rm due to magnetic fields in the cosmic web and ska observations takuya akahori a krcf fellow @ kasi...
TRANSCRIPT
RM due to magnetic fields in the cosmic web and SKA observations
Takuya AkahoriA KRCF fellow @ KASI (-2012.9)A JSPS fellow @ Sydney U. (2012.10-)
2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
References:TA, Ryu (2010), ApJ, 723, 476TA, Ryu (2011), ApJ, 738, 134TA, et al. submitted x2
1/16
Collaborators: D. Ryu, J. Kim , B. G. Gaensler, K. Takahashi, K. KumazakiSpecial thanks: J. Stil, S. A. Mao, X. Sun, M. Machida
Magnetic Fields in the Cosmic Web(Inter-Galactic Magnetic Field, IGMF)
2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
3oo Mpc
©4D2U, NAOJ
2/16
GCs
sheet & void
Groups&
WHIM
Piro+ 07IG
MFFa
raday Rotation
Residual RM, RRM (observed RM-Galactic RM)7-15 [rad/m2] RRM deviation tends to be larger for higher redshift
extragalactic sources (e.g., Kronberg+ 08; Hammond 11)RMs through superclusters in nearby universe
9-60 [rad/m2] RM enhancements in Hercules and Perseus-Pisces (but very tentative, see Xu+ 06)
Cluster outskirts observations<50 [rad/m2] RM deviation at cluster outskirts (e.g., Govoni+ 10)
Observational Implications of RMIGMF
2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
Govoni+ (10)
RMIGMF~O(1-10) [rad/m2]in filaments?3Mpc 4Mpc 5Mpc …
RM~O(100) [rad/m2] in GCs |B|~O(1) µG
3/16
Estimations from LSS formation simulationsHD and MHD (e.g., Ryu+ 98; Dubois & Teyssier 08; Cho & Ryu 09;
Dolag & Stasyszyn 09; Stasyszyn+ 10)
IGMF based on MHD turbulence<(ρB)2>1/2/<ρ2>1/2 ∼ a few × 100 nG (note: <B> ∼ 10 nG) Coherent length, Lint/L0~1/15
Theoretical Estimations of RMIGMF
2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
Cho+ (09) Cho & Ryu (09)
10-4μG |B| 10μG
100 h-1 Mpc
RMIGMF~O(1) [rad/m2] in a filament?
Ryu+ (08)
4/16
Questions:What’s the nature of RM due to turbulent-amplified IGMF?Can we discover (and test) them with latest/future observations such
as SKA and its pathfinders?To answer these questions, we calculate RM
maps using a model of the IGMF by Ryu+ (08)
Calculations of RMIGMF
2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
ne [cm-3], B|| [μG], l [kpc]
RM Map
5/16
2D RM map & 1D RM profile100 (GCs), ~10 (GGs), ~1 (filaments) [rad/m2]RM behaves like a random walk with the scale ~ several x 100 [kpc]
RM at the density peak mostly contributes to the accumulated RM
Result: Local Universe (1/2)2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
2.0
1.0
0.0
-
1.0
-2.0
Log10 |RM| [rad m-2]
-10 -5 0 5 10[Mpc/h]
TA, Ryu (2010), ApJ, 723, 476
6/16
T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
Statistics of RMs for LoSs with Tx = 105-7 KProbability Distribution Function (PDF)Log-normal Root mean square value <RM>rms~1.4 [rad/m2]PRM(k)~PB||,proj(k), LB~1 Mpc ~Lcrl/4 in the linear growth
stage
Result: Local Universe (2/2)2012.8.20-23
TA, Ryu (2010), ApJ, 723, 476
↓Lcrl
↓LB
48 runsaverage of thembest-fit lognormal
7/16
Simple estimation of RMIGMF RM~1 [rad/m2] for a filament in a local universeRM ∝ √N since an accumulation of RM is a random walk processIf N from the path length N~100 [Mpc] / 10 [Mpc] ~10 1×√10 ~3.2 [rad/m2]If N from the column density N~2×10-3 [Mpc/cm3] / 5×10-5 [Mpc/cm3] ~40 1×√40 ~6.3 [rad/m2]IGMF in the WHIM range increases with z by a factor of ~2 (Ryu+
08)
Calculation 2: Cosmological Contribution
2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
path length (dashed) and column density (solid) across the WHIM
RMIGMF~several-10 [rad/m2] through
filaments?
8/16
Result: Cosmological Contribution (1/2)
2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
※Galaxy Cluster Subtraction CLS:ALL – grids (1 Mpc around Tx > 2 keV) TM7:ALL – grids (T > 107 K) TS8:ALL – pixels (Tx* > 107 K & Sx*>10-8 erg/s/cm2/sr) TS0:ALL – pixels (Tx* > 107 K & Sx*>10-10 erg/s/cm2/sr)
Integration of RMIGMFRM behaves like a random walk <RM>rms~7-10 [rad/m2] through
filaments
TA, Ryu (2011), ApJ, 738, 134
200 runaverage
9/16
Statistics of RMs for LoSs through filamentsSF2 is flat at >0.2° with 100-200 [rad2/m4]
Result: Cosmological Contribution (2/2)
2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
South Pole ●:Mao+ (10) WSRT+ACTA ー: Stil+ (11) NVSS(VLA)
North Pole ◯:Mao+ (10) WSRT+ACTA ー: Stil+ (11) NVSS(VLA)
Our Predictions Color: Akahori, Ryu (2011)
TA, Ryu (2011), ApJ, 738, 134
200 runaverage
10/16
RMIGMF in filaments would be 1-10
[rad/m2] RMrms~1.4 [rad/m2] in the local universe
RMrms~7-10 [rad/m2] up to z=5
It would have characteristic structuresA peak scale of 1 Mpc for RMs in the local universeA flat SF at Θ>0.2º for RMs up to z=5
Next questions:How much is the Galactic Foreground?How can we find (and test) the RMIGMF?
Summary of the points so far2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing 11/16
Toward the poles, turbulent magnetic field is predominant. Its precise modeling is importantAmplitudes of regular and turbulent fields should be related each other,
depending on rms Mach number of turbulence and plasma β
Analytic + MHD turbulence model (Akahori+)SF is <100 [rad2/m4] at 10° scale toward the polesThe slope is much steeper that the observed ones at Θ<~1ºObserved RMs would contain significant contributions at small angular
scales from local structure, intrinsic RM, and/or the IGMF!
Furure (1/3): Galactic Foreground2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
TA, Ryu, Kim, Gaensler, submitted
12/16
The Square Kilometer ArrayUltra-wide band & ultra-dense RM grid“Cosmic Magnetism” is one of the five key
science projects
Furure (1/3): Dense RM Grid!!2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
Previous
Pathfinders SKA
Observational uncertainty [rad m-2]
10 1 0.1
Average separation of sources [deg]
1 0.1 0.01
0.1 1 10
Θ [degree]
S [
rad
2 m
-4]
10
100
ASKAP 30 deg2
0.1 1 10
Θ [degree]
SKA 30 deg2
TA+ in prep.
previous
13/16
IGMF + GMF IGMF + GMF
Faraday Tomography (RM Synthesis)What is the best target, and what is the necessary
dataset for the IGMF study?
Furure (2/3): Faraday Tomography2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
0.01 0.1 1 10
λ2 [m2]
P[mJy]=Q+iU
Polarized intensity
IGMF
GMF
Intrinsic
F[mJy]
0 20 40
φ [rad/m2]
ModelFaraday Disp. Func.
TA, Kumazaki, Takahashi, Ryu, submitted
Reconstructed Faraday Disp. Func.
0 20 40
φ [rad/m2]
Faraday Tomography
F[mJy]LOFAR+GMRT+ASKAP
~F[mJy]SKA
~
14/16
RRM or high-pass filter in Fourier-spaceHow can we treat unevenly sampled data?
What is the necessary dataset for IGMF studies?
Furure (3/3): Image Processing2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
TA+ in prep.
Fourier transformation of RM map
Chop the large-scale power in Fourier space
Inverse Fourier transformation
IGMF + GMF IGMF onlyHigh-pass filtered
15/16
Summary2012.8.20-23T. Akahori, IAU-GA2012-SpS4@Beijing
RM due to turbulent-driven IGMF in filamentsLocal universeRMrms~1.4 [rad/m2], lognormal1 Mpc scale
Cosmological contributionRMrms~7-10 [rad/m2], lognormal0.1-0.2º scale & flat SF at
Θ>0.2º
FuturePrecise modeling of Milky WayRM Synthesis & Image processingTests with SKA & its pathfinders!
16/16