r.m. balen pharmd 2004 1 - vhpharmsci.com · use internet-based strategies for keeping up with...
TRANSCRIPT
R.M. Balen PharmD 2004 1
Tips For Evaluating & Keeping Up With The Healthcare Literature
Robert M. Balen BSc(Pharm), PharmDInformatics Coordinator CSU Pharmaceutical SciencesVancouver General HospitalEmail: [email protected]
Background
� Information explosion� Technology → more information for less effort� Rapidly available information affects decision making� > 50% time spent gathering sharing analyzing seeking info� Excess information can be a barrier to finding what you need� Published health information growing beyond manageable level
Ref: Young KM. Informatics for Healthcare Professionals. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Co; 2000
Goals
� Awareness of most common published study types � Familiarity with process for literature evaluation
� Meta-analysis� Randomized controlled trials
� Access the “right amount” of information� Minimize your NNR (Number Needed To Read)*� Use Internet-based strategies for keeping up with literature
* Ref: Identifying Diagnostic Studies in MEDLINE: Reducing the Number Needed to Read
Lucas M. Bachmann, Reto Coray, Pius Estermann, and Gerben ter Riet J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9: 653-658.
Objectives
� Adopt a literature evaluation approach for� Meta-analysis� Randomized controlled trials
� Use the available technology to help you� Subscribe to an eTOC of a professional journal � Identify 2 Internet-based strategies for staying current:
� new literature from publications that do not offer eTOC � with new literature from a “Therapeutic Topic” perspective
Case of the Very Busy Pharmacist
� Pharmacist � Very very busy� Good clinical skills � Good knowledge base� No personal professional journal subscriptions� Department subscriptions to some pharmacy literature
� Problem: How to keep up with healthcare literature? Hundreds of Hits!
R.M. Balen PharmD 2004 2
•You can’t read everything
•growing stacks of unread material can be debilitating,depressing, & paralyzing
•Develop strategies to prioritize what youbrowse/read … or risk burial
•Aspire for "appropriate balance" …
•Avoid getting overwhelmed •Be a browser•Concentrate on spotting the one or two items you need to know
Tips Borrowed From The Web•Use your e-mail client to get organized
•Time is the resource we must trade off to keep up and there is no certain payoff, if done cautiously, wisely, and with a clear strategy, there is no limit to what might be gained. http://www.ala.org/acrl/keepup.html
The Keeping Up Philosophy
Know The 5 “Rights” Of Information
1. Right information2. Right person3. Right time4. Right place5. Right amount
� “Technology promises more information for less effort”� “Excess information … a barrier to finding what you need”
TIP: Admit You Could Use Some Help
Information Management Overview
“Pharmacist as Information Manager”
Dr. P. Loewenhttp://www.vhpharmsci.com/PresentationIndex.htm
Challenges
� MEDLINE 10,000 citations added weekly� PubMed, EMBASE, IPA� Government agencies� Medical societies� Popular press
� Increasing use of internet by general public� Increasingly informed healthcare consumer� Competing demands on time� Evidence-Based Practice
Major Study Types
� Case-control studies� Cohort studies� Randomized clinical trials� Meta-analysis
Reigelman RK. Studying a study and testing A test. How to read the medical evidenceLippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 4th edition (January 15, 2000)
R.M. Balen PharmD 2004 3
Case Control Studies
� Cases� Individuals who developed disease
� Controls� Individuals who have not developed disease
� Begin after development or failure of disease development� Back in time to determine characteristics
� E.g. association between birth control pill (bcp) and stroke
Reigelman RK. Studying a study and testing A test. How to read the medical evidenceLippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 4th edition (January 15, 2000)
Case Control Studies Example
Assignments� Study group (cases) - Females who had stroke� Controls – similar subjects with no strokeAssessment� Each woman's exposure to bcpAnalysis� Odds of stroke in each groupInterpretation� Draw conclusions about meaning of bcp use in these womenExtrapolation� Conclusions about other women taking bcp e.g. lower doses
Reigelman RK. Studying a study and testing A test. How to read the medical evidenceLippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 4th edition (January 15, 2000)
Cohort Studies
� Cohort = group who share a common experience� Identify subjects before disease development� Identify cohort that possesses study characteristic� Identify cohort not possessing study characteristic� Compare frequency of disease in both groups� Eg. Relationship between bcp and stroke
Cohort Study Example
Assignments� Select group of women using bcp� Select similar group of women not using bcpAssessment� Observe both groups for stroke developmentAnalysis� Odds of stroke in women using vs not using bcpInterpretation� Draw conclusions about meaning of bcp use in these womenExtrapolation� Conclusions about other women taking bcp e.g. lower doses
Reigelman RK. Studying a study and testing A test. How to read the medical evidenceLippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 4th edition (January 15, 2000)
R.M. Balen PharmD 2004 4
Randomized Clinical Trial
� Randomization� Method of assigning to groups
� Equal chance of assignment to study or control group
� Blinding� Single or double blind
� E.g. Effect of bcp use on stroke
Randomized Clinical Trial ExampleAssignments� Randomized blinded assignment
� Study group - using bcp� Control group – no bcp
Assessment� Observe both groups for stroke developmentAnalysis� Probability of developing stroke in study groupInterpretation� Draw conclusions about meaning of bcp use in these womenExtrapolation� Conclusions about other women taking bcp e.g. lower doses
Reigelman RK. Studying a study and testing A test. How to read the medical evidenceLippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 4th edition (January 15, 2000)
R.M. Balen PharmD 2004 5
Meta-analyses
� Review of all relevant studies on specific topic� Predetermined review methods
� Systematic:� Identification� Appraisal� Synthesis� Statistical aggregation
Cook DJ et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomizedControlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999; 354: 1896 - 900
Study Types: Strengths
� Case-control� Rare conditions� Few subjects needed
� Cohort� Greater evidence of characteristic preceding disease
� Randomized clinical trial� Helps ensure study characteristic produces result
� Meta-analyses � Aggregation of results from smaller trials Levels of Evidence
http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp#levels
Evaluating The Healthcare Literature: Interventional Studies
� Why� Clear purpose?
� How� Study design
� Randomized / blinded?
� Who� Study population� Group differences� Inclusion exclusion criteria
http://www.familypractice.ubc.ca/residency/educritap.htm
Evaluating The Healthcare Literature: Interventional Studies cont.
� What� Compliance� Outcome measures� Interventions clearly defined � Subject withdrawal and follow-up
� How many� Statistical tests� Statistical significance
� So what� Clinical significance
http://www.familypractice.ubc.ca/residency/educritap.htm
R.M. Balen PharmD 2004 6
Evaluating The Healthcare Literature: Meta-analysis
http://www.consort-statement.org/QUOROM.pdf
Yikes! How do I keep up with all this stuff
TIP: Invest in “Informatics”
� Skills� Information management� Computer competency
� Software� Searching� Storage
� Resources� Hardware� Software� Enabling tools
� Time
What to Read TIP:Distinguish “Need vs. Nice” to Know Info
� Need to Know� Literature that may affect practice� You prioritize
� Nice to Know� Everything else
� Interesting “peripheral” articles� Popular press� Regulatory news
� Easy to find with current search technology� Google / PubMed / Ovid / Medscape / MD Consult
TIP: Select Your “CORE” Sources
� High circulation journals� High return on time investment� Priority list for your area of practice� Ditch the “throw aways”
“Regular perusal of a small set of well-chosen journals is probably the mosteffective way for a scientist to maintain a reasonable level of current awareness in a rapidly proliferating field of research.”
Ref: http://www.mds.qmul.ac.uk/lib/bmedsci/keepup/journals.htm
R.M. Balen PharmD 2004 7
TIP: Scan Your Core Sources Regularly
� Develop a literature scanning habit� Select relevant articles to read
� Triage� Abstract
� Would valid results affect your practice� Original articles� Review articles
� familiarity with new topics
� Critical appraisal
TIP: Push and Pull
� Push � Automatic delivery of information
� Electronic Table of Contents (eTOC)� Amedeo
� Pull� Active retrieval of information
� PubMed Cubby� Focused searching
“Pushing takes less effort”
Electronic Table of Contents (eTOC)
Subscribe eTOC
http://www.theannals.com/
eTOCAnnals of Pharmacotherapy
www.amedeo.com
Amedeo:Journal Options – Critical Care
R.M. Balen PharmD 2004 8
Amedeo (www.amedeo.com): Specific Content from Various Journals
Personal Web Page
www.pharmacistsletter.com/
Warning:Maintain Control of Your Inbox
FoldersFiltersRules
PubMed Cubby
� Cubby to store and rerun searches� Journal search in PubMed� Store & rerun searches
� Rerun periodically for new citations
� Very useful for:� Journals without eTOC service� Clinical topic searches
� Registration required� Free
R.M. Balen PharmD 2004 9
Cubby Link
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed Activate a Cubby Account
Stored Journal Search
Re-run for updates
Tip: Minimize Your NNR
� Invest time in scanning� Triage
� Original articles� Valid and clinically applicable� Scan of abstract and methods section� Review articles - familiarity with new topics
Pick an “Impact” Article to Read
NEJMVolume 347:1549-1556 November 14, 2002 Number 20 Dexamethasone in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis
“prospective, randomized, double-blind”
Conclusions: Early treatment with dexamethasoneimproves the outcome in adults with acute bacterial meningitis and does not increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.
Case: Critical Care Pharmacist
eTOC� Annals Pharmacotherapy� NEJM� JAMA� CHEST� Am J Resp Crit Care Med� Critical Care Med
PubMed Cubby � AJHP� Pharmacotherapy� Lancet
Scanning
EBP – Focused Clinical Question & Search
R.M. Balen PharmD 2004 10
Other Options:
Allied Journal Club: http://www.alliedjournalclub.com/
Medscape: http://www.medscape.com/
Ingenta: http://www.ingenta.com/
Highwire: http://highwire.stanford.edu/
Theheart.org http://www.theheart.org/index.cfm
MDConsult: http://www.mdconsult.com/
Summary
� Select sources� Use technology � Spend time scanning� Form a literature scanning habit� Access right amount of information� Separate need to know from nice to know� Read the “impact” articles� Critical evaluation
Tips For Evaluating & Keeping Up With The Healthcare Literature
Robert M. Balen BSc(Pharm), PharmDInformatics Coordinator CSU Pharmaceutical SciencesVancouver General HospitalEmail: [email protected]
Questions…