources
Suurplaat, Roggeveld
Identified as suitable sites for wind farms
Visual impact; possible conflict with nature conservation initiatives
2 SPATIAL OBJECTIVE:CREATE SUSTAINABLE URBAN & RURAL SETTLEMENTS
2.1
Strengthen hierarchy of activity nodes.
Nodal Development Basic services
Development of Thusong service centres
Providing a range of government, business, communication and educational services to rural
Sutherland, Fraserburg, Williston Available land
Bulk Infrastructure capacity
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
182
KAROO HOOGLAND PHASE 3 SUMMARY TABLE - DESIRED SPATIAL GOAL AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
NO SPATIAL STRATEGIES
STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT LINK
PROGRAM PROJECTS PROJECT BENEFITS
LOCATION
PROJECT ADDRESSING:
SPATIAL OPPORTUNITIES
SPATIAL LIMITATIONS
1 SPATIAL OBJECTIVE: EXPLOIT ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES
communities.
2.2
Strengthen hierarchy of activity nodes.
Nodal Development
Urban renewal
Urban renewal strategy to establish Sutherland as primary node
Contribute to better range of services offered to region Sutherland
Sutherland identified as development node in PGDS; closer to N1, Cape metropole, not affected by SKA advantage areas. None
2.3
Strengthen hierarchy of activity nodes.
Nodal Development
Urban renewal
Develop urban design frameworks for nodes
Improved "sense of place"; will enhance tourism appeal of towns; eliminates dysfunctional spatial development in the future by focusing business development within urban boundaries; promotes developments that are within reasonable
Sutherland, Fraserburg, Williston
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
183
KAROO HOOGLAND PHASE 3 SUMMARY TABLE - DESIRED SPATIAL GOAL AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
NO SPATIAL STRATEGIES
STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT LINK
PROGRAM PROJECTS PROJECT BENEFITS
LOCATION
PROJECT ADDRESSING:
SPATIAL OPPORTUNITIES
SPATIAL LIMITATIONS
1 SPATIAL OBJECTIVE: EXPLOIT ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES
walking distance to public transport; enhances accessibility to public amenities and social facilities.
2.4
Eradicate basic services backlogs Activity Node Housing
Subsidised housing linked to bulk services upgrades program.
Address the housing backlog; available bulk services to deliver basic services.
Sutherland, Fraserburg, Williston Available land
Inadequate bulk services capacity to cater for backlogs
2.5
Conservation of ground water as raw water supply
Nodal development Basic services
Develop a Water Conservation and Management Strategy
Will contribute to sustainability of nodes; ensure basic water
Sutherland, Fraserburg, Williston
Nodes rely on boreholes as only water source; scarce ground water
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
184
KAROO HOOGLAND PHASE 3 SUMMARY TABLE - DESIRED SPATIAL GOAL AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN
NO SPATIAL STRATEGIES
STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT LINK
PROGRAM PROJECTS PROJECT BENEFITS
LOCATION
PROJECT ADDRESSING:
SPATIAL OPPORTUNITIES
SPATIAL LIMITATIONS
1 SPATIAL OBJECTIVE: EXPLOIT ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES
2.6
Conservation of ground water as raw water supply
Nodal development Basic services
Installation of JoJo tanks to harvest rain water
Will contribute to sustainability of nodes; ensure basic water
Sutherland, Fraserburg, Williston
3 SPATIAL OBJECTIVE: PROTECT THE NATURAL & BUILT ENVIRONMENT
3.1
Conservation of natural environment
Conservation zone
Environmental conservation
Development of conservation zone between Tankwa Karoo & Karoo National Parks
Eco-tourism, sustainable job creation
Karoo Hoogland
Rich biodiversity, scenic environment, None
3.2
Protection of heritage features
Conservation zone Heritage
Development of Heritage tourism route as component of "Gateway to the Universe" Tourism strategy, incorporating Fraserburg, Williston and Paleo surface.
Eco-tourism, sustainable job creation, protection of heritage features
Sutherland, Fraserburg, Williston
Many heritage features found in municipal area, paleo surface None
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
185
CHAPTER 5
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
186
31 Phase 4
As demonstrated in previous sections, local economic development in the rural context includes
diversifying the economic base, building backward and forward linkages, ensuring basic
standards of health and safety through provision of basic infrastructure and services,
maximising job creation and building on the inherent potential of local areas. Within the South
African ISRDS, local economic development will be stimulated by enhancing synergy of
investment and programmes within an area designated as a node. A single node cannot be
larger than the regional authority. Several nodes will be clustered to maximise impact wherever
possible.
For rural municipal areas, the path to economic development is usually encumbered by the
need to use limited budgets to address the fulfillment of basic service needs first. While
legislation also protects South Africa’s citizens, making it their right to have access to basic
amenities and services, the distribution of these is bound to be imperfect. Thus, the legislation
points to citizens having a choice to move to a region where such services are more accessible.
By contrast, the policies also point to the need to prevent an urban migration and depopulation
of rural areas, preferring to rather find mechanisms that will make these areas more attractive
for residents to stay, both from an economic standpoint and in terms of their quality of life.
At a minimum, the region must provide for the necessary basic services, amenities, educational
and social (health and safety) resources that can form the basis for a good standard of life for its
citizens. In the 2010/11 IDP, the key interventions that are associated with this are:
• Lack of infrastructure for proper service delivery.
• Roads linking the towns are all gravel and distances between towns are far (minimum
80km).
• Towns are characterised by limited infrastructure development (gravel roads), low
population density and serious levels of poverty due to limited job opportunities.
• Biodiversity priority areas and environmentally sensitive areas require special
intervention in order to maintain the environmental integrity of Karoo Hoogland.
• There are currently 880 names on the housing waiting list for the municipal area.
(Fraserburg 340, Williston 300 and Sutherland 240).
• The severe levels of poverty and the resultant social problems such as alcohol and drug
abuse and the increase in crime and domestic violence need to be addressed.
• High levels of unemployment, low income and the high number of indigents render the
municipality unable to generate sufficient financial resources for the adequate provision
of services.
• There are numerous problems linked to the youth of the community which need to be
addressed, namely the high rate of teenage pregnancies, the lack of basic life skills, and
the low levels of education and literacy.
• Health issues need to be addressed, in particular the containment of the spread of
HIV/Aids and Tuberculosis.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
187
The development plans for Karoo Hoogland Municipality have been aimed at achieving the main
goals of service delivery and dealing with the backlog of housing and dealing with the high
levels of poverty and social problems. The focus on economic development activities, primarily
based on the tourism potential of the area, is also a more viable approach to improve the money
supply into towns than to try to build the supply from within. There has not been enough focus,
however, in the IDP KPA’s to generate sufficient tourism benefits to catalyse upstream or
downstream economic developments.
In Phase 3, the report considered the desired spatial pattern of the Municipality, based on its
spatial goals and objectives, to address some of these challenges. It also considered the types
of strategies that may be most pertinent to achieving the Municipality’s goals and suggested a
number of different approaches. This included the development of nodes and corridors, which
could be enhanced through better-defined tourism, mining and agricultural strategies that can
bolster economic development in the towns. In addition, the proposed strategies considered
ways to ensure more satisfactory service delivery using better coordinated planning methods
that will enable the towns to act more cohesively and inclusively and operate to the benefit of
the whole population.
In the sections that follow, the report will consider how best to implement the spatial plan,
strategies and projects, how to package and market the areas and towns, and the ways in which
the impact of the interventions can be measured and evaluated to ensure that the desired
outcomes are achieved.
32 Capital Expenditure Framework
The Capital Expenditure Framework (See Annexure A: Capital Expenditure Framework) is a
tool to be used by the Municipality to realise all the ideas as conceptualised in the previous
phases.
The main purpose of this framework is to:
• identify projects transpiring from the spatial objectives and strategies;
• to allocate a cost and timing to identified projects; and
• to identify a source of funding and implementation agent.
33 Implementation Policies
The following policies will assure the effective implementation of the Spatial Development
Framework and it is fundamental that:
• The Comprehensive Rural Development Program (CRDP) align its strategies to these;
and
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
188
• A Land Use Management System incorporates these guidelines to ensure effective land
use management in Karoo Hoogland.
33.1 Nodal policy
Nodes are locations of concentrated activity often associated with the presence of employment
opportunities, residential development and supporting social infrastructure located on or
adjacent to mobility roads and spines, and as such act as destinations for public transport.
Nodes can be classified into higher order nodes and local nodes depending on their function,
size and economic growth potential. The nodal order will determine the development guidelines
and management approach to each node.
The towns in Karoo Hoogland have more or less the same function and provide similar services
to the surrounding rural areas. All three towns are categorised as activity nodes, however
distinction is made to focus development in each town.
33.1.1 Nodal hierarchy
Table 48: Nodal classification
Classification Characteristics Interventions
Activity node*
Sutherland
astronomy centre
• Strategically located in proximity to
the N1 and Cape Town
• Prominent tourist destination
(observatories)
• Provide basic level of services and
functions
• Significant heritage in terms of
architectural buildings
• Focus on tourism by providing
sufficient tourist facilities and
accommodation
• Restrict noxious developments
in terms of light and air
pollution
• Attract private and public
investments
• Protect the heritage
significance of Sutherland
• Promote urban renewal
strategies
• Increase economic and social
opportunities
• Focus development within
urban edge
Williston
administrative
centre
• Function as the administrative
centre of Karoo Hoogland
• Good access via road and rail
transport (not operational)
• Provide basic level of services and
• Improve the provision of basic
engineering services
• Encourage tourism
development
• Restrict further growth and
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
189
Classification Characteristics Interventions
goods
development within urban
edge
• Improve main road sections
through town
Fraserburg –
heritage centre
• The historic core of town has high
architectural value
• The paleo surface is near
Fraserburg.
• Protect the heritage
significance of Fraserburg
• Encourage tourism
development
• Restrict growth and
development within urban
edge
• Improve main road sections
through town
*In terms of the Northern Cape Provincial Growth and Development Strategy these nodes are
identified as stagnating small towns. (Refer to Phase 2: Alignment with provincial perspectives)
33.1.2 Nodal interdependence
The location of Sutherland, on a strategic road heading north and linking with Calvinia may,
however, improve the growth potential of the town if the R354 is paved. Likewise, the link from
the N1 to Fraserburg and connecting to Williston and again going north on the R27 to Upington
will provide these towns with important tourist traffic.
The important point is to ensure that nodal towns are accessible to rural communities and that
they are sustainable in terms of the limited but crucial role they play in development. Corridor
development therefore aims to improve people’s quality of life and access to economic
opportunities.
33.1.3 Nodal development guidelines
It is for the Municipality to develop its nodes of importance with a view to finding ways to better
share the advantages of the region through a more coordinated marketing and tourism plan. In
addition, the Municipality should develop the main nodal towns, which may include all of the
towns, Sutherland, Williston and Fraserburg, as complete, compact communities with a number
of social, environmental, health and economic benefits, such as:
• Community benefits: Nodal developments encourage people to walk by placing
shopping, services and housing in close proximity to one another. This revitalises
community life by helping streets, public spaces and pedestrian-oriented retail to
become places where people gather and shop. Enhancing neighbourhood life can boost
the perceived security, too, of an area by increasing the number of people on the street.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
190
It also makes neighbourhoods more attractive to visit, providing tourists with a
welcoming environment in which to dine, shop or stay over.
• Environmental benefits: Nodal development is compact development. It reduces
sprawl and traffic, and preserves limited open spaces and environmentally sensitive
areas. In addition, natural features can be integrated into nodal developments and used
as recreation areas and greenways.
• Agricultural benefits: Compact development helps preserve important agricultural land
and reduced development pressures on them.
• Public health benefits: With shops, services and housing in such close proximity to one
another, nodal development helps make active transportation options like walking or
biking more realistic for a broader range of community members. This helps reduce the
number of automobile trips residents have to make and pedestrian-friendly environments
are recognised as improving community health by making them more active and
reducing obesity and stress.
• Economic benefits: Nodal development has substantial fiscal and economic benefits
for municipalities, developers, community businesses and residents. By concentrating
growth in areas that are already serviced with water and sanitation, municipalities are
able to reduce infrastructure servicing costs, while diversifying and growing their tax
base. For developers, nodal development can reduce the cost of infrastructure and
increase the efficiency of land use.
33.2 Movement policy
Ideally a movement policy would promote the following:
1. Support public transport
2. Promote accessibility of communities to employment, recreation and social opportunities
3. Promote protection of mobility function of major arterials and roads
4. Ensure that the movement system directly links with, and is supported by, strong high
intensity nodes and higher density residential development
5. To create an effective transportation corridor
A point of reference for Karoo Hoogland Municipality’s movement system is to ensure that its
roads form part of the overarching Rural Transport Strategy for South Africa’s roads.
The movement system is seen as the key structuring elements within the Karoo Hoogland
Municipal area to ensure functional urban and rural integration. The efficiency of the towns is
directly related to the efficiency of the movement system.
The movement policy focuses on:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
191
33.2.1 Regional linkages
• Ensure and maintain a high standard of regional accessibility (R63 and railway line).
• Orientate regional access to the N1 main roads.
• Encourage linkages between municipalities.
• Promote and retain the mobility function of existing regional linkages (R63).
33.2.2 Internal municipal access
• Ensure and maintain a high standard of local access within the Municipality (R353)
between Williston and Fraserburg and the R356 between Sutherland and Fraserburg.
• Improve road access to strategic areas within the Municipality.
33.2.3 Road access in towns
• Roads need to be upgraded and maintained in accordance with the Micro Spatial
Development Concept Plans.
• Develop a clear road hierarchy for the towns of Sutherland, Williston and Fraserburg.
33.3 Urban edge policy
The objective of the Urban Edge is to contain urban sprawl and focus on infill and densification
orientated development, thereby maximising the use of existing infrastructure.
Ideally the urban edge policy strives to ensure:
• Optimal utilisation of engineering services
• Optimisation of public transport
• Prevention of urban decay and promotion of urban integration
• Promotion of opportunities for redevelopment
• The conservation of environmentally sensitive areas
• The protection of high-potential agricultural land
• The creation of urban corridors along public transportation routes
Delineation of urban edges
The urban edge is a conceptual line that includes existing settlement footprints and provides for
a projected future growth for the next 20 years. The alignment roughly follows movement
infrastructure (roads, rail), natural physical elements (rivers, mountains) and the built-up areas.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
192
Description
The urban growth boundary indicates the interface between urban and rural environments. It
therefore indicates the area where urban growth should not be allowed.
Locality
As indicated on Micro Spatial Development Concept Plan – Phase 3.
Objective
A major spatial problem is uncontrolled, low-density sprawling of settlements into the
surrounding rural area. This has a number of disadvantages:
• It results in a settlement pattern that has neither urban nor rural advantages.
• In terms of infrastructure investment it is impossibly expensive to serve.
• It could compromise valuable natural environments and high potential agricultural land.
Guidelines
Land uses which can be allowed in the rural areas outside the urban edge will include, inter alia,
the following:
• Extensive and intensive agriculture;
• Conservation areas and nature reserves, tourism and related activities, i.e.,
accommodation establishments, guest houses, conference centres, tea gardens, craft
markets, etc.;
• Recreational facilities and venues, e.g., hiking, hunting, adventure sports, horse riding
schools and stables, etc.;
• Farm stalls, home industries and small-scale agri-industries,
• Rural residential/agricultural holdings in specific areas;
• Agri-villages or agricultural communities; and
• Community facilities and business uses clustered in rural service centres/rural
settlements.
33.4 Residential densification policy
Description
Densification is the process whereby densities, i.e., the number of dwelling units per hectare,
increase in a planned and sustainable manner.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
193
Location (see Micro Concept Plans)
Densification should take place:
• Along main roads
• In and around nodes
• On the periphery of open spaces to increase surveillance
Proposed densification per town
• Sutherland – the total proposed densification area is approximately 14 hectares at 15
units per hectare. The proposed area is situated to the west of the proposed mixed use
area.
• Fraserburg - the total proposed densification area is approximately 16 hectares at 15
units per hectare. The proposed areas are situated to the east of the heritage area.
• Williston – the total proposed densification area is approximately 7 hectares at 15 units
per hectare. The densification areas are situated in the western part of the town.
Objectives of densification
Densification creates more compact environments that improve access to work, services and
public transport. It also provides for more efficient use of infrastructure.
• Ensures a diversification of housing typologies.
• Promotes adequate provision of social and economic amenities to ensure better quality
of life.
• New settlements/developments must promote the optimal use of infrastructure and
resources.
• Promote safety through design.
• Reduce travel and transaction costs through appropriate infrastructure planning.
• Rationalisation of housing patterns in relation to urban opportunities and public
transportation.
Guidelines
The following matters should be taken into account when considering an application for a non-
residential or higher-density residential land use within a residential area:
• Residential amenity should in general be protected, specifically, but not exclusively,
from:
- significant changes to traffic conditions in local streets including an increase in car
parking demand;
- noise, light or odours emitted from the site; and
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
194
- disturbance associated with the hours of operation.
• Low scale, non intrusive, non-residential uses should be permitted in residential areas,
i.e., shopping facilities, home offices, home industries, etc.
• Higher residential densities along main roads and around major nodes and employment
areas should be promoted and actively supported.
• The density of proposed and existing built-up areas should correlate with the availability
of productive open spaces and public amenities in close proximity thereto, the higher the
density/intensity of residential developments, the more productive open space and public
amenities are warranted.
• Areas designated for public use should be incorporated within high-density
developments and larger public open spaces should be provided in close vicinity of
these developments.
• Medium-density residential development should promote a mixture of cluster housing.
• Densification of existing residential areas should take place without compromising the
quality of living principle.
33.5 Urban integration policy
Description:
Integration refers to the interdependence of urban functions and activities resulting from a fine-
grained mix of land uses and/or income groups.
Location:
Integration should be concentrated:
• Along main roads to improve access to opportunities, services and facilities
• Around public spaces in order to create spaces were social integration can occur
See Micro Concept Plans (Phase 3)
Planning efforts should strive to integrate:
• Williston – Amandelboom • Sutherland – north and south
• Fraserburg - Amerville
Goals:
• To redress past spatial imbalances
• Improve access to social economic and recreational opportunities services and facilities
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
195
33.6 Infrastructure policy
The General Guidelines set out in the “Guidelines for Human Settlement and Design” are
accepted as general policy for the development and provision of infrastructure within Karoo
Hoogland Municipality.
Provision of engineering services
A stand or a portion of a stand within a proclaimed township and a new township development
within an area, must be provided with the following essential municipal engineering services:
• Water supply
• Sewerage disposal
• Roads and storm water
• Electricity supply
External services include the bulk supply of, for example, water and electricity by a water
board, electricity supply authority or other body. Sewerage treatment works and waste disposal
are usually the responsibility of the local authority. Link roads are provided by the local or
provincial authority.
Internal services are the services provided by the developer throughout the township up to the
boundary of individual erven. They include roads, storm water drainage, water, sewerage and
electricity reticulation within the township. The cost of providing these services is added onto
the cost of the land when a new township is developed.
Phasing of engineering services
A phased approach shall be followed in the provision of engineering services as indicated as
areas A, B, C, D and E in the Micro Spatial Development Concept Plans.
The phasing is based on the following priorities:
• The upgrade of existing engineering services in all towns to eradicate the backlog and
simultaneously to rural areas that do not comply with basic service level standards.
• Increase engineering capacities to provide for projected growth.
Payment of bulk contributions
The applicant shall pay to the municipality as a contribution towards the costs incurred by the
municipality to install and provide the external engineering services or cause such services to
be installed and provided:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
196
• an amount of money determined by agreement between the applicant and the
municipality,
• in the absence of agreement, an amount of money determined by the Appeal Board on
the application by either the applicant or the municipality.
33.7 Heritage policy
The importance of national heritage to the socio-economic and sustainable development needs
of a country cannot be over-emphasised as national heritage could be defined as the sum total
of all the creativity in all its forms preserved, enhanced and handed over to future generations
as a record of human experience and aspirations.
The aim of this policy is to take appropriate measures for the protection, conservation and
preservation of tangible and intangible national heritage areas situated within its boundaries.
Section 31 of the National Heritage Resources Act requires that provision must be made for the
designation of heritage areas to protect any place of environmental or cultural interest.
The Northern Cape Heritage Resources Authority (Boshwa) has identified the following areas as
heritage conservation worthy areas:
• Fraserburg – the historic core of the town has high architectural value
Karoo Hoogland Municipality will strive to retain, protect and enhance the heritage value of
these exhibits in a sustainable manner.
33.8 Sustainability policy
Water conservation
• A Water Conservation and Water Demand Management strategy must be implemented
to reduce water losses in all three towns.
• Rain water harvesting can potentially benefit individual households and the Municipality
by reducing the strain on the existing ground water resources.
• Re-use of effluent from the waste water treatment works must be investigated against
the cost and technical requirements.
Energy efficiency
All new developments should demonstrate their commitment to energy efficiency by introducing
measures such as:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
197
• Water heating: Each residential unit provides for solar heated hot water cylinders, or the
development as a whole could consider a heat-pump driven water heating system.
• Cooking: Each residential unit makes provision for use of gas for cooking purposes, and
should comply with the required legislation for piping and gas cylinder storage.
• Air conditioning: The installation of air conditioners to be limited to a maximum of two
1.5kW units per residential unit. If possible, green building designs should be done to limit
the need for heating in winter and cooling in summer through electricity.
• Under floor heating: Under floor heating with electricity should not be allowed. Under floor
heating with water heated systems are allowed, provided that the water is not heated with
electricity during peak consumption periods.
• Washing machines, tumble dryers and dishwashers: Washing machines, tumble dryers
and dishwashers should preferably be operated in Eskom’s standard and off-peak time slots
and not in peak time-slots.
• Lighting: Lighting could contain power factor corrected energy efficient lamps. A building
management system could be installed to switch of lights automatically when shops or
offices are empty.
• Street lighting: Street lighting could be done by means of energy efficient lighting.
• Alternative energy: Each connection to the conventional electrical grid should be
supplemented with alternative energy sources inter alia, solar, gas and wind.
34 Land Use Management System Guidelines
Section 26(e) of the Municipal Systems Act, (Act 32 of 2000) stipulates that the Local
Municipality should prepare a SDF which must include basic guidelines for a Land Use
Management System (LUMS) as part of the IDP.
The purpose of this section is to set out guidelines for land use management in order to facilitate
a better understanding of what is desired in terms of the SDF. These guidelines are
fundamental to consider when an application is made for a change in land use or any new
development.
Currently land use management in Karoo Hoogland is done in terms of scheme regulations
(September 2005) prepared in terms of Section 36(1) of the Northern Cape Planning and
Development Act, 1998, without clear land use management guidelines.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
198
The guidelines below shall inform land use management decisions taken by Karoo Hoogland
Municipality and the adherence thereto shall be the combined responsibility of the municipality
and relevant sector departments.
34.1 Environmental conservation
Development or any human intervention within these areas should adhere to the following
guidelines:
• Effective veld management plans and practices, in particular around catchment areas
located in the high-lying regions of the Roggeveld Mountain, are critical if sustainability
of land use is to be achieved in Karoo Hoogland.
• Associated land uses may include nature conservation, tourism development, stock
farming with the implementation of grazing management guidelines, scientific research,
religious ceremonies and environmental education.
• Encourage the utilisation of the environment as an economic asset in order to promote
and develop agri-, edu- and eco-tourism.
• The incursion of alien plants along water courses is a major threat to the health of the
ecosystem in Karoo Hoogland. This requires effective control and eradication strategies
to mitigate the loss of water and ecosystem integrity.
• The outcome of an Environmental Impact Assessment is important when mining
development is considered.
• Prevent the development of any uses with a negative environmental or visually
degrading impact.
• Environmentally significant areas with a high conservation value must be included into or
proclaimed as statutory protected areas.
• Reference has to be made to the Namakwa Biodiversity Sector Plan with respect to
specific land use regulations.
Further environmental guidelines:
34.1.1 Water bodies
• Dams and rivers that form part of the Water Supply System, or any water resource,
should be managed in a sustainable way, especially when development or change in
land use is envisaged.
• Compliance with the requirements of the Department of Water Affairs, when developing
around dams, alongside rivers or when crossing rivers or streams, is a prerequisite.
• Proposed watercourse crossings must be placed in areas where the impact on the
watercourse will be minimal.
• In terms of the National Water Act 1998, no development shall be permitted below the
1:100 year flood line, to be determined by a professional engineer.
• A 100m buffer for rivers was demarcated for non-perennial rivers due to the absence of
flood line calculations.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
199
• Wetlands and perched water tables need to be identified and protected from being
encroached on by development.
34.1.2 Topography
• Land where the gradient is steeper than 20% is not suitable for development in terms of
environmental regulations and guidelines.
• The provision of engineering services is expensive in areas with steep slopes.
• Areas presenting topographical constraints should be carefully assessed in any land use
management decision.
• Environmental legislation requires the protection of granite or rocky outcrops due to the
diverse and sensitive vegetation types associated with these features.
• Areas regarded not suitable for development due to topographical constraints should
form part of a municipal open space system.
34.1.3 Geotechnical considerations
• From a geological perspective “no development areas” include areas affected by
undermining, dolomite and areas where heaving clays are present.
• Areas underlain by geology types not suitable for development must be excluded from
development and included into a conservation zone or an open space system.
• Any township development should be headed by a geotechnical investigation to
determine if the soils are likely to cause foundation problems, especially when
densification or multiple storey development is proposed which impact heavily on
underlying soils.
34.2 Tourism development
Resort development in rural areas should be informed by the following basic guidelines:
• Availability of a resource (natural feature, i.e., hotwater spring, lake, river, or a feature
with cultural historic value) and environmental opportunities and constraints are the most
important criteria for the location of tourism development.
• Such a resource must make the property favourable above any other property in the
area, be worthwhile for holidaymakers to travel from afar and spend more than one day,
be protected in the development of the resort through proper management and
mitigating measures.
• A resort and its resources must be inseparable and access thereto must be guaranteed.
• The outcome of an Environmental Impact Assessment is important when resort
development is considered.
• Topography, soils, flood plains, vegetation and infrastructure are other factors that need
consideration in the establishment of tourist facilities.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
200
• The land uses should be restricted to tourism activities and uses ancillary and
complementary thereto.
• A Site Development Plan approved by the Municipality involving the design and
functional utilisation of the site.
• Resort categories:
- small: 1-10 units and floor area not more than 120m² (60m² in sensitive natural
areas);
- medium: 11-30 units and floor area not more than 120m² per unit (or up to 175m²)
and total floor area of all buildings not more than 3600m²; and
- large: 30-50 units.
• Maximum floor areas recommended for other buildings in resorts are:
- Bed and breakfast establishments/guest house = 350m² (5 bedrooms per unit);
- Farm stalls: 100m²; and
- Businesses: 150m² (shops), 250m² (restaurants).
• Height of resort units should generally be restricted to 6.5m measured from the natural
ground level to the apex of the roof.
34.3 Mining development
Development of these areas should adhere to the following development guidelines:
• Mining will be allowed only after the necessary consents from the Department of Mineral
Resources have been obtained.
• The outcome of an Environmental Impact Assessment is important when mining
development is considered.
• Housing for mine workers should be accommodated within the nearest existing urban
areas/towns where social and economic infrastructure exists.
• Mining development should be avoided in environmentally significant areas with high
biodiversity value.
• The application for mining rights should be accompanied by a Social and Labour Plan as
prescribed in terms of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act, (Act 28
of 2002).
• The provision of resorts or lodges on farms to provide for the housing needs of mine
personnel should not be allowed.
• The commercial use of farms for ancillary uses to mining industry should not be allowed.
34.4 Agricultural development
Developments within the agricultural zone should adhere to the following development
guidelines:
• Livestock and game farming practices must comply with the grazing management
guidelines developed for the Northern Cape.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
201
• Cultivated dry land or cultivated irrigation along river banks should be managed in a
sustainable manner not to impact negatively on the biodiversity value of these areas.
• The land uses should be restricted to agricultural and tourism activities and uses
ancillary and complementary thereto. A Site Development Plan approved by the
Municipality involving the design and functional utilisation of the site.
• An Environmental Management Program, headed by an Environmental Impact
Assessment, should be provided with every new development or change in land use.
• Subdivision of farm portions will be allowed, subject to a subdivision policy of the
Municipality, provided that the consent of the National Department of Agriculture,
Forestry and Fisheries, Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform or the
Municipality has been obtained first.
34.4.1 Agri-village
• The size of agri-villages need to be balanced with the agricultural potential of the land
and also the sustainability of the settlement in terms of the provision of minimum
standard of social and engineering infrastructure.
• Accessibility to viable transportation options and main roads is a determining factor in
the location of agri-villages.
• The settlement of people not directly involved with the use of the resource should not be
allowed.
• The outcome of an EIA is also a key consideration in the establishment of agri-villages.
34.4.2 Agri-industry
The Municipality may grant its consent for an agricultural industry provided that:
• It is satisfied as to the desirability of the agricultural industry on the land unit in question.
• The agricultural industry is subservient and ancillary to the dominant agricultural use of
the property.
• The agricultural industry does not adversely affect the agricultural potential of the
property.
• The area allocated for purposes of an agricultural industry shall be clearly identified on a
plan prepared by a suitably qualified person to the Municipality’s satisfaction.
34.5 Residential
In order to achieve sustainable residential development, infill development should be prioritised,
particularly in the areas demarcated for urban infill and densification in the Spatial Development
Framework.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
202
34.5.1 Affordable housing
The following guidelines are presented for the location of affordable housing projects:
Availability of Bulk Services
As a rule, bulk municipal services are available in or next to existing urban areas. This favours
infill development and opposes urban sprawl as a form of urban development.
Ownership of Land
Land already owned by the Municipality avoids the tedious and expensive purchase and
transfer of private owned land for affordable housing development.
Access to Social Amenities and Economic Opportunities
Affordable housing projects should be located close to existing social and economic nodes or
close to planned socio-economic nodes.
Access to Public Transportation
The aim is to place higher-density land uses, such as affordable housing, in a strip abutting
public transport routes and in doing so, increasing access to the public transportation systems.
Integration of Urban Structure
Affordable housing should contribute to the establishment of integrated, economically viable and
sustainable communities.
Located within Urban Edge
No affordable housing projects must be developed outside the urban edge.
34.6 Industrial
As far as industrial development is concerned the following general guidelines should be
complied with:
• For commercial and industrial land, ideally, a slope of 1:200 or less is suitable. The
alternative is an expensive cut and fills exercise for each commercial or industrial
building.
• Industrial/commercial developments generally require fairly large areas, with gentle
slopes.
• Easy access to road and/or rail transport is imperative when new areas are planned for
industrial development.
• Service industries and light industries may develop in close proximity to residential
areas.
• Existing industrial/commercial zoned land should be substantially filled up before new
industrial/commercial areas are developed.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
203
• Noxious industries should not be developed in close proximity to residential areas.
Specific areas should be delineated for this kind of land use in order to isolate the impact
it might have on its surroundings with specific reference to the direction of prevailing
winds, natural resources downstream, accessibility, infrastructure provision and handling
of waste.
• All industries must comply with environmental and health standard regulations.
34.7 cemeteries
The following general guidelines should inform the development of cemeteries:
• An EIA and geotechnical study is a prerequisite for the approval of a cemetery site.
• Distance from access roads and from churches needs careful consideration.
• Distance from water courses is important to consider in order to prevent the
contamination of water.
• Public amenities need to be provided at cemetery sites.
• A reversion clause must be registered in the Title Deed that, should the property not
develop as a cemetery within a specified time frame, the land will be used for agricultural
purposes.
Upon identification of preferred sites, detailed studies need to be undertaken to confirm the
suitability of the sites in terms of the topography, geology and environmental restrictions.
34.8 Open space
34.8.1 Primary open space network
A primary open space network will function on a regional scale and includes all significant
natural/ecological assets of the Municipality, i.e., mountain ranges, proclaimed nature reserves,
river environments, wetlands and biodiversity corridors. By protecting such areas, urban areas
are prohibited to sprawl freely and are therefore forced into denser urban agglomerations.
34.8.2 Secondary open space network
A secondary open space network has a neighbourhood function and scale, and includes all
open space, parks and sports facilities within neighbourhoods.
Guidelines for planning and design of open spaces:
• Smaller and fewer active open spaces that are reasonably developed and maintained
are far more useful than a large number of active open spaces that are not.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
204
• Larger parks should be located in areas with no or limited access to natural amenities,
i.e., mountains or coastlines. It should be evenly distributed and where possible,
connected by parkways (±500m walking distance or 10 min).
• Larger parks can be juxtaposed to, and incorporate, urban agriculture, fuel wood
planting, solid waste disposal and nature conservation sites.
• Smaller parks can be located within easy walking distance (i.e. ±300m) of workers
situated within busy commercial and industrial centres in order to create contrasting
space of relief, within predominantly residential areas to create easy surveillance of
child-play spaces, and within school clusters, which create safe, shared playtime space
(300m to 700m or 10min).
• Larger sports fields should be located within clusters of schools and close to private
sports clubs, in order to facilitate the sharing of amenities between different user groups
and to avoid under utilisation. Schools can have allocated times of use during the day,
while sports clubs can use the amenities mainly during the evening (±300m of school
buildings and 500m to 1500m of other user groups).
• Sports fields should be located close to public transport services, in order to facilitate the
access of visiting teams.
• Sports fields can be located on low-lying land adjacent to water courses and
incorporated into parkways, in order to act as part of the major storm water management
system in the event of storms.
35 Sector plan alignment
The Spatial Development Framework integrates all actions and interests that manifest in the
physical environment.
The SDF must, together with the municipal development priorities and objectives, inform the
operational strategies and plans of the different departments in the Municipality (such as
infrastructure master plans, housing delivery plans, public transport plans and plans for the
delivery of social and community services such as health and educational facilities). These
sector plans then become implementation mechanisms for the Spatial Development
Framework.
The following sector plans are considered relevant implementation mechanisms for the Spatial
Development Framework:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
205
Table 49: Status of sector plans
Plan or strategy In place/absent Status/date Comment
Water Services Development Plan
In place 2010 To be aligned with SDF proposals and projects
Local Economic Development Strategy
Absent To be aligned with SDF proposals and projects
Comprehensive Infrastructure Plan (CIP)
Absent To be aligned with SDF proposals and
projects
Integrated Transport Plan
Absent To be aligned with SDF proposals and
projects
Housing Plan Absent To be aligned with SDF proposals and
projects
Tourism Plan/Strategy In place Nov-02 Update and consider SDF proposals
Energy Master Plan Absent To be aligned with SDF proposals and
projects
Disaster Management Plan
Absent To be aligned with SDF proposals and
projects
Integrated Waste Management Plan
Absent To be aligned with SDF proposals and
projects
Sector plans that have not been prepared for Karoo Hoogland have to consider the proposals
and projects listed in the Spatial Development Framework. Existing sector plans have to be
reviewed to make provision for the SDF proposals.
36 Monitoring tools
Municipalities should be committed to evaluating and monitoring the impact of their activities,
services and results. Assessment of these activities and outcomes can then be communicated
back to its stakeholders and into the organisation in order for them to continue to grow and
adapt in ways that best suit their beneficiaries.
Karoo Hoogland Municipality should develop a Results Based Management (RBM) framework,
upon which its monitoring and evaluation can be based. This will also assist it in planning,
implementing and assessing its interventions in terms of the extent to which they achieve their
projected results. Progress therefore can be tracked in terms of the types of results that can be
generated by its interventions.
The proposed RBM model will seek to reach the ultimate outcome of achieving its mission “to
become an economical growth node in the Northern Cape, earmarked by active community
participation.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
206
Council must create an environment that will enhance economic development with specific
focus on poverty alleviation and the creation of direct and indirect job opportunities. Residents
will have direct access to basic minimum services and a culture of “pay for services’ must be
promoted. Special focus on the development of life skills, infrastructure and education will add
to economical growth. A safe and healthy environment must be ensured for the communities of
Karoo Hoogland.” Intermediate outcomes will then focus on:
• Exploiting economic opportunities
• Creating sustainable urban and rural settlements
• Protecting the natural and built environment
The Municipality should monitor and evaluate the impact of its activities on intermediate
outcomes through regular assessments of its interventions using interim surveys linked to its
financial cycles. This will use measurement indicators, such as:
• Number of jobs created
• Number of new businesses
• Increase in turnover of existing businesses
• Number of new or improved roads
• Number of households receiving water
• Number of tourists visiting the area, decreasing/increasing
• Quality of the natural and built environment
Immediate outcomes will be evaluated in terms of why these outcomes are changing, what
steps or actions were taken to achieve them and whether the desired output was achieved.
This might include looking more closely at such things as:
• Number of development incentives provided and taken up by residents
• Number of tourist events held in the region
• Number of people involved in improving roads
Quantitative Monitoring
The Municipality should engage an independent auditor to assess its performance based on
agreed indicators. The performance audit will focus on measurable performance indicators
relating to progress on a bi-yearly basis. Where possible, data will be disaggregated by gender,
age, race and income group.
Qualitative Monitoring
Qualitative feedback will be a continuous process. The Municipality should hold focus groups
and community feedback sessions, prepare regular case studies relating its projects, its results
and community perceptions.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
207
Reporting
The Municipality should report on its progress made towards the benchmarks set for each of its
outputs and outcomes as described above either on a monthly or quarterly basis. It should
provide the community with quarterly reports and one annual summary report per year.
37 Marketing strategy
A Spatial Development Framework (SDF) should indicate areas where strategic intervention is
required and act as a marketing tool to promote the development of the region from a business,
tourism and social responsibility perspective. Marketing of the SDF should be driven by the
officials and stakeholders responsible for its delivery and should play a prominent role in all
structures within the Municipality. In order to develop a proactive and programmatic approach,
the first step should be to develop a SDF Committee that can help guide the dissemination of
the information to the public and private sector.
37.1 Establishment of an SDF committee
In terms of the NSDP principles, it is an essential requirement that each official and decision-
maker have a copy of the Spatial Development Framework and that the key Provincial
Departments understand, support and are committed to the Municipality’s SDF. There must be
a vertical alignment and synergy between local, provincial and national government in order to
work towards the successful achievement of this SDF.
An SDF committee should be established within the province to ensure that it is communicated
to the appropriate audiences of public institutions and private sector individuals and companies
that may have an interest in its success. This would include those that may benefit in some way
from the implementation of the SDF as well as those that may play a role as investors or
facilitators of the projects or goals of the SDF. Thus, the committee should act to coordinate the
interests of both internal and external stakeholders and beneficiaries.
The Committee should play a key role in supporting the establishment of structures aimed at
promoting or facilitating the goals of the SDF. These may take the form as suggested below.
37.2 Establishment of a trade and investment agency or directorate
Namakwa District Municipality must seek to establish a trade and investment agency or
directorate in order to align the Karoo Hoogland Municipality’s Macro Strategic Development
Concept with other municipalities and to facilitate access to finance or development assistance.
This may include the following units:
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
208
37.2.1 District business support unit
The District Municipality should create a local business support unit that can offer assistance in
compiling business plans, gaining access to business skills and networking opportunities. The
aim will be to promote the sustainability of local SMME and BEE companies by creating an
enabling small businesses environment that can support their growth over time. The aim will be
to promote SMEs to encourage further economic growth and job creation.
37.2.2 Proactive direct sector marketing
Where key issues and needs have been identified, it is important that each sector and national
department be contacted and be made aware of these, so that funding can be utilised towards
addressing these specific requirements. As each department has a budget and a mandate to
support these initiatives, they would have to be made aware of it and this responsibility would
rest on the District and Local Municipalities. The SDF must be utilised as a key decision making
tool when prioritising projects and allocating budgets.
37.2.3 Marketing to other sources of funding
• State-Owned Enterprises, such as parastatal utility companies like Transnet, Eskom and
Telkom that provide important services in support of economic growth and social
development. In addition, there are a number of development finance institutions such
as the Development Bank of South Africa (DBSA), Industrial Development Corporation
(IDC), Land Bank, USAID and Khula that finance commercially viable economic
development projects and social projects and programmes utilising a range of financial
instruments.
• Private Financial Institutions support SME development through a range of financial
products. In addition, Enterprise Development funds are increasingly available to enable
SMME’s and BEE companies to access funding from private financial institutions.
• Donor Funding can be a source of funding for qualifying social development projects and
programmes.
• Other Funding may include the National Empowerment Fund and the Umsobomvu Fund,
tourism and conservation groups, or other corporate development (CSI) funds.
37.2.4 Marketing of agricultural produce
The SDF can provide a strategic marketing role in terms of giving direction to the promotion of
the agricultural sector in Karoo Hoogland. This would be advantageous for emerging farmers
and game farmers across the area. In addition, linkages with commercial farmers should be
promoted to provide incentives to forge partnerships with smaller farmers and to help them take
part in supply chain initiatives.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
209
37.3 Establishment of a Tourism Marketing Directorate or Agency
A tourism marketing directorate or agency should be established on district or regional level to
assist local municipalities such as Karoo Hoogland in developing a marketing plan. The main
thrust of a Municipality’s marketing plan, in particular as it relates to the SDF, should address
the region’s strengths, which primarily reside in its natural resources, historical value and its
people. Thus, much of the attention from outside comes from an interest in viewing the region
through tourism, which means that each region must be marketed using the full strength of the
region as a destination.
In the main, the Municipality must ensure that it can:
• Offer the best quality experiences to visitors, with a better understanding of what they are seeking;
• Provide service of the highest quality. e.g., doing more than people expect;
• Have excellent, prize winning guesthouses and other places for visitors; • Host region-wide programmes of events and festivals that celebrate the
region’s historical, cultural and environmental diversity; • Have a productive, highly talented workforce;
• Demonstrate through action that the people in the region really care for the environment and for the people who visit the region and its destinations; and
• Generate economic and social benefits for communities and for the region as a whole by adding value to them through this strategy.
The main constraint to promoting tourism as a development catalyst is an inadequate marketing
approach to the region as a whole. There is currently no website dedicated to area or the district
and thus no clear direction in terms of what to do while visiting the area. Most international
visitors to the country, and increasingly local tourists, use the internet to choose their preferred
travel targets, or they rely on travel agents or tour operators to do this for them. Likewise, travel
agents use the internet to make inquiries and to seek out unique packages for their clients.
Local travelers also increasingly use the internet to choose their holidays around the country.
Those regions with a pre-defined plan of activities and events are clearly the most popular.
There are therefore two targets:
• Those seeking travel possibilities through the internet; and • Travel agents and tour operators seeking destinations for their clients.
The role of a Marketing Plan is to make it easy for both to achieve their desired results. A
destination must define what makes it distinctive in order to understand the best strategy to
attract guests that will appreciate what the destination has to offer, while having a positive
impact on the local economy and no negative impact on the natural and built environment.
Incorporating the principles of sustainable tourism into an innovative niche marketing strategy
will attract the desired guest, enhance the local economy and preserve the destination for future
generations.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
210
37.3.1 Developing the plan
It is envisaged that such a process of developing a marketing plan for the region will require the
following key steps:
1. Development of a website and corresponding activity loops; 2. Accreditation and alignment to build quality value:
• “Quali-mark” in conjunction with operators, which designates: i. a quality brand; ii. sector standards; and iii. an effective regional accreditation framework for tourism.
3. Specific recommendations include:
• Developing and implementing a single, integrated, effective quality standards and accreditation;
• Developing a framework for regional tourism products and services;
• Supporting and providing incentives for the adoption of these by operators, building a regional tourism quality brand;
• Clarifying the relationship of the quality brand to other industry standards and quality marks.
4. Gathering, analysing and disseminating information about the fit between visitors’ expectations and their actual experience;
5. Benchmarking international tourism standards and service levels; and 6. Ensuring operators have the necessary capability building tools, training and
assistance.
The first major driver of this strategy is increased productivity and a bigger market share within
the region, there are three tourism strategy aims that support the delivery of this:
• Enhanced communication with the region’s visitors through a dedicated “Destination
Marketing Tourism” website;
• Higher levels of productivity and performance from the businesses operating in the
visitor economy through a localised capacity building organisation; and
• Improved products and higher quality experiences for all of the visitors to the region,
which will be monitored and promoted through the Municipality.
The second major driver within this strategy underpins the first, that is, to grow the size and
capability of the workforce, ensuring a higher proportion of those able to work are able to do so.
37.3.2 Strategic objectives
The strategic objectives described below are those things that need to be achieved in order to
realize the strategic aims of the marketing plan.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
211
a) Improved Visitor Experience
‘Visitor experience’ objectives are to promote:
• Productivity
• Performance • Quality
• Accessibility
These can be achieved by helping businesses improve their performance and the quality of the
products and services that they provide. At the same time, competition must be stimulated in
order to overcome barriers to higher productivity, performance and quality.
Superior skills will be achieved by improving the skills of our workforce and the attractiveness
of the sector as an employer.
Creating a sense of place will improve the public realm as well as the built and natural
environment.
Signature projects will support and encourage projects that will transform the region’s appeal
to visitors.
Signature events will support and encourage a programme of sustainable events of national
and international significance.
The Municipality can play a role in addressing the structural and policy barriers to improving
productivity and working with other regional bodies. It can also play a role of quality assurance
by maintaining the standards of the industry through an agreed grading scheme. In this regard,
only quality-inspected properties will be marketed to visitors on the public visitor information
sites.
This will add value in terms of improving market intelligence and sharing this with businesses in
a way that helps them to make good investment decisions that support the vision and aims of
this strategy. A key focus will be on regional “routes” to support beacon businesses and the
development of clusters that have potential for growth and improvement.
b) Easy Access
The transport infrastructure is a fundamental part of the visitor economy. Both leisure and
business visitors require roads that are easy to travel, well-marked and offer options for dining
or refueling. An important contribution that can be directly delivered by the Municipality is to
ensure that integrated, comprehensive route planning information is available.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
212
c) The “Attack Brand” Approach to Destination Marketing
The “Attack Brand” approach is about leading tourism promotion with what is strongest and has
most appeal to visitors. The region has several attractions that can act as attack brands that are
capable of attracting the attention and meeting the needs of significant numbers of the high
spending visitors who are needed to grow the visitor economy. They are:
• Sutherland telescope and related developments
• Corbelled houses and unique architecture
• The unique cemeteries and “Tombstone Route”
The methodology that will be applied to develop this concept will be based on:
a) Identifying a comprehensive programme to improve service standards and the quality of
the establishments that will support this strategy;
b) Identifying tourism routes, following the “Attack Brand” approach, where individual or
special transport can help to grow regions successfully. The focus will be on both “day
routes” and “thematic routes”. In this regard:
• Day visits are an important element of the visitor economy. Day visitors also sustain the infrastructure of attractions, restaurants, and shops that are essential elements in attracting overnight visitors. Local communities will be responsible for leading actions to grow the day visitor economy in their area. Tourism agents or the Municipality will be responsible for developing approaches to dispersing visitors across the region through promotion and information.
• Thematic marketing recognises that many people are motivated by a particular activity or interest. It is also a useful mechanism to tie together a range of destinations and present them to the market. A number of themes are identified at the regional level as having market potential: these are Cultural Activities, Natural Environment, Eco-Tourism and Mining. At the sub-regional level the communities will identify those themes that have the best market opportunity. Communities may work together on marketing common themes. There are also opportunities for tourist boards to link together places under a thematic approach.
c) The creation of a Destination Marketing Website, which encompasses the above Attack
Brand model.
Thus, the development of a marketing plan will need to include:
a) Stakeholder consultations, particularly among:
• Communities forming part of the regional approach to branding • Local tourism groups
• Government and its agencies
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
213
b) Research into Destination Marketing “Attack Brands”. This will include research into
existing programs and events that may form part of the overall attraction to the region,
including signature events and signature projects:
• Local running and hiking events
• 4x4 and other adventure tourism events • Local development projects promoting the history of diamond mining in the area.
With heightened awareness of the area and the corresponding impact of its marketing plan, this
should bolster the number of visitors to the area. Correspondingly, developments of an
industrial or service nature will organically grow based on an increasing demand for goods and
services. This will at the same time bring more attention to the SDF, its goals and objectives,
and provide potential investors with a more compelling reason to invest in the area, based upon
evidence of sustainable development principles.
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
214
38 List of References
1. Agricultural Geo-Referenced Information System (AGIS), 2010,
<http://www.agis.agric.za.htm>, viewed July 2010
2. Council for Geoscience 2010. Geology types. Pretoria
3. Department of Land Affairs, 2001. Land Use Management Bill, Pretoria
4. Department of Rural Development & Land Reform, 2009. Comprehensive Rural
Development Programme
5. Department of Trade and Industry, 2006. Draft Regional Industrial Development Strategy 6. Department of Transport, 2007. Rural Transport Strategy for South Africa 7. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, 2010. Annual Rainfall Data. Pretoria
8. Destination Niche Marketing, A Sustainable Tourism Strategy, by Karen Raymore
9. Driver et al, 2003. Succulent Karoo Ecosystem Plan Biodiversity: Component Technical
Report, March 2003
10. ISRDS, p.22
11. Karoo Hoogland Municipality, 2001. Karoo Hoogland IDP 2001- 2005 12. Karoo Hoogland Municipality, 2009. Karoo Hoogland Draft IDP 2009-2011 13. Karoo Hoogland Municipality, 2010. Karoo Hoogland Budget Speech, 2010/11
14. Karoo Hoogland Municipality, 2008. Karoo Hoogland Valuation Roll. 2008 15. Karoo Hoogland Municipality, www.karoohoogland.co.za – accessed June 2010 16. Namakwa District Municipality, 2008. Namakwa District Biodiversity Sector Plan. 2008 17. Namakwa District, Namakwa District Growth and Development Strategy 2009
18. Namakwa District, Namakwa District Integrated Development Plan 2006-11
19. Namakwa District Municipality, Namakwa District Local Economic Development Strategy 2009
20. Province of the Northern Cape, Provincial Growth and Development Strategy, 2004-2014
21. Republic of South Africa, 2007. Astronomy Geographic Advantage Act (Act No. 21 of 2007). Cape Town
22. Republic of South Africa, 1996. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (Act 108 of 1996). Cape Town
23. Republic of South Africa, 2006. Draft Regional Industrial Development Strategy, June 2006 24. Republic of South Africa, 1998. Local Government Municipal Structures Act (Act 117 of
1998 25. Republic of South Africa, 2000. Local Government Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of
2000). Cape Town 26. Republic of South Africa, 2001. Municipal Planning and Performance Management
Regulations 27. Republic of South Africa, 1995. The Development Facilitation Act (Act 67 of 1995). Cape
Town 28. Republic of South Africa, 1998. Transformation of Certain Rural Areas Act ( Act No. 94
of 1998) 29. Republic of South Africa, 1998. Northern Cape Planning and Development Act (Act 7 of
1998). Cape Town 30. Republic of South Africa, 2006. National Spatial Development Perspective. 31. Republic of South Africa, 1996. Growth, Employment and Redistribution: A
Macroeconomic Strategy. Pretoria
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
215
32. Republic of South Africa, 2000. Integrated Rural Development Strategy, November 2000 33. Department Of Land Affairs, 1997. Rural Development Framework, May1997. 34. Statistics South Africa, 2001. Census Data 35. Statistics South Africa, 2007. Community Survey 2007: Municipal Data on Household
service, Statistics South Africa. Pretoria. 36. The Presidency, 2006. Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa
(AsgiSA). RSA 37. www.saexplore.co.za/south-africa/distance/travel distance calculator.asp – accessed
July 20 38. CSIR, 2000, Guidelines for human settlement planning and design, CTP Book Printers
(Pty) Ltd, Cape Town 39. Karoo Hoogland Municipality, 2001. Karoo Hoogland IDP 2001- 2005 40. Karoo Hoogland Municipality, 2009. Karoo Hoogland Draft IDP 2009-2010 41. Karoo Hoogland Municipality, 2010. Karoo Hoogland Budget Speech, 2010/11
42. Karoo Hoogland Municipality, 2002. Framework for the development of a Tourism industry in Karoo Hoogland, November. 2002
43. Karoo Hoogland Municipality, www.karoohoogland.co.za – accessed June 2010 44. Namakwa District Municipality, 2008. Namakwa District Biodiversity Sector Plan. 2008 45. Namakwa District Municipality, 2006. Namakwa District IDP 2006-2011
46. Republic of South Africa, 1998. Municipal Structures Act 117 of 1998. Cape Town 47. Republic of South Africa, 2000. Local Government: Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of
2000). Cape Town 48. Republic of South Africa, 1998. White Paper on Environment Policy for South Africa, 14
May 1998. Cape Town 49. Republic of South Africa, 1994. Water Supply and Sanitation Policy White Paper: Water-
an indivisible national asset, Nov 1994. Cape town 50. Statistics South Africa, 1996. Census Data
51. Statistics South Africa, 2001. Census Data
52. Statistics South Africa, 2007. Community Survey 2007: Municipal Data on Household
service, Statistics South Africa. Pretoria.
53. World Health Organization, www.who.or.id – accessed June 2010 54. www.investorwords.com – accessed June 2010 55. www.investorwords.com– accessed June 2010 56. www.arcdictionary.com– accessed June 2010 57. www.unodc.org – accessed June 2010
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
216
39 ANNEXURE A: CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
217
40 ANNEXURE B: MAPS