road safety in australia –the data and the challenge
DESCRIPTION
Road safety in Australia –the data and the challenge. Kym Bills Executive Director Australian Transport Safety Bureau. National Road Safety Strategy 2001-2010. Joint strategy involving all levels of government & other stakeholders endorsed by ATC in late 2000 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Road safety in Australia–the data and the challenge
Kym Bills
Executive Director
Australian Transport Safety Bureau
National Road Safety Strategy 2001-2010
●Joint strategy involving all levels of government & other stakeholders endorsed by ATC in late 2000
●Series of two-year action plans, providing a focus on priority issues
●Target a 40% reduction in the number of road deaths per 100,000 population by end 2010 (5.6 max)
Basis of target
●Based on estimated effects of known measures following a 1998 summit & Corben/Vulcan paper
●Focus on measures likely to be ‘in the pipeline’ (eg road investment, some vehicle technology) plus those feasible to implement & cost-effective
●Estimates adjusted to allow for expected increase in vehicle use, and discounted to avoid double-counting of savings
●40% challenging, but not cf 50% or ‘vision zero’
2010 target: indicative estimates of the effects of known measures
Improve the safety of roads
New technology to reduce human
error
Road user behaviour
Vehicle crashworthiness
Measuring progress●Steady progress toward the target would require a 5% reduction in
the fatality rate each year ●On that basis, the cumulative reduction by the end of May 2007
should have been 27.9%
Road deaths per 100 000 populationrolling 12 monthly data
5.6
6.6
7.6
8.6
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10
Target: 40% reduction
May 2007 target rate = 6.7 Cumulative reduction of 27.9%
5% reduction per year
Measuring progress
Road deaths per 100 000 populationrolling 12 monthly data
5.6
6.6
7.6
8.6
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10
May 2007 rate = 7.8
Cumulative reduction of 16.5%
Target: 40% reduction
May 2007 target rate = 6.7
Cumulative reduction of 27.9%
Changes in vehicle usage
●Total vehicle usage (kilometres per person) has been growing at about 0.9 of a percentage point per year–slightly faster than expected when the target was set–but not enough to explain the gap between safety outcomes
and the pro-rata target –unlikely that the changed safety trend since 2004 is a result of
a surge in total vehicle use • in fact, fuel price rises have probably moderated aggregate
exposure growth.
Changes in vehicle usage
●Truck VKT growth in line with forecast and deaths have decreased (but not in line with pro rata 40% target)
●Unforseen increase in motorcycle usage and motorcycle deaths–motorcycle deaths have increased by 36% since 1999
(22% since 2004)– the trend in motorcycle deaths accounts for about two fifths of
the current gap between the total fatality rate & pro-rata target
Was the target unrealistic?
●Two states have achieved cumulative reductions that are very close to the national pro-rata target for May 2007:–National pro-rata target: 27.9% –NSW reduction: 27.2%–SA reduction: 27.3%
– In Victoria, which started with the lowest rate among the states, the rate has dropped by 24% since December 2000
Was the target unrealistic?
●In the 12 months to May 2007, NSW and Victoria both had road death rates slightly below the national pro-rata target–National pro-rata target: 6.7 deaths per 100,000 –NSW and Victoria: 6.6 deaths per 100,000
●Victoria recorded a 31% reduction in the fatality rate in the two years to April 2004, mainly by using a robust approach to speed management
Victoria’s campaign on speeding: results
Rolling 12 month average
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Dec-98 Dec-00 Dec-02 Dec-04 Dec-06 Dec-08
Dea
th ra
te p
er 1
00 0
00 p
opul
atio
n
Victoria
Australia (excluding Victoria)
Victorian road deaths fell by 31% in the two years
to April 2004
Why are we above the national target?
●National Road Safety Action Plan for 2007 & 2008 many cost-effective measures:
–have not been implementedor–have not been implemented in all jurisdictionsor–have not been implemented on a sufficient scale
●The target was an estimate of what could be achieved not a forecast of what would be
Is the national target still within range?
Road deaths per 100 000 populationrolling 12 monthly data
5.6
6.6
7.6
8.6
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10
May 2007 rate = 7.8
Cumulative reduction of 16.5% in 6 years 5 months
May 2007 target rate = 6.7
Cumulative reduction of 27.9%
Reduction now required to meet target: 28% in 3 years 7 months
●Average annual percentage reduction to meet targetover 10 years: 5.0%
●Average annual percentage reduction to May 2007:2.8%
●Average annual percentage reduction required from now to 2010:8.8%
● Total percentage reduction required from now to 2010: 28%
Is the national target still in range?
“If I wanted to get to there, I wouldn’t start from here.”
The challenge
●On average, 31 people die on Australia’s roads every week
●More than 10 times as many people are seriously injured
●These numbers could be much lower
●Many available options for improving safety would result in a net economic benefit
●We would probably have a more efficient and reliable road transport system with reduced greenhouse emissions and noxious emissions
●We have the outcomes that we have because, as a society, we have made certain choices.