risk assessment

81
Dr. Sa’ari ESC 5714

Upload: claymoar-han

Post on 07-May-2015

1.500 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

From Professor Sa'ari Bin Mustapha's class on Risk Assessment and EIA. Postgraduate class.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Risk assessment

Dr. Sa’ari

ESC 5714

Page 2: Risk assessment

Prescribed activities:

e.g.:

i) Agriculture – covering area 500 hectares

ii) Power generation & transmission - >10 megawatts

iii) Quarries – within 3km of residential or commercial or industrial area

iv) Industry – for products > 100 tonnes/day

v) Housing 50 hectaresvi) Petroleumvii) airportviii) Land reclamationix) Fisheries – increase 50% or more

landing facility/yrx) Infrastructure

RISK ASSESSMENT IS REQUIRED IN SOME EIA REPORTS

Page 3: Risk assessment

HAZARD

Page 4: Risk assessment
Page 5: Risk assessment
Page 6: Risk assessment

What are hazards?

IChemE

1)

Page 7: Risk assessment
Page 8: Risk assessment

Hazards Hazards effect

Page 9: Risk assessment

Answer

Page 10: Risk assessment

2) What are hazards entering for sewer?

Hazards Hazards effect

Page 11: Risk assessment

Answer

Page 12: Risk assessment

MIC releaseBhopal

LPG explosionMexico

Cynide release

Nigeria Pipeline

Lagos munitions explosion

Page 13: Risk assessment

Prepare For Risk?

Page 14: Risk assessment

1) Malaysia: Environmental quality (prescribed activities)(environmental impact assessment) order 1987

Recommended risk 10-6 fatality/year

2) Ecological risk assessment 1991

evaluate the likely-hood that adverse ecological effect may occur oroccurring as a result of exposure to one or more stressor

Page 15: Risk assessment

Stressor

Any physical, chemical or biological entity that can

induce adverse response.

Receptor

A plant, animal, community of organisms, or

ecosystem that is exposed to stressors in environment.

Risk = Exposure x Effect

Exposure is the interaction of stressors with receptors.Measures of exposure can include concentrations of contaminants orphysical habitat.Effects is measured from the changes in the nature and magnitudeof effects as exposure changes.

Page 16: Risk assessment

ExposureExposure1) Duration1) Duration2) Frequency2) Frequency3) Dose (Concentration) or Magnitude(force, pressure or damage)3) Dose (Concentration) or Magnitude(force, pressure or damage)

Effect( or consequence)Effect( or consequence)1)1) Health Health 2)2) EcosystemEcosystem3)3) Property ( or quality of life)Property ( or quality of life)

RiskRisk1)1) Casualty (ill or fatality)Casualty (ill or fatality)2)2) Damage ( cost or lost e.g.RM/hectare) Damage ( cost or lost e.g.RM/hectare) 3)3) Price or standard of living (decrease or increase)Price or standard of living (decrease or increase)

Page 17: Risk assessment

Risk is expressed in three ways:

1) Qualitatively for example high, medium, intolerable and acceptable ;

2) Semi-quantitatively based on likelihood and consequence but then it ranked one against other e.g. major, intermediate and low risks;

3) Quantitatively by calculating the likelihood (frequency) and the potential consequence of event. The result is presented in form of figure e.g. fatality/year.

RISK EXPRESSION

Page 18: Risk assessment

An example of Qualitative Risk Assessment

Intolerable region Risk cannot be justifiedon any ground (except in extraordinary circumstances)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tolerable region Tolerable region ifrisk reduction is notreasonable or its cost is not proportional tothe improvement gained.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Acceptable region Broadly acceptable region

Page 19: Risk assessment

Summarised from Higson (1998). Diagram adapted from HSE. Reference VRJ Individual Risk Criteria for Critical exposed group

Intolerable Risk cannot justified on any ground: 10-4 fatlity/year

Tolerable Only reduction is impracticle or if cost is grossly disproportionate tothe improvement gained : 10-5 fatlity/year

TolerableIf the cost of reduction would exceed the improvement gained: 10-6 fatlity/year

Negligible risk10-7fatlity/year

Trivial risk

An example of Qualitative Risk Assessment

NOTE: Acceptable industrial risk by DOE and DOSH in Malaysia 10-6 fatlity/year

Page 20: Risk assessment

An example of Semi-Qualitative Risk Assessment

Risk is grading into A, B and C

Page 21: Risk assessment

HAZARD EFFECT X PROBABILITY=RISK

Risk is grading into:High, Medium and Low

Page 22: Risk assessment

GUIDELINES

High x High = High

High x Medium or Medium x High = High

High x Low or Low x High = Medium

Medium x Medium = Medium

Medium x Low or Low x Medium = Medium

Low x Low = Low

Page 23: Risk assessment

Example

GRASS CUTTING

Page 24: Risk assessment

Minimise risk Residual risk1) Wearing stout boots or

better still safety shoes2) Do not mow in the wet3) Clear lawn of stones etc.

Keep children awayWear eye protection

4) Mow away from cableInstall ELCB( earth leakage circuit breaker)

Answer NIL, NIL, L, NIL

Page 25: Risk assessment

CONCEPT OF DEVELOPMENT

• Basis for the risk estimate is usually qualitative;• However, it can be quantitative ( for either consequences

or the frequencies, or both);• For this estimation, categories for consequences and frequencies

are divided into 5 categories;• For consequences terms are: catastropic (category 5),

major(category 4), severe (category 3), significant (category 2) and minor(category 1);

• For frequencies terms are: Probable( 5), improbable(4), unlikely (3),very unlikely(2), extremely unlikely(1).

Page 26: Risk assessment

Veryunlikely

unlikely improbable probable

Catastrophic(5)

5 10 15 20 25

Major(4) 4 8 12 16 20

Severe(3) 3 6 9 12 15

Significant(2) 2 4 6 8 10

Minor(1) 1 2 3 4 5

Extremelyunlikely

RISK MATRICES(for risk criteria apply)

FREQUENCY

EFFECT

Values <10–1 can be indicated as medium and low levels of risk

Values >10-25 can be indicated as high level of risk boundary

Page 27: Risk assessment

CONCEPT OF DEVELOPMENT ( continue)

• the highest value of the risk is 25 and the lowest value is 1.

Page 28: Risk assessment

No. Hazard Hazard Effect

Frequency

Effect Risk Risk Level

Propose Mitigation

1. Chlorine leak 2 3

2. LPG Explosion

1 5

3. Contaminated sea water

3 2

4. Poor communications

3 5

5. Occurrence of tsunami

4 5

Determine hazard effect, risk level and propose suitable mitigation for the hazards,frequencies and effects ( in tabulated form) as follows:

Page 29: Risk assessment
Page 30: Risk assessment
Page 31: Risk assessment
Page 32: Risk assessment
Page 33: Risk assessment

1 (flood) Banjir

2 (shipping) Perkapalan

3 (treatment plant) Loji perawatan

4 (non point source waste) Sumber tidak berpunca

5 (Budget/finance) Bajet/keawangan

6 (Short of staff) Kekurangan kakitangan

7 (Finance allocation) Peruntukan Kewangan

Parameters of Study

Page 34: Risk assessment

Risk

Parameter

Contoh Keputusan Hasil Bengkel :Anggaran Risiko Terhadap Sumber Asli Pinggir Laut

02468

101214161820

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Kualiti PerkhidmatanKump SasaranKeadaan A Sekitar

(risk of coastal area)

Page 35: Risk assessment
Page 36: Risk assessment
Page 37: Risk assessment
Page 38: Risk assessment
Page 39: Risk assessment
Page 40: Risk assessment

•Risk is the potential for realisation of unwanted,adverse consequences to human life, health, property, or the

environment

• RISK is probability of loss and injury to people, property, orthe environment

• RISK is probability of the occurrence times the severity of harmful effect

• For accident ;

Risk = frequency (event per year) and consequence(effects/event) of a single or groupof accidents

or Risk = Probability x Severity of Consequence

Page 41: Risk assessment

Exposure of toxic chemicals cause casualty; fatality, injury and health effectExposure; Time-weight average (TWA), Lethal concentration (LC50)

RISK MEASURES is based on methodology and data

Example of RISK MEASURES

Major Accident Fatality/year or injury( ist or 2nd degree of burnair drum rupture, building burn, collapse etc)

Human Health Cases (reported) incident (rate cases)Life loss expectancy

Financial Money loss (lost)Ruin

Ecosystem Drop of population of indicator speciesLost speciesDestroy of community diversity

Page 42: Risk assessment

Risk Perception and Acceptable Risk

Voluntary risk and Involuntary RiskSmoker may accept risk of a higher risk such as smoke 100 cigarettes a day) but may not accept comparable risks imposed to them an incinerator at their backyard work in chemical plants)

Examples of voluntary risk versus risk death per person per year

smoking 20 cigarettes/day 500 x 10 10-5

car driving 17 x 1010-5

football 4 x 1010-5

Examples of Involuntary riskLeukemia 2,000 x 10 -7falling aircraft (UK) 0.5 x 10-5

Page 43: Risk assessment

AuthorityAuthority Intolerable riskIntolerable risk(per year)(per year)

negligible risknegligible risk( per year)( per year)

EPA, W AustraliaEPA, W Australia(new plant)(new plant)

1010--55 1010--66

UK HSEUK HSE(new housing)(new housing)

1010--44 1010--66

Hong KongHong Kong 1010--55 --MalaysiaMalaysia 1010--55 --

A selection of published risk criteria for population at risk

Page 44: Risk assessment

Acceptability can based on ALARPIntolerable region RISK CANNOT BE

JUSTIFIED ON ANYGROUND

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tolerable region Tolerable region ifrisk reduction is notreasonably or economically practicable andachievable

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Acceptable region

Acceptable region

Page 45: Risk assessment

Risk Assessment is a structured sequence activities.

It can be divided into 2 : Risk analysis Risk evaluation

It involves answering the following questions:

What can go wrong? (Hazard Identification) What might be the impact? (consequence analysis) What might be the causes? (causal analysis) How likely is it? (Probability analysis) What is the level of risk? (risk determination)

Page 46: Risk assessment

The process of risk assessment involves:

1)Identification of potential harmful hazards2) Measurements to estimate the consequences of the hazards3) Estimation of the probability of the occurrence of each hazard

consequence4) Quantitative calculation of risks and comparison with potentially

acceptable hazard levels5) Characterisation of the hazard risks to be managed, along with

the assumptions and uncertainties6) Ranking of the risk hazards for management decision making

Page 47: Risk assessment

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

SCENARIO IDENTIFICATION

FREQUENCY(PROBABLITY)ANALYSIS

CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS

RISK DETERMINATION

RISK AND OR HAZARD ACCEPTANCE

INPUT TO RISK MANAGEMENT

Page 48: Risk assessment
Page 49: Risk assessment

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

SCENARIO IDENTIFICATION

FREQUENCY(PROBABLITY)ANALYSIS CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS

RISK DETERMINATION

RISK AND OR HAZARD ACCEPTANCE

INPUT TO RISK MANAGEMENT

Risk assessmentflowchart

Method:e.g Checklist,Hazard Operability Study (HAZOP),

e.g leak, ignition,fire

Radiation(kW/m2),Explosion (pressure)

Acceptable risk5x10-6 fatality/y

Frequency x consequence=risk:Effected area

Historical,deductive

Historical data, Fault Tree Analysis (FTA),Event Tree Analysis (ETA

Potential adverse effect

Page 50: Risk assessment
Page 51: Risk assessment

HAZOP• The method uses guide words such as “too much’, “too little”, which can

be applied to process parameters to generate “ what if” questions such as“ What if there is too much flow”.

• Full HAZOP study is carried out by a team comprises of a cross sectionof experiences plant and lab people.A typical team might involve the following personnel:Team leaderTeam secretaryProcess engineerProject/design engineerPlant/operation managerOperatorOne or ,ore, as and when required, from: SHE expertResearch chemistControl/instrumentation engineerMaintenance/mechanical engineerOther specialist

Page 52: Risk assessment

Generating Deviation

•Meaningful deviation by coupling a guideword and parameter.•List of guidewords and generic meanings___________________________________________________Guideword Meaning___________________________________________________No (not, none) None of the design intent is achievedMore (more of, higher) Quantitative increase in a parameterLess (less of, lower) Quantitative decrease in a parameterAs well as 9more than) An additional activity occursPart of Only some design intention is achievedReverse Logical opposite of the design intention occursOther than (other) Complete substitution-another activity takes

places___________________________________________________Other useful guidewords include:Where else applicable for flows, transfers, sources and

destinationsBefore/after The step (or some part of it) is effected out

of sequenceEarly/late The timing is different from the intentionFaster/slower The step is done/not done with the right timing

Page 53: Risk assessment

Examples of meaningful combination of parameters and guidewords_______________________________________________________________Parameter Guidewords that can give a meaningful combination_______________________________________________________________Flow none, more of, less of, reverse, elsewhere, as well asTemperature Higher, lowerPressure higher, lower, reverseLevel Higher, lower, noneMixing Less, more, noneReaction Higher (rate of), lower (rate of), none, reverse, as well as/other

than , part ofPhase other, reverse, as well asComposition Part of, as well asCommunication None, part of, more of, less of, other, as well as

Page 54: Risk assessment

1)Operator need to stop operation immediately and make inspection;2)Installed low level alarm for flowrate

1)improve maintenance schedule;2)change failure parts/pump

1)–3) Filling of the slow2)LPG spilled

I)Less powerII)Pump failureIII)Valve chokedIV)Tube or connection leak

•Less•Flow•3

•Operator regulate the valve to normal position

1)Installed alarm2)install flow meter3)Inspect valve regularly

•Filling the storage tank fast

•Valve opened too far•More•Flow•2

No flowI)no powerII)valve closedIII)connection slip

NoFlow1

ActionSafeguard/protectionConsequencePossible causeDeviationParameterRef no

Page 55: Risk assessment

Video LNG SPILL

Page 56: Risk assessment
Page 57: Risk assessment

Recording Format For the Detailed Examination

Deviation Cause Consequence Action

Include number, parameter, protection (safe guard), on (person in-charge)

Minimum column

No Parameter Deviation Cause Consequence Action on

Page 58: Risk assessment

total incident flux(radiation, convection)

mass & heatdischarge

re-emitted radiationradiation to vapour

evaporation

convection ornucleate boilingto liquid

conduction

stratified hot layer

Page 59: Risk assessment

Fireball

RELEASE

Page 60: Risk assessment
Page 61: Risk assessment
Page 62: Risk assessment
Page 63: Risk assessment

Loading Bay

Bottling Plant

A LPG tank

Page 64: Risk assessment

LPG Loading

Lorry tanker LPG tank

Vapor line

Liquid line

P1

FA

Page 65: Risk assessment
Page 66: Risk assessment
Page 67: Risk assessment

LPG loading LPG loading

Page 68: Risk assessment
Page 69: Risk assessment

Hazard category Site Hazards

Source of Hazard

Nature of Hazard

Potential Consequences

Mitigation Factors Possible Escalation

Escalation Controls

1. Bullet rupture fracture, leak.

Release of LPG on-site.

LPG may become ignited by compressors pumps , trucks , switchgear room , static etc .. :Jet fire Pool/cloud fireFlash fire.

Fire detection systemGas detection systemIsolationIntrinsically safe equipment to be used.Drainage area from bullet away from site buildings.

BLEVE;Explosion;Missiles.

Automatic deluge system over bullet.

2. KLPGBTHs’pipeworks rupture , fracture , leak.

Release of LPG on-site.

LPG may become ignited by compressors, pumps, trucks, switchgear room , static etc . :Jet firePool/cloud fireFlash fire.

Fire detection systemGas detection systemIsolationIntrinsically safe equipment to be used.

If jet towards bullet;BLEVE;Explosion;Missiles.

Automatic deluge system over bullet.

3.Pump/compressor rupture, fracture, leak.

Release of LPG in compressor shed.

LPG may become ignited by compressors or pumps:Jet fireFlash fire

Fire detection systemGas detection systemIsolationDeluge systemWall betweenCompressor shed and storage bullet.

Ongoing jet fire if isolation fails.

Automatic deluge system over spheres in case wall fails.

Page 70: Risk assessment

Hazard category

Site Hazards

Source of Hazard

Nature of Hazard Potential Consequences

Mitigation Factors Possible Escalation

Escalation Controls

4. Filling equipment rupture, fracture, leak.

Release of LPG in filling hall.

LPG may become ignited by spark, static etc . :Jet fireFlash firePool/cloud fire

Fire detection systemGas detection systemIsolationIntrinsically safe equipment to be usedDeluge system (manual).

Missile (cylinder) damage if cylinders overheat.

5. LPG cylinder valve leak.

Release of LPG from cylinder.

LPG may become ignited by spark, static etc.:Jet fire

Fire detection systemGas detection systemIntrinsically safe equipment to be used.

Missile (cylinder) damage.

6. Manual Handling.

Dropped LPG cylinder. Damage to LPG cylinder with possible LPG release.

Valve protectionPossibility of automatic handling system.

Missile (cylinder) damage if LPG ignited.

7. Transportation

Truck impact to pipeworkcausing release of LPG.

LPG may become ignited by truck, static etc.:Jet firePool fire/fire cloud

Transportation/truckproceduresIsolation.

Continuing jet fire if isolation not possible.

Automatic deluge system over bullet.

Page 71: Risk assessment

Representative set of incidents(OHS, 1996)

Plant ComponentFailure Rate

Catastrophic/guillotine Partial

Vessel above ground 2.0x10-6 per year 1.0x10-6 per year

Pipework 8.8x10-7 per meter per year

8.8x10-6 per meter per year

Fittings Gasket/flange 8.8 x10-4 per yearIsolation valve 5.6 x10-6 per year

Page 72: Risk assessment

CONSEQUENSES

Page 73: Risk assessment

Effect of thermal radiation on construction

2mkW m

Thermal radiation Effect Distance

37.5

23-2525

18-2012.5

12.6

12

Spontaneous ignition of wood after long exposure. Unprotected steel will reach thermal stress temperatures which can cause failures.Non-piloted ignition of wood occurs.Cable insulation degrades.Piloted ignition of wood occurs.Thermal stress level high enough to cause structural failure. Minimum energy required for piloted ignition of wood, melting of plastic tubing.plastic melts.

286

346-360346

385-405481

488491

Page 74: Risk assessment

Buffer zones for probability of 1st. degree of burn

Page 75: Risk assessment
Page 76: Risk assessment

Lines of Defense in Process Industry

Properly Designed/maintained equipment. Control of Releases :

flares, scrubbers, surge tanks, etc

Fixed mitigation systems :fire fighting systems, dikes, drainage etc

Emergency preparedness

? Pandemic diseases,sabotage, loss of e-system,

power failure,Financial crisis etc.

?

Page 77: Risk assessment

Process value

alarm

trip

incident

Operator intervention

Safety instrument system

Active protection (e.g. relief valve)

Passive protection (e.g. bund)

Control system

Tindakbalas Kecemasan

Emergency response

Perlindungan pasif ( e.g. ‘bund’) Perlindungan aktif e.g. injap pelega)

System peralatan keseamatan

Campurtangan operator

System kawalan

mitigationRelate to:

pandemic diseases,

loss of e-system,

power failure, sabotage,

financial crisis etc.

Page 78: Risk assessment
Page 79: Risk assessment
Page 80: Risk assessment

Risk Management

Is an output of risk assessmentInvolves:

application of management policies (regulatory) and practices(R&D, operation and management, public health, politic, social,economy, impact of enforcement) and formal risk assessment or controlling risk in order to protect life, the environment, physical assets and company in cost effective manner to avoid business interruption or for agency decision or actions.

Effective risk management- planning, organizing, implementing, and controlling to achieve

objective- involves all level of personnel (commitment & reward/appreciate) - effective risk communication (information or training)- audit & review

Page 81: Risk assessment