rit 101: understanding scores from map

19
Steven L. Wise Senior Research Fellow RIT 101: Understanding Scores from MAP

Upload: nwea

Post on 02-Jul-2015

2.027 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

RIT 101 Gage Kingsbury & Steve Wise, Senior Resource Fellows, NWEA Fusion 2012, the NWEA summer conference in Portland, Oregon It’s easy to say that the RIT scale is an equal-interval scale, but not as easy to back it up. This session will provide a conceptual review of the RIT scale and its characteristics and help to answer these questions: What is a RIT? What is a Rasch model? Why isn’t the number of correct answers used as the score? How are scores compared if students take different test items? Does a 200 RIT score from a third-grader mean the same thing as a 200 from an eighth grader? Learning outcome: - Gain a deeper understanding of the Rasch model. Audience: - New data user - Experienced data user - Advanced data user - District leadership - Curriculum and Instruction

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

Steven L. Wise

Senior Research Fellow

RIT 101: Understanding

Scores from MAP

Page 2: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

• Unique features of the RIT scales

• Calibrating items for MAP

• The RIT scale and adaptive testing

• Scoring a test

• Interpretation of scores

RIT 101

2

Page 3: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

• Equal Interval

• Cross Graded

• Stable over time

• Allows us to assess change (growth) over time

• Allows us to develop item banks

• Allows us to give tests specific to student needs

Unique Features of RIT Scales

3

Page 4: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

• The RIT scale is the platform upon which both new items are calibrated, a test is chosen for a student and a student’s score is computed and interpreted.

• MAP is a computerized adaptive test (CAT), which means that each student receives a test that is tailored to his/her level of proficiency.

How do we use the RIT scale?

4

Page 5: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

• Item calibration is the process by which we figure out how difficult an item is.

• This is extremely useful in both building an item bank and administering a CAT

• Based on item response theory—specifically, the Rasch model.

– Specifies the relationship between a student’s proficiency level and his/her chances of passing the item.

Item Calibration

5

Page 6: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

• Some items are more difficult than others.

• We figure out an item’s difficulty by field testing it during live test events.

• We then consider how many students got the item right relative to their standing on the RIT scale.

How do we decide a new item’s difficulty?

6

Page 7: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

A Basic Math Item: 5 + 5 = ?

7

0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0

120 170 220 270

RIT

Pro

po

rtio

nC

orr

ec

t

Page 8: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

Fitting a Rasch Curve

8

0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0

120 170 220 270

RIT

Pro

po

rtio

nC

orr

ec

t

Page 9: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

Item Difficulty: the RIT value at which we expect half of the students to pass the item.

9

0.0

0.10.2

0.3

0.40.5

0.6

0.7

0.80.9

1.0

120 170 220 270

RIT

Pro

po

rtio

nC

orr

ect

Difficulty = 170

Page 10: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

• Once an item has been calibrated, it (along with its difficulty) will be added to the MAP item bank.

• MAP banks contain thousands of test items.

• Large item banks are essential for using CAT.

The Item Bank

10

Page 11: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

• The scoring of a student’s test under the Raschmodel takes into account two things:

– how difficult the items were the student received

– how she did on those items

• A standard method of scoring is called “maximum likelihood”

– This just means, “What is the most likely RIT score for a student who performed as she did on the items she received?”

• Conceptually, this is not as complicated as it sounds.

Scoring a Test

11

Page 12: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

A One-item Test

12

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

Pro

po

rtio

n C

orr

ect

RIT

If this item was passed, what are the most likely values of the student’s RIT?

What are the least likely values?

Page 13: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

A Two-item Test

13

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

Pro

po

rtio

n C

orr

ect

RIT

What if the Blue item was passed and the Red Item was failed?

Page 14: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

A Three-item Test

14

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

Pro

po

rtio

n C

orr

ect

RIT

What if the Blue and Green items were passed and the Red Item was failed?

Page 15: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

• Notice that item difficulty and student scores are on the same scale (RIT).

• The best measurement occurs when students are given items whose difficulties are well matched to their proficiency levels.

• This is what a CAT does. It tailors the test to each student by adjusting item difficulty.

• Result: all students can be measured with equal precision.

Maximum Likelihood Scoring and CAT

15

Page 16: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

1. Pick an item of appropriate starting difficulty.

2. The item is presented & answered by the student.

3. If answer is right, choose a harder item to give next. If answer is wrong, choose an easier item to give next.

4. Repeat steps 2 & 3 until enough items have been given.

5. Calculate the student’s RIT score.

How a CAT Works

16

Page 17: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

• How is a student’s RIT score interpreted?

• A RIT score in math of, say 221, by itself is not interpretable.

• We need to have one or more reference points to interpret a score.

Interpreting a RIT Score

17

Page 18: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

• Normative: Shauna’s 221 is at the 62nd percentile relative to other 5th grade students.

• Growth: She has gained 13 RIT points since fall MAP testing. Typical growth for students starting at the same level was 9 points.

• Predictive: Her score indicates that she is on track to being college ready by the 12th grade.

• Content: DesCartes provides information about which skills Shauna is currently ready to learn.

Reference Points for a Spring RIT Score of 221 in Math

18

Page 19: RIT 101: Understanding Scores From MAP

[email protected]

Thank you for your attention.