rm style and culture: setting and running equitable

17
BARBARA HERWEG, RMP WITS COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE RM Style and Culture: Setting and running equitable partnerships

Upload: others

Post on 01-Feb-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

BARBARA HERWEG, RMP

WITS COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE

RM Style and Culture:

Setting and running equitable partnerships

Traditional Research paradigm

Harburg, Ernest. (1966). Research Map. American Scientist, 54, 470.

• Lone activity• Technical expert• Hypothesis• Testing• Trouble shooting• Publication• Reporting• Do you see yourself

here?

Challenges arising from this

Harburg, Ernest. (1966). Research Map. American Scientist, 54, 470.

• Technical excellence• Multi:• Disciplinary,

Institutional, National• Contract Research & Governance• Intellectual Property• Skills development• Ethics & Integrity• Impact/ Diversity/

Gender/ Stakeholder/ Equitability• Or is this more like your reality?

Challenges arising from this

Harburg, Ernest. (1966). Research Map. American Scientist, 54, 470.

• Technical excellence• Multi:• Disciplinary,

Institutional, National• Contract Research & Governance• Intellectual Property• Skills development• Ethics & Integrity• Impact/ Diversity/

Gender/ Stakeholder/ Equitability• Or is this more like your reality?

Partner context

Ideally use pre-existing relationships

(co-supervision; International or Strategic Partnerships office;

bilaterals,

regional networks and

Alliances

Identify researchers with common research goals –

identify opportunities to exchange staff and cross-pollinate ideas

Understand their strengths and how to leverage this and their weaknesses and how to support them with these

Pre Award Considerations

• Who is involved and to what extent of time commitment?

• Will you involve students?

• What will they do?

• Where will they work?

• Are there equipment needs?

• How will procurement affect the research schedule?

• Is travel consistent with the grant purposes?

• Are there partners or consultant issues to be addressed?

• Is the budget requested consistent with the scope of work?

Also…. Cost vs Price

Charge-outs/ cost to company

Once you know funder requirements, structure budget accordingly

Also consider your institution’s internal budgeting policy

Building in overheads and administrative costs

Business development costs

Legal costs

Co-funding

VAT, duties, withholding tax, etc

Inflation

Bank charges

Exchange rates

Audits

Contingency

Alignment of payment terms with

deliverables

Specifying payment terms

Procurement processes

Be aware of time lag for large

purchases and for commissioning

and training of big pieces of equipment esp imported items

Conflict can arise from

Competing understanding of funder

requirements

Between institutional partners

Between Technical & Research Managers

Mismatch between funder & institutional

requirements

Stakeholder requirements

Additional challenges

Language

Not having a common language

Variation of use of language

Time zones

Culture around time

Teams with diverse cultural backgrounds

Different technical disciplines

Different skill level

Application of Organisational Culture Theory

to Research Management

Project characteristics

Project size by budget, team size

Team Dispersion

Leadership style

Leader absorptive capacity

And the effects on

Team trust

Governance awareness

Risk

Project success

Application of Organisational Culture Criteria

to Research Management

Large projects with a high budget and large project teams benefit from

technical team leaders that have:

Transparent communication

Absorptive capacity

Teams reflect more trust and there is reduced risk to the project

When project leader style is transformational this is associated with higher

governance awareness and absorptive capacity

Ideal Research leader

Transformational leadership style

High absorptive capacity

High governance awareness

Increased team trust

Reduced project risk

Encourages Transparent communication

Ideal Research Manager

Support communication in the team

Support governance awareness

Reduce project risk

Increase team trust

How can we drive transparent communication?

Formal communications

Steering committees

Comprising of both Technical and Research managers

Sharing of information

minutes

Web page, newsletters

Research Management

Community of Practise

Not limited to Technical colleagues

Needs to include Research Managers

Networking

Equitable partnerships arise from:

Understanding the partner context

Understanding the external influencers on a project

Developing the Leadership skills of the PI

Developing the RM Professional support

Developing the PI and RM partnership

Building networks – Community of Practise

BARBARA HERWEG, RMP

[email protected]

Thank you