rfp- building asbestos and lead survey consultant · 2019-12-19 · service agreement 02-09-18 for...
TRANSCRIPT
1 Harpst Street • Arcata, California 95521-8299 • 707 826-3646 • fax 707 826-5888 • humboldt.edu
PLANNING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION SUSTAINABILITY OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
BUILDING ASBESTOS & LEAD SURVEY Theater Arts Building
University Project ID: XPL190
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Asbestos & Lead Survey Consultant
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents I. PROJECT INFORMATION ................................................................................................. 2 A. Project Description ............................................................................................................ 2
B. Specific Scope of Work ...................................................................................................... 3
C. Anticipated Project Schedule ............................................................................................ 4
D. Code Requirements ........................................................................................................... 4
E. Public & Regulatory Agencies ........................................................................................... 4
II. SCOPE EXCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................ 4 F. Exclusions .......................................................................................................................... 4
III. FEES & CONTRACT .......................................................................................................... 5 G. Contract Documents ......................................................................................................... 5
H. Fees ................................................................................................................................... 5
IV. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 5 V. SELECTION CRITERIA ...................................................................................................... 6 VI. PROPOSAL LOGISTICS ..................................................................................................... 6 I. Information Contact .......................................................................................................... 6
J. Deadline & Location for Proposal Submittal ..................................................................... 6
ATTACHMENTS
1. California State University Service Agreement 2. Scope of Work 3. Fee Proposal Form 4. Project Location Map 5. Theater Arts Floor Plans 6. Theater Arts Archived Hazardous Material Surveys 7. Theater Arts Seismic Survey
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Project Description The University requests proposals from consultants to perform comprehensive interior and exterior bulk asbestos and lead sampling surveys for the Theater Arts Building. Additionally, the consultant will develop asbestos and lead abatement
specifications in support of the Theater Arts Seismic Retrofit project and survey findings.
B. Specific Scope of Work The following describes the specific scope of work associated with the building as well as project specification and survey documentation and reporting requirements: Exterior Building Survey Scope of Work The exterior survey shall include, but not be limited to the buildings shell, exterior paint, window assemblies, caulks, sealants, exposed waterproofing, roofing, underlayment, insulation, siding and other building materials suspected of containing asbestos and/or lead. Interior Building Survey Scope of Work The interior survey shall include, but not be limited to flooring, paint, ceiling assemblies, caulks, sealants, window assemblies, partition assemblies, insulation, pipe insulation, case goods and other building materials suspected of containing asbestos and/or lead. Additional Building Survey Information The asbestos and lead survey shall identify hazardous materials that may be affected by selective demolition to implement building seismic retrofit of the Theater Arts Building. The University has development plans for the seismic retrofit of the Theater Arts Building; see attachment 7, which may be used as a reference to potential impacted areas. The Theatre Arts Building was built in 1959 and is comprised of 60,317 gross square feet spread over four floors, the ground, first, second and third. The building’s construction (type IIA) includes a concrete primary vertical frame with floor levels constructed of concrete decks with integrated concrete beams. Ceiling assemblies are steel spans with suspended acoustic ceiling, exposed concrete deck, or steel and wood with plaster (typical at the theater). The building houses the largest and most specialized live performance theater on campus, known as the John Van Duzer (JVD) Theater, and offers over 700 fixed seats on the main and balcony levels. The theater’s stage is located under a fully functional fly tower with catwalks, rigging, and curtains which extend well above the third floor level. The stage incorporates a mechanical lift which raises and lowers a section of stage from the performance level (2nd floor) to the lower level (1st Floor) storage and orchestra pit. The ground floor is comprised of 18,467 gross square feet and includes theater storage, theater support facilities, lecture rooms, professional offices, teaching labs, mechanical rooms, and utility spaces. The first floor, comprised of 30,823 gross square feet, includes theater dressing rooms, theater support facilities, the main John Van Duzer Theater seating area, a smaller “black box” theater with movable seating, lecture rooms, professional offices, teaching lab space, costume and scene shops, and utility spaces. The second floor,
comprised of 9,064 gross square feet, includes the KHSU radio station, the John Van Duzer Theater balcony seating, catwalks, lighting access, mechanical space, and rigging access. The third floor, comprised of 1,963 gross square feet, includes access to the lighting gallery and over stage equipment, and access to the lower roofs and utility spaces. Theater Arts’s current floor plans and archived hazardous material surveys can be found in Attachments 5 and 6 respectively.
C. Anticipated Project Schedule The current master project schedule includes the following milestones:
May 2018: Consultant Bid Process
May 2018: Issue Completed Service Agreement
June 2018: Consultant Survey, Report and Specifications work
June 2018: Final Report and Specifications due to the University
July 2018: Project Complete
D. Code Requirements The following codes and regulatory requirements are applicable to this project:
2016 California Building Code, Title 24 as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission
California Administrative Code, Title 19 (Industrial Relations, Public Safety)
California Occupational Safety & Health Act
Public Contract Code, Section 10700 et seq. (California State Contract Law)
E. Public & Regulatory Agencies The following public and regulatory agencies have jurisdiction as described below:
Humboldt State University: Approval of the project and its corresponding scope of work and construction management administration.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): the EPA guidelines and standards with regard to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and other EPA compliance procedures as delegated to state enforcement framework shall be followed.
California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA); Cal/OSHA guidelines and standards with regard to workplace/worker safety as well as asbestos and lead containing materials shall be followed.
II. SCOPE EXCLUSIONS
F. Exclusions The consultant will not be providing construction administration for the
abatement effort associated with the projects described herein. These services
will be procured by the University at a later date and once contracts are finalized
for such work. The consultant is not responsible for costs associated with securing
permits and approvals required for the project.
III. FEES & CONTRACT
G. Contract Documents The contract utilized for this project is the California State University Service Agreement (Attachment 1) which also includes the following documents: Scope of Work (Attachment 2), and the Fee Proposal Form (Attachment 3). The California State University System Office of General Counsel prevents these agreements from being modified in any manner including additional language riders and/or requests.
H. Fees The fee for services shall be proposed based on requirements within the documents noted above and utilizing the selected firm’s rate schedule. Firms shall propose lump sum fees, to be paid monthly, in arrears, based on “percent complete” rather than “hours expended” for each item listed in the Schedule of Values Form.
IV. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Request for Proposals shall be responsive to all required information as follows:
Cover Letter: Provide a cover letter that references the RFP and confirms all elements have been reviewed and understood including explicit acknowledgment of addenda, if any. Indicate the ability of your firm to execute the required CSU contract documents without modification. Include the firm’s legal name and contact information for the single point of contact to be assigned responsibility for this project. List the firm’s insurance coverage. Evidence of such coverage is not required at this time but will be secured prior to entering into an agreement. Confirm the firm’s ability to meet California State University insurance requirements as outlined in the contract documents. Provide the name, title, and signature (secure electronic signature accepted) of the corporate officer authorized to bind the firm contractually.
Understanding of the Project: Demonstrate understanding of the project and explain your firm’s intended approach to ensure compliance with the requirements noted herein. Provide the number of samples your firm intends to take for each floor by building and the building exterior.
Schedule: Provide a proposed schedule that will meet the expected completion date. Additionally, describe methods for keeping the project on schedule and clearly indicate any foreseen challenges achieving such.
Fees: Utilizing the Schedule of Values Form, indicate the firm’s proposed fees. Submit a schedule of hourly rates by employee classification, including terms that would be used to determined fees if additional services are requested.
V. SELECTION CRITERIA The selection committee will screen and rate all Request for Proposals received. Ratings shall be based on, but not limited to, the following criteria:
Approach toward Successful Delivery of the Scope of Services Requested & Achievement of the Project Goals & Objectives
Quality Control & Schedule
Fee
VI. PROPOSAL LOGISTICS
I. Information Contact Questions regarding the Request for Proposals should be directed via email to: Michael Fisher, Associate Director of Planning, Design & Construction [email protected]. Both the question and the answer to all substantive inquiries will be posted on the University’s Contracts & Procurement website (http://www2.humboldt.edu/procurement/node/78). Deadline for inquiries is seven calendar days prior to the due date for submission of proposals
J. Deadline & Location for Proposal Submittal Please submit, via email, one electronic copy of your firm’s proposal for the role of Asbestos & Lead Survey Consultant for the Building Asbestos & Lead Survey Project on or before 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, May 23, 2018. Please direct your submission to: Michael Fisher Associate Director Planning, Design & Construction Facilities Management Humboldt State University Email: [email protected]
SERVICE AGREEMENT 02-09-18
For use on any CSU project.
SERVICE PROVIDER TRUSTEES
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this [Day] day of [Month], [Year] pursuant to the Public Contract Code 10700, et seq., by and between the Trustees of the California State University on behalf of
Campus, hereafter referred to as Trustees, and Amendment No.: Agreement No.: Project No.: California State University Lorem Ipsum 123456 123456 123456 Service Provider, hereafter referred to as Service Provider. CSU Vendor ID No.: License or DIR No.: Ipsum Lorem Service Provider, Inc. 123456 123456
WITNESSETH: That the Service Provider in consideration of the statements and conditions herein contained, agrees to furnish labor, materials, and equipment and to perform work necessary to complete, in a skillful manner: [Provide a brief [summary description of the work] for [Project Name] located at [Campus Name]. The Service Provider shall provide such services as more fully described in the following Rider and Exhibits, which by this reference are incorporated herein and made part of this Agreement:
Rider A Agreement General Provisions, consisting of four (4) pages; Exhibit A Scope of Work, consisting of [Number] pages; Exhibit B Fee and Payment Schedule, consisting of one (1) page; Exhibit C Service Provider Hourly Rate Schedule applicable to this project.
The term shall begin upon receipt of an executed Agreement from the Trustees and shall end as of [Date]. Work elements started during the term shall continue to their completion and acceptance by the Trustees. The Service Provider shall not perform services in excess of the Agreement without prior written authorization to proceed from the Trustees. Service Provider shall report to: [Campus and Name of Project Administrator]
The basic services amount to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed [Insert Value]. Payment shall be made in accordance with Rider A and Exhibits A, B, C.
Trustees of the California State University Service Provider Campus California State University Lorem Ipsum
Firm Name Ipsum Lorem Service Provider, Inc.
By (Trustees’ Authorized Signature) By (Authorized Signature)
Printed Name and Title of Person Signing
John Smith, Campus Representative
Printed Name and Title of Person Signing
Jack Smith, Service Provider Authorized Signatory Address of Campus Project Administrator
99999 Lorem Ipsum Drive, Ipsum, CA 99999
Address of Service Provider
11111 Ipsum Lorem Drive, Lorem CA 11111 SCO Acct Data:
Fund 123456
Sub Fund 123456
Agency 123456
Yr. Ref/Item 123456
Category 123456
Program 123456
Element 123456
Component 123456
Chapter 123456
Fiscal Yr. 123456
Legal Ref. 123456
Fund Name 123456
PS Account 123456
PS Fund 123456
PS Dept. ID 123456
PS Program 123456
PS Class 123456
PS Project/Grant 123456
Amount Encumbered $999,999,999
I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for the period and purpose of the expenditures stated above.
Amount of Increase $999,999,999
Signature of Accounting Officer
Date
Amount of Decrease $999,999,999
I hereby certify that I have examined the written Agreement and find the same to be in accordance with the requirements of California State University Contract Law. G. ANDREW JONES, General Counsel
Total Amount Encumbered $999,999,999
By Attorney
Date
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. The exchange of copies of this Agreement by electronic mail in “portable document format” (“.PDF”) form or by other similar electronic means shall constitute effective execution and delivery of this Agreement and shall have the same effect as copies executed and delivered with original signatures.
Agreement No. XXXX Name of Service Provider
Rider A, Page 1 of 3
Rider A
ASBESTOS ABATEMENT DESIGN THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
A. SCOPE OF WORK
a. Provide complete description of the scope of work which will identify all labor, material and
services required to perform comprehensive interior and exterior bulk asbestos and lead sampling surveys and abatement specifications in support of the Theater Arts Seismic Retrofit project and seismic survey findings for the Theater Arts Building.
b. In consultation with the University representatives, Consultant’s scope of work includes preparation of an asbestos abatement survey report and specifications. The survey report and specifications package will include the abatement technical specifications, drawings and the sample reports with coordinated keyed maps.
c. Provide all service under this Agreement for an amount not to exceed the contract amount
indicated on the attachment 3 of the request for proposals “Fee Proposal Form”. The maximum amount indicated on attachment 3 of the request for proposals “Fee Proposal Form” shall be payable as stated in the following provision which is marked with an “X”:
(The provision which is not so marked shall not apply to this Agreement.)
☒ 1. Single, lump sum payment. Architect shall be paid in a single, lump sum payment in arrears upon completion of all work under this Agreement to the satisfaction of the Trustees.
☐ 2. Progress payments. Architect shall be paid in multiple payments in arrears for work performed to the satisfaction of the Trustees as more particularly specified in Progress Payment Attachment which by this reference is made a part of this Agreement.
Agreement No. XXXX
Name of Service Provider Rider A, Page 2 of 3
B. PROJECT APPROACH
Consultant will initially evaluate existing survey information for use during the abatement design. After this evaluation, Consultant will then prepare the bid package.
Consultant’s scope of work will include meeting with University campus project staff to discuss project logistics and coordination details and to collect and review available data. Consultant will then develop abatement survey report and specifications that meet the requirements as outlined in the scope of work.
Consultant will work with the University to review available records of including as-built drawings, asbestos survey reports and analytical results. Consultant will implement a pre-design investigation strategy following the data review activities, and will mobilize its pre-design investigation team to secure additional data as required to complete the bid documents as an integral part of this work.
During the pre-design investigation, Consultant will collect representative bulk samples, as needed, to supplement and verify available survey information. Consultant will submit to an appropriate licensed laboratory, bulk asbestos samples collected during the surveys, paying all costs necessary for analysis. Surveys shall include, but not be limited to, clearly marked maps of survey points using AutoCAD drawings with final floor plan and building maps being converted to PDF format and included with the survey report. The AutoCAD file shall be submitted to the University with the survey report. The report will also include coordinated test results from the testing agency, site survey log, clearly described test locations and clearly described materials tested. The results, testing log, and descriptions shall be collated into a single spreadsheet with a survey location identification number corresponding to the floor plans and building maps. The report will also have a summary identifying the methodology used for testing and descriptions of areas and/or materials with positive results requiring prioritized attention. The report will also include a cover sheet and table of contents. Survey locations will be repaired by the University’s Department of Facilities Management upon conclusion of the consultant’s field effort
Consultant will evaluate each project area for specific asbestos abatement design considerations such as a strategy for work area containment barriers, the accessibility of removal surfaces for glovebag or gross removal techniques presence of architectural finishes to be projected during abatement, availability of required utilities (i.e., power and water) and user requirements, if any, during the asbestos abatement process.
Consultant will prepare the technical specifications that describe the abatement practices and procedures to be used upon completion of the pre-design investigation. Complete project abatement specifications shall include, but not be limited to, a site/building description including scope of work, the survey report, a scope of work, definitions, related references to governing code and regulations, a project execution section, products, equipment, abatement methodology, containment procedures, prescribed containment areas, site deconstruction, post abatement testing and clearances, waste disposal and chain of custody procedures. Specifications shall be comprehensive and will be included as part of the University bid package associated with the abatement work required to
Agreement No. XXXX
Name of Service Provider Page 3 of 3
complete the project scope of work (renovation or demolition as described herein). All specifications shall be in compliance with California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety & Health (Cal/OSHA) regulations governing asbestos and lead containing materials. Additionally, it is desired that the consultant define administrative requirements, engineering controls and mandated work practices to govern this portion of the work.
The technical specifications will be used to describe the selected Contractor’s pre-job and post-job submittals that include documents necessary to comply with applicable local, state and federal regulations and to protect the University from possible legal or regulatory activity associated with this project
Consultant may prepare abatement drawings for the project using reproducible “as-built” drawings obtained during the data review of renovation drawings if available from the University. In the absence of “as-built” reproducible drawings, Consultant shall prepare the required abatement drawings necessary for the bid documents.
Upon completion of the technical specifications and drawings, the Consultant shall prepare complete bid documents and will review the final bid document package with the University. The General Conditions and Instruction to Bidders will be furnished by the University. Technical specifications shall specifically control the abatement contractor’s demolition process in order to minimize damage to areas not to be remodeled (if applicable)
Consultant will prepare at the request of the University special instruction for break-out prices of the various abatement phases, unit prices for work changes, and alternates for any additional items.
Upon completion of the survey and abatement specifications, Consultant shall submit a detailed construction cost estimate for the abatement work.
It is understood that all aspects of the project planning and design will be conducted in close communication with the University campus and changes will be made as required.
C. PROJECT TEAM
Sound technical skills and project approach will be provided by strong comprehensive management for this abatement project. Professionals selected for the project will have the skills and experience necessary to successfully design this project. The Consultant fully commits the time needed by his professional staff to perform for this project to the firm’s high standard of quality work and in a timely manner.
End of Rider A
Humboldt State University
Building Asbestoes and Lead Survey Consultant RFP
FEE PROPOSAL FORM
Attachement 3
Task ID Task Description
Percentage of
Total Contract
Value Task Value
Theater Arts Building ‐ ‐
4 Field Survey Effort $
5 Testing & Laboratory Fees $
6 Report Generation $
7 Project Specifacation Generation $
Total Proposed Contract Value: $
Total proposed contract value will be inclusive of all reimbursable costs.
OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO BELOW
Final Report
Bulk Asbestos Analysis(EPA Method 600/R-93-116, Visual Area Estimation)
Forensic Analytical Laboratories
2087Client ID:Humboldt State UniversityB154781Report Number:Randy Davis
Date Received:1 Harpst Street09/30/11Date Analyzed:Plan Operations09/30/11Date Printed:Arcata, CA 95521
First Reported:
208712-2857 - Theater Arts 12, IT Call Center FALI Job ID:Job ID/Site:
Date(s) Collected: 09/29/20116Total Samples Submitted:
Total Samples Analyzed: 6
09/30/11
09/30/11
Sample ID Lab NumberAsbestos
TypePercent in
LayerAsbestos AsbestosPercent in Percent in
Type TypeLayer Layer
10-12-001 11174029Layer: Beige Plaster ND
Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)
10-12-002 11174030Layer: Tan Mastic NDLayer: Grey Fibrous Material NDLayer: Paint ND
Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (35 %) Fibrous Glass (45 %)
10-12-003 11174031Layer: Tan Mastic NDLayer: Grey Fibrous Material NDLayer: Paint ND
Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (35 %) Fibrous Glass (45 %)
10-12-004 11174032Layer: Black Non-Fibrous Material NDLayer: Tan Mastic ND
Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)
10-12-005 11174033Layer: Black Non-Fibrous Material NDLayer: Tan Mastic ND
Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)
10-12-006 11174034Layer: Black Non-Fibrous Material NDLayer: Tan Mastic ND
Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)
1 of 23777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218
Report Number: B154781Date Printed: 09/30/11Client Name: Humboldt State University
Sample ID Lab NumberAsbestos
TypePercent in
LayerAsbestos AsbestosPercent in Percent in
Type TypeLayer Layer
Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. (FALI) at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on suchreport. Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by FALI to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested.Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by FALI. The client is solely responsible for theuse and interpretation of test results and reports requested from FALI. Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. is not able to assess the degree of hazard resulting from materialsanalyzed. FALI reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. All samples werereceived in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted.
Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.Tad Thrower, Laboratory Supervisor, Hayward Laboratory
2 of 23777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218
Final Report
Bulk Asbestos Analysis(EPA Method 600/R-93-116, Visual Area Estimation)
2087Client ID:Humboldt State UniversityB141574Report Number:REPLACE W/ NAME COC
Date Received:1 Harpst Street11/04/10Date Analyzed:Plan Operations11/04/10Date Printed:Arcata, CA 95521
First Reported:
2087Work Order 11-3937, Theater Arts Room 19 FALI Job ID:Job ID/Site:
Date(s) Collected: 11/02/20107Total Samples Submitted:
Total Samples Analyzed: 7
11/04/10
Forensic Analytical Laboratories
11/04/10
Sample ID Lab NumberAsbestos
TypePercent in
LayerAsbestos AsbestosPercent in Percent in
Type TypeLayer Layer
10-19-001 11048715Layer: Tan Fibrous Material ND
Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (99 %)
10-19-002 11048716Layer: Tan Fibrous Material NDLayer: Paint NDLayer: Brown Mastic ND
Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (95 %)
10-19-003 11048717Layer: Yellow/Brown Mastic ND
Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)
10-19-004 11048718Layer: Off-White Plaster NDLayer: White Plaster NDLayer: Paint ND
Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)
10-19-005 11048719Layer: Off-White Plaster ND
Asbestos (ND)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)
10-19-006 11048720Layer: Beige Plaster Actinolite TraceLayer: White Plaster NDLayer: Off-White Plaster ND
Asbestos (Trace)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)
1 of 23777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218
Report Number: B141574Date Printed: 11/04/10Client Name: Humboldt State University
Sample ID Lab NumberAsbestos
TypePercent in
LayerAsbestos AsbestosPercent in Percent in
Type TypeLayer Layer
10-19-007 11048721Layer: Black Adhesive Chrysotile 10 %
Asbestos (10%)Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:Cellulose (Trace)
Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. (FALI) at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on suchreport. Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by FALI to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested.Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by FALI. The client is solely responsible for theuse and interpretation of test results and reports requested from FALI. Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. is not able to assess the degree of hazard resulting from materialsanalyzed. FALI reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. All samples werereceived in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted.
Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.James Flores, Laboratory Supervisor, Hayward Laboratory
2 of 23777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218
A6.3
1
A6.4 1
A6.21
FRP WRAP INT COLUMN (SSD)
(E) MASONRY CHIMNEY TO BE REMOVED PATCH WALL/FLOOR TO MATCH (E) FINISH
UPDN
UP
UP
UP
UP DN
UP
REMODEL OF ROOMS 17A, 17B, & 17C - REMOVE PARTITIONS & PATCH WALLS, PROVIDE (N) FLOORING & (N) LAY-IN CEILING W/ LIGHTING & RE-DISTRIBUTION OF HVAC
OFFICE20G OFFICE
20F
OFFICE20E
OFFICE20D
OFFICE20C
OFFICE20B
OFFICE18
EDIT & PROD19A EDIT & PROD
19
WORKROOM20A
THTR FILM DANCEDEPT OFFICE
20
LECTURE17
OFFICE12A
OFFICE12
OFFICE15
PROP STOR7D
PROP STOR7D
PROP STOR7D
MEDIA 100 LAB13
LECTURE11
CTR STAIRS-0B
CUSTC-0A
MEN'SRR-M-0
WOMEN'SRR-W-0
ELECTRICAL6C
CUSTC-0B
CUSTC-0CTELECOM
6B
SET STAIR6A
OFFICE10
DESIGN LAB9
OFFICE10A
OFFICE9A
MECH8
PROP CONSTR AREA7 MECH
7F
MECH7A
ELECT7B
PROP STOR7C
GEN STOR7E
ORCH PIT6E
SET STOR & TRAP RM6
PROP STOR7D
NW STAIRS-0C
SW STAIRS-0A
HALLH-0B
ELEVATOREL-0
A5.19
A5.15
ELEV MECHEL/M-0
DF
REMOVE (E) WDW FRAMING FOR STRUCT CONC WALL INFILL STRENGTHENING - SEE PROPOSED FLOOR PAN (SSD)
REMOVE (E) WDW FRAMING FOR STRUCT CONC WALL INFILL STRENGTHENING - SEE PROPOSED FLOOR PAN (SSD)
REMOVE (E) WDW FRAMING FOR STRUCT CONC WALL INFILL STRENGTHENING - SEE PROPOSED FLOOR PAN (SSD)
REMOVE (E) WDW FRAMING FOR STRUCT CONC WALL INFILL STRENGTHENING - SEE PROPOSED FLOOR PAN (SSD)
A6.3
A6.1
1
HALLH-0A
HALLH-0C
HALLH-0D
HALLH-0E
DEMO (E) DOOR SSD
17B
17A17C
LEGEND - DEMOLITION PLAN
(E) WALL OR ELEMENT TO REMAIN SHOWN SOLID
(E) WALL OR ELEMENT TO BE REMOVED SHOWN DASHED TYP
GENERAL DEMO PLAN NOTES
1. FOR RCPS SEE A4.1 THROUGH A4.8 FOR SELECTIVE CEILING DEMO2. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR STRUCTURAL DEMO 3. SEE SITE PLAN A0.4 & CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDL SITE DEMO4. SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A6.1 THROUGH A6.55. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE SITE
PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID PROPOSALS TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH ALL EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT.
6. OWNER HAS FIRST RIGHT OF REFUSAL OF ALL SALVAGEABLE ITEMS7. REMOVE ALL UNUSED ELECTRICAL WIRING, CONDUITS, WATER PIPING,
VENTS, ETC.8. DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE ANY CONSTRUCTION METHODS
THAT WILL CAUSE DAMAGE TO WORK TO BE LEFT IN PLACE.9 IF ANY EXISTING CONSTRUCTION THAT IS TO BE LEFT IN PLACE OR NOT
SPECIFICALLY NOTED FOR REMOVAL IS DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION WORK, IT SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
10. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION TIMING, MOVEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND STORAGE OF REFUSE CONTAINERS WITH THE OWNER.
11. COORDINATE ARCHITECTURAL DEMOLITION WORK WITH THAT OF THE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL TRADES AND DRAWINGS, VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.
HU
MB
OL
DT
ST
AT
E
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
Thea
ter
Art
s
Sei
smic
Ret
rofi
tA
rcat
a, C
alif
orn
ia
Owner: Trustees of the California StateUniversity
Project Team
Project
Revisions
Sheet Name
Date
Owner #
SKA #
Sheet Number
Seals
Arch: Suarez-Kuehne ArchitectureSan Francisco, CA 94116
Struct: Thornton TomasettiSan Francisco, CA 94108
MEPT: Interface EngineeringSan Francisco, CA 94105
Acoust: Papadimos GroupSan Francisco, CA 94104
Civil: Stover EngineeringCrescent City, CA 95531
Land: Genevieve Schmidt - Landscape DesignMcKinleyville, CA 95521
Cost: Cost EstimationsAnchorage, AK 99518
A2.1
23 MARCH 2018
BASEMENTDEMO PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"1
BASEMENT LEVEL DEMO PLAN
PROJECT NORTH
NORTH
A6.21
TOILET ROOM FIXTURES & FINSHES ACCESSIBILITY REMODEL TO CREATE (N) ACCESSIBLE STALL (WILL REQUIRE 1 LESS WC AND 2 LESS LAVS TYP)
(E) MASONRY CHIMNEY TO BE REMOVED - PATCH WALL/FLOOR TO MATCH (E) FINISH - RELOCATE (E) FEC TO REAR WALL
TOILET ROOM FIXTURES & FINISHES ACCESSIBILITY REMODEL TO CREATE (N) ACCESSIBLE STALL (WILL REQUIRE 1 LESS WC AND 1 LESS LAV TYP)
RAMP ACCESSIBILITY REMODEL TO CREATE (N) COMPLIANT LANDING LENGTH & HANDRAILS
DN
UP
UP DN
DN
DNDN
DN
UP
DN
UPUP
DN
DN
DN
DN
UP
UP
UP
UP
UPUP
LECTURE114
DEPT CHAIR OFFICE113
COSTUME STOR112B
COSTUME SHOP112
OFFICE112A
COSTUME LAUNDRY111
THTR CLASSROOM115
THTR STOR116
CUSTC-1D
GEN STOR101L
EDIT BOOTH117B
EDIT BOOTH117A
FILM / AUDIO LAB117
STAGE WAITING AREA118C
THTR HALL118
CINEMA LAB118B
CUSTC-1C
STAGE101D
AUDIO STOR102A
OFFICE102LIGHT STOR
103A
OFFICE103B
SS STOR103C
SCENE SHOP103
MEN'S DRESSING (JVD)104
MEN'SRR-M-1B
CUSTC-1B
WOMEN'SRR-W-1B
WOMEN'S DRESSING108
MAKE-UP (JVD)109
LECTURE110
SCENE CARP STOR103E
SS STOR103D
JVD THEATER101
CONTROL BOOTH101G
INT STAIR101H
CUSTC-1A
GEN STOR101A
BOX OFFICE100
NW STAIRS-1C
NE STAIRS-1D
CTR STAIRS-1B
ELEVEL-1
SW STAIRS-1A
THTR STAIR101I
HALLH-1C
A5.11 A5.1
3
A5.15
A5.21
CONCESSION101E
MEN'SRR-M-1A
WOMEN'SRR-W-1A
THEATER LOBBY101F
UP
UP
DN
DN
A6.4 1
A6.3
1
A6.1
1
-
VESTIBULERR-W-1C
VESTIBULERR-M-1D
(E) ELEC CAB TO BE RELOCATED AFTER STRUCT SHEAR WALL WORK IN THIS AREA - SEE PROPOSED PLAN (SSD SED)
(E) FHC TO BE RELOCATED TO REAR STAGE WALL AFTER (E) CHIMNEY HAS BEEN REMOVED - THIS INCLUDES RELOCATION OF (E) FIRE WATER CONNECTION LINE TO REAR WALL - SEE PROPOSED PLAN (SSD SPD)
A7.24
10
9
3
HALLH-1A
HALLH-1B
HALLH-1D
HALLH-1B
LEGEND - DEMOLITION PLAN
(E) WALL OR ELEMENT TO REMAIN SHOWN SOLID
(E) WALL OR ELEMENT TO BE REMOVED SHOWN DASHED TYP
GENERAL DEMO PLAN NOTES
1. FOR RCPS SEE A4.1 THROUGH A4.8 FOR SELECTIVE CEILING DEMO2. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR STRUCTURAL DEMO 3. SEE SITE PLAN A0.4 & CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDL SITE DEMO4. SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A6.1 THROUGH A6.55. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE SITE
PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID PROPOSALS TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH ALL EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT.
6. OWNER HAS FIRST RIGHT OF REFUSAL OF ALL SALVAGEABLE ITEMS7. REMOVE ALL UNUSED ELECTRICAL WIRING, CONDUITS, WATER PIPING,
VENTS, ETC.8. DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE ANY CONSTRUCTION METHODS
THAT WILL CAUSE DAMAGE TO WORK TO BE LEFT IN PLACE.9 IF ANY EXISTING CONSTRUCTION THAT IS TO BE LEFT IN PLACE OR NOT
SPECIFICALLY NOTED FOR REMOVAL IS DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION WORK, IT SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
10. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION TIMING, MOVEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND STORAGE OF REFUSE CONTAINERS WITH THE OWNER.
11. COORDINATE ARCHITECTURAL DEMOLITION WORK WITH THAT OF THE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL TRADES AND DRAWINGS, VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.
HU
MB
OL
DT
ST
AT
E
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
Thea
ter
Art
s
Sei
smic
Ret
rofi
tA
rcat
a, C
alif
orn
ia
Owner: Trustees of the California StateUniversity
Project Team
Project
Revisions
Sheet Name
Date
Owner #
SKA #
Sheet Number
Seals
Arch: Suarez-Kuehne ArchitectureSan Francisco, CA 94116
Struct: Thornton TomasettiSan Francisco, CA 94108
MEPT: Interface EngineeringSan Francisco, CA 94105
Acoust: Papadimos GroupSan Francisco, CA 94104
Civil: Stover EngineeringCrescent City, CA 95531
Land: Genevieve Schmidt - Landscape DesignMcKinleyville, CA 95521
Cost: Cost EstimationsAnchorage, AK 99518
A2.3
23 MARCH 2018
LEVEL 1DEMO PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"1
LEVEL 1 DEMO PLAN
PROJECT NORTH
NORTH
A6.3
1
A6.21
(E) MASONRY CHIMNEY TO BE REMOVED PATCH WALL TO MATCH (E) FINISH
DN
UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
DN
UP
UP
DN
UP
DN
DN
SEE PROPOSED PLAN FOR ANY DEMO REMOVAL @ ROOM 115
SEE PROPOSED PLAN FOR ANY DEMO REMOVAL @ ROOM 117
THTR N STAIRS-2G
THEATER BALCONY(JVD)
201
THTR S STAIRS-2H
COSTUME STOR207
CATWALK (BB)215
CTRL & STOR (BB)208A
LIGHT BOOTH (BB)208
CTR STAIRS-2B
HALLH-2B
EDIT BOOTH204 EDIT BOOTH
205 EDIT BOOTH205A
CD LIBRARY203
EDIT BOOTH202
EDIT BOOTH202A
KHSU BOOTH206E
KHSU SUPPORT206B KHSU BOOTH
206A
GEN STOR206F
TELECOM206C
SW STAIRS-2A
ELEVATOREL-2
CD LIBRARY206D
CD LIBRARY206
SEE PROPOSED PLAN FOR ANY DEMO REMOVAL @ FLY GALLERY
UP
A5.15
FILM / AUDIO LAB117
DN
A6.4 1
A6.1
1
A6.3
SEE A2.9 AND A2.10FOR ROOF PLANS TYP
HALLH-2A
DASHED LINE REPRESENTS AREA OF SPECIAL PROTECTION MEASURES TO BE PROVIDED AT THESE SPACES PRIOR TO ANY DEMO / WORK AT ROOF LEVEL ABOVE (SEE SPECIFICATION 01 52 00)
LEGEND - DEMOLITION PLAN
(E) WALL OR ELEMENT TO REMAIN SHOWN SOLID
(E) WALL OR ELEMENT TO BE REMOVED SHOWN DASHED TYP
GENERAL DEMO PLAN NOTES
1. FOR RCPS SEE A4.1 THROUGH A4.8 FOR SELECTIVE CEILING DEMO2. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR STRUCTURAL DEMO 3. SEE SITE PLAN A0.4 & CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDL SITE DEMO4. SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A6.1 THROUGH A6.55. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE SITE
PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID PROPOSALS TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH ALL EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT.
6. OWNER HAS FIRST RIGHT OF REFUSAL OF ALL SALVAGEABLE ITEMS7. REMOVE ALL UNUSED ELECTRICAL WIRING, CONDUITS, WATER PIPING,
VENTS, ETC.8. DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE ANY CONSTRUCTION METHODS
THAT WILL CAUSE DAMAGE TO WORK TO BE LEFT IN PLACE.9 IF ANY EXISTING CONSTRUCTION THAT IS TO BE LEFT IN PLACE OR NOT
SPECIFICALLY NOTED FOR REMOVAL IS DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION WORK, IT SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
10. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION TIMING, MOVEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND STORAGE OF REFUSE CONTAINERS WITH THE OWNER.
11. COORDINATE ARCHITECTURAL DEMOLITION WORK WITH THAT OF THE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL TRADES AND DRAWINGS, VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.
HU
MB
OL
DT
ST
AT
E
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
Thea
ter
Art
s
Sei
smic
Ret
rofi
tA
rcat
a, C
alif
orn
ia
Owner: Trustees of the California StateUniversity
Project Team
Project
Revisions
Sheet Name
Date
Owner #
SKA #
Sheet Number
Seals
Arch: Suarez-Kuehne ArchitectureSan Francisco, CA 94116
Struct: Thornton TomasettiSan Francisco, CA 94108
MEPT: Interface EngineeringSan Francisco, CA 94105
Acoust: Papadimos GroupSan Francisco, CA 94104
Civil: Stover EngineeringCrescent City, CA 95531
Land: Genevieve Schmidt - Landscape DesignMcKinleyville, CA 95521
Cost: Cost EstimationsAnchorage, AK 99518
A2.5
23 MARCH 2018
LEVEL 2DEMO PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"1
LEVEL 2 DEMO PLAN
PROJECT NORTH
NORTH
A6.21
LIGHT GALLERY (JVD)303
CTR STAIRS-3B
EQUIP STOR302
MECH301
SEE PROPOSED PLAN FOR ANY DEMO REMOVAL @ FLY GALLERY
(E) MASONRY CHIMNEY TO BE REMOVED PATCH WALL TO MATCH (E) FINISH
DN
SEE STRUCT DRAWINGS FOR SEISMIC WORK TO BE PERFORMED
WITHIN THE AUDITORIUM ROOF/CEILING TRUSSES ACCESSED FROM THE LIGHT GALLERY (SPACE
303). THIS INCLUDES SEISMIC BLOCKING OF ROOF TRUSSES, SEISMIC STRENGTHENING OF
WALL/ROOF DIAPHRAM CONNECTIONS, & SEISMIC BRACING
OF SUSPENDED PLASTER AUDITORIUM CEILINGS
(E) 4" ROOF DRAIN LINE IN CORNER - REMOVE (FOR REINSTALLATION AFTER RETROFIT) FOR WORK ACCESS -SSD
(E) 4" ROOF DRAIN LINE IN CORNER -REMOVE (FOR REINSTALLATION AFTER RETROFIT) FOR WORK ACCESS - SSD
CORROSION REPAIR (FROM ROOF LEAK AT CHIMNEY) AT ROOF LEDGER - SSD
TRUSS END: WALL CONN TO BE STRENGTHENED - REMOVE DUCTWORK SECTIONS SHOWN DASHED (FOR REINSTALLATION AFTER RETROFIT) FOR WORK ACCESS - SSD
TRUSS END: WALL CONN TO BE STRENGTHENED - REMOVE DUCTWORK SECTIONS SHOWN DASHED (FOR REINSTALLATION AFTER RETROFIT) FOR WORK ACCESS - SSD
(E) ROOF DECK DIAGONAL BRACING SHOWN W/ LIGHT LINES TYP
ROOF BELOW SHOWN DASHED - TYP
DN
A6.4 1
A6.3
1
A6.1
1
DEMO REQD FOR (N) STRUCT STRONGBACKS - SSD
-
SEE A2.9 AND A2.10FOR ROOF PLANS TYP
LEGEND - DEMOLITION PLAN
(E) WALL OR ELEMENT TO REMAIN SHOWN SOLID
(E) WALL OR ELEMENT TO BE REMOVED SHOWN DASHED TYP
GENERAL DEMO PLAN NOTES
1. FOR RCPS SEE A4.1 THROUGH A4.8 FOR SELECTIVE CEILING DEMO2. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR STRUCTURAL DEMO 3. SEE SITE PLAN A0.4 & CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDL SITE DEMO4. SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A6.1 THROUGH A6.55. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE SITE
PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID PROPOSALS TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH ALL EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT.
6. OWNER HAS FIRST RIGHT OF REFUSAL OF ALL SALVAGEABLE ITEMS7. REMOVE ALL UNUSED ELECTRICAL WIRING, CONDUITS, WATER PIPING,
VENTS, ETC.8. DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE ANY CONSTRUCTION METHODS
THAT WILL CAUSE DAMAGE TO WORK TO BE LEFT IN PLACE.9 IF ANY EXISTING CONSTRUCTION THAT IS TO BE LEFT IN PLACE OR NOT
SPECIFICALLY NOTED FOR REMOVAL IS DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION WORK, IT SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
10. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION TIMING, MOVEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND STORAGE OF REFUSE CONTAINERS WITH THE OWNER.
11. COORDINATE ARCHITECTURAL DEMOLITION WORK WITH THAT OF THE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL TRADES AND DRAWINGS, VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.
HU
MB
OL
DT
ST
AT
E
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
Thea
ter
Art
s
Sei
smic
Ret
rofi
tA
rcat
a, C
alif
orn
ia
Owner: Trustees of the California StateUniversity
Project Team
Project
Revisions
Sheet Name
Date
Owner #
SKA #
Sheet Number
Seals
Arch: Suarez-Kuehne ArchitectureSan Francisco, CA 94116
Struct: Thornton TomasettiSan Francisco, CA 94108
MEPT: Interface EngineeringSan Francisco, CA 94105
Acoust: Papadimos GroupSan Francisco, CA 94104
Civil: Stover EngineeringCrescent City, CA 95531
Land: Genevieve Schmidt - Landscape DesignMcKinleyville, CA 95521
Cost: Cost EstimationsAnchorage, AK 99518
A2.7
23 MARCH 2018
LEVEL 3DEMO PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"1
LEVEL 3 DEMO PLAN
PROJECT NORTH
NORTH
ROOF ABOVE LEVEL 2: REMOVE (E) ROOF COVERING & INSUL TYP FOR ENTIRE ROOF AREA (SEE LEGEND FOR CROSSHATCHED AREAS)
DEMO (E) CHIMNEY & ROOFING
(E) SATELLITE DISH & CABLING TO BE REMOVED & REINSTALLED @ (N) LOC - SEE PROPOSED PLAN
(E) EXHUAST FANS (2) TO BE REMOVED & REINSTALLED AFTER RE-ROOFING STRUCT WORK
(E) EXHUAST FANS (3) TO BE REMOVED & REINSTALLED AFTER RE-ROOFING STRUCT WORK
(E) EXHAUST FANS TO BE REMOVED & REINSTALLED AFTER RE-ROOFING & STRUCT WORK TYP
DEMO (E) SKLIGHT & CURB SUPPORTS & REPLACE W/ (N)
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD SYM TYPICALLY DENOTES (E) ROOF DRAIN LOCATION THAT (BASED UPON STRUCT WORK REQUIRING A (N) ROOF COVERING FOR THIS ENTIRE ROOF AREA) WOULD REQUIRE THE ADDITION OF AN OVERFLOW DRAIN W/ VISIBLE SCUPPER THROUGH AN ADJACENT EXT WALL - SPD
RD
(E) GRAVITY VENTS - TYP
(E) SCUTTLE - TYP UON
(E) WALL EXHAUST FAN - TYP
(E) EXHAUST VENT - TYP
RDRD
RD
RD
RD
RDRD
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
(E) OVERFLOW SCUPPERS - NEED TO CONFIRM HEIGHT FROM ROOF & OPEN AREA
RD
(E) ROOF DRAINS -TYP - UON
(E) OVERFLOW SCUPPERS - NEED TO CONFIRM HEIGHT FROM ROOF & OPEN AREA
RD
(E) GRAVITY VENT
A6.21
A6.4 1
A6.3
1
A6.1
1
SPD FOR LOCS OF (N) ROOF OVERFLOW DRAINS NEAR EA ROOF DRAIN FOR DEMO REQD @ ROOF DECK AND EXT WALL FOR DRAIN OUTLET - TYP
(E) ROOF ACCESS HATCH -APPROX LOC
REMOVE & RELOCATE (E) ROOF LADDER - SEE PROPOSED PLAN
(E) ROOF VENTS (TYP OF 5) TO BE REMOVED & REINSTALLED AFTER RE-ROOFING & STRUCT WORK
(E) ROOF HATCH TO BE REMOVED & REINSTALLED AFTER RE-ROOFING & STRUCT WORK
(E) RADIO TOWER ANTENNAE & GUY WIRES TO REMAIN IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION - SIGNAL CABLING/CONDUIT TO BE TEMP SUSPENDED ABOVE ROOF DECK WORK AREA (WHILE REMAINING OPERATIONAL) & THEN REINSTALLED ON (N) ROOF DECK AFTER RE-ROOFING & STRUCT WORK
(E) SATELLITE DISH BOX & CABLING TO BE REMOVED & REINSTALLED AFTER RE-ROOFING -SEE PROPOSED PLAN
(E) HVAC UNIT TO BE REMOVED
(E) SATELLITE DISH - CABLING - CONDUIT TO BE REMOVED & REINSTALLED AFTER RE-ROOFING -SEE PROPOSED PLAN
(E) EXPOSED CONDUIT (ABOVE ROOFING) - REMOVE & REINSTALL AFTER RE-ROOFING
(E) ROOF LADDER TO REMAIN
ROOF ABOVE LEVEL 1: REMOVE (E) ROOF COVERING & INSUL TYP FOR ENTIRE ROOF AREA (SEE LEGEND FOR CROSSHATCHED AREAS)
ROOF ABOVE FLYTOWER: REMOVE (E) ROOF COVERING & INSUL TYP FOR ENTIRE ROOF AREA (SEE LEGEND FOR CROSSHATCHED AREAS)
ROOF ABOVE SCENE SHOP: REMOVE (E) ROOF COVERING & INSUL TYP FOR ENTIRE ROOF AREA (SEE LEGEND FOR CROSSHATCHED AREAS)
DASHED LINE REPRESENTS AREA OF SPECIAL PROTECTION MEASURES IN LEVEL 2 SPACES BELOW TO BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO ANY DEMO AT ROOF LEVEL IN THIS AREA (SEE SPECIFICATION 01 52 00)
DO NOT DEMO SECTION OF (E) ROOF DECKING IMMEDIATLY BELOW (E) ROOF MOUNTED ANTENNAE (GC TO VERIFY SUPPORT CONDITIONS ACROSS TWO (E) ROOF PURLINS BELOW PRIOR TO ADJACENT ROOF DECK DEMO)
ROOF PLAN DEMO DIAGRAM LEGEND
1. DESIGNATES AREA REQUIRING REMOVAL OF (E) ROOF COVERING, (E) INSUL, & (E) ROOF MTL DECKING FOR STRUCTRAL SEISMIC RETROFIT (SSD)
2. REMOVE (E) ROOF COVERING & (E) INSUL FROM ENTIRE ROOF AREA WHERE THIS OCCURS
GENERAL DEMO PLAN NOTES
1. FOR RCPS SEE A4.1 THROUGH A4.8 FOR SELECTIVE CEILING DEMO2. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR STRUCTURAL DEMO 3. SEE SITE PLAN A0.4 & CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDL SITE DEMO4. SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A6.1 THROUGH A6.55. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE SITE
PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID PROPOSALS TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH ALL EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT.
6. OWNER HAS FIRST RIGHT OF REFUSAL OF ALL SALVAGEABLE ITEMS7. REMOVE ALL UNUSED ELECTRICAL WIRING, CONDUITS, WATER PIPING,
VENTS, ETC.8. DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE ANY CONSTRUCTION METHODS
THAT WILL CAUSE DAMAGE TO WORK TO BE LEFT IN PLACE.9 IF ANY EXISTING CONSTRUCTION THAT IS TO BE LEFT IN PLACE OR NOT
SPECIFICALLY NOTED FOR REMOVAL IS DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION WORK, IT SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
10. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION TIMING, MOVEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND STORAGE OF REFUSE CONTAINERS WITH THE OWNER.
11. COORDINATE ARCHITECTURAL DEMOLITION WORK WITH THAT OF THE MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL TRADES AND DRAWINGS, VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.
HU
MB
OL
DT
ST
AT
E
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
Thea
ter
Art
s
Sei
smic
Ret
rofi
tA
rcat
a, C
alif
orn
ia
Owner: Trustees of the California StateUniversity
Project Team
Project
Revisions
Sheet Name
Date
Owner #
SKA #
Sheet Number
Seals
Arch: Suarez-Kuehne ArchitectureSan Francisco, CA 94116
Struct: Thornton TomasettiSan Francisco, CA 94108
MEPT: Interface EngineeringSan Francisco, CA 94105
Acoust: Papadimos GroupSan Francisco, CA 94104
Civil: Stover EngineeringCrescent City, CA 95531
Land: Genevieve Schmidt - Landscape DesignMcKinleyville, CA 95521
Cost: Cost EstimationsAnchorage, AK 99518
A2.9
23 MARCH 2018
ROOFLEVELDEMO PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"1
ROOF DEMO PLAN
PROJECT NORTH
NORTH
A4.85
OFFICE20G OFFICE
20F
OFFICE20E
OFFICE20D
OFFICE20C
THTR FILM DANCEDEPT OFFICE
20
WORKROOM20A
EDIT & PROD19A EDIT & PROD
19
OFFICE20B
OFFICE18
HALLH-0B
LECTURE17
OFFICE12A
OFFICE12
MEDIA 100 LAB13
HALLH-0B
SW STAIRS-0A
ELEVATOREL-0
LECTURE11
OFFICE10
OFFICE10A
OFFICE9A
DESIGN LAB9
MECH8
PROP CONSTR AREA7
MECH7A
ELECT7B
PROP STOR7C
SET STOR & TRAP RM6
ORCH PIT6E
GEN STOR7E WOMEN'S
RR-W-0
MEN'SRR-M-0
CTR STAIRS-0B
CUSTC-0A
CUSTC-0B
CUSTC-0C
ALL (E) FIRE SPRINKLERS AT THIS LEVEL (CROSS HATCHED ZONE) TO BE SEISMICALLY BRACED TYP
GREY HATCH DESIGNATES AREA REQUIRING REMOVAL OF (E) PLASTER CEILING, CEILING SUPPORT MEMBERS & ANY APPLIED FINISHES (SEE PROPOSED DET RCP FOR (N) CEILING LAYOUTS)
HALLH-0C
HALLH-0D
HALLH-0E
HALLH-0A
17A17C
PROP STOR7D
NW STAIRS-0C
ELEV MECHEL/M-0
MECH7F
ELECTRICAL6C
TELECOM6B
SET STAIR6A
17B
OFFICE15
LIGHT FXT - WALL MTD
LIGHT FXT -SURFACE MTD
LIGHT FXT -RECESSED CAN
LIGHT FXT - RECESSED CAN WALL WASHER - SHADED SIDE INDICATES LIGHTED FACE
LIGHT FXT - SPOT OR MONOPOINT - ARROW INDICATES
LIGHT FXT - TRACK
RCP SYMBOLS
FLUOR SURF MTD OR CHAIN-HUNG FIX
LIGHT FXT -UNDERCABINET STRIP
2x4 FLUOR LAY-IN FXT
2x2 FLUOR LAY-IN FXT
LINEAR PENDANT FXT
FLUOR WALL MTD LINEAR SCONCE
2X2 RETURN - SMD
2X2 SUPPLY - SMD
LINEAR SUPPLY - SMDLINEAR RETURN - SMD
PENDANT SPRINKLER HEAD
SIDEWALL SPRINKLER
HU
MB
OL
DT
ST
AT
E
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
Thea
ter
Art
s
Sei
smic
Ret
rofi
tA
rcat
a, C
alif
orn
ia
Owner: Trustees of the California StateUniversity
Project Team
Project
Revisions
Sheet Name
Date
Owner #
SKA #
Sheet Number
Seals
Arch: Suarez-Kuehne ArchitectureSan Francisco, CA 94116
Struct: Thornton TomasettiSan Francisco, CA 94108
MEPT: Interface EngineeringSan Francisco, CA 94105
Acoust: Papadimos GroupSan Francisco, CA 94104
Civil: Stover EngineeringCrescent City, CA 95531
Land: Genevieve Schmidt - Landscape DesignMcKinleyville, CA 95521
Cost: Cost EstimationsAnchorage, AK 99518
A4.1
23 MARCH 2018
BASEMENTLEVELDEMO RCP
3/32" = 1'-0"1
BASEMENT LEVEL DEMO RCP
PROJECT NORTH
NORTH
TWO-STORY SPACE
TWO-STORY SPACE
THREE PLUS -STORY SPACE
TWO-STORY SPACE
JVD THEATER101
BOX OFFICE100
CONTROL BOOTH101G
THTR CLASSROOM115
THTR STOR116
GEN STOR101L
GEN STOR101A
STAGE101D
SCENE SHOP103
LIGHT STOR103A
OFFICE102
OFFICE103B
SS STOR103D
SS STOR103C
SCENE CARP STOR103E
MEN'S DRESSING (JVD)104
NW STAIRS-1C
MEN'SRR-M-1B
WOMEN'SRR-W-1B WOMEN'S DRESSING
108MAKE-UP (JVD)
109
LECTURE110
SW STAIRS-1A
CINEMA LAB118B
FILM / AUDIO LAB117
OFFICE112A
COSTUME LAUNDRY111
COSTUME SHOP112
CTR STAIRS-1B EDIT BOOTH
117AEDIT BOOTH
117B
THTR HALL118
LECTURE114
DEPT CHAIR OFFICE113
COSTUME STOR112B
NE STAIRS-1D
STAGE WAITING AREA118C
HALLH-1C
ELEVEL-1
A4.81
A4.83
CUSTC-1A
CUSTC-1D
CUSTC-1B
CUSTC-1C
A4.87
THEATER LOBBY101F
MEN'SRR-M-1A
CONCESSION101E
WOMEN'SRR-W-1A
(N) CEILINGS IN THESE AREAS - SEE PROPOSED PLANS
GREY HATCH DESIGNATES AREA REQUIRING REMOVAL OF (E) PLASTER CEILING, CEILING SUPPORT MEMBERS & ANY APPLIED FINISHES (SEE PROPOSED RCP FOR (N) CEILING LAYOUTS)
ALL (E) FIRE SPRINKLERS AT THIS LEVEL (CROSS HATCHED ZONE) TO BE SEISMICALLY BRACED TYP
GREY HATCH DESIGNATES AREA REQUIRING REMOVAL OF (E) PLASTER CEILING, CEILING SUPPORT MEMBERS & ANY APPLIED FINISHES FOR ACCESS TO (N) ROOF OVERFLOW PIPING (SPD) (SEE PROPOSED RCP FOR (N) CEILING LAYOUTS)
GREY HATCH DESIGNATES AREA REQUIRING REMOVAL OF (E) PLASTER CEILING, CEILING SUPPORT MEMBERS & ANY APPLIED FINISHES FOR ACCESS TO (N) ROOF OVERFLOW PIPING (SPD) (SEE PROPOSED RCP FOR (N) CEILING LAYOUTS)
GREY HATCH DESIGNATES AREA REQUIRING REMOVAL OF (E) PLASTER CEILING, CEILING SUPPORT MEMBERS & ANY APPLIED FINISHES FOR ACCESS TO (N) ROOF OVERFLOW PIPING (SPD) (SEE PROPOSED DET FOR (N) CEILING LAYOUTS)
GREY HATCH DESIGNATES AREA REQUIRING REMOVAL OF ANY (E) PLASTER CEILING, CEILING SUPPORT MEMBERS & ANY APPLIED FINISHES FOR ACCESS TO (N) ROOF OVERFLOW PIPING (SPD) (SEE PROPOSED RCP FOR (N) CEILING LAYOUTS)
HALLH-1A HALL
H-1B
HALLH-1D
(E) CEILINGS TYP TO REMAIN UON
LIGHT FXT - WALL MTD
LIGHT FXT -SURFACE MTD
LIGHT FXT -RECESSED CAN
LIGHT FXT - RECESSED CAN WALL WASHER - SHADED SIDE INDICATES LIGHTED FACE
LIGHT FXT - SPOT OR MONOPOINT - ARROW INDICATES
LIGHT FXT - TRACK
RCP SYMBOLS
FLUOR SURF MTD OR CHAIN-HUNG FIX
LIGHT FXT -UNDERCABINET STRIP
2x4 FLUOR LAY-IN FXT
2x2 FLUOR LAY-IN FXT
LINEAR PENDANT FXT
FLUOR WALL MTD LINEAR SCONCE
2X2 RETURN - SMD
2X2 SUPPLY - SMD
LINEAR SUPPLY - SMDLINEAR RETURN - SMD
PENDANT SPRINKLER HEAD
SIDEWALL SPRINKLER
HU
MB
OL
DT
ST
AT
E
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
Thea
ter
Art
s
Sei
smic
Ret
rofi
tA
rcat
a, C
alif
orn
ia
Owner: Trustees of the California StateUniversity
Project Team
Project
Revisions
Sheet Name
Date
Owner #
SKA #
Sheet Number
Seals
Arch: Suarez-Kuehne ArchitectureSan Francisco, CA 94116
Struct: Thornton TomasettiSan Francisco, CA 94108
MEPT: Interface EngineeringSan Francisco, CA 94105
Acoust: Papadimos GroupSan Francisco, CA 94104
Civil: Stover EngineeringCrescent City, CA 95531
Land: Genevieve Schmidt - Landscape DesignMcKinleyville, CA 95521
Cost: Cost EstimationsAnchorage, AK 99518
A4.3
23 MARCH 2018
LEVEL 1DEMO RCP
3/32" = 1'-0"1
LEVEL 1 DEMO RCP
PROJECT NORTH
NORTH
THEATER BALCONY(JVD)
201
COSTUME STOR207
CATWALK (BB)215
CTRL & STOR (BB)208A
THTR S STAIRS-2H
HALLH-2B
CTR STAIRS-2B
EDIT BOOTH205
EDIT BOOTH204
EDIT BOOTH205A
FILM / AUDIO LAB117
EDIT BOOTH202
EDIT BOOTH202A
CD LIBRARY206D
KHSU SUPPORT206B
KHSU BOOTH206A
KHSU BOOTH206E
TELECOM206C
CD LIBRARY206
SW STAIRS-2A
ELEVATOREL-2
LIGHT BOOTH (BB)208
AUDITORIUM CEILING TO BE SEISMICALLY BRACED FROM ABOVE (NO REMOVAL OF (E) PLASTER CEILINGS)
NO CEILING
ROOM 115 BELOW: GREY HATCH DESIGNATES AREA REQUIRING REMOVAL OF (E) PLASTER CEILING, CEILING SUPPORT MEMBERS & ANY APPLIED FINISHES FOR ACCESS TO (N) ROOF OVERFLOW PIPING (SPD) (SEE PROPOSED DET RCP FOR (N) CEILING LAYOUTS)
HALLH-2A
HALLH-2A
HALLH-2A
(E) CEILINGS TYP TO REMAIN UON
(E) CEILINGS TYP TO REMAIN UON
REMOVE (E) LIGHT WELL FIN (4 SIDES) TO ACCOMODATE (N) SKYLIGHT ABOVE
LIGHT FXT - WALL MTD
LIGHT FXT -SURFACE MTD
LIGHT FXT -RECESSED CAN
LIGHT FXT - RECESSED CAN WALL WASHER - SHADED SIDE INDICATES LIGHTED FACE
LIGHT FXT - SPOT OR MONOPOINT - ARROW INDICATES
LIGHT FXT - TRACK
RCP SYMBOLS
FLUOR SURF MTD OR CHAIN-HUNG FIX
LIGHT FXT -UNDERCABINET STRIP
2x4 FLUOR LAY-IN FXT
2x2 FLUOR LAY-IN FXT
LINEAR PENDANT FXT
FLUOR WALL MTD LINEAR SCONCE
2X2 RETURN - SMD
2X2 SUPPLY - SMD
LINEAR SUPPLY - SMDLINEAR RETURN - SMD
PENDANT SPRINKLER HEAD
SIDEWALL SPRINKLER
HU
MB
OL
DT
ST
AT
E
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
Thea
ter
Art
s
Sei
smic
Ret
rofi
tA
rcat
a, C
alif
orn
ia
Owner: Trustees of the California StateUniversity
Project Team
Project
Revisions
Sheet Name
Date
Owner #
SKA #
Sheet Number
Seals
Arch: Suarez-Kuehne ArchitectureSan Francisco, CA 94116
Struct: Thornton TomasettiSan Francisco, CA 94108
MEPT: Interface EngineeringSan Francisco, CA 94105
Acoust: Papadimos GroupSan Francisco, CA 94104
Civil: Stover EngineeringCrescent City, CA 95531
Land: Genevieve Schmidt - Landscape DesignMcKinleyville, CA 95521
Cost: Cost EstimationsAnchorage, AK 99518
A4.5
23 MARCH 2018
LEVEL 2DEMO RCP
3/32" = 1'-0"1
LEVEL 2 DEMO RCP
PROJECT NORTH
NORTH
(E) HVAC
CTR STAIRS-3B
EQUIP STOR302
MECH301
LIGHT GALLERY (JVD)303
LIGHT FXT - WALL MTD
LIGHT FXT -SURFACE MTD
LIGHT FXT -RECESSED CAN
LIGHT FXT - RECESSED CAN WALL WASHER - SHADED SIDE INDICATES LIGHTED FACE
LIGHT FXT - SPOT OR MONOPOINT - ARROW INDICATES
LIGHT FXT - TRACK
RCP SYMBOLS
FLUOR SURF MTD OR CHAIN-HUNG FIX
LIGHT FXT -UNDERCABINET STRIP
2x4 FLUOR LAY-IN FXT
2x2 FLUOR LAY-IN FXT
LINEAR PENDANT FXT
FLUOR WALL MTD LINEAR SCONCE
2X2 RETURN - SMD
2X2 SUPPLY - SMD
LINEAR SUPPLY - SMDLINEAR RETURN - SMD
PENDANT SPRINKLER HEAD
SIDEWALL SPRINKLER
(E) HVAC
CTR STAIRS-3B
EQUIP STOR302
MECH301
LIGHT GALLERY (JVD)303
HU
MB
OL
DT
ST
AT
E
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
Thea
ter
Art
s
Sei
smic
Ret
rofi
tA
rcat
a, C
alif
orn
ia
Owner: Trustees of the California StateUniversity
Project Team
Project
Revisions
Sheet Name
Date
Owner #
SKA #
Sheet Number
Seals
Arch: Suarez-Kuehne ArchitectureSan Francisco, CA 94116
Struct: Thornton TomasettiSan Francisco, CA 94108
MEPT: Interface EngineeringSan Francisco, CA 94105
Acoust: Papadimos GroupSan Francisco, CA 94104
Civil: Stover EngineeringCrescent City, CA 95531
Land: Genevieve Schmidt - Landscape DesignMcKinleyville, CA 95521
Cost: Cost EstimationsAnchorage, AK 99518
A4.7
23 MARCH 2018
LEVEL 3DEMO &PROPOSEDRCP
3/32" = 1'-0"1
LEVEL 3 DEMO RCP 3/32" = 1'-0"
2LEVEL 3 PROPOSED RCP
PROJECT NORTH
NORTHPROJECT
NORTH
NORTH