“ringwoodite” more complicated waves, too

17

Post on 15-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too
Page 2: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too
Page 3: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too
Page 4: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too
Page 5: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too

“ringwoodite”

Page 6: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too
Page 7: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too

More complicated waves, too

Page 8: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too

Real life example

• At 23:24:50.6 GMT, on Nov. 22 2001, an earthquake occurred in Fiji (southwest Pacific)

• The P wave from this earthquake was recorded in Pasadena, CA at 23:36:50.7 GMT

• Therefore the observed travel time is 720.10 s• The distance between the Fiji earthquake and

the seismometer in Pasadena is 78.8o (8762 km).

• The theoretical (expected) travel time for a P wave at this distance is 721.25 s.

• Therefore the travel time residual is -1.15 seconds

Page 9: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too
Page 10: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too

Seismic stations from Fiji to the Tonga trench

Page 11: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too

Time residuals from Fiji across the Tonga trench

Page 12: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too

Inferred structure in one slice across the Tonga trench

Fiji Tonga

Pacific plate

earthquakes

slower P waves faster P waves

Page 13: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too

IMap of inferred structure 25 km down

Page 14: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too

140 km down

Page 15: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too

Earthquakes used to do global tomography and where the seismic stations are

Page 16: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too

A few random tomographic slices

Page 17: “ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too

Comparison of different tomographic reconstructions