review of the draft south platte basin implementation plan ......october 1, 2014 municipal ... 12 ....

20
Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan for the Interim Water Resources Review Committee October 1, 2014

Upload: others

Post on 30-Sep-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

Review of the

Draft South Platte Basin

Implementation Plan

for the

Interim Water Resources

Review Committee

October 1, 2014

Page 2: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

Municipal

Industrial

Agricultural

Environmental

Recreational

South Platte Basin Overview – Two Roundtables

Diverse Needs

2

Page 3: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

• The South Platte Basin, including the Metro Area:

• Is home to 70% of the State’s population

• Accounts for 80% of the State’s economic base

South Platte Basin Overview

3

Page 4: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

Urban Sector businesses and industry provide for the majority of

the State’s economy

Single biggest driver in need for additional water supplies is growth

State’s population is expected to nearly double by 2050

Most of the State’s growth will be in the South Platte Basin

Municipal &Industrial (M&I) Water Needs

4

Page 5: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

M&I Water Needs Medium Growth Gap in the South Platte Basin

2050 Gap

Existing Supply

5 *Based on SWSI 2010 Medium Water Demands

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

2008 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Acr

e-F

eet

/Ye

ar

736,000 AF/Y

428,000 AF/Y

Page 6: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

M&I Water Needs Medium Growth Gap in the South Platte Basin

Gap

Medium

Success

IPPs

(60%)

Existing

Supply

Page 7: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

7

M&I Gap by County

IPPs

Remaining Gap

Page 8: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

How to Meet the Municipal Supply Gap:

A Balanced “4 Legs of the Stool” Approach

• Conservation and Reuse

• Identified Projects and Processes

• Transfers from Agriculture / Alternative Transfer Methods

• Transmountain Diversions

Storage to manage the water supplies

Develop water supplies using multipurpose projects

M&I Water Needs

8

Page 9: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

-

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

Portfolio A Portfolio B Portfolio C

Acre

-Fee

t

Traditonal Agricultural Transfers

New Colorado River Supply

New Multipurpose Projects

ATMs

IPPs at 60% Success

Gap = 428,000 AFY

Alternative South Platte Portfolios

9

Page 10: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

-

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

Portfolio A Portfolio B Portfolio C

Acre

-Fee

t

Active Conservation

Traditonal Agricultural Transfers

New Colorado River Supply

New Multipurpose Projects

ATMs

IPPs at 60% Success

Gap = 378,000 AFY

Alternative South Platte Portfolios –

Additional Conservation

10

Page 11: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

-

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

Portfolio A Portfolio B Portfolio C

Acre

-Fee

t

Active Conservation

Traditonal Agricultural Transfers

New Colorado River Supply

New Multipurpose Projects

ATMs

IPPs at 60% Success

Gap = 642,000 AFY

Alternative South Platte Portfolios –

Climate Change

11

Page 12: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

1.4 million acres of irrigated land – 40% of State’s total

Seven of top ten agricultural producing counties in the State

Represents approximately 75% of agricultural sales statewide

Processing of West Slope agricultural products

Agricultural Water Needs

12

Page 13: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

Agricultural Water Shortages (2050)

13 *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

Gap 262,000 AF/Y

Gap 160,000 AF/Y

Page 14: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

Enjoyment of environmental and recreational values

o South Platte Basin is home to the most visited State Parks

o Environment and recreational opportunities important to

quality of life

o Urban environment and recreational opportunities important

to vibrant cities

Various Attributes of Importance within the Basin

o State endangered, threatened, or species of special concern

o Important Riparian Habitat

o Migratory Bird Viewing/Hunting

o Fishing (including Gold Medal fisheries)

o Recreation (including skiing, and whitewater and flatwater

boating)

Environmental and Recreational

14

Page 15: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

Meet the Municipal Supply Gap

Minimize Traditional Agricultural “buy and dry”

Protect and enhance environmental and recreational attributes

Support a collaborative Statewide approach

The South Platte Vision

15

Page 16: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

“A Good Colorado Plan Needs a Good South Platte Plan”

Solutions must be pragmatic, balanced, and consistent with

Colorado law and property rights

The South Platte River Basin will continue its leadership role in

efficient use and management of water

A balanced program is needed to investigate, preserve, and

develop Colorado River options

Overarching Themes for South Platte BIP

16

Page 17: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

Legislature determined Roundtable representation in 2005

o Counties – Planners, Elected Officials

o Municipalities – Water Planners, Engineers

o NGOs – Environmental, Recreational Interests

o Agricultural Interests

o Industry and Business Interests

o Water Rights Holders

o Other interested parties

Metro Roundtable and S. Platte Basin Roundtable collaboration

Expert assistance from West Sage and HDR

Public meetings monthly; outreach meetings held throughout basin

Website for information and comment

BIP presented to CWCB and available for public comment

The South Platte BIP Process

17

Page 18: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

Draft BIP submitted to CWCB

July 31, 2014

Final BIP submitted to CWCB

April 1, 2015

Phase 2 August 2014 to April 2015

Today

Page 19: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

Questions and Comments? Contact Information:

[email protected]

southplattebasin.com

Page 20: Review of the Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan ......October 1, 2014 Municipal ... 12 . Agricultural Water Shortages (2050) *Based on SWSI 2010 Agricultural Needs Projections

This Draft South Platte Basin Implementation Plan (SP-BIP) could not have been developed over the past eight

months without the involvement and guidance of many individuals, committees and organizations with deep

commitments to comprehensive water management in the South Platte and Republican River Basins. A special

thanks to:

South Platte and Metro Roundtables especially the two committees - Metro’s Executive Committee and the South Platte’s

Rio Chato Committee - who were assigned by the Roundtables to do the “heavy lifting” during the development, writing and

editing of the Draft SP-BIP.

Environmental and Recreational Subcommittee, supporting West Sage in the development of the environmental and

recreational portions of the Draft SP-BIP. The balance and thoughtful advice of the subcommittee members brought

important perspectives into the report and helped to provide a well-rounded document.

The support provided to us by John Stulp, special water policy advisor to Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper, to the staff

of the Colorado Water Conservation Board, especially Rebecca Mitchell, Jacob Bornstein and Craig Godbout and to the

State’s consulting team on the Statewide Water Supply Investigation, led by CDM-Smith.

Public input and contribution provided for this Draft helped shape the important needs of the basin.

Acknowledgements