rpt on geol work & linecutting performed on road prop

l -' l

t2A08NEe840 63.3789 GUIBORD ~, 010

K/.- tf 7

REPORT ON

GEOLOGICAL WORK AND LINECUTTING

PERFORMED ON

ROAD PROPERTY

GUIBORD TOWNSHIP, MATHESON AREA,

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION - ONTARIO

FOR

ARMCO MINERAL EXPLORATION LTD.

BY

PETER G. ATHERTON B.Sc.

H. E. NEAL 6 ASSOCIATES LTD.

TORONTO - CANADA

December, 1980

This report on the linecutting and geological survey is submitted under the special provisions dated October 16, 1967 for the credit of 40 assessment work days per claim.

1.0 SUMMARY:

A four man crew conducted linecutting and a geological survey on the

Road Property in Guibord Township between May 22 and June 24, 1980.

The survey only located two outcrops along the Pike River so the

geological interpretation is based on the results of the geophysical

surveys and by observing outcrops on surrounding properties. The

resulting interpretation indicated the location of the Destor-Porcupine

Fault marked by the presence of mafic intrusives and talc schist.

North of the fault zone is a band of mafic volcanics. This contact is

unconformable. North of the mafic volcanics is a belt of intermediate

volcanics.

The results show that the property warrants further work.

- 2 -

2.0 INTRODUCTION;

The Road Claim Group was staked by Armco Mineral Exploration Ltd. in

December 1979. The group consists of 14 contiguous claims, eleven

are being included for assessment. Crew for the work consisted of a

supervisor, one geologist and two linecutters. The claims were staked

on the basis of favourable geology. A grid with sidelines at 400*

intervals was cut in the bush and a geological survey was conducted

over this grid to locate and evaluate the presence of valuable minerals.

The survey was conducted between May 22, 1980 and June 24, 1980 as part

of a larger survey conducted by H.E. Neal S Associates Ltd. in Guibord

Township.

- 3 -

3.0 THE PROPERTY;

The property consists of 14 contiguous mining claims staked in

December, 1979. The claims are currently held by Armco Mineral

Exploration Ltd., P.O. Box 3000, Guelph, Ontario.

Claims are listed below:

L-548507

L-548508

L-548509

L-548510

L-548511

L-548512

L-548513

L-548514

L-548515

L-548516

L-548517

L-548518

L-548519

L-548520

SWa; S*s Lot

SE^ Sh Lot

SW^ S*s Lot

Stik Sh Lot

NVftl S*s Lot

NE^ S^ Lot

NW3!! S *i Lot

NE^ S^ Lot

SE^s N^ Lot

svk nh LotSE^s N^ Lot

NE^ N^ Lot

NW*4 N^ Lot

NE^ N^ Lot

12

12

11

11

12

12

11

11

12

11

11

12

11

11

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Cone. IV

Claims L548518, L548519, L548520 are not being included for credit.

V

/*

y

4

ONTARIOQUE.

\

KEY MAP100 ?00 30C

M.LFS

H'E NEAL a ASSOCIATES TD

- 4 -

4.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS;

The fourteen mining claims are located in Guibord Township, District

of Cochrane in the Larder Lake Mining Division. All of the claims

are located Lots 11, 12, Cone. IV of Guibord Township l*s miles north

of the Holtyre Townsite. Access is by truck along Highway 572 north

from Holtyre.

L © f L (P)36724 l

11369

?C8?I . i 26CI9-l

L (P) , L (P

-.I (56694Z

.'^VlS ' 7:5/^1

- - 4- - - -

L (P) l U (POWR9ITEJ697I l 26970 956919 &6S944

PROPERTY LOCATIONSCALE

1 INCH TO 1/2 MILE

H.E. NEAL S ASSOCIATES LTD.

- 5 -

5.0 PREVIOUS WORK;

19t6 - Hislop Mines Limited drilled 4 holes across the property in

Lot 11, Concession IV. The drill holes intersected mafic

volcanics and talc chlorite schist.

1964 - Hollinger Consolidated Gold Mines drilled three holes for

a total of 2010 feet. The drill holes intersected the sed

andesite contact. Drill holes were located 480' west of

post //2 of what is now L548518.

- 6 -

6.0 LINE CUTTING;

Line cutting was done by H.E. Neal Si Associates Ltd. personnel. The

baseline was cut due east from Highway 572, 100* south of post #4 of

claim L548511. Sidelines were cut every 400' with the exception of

line 04-0. No line was cut at 0+00 due to the presence of a gas pipeline

which was expected to interfere with the geophysical surveys. A total

of 9.9 miles was cut.

- 7 -

7.0 GEOLOGY;

7.1 General Geology

The rocks in the Guibord Township area are Archean in age and belong to

the Abitibi Sub-Province of the Canadian Shield. The township and

surrounding region is underlain by a complex mix of volcanic, sedimentary

and plutonic rocks. The rocks strike generally ESE and WNW.

The Destor-Porcupine fault zone and the Pipestone fault zone are the two

major structural breaks in the area. Other shear zones occur west of

Guibord Township in Hislop Township. The Destor-Porcupine fault is the

largest of the shear zones. It crosses Guibord Township in a southeast-

northwest direction except in the southeast corner of the township where

it is east-west. The fault zone varies in dip from nearly vertical to

45 S (Prest 1951). Rocks south of the fault zone face south and are

generally steeply dipping. North of the fault zone the rocks face north

and also are steeply dipping.

The Pipestone fault zone lies 2 to 3 miles north of the Destor-Porcupine

fault. This fault strikes southeast and is thought to join up with the

Destor-Porcupine fault in Michaud Township to the east. The amount of

movement on these faults is not known.

Cross faulting is common in the area and has been noted on many outcrops

in the township. These faults usually strike NNE to north but they do

vary. Due to the amount of overburden in the area exact fault movement

is not possible. Some but not all of these faults cut across the

Destor-Porcupine fault.

- 8 -

Glacial deposits in the area range from glacial lacustrine clays and

silts which cover most of the township to outwash sands and gravels

that occur on the north east quarter of the township. The sand has been

formed by wind action into dunes. These surficial deposits are underlain

by ablation and lodgement till. The surficial deposits cover 952 of the

township and make rock correlation between outcrops difficult.

A table of formations is listed below;

CFNOX.OIC Table of Formations

RECENT AND PLEISTOCENE: Pea l; river and lake deposits; sand dunes; beach sand and gravel;varved clay; glacial outwash sand and gravel; till ground moraine).

PRECAMBRIANMATACHEWAN^?): Diabase; quartz diabase, and porphyritic phases.ALGOMAN: Granite, porphyritic fer.inite; syenite, porphyritic syenite;

feldspar porphyry, quartz-feldspar porphyry; lamprophyre; carbonate bodies, veins, etc.

BASIC INTRUSIVES: Diorite, gabbro, diabase, and their quartz-bearing equivalents;peridotite; basic intrusive breccia.

VOLCANICS AND SEDIMENTS/ Acidic volcanics, including flows and related intrusivcs; sphcroi-

SOUTHERN VOLCANICSANP SEDIMENTS:

dal and spherulitic rhyolite, coarse and fine pyroclastics ami bedded tu *

pnc ffs.

Intermediate to basic volcanics, including pillow lavas, minor spheroidal lavas, and fragmental*; lalc-chloritc schist; inter- bedded chert.

Sediments: conglomerate, greywacke, arkose, quartzite, and. argillite.

NORTHERN VOLCANICS: Dacitic to basaltic lavas and related rocks, including lavas, spheroidal livas, actinolitized volcanics, and talc-chlorite schists.

NORTHERN SEOIMKNTS: Greywacke, quartzite, argillite; minor arkose, conglomerate, and intraformational conglomerate.

from Prest 1951.

Q

7-2 Geology of the Claim Group

Only two outcrops of mafic volcanics were found in the claim group due

to thick overburden. The surficial deposit consisted of lacustine clay

and silt. Measurements taken from previous diamond drilling indicates

a thickness of 60 feet or more. Ablation till and lodgement till are

exposed on the sides of the Pike River valley and are slightly more sandy

than the lacustrine deposits. Recent surface vegetal swamp deposits

are shown on the map. The Pike River appears to be close to bedrock where

the two outcrops were located.

The following interpretation is based on the magnetic survey and observing

outcrops in surrounding properties due to the small number of outcrops

found on this property.

The assumed location of the Destor-Porcupine fault is marked on the

accompanying map.

North of the Destor-Porcupine fault zone there are two distinct zones

or rock types. The northern part of the claim group is underlain by

intermediate volcanics indicated by the low magnetic values and by

previous drilling by Hollinger. The intermediate volcanics are

underlain by mafic volcanics of basaltic composition interlayered with

probable intermediate volcanics. The examination of outcrops west of

the property indicate these are basaltic in composition and contain more

- 10 -

pyrrhotite than the andesites to the north. A certain amount of shearing

and carbonatization is in evidence in outcrops here and it is likely

to occur on the claims held by Armco. The band of intermediate volcanics

in the middle of this zone is interupted where it encounters the Destor

Porcupine fault zone.

The Destor Porcupine fault zone is marked by extremely high magnetic

values occurring as linear features surrounded by less magnetic zones.

This has been the case on other properties nearby where the fault zone has

been encountered. The linnear magnetic anomalies are likely mafic

intrusives surrounded by talc schist and talcy mafic volcanics and breccias.

Pyrite and carbonatization are common and do occur on the outcrop on

line 20E at the north side of the Pike River. An example of talcy mafic

volcanics can be seen at the south end of line 28E.

The north contact of the fault zone is discordant with the mafic volcanics

while the south contact is more concordant. A NNE trending cross fault

appears to intersect and displace all rock types north of the river between

lines 16E and 28E the fault might account for the brecciation seen on

the outcrop on the north band of the Pike River at line 20E. The area

south of the Destor Porcupine fault zone is likely underlain by mafic

volcanics.

All rock types in this claim group appear to dip steeply including the

mafic intrusives in the fault zone.

- 11 -

8.0 CONCLUSION;

The geological survey along with the magnetometer and VLF surveys aided

in'delineating structure favourable for economic mineralization. Although

few outcrops were located on the claim group the examination of other

outcrops in the immediate area was useful in obtaining an understanding

of the geology of the claim group. This understanding was necessary

for geophysical interpretation.

On the basis of the three surveys the property should be looked at in

more detail particularly south of the river close to the southern contact

of the fault zone. This area also had a strong VLF conductor. Other

areas for further work have been outlined in the other surveys.

Peter G. Atherton B.Se.

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

FUc.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Su Township c Claim Hold

Survey Con Author of 1 Address of Covering D

Total Miles

r M Geological, Magnetometer, VLF-EM.A Guibord Township ir Area r

er(s) Armco Mineral Evnloration I,td.

npany, H -E. Neat i Afifion1afft.fi T.td.

leport Peter G. Atherton

Author

ates of Sun-

of Line Cul

25 Croydon Rd, Burlington, Ontario.May,y 3 1980 to December 1980

(linccutting to office)9.9

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

AIRBORNI Magnetome

DATE: 7

Res. Geol.

l CREDITSter

/.; X /'/" X

Previous SurveysFile No. Type

(Special provi

Electromagi (enter *

SIGW

DAYS

Geophysical p" c aim 20—Electromagnetic .20 —Magnetometer

-Radiometric-Hth-r

lion credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

netir Rariiometrirlays per claim)

iTURF,: sQfc ^ #7xfe

Qualifications

Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

L 548507iprefixj '(number)

L 548508

L 548509

L 548510

L 548511

L " 548512

L 548513

L 548514

L 548515

L 548516

L 548517

i i j J 'i .

TOTAL LLAIMa ——— JJ —— —— — —— i

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEY S — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations Magnetometer - 2041 VLF-EM-968 Number of Readings MAG 2Q4J. Station interval MAG 25'. BL50' ; VLF-EM 50'_______Line sparing 400*-—————

Profile scale. VLF-EM - l" to 20^______________________^____Contour interval Magnetometer - 100—.—.——-.-—.^-——.-—-———-^.—..——,-..

Instrument Scintrex MF-1 Fluxgate Magnetometer——.————.———.—-—-

Zo

uH

Coil configurationO

\ H: H-4

' ^' H

COLo w

Accuracy - Scale mnctant lQ.5% from 1000 to lO.OOO't Scale ± 1.02 10.000^ scale_____.j T, progressiveDiurnal correction method Reading l Baseline minus Reading 2 Baseline/No. Readings -

Base Station check-in interval (hours)_____2 to 4_____________iBase Station location and value Baseline AE, 28E, A AE - 26Q , 320 , 210 , resper.t;tvely.

Instrument Geonics EM-16

2 coils l vertical l horizontal,, ., .. Not applicable. Coil separation ——————LL——————

± IK resolution.Accuracy.Method: 1x3 Fixed transmitter O Shoot back D In line Q Parallel linei

Hyj Frpniipnrv 17.ftKH7. M.A.A-. Tiif-lpr MafnoW

Parameters measured____In-phase____Quad-phase

Instrument.Scale constant.

Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ——————————————————————————————————————'.———:——— Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters - On time __________________________ Frequency ^^^^

-Of f time_________________________ Range ——,———..— Delay time ————————————————————————

Integration time.Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

42A08NEC048 63.3769 GUIBORD O2O

REPORT ON

GEOPHYSICAL WORK

PERFORMED ON

ROAD PROPERTY

GUIBORD TOWNSHIP, MATHESON AREA,

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION - ONTARIO

FOR


BY

PETER G. ATHERTON B.Se.

H. E. NEAL S ASSOCIATES LTD.

TORONTO - CANADA

December, 1980

This report on the electromagnetic and magnetic survey is submitted under the special provisions dated October 16, 1967 for the credit of 40 assessment work days per claim.

1.0 SUMMARY:

A three man crew was engaged in ground geophysical surveys on the Road

Property between May 22 to June 27, 1980.

The magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys outlined two VLF conductors that

warrant further investigation. One of the conductors is associated with

a linnear magnetic body and represents a contact area. The second

conductor (conductor E) is not associated with any magnetic high and

could represent a graphitic or sulphide shear.

The magnetic survey indicated the location of the Destor-Porcupine fault

zone. The northern contact of this zone is marked by an unconformity.

More work is warranted on this property as a result of these two surveys.

- 2 -

2.0 INTRODUCTION;

The Road Claim Group was staked for Armco Mineral Exploration Ltd. in

December 1979. The group consists of 14 contiguous claims 11 of which

are being included for assessment. Crew for the work consisted of

a supervisor and two instrument operators. The claims were staked on

the basis of favourable geology. Electromagnetic and magnetic surveys

were conducted in an effort to locate and evaluate the presence of

economic minerals. Surveys were conducted on a grid with cross lines

every 400'. The surveys were completed between May 22, 1980 and June

24, 1980, as part of larger survey in Guibord Township. Various check

surveys were done throughout the summer months.

— 3 ~

3.0 THE PROPERTY;

The property consists of 14 contiguous mining claims staked in December

1979 in Guibord Township. The claims are currently held by Armco

Mineral Exploration Ltd., P.O. Box 3000, Guelph, Ontario.

The claims are listed below:

L-548507L-548508

L-548509

L-548510L-548511L-548512L-548513L-548514L-548515

L-548516L-548517L-548518 V '

L-548519'L-548520'

S*s Lot 12S*s Lot 12

Sh Lot 11

Sh Lot 118*5 Lot 12

SJg Lot 12S*s Lot 11S*s Lot 11N*5 Lot 12

N*i Lot 11Hh Lot 11NJj Lot 12

N*s Lot 11N*si Lot 11

Cone. IV Cone. IV

Cone. IV Cone. IV Cone. IV

Cone. IV Cone. IV Cone. IV Cone. IV

Cone. IV Cone. IV

Cone. IV Cone. IV Cone. IV

Claims L548518, L548519, and L548520 are not being included for credit.

9

t

4

ONTARIOQUE.

\*

\TIMMINS* 4

GUIBORDTOWNSHIP

l

\

TORONTO

HAMILTON-/'.'. -

KEY MAP100 ?00 30C

M,LES

H E NEAL S ASSOCIATES LTD

4.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS;——————————————. /

The fourteen mining claims are located in Guibord Township, District of

Cochrane in the Larder Lake Mining Division. All of the claims are

located in Lots 11, 12 Cone. IV of Guibord Township, l*i miles north of

the Holtyre Townsite. Access is by truck along Highway 572 north

from Holtyre.

l ©i L ©

L (fj l L IP9ITE

?697I ' J6970h---!---

PROPERTY; LOCATIONSCALE

1 INCH TO 1/2 MILE

H.E. NEAL 6t ASSOCIATES LTD.

- 5 -

5.0 PREVIOUS WORK;

1946 - Hislop Mines Limited drilled 4 holes across the property in

Lot 11, Concession IV. The drill holes intersected mafic

volcanics and talc chlorite schist.

1964 - Hollinger Consolidated Gold Mines drilled three holes for

a total of 2010 feet. The drill holes intersected the sed

andesite contact. Drill holes were located 480' west of

post #2 of what is now L548518.

- 6 -

6.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY;


the Abitibi Sub-province of the Superior Province. The township and

surrounding region is underlain by a complex mix of volcanics, sedimentary

and plutonic rocks. The major structural feature in the area is the

Destor-Porcupine fault zone which crosses the township in a northwest-

southeast direction. Direction and extent of movement along this fault

is not known. The fault zone varies in dip from nearly vertical to 45

South (Prest 1951).

The strata face south on the south side of the fault and face north north

of the fault. The rocks have irregularly shaped contacts but generally

strike northwest southeast.

North of the Destor-Porcupine fault zone is Pipestone fault zone. The

Pipestone Fault is another major shear that joins up with the Destor-

Porcupine Fault Zone east of Guibord Township.

Cross faulting is common in a north-north-east to north direction. Due

to the amount of overburden the extent of these faults is not known.

Glacial deposits in the area range from glacial lacustrine clay and silt

which covers most of the township to outwash sands and gravels in the

east central and northeast part of the township.

For more detailed geology of the claim group see the geological report of

the claim group.

- 7 -

7.0 GEOPHYSICS;

7.1 Magnetic Survey

The magnetic survey was carried out by M. Greer between June 8, 1980

and June 30, 1980. Weather conditions and job related activities

prevented continuous work on the grid. The survey was part of an overall

program conducted by H.E. Neal S Associates Ltd. for Armco Mineral

Exploration Ltd.

Readings were recorded at 25 feet intervals, along the side lines and

every 50 feet along the baseline. The grid consisted of an east-west

baseline with side lines at 400' intervals. No line was cut south from

00 on the baseline due to the presence of a gas pipeline, which was

expected to interfere with the magnetometer survey. Base stations were

located at 4E, 28E and 44E on the baseline.

7.1.1 Instrument and Sensitivity

The instrument used was a Fluxgate Magnetometer, Model MF-1 manufactured

by Scintrex Limited. It has an accuracy of ±0.57. from the 1000 to 10,000

gamma scale and an accuracy of ±1.07, at scales greater than 10,000 gammas.

The fluxgate magnetometer measures the strength of the vertical component

of the total magnetic field. The resulting value is given in gammas.

The magnetic field at any given station will consist of the sum of the

earth's magnetic field and the magnetic field of the bedrock at that point.

- 8 -

The magnetic field of the bedrock is dependant on the concentration of

naturally magnetic minerals in the bedrock or minerals capable of

possessing a secondary field which is induced by the earth's primary

magnetic field.

7.1.2 The Survey

The survey was conducted as described in the previous section. The base

stations were established relative to each other so that even though

different base stations were used, all stations recorded on the grid

could be plotted relative to each other. Base stations were read four

times daily. In addition to the four base stations all other baseline

stations were taken relative to the base stations to eliminate the need

for more frequent checks.

Due to fluctuations in the earth's magnetic field it is necessary to take

frequent base station readings. Any apparent changes in the magnetic

intensity that occur during the time interval between baseline checks is

then applied as a progressive adjustment to the readings taken during that

period of time.

The contoured results of the magnetic survey aid in the determination of

strike, dip, location and shape of a magnetic body.

- 9 -

7.2 Electromagnetic Survey

The VLF-EM survey was carried out by M. Eastwood during the period June

8, 1980 to June 24, 1980 as part of the overall exploration program

conducted by H.E.Neal S Associates Ltd. personnel in Guibord Township.

Station readings were recorded at 50' station intervals along the 400'

cross lines. The readings were recorded as if facing north. The VLF

transmitting station used was NAA, Cutler, Maine, which has a transmitting

frequency of 17.8 K H Z.


The instrument used in the survey was a Geonics EM16 VLF-EM. The

sensitivity of the In-phase is ±15056 and Quad-phase is ±405!. The instrument

ha^ a resolution of ±1K. The Geonics EM-16 has an operating range of

15 to 25 KHz VLF operating band.

The EM16 is a sensitive receiver which measures the vertical field

components of secondary magnetic fields caused in the following manner.

The VLF transmitting stations have a vertical antenna with a vertical

antenna current. This creates a concentric, horizontal magnetic field

around each station. When the magnetic fields come in contact with

conductive bodies in the ground a secondary magnetic field radiates from

these bodies.

-10 -

The receiver has two receiving coils with one coil having a vertical axis

and the other a horizontal axis. The signal from the vertical axis coil is

minimized by tilting the instrument which measures the vertical real

component as a percentage. The remaining signal is balanced out by a

measured percentage of a signal from the horizontal coil which gives an

accurate measure of the quadrature vertical signal. The measured values

are relative only.

The VLF station N.A.A. Cutler, Maine was chosen because it is in line

with the strike of the rocks in the area. The results of a survey when

plotted as a profile show the location of various conductors in the ground.

- 11 -

8.0 RESULTS:

8.1 Magnetic Survey

The magnetic area outlined three distinct magnetic zones. The northern

most magnetic area (Zone A) is characterized by low magnetic values. These

values are fairly consistent north of the baseline with the contact between

it and Zone B occurring between 28E on the baseline and 9+258 on line 52E.

Examination of outcrops nearby and drill hole logs in the area show the

bedrock to be andesite.

The government geological map for the area shows the southern contact

of a large sediment band in the cutting through the property. The magnetic

information does not show this contact as it did not extend far enough

north. The middle zone (Zone B) is delinneated by higher magnetics than

in Zone A. Bedrock in this zone ±e most likely massive mafic lavas.

Examination of nearby outcrops that are an extension of this zone show

this to be the case. Dips appear to be north. The magnetic low occurring,

in the centre of the zone is likely to be intermediate volcanics.

The contact between Zone B and Zone C appears to be unconformible

indicating Zone C to be the Destor-Porcupine Fault Zone. The extremely

high magnetic bodies alternate with lower magnetic bodies. The magnetic

body between lines 20E and 28E on the north bank of the Pike River is

associated with mafic breccias. The other linear magnetic bodies are

probably mafic intrusives surrounded by talc schist. These rock types

are common in the JDestor-Porcupine Pault Zone in the area. A fault appears

to intersect both zones B and C in the area of lines 20E and 24E. The

fault strikes NE-SW.

- 12 -

8.2' Electromagnetic Survey

The VLF survey located 6 conductors. Five of the conductors are

located within magnetic Zone C. Conductor A is associated with the

northern contact of the largest linnear magnetic anomaly. The in-phase

component is very strong with moderate to weak conductivity as shown by

the quadrature phase. The conductor probably reflects the changes in

bedrock depth between the intrusive and the soft bedrock to the north.

It also reflects the contact between the more conductive intrusive

and the less conductive rocks to the north. Conductor B shows a moderate

to strong in-phase response but little or no quadrature strength. This

conductor is probably reflecting surface conditions.

Conductor C from lines 16E to 24 E is similar to Conductor A in geological

setting but the quadrature phase shows it to be more conductive. The

east end of the conductor at line 28E is associated with the south side of

a different magnetic high. This conductor could represent a mineralized

shear zone. Conductor D is similar in character to Conductor A although

not enough is seen of this conductor to be certain. Conductor E is not

associated with any magnetic high and unlike all the other conductors it is

not in magnetic Zone C. Although not associated with any well defined

magnetic high the quadrature response is similar to the response over narrow

coiiducting dykes or shears. It is probably deeper than any of the other

conductors. Conductor F is of short duration and is likely formational

Conductors C and E are the most attractive conductors and warrant further work.

- 13 -

9.0 CONCLUSION:

Both the VLF-EM and the magnetic survey were useful in defining geological

structure in the area. The VLF survey outlined two conductors that

warrant further work. Conductor C is associated with a magnetic high

which appears to be faulted in the east end, between line 24E and 28E.

The shape of the conductor indicates it is at depth and not surficial.

The conductor warrants more work at a closer line interval.

Conductor E is not associated with any particular magnetic high although

it is in a zone of higher magnetics. This conductor could be the

southern contact of the Destor-Porcupine fault. At any rate the conductor

shape shows it to be at depth and more detailed work should be carried

out over the conductor.


ntario



File.



Geological, Magnetometer, VLF-EM.Type of Survey(s).

Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s) Armco Mineral Exploration Ltd.

Guibord Township

Survey Company H. E. Npal f, T.f-d .

Author of Report Peter R .Address of Author 5 425 Croydon Rd * Burlington, Ontario.n . T, . t c May 1980 to December 1980 Covering Dates of Survey- J

Total Miles of Line Cut_ 9.9(linecutting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISION? CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer^.—Radiometric——

DAYS per claim

2020

40

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne turveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

DATE:.

(enter dayi per claim)

SIGNATURE:.

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder


L

L

548507(number)

548508

548509

548510

548511

548512

548513

548514

548515

548516

548517

TOTAL CLAIMS LL


JND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey1

Number of Rtatinnc Magnetometer - 20A1 VLF-EM-968 Nnmhpr of Readings MAfl 2Q&1 Station int^l MAG 25*. BL50' ; VLF-EM 50*______Line sparing ^00*---——- Profile *™^ VLF-EM - l" to 20%_______________________^______Contour interval Magnetometer - 100——————————————————————————.

Instrument Scintrex MF-1 Fluxgate Magnetometer^—————...——.-———.

a

O

,, ,. f. .. 2 coils l vertical l horizontal Coil configuration — —f*

sS BID

O

Accuracy — Scale constant AO.5% from 1000 to 1Q,Q001 Scale ± 1.01 10 tOQO^ scale Diurnal correction method Reading l Baseline minus Reading 2 Baseline /No. Readings -j Base Station check-in interval (hours)—————2 to k___________________;-—-——-—.

progressive

Base Station location and value Baseline 4E, 28E, 4AE - 26Q , 320 , 210 , respectively.

Instrument Geonics EM-16

0 ., t . Not applicable. Coil separation ______LL——————± ^ resolution.. Accuracy

Method: E Fixed transmitter D Shoot back Q In line O Parallel line T7 T ft KH7f N.AiAii Cutler Main?

Parameters measured ____ In-rHase ____ Quad-pha

InstrumentScale constantCorrections made.

Base station value and location,

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ————————————————————————————————————————————— Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters - On time __________________________ Frequency —^^-.

-Offtime________________________ Range ———————— Delay time ——————————————————————————

g wPower.

— Integration time.

Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

42Ae8NEee40 63.3789 GUIBORD 030

n\ j^

REPORT ON

LINE CUTTING AND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PERFORMED ON

MAIN GROUP PROPERTY

GUIBORD TOWNSHIP

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

MATHESON AREA - ONTARIO

FOR


BY


H. E. NEAL 6. ASSOCIATES LTD.

TORONTO - CANADA

December, 1980


1.0 SUMMARY:

The geological survey was conducted by H.E. Neal tt Associates personnel

between July 6, 1980 and October 1980. The survey was conducted over

grids cut in the bush by contractors and H.E. Neal S Associates

personnel.

The survey located the Destor Porcupine fault zone on the property

as well as two other shear zones that appear to be favourable zones

for gold mineralization. In addition to the above, numerous areas of

carbonatization were located which should be sampled.

The resulting interpretation shows the area is mainly underlain by

intermediate to basic volcanics with some lensitic bands of sediments.

A large band of sediments composed of greywacke, argillite and con

glomerate was also located which has quartz carbonate veins and some

sulphide mineralization. The major Intrusive rocks in the area arei

gabbro, granite and syenite, as well as late diabase dykes.

The interpretation showed the property to have good potential for gold

mineralization.

- 2 -

2.0 INTRODUCTION;

The Main Claim Group was staked for Armco Mineral Exploration Ltd.

in December, 1979. The group consists of 59 contiguous claims. All

of the claims are being claimed for assessment. Crew for the work

consisted of a supervisor, geologist, 2 assistants and contract

linecutters. The claims were staked on the basis of favourable geology.

Linecutting and a geological survey were done to locate and evaluate

the presence of economic minerals. The grids were cut at 400* line

spacings except for grid #3 which was cut at 200* intervals. The

geological survey was conducted between July 6 and October, 1980, as

part of a larger survey conducted by H.E. Neal i Associates personnel

in Guibord Township.

- 3 -

3.0 THE PROPERTY;

The property consists of 59 contiguous claims. Fifty-one claims were

staked in December 1979 and June 1980 in Guibord Township and an additional

eight were staked by L. Blain of Noranda in .April of 1980. The 51 claims

listed below are held by Armco Mineral Exploration Ltd., P.O. Box 3000,

Guelph, Ontario:

L548521 to L548527 incl.

L548557 to L548581 incl.

L566919 to L566926 incl.

L566934 to L566944 incl.

The following claims are held by L. Blain:

L524846 to L524853 incl.

/

*

ONTARIOQUE.

t

\*

\TIMMINS'* 4

iGUIBORDTOWNSHIP

l

\

TORONTO WT- ^,^-r

HAMILTON ^.' -

KEY MAP100 ?00 30C

M.LES

H E NEAL a ASSOCIATES LTD

15477 ' 15480

GUIBORD

TOWNSHIP

HOLTYRE TOWNSITEI^MILES

PROPERTY LOCATIONCOOK TWP. SCALE

1 INCH TO 1/2 MILE

H.E. MEAL 8c ASSOCIATES LTD.

- 4 -


The fifty-nine claims are located in Guibord Township, District of

Cochrane in the Larder Lake Mining Division. All of the claims are

in lots 3 to 10 incl., Concessions I and li of Guibord Tovmship. The

west side of the claim group is l*s miles east of the Holtyre Townsite.

Access is by all terrain vehicle along a trail going east from Holtyre

along the boundary between Concessions l and II.

- 5 -

5.0 PREVIOUS WORK;

1947 - Gui For Gold Mines Limited drilled 720 feet in what is now

Claim L566941.

1947 - Weldon Gold Mines Limited conducted a magnetometer survey

over the area now covered by grid #2.

1951 - Dominion Gulf drilled 6 holes for a total of 3,047 feet in

the western end of grid #4.

1964 - Hollinger Consolidated Gold Mines conducted a magnetometer

survey over the area covered by grid #3 and part of grid //4.

1965-66 - Six drill holes by Hollinger for a total of 4419 feet were

drilled.

1974 - Noranda Exploration Company Limited conducted a magnetometer

and electromagnetic survey over the area covered by grid #3.

- 6 -

6.0 LINE CUTTING;

Grids l, 2 and 4 were cut by professional linecutters supplied by

G. Potter of Swastika, Ontario. Lines were cut at 400 foot intervals

on these grids.

Grid if3 was cut by H.E. Neal tt Associates personnel and had 200' lines

spacings. Lines 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42 and 46W on grid #1 were

cut by H.E. Neal S Associates Ltd. A total of 54 miles was cut.

- 7 -

7.0 GEOLOGY;

7.1 General Geology,


the Abitibi Sub-Province of the Superior Province. The township and

surrounding region is underlain by a complex mix of volcanics,

sedimentary and plutonic rocks.

The major structural feature in the area is the Destor-Porcupine fault

zone which crosses the township in a northwest-southeast direction.

The direction and extent of movement along the fault is not known.

The fault zone varies in dip from nearly vertical to 45 south

(Prest 1951).

The strata face south on the south side of the fault and north on the

north side of the fault. The rocks have irregularly shaped contacts

but generally strike northwest-southeast.

The second major structural feature is the Pipestone fault zone which

lies north of Destor-Porcupine fault. The Pipestone fault joins up with

the Destor-Porcupine fault east of Guibord Township.

Cross faulting is common in a NNE to north direction. Due to the amount

of overburden the extent of these faults is not known.


CKXO2O1C Table of Formations

RECENT AND PLEISTOCENE: IVat; river and lake deposits; sand dunes; Iwach sand and gravel;varved clay; glacial outwash sand and gravel; till groundmoraine).

rur.CAMBRIAXMATACHEWAN(?): Diabase; quartz diabase, and porphyritic phases.ALGOMAN: Granite, gxirphyritic granite; syenite, porphyritic syenite;

feldspar porphyry, quam-feldspar porphyry; lamprophyre; carbonate bodies, veins, etc.

BASIC INTRUSIVE?: Diorite, gabbro, diabase, and their quartz-bearing equivalents;peridotite; basic intrusive breccia.

VOLCANICS A\K SEDIMENTS•Acidic volcanics, iiirhnliiiR flows and related intrusive*; sphcroi-

SOUTIIKRX VOLCANICS ASH Si:i)tut:sTs:

dal and snherulitic rli)olitc, coarse and fine pyroclastics and bedded tuffs.

Intermediate lo basic volcanics, including pillow lavas, minorspheroidal lavas, anil fr.itiiuentals; talc-citlorilc KCJiist; inter bedded chert.

Sediments: conglomerate, greywacke, arkose, quartzite, and argillite.

NOKTIIKKN \'UI.CANICS: Dacitic to basaltic luvas and related rocks, including lavas, spheroidal lavas, aclinoliti/ed volcanics, and talc-chlorite

NORTIIKKS SHUMKNTS: Greywacke, quartzite. ar^Mlite; minor arkose, conglomerate, and imr.iforiiKuion.il

from Prest 1951.

- 8 -

which covers most of the township to outwash sand and gravel in the

east-central and northeast part of the township. These surficial

deposits are underlain by ablation and lodgement till which tend to

be more sandy and less sorted.

7.2 Geology of the Claim Group

The interpretation is based on outcrop evidence from the survey and

from magnetic interpretation where no outcrop was located.

7.2.1 Sediments

The sediments in the claim group consist of greywacke, conglomerate,

argillite and arkose. These rocks most frequently occur as thin

irregular bands and lenses between volcanic and intrusive rocks. Only

one band of sedimentary rocks can be traced with confidence from the

east end of the property to the north part of grid #1, line 24W. In

the west this band of sediment is predominantly greywacke and argillite

with very little conglomerate. This zone is highly sheared. To the

east the rocks are mostly composed of greywacke, arkose and conglomerate.

These rocks are not as sheared probably due to the rock being more

competent because of the presence of more clastic type rocks. The grey

wacke is massive to thinly bedded in the east end and relatively

undisturbed since primary sedimentary features are still existent. The

rock is buff grey on the weathered surface and dark grey to black on the

fresh surface.

- 9 -

The argillite is seen only at the west end of the sedimentary band and it

is a black shaley rock containing much pyrite.

The arkose occurs only in the east end and is pink on the fresh surface to

buff coloured when weathered. Bedding is generally massive although

argillaceous layers show some shearing and are thinly bedded.

The conglomerate is a polymictic rock with clasts up to 6". The clasts are

elongate to round and are in a greywacke matrix. Clasts are composed of

volcanic, granitic, gabbroic and sedimentary rocks. The elongation is in

the direction of strike and since shearing is in this direction may be

a result of this.

The band of sediments is 500* wide in the west and reaches widths of

1200' in the east.

Pyrite is the most common sulphide present with some chalcopyrite

The band has much quartz/carbonate veining throughout. These veins

range in size from .5 inches to one foot with some sulphide mineralization

along the borders.

7.2.2 Intermediate to Basic Lavas

These are the most common rock types in the claim group. They range from

andesitic to gabbroic composition. The pillowed variety is relatively

thin (20* to SO 1 ) compared to the more massive gabbroic lavas. Pillows

show tops facing south in all cases where the rock type was observed on

- 10 -

the property and average about 1.5 to 2 feet in diameter.

The massive gabbroic lava is fine to medium grained and shows considerable

thickness. These rocks are difficult to distinguish from the gabbro

intrusives. The major difference is grain size and the gabbros are

more magnetic containing both magnetite and pyrrhotite. The gabbroic

lavas are less magnetic or non-magnetic containing mostly pyrite as an

accessory mineral. These rocks are relatively underformed except south

of the baseline on grid M where they have been sheared with extensive

quartz carbonate veining occurring. Where shearing has occurred between

lines 16W and 40W north of the baseline some of the adjacent intermediate

volcanics have been carbonatized. The volcanics have been extensively

altered in the vicinity of the Destor-Porcupine fault and are altered

to talc chlorite schist and carbonate rock.

7.2.3 Rhyolite and Spheroidal Rhyolite

Rhyolite occurs on the property in outcrop on grid if l, north of the

baseline between lines 20W and 40W. Magnetometer data indicates that the

unit is faulted out between two gabbro intrusives by line 12W. The

rhyolite is spherulitic in places and sheared. Quartz carbonate veining is

common. Pyrite and chalcopyrite are disseminated throughout the rock

type.

The spheroidal lava is green in colour and occurs as a discontinuous band

in the shear zone. The rock contains glassy pea size spheres. The unit

is more sheared than the rhyolite and carbonatization is extensive.

\

- 11 -

The band of spheroidal lava in the large outcrop area at the south end of

line 4W grid //l is relatively underformed and has little veining or

fracturing.

7.2.4 Gabbro

Most of this rock type is seen on the west end of grid #1 in the large

outcrop area and south where large numbers of outcrop occur. These

correspond to magnetic highs. To the east shearing and the presence of

pyrrhotite in the mafic lavas cause linear magnetic highs to occur in the

lavas and the magnetic distinction is not as clear. The gabbro is a medium

to coarse grained intrusive rock containing pyroxene, hornblende and

plagioclase, pyrite and pyrrhotite. The fresh surface has a dark green to

black appearance while weathered surfaces are a brown to grey colour.

These rocks are nearly indistinguishable from the gabbroic lavas and unless

actually seen in outcrop they are not plotted as gabbro on the map.

7.2.5 Granitic Rocks

The granite and granite porphyry occur in two places on the claim group.

The outcrop at 18N line 12W grid //l appears to be a small localised plug.

It is a quartz porphyry with pink feldspar. It is a small outcrop and

likely intruded into a zone of weakness along the shear.

The second outcrop is located from 8W to west of 12W on grid if3 south

of the baseline. The outcrop is megacrystic granite consisting of coarse

grained quartz and feldspar.

- 12 -

Syenite is not seen in outcrop on the property but does occur on

NW^i 5*5 Lot 5 Con. 2 as small intrusive bodies south of the Des tor-

Porcupine fault. Drilling by Hollinger in 1964 show it to occur north

of the Destor-Porcupine fault. This coincides with a magnetic low and

it can be assumed that larger bodies of syenite do occur on the claim

block.

7.2.6 Diabase

This rock type occurs as numerous small dykes throughout the claim block.

The trend of these dykes is generally north-south or northwest-southeast.

Exceptions occur where the dykes intersect shear zones or other zones of

weakness. The dykes tend to parallel these zones for short distances

before cutting across. These are the youngest rock types in the area

and were seen cutting all other rock types. All of the diabase dykes

in the claim group are fine to medium grained and are easily recognized

by the blocky jointing.

7.2.7 Carbonate Rock

This rock type occurs only on grid #3 where three small outcrops are

located. The rock is a result of carbonate alteration of the bedrock

within the Destor-Porcupine. The unit is not continuous. Two varieties

exist in the claim group.

The first variety is a green, micaceous unit that is soft and contains

some pyrite. Chlorite is common. The second variety is reddish, hard

- 13 -

and siliceous and contains abundant pyrite and chalcopyrite. All rock

types in the vicinity have been carbonatized in the area of the fault

zone to varying degrees.

7.2.8 Surficial Geology

Pleistocene silts and clays overlay about 9(^ of the claim block.

The silt and clay was only seen in section along the Little Pike River

and is about 5 feet thick. Sand and gravel underlay most of the clay.

Organic swamp deposits occur everywhere on the claim block due to low

relief and resulting poor drainage.

7.3. Structure

The rock, types where seen in the claim group are without exception

facing south. The rocks strike in a northwest-southeast direction except

to the east where the strike changes to due east-west. The Destor-Porcupine

fault is well marked in outcrop and geophysics and trend south-east.

Other shears parallel to strike are found in outcrop north of the baseline

in grid //l. The northern most shear is composed of a band of sediments

which likely formed a zone of incompetent rocks compressed between more

competent gabbro and volcanics. Pyrite and other sulphides are common

in this zone. The shear can be traced the length of the property but the

amount of shearing lessens to the east.

The southern shear appears to be a zone of less competent volcanics between

two gabbro intrusives. This also is parallel to strike but has a much

- 14 -

shorter duration. It appears to be faulted out around 16W on grid 1.

This is also a zone with abundant pyrite and chalcopyrite.

Cross cutting faults in a northerly direction were seen in outcrop in a

few places but generally are inferred from the magnetic survey. Where

seen in outcrop they are rusty zones a few feet to about 20 feet wide

often accompanied by a breccia zone. Movement appears to be right

handed. The location of all of these faults is shown on the

accompanying maps.

- 15 -

8.0 CONCLUSION:

The geological survey located the Destor-Porcupine fault zone as well

as two secondary shear zones running parallel to it. As shear zones

are favourable zones for economic minerals more work should be conducted

in these areas. The survey also located areas of quartz-carbonate

veining which should be sampled.

As well as providing the above information the survey and resulting

interpretation gave a reasonable explanation for some of the magnetic

anomalies and VLF conductors. The results were a tentative geological

map for the claim group.

l Peter G. Atherton B.Se.t

Ontario



File.



Type of Survey(s).Magnetometer, Electromagnetic

Township or Area Guibord TownshipClaim Holder(s) Armco Mineral Exploration Ltd. and

L. Blain.H.E. Neal S Associates Ltd.

Author of Report Peter G. AthertonAddress of Author 5425 Crovdon Rd. Burlington, Ontario. Covering Dates of Survey May 1980 to December 1980

(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line fint 54.0—^-—.—--—--.--^———--


ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic—20.—Magnetometer.——2Q—Radiometric——————Other———————-

DAYS per claim

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne turveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

DATE:.

(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE: Peter

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys


MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSEDLUt numerically

See attached list(number)

• OTl

TOTAL CLAIMS.


GROUND SURVEYS — I f more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey"^

Niimhpr of Stations Magnetome ter 10.577 VLF 4900 Nnmher of Rf-aHinasMaimetometer 10.577 VLF4

INDUCED POLARIZATION

UH WC

16

1H U

f-H

OdO

i*

^ h*—V.

X

Station interval Magnetometer 25"' VLF SO L ine sparing Grid tfl f 2 t4 (400') Grid

Profile scale 1" to ±40% f or VLF

Contour interval Magnetometer 10Q y contour interval

Scintrex MF-1 Fluxgate MagnetometerInstrument

Armory Scalp constant ±0.5% 100 tO 10.000 ± l .OX 10 f OOO

ninrnal correction method Baseline reading 1 - baseline reading 27K[o readings - ..* 8

#3 (20

s i vettu J vat tuitsu u

Base Station ch^rk-in interval (hours). ..,2 to4

Race Station loration and value Grid M - PL 00 r Grld ^2 BL 00 f Grid #3 BL 49+50WGrid #4 15+50N 12E (secondary base stations at 800 l Interval along each baselinebetter control) Note all points relative to Grid j?2 BL 00 values - Grid til 450 —— Grid #2 410 Grid jP3 970 Grid #4 550Instrument f^onJcfi EM-16^ ., r. ,. 2 coils 1 vertical 1 horizontalCoil Configuration0 .. . Not applicable.Toil separation rr

A™,,^ i " resolution.

Method: O Fixed transmitter Q Shoot back Q In line CD Parallel Frequency 17.8 KHZ NAA C"r ]|or. Maine

1 (ipecify V.L.F. nation) Pa ramblers measured . In-pbise Quad-phase

Instrument

Srale constant

f-orrrrtjons maHe

Basf station value and location , . ,,

Elevation accuracy.,. . . ..™. . , , , — . — ... — .... , .... ,

Instrument ,. ,.... ,. , . . —— ..,....,.,. —— ,.,Method D Time Domain D Frequency DomainParameters — On time . ,, ., Frequency

- Off tim^ Range

— Delay time .. ..,....... -,..,.. .,......- Integration time

Power

Electrode array. . — ...,.. . .

Electrode spacing .Tvne of electrode , ....., — — ...,. —, -

for

line

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED

L-548521 L-548522 L-548523 L-548524 L-548525 L-548526 L-548527

L-548557 L-548558 L-548559 L-548560 L-548561 L-548562 L-548563 L-548564 L-548565 L-548566 L-548567 L-548568 L-548569 L-548570 L-548571 L-548572 L-548573 L-548574 L-548575 L-548576 L-548577 L-548578 L-548579 L-548580 L-548581

L-566919 L-566920 L-566921 L-566922 L-566923 L-566924 L-566925 L-566926

L-566934 L-566935 L-566936 L-566937 L-566938 L-566939 L-566940 L-566941 L-566942 L-566943 L-566944

L-524846 L-524847 L-524848 L-524849 L-524850 L-524851 L-524852 L-524853

42A08NE0040 63.3789 GUIBORD 040

/ 7 X/-* /~ -

^' C^- ~" Q TREPORT ON

GEOPHYSICAL WORK

PERFORMED ON

MAIN GROUP PROPERTY

GUIBORD TOWNSHIP

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

MATHESON AREA - ONTARIO

FOR


BY


H. E. NEAL 6 ASSOCIATES LTD.

TORONTO - CANADA

December, 1980


1.0 SUMMARY:

A four man crew was engaged in geophysical surveys on the Main Property

in Guibord Township between March 17 and October 15, 1980.

Several VLF-EM conductors were located during the survey. Seven con

ductors were considered to be worth following up. They are describeds ~

in the conclusions.

The magnetometer survey was useful in outlining geological structure

as well as providing an explanation for some of the VLF conductors.

The survey located the presence of a geological complex area on grid //l

between lines 16W and 36W which was found to be a shear zone of

rhyolite and spheroidal lavas. The magnetic survey also indicated the

probable location of the Destor-Porcupine fault zone.

These conductors and magnetic anomalous zones will be explored further

in 1981 in a more detailed survey.

- 2 -

2.0 INTRODUCTION!

The Main Claim Group was staked for Armco Mineral Exploration Ltd.

in December 1979. The group consists of 59 contiguous claims all of

which are being claimed for assessment. Crew for the work consisted

of a supervisor, one geologist and two instrument operators. The

claims were staked on the basis of favourable geology. Electromagnetic

and magnetic surveys were conducted in an effort to locate and evaluate

the presence of economic minerals. Surveys were conducted on a grid

with cross lines every 400' except grid #3 where cross lines were every

200*. The surveys were completed between March, 1980 and October,

1980 as part of larger survey in Guibord Township. Various check surveys

were done throughout the summer months. Claim L548567 is being

submitted for magnetometer survey only.

- 3 -

3.0 THE PROPERTY;

The property consists of 59 contiguous claims. Fifty-one claims were

staked in December, 1979 and June, 1980 in Guibord Township and an

additional eight were staked by L. Blain of Noranda in April of 1980.

The 51 claims listed below are held by Armco Mineral Exploration Ltd.,

P.O. Box 3000, Guelph, Ontario:

L548521 to L548527 incl.

L548557 to L548581 incl.

L566919 to L566926 incl.

L566934 to L566944 incl.

The following claims are held by L. Blain:

L524846 to L524853 incl.

t

4

ONTARIOQUE.

TORONTO

HAMILTON ^^i \

KEY MAP100 POO 30C

M.LFS

H E NEAL a ASSOCIATES LTD

- 4 -


The fifty-nine claims are located in Guibord Township, District of

Cochrane in the Larder Lake Mining Division. All of.the claims are in

lots 3 to 10 incl., Concessions I and II of Guibord Township. The

west side of the claim group is 1*5 miles east of the Holtyre Townsite.

Access is by all terrain vehicle along a trail going east from Holtyre

along the boundary between Concessions I and II.

I54T7 ' 15480- - - H- - -

L (P)l L (P GUIBORD

TOWNSHIP

556JO ' 566942l *' T ' - l i l.—'— J . . - - - - x

HOLTYRE TOWNSITEI^MILES

PROPERTY LOCATIONCOOK TWP. SCALE

1 INCH TO 1/2 MILE

H.E. MEAL 6t ASSOCIATES LTD.

- 5 -

5.0 PREVIOUS WORK;

1947 - Gui For Gold Mines Limited drilled 720 feet in what is now

Claim L566941.

1947 - Weldon Gold Mines Limited conducted a magnetometer survey

over the area now covered by grid #2.

1951 - Dominion Gulf drilled 6 holes for a total of 3,047 feet in

the western end of grid #4.

1964 - Hollinger Consolidated Gold Mines conducted a magnetometer

survey over the area covered by grid #3 and part of grid #4.

1965-66 - Six drill holes by Hollinger for a total of 4419 feet were

drilled.

1974 - Noranda Exploration Company Limited conducted a magnetometer

and electromagnetic survey over the area covered by grid #3.

- 6 -

6.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY;

The rocks in the Guibord Township area are Archean in age and belong

to the Abitibi-Sub-Province of the Superior Province. The township

and surrounding region is underlain by a complex mix of volcanic,

sedimentary and plutonic rocks. The major structural feature in the

area is the Destor-Porcupine fault zone which crosses the township

in a northwest-southeast direction. Direction and extent of movement

along the fault is not known. The fault zone varies in dip from nearly

vertical to 45O South (Prest 1951).

The strata face south on the south side of the fault and face north on

the north side of the fault. The rocks have irregularly shaped contacts

but generally strike northwest-southeast.

The Pipestone fault is located north of the Destor-Porcupine fault. It

is a major shear that joins up with the Destor-Porcupine fault zone east

of Guibord Township.

Cross faulting is common in a NNE to north direction. Due to the amount

of overburden the extent of these faults is not known.


which covers most of the township to outwash sands and gravels in the

east-central and northeast part of the township.

For more detailed geology of the claim group see the geological report

of the claim group.

- 7 -

7.0 GEOPHYSICS;

7.1 Magnetic Survey

The magnetic survey was carried out by M. Greer, M. Eastwood and P.

Atherton between March 17, 1980 and October 15, 1980. Weather conditions

and job related activities prevented continuous work on the property.

The survey was conducted on four grid systems due to changing strike in

bedrock. Grids l, 2 and 4 were at 400* line spacings while grid #3 had

200' line spacings. Due to extremely wet conditions complete coverage

of some claims was not possible. This will be finished after freeze-up.

Readings were recorded at 25' intervals along cross lines and at 50'

intervals along the base lines. The main base station was at 00 on

grid #2 and all subsequent readings were taken relative to that station.

Secondary base stations were established relative to 00 grid #2 every 1600*

along each baseline and at common points between grids.


The instrument used was a Fluxgate magnetometer, Model MF.l manufactured

by Scintrex Limited. It has an accuracy of iO.5% from the 1000 to 10,000

gamma scale and an accuracy of ±1.02 at scales greater than 10,000 gammas.

The fluxgate magnetometer measures the strength of the vertical component

of the total magnetic field. The resulting value is given in gammas.

- 8 -

The magnetic field at any given station will consist of the sum of the

earth's magnetic field and the magnetic field of the bedrock at that

point. The magnetic field of the bedrock is dependent on the con

centration of naturally magnetic minerals in the bedrock or minerals

capable of possessing a secondary field which is induced by the earth's

primary magnetic field.

7.1.2 The Survey

The survey was conducted as described in the previous section. The

base stations were established relative to each other so that even

though different base stations were used, all stations recorded on the

grid could be plotted relative to each other. Base stations were read

four times daily. In addition to the four base stations all other base

line stations were taken relative to the base stations to eliminate

the need for more frequent checks.

Due to the fluctuations in the earth's magnetic field it is necessary

to take frequent base station readings. Any apparent changes in the

magnetic Intensity that occur during the time interval between baseline

checks is then applied as a progressive adjustment to the readings taken

during that period of time.

The contoured results of the magnetic survey aid in the determination of

strike, dip, location and shape of a magnetic body.

- 9 -


The VLF-EM survey was carried out by R.Risto, M. Eastwood and M. Greer

between March 17, 1980 and October 15, 1980. This was part of the overall

exploration program conducted by H.E. Neal i Associates Ltd. in Guibord

Township. The survey was conducted over the same grid system as the

magnetometer survey, Readings were recorded at 50* intervals and

recorded as facing north. The VLF transmitting station used was NAA

Cutler, Maine, which has a transmitting frequency of 17.8 KHZ.


The instrument used in the survey was a Geonics EM16 VLF-EM. The

sensitivity of the In-phase is ±150% and Quad-phase is 1405K. The

instrument has a resolution of ±1JL The Geonics EM-16 has an operating

range of 15 to 25 KH? VLF operating band.

The EM16 is a sensitive reciver which measures the vertical field

components of secondary magnetic fields caused in the following manner.

The VLF transmitting stations have a vertical antenna with a vertical

antenna current. This creates a concentric-horizontal magnetic field

around each station. When the magnetic fields come in contact with

conductive bodies in the ground a secondary magnetic field radiates

from these bodies.

The receiver has two receiving coils with one coil having a vertical axis

- 10 -

and the other a horizontal axis. The signal from the vertical axis

coil is minimized by tilting the instrument which measures the vertical

real component as a percentage. The remaining signal is balanced out

by a measured percentage of a signal from the horizontal coil which gives

an accurate measure of the quadrature vertical signal. The measured

values are relative only.

The VLF station N.A.A., Cutler, Maine was chosen because it is in line.with

the strike of the rocks in the area. The results of a survey when

plotted as a profile show the location of various conductors in the

ground.

- 11 -

8.0 RESULTS;

8.1 Magnetic Survey

The magnetic survey outlined two distinct magnetic zones. The northern

zone occupies the northeast part of grid #1* all of grid #3 and most of

north part of grid //4. The survey outlined the extent of the Destor-

Porcupine fault zone. The best example of this is in claims L548565, L548568

and L548569. The fault zone can be traced from these clains northwest

through claim L548557 and southeast through clains L548522,L548523 and

L524848. The irregularities in the shape of the fault zone are probably

due to multiple shearing within the zone. This would explain the high

magnetic zone north of the baseline on grid #4.

Other magnetic highs in the north magnetic zone occur in claims L566941,

and L566934. These are due to southeast striking, diabase dykes which

are moderately magnetic. This explanation would account for the magnetic

highs in claims L548562, L548559 and L524853,

The southern magnetic zone occupies the remainder of grid til, all of grid #2

and the south part of grid #4., The zone shows a series of small linear

magnetic highs occurring in a zone of generally low magnetics. These

magnetic highs probably represent lensitic gabbro intrusives and gabbroic

lavas. These rock types have a large magnetite, pyrrhotite content

and would show up as magnetic highs.

The magnetic lows are probably a series of intermediate to mafic lavas,

felsic volcanics and sediments. The large exception in this zone starts

at line 92E, grid #2, between 11N and 15N and extends to line 48E, grid

#4 between 25S and 29S. This anomaly occurs over a sheared andesitic

- 12 -

lava with pyrite, pyrrhotite mineralization. The magnetic unit is

more subdued but can be traced as a distinct magnetic unit across the

zone in a northwest direction.

The magnetics also outline a structurally complex area between lines

16W and 36W on grid //l, north of the baseline. This anomalous area was

followed up and found to be a shear zone containing rhyolite and

spheroidal lavas. '

t


A large number of conductors were located by the VLF-EM survey. In the

south magnetic zone the conductors are mainly associated with magnetic

highs.

Cond uctors 80-1, 2 and 35 are located on grid #1. These conductors

are of short strike length and are associated with magnetic highs.

These conductors are quite strong and have good conductivity. Conductor

80-12 is located between lines O and 12E on grid #1, north of the baseline.

This is a weak conductor with fair conductivity and is associated with a

magnetic low. This conductor unlike the previous three is probably

associated with a graphitic zone in sediments. The other three conductors

are probably associated with sulphide rich volcanics.

Conductors 80-13, 14, 15, 17 and 22 are located on grid #2. Conductors

80-13, 14 and 17 are located on the contact between bands of low and

high magnetics. The conductors have moderate strength and good conductivity.

- 13 -

Conductors 80-15 and 80-22 are not associated with magnetic highs and

could be associated with graphitic conductors. These conductors have

moderate strength but low conductivity.

Conductor 80-24 is located on lines 36E and 44 E, on grid #4, 3100 feet

south of the baseline. This conductor has moderate strength and low

conductivity. It is located between two magnetic bands and may reflect

changes in conductivity only.

Conductors 80-26, 28, 29 and 30 are located north of the Destor-Porcupinet

fault zone. Conductors 80-28, 29 and 30 are probably part of the same

conductor. These conductors have good strength and good conductivity

and are not associated with any particular magnetic bodies. The

conductor cuts across both magnetic highs and lows and probably indicate

a mineralized shear zone.

Conductor 80-26 has moderate strength and fair conductivity. The con-

du.tor is associated with a magnetic low and is probably a graphitic shear.

Conductor 80-27 is similar to conductor 80-28 in strength and conductivity.

The magnetics indicate a more complex geological structure here and

the conductor could represent a mineralized shear zone.

Conductors 80-10, 11, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23 and 33 are due to outcrop ridges

or buried ridges and therefore are not true conductors.

Conductors 80-3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 16, 34 and 31 reflect changes in

conductivity such as between a sediment and volcanic. These are not true

conductors and will not be discussed further.

- 14 -

9.0 CONCLUSIONS:

The two surveys outlined several areas that require further investigation.

The best conductors are conductors 80-27, 28, 29, 30 and conductor 80-27.

These conductors do not seem to be associated with any particular magnetic

structure and could represent mineralized shears. Hore detailed work is

necessary over these conductors to establish more exact locations.

Extending grid //3 to the east would be necessary. Second priority

conductors would be 80-1, 2 and 35. These conductors are associated with

magnetic highs and further work would determine the exact nature of these

conductors. The rest of the conductors should be followed up as time and

budget permit.

The magnetic survey outlined a structurally complex area betwen 16W and

36W north of the baseline on grid #1. This is due to shearing as shown

in the geological survey. Further work is recommended for this area.


ntario



FUc.



Magnetometer, Electromagnetic

Guibord Township———————Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s) Armco Mineral Exploration Ltd. and

L. Blain.Survey Company H.E. Neal S Associates Ltd. Author of Report Peter G. AthertonAddress of Author 5425 Crovdon Rd, Burlington, Ontario. Covering Dates of Survey May 1980 to December 1980

(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line C.nt 54.0_____________:.————-


ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first ' survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical-Electromagnetic—20—Magnetometer.——^—Radiometric—————-Other________

DAYS per claim

Geological. 40

Geochemical.AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. -Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

DATE:.

(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE:. Peter t or Agent

Res. Geo!.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys



TOTAL CLAIMS.


more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Statics Magnetometer 10.577 VU 4900 Nnmher of RpaHingcMagnatomater 10,577 VLF49QI

Station interval Magnetometer if' VLF 5~D.———-—,Line sparing Grid #l t 2,4 (400M Grid #3 (2QQ*

Profile srale l" to ±40% for "VLF-—-—^.—————.——..^—---—-.-..-..^.-——^.-.--—.————^

Contour interval Magnetometer 100 fr contour interval-.——————.————-.————-—.^————-

Scintrex MF-1 Fluxgate MagnetometerV-.

p2C

uH

d

1 sw J w

HM

c* 0

Accuracy — ScaleDiurnal correction Base Station chec!Base Station locat Grid #4 15-r50Nb t; L L t: t couLzulGrid #2 410 Instrument GeCoil configuration Coil separationAccuracy...."Method: Frequency. 17.8

Parameters measu

Instrument

Scale constantCorrections made

Base station value

Elevation accuracy

rnnstant iO.5% 100 tO 10 r OOO ± 1 .02 10 r OOO

met hod Baseline reading 1 - baseline reading 2 /No readings - ,J ** WUdi 1*

\f.'m interval (hours) 2 to 4

inn and value Grid J?l - BL 00 f Grid if2 BL 00, Grid #3 RL 49+50W12E (secondary base stations at 800 l interval along each baseline for

) Note all points r t; li t i ve to Grid Ir 2 BL 00 values ~ Grid vi 450 Grid J3 970 Grid #4 550nnffifi F.M-16

2 coils 1 vertical 1 horizontalNot applicable.

resolution.

ED Fixed transmitter O Shoot back Q In line Q Parallel line

' (ipecify V.L.F. nation) red Xn~phd6^ Ouad~*phfi60

'

and Inratinn

f ,....... . . ..-.—.. — " ,.,,. ,.——, ' . ,.,,,. — . ' ' . —— ——— ..

Wu

Instrument ————————— Method D Time Domain Parameters — On time ———

— Off time ———— Delay time —-—— Integration time.

D Frequency Domain _ Frequency ____ _ Range———————

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED

L-548521 L-548522 L-548523 L-548524 L-548525 L-548526 L-548527

L-548557 L-548558 L-548559 L-548560 L-548561 L-548562 L-548563 L-548564 L-548565 L-548566 L-548567 L-548568 L-548569 L-548570 L-548571 L-548572 L-548573 L-548574 L-548575 L-548576 L-548577 L-548578 L-548579 L-548580 L-548581

L-566919 L-566920 L-566921 L-566922 L-566923 L-566924 L-566925 L-566926

L-566934 L-566935 L-566936 L-566937 L-566938 L-566939 L-566940 L-566941 L-566942 L-566943 L-566944

L-524846 L-524847 L-524848 L-524849 L-524850 L-524851 L-524852 L-524853

42A06NEB040 63.3789 GUIBORD

524856

524855

524854

L 48 E

'

O Z OO

LOT 4 LOT 3

11 0 W

Mag.

LEGEND

Diabase

aj Granite fit Granite Porphyry b) Syenitec] Lamprophyre

Gabbro

aj Rhyolite b) Spheroidal Rhyolite

Intermediate A Basic Lava a) Gabbroic Phaseb) Pillow lava

Sediments

Carbonate Rock

SYMBOLS

Outcrops

Strike 6 Dip

Schistosity

Fault - known, assumed

Quartz Carbonate Vein

Pillow Lava, indicating tops

Geological Contact (inferred)

Claim postClaim Line

TrailRiver or Lake

Creek (seasonal]Topography and Vegetation Boundary

Poplar bush

Spruce Bush

Tag Alder and/or Swamp

Beaver Dam

KEY MAP

\

fe

- ""

COOK TWP. M. 339

ARMCO MINERAL

EXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

GEOLOGICAL MAP

LOT 3&4' 1 CONC.

GUIBORD TOWNSHIP' DISTRICT OF COCHRANE

200 200 400 600 FEET

1 INCH TO 200 FEET

H.E. NEAL AND ASSOCIATES LTD.TORONTO CANADA

DRAWN BY; B.A.C.

APPROVED BY: H.E.N.

DRAWING No;80-2-1-3,4

DATE; NOV. 1980

LOT 6LOT 5

11 0 W

Mag.

LEGEND

Diabase

a) Granite S Granite Porphyry b) SyenitecJ Lamprophyre

Gabbro


Intermediate S Basic Lava a) Gabbroic Phaseb) Pillow Lava

Sediments

Carbonate Rock

SYMBOLS

Outcrops

Strike 8* D ip

Schistosity

Fault - known, assumedQuartz Carbonate Vein

Pillow Lava, indicating topsGeological Contact (inferred]

Claim post

Claim Line

Trail

River or Lake

Creek [seasonal)Topography and Vegetation Boundary

Poplar bush

Spruce Bush


Beaver Dam

KEY MAP

TC|WNSITE

I

COOK T WP. M. 339

ARMCO MINERAL EXPLORATION LTD

GUIBORD PROJECT

GEOLOGICAL MAP

LOTS5&6 CONC.b- '

GUIBORD TOWNSHIP DISTRICT OF COCHRANE

200 200 400 600 FEET

1 INCH TO 200 FEET


DRAWN BY; B.A,C. APPROVED BY; H.E.N.

DRAWING No;80-2-1-5,6

D-ATE; NOV. 1980

L 12 E L 20 EL 28 E

42A0BNE0040 63.37S9 GUIBORD 220

LOT 8 . ___L. LOT 7

Oz O O

V

*

11 0 W

Mag.

LEGEND

Diabase

a) Granite fi Granite Porphyry bJ Syenitec) Larfiprophyre

Gabbro


Intermediate S Basic Lava a) Gabbroic Phaseb) Pillow lava

Sediments

Carbonate Rock

SYMBOLS

Outcrops

Strike A Dip

Schistosity



Pillow Lava, indicating tops Geological Contact (inferred)

Claim post

Claim Line

TrailRiver or Lake

Creek (seasonal)Topography and Vegetation Boundary

Poplar bush

Spruce Bush


Beaver C.un

KEY MAP

X.H..

HOlilt/RE TCJWNSITE : Vl

x.

T ' fi

I

COOK TWP. M. 339


GUIBORD PROJECT

GEOLOGICAL MAP

200

TIE

LOT 7S.8 CONC,GUIBORD TOWNSHIP

DISTRICT OF COCHRANE

O 200 400

1 INCH TO 200 FEET

600 KFET

H.E. NEAL AND ASSOCIATES LTD TORONTO CANADA

DRAWN BY; B.A.C. APPROVED BY; H.E.N.

DRAWING No. 80-2-I-7

DATE; NOV. 1980

42A0BNE0040 63.3789 GUIBORD 230 LOT 4LOT 3

6

V

7

11 C W

Mag

LEGEND

Diabase

a) Granite d Granite Porphyry b) Syenitec) Lamprophyre

Gabbro

a] Rhyolite b) Spheroidal Rhyolite

Intermediate

Sediments

Basic Lava a^Gabbroic Phase b) Pillow lava

Carbonate Rock

SYMBOLS

Outcrops

Strike d Dip

Schistosity





Claim post

Claim Line

Trail

River or Lake

Creek [seasonal]

Topography and Vegetation Boundary

Poplar bush

Spruce Bush


Beaver Dam

KEY MAP

COOK TWP. M. J39

ARMCO MINERAL

EXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

GEOLOGICAL MAP

LOT S&4 CONC. IIGUIBORD TOWNSHIP


!'(M) l)

l M t-l M Ul M

1 It O

1 INCH TO 200 FEET


DRAWN BY: B.A,C.

APPROVED BY: H.EN.

DRAWING No:80-2-11-3,4

DATE: NOV. 1980

GRID # 3

42A08NE0040 63.3769 GUIBORD S40LOT 6 LOTS

v

9

tM.

1 1 W

LEGEND

Diabase

a) Granite 8* Granite Porphyry b] Syenitec) Lamprophyre

Gabbro

a) Rhyolite b) Spheroidal Rhyolite

Intermediates Basic Lava a) Gabbroic Phaseb) Pillow lava

Sediments

Carbonate Rock

SYMBOLS

Outcrops

Strike A Dip

Schistosity





Claim post

Claim Line

Trail

River or Lake


Poplar bush

Spruce Bush


Beaver Dam

KEY MAP

ARMCO MINERAL

EXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

GEOLOGICAL MAP

LOT 5&G CONC, l i GUIBORD TOWNSHIP

DISTRICT OP COCHRANE

200 O

H

200 400 600 FEETT

INC

H.E MEAL AND ASSOCIATES LTDTOHON l O CANADA

i Hi A W IN C No,80-2-11-5,6

DAT \ N OV. 1980

LOT 8LOT 7

X V V

LEGEND

Diabase

a) Granite A Granite Porphyry b) Syenitec) Lamprophyre

Gabbro

aJ Rhyolite b3 Spheroidal Rhyolite

Intermediate a Basic Lava a) Gabbroic Phaseb) Pillow Lava

Sediments

Carbonate Rock

SYMBOLS

Outcrops

Strike 3t Dip

Schistosity

Fault - known, assumedQuartz Carbonate Vein

Pillow Lava, indicating tops Geological Contact (inferred)

Claim pdst\

Claim Line

Trail

River or Lake


Poplar bush

Spruce Bush


Beaver Dam

KEY MAP

I4 3


GUIBORD PROJECT

GEOLOGICAL MAP

LOT 78,8 CONC. IIGUIBORD TOWNSHIP


1 INCH TO 200 FEET


DRAWN BY. B,A,C, APPROVED BY; H.E.N.

DRAWING No,80-2-11-7,8

DATL: NOV. 1980

LOT 10

V

7

1 1 'W

Mag.

LEGEND

Diabase

a) Granite S Granite Porphyry bJ Syenitec) Lamprophyre

Gabbro

a) Rhyolite b) Spheroidal Rhyolite

Intermediate^ Basic Lava a) Gabbroic Phaseb) Pillow lava

Sediments

Carbonate Rock

SYMBOLS

Outcrops

Strike 8. Dip

Schistosity





Claim post

Claim Line

Trail

River or Lake

Creek (seasonal)

Topography and Vegetation Boundary

Poplar bush

Spruce Bush


Beaver Dam

KEY MAP

TciWNSITE

In , i c 4 J

CO'OK TWP. M. 339

ARMCO MINERAL

EXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

GEOLOGICAL MAP

LOT 9&10 CONC.

GUIBORD T OWNSHIP DISTRICT OF COCHRANE

300 (l - 200 400

fltJ H M M 1-1 . F- " -; ~-^T"

l INCH TO 200 FEET

O O IT F T

H/E. NEAL AND ASSOCIATES LTD. TORONTO CANADA

DRAWN BY; B,A.C,

APPROVED BY; H.E.N.

DRAWING No:80-2-11-9,10

DATE: NOV. 1980

CONC. V

LOT 11 LOT 12

V V V

MM'

7-f

o 1 1 W

Mag.

LEGEND

Not Stragraphic Order

Mafic Intrusive

Mafic Volcanics

Intermediate Volcanics

Mixed Mafic Volcanics and Talc Schist

SYMBOLS

Outcrop

Strike S Dip

Schistosity

Fault- known, assumed

Carbonatized Rock

Pillow lav a indicating .t ops

Geological Contact (inferred]

Claim Post

Claim L ine

Township Road

Trail,;

Bridge

River

Creek (seasonal)

Gully

Slope of terrain

Topography, and Vegetation Boundary

Poplar bush

Spruce bush k

Tag alder and Swamp

Boavor dam

Tag Alder

KEY MAP

ARMCO MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITED

GUIBORD PROJECT

GEOLOGICAL MAP

LOT 11&12 CONC.

GUIBORD T OWNSHIP DISTRICT OF COCHRANE

IV

200 200 400 600 FEE"

1 INCH TO 200 FEET

H,E. NEAL AND ASSOCIATES LTD. TORONTO CANADA

DRAWN BY: M.M.G.

APPROVED BY: H.E.NDRAWING No:

80-2-IV-1 1,12DATE: SEPT. 19

Co

h

1 \ ' ' ~- — --"ir.0 10 O ~, 0 tf-iî m f"* -^ ê to-tp *o (D tr* --p-—-

^

4IH

4H

•B

~V^

\

\

S

xx ' ™'\

\ —

•^*.-. ôs— 7iOfd6Se~

*^5?oS8&-52^0•430-w4^0''

•1'K-•-IfcO-^0'ÔC•37037^-36o330

•370-35b~3lD

33d•^•3ô"VJc?i^•^50 "-250-23dZZO•2^0•2.1*-#3-^6•/go-f 3o-/9o•(W•i 70•/5"n-/8"/5"0

•t&Q./70— 'SO790•/se•?40-/aov/^•yô

• IffaL/7C

OZ O O

LOT 4 LOT 3

1 1 W

Mag

LEGEND

- over 3000 K

- 2500 y

- 2000 y- 1500 if

- 1000 Jf

- 500 r

- o v

SYMBOLS

Base Station (secondary B.S.every 800 ft.]

Contour Interval 100 y

INSTRUMENT

SCINTREX MF 1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER

KEY MAP

^'

4

TC WNSI1L

COOK TWP M, ;i39

EXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

GROUND MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

LOT S&4 CONC. l


?()0 l- - "

1 INCH TO 200 FEET

600 TLET

H.E. NEAL AND ASSOCIATES L TD. TORONTO CANADA

DRAWN BY; B.A.C APPROVED BY: H.E.N.

DRAWING No: 80-2-1-3,4

DATE: NOV. 1980

•T

42A08NE0040 63.3789 GUIBORD

LOT 6 LOT 5

1 1 W

Mag

LEGEND

- over 3000 Y

- 2500 J

- 2000V

- 1500 *

- 1000V

- 500 -i

- O r

SYMBOLS

Base Station (secondary B.S.every 800 ft.)

Contour Interval 100 *

INSTRUMENT


KEY MAP

COOK l WP M. :*39


GUIBORD PROJECT


LOT-5&6 CONC. l


t.UO"l

1 INCH TO 200 FEET

H.E. NEAL AND ASSOCIATES LTD. TORONTO CANADA

DRAWN BY. B.A.C

APPROVED BY; H.E.N.

DRAWING, No:80-2-1-5,6

DATE: NOV. 1980

i M

GRID

L 12 E L 20 EL 28 E

O~z. O O

63.3789 GUIBORD 300

LOT 8. - —L.

LOT 7

11

Mag

LEGEND

- over 3000 *

- 2500 it

- 2000v

- 1500 Y

- 1000 y

- 500*

- O f

SYMBOLS

Base Station Csecondary B.S.every 800 ft.)

Contour Interval 100 K

INSTRUMENT


KEY MAP

TOWNSITE

o?

Ii l

COOK TWP. M. 339


GUIBORD PROJECT


LOT 7&S CONC. lGUIBORD TOWNSHIP


200 O 200 400H h-- ~ —— - -~-^T

1 INCH TO 200 FEET

600 FEET

H.E. NEAL A ND ASSOCIATES L TD TORONTO CANADA

DRAWN BY: B.A,C, APPROVED 8Y: H.E.N,

DRAWING No:80-2-1-7,8

DATE: NOV. 1980

LEGEND

~ over 3000?

- 2500^

- 2000*

- 1500 *"

- 500 y

- OY

SYMBOLS


Contour Interval 100 X

INSTRUMENT


KEY MAP

ARMCO MINERAL

EXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT


M ) l S&4 . ,oNr; II

GUIBORD TOWNSHIP

80-2-11-3,4NOV. 1980

42A08NE0040 63.3789 GUIBORD 310

' i"'. ; t" r'

LOT 6

LEGEND

- over 3000 *

- 2500 y

- 2000 r

- 1500 *

- 1000 vi

- 500 y

- o y

SYMBOLS

Base Station [secondary S.S.every 800 ft.)

Contour Interval 100 Y

INSTRUMENT


KEY MAP

ARMCO MINERAL

EXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

GROUND MAGNETOMETERSURVEY

i o l 5&S CONC; It

GUIBORD TOWNSHIPois l nic r oi t;t;(;HR ANI

200c:

200 400 600 FE-ET

80-2-M-5.6NOV. 1980

42A08NEa040 63.3789 GUIBORD

LOT 7

LEGEND

L over 3000*

- 2500*

- 2000 r

- 1500 X

- 1000 if

- 500 *

- o if

SYMBOLS


Contour Interval 100 if

INSTRUMENT


KEY MAP

ARMCO MINERAL

EXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

GROUND MAGNETOMETER

SURVEYLOT 7&S ' CONC: I I

GUIBORD TOWNSHIPDIST RK: l Of COCHHANF

M i-i

H.F NE" Ai AND ASSOCIAll S LID

f"-; -\ '/; IN' . No

80-2-II-7.8M : i NOV. 1980

LOT 10 LOT 9

w

LEGEND

i ' '

- over 3000*

- 2500 *

- 2000*

- 1500*

- 1000v

- 500 i'

- O*

SYMBOLS

Base Station [secondary B.S.every 800 ft.]

Contour Interval 100 *

INSTRUMENT

SCrNTREX MF t FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER

KEY MAP

ARMCO MINERAL EXPLORATION LTD,

GUIBORD PROJECT


LOT 9&10 GONG I IGUIBORD TOWNSHIP

DISTRICT Of COCHRANE

-FTT-I Ul l-l

H.E NEAL A ND ASSOCIATES LTD,T O H C) N ( O C A N A D A

DRAWN BY. BAG 'DRAWING No, DA l K NOV. 1980 APPROVED BY. H L" N. 8 0-2-11-9,10 |

GONG. V

CONC. IV

L 20 EL 16 E

LEGEND

L 28 E L 32 E L 36 E

- over 4000 i

- 3500

- 3000

SYMBOLS

Base Station,

Contour interval 100-*

INSTRUMENT

SOINTREX MF 1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER

KEY MAP

-380 90

/oJ 050

-/060 ogo

JO GO

JO'30 /030

h f 05"0 /030 /060

350 — 32.0

ARMCO MINERAI EXPLORATION LIMITED

GUIBORD PROJECT


LOT 11&12 CONC. IV GUIBORD TOWNSHIP


1 INCH TO 200 FEET

H. E. MEAL A ND ASSOCIATES LTD. TORONTO CANADA

DRAWN BY: M.M.G. , APPROVED BY: H.E.N.

DRAWING No DATE: SEPT. 1984DLOT 12 CONC. Ill

42A0BNEC040 63.3789 GUIBORD

SYMBOLS

Quadrature

Vertical Scale: 1 }hoh

NAA Cutef. M*irrd

'KEY MAP

ARMCO MfNERALEXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

GROUND VLF ~ EM SURVEY

LOT S&4 CONC,GUIBORD TOWNSHIP


1 INCH TO 200 FEET


42A08NEa040 63.3789 GUIBORD

DRAWN BY: B.A.C

APPROVED BY; H.E.N.DATE: NOV, 1980

SYMBOLS

In-phase

Quadrature

Vertical Scale: l Inon^ *4'OX

INSTRUMENT

STATION: NAA Gulfeff Main*

KEY MAP

ARMCO MINERALEXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

EM SURVEYGROUND VLF

LOT 5&G - CONC.GUIBORD TOWNSHIP -



42A0BNEeC40 63.3789 GUIBORD

DRAWN BY; B.A.C APPROVED BY: H.E.N.

DATE: N OV. 1980

J t .

42AeaNE0a40 63.3789 GUIBORD380

LOT 8

L 12 E L 20 E

LOT 7

L 28

*:.- -.*-

! f

oz o o

Mag,

^IfrW*'*. -t -."t . '-T W ,

KEY MAP

CO'OK TWP. M, 339


GUIBORD PROJECT

GROUND VLF- EM SURVEY

LOT 7&S CONC.

GUIBORD TOWNSHIP


200 Oi t-j t^i "tr?-^ t-j

200 400 600 FEET

1 INCH TO 200 F EET

H.E. NEAL AND ASSOCIATES LTPTORONTO, CANADA

DRAWN BY; Q-A.C. APPROVED BY: H.E.N

DRAWING NO, DATE: N OV. 1980

Oz o o

1 1 W

W,i g

SYMBOLS

In-phase

Quadrature

Vertfeaf Scale: 1 fnc^i* 40X

©EONfOS EMtfi

STTAtlONl NAA ©011^ Maine17,3 kHz

KEY MAP

I

l WP M :*39

ARMGO MINERAL EXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

-VLF-- EM SURVEY

LOT S&4 , CONC. II

GUIBORD TOWNSHIPDISTRICT OF COCHRANE

1-1•1U O i. oo f frr s

1 INCH TO 200 FEET

H.E NEAL AND ASSOCIATES LTD.TORONTO CANADA-

DRAWN BY; 8,A C APPROVED BY; H.E.N.

DRAWING No; DATE: NOV. 1980

42A08NEa043 B3.37B9 GUIBORD

^f , . .u^.,^— i__3SC:

s--. :tt:

42AaBNE(S04ia 63.3789 G UIBORD 4(2)0 LOT 6

u w

V^rtfeal Scale; 1 4056

VLF^EM

3TAHON1 NAA

KEY MAP

i.i i (K i W l-' :m -* r

ARMCO MiNERAL EXPI.OBATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

LOT S&6 CONC. li GUIBORD TOWNSHIP

DISTRICT or COCHRANE:

200L-ta—ea—c7i..

200

l lNk.;H f O-.'OO f 1 ; Fi

400. 600

H.E NEAL AND ASSOCIATES LTD"" i;A.NAl)A

[JH A W N BY H A (; Al'h'ROVLO BV- H L

DRAWING "NO !)ATK N OV. 1980

\ -' r\ \ f'#^

SYMBOLS

Quadrature

Vertfeftf .Soata 1 fn*8i- -40*

EMM*

STATION: NAA

KEY MAP

.COOK TWP M. 339

ARMCO MINERALEXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT

GROUND VLF - EM SURVEY

LOT 7ft8 CONC, tl•Qtirifi


INCH TO 200 FEET

H.E, NEAL A ND ASSOCIATES LTD. TORONTO - CANADA

42A08NE004CI 63.3789 GUIBORD

DRAWN BY: B.A.C. APPROVED 8Y; H.E.N,

DRAWINQ-NO DATE: NOV. 1980

Quadrature

KEY MAP

HOt &RE TC WNSITE

: COOK TWP M. 339

ARMCO MINERAi.EXPLORATION LTD.

GUIBORD PROJECT


LOT 9&10 CONC. M

GUIBORD TOWNSHIPDISTRICT OF COCHRANE

i INCH TO 200 FEET

H.E. NEAL AND ASSOCIATES LTD,TORONTO CANADA42A08NE0e40 63.3789 GUIBORD

DRAWN BY; B,A C, APPROVED BY; H E.N.

DATE: NOV. 1980

CONC. V

lrCONC. IV

Oo p ^

11 0 W

Mag,

SYMBOLS

n-phase

Quadrature

Vertical Scale; 1 inch: ± 20%

INSTRUMENT

GEONICS EM 16 VLF-EM

STATION; NAA Cutler, Maine.

Frequency 17.8 kHz

VLF-CONDUCTOR: — — —

KEY MAP

ARMCO MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITED

GUIBORD PROJECT


LOT 11&12 CONC. IV GUIBORD TOWNSHIP


200 200 400 600 FEET

t INCH TO 200 FEET

H. E. NEAL AND ASSOCIATES LTD. TORONTO . CANADA

DRAWN BY: M..M.G. APPROVED BY; H.E.N.

DRAWING No:8Q-2-IV-11J2

DATE: SEPT. 1980

42A0BNE0040 63.3789 GUIBORD

rpt on geol work & linecutting performed on road prop

Documents