r.o!ras. .• !•4..14110- . -, ' .,: i,g,:i.4,„:. • :: - .).i · department proposal the...
TRANSCRIPT
.• - .. . sSu c.. . ,....r.o!ras.
. ..11E414SIFIED AND MINIM) FOR . - ( -, • ,.. A.• !*•4..'14110- . • *:: - .).'i;t:,,, .f ,-, ' .,:...
...i,.....g...,:i.4,.....„:.
i • . ; .
BY TIE CENTRAL INTRO IENCE AGENCY SELRz 1; . it.i oRE: 2111 • • a Deesilmsv 194 I .J . ..
t:10111011A=1:.X311 $11011 IllialtitABX OF Kra - . .
...:. Subjeet8 Oeetfal Intelliamee igesoy. .... . • •
1. There la a substantial area of agreement between the
War Departeso4 p4ea an the Norwersaok plan as modified. tinder,
both, them is to be a national Satelligoose authority, oneposal
of the 5411134411;1011 of State, 'War, oat the Arr,,, birdies thet
itundlea of Oserdinating latellijunee aetivitiee of goveramental .
-apaelee, Iladoklith, there is to be a elude exeestive•,'
offieer anointed the antlwritr and removablikby vote of a majority
of the members of the 'hatbarity. •
/ a. Beyond this eareaal of agreement, however, there is •a
basis differenee in concept between the two plans. The War -
Department plan eonterpintes an /gamey ander the supervision of
the katherity, laving serials operating itaations, in additioa .
to eoordinatiair itamitions„, ant Dela( Independent of any regale* , .
Govemeat depertnent... The Stat.Departnent plan dose not provide .
foram Indepindentageneyinger the direction ef thekatbority; . ,
and eentemplatee that*. hathorltywill. caersise tie mordinating.
.fametions throw* lateedeparhoestalessmitties, ,,,Underthe
State.:Depatent plan, the orgamination would have no operating
functions in the first inetmoei althea* the Authority might .
anther's. the estanisheent of mortals operations of oemimat
•
,..4 . .g.
•.
-•
so, • 0
• ":
basic diffeience in concept. The principal differences are •
thought to be as follows*
a. 21/trizaasts-in..hniatitana. The Tar Departilkont Pisa '_assigns to the oentamX organisation two definite operating,
responsibilities, subject to the right of the Authority
•.1/ Department hes prt.mary interest and responsibility.
3. Substantially all the differsnces between the '. ;•Departeent plea and the /far Department plan extend. fro gs this •,:;f,.
/.
./ trite:seat where it determined that such operations could not be• ,7
iintisfastdrily oersted eat by the existing
agencries. Tina* there is to be no independent central *remise-
rf; lion- 7 Ander the State Department plan 'personnel are tab.
-Ant lobed by the State, War and *art Departments, and the key
' piirsonnel, at each level, are to be officials of the State ..; •
Departnent. A combination of each details gives the State/ •, .
s. Department proposal the flavor of a project in which the State .
•
to desentralise asy such operations to the extent domed, _
advisable. These operating fbast.tons are direct prosure-
meat of int...names by foreign oil:barge snd ocuster-.
espionage and the scoomplistment of the evaluation mai ,
synthesis of intelligence on a national lore/. The Ter .
Department plan, in this respect, %me based on 'the belief
that these two activities mast be centre/lied to be performed*
effectively. The assignment of these operating itatatiOne
-3-
•
to the sonttal organisation vozt/d hat. the advent:go of
providing an instediato disposition for the 033 persosnel
nav in the War Department and in ties Slats Depertnent
and could posit then to continuo their operations. It_
has 'been thought that zasless thee* °potations aro
oentrallsod, the personnel Saks* over from 033 viii lour
interest and drop away from Government 'termite.
Xs. SoGormaok bee indicatod generally that be is
not idlling to woe to an inmediato centralisation of.
espionage and emonter-espienege imstivitiess or of ovalmation
and synthosis. ?his could leave the OSS porsonnal token over
by tit* state Department, prinartly the Desoarah and Analysis
Group, to cantinas as part of that Stato Deportment.
aittaranns-in-stains-nt.axonstixs.altAsz...
Under tho War Deaertment plan, this °hie ezecativt officer
would le a indspendent olvilian, not an official of anyof tit* throe topertments. Under the State Department .
plan, this official woad lso an Imployes of t.ho State
Dopertmont. Xr loGermack fools that the identification of-
this official vith tho State Department is necessary to
secure Stato Deportnent cooperation. note has boon sone
-3-
opiate* la the War Depestaant • that the sire faster
night prevent °separation oa the :pa of the War and
1a17 Departments. There have been fbrther suggestions
in the Vas Dapaellsoat that, even if this official la
to be a Slats Department employee at the outset, the plea
should. penult that he be an employe* of any at the three
dapertneate, as the Satimer1W night determine to be
nest appropriate at the tine.
1. ktrIMOINSAIL.112111111:1Latzeracronal. trader the
War Department plan, personnel welt be /Wit direVtly
by the watralited ages. Nader the State Depertaant
plea, all personnel 'mad be 'employees of the State, War.
and Navy Depertaents . end wad be detailed. by Wee
departments to the I:Menai latelligreva AutharliT.Kr, NoSernsok believes that recruitment by the several
departments viLl be easier then *.mi eentralised aancl:
The War Department proweal for centralised preferment
of personnel we 'based as the belief that this weld
inseam their being responsible as& loyal. to the watral
money, rhich weld have the right to hire and fire and
weld hive the advantage of providing inaressed stability
of personael ant of effarifigal careers to persona late:sited
in hieeetevel intelligense,
4. atraranama jearteurevikal notnarttl *Attire rervisma.
Tbe War Department plan Galls for the establishmest of a
National Zatalligease Turd emulating of the head of State
Demotment intelligence, the War Department 0-2, the
Assistant Chief of Air 3tatf-2, the %motor of Tavel
'Mollie:sem, and perhaps the Direst°, of the Tederal
31a1een of Investigation, to assist the chief enesutive
offleer of Os seatrellsed assue7,1* ha uctarultat )17as all Important desists= sad to provide the shame'
through visish the several &warble:Its might demand
geese from aad asehange tatalligenee with the esatrallsed
egenari. The purpose of this Board_wee to make the
chief iatelligenoe offieers of the severe/ departmeats
responsible for the off i44 operation of the ems. trails's&
agency, is .order to laser, adequate cooperation. The
State Department piss sails for the establisimmt
of 2 advisory groups, sae for intelligens* and the other
for security latelligenset the first to oonsifit of the
chief 1*UL/times offline* of the State, War, sad *ayDepartments, or their representatives, aad the seism& I.
omelet of the 'Mod' iatelligenee oiliest* of the Tar
Departneat and She Noy aspartssid; and representatives
from Treasury ant Tn. Although. the plane are somewhat
similar is this mopes', the War Department view has been
PrPrIST
of a Nati Intelligences Antbrrity oh osn lame
of the
intelligens' work
latelligeroe Authori
and thus permit.
ladle the oriaalaattan
being created
diriotives to the sting
that its plan tends to make the chief intell.tgenme officers
of the War, $tate and Navy Depertmeate more directly
concerned 4th and responsible for support of the =Mona
orsaajzimon. Xr; McCormack has indicated that he le
willing to let the War awl Navy Department views oontro/
on this natter,-
There are a amber of other features of the State
Department plan with which the ler Department is in earomalat,
and there are a umber of asedtaitisa that acoulA Prontahlr
be resolved. Nor example, there haa been opposition in the
War Department to the proposal that ommeittees shell be the:.7
primary aeons by whisk the National Intelligeree Authority
carries out its ftnotiona. AN a further exempla there has
been disagreement with the State Doper:Went definition of
It is believed. Itywaver, thatintalliganas and aaaater43010311‘.°0•• these matters are not of waffled=
4. The prinalpal argoments in fsartir":11=titlevar" alinfalltaratT
Nieto Departnent proposal, with snob modifications as•
nay be obtained by negotiation, are a* fol./Owe:
that alum will permit the prompt
on the basis of szporisnoe.
b. Sinew legislation mill be required idthia a
year if as independent *PIM'is to 1.$40 sstsblisalsly as.
contemplated /Jr the War Deparbsent plan„ it is advisable •
to homy some fora of national authority established as
promptly as possible in Order to gala as Inch experience
as possible Were submitting legislation.
a. The $tate Department propooal mill probably' allow
a national authority to get endorser with lees pub/laity
'and eentroversy in the press thea mould boa invelved in
the establishment of as independent adsasr.. • ,--daseptenee of the State Department plaa maid -
avoit a oontroverny 'betimes the State Department as the
one bavd sad the War and Saw Deportment* oath. other bend.
Ishii* would rendre referentss to the President for
settlement.If
a, Mr, SoSerswok or some other State Department official
le Is b.tires the job of shier onssoutive officer of the
lational Intanitowse Authority,. it noT Ul k PreflorShl•
to permit his to !tattles, at least at the &Meet, ender
the type of orpnimat.ten vhick he favors rather than one
*sweet on his ar the War sad Iry Departments. !hie elm
alley the clear fining of responsibility la the omit of
the vamoose or failure of the organisation during the
preliminary Awes.
SECRET
If it is dealdet to accept the State Department proposal
in prinelpie, there are certain concessions which should be
obtained. These commissions are as follows
A. The statement of !Nineties* of the NationalIntelligence Authority should be amended to provide that
synthesis and evaluation oa a national level and direst
procurement of intelligenoe by foreign espionege ea& waster-
sepiesage are reeogaised as Amities* of the National
Intelligens' Authority, subject to the rig,* of the
Authority to direct that any of such operations should
decentralised if that cows* appears more teppropriate at
any tine. This aatialment will provide the National
Int.Uigsoos aulasoritr with substantially the same mission
as that contemplated try the Tar Department plan, If the
missies is clearly defined, it Is believed that the
organisation will evolve eventually into the type best
fitted to the aosemplichment of the mission.
/a. A provision *Would be inserted la the X•Ceirmeic
plan to the effect that the execlativ* soeretasy) mita],
madder the advisability of legislation establish/nil an
tindependent Central Intelligence Agenoy under the direction
of the Authority, with an independent budget, and sha3.1
make recommendations thereon to the Authority'. Tide will
prevent the War and Navy Department, from being Toroolo' owl
on the matter of organisation and will permit the organisation
•A
at. I-A
to be restudied and develope%: in the light of experience.4 Assuaa-.
lag that, a decisi.0 is matte to proceed aa the basis of theCi
liXormacX proposal it is believed tat these Lo4conce55ions:
should be souaht as Tit.h..1 matters, but that the War Depart:cent, • •_
• :
• _
111132. els (Page 9)
, "r %.1-4•:;SI
' • r'.
• .
• . •
...; '' ..,,, .-..:.-A. .
. , .. .
.. , . ,..,..,?,,,,:..•Pg.-.: '''‘...."'"P..■ Le , ; •:. :-7 '.:_.:. :,.... • i., "... •: ) . • *... ' .... -•::...1,:: ,..? !.. --, • .•.;JI -:..:4*J.-.•• .1:5t . ' 1; 4‘.0.34., •"..*,!;:-..`'
AL. Paricraph 12 of the rcCormack_propoisid, delLtINg.i• • :; . •:.'-. - : " ' '2.-2 •■• .- :.::: t,..71 -...ri:).. ..-...'.•;.; i.,....N...:2 -.7r,r. ...;:•„4.4 . ..4,Li • hae ,. ..
with Advisory- arCtrps, shoul*i be modified to provide that,: . - .......- ..;:: . ..< ..-:
there shoal be only ono such . op vlich shall hsave.• - ::.. .-:,_ ..... .._., -... .-...:J• f,.-.".... ......:J /, Cs.: :
generally the composition an& fazultions of' the rational• _f falt .4: AL.Z. tqf
Intelligence Board as cro.tlined.in therfar Departmentplan?.'4.. • • • _ .••••
This aodification is thought necessary to insureNhit' •!, • ....•445:W.4. • -
the chiefs of the intelligence agencies of the several'; . • ;.):.f"
departments mill actively support the Authority.
/Usti This amendment is addti at the suggestion ofaeneral arcuneLl, "ha considers it vitally .necessary.
The Secretary of ar inform :. McCormack that the ';ar
Lep-.rtneat rill accept the State :1'apartient proposal
subj ect to tae tro asecarlsents specified in paragraph
••••• ■21. • ' - • As
• • -L'14
• •aik. •••1 ••■•'3t.C-
r '7 ItEb T1
• .*• •
'
..1.4., is,31:,,v. , .,.11...,., ,.. ,.,,,,..........,,,.,._:,..,:eecrvi-mztic...:ciii02•:•..: t.7,41i.7-r.,..;•1"-41,9-etrii• erm-A ei•-e‘./fa,,„sp-avur.._14......,•.,-. •....-.;-!:Ailttt,?•ze..-.'`.:---; 'I : .'. '....-4,'-"•--..:-.
. • ... - .-------",441-• '. • i • 0,15.:......-", ...
-.4,.......: .t . t ----'1
- ..-..-`t;•':=-'-.7.--1,i;-:11-'.'17::.t3"..,..." .' :I .' .*: - ' '; ... ' --7S?443' ,it.,•,-5.§1.‘--'nf..Ithir-5.41-g-Z:frt4.1:1;sX..."'1.0ayd-.• o•t ersicis:*ca' till proceed.--.....t.p..=.-1-,-..-....! .•;3.4.,-1,--„,..t-:•,,r ;;,-.11,•`-'-,4„--,...c -,..,;4- ,-;41-rs.,1.(4. 1 L,54.."44. 141 Li :4:**64'....:::,"1.1. 4%.-:-.' "r . ;;01. , ;op •••• , ,• • . .„-.4.1....cit.4. :- - - .•,.. • •e. -0-..,.- .,:. - _ %,;,.. -,p,, , s •..61,74,- '..l,..'..0-1; ...1,-,?...,e4. . 0,:",4,. ...i ...`• . • • It.4!..• -1 ;.'1,-
- ..:NtiCatiztaZiettro-Pin-S-alp:it is believed:-tiat"thii:Sig•t't.,:o4"cancessianS:rt4. -r . "- • '', . • . ...} • '
ould: be sou‘ht as vital':matters blit:, that"the• War Department : - '''',•,.;.-:-4$!:1-:•-•
zfmin, afford Itei'aCCept , -tei • State' II epartment. :proposal at''the ''''' - • - ' '1".. 4 . : ;.,
, . . •■,J., . ,... • ••,./...1...
'.. .1-7`'..): V;.'I' :--•,' r ': .. Pc.m .;, -4 '2,‘• ...'.i..',. 4 i -4 '
.4.0, - .t. •
-. -outset in all 'hither reapt,cti:j-P4;,_--....• •
X'•. .... :•!,---; ;:. ...4.i...4,-;;;•:•'. • 1. - .
.%).',7,.,...,-;,...t.
g. -.1.... • - -_, ,,_'--...... ....•'"4:4..il• .
... ,..0 .;:. ' Th a Stattl ',Eillpartallt propOaaL-1....even.. Ii.i.T.Me .,'C 012C64113-01128k11.1 ; :::. 77: f 4. 1.,:,...
- ..-• . • • ' , - ..-.: - -. - - . :- • ' , :.;.-- .. •,.., -,::: , : .7'y. A'', i••• ■•:: • .,,:.,, ;...,-.. •-...
-•-, -''• . i - - 1*:-,t. 7, -.-- .....,--),...,)=.... - •,.:•?.,,••-
: the. Steteermartment on all the principal:difterettaeri,*;iifer- ;i t.',' ...;*,;?',..,7-7.;:- • .
- : -- 1 : . ' ,-';''''',.;•,:,:" '' .'. , -.1.e.:::.:71;.:!Ct4";.'''';', : ::z •-'7•1:::=-1-•''''.;- ..4:,::--.1'41:1:":::• - l''' -..""4-'::
ed.to'-in paragrapfa. y.aLvve p Will still oQ'qr•-:.•-.- ; ,,
• War-Depar tment . plans -- pas ti Cularly- In the ...natter', of:: 1.1ulepiti. •k`.:;;,,, ,v, ,e;v.4";"4-
. .. .,.., , . • • .1 :-..,- . ,.:. • -. 1), • .*•':.L,..1. A; ‘•,, . *.j.,,,,...
, da a rock thence f exi.stini; Governmental, departments and in • the -.:,./ 4,;--t- •,t4.'̂.-.•4r.t.i:4?.P '-'• • • • • •... ,/,-....e,;•.:.-.-.,„....114......,.., ,....,---L
. -. _'...-,:i'',.*:... • .. • ,, .:-,:.--. - .. •-: .... ; -4 ., • ! - -%', '-!, - -- : -,- . ..-0.:5.. .. 7,1 ; .S.40....-,.-. ,...
-: : natter ofprocurement'end control cf . -personnel.-..." In determining",. _ ;..,,, ;•,_-„,::.•••
:. _.
whether to accept tie tcGormack p1= 2 ..11....:1 concession&j. or to•-;,-;;,,•-..7.;;',::• . ,-. • :-. ..- st....-,,
• ...•
• : - ••-• . ..
.iasist u,n acceptance a thewar,. .D..epiertae,• .n.t.....p.IP-11.• 1, the etb.itu.- . . • ,
of the ?levyshoul.: be cc....1.sidered.. 47.ite Navy"':"Departmenti i.-:.-41Z. -4.4-;•-..;44-;"-g-I'.. ... !..:;.".--• - ' .:. q
• _
-*- -.- - - - !;•`••;-•"'": - - - ":,:••••••••'..".;;;•,,,:,-.;;;...*:-.: -.'' the
opin_icn that the War and Navy Depart t$'shotild insist--trpozz '•••=11.1.-fJ1f7c,:,.'". ' . . - ". -.; " •:?••••••:.,.:10... 5.;.,'itn?...;'":?••-;-•.
'''''..(4Ce ; 1',. •the Tar D 6 patent plan and that .tadr;matt ‘et. ihOU.Li . be carried• -...- _?,.±:".:.-...,,,,•
• a •:..t fr. 5.1:4 • :
.°,1:?!.. ..... ".: ' ....-. `....:',..,;.-. :-... ".. : •
" to the president. If the 'far Lepartaiet is to adopt "-.a4
Te,--. .......---?.:. • '-• ' .- .,---. ..t.--• •‘.41.....---„,f ..-:,---,---,;:1-, '-
en; attitude its ant-Ica s should he:fcarefully coordinStecl iiittt-; • • •.;;-3,'7 - - ..'..:„7: ,- , '...±-•1'-:;!! VP- -4-47. C.- •" ',....,,,..,. ..„... . , .
•.. ..,, .,.e Na
c4:••• •
....- tcir".,../....:1...1
- • • 1. ., :-..,...,..... ,f, .....,. ...f;!....t...f:...• I., • ;-• •,, TO.* •:" . . . .. ;., ...:t .
7 • . Th2 reco....-,mendatihn of the "committee is aS•followsi.,.:,.,........„,, • •. .. ,......; . ..a„ r.'..-Z;•:;;;!..:-.....',.% '; ' • .,. , . ." ; • • ., ..- :.: . •,•-r.',..*: 4,..;„"
Tha ty SUbl OC t to azreent . by . the NaVY" fiePartsients... . - . • -,-,•-• , N - . . -
The Secret;.....--j- of ;lax inform `44...r: ticCormack- that tho 1;ir''',2
D07.rtae1t mill accept the"St.::te Lfspartmtnit:-Sproposel'",.
subject to the t-zo r_mentiv..nts sr-,ecified. in pitragre.pki -',._"',.• 4
-9-
a A Z..
■
above; and that if Mr. MCCormank refuses to make
such concessions, the deoretar, of War aid the
Secretary of the Wavy JOla in submitting the War .
Dopertaint plan directly to the President for his.
approval, after notifying the State Department that
such option is to be taken. This recommendation
is made la the interest of reaching an agreement
. although the Committee believes the War Departmont
plan is preferable to the plan proposed by the
State Department, even with the concessions specified.
.111,1mAnnif
That the Secretary of Sex join with the Secretary
of the Wavy in submitting the War Departaent plan
directly to the President for his approval, after
notifying the Slate Departaent that such action is
to be Wm. -