rhode island’s lead hazard mitigation act - ri...

6
Lead Hazard Mitigation Act RHODE ISLAND’S A LOOK AT PROPERTIES IN RI’S URBAN CORE 94% 6% properties built after 1978 and shouldn’t contain lead paint properties built before 1978 REQUIRED to comply 31% NOT REQUIRED to comply 69% Non owner-occupied 1-, 2-, or 3-family Properties with 4+ units Owner-occupied 1-, 2-, or 3-family 51,504 PROPERTIES Properties below include single-family, apartment, multi-family, and mixed use only 16,043 Properties 35,461 Properties NOT COMPLIANT COMPLIANT COMPLIED by 2009 20% Are these REQUIRED properties compliant? 3,174 Single-family 895 Apartment 7,670 Multi-family 1,049 Mixed use 80% DID NOT COMPLY by 2009 12,788 PROPERTIES

Upload: nguyenliem

Post on 25-May-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Lead Hazard Mitigation ActRHODE ISLAND’S

A LOOK AT PROPERTIES IN RI’S URBAN CORE

94% 6% properties built after 1978 and shouldn’t contain lead paintproperties built before 1978

REQUIRED to comply31% NOT REQUIRED

to comply69%Non owner-occupied 1-, 2-, or 3-family

Properties with 4+ units

Owner-occupied

1-, 2-, or 3-family

51,504PROPERTIES

Properties below include single-family, apartment, multi-family, and mixed use only

16,043 Properties 35,461 Properties

NOT COMPLIANT COMPLIANT

COMPLIED by 200920%

Are these REQUIRED properties compliant?

3,174 Single-family

895Apartment

7,670Multi-family

1,049Mixed use

80%DID NOT COMPLY by 2009

12,788 PROPERTIES

Lead Hazard Mitigation ActRHODE ISLAND’S

4,284with EBLL

3,693with EBLL

51% or 17,007living in propertiesNOT REQUIRED to comply

A LOOK AT CHILDREN LIVING IN RI’S URBAN CORE

Kids 6 years old & under, living in pre-1978 properties and screened for lead between 2005 & 2009

49% or 16,051living in properties REQUIRED to comply

63% or 10,122living in NON-COMPLIANT properties

37% or 5,929living in COMPLIANT properties

NO YES

Are these kids living in compliant properties?

# of kids with Elevated BloodLead Levels (EBLL)

7,977 total kids with Elevated Blood Lead Levels of 5 µg/dL or greater* by 2009

Health experts have long known the

serious health problems resulting

from exposure to lead, particularly for

young children.

Children can be exposed to lead from food, water,

paint chips, dirt, dust, or sand in and around their

home. But lead poisoning is preventable, which is

why the state worked to strengthen lead poisoning

prevention efforts with the Lead Hazard Mitigation

Law enacted in 2005. Under the law, rental property

owners must attend a lead hazard awareness class,

inspect rental properties, fix lead hazards, provide

tenants information about lead hazards and a copy

of the inspection report, respond to tenant concerns

about any lead hazards and use lead-safe work

practices when performing any maintenance.

Given Rhode Island’s aging housing stock, the law has

the potential to increase the healthiness and quality of

housing in the state, but a great number of properties

remain exempt from the law and the protections

it offers to residents. This Issue Brief will examine

the impact of that law on childhood lead exposure

in Rhode Island and identify ways to prevent lead

poisoning in our children.

I N T R O D U C T I O N

A LOOK AT RHODE ISLAND’S

LEAD HAZARD MITIGATION LAW

A Look at Rhode Island’s Lead Hazard Mitigation Law • ProvPlan

AS SEEN IN THE ADJACENT INFOGRAPHIC, THE STUDY OF AT RISK PROPERTIES CONCLUDED THAT:

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR CHILDREN LIVING IN AT RISK PROPERTIES IN THE URBAN CORE? THE STUDY OF AT RISK KIDS CONCLUDED THAT:

K E Y F I N D I N G S

A Look at Rhode Island’s Lead Hazard Mitigation Law • ProvPlan

u Most properties in the urban core were built before 1978 and are considered

potential risks for lead poisoning. ProvPlan looked at nearly all residential

properties in Central Falls, Pawtucket, Providence, and Woonsocket for this study.

94 percent of the residential properties we studied were built before 1978, meaning

paint at the property may contain lead paint that could poison children.

u Even though these properties pose potential risks, most are not required to

comply with the law. Our findings show that less than one third of properties

built before 1978 were required to comply with the law. The remaining 69 percent

of properties studied were owner-occupied single-family homes and multi-family

properties with two or three units and were not required to comply with the law.

u Of the 16,043 properties that were required to comply with the law, only 20

percent had complied within the first five years of the law’s implementation. By

2012, we found that 30 percent of properties had gotten at least one certificate, but

some of these properties may have only become compliant after a lead poisoning

had occurred.

u More than half of the children screened between 2005 and 2009 were living in

properties that were not required to comply with the law.

u Of children living in homes required to comply, the majority live in non

compliant homes.

u In our study analysis, blood lead levels were significantly reduced in children

living in properties where landlords were fully compliant with the Lead Hazard

Mitigation Law. This suggests that if more properties complied with the law, more

children would benefit.

In 2011 ProvPlan began researching the effectiveness of the state’s Lead Hazard Mitigation Law.

First we worked to identify the number

of properties required to comply with

the Lead Hazard Mitigation Act and the

number of those properties that were

actually in compliance.

Then we analyzed whether the

regulations have helped reduce the

number of children poisoned by lead at

those properties.

We then focused on properties that

are exempt from the law to see how

many of these properties still house

lead-exposed children.

We focused our analysis on residential properties in the four core cities in Rhode Island: Central Falls, Pawtucket, Providence, and Woonsocket. These cities comprise much of the state’s oldest housing stock—a risk factor for lead-based paint exposure. These cities historically have also had higher rates of childhood lead exposure.

We excluded properties built during or after 1978 and included four main property types: one-family residences, two- to five-family residences, apartments, and commercial and residential mixed-use buildings. The findings in this Issue Brief measure incidences of lead exposure from 2005 through 2009.

ABOUT OUR STUDYEven small amounts of lead in the blood can compromise

cognition, behavior, growth, and development. Lead can

also contribute to anemia, elevated blood pressure, kidney

damage, muscle weakness, and brain damage. Young children

are more at risk of these negative effects because their smaller

bodies absorb more lead than adults and their developing

brains are at greater risk of lasting complications.

Although average blood lead levels have greatly decreased in recent

decades, childhood lead poisoning still occurs today. According to the

RI Department of Health, incidence of children’s blood lead levels of

5 micrograms per deciliter or greater (the current CDC reference level

for lead) decreased from 19% in 2003 to 4% in 2013. While these recent

poisoning rates seem acceptably low, a statewide incidence rate of 4% still

means that 1,002 children in Rhode Island who had never previously

been lead poisoned were newly exposed in 2013.

The Lead Hazard Mitigation Law was intended to decrease lead exposure

risks and reduce the number of poisoned children. The law requires that

landlords of non-owner-occupied buildings built before 1978 that have

more than three units take a 3-hour lead hazard awareness class, assess

and fix any hazards to the property, perform lead-safe maintenance

practices and obtain the certificate from a proper inspector. Many

properties remain exempt from the law including:

uowner-occupied single-family homes;

u owner-occupied multi-family homes with three or fewer units;

u homes that have received Lead Safe or Lead Free (LSLF) certificates;

u temporary or seasonal units;

u and elderly housing.

ProvPlan studied residential properties in the four cities that have

traditionally had the highest rates of childhood lead exposure – Central

Falls, Pawtucket, Providence, and Woonsocket – to see if the law was

preventing children from lead exposure.

M O R E A B O U T T H E L E A D H A Z A R D M I T I G AT I O N L A W

A Look at Rhode Island’s Lead Hazard Mitigation Law • ProvPlan

Lead Technical Study ISSUE BRIEF • Providence Plan

For children, even mild lead poisoning

can permanently affect their attention

span and IQ. With such devastating

and lasting impacts, preventing lead

exposure in our young children is

imperative.

The good news is that the Lead Hazard Mitigation Law

can work in preventing childhood lead exposure when

fully implemented. Blood lead levels were significantly

reduced in children living at properties where

landlords were fully compliant with the Lead Hazard

Mitigation Law. But in the four cities where children

are most at risk for lead exposure, only 20 percent

of the properties required under state law to protect

tenants from lead exposure had done so by 2009. Even

more troubling, the widespread exemptions from the

law mean that more than one in five children living in

homes without a certificate of compliance have had at

least one elevated blood lead level.

Policymakers must address the risk that lead poses in

all residential properties built before 1978. In addition,

the state must ensure that resources are available to

not only fully implement the current law, but to assist

property owners with protecting their tenants from

lead exposure and obtaining a certificate of compliance.

Only when the state works to fully implement the

Lead Hazard Mitigation Law will we ensure that all of

our children can grow up healthy, ready to learn and

become active participants in Rhode Island’s future.

P O L I C Y C O N S I D E R AT I O N S

A Look at Rhode Island’s Lead Hazard Mitigation Law • ProvPlan

THE HIDDEN COST OF LEAD POISONING

Elevated blood lead levels can have lasting impacts on children’s

readiness for school. For example, a study of Rhode Island

children who had been exposed to lead were two times less

likely to be reading ready upon entering kindergarten than those

without lead exposure.1

What’s more, researchers estimate that one in five children with

very high levels of lead exposure will need special education

services upon entering school. These students may require up to

three years of special education and these interventions can be

costly. During the 2010 school year Rhode Island school districts

each spent, on average, $9.2 million for special education and

$3,301 per pupil receiving special education.2

The cost of lead poisoning goes beyond these special education

services. Nationally it is estimated that the medical treatment

costs of treating children under the age of six who have elevated

blood lead levels ranges from $10.8 to $53.1 million annually,3

depending on the severity of lead poisoning. This does not

factor in behavioral treatment. And because lead poisoning

can have lasting consequences, the lifetime earnings loss due

to lead exposure has been estimated from $165 to $233 billion

nationwide.4

1 McLaine, P., Navas-Acien, A., Diener-West, M., Simon, P., & Agnew, J. (2009). Elevated Blood Lead Levels Negatively Impact Kindergarten Reading Readiness. Epidemiology. Vol. 20. Iss. 6. http://goo.gl/5OhSWe 2 Rhode Island Department of Education, Uniform Charts of Accounting. FY2010. http://goo.gl/sStesd

3 Childhood Lead Poisoning: Conservative Estimates of the Social and Economic Benefits of Lead Hazard Control. Gould, Elise; Environmental Health Perspectives, March 2009. 4 Cutting Lead Poisoning and Public Costs. Partnership for America’s Economic Success Issue Brief#14. The Pew Center on The States, February 2010.