roads 2000 strategic plan 2013 – 2017 2000 strategic plan.pdf · inistry f ro ads enh ancing...

MINISTRY OF ROADSEnhancing connectivity

iStrategic Plan 2013 – 2017

Roads 2000 Strategic Plan

ROADS 2000 STRATEGIC PLAN

2013 – 2017

With financial & technical assistance from:

ii Strategic Plan 2013 – 2017

Roads 2000 Strategic PlanMINISTRY OF ROADSEnhancing connectivity


iiiStrategic Plan 2013 – 2017


Table of ContentsAbbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................................................... vForeword by the Minister, MoR .................................................................................................................. viStatement by the Permanent Secretary, MoR .......................................................................................... viiiThe 2nd R2000 Programme Strategic Plan (2013 – 2017) at a Glance ....................................................... ixExecutive Summary .................................................................................................................................... xi

1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................11.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 21.2 Definition of the Roads 2000 Strategy ................................................................................................. 31.3 Situation Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 31.3.1 National Targets for R2000 Programme ........................................................................................... 31.3.2 R2000 Programme Achievements .................................................................................................... 31.3.3 GoK Contribution .............................................................................................................................. 41.3.5 General Observation on the Performance of Roads 2000 Projects ..................................................51.3.6 Challenges ........................................................................................................................................ 51.3.7 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 61.4 Rationale for Extending the Roads 2000 Programme .......................................................................... 61.4.1 Current Socio-economic Situation .................................................................................................... 61.4.2 Infrastructure Goals under the first Medium Term Plan .................................................................. 71.4.3 Kenya Youth Empowerment Project, Component 1 ......................................................................... 81.4.4 The Constitution of Kenya, 2010 ...................................................................................................... 91.4.5 Complementary Role of Counties and National Governments ......................................................101.4.6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 101.5 Road Sub-Sector Reforms ................................................................................................................... 101.6 Framework of the Roads 2000 Programme ...............................................................................................................121.6.1 Strategic Partners ........................................................................................................................... 121.6.2 Organisational set-up, responsibilities and functions ..................................................................... 131.6.3 Financing ........................................................................................................................................ 14

2 MANDATE ....................................................................................................................................... 162.1 National Policy Level .......................................................................................................................... 172.1.1 New Constitution and Bill of Rights ................................................................................................ 172.1.2 Vision 2030 ..................................................................................................................................... 172.2 Sector Policy Level .............................................................................................................................. 172.2.1 Sessional Paper No. 5 (2006) .......................................................................................................... 172.2.2 Road Sector Investment Programme and Strategy ......................................................................... 182.3 Sector Strategy Level .......................................................................................................................... 182.3.1 Ministry of Roads ............................................................................................................................ 182.3.2 Ministry of Local Government ........................................................................................................ 19

iv Strategic Plan 2013 – 2017


3 STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 203.1 Current participation situation ........................................................................................................... 213.2 Required participation ....................................................................................................................... 214 Vision, Mission and Values ................................................................................................................. 224.1 Vision Statement ................................................................................................................................ 234.2 Mission Statement ............................................................................................................................. 234.3 Value Statement ................................................................................................................................. 23

5 STRATEGIC ANALYSIS (SWOT) .......................................................................................................... 26

6 STRATEGY OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED RESULTS ........................................................................................276.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 286.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................................... 306.3 Strategies, Activities, Output Targets and Indicators of Success ........................................................ 30

7 IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS ........................................................................................................... 357.1 Process Elements: .............................................................................................................................. 347.2 Promotion of the Strategic Plan: ........................................................................................................ 347.3 Development of Systems and Tools: .................................................................................................. 347.4 Implementation of the Strategic Plan ................................................................................................ 34

8 MonitoringandEvaluation ......................................................................................................... 38

9 ASSUMPTIONS AND RISKS .............................................................................................................. 399.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 409.2 Conducive environment for the Implementation of the R2000 Strategy ...........................................40Annex I: Implementation Action Plan ........................................................................................................ 43Annex IIA: Outline Targets and Implementation Budget (MOR)Annex IIB: Outline Targets and

Implementation Budget (KRB) ................................................................................................. 54Annex IIC: Outline Targets and Implementation Budget (KeNHA) ............................................................. 64Annex IID: Outline Targets and Implementation Budget (KeRRA) ............................................................. 75Annex IIE: Outline Targets and Implementation Budget (KURA) ............................................................... 85


vStrategic Plan 2013 – 2017


AbbreviationsandAcronyms

AFD Agence Française de Développement

AfDB African Development Bank

AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

CCIs Cross Cutting Issues

CCN City Council of Nairobi

CDF Constituency Development Fund

CRC Constituency Roads Committee

Danida Danish International Development Agency

ERS Economic Recovery Strategy

ESP Economic Stimulus Project

EU/EC European Union/European Commission

GNI Gross National Income

GNP Gross National Product

GoK Government of Kenya

HIV Human Immuno Deficiency Virus

KeNHA Kenya National Highways Authority

KEPSA Kenya Private Sector Alliance

KeRRA Kenya Rural Roads Authority

KFS Kenya Forestry Service

KfW Kreditanstalt für Weideraubau

KIHBT Kenya Institute of Highways and Building Technology

Km Kilometres

KRA Key Result Area

KRB Kenya Roads Board

KTC Kisii Training Centre

KURA Kenya Urban Roads Authority

KWS Kenya Wildlife Service

KYEP Kenya Youth Empowerment Project

LATF Local Authority Transfer Fund

LB Labour Based

LBT Labour Based Technology

LRBA Local Resource Based Approach

M&E Monitoring and Evaluation

MDGs Millennium Development Goals

ME&MR Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources

MNPD&V2030 Ministry of Planning, National Development & Vision 2030

MoA Ministry of Agriculture

MoF Ministry of Finance

MoF&W Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife

MoGC&SD Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Development

MoH Ministry of Health

MoR Ministry of Roads

MoRDA Ministry of Regional Development Authorities

MoYAS Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports

MRP Minor Roads Programme

NCC National Coordination Committee

NGO Non Governmental Organization

NSC National Steering Committee

NYS National Youth Service

PLWD People Leaving with Disability

R&D Research and Development

R2000 Roads 2000

RACECA Roads and Civil Engineering Contractors Association

RMLF Road Maintenance Levy Fund

RSIP Road Sector Investment Programme and Strategy

SAGA Semi Autonomous Government Agency

Sida Swedish International Cooperation Development Agency

SWAP Sector Wide Approach

TA Technical Advisor

ToR Terms of Reference

WB World Bank

vi Strategic Plan 2013 – 2017


ForewordbytheMinisterforRoads

KENYA government is striving to improve the welfare of its people through programmes and strategies that focus on poverty eradication, creation of wealth, employment and empowerment of our people through self determination and participation in decision making.

The Country’s Vision 2030 aims to transform Kenya into a newly industrialising “middle-income country providing a high quality life to all its citizens by the year 2030”. Infrastructure sector is one of the foundations of the three pillars expected to “Provide cost effective world-class infrastructure facilities and services in support of Vision 2030”.

Roads 2000 programme was identified in the First Medium Term Plan (2008 – 2012) as one of the flagship projects, with the objective of creating short-term labour intensive employment for young people.

The strategy focuses on the optimum use of labour and local resources with the support of appropriate tools and equipment. Some of the reasons for adopting the Roads 2000 Strategy are:

a) Kenya has a big number of un-employed and under-employed work force which can effectively be used for the maintenance and improvement of the country’s infrastructure, especially roads.

b) By utilising labour intensive methods, the country will save substantial foreign exchange which would normally have been used to import equipment and necessary petrol/diesel, oil, lubricants and spare parts

c) The Strategy can create substantial amount of jobs each year thereby reducing unemployment and creating wealth for the rural and urban poor.

The promulgation of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, and in particular the devolution of governance structures has brought with it new opportunities for beneficiaries to participate more actively in shaping and implementing development initiatives. The Constitution, under the Bill of Rights (Chapter 4), Article 43(1) provides for broad based Economic and Social Rights of persons. The R2000 concept effectively facilitates the compliance of the road sub sector with the provisions of the Constitution.

The Road Sub-Sector Policy document, Sessional Paper No. 5, of 2006 led to the formation of the 3 road authorities established under the Kenya Roads Act, 2007. Their operationalisation has streamlined the implementation of R2000 programmes which has lead to more efficient and effective implementation of the Strategy.

This has set a firm foundation for the rolling out of R2000 Strategy Nationally for the implementation of roadworks and In this regard, the Government will through the Road Maintenance Levy Fund implement the Strategy across the whole country.

This 2nd Strategic plan (2013-2017) is meant to serve as a framework of implementation for R2000 Programme nationwide. The R2000 Strategic Plan provides the necessary guidance to stakeholders at all


viiStrategic Plan 2013 – 2017


levels of governance structures on issues related to Local Resources Based approach especially in regards to Cross Cutting Issues (CCIs).

The Government will work closely with all stakeholders and Development Partners (ADB, AfD, Danida, EU, Finnish government, KfW and Sida) who have supported the Strategy so far and those who continue to support it in future. In the next five years, it is planned to utilise Kshs 149 billion of Government funds and contributions from the Development Partners in the implementation of the Strategy. This is expected to create about 23 million person days of employment annually for the next five years.

This will significantly contribute to our national goals of employment and wealth creation there by improving the livelihood of our people.

I therefore wish to thank all those involved in the development of this strategic plan. Special thanks go to ILO for supporting the formulation of this strategic plan.

In conclusion, I call upon all Kenyans to support R2000 strategy in general and the implementation of this strategic plan in particular in order to ensure maximum benefits and a bright future for our people.

Hon.FranklinBett,MP,EGH.Minister for Roads

viii Strategic Plan 2013 – 2017


StatementbythePermanentSecretary,MoRKenya has a tradition for Structured Labour Based road works, starting in the 1970’s with the Rural Access Roads Program (RAR) that was implemented from 1974 to 1986 and constructed about 8,000 km of farm to market access roads. This was followed by the Minor Roads Program (MRP) in the late eighties (1986 to 1996) which improved about 4,500 km of the classified Secondary (D), Minor (E) and Special Purpose roads such as tea, coffee, settlement area and wheat roads in areas of high agricultural potential in the country.

In the early 1990’s it was realized that the level of road maintenance was not sufficient to keep the growing number of improved roads in good condition. In order to address the situation, the Government initiated the R2000 Concept / Strategy. The Roads 2000 Strategy is a method of road development and management that ensures optimum utilization and development of locally available resources where technically and economically feasible. The R2000 Strategy was to be rolled out nationwide to cover the entire road network based on the lessons learnt from the two previous labour based programmes (RARP & MRP). The rolling out was expected to be complete by the year 2000, hence the name “Roads 2000”.

However, due to various institutional and operational challenges, the strategy was only implemented in 6 districts in Kenya by the year 2000 and its impact was limited. To enhance the uptake of the programme, the MoR developed the 1st R2000 Strategic Plan in 2004 covering the period from July 2005 to June 2010. This Strategic Plan was meant to provide a framework for the implementation of the programme. By June 2010 when the first strategic plan came to a close, the R2000 programme had been implemented in many parts of the country such as Nyanza, Rift valley, Eastern and Central provinces. In the process about 8,000 km of roads were improved and more than 4 million person days of employment were generated in the rural areas, where such opportunities were limited. The programme also championed the inclusion of social and environmental issues into the roads subsector.

Encouraged by the achievements during the 1st Strategic Plan period and the wish to expand the benefits to Kenyans nationwide, the MoR decided to develop the 2nd R2000 Strategic Plan. The plan is aimed at addressing the challenges encountered during implementation of the 1st R2000 programme, further developing and rolling out of R2000 strategy as well as consolidating the gains made.

The 2nd R2000 Strategic Plan will guide the implementation of the R2000 programme and is expected to result in substantial benefits to our people. Key among these will be the creation of gainful employment opportunities, supporting local industry and more importantly improving the country’s road network. The improved road network will facilitate the transportation of goods and services to and from the markets thereby stimulating the local economy.

I therefore urge all the implementing agencies to seriously engage in the realization of the 2nd R2000 Strategic Plan.Thank you

Eng.MichaelS.M.Kamau,CBSPermanentSecretary,MinistryofRoads


ixStrategic Plan 2013 – 2017


AcknowledgmentbyExecutiveDirector,KRBThis 2nd R2000 strategic plan is a result of combined efforts by many road practitioners from the MoR, Road Authorities, KRB and other stakeholders. The Strategic Plan was developed in a participatory process and incorporated a wide range of views. I therefore wish to thank the above institutions, in particular KeNHA, KeRRA, KURA and KRB, for their support in the development of the Plan. It is also my sincere hope that all the stakeholders that helped develop this strategic plan will take ownership and remain committed in its implementation.

The process of developing the Strategic Plan was spearheaded by the National Working Group (NWG) which was established by the National Steering Committee (NSC). The work of the NWG was supported by a consultant engaged by the International Labour Organization (ILO). The NWG put in long working hours to see the 2nd Strategic Plan to completion. I therefore wish to thank members of the NWG for a job well done. I also acknowledge and appreciate the continued support from the ILO.

I would also like to express my sincere gratitude to all the members of the Roads 2000 NCC, NWG Secretariat and the consulting team who actively participated in development of the Strategic Plan. In this regard, special mention goes to;

Eng. Joseph Muturi KeRRA

Mr. Asfaw Kidanu ILO/ KeRRA

Eng. Silas Kinoti KURA

Eng. Njuguna Gatitu KeNHA

Eng. Christopher Nzioka KeNHA

Eng. Hudson Kihumba KRB

Eng. Wilson Kosgey KRB

Mr. Livingstone Karanja KRB

Mr. Calistus Baraza KURA

Eng. Nyakundi Omari Consultant

Eng. Tom Opiyo Consultant

My sincere gratitude goes to the Roads 2000 National Steering Committee under the Chairmanship of the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry Roads for their thorough discussion, subsequent amendments and final approval of this document.

Finally I would like to thank the Minister for Roads Hon. Franklin Bett for his continued guidance and support in implementing the Roads 2000 strategy as manifested in the adoption of this document as an official policy document of the Ministry of Roads.

Dr.F.N.Nyangaga,OGWExecutive Director, Kenya Roads Board.

x Strategic Plan 2013 – 2017


The2ndR2000ProgrammeStrategicPlan(2013–2017)ataGlance

STRA

TEG

IC P

LAN

201

3-17

ROADS 2000 PROGRAMME

MISSION: To improve access to socio-economic facilities by promoting the development and management of the road network .......

2quality, cost-effective and

socially responsive road works

OBJECTIVES

1create and sustain an enabling

environment

3development of a national capacity

4integration of cross cutting issues

POLICY, REGULATION & COORDINATION

MINISTRY OF ROADS

R2000 National Steering Committee

R2000 National Coordination Committee

TARGETS

ROAD SECTOR POLICY: The Government will promote the use of local resources and labour-based methods …….

STRATEGIC PARTNERS

MoFKRBOPM

DP

KRBRAsKWSKSB

Others

MoLMoYS

MoGSSMoE

KIHBT/KTCEd. Inst.Pr. Inst.

Private Sector

VISION: To attain and sustain excellence in road development and management .......


xiStrategic Plan 2013 – 2017


ExecutiveSummaryIntroductionIn the early 1990’s, the rural access roads improved under the RAR and MRP in many areas of Kenya were of a better standard than the higher class feeder roads. As a result the Government of Kenya (GoK) through the Road Maintenance Initiative (RMI) identified constraints to road maintenance and outlined mitigations measures thereto. One of the recommendations was to utilise the labour based experience to also maintain the higher class feeder roads as well as some paved roads in both rural an urban areas. The Roads 2000 maintenance strategy was born out of these needs.

The Roads 2000 strategy was conceived with the aim of implementing a new approach to rapidly bring roads to a maintainable standard and place them under effective maintenance with the optimum use of local resources. The name was derived from the vision of implementing the strategy throughout Kenya by the year 2000. However, over the years the ‘Roads 2000’ has become a generic name signifying local resource based technology.

The main features of the Roads 2000 Strategy include:

a) The use of optimum mix of labour and equipment

b) Increased use of local resources

c) Adoption of network approach instead of the conventional link based approach

d) Increased involvement of the private sector in infrastructure delivery

e) Provide an employment-based social protection mechanism for the marginalized population.

f) Systematic or efficient use of scarce maintenance funds

The Government consequently adopted the concept for full national implementation in 1994

after piloting the concept in some areas of the country. Since then a number of Roads 2000 projects were undertaken in all parts of the country with support of development partners.

The first Strategic Plan (July 2005 to June 2010) was developed and approved in 2004/05with the aim of providing an implementation framework for all partners concerned.

Since 2005, the Government of Kenya has been implementing the Roads 2000 programme which has been largely successful despite some challenges. Significant achievements were made in all the components of the programme particularly in employment creation, training, creating economic and social opportunities for vulnerable groups such as women and the youth. The programme improved more than 7,000 km of rural roads, generated about 4,7 million person-days of employment, trained 5,600 LRB contractors and injected more than Ksh1,0 billion (US$13 million) to the rural Kenya. About 25% and 40% of the direct beneficiaries of the programme were women and youth respectively.

Encouraged by these positive results, the Government decided to expand the programme and hence a second strategic plan.

RationaleDespite the recent favourable economic situation and high potential for growth, poverty in Kenya still persists and in some areas is increasing.

The GoK acknowledges that poverty, unemployment and social imbalances are the most pervasive problems that the country is confronted with and is committed to a broad based policy reforms and programmes meant to address these challenges.

In view of the above situation, employment intensive approaches are applicable in all sectors where semi-skilled and unskilled labour can cope

xii Strategic Plan 2013 – 2017


with the production requirements.

The Constitution of Kenya, 2010 provides for the rights of every person to broad based rights which must be incorporated in the delivery of social programmes. This Plan incorporates strategies that will facilitate compliance of the road sub sector with the relevant sections of the Constitution and thus provide the necessary guidance to stakeholders at all levels of the emerging governance structures.

More over the Roads 2000 programme is identified in the First Medium Term Plan (2008 – 2012) of Vision 2030 as one of the flagship projects during the period, with the objective of creating short-term labour intensive employment for young people.

RoadSubsectorReformThe road subsector in Kenya has undergone extensive institutional reforms since the early 1990’s. The creation of the Road Maintenance Levy Fund (RMLF) in 1994, which has continued to provide a secure and sustainable source of maintenance funds, and the establishment of the Kenya Roads Board (KRB) in 1999 to manage the fund, have been important milestones.

A Road Sub-Sector Policy document, Sessional Paper No. 5 on the Development and Management of the Roads Sub-sector for Sustainable Economic Growth, was concluded and endorsed by Parliament in 2006. The Policy has, as its main goal, the attainment of an efficient road sub-sector that supports and promotes economic growth through the cost effective provision and maintenance of road infrastructure.

Furthermore, the Kenya Roads Act, 2007 established three new Road Authorities, namely, the Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA), the Kenya Rural Roads Authority (KeRRA), and the Kenya Urban Roads Authority (KURA). These Authorities have now been fully constituted and the new institutional structure is in place.

In addition to the road sub-sector, the R2000 programme relies on a strong partnership network that covers all stakeholders that are committed to the ideals of its strategy. There is also a need to put in place a framework to guide, synchronise and coordinate the overall management and operational activities of the various partners to ensure effective implementation of the programme. In this regard it is necessary to establish a dedicated fulltime National Coordination Secretariat based in the KRB with the responsibility of coordinating the activities of all road agencies and development partners that are involved in the implementation of Roads 2000 programme.

FundingThe bulk of local funding for the implementation of the R2000 Strategy will come from the RMLF through KRB. Other sources include national development budget allocations, contributions from Development partners as well as local sources such as the LATF, CDF and Agricultural Cess.

Mandate The mandate for the Roads 2000 Programme is primarily derived from the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 and Vision 2030. The programme also directly links to or contributes to several national and sectoral policies and programmes.

VisionStatementTo attain and sustain excellence in road development and management that contributes to the National Development Priorities of Kenya

MissionStatementTo improve access to socio-economic facilities by promoting the development and management of the road network using local resources to the satisfaction of stakeholders


xiiiStrategic Plan 2013 – 2017


ValueStatementThe practitioners and implementers of R2000 strategy must commit themselves to live up to the highest ideals of good governance and to seek to be trustworthy, respectful and honest; be socially responsible, and promote and pursue excellence throughout its operations. As a consequence the implementing practitioners of the R2000 strategy shall:

1. Operate to the highest levels of probity, accountability and transparency;

2. Act at all times with the highest degree of honesty and integrity;

3. Take initiative and calculated risk towards realization of the vision and mission of the strategy;

ObjectivesThe objectives of the 2nd Roads 2000 Strategic plan will contribute to achieving the overall goal, Vision and Mission of the programme. The four objectives that define the cornerstones of the strategy have been identified as:

a) Objective # 1: To develop and manage roads in a cost-effective and socially responsive manner

b) Objective # 2: To enhance and sustain a national implementation capacity for development and management of roads

c) Objective # 3: To enhance and sustain an enabling environment for the implementation of the strategy

d) Objective # 4: To ensure full integration of cross cutting issues

NationalTargetsThenationaltargetstobeachievedovertheplanperiod are:

• Routine Maintenance (Paved) – 2,536km annually

• Routine Maintenance (Unpaved) – 31,599km annually

• Periodic Maintenance (Paved) – 1,538km

• Periodic Maintenance (Unpaved) – 10,683km

• Rehabilitation/Spot Improvement (Paved) – 472km

• Rehabilitation Spot Improvement (Unpaved) – 890km

• Upgrading (Paved) –569km

• Upgrading (Unpaved) –40km

• New Construction/Reconstruction (Paved) – 194km

• New Construction (Unpaved) – 513km

• Employment creation of 23 Million Person-days (104,274 jobs) annually over the plan period with a minimum of 33.3% being women and 2% being Persons Living With Disabilities

• Additional awareness creation and Training:

o Training of 1,316 No. Road Agency and contractor Staff.

o Training of 844 No. Small Scale Contractors for Routine/Improvement works

o Training of 150 No. Consultantso At least 20 No. Sensitization Workshops for

practising Engineers

In addition to the above, a number of supporting policies and guidelines as well as technical and managerial manuals will be developed in the plan period.

The 2nd Strategic Plan will have three broad areas of Implementation, namely promotion of the Strategic Plan, development of Systems and Tools, and Implementation of the Strategic Plan.

xiv Strategic Plan 2013 – 2017


Financial TargetsThe financial requirements to achieve the planned activities are as summarized below;SummarybyActivity

ActivityQuantityKM

Budget(KShs.mill)

Routine Maintenance 34,1361 26,617Periodic Maintenance 12,221 58,254Rehabilitation 1,362 16,539Upgrading 609 21,991New Construction 707 24,585Capacity Building - 892 TOTAL 148,878

1Average Annual figure

NOTE: LATF funds have not been included in the above figures. LATF contribution will be inserted once the detailed statistics are available.

Summaryby

FundingInstitution Budget (KShs. mill) MoR 465 KeNHA 38,813 KeRRA 95,348 KURA 11,206 KWS 2,906 KRB 140 TOTAL 148,878

summary by implementation agency

RoadAgencytargetsforthenextfiveyears(2013-2017)

The Road agency targets for physical works, R2000 budget and employment creation for the next five years under each intervention type are outlined in the table below (Nextpage)


xvStrategic Plan 2013 – 2017


Ke

NHA5yrstargets

KeRR

A5yrstargets

KURA

5yrstargets

KWS5y

rsta

rgets

INTE

RVEN

TIO

N T

YPE

PHYS

ICA

LBU

DG

ETLA

BOU

RPH

YSIC

AL

BUD

GET

LABO

UR

PHYS

ICA

LBU

DG

ETLA

BOU

RPH

YSIC

AL

BUD

GET

LABO

UR

Routi

ne M

aint

enan

ce (P

R)10

,529

.23

2,37

0.97

2,

870.

86

1,68

4.01

1,

375.

02

1,

802.

69

4

68.5

9 3

,184

.45

3,91

0

-

-

-

Routi

ne M

aint

enan

ce (U

R10

,932

.81

1,34

8.62

1,

617.

46

145,

778.

23

17,9

05.1

5 21

,249

.50

1

55.0

0

21

8.63

26

6 1

,130

.77

2

14.5

1 25

4.21

Peri

odic

Mai

nten

ance

(PR)

996.

46

7,56

5.39

7,

003.

97

482.

44

8,18

8.53

7,68

2.19

5

9.41

67

4.86

63

3

-

-

-

Peri

odic

Mai

nten

ance

(UR)

171.

93

484.

86

443.

86

10,3

00.8

8 40

,546

.60

36,7

02.4

8

4

7.24

16

0.51

14

9

163

.01

6

33.5

0 54

5.84

Reha

bilit

ation

/Spo

t

Impr

ovem

ent (

PR)

149.

89

2,54

1.76

97

7.45

29

2.93

8,

286.

28

3,

191.

53

29.

31

732.

44

284

-

-

-

Reha

bilit

ation

/Spo

t

Impr

ovem

ent (

UR)

-

-

-

686.

32

3,47

6.14

5,77

6.43

3

7.79

21

4.01

37

4

165

.77

1,2

88.4

7 1,

876.

44

Reco

nstr

uctio

n (P

R)16

1.58

18

,351

.35

7,11

4.56

-

-

-

11.

20

1,5

43.7

6 19

3

-

-

-

Reco

nstr

uctio

n (U

R)-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

-

-

-

Upg

radi

ng /

Exp

ansi

on (

PR)

53.2

1 6,

036.

33

3,22

9.23

50

0.00

13

,814

.08

4

,038

.73

10.

71

1,4

76.6

4 42

5

5.43

347

.05

139.

86

Upg

radi

ng /

Exp

ansi

on (U

R)-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

40

.00

3

16.7

9 38

7.44

New

Con

stru

ction

(PR)

-

-

-

- -

-

2

1.23

2

,926

.44

1,38

5

-

-

-

New

Con

stru

ction

UR)

-

-

-

500.

00

1,65

7.69

-

-

-

0

12

.60

1

05.5

1 17

6.01

TOTA

L22

,995

38,6

9923

,257

160,

225

95,2

4980

,444

840

11,1

327,

620

1,51

82,

906

3,38

0

Capa

cityBuilding

excl

usiv

e

of M

OR

Kshs

465

Mill

ion

and

KRB

Kshs

140

Mill

ion

114

99

74

-

Gra

nd T

otal

38

,813

95,3

4811

,206

2,90

6

All

Impl

emen

ting

Age

ncie

s w

ill b

e re

quire

d to

ado

pt th

ese

targ

ets

in th

eir

Perf

orm

ance

Con

trac

ts c

omm

enci

ng in

FY2

013-

2014

xvi Strategic Plan 2013 – 2017


R2000STRATEGICPLAN(2013-2017)CONTRIBU-TION TO RSIP

The R2000 financial targets of this strategic plan represent approximately 13% contribution of R2000 to the RSIP annual financial target. It should be noted however that the figures used to arrive at this contribution are the annual average implementation budget for RSIP phase 1 for year 2013 & 2014 (2yrs) while those targets for R2000 are for the same time period of the Strategic plan.

(Details of R2000 Contribution to RSIP are under chapter 6.3)

MonitoringandEvaluation(M&E)M&E is part of the overall road management system. The 2nd strategic plan envisages effective M&E to be undertaken during the plan period and incorporate Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to be monitored in the process. This will ensure full effectiveness of M&E as it will be closely linked to activities at every stage of the programme lifecycle.

AssumptionsandRisksThe fundamental conditions that will need to be fulfilled for the successful implementation of the Strategic Plan include:

i. Political and public support at the Nation-al and County government levels

ii. Sufficient and consistent funding from lo-cal sources, including the private sector

iii. Full commitment of all stakeholders

iv. Sufficient financial and logistical support from the Government and development partners to implement the strategy na-tionwide

v. Improved and transparent procurement system to enhance utilization of local re-sources

vi. Improved Monitoring and Evaluation Sys-tem to enhance efficiency

vii. Sufficient local capacity, in terms of suffi-ciently experienced professionals, and ap-propriate equipment and materials

viii. Consistency and commitment to Research & Development

ix. Comprehensive capacity (training) pro-gramme for all partners at all levels ap-proved and accredited

x. Private construction sector to be fully in-volved and having an effective capacity to pursue its own development

The risks associated with the implementation of the 2nd Strategic plan were identified with the aim of ensuring the above requirements and putting in place mitigating measures against any problem that may negatively impact on smooth implementation of the Roads 2000 programme.


1Strategic Plan 2013 – 2017


Chapter

ONE INTRODUCTION

2 Strategic Plan 2013 – 2017


1.1 Background

Through the Rural Access Roads (RAR) and Minor Roads Programmes (MRP) Kenya constructed and maintained 12,000 km of rural roads in 1970’s, 1980’s and early 1990’s. These programs were a driving force in developing labour based technology and it is often said that large scale labour based works was born and raised in Kenya. The same technology has been utilised and further developed through much of Sub Saharan Africa.

In the late 1980’s and 1990’s the emphasis shifted from construction to maintenance as it was becoming evident that Kenya was unable to maintain her roads adequately. In many areas of Kenya the access roads improved under the RAR and MRP were of a better standard than the higher class feeder roads. Through the Road Maintenance Initiative (RMI), constraints to road maintenance were identified and one of the recommendations was to utilise the labour based experience to also maintain the higher class feeder roads as well as some paved roads in both rural and urban areas.

The Roads 2000 maintenance strategy was born out of this need in the early 1990’s. The name was derived from the vision of implementing the strategy throughout Kenya by the year 2000. However, over the years the ‘Roads 2000’ has become a generic name signifying local resource based technology.

The Roads 2000 strategy was conceived with the aim of implementing a new approach to rapidly bring roads to a maintainable standard and place them under effective maintenance with the optimum use of local resources. This was to be achieved through planned spot improvements together with guaranteed maintenance and progressive rehabilitation of the entire road network.

A pilot project in the then South Nyanza and Kericho Districts demonstrated the applicability of the approach. The Government consequently adopted

the concept for full national implementation in 1994. However, until 2002 relatively little and uncoordinated work was carried out under the Roads 2000 umbrella. Through the proactive initiative of KRB and the introduction of the Roads 2000 National Steering Committee and the National Coordination Committee, the Roads 2000 concept was revived and established at a national level. This also attracted the interest of a number of development partners to participate in funding the implementation.

Consequently the first Strategic Plan (July 2005 to June 2010) was drafted with the aim of providing an implementation framework for all partners concerned. The mainstay of the Roads 2000 Strategy is the network approach to road maintenance and maximum utilisation of local resources.

The network maintenance approach can be achieved using the following priorities in order to increase the proportion of the network in good condition:1. Undertake Routine Maintenance on the roads

that are in a good condition (maintainable network).

2. Spot Improve bad sections of the good roads to consolidate the maintainable network.

3. Increase the maintainable network by partial rehabilitation of prioritised links in order to improve connectivity and provide access to the majority of the population.

The main features of the Roads 2000 Strategy include:

a) The use of optimum mix of labour and equipment

b) Increased use of local resources

c) Adoption of network approach instead of the conventional link based approach




d) Increased involvement of the private sector in infrastructure delivery

e) Provide an employment-based social protection mechanism for the marginalized population.

f) Systematic or efficient use of scarce maintenance funds

Since 2005, the Government of Kenya has been implementing the Roads 2000 programme which has been largely successful despite some challenges. Based on the experiences gained during this period, some revisions have been proposed on the targets as well as on the implementation approach of the R2000 strategy which is reflected in this second strategic plan. This includes among others the use of local resource based approach as opposed to labour based approach.

1.2 DefinitionoftheRoads2000StrategyTheRoads2000Strategyisamethodofroad

developmentandmanagementthatensuresoptimumutilisationanddevelopmentoflocallyavailableresourceswheretechnically;andeconomicallyfeasibleandina

sociallyresponsivemanner

The key feature of the Roads 2000 Strategy is the use of the Local Resources Based (LRB) Approach. The LRB interpretation within the context of the Roads 2000 Strategy includes:

1. Participatory and integrated project planning, implementation and monitoring

2. Network approach to road development and maintenance

3. Appropriate technical solutions and effective work methods

4. Transparent and effective project management

5. Transparent and competitive contracting arrangements

6. Utilisation of locally available labour, materials , tools and equipment to the maximum extent possible

7. Utilisation and development of local consultants, contractors, community groups and suppliers for work implementation

8. Utilisation and strengthening of local government organisations

9. Integration of crosscutting issues in all project aspects

1.3 SituationAnalysis

1.3.1 NationalTargetsforR2000ProgrammeThe five year National Strategic Plan for the R2000 Programme, covering the period 2005 -2010, was developed in 2004. The Plan outlined the principles and methodologies for the programme, and, among others, set the following targets:

1. Routine and holding maintenance of 10,000 Km of Paved Roads.

2. Increasing Routine Maintenance of un-Paved Roads from 20,000 Km to 37,000 Km over the plan period.

3. Spot Improvement of 18,000 Km of unpaved roads to maintainable standard.

4. Creation of 150,000 temporary jobs (35,000 full time) annually.

5. Train 1,250 active labour based contractors.6. Improved quality and cost effectiveness of

roadworks

1.3.2 R2000ProgrammeAchievementsThere are several Roads 2000 programmes that were implemented in all parts of the country except in the North Eastern province. Significant achievements were made in all the programmes particularly in employment creation, training and creating economic and social opportunities for vulnerable groups such as women and the youth.

The Development Partners who were active in supporting the implementation of the Roads 2000 Programme between 2004 and 2010 include Sida, KfW, AfD, AfDB, EU and Danida through the Decentralized Agriculture Support Structure (DASS). The progress achieved as at June 2010 was as follows:



PhysicalProgressProject Province/Region Planned

Progress (Km)

Actual Progress (Km)

% Achievement

AfDB North Rift 934 993 106

AfDB South Rift 1637 1,339 85

AfD Central 1,015 864 85

Danida (DASS) Coast and Eastern 627 837 133

EU/EC Eastern 1,128 935 83

KfW Central Rift/Nyanza 1,004 971 97

Sida Nyanza 1,500 1,224 82

Total 7,845 7,247 92

Financial ProgressProject Province/

RegionPlanned

Progress (KES Million)

Actual Progress (KES Million)

%Achievement

AfDB North Rift 1,100 1,077.3 98

AfDB South Rift 900 807.8 90

AFD Central 1,960 1,435 73

D a n i d a (DASS)

Coast and Eastern

225 462 205

EU/EC Eastern 900 703.1 78

KfW Central Rift/Nyanza

487 460 95

Sida Nyanza 1,043 843 81

Total 6,615 5,363 81

EmploymentCreationandParticipationofWomenProject P r o v i n c e /

RegionEmployment Total % of

WomenMen Women

AfDB North Rift 632,321 71,499 708,820 10

AfDB South Rift 266,315 29,580 295,895 10

AFD Central 703,000 247,000 950,000 26

Danida (DASS)

Coast and Eastern

341,478 60,261 401,739 15

EU/EC Eastern 338,547 42,998 381,545 11


130,575 39,082 169,657 23

Sida Nyanza 1,179,111 608,520 1,787,631 34

Total 3,591,347 1,098,940 4,695,287 23

TrainingOpportunitiesProject P r o v i n c e /

RegionNo. of Contractors* Supervi-

sorsAgencyStaffImprovement R o u t i n e

Mtce

AfDB North Rift 28 10 51 24

AfDB South Rift 20 27 47 12

AFD Central 40 50 86 30

D a n i d a (DASS)

Coast and Eastern

21 37 42 26

EU/EC Eastern 16 - 63 21


30 - 60 71

Sida Nyanza 43 154 86 51

Total 198 278 435 235

*Inaddition some 5,000 small scale construction undergone road

construction at KIHBT/KTC on private assignment.

1.3.3 GoKContributionThe Government of Kenya made significant contribution towards the successful implementation of the above projects both financially and in allocating human resources. The government contributed:

• 15-20% of the total cost of projects;

• provided adequate personnel which is estimated at about 5% of the cost of the projects, and

• Put all roads improved by the projects under maintenance at an average cost of about 95 million a year

In addition, the government adopted and rolled out good practices resulted from the roads2000 concept as part of its nationwide road improvement and maintenance programme. These include computer based management system, RMMS, harmonized contract procurement documents, rights-based planning and implementation system, which involves recognition of the rights of workers, disadvantaged groups such as youth and women, community participation as well as prevention and management of HIV/AIDs , into the process of undertaking road infrastructure project. In view of the above, the GoK achieved 89,494km of routine Maintenance and 46,349km Periodic Maintenance using RMLF thereby creating employment estimated at 20 million person days.

1.3.4TransitionalPreparatoryPhase(2010-2012)The transitional preparatory phase was introduced to finalise the activities of the first strategic plan, to allow for a wider consultative process in developing the second strategic plan and to align the implementation period to the Vision 2030 - second MTP.

During this period, the R2000 programme continued throughout the country and managed to improve 593 km of roads at a total cost of KShs. 974 million and creating 530,740 person days of employment.




In addition some 11 no. of Small Scale Contractors, 107 Agency Staff and 19 artisans were trained on technical and managerial skills related to R2000 programme.

At the same time some ongoing projects (supported by AFD Ph. 1, SIDA, ADB & EU Ph. 2) were completed while new projects commenced as follows.

Funding Agency

AreaofOperation EstimatedBudgetInclusiveGOKcomponent

(Mill.’Ksh.’)AFD (II) Central Province &

Laikipia county4,400

KfW (II) Western province: Bungoma, Busia, Kakamega, Lugari, and Vihiga counties

1,493

Finland Government(PALWECO)

Western Province: Busia county

1,008

EU (III) Eastern Province; Meru, Tharaka-Nithi,Makueni, Machakos and Embu Counties

2,784

Total 9,685

Preparation of this 2nd SP was done through a consultative process involving all stakeholders in the Roads Subsector. To drive the process a R2000 NWG was established which was supported by an ILO funded consultant. Several consultative workshops were held to formulate, review and finalize the strategic Plan.

1.3.5 General Observation on the PerformanceofRoads2000Projects a) All projects achieved relatively high delivery

rates (Physical 92% & Financial 81%) b) Significant cash inflow to rural areas (Ksh1.0

billion) although the rate of employment created per unit of investment is still low. Only about 20%

c) High women’s participation, 23%, compared to previous years, although still below the 30% minimum adopted in R2000 guidelines

d) High youth participation e) Stakeholder participation featured in almost all

projects

f) Created training opportunities for implementing agency staff;

g) Provided Business Development Skills services for emerging entrepreneurs

h) Enhanced contracting capacity with a total of 5,600 trained labour based contractors out of which 476 were trained through the projects above.

i) Introduced innovative working methods, i.e., participatory mechanism, RMMS, harmonized auditing and training, low volume surfacing, etc.

j) Contributed towards building of capacities of implementing bodies through Private sector TA -Technology and Knowledge Transfers.

k) Developed operational and management guidelines including Road maintenance manuals, environmental management, soil and water conservation, which can be used by others.

l) Increased contribution towards the creation of awareness against HIV/AIDS in project areas.

m) Contributed to the revision of the Road Design Manuals and Specifications.

n) Contributed to the development of the Road Sector Investment Programme (2010 – 2024).

1.3.6 Challengesa) In spite of its apparent benefits, the R2000

concept is not yet fully mainstreamed in regular programmes of most implementing bodies and remains to be donor driven.

b) The programme is not yet accompanied by a long-term network development plan.

c) Low level of awareness and buy-in among engineers and policy makers about R2000.

d) Lack of technical and managerial capacity at regional levels.

e) Crosscutting issues which are becoming increasingly important in the road sub-sector are not yet fully incorporated in the training programme.

f) Some target outputs of R2000 projects not yet fully anchored to the performance contract of implementing agencies.



g) Availability of appropriate equipment to supplement labour

A review of the Implementation Status of the R2000 Strategy was carried out in 2009 and the key findings are presented in AnnexIII of this Plan.

1.3.7 Conclusiona) Despite some challenges, the Roads 2000

programme has achieved most of the targets set in the 2005-2010 Strategy.

b) R2000 programme is one of the sectoral interventions that has covered wider thematic areas, created significant employment and injected most needed income into the rural economy.

c) The Roads 2000 Strategy by and large has been accepted as a main instrument for:

i) Delivering road improvement and maintenance works and

ii) Providing employment-based social protection for the rural and urban poor.

It is therefore of paramount importance to upscale the implementation of R2000 programme nationwide in order to expand the benefits realized so far and contribute more towards the national goal of poverty reduction and enhanced socio-economic growth of Kenya.

1.4 Rationale for Extending the Roads 2000Programme

1.4.1CurrentSocio-economicSituationThe disparity between the rich and poor in Kenya is increasing despite the fact that there is a significant GDP growth over the recent years. The population below the poverty line is about 50% (rank 26th poorest country, out of 145 ranked states in 20081).

1 The poorest country is No. 1 and the richest is No. 145.

Socio-Economic Key IndicatorsSelectedKey-Data 2000 2005 2007/8

Population, total Nr. Mio 31.3 35.6 38.5

Population growth annual % 2.6 2.6 2.7Prevalence of HIV

(ages 15-49) % popul. ** 6.1 **Life expectancy at

birth, Years 52.0 53.0 54.0

GNI (Atlas method1) cur $ Billion 13.2 18.6 29.5

GNI per capita current $ 420.0 520.0 760.0

GDP growth annual % 0.6 5.8 3.6Time required to

start a business days ** 54.0 30.0Official development

assistance and aid cur $ Mio 510.0 767.0 1,275.0Workers’

remittances and compensations cur $ Mio 538.0 805.0 1,692.0

** Unavailable data

Source: World Bank; World Development Indicators Database, September 2009

At 2.7% the population growth rate is still among the highest in the world despite the fact that agricultural land reserves are limited and the industrial growth is relatively small. The unemployment rate of now over 40% (source, World Bank) is equally alarming and especially severe among the relatively well-educated youth. This calls for national strategies that give particular attention to creating employment opportunities for the youth.

Youth (15-35 years) represent 60 percent of Kenya’s population and constitute 64% of unemployed persons in the country. Almost one third of Kenyans are between 15 and 29 years, and the total reached almost 11 million people in 2006 (compared to 8.5 million in 1999). Youth in Kenya face serious challenges, including high rates of unemployment and underemployment. Statistics on joblessness suggest that the magnitude of the unemployment problem is larger for youth with 38 percent of youth neither in school nor work2.

2 The Kenya Youth Empowerment Project, Assessment of a Sample of Representative KKV Projects, by Eng. W. N. Omari




In addition the country faces the following development challenges:

1. Although the roads in Kenya form an intercon-nected transport network, its maintenance does not provide sufficient serviceability.

2. There is inadequate coordination of implement-ing agencies and development partners.

3. The private construction sector in Kenya consti-tutes one of the largest industries in the coun-try and as such is the major executioner of road works. However, as an industry the sector is underdeveloped and poorly represented, espe-cially the hundreds of locally based small-scale contractors.

4. Local resource based approach is not fully main-streamed in academic and skills training institu-tions as well as in research works.

5. Cross cutting issues such as community partici-pation, HIV/AIDS, gender, youth, PLWD and en-vironmental issues have in the past been either ignored or treated in isolation during project implementation. These aspects cannot be dealt with in isolation, but need to be effectively in-tegrated to all planning and implementation ac-tivities.

In view of the above situation, employment intensive approaches are applicable in all sectors where semi-skilled and unskilled labour can cope with the production requirements. This is particularly the case in the agricultural sector and also for infrastructure works.

For rural and urban roads, local resource-based design and construction methods are particularly applicable and provide widespread and continuous employment potentials. This, however, needs to be coupled with adequate capacity building efforts to provide ample advanced training opportunities to allow young people to further their education and hence their ability to build a sustainable job career. Local resource-based road maintenance provides

part-time employment opportunities for the unemployed and underemployed who can supplement their income with additional cash earning. It also provides desperately required job opportunities for disadvantaged people, such as single mothers, the landless and persons living with disabilities.

As long as the current daily wage rate for labour does not significantly increase, (currently at about at US$ 3 to 4 per day), labour can still compete in financial terms with equipment based work methods for many work items. In socio-economic terms the use of locally available labour may be justified for an even higher wage rate. The social cost for unemployment is enormous!

1.4.2InfrastructureGoalsunderthefirstMediumTermPlan

The Kenya Vision 2030 aims to transform Kenya into a newly industrialising “middle-income country providing a high quality life to all its citizens by the year 2030”. Towards this end, the Government aims at attaining a 10% growth rate per annum over the first Medium Term Plan (2008-2012) of the Vision 2030. This will be achieved through investment in tourism, agriculture, manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade, Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) and financial services.

The Vision of the infrastructure sector under the MTP period is “to provide cost effective world-class infrastructure facilities and services in support of Vision 2030”.

Apart from infrastructure being identified as a necessity in improving the living conditions of both farming and pastoralists’ communities, it is also necessary for improving security. Infrastructure is also expected to contribute significantly to the reduction of cost of doing business.



Vision 2030 has therefore identified a number of goals in infrastructure to be achieved by year 2030. These include:

• Accelerating on-going infrastructure development by focusing on quality and functionality.

• Building Infrastructure in support of identified flagship projects which contribute to social equity and economic goals.

• Improving efficiency and effectiveness of infrastructure at all levels of planning, contracting and constructing.

The Roads 2000 programme is identified in the First Medium Term Plan (2008 – 2012) as one of the flagship projects during the period, with the objective of creating short-term labour intensive employment for young people. The Government will employ a number of strategies to improve the available infrastructure facilities to maximize attainment of economic and social goals.

Some of the strategies that were to be pursued include:-

• Strengthening the existing framework and accelerating their speed of implementation. This will also include raising efficiency and quality.

• Enhancing local content of identified projects.• Benchmarking infrastructure facilities with

globally accepted standards.• Targeting projects in otherwise neglected areas

to increase connectivity and stimulate economic activities.

• Enhancing Private Sector participation in provision of infrastructure facilities and services strategically complimented by Public Sector Interventions.

The Roads 2000 Strategy is therefore very relevant in the country’s national plan and will play a critical role in the attainment of Vision 2030, and therefore

needs to be aligned to contribute to achieving this ambitious goal.

Towards financing the infrastructure works identified in the MTF, the Government has expressed its intention to increase private sector participation in the provision and rehabilitation of national transport infrastructure and services. It wishes to do so in order to lower the costs of doing business in Kenya, provide affordable & efficient modes of transport for Kenya and increase overall living standards. The 2006/2007 Finance Act provides for enhanced capacity of the domestic bond markets in the provision of long term funding for infrastructure projects. This is being attained by using long-term bonds to finance infrastructure projects. The infrastructure sector has been identified as one of the beneficiaries from this venture due to the important role quality infrastructure plays in national development. The domestic bond market will enable the Government to source for funds domestically to finance rehabilitation of the national infrastructure.

1.4.3 Kenya Youth Empowerment Project,Component1The Government of Kenya with the support of the World Bank is currently implementing the Kenya Youth Empowerment Project (KYEP) that will run for the next four years. The KYEP is an enhancement to the GoK funded Kazi Kwa Vijana (KKV) project which was launched in April 2009 with the objective of helping to meet the twin critical needs at that time, namely: (a) providing relief to the people at risk through gainful employment; and (b) contributing to increasing food production, particularly through better utilization of our water resources.

The Project Development Objective (PDO) of the Kenyan Youth Empowerment Project is to support the Government of Kenya efforts to increase access to youth-targeted temporary employment programs and to improve youth employability. The PDO will be achieved through three components:




• Component 1: Labour-intensive works andsocialservices(US$43million);

• Component 2: Private Sector Internships andTraining(US$15.5million);and

• Component 3: Capacity Building and PolicyDevelopment(US$1.5million).

The main objective of Component 1: “Labour intensive works and social services” (US $ 43 million over 4 years), which is highly relevant to this Plan, is to reduce the vulnerability of unemployed young women and men by expanding and enhancing the effectiveness of the KKV project. The target group of the component is unemployed youth in the 18-35 age bracket. This component will just like the previous KKV, finance labour intensive projects that provide income opportunities to participating youth, and at the same time, enhance communities’ access to social and economic infrastructure.

The implementation of the small scale infrastructure projects will be carried out using a smart combination of labour and equipment with a higher priority (70%) being given to labour. The extension of the R2000 plan will thus support the implementation of the KYEP Component 1 and contribute to the attainment of the national social and economic goals under Vision 2030.

1.4.4 TheConstitutionofKenya,2010The promulgation of the Constitution of Kenya and in particular the devolution of governance structures has brought with it new opportunities for beneficiaries to participate more actively in shaping and implementing development initiatives. The Fourth Schedule of the Constitution of Kenya sets out the respective functions of the national government and the county governments. Some of these functions are strictly separated, such as foreign affairs, international trade, immigration and citizenship, tertiary education, monetary policy, and the courts which are functions reserved for the national government.

Functions reserved for the counties include county health services, county transport, and county planning and development while some overlap and may be exercised at both national and county levels. These include culture, sport and the control of pollution.

Revenue raised nationally is to be shared equitably among the national and county governments. County governments may be given additional allocations from the national government’s share of the revenue, either conditionally or unconditionally. Criteria for equitable sharing are set out in Article 203 but the amount allocated to county governments must not be less than 15% of the national revenues of the preceding year.

Article 204 provides for an Equalisation Fund into which will be paid one half of one per-cent of all revenue collected by the national government each year. The Equalisation Fund will be used by the national government only for the purpose of providing basic services such as health, water, roads and electricity to marginalised areas.

Under the Bill of Rights (Chapter 4), the Economic and Social Rights of persons are elaborated in Article 43. (1), which states:

Every person has the right:

a) to the highest attainable standard of health, which includes the right to health care services, including reproductive health care;

b) to accessible and adequate housing, and to reasonable standards of sanitation;

c) to be free from hunger, and to have adequate food of acceptable quality;

d) to clean and safe water in adequate quantities;

e) to social security; and

f) to education.



This Plan incorporates strategies that will facilitate compliance of the road sub sector with the relevant sections of the Constitution and thus provide the necessary guidance to stakeholders at all levels of the emerging governance structures.

1.4.5 Complementary Role of Counties andNationalGovernmentsAs indicated above, the constitution gives the National and County governments the role of managing roads under their jurisdictions. However, the way this will be put in practice is not yet clear. The MoR in consultation with relevant stakeholders is in the process of defining the roles and responsibilities of the National and County governments in relation to management of roads. It is also streamlining and reorganizing the existing road sector institutions in conformity with the constitution requirements.

The transition of the current institutional framework shall be in line with the Transition to the Devolved Government Act, 2012 and the Constitution of Kenya. Shared powers and functions shall be managed as provided for under the Intergovernmental Relations Act, 2012. Shared resources and planning shall be in accordance with the County Governments legislation.

During the transition period the institutions under the MoR, shall continue to discharge their mandates until the functions have been transferred in accordance with the Transition to Devolved Government Act, 2012.

1.4.6 ConclusionThe first Strategic Plan 2005 – 2010 provided a national framework for implementation of the strategy through GoK funding with support from some Development Partners. The implementation of Roads 2000 has shown a number of successes in many areas. Specifically the maintainable road network has been significantly increased and a large number of employment opportunities have been provided. However, a recent review has also

identified a number of challenges that need to be tackled.

The identified challenges, the current reforms with regards to the formation of three road authorities, and the organisational and fiscal changes brought about by the new constitution, called for a review of the Roads 2000 Strategy. At the same time the Strategy needs to consider the requirements for the forthcoming 5-year plan 2013 - 2017 to be able to respond to the aspirations of Kenya’s Vision 2030.It’s important that the Strategic Plan takes adequate cognisance of the needs and requirements described above and provides the necessary regulative guidance for all partners involved.

1.5 RoadSub-SectorReformsThe road subsector in Kenya has undergone extensive institutional reforms since the early 1990’s. The process of reforms was a collaborative effort between the Government and Development Partners towards establishing an effective and sustainable management and financing of the public road network. The creation of the Road Maintenance Levy Fund (RMLF) in 1994, which has continued to provide a secure and sustainable source of maintenance funds, and the establishment of the Kenya Roads Board (KRB) in 1999 to manage the fund, have been important milestones.

A Road Sub-Sector Policy document, Sessional Paper No. 5 on the Development and Management of the Roads Sub-sector for Sustainable Economic Growth, was concluded and endorsed by Parliament in 2006, marking the culmination of a sustained consultative process involving several technical assistance studies and stakeholder workshops. The Policy has, as its main goal, the attainment of an efficient road sub-sector that supports and promotes economic growth through the cost effective provision and maintenance of road infrastructure. The policy outlines a new institutional framework to streamline management of the roads through the creation of road implementing authorities with




clear mandates, political/ managerial/commercial/financial autonomy, are lean in terms of staffing levels and operating with business plan.

The Kenya Roads Act, 2007 established three new Road Authorities, namely, the Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA), the Kenya Rural Roads Authority (KeRRA), and the Kenya Urban Roads Authority (KURA). These Authorities have now been constituted and the new institutional structure is in place. Under this new institutional framework, the involved institutions are mandated to carry out the following functions:

MinistryofRoads(MoR)MoR is in charge of Policy and Strategy relating to the provision of roads, including regulatory areas such as technical standards (including axle loads). In addition, MoR is the lead ministry in the road sub-sector and therefore coordinates issues of Policy, Strategy and Oversight as well as investment plans for the whole sub-sector, including urban roads currently under the Ministry of Local Government.

KenyaRoadsBoard(KRB)KRB is responsible for the administration of the Road Maintenance Levy Fund (RMLF). This includes oversight on road maintenance works, carrying out regular audits on the use of the Fund and advising the Minister on all matters related thereto.

KenyaNationalHighwaysAuthority(KeNHA)KeNHA is the implementing agency for the management, development and maintenance of class A, B and C roads. In addition to implementing works, KeNHA advises the Minister responsible for roads on technical issues such as standards, axle load limits, research and development, among others.

KenyaRuralRoadsAuthority(KeRRA)KeRRA is responsible for the management, development and maintenance of Class D roads and below including special purpose roads and

unclassified roads (currently under county councils and town councils). The KeRRA is also responsible for Kenya Forest Service Roads and County Council Game Reserve Roads. KeRRA advises the Minister responsible for roads on technical issues such as standards, axle load limits, research and development, among others

KenyaUrbanRoadsAuthority(KURA)KURA is responsible for developing, managing and maintaining all road works on urban roads in cities and municipalities. Local Authorities are still the major stakeholders in prioritising road works to be implemented by KURA. KURA advises the Minister responsible for roads on technical issues such as standards, axle load limits, research and development, among others

KenyaWildlifeService(KWS)KWS is responsible for roads in National Parks and National Reserves as well as access roads allocated to KWS by MoR. KWS is also responsible for roads in important game reserves such as Maasai Mara and Samburu which are under the relevant County Councils.

MechanicalandTransportDepartmentThe Mechanical and Transport Department is in charge of provision and management of the mechanical, transport and plant services to both public and private sectors in the country. It is in the process of being restructured into a Semi Autonomous Government Agency (SAGA).

MaterialsDepartmentThe Materials Department is in charge of testing of engineering and non-engineering materials for the building and construction industry in the country. The Department also undertakes geotechnical studies for foundations, road pavement studies and carries out research on the performance of various products. It is in the process of being restructured into a Semi Autonomous Government Agency (SAGA).



Kenya Institute of Highways and BuildingTechnology(KIHBT)KIHBT is a public institution vested with the mandate of training Ministry of Roads Staff and other Government Employees and also staff from the private sector in the various technical fields. The institute also offers international training courses in the various technical fields. KIHBT has a labour based training centre in Kisii (KTC). It is in the process of being restructured into a Semi Autonomous Government Agency (SAGA).

1.6 FrameworkoftheRoads2000Programme

1.6.1 StrategicPartnersThe R2000 programme relies on a strong partnership network that covers all stakeholders that are committed to the ideals of its strategy. The following table lists the partners with their respective main functions and their participation tasks.

Policy,Regulation,CoordinationandFundingPartners

Organisation Functions(related to road sector) R2000ParticipationTasks

MinistryofFinance Sourcing of funds, provision of national budget, disbursements and expenditure control

fund allocation and auditing

MinistryofRoads provision of policies and regulations for road infrastructure development and maintenance

Standards , coordination, monitoring and overall control

KenyaRoadsBoard Fund administrator for road infrastructure development and maintenance

Work plan approval, fund allocation (fuel levy), monitoring and advocacy (promotion)

OfficeofthePrimeMinister

Overall Coordination and monitoring of the MoR as well as coordination and funding of KYEP/KKV

Potential for promoting and funding LRB approach through KYEP/KKV

MinistryofForestry&Wildlife

Development and maintenance of Forest roads (KFS) and Park roads (KWS)

Potential for adopting LRB approach.

MinistryofYouthAffairs& Sports

Development and maintenance of roads and providing linkage to youth for training and employment (NYS & DYT)

Potential for adopting LRB approach on a wider scale

MinistryofNairobiMetropolitan Development

Provision of policies and regulations for road infrastructure development and maintenance within Nairobi Metropolitan region

Potential for policy and implementation

MinistryofLabour provision of labour laws policies, regulations, monitoringMinistryofEnvironment& Mineral Resources

provision of policies and regulations to safeguard the national environment

development of road sector environmental guidelines (NEMA)

MinistryofPlanning,NationalDevelopmentand Vision 2030

overall planning of Government programmes; monitoring and evaluation of performance of the Government agencies;

tracking the contribution of the Strategy to MTP and Vision 2030

Development Partners Provision of development support through the Ministry of Finance

Funding projects and management support (technical assistance)

KEPSA Lobbying for private sector participation in LRBA potential for advocacy of LRB concept

RACECA (Contractor Association)

representing and developing the contractors in Kenya

potential for advocacy and adoption of LRB approach

ProfessionalInstitutions(Eng)

representing and developing the engineers’ society in Kenya

potential for advocacy and adoption of LRB approach




ImplementationPartnersOrganisation Functions(related to road works) R2000ParticipationTasksKeNHA development and maintenance of national highway

road networkimplementing LRB approach

KeRRA development and maintenance of rural roads implementing LRB approach (current national coordination agency)

KURA development and maintenance of urban roads implementing LRB approachKenyaWildlifeService development and maintenance of national park

roadsimplementing LRB approach on park roads wherever applicable

CityCouncilofNairobidevelopment and maintenance of roads within Nairobi city

implementing LRB approach

MinistryofRegionalDevelopmentAuthorities

development and maintenance of roads, soil erosion control, water pans, dams, irrigation schemes in remote areas

Potential for implementing LRB approach.

MinistryofNairobiMetropolitanDevelopment

development and maintenance of selected roads within Nairobi Metropolitan region

Potential for implementing LRB approach.

MinistryofAgriculturecommunity mobilisation, soil erosion control community mobilisation, soil erosion

control and potential for adoption of LRB approach for agricultural roads

KenyaSugarBoard coordination for development and maintenance of sugar roads with millers

potential for adopting LRB approach

Service PartnersOrganisation Functions R2000ParticipationTasksIndividual Contractors executing road work contracts applying LRB approachIndividualConsultingFirms designing and supervising road work contracts applying LRB approachKenyaInstituteofHighwaysandBuildingTechnology

provision of technical training training for agency staff and involved contractors

MinistryofYouthAffairs&Sports

(NYS) provision of technical training training of youth as plant operators, artisans, drivers

UniversitiesandColleges tertiary education Potential for training in LRB approach MaterialsDepartment(MOR)

research and testing Undertake appropriate technology research and testing

MechanicalandTransportDepartment(MOR)

provision and management of mechanical, transport and plant services

Supply of construction plants and equipments to public and private sector

MinistryofGenderandSocial Services

Implementation of National Gender policy, social transformation and Gender responsive development

Implementation of National Gender policy, social transformation and Gender responsive development

1.6.2 Organisationalset-up,responsibilitiesandfunctionsIn terms of organisational arrangements, the most important aspects are effective steering and coordination to ensure planned operations and controlled finance management. The key to this is the separationofPolicyandRegulation,FinancesandOperations with each independently managed. In essence this has been achieved through the recent road sub sector reform.

To support the implementation of this strategy, there is need to put in place a framework to guide, synchronise and coordinate the overall management and operational activities of the various partners. In this regard it is necessary to establish a dedicated and permanent NationalCoordinationSecretariat based in the KRB with the responsibility of coordinating the activities of all road agencies and development partners that are involved in the implementation of the Strategy. The following figure illustrates these arrangements:



Ministry of Roads

National Steering Committee

National Coordination Committee

National Coordination Secretariat

Implementing Agencies

Work Execution and Service Partners

GOK Policy and Regulation Partners

The Ministry of Roads has overall responsibility for formulating policy on all matters relating to the provision of road infrastructure on the road network in Kenya.

The National Steering Committee is chaired by the PS of MoR and consists of high-level managers representing the same institutions as those represented in the NCC. The NSC meets once a year and provides policy directions and makes decisions on the implementation of the Strategy based on the recommendations of the NCC.

The National Coordination Secretariat – this is a new office to be hosted at the KRB with the responsibility of coordinating all major stakeholders involved in the implementation of the Strategy. The NCS will also follow up on recommendations of the NSC & NCC to ensure timely adoption and implementation.

The NationalCoordinationCommittee consists of technical level representatives of MoR, KRB, KeNHA, KeRRA, KURA, KWS, participating development partners, Materials Department (MoR), KIHBT and representatives of Universities. The Chairman is the Executive Director of KRB. The NCC meets twice a year.

The NCC, in concurrence with the NSC can establish a National Working Group on an adhoc basis to undertake specific technical tasks.

1.6.3 Financing

Local FundingThe bulk of local funding for the implementation of the R2000 Strategy will come from the RMLF through KRB. All implementing agencies are expected to use Roads 2000 strategy on improvement and maintenance works. Other sources of local funding include the national development budget allocations. The new governance structures in the




Constitution of Kenya, 2010 supports devolvement of resources to the county level. Increased financial resources will therefore be available at the county level from other sources such as the LATF, CDF and Agricultural Cess.

At the National level, there is a potential of anchoring Roads 2000 sub-projects onto major development projects funded by the Central Government. This is because the economic feasibility of these major development projects is largely enhanced by the local feeder/access roads.

It is worthwhile to note that the RMLF and national budget allocation is not sufficient to fund the backlog of reconstruction and rehabilitation works. The RMLF is also not intended to fund capacity building of the road agencies. Hence there is an

urgent need to source additional funding and consolidate existing funds to the road sub-sector in order to bridge the financial gap.

ExternalFundingThe Roads 2000 Strategy is a sector wide road maintenance strategy and there are therefore ample opportunities for Development Partners to provide funding for its implementation as well as supporting capacity building efforts.

There is also a potential of anchoring Roads 2000 sub-projects onto major development projects funded by Development Partners. This is because the economic feasibility of these major development projects is largely enhanced by the local feeder/access roads. As such it is important to adopt a more holistic transport network development approach.



Chapter

TWO MANDATE




2 MandateThe mandate for the Roads 2000 Programme is primarily derived from the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 and Vision 2030. The mandates can be viewed from two levels; (i) National Policy Level and (ii) Sector Policy and Strategy Level.

2.1 NationalPolicyLevel

2.1.1 NewConstitutionandBillofRightsUnder the Bill of Rights (Chapter 4), the Economic and Social Rights of persons are elaborated in Article 43. (1), which states:Every person has the right:-a) to the highest attainable standard of health,

which includes the right to health care services, including reproductive health care;

b) to accessible and adequate housing, and to reasonable standards of sanitation;

c) to be free from hunger, and to have adequate food of acceptable quality;

d) to clean and safe water in adequate quantities;e) to social security; andf) to education.

In Chapter 4, Part 3 – specific application of the rights – Articles 55 (c) and 56 (c) further give specific rights to employment to youth and, minorities and marginalized groups, respectively. One of the specific objectives of the Roads 2000 programme is to create employment (and skills) among the youth and marginalized people thereby contributing towards alleviation of poverty.

2.1.2 Vision2030The Kenya Vision 2030 aims to transform Kenya into a newly industrialising “middle-income country providing a high quality life to all its citizens by the year 2030”.

The Roads 2000 programme is identified in the First Medium Term Plan (2008 – 2012) of Vision 2030, as one of the flagship projects with the objective of

creating short-term labour intensive employment for young people. The Government will employ a number of strategies to improve the available infrastructure facilities to maximize attainment of economic and social goals.

2.2 SectorPolicyLevel

2.2.1 SessionalPaperNo.5(2006)The Sessional Paper No. 5 on the Development and Management of the Roads Sub-sector for Sustainable Economic Growth was concluded and endorsed by Parliament in 2006. The goal of the policies outlined in Sessional Paper No. 5 (2006) is the attainment of an efficient road sub-sector that supports and promotes economic growth through the cost effective provision and maintenance of road infrastructure that is necessary for safe and reliable road transport.

The following policy statement clearly demonstrates the importance of the Utilisation of Local Resources in the delivery of infrastructure works which is very clear:

PolicyStatement“The Government will promote the use of local resources and labour based methods, wherever these are cost effective, including the development of small and medium scale contractors through the implementation of the Roads 2000 road maintenance strategy in order to maximise the poverty reduction impact of road works. The maximisation of employment creation component of the R2000 Strategy will be applied to the entire network. All road works implementation on the low volume network shall follow the R2000 Strategy.”

Source: Sessional Paper No 5, 2006, Section 5.4 on Delivery Options for Road Works under sub-section 5.4.2: Utilisation of Local Resources.



2.2.2 Road Sector Investment Programme andStrategyThe RSIP (2010 – 2024) is a roadmap for future investment in the roads sub-sector. It gives indicative funding requirements for maintenance and management of the network and prioritizes key links on the network for rehabilitation, upgrading and capacity improvement. The programme also details the country’s road network infrastructure development and maintenance needs for the medium term and long term in order to facilitate secure, aggressive, timely and quality investment for maximum benefits to the economy.

In Chapter 3: Institutional and Policy Framework of the Road Sub-sector under 3.6 Roads 2000 Strategy it is stated that:

“The (Roads 2000) strategy is a useful tool for the implementation of the objectives contained in the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP); Economic Recovery Strategy for Wealth and Employment Creation (ERS 2003-2008); Kenya Vision 2030 as well as in the Millenium Development Goals (MDGs). Roads 2000 Strategy focuses on providing access and reduction of transportation costs for the majority of Kenyans through the improvement and maintenance of low volume roads while providing local employment by use of labour based techniques.Gender equality (MDG No. 3) is addressed in the Roads 2000 Strategy with 30% of employment targeted for women. The Roads 2000 Strategy incorporates all cross-cutting issues such as road safety, environment, HIV/Aids and rights-based approach.”

2.3SectorStrategyLevelThere are several institutions that have developed their own Strategic Plan and in all of them, the Roads 2000 Strategy or Local Resource-based Approach is given prominence. The following are some examples taken from these Strategic Plans.

2.3.1 MinistryofRoadsThe MoR Strategic Plan 2008 – 2012 recognizes the Ministry’s prime responsibility of facilitating development, maintenance and rehabilitation of the road network.

Under External Environment Analysis the MoR Strategic Plan in section 5.2.4 recognizes the opportunity that “The Kenyan labour market provides abundance of labour force for use in the implementation of labour intensive projects such as Roads 2000 at competitive rates. This enables the Ministry to concentrate the bulk of the resources on the procurement of other road construction inputs. The implementation of road construction through labour-based approaches has also contributed to generating additional employment opportunities in the labour market.”

KenyaNationalHighwaysAuthorityThe KeNHA Strategic Plan for the period 2008 – 2012 under Chapter 5, The Strategic Model recognizes the promotion of the use of local resources in road construction and maintenance as a key objective.In KRA 4: Promote Use of Local Resources “… the Authority will ensure that locally available materials for road construction are not imported. Instead, use of such local materials will be encouraged. As much as possible, local labour will also be used in road construction.

To achieve the results, the following two strategies and activities will be implemented:

1. Enhance the use of local resources by:i) Promoting research and development in

the use of local and recycled materials through linkages with local and international institutions.

ii) Encouraging the use of locally available labour and materials in road construction and maintenance where appropriate.

2. Build capacity of local human resources in road consulting services, construction and




maintenance by:i) Establishing mechanisms to encourage

foreign consultants and contractors to partner with local firms in projects funded by the Authority to enhance knowledge transfer and capacity building.

ii) Building capacity of young professional graduates through internship in KeNHA projects;

iii) Sensitising/lobbying the public and other key stakeholders on road construction projects and distribution.”

KenyaRoadsBoardIn the KRB Strategic Plan covering the period 2003 - 2008 under the Corporate objective of “To optimise utilisation of resources” one of the Strategies is “To promote use of local labour, materials and technologies” with the following three Departmental Strategies:

• Ensure National uniform approach to implementation of Roads 2000 Strategy.

• Monitor Road Agencies on their application of R2000 Strategy.

• Promote the inclusion of R2000 Strategy in Tertiary Training Institutions.

In the current KRB (2008 – 2012) Strategic plan, under “Output 3 – Ensured efficient and effective delivery of road works” the Plan envisages the adoption and implementation of the Roads 2000 strategy.

KenyaRuralRoadsAuthorityIn the KeRRA Strategic Plan for the period 2009 – 2012 under Section 3.4 Road Infrastructure Outputs:

“Roads infrastructure is considered as an enabling sector in support of the six key sectors. The Ministry of Roads and the Roads Authorities will therefore continue targeting maintenance and rehabilitation

of the existing infrastructure to reduce the cost of doing business. Secondly, attention will be paid to opening up areas in particular sectors such as tourism resort areas, economically productive areas as well as businesses and retail identified areas to promote their growth. Key targets under the MTP include:

• Roads reconstructed/rehabilitated/maintained – during the MTP period the focus will be on this area and aim to bring the existing road network to motorable state. To achieve this goal, key measures will be pursued during the plan period. These will include sourcing for alternative financing and implementation mechanisms including partnerships, concessions and labour intensive technologies.

• Roads 2000 Programme – it is a core poverty alleviation programme that is used for improvement and maintenance of the country’s roads network. During the MTP period, the programme will be extended to cover all the districts (counties) countrywide.”

KenyaUrbanRoadsAuthorityIn the KURA Strategic Plan for the period 2008 – 2012 one of the strategies under Design and Construction, and Maintenance is to enhance the capacity of local consultants and contractors which is in line with the Roads 2000 Strategic Plan.

2.3.2 MinistryofLocalGovernmentThe Ministry of Local Government has also highlighted the use of Labour Intensive Methodologies in its Strategic Plan.



Chapter

THREE STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS




3StakeholdersAnalysis3.1 CurrentparticipationsituationThe current partners participating in the implementation of Roads 2000 come from different sectors, have different degrees of involvement and play different roles and functions. There are also a number of partners whose current degree of participation is not sufficiently synchronised with the strategy’s requirement. The analysis of the current situation, as compared to the stakeholder description of the previous strategy, shows that there are significant changes in the partnership situation. The following is a summary of the current situation:1. The institutional reforms have created new im-

plementing agencies with differing mandates (KeRRA, KeNHA and KURA). So far the Roads 2000 programme has been placed under the responsibility of KeRRA.

2. All other roadwork implementers, such as Con-stituency Road Committees, Kenya Wildlife Ser-vice, municipalities, and city councils do not ac-tively participate in the implementation of the Roads 2000 programme.

3. The Private Construction Sector (consultants and contractors) is the main executioner of road works. The contractors are not properly organ-ised as an industry and as such lack substance as a strategic partner. A recently formed organ-isation RACECA has a membership comprising

only the large civil engineering contractors thus excluding the large number of small and medi-um sized civil engineering contractors.

4. On the level of indirect partners, e.g. policy, regulation, services, etc. partners have been identified and are usually addressed if services are required and informed on relevant issues. However, their involvement could be better co-ordinated and formalised.

5. Besides KIHBT, who is the main provider of LRB training, the participation of all other educa-tional partners does not go beyond ‘showing interest’.

6. There is no institutional capacity in the RAs for research and development on the LRB ap-proach.

Reference: For details see Partnership Analysis in AnnexIV

3.2 RequiredparticipationFor the Strategy to work as intended, the partnership network and individual roles and functions need to be clarified and strengthened. Especially those implementation partners who are currently considered ‘not active’ but have essential roles to play for a nationwide operation need to be obligated and their functions clearly identified.



Chapter

FOUR VISION, MISSION AND VALUES




4 Vision, Mission and Values4.1VisionStatementThe Roads 2000 Strategy contributes to achieving the national development goal aimed at by the Kenya Vision 2030. Consequently the Strategy Vision is as follows:

VisionStatementTo attain and sustain excellence in road

development and management that contributes to the National Development Priorities of Kenya

The Vision or development objective as shown above indicates that the R2000 Strategy’s goal is to not only attain excellence in road development and management but crucially to transform Kenya into a newly industrializing, “middle-income country providing a high quality life to all its citizens by the year 2030.”

The progress in achieving this Vision and the subsequent impact on society can be measured with the following impact indicators:

Impact Indicators of Vision include:a) Improved access to social and economic

opportunities.b) Reduced agricultural production costs.c) Employment Creation

4.2MissionStatementThe Strategy Mission is the specification of the Strategy Objective that contributes to achieving the Vision:

MissionStatementTo improve access to socio-economic facilities by promoting the development and management

of the road network using local resources to the satisfaction of stakeholders

In order to fully understand the Mission or broad objective of the Strategy, it can be broken down into the following main areas:

Improving access to socio-economic facilities bypromotingthedevelopmentandmanagementoftheroadnetwork: The first part of the statement highlights the need to improve access by promoting the development and management of the road network. This underlines that the Strategy is road network development and management programme.

Using local resources: This part of the mission stipulates the preferred delivery method that target poverty reduction and local capacity building through using locally available resources, such as labour based methods, local materials and the private sector – in particular small and medium scale enterprises. This delivery method must be used as a first choice.

The progress in achieving this Mission and the subsequent outcome of implementing the R2000 strategic Plan will be measured with the following outcome indicators:a) Improve access to social and economic activities;

b) Creation of productive employment

c) Improve Capacity through training

d) Increased use of local resources

4.3ValueStatementIn order to realize the above Vision and Mission, certain values need to be nurtured within the Strategy. There is great need to demonstrate that the Strategy is guided by the right values and recognizes the high levels of expectations from all stakeholders.



ValueStatement

The practitioners and implementers of R2000 strategy must commit themselves to live up to the highest ideals of good governance and to seek to be trustworthy, respectful and honest; be socially responsible, and promote and pursue excellence throughout its operations. As a consequence the implementing practitioners of the R2000 strategy shall:

1. Operate to the highest levels of probity, accountability and transparency;

2. Act at all times with the highest degree of honesty and integrity;

3. Take initiative and calculated risk towards realization of the vision and mission of the strategy;

4. Perform to the highest measures of competence and professionalism;

5. Promote at all times the virtues of equity and fair play;

6. Operate in such a manner as to communicate a sense of high responsibility within society; and,

7. Institute such measures as are likely to satisfy all stakeholders.




Chapter

FIVE STRATEGIC ANALYSIS (SWOT)



5StrategicAnalysis(SWOT)The current Strengths- Weaknesses- Opportunities- Threats (SWOT) were reviewed and defined as follows:

Strengths: Weaknesses:

Existence of institutional structures.

Existence of an enabling legal framework

Highly qualified professional staff.

Availability of substantial road sector data.

Existence of some well-trained local contractors in labour based methods.

Existence of monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.

Sustainable funding for road maintenance works

LRB Training capacity

Experience in the use of R2000 methodology.

No clear implementation of government policy on R2000 Strategy.

Non-involvement of local authorities and other road agencies.

Stakeholders’ perception of R2000 Strategy as being donor driven.

Lack of buy-in by practitioners

Inadequate R2000 coordinating mechanism.

Lack of sustainable funding for capacity building.

Bureaucracy and red tape in approvals of work plans and disbursements of funds.

Lack of common national road management systems.

Lack of road maintenance training syllabus in our national academic training institutions.

Opportunities : Threats:

Political goodwill and good governance

Improved relations with development partners

Sustainable funding mechanisms

Availability of affordable labour

Availability of affordable local resources for road construction.

Increased economic activities in other sectors

Positive attitudes towards working on roads.

Increased awareness on gender equity.

Long experience on Labour based technology in Kenya

Existence of institutional and professional capacity.

A vibrant private sector.

Availability of advanced information and communication technology.

Lack of efficient and transparent procurement systems

Stakeholders’ resistance to change.

Intensive competition from conventional contractors.

Possible interference from politicians and administrators

Conflicting Laws

HIV/AIDS Pandemic

Chapter

SIX




Chapter

SIX STRATEGY OBJECTIVESAND EXPECTED RESULTS



6StrategyObjectivesandExpectedResults2) Improved quality assurance on all Roads

2000 projects: Employment Intensive technology was seen by some as a low cost mode of construction, which did not merit detailed design. The emphasis when initiating Employment Intensive projects has, therefore, been mainly on the assessment of potential social benefits with little consideration to the engineering life-time cost and benefits. This has in some cases resulted in unacceptable financial and environmental costs. This was also obvious in many Roads 2000 projects. It is envisaged for the future that all projects will:

a. Constitute quality assurance plan at the start of the project and carry out regular tests to ascertain quality of work.

b. Where there is shortage of personnel to carry out routine testing, project engineers may provide method specifications which will be reviewed regularly with the changes in the working environment.

c. Increased use of the private sector in construction and supervision of road works

3) Performance based contracting for roadmaintenance: this form of contracting has several advantages including reducing cost, improving efficiency and quality, fast-tracking project delivery, triggering innovation, enhancing risk management and overcoming lack of expertise;

4) Introduction of employment intensivelow-volume paving methods to address maintenance backlog in the face of dwindling natural gravel sources;

5) Introduction of Cobblestone paving andDo-nou maintenance technologies: these are alternative technologies proven to improve the livelihood of the rural and

6.1 IntroductionThe Roads 2000 Strategic Plan, of 2005 – 2010, outlined nine (9) clear objectives that were to be attained within the implementation period. In order to ascertain the implementation status of the Roads 2000 Programme nationally, KeRRA with assistance from Sida and the ILO undertook a review study in mid 2009. The primary objective of the review was to analyze the degree to which the objectives of the Roads 2000 Strategic Plan have been met and make recommendations on the key issues that need to be addressed in the next planning process.

Several discussions and consultations were also made in the past one year in the NSC and NCC meetings as well as during the course of the review of the strategic plan. These discussions focused on identifying corrective actions and recommendations needed for the R2000 programme to achieve maximum impact.

Based on the above engagements the following key issues that need to be addressed in the 2nd Strategic Plan were highlighted, among others:

1) Enhancement of employment creationstrategies: Although the roads 2000 programmes made significant contribution to the national call for employment creation, the scope is still too little considering the socio-economic situation of the country. More over the employment creation was limited to the use of labour-based methods on rural access roads while there is a great potential for the same in conventional projects. In light of this the two pronged approaches will be adopted in future. These are:

a. Expand the Labour-based works to cover low volume roads (rural and Urban) nationwide; and

b. Maximizing the labour content in conventional road projects;




urban communities and enhance their role in the maintenance of roads and other infrastructure.

Cobblestone

Cobblestone’ is a term given to a naturally occurring rounded stone found in river beds or stone cut or chiselled to the required size and used for road paving. Cobblestone (stone sets) forms a very durable pavement (top layer of a road, walkways, etc) provided the lower layers have been constructed to the required quality. The Cobblestone paving technology has vast potential in improving urban and rural infrastructure. Experiences in the neighbouring countries have shown that the technology is a cheaper alternative to conventional paving techniques is relatively simple to implement and quickly embraced by the private sector and the general public. Some benefits of the Cobblestone technology include that it:

• Is labour-intensive which creates lots of job opportunities;

• Can be source of income for the target community and injects cash in to the local economy;

• Provides marketable skills to the youth;

• Inculcates a sense of hard work among the youth and community at large;

• Improves access and leaving environment in poorer areas in urban areas;

• Enhances local business and uplifts land and property value, and

• Reduces environmental damages such as dust, soil erosion.

Do-nouTechnology

“Do-nou” is Japanese word that means wrapping soil in a gunny bag. “Do-nou” Technology involves use of gunny bags filled appropriately with either sand, farm soil,

gravel and the opening properly secured. “Do-nou” has high bearing capacity which makes it amenable for engineering works. Under the right conditions, the bearing capacity of a Do-nou can reach up to 250 kN (25.5 ton). Do-nou is commonly used for:

• raising embankments to prevent floods;• construction of temporary structures

after disasters and • Reinforcing buildings’ foundations.

It is also ideal for emergency and routine maintenance of rural and urban roads and drainage structures.

The two technologies are reintroduced to Kenya through a Ministry of Roads project supported by the ILO and the Government of Japan. The two technologies are labour intensive and have a potential to create millions of jobs for the youth of Kenya, which will in turn directly contribute towards improving the livelihood of the people and maintaining peace and security in the country.

The initial targets of the project are to:-

• Identify training institutions, facilities, and trial project sites ( 3 no. training sites)

• Develop training material and a training plan for ToT, with detailed input requirements

• Training of 100 SMEs on Cobble stone Technology

• Training of 20 SMEs on Do-nou technology

6) The mainstreaming of CCIs on all Roads2000 projects: The Constitution of Kenya, 2010 through the Bill of Rights, provides for the right of every person to good life and protection against any form of discrimination. The CCIs are also becoming the main focus of the government of Kenya as clearly indicated in various national policy documents and guidelines. It is therefore of paramount importance that public bodies and private citizens comply with the requisite provisions. The Roads 2000 programme by and large



already incorporated CCIs in all aspects of road construction and maintenance. The following need to be undertaken going forward in order to firmly anchor CCIs in programme activities:

a. The introduction of simplified contract documentation that takes into account the rights of workers, gender equality, Persons Living With Disabilities (PLWDs), Occupational Safety and Health (OSH), environmental issues, road safety etc.

b. Provide adequate funding through projects to ensure compliance

7) Cautious application of the spotimprovement/rehabilitation concept: The application of the spot improvement concept has often given rise to technical and financial audit queries particularly with regard to quality assurance and methods of measurement. In addition the concept of spot improvement is not technically and economically feasible in areas where the predominant in-situ soils are expansive clays. Hence the need for cautious approach to the application of spot improvement;

8) Introduction of a dedicated nationalcoordination unit for the Roads 2000programme: R2000 National Coordination Committee’s recommendations to the National Steering Committee have not been implemented satisfactorily since the launch of the R2000 Strategic Plan in 2005. This is due to the fact that the NCC members have other functions unrelated or remotely related to NCC duties to attend. The dedicated National Coordination unit will provide fulltime support to ensure proper follow up of issues raised at NCC meetings ; and

9) Increased use of local resources: this includes the use of local consultants, contractors, appropriate equipment as well as the adoption of innovative approaches to use low cost alternative construction materials.

6.2 ObjectivesThe nine (9) objectives of the first Strategic Plan have been narrowed into four (4) broad-

based objectives without losing any of the initial content. These four objectives are supported by comprehensive strategies (expected results to be achieved) to address all of the issues arising from the review of the implementation status of the Roads 2000 programme nationally.The objectives of the 2nd Roads 2000 Strategic plan will contribute to achieving the overall goal, Vision and Mission of the programme. The four objectives that define the cornerstones of the strategy have been identified as:

a) Objective # 1: To develop and manage roads in a cost-effective and socially responsive manner

b) Objective #2: To enhance and sustain a national implementation capacity for development and management of roads

c) Objective # 3: To enhance and sustain an enabling environment for the implementation of the strategy

d) Objective # 4: To ensure full integration of cross cutting issues

6.3 Strategies, Activities, Output Targets and

IndicatorsofSuccessThe strategies describe the outcome of the planned activities to achieve the set objectives, while output targets and indicators of success provide the means of setting targets and measuring the objectives and results. The framework of the objectives, expected results, activities, output targets and Indicators of success are presented in ANNEX I. The summary of the main output targets under each objective are given below:

Objective#1:Todevelopandmanageroadsinacost-effectiveandsociallyresponsivemanner

The strategies to achieve this objective include increasing the Maintainable Road Network through Utilization of locally available resources nationally. The national targets to be achieved over the plan period are:• Routine Maintenance (Paved) – 2,536km

annually

• Routine Maintenance (Unpaved) – 31,599km annually




• Periodic Maintenance (Paved) – 1,538km

• Periodic Maintenance (Unpaved) – 10,683km

• Rehabilitation/Spot Improvement (Paved) – 472km

• Rehabilitation Spot Improvement (Unpaved) – 890km

• Upgrading (Paved) –569km

• Upgrading (Unpaved) –40km

• New Construction/Reconstruction (Paved) – 194km

• New Construction (Unpaved) – 513km

• Employment creation of 23 Million Person-days (104,274jobs) annually over the plan period with a minimum of 33.3% being women and 2% being Persons Living With Disabilities

Objective#2:Toenhanceandsustainanationalimplementation capacity for development andmanagementofroads

The strategies to achieve this objective include the enhancement of the capacity of both the Implementing Agencies and the Private Sector. The national targets to be achieved over the plan period are:• Training of 1,316 No. Road Agency and

contractor Staff.

• Training of 844 No. Small Scale Contractors for Routine/Improvement works

• Training of 150 No. Consultants

• At least 20 No. Sensitization Workshops for practising Engineers

The above figures are in addition to the 5,600 LRB contractors already trained.

Objective#3:Toenhanceandsustainanenablingenvironment for the implementation of thestrategy

The strategies to achieve this objective will include the formulation of supportive policies to facilitate the attainment of the objectives of the Roads 2000 Strategic Plan. The national targets to be achieved

over the plan period are:• Revised Policies to support utilisation of

locally available resources

• Mobilisation of adequate financial resources to fund the implementation process. The global budget requirement is estimated to be KES. 149 Billion

• Goal – to get R2000 Strategy recognised as a flagship project under vision 2030 to benefit from the funding that may be available to meet the targets.

Objective#4: Toensurefull integrationofcrosscuttingissues

The strategies to achieve this objective will include the formulation of supportive policy instruments including guideline to facilitate the wider mainstreaming of all cross cutting issues. The national targets to be achieved over the plan period are:• Review operation manuals and guidelines in

line with existing Govt policies that facilitate the mainstreaming of CCIs in the roads sub-sector in including;

o 33% minimum women participation

o 40% minimum youth participation

o 2 % minimum PLWD participation

o Community participation in decision making in whole project cycle

• At least 20 No. Sensitization Workshops for practitioners

The above targets will be implemented by individual road agencies and all Implementing Agencies will be required to adopt these targets in their Performance Contracts.

In arriving at the targets for employment in the strategic plan, the Road Agencies were guided by the following threshold:-

Wage bill of at least 30% of the total cost for Maintenance works and

At least 10% of the total cost for capital works



The targets for each Road Agency are outlined below:-

KeNHA targets 5yrs Annual Average Targets

INTERVENTION TYPEPHYSICAL

(KM)BUDGET

(kshs.Mill)

LABOUR (person

days.Mill)PHYSICAL

(KM)BUDGET

(kshs.Mill)

LABOUR (person

days.Mill)

Routine Maintenance (PR) 10,529.23 2,370.97 2,870.86 2,105.85 474.19 574.17

Routine Maintenance (UR 10,932.81 1,348.62 1,617.46 2,186.56 269.72 323.49

Periodic Maintenance (PR) 996.46 7,565.39 7,003.97 199.29 1,513.08 1,400.79

Periodic Maintenance (UR) 171.93 484.86 443.86 34.39 96.97 88.77

Rehabilitation/ Spot Improvement (PR) 149.89 2,541.76 977.45 29.98 508.35 195.49

Rehabilitation/ Spot Improvement (UR) - - - - - -

Reconstruction (PR) 161.58 18,351.35 7,114.56 32.32 3,670.27 1,422.91

Reconstruction (UR) - - - - - -

Upgrading / Expansion (PR) 53.21 6,036.33 3,229.23 10.64 1,207.27 645.85

Upgrading / Expansion (UR) - - - - - -

New Construction (PR) - - - - - -

New Construction UR) - - - - - -

TOTAL 22,995 38,699 23,257 4,599 7,740 4,651

CapacityBuilding 114 23

KeRRA targets 5yrs Annual Average Targets

INTERVENTION TYPEPHYSICAL

(KM)BUDGET

(kshs.Mill)

LABOUR (person

days.Mill)PHYSICAL

(KM)BUDGET

(kshs.Mill)

LABOUR (person

days.Mill)

Routine Maintenance (PR) 1,684.01 1,375.02 1,802.69 336.80 275.00 360.54

Routine Maintenance (UR 145,778.23 17,905.15 21,249.50 29,155.65 3,581.03 4,249.90

Periodic Maintenance (PR) 482.44 8,188.53 7,682.19 96.49 1,637.71 1,536.44

Periodic Maintenance (UR) 10,300.88 40,546.60 36,702.48 2,060.18 8,109.32 7,340.50

Rehabilitation/ Spot Improvement (PR) 292.93 8,286.28 3,191.53 58.59 1,657.26 638.31

Rehabilitation/Spot Improvement (UR) 686.32 3,476.14 5,776.43 137.26 695.23 1,155.29

Reconstruction (PR) - - - - - -

Reconstruction (UR) - - - - - -

Upgrading / Expansion (PR) 500.00 13,814.08 4,038.73 100.00 2,762.82 807.75

Upgrading / Expansion (UR) - - - - - -

New Construction (PR) - - - - - -

New Construction UR) 500.00 1,657.69 - 100.00 331.54 -

TOTAL 160,225 95,249 80,444 32,045 19,050 16,089

CapacityBuilding 99 19.8




KURA targets 5yrs Annual Average Targets

INTERVENTION TYPE PHYSICAL (KM)BUDGET

(kshs.Mill)

LABOUR (person

days.Mill)PHYSICAL

(KM)BUDGET

(kshs.Mill)

LABOUR (persondays.

Mill)Routine Maintenance (PR) 468.59 3,184.45 3,910.23 93.72 636.89 782.05 Routine Maintenance (UR 155.00 218.63 266.12 31.00 43.73 53.22 Periodic Maintenance (PR) 59.41 674.86 633.46 11.88 134.97 126.69 Periodic Maintenance (UR) 47.24 160.51 149.09 9.45 32.10 29.82 Rehabilitation/ Spot Improvement (PR) 29.31 732.44 283.99 5.86 146.49 56.80 Rehabilitation/Spot Improvement (UR) 37.79 214.01 373.96 7.56 42.80 74.79 Reconstruction (PR) 11.20 1,543.76 193.22 2.24 308.75 38.64 Reconstruction (UR) - - - - - - Upgrading / Expansion (PR) 10.71 1,476.64 425.08 2.14 295.33 85.02 Upgrading / Expansion (UR) - - - - - - New Construction (PR) 21.23 2,926.44 1,384.72 4.25 585.29 276.94 New Construction UR) - - - - - -

TOTAL 840 11,132 7,620 168 2,226 1,524CapacityBuilding 74 14.8

KWS targets 5yrs Annual Average Targets

INTERVENTION TYPE PHYSICAL (KM)BUDGET

(kshs.Mill)

LABOUR (person

days.Mill)PHYSICAL

(KM)BUDGET

(kshs.Mill)

LABOUR (persondays.

Mill)Routine Maintenance (PR) - - - - - - Routine Maintenance (UR 1,130.77 214.51 254.21 226.15 42.90 50.84 Periodic Maintenance (PR) - - - - - - Periodic Maintenance (UR) 163.01 633.50 545.84 32.60 126.70 109.17 Rehabilitation/ Spot Improvement (PR) - - - - - - Rehabilitation/Spot Improvement (UR) 165.77 1,288.47 1,876.44 33.15 257.69 375.29 Reconstruction (PR) - - - - - - Reconstruction (UR) - - - - - - Upgrading / Expansion (PR) 5.43 347.05 139.86 1.09 69.41 27.97 Upgrading / Expansion (UR) 40.00 316.79 387.44 8.00 63.36 77.49 New Construction (PR) - - - - - - New Construction UR) 12.60 105.51 176.01 2.52 21.10 35.20

TOTAL 1,518 2,906 3,380 304 581 676CapacityBuilding - 0.0

R2000STRATEGICPLAN(2013-2017)CONTRIBUTIONTORSIP RSIP Targets R2000 targets % R2000

contributiontoRSIPINTERVENTION TYPE

Budget2013-2014

RSIP Average budget

Budget2013-2014

R2000 Average budget

Routine Maintenance1 (Km) 27,399 13,700 7,489 3,745 27.33 Periodic Maintenance1 (Km) 45,475 22,738 15,387 7,694 33.84 Rehabilitation/ Spot Improvement (Km) 55,471 27,736 4,093 2,047 7.38 Upgrading (Km) 155,135 77,568 6,782 3,391 4.37 New Construction (Km) 10,050 5,025 5,162 2,581 51.36 Capacity building 3,800 1,900 - - -

297,330 148,665 38,913 19,457 13.09

The R2000 financial targets of this strategic plan represent approximately 13% contribution of R2000 to the RSIP annual financial target.

It should be noted however that the figures used to arrive at this contribution are the annual average implementation budget for RSIP phase 1 for year 2013 & 2014 (2yrs) while those targets for R2000 are for the same time period of the Strategic plan.



Chapter

SEVEN IMPLEMENTATIONPROCESS




7ImplementationProcess7.1 ProcessElements:

The implementation of the Strategy will be preceded by a transitional preparatory phase as depicted below:

1. The TransitionPreparatoryPhase 2010 – 2012, during this phase the 2nd strategic plan was developed and finalised. At the same time the implementation of R2000 programme continued as reported in section 1.3.4.

2. The Implementation Phase 2013 – 2017 is the full implementation phase of all strategy elements.

Transition Phase

July2010

June2012

June2017

July2012

Implementation Phase

The Implementation of Strategic Plan can broadly be divided into threemainareas:

• PromotionoftheStrategicPlan

• DevelopmentofSystemsandTools

• ImplementationoftheStrategicPlan

7.2 PromotionoftheStrategicPlan:

The Strategic Plan needs to be disseminated and promoted to all stakeholders at political, national and county Government and private sector levels and for the Kenyan public at large. The National Coordination Secretariat under KRB will take the lead in this aspect utilising available GoK funds. However the support from Development Partners will be essential.

7.3 DevelopmentofSystemsandTools:

In order to implement the Strategic Plan in a coherent and professional manner, a national framework of guidelines, manuals, training and management tools have to be further developed. A lot of work has already been done under different projects and programmes and many systems are in place. The second Strategic Plan will build on these achievements.

The aim is therefore to compile the best practices, further develop, approve and roll them out in consultation with practitioners in the road sector.

The MOR through the R2000 National Co-ordination Committee will spearhead this development

utilising GoK Funds and Development Partner support. There is however need for continued financial support bearing in mind that the systems and guidelines need to be continuously improved.

7.4 ImplementationoftheStrategicPlanThe implementation of the first R2000 Strategic Plan (2005-2010) has largely been driven by the Development Partner through various projects in Central, Coast, Eastern, Rift Valley and Nyanza provinces. However, the strategy now needs to be GoK driven and be aggressively promoted in all implementing agencies for infrastructure works.

The Implementation of the Plan can be divided into three main operational components:



• Implementation of improvement andmaintenanceworks.

• Implementation of capital works – newconstruction,upgradingandrehabilitation.

• Capacity Building – training and institutionalsupport.

The first component will largely be funded by RMLF whereas the GoK development budget and Development Partner support is required for the other components. The current RMLF allocation to various road agencies is as indicated below:

The KRB Act No. 7 of 1999 as amended by the Kenya Road Act of 2007 stipulates the allocation of RMLF funds as follows:

a) Twenty two percent (22%), allocated equally to Constituencies and is administered by the Kenya Rural Roads Authority.

b) Ten percent (10%) allocated equally to Constituencies in respect of Rural roads administered by the Kenya Rural Roads Authority;

c) Forty percent (40%) allocated in respect of the national roads to be administered by the Kenya National Highways Authority;

d) Fifteen percent (15%) allocated in respect of the Urban Roads to be administered by Kenya Urban Roads Authority

e) One percent (1%) allocated in respect of roads in national parks and reserves to be administered by the Kenya Wildlife Service.

f) Ten percent (10%) to be allocated by the minister/KRB in accordance with the RSIP.

It is important to note that the needs of Kenya’s road network are more than can be addressed by this strategic plan. However the implementation of this strategic plan can make a significant contribution to the improvement of the network.

The detailed action plans for implementing the second Strategic Plan are attached as Annex 1. These action plans will be supplemented with annual action plans that will be used to monitor the implementation.

The Action Plans cover the four key objectives which have been broken down into activities with the aim of assigning the required funds from the fuel levy fund as well as funds from other local sources as well as Development Partners. Total estimated required funding is KES. 149 Billion.




Chapter

EIGHT MONITORING ANDEVALUATION



8MonitoringandEvaluationAt each level of the Strategy, indicators have been developed. Monitoring and evaluation of the strategy will be based on these indicators. The table below indicates the type of indicators and the monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.

StrategyLevelCorresponding Indicators

MonitoringandEvaluation.

Vision Impact Indicators

Baseline data in year 1Impact Study in year 5

Mission Outcome Indicators

Baseline data in year 1Impact Study in year 5

Objectives and Strategies

Output Indicators

Annual planQuarterly progress reports prepared by institution responsible for activity.Biannual progress reports prepared by R2000 National Coordination Secretariat

Activities Performance indicators

Annual planQuarterly progress reports prepared by institution responsible for activity.Reports compiled by R2000 National Coordination Secretariat on a biannual basis.

Monitoring and evaluation is part of the overall road management system. This will ensure full

effectiveness of M&E as it will be closely linked to activities at every stage of the programme lifecycle.

The socio economic baseline and impact studies will need to be simple but sufficiently focussed to provide results that add value to the implementation of the Strategy.




Chapter

NINE ASSUMPTIONSAND RISKS



9AssumptionsandRisks9.1 IntroductionThe first R2000 Strategic Plan outlined the principles and methodologies for the programme, and, among others, set out clear targets that were to be achieved over the plan period. Despite several challenges several planned targets such as employment creation, training of practitioners and increase in improved road were attained.

This provided sufficient justification to develop the second strategic plan taking into consideration the lessons learned to date and to expand the benefits of the R2000 programme. The transitional preparatory phase was meant to finalise the activities of the first strategic plan, to allow wider consultative process in developing the second strategic plan to align the implementation period to the second MTP.

The second strategic plan will incorporate the lessons learnt from the previous works and will be implemented from July 2013– June 2018. The operational environment, assumptions and risks associated with the second strategic plan are detailed here below:

9.2 Conduciveenvironmentforthe

ImplementationoftheR2000StrategyThe fundamental conditions that will need to be fulfilled for the successful implementation of the Strategic Plan include:xi. Political and public support at the National

and County government levelsxii. Sufficient and consistent funding from local

sources, including the private sectorxiii. Full commitment of all stakeholdersxiv. Sufficient financial and logistical support from

the Government and development partners to implement the strategy nationwide

xv. Improved and transparent procurement sys-tem to enhance utilization of local resources

xvi. Improved Monitoring and Evaluation System to enhance efficiency

xvii. Sufficient local capacity, in terms of sufficient-ly experienced professionals, and appropriate equipment and materials

xviii. Consistency and commitment to Research & Development

xix. Comprehensive capacity (training) pro-gramme for all partners at all levels approved and accredited

xx. Private construction sector to be fully involved and having an effective capacity to pursue its own development




The assumptions and corresponding risks have been identified in the development of this Strategic Plan are as indicated in the table below:

Assumptions Risks AssessmentofrisksPolitical will and Public Support at National and County government Level

Lack of political will and public support at national as well as county government level to implement the R2000 strategy can seriously affect the performance and even viability of the strategy.

The risk is currently small with the strategy enjoying political and public support at national level.

Political support at all levels is crucial especially considering the pivotal role of the CRC’s in the rural roads and the local authorities in the urban roads. Sensitisation, involvement and information are the main ways of mitigating this risk.

Willingness to adopt labour based methodologies and R2000 methods.

Resistance to change from conventional methods by road maintenance practitioners.

Despite the long history of labour based programmes in Kenya some engineers still view labour based as second rate and backward compared to machine based. Conventional contractors will also resist the change, having invested in equipment they would not want to use labour.

In mitigating this risk, training of engineers is key. Although R2000 is labour based, it is not labour only and recommends an optimum mixture of labour and equipment that is most appropriate.

Sufficient funding available from Fuel Levy fund for Roads 2000 Programme.

Currently some of the RMLF is available for the R2000 strategy through the road agencies. In most cases these funds are not sufficient for both routine maintenance and improvements. Funding from the fuel levy is also required for capacity building and improved supervision.

The 22% and 10% of the Fuel levy fund is guaranteed to reach the constituencies through KeRRA and subject to CRC approval can be used for the Roads 2000 Strategy.

Other implementing agencies are likely to put part of the development and RMLF allocations to the R2000 programme related works.

Consistent funding in order to implement routine maintenance.

Uneven flow of funds to the project resulting in no/little funds in the first 4 months of the financial year and too much funding the last 3 months of the financial year.

KRB can only release funds after collection; this creates a funding gap at the beginning a financial year. KRB should look for a mechanism of bridging the gap.

Road agencies release funds to projects after procurement. They should streamline their procurement processes and package projects in line with funds.

Road agencies absorption capacity is currently low. They should continuously improve/enhance their capacities through training, outsourcing etc.

Sufficient Support from development partners to implement the strategy nationwide.

Some regions and implementing agencies might not have any development partner support. Unless funds can be allocated from GoK for capacity building and improvements the Strategy might not succeed in these areas.

Development partner support has been pledged for some of regions and implementing agencies.

Advocacy and development partner coordination to achieve a wider national coverage.

More GoK funds will need to be set aside for regions and implementing agencies that don’t have development partner funding.

Improved procurement systems to assist in utilising

Local capacity

Current procurement systems not developed with small scale enterprises in mind, making it difficult to procure from local capacity.

Although every effort should be made to amend the current procurement systems it is possible to use the current system although it is time consuming.



Assumptions Risks AssessmentofrisksImproved Road Maintenance Management Systems to improve efficiency

Without a good road maintenance management system it is difficult to trace the funding and progress when implementing a network approach.

Although the RMMS database system has been adopted by all road authorities there is need to have the system rolled out nationally and anchored into their regular planning and reporting systems.

Availability of labour and Labour based contractors

When there are few labourers and labour based contractors the strategy might not work.

There are seasonal variations in the availability of labour in some areas.

Programme managers should take cognisance of the above and plan their work accordingly.

Labour based contractors might not be readily available in some regions.

Targeted training should be undertaken to mitigate the shortage.

Improved Institutional framework, especially at county government level.

The Constitution of Kenya 2010 gave counties responsibilities of managing county roads. It is not clear how this will affect the existing institutional frameworks.

Although in the medium term a revised institutional framework is required at county government level the strategy can be implemented with the current frame work.



Roads 2000 Strategic PlanANNEX

I-Acti

onPlan&Bud

get-ALLROADAGEN

CIES

OBJEC

TIVENo.1:TODEV

ELOPANDM

ANAGERO

ADSINACOST-EFFEC

TIVEANDSOCIALLYRE

SPONSIVEMANNER

Strategy

Out

puts

Acti

viteis,targetsand

IndicatorsofS

uccess

Respon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

1.1

Incr

ease

m

aint

aina

ble

road

ne

twor

k an

d al

l-se

ason

acc

ess

usin

g lo

cal r

esou

rce-

base

d ap

proa

ch.

1.1.

1 In

crea

sed

leng

th

of a

ll-se

ason

acc

ess

Cons

truc

t 21

Km a

nd 5

13 K

m o

f pa

ved

and

unpa

ved

road

s us

ing

R200

0 st

rate

gyLe

ad: K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA a

nd K

WS;

Fi

nanc

e: M

OR/

KRB

4,69

0

1.1.

2 In

crea

sed

legt

h of

m

aint

aina

ble

road

s

Reha

bilit

ate

472

Km

and

890k

m

of

pave

d an

d un

pave

d ro

ads

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, K

URA

and

KW

S;

Fina

nce:

MO

R/KR

B36

,434

Und

erta

ke p

erio

dic

mai

nten

ance

of

1,53

8 Km

and

10

,683

km

of p

aved

and

unp

aved

road

s, re

spec

tivel

y.Le

ad: K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA a

nd K

WS;

Fi

nanc

e: M

OR/

KRB

58,2

54

1.1.

3 U

npav

ed ro

ads

upgr

aded

to b

itum

en

stan

dard

Upg

rade

569

Km

and

40K

m o

f pa

ved

and

unpa

ved

road

s.Le

ad: K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA a

nd K

WS;

Fi

nanc

e: M

OR/

KRB

21,9

91

1.1.

4 Le

ngth

of r

oads

re

ceiv

ing

routi

ne

mai

nten

ance

ann

ually

is

incr

ease

d by

5%

an

nual

ly

Und

erta

ke r

outin

e m

aint

enan

ce a

nnua

lly o

f 2,

536

Km a

nd 3

1,59

9 Km

of

pave

d an

d un

pave

d ro

ads

resp

ectiv

ely.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, K

URA

and

KW

S;

Fina

nce:

MO

R/KR

B26

,617

1.2

Ensu

re in

crea

sed

utilis

ation

of l

ocal

ly

avai

labl

e re

sour

ces

in d

evel

opm

ent a

nd

man

agem

ent o

f ro

ads.

1.2.

1 Lo

cal r

esou

rces

uti

lisati

on a

sses

smen

t to

ols

and

proc

edur

es

deve

lope

d an

d di

ssem

inat

ed

deve

lop

sim

plifi

ed a

sses

smen

t to

ols

and

proc

edur

es

to g

uide

the

use

of

loca

l la

bour

, m

ater

ials

, an

d ap

prop

riat

e eq

uipm

ent

Lead

: N

CS/

Keny

a Ro

ads

Boar

d;

Fina

nce:

M

OR/

Keny

a Ro

ads

Boar

d;

Participa

tion

an

dIm

plem

entation

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA

1.2.

2 U

tilis

ation

of

loca

lly a

vaila

ble

reso

urce

s en

hanc

ed

(in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith s

et

min

imum

thre

shol

ds o

r to

the

max

imum

ext

ent

poss

ible

).

Crea

te a

bout

23

mill

ion

pers

on-d

ays

of e

mpl

oym

ent

Ann

ually

in K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA a

nd K

WS

proj

ects

. At

leas

t 33

.3%

will

be

wom

en a

nd 2

% P

LWD

whe

re

ever

pos

sibl

e

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

Dev

elop

gui

delin

es f

or a

uditi

ng t

he u

se o

f lo

cal

reso

urce

s (la

bour

, m

ater

ials

an

d eq

uipm

ent

sour

cing

). A

n au

dit u

nder

take

n fo

r at l

east

20%

of a

ll on

-goi

ng ro

ad p

roje

cts.

Lead

: MoR

/NCS

/KRB

; Fin

anci

ng: K

RB,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

155



Strategy

Out

puts

Acti

viteis,targetsand

IndicatorsofS

uccess

Respon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

1.3

Revi

ew a

nd a

dopt

de

sign

man

uals

and

w

ork

spec

ifica

tions

ap

prop

riat

e to

loca

l re

sour

ce-b

ased

ap

proa

ch

1.3.

1 Te

chni

cal a

nd

man

ager

ial t

ools

de

velo

ped

to e

nahn

ce

the

use

of L

ocal

Re

sour

ces-

bas

ed

tech

nolo

gy.

Revi

se a

nd u

pdat

e de

sign

, op

erati

onal

and

tra

inin

g m

anua

ls f

or c

onst

ructi

on a

nd m

aint

enan

ce.

Targ

et:

The

man

uals

in u

se b

y 20

15 .

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

5

Revi

ew

and

adop

t w

ork/

cont

ract

sp

ecifi

catio

ns

that

ens

ure

high

er i

nput

of

loca

l re

sour

ces

in r

oad

proj

ects

. The

revi

ewed

spe

cific

ation

by

2015

.

Lead

: N

CS/K

RB;

Fina

ncin

g:

KRB,

Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA5

Revi

ew

and

adop

t te

st/

appr

oval

m

etho

ds

that

en

sure

fas

ter

and

bett

er q

ualit

y co

ntro

l in

roa

d pr

ojec

ts.

Ham

oniz

ed t

estin

g an

d ap

prov

al m

etho

d ro

lled

out b

y 20

14

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

6

1.4

To u

se o

f ap

prop

riat

e pl

anni

ng a

nd

oper

ation

sys

tem

co

mm

ensu

rate

with

lo

cal-r

esou

rces

ba

sed

tech

nolo

ggy.

1.4.

1 Eff

ectiv

e pl

anni

ng

syst

em d

evel

oped

and

us

ed

Dev

elop

sim

plifi

ed P

lann

ing

Proc

edur

e an

d G

uide

for

impl

emen

tatio

n of

R20

00 p

roje

cts.

Le

ad: M

OR/

NCS

; Fin

anci

ng: K

RB/D

P;

Implem

entation

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, an

d KU

RA

5

Revi

ew e

xisti

ng R

oads

200

0 O

pera

tions

Man

ual (

OM

) an

d up

date

tho

se s

ectio

ns t

hat

no l

onge

r co

nfor

m

with

th

e cu

rren

t or

gani

satio

nal

and

oper

ation

al

situ

ation

as w

ell a

s inc

ludi

ng n

ew te

chno

logy

opti

ons,

e.

g. a

ltern

ative

pav

emen

t opti

ons

Lead

: N

CS/M

OR;

Fin

anci

ng:

KRB/

DP;

Im

plem

entation

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA

5

Regu

larl

y co

llect

and

col

late

roa

d in

vent

ory

and

cond

ition

(RI

C) d

ata,

incl

udin

g da

ta o

n: r

oad

leng

th,

wid

ths,

str

uctu

res,

tra

ffic

volu

mes

, an

d co

nditi

on

avai

labl

e an

d us

ed fo

r pl

anni

ng a

nd o

pera

tions

.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

Dev

elop

relia

ble

M&

E fr

amew

ork

M&

E; In

dica

tors

for

M&

E ag

reed

, bei

ng c

olle

cted

and

use

d fo

r pl

anni

ng

and

impl

emen

tatio

n; re

gula

r M&

E be

ing

unde

rtak

en.

Lead

: N

CS/K

RB,

KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, an

d KU

RA

1.5

Dev

elop

ICT

syst

ems

for

proj

ect

man

agem

ent.

1.6.

1 In

tegr

ated

Pro

ject

M

anag

emen

t Sys

tem

de

velo

ped

and

rolle

d ou

t

Dev

elop

app

ropr

iate

, us

er f

rein

dly

and

inte

grat

ed

com

pute

r-ba

sed

syst

em t

hat

cove

rs a

mon

g ot

hers

: -

proj

ect/

oper

ation

man

agem

ent

syst

em,

-

proc

urem

ent

man

agem

ent

syst

em f

or w

orks

and

se

rvic

e, a

nd

- fin

anci

al m

anag

emen

t sy

stem

.

Lead

: KRB

, KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

40

Budg

etEstimateObjectiveNo.1

148,

207



Roads 2000 Strategic PlanO

BJEC

TIV

E N

o. 2

: TO

EN

HA

NCE

AN

D S

UST

AIN

NAT

ION

AL

CAPA

CITY

FO

R TH

E IM

PLEM

ENTA

TIO

N O

F TH

E RO

AD

S 20

00 S

TRAT

EGY

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)2.

1Pr

omot

e eff

ectiv

e in

form

ation

sha

ring

an

d pu

blic

rela

tions

.

2.1.

1 Th

e vi

sibi

lity

of

loca

l res

ourc

es-b

ased

te

chno

logy

enh

ance

d.

Dev

elop

and

des

sim

inat

e in

form

ation

pac

kage

s on

th

e ac

hiev

emen

t of

the

pro

gram

me

usin

g ag

reed

Ke

y Pe

rfor

man

ce In

dica

tors

(e.

g., P

hysi

cal p

rogr

ess,

em

ploy

men

t cre

ate,

bus

ines

ses

gene

rate

d, i

ncom

es

earn

ed, e

tc.).

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

/KRB

; Fi

nanc

ing:

M

OR;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

5

Enga

ge t

he m

edia

to

broa

dcas

t co

mpr

ehen

sive

ly o

n th

e St

rate

gy.

At l

east

2N

o of

Med

ia p

rese

ntati

ons

(TV,

Rad

io, P

rint

Med

ia) a

nnua

lly

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS/K

RB; F

inan

cing

: KRB

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

42

Cond

uct

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

. At

le

ast

2No

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

tar

getin

g po

litica

l lea

ders

and

ad

min

istr

ation

offi

cial

s an

nual

ly

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS/K

RB; F

inan

cing

: KRB

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

42

Cond

uct a

war

enes

s an

d pu

blic

rela

tion

cam

paig

ns a

t co

unty

and

loca

l lev

els.

Tar

get 2

No

publ

ic a

war

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

ann

ually

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS/K

RB; F

inan

cing

: KRB

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

42

2.2

Conti

nous

de

velo

pmen

t of

impl

emen

tatio

n ca

paci

ty o

f Roa

d A

genc

ies

2.2.

1 Se

ctor

al T

rain

ig

capa

city

enh

ance

d th

roug

h in

corp

orati

ng

new

tech

nolo

gies

and

w

ork

met

hods

.

Carr

y ou

t Tr

aini

ng N

eeds

Ass

essm

ent

(TN

A)

for

all

agen

cies

with

a fo

cus

on th

e R2

000

Stra

tegy

Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

4

Dev

elop

and

roll

out c

ompr

hens

ive

Nati

onal

Tra

inin

g Pl

an f

or R

2000

pro

gram

me

and

in l

ine

with

the

im

plem

tinin

g ag

enci

es’ H

RD p

lans

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

2

prov

ide

trai

nig

for

agen

cies

’ st

aff,

smal

l sc

ale

entr

epre

neur

s, a

rtiza

ns,

etc.

Tar

get:

50,

100

& 2

00

agen

cies

’ sta

ff, S

MES

and

Arti

zans

resp

ectiv

ely

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

, KRB

.14

0



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

2.3

Enha

nce

capa

city

of

Priv

ate

cons

truc

tion

sect

or

2.3.

1 N

ation

al S

mal

l Sc

ale

Cont

ract

ors

& C

onsu

ltant

s D

evel

opm

ent

Plan

, rel

ating

to

LRBA

, de

velo

p an

d im

plem

ente

d to

enh

ace

the

part

cipa

tion

of th

e Pr

ivat

e se

ctor

Dev

elop

nati

onal

pla

n/st

rate

gy: T

arge

t: p

lan

in p

lace

by

201

5

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

10

Cond

uct

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

am

ong

the

priv

ate

sect

or s

take

hold

ers:

Tar

get:

1 a

nnua

llyLe

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

2

Intr

oduc

e m

etho

d-sp

ecifi

catio

ns a

nd m

odifi

ed B

oQ

to s

uit s

mal

l-sca

le w

orks

con

trac

tsLe

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enga

ge

the

Nati

onal

Co

nstr

uctio

n A

utho

rity

to

m

ainl

y as

sist

em

ergi

ng a

nd s

mal

l sc

ale

cont

ract

ors

and

cons

ulta

nts

to d

evel

op th

eir

busi

ness

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enco

urag

e jo

int

vent

ures

bet

wee

n in

tern

ation

al a

nd

loca

l co

nsul

ting

and

cont

racti

ng fi

rms.

Tar

get:

At

leas

t 50%

of m

ajor

tend

ers

cont

ract

ed to

JV’s

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enco

urag

e an

d fa

cilit

ate

the

crea

tion

of a

n eff

ectiv

e sm

all-s

cale

con

trac

tors

ass

ocia

tion.

Tar

get:

at

leas

t 50

% S

CC re

gist

ered

as

mem

bers

.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs,

Cont

ract

ors

and

Cons

ulta

nts.

Dev

elop

a p

olic

y fo

r inc

entiv

es fo

r R20

00 p

racti

tione

rs

and

serv

ice

prov

ider

sLe

ad: K

RB/N

CS; Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, K

RB, K

IHBT

, Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs,

Cont

ract

ors

and

Cons

ulta

nts.

5

Ass

ess

the

feas

ibili

ty o

f Cr

edit

Sche

mes

Sm

all-s

cale

co

ntra

ctor

s an

d pr

omot

e its

est

ablis

hmen

t.5

Dev

elop

and

ens

ure

usag

e of

app

ropr

iate

con

trac

t ad

min

istr

ation

gui

delin

es fo

r SM

EsAd

voca

te a

nd a

ssist

the

est

ablis

hmen

t of

a s

tatu

tory

Co

ntra

ctor

’s an

d Co

nsul

tant

’s Re

gist

ratio

n Bo

ard.

Ta

rget

: Ac

t es

tabl

ishi

ng t

he f

orm

ation

of

Cont

ract

or’s

and

Cons

ulta

nt’s

Regi

stra

tion

Boar

d in

pla

ce a

nd in

use

Enco

urag

e Re

sear

ch

in

appr

opri

ate

tool

s an

d eq

uipm

ent

Lead

: NCS

/MO

R



Roads 2000 Strategic PlanStrategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)2.

4Es

tabl

ish

a st

anda

rdis

ation

an

d ac

cred

itatio

n pr

ofici

ency

trai

ning

.

2.4.

1 N

ation

al

Profi

cien

cy T

rain

ing

Stan

dard

and

Ce

rtific

ation

pol

icy

deve

lope

d.

Dev

elop

an

Inte

rim

LRB

Pro

ficie

ncy

Trai

ning

Sta

ndar

d an

d Ce

rtific

ation

pro

cedu

res

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

5

Dev

elop

Nati

onal

Pro

ficie

ncy

Trai

ning

Sta

ndar

d an

d Ce

rtific

ation

sch

eme

for

LRB

tech

nolo

gy f

or b

oth

publ

ic a

nd p

riva

te s

take

hold

ers.

Tar

get:

sch

eme

in

plac

e by

201

4

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS5

Set

up In

teri

m L

RBA

Sta

ndin

g Co

mm

ittee

, in

liais

on

with

ER

B,

IEK

and

cons

truc

tion

asso

ciati

ons,

m

anda

ted

to c

oord

inat

e,

appr

ove

stan

dard

s an

d m

onito

ring

LRB

A tr

aini

ng.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; K

IHBT

Participa

tion

: ER

B, IE

K, C

ontr

acto

r as

soci

ation

s.

2.5

Prom

ote

the

use

of L

RB

tech

nolo

gies

am

ong

the

acad

emic

co

mm

unity

as

wel

l as,

new

and

pr

actic

ing

engi

neer

s an

d te

chni

cian

s.

2.5.

1 LR

BA tr

aini

ng

mod

ules

/cou

rses

m

ains

trea

med

in th

e re

gula

r pr

ogra

mm

es

of te

chni

cal t

rain

ing

insti

tutio

ns.

Dev

elop

or

upda

te e

xisti

ng L

RBA

tra

inin

g cu

rric

ulum

an

d co

urse

mod

ules

in c

olla

bora

tion

with

tec

hnic

al

trai

ning

insti

tute

s.

Lead

: M

OR;

KI

HBT

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B, I

EK,

KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA,

KRB,

U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd P

olyt

echn

ics.

2

Liai

se w

ith E

RB fo

r app

rova

l and

ado

ption

of r

evie

wed

tr

aini

ng c

uric

ulum

.Le

ad: N

CS/M

OR

Faci

litat

e an

d as

sist

in f

orm

ing

colla

bora

tion

pact

s/ag

reem

ents

/MO

Us

betw

een

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

, co

llege

s and

oth

er se

ctor

trai

ning

insti

tutio

ns. T

arge

t:

By y

ear

2015

.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; K

IHBT

Participa

tion

: ER

B, I

EK,

KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA,

KRB,

U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd P

olyt

echn

ics.

Prov

ide

inte

rnsh

ip

for

youn

g pr

ofes

sion

als

on

ongo

ing

proj

ects

. Tar

get:

At l

east

50

No.

Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS

Participa

tion

:Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Pol

ytec

hnic

s.

5

Org

aniz

e an

d co

nduc

t re

orie

ntati

on

prog

ram

mes

fo

r lo

cal

Aca

dem

ic c

omm

unity

in

high

er l

earn

ing

insti

tutio

ns o

n LR

B te

chno

logy

. Tar

get 2

0 N

o.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

Pa

rticipa

tion

: K

RB,

KIH

BT, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd P

olyt

echn

ics.

2

Trai

n 50

No.

tech

nici

ans

in L

RBA

ann

ually

.Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS Participa

tion

: K

RB,

KIH

BT, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd P

olyt

echn

ics.

20



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)Lo

bby

ERB

and

IEK

to r

ecom

men

d to

Insti

tutio

ns o

f hi

gher

lear

ning

to in

clud

e LR

BA in

thei

r cu

rric

ula

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Pol

ytec

hnic

s.Lo

bby

ERB

and

IEK

to in

tegr

ate

LRBA

issu

es in

to t

he

prof

essi

onal

inte

rvie

ws

Lead

: MO

R; Participa

tion

: ERB

, IEK

.

Dev

elop

Co

mm

unic

ation

St

rate

gy

for

prom

oting

LR

B te

chno

logy

tar

getin

g po

licy

mak

ers,

pro

gram

me

man

ager

s, p

rofe

ssio

nals

, se

rvic

e pr

ovid

ers

and

the

gene

ral p

ublic

. Tar

get

the

Stra

tegy

to

be in

pla

ce b

y ye

ar 2

014.

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs,

cons

ulta

nts

and

cont

ract

ors.

Dev

elop

and

offe

r or

ient

ation

cou

rses

on

LRBA

for

pr

actis

ing

engi

neer

s an

d te

chni

cian

s. T

arge

t: 2

0 N

o.

each

yea

r

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs,

cons

ulta

nts

and

cont

ract

ors.

5

Budg


343




BJEC

TIV

E N

o. 3

: TO

DEV

ELO

P PO

LICI

ES A

ND

GU

IDEL

INES

TO

SU

PPO

RT IM

PLEM

ENTA

TIO

N O

F TH

E RO

AD

S 20

00 S

TRAT

EGY

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

3.1

Road

Sec

tor

Polic

y to

sup

port

/refl

ect

obje

ctive

s of

the

Road

s 20

00 S

trat

egy

3.1.

1 Fu

ture

road

po

licie

s fu

lly s

uppo

rt

the

appl

icati

on o

f the

St

rate

gy fo

r th

e en

tire

Keny

an ro

ad n

etw

ork

and

for a

ll ty

pes

of ro

ad

wor

ks.

Lobb

y fo

r th

e fu

ll in

clus

ion

of R

2000

Str

ateg

y in

the

fu

ture

Roa

d se

ctor

pol

ices

.Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Ensu

re t

hat

all R

oad

Age

ncie

s ap

ply

the

Stra

tegy

in

the

deve

lopm

ent a

nd m

anag

emen

t of t

heir

net

wor

ksLe

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3.2

Dev

elop

, int

rodu

ce

and

enfo

rce

polic

y on

loca

l res

ourc

es

cont

ent i

n ro

ad

wor

ks

3.2.

1 N

ation

al P

olic

y an

d gu

idel

ine

for

the

use

of lo

cal r

esou

rces

ba

sed

tech

nolo

gy

deve

lope

d.

Dev

elop

an

d ro

llout

na

tiona

l LR

B te

chno

logy

op

erati

on

polic

y in

clud

ing

amon

g ot

hers

re

vise

d co

ntra

ct d

ocum

ents

(w

ith m

etho

d st

atem

ents

and

m

inim

um lo

cal r

esou

rce

cont

ent)

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

10

Dev

elop

a

clea

r st

anda

rdis

ed

proj

ect

sele

ction

sy

stem

bas

ed o

n ag

reed

soc

ial,

econ

omic

, cu

ltura

l an

d ot

her

crite

ria.

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, K

URA

, and

KRB

.10

Revi

se,

upda

te

and

rollo

ut

R200

0 pr

ojec

ts

impl

emen

tatio

n gu

idel

ines

and

Man

uals

aim

ed a

t m

axim

isin

g la

bour

con

tent

.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KW

S, K

IHBT

an

d KR

B.

20

Mon

itor

the

use

of im

plem

enta

tion

Gui

delin

es a

nd

man

uals

Lead

: NCS

/MO

R

Dev

elop

po

licy

and

guid

elin

es

for

Empl

oym

ent

Impa

ct a

nd C

omm

unity

Par

ticip

ation

Ass

essm

ent

(EI&

CPA

) and

und

erta

ke E

I&CP

A fo

r all

road

pro

ject

s. Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

5

Dev

elop

and

int

rodu

ce a

har

mon

ized

em

ploy

men

t an

d so

cio-

econ

omic

impa

ct a

sses

smen

t and

app

rova

l sy

stem

for

Road

200

0 pr

ojec

ts.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

20



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

3.3

Esta

blis

h an

effe

ctive

in

stitu

tiona

l co

ordi

natio

n an

d co

llabo

ratio

n

3.3.

1 Cr

oss-

sect

oral

co

llabo

ratio

n an

d co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

est

ablis

hed

and

stre

ngth

ened

en

hanc

e pr

ojec

ts

plan

ning

and

im

plem

enta

tion

and

mon

itori

ng.

Dev

elop

po

licy

fram

ewor

k an

d pu

t in

pl

ace

appr

opri

ate

proj

ect

coor

dina

tion

stru

ctur

e.;

Qua

rter

ly c

olla

bora

tion

mee

tings

bei

ng h

eld.

Lead

: M

OF,

M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Set

up a

ful

l-tim

e N

ation

al C

oord

inati

on S

ecre

tari

at

(NCS

) ba

sed

at t

he K

RB. T

arge

t: t

he N

CS in

Pla

ce b

y Ju

ne 2

013.

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, K

URA

, and

KRB

; Dev

elop

men

t Pa

rtne

rs.

Inco

rpor

ate

R200

0 pr

ogra

mm

e ta

rget

s in

th

e pe

rfor

man

ce c

ontr

acts

of M

OR

and

all i

mpl

emen

ting

agen

cies

. Tar

get:

to s

tart

from

201

3/20

14 fi

scal

yea

r

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB; L

ocal

A

utho

ritie

s.

Inco

rpor

ate

empl

oym

ent

crea

tion

targ

ets

in

the

perf

orm

ance

co

ntra

cts

of

MoR

an

d ot

her

impl

emen

ting

agen

cies

. Ta

rget

: to

st

art

from

20

13/2

014

fisca

l yea

r.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB; L

ocal

A

utho

ritie

s.

3.4

Cons

olid

ate

and

mob

ilise

s fin

anci

al

reso

urce

s

3.4.

1 Th

e us

e of

fund

s fo

r Ru

ral R

oad

wor

ks

from

var

ious

sou

rces

(R

MLF

, LAT

F, C

DF,

Ces

s M

onie

s, E

SP fu

nds)

co

nsol

idat

ed a

nd

coor

dina

ted

lobb

y th

e re

leva

nt a

utho

ritie

s to

enf

orce

exi

sting

la

ws

for

use

of th

ese

fund

sLe

ad:

MO

F, M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Inte

grat

e R2

000

proj

ects

into

wid

er ro

ad d

evel

opm

ent

prog

ram

mes

us

ing

Inte

grat

ed

Proj

ect

Plan

ning

pr

oces

ses:

Tar

get:

All

Age

ncie

s’ r

oad

deve

lopm

ent

plan

s ha

ve R

oads

200

0 co

mpo

nent

by

June

201

4

Lead

: M

OR,

M

OF;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3.5

Esta

blis

h Po

litica

l an

d co

mm

unity

go

odw

ill.

3.5.

1 Pa

rtici

pato

ry

Proj

ect P

lann

ing

and

Impl

emen

tatio

n A

ppro

ach

in p

lace

.

deve

lop

proc

edur

es f

or c

omm

unity

par

ticip

ation

as

part

of p

roje

ct p

lann

ing

proc

ess

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, K

URA

, and

KRB

; Par

liam

enta

ry

Com

mitt

ees;

Use

r A

ssoc

iatio

ns.

Crea

te p

ublic

aw

aren

ess

and

feed

back

mec

hani

sms

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, an

d KR

B;

Parl

iam

enta

ry

Com

mitt

ees;

U

ser

Ass

ocia

tions

.

5

Budg


70




BJEC

TIV

E N

o. 4

: TO

EN

SURE

FU

LL IN

TEG

RATI

ON

OF

CRO

SS C

UTT

ING

ISSU

ESStrategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)4.

1M

ains

trea

m g

ende

r is

sues

.4.

1.1

Sub-

sect

or a

nd

corp

orat

e po

licie

s an

d gu

idel

ines

on

cros

s cu

tting

issu

es in

pla

ce

and

appl

ied

in a

ll pr

ojec

ts.

Faci

litat

e th

e de

velo

pmen

t an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of

sub-

sect

or a

nd c

orpo

rate

gen

der

polic

ies

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

an

d M

OG

C&SS

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, an

d KR

B.

Inco

rpor

ated

CC

I re

quire

men

ts

(incl

udin

g ge

nder

eq

ualit

y) i

n op

erati

onal

and

rep

ortin

g sy

stem

s an

d en

sure

com

plia

nce

with

sub

-sec

tor

gend

er p

olic

ies

in R

2000

pro

gram

mes

.

Enco

urag

e w

omen

par

ticip

ation

thr

ough

tar

gete

d aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns (r

evis

e co

ntra

ct p

roce

dure

s to

en

sure

this

hap

pens

).

Prov

ide

cond

uciv

e w

orki

ng e

nviro

nmen

t fo

r w

omen

(s

peci

fic n

eeds

). In

dica

tors

: nu

mbe

r an

d ty

pe o

f fa

ciliti

es p

rovi

ded;

flex

ible

wor

king

hou

rs.

Incl

ude

min

imum

thre

shol

d fo

r wom

en p

artic

ipati

on

in

perf

orm

ance

co

ntra

cts

of

agen

cies

. Ta

rget

: In

crea

se p

artic

ipati

on o

f w

omen

to

at le

ast

33%

in

all w

orks

.

4.2

Mai

nstr

eam

you

th

issu

es.

Incl

ude

min

imum

thr

esho

ld fo

r yo

uth

(18

to 3

4 yr

s.)

parti

cipa

tion

in p

erfo

rman

ce c

ontr

acts

of

agen

cies

. Ta

rget

: In

crea

se p

artic

ipati

on o

f Yo

uth

to a

t le

ast

40%

in a

ll w

orks

.

Lead

: MO

R an

d M

OYA

S Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Enco

urag

e in

tern

ship

and

tra

inin

g pr

ogra

mm

e fo

r th

e yo

uth.

Thou

gh

regu

lar

targ

eted

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns

10



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

4.3

Inte

grat

e an

d cr

eate

H

IV/A

IDS

awar

enes

sEn

hanc

e im

plem

enta

tion

and

com

plia

nce

of H

IV/

AID

S pr

even

tion

and

man

agem

ent

mea

sure

s ac

ross

th

e bo

ard;

bot

h fo

r em

ploy

ees

and

the

com

mun

ity.

Incl

ude

cont

rol m

easu

res.

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

H;Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Inco

rpor

ate

prev

entio

n an

d &

man

agem

ent

of H

IV/

AID

S in

con

trac

tual

and

ope

ratio

nal

docu

men

ts a

s w

ell a

s re

porti

ng s

yste

ms.

Enco

urag

e cr

oss-

sect

oral

app

roac

h an

d co

llabo

ratio

n w

ith o

ther

age

ncie

s.

4.4

Mai

nstr

eam

PLW

D

issu

es in

LRB

wor

ksSu

b-se

ctor

and

cor

pora

te p

olic

ies

and

guid

elin

es in

pl

ace

and

appl

ied

in a

ll pr

ojec

ts.

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

CG&

SS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, an

d KR

B.

10

Inco

rpor

ate

the

righ

ts o

f PL

WD

in

cont

ract

ual

and

oper

ation

al

docu

men

ts

as

wel

l as

in

re

porti

ng

syst

ems.

Ensu

re t

he in

corp

orati

on o

f ne

eds

of P

LWD

in r

oad

desi

gns.

Impr

ove

mon

itori

ng

of

the

parti

cipa

tion

and

faci

litati

on o

f PL

WD

in

road

wor

ks t

hrou

gh r

egul

ar

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

& m

eetin

gs o

n pr

ojec

ts.

Enco

urag

e PL

WD

pa

rtici

patio

n th

roug

h ta

rget

ed

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

an

d pr

ovid

e a

cond

uciv

e w

orki

ng e

nviro

nmen

t to

incr

ease

thei

r pa

rtici

patio

n.

Targ

et:

2.5%

PLW

D p

artic

ipati

on o

n R2

000

proj

ects

4.5

Inte

grat

e En

viro

nmen

tal a

nd

Soci

al Is

sues

Ensu

re c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith E

MCA

in

all

Road

s 20

00

proj

ects

.Le

ad: M

OR

and

NEM

A; P

articipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RBD

isse

min

ate

info

rmati

on

on

co

nser

vatio

n of

en

viro

nmen

t us

ing

prac

tical

gu

idel

ines

an

d pr

omoti

onal

m

ater

ials

an

th

roug

h fo

rmal

an

d in

form

al tr

aini

ng p

acka

ges.

Sens

itise

LR

BA

prac

tition

ers

on

envi

ronm

enta

l is

sues

. Tar

get:

all

Prac

tition

ers

appl

y En

viro

nmen

tal

cons

erva

tion

on ro

ad p

roje

cts.

15




Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)4.

6En

forc

e La

bour

law

s an

d re

gula

tions

Inco

rpor

ate

rele

vant

pa

rts

of

the

labo

ur

law

in

pr

ojec

t and

con

trac

tual

doc

umen

ts

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

L; Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB

Dev

elop

gui

delin

es fo

r tr

aini

ng a

nd u

se ‘i

n th

e fie

ld’.

10

Crea

te a

war

enes

s in

the

lab

our-

forc

e on

rel

evan

t la

bour

law

s an

d re

gula

tions

thr

ough

reg

ular

pub

lic

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

.

10

4.7

Ensu

re C

omm

unity

/

stak

ehol

der

parti

cipa

tion.

Esta

blis

h pl

atfor

m f

or c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith c

lear

sub

-se

ctor

pol

icy

and

guid

elin

es o

f eng

agem

ent.

Le

ad:

MO

R; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, K

URA

, and

KRB

.

Esta

blis

h m

echa

nism

s fo

r co

llabo

ratin

g w

ith o

ther

ag

enci

es in

volv

ed in

com

mun

ity w

orks

. 4.

8O

bser

ve

Occ

upati

onal

H

ealth

and

Saf

ety

requ

irem

ents

.

Iden

tify

appr

opri

ate

safe

ty a

nd h

ealth

requ

irem

ents

fo

r th

e ro

ad c

onst

ructi

on s

ecto

r an

d de

velo

p an

d in

trod

uce

impl

emen

tatio

n gu

idel

ines

and

br

ochu

res.

Lead

: MO

R an

d M

OT&

I; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB

30

Revi

ew

and

upda

te

cond

ition

s of

co

ntra

ct

and

spec

ifica

tions

to

ensu

re f

ull c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith s

afet

y an

d he

alth

regu

latio

ns.

10

Dev

elop

and

intr

oduc

e an

effe

ctive

OSH

M&

E co

ntro

l sy

stem

.90

4.9

Crea

te R

oad

Safe

ty

Aw

aren

ess.

Cont

ribu

te t

owar

ds t

he c

reati

on o

f aw

aren

ess

in

road

saf

ety

in t

he l

ocal

com

mun

ity t

houg

h pu

blic

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns.

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, K

URA

, and

KRB

.70

esta

blis

h a

mec

hani

sm

for

colla

bora

ting

and

coor

dina

tion

with

oth

er a

genc

ies

invo

lved

in

road

sa

fety

. Bu

dgetEstimateObjectiveNo.4

255

148,

876



Ann

exIIA:O

utlin

eTargetsan

dIm

plem

entation

Bud

get(MOR)

MIN

ISTR

Y O

F RO

AD

SOBJEC

TIVENo.1:TODEV

ELOPANDM

ANAGERO

ADSINACOST-EFFEC

TIVEANDSOCIALLYRE

SPONSIVEMANNER

Strategy

Out

puts

Acti

viteis,targetsand

IndicatorsofS

uccess

Respon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)1.

1In

crea

se

mai

ntai

nabl

e ro

ad n

etw

ork

and

all-

seas

on a

cces

s us

ing

loca

l re

sour

ce-b

ased

ap

proa

ch.

1.1.

1 In

crea

sed

leng

th

of a

ll-se

ason

acc

ess

Cons

truc

t 21K

m a

nd 5

13 K

m o

f pav

ed a

nd u

npav

ed ro

ads

usin

g R2

000

stra

tegy

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, K

URA

and

KW

S; F

inan

ce: M

OR

1.1.

2 In

crea

sed

legt

h of

m

aint

aina

ble

road

s

Reha

bilit

ate

472

Km a

nd 8

90km

of p

aved

and

unp

aved

road

sLe

ad: K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA a

nd

KWS;

Fin

ance

: MO

R/KR

BU

nder

take

per

iodi

c m

aint

enan

ce o

f 1,5

38 K

m a

nd 1

0,68

3 km

of

pave

d an

d un

pave

d ro

ads,

resp

ectiv

ely.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, K

URA

and

KW

S; F

inan

ce: M

OR/

KRB

1.1.

3 U

npav

ed ro

ads

upgr

aded

to b

itum

en

stan

dard

Upg

rade

569

Km

and

40K

m o

f pav

ed a

nd u

npav

ed ro

ads.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, K

URA

and

KW

S; F

inan

ce: M

OR/

KRB

1.1.

4 Le

ngth

of r

oads

re

ceiv

ing

routi

ne

mai

nten

ance

ann

ually

is

incr

ease

d by

5%

an

nual

ly

Und

erta

ke r

outin

e m

aint

enan

ce a

nnua

lly o

f 2,

536

Km a

nd

31,5

99 K

m o

f pav

ed a

nd u

npav

ed ro

ads

resp

ectiv

ely.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, K

URA

and

KW

S; F

inan

ce: M

OR/

KRB

1.2

Ensu

re

incr

ease

d uti

lisati

on o

f lo

cally

ava

ilabl

e re

sour

ces

in

deve

lopm

ent

and

man

agem

ent o

f ro

ads.

1.2.

1 Lo

cal r

esou

rces

uti

lisati

on a

sses

smen

t to

ols

and

proc

edur

es

deve

lope

d an

d di

ssem

inat

ed

deve

lop

sim

plifi

ed a

sses

smen

t too

ls a

nd p

roce

dure

to g

uide

the

use

of lo

cal l

abou

r, m

ater

ials

, and

app

ropr

iate

equ

ipm

ent

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; F

inan

ce: K

enya

Ro

ads

Boar

d;

Participa

tion

an

dIm

plem

entation

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

1.2.

2 U

tilis

ation

of

loca

lly a

vaila

ble

reso

urce

s en

hanc

ed

(in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith s

et

min

imum

thre

shol

ds o

r to

the

max

imum

ext

ent

poss

ible

).

Crea

te a

bout

23

mill

ion

pers

on-d

ays

of e

mpl

oym

ent A

nnua

lly in

Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA a

nd K

WS

proj

ects

. At

leas

t 33

.3%

will

be

wom

en a

nd 2

% P

LWD

whe

re e

ver

poss

ible

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

Dev

elop

gui

delin

es fo

r aud

iting

the

use

of lo

cal r

esou

rces

(lab

our,

mat

eria

ls a

nd e

quip

men

t so

urci

ng).

An

audi

t un

dert

aken

for

at

leas

t 20%

of a

ll on

-goi

ng ro

ad p

roje

cts.

Lead

: MoR

/NCS

/KRB

; Fin

anci

ng:

KRB,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

8




Out

puts

Acti

viteis,targetsand

IndicatorsofS

uccess

Respon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)1.

3Re

view

and

ad

opt d

esig

n m

anua

ls

and

wor

k sp

ecifi

catio

ns

appr

opri

ate

to

loca

l res

ourc

e-ba

sed

appr

oach

1.3.

1 Te

chni

cal a

nd

man

ager

ial t

ools

de

velo

ped

to e

nahn

ce

the

use

of L

ocal

Re

sour

ces-

bas

ed

tech

nolo

gy.

Revi

se a

nd u

pdat

e de

sign

, ope

ratio

nal a

nd tr

aini

ng m

anua

ls fo

r co

nstr

uctio

n an

d m

aint

enan

ce. T

arge

t: T

he m

anua

ls in

use

by

2014

.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B, K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA5

Revi

ew a

nd a

dopt

wor

k/co

ntra

ct s

peci

ficati

ons

that

ens

ure

high

er in

put

of lo

cal r

esou

rces

in r

oad

proj

ects

. The

rev

iew

ed

spec

ifica

tion

by 2

015.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B, K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA

Revi

ew a

nd a

dopt

tes

t/ a

ppro

val

met

hods

tha

t en

sure

fas

ter

and

bett

er q

ualit

y co

ntro

l in

road

pro

ject

s. H

amon

ized

tes

ting

and

appr

oval

met

hod

rolle

d ou

t by

2014

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B, K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA

1.4

To u

se o

f ap

prop

riat

e pl

anni

ng a

nd

oper

ation

sy

stem

co

mm

ensu

rate

w

ith lo

cal-

reso

urce

s ba

sed

tech

nolo

ggy.

1.4.

1 Eff

ectiv

e pl

anni

ng

syst

em d

evel

oped

and

us

ed

Dev

elop

si

mpl

ified

Pl

anni

ng

Proc

edur

e an

d G

uide

fo

r im

plem

enta

tion

of R

2000

pro

ject

s.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; F

inan

cing

: KR

B/D

P; Im

plem

entation

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA

Revi

ew e

xisti

ng R

oads

200

0 O

pera

tions

Man

ual

(OM

) an

d up

date

tho

se s

ectio

ns t

hat

no lo

nger

con

form

with

the

cur

rent

or

gani

satio

nal

and

oper

ation

al s

ituati

on a

s w

ell

as i

nclu

ding

ne

w te

chno

logy

opti

ons,

e.g

. alte

rnati

ve p

avem

ent o

ption

s

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B/D

P;

Implem

entation

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA

Regu

larl

y co

llect

and

col

late

roa

d in

vent

ory

and

cond

ition

(RIC

) da

ta, i

nclu

ding

dat

a on

: roa

d le

ngth

, wid

ths,

str

uctu

res,

tra

ffic

volu

mes

, an

d co

nditi

on a

vaila

ble

and

used

for

pla

nnin

g an

d op

erati

ons.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

Dev

elop

re

liabl

e M

&E

fram

ewor

k M

&E;

In

dica

tors

fo

r M

&E

agre

ed,

bein

g co

llect

ed

and

used

fr

o pl

anni

ng

and

impl

emen

tatio

n; re

gula

r M

&E

bein

g un

dert

aken

.

Lead

: KR

B, K

eNH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

1.5

Dev

elop

IC

T sy

stem

s fo

r pr

ojec

t m

anag

emen

t.

1.6.

1 In

tegr

ated

Pro

ject

M

anag

emen

t Sys

tem

de

velo

ped

and

rolle

d ou

t

Dev

elop

app

ropr

iate

, us

er f

rein

dly

and

inte

grat

ed c

ompu

ter-

base

d sy

stem

that

cove

rs a

mon

g ot

hers

:

- pr

ojec

t/op

erati

on m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

,

- pr

ocur

emen

t man

agem

ent

syst

em fo

r wor

ks a

nd s

ervi

ce, a

nd

-

finan

cial

m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

.

Lead

: KR

B, K

eNH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

Budg


13



OBJ

ECTI

VE

No.

2: T

O E

NH

AN

CE A

ND

SU

STA

IN N

ATIO

NA

L CA

PACI

TY F

OR

THE

IMPL

EMEN

TATI

ON

OF

THE

ROA

DS

2000

STR

ATEG

YStrategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

2.1

Prom

ote

effec

tive

info

rmati

on

shar

ing

and

publ

ic re

latio

ns.

2.1.

1 Th

e vi

sibi

lity

of

loca

l res

ourc

es-b

ased

te

chno

logy

enh

ance

d.

Dev

elop

an

d de

ssim

inat

e in

form

ation

pa

ckag

es

on

the

achi

evem

ent

of t

he p

rogr

amm

e us

ing

agre

ed K

ey P

erfo

rman

ce

Indi

cato

rs

(e.g

., Ph

ysic

al

prog

ress

, em

ploy

men

t cr

eate

, bu

sine

sses

gen

erat

ed,

inco

mes

ear

ned,

etc

.).

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

5

Enga

ge

the

med

ia

to

broa

dcas

t co

mpr

ehen

sive

ly

on

the

Stra

tegy

. At

leas

t 2N

o of

Med

ia p

rese

ntati

ons

(TV,

Rad

io, P

rint

M

edia

) ann

ually

Lead

: M

OR/

NSC

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

5

Cond

uce

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

. At

le

ast

2No

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

ta

rgetti

ng

politi

cal

lead

ers

and

adm

inis

trati

on

offici

als

annu

ally

Lead

: M

OR/

NSC

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

5

Cond

uct a

war

enes

s and

pub

lic re

latio

n ca

mpa

igns

at c

ount

y an

d lo

cal l

evel

s. T

arge

t 2N

o pu

blic

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns a

nnua

llyLe

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Fina

ncin

g:

KRB;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

5

2.2

Conti

nous

de

velo

pmen

t of

impl

emen

tatio

n ca

paci

ty o

f Ro

ad A

genc

ies

2.2.

1 Se

ctor

al T

rain

ig

capa

city

enh

ance

d th

roug

h in

corp

orati

ng

new

tech

nolo

gies

and

w

ork

met

hods

.

Carr

y ou

t Tra

inin

g N

eeds

Ass

essm

ent (

TNA

) for

all

agen

cies

with

a

focu

s on

the

R200

0 St

rate

gy

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

4

Dev

elop

and

rol

l out

com

prhe

nsiv

e N

ation

al T

rain

ing

Plan

for

R2

000

prog

ram

me

and

in li

ne w

ith t

he im

plem

tinin

g ag

enci

es’

HRD

pla

ns

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

2

prov

ide

trai

nig

for

agen

cies

’ st

aff,

smal

l sc

ale

entr

epre

neur

s,

artiz

ans,

etc

. Ta

rget

: 50

, 10

0 &

200

age

ncie

s’ s

taff,

SM

ES a

nd

Arti

zans

resp

ectiv

ely

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

70




Out

puts

Acti

viteis,targetsand

IndicatorsofS

uccess

Respon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

2.3

Enha

nce

capa

city

of

Pri

vate

co

nstr

uctio

n se

ctor

2.3.

1 N

ation

al S

mal

l Sc

ale

Cont

ract

ors

& C

onsu

ltant

s D

evel

opm

ent

Plan

, rel

ating

to

LRBA

, de

velo

p an

d im

plem

ente

d to

enh

ace

the

part

cipa

tion

of th

e Pr

ivat

e se

ctor

Dev

elop

nati

onal

pla

n/st

rate

gy: T

arge

t: p

lan

in p

lace

by

2015

Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

10

Cond

uct

awar

ness

cm

apig

ns

amon

g th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

st

akeh

olde

rs: T

arge

t: 1

ann

ually

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

2

Intr

oduc

e m

etho

d-sp

ecifi

catio

ns a

nd m

odifi

ed B

oQ t

o su

it sm

all-s

cale

wor

ks c

ontr

acts

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enga

ge t

he N

ation

al C

onst

ructi

on A

utho

rity

(N

CA)

to m

ainl

y as

sist

em

ergi

ng a

nd s

mal

l sca

le c

ontr

acto

rs a

nd c

onsu

ltant

s to

de

velo

p th

eir

busi

ness

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enco

urag

e jo

int

vent

ures

be

twee

n in

tern

ation

al

and

loca

l co

nsul

ting

and

cont

racti

ng fi

rms.

Tar

get:

At

leas

t 50

% o

f m

ajor

te

nder

s co

ntra

cted

to JV

’s

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enco

urag

e an

d fa

cilit

ate

the

crea

tion

of a

n eff

ectiv

e sm

all-s

cale

co

ntra

ctor

s as

soci

ation

. Tar

get:

at

leas

t 50

% S

CC r

egis

tere

d as

m

embe

rs.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs,

Cont

ract

ors

and

Cons

ulta

nts.

Dev

elop

a p

olic

y fo

r in

centi

ves

for

R200

0 pr

actiti

oner

s an

d se

rvic

e pr

ovid

ers

Ass

ess

the

feas

ibili

ty o

f Cre

dit S

chem

es S

mal

l-sca

le c

ontr

acto

rs

and

prom

ote

its e

stab

lishm

ent.

5

Dev

elop

and

ens

ure

usag

e of

app

ropr

iate

cont

ract

adm

inis

trati

on

guid

elin

es fo

r SM

Es

Adv

ocat

e an

d as

sist

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of a

stat

utor

y Co

ntra

ctor

’s

and

Cons

ulta

nt’s

Reg

istr

ation

Boa

rd. T

arge

t: A

ct e

stab

lishi

ng th

e fo

rmati

on o

f Co

ntra

ctor

’s a

nd C

onsu

ltant

’s R

egis

trati

on B

oard

in

pla

ce a

nd in

use



Strategy

Out

puts

Acti

viteis,targetsand

IndicatorsofS

uccess

Respon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

2.4

Esta

blis

h a

stan

dard

isati

on

and

accr

edita

tion

profi

cien

cy

trai

ning

.

2.4.

1 N

ation

al

Profi

cien

cy T

rain

ing

Stan

dard

and

Ce

rtific

ation

pol

icy

deve

lope

d.

Dev

elop

an

Inte

rim

LRB

Pro

ficie

ncy

Trai

ning

Sta

ndar

d an

d Ce

rtific

ation

pro

cedu

res

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

5

Dev

elop

Nati

onal

Pro

ficie

ncy

Trai

ning

Sta

ndar

d an

d Ce

rtific

ation

sc

hem

e fo

r LR

B te

chno

logy

fo

r bo

th

publ

ic

and

priv

ate

stak

ehol

ders

. Tar

get:

sch

eme

in p

lace

by

2014

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS5

Set

up I

nter

im L

RBA

Sta

ndin

g Co

mm

ittee

, in

liai

son

with

ERB

, IE

K an

d co

nstr

uctio

n as

soci

ation

s, m

anda

ted

to c

oord

inat

e,

appr

ove

stan

dard

s an

d m

onito

ring

LRB

A tr

aini

ng.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; KI

HBT

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

Co

ntra

ctor

ass

ocia

tions

.En

cour

age

Rese

arch

in a

ppro

pria

te to

ols

and

equi

pmen

tLe

ad: N

CS/M

OR

2.5

Prom

ote

the

use

of L

RB

tech

nolo

gies

am

ong

the

acad

emic

co

mm

unity

as

wel

l as,

new

an

d pr

actic

ing

engi

neer

s an

d te

chni

cian

s.

2.5.

1 LR

BA tr

aini

ng

mod

ules

/cou

rses

m

ains

trea

med

in th

e re

gula

r pr

ogra

mm

es

of te

chni

cal t

rain

ing

insti

tutio

ns.

Dev

elop

or u

pdat

e ex

istin

g LR

BA tr

aini

ng c

urri

culu

m a

nd c

ours

e m

odul

es in

col

labo

ratio

n w

ith te

chni

cal t

rain

ing

insti

tute

s.

Lead

: MO

R; K

IHBT

Participa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs.

2

Liai

se w

ith E

RB fo

r ap

prov

al a

nd a

dopti

on o

f rev

iew

ed t

rain

ing

curi

culu

m.

Lead

: NCS

/MO

R

Faci

litat

e an

d as

sist

in fo

rmin

g co

llabo

ratio

n pa

cts/

agre

emen

ts/

MO

Us

betw

een

KIH

BT, U

nive

rsiti

es,

colle

ges

and

othe

r se

ctor

tr

aini

ng in

stitu

tions

. Tar

get:

By

year

201

5.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; KI

HBT

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B, I

EK,

KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA,

KRB,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs.

Prov

ide

inte

rnsh

ip fo

r yo

ung

prof

essi

onal

s on

ong

oing

pro

ject

s.

Targ

et: A

t lea

st 5

0 N

o.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

Participa

tion

:Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs.

3

Org

aniz

e an

d co

nduc

t re

orie

ntati

on

prog

ram

mes

fo

r lo

cal

Aca

dem

ic c

omm

unity

in

high

er l

earn

ing

insti

tutio

ns o

n LR

B te

chno

logy

. Tar

get 2

0 N

o.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS Participa

tion

: KR

B, K

IHBT

, Uni

vers

ities

and

Po

lyte

chni

cs.

2

Trai

n 50

No.

tech

nici

ans

in L

RBA

ann

ually

.Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS P

articipa

tion

: KR

B,

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs.

20

Loby

ERB

and

IEK

to

reco

mm

end

to I

nstit

ution

s of

hig

her

lear

ning

to in

clud

e LR

BA in

thei

r cu

rric

ula

Lead

: MO

R; Participa

tion

: ERB

, IE

K, K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, K

RB,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Pol

ytec

hnic

s.Lo

bby

ERB

and

IEK

to in

tegr

ate

LRBA

issu

es in

to th

e pr

ofes

sion

al

inte

rvie

ws

Lead

: M

OR;

Participa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK.



Roads 2000 Strategic PlanD

evel

op C

omm

unic

ation

Str

ateg

y fo

r pro

moti

ng L

RB te

chno

logy

ta

rgeti

ng p

olic

y m

aker

s, p

rogr

amm

e m

anag

ers,

pro

fess

iona

ls,

serv

ice

prov

ider

s an

d th

e ge

nera

l pub

lic. T

arge

t th

e St

rate

gy t

o be

in p

lace

by

year

201

4.

Lead

: MO

R; Participa

tion

: ERB

, IE

K, K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, K

RB,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Pol

ytec

hnic

s,

cons

ulta

nts

and

cont

ract

ors.

Dev

elop

and

offe

r or

ient

ation

cou

rses

on

LRBA

for

pra

ctisi

ng

engi

neer

s an

d te

chni

cian

s. T

arge

t: 2

0 N

o. e

ach

year

Lead

: MO

R; Participa

tion

: ERB

, IE

K, K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, K

RB,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Pol

ytec

hnic

s,

cons

ulta

nts

and

cont

ract

ors.

5

Budg


155



OBJ

ECTI

VE

No.

3: T

O D

EVEL

OP

POLI

CIES

AN

D G

UID

ELIN

ES T

O S

UPP

ORT

IMPL

EMEN

TATI

ON

OF

THE

ROA

DS

2000

STR

ATEG

YStrategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)3.

1Ro

ad S

ecto

r Po

licy

to

supp

ort/

refle

ct

obje

ctive

s of

th

e Ro

ads

2000

St

rate

gy

3.1.

1 Fu

ture

road

po

licie

s fu

lly s

uppo

rt

the

appl

icati

on o

f the

St

rate

gy fo

r th

e en

tire

Keny

an ro

ad n

etw

ork

and

for

all t

ypes

of

road

wor

ks.

Lobb

y fo

r the

full

incl

usio

n of

R20

00 S

trat

egy

in th

e fu

ture

Roa

d se

ctor

pol

ices

.Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Ensu

re

that

al

l Ro

ad

Age

ncie

s ap

ply

the

Stra

tegy

in

th

e de

velo

pmen

t and

man

agem

ent o

f the

ir n

etw

orks

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3.2

Dev

elop

, in

trod

uce

and

enfo

rce

polic

y on

loca

l re

sour

ces

cont

ent i

n ro

ad

wor

ks

3.2.

1 N

ation

al P

olic

y an

d gu

idel

ine

for

the

use

of lo

cal r

esou

rces

ba

sed

tech

nolo

gy

deve

lope

d.

Dev

elop

and

rol

lout

nati

onal

LRB

tec

hnol

ogy

oper

ation

pol

icy

incl

udin

g am

ong

othe

rs

revi

sed

cont

ract

do

cum

ents

(w

ith

met

hod

stat

emen

ts a

nd m

inim

um lo

cal r

esou

rce

cont

ent)

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

10

Dev

elop

a c

lear

sta

ndar

dise

d pr

ojec

t sel

ectio

n sy

stem

bas

ed o

n ag

reed

soc

ial,

econ

omic

, cul

tura

l and

oth

er c

rite

ria.

Le

ad:

MO

R;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

10

Revi

se,

upda

te a

nd r

ollo

ut R

2000

pro

ject

s im

plem

enta

tion

&

Man

uals

gui

delin

es a

imed

at m

axim

isin

g la

bour

con

tent

.Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

20

Dev

elop

pol

icy

and

guid

elin

es f

or E

mpl

oym

ent

Impa

ct a

nd

Com

mun

ity P

artic

ipati

on A

sses

smen

t (E

I&CP

A)

and

unde

rtak

e EI

&CP

A fo

r al

l roa

d pr

ojec

ts.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

5

Dev

elop

and

intr

oduc

e a

harm

oniz

ed e

mpl

oym

ent

and

soci

o-ec

onom

ic i

mpa

ct a

sses

smen

t an

d ap

prov

al s

yste

m f

or R

oad

2000

pro

ject

s.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

20

3.3

Esta

blis

h an

effe

ctive

in

stitu

tiona

l co

ordi

natio

n an

d co

llabo

ratio

n

3.3.

1 Cr

oss-

sect

oral

co

llabo

ratio

n an

d co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

est

ablis

hed

and

stre

ngth

ened

en

hanc

e pr

ojec

ts

plan

ning

and

im

plem

enta

tion

and

mon

itori

ng.

Dev

elop

pol

icy

fram

ewor

k an

d pu

t in

pla

ce a

ppro

pria

te p

roje

ct

coor

dina

tion

stru

ctur

e.;

Qua

rter

ly

colla

bora

tion

mee

tings

be

ing

held

.

Lead

: MO

F, M

OR;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Set u

p a

full-

time

Nati

onal

Coo

rdin

ation

Sec

reta

riat

(NCS

) bas

ed

at th

e KR

B. T

arge

t: th

e N

CS in

Pla

ce b

y Ju

ne 2

013.

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Dev

elop

men

t Par

tner

s.In

corp

orat

e R2

000

prog

ram

me

targ

ets

in t

he p

erfo

rman

ce

cont

ract

s of

MO

R an

d al

l im

plem

entin

g ag

enci

es.

Targ

et:

to

star

t fro

m 2

013/

14 fi

scal

yea

r

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Loca

l Aut

hori

ties.

Inco

rpor

ate

empl

oym

ent

crea

tion

targ

ets

in t

he p

erfo

rman

ce

cont

ract

s of

MoR

and

oth

er im

plem

entin

g ag

enci

es. T

arge

t: t

o st

art f

rom

201

3/14

fisc

al y

ear.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Loca

l Aut

hori

ties.




Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

3.4

Cons

olid

ate

and

mob

ilise

s fin

anci

al

reso

urce

s

3.4.

1 Th

e us

e of

fund

s fo

r Ru

ral R

oad

wor

ks

from

var

ious

sou

rces

(R

MLF

, LAT

F, C

DF,

Ces

s M

onie

s, E

SP fu

nds)

co

nsol

idat

ed a

nd

coor

dina

ted

loby

the

rel

evan

t au

thor

ities

to

enfo

rce

exis

ting

law

s fo

r us

e of

th

ese

fund

sLe

ad:

MO

F,

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

.

Inte

grat

e R2

000

proj

ects

in

to

wid

er

road

de

velo

pmen

t pr

ogra

mm

es

usin

g In

tegr

ated

Pr

ojec

t Pl

anni

ng

proc

esse

s:

Targ

et: A

ll A

genc

ies’

roa

d de

velo

pmen

t pl

ans

have

Roa

ds 2

000

com

pone

nt b

y Ju

ne 2

014

Lead

: MO

R, M

OF;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3.5

Esta

blis

h Po

litica

l and

co

mm

unity

go

odw

ill.

3.5.

1 Pa

rtici

pato

ry

Proj

ect P

lann

ing

and

Impl

emen

tatio

n A

ppro

ach

in p

lace

.

deve

lop

proc

edur

es f

or c

omm

unity

par

ticip

ation

as

part

of

proj

ect p

lann

ing

proc

ess

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Parl

iam

enta

ry

Com

mitt

ees;

U

ser

Ass

ocia

tions

.

Crea

te p

ublic

aw

aren

ess

and

feed

back

mec

hani

sms

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Parl

iam

enta

ry

Com

mitt

ees;

U

ser

Ass

ocia

tions

.

5

Budg


70



OBJ

ECTI

VE

No.

4: T

O E

NSU

RE F

ULL

INTE

GRA

TIO

N O

F CR

OSS

CU

TTIN

G IS

SUES

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)4.

1M

ains

trea

m

gend

er is

sues

.4.

1.1

Sub-

sect

or a

nd

corp

orat

e po

licie

s an

d gu

idel

ines

on

cros

s cu

tting

issu

es in

pla

ce

and

appl

ied

in a

ll pr

ojec

ts.

Faci

litat

e th

e de

velo

pmen

t an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of s

ub-s

ecto

r an

d co

rpor

ate

gend

er p

olic

ies

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS a

nd M

OG

C&SS

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

.In

corp

orat

ed C

CI r

equi

rem

ents

(in

clud

ing

gend

er e

qual

ity)

in

oper

ation

al a

nd re

porti

ng s

yste

ms

and

ensu

re c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith

sub-

sect

or g

ende

r po

licie

s in

R20

00 p

rogr

amm

es.

Enco

urag

e w

omen

par

ticip

ation

thr

ough

tar

gete

d aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns (r

evis

e co

ntra

ct p

roce

dure

s to

ens

ure

this

hap

pens

).Pr

ovid

e co

nduc

ive

wor

king

env

ironm

ent

for

wom

en (

spec

ific

need

s).

Indi

cato

rs:

num

ber

and

type

of

faci

lities

pro

vide

d;

flexi

ble

wor

king

hou

rs.

Incl

ude

min

imum

th

resh

old

for

wom

en

parti

cipa

tion

in

perf

orm

ance

cont

ract

s of a

genc

ies.

Targ

et: I

ncre

ase

parti

cipa

tion

of w

omen

to a

t lea

st 3

3% in

all

wor

ks.

4.2

Mai

nstr

eam

yo

uth

issu

es.

Incl

ude

min

imum

th

resh

old

for

yout

h pa

rtici

patio

n in

pe

rfor

man

ce co

ntra

cts o

f age

ncie

s. Ta

rget

: Inc

reas

e pa

rtici

patio

n of

You

th to

at l

east

33%

in a

ll w

orks

.

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

YAS

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

.En

cour

age

inte

rnsh

ip a

nd t

rain

ing

prog

ram

me

for

the

yout

h.

Thou

gh re

gula

r ta

rget

ed a

war

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

2

4.3

Inte

grat

e an

d cr

eate

HIV

/AID

S aw

aren

ess

Enha

nce

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d co

mpl

ianc

e of

H

IV/A

IDS

prev

entio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t m

easu

res

acro

ss t

he b

oard

; bot

h fo

r em

ploy

ees

and

the

com

mun

ity. I

nclu

de c

ontr

ol m

easu

res.

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

H;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

.In

corp

orat

e pr

even

tion

and

&

man

agem

ent

of

HIV

/AID

S in

co

ntra

ctua

l and

ope

ratio

nal d

ocum

ents

as w

ell a

s rep

ortin

g sy

stem

s.

Enco

urag

e cr

oss-

sect

oral

app

roac

h an

d co

llabo

ratio

n w

ith o

ther

age

ncie

s.

4.4

Mai

nstr

eam

PL

WD

issu

es in

LR

B w

orks

Sub-

sect

or a

nd c

orpo

rate

pol

icie

s an

d gu

idel

ines

in p

lace

and

ap

plie

d in

all

proj

ects

.Le

ad:

MO

R an

d M

OCG

&SS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

.

2

Inco

rpor

ate

the

righ

ts o

f PL

WD

in c

ontr

actu

al a

nd o

pera

tiona

l do

cum

ents

as

wel

l as

in re

porti

ng s

yste

ms.

Ensu

re th

e in

corp

orati

on o

f nee

ds o

f PLW

D in

road

des

igns

.

Impr

ove

mon

itori

ng o

f th

e pa

rtici

patio

n an

d fa

cilit

ation

of

PLW

D in

roa

d w

orks

thr

ough

reg

ular

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns &

m

eetin

gs o

n pr

ojec

ts.




Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)En

cour

age

PLW

D p

artic

ipati

on t

hrou

gh t

arge

ted

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

and

pro

vide

a c

ondu

cive

wor

king

env

ironm

ent

to

incr

ease

the

ir p

artic

ipati

on.

Targ

et:

2.5

% P

LWD

par

ticip

ation

on

R20

00 p

roje

cts

4.5

Inte

grat

e En

viro

nmen

tal

and

Soci

al

Issu

es

Ensu

re c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith E

MCA

in a

ll Ro

ads

2000

pro

ject

s.Le

ad:

MO

R an

d N

EMA

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

Dis

sem

inat

e in

form

ation

on

cons

erva

tion

of e

nviro

nmen

t usi

ng

prac

tical

gu

idel

ines

an

d pr

omoti

onal

m

ater

ials

an

th

roug

h fo

rmal

and

info

rmal

trai

ning

pac

kage

s.Se

nsiti

se L

RBA

pra

ctitio

ners

on

envi

ronm

enta

l is

sues

. Ta

rget

: al

l Pr

actiti

oner

s ap

ply

Envi

ronm

enta

l co

nser

vatio

n on

roa

d pr

ojec

ts.

3

4.6

Enfo

rce

Labo

ur

law

s an

d re

gula

tions

Inco

rpor

ate

rele

vant

par

ts o

f th

e la

bour

law

in

proj

ect

and

cont

ract

ual d

ocum

ents

Le

ad:

MO

R an

d M

OL;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

D

evel

op g

uide

lines

for

trai

ning

and

use

‘in

the

field

’.10

Crea

te a

war

enes

s in

the

labo

ur-f

orce

on

rele

vant

labo

ur la

ws

and

regu

latio

ns th

roug

h re

gula

r pu

blic

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns.

10

4.7

Ensu

re

Com

mun

ity /

st

akeh

olde

r pa

rtici

patio

n.

Esta

blis

h pl

atfor

m fo

r co

nsul

tatio

n w

ith c

lear

sub

-sec

tor

polic

y an

d gu

idel

ines

of e

ngag

emen

t.

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Esta

blis

h m

echa

nism

s fo

r co

llabo

ratin

g w

ith o

ther

age

ncie

s in

volv

ed in

com

mun

ity w

orks

. 4.

8O

bser

ve

Occ

upati

onal

H

ealth

an

d Sa

fety

re

quire

men

ts.

Iden

tify

appr

opri

ate

safe

ty a

nd h

ealth

requ

irem

ents

for

the

road

con

stru

ction

sec

tor

and

deve

lop

and

intr

oduc

e im

plem

enta

tion

guid

elin

es a

nd b

roch

ures

.

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

T&I;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

30

Revi

ew a

nd u

pdat

e co

nditi

ons

of c

ontr

act

and

spec

ifica

tions

to

ensu

re fu

ll co

mpl

ianc

e w

ith s

afet

y an

d he

alth

regu

latio

ns.

10

Dev

elop

and

intr

oduc

e an

effe

ctive

OSH

M&

E co

ntro

l sys

tem

.90

4.9

Crea

te

Road

Saf

ety

Aw

aren

ess.

Crea

te a

war

enes

s in

road

saf

ety

in th

e lo

cal c

omm

unity

thou

gh

publ

ic a

war

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

.Le

ad:

MO

R;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

70

esta

blis

h a

mec

hani

sm fo

r co

llabo

ratin

g an

d co

ordi

natio

n w

ith

othe

r ag

enci

es in

volv

ed in

road

saf

ety.

Budg


227

Ann

exIIB:Outlin

eTargetsan

dIm

plem

entation

Bud

get(KR

B)



KEN

YA R

OA

DS

BOA

RD

OBJEC

TIVENo.1:TODEV

ELOPANDM

ANAGERO

ADSINACOST-EFFEC

TIVEANDSOCIALLYRE

SPONSIVEMANNER

Strategy

Out

puts

Acti

viteis,targetsand

IndicatorsofS

uccess

Respon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

1.1

Incr

ease

m

aint

aina

ble

road

net

wor

k an

d al

l-sea

son

acce

ss u

sing

lo

cal r

esou

rce-

base

d ap

proa

ch.

1.1.

1 In

crea

sed

leng

th

of a

ll-se

ason

acc

ess

Cons

truc

t 21

Km a

nd 5

13 K

m o

f pa

ved

and

unpa

ved

road

s us

ing

R200

0 st

rate

gyLe

ad: K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA a

nd K

WS;

Fi

nanc

e: M

OR/

KRB

1.1.

2 In

crea

sed

legt

h of

m

aint

aina

ble

road

s

Reha

bilit

ate

472

Km a

nd 8

90km

of p

aved

and

unp

aved

ro

ads

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, K

URA

and

KW

S;

Fina

nce:

MO

R/KR

B

Und

erta

ke p

erio

dic

mai

nten

ance

of

1,53

8 Km

and

10

,683

km

of p

aved

and

unp

aved

road

s, re

spec

tivel

y.Le

ad: K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA a

nd K

WS;

Fi

nanc

e: M

OR/

KRB

1.1.

3 U

npav

ed ro

ads

upgr

aded

to b

itum

en

stan

dard

Upg

rade

569

Km

and

40K

m o

f pa

ved

and

unpa

ved

road

s.Le

ad: K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA a

nd K

WS;

Fi

nanc

e: M

OR/

KRB

1.1.

4 Le

ngth

of r

oads

re

ceiv

ing

routi

ne

mai

nten

ance

ann

ually

is

incr

ease

d by

5%

an

nual

ly

Und

erta

ke

routi

ne

mai

nten

ance

an

nual

ly

of

2,53

6 Km

and

31,

599

Km o

f pa

ved

and

unpa

ved

road

s re

spec

tivel

y.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, K

URA

and

KW

S;

Fina

nce:

MO

R/KR

B

1.2

Ensu

re in

crea

sed

utilis

ation

of

loca

lly a

vaila

ble

reso

urce

s in

de

velo

pmen

t an

d m

anag

emen

t of

road

s.

1.2.

1 Lo

cal r

esou

rces

uti

lisati

on a

sses

smen

t to

ols

and

proc

edur

es

deve

lope

d an

d di

ssem

inat

ed

deve

lop

sim

plifi

ed a

sses

smen

t to

ols

and

proc

edur

e to

gu

ide

the

use

of lo

cal l

abou

r, m

ater

ials

, and

app

ropr

iate

eq

uipm

ent

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

e:

Keny

a Ro

ads

Boar

d;

Participa

tion

an

dIm

plem

entation

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

1.2.

2 U

tilis

ation

of

loca

lly a

vaila

ble

reso

urce

s en

hanc

ed

(in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith s

et

min

imum

thre

shol

ds o

r to

the

max

imum

ext

ent

poss

ible

).

Crea

te a

bout

23

mill

ion

pers

on-d

ays

of e

mpl

oym

ent

Ann

ually

in K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA a

nd K

WS

proj

ects

. At

leas

t 33

.3%

will

be

wom

en a

nd 2

% P

LWD

whe

re e

ver

poss

ible

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

Dev

elop

gu

idel

ines

fo

r au

ditin

g th

e us

e of

lo

cal

reso

urce

s (la

bour

, mat

eria

ls a

nd e

quip

men

t so

urci

ng).

An

audi

t un

dert

aken

for

at

leas

t 20

% o

f al

l on

-goi

ng

road

pro

ject

s.

Lead

: MoR

/NCS

/KRB

; Fin

anci

ng: K

RB,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

15




Out

puts

Acti

viteis,targetsand

IndicatorsofS

uccess

Respon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)1.

3Re

view

and

ad

opt d

esig

n m

anua

ls

and

wor

k sp

ecifi

catio

ns

appr

opri

ate

to

loca

l res

ourc

e-ba

sed

appr

oach

1.3.

1 Te

chni

cal a

nd

man

ager

ial t

ools

de

velo

ped

to e

nahn

ce

the

use

of L

ocal

Re

sour

ces-

bas

ed

tech

nolo

gy.

Revi

se a

nd u

pdat

e de

sign

, op

erati

onal

and

tra

inin

g m

anua

ls f

or c

onst

ructi

on a

nd m

aint

enan

ce.

Targ

et:

The

man

uals

in u

se b

y 20

14 .

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

5

Revi

ew a

nd a

dopt

wor

k/co

ntra

ct s

peci

ficati

ons

that

en

sure

hig

her i

nput

of l

ocal

reso

urce

s in

road

pro

ject

s.

The

revi

ewed

spe

cific

ation

by

2015

.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

4

Revi

ew a

nd a

dopt

test

/ ap

prov

al m

etho

ds t

hat

ensu

re

fast

er a

nd b

etter

qua

lity

cont

rol

in r

oad

proj

ects

. H

amon

ized

testi

ng a

nd a

ppro

val m

etho

d ro

lled

out

by

2014

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

4

1.4

To u

se o

f ap

prop

riat

e pl

anni

ng a

nd

oper

ation

sy

stem

co

mm

ensu

rate

w

ith lo

cal-

reso

urce

s ba

sed

tech

nolo

ggy.

1.4.

1 Eff

ectiv

e pl

anni

ng

syst

em d

evel

oped

and

us

ed

Dev

elop

sim

plifi

ed P

lann

ing

Proc

edur

e an

d G

uide

for

im

plem

enta

tion

of R

2000

pro

ject

s.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; F

inan

cing

: KRB

/DP;

Im

plem

entation

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, an

d KU

RA

5

Revi

ew e

xisti

ng R

oads

200

0 O

pera

tions

Man

ual (

OM

) an

d up

date

thos

e se

ction

s th

at n

o lo

nger

con

form

with

th

e cu

rren

t or

gani

satio

nal

and

oper

ation

al s

ituati

on

as w

ell

as i

nclu

ding

new

tec

hnol

ogy

optio

ns,

e.g.

al

tern

ative

pav

emen

t opti

ons

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; F

inan

cing

: KRB

/DP;

Im

plem

entation

:

KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, an

d KU

RA

5

Regu

larl

y co

llect

an

d co

llate

ro

ad

inve

ntor

y an

d co

nditi

on (

RIC)

dat

a, i

nclu

ding

dat

a on

: ro

ad l

engt

h,

wid

ths,

st

ruct

ures

, tr

affic

volu

mes

, an

d co

nditi

on

avai

labl

e an

d us

ed fo

r pl

anni

ng a

nd o

pera

tions

.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

5

Dev

elop

rel

iabl

e M

&E

fram

ewor

k M

&E;

Indi

cato

rs f

or

M&

E ag

reed

, be

ing

colle

cted

and

use

d fr

o pl

anni

ng

and

impl

emen

tatio

n; re

gula

r M

&E

bein

g un

dert

aken

.

Lead

: KRB

, KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

5

1.5

Dev

elop

IC

T sy

stem

s fo

r pr

ojec

t m

anag

emen

t.

1.6.

1 In

tegr

ated

Pro

ject

M

anag

emen

t Sys

tem

de

velo

ped

and

rolle

d ou

t

Dev

elop

ap

prop

riat

e,

user

fr

eind

ly

and

inte

grat

ed

com

pute

r-ba

sed

syst

em t

hat

cove

rs a

mon

g ot

hers

: -

proj

ect/

oper

ation

m

anag

emen

t sy

stem

,

- pr

ocur

emen

t m

anag

emen

t sy

stem

fo

r w

orks

an

d se

rvic

e, a

nd

-

finan

cial

man

agem

ent

syst

em.

Lead

: KRB

, KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

10

Budg


58



OBJ

ECTI

VE

No.

2: T

O E

NH

AN

CE A

ND

SU

STA

IN N

ATIO

NA

L CA

PACI

TY F

OR

THE

IMPL

EMEN

TATI

ON

OF

THE

ROA

DS

2000

STR

ATEG

YStrategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

2.1

Prom

ote

effec

tive

info

rmati

on

shar

ing

and

publ

ic re

latio

ns.

2.1.

1 Th

e vi

sibi

lity

of

loca

l res

ourc

es-b

ased

te

chno

logy

enh

ance

d.

Dev

elop

and

des

sim

inat

e in

form

ation

pac

kage

s on

th

e ac

hiev

emen

t of

th

e pr

ogra

mm

e us

ing

agre

ed

Key

Perf

orm

ance

Ind

icat

ors

(e.g

., Ph

ysic

al p

rogr

ess,

em

ploy

men

t cr

eate

, bu

sine

sses

gen

erat

ed,

inc

omes

ea

rned

, etc

.).

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

Enga

ge t

he m

edia

to

broa

dcas

t co

mpr

ehen

sive

ly o

n th

e St

rate

gy. A

t le

ast

2No

of M

edia

pre

sent

ation

s (T

V,

Radi

o, P

rint

Med

ia) a

nnua

lly

Lead

: M

OR/

NSC

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

7

Cond

uce

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

. At

le

ast

2No

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

tar

getti

ng p

oliti

cal

lead

ers

and

adm

inis

trati

on o

ffici

als

annu

ally

Lead

: M

OR/

NSC

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

7

Cond

uct

awar

enes

s an

d pu

blic

rel

ation

cam

paig

ns a

t co

unty

and

loca

l lev

els.

Tar

get

2No

publ

ic a

war

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

ann

ually

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

7

2.2

Conti

nous

de

velo

pmen

t of

impl

emen

tatio

n ca

paci

ty o

f Roa

d A

genc

ies

2.2.

1 Se

ctor

al T

rain

ig

capa

city

enh

ance

d th

roug

h in

corp

orati

ng

new

tech

nolo

gies

and

w

ork

met

hods

.

Carr

y ou

t Tr

aini

ng N

eeds

Ass

essm

ent

(TN

A)

for

all

agen

cies

with

a fo

cus

on th

e R2

000

Stra

tegy

Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

2

Dev

elop

and

rol

l ou

t co

mpr

hens

ive

Nati

onal

Tra

inin

g Pl

an

for

R200

0 pr

ogra

mm

e an

d in

lin

e w

ith

the

impl

emtin

ing

agen

cies

’ HRD

pla

ns

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

5

prov

ide

trai

nig

for

agen

cies

’ st

aff,

smal

l sc

ale

entr

epre

neur

s, a

rtiza

ns,

etc.

Tar

get:

1,31

6 st

aff,

844

SSCs

and

150

Con

sulta

nts

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

5

2.3

Enha

nce

capa

city

of

Pri

vate

co

nstr

uctio

n se

ctor

2.3.

1 N

ation

al S

mal

l Sc

ale

Cont

ract

ors

& C

onsu

ltant

s D

evel

opm

ent

Plan

, rel

ating

to

LRBA

, de

velo

p an

d im

plem

ente

d to

enh

ace

the

part

cipa

tion

of th

e Pr

ivat

e se

ctor

Dev

elop

nati

onal

pla

n/st

rate

gy:

Targ

et:

plan

in

pla

ce

by 2

015

Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Cond

uct a

war

ness

cam

paig

ns a

mon

g th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

st

akeh

olde

rs: T

arge

t: 1

ann

ually

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Intr

oduc

e m

etho

d-sp

ecifi

catio

ns a

nd m

odifi

ed B

oQ t

o su

it sm

all-s

cale

wor

ks c

ontr

acts

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enga

ge t

he N

ation

al C

onst

ructi

on A

utho

rity

(N

CA)

to

mai

nly

assi

st e

mer

ging

and

sm

all s

cale

con

trac

tors

and

co

nsul

tant

s to

dev

elop

thei

r bu

sine

ss

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.




Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)En

cour

age

join

t ve

ntur

es b

etw

een

inte

rnati

onal

and

lo

cal c

onsu

lting

and

con

trac

ting

firm

s. T

arge

t: A

t le

ast

50%

of m

ajor

tend

ers

cont

ract

ed to

JV’s

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enco

urag

e an

d fa

cilit

ate

the

crea

tion

of a

n eff

ectiv

e sm

all-s

cale

con

trac

tors

ass

ocia

tion.

Tar

get:

at

leas

t 50

% S

CC re

gist

ered

as

mem

bers

.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; P

articipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, K

RB, K

IHBT

, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd P

olyt

echn

ics,

Co

ntra

ctor

s an

d Co

nsul

tant

s.D

evel

op a

pol

icy

for

ince

ntive

s fo

r R2

000

prac

tition

ers

and

serv

ice

prov

ider

s

Ass

ess

the

feas

ibili

ty o

f Cr

edit

Sche

mes

Sm

all-s

cale

co

ntra

ctor

s an

d pr

omot

e its

est

ablis

hmen

t.

Dev

elop

and

ens

ure

usag

e of

app

ropr

iate

con

trac

t ad

min

istr

ation

gui

delin

es fo

r SM

EsA

dvoc

ate

and

assi

st t

he e

stab

lishm

ent

of a

sta

tuto

ry

Cont

ract

or’s

an

d Co

nsul

tant

’s

Regi

stra

tion

Boar

d.

Targ

et:

Act

est

ablis

hing

the

for

mati

on o

f Co

ntra

ctor

’s

and

Cons

ulta

nt’s

Reg

istr

ation

Boa

rd in

pla

ce a

nd in

use

Enco

urag

e Re

sear

ch

in

appr

opri

ate

tool

s an

d eq

uipm

ent

Lead

: NCS

/MO

R

2.4

Esta

blis

h a

stan

dard

isati

on

and

accr

edita

tion

profi

cien

cy

trai

ning

.

2.4.

1 N

ation

al

Profi

cien

cy T

rain

ing

Stan

dard

and

Ce

rtific

ation

pol

icy

deve

lope

d.

Dev

elop

an

Inte

rim

LRB

Pro

ficie

ncy

Trai

ning

Sta

ndar

d an

d Ce

rtific

ation

pro

cedu

res

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Dev

elop

Nati

onal

Pro

ficie

ncy

Trai

ning

Sta

ndar

d an

d Ce

rtific

ation

sche

me

for L

RB te

chno

logy

for b

oth

publ

ic

and

priv

ate

stak

ehol

ders

. Tar

get:

sch

eme

in

plac

e by

20

14

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS

Set

up I

nter

im L

RBA

Sta

ndin

g Co

mm

ittee

, in

lia

ison

w

ith E

RB, I

EK a

nd c

onst

ructi

on a

ssoc

iatio

ns, m

anda

ted

to c

oord

inat

e,

appr

ove

stan

dard

s an

d m

onito

ring

LR

BA tr

aini

ng.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; K

IHBT

Participa

tion

: ER

B, IE

K, C

ontr

acto

r as

soci

ation

s.4



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)2.

5Pr

omot

e th

e us

e of

LRB

te

chno

logi

es

amon

g th

e ac

adem

ic

com

mun

ity a

s w

ell a

s, n

ew

and

prac

ticin

g en

gine

ers

and

tech

nici

ans.

2.5.

1 LR

BA tr

aini

ng

mod

ules

/cou

rses

m

ains

trea

med

in th

e re

gula

r pr

ogra

mm

es

of te

chni

cal t

rain

ing

insti

tutio

ns.

Dev

elop

or

upda

te e

xisti

ng L

RBA

tra

inin

g cu

rric

ulum

an

d co

urse

mod

ules

in

colla

bora

tion

with

tec

hnic

al

trai

ning

insti

tute

s.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; K

IHBT

Participa

tion

: ER

B, IE

K, K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, K

RB,

ACEK

, Uni

vers

ities

and

Pol

ytec

hnic

s.

Liai

se w

ith E

RB fo

r ap

prov

al a

nd a

dopti

on o

f rev

iew

ed

trai

ning

cur

icul

um.

Lead

: NCS

/MO

R4

Faci

litat

e an

d as

sist

in

form

ing

colla

bora

tion

pact

s/ag

reem

ents

/MO

Us

betw

een

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

, co

llege

s an

d ot

her

sect

or t

rain

ing

insti

tutio

ns. T

arge

t:

By y

ear

2015

.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; K

IHBT

Participa

tion

: ER

B, IE

K, K

eNH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, K

RB,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Pol

ytec

hnic

s.

Prov

ide

inte

rnsh

ip fo

r yo

ung

prof

essi

onal

s on

ong

oing

pr

ojec

ts. T

arge

t: A

t lea

st 5

0 N

o.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

Pa

rticipa

tion

:Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B, K

IHBT

, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd P

olyt

echn

ics.

5

Org

aniz

e an

d co

nduc

t re

orie

ntati

on

prog

ram

mes

fo

r lo

cal

Aca

dem

ic

com

mun

ity

in

high

er

lear

ning

in

stitu

tions

on

LRB

tech

nolo

gy. T

arge

t 20

No.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS P

articipa

tion

: KR

B,

KIH

BT, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd P

olyt

echn

ics.

Trai

n 50

No.

tech

nici

ans

in L

RBA

ann

ually

.Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS Participa

tion

: K

RB,

KIH

BT, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd P

olyt

echn

ics.

Loby

ERB

and

IEK

to

reco

mm

end

to I

nstit

ution

s of

hi

gher

lear

ning

to in

clud

e LR

BA in

thei

r cu

rric

ula

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Pol

ytec

hnic

s.Lo

bby

ERB

and

IEK

to i

nteg

rate

LRB

A i

ssue

s in

to t

he

prof

essi

onal

inte

rvie

ws

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK.

Dev

elop

Co

mm

unic

ation

St

rate

gy

for

prom

oting

LR

B te

chno

logy

tar

getin

g po

licy

mak

ers,

pro

gram

me

man

ager

s, p

rofe

ssio

nals

, se

rvic

e pr

ovid

ers

and

the

gene

ral

publ

ic.

Targ

et t

he S

trat

egy

to b

e in

pla

ce b

y ye

ar 2

014.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd P

olyt

echn

ics,

co

nsul

tant

s an

d co

ntra

ctor

s.

5

Dev

elop

and

offe

r or

ient

ation

cou

rses

on

LRBA

for

pr

actis

ing

engi

neer

s an

d te

chni

cian

s. T

arge

t: 2

0 N

o.

each

yea

r

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd P

olyt

echn

ics,

co

nsul

tant

s an

d co

ntra

ctor

s.Bu


51




BJEC

TIV

E N

o. 3

: TO

DEV

ELO

P PO

LICI

ES A

ND

GU

IDEL

INES

TO

SU

PPO

RT IM

PLEM

ENTA

TIO

N O

F TH

E RO

AD

S 20

00 S

TRAT

EGY

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)3.

1Ro

ad S

ecto

r Po

licy

to

supp

ort/

refle

ct

obje

ctive

s of

th

e Ro

ads

2000

St

rate

gy

3.1.

1 Fu

ture

road

po

licie

s fu

lly s

uppo

rt

the

appl

icati

on o

f the

St

rate

gy fo

r th

e en

tire

Keny

an ro

ad n

etw

ork

and

for

all t

ypes

of r

oad

wor

ks.

Lobb

y fo

r th

e fu

ll in

clus

ion

of R

2000

Str

ateg

y in

the

fu

ture

Roa

d se

ctor

pol

ices

.Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Ensu

re th

at a

ll Ro

ad A

genc

ies

appl

y th

e St

rate

gy in

the

deve

lopm

ent a

nd m

anag

emen

t of t

heir

net

wor

ksLe

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3.2

Dev

elop

, in

trod

uce

and

enfo

rce

polic

y on

loca

l re

sour

ces

cont

ent i

n ro

ad

wor

ks

3.2.

1 N

ation

al P

olic

y an

d gu

idel

ine

for

the

use

of lo

cal r

esou

rces

ba

sed

tech

nolo

gy

deve

lope

d.

Dev

elop

and

rollo

ut n

ation

al L

RB te

chno

logy

ope

ratio

n po

licy

incl

udin

g am

ong

othe

rs

revi

sed

cont

ract

do

cum

ents

(w

ith m

etho

d st

atem

ents

and

min

imum

lo

cal r

esou

rce

cont

ent)

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Dev

elop

a c

lear

sta

ndar

dise

d pr

ojec

t se

lecti

on s

yste

m

base

d on

agr

eed

soci

al, e

cono

mic

, cul

tura

l and

oth

er

crite

ria.

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, K

URA

, and

KRB

.

Revi

se,

upda

te

and

rollo

ut

R200

0 pr

ojec

ts

impl

emen

tatio

n &

M

anua

ls

guid

elin

es

aim

ed

at

max

imis

ing

labo

ur c

onte

nt.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3

Dev

elop

pol

icy

and

guid

elin

es fo

r Em

ploy

men

t Im

pact

an

d Co

mm

unity

Par

ticip

ation

Ass

essm

ent

(EI&

CPA

) an

d un

dert

ake

EI&

CPA

for

all r

oad

proj

ects

.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3

Dev

elop

and

int

rodu

ce a

har

mon

ized

em

ploy

men

t an

d so

cio-

econ

omic

impa

ct a

sses

smen

t an

d ap

prov

al

syst

em fo

r Ro

ad 2

000

proj

ects

.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

3.3

Esta

blis

h an

effe

ctive

in

stitu

tiona

l co

ordi

natio

n an

d co

llabo

ratio

n

3.3.

1 Cr

oss-

sect

oral

co

llabo

ratio

n an

d co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

est

ablis

hed

and

stre

ngth

ened

en

hanc

e pr

ojec

ts

plan

ning

and

im

plem

enta

tion

and

mon

itori

ng.

Dev

elop

pol

icy

fram

ewor

k an

d pu

t in

plac

e ap

prop

riat

e pr

ojec

t coo

rdin

ation

stru

ctur

e.; Q

uart

erly

colla

bora

tion

mee

tings

bei

ng h

eld.

Lead

: M

OF,

M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

2

Set

up a

ful

l-tim

e N

ation

al C

oord

inati

on S

ecre

tari

at

(NCS

) ba

sed

at t

he K

RB.

Targ

et:

the

NCS

in

Plac

e by

Ju

ne 2

013.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, an

d KR

B;

Dev

elop

men

t Par

tner

s.

14

Inco

rpor

ate

R200

0 pr

ogra

mm

e ta

rget

s in

th

e pe

rfor

man

ce c

ontr

acts

of

MO

R an

d al

l im

plem

entin

g ag

enci

es. T

arge

t: to

sta

rt fr

om 2

013/

14 fi

scal

yea

r

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB; L

ocal

A

utho

ritie

s.

Inco

rpor

ate

empl

oym

ent

crea

tion

targ

ets

in

the

perf

orm

ance

cont

ract

s of M

oR a

nd o

ther

impl

emen

ting

agen

cies

. Tar

get:

to s

tart

from

201

3/14

fisc

al y

ear.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB; L

ocal

A

utho

ritie

s.




Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)3.

4Co

nsol

idat

e an

d m

obili

ses

finan

cial

re

sour

ces

3.4.

1 Th

e us

e of

fund

s fo

r Ru

ral R

oad

wor

ks

from

var

ious

sou

rces

(R

MLF

, LAT

F, C

DF,

Ces

s M

onie

s, E

SP fu

nds)

co

nsol

idat

ed a

nd

coor

dina

ted

lobb

y th

e re

leva

nt a

utho

ritie

s to

enf

orce

exi

sting

law

s fo

r us

e of

thes

e fu

nds

Lead

: MO

F, M

OR/

NCS

; Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Inte

grat

e R2

000

proj

ects

into

wid

er ro

ad d

evel

opm

ent

prog

ram

mes

us

ing

Inte

grat

ed

Proj

ect

Plan

ning

pr

oces

ses:

Tar

get:

All

Age

ncie

s’ r

oad

deve

lopm

ent

plan

s ha

ve R

oads

200

0 co

mpo

nent

by

June

201

4

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS, M

OF;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3.5

Esta

blis

h Po

litica

l and

co

mm

unity

go

odw

ill.

3.5.

1 Pa

rtici

pato

ry

Proj

ect P

lann

ing

and

Impl

emen

tatio

n A

ppro

ach

in p

lace

.

deve

lop

proc

edur

es f

or c

omm

unity

par

ticip

ation

as

part

of p

roje

ct p

lann

ing

proc

ess

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, an

d KR

B;

Parl

iam

enta

ry

Com

mitt

ees;

U

ser

Ass

ocia

tions

.Cr

eate

pub

lic a

war

enes

s an

d fe

edba

ck m

echa

nism

sLe

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, an

d KR

B;

Parl

iam

enta

ry

Com

mitt

ees;

U

ser

Ass

ocia

tions

.Bu


22



OBJ

ECTI

VE

No.

4: T

O E

NSU

RE F

ULL

INTE

GRA

TIO

N O

F CR

OSS

CU

TTIN

G IS

SUES

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)4.

1M

ains

trea

m

gend

er is

sues

.4.

1.1

Sub-

sect

or a

nd

corp

orat

e po

licie

s an

d gu

idel

ines

on

cros

s cu

tting

issu

es in

pla

ce

and

appl

ied

in a

ll pr

ojec

ts.

Faci

litat

e th

e de

velo

pmen

t an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of

sub-

sect

or a

nd c

orpo

rate

gen

der

polic

ies

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

an

d M

OG

C&SS

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

and

KRB.

Inco

rpor

ated

CC

I re

quire

men

ts

(incl

udin

g ge

nder

eq

ualit

y) i

n op

erati

onal

and

rep

ortin

g sy

stem

s an

d en

sure

com

plia

nce

with

sub

-sec

tor

gend

er p

olic

ies

in

R200

0 pr

ogra

mm

es.

Enco

urag

e w

omen

pa

rtici

patio

n th

roug

h ta

rget

ed

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

(re

vise

con

trac

t pr

oced

ures

to

ensu

re th

is h

appe

ns).

Prov

ide

cond

uciv

e w

orki

ng e

nviro

nmen

t fo

r w

omen

(s

peci

fic

need

s).

Indi

cato

rs:

num

ber

and

type

of

fa

ciliti

es p

rovi

ded;

flex

ible

wor

king

hou

rs.

Incl

ude

min

imum

thr

esho

ld f

or w

omen

par

ticip

ation

in

per

form

ance

con

trac

ts o

f age

ncie

s. T

arge

t: In

crea

se

parti

cipa

tion

of w

omen

to a

t lea

st 3

3% in

all

wor

ks.

4.2

Mai

nstr

eam

yo

uth

issu

es.

Incl

ude

min

imum

thr

esho

ld f

or y

outh

par

ticip

ation

in

perf

orm

ance

con

trac

ts o

f ag

enci

es.

Targ

et:

Incr

ease

pa

rtici

patio

n of

You

th to

at l

east

33%

in a

ll w

orks

.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

an

d M

OYA

S Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

and

KRB.

Enco

urag

e in

tern

ship

and

tra

inin

g pr

ogra

mm

e fo

r th

e yo

uth.

Tho

ugh

regu

lar

targ

eted

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns2

4.3

Inte

grat

e an

d cr

eate

HIV

/AID

S aw

aren

ess

Enha

nce

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d co

mpl

ianc

e of

HIV

/AID

S pr

even

tion

and

man

agem

ent

mea

sure

s ac

ross

th

e bo

ard;

bot

h fo

r em

ploy

ees a

nd th

e co

mm

unity

. Inc

lude

co

ntro

l mea

sure

s.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

an

d M

OH

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

and

KRB.

Inco

rpor

ate

prev

entio

n an

d &

man

agem

ent

of H

IV/

AID

S in

con

trac

tual

and

ope

ratio

nal d

ocum

ents

as

wel

l as

repo

rting

sys

tem

s.

Enco

urag

e cr

oss-

sect

oral

app

roac

h an

d co

llabo

ratio

n w

ith o

ther

age

ncie

s.




Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)4.

4M

ains

trea

m

PLW

D is

sues

in

LRB

wor

ks

Sub-

sect

or a

nd c

orpo

rate

pol

icie

s an

d gu

idel

ines

in

plac

e an

d ap

plie

d in

all

proj

ects

.Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS

and

MO

CG&

SS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

and

KRB.

2

Inco

rpor

ate

the

righ

ts o

f PL

WD

in

cont

ract

ual

and

oper

ation

al d

ocum

ents

as

wel

l as

in re

porti

ng s

yste

ms.

Ensu

re th

e in

corp

orati

on o

f nee

ds o

f PLW

D in

road

des

igns

.

Impr

ove

mon

itori

ng o

f the

par

ticip

ation

and

faci

litati

on

of P

LWD

in

road

wor

ks t

hrou

gh r

egul

ar a

war

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

& m

eetin

gs o

n pr

ojec

ts.

Enco

urag

e PL

WD

pa

rtici

patio

n th

roug

h ta

rget

ed

awar

enes

s cam

paig

ns a

nd p

rovi

de a

con

duci

ve w

orki

ng

envi

ronm

ent

to i

ncre

ase

thei

r pa

rtici

patio

n. T

arge

t:

2.5%

PLW

D p

artic

ipati

on o

n R2

000

proj

ects

4.5

Inte

grat

e En

viro

nmen

tal

and

Soci

al Is

sues

Ensu

re

com

plia

nce

with

EM

CA

in

all

Road

s 20

00

proj

ects

.Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS

and

NEM

A;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

and

KRB

Dis

sem

inat

e in

form

ation

on

cons

erva

tion

of

envi

ronm

ent u

sing

pra

ctica

l gui

delin

es a

nd p

rom

otion

al

mat

eria

ls a

nd t

hrou

gh f

orm

al a

nd i

nfor

mal

tra

inin

g pa

ckag

es.

Sens

itise

LR

BA

prac

tition

ers

on

envi

ronm

enta

l is

sues

. Ta

rget

: al

l Pr

actiti

oner

s ap

ply

Envi

ronm

enta

l co

nser

vatio

n on

road

pro

ject

s.

3

4.6

Enfo

rce

Labo

ur

law

s an

d re

gula

tions

Inco

rpor

ate

rele

vant

par

ts o

f the

labo

ur la

w in

pro

ject

an

d co

ntra

ctua

l doc

umen

ts

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

an

d M

OL;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

and

KRB

Dev

elop

gui

delin

es fo

r tr

aini

ng a

nd u

se ‘i

n th

e fie

ld’.

Crea

te

awar

enes

s in

th

e la

bour

-for

ce

on

rele

vant

la

bour

law

s an

d re

gula

tions

thr

ough

reg

ular

pub

lic

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

.

2

4.7

Ensu

re

Com

mun

ity /

st

akeh

olde

r pa

rtici

patio

n.

Esta

blis

h pl

atfor

m f

or c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith c

lear

sub

-se

ctor

pol

icy

and

guid

elin

es o

f eng

agem

ent.

Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Esta

blis

h m

echa

nism

s fo

r co

llabo

ratin

g w

ith o

ther

ag

enci

es in

volv

ed in

com

mun

ity w

orks

.



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)4.

8O

bser

ve

Occ

upati

onal

H

ealth

an

d Sa

fety

re

quire

men

ts.

Iden

tify

appr

opri

ate

safe

ty a

nd h

ealth

requ

irem

ents

fo

r th

e ro

ad c

onst

ructi

on s

ecto

r an

d de

velo

p an

d in

trod

uce

impl

emen

tatio

n gu

idel

ines

and

bro

chur

es.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

an

d M

OT&

I; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

and

KRB

Revi

ew

and

upda

te

cond

ition

s of

co

ntra

ct

and

spec

ifica

tions

to

ensu

re f

ull

com

plia

nce

with

saf

ety

and

heal

th re

gula

tions

. D

evel

op a

nd in

trod

uce

an e

ffecti

ve O

SH M

&E

cont

rol

syst

em.

4.9

Crea

te

Road

Saf

ety

Aw

aren

ess.

Crea

te a

war

enes

s in

road

safe

ty in

the

loca

l com

mun

ity

thou

gh p

ublic

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

esta

blis

h a

mec

hani

sm

for

colla

bora

ting

and

coor

dina

tion

with

oth

er a

genc

ies

invo

lved

in

road

sa

fety

. Bu


9 140



Roads 2000 Strategic PlanAnn

exIIC:Outlin

eTargetsan

dIm

plem

entation

Bud

get(Ke

NHA)

KEN

YA N

ATIO

NA

L H

IGH

WAY

S A

UTH

ORI

TYOBJEC

TIVENo.1:TODEV

ELOPANDM

ANAGERO

ADSINACOST-EFFEC

TIVEANDSOCIALLYRE

SPONSIVEMANNER

Strategy

Out

puts

Acti

viteis,targetsand

IndicatorsofS

uccess

Respon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

1.1

Incr

ease

m

aint

aina

ble

road

net

wor

k an

d al

l-sea

son

acce

ss u

sing

lo

cal r

esou

rce-

base

d ap

proa

ch.

1.1.

1 In

crea

sed

leng

th o

f all-

seas

on a

cces

s

1.1.

2 In

crea

sed

legt

h of

m

aint

aina

ble

road

s

Reha

bilit

ate

150

Km o

f pa

ved

road

s an

d re

cons

truc

t 16

2km

of

pave

d ro

ads

Lead

: KeN

HA

, Fi

nanc

e:

MO

R/KR

B20

,893

Und

erta

ke p

erio

dic

mai

nten

ance

of 9

96 K

m a

nd 1

72 k

m o

f pav

ed

and

unpa

ved

road

s, re

spec

tivel

y.Le

ad: K

eNH

A,

Fina

nce:

M

OR/

KRB

8,05

0

1.1.

3 U

npav

ed ro

ads

upgr

aded

to b

itum

en

stan

dard

Upg

rade

53

Km o

f pav

ed ro

ads.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, Fi

nanc

e:

MO

R/KR

B6,

036

1.1.

4 Le

ngth

of r

oads

re

ceiv

ing

routi

ne

mai

nten

ance

ann

ually

is

incr

ease

d by

5%

ann

ually

Und

erta

ke r

outin

e m

aint

enan

ce o

f 2,

106

Km a

nd 2

,187

Km

on

aver

age

annu

ally

of p

aved

and

unp

aved

road

s re

spec

tivel

y.Le

ad: K

eNH

A,

Fina

nce:

M

OR/

KRB

3,72

0

1.2

Ensu

re

incr

ease

d uti

lisati

on o

f lo

cally

ava

ilabl

e re

sour

ces

in

deve

lopm

ent

and

man

agem

ent o

f ro

ads.

1.2.

1 Lo

cal r

esou

rces

uti

lisati

on a

sses

smen

t too

ls

and

proc

edur

es d

evel

oped

an

d di

ssem

inat

ed

deve

lop

sim

plifi

ed a

sses

smen

t to

ols

and

proc

edur

e to

gui

de t

he

use

of lo

cal l

abou

r, m

ater

ials

, and

app

ropr

iate

equ

ipm

ent

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Fina

nce:

Ken

ya R

oads

Bo

ard;

Participa

tion

an

dIm

plem

entation

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA1.

2.2

Util

isati

on o

f loc

ally

av

aila

ble

reso

urce

s en

hanc

ed (i

n ac

cord

ance

w

ith s

et m

inim

um

thre

shol

ds o

r to

the

max

imum

ext

ent p

ossi

ble)

.

Crea

te a

bout

4.6

mill

ion

pers

on-d

ays

of e

mpl

oym

ent

Ann

ually

in

KeN

HA

pro

ject

s. A

t le

ast

33.3

% w

ill b

e w

omen

and

2%

PLW

D

whe

re e

ver

poss

ible

Lead

: KeN

HA

,

Dev

elop

gui

delin

es fo

r au

ditin

g th

e us

e of

loca

l res

ourc

es (l

abou

r, m

ater

ials

and

equ

ipm

ent

sour

cing

). A

n au

dit

unde

rtak

en f

or a

t le

ast 2

0% o

f all

on-g

oing

road

pro

ject

s.

Lead

: MoR

/NCS

/KRB

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KRB

, KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA

62



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Bu

dg

et

Item

(KE

SM

illio

ns)

1.3

Revi

ew a

nd

adop

t des

ign

man

uals

an

d w

ork

spec

ifica

tions

ap

prop

riat

e to

lo

cal r

esou

rce-

base

d ap

proa

ch

1.3.

1 Te

chni

cal a

nd

man

ager

ial t

ools

dev

elop

ed

to e

nahn

ce th

e us

e of

Lo

cal R

esou

rces

- bas

ed

tech

nolo

gy.

Revi

se a

nd u

pdat

e de

sign

, op

erati

onal

and

tra

inin

g m

anua

ls f

or

cons

truc

tion

and

mai

nten

ance

. Ta

rget

: Th

e m

anua

ls i

n us

e by

20

14 .

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Fina

ncin

g: K

RB, K

eNH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

Revi

ew a

nd a

dopt

wor

k/co

ntra

ct s

peci

ficati

ons

that

ens

ure

high

er

inpu

t of l

ocal

reso

urce

s in

road

pro

ject

s. T

he re

view

ed sp

ecifi

catio

n by

201

5.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Fina

ncin

g: K

RB, K

eNH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

1

Revi

ew a

nd a

dopt

tes

t/ a

ppro

val m

etho

ds t

hat

ensu

re fa

ster

and

be

tter

qua

lity

cont

rol

in r

oad

proj

ects

. H

amon

ized

tes

ting

and

appr

oval

met

hod

rolle

d ou

t by

2014

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Fina

ncin

g: K

RB, K

eNH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

1

1.4

To u

se o

f ap

prop

riat

e pl

anni

ng a

nd

oper

ation

sy

stem

co

mm

ensu

rate

w

ith lo

cal-

reso

urce

s ba

sed

tech

nolo

ggy.

1.4.

1 Eff

ectiv

e pl

anni

ng

syst

em d

evel

oped

and

use

d D

evel

op

sim

plifi

ed

Plan

ning

Pr

oced

ure

and

Gui

de

for

impl

emen

tatio

n of

R20

00 p

roje

cts.

Le

ad: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KRB

/DP;

Im

plem

entation

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA

Revi

ew

exis

ting

Road

s 20

00

Ope

ratio

ns

Man

ual

(OM

) an

d up

date

tho

se s

ectio

ns t

hat

no l

onge

r co

nfor

m w

ith t

he c

urre

nt

orga

nisa

tiona

l and

ope

ratio

nal s

ituati

on a

s w

ell a

s in

clud

ing

new

te

chno

logy

opti

ons,

e.g

. alte

rnati

ve p

avem

ent o

ption

s

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Fina

ncin

g: K

RB/D

P;

Implem

entation

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RARe

gula

rly

colle

ct a

nd c

olla

te r

oad

inve

ntor

y an

d co

nditi

on (

RIC)

da

ta,

incl

udin

g da

ta o

n: r

oad

leng

th,

wid

ths,

str

uctu

res,

tra

ffic

volu

mes

, an

d co

nditi

on a

vaila

ble

and

used

for

pla

nnin

g an

d op

erati

ons.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA,

and

KURA

Dev

elop

relia

ble

M&

E fr

amew

ork

M&

E; In

dica

tors

for M

&E

agre

ed,

bein

g co

llect

ed a

nd u

sed

fro

plan

ning

and

impl

emen

tatio

n; re

gula

r M

&E

bein

g un

dert

aken

.

Lead

: KRB

, KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA

1.5

Dev

elop

IC

T sy

stem

s fo

r pr

ojec

t m

anag

emen

t.

1.6.

1 In

tegr

ated

Pro

ject

M

anag

emen

t Sys

tem

de

velo

ped

and

rolle

d ou

t

Dev

elop

app

ropr

iate

, use

r fre

indl

y an

d in

tegr

ated

com

pute

r-ba

sed

syst

em th

at c

over

s am

ong

othe

rs:

- p

roje

ct/

oper

ation

man

agem

ent

syst

em,

- pr

ocur

emen

t m

anag

emen

t sy

stem

for

wor

ks a

nd s

ervi

ce, a

nd

-

finan

cial

m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

.

Lead

: KRB

, KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA10



Roads 2000 Strategic PlanBu


38,7

73O

BJEC

TIV

E N

o. 2

: TO

EN

HA

NCE

AN

D S

UST

AIN

NAT

ION

AL

CAPA

CITY

FO

R TH

E IM

PLEM

ENTA

TIO

N O

F TH

E RO

AD

S 20

00 S

TRAT

EGY

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

2.1

Prom

ote

effec

tive

info

rmati

on

shar

ing

and

publ

ic re

latio

ns.

2.1.

1 Th

e vi

sibi

lity

of lo

cal

reso

urce

s-ba

sed

tech

nolo

gy

enha

nced

.

Dev

elop

and

des

sim

inat

e in

form

ation

pac

kage

s on

the

achi

evem

ent

of t

he p

rogr

amm

e us

ing

agre

ed K

ey P

erfo

rman

ce In

dica

tors

(e.g

., Ph

ysic

al

prog

ress

, em

ploy

men

t cr

eate

, bu

sine

sses

ge

nera

ted,

in

com

es e

arne

d, e

tc.).

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Fina

ncin

g: K

RB;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA

Enga

ge t

he m

edia

to

broa

dcas

t co

mpr

ehen

sive

ly o

n th

e St

rate

gy.

At l

east

2N

o of

Med

ia p

rese

ntati

ons

(TV,

Rad

io,

Prin

t M

edia

) an

nual

ly

Lead

: MO

R/N

SC;

Fina

ncin

g: K

RB;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA

10

Cond

uct a

war

enes

s cam

paig

ns. A

t lea

st 2

No

awar

enes

s cam

paig

ns

targ

etting

pol

itica

l lea

ders

and

adm

inis

trati

on o

ffici

als

annu

ally

Lead

: MO

R/N

SC;

Fina

ncin

g: K

RB;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA

10

Cond

uct

awar

enes

s an

d pu

blic

rel

ation

cam

paig

ns a

t co

unty

and

lo

cal l

evel

s. T

arge

t 2N

o pu

blic

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns a

nnua

llyLe

ad: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KRB

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA

10

2.2

Conti

nous

de

velo

pmen

t of

impl

emen

tatio

n ca

paci

ty o

f Roa

d A

genc

ies

2.2.

1 Se

ctor

al T

rain

ig

capa

city

enh

ance

d th

roug

h in

corp

orati

ng n

ew

tech

nolo

gies

and

wor

k m

etho

ds.

Carr

y ou

t Tra

inin

g N

eeds

Ass

essm

ent (

TNA

) for

all

agen

cies

with

a

focu

s on

the

R200

0 St

rate

gy

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Dev

elop

and

rol

l ou

t co

mpr

hens

ive

Nati

onal

Tra

inin

g Pl

an f

or

R200

0 pr

ogra

mm

e an

d in

lin

e w

ith t

he i

mpl

emtin

ing

agen

cies

’ H

RD p

lans

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

prov

ide

trai

nig

for

agen

cies

’ st

aff,

smal

l sc

ale

entr

epre

neur

s,

artiz

ans,

etc

. Ta

rget

: 50

, 10

0 &

200

age

ncie

s’ s

taff,

SM

ES a

nd

Arti

zans

resp

ectiv

ely

Lead

: MO

R;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

2.3

Enha

nce

capa

city

of

Pri

vate

co

nstr

uctio

n se

ctor

2.3.

1 N

ation

al S

mal

l Sca

le

Cont

ract

ors

& C

onsu

ltant

s D

evel

opm

ent P

lan,

rela

ting

to L

RBA

, de

velo

p an

d im

plem

ente

d to

enh

ace

the

part

cipa

tion

of th

e Pr

ivat

e se

ctor

Dev

elop

nati

onal

pla

n/st

rate

gy: T

arge

t: p

lan

in p

lace

by

2015

Le

ad: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Cond

uct

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

am

ong

the

priv

ate

sect

or

stak

ehol

ders

: Tar

get:

1 a

nnua

llyLe

ad: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Intr

oduc

e m

etho

d-sp

ecifi

catio

ns a

nd m

odifi

ed B

oQ t

o su

it sm

all-

scal

e w

orks

con

trac

tsLe

ad: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enga

ge th

e N

ation

al C

onst

ructi

on A

utho

rity

(NCA

) to

mai

nly

assi

st

emer

ging

and

sm

all s

cale

con

trac

tors

and

con

sulta

nts

to d

evel

op

thei

r bu

sine

ss

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enco

urag

e jo

int

vent

ures

be

twee

n in

tern

ation

al

and

loca

l co

nsul

ting

and

cont

racti

ng fi

rms.

Tar

get:

At

leas

t 50

% o

f m

ajor

te

nder

s co

ntra

cted

to JV

’s

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.




Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

Enco

urag

e an

d fa

cilit

ate

the

crea

tion

of a

n eff

ectiv

e sm

all-s

cale

co

ntra

ctor

s as

soci

ation

. Ta

rget

: at

lea

st 5

0% S

CC r

egis

tere

d as

m

embe

rs.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, K

RB,

KIH

BT, U

nive

rsiti

es

and

Poly

tech

nics

, Co

ntra

ctor

s an

d Co

nsul

tant

s.

Dev

elop

a p

olic

y fo

r inc

entiv

es fo

r R20

00 p

racti

tione

rs a

nd s

ervi

ce

prov

ider

s

Ass

ess

the

feas

ibili

ty o

f Cr

edit

Sche

mes

Sm

all-s

cale

con

trac

tors

an

d pr

omot

e its

est

ablis

hmen

t.D

evel

op a

nd e

nsur

e us

age

of a

ppro

pria

te c

ontr

act

adm

inis

trati

on

guid

elin

es fo

r SM

EsA

dvoc

ate

and

assi

st t

he e

stab

lishm

ent

of a

sta

tuto

ry C

ontr

acto

r’s

and

Cons

ulta

nt’s

Reg

istr

ation

Boa

rd.

Targ

et:

Act

est

ablis

hing

the

fo

rmati

on o

f Co

ntra

ctor

’s a

nd C

onsu

ltant

’s R

egis

trati

on B

oard

in

plac

e an

d in

use

2.4

Esta

blis

h a

stan

dard

isati

on

and

accr

edita

tion

profi

cien

cy

trai

ning

.

2.4.

1 N

ation

al P

rofic

ienc

y Tr

aini

ng S

tand

ard

and

Certi

ficati

on p

olic

y de

velo

ped.

Dev

elop

an

In

teri

m

LRB

Profi

cien

cy

Trai

ning

St

anda

rd

and

Certi

ficati

on p

roce

dure

s Le

ad: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Dev

elop

Nati

onal

Pro

ficie

ncy

Trai

ning

Sta

ndar

d an

d Ce

rtific

ation

sc

hem

e fo

r LRB

tech

nolo

gy fo

r bot

h pu

blic

and

pri

vate

stak

ehol

ders

. Ta

rget

: sch

eme

in p

lace

by

2014

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS

Set

up In

teri

m L

RBA

Sta

ndin

g Co

mm

ittee

, in

liais

on w

ith E

RB, I

EK

and

cons

truc

tion

asso

ciati

ons,

man

date

d to

coo

rdin

ate,

app

rove

st

anda

rds

and

mon

itori

ng L

RBA

trai

ning

.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; K

IHBT

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ERB

, IEK

, Co

ntra

ctor

ass

ocia

tions

.2.

5Pr

omot

e th

e us

e of

LRB

te

chno

logi

es

amon

g th

e ac

adem

ic

com

mun

ity a

s w

ell a

s, n

ew

and

prac

ticin

g en

gine

ers

and

tech

nici

ans.

2.5.

1 LR

BA tr

aini

ng

mod

ules

/cou

rses

m

ains

trea

med

in th

e re

gula

r pr

ogra

mm

es o

f tec

hnic

al

trai

ning

insti

tutio

ns.

Dev

elop

or

upda

te e

xisti

ng L

RBA

tra

inin

g cu

rric

ulum

and

cou

rse

mod

ules

in c

olla

bora

tion

with

tech

nica

l tra

inin

g in

stitu

tes.

Le

ad: M

OR;

KIH

BT

Participa

tion

: ERB

, IEK

, Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

KRB,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Po

lyte

chni

cs.



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)Fa

cilit

ate

and

assi

st i

n fo

rmin

g co

llabo

ratio

n pa

cts/

agre

emen

ts/

MO

Us

betw

een

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

, c

olle

ges

and

othe

r se

ctor

tr

aini

ng in

stitu

tions

. Tar

get:

By

year

201

5.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; K

IHBT

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ERB

, IEK

, Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

KRB,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Po

lyte

chni

cs.

Prov

ide

inte

rnsh

ip f

or y

oung

pro

fess

iona

ls o

n on

goin

g pr

ojec

ts.

Targ

et: A

t lea

st 5

0 N

o.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS

Participa

tion

:KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, K

RB,

KIH

BT, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd

Poly

tech

nics

.

2

Org

aniz

e an

d co

nduc

t re

orie

ntati

on

prog

ram

mes

fo

r lo

cal

Aca

dem

ic

com

mun

ity

in

high

er

lear

ning

in

stitu

tions

on

LR

B te

chno

logy

. Tar

get 2

0 N

o.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS

Participa

tion

: KR

B,

KIH

BT, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd

Poly

tech

nics

.Tr

ain

50 N

o. te

chni

cian

s in

LRB

A a

nnua

lly.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS

Participa

tion

: KR

B,

KIH

BT, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd

Poly

tech

nics

.Lo

bby

ERB

and

IEK

to re

com

men

d to

Insti

tutio

ns o

f hig

her l

earn

ing

to in

clud

e LR

BA in

thei

r cu

rric

ula

Lead

: MO

R;

Participa

tion

: ERB

, IEK

, Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

KRB,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Po

lyte

chni

cs.

Lobb

y ER

B an

d IE

K to

inte

grat

e LR

BA is

sues

into

the

pro

fess

iona

l in

terv

iew

sLe

ad: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ERB

, IEK

.D

evel

op C

omm

unic

ation

Str

ateg

y fo

r pr

omoti

ng L

RB t

echn

olog

y ta

rgeti

ng p

olic

y m

aker

s, p

rogr

amm

e m

anag

ers,

pro

fess

iona

ls,

serv

ice

prov

ider

s an

d th

e ge

nera

l pub

lic. T

arge

t the

Str

ateg

y to

be

in p

lace

by

year

201

4.

Lead

: MO

R;

Participa

tion

: ERB

, IEK

, Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

KRB,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Po

lyte

chni

cs, c

onsu

ltant

s an

d co

ntra

ctor

s.D

evel

op a

nd o

ffer

orie

ntati

on c

ours

es o

n LR

BA f

or p

racti

sing

en

gine

ers

and

tech

nici

ans.

Tar

get:

20

No.

eac

h ye

arLe

ad: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ERB

, IEK

, Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

KRB,

Uni

vers

ities

and

Po

lyte

chni

cs, c

onsu

ltant

s an

d co

ntra

ctor

s.Bu


32




BJEC

TIV

E N

o. 3

: TO

DEV

ELO

P PO

LICI

ES A

ND

GU

IDEL

INES

TO

SU

PPO

RT IM

PLEM

ENTA

TIO

N O

F TH

E RO

AD

S 20

00 S

TRAT

EGY

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

3.1

Road

Sec

tor

Polic

y to

su

ppor

t/re

flect

ob

jecti

ves

of

the

Road

s 20

00

Stra

tegy

3.1.

1 Fu

ture

road

pol

icie

s fu

lly s

uppo

rt th

e ap

plic

ation

of

the

Stra

tegy

for

the

entir

e Ke

nyan

road

net

wor

k an

d fo

r al

l typ

es o

f roa

d w

orks

.

Lobb

y fo

r th

e fu

ll in

clus

ion

of R

2000

Str

ateg

y in

the

fut

ure

Road

se

ctor

pol

ices

.Le

ad: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Ensu

re th

at a

ll Ro

ad A

genc

ies a

pply

the

Stra

tegy

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t an

d m

anag

emen

t of t

heir

net

wor

ksLe

ad: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3.2

Dev

elop

, in

trod

uce

and

enfo

rce

polic

y on

loca

l re

sour

ces

cont

ent i

n ro

ad

wor

ks

3.2.

1 N

ation

al P

olic

y an

d gu

idel

ine

for

the

use

of lo

cal

reso

urce

s ba

sed

tech

nolo

gy

deve

lope

d.

Dev

elop

and

rol

lout

nati

onal

LRB

tec

hnol

ogy

oper

ation

pol

icy

incl

udin

g am

ong

othe

rs re

vise

d co

ntra

ct d

ocum

ents

(with

met

hod

stat

emen

ts a

nd m

inim

um lo

cal r

esou

rce

cont

ent)

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Dev

elop

a c

lear

sta

ndar

dise

d pr

ojec

t se

lecti

on s

yste

m b

ased

on

agre

ed s

ocia

l, ec

onom

ic, c

ultu

ral a

nd o

ther

cri

teri

a.

Lead

: MO

R;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Revi

se,

upda

te

and

rollo

ut

R200

0 pr

ojec

ts

im

plem

enta

tion

guid

elin

es &

Man

uals

aim

ed a

t max

imis

ing

labo

ur c

onte

nt.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Dev

elop

po

licy

and

guid

elin

es

for

Empl

oym

ent

Impa

ct

and

Com

mun

ity P

artic

ipati

on A

sses

smen

t (E

I&CP

A)

and

unde

rtak

e EI

&CP

A fo

r al

l roa

d pr

ojec

ts.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Dev

elop

and

int

rodu

ce a

har

mon

ized

em

ploy

men

t an

d so

cio-

econ

omic

impa

ct a

sses

smen

t an

d ap

prov

al s

yste

m fo

r Ro

ad 2

000

proj

ects

.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3.3

Esta

blis

h an

effe

ctive

in

stitu

tiona

l co

ordi

natio

n an

d co

llabo

ratio

n

3.3.

1 Cr

oss-

sect

oral

co

llabo

ratio

n an

d co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

es

tabl

ishe

d an

d st

reng

then

ed e

nhan

ce

proj

ects

pla

nnin

g an

d im

plem

enta

tion

and

mon

itori

ng.

Dev

elop

pol

icy

fram

ewor

k an

d pu

t in

pla

ce a

ppro

pria

te p

roje

ct

coor

dina

tion

stru

ctur

e.;

Qua

rter

ly c

olla

bora

tion

mee

tings

be

ing

held

.

Lead

: MO

F, M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)Se

t up

a fu

ll-tim

e N

ation

al C

oord

inati

on S

ecre

tari

at (N

CS) b

ased

at

the

KRB.

Tar

get:

the

NCS

in P

lace

by

June

201

3.Le

ad: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Dev

elop

men

t Par

tner

s.In

corp

orat

e R2

000

prog

ram

me

targ

ets

in

the

perf

orm

ance

co

ntra

cts

of M

OR

and

all i

mpl

emen

ting

agen

cies

. Tar

get:

to

star

t fr

om 2

013/

2014

fisc

al y

ear

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Loca

l Aut

hori

ties.

Inco

rpor

ate

empl

oym

ent

crea

tion

targ

ets

in t

he p

erfo

rman

ce

cont

ract

s of

MoR

and

oth

er i

mpl

emen

ting

agen

cies

. Ta

rget

: to

st

art f

rom

201

3/20

14 fi

scal

yea

r.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Loca

l Aut

hori

ties.

3.4

Cons

olid

ate

and

mob

ilise

s fin

anci

al

reso

urce

s

3.4.

1 Th

e us

e of

fund

s fo

r Ru

ral R

oad

wor

ks fr

om

vari

ous

sour

ces

(RM

LF,

LATF

, CD

F, C

ess

Mon

ies,

ESP

fu

nds)

con

solid

ated

and

co

ordi

nate

d

loby

the

rel

evan

t au

thor

ities

to

enfo

rce

exis

ting

law

s fo

r us

e of

th

ese

fund

sLe

ad: M

OF,

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Inte

grat

e R2

000

proj

ects

into

wid

er ro

ad d

evel

opm

ent p

rogr

amm

es

usin

g In

tegr

ated

Pro

ject

Pla

nnin

g pr

oces

ses:

Tar

get:

All

Age

ncie

s’

road

dev

elop

men

t pl

ans

have

Roa

ds 2

000

com

pone

nt b

y Ju

ne

2014

Lead

: MO

R, M

OF;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3.5

Esta

blis

h Po

litica

l and

co

mm

unity

go

odw

ill.

3.5.

1 Pa

rtici

pato

ry

Proj

ect P

lann

ing

and

Impl

emen

tatio

n A

ppro

ach

in p

lace

.

deve

lop

proc

edur

es fo

r com

mun

ity p

artic

ipati

on a

s pa

rt o

f pro

ject

pl

anni

ng p

roce

ssLe

ad: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd

KRB;

Par

liam

enta

ry

Com

mitt

ees;

Use

r A

ssoc

iatio

ns.

Crea

te p

ublic

aw

aren

ess

and

feed

back

mec

hani

sms

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd

KRB;

Par

liam

enta

ry

Com

mitt

ees;

Use

r A

ssoc

iatio

ns.

Budg


0




BJEC

TIV

E N

o. 4

: TO

EN

SURE

FU

LL IN

TEG

RATI

ON

OF

CRO

SS C

UTT

ING

ISSU

ESStrategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)

4.1

Mai

nstr

eam

ge

nder

issu

es.

4.1.

1 Su

b-se

ctor

and

co

rpor

ate

polic

ies

and

guid

elin

es o

n cr

oss

cutti

ng

issu

es in

pla

ce a

nd a

pplie

d in

all

proj

ects

.

Faci

litat

e th

e de

velo

pmen

t an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of s

ub-s

ecto

r an

d co

rpor

ate

gend

er p

olic

ies

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS a

nd

MO

GC&

SS Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA,

and

KRB.

Inco

rpor

ated

CC

I re

quire

men

ts

(incl

udin

g ge

nder

eq

ualit

y)

in

oper

ation

al a

nd re

porti

ng s

yste

ms

and

ensu

re c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith s

ub-

sect

or g

ende

r pol

icie

s in

R20

00 p

rogr

amm

es.

Enco

urag

e w

omen

pa

rtici

patio

n th

roug

h ta

rget

ed

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

(rev

ise

cont

ract

pro

cedu

res

to e

nsur

e th

is h

appe

ns).

Prov

ide

cond

uciv

e w

orki

ng e

nviro

nmen

t for

wom

en (s

peci

fic n

eeds

). In

dica

tors

: nu

mbe

r an

d ty

pe o

f fa

ciliti

es p

rovi

ded;

flex

ible

wor

king

ho

urs.

Incl

ude

min

imum

thre

shol

d fo

r wom

en p

artic

ipati

on in

per

form

ance

co

ntra

cts

of a

genc

ies.

Tar

get:

Incr

ease

par

ticip

ation

of w

omen

to

at

leas

t 33%

in a

ll w

orks

.4.

2M

ains

trea

m

yout

h is

sues

.In

clud

e m

inim

um t

hres

hold

for

you

th p

artic

ipati

on in

per

form

ance

co

ntra

cts

of a

genc

ies.

Tar

get:

Incr

ease

par

ticip

ation

of

Yout

h to

at

leas

t 33%

in a

ll w

orks

.

Lead

: MO

R an

d M

OYA

S Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Enco

urag

e in

tern

ship

and

trai

ning

pro

gram

me

for t

he y

outh

. Th

ough

re

gula

r tar

gete

d aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns1

4.3

Inte

grat

e an

d cr

eate

HIV

/AID

S aw

aren

ess

Enha

nce

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d co

mpl

ianc

e of

HIV

/AID

S pr

even

tion

and

man

agem

ent

mea

sure

s ac

ross

the

boa

rd;

both

for

em

ploy

ees

and

the

com

mun

ity. I

nclu

de c

ontr

ol m

easu

res.

Lead

: MO

R an

d M

OH

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Inco

rpor

ate

prev

entio

n an

d &

man

agem

ent o

f HIV

/AID

S in

cont

ract

ual

and

oper

ation

al d

ocum

ents

as

wel

l as

repo

rting

syst

ems.

Enco

urag

e cr

oss-

sect

oral

app

roac

h an

d co

llabo

ratio

n w

ith o

ther

ag

enci

es.

4.4

Mai

nstr

eam

PL

WD

issu

es in

LR

B w

orks

Sub-

sect

or a

nd c

orpo

rate

pol

icie

s and

gui

delin

es in

pla

ce a

nd a

pplie

d in

all

proj

ects

.Le

ad: M

OR

and

MO

CG&

SS;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

2

Inco

rpor

ate

the

right

s of

PLW

D i

n co

ntra

ctua

l an

d op

erati

onal

do

cum

ents

as

wel

l as

in re

porti

ng sy

stem

s.

Ensu

re th

e in

corp

orati

on o

f nee

ds o

f PLW

D in

road

des

igns

.

Impr

ove

mon

itori

ng o

f th

e pa

rtici

patio

n an

d fa

cilit

ation

of

PLW

D

in r

oad

wor

ks t

hrou

gh r

egul

ar a

war

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

& m

eetin

gs

on p

roje

cts.



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)En

cour

age

PLW

D

parti

cipa

tion

thro

ugh

targ

eted

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns a

nd p

rovi

de a

con

duci

ve w

orki

ng e

nviro

nmen

t to

in

crea

se t

heir

par

ticip

ation

. Tar

get:

2.

5% P

LWD

par

ticip

ation

on

R200

0 pr

ojec

ts4.

5In

tegr

ate

Envi

ronm

enta

l an

d So

cial

Is

sues

Ensu

re c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith E

MCA

in a

ll Ro

ads

2000

pro

ject

s.Le

ad: M

OR

and

NEM

A;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RBD

isse

min

ate

info

rmati

on

on c

onse

rvati

on o

f en

viro

nmen

t us

ing

prac

tical

gui

delin

es a

nd p

rom

otion

al m

ater

ials

an

thro

ugh

form

al

and

info

rmal

trai

ning

pac

kage

s.Se

nsiti

se L

RBA

pra

ctitio

ners

on

envi

ronm

enta

l is

sues

. Ta

rget

: al

l Pr

actiti

oner

s ap

ply

Envi

ronm

enta

l con

serv

ation

on

road

pro

ject

s.3

4.6

Enfo

rce

Labo

ur

law

s an

d re

gula

tions

Inco

rpor

ate

rele

vant

par

ts o

f th

e la

bour

law

in

proj

ect

and

cont

ract

ual d

ocum

ents

Le

ad: M

OR

and

MO

L;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB

Dev

elop

gui

delin

es fo

r tr

aini

ng a

nd u

se ‘i

n th

e fie

ld’.

Crea

te a

war

enes

s in

the

labo

ur-f

orce

on

rele

vant

labo

ur la

ws

and

regu

latio

ns th

roug

h re

gula

r pu

blic

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns.

2

4.7

Ensu

re

Com

mun

ity /

st

akeh

olde

r pa

rtici

patio

n.

Esta

blis

h pl

atfor

m f

or c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith c

lear

sub

-sec

tor

polic

y an

d gu

idel

ines

of e

ngag

emen

t.

Lead

: MO

R;

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Esta

blis

h m

echa

nism

s fo

r co

llabo

ratin

g w

ith o

ther

age

ncie

s in

volv

ed in

com

mun

ity w

orks

. 4.

8O

bser

ve

Occ

upati

onal

H

ealth

an

d Sa

fety

re

quire

men

ts.

Iden

tify

appr

opri

ate

safe

ty a

nd h

ealth

requ

irem

ents

for

the

road

co

nstr

uctio

n se

ctor

and

dev

elop

and

intr

oduc

e im

plem

enta

tion

guid

elin

es a

nd b

roch

ures

.

Lead

: MO

R an

d M

OT&

I; Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB

Revi

ew a

nd u

pdat

e co

nditi

ons

of c

ontr

act

and

spec

ifica

tions

to

ensu

re fu

ll co

mpl

ianc

e w

ith s

afet

y an

d he

alth

regu

latio

ns.

Dev

elop

and

intr

oduc

e an

effe

ctive

OSH

M&

E co

ntro

l sys

tem

.

4.9

Crea

te

Road

Saf

ety

Aw

aren

ess.

Crea

te a

war

enes

s in

roa

d sa

fety

in

the

loca

l co

mm

unity

tho

ugh

publ

ic a

war

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

.Le

ad: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

esta

blis

h a

mec

hani

sm f

or c

olla

bora

ting

and

coor

dina

tion

with

ot

her

agen

cies

invo

lved

in ro

ad s

afet

y.

Budg


8To

tal s

trat

egic

pla

n38

,813

Road

wor

ks38

,699

Capa

city

bui

ldin

g11

4



Roads 2000 Strategic PlanAnn

exIID:O

utlin

eTargetsan

dIm

plem

entation

Bud

get(Ke

RRA)

KEN

YA R

URA

L RO

AD

S A

UTH

ORI

TYOBJEC

TIVENo.1:TODEV

ELOPANDM

ANAGERO

ADSINACOST-EFFEC

TIVEANDSOCIALLYRE

SPONSIVEMANNER

Strategy

Out

puts

Acti

viteis,targetsand

IndicatorsofS

uccess

Respon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)1.

1In

crea

se

mai

ntai

nabl

e ro

ad

netw

ork

and

all-

seas

on a

cces

s us

ing

loca

l res

ourc

e-ba

sed

appr

oach

.

1.1.

1 In

crea

sed

leng

th o

f all-

seas

on a

cces

sCo

nstr

uct

500

Km o

f un

pave

d ro

ads

usin

g R2

000

stra

tegy

Lead

: KeR

RA, F

inan

ce: M

OR

1,65

8

1.1.

2 In

crea

sed

legt

h of

m

aint

aina

ble

road

s

Reha

bilit

ate

293K

m a

nd 6

86km

of

pave

d an

d un

pave

d ro

ads

Lead

: Ke

RRA

, Fi

nanc

e:

MO

R/KR

B11

,762

Und

erta

ke

peri

odic

m

aint

enan

ce

of

482

Km

and

1030

1 km

of

pa

ved

and

unpa

ved

road

s,

resp

ectiv

ely.

Lead

: K

eRRA

, Fi

nanc

e: M

OR/

KRB

48,7

35

1.1.

3 U

npav

ed ro

ads

upgr

aded

to

bitu

men

sta

ndar

dU

pgra

de 5

00Km

of u

npav

ed ro

ads.

Lead

: K

eRRA

, Fi

nanc

e: M

OR/

KRB

13,8

14

1.1.

4 Le

ngth

of r

oads

rece

ivin

g ro

utine

mai

nten

ance

ann

ually

is

incr

ease

d by

5%

ann

ually

Und

erta

ke r

outin

e m

aint

enan

ce o

f 33

7Km

and

29

,156

Km

on

aver

age

annu

ally

of

pa

ved

and

unpa

ved

road

s re

spec

tivel

y.

Lead

: K

eRRA

, Fi

nanc

e: M

OR/

KRB

19,2

80

1.2

Ensu

re in

crea

sed

utilis

ation

of l

ocal

ly

avai

labl

e re

sour

ces

in d

evel

opm

ent

and

man

agem

ent

of ro

ads.

1.2.

1 Lo

cal r

esou

rces

util

isati

on

asse

ssm

ent t

ools

and

pro

cedu

res

deve

lope

d an

d di

ssem

inat

ed

deve

lop

sim

plifi

ed a

sses

smen

t too

ls a

nd p

roce

dure

to

gui

de t

he u

se o

f lo

cal

labo

ur,

mat

eria

ls,

and

appr

opri

ate

equi

pmen

t

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; F

inan

ce: K

enya

Ro

ads

Boar

d;

Participa

tion

an

dIm

plem

entation

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

1.2.

2 U

tilis

ation

of l

ocal

ly

avai

labl

e re

sour

ces

enha

nced

(in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith s

et m

inim

um

thre

shol

ds o

r to

the

max

imum

ex

tent

pos

sibl

e).

Crea

te

abou

t 16

m

illio

n pe

rson

-day

s of

em

ploy

men

t A

nnua

lly in

KeR

RA p

roje

cts.

At

leas

t 33

.3%

will

be

wom

en a

nd 2

% P

LWD

whe

re e

ver

poss

ible

Lead

: KeR

RA

Dev

elop

gui

delin

es f

or a

uditi

ng t

he u

se o

f lo

cal

reso

urce

s (la

bour

, m

ater

ials

an

d eq

uipm

ent

sour

cing

). A

n au

dit u

nder

take

n fo

r at

leas

t 20%

of

all o

n-go

ing

road

pro

ject

s.

Lead

: MoR

/NCS

/KRB

; Fin

anci

ng:

KRB,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

5



Strategy

Out

puts

Acti

viteis,targetsand

IndicatorsofS

uccess

Respon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)1.

3Re

view

and

ad

opt d

esig

n m

anua

ls a

nd w

ork

spec

ifica

tions

ap

prop

riat

e to

loca

l re

sour

ce-b

ased

ap

proa

ch

1.3.

1 Te

chni

cal a

nd m

anag

eria

l to

ols

deve

lope

d to

ena

hnce

the

use

of L

ocal

Res

ourc

es- b

ased

te

chno

logy

.

Revi

se a

nd u

pdat

e de

sign

, ope

ratio

nal a

nd tr

aini

ng

man

uals

fo

r co

nstr

uctio

n an

d m

aint

enan

ce.

Targ

et: T

he m

anua

ls in

use

by

2014

.

Lead

: M

OR;

Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

Revi

ew a

nd a

dopt

wor

k/co

ntra

ct s

peci

ficati

ons

that

ens

ure

high

er in

put o

f loc

al re

sour

ces

in ro

ad

proj

ects

. The

revi

ewed

spe

cific

ation

by

2015

.

Lead

: M

OR;

Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

1

Revi

ew a

nd a

dopt

tes

t/ a

ppro

val

met

hods

tha

t en

sure

fas

ter

and

bett

er q

ualit

y co

ntro

l in

roa

d pr

ojec

ts. H

amon

ized

testi

ng a

nd a

ppro

val m

etho

d ro

lled

out b

y 20

14

Lead

: M

OR;

Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

1

1.4

To u

se o

f ap

prop

riat

e pl

anni

ng a

nd

oper

ation

sys

tem

co

mm

ensu

rate

w

ith lo

cal-

reso

urce

s ba

sed

tech

nolo

ggy.

1.4.

1 Eff

ectiv

e pl

anni

ng s

yste

m

deve

lope

d an

d us

ed

Dev

elop

sim

plifi

ed P

lann

ing

Proc

edur

e an

d G

uide

fo

r im

plem

enta

tion

of R

2000

pro

ject

s.

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS; F

inan

cing

: KR

B/D

P; Im

plem

entation

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA

Revi

ew e

xisti

ng R

oads

200

0 O

pera

tions

Man

ual

(OM

) an

d up

date

tho

se s

ectio

ns t

hat

no l

onge

r co

nfor

m

with

th

e cu

rren

t or

gani

satio

nal

and

oper

ation

al s

ituati

on a

s w

ell

as i

nclu

ding

new

te

chno

logy

op

tions

, e.

g.

alte

rnati

ve

pave

men

t op

tions

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B/D

P;

Implem

entation

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA

5

Regu

larl

y co

llect

and

col

late

roa

d in

vent

ory

and

cond

ition

(R

IC)

data

, in

clud

ing

data

on

: ro

ad

leng

th,

wid

ths,

str

uctu

res,

tra

ffic

volu

mes

, an

d co

nditi

on a

vaila

ble

and

used

for

pla

nnin

g an

d op

erati

ons.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd K

URA

Dev

elop

relia

ble

M&

E fr

amew

ork

M&

E; In

dica

tors

fo

r M

&E

agre

ed,

bein

g co

llect

ed a

nd u

sed

fro

plan

ning

and

impl

emen

tatio

n; r

egul

ar M

&E

bein

g un

dert

aken

.

Lead

: KR

B, K

eNH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

1.5

Dev

elop

ICT

syst

ems

for

proj

ect

man

agem

ent.

1.6.

1 In

tegr

ated

Pro

ject

M

anag

emen

t Sys

tem

dev

elop

ed

and

rolle

d ou

t

Dev

elop

app

ropr

iate

, use

r fr

eind

ly a

nd

inte

grat

ed c

ompu

ter-

base

d sy

stem

that

cov

ers

amon

g ot

hers

:

-

pro

ject

/op

erati

on m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

, - p

rocu

rem

ent

man

agem

ent s

yste

m fo

r w

orks

and

ser

vice

, and

- fin

anci

al m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

.

Lead

: KR

B, K

eNH

A,

KeRR

A,

and

KURA

10



Roads 2000 Strategic PlanBu


95,2

71O

BJEC

TIV

E N

o. 2

: TO

EN

HA

NCE

AN

D S

UST

AIN

NAT

ION

AL

CAPA

CITY

FO

R TH

E IM

PLEM

ENTA

TIO

N O

F TH

E RO

AD

S 20

00 S

TRAT

EGY

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)2.

1Pr

omot

e eff

ectiv

e in

form

ation

sh

arin

g an

d pu

blic

re

latio

ns.

2.1.

1 Th

e vi

sibi

lity

of lo

cal

reso

urce

s-ba

sed

tech

nolo

gy

enha

nced

.

Dev

elop

and

des

sim

inat

e in

form

ation

pac

kage

s on

th

e ac

hiev

emen

t of

th

e pr

ogra

mm

e us

ing

agre

ed K

ey P

erfo

rman

ce In

dica

tors

(e.

g., P

hysi

cal

prog

ress

, em

ploy

men

t cr

eate

, bu

sine

sses

ge

nera

ted,

inc

omes

ear

ned,

etc

.).

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

Enga

ge th

e m

edia

to b

road

cast

com

preh

ensi

vely

on

the

Stra

tegy

. At

leas

t 2N

o of

Med

ia p

rese

ntati

ons

(TV,

Rad

io, P

rint

Med

ia) a

nnua

lly

Lead

: M

OR/

NSC

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

10

Cond

uct

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

. At

le

ast

2No

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

tar

getti

ng p

oliti

cal

lead

ers

and

adm

inis

trati

on o

ffici

als

annu

ally

Lead

: M

OR/

NSC

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

10

Cond

uct a

war

enes

s an

d pu

blic

rela

tion

cam

paig

ns

at

coun

ty

and

loca

l le

vels

. Ta

rget

2N

o pu

blic

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns a

nnua

lly

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Fi

nanc

ing:

KR

B;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A, a

nd K

URA

10

2.2

Conti

nous

de

velo

pmen

t of

impl

emen

tatio

n ca

paci

ty o

f Roa

d A

genc

ies

2.2.

1 Se

ctor

al T

rain

ig c

apac

ity

enha

nced

thro

ugh

inco

rpor

ating

ne

w te

chno

logi

es a

nd w

ork

met

hods

.

Carr

y ou

t Tra

inin

g N

eeds

Ass

essm

ent (

TNA

) for

all

agen

cies

with

a fo

cus

on th

e R2

000

Stra

tegy

Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Dev

elop

an

d ro

ll ou

t co

mpr

hens

ive

Nati

onal

Tr

aini

ng P

lan

for

R200

0 pr

ogra

mm

e an

d in

lin

e w

ith th

e im

plem

tinin

g ag

enci

es’ H

RD p

lans

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

prov

ide

trai

nig

for

agen

cies

’ st

aff,

smal

l sc

ale

entr

epre

neur

s, a

rtiza

ns, e

tc. T

arge

t: 5

0, 1

00 &

200

ag

enci

es’ s

taff,

SM

ES a

nd A

rtiza

ns re

spec

tivel

y

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.



2.3

Enha

nce

capa

city

of

Pri

vate

co

nstr

uctio

n se

ctor

2.3.

1 N

ation

al S

mal

l Sca

le

Cont

ract

ors

& C

onsu

ltant

s D

evel

opm

ent P

lan,

rela

ting

to

LRBA

, de

velo

p an

d im

plem

ente

d to

enh

ance

the

part

cipa

tion

of

the

Priv

ate

sect

or

Dev

elop

nati

onal

pla

n/st

rate

gy:

Targ

et:

plan

in

pl

ace

by 2

015

Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Cond

uct

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

am

ong

the

priv

ate

sect

or s

take

hold

ers:

Tar

get:

1 a

nnua

llyLe

ad:

MO

R/N

CS; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Intr

oduc

e m

etho

d-sp

ecifi

catio

ns

and

mod

ified

Bo

Q to

sui

t sm

all-s

cale

wor

ks c

ontr

acts

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enga

ge

the

Nati

onal

Co

nstr

uctio

n A

utho

rity

(N

CA)

to m

ainl

y as

sist

em

ergi

ng a

nd s

mal

l sc

ale

cont

ract

ors

and

cons

ulta

nts

to

deve

lop

thei

r bu

sine

ss

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)En

cour

age

join

t ve

ntur

es b

etw

een

inte

rnati

onal

an

d lo

cal c

onsu

lting

and

con

trac

ting

firm

s. T

arge

t:

At le

ast 5

0% o

f maj

or te

nder

s co

ntra

cted

to JV

’s

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Enco

urag

e an

d fa

cilit

ate

the

crea

tion

of

an

effec

tive

smal

l-sca

le

cont

ract

ors

asso

ciati

on.

Targ

et: a

t lea

st 5

0% S

CC re

gist

ered

as

mem

bers

.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs,

Cont

ract

ors

and

Cons

ulta

nts.

Dev

elop

a

polic

y fo

r in

centi

ves

for

R200

0 pr

actiti

oner

s an

d se

rvic

e pr

ovid

ers

5

Ass

ess

the

feas

ibili

ty o

f Cr

edit

Sche

mes

Sm

all-

scal

e co

ntra

ctor

s an

d pr

omot

e its

est

ablis

hmen

t.D

evel

op a

nd e

nsur

e us

age

of a

ppro

pria

te c

ontr

act

adm

inis

trati

on g

uide

lines

for

SMEs

10

Adv

ocat

e an

d as

sist

th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent

of

a st

atut

ory

Cont

ract

or’s

an

d Co

nsul

tant

’s

Regi

stra

tion

Boar

d.

Targ

et:

Act

es

tabl

ishi

ng

the

form

ation

of

Cont

ract

or’s

and

Con

sulta

nt’s

Re

gist

ratio

n Bo

ard

in p

lace

and

in u

se



Roads 2000 Strategic Plan2.

4Es

tabl

ish

a st

anda

rdis

ation

an

d ac

cred

itatio

n pr

ofici

ency

tr

aini

ng.

2.4.

1 N

ation

al P

rofic

ienc

y Tr

aini

ng

Stan

dard

and

Cer

tifica

tion

polic

y de

velo

ped.

Dev

elop

an

In

teri

m

LRB

Profi

cien

cy

Trai

ning

St

anda

rd a

nd C

ertifi

catio

n pr

oced

ures

Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, and

KU

RA, K

RB.

Dev

elop

Nati

onal

Pro

ficie

ncy

Trai

ning

Sta

ndar

d an

d Ce

rtific

ation

sch

eme

for

LRB

tech

nolo

gy f

or

both

pu

blic

an

d pr

ivat

e st

akeh

olde

rs.

Targ

et:

sche

me

in p

lace

by

2014

Lead

: MO

R/N

CS

Set u

p In

teri

m L

RBA

Sta

ndin

g Co

mm

ittee

, in

liais

on

with

ER

B,

IEK

and

cons

truc

tion

asso

ciati

ons,

m

anda

ted

to c

oord

inat

e,

appr

ove

stan

dard

s an

d m

onito

ring

LRB

A tr

aini

ng.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; KI

HBT

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

Co

ntra

ctor

ass

ocia

tions

.

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)2.

5Pr

omot

e th

e us

e of

LR

B te

chno

logi

es

amon

g th

e ac

adem

ic

com

mun

ity a

s w

ell a

s, n

ew

and

prac

ticin

g en

gine

ers

and

tech

nici

ans.

2.5.

1 LR

BA tr

aini

ng m

odul

es/

cour

ses

mai

nstr

eam

ed in

the

regu

lar

prog

ram

mes

of t

echn

ical

tr

aini

ng in

stitu

tions

.

Dev

elop

or

up

date

ex

istin

g LR

BA

trai

ning

cu

rric

ulum

and

cou

rse

mod

ules

in

colla

bora

tion

with

tech

nica

l tra

inin

g in

stitu

tes.

Lead

: MO

R; K

IHBT

Participa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs.

Faci

litat

e an

d as

sist

in fo

rmin

g co

llabo

ratio

n pa

cts/

agre

emen

ts/M

OU

s be

twee

n KI

HBT

, U

nive

rsiti

es,

colle

ges

and

othe

r se

ctor

tra

inin

g in

stitu

tions

. Ta

rget

: By

year

201

5.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; KI

HBT

Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B, I

EK,

KeN

HA

, Ke

RRA

, KU

RA,

KRB,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs.

Prov

ide

inte

rnsh

ip

for

youn

g pr

ofes

sion

als

on

ongo

ing

proj

ects

. Tar

get:

At l

east

50

No.

Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS Pa

rticipa

tion

:Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs.

2

Org

aniz

e an

d co

nduc

t re

orie

ntati

on p

rogr

amm

es

for

loca

l Aca

dem

ic c

omm

unity

in h

ighe

r le

arni

ng

insti

tutio

ns o

n LR

B te

chno

logy

. Tar

get 2

0 N

o.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

Pa

rticipa

tion

: KR

B,

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs.



Trai

n 50

No.

tech

nici

ans

in L

RBA

ann

ually

.Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS Pa

rticipa

tion

: KR

B,

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs.

16

Lobb

y ER

B an

d IE

K to

rec

omm

end

to In

stitu

tions

of

hig

her l

earn

ing

to in

clud

e LR

BA in

thei

r cur

ricu

laLe

ad:

MO

R; Participa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, K

URA

, KRB

, U

nive

rsiti

es a

nd P

olyt

echn

ics.

2

Lobb

y ER

B an

d IE

K to

int

egra

te L

RBA

iss

ues

into

th

e pr

ofes

sion

al in

terv

iew

sLe

ad:

MO

R/N

CS; Pa

rticipa

tion

: ER

B, IE

K.3

Dev

elop

Com

mun

icati

on S

trat

egy

for

prom

oting

LR

B te

chno

logy

ta

rgeti

ng

polic

y m

aker

s,

prog

ram

me

man

ager

s,

prof

essi

onal

s,

serv

ice

prov

ider

s an

d th

e ge

nera

l pu

blic

. Ta

rget

th

e St

rate

gy to

be

in p

lace

by

year

201

4.

Lead

: M

OR;

Participa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, K

URA

, KRB

, U

nive

rsiti

es

and

Poly

tech

nics

, co

nsul

tant

s an

d co

ntra

ctor

s.

Dev

elop

and

offe

r ori

enta

tion

cour

ses

on L

RBA

for

prac

tisin

g en

gine

ers

and

tech

nici

ans.

Tar

get:

20

No.

eac

h ye

ar

Lead

: M

OR;

Participa

tion

: ER

B,

IEK,

KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, K

URA

, KRB

, U

nive

rsiti

es

and

Poly

tech

nics

, co

nsul

tant

s an

d co

ntra

ctor

s.Bu


68O

BJEC

TIV

E N

o. 3

: TO

DEV

ELO

P PO

LICI

ES A

ND

GU

IDEL

INES

TO

SU

PPO

RT IM

PLEM

ENTA

TIO

N O

F TH

E RO

AD

S 20

00 S

TRAT

EGY

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)3.

1Ro

ad S

ecto

r Po

licy

to s

uppo

rt/

refle

ct o

bjec

tives

of

the

Road

s 20

00

Stra

tegy

3.1.

1 Fu

ture

road

pol

icie

s fu

lly

supp

ort t

he a

pplic

ation

of t

he

Stra

tegy

for

the

entir

e Ke

nyan

ro

ad n

etw

ork

and

for

all t

ypes

of

road

wor

ks.

Lobb

y fo

r th

e fu

ll in

clus

ion

of R

2000

Str

ateg

y in

th

e fu

ture

Roa

d se

ctor

pol

ices

.Le

ad:

MO

R/N

CS; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Ensu

re t

hat

all R

oad

Age

ncie

s ap

ply

the

Stra

tegy

in

the

dev

elop

men

t an

d m

anag

emen

t of

the

ir

netw

orks

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.



Roads 2000 Strategic Plan3.

2D

evel

op, i

ntro

duce

an

d en

forc

e po

licy

on lo

cal r

esou

rces

co

nten

t in

road

w

orks

3.2.

1 N

ation

al P

olic

y an

d gu

idel

ine

for

the

use

of lo

cal

reso

urce

s ba

sed

tech

nolo

gy

deve

lope

d.

Dev

elop

an

d ro

llout

na

tiona

l LR

B te

chno

logy

op

erati

on p

olic

y in

clud

ing

amon

g ot

hers

rev

ised

co

ntra

ct d

ocum

ents

(with

met

hod

stat

emen

ts a

nd

min

imum

loca

l res

ourc

e co

nten

t)

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Dev

elop

a c

lear

sta

ndar

dise

d pr

ojec

t se

lecti

on

syst

em b

ased

on

agre

ed s

ocia

l, ec

onom

ic, c

ultu

ral

and

othe

r cr

iteri

a.

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Revi

se,

upda

te

and

rollo

ut

R200

0 pr

ojec

ts

impl

emen

tatio

n gu

idel

ines

& m

anua

ls a

imed

at

max

imis

ing

labo

ur c

onte

nt.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Dev

elop

pol

icy

and

guid

elin

es f

or E

mpl

oym

ent

Impa

ct a

nd C

omm

unity

Par

ticip

ation

Ass

essm

ent

(EI&

CPA

) an

d un

dert

ake

EI&

CPA

fo

r al

l ro

ad

proj

ects

.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Dev

elop

and

intr

oduc

e a

harm

oniz

ed e

mpl

oym

ent

and

soci

o-ec

onom

ic

impa

ct

asse

ssm

ent

and

appr

oval

sys

tem

for

Road

200

0 pr

ojec

ts.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.



3.3

Esta

blis

h an

effe

ctive

in

stitu

tiona

l co

ordi

natio

n an

d co

llabo

ratio

n

3.3.

1 Cr

oss-

sect

oral

col

labo

ratio

n an

d co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

es

tabl

ishe

d an

d st

reng

then

ed

enha

nce

proj

ects

pla

nnin

g an

d im

plem

enta

tion

and

mon

itori

ng.

Dev

elop

po

licy

fram

ewor

k an

d pu

t in

pl

ace

appr

opri

ate

proj

ect

coor

dina

tion

stru

ctur

e.;

Qua

rter

ly c

olla

bora

tion

mee

tings

bei

ng h

eld.

Lead

: MO

F, M

OR;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Set u

p a

full-

time

Nati

onal

Coo

rdin

ation

Sec

reta

riat

(N

CS) b

ased

at t

he K

RB. T

arge

t: th

e N

CS in

Pla

ce b

y Ju

ne 2

013.

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Dev

elop

men

t Par

tner

s.In

corp

orat

e R2

000

prog

ram

me

targ

ets

in

the

perf

orm

ance

co

ntra

cts

of

MO

R an

d al

l im

plem

entin

g ag

enci

es.

Targ

et:

to

star

t fr

om

2013

/14

fisca

l yea

r

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Loca

l Aut

hori

ties.

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)In

corp

orat

e em

ploy

men

t cr

eatio

n ta

rget

s in

th

e pe

rfor

man

ce c

ontr

acts

of

MoR

and

oth

er

impl

emen

ting

agen

cies

. Ta

rget

: to

st

art

from

20

13/1

4 fis

cal y

ear.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Loca

l Aut

hori

ties.

3.4

Cons

olid

ate

and

mob

ilise

s fin

anci

al

reso

urce

s

3.4.

1 Th

e us

e of

fund

s fo

r Ru

ral

Road

wor

ks fr

om v

ario

us s

ourc

es

(RM

LF, L

ATF,

CD

F, C

ess

Mon

ies,

ES

P fu

nds)

con

solid

ated

and

co

ordi

nate

d

lobb

y th

e re

leva

nt a

utho

ritie

s to

enf

orce

exi

sting

la

ws

for

use

of th

ese

fund

sLe

ad:

MO

F,

MO

R/N

CS;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

.

Inte

grat

e R2

000

proj

ects

in

to

wid

er

road

de

velo

pmen

t pr

ogra

mm

es

usin

g In

tegr

ated

Pr

ojec

t Pl

anni

ng p

roce

sses

: Ta

rget

: A

ll A

genc

ies’

ro

ad

deve

lopm

ent

plan

s ha

ve

Road

s 20

00

com

pone

nt b

y Ju

ne 2

014

Lead

: MO

R, M

OF;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

3.5

Esta

blis

h Po

litica

l an

d co

mm

unity

go

odw

ill.

3.5.

1 Pa

rtici

pato

ry P

roje

ct

Plan

ning

and

Impl

emen

tatio

n A

ppro

ach

in p

lace

.

deve

lop

proc

edur

es f

or c

omm

unity

par

ticip

ation

as

par

t of p

roje

ct p

lann

ing

proc

ess

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Parl

iam

enta

ry

Com

mitt

ees;

U

ser

Ass

ocia

tions

.Cr

eate

pub

lic a

war

enes

s and

feed

back

mec

hani

sms

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB;

Parl

iam

enta

ry

Com

mitt

ees;

U

ser

Ass

ocia

tions

.Bu


0

OBJ

ECTI

VE

No.

4: T

O E

NSU

RE F

ULL

INTE

GRA

TIO

N O

F CR

OSS

CU

TTIN

G IS

SUES




Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)4.

1M

ains

trea

m g

ende

r is

sues

.4.

1.1

Sub-

sect

or a

nd c

orpo

rate

po

licie

s an

d gu

idel

ines

on

cros

s cu

tting

issu

es in

pla

ce a

nd a

pplie

d in

all

proj

ects

.

Faci

litat

e th

e de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

su

b-se

ctor

and

cor

pora

te g

ende

r po

licie

sLe

ad: M

OR/

NCS

and

MO

GC&

SS

Participa

tion

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA,

KURA

, and

KRB

.

Inco

rpor

ated

CCI

req

uire

men

ts (

incl

udin

g ge

nder

eq

ualit

y) i

n op

erati

onal

and

rep

ortin

g sy

stem

s an

d en

sure

com

plia

nce

with

sub

-sec

tor

gend

er

polic

ies

in R

2000

pro

gram

mes

. En

cour

age

wom

en p

artic

ipati

on t

hrou

gh t

arge

ted

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

(rev

ise

cont

ract

pro

cedu

res

to e

nsur

e th

is h

appe

ns).

Prov

ide

cond

uciv

e w

orki

ng

envi

ronm

ent

for

wom

en (

spec

ific

need

s).

Indi

cato

rs:

num

ber

and

type

of f

acili

ties

prov

ided

; flex

ible

wor

king

hou

rs.

Incl

ude

min

imum

th

resh

old

for

wom

en

parti

cipa

tion

in p

erfo

rman

ce co

ntra

cts o

f age

ncie

s.

Targ

et: I

ncre

ase

parti

cipa

tion

of w

omen

to a

t lea

st

33%

in a

ll w

orks

.4.

2M

ains

trea

m y

outh

is

sues

.In

clud

e m

inim

um th

resh

old

for y

outh

par

ticip

ation

in

pe

rfor

man

ce

cont

ract

s of

ag

enci

es.

Targ

et:

Incr

ease

par

ticip

ation

of

Yout

h to

at

leas

t 33

% in

al

l wor

ks.

Lead

: MO

R an

d M

OYA

S Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA,

KURA

, and

KRB

.

Enco

urag

e in

tern

ship

and

tra

inin

g pr

ogra

mm

e fo

r th

e yo

uth.

Th

ough

reg

ular

tar

gete

d aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns

2

4.3

Inte

grat

e an

d cr

eate

HIV

/AID

S aw

aren

ess

Enha

nce

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d co

mpl

ianc

e of

HIV

/A

IDS

prev

entio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t m

easu

res

acro

ss t

he b

oard

; bo

th f

or e

mpl

oyee

s an

d th

e co

mm

unity

. Inc

lude

con

trol

mea

sure

s.

Lead

: MO

R an

d M

OH

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA,

KURA

, and

KRB

.

Inco

rpor

ate

prev

entio

n an

d &

man

agem

ent o

f HIV

/A

IDS

in c

ontr

actu

al a

nd o

pera

tiona

l doc

umen

ts a

s w

ell a

s re

porti

ng s

yste

ms.

Enco

urag

e cr

oss-

sect

oral

ap

proa

ch

and

colla

bora

tion

with

oth

er a

genc

ies.



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)4.

4M

ains

trea

m P

LWD

is

sues

in L

RB w

orks

Sub-

sect

or a

nd c

orpo

rate

pol

icie

s an

d gu

idel

ines

in

pla

ce a

nd a

pplie

d in

all

proj

ects

.Le

ad:

MO

R an

d M

OCG

&SS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

.

2

Inco

rpor

ate

the

righ

ts o

f PLW

D in

con

trac

tual

and

op

erati

onal

doc

umen

ts a

s w

ell

as i

n re

porti

ng

syst

ems.

Ensu

re th

e in

corp

orati

on o

f nee

ds o

f PLW

D in

road

de

sign

s.Im

prov

e m

onito

ring

of

th

e pa

rtici

patio

n an

d fa

cilit

ation

of P

LWD

in ro

ad w

orks

thro

ugh

regu

lar

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

& m

eetin

gs o

n pr

ojec

ts.

Enco

urag

e PL

WD

par

ticip

ation

thr

ough

tar

gete

d aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns a

nd p

rovi

de a

con

duci

ve

wor

king

en

viro

nmen

t to

in

crea

se

thei

r pa

rtici

patio

n. T

arge

t: 2

.5%

PLW

D p

artic

ipati

on o

n R2

000

proj

ects

4.5

Inte

grat

e En

viro

nmen

tal a

nd

Soci

al Is

sues

Ensu

re c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith E

MCA

in a

ll Ro

ads

2000

pr

ojec

ts.

Lead

: M

OR

and

NEM

A;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

Dis

sem

inat

e in

form

ation

on

cons

erva

tion

of

envi

ronm

ent

usin

g pr

actic

al

guid

elin

es

and

prom

otion

al

mat

eria

ls

an

thro

ugh

form

al

and

info

rmal

trai

ning

pac

kage

s.Se

nsiti

se

LRBA

pr

actiti

oner

s on

en

viro

nmen

tal

issu

es. T

arge

t: a

ll Pra

ctitio

ners

app

ly E

nviro

nmen

tal

cons

erva

tion

on ro

ad p

roje

cts.

3

4.6

Enfo

rce

Labo

ur

law

s an

d re

gula

tions

Inco

rpor

ate

rele

vant

par

ts o

f th

e la

bour

law

in

proj

ect a

nd c

ontr

actu

al d

ocum

ents

Le

ad:

MO

R an

d M

OL;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

D

evel

op g

uide

lines

for t

rain

ing

and

use

‘in th

e fie

ld’.

Crea

te a

war

enes

s in

the

labo

ur-f

orce

on

rele

vant

la

bour

law

s an

d re

gula

tions

thro

ugh

regu

lar p

ublic

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns.

2

4.7

Ensu

re C

omm

unity

/

stak

ehol

der

parti

cipa

tion.

Esta

blis

h pl

atfor

m fo

r co

nsul

tatio

n w

ith c

lear

sub

-se

ctor

pol

icy

and

guid

elin

es o

f eng

agem

ent.

Le

ad:

MO

R;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

Esta

blis

h m

echa

nism

s for

col

labo

ratin

g w

ith o

ther

ag

enci

es in

volv

ed in

com

mun

ity w

orks

.




Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

et

Item

(KES

Mill

ions

)4.

8O

bser

ve

Occ

upati

onal

H

ealth

and

Saf

ety

requ

irem

ents

.

Iden

tify

appr

opri

ate

safe

ty a

nd h

ealth

re

quire

men

ts fo

r th

e ro

ad c

onst

ructi

on s

ecto

r an

d de

velo

p an

d in

trod

uce

impl

emen

tatio

n gu

idel

ines

and

bro

chur

es.

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

T&I;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, and

KRB

Revi

ew a

nd u

pdat

e co

nditi

ons

of c

ontr

act

and

spec

ifica

tions

to

en

sure

fu

ll co

mpl

ianc

e w

ith

safe

ty a

nd h

ealth

regu

latio

ns.

Dev

elop

and

int

rodu

ce a

n eff

ectiv

e O

SH M

&E

cont

rol s

yste

m.

4.9

Crea

te R

oad

Safe

ty

Aw

aren

ess.

Crea

te

awar

enes

s in

ro

ad

safe

ty

in

the

loca

l co

mm

unity

thou

gh p

ublic

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns.

Lead

: M

OR;

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A, K

eRRA

, KU

RA, a

nd K

RB.

esta

blis

h a

mec

hani

sm

for

colla

bora

ting

and

coor

dina

tion

with

oth

er a

genc

ies

invo

lved

in r

oad

safe

ty.

Budg


9

Tota

l str

ateg

ic p

lan

95,3

48

Road

wor

ks95

,249

Capa

city

bui

ldin

g99



Ann

exIIE:Outlin

eTargetsan

dIm

plem

entation

Bud

get(KU

RA)

KEN

YA W

ILD

LIFE

SER

VIC

E

OBJEC

TIVENo.1:TODEV

ELOPANDM

ANAGERO

ADSINACOST-EFFEC

TIVEANDSOCIALLYRE

SPONSIVEMANNER

Strategy

Out

puts

Acti

viteis,

targets

and

Indicatorsof

Succ

ess

Respon

sibility

Budg

etItem

(K

ES M

illio

ns)

1.1

Incr

ease

mai

ntai

nabl

e ro

ad

netw

ork

and

all-s

easo

n ac

cess

usi

ng lo

cal r

esou

rce-

base

d ap

proa

ch.

1.1.

1 In

crea

sed

leng

th o

f all-

seas

on a

cces

sCo

nstr

uct

13Km

of

unpa

ved

road

s us

ing

R200

0 st

rate

gyLe

ad: K

WS;

Fin

ance

: MO

R10

6

1.1.

2 In

crea

sed

legt

h of

m

aint

aina

ble

road

s

Reha

bilit

ate

166

Km o

f pav

ed ro

ads

Lead

: KW

S;

Fina

nce:

M

OR/

KRB

1,28

8

Und

erta

ke p

erio

dic

mai

nten

ance

of

163

Km o

f un

pave

d ro

ads.

Lead

: KW

S;

Fina

nce:

M

OR/

KRB

634

1.1.

3 U

npav

ed ro

ads

upgr

aded

to

bitu

men

sta

ndar

dU

pgra

de 5

Km

and

40K

m o

f pa

ved

and

unpa

ved

road

s.Le

ad:

KWS;

Fi

nanc

e:

MO

R/KR

B66

4

1.1.

4 Le

ngth

of r

oads

rece

ivin

g ro

utine

mai

nten

ance

ann

ually

is

incr

ease

d by

5%

ann

ually

Und

erta

ke r

outin

e m

aint

enan

ce o

f 11

31

Km a

nd u

npav

ed ro

ads

resp

ectiv

ely.

Lead

: KW

S;

Fina

nce:

M

OR/

KRB

215

1.2

Ensu

re in

crea

sed

utilis

ation

of

loca

lly a

vaila

ble

reso

urce

s in

dev

elop

men

t an

d m

anag

emen

t of r

oads

.

1.2.

2 U

tilis

ation

of l

ocal

ly

avai

labl

e re

sour

ces

enha

nced

(in

acc

orda

nce

with

set

m

inim

um th

resh

olds

or

to th

e m

axim

um e

xten

t pos

sibl

e)

Crea

te a

bout

16

mill

ion

pers

on-d

ays

of

empl

oym

ent A

nnua

lly in

KW

S pr

ojec

ts. A

t le

ast

33.3

% w

ill b

e w

omen

and

2%

PLW

D

whe

re e

ver

poss

ible

Lead

: KW

S

1.4

To u

se o

f app

ropr

iate

pl

anni

ng a

nd o

pera

tion

syst

em c

omm

ensu

rate

w

ith lo

cal-r

esou

rces

bas

ed

tech

nolo

ggy.

1.4.

1 Eff

ectiv

e pl

anni

ng s

yste

m

deve

lope

d an

d us

ed

Regu

larl

y col

lect

and

colla

te ro

ad in

vent

ory

and

cond

ition

(RI

C) d

ata,

inc

ludi

ng d

ata

on: r

oad

leng

th, w

idth

s, s

truc

ture

s, tr

affic

volu

mes

, an

d co

nditi

on

avai

labl

e an

d us

ed fo

r pl

anni

ng a

nd o

pera

tions

.

Lead

: KeN

HA

, KeR

RA, a

nd

KURA

Participa

tion

: KW

S

Budg


2,90

6




BJEC

TIV

E N

o. 2

: TO

EN

HA

NCE

AN

D S

UST

AIN

NAT

ION

AL

CAPA

CITY

FO

R TH

E IM

PLEM

ENTA

TIO

N O

F TH

E RO

AD

S 20

00 S

TRAT

EGY

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

etItem

(K

ES M

illio

ns)

2.2

Conti

nous

dev

elop

men

t of

impl

emen

tatio

n ca

paci

ty o

f Ro

ad A

genc

ies

2.2.

1 Se

ctor

al T

rain

ig

capa

city

enh

ance

d th

roug

h in

corp

orati

ng n

ew te

chno

logi

es

and

wor

k m

etho

ds.

Carr

y ou

t Tr

aini

ng

Nee

ds

Ass

essm

ent

(TN

A) f

or a

ll ag

enci

es w

ith a

focu

s on

the

R2

000

Stra

tegy

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KWS

and

KURA

, KR

B.

prov

ide

trai

nig

for

agen

cies

’ st

aff,

smal

l sc

ale

entr

epre

neur

s, a

rtiza

ns, e

tc. T

arge

t:

50,

100

& 2

00 a

genc

ies’

sta

ff, S

MES

and

A

rtiza

ns re

spec

tivel

y

Lead

: MO

R; Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KWS

and

KURA

, KRB

.

2.5

Prom

ote

the

use

of L

RB

tech

nolo

gies

am

ong

the

acad

emic

com

mun

ity a

s w

ell a

s, n

ew a

nd p

racti

cing

en

gine

ers

and

tech

nici

ans.

2.5.

1 LR

BA tr

aini

ng m

odul

es/

cour

ses

mai

nstr

eam

ed in

th

e re

gula

r pr

ogra

mm

es o

f te

chni

cal t

rain

ing

insti

tutio

ns.

Prov

ide

inte

rnsh

ip fo

r you

ng p

rofe

ssio

nals

on

ong

oing

pro

ject

s. T

arge

t: A

t le

ast

50

No.

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

Pa

rticipa

tion

:Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KR

B,

KIH

BT,

Uni

vers

ities

an

d Po

lyte

chni

cs.

Budg


0



OBJ

ECTI

VE

No.

4: T

O E

NSU

RE F

ULL

INTE

GRA

TIO

N O

F CR

OSS

CU

TTIN

G IS

SUES

Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

etItem

(K

ES M

illio

ns)

4.1

Mai

nstr

eam

gen

der

issu

es.

4.1.

1 Su

b-se

ctor

and

cor

pora

te

polic

ies

and

guid

elin

es o

n cr

oss

cutti

ng is

sues

in p

lace

and

ap

plie

d in

all

proj

ects

.

Faci

litat

e th

e de

velo

pmen

t an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of

sub-

sect

or

and

corp

orat

e ge

nder

pol

icie

s

Lead

: M

OR/

NCS

an

d M

OG

C&SS

Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KW

S, a

nd K

RB.

Inco

rpor

ated

CCI

req

uire

men

ts (

incl

udin

g ge

nder

eq

ualit

y)

in

oper

ation

al

and

repo

rting

sys

tem

s an

d en

sure

com

plia

nce

with

sub

-sec

tor

gend

er p

olic

ies

in R

2000

pr

ogra

mm

es.

Enco

urag

e w

omen

par

ticip

ation

thr

ough

ta

rget

ed

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

(r

evis

e co

ntra

ct

proc

edur

es

to

ensu

re

this

ha

ppen

s).

Prov

ide

cond

uciv

e w

orki

ng e

nviro

nmen

t fo

r w

omen

(sp

ecifi

c ne

eds)

. In

dica

tors

: nu

mbe

r an

d ty

pe o

f fa

ciliti

es p

rovi

ded;

fle

xibl

e w

orki

ng h

ours

.

Incl

ude

min

imum

thr

esho

ld f

or w

omen

pa

rtici

patio

n in

per

form

ance

con

trac

ts o

f ag

enci

es. T

arge

t: In

crea

se p

artic

ipati

on o

f w

omen

to a

t lea

st 3

3% in

all

wor

ks.

4.2

Mai

nstr

eam

you

th is

sues

.In

clud

e m

inim

um

thre

shol

d fo

r yo

uth

parti

cipa

tion

in p

erfo

rman

ce c

ontr

acts

of

agen

cies

. Tar

get:

Incr

ease

par

ticip

ation

of

Yout

h to

at l

east

33%

in a

ll w

orks

.

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

YAS

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KW

S, a

nd

KRB.

Enco

urag

e in

tern

ship

an

d tr

aini

ng

prog

ram

me

for t

he y

outh

. Th

ough

regu

lar

targ

eted

aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns




Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

etItem

(K

ES M

illio

ns)

4.3

Inte

grat

e an

d cr

eate

HIV

/A

IDS

awar

enes

sEn

hanc

e im

plem

enta

tion

and

com

plia

nce

of H

IV/A

IDS

prev

entio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t m

easu

res

acro

ss

the

boar

d;

both

fo

r em

ploy

ees

and

the

com

mun

ity.

Incl

ude

cont

rol m

easu

res.

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

H;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KW

S, a

nd

KRB.

Inco

rpor

ate

prev

entio

n an

d &

m

anag

emen

t of

HIV

/AID

S in

con

trac

tual

an

d op

erati

onal

doc

umen

ts a

s w

ell

as

repo

rting

sys

tem

s.

Enco

urag

e cr

oss-

sect

oral

app

roac

h an

d co

llabo

ratio

n w

ith o

ther

age

ncie

s.

4.4

Mai

nstr

eam

PLW

D is

sues

in

LRB

wor

ksSu

b-se

ctor

an

d co

rpor

ate

polic

ies

and

guid

elin

es

in

plac

e an

d ap

plie

d in

al

l pr

ojec

ts.

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

CG&

SS; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KW

S an

d KR

B.

Inco

rpor

ate

the

righ

ts

of

PLW

D

in

cont

ract

ual

and

oper

ation

al d

ocum

ents

as

wel

l as

in re

porti

ng s

yste

ms.

Ensu

re

the

inco

rpor

ation

of

ne

eds

of

PLW

D in

road

des

igns

.

Impr

ove

mon

itori

ng o

f th

e pa

rtici

patio

n an

d fa

cilit

ation

of

PLW

D i

n ro

ad w

orks

th

roug

h re

gula

r aw

aren

ess

cam

paig

ns &

m

eetin

gs o

n pr

ojec

ts.

Enco

urag

e PL

WD

pa

rtici

patio

n th

roug

h ta

rget

ed

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

an

d pr

ovid

e a

cond

uciv

e w

orki

ng e

nviro

nmen

t to

in

crea

se

thei

r pa

rtici

patio

n.

Targ

et:

2.5%

PL

WD

pa

rtici

patio

n on

R2

000

proj

ects



Strategy

Acti

vities

Out

put t

arge

ts a

nd In

dica

tors

of S

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibility

Budg

etItem

(K

ES M

illio

ns)

4.5

Inte

grat

e En

viro

nmen

tal

and

Soci

al Is

sues

Ensu

re c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith E

MCA

in a

ll Ro

ads

2000

pro

ject

s.Le

ad:

MO

R an

d N

EMA

; Pa

rticipa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KW

S an

d KR

B

4.6

Enfo

rce

Labo

ur la

ws

and

regu

latio

nsIn

corp

orat

e re

leva

nt p

arts

of

the

labo

ur

law

in p

roje

ct a

nd c

ontr

actu

al d

ocum

ents

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

L;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KW

S an

d KR

B

4.7

Ensu

re C

omm

unity

/

stak

ehol

der

parti

cipa

tion.

Esta

blis

h pl

atfor

m f

or c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith

clea

r su

b-se

ctor

pol

i cy

and

guid

elin

es o

f en

gage

men

t.

Lead

: MO

R; Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KW

S an

d KR

B.

Esta

blis

h m

echa

nism

s fo

r co

llabo

ratin

g w

ith o

ther

age

ncie

s inv

olve

d in

com

mun

ity

wor

ks.

4.8

Obs

erve

Occ

upati

onal

H

ealth

and

Saf

ety

requ

irem

ents

.

Iden

tify

appr

opri

ate

safe

ty a

nd h

ealth

re

quire

men

ts fo

r th

e ro

ad c

onst

ructi

on

sect

or a

nd d

evel

op a

nd in

trod

uce

impl

emen

tatio

n gu

idel

ines

and

br

ochu

res.

Lead

: M

OR

and

MO

T&I;

Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KW

S an

d KR

B

4.9

Crea

te R

oad

Safe

ty

Aw

aren

ess.

Crea

te a

war

enes

s in

road

saf

ety

in

the

loca

l com

mun

ity th

ough

pub

lic

awar

enes

s ca

mpa

igns

.

Lead

: MO

R; Participa

tion

: Ke

NH

A,

KeRR

A,

KURA

, KW

S an

d KR

B.

esta

blis

h a

mec

hani

sm f

or c

olla

bora

ting

and

coor

dina

tion

with

ot

her

agen

cies

in

volv

ed in

road

saf

ety.

Budg


0

2,90

6

roads 2000 strategic plan 2013 – 2017 2000 strategic plan.pdf · inistry f ro ads enh ancing...

Documents