RTI and Behavior Process Improvement Group

Facilitators: Bill Trant, Susan Cole, & Leigh Gates

Agenda

– Presentation of the Data

– Description of the Process

– What Works?

• Small Group Discussion & Whole Group Share

– What Needs to Work Better?

• Small Group Discussion & Whole Group Share

– Wrap-up

THE STATE-LEVEL PERSPECTIVE

The Continuous Improvement Performance Plan•Indicator 4b•Indicators 9 and 10

Indicator 4b

Significant Discrepancy of > 10 Day Suspensions by Race/Ethnicity Due to 2009-2010 Data

– 1,073 total students suspended – 78 (7.3%) students with IEPs– More than 2 times discrepant in the number of

suspensions by race/ethnicity (African American)

Indicator 9 & 10

Disproportionate Representation by Race/Ethnicity in Disability Categories That is a Result of Inappropriate Identification 2001-2001 Data

– 2 categories: ID-MI (82/133) and SED (63/105). – ID-MI risk ratio: 6.2% NHCS > 5.36% State– SED risk ratio: 6% NHCS > 5% State – Disproportionate in the identification of African American

students in these two categories

THE DISTRICT-LEVEL PERSPECTIVE

RTI from a system perspective•A break down of data in terms of Behavior Intervention•A break down of Behavior Intervention in terms of Tiers

Entitlement Data

05-06 17

06-07 71

07-08 106

08-09 127

09-10 154

10-11 222

Entitlements by Behavior State Child Count (SED/Total)= 4%

05-06• 17• 0• At: 0• Ag: 0• 2 B: 0

06-07• 71• B:4(5.

63%)• At: 3• Ag: 1• 2 B: 0

07-08• 106• B:4(3.

77%)• At: 3• Ag: 1• 2 B: 0

08-09• 127• B:5(2.

36%)• At: 1• Ag: 3• 2 B: 1

09-10• 154• B:22(6

.49%)• At: 7• Ag: 9• 2 B: 6

09-10• 222• B:21(4

.05%)• At: 7• Ag: 8• 2 B: 6

KEY: B= Behavior; At= Entitled in Attention; Ag: Entitled in Aggression; 2 B= Entitled in 2 Behaviors

K-5 Students Provided Interventions in Tiers 2009-2010

• 3,501* (30% ADM) in RTI• 1,696 (48%) intervention info.• 639** (38%) cases = behavior• 539 * (84%) tier information

2010-2011

* Based on 25 schools**Based on 25 sch. w/3-4 w/<50% of data

89 (17%)

193 (36%)

237 (37%)

3 (1%)4

2

1

3

• 3,250* (29% ADM) in RTI• 1,261 (39%) intervention info.• 345** (27%) cases = behavior• 292 * (85%) tier information

* Based on 25 schools**Based on 20 sch. w/8-9 w/<50% of data

51 (17%)

122 (42%)

112 (38%)

7 (2%)4

2

1

3

6-8 Students Provided Interventions in Tiers

2009-2010

• 418* (8% ADM) in RTI• 197 (47%) intervention info.• 24** (12%) cases = behavior• 24* (100%) tier information

2010-2011

* Based on 7 schools**Based on 7 sch. w/2 w/<50% of data

0 (0%)

17 (71%)

6 (25%)

1 (4%)4

2

1

3

• 907* (17% ADM) in RTI• 401 (44%) intervention info.• 71** (18%) cases = behavior• 63* (89%) tier information

* Based on 7 schools**Based on 5 sch. w/3 w/<50% of data

12 (19%)

14 (22%)

36 (57%)

1 (2%)4

2

1

3