richard n. rose university of maryland academic telecommunications system copyrighted by richard n....
TRANSCRIPT
Richard N. Rose
University of Maryland Academic Telecommunications System
Copyrighted by Richard N. Rose, February 19, 2004 -this work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that
this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the
author.
Our Customers University System of Maryland (13 institutions and
multiple regional satellite campuses) Community Colleges (slowly justifying cost) Maryland State Department of Higher Education SEGP Affiliates
Public Libraries (SAILOR) K-12 (SAILOR) Community Colleges Johns Hopkins University Morgan State University City of Baltimore State of Maryland (future)
Network Architecture 100% IP Based over Sonet
gigE OC3 DS3 T-1 Clear channel (only a few to smaller
institutions) T-1 frame –very limited out of convenience
NO ATM!
Network Architecture
Capacity Planning
Home Grown Core Infrastructure Monitoring More than adequate infrastructure
between the campuses IP Utilization Monitoring
campus UMATS
Threats to success?
Budgets Student entertainment usage RIAA/MPAA Perceived value of service by our
customers Unwillingness to partner with State
bureaucracy Poor and expensive service
Governance Structure Chartered By-Laws UMATS Council
1 representative appointed by every campus president
academic – administrative – libraries appointments by their peers
Executive Committee Engineering Committee Adhoc Committees
Strategic Planning Special Projects
Funding Sources Campus Contributions
$1.6M total budget Allocation table, based on % usage of total sum of the
whole Budgets approved 1 year in advance for planning and
based on: Infrastructure Interface
IP Utilization State Subsidies
Lines to underserved areas Block Funding ($455K but trend to reduce) Bartering with State
lines for backup IP service
490,000$ 718,402$
Institution Inte rne t Usage Pe rce ntage ISP Mb Cost/Mb Fixe d FY2005 FY2004 Diffe re nce
UMB 29,160,600,000,000 5.63% 27,593$ 135 820$ 110,712$ 138,305$ 213,592$ $ (75,287)
UMCP 5,974,030,000,000 1.15% 5,653$ 137 820$ 111,942$ 117,595$ 94,359$ $ 23,236
SHDGRV 30 820$ 24,603$ 24,603$ 19,109$ $ 5,494
BSU 9,358,320,000,000 1.81% 8,855$ 45 820$ 36,904$ 45,759$ 44,133$ $ 1,626
TU 48,688,400,000,000 9.40% 46,071$ 45 820$ 36,904$ 82,975$ 77,927$ $ 5,048
UMES 18,495,400,000,000 3.57% 17,501$ 45 820$ 36,904$ 54,405$ 49,852$ $ 4,553
FSU 22,388,300,000,000 4.32% 21,185$ 45 820$ 36,904$ 58,089$ 57,159$ $ 930
Coppin 3,166,720,000,000 0.61% 2,996$ 45 820$ 36,904$ 39,901$ 32,974$ $ 6,927
UB 5,987,900,000,000 1.16% 5,666$ 45 820$ 36,904$ 42,570$ 31,561$ $ 11,009
SSU 22,031,100,000,000 4.25% 20,847$ 45 820$ 36,904$ 57,751$ 68,781$ $ (11,030)
UMBC 344,561,000,000,000 66.54% 326,038$ 135 820$ 110,712$ 436,750$ 223,172$ $ 213,578
UMUC 4,621,101,721 0.00% 4$ 45 820$ 36,904$ 36,908$ 49,925$ $ (13,017)
UMCES 2,224,880,000,000 0.43% 2,105$ 15 820$ 12,301$ 14,407$ 49,818$ $ (35,411)
UMBI 4,605,490,000,000 0.89% 4,358$ 60 820$ 49,205$ 53,563$ 40,687$ $ 12,876
USMO 1,191,660,000,000 0.23% 1,128$ 3 820$ 2,460$ 3,588$ 11,540$ $ (7,952)
Totals 517,838,421,101,721 100.00% 490,000$ 875 717,169$ 1,207,169$ 1,064,589$ $ 142,580
FY05 Expense Budget UMATS Outside Agency
Item 1 128,000.00$ 128,000.00$ Item 2 188,640.00$ 188,640.00$ Item 3 55,000.00$ 55,000.00$ Item 4 485,500.00$ 485,500.00$ Item 6 94,062.00$ 94,062.00$ Item 7 200,000.00$ 200,000.00$ Item 8 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ Item 9 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ Item 10 4,000.00$ 5,000.00$ Item 11 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ Subtotal 1,174,202.00$ 1,175,202.00$
Block Funding (455,800.00)$ -$ -$
Total 718,402 1,175,202Total Mb 874.5 1090Cost/mb 821.5002859 1078.166972
Cost Allocation Table FY05
Network Centric Services Internet 1
gigeE Washington D.C. via College Park OC3 MAX, College Park OC3 Baltimore
Internet 2 OC48 between Baltimore & College Park
News (satellite and peering feeds) Akamai Caching Interactive Video, Switches, and Gateways Centralized Purchasing Centralized Management
Bureaucratic Relationships
State of Maryland Subsidies
455K Bartering Arrangements with State,
Government, City
State Acquisition Policies Restrictions
USM - Public Corporation
Private & Public Sector Partnerships Baltimore Education and Research Network
(BERnet) Consortium City of Baltimore State Government UMATS Morgan State University Johns Hopkins University Sailor (regional public library network) University of Maryland, Baltimore University of Maryland, Baltimore County Mid Atlantic Crossroads (MAX)
Economic Slowdown and Predictions
Budget Cuts Washington D.C. area has one of the
lowest unemployment rates in the country at (2.5%)
State revenue is down, but still good in comparison to other states
SLOTS – Gambling – Casinos Effectiveness and Efficiency Issues
CEO Insomnia (UMATS does not contribute to sleepless nights) UMATS has increased services and lowered
costs since it began. It has become a model within the USM for effectiveness and efficiency.
Current budget has not changed in three years By April of this year, ISP services will have increased
by 6 times, expanded to three different geographic locations, for virtually the same cost as budgeted in 2003
I2 services have greatly expanded, at no additional cost
Interactive video eliminates travel for meetings, extends academic services to rural areas and regional centers,
CEO Insomnia Budgets
FY 2004, the USM had a 14% reduction in State support Health benefits and growth in student enrollment has increased the
budget gap by another $84, bringing the total to $206M in just over one year
800 positions were eliminated Salaries and new hires are frozen Academic offerings are being eliminated Facility openings are being postponed, repairs deferred, technology
upgrades delayed
Since January, 2003, tuition has increased dramatically and is expected to climb even more January, 5% mid-year increase July, additional 13% increase September, another 10% Expected to see another 10% increase before Fall of 2004 Between Spring 2003 and Fall 2004, tuition increase averages 30%
Board approved a recommendation to require USM undergraduate programs to develop four-year tuition plans
