rough cut 2analysis: credits

Updating Title Sequence Credits

Rough Cut 2 Analysis: Credits

Omar Marah

Rough Cut 1: Credits

In the original title sequence the credits shown on screen were very poorly done.
As you can see, there is a complete neglect in the appropriate crediting of roles such as director, actors, photography etc.
This is very crucial in our title sequence as it follows the generic codes of film in the media industry as well as provides the viewers with information they may need. In addition the typography is not very visually appealing, the colour is not very visible and does not attract viewers. The font used is also very atrocious and looks odd, it does not compliment the tone of our film.

Rough cut 2: Font and change

After the first initial rough-cut, we decided that the whole title sequences credits needed to be re done. We decided to introduce all appropriate roles and credits to our sequence such as directing, actors, photography, music by etc.
-We wanted to introduce new credits that seemed dramatic whilst being simplistic.

-However, after reviewing the titles and getting feedback from our audiences, we realised that the titles need to be re-vamped yet again. One crucial reason is the fact the way the credits are positioned really distract the audience making it hard to read.
-The typography again, does not compliment the visuals shown on screen. The font is very generic, and seems overall boring and dull. Despite us all deciding that we wanted simple typography, we wanted to ensure that the text would both stand out and fit the theme of our film being a psychological thriller.
-This is all due to the lack of communication as a group and the time we had to our titles as we had to rush them in.

Rough cut 2: Special Effects

After reviewing our first title sequence,
we decided that we wanted to add an effect that
would compliment the credits making them seem
scary and look more interesting. We went into adobe
after effects and created new credits and used the
animation jiggy. The problem with this title is the fact that
it is very hard to read due to the shaking effect and the blur.

We decided that it would be better to remove the effect as a
whole so that the audience can read the titles properly and
possibly decide on a foggy effect or a fade in.

Example

Conclusion

In conclusion it is apparent that the lots more work on the credits is needed. We need to work on the order of the titles as many of them were placed in the wrong places. In addition, we need to change the typography as a whole.

Click to edit Master title style

Edit Master text styles

Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

1/1/2000


Click to edit Master subtitle style

1/1/2000



Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

1/1/2000



1/1/2000



Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level


Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

1/1/2000




Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level



Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

1/1/2000


1/1/2000

1/1/2000



Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level


1/1/2000


Click icon to add picture


1/1/2000




1/1/2000



1/1/2000




1/1/2000



1/1/2000








1/1/2000











1/1/2000



Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

1/1/2000



Second level

Third level

Fourth level

Fifth level

1/1/2000

rough cut 2analysis: credits

Education