role of non-histones in chromosome structurerole of non-histones in chromosome structure cell cycle...

7
Role of Non-histones inChromosome Structure CELL CYCLE VARIATIONS IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS* (Received for publication, December 24, 1981) Kenneth W. Adolph and Judith P. Phelps From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 As part of a study of the role of non-histoneproteins in chromosome structure, the synthesis of non-histones associated with interphase chromatin was investi- gated. Synchronizedsuspension cultures of HeLa cells were pulse-labeled with 136S]methionine, and chroma- tin was prepared by mild micrococcal nuclease diges- tion. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electropho- resis, in addition to one-dimensional electrophoresis, was used to resolve the patterns of incorporation of radioactive label. Significant variationsin non-histone synthesis were seen during the cell cycle. A strong correlation was not found between DNA synthesis in mid-S phase and variations in non-histone synthesis. The non-histoneproteins of purified metaphase chro- mosomes were also characterized by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis andcompared to theproteins of interphase chromatin. The pattern of non-histones is notidentical with that ofinterphasechromatin,al- though a number of major species may be shared by interphase chromatin and metaphase chromosomes. The HeLa nuclear scaffold, the framework that main- tains the overall morphology of the interphase nucleus, shows relatively few proteins on two-dimensional gels. The synthesis of nuclear scaffold proteins was quanti- tated by excising each of 19 proteins from two-dimen- sional gels and determining the incorporated radioac- tivity by scintillation counting. Substantial variations in protein synthesis were found, with several species showing changes of about 2-fold in the percentage of incorporation. Non-histone proteins are major components of metaphase chromosomesandinterphasechromatin,yettheir precise structural and functional roles are incompletely understood. An approach to uncover a structural role for non-histones in the higher order organization of metaphase chromosomes was to extract histones and other chromosomal proteins and to characterize the residual particles by polyacrylamide gel elec- trophoresis and electron microscopy (1, 2). The DNA of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes was found to be arranged into loops by a well defined subset of non-histones, the metaphase scaffold. The significance of a residual chro- mosomal structure inorganizing DNA is now well established The protein framework that maintains the morphology of interphase nuclei has also been studied. Extracting histones and other proteins from nuclei was foundto produceresidual (3-13). * This research was supported by Grant GM 26440 from the National Institutes of Health. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be herebymarked "aduertisernent" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. particles which maintain a high degree of DNA organization (14-16). This result is complemented by experiments showing the interphase genome to consist of looped domains (17, 18). The sites of DNA replication appear to be anchored to the residualproteinstructure (19, 20). Nuclease digestion has been combined with protein extraction to create a nuclear substructure composed primarily of protein (16, 21-25). Besides these structural roles with metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei, non-histone proteins also have func- tional roles as regulatorsof gene expression. In this capacity, non-histones may interact with the nucleosomal structure of chromatin to produce specific regulatory effects. The arrange- ment of histoneswithDNAtoform nucleosomes is well understood (26), but the nature of the involvement of non- histones is less clear. The experiments described inthis paper are concerned with investigating the cell cycle-dependent changes in the synthesis of chromatin-associated non-histones. The experiments are also concerned with the relationship of these proteins to the non-histones of metaphase chromosomes and nuclear scaf- folds, residual structures produced by nuclease digestion and extraction of proteins (16). This information is likely to be crucial to an understanding of the structural and functional changes in the genome through interphase and into mitosis. To obtain a high resolution separation of the proteins of chromatin and chromosomes, two-dimensional polyacryl- amide gel electrophoresis has been applied. Previous studies have used the high resolution of two-dimensional gels to examine polypeptide synthesis in whole cells and nuclei (27, 28) and to survey HeLa non-histone proteins (29). One-dimen- sional polyacrylamide gels have shown different profiles for acidic chromosomal protein during GI, S, and GS (30, 31). EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Cell Culture and Synchronization-HeLa S3 cells(ATCC CCL 2.2) were maintained in suspension culture at 37 "C in minimum essential medium (Joklik-modified) supplemented with 10%: newborn calf serum(GrandIslandBiological Co.). Synchronized cells were obtained with a double block of thymidine (32) or hydroxyurea (33). In a typical experiment, thymidine was added to a suspension culture of HeLa cells to a final concentration of 2 mM or 5 mM. After 16 h, the block was released by washing the cells in normal medium, and, after a further 9-h incubation, the cells were again blocked with thymidine for 16 h. Releasing the culture from the second block gave a popula- tion of cells synchronized at the GI/S boundary. The degree of synchrony was routinely estimated by measuring the incorporation of [ 'Hlthymidine into DNA. A peak of incorporation was found at 5 h after release from the GI/S boundary, a result similar to that previ- ously reported (30). The degree of synchrony was also determined by counting the number of mitotic cells and the total concentration of cells. To aid the identification of mitotic cells, portions of synchro- nized cultures were withdrawn and resuspended in hypotonic buffer (10 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCL) prior to counting. The maximum fraction of mitotic cells was found at 11 h after release from GI& while a doubling of the concentration of cells was found at 12-13 h. 9086

Upload: others

Post on 16-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Role of Non-histones in Chromosome StructureRole of Non-histones in Chromosome Structure CELL CYCLE VARIATIONS IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS* (Received for publication, December 24, 1981) Kenneth

Role of Non-histones in Chromosome Structure CELL CYCLE VARIATIONS IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS*

(Received for publication, December 24, 1981)

Kenneth W. Adolph and Judith P. Phelps From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

As part of a study of the role of non-histone proteins in chromosome structure, the synthesis of non-histones associated with interphase chromatin was investi- gated. Synchronized suspension cultures of HeLa cells were pulse-labeled with 136S]methionine, and chroma- tin was prepared by mild micrococcal nuclease diges- tion. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electropho- resis, in addition to one-dimensional electrophoresis, was used to resolve the patterns of incorporation of radioactive label. Significant variations in non-histone synthesis were seen during the cell cycle. A strong correlation was not found between DNA synthesis in mid-S phase and variations in non-histone synthesis.

The non-histone proteins of purified metaphase chro- mosomes were also characterized by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and compared to the proteins of interphase chromatin. The pattern of non-histones is not identical with that of interphase chromatin, al- though a number of major species may be shared by interphase chromatin and metaphase chromosomes. The HeLa nuclear scaffold, the framework that main- tains the overall morphology of the interphase nucleus, shows relatively few proteins on two-dimensional gels. The synthesis of nuclear scaffold proteins was quanti- tated by excising each of 19 proteins from two-dimen- sional gels and determining the incorporated radioac- tivity by scintillation counting. Substantial variations in protein synthesis were found, with several species showing changes of about 2-fold in the percentage of incorporation.

Non-histone proteins are major components of metaphase chromosomes and interphase chromatin, yet their precise structural and functional roles are incompletely understood. An approach to uncover a structural role for non-histones in the higher order organization of metaphase chromosomes was to extract histones and other chromosomal proteins and to characterize the residual particles by polyacrylamide gel elec- trophoresis and electron microscopy (1, 2). The DNA of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes was found to be arranged into loops by a well defined subset of non-histones, the metaphase scaffold. The significance of a residual chro- mosomal structure in organizing DNA is now well established

The protein framework that maintains the morphology of interphase nuclei has also been studied. Extracting histones and other proteins from nuclei was found to produce residual

(3-13).

* This research was supported by Grant GM 26440 from the National Institutes of Health. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "aduertisernent" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

particles which maintain a high degree of DNA organization (14-16). This result is complemented by experiments showing the interphase genome to consist of looped domains (17, 18). The sites of DNA replication appear to be anchored to the residual protein structure (19, 20). Nuclease digestion has been combined with protein extraction to create a nuclear substructure composed primarily of protein (16, 21-25).

Besides these structural roles with metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei, non-histone proteins also have func- tional roles as regulators of gene expression. In this capacity, non-histones may interact with the nucleosomal structure of chromatin to produce specific regulatory effects. The arrange- ment of histones with DNA to form nucleosomes is well understood (26), but the nature of the involvement of non- histones is less clear.

The experiments described in this paper are concerned with investigating the cell cycle-dependent changes in the synthesis of chromatin-associated non-histones. The experiments are also concerned with the relationship of these proteins to the non-histones of metaphase chromosomes and nuclear scaf- folds, residual structures produced by nuclease digestion and extraction of proteins (16). This information is likely to be crucial to an understanding of the structural and functional changes in the genome through interphase and into mitosis.

To obtain a high resolution separation of the proteins of chromatin and chromosomes, two-dimensional polyacryl- amide gel electrophoresis has been applied. Previous studies have used the high resolution of two-dimensional gels to examine polypeptide synthesis in whole cells and nuclei (27, 28) and to survey HeLa non-histone proteins (29). One-dimen- sional polyacrylamide gels have shown different profiles for acidic chromosomal protein during GI, S, and GS (30, 31).

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cell Culture and Synchronization-HeLa S3 cells (ATCC CCL 2.2) were maintained in suspension culture at 37 "C in minimum essential medium (Joklik-modified) supplemented with 10%: newborn calf serum (Grand Island Biological Co.). Synchronized cells were obtained with a double block of thymidine (32) or hydroxyurea (33). In a typical experiment, thymidine was added to a suspension culture of HeLa cells to a final concentration of 2 mM or 5 mM. After 16 h, the block was released by washing the cells in normal medium, and, after a further 9-h incubation, the cells were again blocked with thymidine for 16 h. Releasing the culture from the second block gave a popula- tion of cells synchronized at the GI /S boundary. The degree of synchrony was routinely estimated by measuring the incorporation of [ 'Hlthymidine into DNA. A peak of incorporation was found at 5 h after release from the GI/S boundary, a result similar to that previ- ously reported (30). The degree of synchrony was also determined by counting the number of mitotic cells and the total concentration of cells. To aid the identification of mitotic cells, portions of synchro- nized cultures were withdrawn and resuspended in hypotonic buffer (10 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCL) prior to counting. The maximum fraction of mitotic cells was found at 11 h after release from GI& while a doubling of the concentration of cells was found at 12-13 h.

9086

Page 2: Role of Non-histones in Chromosome StructureRole of Non-histones in Chromosome Structure CELL CYCLE VARIATIONS IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS* (Received for publication, December 24, 1981) Kenneth

Cell Cycle Variations in Non-histone Synthesis 9087

,_"

" 0 - "" I

a b c \

FIG. 1. SDS-polyacrylamide gel of the proteins of isolated HeLa nuclei. The gel contains 12.5? acrylamide and was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue after electrophoresis. a. molecular weight markers of, from top to hottom, bovine serum albumin (66,000). chicken egg albumin (45,000). carbonic anhydrase (30,000). and lyso- zyme (14.000). h, nuclei purified as described under "Experimental Procedures" but using Nonidet 1'-40 (0.5'r) as the only detergent. c, nuclei prepared with both Nonidet 1'-40 (0.5%;) and sodium deoxycho- late (0.1'6). The same pattern of proteins is found in both hand c. At the right of the figure is a densitometer scan of the nuclear proteins.

Chromatin Preparation-To measure the synthesis of chromatin- associated non-histones during the cell cycle, portions of cultures synchronized with double blocks of thymidine or hydroxyurea were withdrawn at intervals of 4 h following release from the CI/S bound- ary. Each portion was concentrated by centrifugation to give 10' cells in 1 ml, and 0.5-1.0 mCi of ['%]methionine was added. The cells were in normal minimum essential medium or in a 1:I mixture of normal minimum essential medium and medium lacking methionine. The cells were labeled for 1.0 h a t 37 "C in a gyrotory water bath, after which the cells were rapidly cooled on ice. Nuclei were then prepared (16). The cells were washed in a buffer of I O mM NaCI, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCI?, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride at 0 "C, and resuspended in the buffer at a cell concentration of ahout 10"/mI. After leaving the cells for 30 min in the hypotonic buffer, the cells were disrupted with a Dounce homogenizer. following the addition of 0.5% Nonidet 1'-40 and 0.15i sodium deoxycholate. The nuclei were purified by centrifugation and resuspended at a concentration of about 2 X 10" nuclei/ml. Fig. 1 shows the protein species found with preparations of isolated nuclei. For the sample in lane h, only the non-ionic detergent Nonidet 1'-40 was used in isolating nuclei, while for the sample in lane c, sodium deoxycholate was also included. The inclusion of sodium deoxycholate is useful in removing residual cy- toskeletal material which sometimes remains attached to the nuclei. Fig. I demonstrates that low concentrations of deoxycholate do not have a detrimental effect upon nuclear protein composition. The same pattern of species is seen in lane c as in lane h.

Chromatin was obtained by mild digestion of nuclei with micrococ- cal nuclease (34). Nuclei were treated with micrococcal nuclease at a concentration of 15 units/ml. The supernatant of unfractionated chromatin was used without further purification or was fractionated on density gradients of 5-30% sucrose (35). The gradients ( 5 ml) were prepared in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, O.I? Nonidet 1'-40, and, after layering loop11 of chromatin on each gradient, centrifugation was for 17 h a t 33.000 X g (20.000 rpm). Similar experiments were carried out with chromatin labeled with ["Hlthymidine to demon- strate that the protein and DNA peaks coincide.

Metaphase Chromoscme Preparation-HeLa metaphase chro- mosomes were isolated by procedures in which the chromosomes are maintained in a condensed state with divalent cations or polyamines while the mitotic cells are disrupted in a Ilounce homogenizer ( 3 6 ) . To obtain an adequate number of mitotic cells, suspension cultures were arrested in mitosis by adding 0.2 pg/ml of colchicine for 12-16 h. The cells were resuspended in a buffer containing 50 mM NaCI, 5 mM HEPES,' pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCI,, 0.5 mM CaC12. 0.1 mM phenylmethvl- sulfonyl fluoride. An alternate, polyamine-containing buffer is com-

I The abbreviations used are: HEI'ES. 4-(2-h.vdroxyethyl)-I-pil)er- aaineethanesulfonic acid; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate.

posed of 80 mM NaCI. 5 mM HEI'ES, pH 7.4, 0.5 mM spermine. 0.15 mM spermidine, 0.2 mM ethylene glycol his(/hwninoethyl ether)- N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid, 0 . 1 mM phenvlnlethylsulfonyl fluoride. Chromosomes were purified by layering the supernatant. after pellet- ing nuclei, on a gradient of 0.3 M to 0.8 M Metrizamide in isolation buffer. l'he discrete band of chromosomes was removed after centrif- ugation. Metaphase chromosomes labeled with [.'"S]methionine were obtained by adding 25-54 pCi/ml of ['%Imethionine to suspension cultures of HeLa cells for :I2 h before blocking the cells in mitosis with colchicine. The incorporation of lahel was greatly increased by using a 1:1 mixture of normal medium and medium without methio- nine.

Nuclear Scaffold Pre/~arcction-Nuclei were isolated as outlined in the section on chromatin preparation and further purified by sedimentation into gradients of 20-6Ori sucrose. Centrifugation was for 8 min at 50 X g. In some experiments. the entire isolation procedure was carried out in the presence of 5 mM /~-mercaptoethanol. Nuclear scaffolds were derived by treating purified nuclei with DNase 1 at 1 0 0 pg/ml for 60 min on ice and then adding an equal volume of 4 M NaCI, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 20 mM EDTA. 0.2'; Ammonvx LO

5'" (16). After an additional 30 min, the scaffolds were pelleted through

< sucrose. Electrophoresis of Protein-Proteins were separated on the hasis

of molecular weight using SIX-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (37). The procedure of O'Farrell (38). combining isoelectric focusing with SIX-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, allows proteins to be separated in two dimensions. The nonequilibrium procedure (39) was found to be especially useful in separating both basic and acidic proteins. Gels containing proteins labeled with [%]methionine were processed by fluorography (40).

RESULTS

Cell Cycle Variations in the Synthesis of Interphase Chro- matin Non-histones-The HeLa cell cycle is divided into G I , S, Gn, and M phases having durations of about 1 1 h, 8 h, 2 h, and 2 h, respectively. The synthesis during the cell cycle of non-histone proteins associated with interphase chromatin was investigated by pulse-labeling synchronized suspension cultures of HeLa cells with ['"'Slmethionine for 1.0 h, isolating nuclei, and preparing chromatin by digestion with micrococcal nuclease. The chromatin fragments were fractionated by sed- imentation into 540% sucrose density gradients. Fig. 2 shows the profile of [:ir'S]methionine counts per min along such a gradient. In experiments in which the DNA is labeled with ["Hlthymidine, the profile of radioactivity is found to coincide with that of [%]methionine, demonstrating that the peak of protein represent.. the position of chromatin. The sedimenta- tion coefficient ( s ~ , ~ , , , . ) of chromatin prepared under these conditions was calculated to be 38 S in 10 mM Tris buffer.

The peak of chromatin was removed from such gradients and the associated non-histones characterized by SDS-poly- acrylamide gel electrophoresis. Fig. 3 presents fluorograms of chromatin proteins from unsynchronized cells pulse-labeled for 1 h (a) and from synchronized cells pulse-labeled at 0-1 h

10 20 30 Fractlon Number

FIG. 2. Fractionation on a 5-30% sucrose gradient of HeLa chromatin pulse-labeled with ["'S]methionine. Chromatin was prepared from nuclei by mild digestion with micrococcal nuclease. Centrifugation was at 33,oOO X g for 17 h. l'he direction of sedimen- tation is from right to left.

Page 3: Role of Non-histones in Chromosome StructureRole of Non-histones in Chromosome Structure CELL CYCLE VARIATIONS IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS* (Received for publication, December 24, 1981) Kenneth

9088 Cell Cycle Variations in Non-histone Synthesis

1

; 1 L i Ub.4 i 466

i I

445 I

FIG. 3. SDS-polyacrylamide gels of the synthesis of non-his- tone proteins associated with interphase chromatin. HeLa cells were pulse-labeled for 1.0 h with [:"SS]methionine. Chromatin was obtained by digestion with micrococcal nuclease and was purified on sucrose density gradients. Following electrophoresis, the gels were processed by fluorography. a, chromatin from unsynchronized cells. b, d, chromatin from synchronized cells labeled at 0-1 h after release from the GI/S boundary. c, e, chromatin from synchronized cells labeled at 12-13 h after release from GI/S. The gels in a, b, and c are 12.58 acrylamide, and the gels in d and e are 8% acrylamide.

( b , d) and 12-13 h (c, e) after release from the GI/S boundary. A double thymidine block was used to obtain synchronized cells. Columns a , b, and c of Fig. 3 display 12.5% polyacryl- amide gels, while d and e display 8% gels. A large number of non-histone species are seen to be associated with chromatin purified on sucrose density gradients. At least 50 species can be distinguished, although this number greatly underesti- mates the true number because of overlapping of bands. Two- dimensional gels, which are described below, resolve more than 300 species.

Fig. 3 reveals the significant variations in the incorporation of ["%]methionine that are found for non-histones labeled at 0-1 h and 12-13 h after release from the GI/S boundary. Variations in the synthesis of non-histones for synchronized cells pulse-labeled at 4-5 h and 8-9 h are intermediate to the differences found a t 0-1 h and 12-13 h. There does not, therefore, appear to be a strong correlation between DNA synthesis, which peaks at about 5 h after GI/& and changes in non-histone synthesis. The pattern of [:'"S]methionine in- corporation from cells labeled at 16-17 h is also similar to the 0- to 1-h samples. Cells at 16-17 h after GI/S have progressed into GI of the next cell cycle, and thus protein synthesis in GI is seen to resemble that in early S phase.

Densitometer scans of fluorograms of chromatin labeled a t 0-1 h and 12-13 hare shown in Fig. 4. The scans quantitatively display the substantial differences in non-histone synthesis that occur during the HeLa cell cycle.

Synthesis of Interphase Non-histones: Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis-Although one-dimensional electropho- resis is useful for directly comparing different chromatin sam- ples in adjacent lanes of slab gels, two-dimensional electro- phoresis provides a higher resolution separation of individual protein species. Fig. 5 contains two-dimensional gels of chro- matin from cells labeled with ['"S]methionine a t (a) 0-1 h and ( b ) 12-13 h after release from the GI /S boundary. The cells were synchronized with a double thymidine block. The chro- matin samples were not fractionated on sucrose gradients, but

the patterns with fractionated chromatin are similar. The nonequilibrium procedure (39) was used to separate proteins according to their charge in the first dimension, while electro- phoresis in 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels was used in the second dimension.

The complexity of the non-histone composition of HeLa chromatin is apparent from Fig. 5. Over 300 different species can be counted. Some additional proteins of lower molecular

Molecular Weight (x )

66 I

45 X ,

FIG. 4. Densitometer scans of fluorograms of interphase chromatin non-histones from synchronized cells labeled with [36S]methionine at (a) 0-1 h and ( b ) 12-13 h after GI/S. Electro- phoresis was in gels of 8% acrylamide. (The fluorograms are shown in Fig. 3, d and e.)

pH 9 7 5

L

FIG. 5. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels of non-his- tones associated with chromatin from synchronized cells pulse-labeled with [3sSS]methionine at (a) 0-1 h and ( b ) 12-13 h after GI/S. Electrophoresis in the first dimension was by the nonequilibrium procedure (39). while 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels were used in the second dimension. Fluorography was employed to detect the radioactively labeled proteins.

Page 4: Role of Non-histones in Chromosome StructureRole of Non-histones in Chromosome Structure CELL CYCLE VARIATIONS IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS* (Received for publication, December 24, 1981) Kenneth

Cell Cycle Variations in Non-histone Synthesis 9089

weight can be observed when samples are electrophoresed in SDS gels containing a higher percentage of acrylamide, al- though the preponderance of chromatin non-histones have molecular weights greater than 30,000. The nonequilibrium technique separates basic as well as acidic proteins, and it can be seen from Fig. 5 that both of these classes of proteins are well represented among the non-histones of interphase chro- matin. The majority of species, however, are acidic. Many changes can be observed in the degree of incorporation of ["S]methionine when comparing the electrophoretic patterns for 0-1 h and 12-13 h chromatin. But while the changes in non-histone synthesis are significant, they are not dramatic. As was also observed with one-dimensional SDS-polyacryl- amide gels, non-histone synthesis at 4-5 h, 8-9 h, and 16-17 h shows patterns intermediate to those a t 0-1 h and 12-13 h.

Experiments were undertaken to determine the effect of DNA replication inhibitors upon non-histone synthesis. DNA replication was inhibited in one portion of a synchronized culture by adding 5 mM thymidine or 1 mM hydroxyurea. At 4-5 h after release from GJS, both the uninhibited and inhibited portions were labeled with ["'Slmethionine, chro- matin was prepared, and the chromatin-associated non-his- tones were resolved on two-dimensional gels. The patterns of incorporation of label were similar whether or not the DNA replication inhibitor was present, although the overall level of protein synthesis was reduced by 50% in the presence of inhibitor.

Pulse-chase experiments have been carried out to examine the later fate of the incorporated label during the cell cycle. Synchronized cells, prepared with a double thymidine block, were pulse-labeled with ["'S]methionine for 0-1 h after release from GI/S and then resuspended in fresh medium, free of radioactive label, for an additional 4 or 7 hours. Chromatin was obtained, and the associated non-histones were electro- phoresed on two-dimensional gels. Fig. 6 shows a two-dimen- sional gel for such an experiment and reveals differences in the distribution of label among chromatin non-histones com- pared to samples that were not chased (Fig. 5). A number of factors could be responsible for this result, including differ- ences in the stability of association of non-histones with chromatin, in the rates of synthesis, in post-translational modifications, and in the rates of degradation.

The experiments presented in Figs. 2 to 6 used cells syn-

i 9

pH 7

m h

'g 1 Y

5

FIG. 6. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel of a pulse- chase experiment with chromatin non-histones from synchro- nized cells. Cells were labeled with [%]methionine at 0-1 h after release from the G,/S boundary, and, after removing the isotope, the cells were incubated for an additional 7 h. Chromatin was prepared, and the associated non-histones were separated on two-dimensional gels by the nonequilibrium procedure (39) combined with 8 8 SDS- polyacrylamide slab gels. The proteins indicated by circles show large changes in the distribution of label among chromatin non-histones compared to control samples (Fig. 5a).

pH 9 7 5

66-

m h

x 45- Y - c .O, 30.' ; :' - L m 3 0 a, 0 - H

66 -

45 -

30 -

FIG. 7. Separation of metaphase chromosome non-histones on two-dimensional gels. HeLa cells were labeled with ["S]methi- onine, and, after arresting the cells in mitosis with colchicine, meta- phase chromosomes were obtained by the pH 7.4, Mg/Ca method described under "Experimental Procedures." The chromosomes were purified in density gradients of Metrizamide. a, HeLa metaphase chromosomes. b, mixture of metaphase chromosomes and interphase chromatin. In 6, the positions of major non-histones of metaphase chromosomes (0) and interphase chromatin (0) are indicated.

chronized with a double thymidine block, but a number of experiments used samples prepared with a double hydroxyu- rea block. Two-dimensional gels of pulse-labeled chromatin derived from hydroxyurea-synchronized cells showed results similar to those with thymidine-synchronized cells.

Relationship of Non-histones of Metaphase Chromosomes and Interphase Chromatin-The non-histone proteins asso- ciated with purified HeLa metaphase chromosomes have been characterized and compared to the proteins of interphase chromatin by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Fig. 7a presents a two-dimensional gel of metaphase chromosomes isolated in a pH 7.4 buffer containing divalent cations (M$', Ca"). The chromosomes were purified by sedimentation into a density gradient of 0.3 M to 0.8 M Metrizamide. Fig. 7a shows that a large number of non-histone species are found with purified metaphase chromosomes and that these proteins display a broad spectrum of molecular weights and isoelectric points. At least 280 species can be counted. Electrophoresing the proteins in SDS-slab gels containing a higher percentage of acrylamide also reveals an additional number of species of lower molecular weight, although most species have molecular weights above 30,000. Chromosomes were also prepared in a buffer containing the polyamines, spermine and spermidine. The two-dimensional gel pattern for spermine/spermidine chromosomes is similar to the pattern for Mg/Ca chromo- somes (result not shown).

Comparing Figs. 5 and 7 shows that the non-histones asso- ciated with purified metaphase chromosomes and interphase chromatin are not identical. A more direct comparison is achieved by mixing samples of protein from chromosomes and

Page 5: Role of Non-histones in Chromosome StructureRole of Non-histones in Chromosome Structure CELL CYCLE VARIATIONS IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS* (Received for publication, December 24, 1981) Kenneth

9090 Cell Cycle Variations in Non-histone Synthesis

chromatin before electrophoresis. The result of a mixing ex- periment is shown in Fig. 76. The positions of some of the major proteins of metaphase chromosomes and interphase chromatin are indicated on the figure. Such experiments con- firm the observation that a number of the major proteins are distinct to chromosomes or to chromatin. Although this ex- periment uses proteins labeled with a radioactive isotope, the same result is found using gels stained with Coomassie bril- liant blue or a silver stain. The silver-stained patterns of interphase chromatin and metaphase chromosome non-his- tones resemble the fluorograms of Figs. 5 and 7a, respectively.

Synthesis of Nuclear Scaffold Proteins-The nuclear scaf- fold is a substructure that maintains the general morphology of the nucleus and that may be involved in the long range organization of chromatin (16). To characterize nuclear scaf- fold proteins, samples were electrophoresed on two-dimen- sional gels (Fig. 8). The samples were obtained by DNase I (100 pg/ml) treatment and extraction with 2 M NaCl at pH 7.4. Only a relatively few proteins are seen on the two-dimen- sional gels. One group has molecular weights of around 65,000- 70,000, and some of these proteins are probably identical with the peripheral lamina proteins (22). Comparing the gels of interphase chromatin non-histones (Fig. 5) with Fig. 8 dem- onstrates that a number of scaffold proteins are distinct from chromatin non-histones.

The synthesis of nuclear scaffold proteins during the cell cycle was quantitated by directly measuring the [:‘“S]methio- nine radioactivity incorporated into a majority of the major and minor proteins (Table I) . Cells were synchronized with double thymidine blocks, and portions of the synchronized cultures were radioactively labeled a t 0-1 h, 4-5 h, 8-9 h, 12- 13 h, 16-17 h, and 20-21 h after release from the GI/S boundary. Nuclear scaffolds were obtained, and the scaffold proteins were resolved by electrophoresis on two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels. The proteins were located by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue. Stained areas corresponding to each of 19 proteins were cut from gels and dissolved by heating in HnOn before determining the radioactivity in a scintillation counter.

These specific changes measured for the synthesis of nuclear scaffold proteins confirm the observations with two-dimen-

FIG. 8. Nuclear scaffold proteins electrophoresed on a two- dimensional gel and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Samples were prepared as described under “Experimental Proce- dures” by treating isolated nuclei with DNase I before extracting proteins with 2 M NaCl at pH 7.4. The cells had been synchronized with a double thymidine block, and nuclear scaffolds were prepared a t 5 h after release from the GI/S boundary. At this time DNA synthesis occurs a t a maximum rate. The majority of the major and minor stained proteins have been numbered, and the same numbering system is used in Table I.

TABLE I Synthesis of nuclear scaffold proteins during the cell cycle

The relative proportions of incorporation of [:‘“S]methionine into a number of the major and minor proteins of the HeLa nuclear scaffold were measured for cells synchronized with a double thymidine block and radioactively labeled for 1 h. Nuclear scaffolds were pre- pared by digestion of isolated nuclei with DNase I and extraction with 2 M NaCl at pH 7.4. Proteins were separated on two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels and located by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue. Gel sections containing each of the 19 proteins indicated in Fig. 8 were excised and dissolved in H202 before [,”‘SS]methionine radio- activity was determined by scintillation counting. Values given in the table represent the percentage of radioactivity in a particular species with respect to the total incorporation into all 19 proteins. The values represent the average of two or more determinations.

Relative proportion

Protein 0-1 h” 4-5 h 8-9 h 12-13 h 16-17 h 20-21 h (GI/S) (S ) ( S / G I ) (M/GI) (GI) (GI)

5& 1 0.4h 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 0.4

3 0.6 1.5 2.4 0.8 2.4 2.2 4 1 .o 1.1 0.8 0.7 1.5 1.2 5 0.7 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.5 1.4 6 2.4 2.8 5.1 3.5 6.1 6.8 7 3.3 4.6 4.5 3.9 5.5 6.2 8 0.7 1.0 2.0 1.3 1.7 2.0 9 2.0 2.3 4.9 4.4 8.5 7.7

10 20.5 18.2 17.2 14.8 9.4 9.3 11 10.8 9.5 5.8 11.6 7.2 6.8 12 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6

2 11.9 12.7 15.7 9.6 17.4 20.2

13 3.5 3.3 2.3 3.1 1.5 1.4 14 3.1 2.5 2.6 3.4 2.7 1.8 15 8.5 9.0 6.7 9.3 5.3 6.2 16 8.0 9.4 10.5 9.5 12.8 13.8 17 7.7 7.4 5.5 7.5 5.1 4.1 18 5.2 4.0 3.9 5.6 3.8 3.6 19 9.2 8.6 7.3 6.5 6.2 4.6

“ The times denote the I-h periods of labeling with [:‘“S]methionine after release of synchronized cells from the GI/S boundary. The position in the cell cycle is given in parenthesis.

The uncertainty in the average values for major species such as proteins 2 and 10 is estimated to be +3%. while the uncertainty for minor species such as proteins 1 and 12 is estimated to be +20%.

sional gels of non-histones from chromatin and nuclei. Signif- icant changes are found in the synthesis of a number of nuclear scaffold proteins. The changes, however, are not ex- treme, nor are the changes confined to any position in the cell cycle. For example, the major species being synthesized at 0- 1 h is protein 10, which incorporated 20.5% of the [:‘“S]methi- onine. The percentage of incorporation decreases progres- sively through the cell cycle by more than one-half to 9.3% a t 20-21 h. At 20-21 h, the major species being synthesized is protein 2. This protein contains 20.2% of the radioactivity, a value which has increased from 11.9% at 0-1 h. Other proteins which show a generally smooth progression in the relative proportion of incorporation during the cell cycle include pro- tein 16, which increases from 8.0% to 13.8%, and protein 19, which decreases from 9.2% to 4.6%. The period close to mitosis (12-13 h) shows some anomalies in the synthesis of proteins. The synthesis of protein 2, for example, decreases substan- tially a t 12-13 h, although the synthesis of this protein is generally increasing.

Cell Cycle Variations in the Synthesis of Nuclear Pro- teins-The incorporation of [“‘S]methionine by whole nuclei prepared from synchronized suspension cultures of HeLa cells was characterized by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Cells, synchronized with double thymidine or hydroxyurea blocks, were pulse-labeled for 1.0 h with [:‘“S]methionine. Nuclei were isolated, and the nuclear proteins were separated

Page 6: Role of Non-histones in Chromosome StructureRole of Non-histones in Chromosome Structure CELL CYCLE VARIATIONS IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS* (Received for publication, December 24, 1981) Kenneth

Cell Cycle Variations in Non-histone Synthesis 9091

0 h

'z Y X

9 pH 7 5

FIG. 9. Synthesis during the cell cycle of proteins from whole nuclei. Synchronized cells were pulse-labeled at ( a ) 0-1 h, ( b ) 12-13 h, and ( c ) 16-17 h after release from GI/& and nuclei were prepared. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was performed, with the proteins being separated in the first dimension by the nonequili- brium procedure (39) and in the second dimension on SDS-polyacryl- amide slab gels. The positions of major proteins of the nuclear scaffold (A) and interphase chromatin (0) are indicated in b.

by the nonequilibrium procedure (39) and then on SDS-poly- acrylamide gels. Fig. 9 contains two-dimensional patterns for nuclei at 0-1 h, 12-13 h, and 16-17 h after release from a double thymidine block. Whole nuclei show variations in protein synthesis that are similar to those of chromatin. Dramatic changes in the species that are synthesized are not found, though significant modulations in the various species are apparent. The two-dimensional patterns for whole nuclei show a strong resemblance to the appearance of the chromatin gels (compare Figs. 5 and 9). This, of course, reflects the fact that chromatin is the major component of nuclei. Nuclear scaffold proteins can also be seen in the patterns for whole nuclei, and the positions of some of the major nuclear scaffold and chromatin species are indicated on Fig. 96.

DISCUSSION

A major purpose of this investigation was to use two-di- mensional gels to determine the variations during the cell

cycle in the synthesis of non-histones associated with inter- phase chromatin. Such variations may be involved in changes in the structural organization of the HeLa genome during interphase. The non-histones of interphase chromatin were also compared to the proteins of isolated metaphase chromo- somes. In mitosis the genome undergoes its greatest organi- zational change to form the characteristic structural features of metaphase chromosomes. Understanding the differences in non-histones from interphase to metaphase may help to reveal the interactions which are responsible for the condensation of metaphase chromosomes. Another purpose of these experi- ments was to determine whether nuclear scaffold proteins are unique species or are also found as major proteins of chro- matin.

Chromatin was prepared by micrococcal nuclease digestion of isolated nuclei after labeling synchronized cells a t 0-1 h, 4- 5 h, 8-9 h, 12-13 h, and 16-17 h after release from the GI/S boundary. Electrophoresis on one-dimensional SDS-poly- acrylamide gels revealed significant differences in non-histone synthesis, particularly when comparing early S phase (0-1 h after GI/S) and a period close to mitosis (12-13 h after GI/S). The peak of DNA synthesis occurs a t around 5 h after release from GI/S, but this burst of nucleic acid synthesis is not correlated with a substantial change in non-histone synthesis. 8- to 9-h samples also show an intermediate pattern of protein synthesis. By 16-17 h after GI/S, the synchronized cells have progressed through mitosis and into GI of the next cell cycle, and protein synthesis a t 16-17 h also has a pattern between that of 0-1 h and 12-13 h samples.

Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis ex- tends these results by providing a higher resolution separation of proteins. On two-dimensional gels, the patterns of incor- poration of [:'%]methionine show significant changes during the cell cycle, but, as was the situation with one-dimensional gels, abrupt, large-scale alterations in protein synthesis are not observed. Instead, a progressive modulation of protein synthesis is found which shows the greatest difference when comparing 0-1 h and 12-13 h samples.

Isolated metaphase chromosomes were also seen to have a complex composition of non-histone proteins. Over 280 spe- cies, both basic and acidic and possessing a wide range of molecular weights, could be counted on two-dimensional gels. The pattern of proteins is not identical with that of interphase chromatin. A reason for this could be that a number of metaphase non-histones are structural components of regions unique to metaphase chromosomes, such as the kinetochore, and would, therefore, not have a counterpart among inter- phase chromatin non-histones. In addition, proteins that are involved in maintaining the condensed state of chromosomes may be found as components of metaphase chromosomes. And since metaphase chromosomes are effectively inactive in gene expression, proteins involved in switching from the active to inactive states of the genome could also account for the differences between metaphase chromosomes and interphase chromatin.

In addition to chromatin, another major component of the interphase nucleus is the nuclear scaffold. The nuclear scaffold is the structural framework which maintains the large scale features of nuclear morphology. The framework helps to compartmentalize the interphase genome, and, since structure is intimately related to function, this higher order constraint upon the genome is also likely to be important in gene expres- sion. The protein composition of nuclear scaffolds revealed by two-dimensional electrophoresis is much less complex than either chromosomes or chromatin. Some of these proteins are distinct from major components of chromatin. This is to be expected in view of the separate nature of the nuclear scaffold.

Page 7: Role of Non-histones in Chromosome StructureRole of Non-histones in Chromosome Structure CELL CYCLE VARIATIONS IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS* (Received for publication, December 24, 1981) Kenneth

9092 Cell Cycle Variations in Non-histone Synthesis

Because of the relatively small number of proteins associ- ated with the nuclear scaffold, this substructure was chosen to quantitate changes in the incorporation of [35S]methionine during the cell cycle. Directly determining the incorporated radioactivity for each of 19 proteins showed variations of around 2-fold for several species. The changes, for the most part, represented gradual increases or decreases in incorpo- ration through the cell cycle. Some anomalies were seen for samples labeled at 12-13 h (M/GI). A correlation was not found between DNA synthesis, which peaks at 5 h after release from GJS, and the synthesis of nuclear scaffold pro- teins.

These results establish the basis for further experiments that have the ultimate aim of correlating changes in non- histones with changes in the structure and function of the interphase and metaphase genome.

REFERENCES 1. Adolph, K. W., Cheng, S. M., and Laemmli, U. K. (1977) Cell 12,

2. Paulson, J. R., and Laemmli, U. K. (1977) Cell 12,817-828 3. Maio, J. J., and Schildkraut, C. L. (1967) J. Mol. Biol. 24, 29-39 4. Stubblefield, E., and Wray, W. (1971) Chromosoma (Berl.) 32,

5. Jeppesen, P. G. N., Bankier, A. T., and Sanders, L. (1978) Exp.

6 . Warren, A. C., and Cook, P. R. (1978) J. Cell Sci. 30, 211-226 7. Campbell, A. M., Briggs, R. C., Bird, R. E., and Hnilica, L. S.

8. Mullinger, A. M., and Johnson, R. T. (1980) J. CellSci. 46,61-86 9. Rattner, J. B., Goldsmith, M., and Hamkalo, B. A. (1980) Chro-

10. Rattner, J. B., Goldsmith, M. R., and Hamkalo, B. A. (1981)

11. Ruin , S. V., Mantieva, V. L., and Georgiev, G. P. (1978) Nucleic

12. Jeppesen, P. G. N., and Bankier, A. T. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res.

13. Bowen, B. C. (1981) Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 5093-5108 14. Brasch, K., and Settefileld, G. (1974) Exp. Cell Res. 83, 175-185

805-816

262-294

Cell Res. 115,293-302

(1979) Nucleic Acids Res. 6,205-218

mosoma (Berl.) 79,215-224

Chromosoma (Berl.) 82, 341-351

Acids Res. 5, 4737-4751

7,49-67

15. Cook, P. R., and Brazell, I. A. (1975) J. Cell Sci. 19, 261-279 16. Adolph, K. W. (1980) J . Cell Sci. 42, 291-304 17. Benyajati, C., and Worcel, A. (1976) Cell, 9, 393-407 18. Igo-Kemenes, T., and Zachau, H. G. (1978) Cold Spring Harbor

19. Vogelstein, B., Pardoll, D. M., and Coffey, D. S. (1980) Cell 22,

20. McCready, S. J., Godwin, J., Mason, D. W., Brazell, I. A., and

21. Berezney, L., and Coffey, D. S. (1974) Biochem. Biophys. Res.

22. Aaronson, R. P., and Blobel, G. (1975) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.

23. Keller, J. M., and Riley, D. E. (1976) Science (Wash. D. C.) 193,

24. Hodge, L. D., Mancini, P., Davis, F. M., and Heywood, P. (1977)

25. Miller, T. E., Huang, C.-Y., and Pogo, A. 0. (1978) J. Cell Biol.

26. McGhee, J. D., and Felsenfeld, G. (1980) Annu. Reu. Biochern.

27. Milcarek, C., and Zahn, K. (1978) J. Cell Biol. 79,833-838 28. Bravo, R., and Celis, J. E. (1980) J. Cell Biol. 84, 795-802 29. Peterson, J . L., and McConkey, E. H. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251,

30. Stein, G . S., and Borun, T. W. (1972) J. Cell Biol. 52, 292-307 31. Bborjee, J. S., and Pederson, T. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.

32. Prescott, D. M. (1976) Reproduction in Eukaryotic Cells, pp. 31-

33. Plagemann, P. G. W., Richey, D. P., Zylka, J. M., and Erbe, J.

34. Noll, M., Thomas, J. O., and Kornberg, R. D. (1975) Science

35. Butler, P. J. G., and Thomas, J. 0. (1980) J. Mol. Biol. 140,505-

36. Adolph, K. W. (1980) Chromosoma (Berl.) 76,23-33 37. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature (Berl.) 227,680-685 38. O’Farrell, P. H. (1975) J. B i d Chem. 250,4007-4021 39. O’Farrell, P. Z., Goodman, H. M., and O’Farrell, P. H. (1977) Cell

40. Laskey, R. A,, and Mills, A. D. (1975) Eur. J. Biochem. 56,335-

Symp. Quant. Bid . 42, 109-118

79-85

Cook, P. R. (1980) J. Cell Sci. 46,365-386

Comrnun. 60, 1410-1417

S. A . 72, 1007-1011

399-401

J. Cell Biol. 72, 194-208

76,675-691

49, 1115-1156

548-554

S. A. 69,3345-3349

35, Academic Press, New York

(1975) J. Cell Biol. 64,29-41

(Wash. D. C.) 187, 1203-1206

529

12, 1133-1142

34 1