roundtable 2015: jim bernard

16
August, 2015 Jim Bernard, SVP Digital Value of Viral Traffic: A Case Study

Upload: leap-media-solutions-llc

Post on 10-Feb-2017

868 views

Category:

Marketing


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

August, 2015

Jim Bernard, SVP Digital

Value of Viral Traffic: A Case Study

Page 2: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

2|

Unique Visitor Growth

“The unique visitor number tells one story quite well—and begs another.

What is the business value of that traffic increase? How’s it doing in

monetizing those new readers?”

Ken Doctor, Is the Washington Post closing in on the Times?

http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/media/2015/08/8573545/washington-post-closing-times

Page 3: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

3|

Eagle/Lion Case Study

Page 4: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

4|

• Eagle

Page 5: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

5|

The Eagle

• Dramatic picture of Eagle in local veterans cemetery was covered by staff columnist and then caught viral attention twice. The first wave was on publishing in 2011 and the second was independent viral activity on Facebook in 2015.

• Three or four assets: stories, follow up stories, one photo

• Reach: 1M visitors for 1.5m pv total

• Round 1 (2011) -- 300k visitors for 500k pv

• Round 2 (2015) -- 700k visitors for 1M pv

Page 6: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

6|

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

Jun-11 Dec-11 Jun-12 Dec-12 Jun-13 Dec-13 Jun-14 Dec-14 Jun-15

Pag

e V

iew

s

Total Facebook

FB 51K, 16%

FB 633K, 70%

Page 7: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

7|

• Lion

Page 8: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

8|

The Lion

• Local (to us) dentist and game hunter kills famous lion in Zimbabwe and outrage explodes including local protests. Over the course of a week the story evolves.

• Dozens of assets: articles, photo galleries, videos, “Google bombs”

• Reach: 800k visitors on 1.5M pageviews

Page 9: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

9|

Entry on Story97% 77%

Non - Minnesota

99% 92%

Facebook

75% 7%

Google37%3%

Page 10: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

10|

Handset

74% 34%

Non-Subscriber

1% 92%

Page 11: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

11|

Relative incremental advertising value of Lion and EagleIndexed to “normal” advertising value of 100

83

97

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Page 12: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

12|

9

82

-

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Relative incremental circulation value of Lion and EagleIndexed to “normal” circulation value of 100

Page 13: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

13|

140

All deviceAverage

Index 100

20110

REVENUE PER VISIT

350

340

Sub All deviceAverage 280

350

REVENUE PER SUBSCRIBER VISIT

160270

Non Sub All deviceAverage 70

100

350

REVENUE PER NON-SUBSCRIBER VISIT

1070

Relative visit value of ST trafficIndexed to average visit value of 100, June 2015

Page 14: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

14|

Observations

• Not all traffic is created equal: we should invest where we create the most business value.

• Subscriber engagement and handset monitization are foundation layers and impact both viral and core revenue potential.

• Non-core viral audience is less profitable but still incrementally helpful.

• Facebook is a handset game, so all solutions (aud growth, FB instant, etc) should be seen in the light of handset revenue (which is poor).

Page 15: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

15|

Subscriptions and ad services are driving digital revenueDisplay revenue under pressure due to less inventory, lower yield;

growth coming from direct consumer and marketing services.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 ROY

Display Ads Adv Services Circulation

Page 16: ROUNDTABLE 2015: Jim Bernard

16|16|

Jim Bernard

SVP, Digital

[email protected]

@bernardjim