rules of engagement respect for the individual no cell phone use during workshop there are no stupid...
DESCRIPTION
GETTING YOUR ATTENTION ICEBREAKER: “SIMON SAYS”TRANSCRIPT
RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
RESPECT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL
NO CELL PHONE USE DURING WORKSHOP
THERE ARE NO STUPID QUESTIONS
teambuilding
YOUR EXPECTATIONS FOR THIS WORKSHOP ????----
MY EXPECTATIONS……- ESTABLISH CREDIBILITY FOR THE CONCEPT- EXPOSE YOU TO SUCCESSFUL STRATEGIES- INSPIRE YOU TO ATTEMPT TO BUILD BETTER TEAMS
GETTING YOUR ATTENTION
ICEBREAKER: “SIMON SAYS”
TEAMWORK
INDUSTRY – SIZE – LOCATION
ATTITUDE
LEADERSHIP RESPONSIBILITY
INITIAL UNDERSTANDINGS
EXERCISE:
- THE MAIN BENEFIT OF A TEAM IS___________________ ?
- FOR A TEAM TO BE SUCCESSFUL, A LEADER MUST_____________?
- THE NUMBER ONE THING THAT WEAKENS A TEAM___________?
- THE KEY FACTOR FOR A TEAM’S SUCCESS IS______________?
- FOR A TEAM TO BE SUCCESSFUL MEMBERS MUST______________?
- AS A LEADER, HOW DO YOU BEGIN TO BUILD YOUR TEAM ?
OUR CHALLENGE
RECOGNIZE THE ADVANTAGES
LEARN TO ARTICULATE THE CONCEPT
THEN DO IT….
EMPLOY THE PRINCIPLES
REWARD THE RESULTS
Key components of a team
TRUST
COMMITMENT
ACCOUNTABILITY
ATTENTION TO RESULTS
TRUST
CAN YOU DEFINE IT
WHY IS IT IMPORTANT IN A TEAM
HOW DO YOU DEVELOP IT
DO YOU HAVE IT WITH YOUR STAFF
UNDERSTANDING TRUST
HOW DO YOU KNOW WHEN YOU CAN TRUST SOMEONE ?
WHEN YOU WANT SOMEONE TO TRUST YOU, WHO HAS MOST OF THE RESPONSIBILITY, YOU OR THE OTHER PERSON ? WHY ?
SHOULD WE START OFF TRUSTING OTHERS AND ONLY STOP TRUSTING THEM IF THEY PROVE THEY’RE NOT WORTHY ?
SHOULD WE ONLY TRUST OTHERS AFTER THEY PROVE THEY ARE WORTHY ?
DO YOU TRUST ME AND EACH OTHER ?
TRUST GAME
- FOUR/FIVE TEAMS- ONE INVESTOR WITH HIS/HER ADVISORS- ONLY INVESTOR KNOWS WHAT SHE/HE WILL
INVEST- IF INVESTORS HIT THE TARGET-THEY EARN A
BONUS- IF INVESTORS MISS THEIR TARGET THEY LOSE
THEIR MONEY
LESSONS LEARNED:-
-
-
-
TRUSTAMONG TEAM MEMBERS
FUNDAMENTAL
EMOTIONAL
VULNERABLE
OPEN WITHOUT FILTERS
COMMITMENT
YOUR DEFINITION…….
COMMITMENTWEBSTER’S DEFINITION…..
AN AGREEMENT OR PLEDGE TO DO SOMETHING IN THE FUTURE;THE STATE OF BEING OBLIGATED
OREMOTIONALLY IMPELLED
COMMITMENTAMONG TEAM MEMBERS
ALL OPINIONS/IDEAS ON THE TABLE
OPEN PROCESS
FULL EXPRESSION
CONFIDENCE
FULL COMMITMENT
TEAMBUILDINGEXERCISE: “COOKIE MONSTERS”
- THE TEAM THAT CAN EAT THE MOST COOKIES IN 3 MINS WINS- 2 TEAMS OF 3 MEMBERS EACH
ACTIVITY:- TEAMS WILL HAVE 3 MINS TO PREPARE- EACH TEAM WILL BE GIVEN AS MANY COOKIES AS THEY
NEED- NO ONE CAN USE THEIR HANDS EXCEPT TO PLACE A
COOKIE ON A FOREHEAD OR TO PICK UP A COOKIE
OBJECTIVES:- SIMPLE PLANNING EXERCISE WITH LIMITED TEAM
STRATEGIES - ICE BREAKER ACTIVITY OR TO LIGHTEN THE MOOD OF A
MEETING
ACCOUNTABILITYYOUR DEFINITIO N……
ACCOUNTABILITY
WEBSTER’S DEFINITION….
SUBJECT TO GIVING AN ACCOUNT;
TO FURNISH A JUSTIFYING EXPLANATION
ATTENTION TO RESULTS
ESTABLISH STANDARDS
SCHEDULE REPORTING
PROVIDE FOR ADJUSTMENTS
AVOID APATHY
TEAMBUILDINGEXERCISE: IMPROVISATION- 3 TEAMS OF 3 MEMBERS EACH- 3 DIFFERENT BUSINESSES – 1 FOR EACH TEAM
ACTIVITY:- EACH TEAM TO PRESENT THEIR BEST SELLING
DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICE SHOWN ON THEIR ADVERTISEMENT
- 15 MINS TO PREPARE- 3 MINS FOR EACH PRESENTATION- TEAM WITH THE BEST PRESENTATION WINS
OBJECTIVES:- OBSERVE GROUP/TEAM DECSION MAKING PROCESS- HAVE EACH GROUP RECOGNIZE INDIVIDUAL
STRENGTHS- ENCOURAGE GROUP/TEAM TO SEEK CONSENSUS IN
DECISIONS DEBRIEFING: WHAT DID WE LEARN ABOUT THESE TEAMS ?
THE FIVE DYSFUNCTIONSOF
A TEAM
ABSENCE OF TRUSTFEAR OF CONFLICT
LACK OF COMMITMENTAVOIDANCE OF
ACCOUNTABILITYINATTENTION TO RESULTS
ABSENCE OF TRUSTWHAT ACTIONS WOULD CAUSE AN ABSENCE OF TRUST WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION ?
-
-
-
-
-
CONFLICT
WEBSTER’S DEFINITION…..
ANTAGONISTIC STATE OF STRUGGLERESULTING FROM INCOMPATIBLE
OROPPOSING NEEDS, DRIVES, IDEAS ORINTERESTS
CONFLICT AMONG TEAM MEMBERS
NO FEAR
PASSIONATE DIALOGUE
CHALLENGE
QUESTION
BEST DECISIONS
INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITYAMONG TEAM MEMBERS
TEAM STANDARDS
TEAM DECISIONS
PEER TO PEER
NOT LEADER DRIVEN
INATTENTION TO RESULTS
COMPLACENT
NAÏVE
UNAWARE
IGNORING THE HANDWRITING ON THE WALLS
TEAMBUILDINGEXERCISE: DESIGNING THE PERFECT TEAM MEMBER- 4-5 TEAMS OF 8 MEMBERS EACH ( ENTIRE CLASS)ACTIVITY:- EA. TEAM WILL DESIGN THE PERFECT TEAM MEMBER BASED ON WHAT THEY BELIEVE THAT PERSON SHOULD BRING TO A TEAM- EA. MEMBER SUGGESTS 1 CHARACTERISTIC TO BE
INCLUDED- TEAM DECIDES ON ONLY 8 CHARACTERISTICS- TEAM DECIDES ON A NAME FOR THEIR PERFECT TEAM
MEMBER- TEAM DRAWS A PICTURE OF THEIR PERFECT TEAM
MEMBER- TEAM WRITES A 3 MIN. STORY ABOUT HOW THIS
PERSON USES THEIR 8 CHARACTERISTICS TO BENEFIT THE TEAM
- A MEMBER OF EA. TEAM IS CHOSEN TO SHOW THE PICTURE AND TELL US THE NAME OF THEIR PERFECT TEAM MEMBER AND READ THEIR STORY
DEBRIEFING:- WHAT DID YOU LEARN ABOUT THE TEAMBUILDING
PROCESS ?- DO YOU THINK THAT YOUR STAFF WOULD LEARN WHAT
YOU LEARNED BY PARTICIPATING IN THIS EXERCISE ?
HOW DO WE DEAL WITH THE CHANGESREQUIRED
?
DEALING WITH CHANGE
COMMON REACTIONS:
FEAR = “CIRCLE THE WAGONS”
DEFENSIVE = “THERE IS NO PROBLEM”
DISMISSIVE = “NOTHNG NEW”
WELCOMING = “IT’S ABOUT TIME”
DEALING WITH CHANGE
WE ARE HERE
WEWANT TOGET HERE
T E R R I T O R I A L
C U R I O U S
D I S C O V E R Y
C A N D I D
S H A R I N G
PARTNERING