rhinoscleroma: a growing concern in the united states? mayo clinic experience
TRANSCRIPT
Rhinoscleroma: A Growing Concern in the United States?Mayo Clinic Experience
RAFAEL ANDRACA, M.D.,* RANDALL S. EDSON, M.D., AND EUGENE B. KERN, M.D.
Rhinoscleroma is a chronic, progressive, granulomatous infection of the upper airways caused by thebacterium Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis. Although most cases occur in developing countries, recentimmigration patterns have led to an increasing number of patients with rhinoscleroma in the UnitedStates. Rhinoscleroma may mimic various inflammatory and neoplastic processes, including leprosy,paracoccidioidomycosis, sarcoidosis, basal cell carcinoma, and Wegener's granulomatosis. Currenttherapy consists of a combination of surgical debridement and prolonged antimicrobial therapy.Rhinoscleroma should be added to the list of opportunistic infections that can occur in patients withhuman immunodeficiency virus.
In this retrospective study, we reviewed the medical literature on rhinoscleroma (RS) from 1965 to the present and themedical records of patients who were diagnosed with ortreated for RS at the Mayo Clinic from January 1900 toNovember 1991. Only two such patients were born in theUnited States (cases 5 and 6); the others were from aroundthe world.
Of the six Mayo Clinic patients who were identified ashaving RS, three had a definite diagnosis (cases 1,2, and 3),two had a probable diagnosis (cases 4 and 5; the diagnosiswas never fully established, but they responded to treatment), and one (case 6) had a possible diagnosis. For theMayo Clinic cases, RS was diagnosed on the basis of positive results of culture, report of pathologic abnormalities, orpositive results of an immunoperoxidase test.
The following case reports illustrate the initial clinicalmanifestations, course, and treatment of RS (Tables 1through 5).
From the Department of Otorhinolaryngology (RA., E.B.K.) and DivisionofInfectious Diseases and Internal Medicine (RS.E.), Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
*Current address: Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, Mexico City,Mexico.
Address reprint requests to Dr. R S. Edson, Division ofInfectious Diseases,Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
REPORT OF ILLUSTRATIVE CASESCase 1.-A 33-year-old woman was admitted to the MayoClinic in July 1946. Seven years earlier, RS had beendiagnosed while she was living in Shanghai. Treatment withKlebsiella rhinoscleromatis vaccine was unsuccessful. Shehad a history of a spontaneous pneumothorax in 1938 and oftuberculosis in 1941 (managed with thoracotomy andpneumonectomy). In addition, she had a 15-year history ofnasal crusting, stuffiness, purulent nasal discharge, tinnitus,and a 15.9-kg weight loss in 10 years. Three months beforeadmission, she began to have increasing dysphagia andhoarseness.
On physical examination, the patient had nasal obstruction with bloody secretions, cicatricial tissue, and atrophy ofthe nasal mucosa. Moreover, scarring of the pharynx andgranulomatous tissue in the epiglottis were noted. The diagnosis of rhinoscleroma was confirmed by culture and biopsy,both of which had positive results. Treatment with streptomycin (1 g/day for 65 days) yielded a good response and anuneventful recovery. After almost 1 year of follow-up, noevidence of reactivation of the disease was noted.
Case 3.-A 39-year-old man from the Soviet Union cameto the Mayo Clinic in December 1944. Eight years previously, he had undergone surgical correction for a 10-yearhistory of chronic sinusitis and a nasal septal deviation. He
Mayo Clin Proc 1993; 68:1151-1157 1151 © 1993 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
1152 RHINOSCLEROMA Mayo CIiDProc,December 1993, Vol 68
Table I.-Demographic Data for Six Mayo PatientsWith Rhinoscleroma, Stratified by Type of Diagnosis
Table 2.-Medical Histories of Six Mayo PatientsWith Rhinoscleroma
had a 3-year history of nasal crusting associated with foultaste and smell, a 6.8-kg weight loss during a 2-year period,and progressive hoarseness, dyspnea, and cough.
Findings on physical examination were laryngeal andsubglottic obstruction in conjunction with scarring, cicatricial tissue, and 'atrophy of the larynx. Results of culture werepositive, but the biopsy results were doubtful because of thelarge amount of scarring and cicatricial tissue ..The patientwas treated with irradiation (224 rad) for one session, followed by two sessions of electrocoagulation and topicalapplication of acriflavine for 3 months. During a 4-yearfollow-up, he was without evidence of recurrence. He diedin 1951 of unrelated causes.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE t
RS is a chronic, slowly progressive, granulomatous diseasethat affects the upper and lower airways and has a preferencefor the nose. It has a limited capacity to spread throughoutthe body and is extremely difficult to cure.
History.-RS (or scleroma) has affected humanity formore than a thousand years. Early evidence of this diseasewas found on a small terra-cotta head from the Mayan culture (Guatemala), dating from AD 300 to 600,! with thecharacteristic Hebra nose. In more recent times, moulagesmade in Krakow, Poland, by Bierkowski in 1840 alsoshowed features suggestive of RS. Ferdinand von Hebra ofVienna provided the first complete description of the disease. Although von Hebra and Kaposi considered the disease of neoplastic origin, Geber and Mikulicz thought that itwas of inflammatory origin.' In 1882, von Frisch describedthe causative organism now known as K. rhinoscleromatis.'In 1932, at the Second International Congress of Otorhinolaryngology held in Madrid, Spain, a change in thename ofthe disease from "rhinoscleroma" to "scleroma" wassuggested, to emphasize that the disease can involve most ofthe respiratory tract.' Alternatively, however, retention of
33 F Siberia Shanghai 7/8/4633M Guadalajara, Mexico l/23/5939M SovietUnion ? 12/5/44
23M Arequipa, Peru 4/2l/8236 F Texas,USA 9/28/75
32M Oklahoma, USA 1120/40
Geographic data
the prefix "rhino-" has been considered useful for avoidingconfusion with scleroderma or multiple sclerosis."
Etiology.-Since von Frisch's description of the bacillusfound in the lesions of RS, extensive data have been presented about the role of this bacterium in the pathogenesis ofRS. Although earlier studies suggested two types of causative organisms," not until 1961 (when all Koch's postulateswere fulfilled") was a better understanding of K.rhinoscleromatis possible. K. rhinoscleromatis is a gramnegative, encapsulated, nonmotile, glucose-fermenting diplobacillus. It is also a facultative anaerobe that can growintracellularly or extracellularly'' and whose only host ishumans. Its antigenic formula is 02K3' in which °is thesmooth somatic antigen and K is the capsular antigen." Thislatter antigen forms the basis of the immunoperoxidase test.It can persist in the human host for months, years, and evendecades if untreated.
Epidemiology.-RS, a global disease, has been reported.in more than 68 countries (primarily in the tropics) as bothsporadic and endemic cases." More than 80% of the reportedcases have occurred in five endemic foci;'? eastern andcentral Europe (Poland, Hungary, Russia, and Romania);Mexico, Central America, and South America (Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Venezuela); Africa-where 5% of the world's cases have beenfound!' (East Africa, Egypt, and the region of LakeVictoria); India; and Indonesia.P''? The disease does nothave a uniform distribution, affecting mainly rural areas.
*See text for detailedcase report.
1* Pneumothorax in 1938Tuberculosis diagnosedin 1941 (treatedwith
thoracotomy and pneumonectomy)
2 Medical student
3* Eight years beforeadmission: surgicalcorrectionfor a10-yearhistoryof chronicsinusitisand septal defect
4 Allergicto penicillinPapillomain the soft palate in 1978(treatedwith
cryosurgery)Schizophrenia-paranoia diagnosedin 1982
5 Tonsillectomy in 1928Diabetessince 1954Hysterectomy and radiotherapy for cervicalcancer in
1963Pemphigus since 1964Tracheostomies in 1954,1958,and 1968becauseof
tracheal stenosis
6 Malaria in 1930(treatedwith chloroquine)Chronicprostatitisin 1938
Case HistoryDate of~ssion
Residence (mo/day/yr)Birthplace
Age (yr)and sex
Definite123
Probable45
Possible6
Case
Mayo Clin Proc, December 1993, Vol 68 RHINOSCLEROMA 1153
Table 3.-Initial Symptoms and Signs in Six Mayo PatientsWith Rhinoscleroma
Case* No. ofSymptom or sign 2 3t 4 5 6 patients
Crusts + + + + + + 6Stuffiness + + + + + 5Foul taste and smell + + + + + 5Hyposmia + + + + 4
.Hoarseness + + + + 4,-----Purulent discharge 4+ + + +Bloody discharge + + + 3Epistaxis + + 2Cough + + 2Dysphagia + + 2Dyspnea + + 2Tinnitus + IAdenopathy + 1Lacrimal involvement + 1Weight loss + + + 3
(kg) (15.9):j: (6.8)§ (9)f Mean loss,23.3
Duration (yr) 15 2 3 7 2mo 21 Mean, 8
*Plus sign indicates presence of sign or symptom.t'This patient had primary laryngeal scleroma at time of initial assessment.:j:In 10 years.§In 2 years.§In 12 years.
Most of the sporadic cases are due to migration from endemic regions. l3 The frequency in an endemic zone ofPoland was approximately 0.5%.10
Until recently, RS was rarely reported in the UnitedStates. Before 1968, RS had been diagnosed in approximately 4,000 patients worldwide, only 171 of whom received the diagnosis in the United States (47 of these patientswere born in the United States). From 1966 to 1980, 24
cases were diagnosed in the United States, and only 6 of thepatients were born in the United States." Because of thescarcity of RS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, has not maintained statistics on it.This situation will likely change in the near future becausethe United States currently has many immigrants from endemic nations and also because of the increased US militarypresence in Central America and the Middle East.5•14 The
", Table 4.-Findings on Physical Examination in Six Mayo PatientsWith Rhinoscleroma
Case
Finding 2 3 4 5 6
Obstruction Nose Nose Larynx, Nose Nose Nosesubglottis
Cicatricial Nose Larynx Nose,tissue larynx
Scarring Pharynx Interarytenoid Septum Larynx,area trachea
Granulomatous Epiglottis Nose Larynx, Middle Nosetissue subglottis turbinate
Adenopathy CervicalCrusting Nose Nose Nose NoseAtrophy Nasal Laryngeal Nasal
mucosa mucosa mucosaBloody
secretions Yes Yes Yes
1154 RHINOSCLEROMA Mayo Clin Proc, December1993,Vol 68
Table 5.-Method of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up Data for Six Mayo Patients With Rhinoscleroma
Case
2
3
4
5
6
Diagnosis
Shanghai, 1939: biopsy + cultureMayo, 9/13/46: biopsy + culture
Mexico, 1110/59: biopsy + culture
Mayo, 12/5/44: biopsy doubtful,culture positive
Mayo, 4/21182: biopsy, chronicinflammation; culture positivefor Staphylococcus aureus andCorynebacterium spp
Mayo,9/29/75: biopsy, chronicinflammation; culture positivefor Klebsiella spp
Mayo, 1123/40: biopsy, chronicinflammation; no culture resultreported
Treatment
Vaccine, 1939Streptomycin, 1 g/day
intramuscularly, 9/22/46-11125/46(65 days)
Radiotherapy, 1959 (1,000 rad twice)+ neomycin (dose?), 3 mo beforecoming to Mayo
Radiotherapy, 12/10/44 (224 rad)Electrocoagulation, 12/18/44 and
Feb 1945Topically applied acriflavine, Feb 1945
Only reassurance
Tracheal stoma, 6/4/75Nasal valve operation, 10/26/81Tracheal end-to-end anastomosis, 3/10/86Segmental tracheal resection + primary
closure, 7/28/86
Radiotherapy (300 rad), three occasions;1/24/40, 1/27/40, and 1130/40
Potassium iodide, 25 drops three timesa day
Follow-up
11/25/46,3/18/47,7/25/47: biopsy andculture negative
None
Feb 1945, Dec 1945, Feb 1947, Jan1949: all cultures and biopsiesnegative
Died 1951
None
Died, 8/13/86
None
number of cases has already increased in the southern borderstates; for example, the Los Angeles County-University ofSouthern California Medical Center now examines a meanof six patients with RS per year.'
The person-to-person transmission of this disease mostlikely occurs through airborne secretions and requires prolonged intimate contact, similar to Hansen's disease (leprosy). The requirements for transmission include activedisease," subjects living in close quarters," and presence ofpredisposing factors. IS The most common predisposing factors include low socioeconomic conditions, poor hygiene,poor nutrition, and young age (typically, persons in the second or third decade of life). RS also tends to affect womenslightly more often than men (female:male ratio, 1.3:1),12 Inaddition, iron deficiency" and immunologic factors maypredispose to the acquisition of RS.
Pathophysiology.-Although the pathogenesis of RS isnot clearly established, the disease process probably beginsat the junction between two epithelia-the stratified squamous epithelium of the vestibule and the respiratory epithelium of the nose. Pharyngoscleroma begins at the junctionbetween the respiratory and squamous epithelia of the pharynx, whereas laryngoscleroma arises below the vocal cordswhere the stratified squamous epithelium adjoins the respiratory epithelium in the subglottic area.'? In otoscleroma, the
disease begins between the respiratory epithelium and theflattened nonciliated epithelium ofthe middle ear."
Iron deficiency alters epithelial regeneration and thuscauses squamous metaplasia (a common finding in RS).Because both menstruating and pregnant women with RSseem to have a more severe course than do other patients,iron deficiency can be considered a predisposing factor inRS by altering the normal integrity of the epithelium."
Many theories have been proposed to explain thepathophysiologic aspects of this disease, but most investigators agree that the mucopolysaccharide in the capsule of thebacterium may be responsible for most of the damage. Thecapsule protects the bacteria by inhibiting phagocytosisthrough a complex series of events. 19,20
The humoral immunologic response in patients with RS isnormal;" however, cellular immunity seems impaired inthese patients. The granulomas in RS are ineffective histiocytic granulomas-that is, the macrophages are inactivatedand cannot transform into epidermoid cells that kill the bacteria." A person with RS exposed to antigens from variousstrains of K. rhinoscleromatis responds with an increase inserum antibodies but does not form antibodies to the infecting strain of Klebsiella." seemingly demonstrating a patternof "tolerance" to the disease. The CD4:CD8 ratio is alteredin RS: the CD4 lymphocytes are decreased and the CD8
Mayo Clin Proc, December 1993, Vol 68
lymphocytes are increased. In addition, CD4 lymphocytesshow a minimal response to a stimulus with interleukin 2.This lack of response could explain why histiocytic granulomas are formed instead of epidermoid cell granulomas.Thus, the disease causes some type of acquired cellularirnmunodeficiency.t':"
RS is believed to be spread by contiguity, the lymphaticsystem, or direct contact. The squamous metaplasia noted inRS may protect from an intense contiguous disseminationand thus may explain the long incubation period of thedisease.v" Lymphatic spread can be limited by the fibroustissue surrounding the granuloma; this feature also explainswhy cervical lymphadenopathy is an uncommon clinicalfinding.P-"
Pathology.-The histologic characteristics of the lesionsof RS depend on the clinical stage of the disease. Clinicallyand pathologically, RS has been classified into three or fourstages: catarrhal, atrophic (this stage is sometimes considered part of the catarrhal stage), granulomatous, and scle-
, rotic. In the catarrhal-atrophic stage, the typical finding isepithelial squamous metaplasia in conjunction with asubepithelial infiltrate of polymorphonuclear cells and somegranulation tissue." During the granulomatous stage (themost characteristic stage), pseudoepitheliomatoushyperplasia (hypertrophy of the epithelium by downwardgrowth) and a chronic inflammatory reaction with manymonocytes, lymphocytes, and histiocytes are evident. Occasionally, the infiltrate tends to be angiocentric and to cause avasculitis-like picture with hyalinization of the vessels."Some studies have also reported the existence of amyloidlike deposits, which are thought to be caused by the chronicinfection." Characteristically, Russell bodies are found during the chronic, granulomatous stage.
Mikulicz cells can be found beneath the basal lamina;they are large histiocytes that have a single nucleus withdiffuse chromatin. The nucleus is displaced to the peripherybecause of the numerous vacuoles in the cytoplasm. Viablebacilli may be present in some of these vacuoles. WithinMikulicz cells, two types of granules-"A" and "B"-havebeen found. Type A granules are mainly in vacuoles thatcontain bacilli and are believed to be a large quantity ofantibodies against them, whereas type B granules arethought to be a cluster of antigens with a large amount ofmucopolysaccharide inside them."
Alternatively, the Russell bodies are structures in thecytoplasm of the plasma cells. These bodies are 20 to 40 urn,homogeneous, and extremely eosinophilic.
The sclerotic stage manifests with large amounts of fibrous and cicatricial tissue, residual stenosis, and few or noplasma cells, Mikulicz cells, or Russell bodies.
Clinical Manifestations.-RS is a slowly progressive,granulomatous, infectious disease. Although it can be dis-
RHINOSCLEROMA 1155
figuring, it is rarely lethal, unless it obstructs either thelarynx or the trachea. It affects primarily young persons inthe second or third decade of life. Because the diseaseprogresses slowly, the initial manifestations can be detectedin adolescence. As already described, the disease can beclassified into three or four clinical stages.
The Catarrhal-Atrophic Stage.-The catarrhal-atrophic stage manifests as purulent, fetid rhinorrhea of longduration (weeks or months), unilateral or bilateral nasal obstruction, and crusting (although not as intense as withWegener's granulomatosis). ' Physical examination maydemonstrate atrophy and crusting of the nasal mucosaor interarytenoid hyperemia and exudates if the larynx isinvolved.
The Granulomatous Stage.-The granulomatous stageis characterized by epistaxis, nasal deformity (depending onthe duration), labial edema, involvement of the paranasalsinuses, hoarseness (if the larynx is affected), anosmia, anesthesia of the soft palate, and epiphora (affecting the lacrimalapparatus). On physical examination, the initial finding willbe a bluish red and rubbery granulomatous lesion, whichsubsequently evolves into a pale and indurated granulomatous mass. Bony destruction and, in some cases, cervical node involvement can occur."
The Sclerotic Stage.-The sclerotic stage is similar tothe granulomatous stage but with increased deformity andstenosis. Physical examination may demonstrate granulomatous lesions surrounded by dense fibrotic tissue.
Pattern of Involvement and Related Prognosis.-RScan begin anywhere in the respiratory tract. The nose isaffected in 95 to 100% of cases, the pharynx in 18 to 43%,the trachea in 12%, and the bronchi in 2 to 7%.17,20,30.33 Theparanasal sinuses can also be affected (26.4% of cases)y,34Rare sites of involvement include the eustachian tube," themiddle ear (manifesting as otorrhea and anakusis"), and oneor both eyes (blindness, lacrimal dysfunction.v-r'-" and eventhe orbital apex syndrome"). Skin involvement occurs primarily on the upper lip, the nasal dorsum, and, rarely, theback.F-" Cerebral dissemination has also been described."
The earlier the diagnosis of RS, the better the prognosis.Unfortunately, patients tend to consult a physician when thelesions arein an advanced stage. In one study," the signsand symptoms when patients were initially examined bytheir physicians included nasal obstruction in 94%, nasaldeformity in 32%, hoarseness in 12%, epistaxis in 11%,swelling ofthe lip in 10%, sore throat in 6%, and epiphora in4%.
Complications.-Malignant degeneration has been described" but poorly documented in RS. The most commoncomplication is relapse," which necessitates prolongedtherapy. Stenosis is another common complication; it occursbecause of cicatricial tissue and can be fatal if the upper
1156 RHINOSCLEROMA
airways become obstructed. This complication necessitatestracheostomy and surgical debridement."
Differential Diagnosis.-Various granulomatous processes of the head and neck can mimic RS. Infectious,neoplastic, and autoimmune diseases are included in thedifferential diagnosis. Bacterial diseases such as tuberculosis, actinomycosis, syphilis, and leprosy can all producegranulomas in the upper airways. Fungal infections such ashistoplasmosis, blastomycosis, paracoccidioidomycosis, andsporotrichosis can also produce similar lesions, but the use ofappropriate cultures or silver stains can help establish anaccurate diagnosis. Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis can alsoproduce granulomatous lesions that mimic RS.5,1I
Malignant lesions such as the usual lymphomas of thenose, unusual lymphomas such as T-cell lymphoma (formerly called polymorphic reticulosis), and sinushistiocytosis in conjunction with cervical adenopathy cansimulate RS. 41 Sarcoidosis and vasculitis, especiallyWegener's granulomatosis, should be considered in the assessment of a patient with a possible diagnosis of RS.
Diagnosis.s-:To establish an accurate diagnosis, the clinician must obtain a complete history from the patient, including birthplace and residence, family history, hygienic andnutritional habits, and duration of the disease .. A thoroughphysical examination is also helpful, especially when thelesions are in the catarrhal-atrophic or granulomatous stage.
Biopsy and bacterial culture remain the most helpful toolsfor diagnosis. Routine cultures on blood or MacConkey agarwill be positive for K. rhinoscleromatis in 50 to 60% ofpatients."
Imaging techniques, especially computed tomography,can help establish the extent of the disease.'? Likewise,endoscopy can provide valuable information about the extent of RS and can also be useful in its treatment. 33
Biopsy results, although not pathognomonic for RS, arehelpful and are characterized by Mikulicz cells, Russell bodies, pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, and squamousmetaplasia; when these are considered in combination withthe results of immunoperoxidase staining, specificity approaches 100%.13,39 Other useful stains include periodicacid-Schiff," Giemsa, and Warthin-Starry. Serologic studies such as the complement-fixation test have cross-reactions, but they can be of help in assessing the response totreatment.42
Treatment.-RS is difficult to treat, and the relapse rate ishigh. Numerous treatment options have been described.Initial therapy included mercurials, caustics (such as zincchloride, silver nitrate, and salicylic acid), cautery, arsenicals, and methylene blue. Radium and radiotherapy werelater used. Recently, antibiotics, ranging from systemicallyadministered streptomycin to locally administered rifampinor acriflavine, have been used. Surgical debridement has
Mayo Clin Proc, December 1993, Vol 68
always played a part in treatment, and laser therapy is currently one of the best surgical methods." Even a vaccine hasbeen proposed as a potential therapeutic modality." Despitethe many treatment options, relapse is common, and oftenthe symptoms can only be mitigated and the evolution of thedisease restricted."
Radiotherapy for RS was used during the first half of thiscentury, primarily before the advent of antimicrobial agents.This type of therapy provided symptomatic relief for longperiods (months to years), but most patients eventually had arelapse.
Currently, treatment typically is a combination of prolonged antimicrobial therapy and surgical debridement. Antimicrobial therapy must be given for prolonged periodsfrom months to years in some cases." In the absence ofcontrolled clinical trials, treatment is guided by antimicrobial susceptibility data." The systemically administered antibiotics that have been used are streptomycin, tetracycline,rifampin, second- and third-generation cephalosporins, andagents such as sulfonamides and clofazimine." Antimicrobial agents have been used alone or in combination.
Streptomycin has been used as a single agent to treat RSwithout involvement of any site other than the nose, but thehigh doses needed ultimately produced ototoxicity andnephrotoxicity. When used in combination with tetracyclines or other antibiotics, the dose of streptomycin can bedecreased; thus, toxicity is reduced." Tetracyclines are areasonable choice because they act intracellularly and areinexpensive; however, their use is contraindicated in children, infants, or pregnant women.P-" Agents such asclofazimine were recently reported to yield promising therapeutic results, mainly if used in the early (catarrhal-atrophicand granulomatous) stages of the disease." Rifampin hasproduced microbiologic resolution of the disease, but it mustbe used for prolonged periods." Second- and third-generation cephalosporins are effective against K. rhinoscleromatisbut necessitate parenteral therapy; thus, long-term outpatientuse is limited.' Despite the absence of published clinicaltrials, the new orally administered fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents have excellent activity against gram-negativebacteria, low toxicity, and limitations similar to those of thetetracyclines. Topical therapy with acriflavine (an acridinederivative used for treating giardiasis) or rifampin has shownpromising results; response rates have exceeded the usualresponse rate of 60 to 70%.20,25,43-45
In patients with RS who have cosmetic deformity orfunctional obstruction of the airway, surgical therapy is indicated. Operation should be delayed either until the diagnosisis definite (through biopsy or culture) or until no residualdisease activity is evident in the tissue to be debrided. Ifdisease activity exists, medical treatment should be institutedand completed before operation because the risk of recur-
Mayo Clio Proc, December 1993, Vol 68
renee or dissemination is substantial. 12•26.45.46 Laser therapymay be used when debridement is necessary; it will decreasethe amount of cicatricial tissue and thus minimize dissemination of the disease and postoperative edema.8.9.47
ADDENDUMAfter our manuscript was submitted for publication, Pauland associates" described two patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and RS. This report provides further evidence of the association between RS andaltered T-cell immunity. RS should be added to the list ofopportunistic infections that can potentially occur in HIVpositive patients who either visit or reside in endemic areas.
REFERENCES1. Goldman L. Pre-Columbian rhinoscleroma [letter]. Arch Derrnatol
1979; 115:106-1072. Goihman-Yahr M. Rhinoscleroma and rhinosporidiosis: an ap
proach through history. Int J Dermatol 1986; 25:476-4783. Cone LA, Barton SM, Woodard DR. Treatment of scleroma with
ceforanide. Arch OtolaryngolHead Neck Surg 1987; 113:374-3764. Gonzalez-Angulo A, Marques-Monter H, Greenberg SD, Cerbon J.
Ultrastructure of nasal scleroma (emphasizing the fine structure ofKlebsiella rhinoscleromatis within the lesion). Ann Otol RhinolLaryngol 1965; 74:1022-1033
5. Stiemberg CM, Clark WD. Rhinoscleroma-a diagnostic challenge.Laryngoscope 1983; 93:866-870 .
6. Gaafar H, El-Ghazzawi E, Awaad A, Harada Y. Transmission andscanning electron microscopic studies of rhinoscleroma. J LaryngolOtol 1979;93:983-989
7. Nayar RC, Mathur RP, Gulati A, Mann SBS. Orbital apex syndromedue to rhinoscleroma: a case report. J Laryngol Otol 1985; 99:597599
8. Lenis A, Ruff T, Diaz JA, Ghandour EG. Rhinoscleroma. SouthMed J 1988; 81:1580-1582
9. Williams I, Radcliffe G, Hetzel M, Millard J. Trachealrhinoscleroma treated by argon laser. Thorax 1982; 37:638-639
10. Khalifa MC, Bassyoni AM. Rhinoscleromapresentingas a unilateralnasal mass. J Egypt Med Assoc 1978; 61:313-319
II. Okoth-Olende CA, Bjerregaard B. Scleroma in Africa: a review ofcases from Kenya. East Afr Med J 1990;67:231-236
12. Ssali CLK. The management of rhinoscleroma. J Laryngol Otol1975; 89:91-99
13. Meyer PR, Shum TK, Becker TS, Taylor CR. Scleroma(rhinoscleroma): a histologic immunohistochemicalstudy with bacteriologic correlates. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1983; 107:377-383
14. Tapia A. Rhinoscleroma: a naso-oral dermatosis. Cutis 1987;40:101-103
15. Toppozada H, Elsawy M, MalatyR, Dogheim Y. The skin windowtest in rhinoscleroma contacts. J Laryngol Otol 1984; 98:475-479
16. Akhnoukh S, Saad EF. Iron-deficiency in atrophic rhinitis &scleroma. Indian J Med Res 1987 May; 85:576-579
17. Abou-Seif SG, Baky FA, EI-EbrashyF, Gaafar HA. Scleroma of theupper respiratory passages: a CT study. J Laryngol Otol 1991;105:198-202
18. Abou-Bieh A, Bedawy AE-F. Otoscleroma. J Laryngol Otol 1975;89:545-547
19. Hoffmann EO, Loose LD, Harkin JC. The Mikulicz cell inrhinoscleroma: light, fluorescent and electron microscopic studies.Am J Pathol 1973; 73:47-58
20. Jay J, Green RP, Lucente FE. Isolated laryngeal rhinoscleroma.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93:669-673
21. Dogheim Y, Maher A, El-Sawy M. Serum immunoglobulin levels inrhinoscleroma contacts. J Laryngol Otol 1986; 100:171-173
RHINOSCLEROMA 1157
22. Modlin RL, Hofman FM, Meyer PR, Sharma OP, Taylor CR, ReaTH. In situ demonstration ofT lymphocyte subsets in granulomatousinflammation: leprosy, rhinoscleroma and sarcoidosis. Clin ExpImmunol 1983; 51:430-438
23. Toppozada HH, Michaeles L, Mazloum H, EI-Sawy M, Malaty R,Yakout Y. The skin window test in rhinoscleroma. Am JOtolaryngol 1981; 2:30-35
24. Berron P, Berron R, Ortiz-Ortiz L. Alterations in the T-Iymphocytesubpopulation in patients with rhinoscleroma. J Clin Microbiol1988; 26:1031-1033
25. Gamea AM, El-Tatawi FAY. The effect of rifampicin onrhinoscleroma: an electron microscopic study. J Laryngol Otol1990; 104:772-777
26. Dawlatly EE, Anim JT, Baraka ME. Local iatrogenic complicationsin nasopharyngeal rhinoscleroma. J Laryngol Otol 1988; 102:11151118
27. Badrawy R, EI-Shennawy M. Affection of cervical lymph nodes inrhinoscleroma. J Laryngol Otol 1974; 88:261-269
28. Karchev T, Kabakchiev P. Amyloid-like protein in children withrhinoscleroma. Rhinology 1989; 27:27-36
29. Toppozada H, Riad W, Michaels L, Gaafar H, SidAhmed K. Thetunica propria in rhinoscleroma: an electron microscopic study. ActaOtolaryngol (Stockh) 1981; 91:595-604
30. Gamea AM. Role of endoscopy in diagnosing scleroma in its uncommon sites. J Laryngol Otol 1990; 104:619-621
31. Shehata MA, Salama AM. Clofazimin in the treatment of scleroma.J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103:856-860
32. Gaafar HA, EI Assi MH. Skin affection in rhinoscleroma: a clinical,histological and electron microscopic study on four patients. ActaOtolaryngol (Stockh) 1988; 105:494-499
33. Acuna RT. Endoscopy of the air passages with special reference toscleroma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1973; 82:765-769
34. Saad EF. Antroscleroma. J Laryngol Otol 1988; 102:362-36435. Kestelyn P. Rhinoscleroma with bilateral orbital involvement [let
ter}. AmJ Ophthalmol 1986; 101:381-38236. Bahri HC, Bassi NK, Rohatgi MS. Scleroma with intracranial exten
sion. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1972; 81:856-85937. Miller RH, Shulman JB, Canalis RF, Ward PH. Klebsiella
rhinoscleromatis: a clinical and pathogenic enigma. OtolaryngolHead Neck Surg 1979; 87:212-221
38. Singh AP, Srivastava RN. Malignant changes in scleroma.Laryngoscope 1972;82:444-446
39. Shum TK, Whitaker CW, Meyer PRo Clinical update onrhinoscleroma. Laryngoscope 1982; 92:1149-1153
40. Goldberg SN, Canalis RF. Rhinoscleroma as a cause of airwayobstruction. Ear Nose Throat J 1980 Apr; 59:145-149
41. Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman RF. The ophthalmologic manifestationsof sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. Am JOphthalmo1 1979; 87:354-367
42. Toppozada H, Mazloum H, EI-Sawy M, Malaty R, Yakout Y. Thecomplement fixation test in rhinoscleroma. J Laryngol Otol 1983;97:55-57
43. Maher AI, EI-Kashlan HK, Soliman Y, Galal R. Rhinoscleroma:management by carbon dioxide surgical laser. Laryngoscope 1990;100:783-788
44. Gamea AM: Local rifampicin in treatment of rhinoscleroma. JLaryngolOtol 1988; 102:319-321
45. Shaer M, Rizk M, Shawaf I, Ali M, Hashash M. Local acriflavine:a new therapy for rhinoscleroma. J Laryngol Otol 1981; 95:701706
46. Rifai M. Laryngotracheal resection for post scleromatous laryngealstenosis. J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103:935-938
47. Monnier PH, Ravussin P, Savary M, Freeman J. Percutaneoustranstracheal ventilation for laser endoscopic treatment of laryngealand subglottic lesions. Clin Otolaryngol 1988; 13:209-217
48. Paul C, Pialoux G, Dupont B, Fleury J, Gonzalez-Canali G,Eliaszewicz M, et al. Infection due to Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis intwo patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. ClinInfect Dis 1993; 16:441-442