revised payment services directive - a brief explanation

10
PSD2 BRIEFING Disclaimer: The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of the ECB, EBA or the European Parliament. The competent authorities have not approved, endorsed or embraced this publication. The counsel provided in the document may be used upon careful deliberation with necessary industrial specialists and experts 1 1 Revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2) gets established from Dec, 2015 and will be implemented across banks in the next couple of years. PSD2 will introduce measures that banks, payment service providers, payment institutions and others will need to comply. It not only discusses about compliance and regulatory standards, but about market standards, competition from third party providers and opportunity to open virtual trade routes outside the European Union. PSD2 works around the collective information gathered from experience of various banks, payment institutions and payment service providers after PSD1 became law. The working principles of PSD2 revolves around one of the following major topics. Improve level playing field for Payment Service Providers Since the inception of Payment Services Directive in 2007, advancements in technology and payment industry have continued at a rapid pace. New innovations in payment services has brought better options for consumers and merchants. PSD2 has revised the role of payment service providers to cope- up with the changes in market. Keeping in a futuristic development model, ample options are provided for innovation and progress. By improving competition within the domain, the European Banking Association brings in zests from the best of the breed and steers banks to self-evolve. Safer and more secure payment transactions Online data is being subjected to multiple scrutiny in order to avoid hacks and leaks. Developments in security & cryptography standards, guarantees better security and safety procedures for financial transactions. The growth of virtual currencies, de-centralised settlement system and block-chain technology has provided means for better structure in payment transactions. Online transactions has increased manifold in the past 5 years and the number of interactions between consumers, merchants and banks on devices (mobile, tablets, laptops etc.) has amplified. To ensure the audit and security of transactions as well as to maintain a low tolerance towards data leakage – all stakeholders must adopt safer and more secure payment transactions. Consumer Protection PSD1 enabled payment service providers to act as intermediaries for various banking services. PSD2 allows third party providers in to the payments arena for the betterment of services. EBA ensures that consumers are not affected due to any malpractice or fraudulent nature of the services offered by

Upload: nivin-paramasivam

Post on 18-Jan-2017

300 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

PSD2 BRIEFING

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of the ECB, EBA or the European Parliament. The competent authorities have not approved, endorsed or embraced this publication. The counsel provided in the document may be used upon careful deliberation with necessary industrial specialists and experts 1 1

Revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2) gets established from

Dec, 2015 and will be implemented across banks in the next couple

of years. PSD2 will introduce measures that banks, payment service

providers, payment institutions and others will need to comply. It

not only discusses about compliance and regulatory standards, but

about market standards, competition from third party providers

and opportunity to open virtual trade routes outside the European

Union.

PSD2 works around the

collective information

gathered from experience

of various banks, payment

institutions and payment

service providers after

PSD1 became law. The

working principles of PSD2

revolves around one of the

following major topics.

Improve level playing

field for Payment

Service Providers –

Since the inception of

Payment Services Directive

in 2007, advancements in

technology and payment

industry have continued at

a rapid pace. New

innovations in payment

services has brought better

options for consumers and

merchants. PSD2 has

revised the role of payment

service providers to cope-

up with the changes in

market. Keeping in a

futuristic development

model, ample options are

provided for innovation

and progress. By improving

competition within the

domain, the European

Banking Association brings

in zests from the best of the

breed and steers banks to

self-evolve.

Safer and more secure

payment transactions –

Online data is being

subjected to multiple

scrutiny in order to avoid

hacks and leaks.

Developments in security &

cryptography standards,

guarantees better security

and safety procedures for

financial transactions. The

growth of virtual

currencies, de-centralised

settlement system and

block-chain technology has

provided means for better

structure in payment

transactions. Online

transactions has increased

manifold in the past 5 years

and the number of

interactions between

consumers, merchants and

banks on devices (mobile,

tablets, laptops etc.) has

amplified. To ensure the

audit and security of

transactions as well as to

maintain a low tolerance

towards data leakage – all

stakeholders must adopt

safer and more secure

payment transactions.

Consumer Protection –

PSD1 enabled payment

service providers to act as

intermediaries for various

banking services. PSD2

allows third party

providers in to the

payments arena for the

betterment of services.

EBA ensures that

consumers are not affected

due to any malpractice or

fraudulent nature of the

services offered by

PSD2 BRIEFING

2

different participants in the

program. Protection to

data-privacy laws and

consumer information has

to be maintained within the

ambit of regulation.

Stringent actions must be

put in place to ensure that

payment service providers,

account services payment

service providers, payment

initiation service providers

and payment institutions

do not expose critical

information.

Harmonise pricing –

the interchange card fee

and Payments Account

Directive (May, 2014)

ensures to achieve a level

playing field for pricing and

billing strategies, usage of

common terms, transfer of

accounts, opening new

accounts and charges are

transparent and common

across all member states in

the Union. PSD2 warrants

that these are continued in

practice for payment

transactions to improve

trade relations and money

flow within the member

states.

PSD2 enables cross-

currency transactions as

long as one of the parties in

the transaction is

registered within any

member state. Cross-

border trade and relative

positioning of Euro

currency in the world

payments market will

intensify. All the above

objectives shall lead to

efficient and more

integrated European

payments world.

Table 1 – Topics covered under Revised Payment Services Directive

HEADING DESCRIPTION # Articles

Title I Subject matter, scope and definition 4

Title II Payment service providers 33

Title III Transparency of conditions and information requirements for payment services 23

Title IV Rights and obligations in relation to the provision and use of payment services 43

Title V Delegated acts and regulatory technical standards 3

Title VI Final provisions 11

Recitals Total number of recitals based on which articles were developed 113

Annexure I Payment services that are referred in the directive 8

Annexure II Correlation table between PSD2 and PSD1 -

Title I – Subject matter, scope and definition

* When these bodies are not acting in their capacity as monetary authority or other public authorities

3

The directive establishes rules in accordance with which member states shall distinguish between

the different categories of payment service providers. The figure below represents the various

categories of payment service

providers in scope.

The directive also deals with

transparency of conditions,

information requirements, rights

and obligations of respective

payment service providers in

respect to the provision as a

business or occupation.

List of Payment Services

Services enabling cash to be placed on a payment account as

well as all the operations required for operating a payment

account.

Services enabling cash withdrawals from a payment account as

well as all the operations required for operating a payment

account.

Execution of payment transactions, including transfers of funds

on a payment account with the user’s payment service provider

or with another payment service provider:

a) execution of direct debits, including one-off direct debits;

b) execution of payment transactions through a payment card

or a similar device;

c) execution of credit transfers, including standing orders.

Execution of payment transactions where the funds are

covered by a credit line for a payment service user:

a) execution of direct debits, including one-off direct debits;

b) execution of payment transactions through a payment card

or a similar device;

c) execution of credit transfers, including standing orders.

Issuing of payment instruments and/or acquiring of payment

transactions.

Money remittance.

Payment initiation services

Account information services

PSD2

Credit Institutions

Electronic Money Institutions

Post Office Giro Institutions

*ECB & National CentralBanksPayment Institutions

*Member states orlocal/regional authorities

Direct Cash Payments

cash to cash currency exchange

Authorised commercial agent for sale/purchase

of goods from either only payee

or payer

Vouchers, Drafts

and TC

Physical transport of banknotes or

coins

cash collection and delivery

within non-profit or charitable organisation

Paper based

money orders

Services where commission is

provided as cash by payee to payer

Fig 2 – List of services excluded from directive

Fig 1 – List of parties involved in the directive

Title II – Payment Service Providers

4

Title II explains about various rules and obligations a payment institution must adhere to. It also

delegates responsibility to competent authorities and member states wherever applicable like

granting/withdrawal of authorisation, safeguarding and maintenance of requirements and

record-keeping. Member states have the responsibility to ensure that Payment service providers

meet a certain Level of Assurance (LoA) by means of initial capital based on the type of

payment service they would like to provide. PSPs could avail the services of agents, branches or

entities to whom they can outsource their services. The EBA is directed to maintain a register

where all PSPs must be

authorised. This register will be

available online and can be

observed across all member

states.

The sections under this title lays

out different principles on which

PSPs should act and apportion

their tasks. It allows PSPs to

challenge competent authorities

by the right to apply to courts and

settlement of any disagreements

of competent authorities of

different member states. The

articles defined under this title

further goes on to explain the

access rights of a payment

institution and credit institution.

The services granted or accessed

by member state or competent

authorities must maintain a level

of discrimination and should be without prejudice to the services offered. It also advices enhanced

co-operation between competent authorities of all member states. The Regulatory Technical

Standards (RTS) and Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) for the register will be finalised by

the EBA by July 2017 and shall enter-in to-force 18 months from then. There are set of RTS which

shall be released by EBA at various timelines in the near future (a detailed list is available at

official website).

Key Points to Remember

PSPs must maintain initial capital depending on

the type of payment services offered

Member states must appoint competent

authorities for various safeguarding purpose

Payment institutions and payment service

providers must adhere to certain guidelines to be

authorised and provide their services

EBA will release a web-register where details of all

authorised PSPs will be maintained. This shall be

accessible across all member states of the Union

PSPs can operate in a member state other than

the home member state where they have been

authorised, but will have to provide information to

competent authorities of the member state

Title III – Transparency of conditions and information

requirements for Payment Services

5

The 2 major topics that are deliberated under this title are ‘single payment transactions’ and

‘framework contracts’ and any payment transactions that are enclosed by them. Provisions to

microenterprises are applied the same way as it is applicable to a consumer. Whenever any

payment is made, the currency in which transaction is done is agreed with both the payer and

payee. Currency conversion will apply exchange rates are to be supplied before initiation of the

payment. Similarly any charges or breakdown of charge (if applicable) shall also be informed to

the payer and payee before initiation of the transaction. Any discounts offered on a particular

payment instrument shall be disclosed to the payer thereof prior to the initiation of the payment

transaction. There are some derogation to information requirements for certain low-value

payment instruments and electronic money (less than €30).

Framework contract

contains the terms and

conditions and any other

information along with

their consequences, that

the payer and payee

must be aware for using

the payment service. The

contract should be

provided to the user, well

in advance and in a

language and format that

is easily understandable

to all participants

involved. All contractual

obligations on the usage

of a payment instrument

or conducting a payment

transaction should be

clearly laid out

transparently. PSPs

must provide their

geographical address

and details of relevant

supervisory authorities

and registry. It must also

outline the main

characteristics of the

services offered and

must contain the form

and procedure of

consent, to initiate a

payment order and for

execution/withdrawal

of a transaction. All

parties must also agree

to the language, means

of communication and

frequency, (including

the technical

requirements of the

user’s equipment and

software) that shall be

used for notification.

Procedures for

compensation must

also be clearly defined

according to the ADR

procedures defined

under title IV or any

national law. Changes

to interest rates and

exchange rates can be

applied without any

Key Points to Remember

PISPs must provide reference

of transaction to the payer’s

ASPSP

Unique transaction reference,

transaction amount, exchange

rate (if applicable), charges

and breakdown of charges (if

applicable) and date of the

transaction will be

communicated during various

stages of the payment order or

payment transaction

When not covered as part of

framework contract all these

information must be provided

before initiation of payment

transaction and immediately

after execution of transaction

Access to accounts are

enabled through API (XS2A)

Title III – Transparency of conditions and information

requirements for Payment Services

6

notification. Any other

amendment to the

framework contract should

be notified to the partakers

involved.

Single payment

transactions advocates

on the information to be

provided to a user, on

individual payment

transactions, that are not

covered under any

framework contract

defined above. It appoints

member states to ensure

that such information is

available at each stage of

the payment transactions

like ‘before initiation’,

‘after initiation’, ‘on receipt

of payment order’, ‘after

execution of payment

transaction’ etc. Needless

to say ASPSPs, payer,

payee, PISPs and PSPs will

have to adhere to the terms

and conditions of the

payment service offered.

Title IV – Right and obligations in relation to the provision

and use of Payment Services

7

The procedure and obligations to capture information during authorisation and execution of a

payment transaction or the payment order is discussed in detail under this title. It also debates in

detail about data protection, operational and security risks, authentication protocols and ADR

procedures that need to be adopted during settlement of disputes. PSPs cannot charge users for

fulfilling its information obligations or corrective & preventive measures. Wherever charges are

applicable, it must be in line

with the actual costs involved. In

cases of low-value payments

(less than €30), some

obligations can be exempted.

A payment transaction will be

considered ‘authorised’ only if

the payer provides consent to

execute the payment

transaction. ASPSPs shall

confirm on the availability of

funds upon request, if the

payer’s account is accessible

online and if payer has given

explicit consent to respond to

such requests from a specific

PSP. However, ASPSPs shall not

block funds on the payer’s

payment account. PISPs can

initiate a transaction for the

payer to ASPSP, and shall never

hold the payer’s funds in

connection with the provision of

the service. They shall not

tamper with the data and use the

data for other business purpose

without the explicit consent or

authorisation of the user. PSPs can block or limit the amount usage on a payment instrument, but

should communicate justifiable reasons to the user while doing so. Furthermore, they shall

unblock or replace the payment instrument if the reason for blocking, no longer exists.

Unauthorised or incorrectly executed transactions shall be rectified if user notifies to the PSP and

no later than 13months of the debit date. It is the responsibility of the PSP to provide evidence of

Key Points to Remember

Authorisation and execution rules are applicable to

all stakeholders involved in the payment supply

chain

Member states must appoint competent

authorities for ensuring that PSPs have adequate

and effective procedures to address data

protection, operational and security concerns

PSPs or PISPs or ASPSPs are liable to compensate

the financial loss of payer in any event of

unauthorised transaction if proved.

Payer must notify PSP without any undue delay if

any unauthorised or fraudulent transaction is

executed

Personal data can be consumed during investigation

to prevent transaction fraud.

All stakeholders must follow strong customer

authentication and secure communication

standards

EBA along with ECB shall release set of guidelines

that must be adopted.

Title IV – Right and obligations in relation to the provision

and use of Payment Services

8

authentication and execution of payment transaction. If PISPs were involved then they are held

responsible. Information exchange must happen cordially between PSP and PISP. The payer is

liable to bear the loss up to a maximum of €50 in case of an unauthorised transaction. Within 10

business days of receiving a request for a refund, PSP shall either refund the full amount or

provide a justification to refuse the refund.

Funds can only be debited only after successful execution of a payment transaction. Receipt of

payment orders must be communicated immediately to the concerned participants involved in

the transaction. ASPSPs cannot revoke a transaction for which consent has been already provided

for initiation request. Fund transfers between Payer’s ASPSP, PSPs, PISPs and Payee’s ASPSP

must be immediate and without delay. Funds must be available within the end of next business

day and should be effective to the value-date of the payment transaction. It is the responsibility of

the PSP to communicate the unique reference identifier specification to the user. All

communications between parties must be secure and adhere to strong customer

authentication rules mandated by EBA. In cases where such procedures are not in place, the

PSP shall be liable for financial losses arising out of security breach. Wherever applicable, the

payer’s account shall be restored, as if the debit transaction has not happened in case of an

unauthorised or incorrect or late execution or non-execution of a transaction. Processing of

personal data shall be permitted by member states when necessary to safeguard the prevention,

investigation and detection of payment fraud.

Member states are delegated with the authority to ensure that payment service providers establish

and maintain appropriate risk mitigation measures, have in place effective incident management

procedures including the detection and classification of major operational and security incidents.

EBA in close cooperation with ECB shall issue guidelines with regard to the establishment,

implementation and monitoring of the security measures, including certification

processes by the 13th of July, 2017. These guidelines will be reviewed in any event at least

every 2 years. PSPs must ensure that competent authorities must be notified of a major

operational or security incident without undue delay.

Authentication may be applied whenever the payer (a) accesses its payment account online; (b)

initiates an electronic payment transaction; (c) carries out any action through a remote channel.

EBA shall issue technical standards which shall ensure that strong customer authentication is

established and that all communication within various parties are secure. They shall advice

member states to adopt common and open standards for API development which will be used to

communicate with each payment player.

Title V – Delegated acts and regulatory technical

standards

9

This title provides information about the powers of delegation and the scope of delegated tasks.

It also expresses the control of delegates by the Commission and procedures to revoke or grant

tasks. One of the key objectives of PSD2 is to ensure protection of consumer rights and measures

are taken, in order to accommodate it. There will be 5 RTS and 1 ITS which will be issued by EBA,

after close consultation with various stakeholders and the cooperation of ECB in the near future.

The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission for an undetermined

period of time from 12th of January, 2016. The power can be revoked by the European Parliament

or by the Council. The decision to revoke delegation shall not affect the validity of any delegated

acts already in force.

The Commission shall provide a user-friendly electronic leaflet, listing in a clear and easily

comprehensible manner about ‘consumer rights under PSD2’ by 13th of January, 2018. PSPs

must ensure that the leaflet is available on their respective websites in an easily accessible manner.

Title VI – Final provisions

Various amendments to already circulated Directives in the previous years are mentioned. Any

change in the clauses or national law or Union law shall be communicated to the Commission.

Conclusion

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of the ECB, EBA or the European Parliament. The competent authorities have not approved, endorsed or embraced this publication. The counsel provided in the document may be used upon careful deliberation with necessary industrial specialists and experts

Author: Nivin P 10

The Revised Payment Service Directive promotes harmonised pricing among all member states

and prepares a level playing field for increased competition. It sets the stage for mergers,

acquisitions and collaborations with niche industry specialists and banks. Banks can provide more

value-added services through API’s or through networking with third party providers to improve

their line of sight in the business world and expand their geographical footprint. The Directive

does not compromise on consumer rights and security measures and articulates necessary

stakeholders to adopt advanced technological solutions. It endorses open-market principles,

transparency, and efficiency of services and coerces banks to think beyond the traditional thought

process and embrace change for the betterment of financial industry as a whole.