review of 2006-2014 housing element - la city planning · cover image tk review of 2006-2014...
TRANSCRIPT
Cover Image TK
Review of 2006-2014 Housing Element
Appendix i
Photo TK
Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and ProgramsThe following section identifies each goal, objective, and policy of the previous Housing Element and evaluates its effectiveness and appropriateness. Related policies are grouped together for purposes of this evaluation.
A. REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF EXISTING POLICIES
It is the overall housing goal of the City of Los Angeles to create for all residents a city of livable and sustainable neighborhoods with a range of housing types, sizes and costs in proximity to jobs, amenities and services. In keeping with decades of federal Housing Acts and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that declared housing as a human right, the City will work towards assuring that housing is provided to all residents.
goAl 1: A City where housing production and preservation result in an adequate supply of ownership and rental housing that is safe, healthy, sanitary and affordable to people of all income levels, races, ages, and suitable for their various needs.
Progress/Effectiveness: This objective supported the overall goals of the General Plan and highlighted the importance of decent, affordable housing supply for all.
Appropriateness: Continue focus on an adequate supply of ownership and rental housing.
objective 1.1
Plan the capacity and develop incentives for the production of an adequate supply of rental and ownership housing for households of all income levels and needs.
Progress/Effectiveness: Supported the goal, but planning (“plan the capacity”) efforts are better addressed separately under the existing forecasting objective.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-3
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Appropriateness: Re-focus objective on increasing production for current and projected housing needs. Move “plan the capacity” language to Objective 1.3.
Policies
1.1.1 Promote home ownership opportunities and support current homeowners in retaining their homeowner status.
Progress/Effectiveness: Supports the goal of homeownership, but “promote” does not fully capture the work being done on the issue.
Appropriateness: Continue, with the word “expand” rather than “promote.”
1.1.2 Promote affordable rental housing for all income groups that need assistance.
Progress/Effectiveness: Supported the goal of affordable rental housing, but “promote” does not fully capture the City’s work on this issue. Recent losses of financial resources and other tools for the production of affordable rental housing are likely to take a toll on supply without compensatory action.
Appropriateness: Continue, with “expand” rather than “promote.” Look for innovative ways to increase the supply of affordable housing through programs.
1.1.3 Facilitate new construction of a variety of housing types that address current and projected needs of the city’s households.
Progress/Effectiveness: Described goal of providing a variety of different types of housing needs of a diverse population, but should acknowledge options beyond new construction to increase supply of these units. The dissolution of the Community Redevelopment Authority of the City of Los Angeles (CRA/LA) will likely impact the implementation of this policy.
Appropriateness: Revise to include preservation and retrofit/remodel program options relating to this policy.
1.1.4 Expand location options for residential development, particularly in designated Centers, Transit Oriented Districts and along Mixed-Use Boulevards.
Progress/Effectiveness: Policy supported goal of expanding opportunities for residential uses in areas designated for growth in the Framework Element. However the phrase “expand location” may make it appear that the policy is solely about allowing residential uses in new places.
I-4 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Appropriateness: Begin revised policy with “Expand opportunities for...” to encompass programs that involve things like code flexibility or government facilitation.
1.1.5 Develop financial resources for new construction of affordable housing.
Progress/Effectiveness: This policy highlighted the importance of pursuing financing of affordable housing.
Appropriateness: Continue unchanged.
1.1.6 Facilitate innovative models that reduce land, materials and labor costs.
Progress/Effectiveness: Policy acknowledged that new models of development are needed to reduce construction costs. However, programs on material and labor costs have been lost due to the dissolution of the CRA/LA.
Appropriateness: Continue with focus on land and construction costs
1.1.7 Strengthen the capacity of the development community to develop affordable housing.
Progress/Effectiveness: While City programs that directly strengthen the capacity of the development community are limited, the City’s retains the policy of providing technical assistance and capacity building when possible.
Appropriateness: Retain policy.
objective 1.2
Develop incentives for the preservation of quality rental and ownership housing for households of all income levels and special needs.
Progress/Effectiveness: This preservation objective related back to Goal 1, however the “develop incentives” language does not capture all the tactics and strategies being employed to preserve housing. New preservation policy on affordable housing at transit stops needed.
Appropriateness: Broaden language to simply state: “Preserve quality rental...” Add new preservation policy (1.2.7) near transit stops.
Policies
1.2.1 Facilitate the maintenance of existing housing in decent, safe, healthy, and sanitary condition.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-5
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Progress/Effectiveness: This policy supported the objective by promoting a safe and healthy living environment.
Appropriateness: Retain without any changes.
1.2.2 Encourage and incentivize the preservation of affordable housing to ensure that demolitions and conversions do not result in the net loss of the City’s stock of decent, safe, healthy, sanitary, or affordable housing. Encourage but not require one-for-one replacement of demolished affordable units, except as mandated by law or ordinance.
Progress/Effectiveness: Highlighted the important role of condo conversions and demolitions in the loss of (non-subsidized) affordable housing. But the specificity and length may cloud the policy focus.
Appropriateness: Shorten and broaden to include facilitation of preservation.
1.2.3 Rehabilitate and/or replace substandard housing with housing that is decent, safe, healthy, sanitary and affordable and of appropriate size to meet the City’s current and future household needs.
Progress/Effectiveness: Focused on correcting substandard housing, which relates to the preservation objective.
Appropriateness: Retain, however remove the word sanitary as it is redundant.
1.2.4 Plan for post-disaster reconstruction of housing.
Progress/Effectiveness: Important policy, however it relates more towards the planning objective (1.3) than preservation.
Appropriateness: Move policy under objective 1.3.
1.2.5 Develop financial resources for the long-term affordability of publicly assisted rental and ownership housing.
Progress/Effectiveness: This policy pursued financial resources for the preservation of assisted housing.
Appropriateness: Retain policy.
1.2.6 Provide incentives that extend affordability to existing market rate housing units.
Progress/Effectiveness: This policy concentrated on extending affordability to market-rate units.
I-6 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Appropriateness: Retain policy.
1.2.7 Provide incentives for the preservation of historic residential structures.
Progress/Effectiveness: Policy expresses support for incentivizing historic preservation.
Appropriateness: Retain policy.
1.2.8 Strengthen the capacity of the development community to preserve and manage affordable housing.
Progress/Effectiveness: Policy refers to the importance of good property management in maintaining a quality housing stock. Activities remain in this area.
Appropriateness: Retain
objective 1.3
Forecast changing housing needs over time in relation to production and preservation needs.
Progress/Effectiveness: This objective refers to the importance of forecasting housing needs over time in setting housing policy and priorities. Along with forecasting, planning for meeting the housing needs should be included under this objective.
Appropriateness: Continue, incorporating planning efforts around housing.
Policies
1.3.1 Monitor the production and preservation of the housing supply.
Progress/Effectiveness: Monitoring production and preservation results is key to having the necessary information to undertake basic housing analysis. However, the importance of publicly reporting the information should be included as well.
Appropriateness: Include reporting alongside monitoring in the policy.
1.3.2 Advocate for the production of data necessary for the City’s planning purposes, particularly with regard to special needs populations.
Progress/Effectiveness: Advocating for additional data and to retain the data sources that are being threatened are both important parts of being able to forecast and plan. However this policy should also include collaboration for the production of data.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-7
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Appropriateness: Add collaborate alongside advocate for the production of data.
1.3.3 Collect, report and project citywide and local housing needs on a periodic basis.
Progress/Effectiveness: Policy refers to compiling socio-economic and other data for planning purposes. Budgetary constraints have impacted the ability to meet data collection and reporting objectives.
Appropriateness: No change to wording.
objective 1.4
Promote an equitable distribution of affordable housing opportunities throughout the City.
Progress/Effectiveness: Reflected the importance of where affordable housing is produced and working towards trying to be more equitable in its distribution.
Appropriateness: Continue with minor text change (“more equitable”). Also move under Goal 2, which is more about the location and qualities of residential growth.
Policies
1.4.1 Provide incentives to include affordable housing in residential development, particularly in mixed use development, Transit Oriented Districts and designated Centers.
Progress/Effectiveness: Incentives remain an important way to carry out the objective of achieving affordable housing in the City’s designated growth areas. The policy reflected the Framework Element Policy 4.2.1. However the issue is more than just about “equitable distribution,” as it touches on mobility, economic development, sustainability, etc.
Appropriateness: Retain wording as-is, but move, along with Objective 1.4 under Goal 2.
1.4.2 Promote the development of new affordable housing units citywide and within each Community Plan area.
Progress/Effectiveness: Directly relates to the objective by noting that each community has a need for affordable housing.
Appropriateness: Continue with a renewed emphasis of finding ways to promote and incentivize mixed-income developments in all areas of the City, but move, along with Objective 1.4 under Goal 2.
I-8 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
objective 1.5
Reduce regulatory and procedural barriers to the production and preservation of housing at all income levels and needs.
Progress/Effectiveness: Though progress has been made towards reducing regulatory and procedural barriers, much remains to be done and the objective remains relevant. However there is some concern that the provision of certain
Appropriateness: Objective will remain unchanged.
Policies
1.5.1 Streamline the land use entitlement, environmental review, and building permit processes.
Progress/Effectiveness: Streamlining these related city processes remains an effective policy to meet the larger objective.
Appropriateness: No change.
1.5.2 Streamline affordable housing funding processes.
Progress/Effectiveness: Better coordinating funding processes remains relevant and meets the objective.
Appropriateness: No change.
goAl 2: A City in which housing helps to create safe, livable and sustainable neighborhoods.
Progress/Effectiveness: This goal reflects the important linkages between housing and creating sustainable, healthy, and livable communities. A good deal of progress has been made in this area in recent years.
Appropriateness: No change to this goal is needed.
objective 2.1
Promote safety and health within neighborhoods.
Progress/Effectiveness: Reflected the opportunities to promote healthy communities through development standards.
Appropriateness: Continue to promote safe and healthy neighborhoods.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-9
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Policies
2.1.1 Establish development standards and policing practices that reduce the likelihood of crime.
Progress/Effectiveness: This policy focusing on public safety remains relevant to livability and quality of life.
Appropriateness: Retain.
2.1.2 Establish development standards that enhance health outcomes.
Progress/Effectiveness: The important intersections of health and housing are becoming better appreciated. Progress is occurring beyond just the development of development standards.
Appropriateness: Continue, with a broadening to include measures beyond standards and guidelines.
objective 2.2
Promote sustainable neighborhoods that have mixed-income housing, jobs, amenities, services and transit.
Progress/Effectiveness: This objective delineated important elements of sustainable neighborhoods and relates strongly to the overall goal.
Appropriateness: Retain without any changes.
Policies
2.2.1 Provide incentives to encourage the integration of housing with other compatible land uses.
Progress/Effectiveness: This policy reflected the importance of mixed-use development and mixed-use neighborhoods in achieving sustainable neighborhoods.
Appropriateness: Retain the focus on integrating housing with other compatible land uses.
2.2.2 Develop design standards that promote sustainable development in public and private open space and street rights-of-way (ROW).
Progress/Effectiveness: Appropriate design standards have been an important way the City has promoted livable and sustainable places to live
I-10 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
in recent years. Related to Objective 2.2, however may be more logically located beneath Objective 2.4 which is explicitly about “quality design” to promote livable neighborhoods. Also the policy could be broadened a bit beyond just promoting sustainable development to promoting linkages between housing and open space and recreational areas.
Appropriateness: Continue to pursue appropriate design standards for the public way but move under Objective 2.4. Add sentence on increasing access to open space, parks and green spaces.
2.2.3 Provide incentives and flexibility to generate new housing and to preserve existing housing near transit.
Progress/Effectiveness: Generating additional housing with access to nearby transit remains a core element of the City’s growth strategy. However, equal emphasis on producing and preserving housing near transit equally may result in some confusion amongst decision makers when redevelopment projects come forward.
Appropriateness: Remove “preserve existing housing” from this policy, however include a new policy on preserving affordable housing near transit (1.2.8). Also combine Policies 2.2.3 and 2.2.6, to include encouraging housing in near transit-oriented communities and designated centers.
2.2.4 Promote and facilitate a jobs/housing balance at a citywide level.
Progress/Effectiveness: This policy helps to meet housing goals as well as mobility, sustainability and economic objectives.
Appropriateness: Continue to promote housing in jobs-rich areas and vice-versa.
2.2.5 Educate the public to understand and support the benefits of mixed-use and mixed-income communities to accommodate projected growth.
Progress/Effectiveness: Supported the goal and the need for education on growth issues. This supported efforts to accommodate all housing needs and sustainability across the City.
Appropriateness: Continue to promote outreach and education regarding housing rights, responsibilities and opportunities and inform communities of special needs populations in the City and the effective approaches to meeting their housing needs.
2.2.6 To accommodate projected growth to 2014 in a sustainable way, encourage housing in centers and near transit, in accordance with the General Plan Framework Element, as reflected in Map ES.1.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-11
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Progress/Effectiveness: Directly relevant to the goals articulated in the General Plan Framework. However this policy is very similar to Policy 2.2.3 and the two can be combined.
Appropriateness: Combine Policies 2.2.3 and 2.2.6, to include encouraging housing in near transit-oriented communities and designated centers.
objective 2.3
Promote sustainable buildings, which minimize adverse effects on the environment and minimize the use of non-renewable resources.
Policies
2.3.1 Streamline entitlement, environmental, and permitting processes for sustainable buildings.
2.3.2 Promote and facilitate reduction of water consumption in new and existing housing.
2.3.3 Promote and facilitate reduction of energy consumption in new and existing housing.
2.3.4 Promote and facilitate reduction of waste in construction and building operations.
2.3.5 Promote outreach and education regarding sustainable buildings.
Progress/Effectiveness: Facilitating the reduction of water, energy and waste in the development process relates directly to Goal 2. Streamlining City processes and promoting outreach and education are two key areas where the City can help.
Appropriateness: Continue to deepen the City’s commitment to sustainability in new and existing housing.
objective 2.4
Promote livable neighborhoods with a mix of housing types, quality design and a scale and character that respects unique residential neighborhoods in the City.
Progress/Effectiveness: Directly relates to Goal 2 and has been a particularly active area in recent years.
Appropriateness: Continue to promote a mix of housing types, quality design and respect of neighborhood character.
I-12 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Policies
2.4.1 Provide sufficient services and amenities to support the planned population while preserving the neighborhood for those currently there.
Progress/Effectiveness: Services and amenities help create livable and sustainable neighborhoods, therefore connecting to Goal 2. Related to Objective 2.4, however may be more logically located beneath Objective 2.2 which is explicitly mentions access to amenities and services.
Appropriateness: Continue to pursue this policy but move under Objective 2.2.
2.4.2 Develop and implement design standards that promote quality development.
Progress/Effectiveness: Highlighted the important role of standards in promoting livable sustainable neighborhoods. Many design guidelines and standards have been completed in the planning period.
Appropriateness: Continue to develop and implement design standards in residential development.
2.4.3 Promote preservation of neighborhood character in balance with facilitating new development.
Progress/Effectiveness: Preservation of neighborhood character remains vital to the city’s housing goals. A number of neighborhood preservation tools have been developed and expanded during the planning period.
Appropriateness: Continue to promote the preservation of neighborhood character.
2.4.4 Promote residential development that meets the needs of current residents as well as new residents.
Progress/Effectiveness: Development should certainly strive to meet the needs of residents, however this policy lacks specificity and is therefore redundant with much of the existing objectives and policies. Progresses on implementation actions related to the policy have halted with the dissolution of the CRA/LA.
Appropriateness: Delete policy, as its essence is already reflected in many other goals, objectives and policies.
goAl 3: A City where there are housing opportunities for all without discrimination.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-13
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Progress/Effectiveness: Goal articulated a vision that remains an important goal for the City.
Appropriateness: Should continue without change.
objective 3.1
Assure that housing opportunities are accessible to all residents without discrimination on the basis of race, ancestry, sex, national origin, color, religion, sexual orientation, marital status, familial status, age, disability (including HIV/AIDS), and student status.
Progress/Effectiveness: Objective remains a cornerstone of promoting fair housing and opportunities for all.
Appropriateness: Continue.
Policies
3.1.1 Promote and facilitate equal opportunity practices in the sale and rental of housing.
Progress/Effectiveness: An effective policy to carry out the objective. However the policy could be broadened beyond the point of sale and rental of housing, to include the construction and provision of housing. Related programs already reflect this more expansive approach.
Appropriateness: Broaden to include promotion of equal opportunity, fair housing and accessibility in all areas of housing.
3.1.2 Promote responsible mortgage lending that meets community credit needs and the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA).
Progress/Effectiveness: An important component of promoting housing opportunities for all.
Appropriateness: Continue to promote responsible mortgage lending as part of promoting equal opportunity.
objective 3.2
Promote fair housing practices and accessibility among residents, community stakeholders and those involved in the production, preservation and operation of housing.
I-14 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Progress/Effectiveness: This objective supported the goal and the need for housing opportunities for all people, including those with special needs.
Appropriateness: Continue to promote fair housing practices and accessibility.
Policies
3.2.1 Provide outreach and education for homebuyers and renters regarding rights, financing options, rental subsidies available and protections in the purchase, rental and/or modification of housing units.
Progress/Effectiveness: Delineated important tasks of the City in promoting fair housing practices, thereby relating to the objective.
Appropriateness: No change.
3.2.2 Provide outreach and education for the broader community of residents, residential property owners and operators regarding fair housing practices and requirements.
Progress/Effectiveness: Outreach and education on fair housing remains an important task. Progress was limited in the planning period.
Appropriateness: Continue to provide outreach and education on fair housing practices.
3.2.3 Collect and report findings on discrimination in the sale and rental of housing.
Progress/Effectiveness: Research on housing discrimination is being collected and is an important part of promoting fair housing practices.
Appropriateness: Continue to collect and disseminate findings on housing discrimination.
goAl 4: A City committed to preventing and ending homelessness.
objective 4.1
Provide an adequate supply of short-term and permanent housing and services throughout the City that are appropriate and meet the special needs of persons who are homeless or who are at high risk of homelessness.
4.1.1 Ensure an adequate supply of emergency and temporary housing for people who become homeless or are at a high risk of becoming homeless, including special needs populations.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-15
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Progress/Effectiveness: Objective and Policy supporting an adequate supply of short-term and permanent housing is critical to meeting the Goal of preventing and ending homelessness.
Appropriateness: Continue both, with minor clarification language.
4.1.2 Promote and facilitate programs and strategies that ensure the rapid return to housing of all special needs populations who become homeless.
Progress/Effectiveness: Policy focuses on re-rapidly housing special needs populations; however the only program associated with the policy focuses on all priority occupancy for all homeless persons.
Appropriateness: Retain, but broaden to focus on rapid re-housing of all populations. Catering housing and services to those with special needs is found in Policy 4.1.3.
4.1.3 Provide permanent supportive housing options for homeless persons and special needs households with services such as job training and placement programs, treatment, rehabilitation and personal management training to assure that they remain housed.
Progress/Effectiveness: Combining housing with services is a key strategy to preventing and ending homelessness. Many effective programs support this policy.
Appropriateness: Continue, without the need for specifically listing out the types of services that may be required, as many more types of services would need to be added.
4.1.4 Promote and facilitate a planning process that includes providers of housing and services for the homeless.
Progress/Effectiveness: Planning and coordination has improved and is essential to the effective coordination and use of limited resources.
Appropriateness: Can be made more effective by broadening those involved in the planning process and explaining the reason for facilitating a broad process.
4.1.5 Plan for emergency housing needs that will result from natural or man-made disasters.
Progress/Effectiveness: Disaster can quickly and dramatically create homelessness. Planning for emergency housing needs is critical to ensuring an effective response.
Appropriateness: Retain without change.
I-16 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
4.1.6 Eliminate zoning and other regulatory barriers to the placement and operation of housing facilities for the homeless and special needs populations in appropriate locations throughout the City.
Progress/Effectiveness: The City has been largely effective in eliminating zoning and other regulatory barriers to the placement of housing facilities for the homeless and special needs populations.
Appropriateness: Retain without change.
objective 4.2
Promote outreach and education to: homeless populations; residents; community stakeholders; health, social service and housing providers and funders; criminal justice system agencies; and, communities in which facilities and services may be located
4.2.1 Inform homeless persons and persons at risk of homelessness of their rights and assist them in accessing services to which they are entitled.
4.2.2 Inform communities about special needs populations in the City and effective approaches to meeting their housing needs
Progress/Effectiveness: The Objective and Policies surrounding providing outreach and information to homeless persons and communities are important to the goal of preventing and ending homelessness.
Appropriateness: Retain without changes.
4.2.3 Strengthen the capacity of the development community to locate, construct and manage housing facilities for the homeless.
Progress/Effectiveness: Maximizing the capacity of the homeless housing and service development community is critical to the objective.
Appropriateness: Retain
4.2.4 Provide a high level of outreach targeted to the chronically homeless to move them from the streets into permanent housing with appropriate support services.
Progress/Effectiveness: Outreach to the homeless, particularly the chronically homeless, is critical to meeting the goals.
Appropriateness: Retain
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-17
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.1.
1A. H
omeb
uyer
A
ssis
tanc
e: P
urch
ase
Ass
ista
nce
“366
loan
s fo
r low
-in
com
e ho
meb
uyer
s
200
loan
s fo
r mod
erat
e-in
com
e ho
meb
uyer
s
72 lo
ans
for a
bove
m
oder
ate-
inco
me
hom
ebuy
ers”
“Loa
ns F
unde
d:
Low
Inco
me
- 463
low
Mod
erat
e In
com
e - 2
79 m
od
Abo
ve M
oder
ate
Inco
me
- 82”
This
prog
ram
has
exc
eede
d its
obj
ectiv
e.Re
tain
, how
ever
com
bine
all
hom
ebuy
er
assis
tanc
e pr
ogra
ms
into
one
pro
gram
ca
lled
Hom
ebuy
er A
ssis
tanc
e.
1.1.
1B. H
omeb
uyer
A
ssis
tanc
e: M
ortg
age
Cred
it Ce
rtifi
cate
s (M
CCs)
“168
MCC
s fo
r low
in
com
e ho
meb
uyer
s
252
MCC
s fo
r mod
erat
e in
com
e ho
meb
uyer
s”
“Tot
al M
CCs
issu
ed:
Low
Inco
me
- 249
Mod
erat
e in
com
e - 2
23 “
This
prog
ram
has
exc
eede
d its
obj
ectiv
e fo
r low
in
com
e ho
meb
uyer
s an
d is
on tr
ack
to m
eet i
ts
obje
ctiv
e fo
r mod
erat
e in
com
e ho
meb
uyer
s.
To b
e m
erge
d w
ith H
omeb
uyer
A
ssis
tanc
e: P
urch
ase
Ass
ista
nce.
1.1.
1C. F
or-S
ale
Deve
lope
r A
ssis
tanc
e: F
orw
ard
Com
mitm
ent P
rogr
am
“Con
trac
ts fo
r 30
mod
erat
e in
com
e ho
meb
uyer
s
Cont
ract
s fo
r 85
abov
e m
oder
ate
inco
me
hom
ebuy
ers”
Forw
ard
Com
mitm
ent p
urch
ase
assis
tanc
e pr
ovid
ed lo
ans
to 3
1 lo
w in
com
e an
d 14
mod
erat
e in
com
e ho
meb
uyer
s sin
ce 2
006.
This
prog
ram
ass
iste
d lo
wer
and
mod
erat
e in
com
e ho
meb
uyer
s. P
urch
ase
assis
tanc
e w
as n
ot p
rovi
ded
to a
bove
mod
erat
e in
com
e ho
meb
uyer
s be
caus
e de
velo
pmen
t pro
ject
s w
ere
not c
ompl
eted
as
a re
sult
of th
e do
wnt
urn
in th
e ho
usin
g m
arke
t. Ci
ty fu
ndin
g fo
r thi
s pr
ogra
m is
no
long
er a
vaila
ble.
“To
be m
erge
d w
ith H
omeb
uyer
A
ssis
tanc
e: P
urch
ase
Ass
ista
nce.
Mod
ify to
incl
ude
only
Sta
te B
EGIN
gr
ant f
undi
ng to
ass
ist l
ower
and
m
oder
ate
inco
me
hous
ehol
ds.”
1.1.
1D. F
or-S
ale
Deve
lope
r Ass
ista
nce:
Sm
all S
ites
Deve
lopm
ent
Opp
ortu
nitie
s
Fina
nce
for-s
ale
deve
lopm
ents
, pro
vidi
ng
44 lo
w-in
com
e ow
ners
hip
units
Smal
l Site
s De
velo
pmen
t Opp
ortu
nitie
s pr
ovid
ed lo
ans
to 8
5 lo
w-in
com
e ho
meb
uyer
s sin
ce 2
006.
Pro
gram
was
dis
cont
inue
d.Th
is pr
ogra
m h
as e
xcee
ded
its o
bjec
tives
.Re
mov
e. P
rogr
am n
o lo
nger
ava
ilabl
e.
1.1.
1E. F
or-S
ale
Deve
lope
r A
ssis
tanc
e: In
-fill
Hous
ing
Deve
lopm
ent
“45
for-s
ale
mod
erat
e in
com
e un
its a
nnua
lly
5 lo
w in
com
e un
its
annu
ally
”
Una
ble
to d
eter
min
e an
acc
urat
e fig
ure
due
to th
e de
mis
e of
the
Com
mun
ity R
edev
elop
men
t Age
ncy/
LA.
Una
ble
to d
eter
min
e ov
eral
l effe
ctiv
enes
s du
e to
the
diss
olut
ion
of th
e CR
A/L
A.
Rem
ove.
Pro
gram
has
bee
n di
scon
tinue
d du
e to
dem
ise
of R
edev
elop
men
t Age
ncie
s.
1.1.
1F. F
or-S
ale
Deve
lope
r A
ssis
tanc
e: N
ew
Hous
ing
Opp
ortu
nitie
s
“45
for-s
ale
mod
erat
e in
com
e un
its a
nnua
lly
5 fo
r-sal
e lo
w-in
com
e un
its a
nnua
lly
in C
RA/L
A Do
wnt
own
proj
ect a
reas
”
Una
ble
to d
eter
min
e an
acc
urat
e fig
ure
due
to th
e de
mis
e of
the
Com
mun
ity R
edev
elop
men
t Age
ncy/
LA.
Una
ble
to d
eter
min
e ov
eral
l effe
ctiv
enes
s du
e to
the
diss
olut
ion
of th
e CR
A/L
A.
Rem
ove.
Pro
gram
has
bee
n di
scon
tinue
d du
e to
dem
ise
of R
edev
elop
men
t Age
ncie
s.
1.1.
1G. F
or-S
ale
Deve
lope
r A
ssis
tanc
e: R
espo
nse
to
Hous
ing
Opp
ortu
nitie
s
“25
for-s
ale
mod
erat
e in
com
e un
its a
nnua
lly
25 fo
r-sal
e lo
w in
com
e un
its a
nnua
lly
in C
RA/L
A pr
ojec
t are
as”
Una
ble
to d
eter
min
e an
acc
urat
e fig
ure
due
to th
e de
mis
e of
the
Com
mun
ity R
edev
elop
men
t Age
ncy/
LA.
Una
ble
to d
eter
min
e ov
eral
l effe
ctiv
enes
s du
e to
the
diss
olut
ion
of th
e CR
A/L
A.
Rem
ove.
Pro
gram
has
bee
n di
scon
tinue
d du
e to
dem
ise
of R
edev
elop
men
t Age
ncie
s.
I-18 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.1.
1H. F
or-S
ale
Deve
lope
r Ass
ista
nce:
Sm
all L
ot S
ubdi
visio
ns
314
mar
ket-
rate
un
its w
ithin
sm
all l
ot
subd
ivisi
ons
annu
ally
“App
roxi
mat
ely
184
Smal
l Lot
Sub
divi
sion
deve
lopm
ent p
roje
cts
have
be
en fi
led
with
the
City
sin
ce 2
006,
con
sistin
g of
1,5
27 p
ropo
sed
units
. 629
uni
ts h
ave
been
per
mitt
ed a
s of
the
end
of 2
012.
Out
reac
h to
dev
elop
ers
and
arch
itect
s on
pos
sible
impr
ovem
ents
to
the
prog
ram
’s po
licie
s an
d pr
oced
ures
took
pla
ce. A
list
of i
ssue
ar
eas
was
com
pile
d, a
s w
as a
n up
date
to th
e Sm
all L
ot D
esig
n G
uide
lines
. Wor
k is
expe
cted
to c
ontin
ue th
roug
h 20
13.”
Prod
uctio
n w
as b
elow
exp
ecta
tions
, alth
ough
th
is w
as li
kely
larg
ely
due
to th
e cr
ash
of
the
for-s
ale
hous
ing
mar
ket i
n 20
07. M
ostly
ad
min
istr
ativ
e in
ter-
depa
rtm
enta
l cla
rifica
tions
an
d ad
just
men
ts c
an b
e m
ade
to m
ake
prog
ram
mor
e w
orka
ble
and
effic
ient
.
Reta
in.
1.1.
2A. M
ortg
age
Reve
nue
Bond
Fin
anci
ng fo
r N
ew R
enta
l Hou
sing
“75
low
-inco
me
rent
al
units
and
300
abo
ve
mod
erat
e in
com
e un
its
annu
ally,
thro
ugh
CRA
/LA
180
very
low
-inco
me
rent
al
units
, thr
ough
HCI
DLA”
“Sin
ce 2
006,
HCI
DLA
has
issu
ed b
onds
for 3
5 ne
w
cons
truc
tion
(bon
d-on
ly) r
enta
l hou
sing
units
(plu
s a
tota
l of 1
,585
new
con
stru
ctio
n un
its
com
bine
d w
ith A
HTF
fund
s)”
Effe
ctiv
e
Mer
ge w
ith N
ew P
rodu
ctio
n of
Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
prog
ram
. Bet
wee
n ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
reha
b bo
nd
prog
ram
s, o
bjec
tive
is fo
r 1,0
00
new
or r
ehab
bed
low
-inco
me
units
an
d 12
0 ve
ry lo
w-in
com
e un
its.
1.1.
2B. A
fford
able
Hou
sing
Trus
t Fun
d (A
HTF)
for
New
Ren
tal H
ousin
g
“4,7
89 v
ery
low
in
com
e un
its
479
low
inco
me
units
”
From
200
6 to
pre
sent
84
new
con
stru
ctio
n pr
ojec
ts fu
ndin
g 3,
997
very
low
inco
me
units
at 5
0% o
r bel
ow a
nd a
n ad
ditio
nal
1,58
9 lo
w in
com
e un
its b
etw
een
50%
to 6
0% A
MI.
Very
effe
ctiv
e, c
lose
to m
eetin
g ve
ry lo
w
inco
me
unit
goal
and
exc
eedi
ng lo
w in
com
e un
it go
al. G
oing
forw
ard
HCID
LA w
ill h
ave
a se
vere
redu
ctio
n in
fund
ing
caus
ing
a re
duct
ion
in a
fford
able
uni
t pro
duct
ion.
Reta
in
1.1.
2C. N
ew R
enta
l Ho
usin
g O
ppor
tuni
ties
“70
very
low
inco
me,
70 lo
w in
com
e, a
nd
60 m
oder
ate
inco
me
rent
al u
nits
ann
ually
”
Una
ble
to d
eter
min
e an
acc
urat
e fig
ure
due
to th
e de
mis
e of
the
Com
mun
ity R
edev
elop
men
t Age
ncy/
LA.
N/A
- Pr
ogra
m h
as b
een
disc
ontin
ued
due
to d
emis
e of
Red
evel
opm
ent A
genc
ies.
Rem
ove
1.1.
2D. R
espo
nse
to R
enta
l Ho
usin
g O
ppor
tuni
ties
“50
very
low
inco
me,
50 lo
w in
com
e, a
nd
50 m
oder
ate
inco
me
rent
al
units
app
rove
d an
nual
ly
in C
RA/L
A pr
ojec
t are
as”
Una
ble
to d
eter
min
e an
acc
urat
e fig
ure
due
to th
e de
mis
e of
the
Com
mun
ity R
edev
elop
men
t Age
ncy/
LA.
N/A
- Pr
ogra
m h
as b
een
disc
ontin
ued
due
to d
emis
e of
Red
evel
opm
ent A
genc
ies.
Rem
ove
1.1.
2E. P
roje
ct-B
ased
Re
ntal
Ass
ista
nce
“1,0
74 (4
30 e
xtre
mel
y lo
w, 6
44 v
ery
low
inco
me)
ho
useh
olds
hou
sed
thro
ugh
proj
ect-
base
d re
ntal
ass
ista
nce
vouc
hers
745
low
inco
me
units
of
rent
al h
ousin
g”
HAC
LA h
as a
tota
l of 2
,505
allo
cate
d un
its.
Very
effe
ctiv
e, e
xcee
ding
obj
ectiv
e.Re
tain
1.1.
2F. N
ew G
ener
atio
n Fu
nd—
New
Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
Supp
ort t
he c
onst
ruct
ion
of 2
,560
new
uni
ts$3
3.2
mill
ion
has
been
inve
sted
thro
ugh
the
New
Gen
erat
ion
Fund
, res
ultin
g in
662
affo
rdab
le u
nits
cre
ated
or p
rese
rved
.
The
New
Gen
erat
ion
Fund
has
bee
n an
im
port
ant s
ourc
e of
fund
ing
for n
ew a
fford
able
ho
usin
g. T
he p
rogr
am h
as b
een
mod
ified
to
bett
er a
ddre
ss th
e ga
p in
pre
deve
lopm
ent a
nd
acqu
isitio
n fu
nds
that
the
clos
ing
of C
RA/L
A cr
eate
d. A
lso
To m
axim
ize
effe
ctiv
enes
s HC
IDLA
ha
s al
igne
d th
is fu
nd w
ith th
e pe
rman
ent
fund
ing
sour
ces
avai
labl
e to
thes
e pr
ojec
ts.
Cont
inue
, with
min
or c
hang
es to
prio
ritie
s.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-19
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.1.
3A. H
ousin
g fo
r Sen
ior
and
Disa
bled
Per
sons
“50
units
for v
ery
low
in
com
e se
nior
s an
nual
ly
50 u
nits
for v
ery
low
inco
me
disa
bled
pe
rson
s an
nual
ly”
“The
City
ado
pted
the
Elde
r Fac
ilitie
s O
rdin
ance
in 2
006.
Thi
s O
rdin
ance
cre
ates
a s
ingl
e ap
prov
al p
roce
ss fo
r Alz
heim
er’s
/Dem
entia
Ca
re H
ousin
g, A
ssis
ted
Livi
ng C
are
Hous
ing,
Sen
ior I
ndep
ende
nt
Hous
ing
and
Skill
ed N
ursin
g Ca
re H
ousin
g. T
he O
rdin
ance
per
mits
th
is us
e in
zon
es w
here
the
Faci
lity
does
not
mee
t the
use
, hei
ght o
r ar
ea p
rovi
sions
of t
he u
nder
lyin
g zo
ning
, with
Zon
ing
Adm
inis
trat
or
findi
ngs.
The
Ord
inan
ce a
lso
perm
its fe
wer
par
king
spa
ces
than
ot
herw
ise
requ
ired.
DCP
has
rece
ived
app
licat
ions
for 1
2 El
derc
are
Faci
litie
s sin
ce 2
006,
repr
esen
ting
1047
new
sen
ior h
ousin
g un
its.
CRA
Activ
ity: 1
3 se
nior
-orie
nted
pro
ject
s w
ere
com
plet
ed, i
n co
nstr
uctio
n or
in p
re-d
evel
opm
ent a
s of
201
0 to
talin
g 18
85
units
, inc
ludi
ng 1
765
affo
rdab
le u
nits
for s
enio
rs a
nd/o
r dis
able
d pe
rson
s (8
ext
rem
ely
low
inco
me,
194
ver
y lo
w in
com
e, 3
09 lo
w
inco
me,
32
mod
erat
e in
com
e an
d 10
93 c
anno
t be
dete
rmin
ed).
HAC
LA h
as h
elpe
d cr
eate
223
Sen
ior u
nits
in 2
pro
ject
s in
Wilm
ingt
on a
nd W
est L
os A
ngel
es a
s w
ell a
s 57
sen
ior
and
disa
bled
uni
ts in
N. H
olly
woo
d an
d So
uth
LA.
LADB
S ha
s cr
eate
d tw
o pr
ogra
ms
to e
xped
ite p
erm
ittin
g pr
oces
ses
for q
ualifi
ed p
roje
cts
of a
cer
tain
siz
e.
Thre
shol
ds w
ere
mad
e lo
wer
for s
enio
r pro
ject
s.”
“Lar
gely
effe
ctiv
e at
mee
ting
prod
uctio
n go
als,
ho
wev
er th
e de
mis
e of
the
CRA
/LA
will
like
ly c
ut
affo
rdab
le s
enio
r pro
duct
ion
in th
e co
min
g ye
ars.
All
Elde
rcar
e pr
ojec
ts h
ave
been
100
%
mar
ket-
rate
. Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d co
mpa
tibili
ty
has
also
bee
n qu
estio
ned
on s
ome
proj
ects
in
larg
ely
singl
e-fa
mily
nei
ghbo
rhoo
ds.”
Cont
inue
with
out C
RA in
volv
emen
t. Ad
d re
cent
per
mit
stre
amlin
ing
mea
sure
s in
to p
rogr
am. L
ook
into
feas
ibili
ty o
f in
clud
ing
affo
rdab
ility
and
nei
ghbo
rhoo
d co
mpa
tibili
ty c
ompo
nent
s to
Eld
erca
re
Faci
litie
s O
rdin
ance
. Con
sider
way
s to
faci
litat
e th
e pr
oduc
tion
of u
nits
fo
r sen
ior a
nd th
e di
sabl
ed th
roug
h th
e LI
HTC
proc
ess,
as
the
City
will
so
on h
ave
cont
rol o
ver s
ettin
g po
licie
s fo
r its
ow
n ap
port
ionm
ent.
1.1.
3B. H
ousin
g fo
r All
Hous
ehol
d Si
zes
and
Type
s
“75
larg
e fa
mily
low
in
com
e un
its
75 s
mal
l low
inco
me
units
”
“HAC
LA A
ctiv
ity: A
cqui
red
98 u
nits
of l
ow/m
oder
ate
inco
me
apar
tmen
t 4-b
edro
om u
nits
at 1
2100
She
ldon
Ave
nue,
Nor
th
Holly
woo
d (2
008)
. Acq
uire
d tw
o 4
bedr
oom
tow
nhom
es o
f pub
lic
hous
ing
in W
atts
(201
0). A
cqui
red
twel
ve 4
bed
room
tow
nhom
es
of p
ublic
hou
sing
in W
atts
. Acq
uire
d 1
singl
e fa
mily
resid
ence
as
pub
lic h
ousin
g in
Wat
ts (2
011)
. Acq
uire
d 20
resid
entia
l uni
ts
of p
ublic
hou
sing
in 1
5 se
para
te p
rope
rtie
s in
Wat
ts (2
012)
.
CRA
Activ
ity: O
ver 3
0 pr
ojec
ts w
ere
com
plet
ed, u
nder
con
stru
ctio
n or
in p
rede
velo
pmen
t in
2010
tota
ling
3,44
6 un
its, i
nclu
ding
ov
er 2
,805
affo
rdab
le u
nits
(at l
east
329
affo
rdab
le fa
mily
uni
ts,
488
effic
ienc
y un
its a
nd a
t lea
st 1
,093
1-b
edro
om u
nits
).”
“Muc
h of
this
wor
k fe
ll to
the
CRA
/LA
, w
hich
mea
ns th
at p
rodu
ctio
n in
this
area
is
likel
y to
dec
line
with
out a
rene
wed
focu
s.
HAC
LA re
port
s cu
rren
tly h
avin
g no
pla
ns to
ac
quire
or f
or d
evel
opm
ent o
f hou
sing
othe
r th
an p
ublic
hou
sing
rede
velo
pmen
t.”
Rem
ove
give
n th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
and
lack
of H
ACLA
pla
ns. H
CIDL
A’s
com
mitm
ent t
o la
rge
fam
ilies
is m
entio
ned
in n
ew p
rogr
am 6
New
Pro
duct
ion
of
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g. A
lso
adde
d la
rge
fam
ily p
rodu
ctio
n to
52
Mon
itor a
nd
Upd
ate
the
Dens
ity B
onus
pro
gram
.
1.1.
3C. I
nnov
ativ
e Ho
usin
g U
nit D
esig
n
“50
very
low
inco
me
units
of a
ltern
ativ
e m
ulti-
fam
ily h
ousin
g
50 v
ery
low
inco
me
units
with
uni
vers
al
desig
n el
emen
ts
Prov
ide
assis
tanc
e to
dev
eloe
prs
and
prop
erty
ow
ners
dur
ing
proj
ect r
evie
w”
The
prop
osed
Tas
k Fo
rce
and
reco
mm
enda
tions
for r
evis
ed
regu
latio
ns h
as re
mai
ned
on h
old
pend
ing
budg
et a
nd
staf
f res
ourc
es th
roug
hout
the
plan
ning
per
iod.
Has
not b
een
effe
ctiv
e at
mee
ting
obje
ctiv
es.
Cont
inue
the
goal
of p
rom
otin
g in
nova
tive
units
des
ign,
with
a re
new
ed fo
cus
on
assis
ting
the
elde
rly to
“ag
e in
pla
ce.”
I-20 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.1.
3D. A
ltern
ativ
e M
ulti-
Fam
ily D
evel
opm
ent
“20
seco
nd u
nits
on
lots
an
nual
ly, in
clud
ing
6 lo
w in
com
e un
its,
7 m
oder
ate
inco
me
units
and
7 ab
ove-
mod
erat
e in
com
e un
its”
At le
ast 1
87 s
econ
d un
its o
n a
lot w
ere
appr
oved
from
200
6 to
20
11, p
ursu
ant t
o A
B 18
66. N
one
wer
e kn
own
to b
e af
ford
able
.
Larg
ely
effe
ctiv
e, a
lthou
gh g
oals
are
rela
tivel
y m
odes
t for
a C
ity th
is la
rge.
Af
ford
abili
ty c
ompo
nent
not
effe
ctiv
e.
Prog
ram
ove
rlaps
with
1.5
.1 J.
Mod
ifica
tions
to
Sec
ond
Uni
t (“G
rann
y Fl
at”)
Pro
cess
Mer
ge p
rogr
am w
ith 1
.5.1
J. M
odifi
catio
ns
to S
econ
d U
nit (
“Gra
nny
Flat
”) P
roce
ss.
Look
for w
ays
to e
xpan
d ap
plic
abili
ty.
1.1.
3E. N
ew P
rogr
ams
to
Incr
ease
the
Prod
uctio
n of
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
gIn
trod
uce
Mot
ion
Actio
ns o
n th
e pr
opos
ed m
ixed
inco
me
(incl
usio
nary
zon
ing)
or
dina
nce
was
hal
ted
due
to th
e Pa
lmer
Vs.
Los
Ang
eles
cou
rt c
ase
in 2
009,
whi
ch ru
led
that
affo
rdab
ility
requ
irem
ents
in n
ew re
ntal
co
nstr
uctio
n w
ere
cont
rary
to th
e St
ate’
s Co
sta-
Haw
kins
Act
.
Not
effe
ctiv
e du
e to
lega
l act
ion.
Rem
ove.
1.1.
3F. S
mal
l Site
s fo
r Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
“Rep
ort t
o M
ayor
an
d Ci
ty C
ounc
il
Draf
t ord
inan
ce,
polic
ies,
pro
cedu
res
as
dete
rmin
ed in
stu
dy”
No
activ
ity w
as re
port
ed.
Not
effe
ctiv
e.
Rem
ove,
as
prov
ision
s fo
r sm
all s
ites
alre
ady
exis
t in
the
Zoni
ng C
ode,
in
clud
ing
Smal
l Lot
Sub
divi
sion
and
cert
ain
exce
ptio
ns g
rant
ed to
sm
all l
ots
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t pro
cess
. Pro
gram
la
cked
focu
s on
wha
t cou
ld b
e do
ne.
1.1.
4A. A
dapt
ive
Reus
e“4
50 m
arke
t rat
e an
d
50 a
fford
able
hou
sing
units
ann
ually
”
A to
tal o
f 92
build
ing
perm
its c
onta
inin
g 4,
127
units
ha
ve b
een
issu
ed fo
r Ada
ptiv
e Re
use
proj
ects
sin
ce 2
006.
A
n ad
ditio
nal 5
pro
ject
s w
ith 4
41 p
ropo
sed
units
wer
e kn
own
to b
e in
pre
-dev
elop
men
t in
late
201
2.
Prog
ram
has
bee
n ve
ry e
ffect
ive,
how
ever
the
pace
of p
roje
cts
has
slow
ed c
onsid
erab
ly in
re
cent
yea
rs -
part
ially
due
to th
e ec
onom
ic
dow
ntur
n bu
t als
o be
caus
e la
nd c
osts
ha
ve ri
sen
cons
ider
ably
and
bui
ldin
gs ri
pe
for c
onve
rsio
n ar
e ha
rder
to c
ome
by
Cont
inue
, but
exp
lore
add
ition
al in
cent
ives
to
faci
litat
e ad
aptiv
e re
use,
suc
h as
re
duce
d m
inim
um u
nit s
izes
, or s
hare
d/pu
blic
ly d
evel
oped
par
king
opp
ortu
nitie
s to
sup
port
pro
pose
d de
velo
pmen
ts.
1.1.
4B. R
edev
elop
men
t of
City
-Ow
ned
Prop
erty
“Pos
t upd
ated
inve
ntor
y of
City
-ow
ned
prop
erty
at
leas
t onc
e a
year
Crea
te o
ppor
tuni
ty
for d
evel
opm
ent o
f:
50 lo
w-in
com
e re
ntal
un
its th
roug
h CR
A/L
A
188
low
-inco
me
rent
al u
nits
31 lo
w-in
com
e ho
meo
wne
rshi
p un
its
15 m
oder
ate
inco
me
hom
eow
ners
hip
units
15 a
bove
-mod
erat
e ho
meo
wne
rshi
p un
its”
Blos
som
Pla
za: 2
62 u
nits
, Ave
nue
57: 1
00 u
nits
, Pic
o/Ro
bert
son
43 u
nits
, all
thre
e pr
ojec
ts a
re in
pre
deve
lopm
ent.
One
pro
ject
in c
onst
ruct
ion
Phas
e IIB
Gra
nd A
ve
260
units
and
on
com
plet
ed p
roje
ct 6
6 un
its.
“A li
st o
f City
ow
ned
land
for a
uctio
n is
post
ed
annu
ally.
How
ever
the
list i
s no
t tai
lore
d fo
r affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g re
deve
lopm
ent.
HCID
LA’s
Hous
ing
Deve
lopm
ent C
entr
al (H
DC)
was
not
effe
ctiv
e an
d w
as c
ance
lled
in 2
010.
”
Rem
ove
give
n di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
and
the
canc
ella
tion
of th
e HD
C. T
he
rede
velo
pmen
t of C
ity-o
wne
d pr
oper
ty,
incl
udin
g fo
rmer
CRA
land
ass
ets,
will
be
inco
rpor
ated
into
new
pro
gram
New
Pr
oduc
tion
of A
fford
able
Hou
sing.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-21
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
I-22 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.1.
4C. I
ndus
tria
l La
nd: R
edev
elop
men
t O
ppor
tuni
ties
“Com
plet
e In
dust
rial
Land
Use
Stu
dy a
nd 1
6 Co
mm
unity
Pla
n U
pdat
es
Adop
t reg
ulat
ions
re
quiri
ng a
fford
able
ho
usin
g se
t-asid
e w
ith re
deve
lopm
ent
of in
dust
rial l
and.
Cr
eate
opp
ortu
nity
for
deve
lopm
ent o
f 400
m
arke
t rat
e w
ork
forc
e ho
usin
g un
its a
nd 1
00
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g un
its
durin
g th
e pl
anni
ng p
erio
d,
incl
udin
g 25
ext
rem
ely
low
-inco
me
units
, 25
very
low
-inco
me
units
,
25 lo
w-in
com
e un
its, a
nd
25 m
oder
ate-
inco
me
units
”
“The
Indu
stria
l Lan
d U
se S
tudy
was
com
plet
ed in
200
7. It
s re
com
men
datio
ns fo
rm th
e ba
sis o
f sub
sequ
ent p
lann
ing
and
zoni
ng a
ctio
ns in
are
as w
ith in
dust
rial l
and,
incl
udin
g ne
w C
omm
unity
Pla
ns a
nd T
rans
it N
eigh
borh
ood
Plan
s.
Prop
osed
regu
latio
ns to
requ
ire a
fford
able
hou
sing
set-a
side
with
rede
velo
pmen
t of i
ndus
tria
l lan
d in
are
as id
entifi
ed
as “
”tra
nsiti
onal
”” h
ave
not t
aken
pla
ce. T
here
fore
litt
le,
if an
y, a
fford
able
hou
sing
has
been
cre
ated
as
a re
sult
of re
siden
tial p
roje
cts
on fo
rmer
ly in
dust
rial l
and.
”
The
stud
y ha
s be
en e
ffect
ive
at g
uidi
ng la
nd
use
deci
sions
, but
the
lack
of a
n af
ford
abili
ty
requ
irem
ent h
as le
d to
sub
par r
esul
ts w
ith
rega
rds
to a
fford
able
hou
sing
prod
uctio
n go
als.
Rem
ove,
as
the
Stud
y po
rtio
n ha
s be
en
com
plet
ed a
nd m
erge
the
prop
osed
af
ford
able
hou
sing
requ
irem
ents
as
pect
into
a n
ew p
rogr
am ti
tled
Land
Use
Ince
ntiv
es to
Incr
ease
th
e Pr
oduc
tion
of H
ousin
g.
1.1.
4D. R
edev
elop
men
t of
Bro
wnfi
eld
Indu
stria
l an
d Co
mm
erci
al S
ites
“Env
ironm
enta
l cl
ean-
up o
f at l
east
fiv
e br
ownfi
eld
site
s
Crea
te o
ppor
tuni
ty fo
r 10
0 un
its, i
nclu
ding
10 v
ery
low
and
10 lo
w in
com
e un
its”
As
best
as
can
be d
eter
min
ed, r
edev
elop
men
t of b
row
nfiel
d si
tes
has
resu
lted
in o
ne a
fford
able
hou
sing
proj
ect -
the
Phili
pino
W
orke
rs C
ente
r Fam
ily H
ousin
g pr
ojec
t, w
hich
will
pro
vide
45
tota
l uni
ts o
f affo
rdab
le fa
mily
hou
sing,
incl
udin
g 9
units
set
asid
e fo
r tra
nsiti
on-a
ge y
outh
and
22
units
for h
omel
ess
indi
vidu
als.
A
ll un
its a
re a
fford
able
and
rang
e fro
m 3
0% to
50%
AM
I.
Whi
le re
deve
lopm
ent o
f bro
wnfi
eld
indu
stria
l an
d co
mm
erci
al s
ites
cont
inue
s to
mov
e fo
rwar
d,
few
hou
sing
deve
lopm
ents
hav
e re
sulte
d fro
m
the
wor
k. M
ost r
edev
elop
men
t pro
ject
s re
sult
in p
ark
site
s or
com
mer
cial
rede
velo
pmen
t.
Cont
inue
, with
rene
wed
focu
s on
hou
sing
deve
lopm
ent a
s an
end
pro
duct
.
1.1.
4E. P
ublic
Fac
ilitie
s Zo
ned
Land
: Joi
nt
Use
Opp
ortu
nitie
s
“Cre
ate
oppo
rtun
ities
for
50 v
ery
low
and
50 lo
w in
com
e un
its
durin
g th
e pl
anni
ng
perio
d”
“The
Los
Ang
eles
Uni
fied
Scho
ol D
istr
ict (
LAU
SD)
part
nere
d w
ith a
non
profi
t dev
elop
er to
fina
lize
cons
truc
tion
on 5
0 un
its o
f affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g (2
-
3 BR
s/30
-60%
AM
I) on
sch
ool-d
istr
ict o
wne
d su
rplu
s la
nd in
the
Gla
ssel
Par
k co
mm
unity
. A s
econ
d 29
uni
t pro
ject
by
the
sam
e pa
rtne
rs is
cur
rent
ly g
oing
thro
ugh
the
entit
lem
ent p
roce
ss.”
The
prog
ram
has
met
hal
f of i
ts o
bjec
tive
to
build
100
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g un
its o
n Pu
blic
Fa
cilit
ies
(LAU
SD) z
oned
pro
pert
y. A
noth
er
proj
ect (
prop
osed
for 2
9 lo
w-in
com
e un
its)
rem
ains
in p
re-d
evel
opm
ent,
whi
ch w
ould
re
sult
in th
e go
als
bein
g la
rgel
y m
et.
Cont
inue
, as
the
pote
ntia
l for
re
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
se s
ites
rem
ains
val
id.
1.1.
4F. I
nfill
Opp
ortu
nitie
s
Ass
ist p
lann
ers
and
deve
lope
rs to
iden
tify
10 n
ew lo
catio
ns
for r
esid
entia
l de
velo
pmen
t ann
ually
No
tang
ible
pro
gres
s ha
s be
en m
ade
on th
is pr
ogra
m
mee
ting
its o
bjec
tives
due
to b
udge
t iss
ues.
Whi
le w
ork
bega
n on
iden
tifyi
ng s
oftw
are
need
s an
d co
sts
to c
ompl
ete
the
prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es,
adeq
uate
reso
urce
s w
ere
not a
ble
to b
e lo
cate
d.
Rem
ove,
as
reso
urce
s do
not
app
ear
to b
e av
aila
ble.
Als
o, th
e pr
ogra
m is
sli
ghtly
dup
licat
ive
of th
e ad
equa
te s
ite
sele
ctio
n fo
r res
iden
tial d
evel
opm
ent
cont
aine
d in
the
Hous
ing
Elem
ent.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-23
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.1.
4G. I
nfill
Opp
ortu
nitie
s:
Dow
ntow
n Ce
nter
“Cre
ate
loca
tions
for 7
00
hous
ing
units
, inc
ludi
ng
40 m
oder
ate,
30 lo
w, a
nd
30 v
ery
low
inco
me
units
”
The
Gre
ater
Dow
ntow
n Ho
usin
g In
cent
ive
Prog
ram
was
la
unch
ed in
200
7. It
offe
rs in
crea
sed
heig
ht a
nd F
AR
right
s in
ex
chan
ge fo
r the
pro
visio
n of
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g. A
t lea
st 4
pr
ojec
ts w
ith 3
38 u
nits
(308
affo
rdab
le) h
ave
been
dev
elop
ed
since
the
prog
ram
beg
an in
200
7. O
ne o
f the
pro
ject
s w
as
mar
ket-
base
d, w
hile
the
othe
r 3 w
ere
assis
ted
proj
ects
.
“Gre
ater
Dow
ntow
n Ho
usin
g In
cent
ive
Prog
ram
w
as la
unch
ed a
s th
e ho
usin
g cr
isis
bega
n in
20
07, t
here
fore
tota
l pro
gres
s ha
s be
en m
uted
.
This
port
ion
of th
e pr
ogra
m is
repe
titiv
e w
ith
anot
her s
tand
alon
e pr
ogra
m (D
ownt
own
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g Bo
nus)
. The
Dow
ntow
n TF
AR
aspe
ct h
as re
mai
ned
rele
vant
; how
ever
it
is al
so d
uplic
ativ
e of
ano
ther
sta
ndal
one
prog
ram
(Dow
ntow
n TF
AR
Publ
ic B
enefi
t Fee
).”
Rem
ove,
as
both
maj
or p
arts
of t
he
prog
ram
app
ear e
lsew
here
as
stan
dalo
ne
prog
ram
s. N
o ne
ed fo
r dup
licat
ion.
1.1.
4H. C
oord
inat
ion
of In
frast
ruct
ure
Impr
ovem
ents
Faci
litie
s fin
anci
ng p
lan
in u
p to
8 u
dpat
ed
Com
mun
ity P
lans
Whi
le in
frast
ruct
ure/
faci
litie
s ch
apte
rs a
re b
eing
incl
uded
in
the
New
Com
mun
ity P
lans
, the
obj
ectiv
e of
cre
atin
g Fa
cilit
ies
Fina
ncin
g Pl
ans
has
not b
een
adop
ted,
nor
has
th
e id
ea o
f for
mal
ly a
lloca
ting
reso
urce
s to
com
mun
ities
th
at h
ave
seen
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g pr
oduc
tion.
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es h
ave
not b
een
reac
hed
as th
e fe
asib
ility
of d
oing
so
is lo
w.
Rem
ove,
as
it do
es s
eem
like
ly th
at
this
prog
ram
will
be
impl
emen
ted
with
in th
e pl
anni
ng p
erio
d.
1.1.
5A. P
erm
anen
t and
N
ew F
undi
ng S
ourc
es
for t
he A
fford
able
Ho
usin
g Tr
ust F
und
$100
,000
,000
ann
ually
Redu
ctio
n in
HO
ME
allo
catio
n fro
m a
ppro
xim
atel
y 40
mill
ion
annu
ally
to 2
2 m
illio
n du
ring
the
12/1
3 fis
cal y
ear.
NSP
2 an
d EE
CBG
hav
e be
en s
pent
, with
no
signi
fican
t pro
gram
inco
me
antic
ipat
ed. N
o ne
w F
eder
al s
ourc
es h
ave
been
iden
tified
.
Effe
ctiv
e in
spe
ndin
g fu
nds
but n
o su
cces
s in
fin
ding
new
fund
ing.
Pos
sible
futu
re p
rogr
am
inco
me
from
rest
ruct
urin
g 15
yea
r or o
lder
pr
ojec
ts o
r ado
ptio
n of
fee
on d
evel
opm
ent
that
cre
ates
dem
and
for h
ousin
g.
Com
bine
with
oth
er a
dvoc
acy
prog
ram
s to
cre
ate
new
Adv
ocat
e fo
r Hou
sing
Fund
s pr
ogra
m.
1.1.
5B. A
dvoc
ate
for S
tate
an
d Fe
dera
l Hou
sing
Fund
s
Supp
ort S
tate
and
Fed
eral
bi
lls th
at p
rovi
de fu
nds
for a
fford
able
hou
sing
deve
lopm
ent i
n th
e Ci
ty
of L
os A
ngel
es in
eac
h le
gisla
tive
sess
ion
The
CLA
reco
mm
ende
d th
at C
ity C
ounc
il su
ppor
t at l
east
13
pie
ces
of h
ousin
g-re
late
d le
gisla
tion
at th
e St
ate
and
Fede
ral l
evel
sin
ce 2
006.
The
HCI
DLA
trac
ked
and
prod
uced
a
bill
anal
ysis
in s
uppo
rt o
f sel
ecte
d le
gisla
tion.
This
prog
ram
met
its
obje
ctiv
e.Co
mbi
ne w
ith o
ther
adv
ocac
y pr
ogra
ms
to c
reat
e ne
w A
dvoc
ate
for H
ousin
g Fu
nds
prog
ram
.
1.1.
5C. A
fford
able
Hou
sing
Publ
ic B
enefi
t Fee
“Com
plet
e ne
xus
stud
y to
est
ablis
h a
Publ
ic B
enefi
t Fee
Adop
t am
endm
ents
to th
e Zo
ning
Cod
e to
impl
emen
t a
Publ
ic B
enefi
t Fee
Targ
et $
20 m
illio
n in
fees
col
lect
ed to
su
ppor
t affo
rdab
le
hous
ing
deve
lopm
ent
and/
or in
frast
ruct
ure
impr
ovem
ents
”
“The
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g Pu
blic
Ben
efit F
ee S
tudy
was
co
mpl
eted
in 2
011.
The
stu
dy lo
oked
at t
he n
exus
be
twee
n ne
w m
arke
t-ra
te d
evel
opm
ent a
nd
the
subs
eque
nt in
crea
se in
dem
and
for a
fford
able
hou
sing
in th
e Ci
ty o
f Los
Ang
eles
. The
repo
rt w
as re
leas
ed
publ
icly
in 2
012.
No
actio
n su
bseq
uent
to re
leas
e, b
esid
es
publ
ic p
rese
ntat
ions
and
feed
back
ses
sions
.”
The
nexu
s st
udy
was
com
plet
ed, b
ut n
o su
bseq
uent
City
act
ion
to im
plem
ent t
he id
ea.
The
stud
y w
as re
leas
ed p
ublic
ly in
late
201
2.
Rem
ove
as s
tand
alon
e pr
ogra
m a
s it
does
not
cur
rent
ly s
eem
pro
babl
e th
at
impl
enta
tion
actio
ns w
ill b
e ta
ken.
I-24 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.1.
5D. D
ownt
own
TFA
R Pu
blic
Ben
efit F
ee$2
0 m
illio
n fo
r affo
rdab
le
hous
ing
deve
lopm
ent
“The
Dow
ntow
n TF
AR
Publ
ic B
enefi
t Fee
fund
s a
num
ber o
f co
mm
unity
ben
efit p
roje
cts
in th
e do
wnt
own
area
, inc
ludi
ng
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g. M
illio
ns fo
r dol
lars
hav
e be
en d
edic
ated
to
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g do
wnt
own
since
200
6, h
owev
er a
n ex
act n
umbe
r was
not
abl
e to
be
gene
rate
d at
this
time.
Ther
e ha
s be
en n
o pr
ogre
ss o
n de
dica
ting
a po
rtio
n of
the
Bene
fit F
ee d
irect
ly to
the
City
’s Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
Trus
t Fun
d,
or in
requ
iring
affo
rdab
ility
to ta
ke p
art i
n th
e pr
ogra
m.”
“Lar
gely
effe
ctiv
e in
pro
vidi
ng a
n im
port
ant s
trea
m o
f affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g re
sour
ces
in th
e do
wnt
own
area
.
With
the
diss
olut
ion
of th
e CR
A/L
A, D
CP
tran
sfer
red
the
juris
dict
ion
of th
e “”
Allo
catio
n of
Flo
or A
rea
Righ
ts””
pro
gram
pre
viou
sly
cont
aine
d in
the
Bunk
er H
ill R
edev
elop
men
t Pr
ojec
t Are
a, to
the
DCP
thro
ugh
a ne
w B
unke
r Hi
ll Sp
ecifi
c Pl
an (2
013)
. The
tran
sfer
allo
ws
the
City
to c
ontin
ue a
lloca
ting
a po
ol o
f unb
uilt
floor
ar
ea ri
ghts
in th
e di
stric
t, fa
cilit
ate
cont
inue
d de
sign
revi
ew o
f new
dev
elop
men
t, an
d m
odify
pa
rkin
g re
quire
men
ts. H
owev
er p
aym
ents
to th
e Pu
blic
Ben
efit T
rust
Fun
d ha
ve b
een
ende
d.”
Reta
in, w
ith c
urre
nt p
rogr
am
mod
ifica
tion
idea
s.
1.1.
6A. O
ff-Si
te
Park
ing
Opt
ions
Redu
ce th
e co
st o
f hou
sing
prod
uctio
n by
redu
cing
th
e co
st o
f par
king
in
10 n
eigh
borh
oods
The
City
has
app
rove
d tw
o fu
lly a
utom
ated
par
king
str
uctu
res
– a
15-c
ar fu
lly a
utom
ated
lift
in th
e Va
lley
and
a 17
-car
faci
lity
in
Chin
atow
n. A
maj
or re
siden
tial p
roje
ct in
Cen
tury
City
(283
uni
ts)
prop
oses
the
use
of s
uch
a st
ruct
ure.
In 2
012,
the
City
Cou
ncil
inst
ruct
ed th
e ap
prop
riate
City
age
ncie
s to
pre
pare
and
rele
ase
an
RFP
to p
rovi
de a
n au
tom
ated
par
king
sys
tem
at t
he n
ew C
ity-
owne
d pa
rkin
g lo
ts o
n El
ectr
ic A
venu
e in
the
Veni
ce c
omm
unity
.
Prog
ram
has
bee
n ef
fect
ive
in w
orki
ng
tow
ards
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f util
izin
g th
is te
chno
logy
to a
ssis
t in
hous
ing
prod
uctio
n.
How
ever
, the
larg
er p
rogr
am g
oals
are
dupl
icat
ive
with
ano
ther
exi
stin
g pa
rkin
g pr
ogra
m (I
nnov
ativ
e Pa
rkin
g St
rate
gies
).
Mer
ge p
rogr
am o
bjec
tives
with
In
nova
tive
Park
ing
Stra
tegi
es p
rogr
am.
1.1.
6B. C
oope
rativ
e La
bor A
gree
men
ts a
nd
Coop
erat
ive
Mat
eria
ls Pu
rcha
sing
Agre
emen
ts
Dem
onst
ratio
n co
oper
ativ
e ag
reem
ent f
or la
bor a
nd/
or m
ater
ials
amon
g se
vera
l re
siden
tial d
evel
oper
s
Prog
ress
on
this
prog
ram
is u
ncle
ar d
ue to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.Ef
fect
iven
ess
is un
know
n, a
nd th
e pr
ogra
m h
as
ende
d w
ith th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
Rem
ove.
1.1.
6C. L
and
Ow
ners
hip
Alte
rnat
ives
Dem
onst
ratio
n pr
ojec
t w
ith o
ne o
r mor
e de
velo
pers
em
ploy
ing
alte
rnat
ive
land
ow
ners
hip
stru
ctur
es
Prog
ress
on
this
prog
ram
is u
ncle
ar d
ue to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.Ef
fect
iven
ess
is un
know
n, a
nd th
e pr
ogra
m h
as
ende
d w
ith th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
Rem
ove.
1.1.
7A. C
ase
Man
agem
ent
and
Case
Pro
cess
ing
Ass
ista
nce
Ass
ist 5
0 pr
ojec
ts p
er y
ear
The
City
rece
ntly
cre
ated
two
stre
amlin
ed c
ase
man
agem
ent
proc
esse
s fo
r obt
aini
ng b
uild
ing
perm
its -
the
Para
llel D
esig
n Pe
rmitt
ing
Prog
ram
(PDP
P) a
nd D
evel
opm
ent S
ervi
ces
Case
M
anag
emen
t (DS
CM).
DBS
allo
ws
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g pr
ojec
ts to
pa
rtic
ipat
e at
low
er u
nit t
hres
hold
s th
an p
roje
cts
with
out a
fford
able
ho
usin
g. B
oth
proc
esse
s pr
ovid
e ca
se m
anag
emen
t ass
ista
nce
that
gr
eatly
ass
ist i
n st
ream
linin
g th
e pe
rmitt
ing
proc
ess.
In 2
012,
the
City
als
o cr
eate
d in
inte
r-de
part
men
tal c
oord
inat
ed re
view
pla
n - t
he
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g Pr
ojec
t Rev
iew
Pro
cedu
res
Mem
o +
Flo
wch
art.
Goo
d pr
ogre
ss h
as b
een
mad
e in
exp
editi
ng
and
stre
amlin
ing
proj
ects
thro
ugh
bett
er
case
man
agem
ent a
nd in
ter-
depa
rtm
enta
l co
llabo
ratio
n. T
he p
rogr
am, h
owev
er,
over
laps
with
ano
ther
pro
gram
(Exp
edite
Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
Proj
ects
).
Com
bine
cas
e m
anag
emen
t and
cas
e pr
oces
sing
assis
tanc
e w
ith s
imila
r pro
gram
(E
xped
ite A
fford
able
Hou
sing
Proj
ects
).
1.1.
7B. E
mpl
oyer
-A
ssis
ted
Hous
ing
Crea
te 5
0 m
oder
ate
and
50 a
bove
mod
erat
e ho
usin
g un
its a
s de
mon
stra
tion
proj
ect
with
one
em
ploy
er
Prog
ress
on
this
prog
ram
is u
ncle
ar d
ue to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.Ef
fect
iven
ess
is un
know
n, a
nd th
e pr
ogra
m h
as
ende
d w
ith th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
Rem
ove.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-25
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.2.
1A. S
yste
mat
ic
Code
Enf
orce
men
t Pr
ogra
m (S
CEP)
Insp
ect 1
,629
,553
uni
ts
Purs
uant
to C
hapt
er X
VI o
f the
Los
Ang
eles
Mun
icip
al C
ode,
the
HCID
LA a
dmin
iste
rs th
e SC
EP p
rogr
am. T
he p
rogr
am p
rovi
des
for
the
rout
ine
habi
tabi
liy in
spec
tion
of th
e Ci
ty’s
720,
000
mul
ti-fa
mily
resid
entia
l ren
t uni
ts to
ens
ure
conf
orm
ance
with
the
Calif
orni
a He
alth
and
Saf
ety
Code
and
loca
l ord
inan
ces.
Fro
m 2
006
thro
ugh
2012
, the
SCE
P pr
ogra
m in
spec
ted
1,33
3,97
0 m
ulti-
fam
ily re
siden
tial r
enta
l uni
ts, a
nd c
ited
2,17
3,12
8 ha
bita
bilit
y vi
olat
ions
. The
SCE
P pr
ogra
m c
olle
cts
appr
oxim
atel
y $3
5 m
illio
n in
ann
ual r
even
ue fo
r HCI
DLA’
s Co
de E
nfor
cem
ent T
rust
Fun
d.
Sinc
e th
e pr
ogra
m’s
ince
ptio
n, re
aliz
ed a
98%
redu
ctio
n in
the
num
ber o
f sub
stan
dard
pro
pert
ies
with
in th
e Ci
ty o
f Los
Ang
eles
fro
m 1
50,0
00 to
3,5
00. T
he p
rogr
am m
aint
ains
a 9
9% c
ompl
ianc
e ra
te w
ith D
epar
tmen
t-is
sued
ord
ers
to re
pair
viol
atio
ns.
The
SCEP
pro
gram
has
mat
ured
and
evo
lved
in
to o
ne o
f the
mos
t suc
cess
ful,
proa
ctiv
e ha
bita
bilit
y in
spec
tion
prog
ram
s in
the
natio
n an
d is
reco
gniz
ed a
s a
lead
er in
the
code
en
forc
emen
t ind
ustr
y. T
he p
rogr
am c
onsis
tent
ly
mee
ts o
r exc
eeds
its
goal
s, fu
lfills
the
inte
nt a
nd
purp
ose
of th
e Ho
usin
g Co
de, a
nd c
ontr
ibut
es
to th
e pr
eser
vatio
n of
the
City
’s re
ntal
hou
sing
for t
he C
ity’s
rent
al h
ousin
g po
pula
tion.
Reta
in
1.2.
2A. S
ingl
e Fa
mily
Re
habi
litat
ion
“3,0
52 e
xtre
mel
y lo
w in
com
e un
its
2,05
0 ve
ry lo
w
inco
me
units
1,17
8 lo
w in
com
e un
its”
“Min
or h
ome
repa
irs o
r ins
talla
tion
of s
afet
y &
secu
rity
devi
ces:
Extr
emel
y lo
w-in
com
e - 7
,857
Very
low
-inco
me
- 4,0
88
Low
-inco
me
- 1,9
10”
This
prog
ram
has
exc
eede
d its
obj
ectiv
es.
Reta
in
1.2.
2B. R
esid
entia
l Re
habi
litat
ion
“189
ver
y lo
w in
com
e un
its
290
low
inco
me
units
”
Resid
entia
l Reh
abili
tatio
n Pr
ogra
m c
ompl
eted
78
proj
ects
to
ass
ista
nce
low
inco
me
hom
eow
ners
sin
ce 2
006.
Pro
gram
di
scon
tinue
d in
200
8 du
e to
fund
ing
redu
ctio
ns.
This
prog
ram
did
not
mee
t its
obj
ectiv
e du
e to
fund
ing
redu
ctio
ns in
200
8.Re
mov
e. P
rogr
am n
o lo
nger
ava
ilabl
e.
1.2.
2C. U
tility
M
aint
enan
ce P
rogr
am
Prev
ent t
he v
acat
ion
of
2,05
0 m
aste
r-met
ered
ap
artm
ent b
uild
ings
DWP
refe
rred
ove
r 196
cas
es re
ferr
ed to
HCI
DLA
, of w
hich
16
ram
ains
ope
n. B
etw
een
the
UM
P an
d RE
AP
over
777
util
ity s
hot
off w
ere
prev
ente
d, w
hich
dur
ing
the
fore
clos
ure
crisi
s pl
ayed
an
impo
rtan
t rol
e in
mai
ntai
ning
util
ities
in fo
recl
osed
pro
pert
ies.
Fr
om Ja
nuar
y 1,
200
6 th
roug
h De
cem
ber 3
1, 2
012,
HCI
DLA
issu
ed
890
paym
ents
tota
ling
$2.3
mill
ion
to th
e De
part
men
t of W
ater
an
d Po
wer
to p
reve
nt u
tility
shu
t-of
f in
prop
ertie
s th
roug
hout
the
City
, and
ther
efor
e pr
even
t disp
lace
men
t of t
enan
ts. I
n ad
ditio
n to
pay
men
ts to
DW
P, th
roug
h U
MP,
199
pay
men
ts to
talin
g $1
67,8
00 w
ere
also
issu
ed to
The
Gas
Com
pany
to a
void
util
ity
shut
off.
The
ave
rage
pay
men
t am
ount
was
$2,
100.
Dur
ing
the
fore
clos
ure
crisi
s, th
is as
sista
nce
has
play
ed a
n im
port
ant
role
in m
aint
aini
ng u
tiliti
es in
fore
clos
ed p
rope
rtie
s as
wel
l.
Effe
ctiv
e. U
MP
has
succ
essf
ully
pre
vent
ed u
tility
se
rvic
e te
rmin
atio
n in
par
ticip
atin
g bu
ildin
gs.
Reta
in th
is pr
ogra
m to
pro
vide
pay
men
t fo
r ess
entia
l ser
vice
s on
beh
alf o
f the
Ci
ty’s
mos
t vul
nera
ble
resid
ents
.
I-26 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.2.
2D. R
esid
entia
l Re
habi
litat
ion
of O
bsol
ete
Publ
ic H
ousin
g
“Com
plet
e re
vita
lizat
ion
of H
arbo
r Vie
w a
nd
Jord
an d
owns
77 a
bove
mod
erat
e-in
com
e,
200
mod
erat
e-in
com
e,
25 lo
w-in
com
e, a
nd
103
very
low
-inco
me
units
in th
e Ha
rbor
Vie
w
Deve
lopm
ent
280
extr
emel
y lo
w in
com
e,
280
very
low
inco
me,
and
140
low
inco
me
1-fo
r-1
repl
acem
ent P
ublic
Ho
usin
g un
its,
700
wor
kfor
ce h
ousin
g un
its a
nd m
arke
t rat
e ho
meo
wne
rshi
p,
700
mar
ket r
ate
rent
al u
nits
in th
e Jo
rdan
Dow
ns
Deve
lopm
ent”
“HAC
LA’s
Dana
Str
and
rede
velo
pmen
t has
com
plet
ed P
hase
s 1-
3,
resu
lting
in 3
36 u
nits
con
stru
cted
. Sel
ectio
n of
dev
elop
er fo
r Pha
se
IV is
und
erw
ay. A
com
preh
ensi
ve m
oder
niza
tion
of 4
48 u
nits
at
San
Fern
ando
Gar
dens
took
pla
ce in
200
9. H
ACLA
has
focu
sed
its
rece
nt C
apita
l Gra
nt fu
ndin
g to
war
ds th
e re
plac
emen
t of b
uild
ing
syst
ems
(suc
h as
wat
er li
nes,
gas
line
s an
d ro
ofs)
for i
ts la
rge
publ
ic h
ousin
g si
tes
thro
ugho
ut th
e Ci
ty. S
ince
201
0 th
e Ho
usin
g Au
thor
ity h
as re
habi
litat
ed 3
2 fir
e da
mag
ed u
nits
thro
ugho
ut th
e pu
blic
hou
sing
port
folio
. In
addi
tion,
the
Auth
ority
has
aba
ted
78
asbe
stos
con
tain
ing
units
. Goi
ng fo
rwar
d, th
e Ho
usin
g Au
thor
ity
will
als
o us
e its
Cap
ital F
unds
to c
onve
rt a
por
tion
of th
e pu
blic
ho
usin
g un
its to
mee
t ADA
requ
irem
ents
for i
ts d
isab
led
resid
ents
.
The
next
pla
nned
rede
velo
pmen
t is
Jord
an D
owns
. HAC
LA
has
acqu
ired
a 21
-acr
e ad
jace
nt p
rope
rty
allo
win
g fo
r re
deve
lopm
ent e
ffort
s to
take
effe
ct w
ith m
inim
al d
ispla
cem
ent
of c
urre
nt re
siden
ts. C
ompl
eted
Jord
an D
owns
Com
mun
ity-
Base
d M
aste
r Pla
n, s
ecur
ed C
ity P
lann
ing
Com
mis
sion
appr
oval
and
hire
d M
aste
r Dev
elop
er P
artn
er.”
Obj
ectiv
es o
n tr
ack
to re
aliz
atio
n. T
he H
ousin
g Au
thor
ity c
ontin
ues
to re
orga
nize
its
depa
rtm
ents
an
d w
ork
to m
ore
effe
ctiv
ely
and
effic
ient
ly u
se
Capi
tal F
unds
to im
prov
e th
e qu
ality
of h
ousin
g un
its a
nd th
e ap
pear
ance
of t
he d
evel
opm
ents
.
Reta
in
1.2.
2E. R
esid
entia
l Ho
tel a
nd S
ingl
e Ro
om
Occ
upan
cy (S
RO)
Hote
l Pre
serv
atio
n
Acqu
isitio
n an
d re
habi
litat
ion
of S
RO h
otel
sCR
A/L
A fu
ndin
g al
low
ed n
onpr
ofit o
rgan
izat
ions
to a
cqui
re
and
reha
bilit
ate
36 S
RO h
otel
s w
ith 2
,003
affo
rdab
le u
nits
.
Prog
ram
was
larg
ely
effe
ctiv
e; h
owev
er th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
has
rem
oved
the
mai
n fu
ndin
g so
urce
for r
ehab
ilita
ting
and
pres
ervi
ng
SRO
s as
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g. Y
et, l
aws
rem
ain
in
plac
e th
at p
rote
ct s
resid
entia
l hot
els
and
SRO
s.
Mer
ge in
to D
ue P
roce
ss H
earin
gs p
rogr
am.
1.2.
2F. R
egul
atio
n of
Co
nver
sion
and
Dem
oliti
on
of R
esid
entia
l Hot
els
Pres
erve
15,
000
resid
entia
l un
its in
315
hot
els
or
conv
ert t
o af
ford
able
uni
ts
A pr
ogre
ss re
view
refle
cts
the
curr
ent d
eter
min
atio
n of
Res
idne
tial
hote
ls an
d un
its e
xcee
ded
the
orig
inal
forc
astin
g of
one
-thi
rd o
f the
or
igin
al li
st (3
15 h
otel
s). T
he w
ork
of id
entif
ying
resid
entia
l hot
els
and
resid
entia
l uni
ts w
ill b
e co
ntin
uing
in a
n on
goin
g m
anne
r. Du
ring
2012
, the
Cod
e En
forc
emen
t Div
ision
took
pro
activ
e m
easu
res
to
iden
tify
resid
entia
l hot
els
in th
e Ci
ty th
roug
h qu
erie
s of
Dep
artm
ent
and
Coun
ty p
rope
rty
data
. Ins
pect
ors
perf
orm
ed fi
eld
surv
eys
of
205
prop
ertie
s an
d id
entifi
ed 6
1 pr
oper
ties
for p
oten
tial i
nclu
sion
in th
e pr
ogra
m, p
endi
ng fu
rthe
r ana
lysis
. Dur
ing
2013
, the
Cod
e En
forc
emen
t Div
ison
will
con
tinue
to s
urve
y ad
ditio
nal p
rope
rtie
s an
d an
ticip
ates
gro
wth
in th
e re
siden
tial h
otel
inve
ntor
y.
The
Ord
inan
ce, p
roce
dure
s an
d de
term
inat
ion
proc
ess
is ef
fect
ive
in a
chiv
ing
the
Prog
ram
goa
ls.
Mer
ge in
to D
ue P
roce
ss H
earin
gs p
rogr
am.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-27
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.2.
2G. S
ectio
n 8
Mod
erat
e Re
habi
litat
ion
Sing
le R
oom
Occ
upan
cy
Mai
ntai
n Se
ctio
n 8
rent
al a
ssis
tanc
e fo
r exi
stin
g 1,
300
part
icip
atin
g SR
O u
nits
HAC
LA h
as a
tota
l of 1
,107
allo
cate
d un
its.
“Pro
gram
was
larg
ely
effe
ctiv
e. T
he o
bjec
tive
of 1
,300
uni
ts in
clud
ed 1
93 M
RP u
nits
.
The
diss
olut
ion
of C
RA/L
A ha
s re
mov
ed th
e m
ain
fund
ing
sour
ce fo
r reh
abili
tatin
g an
d pr
eser
ving
SR
Os
as a
fford
able
hou
sing.
Yet
, law
s re
mai
n in
pla
ce th
at p
rote
cts
resid
entia
l hot
els
and
SRO
s. M
erge
with
sim
ilar p
rogr
am (R
egul
atio
n of
Co
nver
sion
and
Dem
oliti
on o
f Res
iden
tial H
otel
s).
Inco
rpor
ate
insp
ectio
n an
d co
de c
ompl
ianc
e ef
fort
s ta
rget
ed fo
r res
iden
tial h
otel
s an
d SR
Os.
“
Rem
ove,
as
deve
lope
rs a
re n
o lo
nger
pro
duci
ng S
RO u
nits
.
1.2.
2H. M
obile
Hom
e Pa
rk P
rese
rvat
ion
“Ass
ist 1
00 m
obile
pa
rk te
nant
s
250
mar
ket-
rate
m
obile
hom
e pa
rk
pads
in re
siden
tial
area
s pr
eser
ved”
In Ja
nuar
y 20
12, H
CIDL
A re
leas
ed a
repo
rt th
at re
view
ed th
e ap
plic
atio
n of
the
Rent
Sta
biliz
atio
n O
rdin
ance
(RSO
) in
mob
ile
hom
e pa
rks,
with
a fo
cus
on th
e un
ique
fina
ncia
l cha
ract
eris
tics
of m
obile
hom
es o
wne
rs a
nd p
ark
owne
rs. T
he re
port
con
tain
ed
spec
ific
reco
mm
enda
tions
rega
rdin
g ch
ange
s to
the
RSO
. Ci
ty C
ounc
il de
cide
d to
con
tinue
the
item
to a
dat
e TB
D.
The
prog
ram
has
not
met
its
obje
ctiv
e, w
hich
w
as c
hang
ed to
the
way
relo
catio
n as
sista
nce
is pr
oces
sed
unde
r the
RSO
for m
obile
hom
es.
Cont
inue
1.2.
2I. P
rese
rvat
ion
of
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
gPr
eser
ve a
fford
abili
ty in
up
to 1
5,85
0 ex
pirin
g un
its
HCID
LA m
onito
rs a
nd tr
acks
the
date
s w
hen
15,8
50 a
t-ris
k af
ford
able
hou
sing
units
will
con
vert
to m
arke
t rat
e un
its d
ue to
th
e te
rmin
atio
n of
rent
al s
ubsid
ies
and/
or a
fford
abili
ty re
stric
tions
. A
lso
ensu
res
enfo
rcem
ent o
f not
ice
requ
irem
ents
and
ass
ists
ow
ners
, man
ager
s an
d de
velo
pers
to id
entif
y re
sour
ces
and
optio
ns
to e
xten
d an
d/or
pre
serv
e ex
istin
g at
-risk
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g.
Sam
e ef
fort
s as
oth
er p
rogr
ams
to p
rese
rve
at-r
isk h
ousin
g
Mod
ify th
e pr
ogra
m n
ame
to b
ette
r fit
the
prog
ram
des
crip
tion.
Mod
ify
obje
ctiv
es a
s th
e am
ount
of u
nits
is
unac
hiev
able
with
ava
ilabl
e re
sour
ces.
1.2.
2J. P
rese
rvat
ion
of th
e Re
ntal
Hou
sing
Stoc
k -
Cond
omin
ium
Con
vers
ions
Prop
ose
Zoni
ng
Code
am
endm
ent
The
City
enf
orce
d Se
ctio
n 12
.95.
2 of
the
Los
Ang
eles
Mun
icip
al
Code
in th
e ev
alua
tion
of a
pplic
atio
ns fo
r con
vers
ions
of m
ulti-
fam
ily re
ntal
hou
sing
to c
ondo
min
ium
s. T
he C
ode
was
not
ch
ange
d to
tigh
ten
cond
o co
nver
sion
findi
ngs,
how
ever
.
Part
ially
effe
ctiv
e. E
nfor
cem
ent o
f the
five
re
quire
d co
ndo
conv
ersio
n fin
ding
s le
d to
in
crea
sed
deni
als
of c
ondo
con
vers
ions
th
at d
o no
t mee
t the
law
. How
ever
no
effo
rts
wer
e m
ade
to s
tren
gthe
n th
e co
ndo
conv
ersio
n la
w. T
he e
xact
type
of p
ropo
sed
Code
cha
nges
was
not
spe
cifie
d.
Cont
inue
with
mor
e sp
ecifi
city
on
prop
osed
cha
nges
to th
e re
quire
d co
ndo
conv
ersio
n fin
ding
s. F
ocus
at
tent
ion
on li
ght-
rail
tran
sit s
tatio
ns.
1.2.
2K. C
ondo
min
ium
Co
nver
sions
“Com
plet
e St
udy
Draf
t ord
inan
ce”
RSO
& P
rimar
y Re
nova
tion
& Te
nant
Hab
itabi
lity
Prog
ram
s re
mai
n in
effe
ct &
tool
s in
pre
serv
ing
638,
000
RSO
uni
ts &
en
cour
agin
g re
inve
stm
ent i
n re
ntal
hou
sing
stoc
k. H
CIDL
A co
ntin
ues
to p
rovi
de tr
aini
ng &
info
to th
e pu
blic
on
prov
ision
s of
thes
e pr
ogra
ms.
App
roxi
mat
ely
1,85
0 re
nt a
djus
tmen
t ap
plic
atio
ns w
ere
proc
esse
d &
appr
oxim
atel
y ov
er $
90
mill
ion
in p
rope
rty
impr
ovem
ents
wer
e ap
prov
ed.
Prog
ram
mee
ts o
bjec
tives
.M
erge
with
sim
ilar p
rogr
am a
bove
(P
rese
rvat
ion
of th
e Re
ntal
Hou
sing
Stoc
k - C
ondo
min
ium
Con
vers
ions
).
1.2.
2L. D
emol
ition
s - P
rese
rvat
ion
of
Com
mun
ity C
hara
cter
“Com
pelte
Stu
dy
Draf
t ord
inan
ce”
Stud
y on
str
ateg
ies
to li
mit
the
dem
oliti
on o
f via
ble,
sta
ble
affo
rdab
le re
ntal
hou
sing
was
not
und
erta
ken.
Not
effe
ctiv
e. S
imila
r to
anot
her p
rogr
am
(Pre
serv
atio
n of
the
Rent
al H
ousin
g St
ock
- Con
dom
iniu
m C
onve
rsio
ns).
Mer
ge p
rogr
am o
bjec
tives
with
ex
istin
g pr
ogra
m (P
rese
rvat
ion
of th
e Re
ntal
Hou
sing
Stoc
k -
Cond
omin
ium
Con
vers
ions
).
1.2.
2M. P
rese
rvat
ion
of R
ent-S
tabi
lized
Ho
usin
g U
nits
Pres
erve
633
,000
RS
O u
nits
RSO
& P
rimar
y Re
nova
tion
& Te
nant
Hab
ilita
bilit
y Pr
ogra
ms
are
rem
ain
in e
ffect
& to
ols
in p
rese
rvin
g 63
8,00
0 RS
O
units
& e
ncou
ragi
ng re
inve
stm
ent i
n re
ntal
hou
sing
stoc
k.
HCID
LA c
ontin
ues
to p
rovi
de tr
aini
ng &
info
to th
e pu
blic
on
pro
visio
ns o
f the
se p
rogr
ams.
App
roxi
mat
ely
1,85
0 re
nt
adju
stm
ent a
pplic
atio
ns w
ere
proc
esse
d &
appr
oxim
atel
y ov
er
$90
mill
ion
in p
rope
rty
impr
ovem
ents
wer
e ap
prov
ed.
Prog
ram
mee
ts o
bjec
tives
.Re
tain
I-28 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.2.
2N. R
SO E
nfor
cem
ent
Refe
r 60
case
s to
the
city
Att
orne
y an
nual
ly
“HCI
DLA
activ
ity:
RSO
Inve
stig
atio
ns &
Enf
orce
men
t (I&
E) p
rogr
ams
have
bee
n st
reng
then
ed th
roug
h co
ntin
ued
fillin
g of
sev
eral
sup
ervi
sory
po
sitio
ns &
sta
ff tr
aini
ng. A
ppro
xim
atel
y 30
,000
cas
es w
ere
inve
stig
ated
& a
ppro
xim
atel
y 32
5 ca
ses
sent
to th
e Ci
ty A
ttor
ney.
Th
e re
mai
nder
wer
e re
solv
ed in
-hou
se. O
utre
ach
on te
nant
&
land
lord
righ
ts &
resp
onsib
ilitie
s ha
s be
en e
xpan
ded.
OCA
act
ivity
:
App
roxi
mat
ely
350
case
s w
ere
refe
rred
to th
e Ci
ty A
ttor
ney.
In
add
ition
, the
re w
ere
appr
oxim
atel
y 28
5 Ci
ty A
ttor
ney
Offi
ce h
earin
gs (C
AOH)
con
duct
ed. D
urin
g th
e sa
me
perio
d, th
e Ci
ty A
ttor
ney
clos
ed a
ppro
xim
atel
y 45
0 ca
ses
due
to v
olun
tary
com
plia
nce
pre
and
post
-CAO
H.”
Prog
ram
of i
nves
tigat
ing
and
reso
lvin
g ca
ses
mee
ts o
bjec
tives
.
Obj
ectiv
e sh
ould
be
to re
solv
e ca
ses
befo
re th
ey n
eed
to g
o to
City
Att
orne
y of
fice
as th
at w
ill re
flect
gre
ater
co
mpl
ianc
e ac
hiev
ed b
y th
e I &
E s
taff.
1.2.
2O. P
rese
rvat
ion
thro
ugh
Tran
sfer
of
Ow
ners
hip
Reha
bilit
ate
20
subs
tand
ard
hous
ing
units
per
yea
r
Prog
ress
on
this
prog
ram
is u
ncle
ar d
ue to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.Ef
fect
iven
ess
is un
know
n, a
nd th
e pr
ogra
m h
as
ende
d w
ith th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
Rem
ove.
1.2.
2P. M
ortg
age
Reve
nue
Bond
Fin
anci
ng
for R
ehab
ilita
tion
of
At-R
isk R
enta
l Hou
sing
Reha
bilit
ate
524
low
-in
com
e un
its a
nnua
llyCo
mbi
ne w
ith n
ew P
rese
rvat
ion
of
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g pr
ogra
m.
1.2.
2Q. A
fford
able
Ho
usin
g Tr
ust F
und
(AHT
F) –
At-
Risk
Ren
tal
Hous
ing
Reha
bilit
atio
n
Reha
bilta
te 1
13 lo
w-
inco
me
units
ann
ually
Sinc
e 20
06 th
e A
HTF
has
fund
ed 1
1 At
-Risk
pro
ject
s cr
eatin
g a
tota
l of 7
82 lo
w in
com
e un
its.
Effe
ctiv
e. H
CIDL
A w
ill c
ontin
ue to
sup
port
At
-Risk
pro
ject
s as
they
app
ly to
the
Stat
e.Co
mbi
ne w
ith n
ew P
rese
rvat
ion
of
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g pr
ogra
m.
1.2.
2R. P
ublic
Hou
sing
Ann
ual I
nspe
ctio
ns
“All
publ
ic h
ousin
g un
its
inps
ecte
d an
nual
ly
All
Sect
ion
8 un
its
insp
ecte
d an
nual
ly”
HAC
LA c
ontin
ued
to c
ondu
ct a
nnua
l ins
pect
ions
of a
ll un
its
unde
r the
Pub
lic H
ousin
g an
d Se
ctio
n 8
prog
ram
s.M
et p
rogr
am o
bjec
tives
.Re
tain
1.2.
2S. L
ead-
Safe
Ho
usin
g: P
rivat
ely-
owne
d Ho
usin
g U
nits
“Com
plet
e le
ad a
bate
men
t in
90
extr
emel
y lo
w
inco
me
units
Com
plet
e le
ad
abat
emen
t in
135
very
lo
w in
com
e un
its
Com
plet
e le
ad a
bate
men
t in
225
low
inco
me
units
”
“Com
plet
ed le
ad a
bate
men
t in
a to
tal o
f 927
ex
trem
ely
low
, ver
y lo
w a
nd lo
w in
com
e un
its.
The
City
’s Le
ad H
azar
d Re
med
iatio
n Pr
ogra
m re
ceiv
es
fund
ing
from
HU
D’s
lead
haz
ard
redu
ctio
n
and
heal
thy
hom
es p
rodu
ctio
n pr
ogra
m g
rant
s. T
he
City
sta
ff w
ork
with
sev
eral
com
mun
ity-b
ased
orga
niza
tions
, hea
lthy
hom
es a
dvoc
ates
and
the
Child
hood
Lea
d Po
ison
ing
Prev
entio
n
Prog
ram
(CLP
PP) o
f the
Cou
nty
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Pu
blic
Hea
lth to
impl
emen
t the
pro
gram
s. In
addi
tion,
City
’s Sy
stem
atic
Cod
e En
forc
emen
t Pro
gram
ci
tes
unsa
fe le
ad w
ork
prac
tices
whe
n
apar
tmen
t ow
ners
or d
wel
lers
con
duct
reha
bilit
atio
n in
ol
der h
ousin
g an
d ex
pose
the
resid
ents
or w
orke
rs to
lead
-ba
sed
pain
t haz
ards
. The
Hea
lthy
Hom
es C
olla
bora
tive,
a
non-
profi
t org
aniz
atio
n, fa
cilit
ates
this
proc
ess.”
This
prog
ram
has
exc
eede
d its
obj
ectiv
es.
“Ret
ain.
Chan
ge n
ame
to “
”Hea
lth H
omes
an
d Le
ad-S
afe
Hous
ing”
””
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-29
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.2.
2T. L
ead-
Safe
Hou
sing:
H
ACLA
Hou
sing
Uni
ts
Aba
te le
ad-b
ased
pa
int h
azar
ds in
35
units
ann
ually
HAC
LA a
bate
d or
sta
biliz
ed le
ad-b
ased
pai
nts
in u
nits
as
need
ed.
Effe
ctiv
e.Re
tain
, but
rena
me
to L
ead-
Base
d Pa
int E
valu
atio
n an
d A
bate
men
t.
1.2.
2U. A
t-Ri
sk A
fford
able
Ho
usin
g Te
nant
Out
reac
h an
d Ed
ucat
ion
Invo
lve
up to
8,0
00
resid
ents
of i
dent
ified
at
-risk
uni
ts in
pr
eser
vatio
n ef
fort
s
From
200
9 to
201
2, th
e pr
ogra
m in
volv
ed 8
,997
resid
ents
of
iden
tified
at-
risk
units
that
resu
lted
in re
new
al o
f ren
tal
subs
idie
s, im
prov
emen
ts in
bui
ldin
g’s
phys
ical
con
ditio
ns,
and
prev
entio
n of
ille
gal r
ent i
ncre
ases
and
/or e
vict
ions
“Thi
s pr
ogra
m e
xcee
ded
its
obje
ctiv
e.
Activ
ity w
as fu
nded
by
Mac
Art
hur G
rant
fund
s an
d ne
w fu
ndin
g ne
ed to
be
iden
tified
.”
Reta
in. M
odify
out
reac
h nu
mbe
r obj
ectiv
e
1.2.
2V. P
rese
rve
Affo
rdab
ility
Cov
enan
ts
of A
t-Ri
sk U
nits
“Mon
itor a
ll 15
, 850
uni
ts
with
exp
iring
cov
enan
ts
Exte
nd a
nd p
rese
rve
affo
rdab
ility
of u
p to
2,
000
at-r
isk u
nits
”
A to
tal o
f 2,3
20 a
t-ris
k un
its p
rese
rved
. 902
uni
ts (1
2 pr
ojec
ts) u
nder
the
AHT
F. 1
,418
uni
ts (9
pro
ject
s) u
nder
th
e Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
Bond
Pro
gram
(AHB
P)
“Thi
s pr
ogra
m e
xcee
ded
its
obje
ctiv
e.”
Com
bine
with
Pre
serv
atio
n of
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g.
1.2.
2W. M
ortg
age
Reve
nue
Bond
Fin
anci
ng-
-Reh
abili
tatio
n of
Af
ford
able
Ren
tal H
ousin
g
Reha
bilit
ate
540
very
lo
w-in
com
e un
its
Sinc
e 20
06, H
CIDL
A ha
s is
sued
bon
ds fo
r 1,6
73 re
hab
(bon
d on
ly) r
enta
l hou
sing
units
, of w
hich
229
use
d N
SP fu
nds)
(plu
s a
tota
l of 4
24 re
hab
units
com
bine
d w
ith A
HTF
fund
s)Ef
fect
ive
Com
bine
with
Mor
tgag
e Re
venu
e Bo
nd F
inan
cing
.
1.2.
3A. U
rgen
t Re
pair
Prog
ram
Prev
ent t
he v
acat
ion
of 4
,509
mar
ket-
rate
ap
artm
ent b
uild
ings
due
to
life-
safe
ty H
ousin
g Co
de
and
the
Calif
orni
a He
alth
an
d Sa
fety
Cod
e vi
olat
ions
From
200
6 th
roug
h 20
12, 4
,161
cas
es w
ere
refe
rred
to th
e U
rgen
t Re
pair
Prog
ram
for r
epai
r of u
rgen
t life
-saf
ety
habi
tabi
lity
viol
atio
ns.
Of t
he 4
,161
cas
es, H
CIDL
A su
cces
sful
ly o
btai
ned
com
plia
nce
from
91
% o
f pro
pert
y ow
ners
. For
the
rem
aini
ng 4
11 c
ases
, HCI
DLA
, th
roug
h a
pre-
appr
oved
con
trac
tor,
faci
litat
ed th
e tim
ely
repa
ir of
haz
ardo
us c
ondi
tions
. HCI
DLA
take
s ac
tion
to re
cove
r suc
h fu
nds
expe
nded
incl
udin
g bi
lling
for a
dmin
istr
ativ
e co
sts
and
pena
lties
and
pla
cem
ent o
f a li
en a
gain
st th
e pr
oper
ty w
ith th
e Co
unty
Tax
Ass
esso
r. Th
e pr
ogra
m e
xpen
ds ro
ughl
y $3
00,0
00
annu
ally
in C
omm
unity
Dev
elop
men
t Blo
ck G
rant
fund
s.
The
Urg
ent R
epai
r Pro
gram
pro
vide
s a
timel
y an
d co
st-e
ffect
ive
mea
ns o
f pre
serv
ing
tena
ncy
and
prev
entin
g th
e va
catio
n an
d re
loca
tion
of te
nant
s fro
m re
ntal
uni
ts. T
he p
rogr
am h
as a
pro
foun
dly
posi
tive
impa
ct o
n th
e re
siden
ts o
f mul
ti-fa
mily
rent
al h
ousin
g in
the
City
by
prot
ectin
g th
em fr
om u
nsaf
e an
d ha
zard
ous
livin
g co
nditi
ons
and
from
pot
entia
l hom
eles
snes
s .
Reta
in
1.2.
3B. N
uisa
nce
Aba
tem
ent i
n Va
cant
Re
siden
tial B
uild
ings
“Res
pond
to 3
,500
nu
isan
ce c
ompl
aint
s””
and
“”re
solv
e 2,
500
nuis
ance
issu
es.
I-30 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
Plea
se n
ote
that
the
num
eric
al in
form
atio
n ha
s be
en c
hang
ed fr
om
orig
inal
Hou
sing
Elem
ent,
due
to a
tech
nica
l err
or.”
“LA
DBS
open
ed 1
6,52
8 cu
stom
er s
ervi
ce re
ques
ts
(CSR
s) in
201
1 an
d su
cces
sful
ly re
solv
ed
16,3
41 c
ases
(mos
tly
singl
e-fa
mily
, but
als
o so
me
com
mer
cial
/in
dust
rial).
102
cas
es
wer
e tu
rned
into
the
Offi
ce o
f the
City
Att
orne
y (O
CA) f
or c
rimin
al fi
lings
. HC
IDLA
ope
ned
an
aver
age
of a
bout
14,
000
com
plai
nts
on m
ulti-
fam
ily
resid
entia
l pro
pert
ies,
su
cces
sful
ly c
losin
g m
ore
than
99%
of t
hem
.
The
Aba
ndon
ed
Build
ing
Task
For
ce
(ABT
F) a
ddre
sses
pr
oble
ms
asso
ciat
ed
with
vac
ant b
uild
ings
w
ith a
coo
rdin
ated
ef
fort
bet
wee
n ci
ty
pros
ecut
ors,
insp
ecto
rs
from
the
Depa
rtm
ent
of B
uild
ing
and
Safe
ty
(LA
DBS)
and
the
Hous
ing
Depa
rtm
ent,
and
the
Plan
ning
Dep
artm
ent.
ABT
F’s
obje
ctiv
e is
to
reha
bilit
ate
nuis
ance
pr
oper
ties
and
plac
e th
em
back
into
pro
duct
ive
hous
ing
stoc
k. In
thos
e in
stan
ces
whe
n pr
oper
ties
cann
ot b
e re
habi
litat
ed,
LADB
S ca
n se
ek to
hav
e th
em d
emol
ished
.”
Effe
ctiv
e at
resp
ondi
ng to
and
reso
lvin
g nu
isan
ce c
ompl
aint
s.
Reta
in, b
ut b
road
en (a
nd re
nam
e) b
eyon
d va
cant
pro
pert
ies
(alth
ough
reta
in a
s a
focu
s)
to in
clud
e al
l nui
sanc
e is
sues
in a
ll re
siden
tial
prop
ertie
s. F
orec
losu
res
hand
led
unde
r th
e ne
w F
orec
losu
re R
egis
try
prog
ram
.
1.2.
3C. C
ityw
ide
Nui
sanc
e A
bate
men
t Pro
gram
1,20
0 ch
roni
c pr
oble
m
prop
ertie
s an
d nu
isan
ce
issu
es re
solv
ed a
nnua
lly
CNA
P ty
pica
lly o
pens
cas
es o
n 6-
700
prop
ertie
s a
year
du
ring
the
perio
d. M
ost w
ere
for m
edic
al m
ariju
ana
issu
es. D
urin
g th
e sa
me
perio
d, T
akin
g O
ut U
rban
Gan
g He
adqu
arte
rs (T
OU
GH)
revi
ewed
hun
dred
s of
cas
es,
filin
g la
wsu
its, h
oldi
ng c
ase
conf
eren
ces
cond
ucte
d an
d pr
omtin
g ev
ictio
ns o
f gan
g m
embe
rs a
nd th
eir f
amili
es.
Effe
ctiv
e pr
ogra
m, b
ut m
any
case
s ar
e no
t, st
rictly
spe
akin
g, h
ousin
g re
late
d.
Prog
ram
may
resu
lt in
evi
ctio
n.
Rem
ove
as th
is pr
ogra
m fo
cuse
s m
ostly
on
non
-hou
sing
rela
ted
issu
es. H
ousin
g re
late
d nu
isan
ce a
bate
men
t cas
es n
ow
cons
olid
ated
und
er N
uisa
nce
Aba
tem
ent
in R
esid
entia
l Bui
ldin
gs p
rogr
am.
1.2.
3D. R
ent E
scro
w
Acco
unt P
rogr
am (R
EAP)
5,82
0 ca
ses
5,54
3 ca
ses
wer
e re
ferr
ed to
REA
P. A
s a
resu
lt of
the
REA
P en
forc
emen
t 5,4
10 c
ases
wer
e cl
osed
brin
ging
ove
r 21
,000
resid
entia
l uni
ts to
hab
itabl
e co
nditi
ons.
REA
P is
an e
ffect
ive
enfo
rcem
ent p
rogr
am.
The
num
ber o
f ref
erra
ls to
REA
P is
low
er a
nd
the
rate
of r
ecid
ivism
is a
lso
low
er. T
here
are
fe
wer
inst
ance
s of
repe
at p
rope
rty
owne
rs
who
se p
rope
rtie
s ar
e pl
aced
into
REA
P.
Reta
in R
EAP
as im
plem
ente
d. R
EAP
has
effe
ctiv
ely
mot
ivat
ed p
rope
rty
owne
rs to
mai
ntai
n th
eir p
rope
rtie
s an
d co
mpl
y w
ith c
itatio
ns. C
urre
ntly,
ap
prox
imat
ely
1% o
f hou
sing
insp
ectio
ns
esca
late
into
REA
P re
ferr
als.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-31
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.2.
3E. H
ousin
g En
forc
emen
t (In
ter-A
genc
y Sl
um H
ousin
g Ta
sk F
orce
)
500
prop
ertie
s su
bjec
ted
to T
ask
Forc
e re
view
and
/or
pro
secu
tion
annu
ally
“Sin
ce 2
006
the
City
Att
orne
y’s
Hous
ing
Enfo
rcem
ent S
ectio
n ty
pica
lly re
ceiv
ed a
roun
d 4-
500
case
s su
bmitt
ed b
y th
e pa
rtic
ipat
ing
Task
For
ce a
genc
ies
durin
g th
e pl
anni
ng p
erio
d. It
con
duct
ed P
re-
Filin
g as
e M
anag
emen
t Con
fere
nces
(PFC
MC)
with
pro
pert
y ow
ners
.
Durin
g th
e sa
me
perio
d, H
ousin
g En
forc
emen
t file
d ar
ound
2-
300
case
s a
year
, cha
rgin
g be
twee
n 1-
2000
cod
e vi
olat
ions
. Th
is ef
fort
resu
lted
in b
etw
een
1-20
00 re
ntal
uni
ts b
roug
ht in
to
com
plia
nce
ofte
n vi
a po
st-c
onvi
ctio
n co
urt h
earin
gs e
ach
year
.”
Effe
ctiv
e pr
ogra
m th
at is
focu
sed
on h
ousin
g en
forc
emen
t.Re
tain
.
1.2.
3F. N
ew O
wne
rshi
p of
Sub
stan
dard
Hou
sing
“Ado
pt a
rece
iver
ship
pr
ogra
m
Plac
e 25
pro
pert
ies
into
re
ceiv
ersh
ip a
nnua
lly”
Prog
ress
on
this
prog
ram
is u
ncle
ar d
ue to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.Ef
fect
iven
ess
is un
know
n, a
nd th
e pr
ogra
m h
as
ende
d w
ith th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
Rem
ove.
1.2.
3G. A
mer
ican
Dr
eam
Pro
gram
Plac
e 25
pro
pert
ies
into
Am
eric
an D
ream
Pr
ogra
m a
nnua
lly
Prog
ress
on
this
prog
ram
is u
ncle
ar d
ue to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.Ef
fect
iven
ess
is un
know
n, a
nd th
e pr
ogra
m h
as
ende
d w
ith th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
Rem
ove.
1.2.
4A. E
xped
ited
Resid
entia
l Rec
over
y
In th
e ev
ent o
f a n
atur
al
disa
ster
, iss
ue e
ntitl
emen
t ap
prov
als
with
in 4
w
eeks
of a
pplic
atio
n fo
r rec
onst
ruct
ion
Ther
e ha
ve n
ot b
een
any
disa
ster
s sin
ce 2
006
that
re
quire
d ex
pedi
ted
entit
lem
ent a
ppro
vals
.
Prog
ram
rem
ains
an
impo
rtan
t par
t of t
he
City
’s re
cons
truc
tion
plan
s ev
en th
ough
it
was
not
test
ed d
urin
g th
e pl
anni
ng p
erio
d.Re
tain
1.2.
4B. E
mer
genc
y A
lloca
tion
of R
esid
entia
l Re
cons
truc
tion
Fund
s
In th
e ev
ent o
f a n
atur
al
disa
ster
, iss
ue lo
ans
and
gran
ts w
ithin
4
wee
ks o
f app
licat
ion
for
reco
nstr
uctio
n fu
nds
“HCI
DLA
was
aw
arde
d $3
.5 M
illio
n by
the
Stat
e of
Ca
lifor
nia,
Dep
artm
ent o
f Hou
sing
and
Com
mun
ity
Deve
lopm
ent (
HCD)
, Dis
aste
r Rec
over
y In
itiat
ive
(DRI
) gra
nt fu
nds
for d
isas
ter v
ictim
s of
the
2008
Say
re
Wild
fire
in S
ylm
ar. T
he p
rogr
am w
ill o
ffer e
ligib
le h
omeb
uyer
s pu
rcha
se a
ssis
tanc
e in
the
form
of a
def
erre
d lo
an fo
r do
wnp
aym
ent,
clos
ing
cost
s an
d ac
quisi
tion
finan
cing
to
purc
hase
a m
obile
, man
ufac
ture
d or
sin
gle-
fam
ily h
ome.
Thes
e pl
ans
are
bein
g pu
t int
o pl
ace
as p
art o
f the
Los
Hou
sing
Depa
rtm
ent’s
Em
erge
ncy
Man
agem
ent P
lann
ing.
”
Prog
ram
rem
ains
an
impo
rtan
t par
t of t
he
City
’s re
cons
truc
tion
plan
s ev
en th
ough
it
was
not
test
ed d
urin
g th
e pl
anni
ng p
erio
d.
Does
not
nee
d to
be
a st
anda
lone
pro
gram
.
Com
bine
with
Exp
edite
d Re
siden
tial R
ecov
ery
1.2.
5A. R
esou
rces
fo
r Pre
serv
atio
n of
Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
“Pre
serv
e af
ford
abili
ty in
up
to 1
5,85
0 ex
pirin
g un
its
Expa
nd re
sour
ces
for
prog
ram
adm
inis
trat
ion
Expa
nd re
sour
ces
for
the
pres
erva
tion
of
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g”
Succ
essf
ully
sec
ured
a $
1 m
illio
n do
llars
gra
nt fr
om th
e Jo
hn D
. an
d Ca
ther
ine
T. M
acA
rthu
r Fou
ndat
ion.
Fun
ds w
ere
dedi
cate
d to
enh
ance
HCI
DLA’
s Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
Pres
erva
tion
Prog
ram
(A
HPP)
dat
a sy
stem
, per
sonn
el, o
utre
ach
and
educ
atio
n, im
prov
e co
ordi
natio
n w
ith o
ther
City
and
fina
ncin
g ag
enci
es, a
nd d
irect
m
ore
reso
urce
s to
war
d pr
eser
ving
affo
rdab
le re
ntal
hou
sing.
“Thi
s pr
ogra
m m
et it
s
obje
ctiv
e.”
Mod
ify b
y re
mov
ing
pres
erva
tion
num
ber i
n ob
ject
ive.
Num
ber i
s un
achi
evab
le a
nd o
ther
pro
gram
s ad
dres
s th
e nu
mbe
r to
pres
erve
.
I-32 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.2.
5B. A
dvoc
ate
for A
fford
abili
ty
Pres
erva
tion
Fund
s
Supp
ort S
tate
and
Fe
dera
l Bill
s th
at p
rovi
de
fund
s fo
r pre
serv
ing
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g in
ea
ch le
gisla
tive
sess
ion
“The
Los
Ang
eles
Hou
sing
and
Com
mun
ity In
vest
men
t De
part
men
t (HC
IDLA
) tra
cked
and
sup
port
ed fe
dera
l and
st
ate
legi
slatio
n th
at w
ill in
crea
se re
sour
ces
and
regu
lato
ry
mod
ifica
tions
for t
he p
rese
rvat
ion
of fe
dera
lly-a
ssis
ted
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g at
-risk
of c
onve
rsio
n to
mar
ket-
rate
. The
HCI
DLA
trac
ked
and
supp
orte
d th
e
follo
win
g le
gisla
tion/
law
s:
● Tr
ansp
orta
tion,
Hou
sing,
and
Urb
an D
evel
opm
ent A
ppro
pria
tions
● N
atio
nal H
ousin
g Tr
ust F
und
(NHT
F)
● Re
ntal
Ass
ista
nce
Dem
onst
ratio
n (R
AD)
● Ho
mel
ess
Emer
genc
y A
ssis
tanc
e an
d Ra
pid
Tran
sitio
n to
Hou
sing
(HEA
RTH)
Act
CLA
activ
ity: S
ee re
spon
se u
nder
Pro
gram
1.1
.5.B
“”
Advo
cate
fo
r Sta
te a
nd F
eder
al H
ousin
g Fu
nds”
” on
pag
e 11
.”
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
e w
as m
et.
“Com
bine
with
oth
er a
dvoc
acy
prog
ram
s to
cre
ate
new
Adv
ocat
e fo
r Hou
sing
Fund
s pr
ogra
m.
Mod
ify b
y re
mov
ing
pres
erva
tion
num
ber i
n ob
ject
ive.
Num
ber i
s un
achi
evab
le a
nd o
ther
pro
gram
s ad
dres
s th
e nu
mbe
r to
pres
erve
.”
1.2.
5C. T
enan
t and
Te
nant
-App
rove
d N
onpr
ofit B
uyou
ts o
f At
-Risk
Bui
ldin
gs
“Cre
ate
an e
ffect
ive
stra
tegy
to a
ssis
t in
tena
nt a
nd te
nant
-ap
prov
ed n
onpr
ofit
buyo
uts
of a
fford
able
ho
usin
g pr
ojec
ts w
here
at
-risk
uni
ts w
ould
rem
ain
affo
rdab
le u
nder
tena
nt
or n
onpr
ofit c
ontr
ol
Iden
tify
the
poss
ible
fu
ndin
g so
urce
s, in
clud
ing
a re
com
men
ded
set a
side
of fu
ndin
g re
sour
ces
appr
opria
te p
er y
ear”
Stud
y in
itiat
ed in
200
8 re
sulti
ng in
the
City
Cou
ncil
inst
ruct
ing
the
City
Att
orne
y’s
Offi
ce a
nd D
epar
tmen
t of
City
Pla
nnin
g to
furt
her r
evie
w p
rogr
ams
such
as
the
Dist
rict
of C
olum
bia’
s Te
nant
Opp
ortu
nity
to P
urch
ase
Act (
TOPA
) an
d pr
ovid
e le
gal a
naly
sis (i
nclu
ding
a re
view
of t
he E
llis
Act)
rela
tive
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f a s
imila
r law
/pro
gram
in
Los
Ang
eles
. No
HCID
LA o
r CRA
/LA
subs
eque
ntly.
Prog
ram
not
impl
emen
ted
Rem
ove
1.2.
5D. L
os A
ngel
es
Inte
r-Age
ncy
Pres
erva
tion
Wor
king
Gro
up
“City
wid
e an
d su
breg
iona
l ef
fort
s to
cre
ate
stra
tegi
es fo
r pre
serv
ing
at-r
isk h
ousin
g
Regu
lar r
epor
ts o
n st
rate
gies
iden
tified
”
Activ
ities
hav
e be
en c
arrie
d ou
t thr
ough
the
Los
Ang
eles
Pre
serv
atio
n W
orki
ng G
roup
(LA
PWG
). M
eetin
gs w
ere
held
qua
rter
ly. T
he H
CIDL
A ha
s be
en p
art o
f the
cor
e gr
oup
that
led
thes
e m
eetin
gs a
nd e
ffort
s.
The
LAPW
G h
as b
een
effe
ctiv
e in
enl
argi
ng
the
grou
p an
d id
entif
ying
str
ateg
ies
for p
rese
rvin
g at
-risk
hou
sing.
Rem
ove
as s
tand
alon
e pr
ogra
m.
Mod
ified
pro
gram
obj
ectiv
es b
eing
co
nsol
idat
ed in
to a
noth
er p
rogr
am
(Pre
serv
e Af
ford
able
Hou
sing)
.
1.2.
5E. N
ew G
ener
atio
n Fu
nd –
Pre
serv
atio
n of
At-
Risk
Hou
sing
Supp
ort p
rese
rvat
ion
of
640
low
-inco
me
units
NG
F no
t tar
getin
g at
-risk
pro
ject
s.N
ot e
ffect
ive.
Re
mov
e.
1.2.
6A. R
ent S
tabi
lizat
ion
Ord
inan
ce (R
SO)
Mai
ntai
n re
gist
ratio
n of
63
3,00
0 un
its a
nnua
lly.
Prot
ect t
enan
ts fr
om
unre
ason
able
rent
in
crea
ses
whi
le p
rovi
ding
la
ndlo
rds
with
a ju
st
and
reas
onab
le re
turn
Regi
stra
tion
of a
ppro
xim
atel
y 63
8,00
0 RS
O u
nits
is re
quire
d an
nual
ly. R
SO c
ontin
ues
in e
ffect
& fu
lly o
pera
tiona
l. $1
mill
ion
RSO
Stu
dy c
ompl
eted
& fi
ndin
gs &
reco
mm
enda
tions
forw
arde
d to
Ci
ty C
ounc
il. O
utre
ach
& ed
ucat
ion
prog
ram
com
plet
ed &
out
reac
h ex
pand
ed. R
SO li
mits
/pre
vent
s ar
bitr
ary
evic
tions
. App
roxi
mat
ely
2,10
0 la
ndlo
rd d
ecla
ratio
ns o
f int
ent t
o ev
ict w
ere
proc
esse
d &
appr
oxim
atel
y 1,
687
tena
nt h
ouse
hold
s w
ere
prov
ided
app
roxi
mat
ely
$16
mill
ion
in re
loca
tion
assis
tanc
e th
roug
h HC
IDLA
con
trac
tor.
Prog
ram
mee
ts o
bjec
tives
.Re
tain
.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-33
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.2.
6B. H
ousin
g Ch
oice
Vo
uche
r Pro
gram
Mai
ntai
n 37
,000
Sec
tion
8 vo
uche
rs fo
r ver
y lo
w-in
com
e ho
useh
olds
HAC
LA h
as a
tota
l of m
ore
than
47,
500
vouc
hers
fo
r ver
y lo
w-in
com
e ho
useh
olds
.Ve
ry e
ffect
ive,
exc
eedi
ng o
bjec
tive.
Co
ntin
ue w
ith a
im o
f con
tinui
ng to
st
ream
line
of p
rogr
am a
dmin
istr
atio
n
1.2.
6C. S
ectio
n 8
Vouc
hers
for D
isab
led
and
Elde
rly H
ouse
hold
s
Cont
inue
to p
rovi
de
518
vouc
hers
HAC
LA h
as a
tota
l of m
ore
than
47,
500
vouc
hers
fo
r ver
y lo
w-in
com
e ho
useh
olds
.
Effe
ctiv
e. O
bjec
tive
revi
sed
base
d on
HU
D ap
prov
ed a
lloca
tion.
Sub
ject
to
Cong
ress
iona
l exp
endi
ture
s.Pr
ogra
m s
houl
d co
ntin
ue a
s-is
.
1.2.
6D. R
eal E
stat
e O
wne
d (R
EO) A
cqui
sitio
n
“50
REO
pro
pert
ies
purc
hase
d by
low
-in
com
e ho
useh
olds
50 R
EO p
rope
rtie
s pu
rcha
sed
by m
oder
ate-
inco
me
hous
ehol
ds”
This
prog
ram
was
com
bine
d w
ith th
e N
SP -
Fore
clos
ed
Prop
ertie
s pr
ogra
m d
escr
ibed
bel
ow.
This
prog
ram
was
com
bine
d w
ith th
e N
SP -
Fore
clos
ed P
rope
rtie
s pr
ogra
m d
escr
ibed
bel
ow.
Rem
ove.
Pro
gram
’s in
tent
is
larg
ely
dupl
icat
ed b
y N
SP.
1.2.
6E. N
eigh
borh
ood
Stab
iliza
tion
Prog
ram
—Fo
recl
osed
Pro
pert
ies
“1,0
00 m
oder
ate
inco
me
units
(120
%
of A
MI)
or b
elow
ac
quire
d, re
habi
litat
ed,
and
reso
ld/re
nted
25 p
erce
nt o
f all
fund
ing
for v
ery
low
inco
me
units
(5
0% o
f AM
I) an
d be
low
”
As
of th
e en
d of
201
2 N
SP a
cqui
red
a to
tal o
f 839
hou
sing
units
in
clud
ing
202
Sing
le F
amily
, 87
Mul
ti-Fa
mily
(2-4
) and
550
Mul
ti-Fa
mily
(5+
). N
SP h
as re
habb
ed a
tota
l of 2
79 h
ousin
g un
its in
clud
ing
145
Sing
le F
amily
, 51
Mul
ti-Fa
mily
(2-4
) and
83
Mul
ti-Fa
mily
(5+
).
This
prog
ram
is c
urre
ntly
on-
goin
g an
d w
ill m
eet
the
HUD
expe
nditu
re d
eadl
ines
sch
edul
ed fo
r Fe
b. 2
013
and
Mar
ch 2
014.
As
prog
ram
inco
me
is ge
nera
ted
the
hous
ing
unit
obje
ctiv
es w
ill b
e m
et.
Reta
in
1.2.
6F. M
ortg
age
Reve
nue
Bond
Fin
anci
ng
– Af
ford
able
Uni
ts in
M
arke
t Rat
e Ho
usin
g
Reha
bilit
ate
90 u
nits
fo
r ver
y lo
w-in
com
e ho
useh
olds
Sinc
e 20
06, H
CIDL
A ha
s is
sued
bon
ds fo
r 55
affo
rdab
le
units
in m
arke
t rat
e m
ixed
-inco
me
hous
ing
Not
effe
ctiv
eRe
tain
1.2.
7A. H
isto
ric
Pres
erva
tion
“25
units
per
yea
r in
his
toric
str
uctu
res
for m
oder
ate
inco
me
hous
ehol
ds
Acce
ssib
le u
nit(s
) in
ever
y pr
ojec
t”
At le
ast 5
his
toric
pre
serv
atio
n-re
late
d af
ford
able
hou
sing
proj
ects
ha
ve b
een
fund
ed s
ince
200
6, w
ith a
tota
l of 2
56 a
fford
able
uni
ts.
Prog
ram
was
effe
ctiv
e; h
owev
er th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
has
rem
oved
the
mai
n fu
ndin
g so
urce
for r
ehab
ilita
ting
and
pres
ervi
ng
hist
oric
bui
ldin
gs a
s af
ford
able
hou
sing.
Reta
in h
isto
ric p
rese
rvat
ion
prog
ram
bu
t foc
us m
ore
on d
esig
natin
g hi
stor
ic
and
cultu
rally
sig
nific
ant n
eigh
borh
oods
as
His
toric
Pre
serv
atio
n O
verla
y Zo
nes
(HPO
Zs) a
nd in
divi
dual
bui
ldin
gs a
s Hi
stor
ic C
ultu
ral M
onum
ents
(HCM
s). S
uch
desig
natio
ns a
llow
his
toric
resid
entia
l bu
ildin
gs to
qua
lify
for t
ax c
redi
ts
and
othe
r fina
ncia
l inc
entiv
es fo
r the
ir re
habi
litat
ion
and
adap
tive
reus
e. E
xplo
re
the
prov
ision
of a
dditi
onal
ince
ntiv
es
for t
he re
habi
litat
ion
of a
fford
able
ho
usin
g an
d fo
r low
-inco
me
hom
eow
ners
of
his
toric
pro
pert
ies
in H
POZs
.
1.2.
7B. I
ncen
tives
for
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g in
Hi
stor
ic P
rese
rvat
ion
Ove
rlay
Zone
s
Reha
bilit
atio
n of
10
hom
es o
ccup
ied
by
low
-inco
me
hous
ehol
ds
in H
POZs
ann
ually
No
spec
ific
ince
ntiv
es fo
r the
reha
bilit
atio
n of
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g Lo
s A
ngel
es’ h
isto
ric d
istr
icts
wer
e cr
eate
d du
ring
the
plan
ning
pe
riod.
How
ever
, DCP
did
cre
ate
a se
ries
of in
form
atio
nal b
roch
ures
on
in E
nglis
h an
d Sp
anish
to d
emys
tify
the
HPO
Z pr
oces
s an
d hi
stor
ic h
ome
repa
ir te
chni
ques
. In
addi
tion,
the
City
app
lied
for a
nd w
as a
ppro
ved
as a
Cer
tified
Loc
al G
over
nmen
t in
2007
, w
hich
mak
es it
eas
ier t
o fin
d gr
ant f
undi
ng fo
r suc
h pr
ogra
ms.
Onl
y pa
rtia
lly e
ffect
ive,
yet
the
City
rem
ains
co
mm
itted
to fi
ndin
g w
ays
to a
ssis
t lo
w-in
com
e pr
oper
ty o
wne
rs o
f his
toric
pr
oper
ties
to re
habi
litat
e th
eir p
rope
rtie
s in
a h
isto
rical
ly s
ensi
tive
man
ner.
Mer
ge p
rogr
am o
bjec
tives
with
Hi
stor
ic P
rese
rvat
ion
prog
ram
.
I-34 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.2.
7C. M
ills
Act
Impl
emen
tatio
n25
hom
es a
nnua
llyA
tota
l of 3
48 M
ills
Act c
ontr
acts
wer
e pr
oces
sed
by th
e Ci
ty fr
om 2
006
thro
ugh
2012
. The
pro
pert
ies
are
able
to q
ualif
y fo
r red
uced
pro
pert
y ta
xes.
Very
effe
ctiv
e, e
xcee
ded
obje
ctiv
es. H
owev
er,
it is
diffi
cult
to tr
ack
how
man
y ho
mes
wer
e re
habi
litat
ed fo
r low
-inco
me
owne
rs a
nd re
nter
s.Re
tain
.
1.2.
8A. R
ent S
tabi
lizat
ion
Trai
ning
Pro
gram
“Com
plet
e de
velo
pmen
t of
trai
ning
mat
eria
ls
Dist
ribut
e in
form
atio
n”
HCID
LA c
anno
t leg
ally
com
pel p
rope
rty
purc
hase
rs &
new
man
ager
s to
att
end
prop
erty
man
agem
ent t
rain
ing.
Lan
dlor
ds in
Ren
t Es
crow
Acc
ount
Pro
gram
(REA
P) a
re re
quire
d to
att
end
Prop
erty
M
anag
emen
t Tra
inin
g Pr
ogra
m (P
MTP
) cla
sses
& o
ther
s m
ay a
tten
d vo
lunt
arily
. HCI
DLA
coor
dina
tes
& pr
ovid
es tr
aini
ng fo
r 24
PMTP
se
ssio
ns a
nnua
lly fo
r app
roxi
mat
ely
720
land
lord
s &
man
ager
s.
Prog
ram
mee
ts o
bjec
tives
(but
is d
uplic
ativ
e?)
Rem
ove
1.2.
8B. P
rope
rty
Man
agem
ent
Trai
ning
Pro
gram
Trai
ning
com
plet
ed fo
r 3,
413
man
agem
ent e
ntiti
es
Fisc
al Y
ears
200
6 th
roug
h 20
12, H
CIDL
A re
ferr
ed 1
2,04
0 pr
oper
ty
owne
rs w
ho fa
iled
to c
ompl
y w
ith H
CIDL
A or
ders
to re
pair
heal
th
and
safe
ty c
ode
viol
atio
ns to
par
ticip
ate
in th
e Pr
oper
ty M
anag
emen
t Tr
aini
ng P
rogr
am to
rece
ive
inst
ruct
ion
pert
aini
ng to
pro
pert
y m
anag
emen
t, m
aint
enan
ce, l
egal
, and
fire
-life
saf
ety
topi
cs.
The
prog
ram
fulfi
lls th
e sp
irit a
nd p
urpo
se o
f Ch
apte
r XV,
Art
icle
4, S
ectio
n 15
4.00
of t
he
Los
Ang
eles
Mun
icip
al C
ode
by e
duca
ting
prop
erty
ow
ners
who
lack
the
expe
rienc
e an
d ex
pert
ise
to m
anag
e th
eir p
rope
rtie
s.
Reta
in
1.3.
1A. C
oast
al
Zone
Mon
itorin
g
“Ann
ual r
epor
ts o
n th
e st
atus
of t
he a
fford
able
ho
usin
g st
ock
in th
e Co
asta
l Zon
e
Mon
itor a
nd e
nfor
ce
com
plia
nce
with
af
ford
abili
ty c
oven
ants
”
“At l
east
7 n
ew h
ousin
g de
velo
pmen
ts w
ith a
fford
able
uni
ts
in th
e Co
asta
l Zon
e w
ere
appr
oved
by
DCP
from
200
6 to
20
11, r
esul
ting
in th
e ap
prov
al o
f 34
new
affo
rdab
le u
nits
.
The
City
has
trac
ked
the
num
ber o
f affo
rdab
le u
nits
cr
eate
d in
the
Coas
tal Z
one
on a
n an
nual
bas
is th
roug
h th
e A
nnua
l Pro
gres
s Re
port
of t
he H
ousin
g El
emen
t”
Som
ewha
t effe
ctiv
e, b
ecau
se th
e A
PR
did
not l
ist C
oast
al Z
one
units
in s
ome
year
s. A
sep
arat
e Co
asta
l Zon
e re
port
w
as n
ot fo
und
to b
e ne
cess
ary.
Mer
ge re
port
ing
obje
ctiv
es w
ith A
fford
able
Ho
usin
g M
onito
ring
prog
ram
.
1.3.
1B. A
fford
able
Ho
usin
g M
onito
ring
“Ann
ual r
epor
ts o
n th
e st
atus
of t
he a
fford
able
ho
usin
g in
vent
ory
Mon
itor a
nd e
nfor
ce
com
plia
nce
with
af
ford
abili
ty c
oven
ants
”
A da
taba
se o
f exi
stin
g ho
usin
g un
its c
ityw
ide
serv
ing
very
lo
w-,
low
- and
mod
erat
e-in
com
e ho
useh
olds
, inc
ludi
ng th
e lo
catio
n, a
fford
abili
ty e
xpira
tion
date
, and
inco
me
leve
l se
rved
was
mai
ntai
ned
and
repo
rted
on
an a
nnua
l bas
is.
Com
plia
nce
with
cov
enan
ts w
as m
onito
red
by H
CIDL
A.
Inco
rpor
atio
n of
affo
rdab
ility
cov
enan
t inf
orm
atio
n in
to Z
IMA
S re
mai
ned
on-h
old
pend
ing
budg
et a
nd s
taff
reso
urce
s.
Effe
ctiv
e.
Reta
in
1.3.
1C. C
ityw
ide
Hous
ing
Prod
uctio
n Sy
stem
“Cre
ate
new
inte
r-de
part
men
tal s
yste
m
Gen
erat
e re
port
s”
In 2
010,
CHP
S im
plem
enta
tion
/ dev
elop
men
t wer
e co
mpl
eted
. CH
PS h
as b
een
in p
rodu
ctio
n sin
ce th
en. C
HPS
syst
em a
llow
s pa
rtne
rs to
upl
oad
data
via
File
Tra
nsfe
r Pro
toco
l (FT
P) a
nd
gene
rate
repo
rts.
Pha
se II
was
com
plet
ed in
Dec
embe
r 201
0.
Phas
e II
incl
udes
onl
ine
form
for d
irect
dat
a en
try
by e
ach
agen
cy
and
mor
e re
port
s su
ch a
s un
its s
umm
ary,
fund
ing
sum
mar
y an
d de
tail
proj
ect d
ata.
Dat
a fo
r pro
ject
s fro
m 2
008
to 2
012
wer
e co
llect
ed fr
om H
CIDL
A, C
RA, H
ACLA
, HCI
DLA
Land
Use
gr
oup
and
Build
ing
& Sa
fety
. Dat
a re
conc
iliat
ion
& cl
ean-
up
for p
roje
cts
betw
een
2008
and
201
2 w
ere
com
plet
ed.
Effe
ctiv
e an
d ha
s la
rgel
y m
et o
bjec
tives
in
des
igni
ng a
nd c
reat
ing
the
CHPS
sy
stem
. The
repo
rtin
g pa
rt o
verla
ps w
ith
anot
her p
rogr
am a
nd c
an b
e m
erge
d.
Reta
in.
1.3.
1D. R
SO M
onito
ring
Ann
ual r
epor
t on
the
stat
us o
f RSO
pro
pert
ies
Regi
stra
tion
of a
ppro
xim
atel
y 63
8,00
0 RS
O u
nits
is re
quire
d an
nual
ly. R
SO D
eter
min
atio
ns u
nit r
evie
ws
exem
ptio
ns &
mai
ntai
ns
findi
ngs
& re
cord
s in
BIM
S sy
stem
. Dem
oliti
ons
of R
SO u
nits
are
tr
acke
d th
roug
h re
quire
d fil
ings
of l
andl
ord
decl
arat
ions
of i
nten
t to
evic
t for
dem
oliti
on &
per
man
ent r
emov
al fr
om th
e re
ntal
hou
sing
mar
ket.
App
roxi
mat
ely
225
rem
oval
app
licat
ions
wer
e pr
oces
sed.
Prog
ram
mee
ts o
bjec
tives
.Re
tain
.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-35
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.3.
1E. I
nven
tory
Upd
ate
Ann
ual r
epor
t on
deve
lopm
ent o
f si
tes
incl
uded
in th
e In
vent
ory
of S
ites
A re
port
on
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f site
s in
clud
ed in
th
e Si
te In
vent
ory
has
not b
een
com
plet
ed.
Not
effe
ctiv
e at
mee
ting
obje
ctiv
es
due
to s
taff
and
budg
et re
sour
ces.
Reta
in -
the
City
aim
s to
trac
k de
velo
pmen
t of
site
s id
entifi
ed in
the
Hous
ing
Elem
ent t
hrou
gh th
e A
nnua
l Pro
gres
s Re
port
mec
hani
sm u
sing
Geo
grap
hic
Info
rmat
ion
Syst
ems
tech
nolo
gy.
1.3.
1F. M
onito
r Hou
sing
Prod
uctio
n G
oals
Perio
dic
repo
rt o
n th
e Ci
ty’s
hous
ing
prod
uctio
n an
d pr
eser
vatio
n go
als
and
acco
mpl
ishm
ents
“Con
sider
able
impr
ovem
ents
to th
e w
ay h
ousin
g pr
oduc
tion
gets
mon
itore
d to
ok p
lace
dur
ing
the
plan
ning
per
iod,
incl
udin
g th
roug
h th
e Ci
tyw
ide
Hous
ing
Prod
uctio
n Sy
stem
(CHP
S)
and
the
Ann
ual P
rogr
ess
Repo
rt o
f the
Hou
sing
Elem
ent.
HCID
LA, i
n co
oper
atio
n w
ith H
ACLA
and
LA
HSA
com
pile
in
form
atio
n on
all
assis
ted
units
cre
ated
dur
ing
the
year
.
LAHS
A on
a y
early
bas
is up
date
s th
e Ho
usin
g an
d Se
rvic
es
Inve
ntor
y th
at g
ets
subm
itted
to H
UD.
Thi
s re
port
is
vett
ed w
ith th
e 10
Hom
eles
s Co
aliti
ons
and
Plan
ning
Bo
dies
thro
ugho
ut th
e Co
unty
of L
os A
ngel
es.
CRA
/LA
mon
itore
d pr
oduc
tion
of a
fford
able
hou
sing
to c
ompl
y w
ith re
deve
lopm
ent l
aw, fi
led
annu
al H
CD re
port
, and
trac
ked
prod
uctio
n an
d Lo
w M
od In
com
e Ho
usin
g Fu
nd e
xpen
ditu
re d
ata
for
Five
-Yea
r Im
plem
enta
tion
Plan
s. P
repa
red
agen
cy-w
ide
repo
rts.”
Mos
tly e
ffect
ive,
alth
ough
a s
tand
-alo
ne h
ousin
g pr
oduc
tion
repo
rt w
as n
ever
com
plet
ed. T
he
Hous
ing
Elem
ent A
nnua
l Pro
gres
s Re
port
(A
PR) c
ompi
led
all m
arke
t and
ass
iste
d ho
usin
g pr
oduc
ed d
urin
g th
e ca
lend
ar y
ear.
In a
dditi
on, D
CP c
ompi
led
quar
terly
and
an
nual
sum
mar
ies
on re
siden
tial b
uild
ing
perm
it ac
tivity
and
pos
ted
it on
its
web
site
.
Reta
in, a
lthou
gh a
dd re
port
ing
in
the
title
to m
ake
clea
r the
pro
gram
is
abou
t bot
h m
onito
ring
and
repo
rtin
g on
hou
sing
prod
uctio
n da
ta.
1.3.
1G. A
nnua
l Rep
ort o
n th
e Ci
ty’s
Hous
ing
Stoc
k
“Qua
rter
ly a
nd a
nnua
l re
port
s on
resid
entia
l bu
ildin
g ac
tivity
Perio
dic
repo
rt o
n ch
ange
s in
the
rent
al
hous
ing
stoc
k”
Qua
rter
ly a
nd a
nnua
l rep
orts
for 2
006-
2010
hav
e be
en p
oste
d on
DC
P w
ebsi
te. D
ata
for p
art o
f 201
0, a
nd a
ll of
201
1-20
212
have
not
be
en p
oste
d du
e to
sta
ff re
duct
ions
as
a re
sult
of b
udge
t cut
s.
Larg
ely
effe
ctiv
e, b
ut d
eclin
ing
budg
ets
and
staf
f res
ourc
es h
ave
ham
pere
d th
e re
port
ing
effo
rt in
rece
nt y
ears
.
Mer
ge w
ith e
xist
ing
prog
ram
(M
onito
r Hou
sing
Prod
uctio
n G
oals)
du
e to
sim
ilarit
y of
obj
ectiv
es.
1.3.
1H. M
onito
r the
Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
Ince
ntiv
es P
rogr
am
Perio
dic
repo
rt o
n af
ford
able
hou
sing
units
pr
oduc
ed a
s a
resu
lt of
la
nd u
se in
cent
ives
The
Hous
ing
Elem
ent A
nnua
l Pro
gres
s Re
port
(APR
) com
pile
d al
l den
sity
bon
us u
nits
pro
duce
d du
ring
the
cale
ndar
yea
r. A
repo
rt o
n th
e nu
mbe
r of d
ensi
ty b
onus
dev
elop
men
ts
for w
hich
cov
enan
ts w
ere
exec
uted
from
Janu
ary
1,20
05
thro
ugh
Dece
mbe
r 31,
200
9 w
as c
ompl
eted
in a
May
11,
20
11 re
port
(C.F
. 11-
0600
-S63
). Ho
wev
er th
e re
port
did
not
go
into
suf
ficie
nt d
etai
l to
mee
t the
pro
gram
obj
ectiv
es.
Part
ially
effe
ctiv
e. M
ore
deta
iled
repo
rts
are
need
ed to
ade
quat
ely
inve
stig
ate
the
effic
acy
of th
e la
nd u
se in
cent
ives
con
tain
ed
in th
e Ci
ty’s
dens
ity b
onus
pro
gram
.
Cont
inue
as
a st
anda
lone
pro
gram
, as
mon
itorin
g th
e de
nsity
bon
us p
rogr
am
rem
ains
a h
igh
prio
rity
for t
he C
ity.
1.3.
2A. A
dvoc
acy
for S
tate
and
Fed
eral
Da
ta P
rodu
ctio
n
Supp
ort S
tate
and
Fed
eral
bi
lls th
at p
rovi
de fo
r the
pr
oduc
tion
and
colle
ctio
n of
dat
a th
at s
uppo
rts
the
City
’s pl
anni
ng n
eeds
The
City
adv
ocat
ed fo
r bill
s th
at p
rovi
ded
for
grea
ter p
rodu
ctio
n an
d co
llect
ion
of d
ata.
A ve
ry n
arro
w p
rogr
am a
nd o
bjec
tive.
Can
be
com
bine
d w
ith o
ther
adv
ocac
y pr
ogra
m.
Com
bine
with
oth
er a
dvoc
acy
prog
ram
s to
cre
ate
new
Adv
ocat
e fo
r Hou
sing
Fund
s pr
ogra
m.
1.3.
2B. C
olla
bora
tion
on D
ata
Prod
uctio
n an
d Co
llect
ion
“Add
ition
al d
ata
from
Fe
dera
l, St
ate,
regi
onal
an
d Co
unty
age
ncie
s
Hom
eles
s Co
unt w
ith C
ity
of L
os A
ngel
es d
ata”
The
City
wid
e Ho
usin
g Pr
oduc
tion
Syst
em (C
HPS)
was
cre
ated
in
2010
. It a
llow
s ag
ency
par
tner
s to
upl
oad
hous
ing
proj
ect d
ata,
en
ter d
ata
dire
ctly
into
the
syst
em a
nd g
ener
ate
repo
rts
such
as
uni
ts s
umm
ary,
fund
ing
sum
mar
y an
d de
tail
othe
r pro
ject
da
ta. D
ata
for p
roje
cts
from
200
8 to
201
2 w
ere
colle
cted
from
HC
IDLA
, CRA
, HAC
LA, H
CIDL
A La
nd U
se g
roup
and
Bui
ldin
g &
Safe
ty. D
ata
reco
ncili
atio
n &
clea
n up
was
com
plet
ed. L
AHS
A cr
eate
d an
d sh
ared
its
own
data
on
the
hom
eles
s po
pula
tion
thro
ugh
the
Hom
eles
s Co
unt a
nd a
ccom
pani
ed re
port
.
Has
been
effe
ctiv
e at
incr
easin
g co
llabo
ratio
n on
dat
a pr
oduc
tion
and
colle
ctio
n.Re
tain
.
I-36 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.3.
2C. C
ensu
s 20
10Ce
nsus
form
s an
d m
etho
dolo
gies
that
bet
ter
refle
ct th
e Ci
ty’s
need
s
“Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic W
orks
/Bur
eau
of E
ngin
eerin
g re
spon
ded
to th
e Ce
nsus
Bur
eau’
s an
nual
Bou
ndar
y A
nnex
atio
n Su
rvey
to re
view
and
sub
mit
geog
raph
ic
info
rmat
ion
that
ens
ures
an
accu
rate
cen
sus
for t
he C
ity.
The
May
or’s
Offi
ce e
ngag
ed in
a ro
bust
cam
paig
n to
sup
port
th
e co
mpl
ete
coun
t effo
rts.
The
May
or’s
Offi
ce w
ill c
ontin
ue to
ad
voca
te fo
r cou
ntin
g m
etho
dolo
gies
that
ens
ure
a fa
ir co
unt a
nd
shar
e of
fede
ral r
esou
rces
that
are
bas
ed o
n po
pula
tion
coun
ts.”
The
City
ass
iste
d th
e U.
S. C
ensu
s Bu
reau
with
ou
trea
ch a
nd e
duca
tion
in o
rder
to o
btai
n m
ore
com
plet
e an
d ac
cura
te d
ata
colle
ctio
n an
d re
port
ing
in th
e 20
10 C
ensu
s. It
is n
ot b
elie
ved
any
effo
rts
have
resu
lted
in s
peci
fic im
prov
emen
ts
in C
ensu
s fo
rms
and
met
hodo
logi
es th
at
bett
er re
flect
the
City
’s ho
usin
g ne
eds.
Reta
in. C
ensu
s 20
20 fa
lls w
ithin
the
plan
ning
per
iod.
The
Cen
sus
rem
ains
a
key
data
sou
rce
for a
sses
sing
the
City
’s ho
usin
g ne
eds.
1.3.
3A. H
ousin
g N
eeds
Ass
essm
ent b
y Co
mm
unity
Pla
n A
rea
“Ado
pt re
visio
ns o
f Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns th
at
incl
ude
the
desig
natio
n of
app
ropr
iate
loca
tions
an
d de
nsiti
es o
f hou
sing
Adop
t im
plem
enta
tion
mea
sure
s to
ass
ure
that
su
ch s
ites
are
desig
nate
d an
d zo
ned
appr
opria
tely
Deve
lop
diffe
rent
sce
nario
s fo
r eac
h co
mm
unity
to
reac
h fa
ir sh
are
goal
s in
the
Com
mun
ity P
lans
w
here
upd
ates
will
not
be
com
plet
ed b
y 20
14
and
cond
uct p
ublic
pa
rtic
ipat
ion
proc
ess
to
disc
uss
and
sele
ct th
e pr
efer
red
scen
ario
”
6 Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns h
ave
been
, or w
ill b
e co
mpl
eted
by
2014
. Ea
ch re
visio
n in
clud
ed th
e de
signa
tion
of a
ppro
pria
te lo
catio
ns
and
dens
ities
of h
ousin
g, in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
Fram
ewor
k El
emen
t pol
icie
s fo
r dire
ctin
g gr
owth
. The
y al
so in
clud
ed v
ario
us
hous
ing-
rela
ted
polic
ies
and
prog
ram
s. A
par
ticul
ar e
mph
asis
on
impl
emen
tatio
n m
easu
res
to c
arry
out
the
polic
ies
and
prog
ram
s of
eac
h pl
an is
a h
allm
ark
of th
is ro
und
of C
omm
unity
Pla
ns.
A to
tal o
f 4,1
97 a
dditi
onal
hou
sing
units
cap
acity
ha
s be
en a
dded
to th
e Ci
ty a
s a
resu
lt of
the
1 Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns d
evel
oped
sin
ce 2
006
(Hol
lyw
ood)
. Few
er C
omm
unity
Pla
ns th
an
antic
ipat
ed h
ave
been
dev
elop
ed, d
ue to
sta
ff an
d bu
dget
lim
itatio
ns. H
owev
er th
ose
that
ha
ve m
ove
forw
ard
larg
ely
met
the
obje
ctiv
es.
One
exc
eptio
n is
the
“fai
r sha
re”
affo
rdab
le
hous
ing
goal
s fo
r eac
h co
mm
unity
. Whi
le p
lans
ta
ke in
to a
ccou
nt 2
030
popu
latio
n pr
ojec
tions
fo
r eac
h co
mm
unity
and
gen
eral
ly e
ncou
rage
an
equ
itabl
e di
strib
utio
n of
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g th
roug
hout
the
plan
are
a, e
xplic
it af
ford
able
ho
usin
g un
it go
als
are
not b
eing
ado
pted
.
Cont
inue
, but
rem
ove
“fai
r sha
re”
conc
ept.
1.3.
3B. D
atab
ase
for
Eval
uatin
g Ho
usin
g N
eeds
“Dat
abas
e of
cur
rent
so
cioe
cono
mic
and
de
mog
raph
ic d
ata
Perio
dic
repo
rts
of
soci
oeco
nom
ic a
nd
dem
ogra
phic
dat
a”
DCP
mai
ntai
ned
a da
taba
se o
f soc
ioec
onom
ic a
nd d
emog
raph
ic
info
rmat
ion
and
prod
uced
repo
rts
upon
requ
est.
Staf
f and
bud
get c
uts
have
str
etch
ed th
e Ci
ty’s
reso
urce
s in
this
area
in re
cent
yea
rs,
alth
ough
pro
gres
s co
ntin
ues
to b
e m
ade.
Cont
inue
.
1.3.
3C. A
djus
t Pro
duct
ion
and
Pres
erva
tion
Goa
ls on
A P
erio
dic
Basis
Perio
dic
adju
stm
ent o
f ho
usin
g pr
oduc
tion
and
pres
erva
tion
goal
s an
d pr
ogra
m p
riorit
ies
Not
a H
ousin
g pr
ogra
m w
ith o
bjec
tives
and
goa
lsN
ot e
ffect
ive
Rem
ove
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-37
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.4.
1A. D
ensi
ty B
onus
“Ado
pt a
men
dmen
ts
to th
e Zo
ning
Cod
e to
re
flect
cur
rent
Sta
te
dens
ity b
onus
law
Adop
t am
endm
ents
to
the
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g In
cent
ives
Pro
gram
G
uide
lines
to fa
cilit
ate
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
mos
t rec
ent d
ensi
ty
bonu
s re
quire
men
ts
45 v
ery
low
inco
me
units
ann
ually
129
low
inco
me
units
ann
ually
118
mod
erat
e in
com
e un
its a
nnua
lly”
A to
tal o
f 185
Den
sity
Bon
us p
roje
cts
rece
ived
affo
rdab
le
hous
ing
cove
nant
s fro
m 2
006-
2011
, to
prod
uce
3,45
3 af
ford
able
uni
ts a
nd 7
,890
tota
l uni
ts.
The
dens
ity b
onus
pro
gram
has
bee
n ef
fect
ive,
how
ever
pro
duct
ion
of a
fford
able
ho
usin
g in
“m
arke
t rat
e” d
evel
opm
ents
has
ge
nera
lly b
een
low
, due
to th
e ov
erw
helm
ing
maj
ority
of p
roje
cts
optin
g to
pro
vide
(fe
wer
) ver
y lo
w-in
com
e un
its ra
ther
than
(m
ore)
low
- or m
oder
ate-
inco
me
units
.
Cont
inue
with
goa
l of i
mpr
ovin
g th
e pr
oduc
tion
of a
fford
able
uni
ts,
part
icul
arly
aro
und
Tran
sit S
tops
/M
ajor
Em
ploy
men
t Cen
ters
.
1.4.
1B. D
ownt
own
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g Bo
nus
“Ado
pt a
men
dmen
ts to
the
Zoni
ng C
ode
to im
plem
ent
ince
ntiv
es in
Dow
ntow
n
40 m
oder
ate,
30 lo
w, a
nd
30 v
ery
low
inco
me
affo
rdab
le u
nits
ann
ually
”
Sinc
e th
e G
DHIA
ord
inan
ce b
ecam
e ef
fect
ive
in 2
007
until
201
1,
a to
tal o
f 580
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g un
its h
ave
been
inco
rpor
ated
in
eig
ht p
ropo
sed
or b
uilt
resid
entia
l dev
elop
men
ts d
ownt
own.
40
4 of
the
affo
rdab
le u
nits
hav
e be
en p
erm
itted
thro
ugh
2012
.
The
Ord
inan
ce w
as a
dopt
ed b
ut p
rodu
ctio
n ha
s no
t bee
n as
hig
h as
ant
icip
ated
due
m
ostly
to th
e ch
ange
in m
arke
t con
ditio
ns
at th
e tim
e of
ado
ptio
n. W
hile
ther
e ha
s be
en in
crea
sed
inte
rest
in 2
012,
the
City
m
ay n
eed
to e
xam
ine
way
s to
incr
ease
usa
ge
of th
e pr
ogra
m if
it d
oes
not p
ick
up.
Cont
inue
with
goa
l of i
mpr
ovin
g th
e pr
oduc
tion
of a
fford
able
uni
ts,
part
icul
arly
aro
und
Tran
sit S
tops
/M
ajor
Em
ploy
men
t Cen
ters
.
1.4.
1C. A
fford
able
Hou
sing
in th
e Co
asta
l Zon
e (M
ello
Ac
t Im
plem
enta
tion)
“Ado
pt a
men
dmen
ts
to th
e Zo
ning
Cod
e to
im
plem
ent i
nclu
siona
ry
and
repl
acem
ent
hous
ing
requ
irem
ents
in
the
Coas
tal Z
one
Adop
t am
endm
ents
to
the
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g In
cent
ives
Pro
gram
G
uide
lines
to fa
cilit
ate
impl
emen
tatio
n of
af
ford
able
hou
sing
requ
irem
ents
in th
e Co
asta
l Zon
e
45 v
ery
low
inco
me
units
30 lo
w in
com
e un
its
50 m
oder
ate
inco
me
units
”
No
amen
dmen
ts to
the
Zoni
ng C
ode
rega
rdin
g im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
Mel
lo A
ct h
ave
been
mad
e. In
201
2 th
e Ci
ty C
ounc
il in
stru
cted
th
e Ci
ty A
ttor
ney
and
the
Hous
ing
Depa
rtm
ent t
o re
view
the
Mel
lo
Act a
nd re
port
rela
tive
to a
dopt
ion
of a
per
man
ent M
ello
Ord
inan
ce.
The
prog
ram
has
not
bee
n ef
fect
ive
in
refe
renc
e to
ado
ptin
g th
e Co
de A
men
dmen
ts
for i
mpl
emen
ting
the
Stat
e’s
Mel
lo A
ct. I
n lie
u of
a lo
cal o
rdin
ance
, the
City
has
bee
n sim
ply
impl
emen
ting
Stat
e la
w re
gard
ing
affo
rdab
le
hous
ing
requ
irem
ents
in th
e Co
asta
l Zon
e.
Cont
inue
with
the
sam
e ob
ject
ives
.
I-38 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.4.
1D. E
xped
ite
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g Pr
ojec
ts
“Ado
pt a
men
dmen
ts to
th
e Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
Ince
ntiv
es P
rogr
am
Gui
delin
es to
faci
litat
e im
plem
enta
tion
of
expe
dite
d pr
oces
ses
for a
fford
able
hou
sing
deve
lopm
ent
Prio
ritiz
e af
ford
able
ho
usin
g pr
ojec
ts to
ex
pedi
te p
roce
ssin
g of
per
mits
and
any
re
late
d en
title
men
ts
Redu
ce b
uild
ing
perm
it pr
oces
sing
time
by
up to
3 m
onth
s
Redu
ce e
ntitl
emen
t pr
oces
sing
time
by
up to
3 m
onth
s”
DBS
allo
ws
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g pr
ojec
ts to
take
adv
anta
ge o
f the
Pa
ralle
l Des
ign
Perm
ittin
g Pr
ogra
m (P
DPP)
and
Dev
elop
men
t Ser
vice
s Ca
se M
anag
emen
t (DS
CM) a
t low
er th
resh
olds
than
pro
ject
s w
ithou
t af
ford
able
hou
sing
(20
units
vs.
50)
. Bo
th p
roce
sses
gre
atly
ass
ist i
n th
e pe
rmitt
ing
proc
ess.
Affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g pr
ojec
ts h
ave
gene
rally
no
t rec
eive
d pr
iorit
y/ex
pedi
ted
entit
lem
ent p
roce
ssin
g, w
ith th
e ex
cept
ion
of th
ose
who
pay
the
addi
tiona
l fee
for E
xped
ited
Serv
ices
.
Very
effe
ctiv
e in
term
s of
the
perm
ittin
g pr
oces
s, b
ut n
ot a
s m
uch
for e
xped
iting
af
ford
able
hou
sing
proj
ects
thro
ugh
the
plan
ning
and
ent
itlem
ent p
roce
ss.
Cont
inue
with
rene
wed
focu
s on
fin
ding
a w
ay to
exp
edite
or s
trea
mlin
e th
e en
title
men
t pro
cess
, par
ticul
arly
fo
r affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g pr
ojec
ts.
1.4.
2A. C
omm
unity
Pla
n Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
Targ
ets
Brea
k do
wn
the
city
wid
e RH
NA
hous
ing
goal
s pl
us
othe
r unm
et h
ousin
g ne
eds
(fair
shar
e go
als)
am
ong
the
35 c
omm
unity
pla
ns b
y af
ford
abili
ty le
vel a
nd u
nits
6 Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns h
ave
been
, or w
ill b
e co
mpl
eted
by
2014
. Ea
ch re
visio
n in
clud
ed v
ario
us p
olic
ies
and
prog
ram
s pr
omot
ing
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g. H
owev
er, n
o pr
ecis
e af
ford
able
hou
sing
targ
ets
base
d on
RHN
A fig
ures
hav
e be
en p
ut fo
rwar
d.
Whi
le p
lans
take
into
acc
ount
203
0 po
pula
tion
proj
ectio
ns fo
r eac
h co
mm
unity
an
d ge
nera
lly e
ncou
rage
an
equi
tabl
e di
strib
utio
n of
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g th
roug
hout
th
e pl
an a
rea,
exp
licit
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g un
it go
als
are
not b
eing
ado
pted
.
Rem
ove,
as
the
prog
ram
is d
uplic
iativ
e of
ano
ther
(Hou
sing
Nee
ds A
sses
smen
t by
Com
mun
ity P
lan
Are
) and
doe
s no
t app
ear l
ikel
y to
be
adop
ted.
1.4.
2B. N
eigh
borh
ood
Leve
l Affo
rdab
le
Hous
ing
Prog
ram
s
“Cne
tral
City
Wes
t: 67
0 lo
w-in
com
e un
its
Play
a Vi
sta:
190
mod
erat
e-in
com
e fo
r-sal
e an
d 10
0 lo
w-in
com
e re
ntal
uni
ts
in P
hase
1, a
nd 1
25
mod
erat
e-in
com
e fo
r-sa
le a
nd 8
3 lo
w-in
com
e re
ntal
uni
ts in
Pha
se 2
War
ner C
ente
r: 12
00-
1300
wor
kfor
ce h
ousin
g un
its (2
00 p
er y
ear f
or th
e ne
xt 6
yea
rs) b
y 20
14”
A to
tal o
f 482
affo
rdab
le u
nits
wer
e pr
oduc
ed in
Pla
ya V
ista
, w
ith a
n ad
ditio
nal 3
19 C
ontr
olle
d Pr
ice
Uni
ts (u
nits
who
se re
sale
pr
ice
is lim
ited)
. In
War
ner C
ente
r, a
num
ber o
f dev
elop
men
ts
wer
e ap
prov
ed w
ith m
oder
ate
inco
me
units
requ
ired,
how
ever
th
e Pa
lmer
vs.
Los
Ang
eles
dec
ision
in 2
009
allo
wed
thos
e de
velo
pmen
ts to
be
cons
truc
ted
with
out t
he a
fford
able
uni
ts.
The
prog
ram
was
mee
ting
its o
bjec
tives
un
til th
e Pa
lmer
vs.
City
of L
os A
ngel
es
cour
t dec
ision
in 2
009,
whi
ch e
ffect
ivel
y ru
led
that
City
requ
irem
ents
to li
mit
rent
leve
ls on
new
con
stru
ctio
n vi
olat
ed
the
Stat
e’s
Cost
a Ha
wki
ns A
ct.
Revi
se p
rogr
am to
focu
s on
nex
t ste
ps in
en
cour
agin
g m
ixed
-inco
me
com
mun
ities
.
1.4.
2C. R
edev
elop
men
t Pr
ojec
t Are
a Ho
usin
g Pr
ogra
ms
Adop
t inc
lusio
nary
af
ford
able
hou
sing
requ
irem
ents
with
in
each
rede
velo
pmen
t pr
ojec
t are
a’s
Five
Yea
r Pl
an in
con
form
ance
w
ith th
e Co
mm
unity
Re
deve
lopm
ent L
aw
Prog
ress
on
this
prog
ram
is u
ncle
ar d
ue to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.Ef
fect
iven
ess
is un
know
n, a
nd th
e pr
ogra
m h
as
ende
d w
ith th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
Rem
ove.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-39
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.4.
2D. R
edev
elop
men
t Pr
ojec
t Are
a W
orkf
orce
In
com
e Ho
usin
g Pr
ogra
ms
Adop
t Wor
kfor
ce
Inco
me
Hous
ing
Prog
ram
Gui
delin
es
Prog
ress
on
this
prog
ram
is u
ncle
ar d
ue to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.Ef
fect
iven
ess
is un
know
n, a
nd th
e pr
ogra
m h
as
ende
d w
ith th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
Rem
ove.
1.5.
1A. P
rese
rvat
ion
Barr
iers
Ass
essm
ent
“Ide
ntify
dev
elop
men
t st
anda
rds
that
pos
e co
mpl
ianc
e di
fficu
lties
for
pres
erva
tion
proj
ects
Adop
t am
endm
ents
to
the
Zoni
ng C
ode
to
alle
viat
e ch
alle
nges
”
The
prog
ram
has
rem
aine
d on
hol
d pe
ndin
g bu
dget
and
sta
ff re
sour
ces.
Not
bee
n ef
fect
ive,
alth
ough
a 2
012
Coun
cil
Mot
ion
and
rece
nt a
ctiv
ity a
roun
d th
e is
sue
have
pro
vide
d re
new
ed m
omen
tum
.Re
tain
, with
som
e ad
just
men
ts.
1.5.
1B. S
trea
mlin
ed R
evie
w
Proc
ess
for R
edev
elop
men
t Pr
ojec
t Are
as
Redu
ce e
ntitl
emen
t pr
oces
sing
time
for
resid
entia
l dev
elop
men
t by
at l
east
3 m
onth
s
DCP
staf
f coo
rdin
ated
pro
ject
revi
ew w
ith C
RA/L
A st
aff
to s
trea
mlin
e an
d av
oid
dupl
icat
ion
of e
ffort
, inc
ludi
ng
desig
n re
view
and
the
prep
arat
ion
of e
nviro
nmen
tal r
evie
w
docu
men
tatio
n. B
udge
t and
sta
ff re
duct
ions
pre
vent
ed
furt
her i
mpr
ovem
ents
to e
ntitl
emen
t pro
cess
ing
time.
The
diss
olut
ion
of th
e Co
mm
unity
Red
evel
opm
ent
Agen
cy o
f LA
has
ende
d th
e pr
ogra
m.
Rem
ove,
giv
en th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.
1.5.
1C. I
mpr
ovem
ents
to
Entit
lem
ent P
roce
ssin
g
“Com
plet
e fe
e st
udy
of e
ntitl
emen
t pr
oces
sing
cost
s
Am
end
the
Zoni
ng
Code
to im
plem
ent
full
cost
reco
very
Redu
ce e
ntitl
emen
t pr
oces
sing
time
for
resid
entia
l dev
elop
men
t by
at l
east
3 m
onth
s
Redu
ce th
e nu
mbe
r of
City
dep
artm
ents
in
volv
ed in
app
rovi
ng a
nd
signi
ng-o
ff fo
r bui
ldin
g pe
rmit
issu
ance
”
Fee
stud
ies
and
corr
espo
ndin
g Co
de a
men
dmen
ts h
ave
been
m
ade
that
hav
e im
prov
ed th
e co
st re
cove
ry a
nd ti
mel
y pr
oces
sing
of D
CP a
pplic
atio
ns fo
r mar
ket r
ate
proj
ects
. The
ope
ning
of
a ne
w in
ter-a
genc
y de
velo
pmen
t ser
vice
s ce
nter
has
had
a
maj
or b
enefi
cial
impa
ct o
n cu
stom
er s
ervi
ce. M
any
addi
tiona
l im
prov
emen
ts h
ave
been
mad
e to
ent
itlem
ent p
roce
ssin
g un
der
DCPs
dep
artm
enta
l reo
rgan
izat
ion
plan
, inc
ludi
ng o
rgan
izat
ion
by
geog
raph
y, a
con
solid
ated
and
cen
tral
ized
Maj
or P
roje
cts
Sect
ion,
an
d th
e “o
ne p
roje
ct, o
ne p
lann
er”
mod
el o
f cas
e pr
oces
sing.
The
prog
ram
has
bee
n ef
fect
ive
in m
akin
g im
prov
emen
ts to
the
entit
lem
ent p
roce
ss.
Reta
in, w
ith s
ome
adju
stm
ents
. Refl
ect
prog
ress
that
has
bee
n m
ade
1.5.
1D. D
evel
opm
ent
and
Desig
n St
anda
rds
“Red
uce
need
for
entit
lem
ents
for r
esid
entia
l de
velo
pmen
t pro
ject
s
Incl
ude
deve
lopm
ent
and
desig
n st
anda
rds
in
16 C
omm
unity
Pla
ns”
Deve
lopm
ent a
nd d
esig
n st
anda
rds
are
bein
g cr
eate
d th
roug
h th
e 6
new
Com
mun
ity P
lans
that
will
tailo
r dev
elop
men
t reg
ulat
ions
in
ord
er to
enh
ance
the
uniq
ue c
hara
cter
of n
eigh
borh
oods
whi
le
acco
mm
odat
ing
grow
th a
t pre
ferr
ed lo
catio
ns. I
mpl
emen
tatio
n in
clud
es d
esig
n gu
idel
ines
, as
wel
l as
spec
ific
tool
s su
ch a
s th
e Co
mm
unity
Pla
n Im
plem
enta
tion
Ove
rlay
(CPI
O),
Com
mun
ity
Desig
n O
verla
y (C
DO
), Hi
stor
ic P
rese
rvat
ion
Ove
rlay
Zone
(H
POZ)
, Gro
und
Floo
r Com
mer
cial
zon
ing
desig
nato
r (G
FC),
and
Pede
stria
n Em
phas
is De
sign
zoni
ng d
esig
nato
r (PE
D).
Effe
ctiv
e, a
lthou
gh th
e nu
mbe
r of n
ew
Com
mun
ity P
lans
has
not
bee
n as
hig
h as
an
ticip
ated
due
to b
udge
t and
sta
ff cu
ts.
Reta
in w
ith n
ew e
mph
asis
on u
se o
f Com
mun
ity P
lan
Impl
emen
tatio
n O
verla
y di
stric
ts.
1.5.
1E. Z
onin
g Co
de R
efor
m
“Ado
pt Z
onin
g Co
de
amen
dmen
ts to
st
ream
line
the
revi
ew
and
appr
oval
pro
cess
Adop
t var
ious
pac
kage
s of
gro
uped
cod
e am
endm
ents
”
A m
ajor
ove
rhau
l/rev
ision
of t
he C
ity’s
Zoni
ng C
ode
has
begu
n in
201
2. T
he re
visio
n is
expe
cted
to b
e co
mpl
eted
by
2017
.
A m
ore
ambi
tious
revi
sion
to th
e Co
de th
an
envi
rone
d ha
s co
mm
ence
d. T
he m
ajor
ity o
f the
w
ork
will
take
pla
ce in
the
next
pla
nnin
g cy
cle.
Cont
inue
, with
a re
flect
ion
of th
e m
ajor
Zo
ning
Cod
e ov
erha
ul u
nder
way
and
the
oppo
rtun
ities
that
brin
gs fo
r res
iden
tial
deve
lopm
ent t
o m
ove
tow
ards
the
goal
s an
d po
licie
s of
of t
he G
ener
al P
lan.
I-40 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.5.
1F. A
men
d th
e Zo
ning
Co
de to
Fac
ilita
te N
on-
Conv
entio
nal H
ousin
g
Adop
t am
endm
ents
to
the
Zoni
ng C
ode
to
acco
mm
odat
e in
nova
tive
mul
tifam
ily ty
pes
Ord
inan
ce in
dev
elop
men
t to
allo
w b
y-rig
ht li
cens
ed
com
mun
ity c
are
faci
litie
s. T
he O
rdin
ance
wen
t bef
ore
the
City
Cou
ncil
in e
arly
201
3, a
nd w
as re
ferr
ed to
a
wor
king
com
mitt
ee to
furt
her r
efine
the
legi
slatio
n.
The
Ord
inan
ce h
as b
een
cont
rove
rtia
l and
bee
n am
ende
d se
vera
l tim
es. W
ork
cont
inue
s.
Reta
in
1.5.
1G. U
pdat
e th
e Lo
s A
ngel
es B
uild
ing
Code
Adop
t the
CBC
The
new
bui
ldin
g co
de w
as u
pdat
ed in
201
1 to
inco
rpor
ate
prov
ision
s of
the
2009
Inte
rnat
iona
l Bui
ldin
g Co
de
the
2010
Cal
iforn
ia B
uild
ing
Code
. The
Gre
en B
uild
ing
Code
was
add
ed to
the
Code
at t
he e
nd o
f 201
0.
Has
met
obj
ectiv
es.
Can
rem
ove.
1.5.
1H. C
ompl
ete
Com
mun
ity P
lan
EIRs
Min
imal
env
ironm
enta
l re
view
(i.e
., N
egat
ive
Decl
arat
ion)
requ
ired
for r
esid
entia
l de
velo
pmen
t pro
ject
s
6 Co
mm
unity
Pla
n an
d co
rres
pond
ing
Prog
ram
EIR
s ha
ve e
ither
be
en c
ompl
eted
or a
re in
an
adva
nced
sta
ge o
f dev
elop
men
t.
Effe
ctiv
e, a
lthou
gh th
e nu
mbe
r of n
ew
Com
mun
ity P
lans
has
not
bee
n as
hig
h as
an
ticip
ated
due
to b
udge
t and
sta
ff cu
ts.
Reta
in
1.5.
1I. M
odifi
catio
ns
to S
mal
l Lot
Su
bdiv
ision
Pro
cess
“Ide
ntify
dev
elop
men
t st
anda
rds,
cod
e re
quire
men
ts, a
nd
proc
edur
es th
at p
ose
com
plia
nce
diffi
culti
es fo
r sm
all l
ot s
ubdi
visio
ns
Adop
t am
endm
ents
to
the
Zoni
ng C
ode
to
alle
viat
e ch
alle
nges
”
Out
reac
h to
dev
elop
ers
and
arch
itect
s on
impr
ovem
ents
to
the
prog
ram
’s po
licie
s an
d pr
oced
ures
beg
an
in 2
011
and
mee
tings
took
pla
ce in
201
2.
Sign
ifica
nt p
rogr
ess
has
been
mad
e to
id
entif
y in
effic
ienc
ies
and
way
s to
impr
ove
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Smal
l Lot
Su
bdiv
ision
s pr
ogra
m, h
owev
er m
uch
of th
e ne
cess
ary
chan
ges
have
not
yet
ocu
rred
.
Mer
ge p
rogr
am o
bjec
tives
with
Sm
all
Lot S
ubdi
visio
ns p
rogr
am, a
s th
e tw
o ar
e du
plic
ativ
e of
one
ano
ther
.
1.5.
1J. M
odifi
catio
ns to
Se
cond
Uni
t (“G
rann
y Fl
at”)
Pro
cess
“Ide
ntify
dev
elop
men
t st
anda
rds
and
code
re
quire
men
ts th
at p
ose
com
plia
nce
diffi
culti
es
to S
econ
d U
nit P
roce
ss
Adop
t am
endm
ents
to
the
Zoni
ng C
ode
to
alle
viat
e ch
alle
nges
”
ZA M
emo
#120
was
issu
ed in
201
0 to
pro
vide
gui
danc
e on
impl
emen
ting
Stat
e pr
ovisi
ons
gove
rnin
g th
e de
velo
pmen
t of s
econ
d un
its o
n re
siden
tial l
ots.
No
Zoni
ng C
ode
Am
endm
ents
hav
e be
en p
ropo
sed.
Zoni
ng C
ode
amen
dmen
t was
not
de
term
ined
to b
e ne
eded
.
Mer
ge w
ith re
late
d pr
ogra
m (A
ltern
ativ
e M
ulti-
Fam
ily D
evel
opm
ent)
to
crea
te n
ew S
econ
d U
nit (
“Gra
nny
Flat
” Pr
oces
s” p
rogr
am.
1.5.
1K. S
trea
mlin
e Af
ford
able
Hou
sing
Cove
nant
Pro
cess
“Red
uce
time
need
ed
to p
repa
re a
fford
able
ho
usin
g co
vena
nts
Redu
ce ti
me
need
ed
to o
btai
n cl
eara
nce
from
HCI
DLA
for
build
ing
perm
its
Ann
ual r
epor
t on
cove
nant
pro
duct
ion
and
proc
essin
g tim
e”
“A g
uide
for p
repa
ring
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g co
vena
nts
was
pro
duce
d in
Oct
ober
201
1 an
d pu
t on
the
Hous
ing
Depa
rtm
ent’s
web
site
. Gui
delin
es fo
r
the
Depa
rtm
ent’s
han
dlin
g of
cov
enan
ts w
ere
upda
ted
on D
ecem
ber
2010
. A L
and
Use
dat
abas
e is
used
to tr
ack
the
prog
ress
of c
oven
ant
prep
arat
ion.
A L
and
Use
dat
abas
e is
used
to tr
ack
the
prog
ress
of
cov
enan
t pre
para
tion.
The
“”B
uild
LA”
” w
orki
ng g
roup
aim
s to
str
eam
line
all a
spec
ts o
f the
per
mit
appl
icat
ion
proc
essin
g.”
HCID
LA’s
Land
Use
cov
enan
t pro
gram
has
un
derg
one
signi
fican
t cha
nges
, whi
ch h
ave
elim
inat
ed b
ackl
og, r
educ
ed ti
me
to p
roce
ss,
and
prov
ided
acc
urat
e tr
acki
ng a
nd re
port
ing.
Dele
te.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-41
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
1.5.
2A. I
nter
-age
ncy
and
Inte
r-jur
isdi
ctio
nal
Coor
dina
tion
Leve
rage
7:1
(ins
tead
of
curr
ent 4
:1) i
n ad
ditio
nal
Coun
ty, r
egio
nal,
Stat
e an
d Fe
dera
l fun
ds to
lo
cal f
unds
for r
esid
entia
l de
velo
pmen
t
“The
mos
t rec
ent l
ever
age
ratio
(201
1) fo
r AHT
F pr
ojec
ts w
as
3.85
:1 a
nd 6
.22:
1 fo
r per
man
ent s
uppo
rtiv
e ho
usin
g pr
ojec
ts.
The
City
has
take
n a
lead
ersh
ip ro
le in
the
deve
lopm
ent
of e
ffect
ive
part
ners
hips
that
leve
rage
publ
ic a
nd p
rivat
e fu
ndin
g so
urce
s, li
ke th
e Ho
me
for
Goo
d Fu
nder
’s Co
llabo
rativ
e, a
nd to
coo
rdin
ate
thes
e re
sour
ces
to s
erve
the
man
y di
ffere
nt s
ub-p
opul
atio
ns o
f ho
mel
ess
and
at-r
isk in
divi
dual
s an
d fa
mili
es in
LA
.
As
the
Cont
inuu
m o
f Car
e le
ad a
nd C
olla
bora
tive
App
lican
t, LA
HSA
subm
its o
n an
ann
ual b
asis
the
Supe
rNO
FA a
pplic
atio
n fo
r fed
eral
fu
nds.
In 2
011
and
2012
, the
Req
uest
for P
ropo
sal (
RFP)
incl
uded
a
join
t crit
eria
dev
elop
ed in
con
junc
tion
with
the
Hous
ing
Auth
oriti
es.
HAC
LA c
oord
inat
ed th
e Pe
rman
ent S
uppo
rtiv
e Ho
usin
g N
OFA
with
HCI
DLA
and
Los
Ang
eles
Cou
nty
in 2
011.
“
Whi
le th
e pr
ogra
m a
ims
broa
dly
for i
nter
-ag
ency
and
inte
r-jur
isdi
ctio
nal c
oord
inat
ion,
it
lack
s sp
ecifi
c ob
ject
ives
in th
at re
gard
. G
reat
er c
oord
inat
ion
does
not
nec
essa
rily
lead
to g
reat
er le
vera
ging
ratio
s.
Rem
ove
2.1.
1A. C
rime
Prev
entio
n th
roug
h En
viro
nmen
tal
Desig
n (C
PTED
)
40 re
siden
tial p
roje
cts
give
n te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e an
d re
com
men
datio
ns
annu
ally
DCP
enco
urag
ed, a
nd in
som
e ca
ses
requ
ired,
con
sulta
tion
with
the
LA P
olic
e De
pt. (
LAPD
) and
thei
r Des
ign
Out
Crim
e G
uide
lines
: Crim
e Pr
even
tion
Thro
ugh
Envi
ronm
enta
l Des
ign.
LA
PD’s
Crim
e Pr
even
tion
Uni
t con
sulte
d w
ith p
rivat
e de
velo
pers
to
inco
rpor
ate
CPTE
D te
chni
ques
into
pro
ject
s. T
he C
PTED
te
chni
ques
are
als
o in
corp
orat
ed in
to H
ACLA
pub
lic h
ousin
g si
tes.
Mos
tly e
ffect
ive,
alth
ough
the
goal
of 4
0 pr
ojec
ts a
yea
r app
ears
to b
e to
o am
bitio
us.
Rem
ove
the
prog
ram
, as
it do
es n
ot
dire
ctly
rela
te to
the
Stat
e’s
Hous
ing
Elel
emen
t req
uire
men
ts a
nd th
ere
are
no
sche
dule
d ac
tions
bey
ond
carr
ying
out
th
e co
nsul
tatio
ns o
n an
ad-
hoc
basis
.
2.1.
1B. N
eigh
borh
ood
Wat
ch
Tech
nica
l sup
port
and
as
sista
nce
to 2
0 ne
w
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d W
atch
pr
ogra
ms
annu
ally
Data
not
ava
ilabl
e.N
ot k
now
n.Re
mov
e th
e pr
ogra
m, a
s it
does
no
t dire
ctly
rela
te to
the
Stat
e’s
Hous
ing
Elel
emen
t req
uire
men
ts.
2.1.
1C. S
afer
City
Initi
ativ
e
“10%
redu
ctio
n in
cr
imin
al a
ctiv
ity o
n Sk
id R
ow a
nnua
lly
400
hom
eles
s pe
rson
s di
rect
ed to
hou
sing
and
serv
ice
prog
ram
s an
nual
ly”
“Ope
ratio
n He
alth
y St
reet
was
laun
ched
in 2
011
to
clea
n Sk
id R
ow s
tree
ts a
nd p
rovi
de a
cle
aner
and
sa
fer e
nviro
nmen
t. Fi
ve m
iles
of s
tree
t and
sidew
alks
wer
e cl
eane
d. P
erso
nal l
ocke
r sys
tem
in
crea
sed
by 5
00 u
nits
for a
tota
l of 1
136
lock
ers
for
the
hom
eles
s. A
new
bat
hroo
m, s
how
er a
nd
laun
dry
faci
lity
wer
e m
ade
avai
labl
e. T
he C
ity a
lso
open
ed a
n ab
ando
ned
item
90-
day
stor
age
prog
ram
fo
r ite
ms
left
in S
kid
Row
so
the
hom
eles
s
coul
d cl
aim
them
.”
Una
ble
to v
erify
whe
ther
pro
gram
ob
ject
ives
hav
e be
en m
et.
Rem
ove
the
prog
ram
, as
it do
es
not d
irect
ly re
late
to th
e St
ate’
s Ho
usin
g El
elem
ent r
equi
rem
ents
.
2.1.
2A. H
ealth
-bas
ed
Buffe
r Zon
es fo
r Re
siden
tial N
eigh
borh
oods
“Est
ablis
h ap
prop
riate
bu
ffers
in 1
2 Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns
Mak
e m
odifi
catio
ns to
th
e Zo
ning
Cod
e an
d pr
ojec
t-ba
sed
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
as n
eces
sary
”
In 2
012
an A
dvis
ory
Not
ice
to p
roje
cts
with
in 1
,000
feet
of f
reew
ays
in L
os A
ngel
es w
as a
ppro
ved
by th
e Ci
ty P
lann
ing
Com
mis
sion.
Thi
s is
an in
form
atio
nal n
otic
e fo
r the
pur
pose
of c
allin
g at
tent
ion
to e
xist
ing
adop
ted
goal
s, o
bjec
tives
, pol
icie
s, a
nd p
rogr
ams
in th
e G
ener
al P
lan
that
add
ress
land
use
com
patib
ility
with
resp
ect t
o th
e si
ting
near
fre
eway
s of
new
resid
entia
l dev
elop
men
t and
sen
sitiv
e la
nd u
ses.
The
N
otic
e su
mm
ariz
es s
tand
ard
proj
ect c
ondi
tions
com
mon
ly a
pplie
d to
free
way
-adj
acen
t res
iden
tial p
roje
cts
and
reco
mm
ends
pro
ject
de
sign
feat
ures
that
cou
ld h
elp
to im
prov
e pu
blic
hea
lth o
utco
mes
. Th
e Ad
viso
ry N
otic
e w
ould
not
cre
ate
addi
tiona
l dis
cret
iona
ry
revi
ew o
r oth
erw
ise
mod
ify e
stab
lishe
d th
resh
olds
of C
EQA
revi
ew.
Heal
th-b
ased
buf
fers
wer
e no
t offi
cial
ly a
dopt
ed
in C
omm
unity
Pla
ns o
r the
Zon
ing
Code
, how
ever
m
itiga
tions
and
pro
ject
con
ditio
ns w
ere
ofte
n im
pose
d by
the
City
Pla
nnin
g Co
mm
issio
n or
DC
P fo
r dis
cret
iona
ry p
roje
cts
with
in a
cer
tain
di
stan
ce o
f fre
eway
s (o
ften
500
feet
), de
pend
ing
on in
divi
dual
ass
essm
ents
of s
peci
fic c
ondi
tions
.
Rem
ove
the
prog
ram
, as
it do
es n
ot
dire
ctly
rela
te to
the
Stat
e’s
Hous
ing
Elel
emen
t req
uire
men
ts a
nd n
o ad
ditio
nal i
mpl
emen
tatio
n ac
tiviti
es a
re
sche
dule
d fo
r the
pla
nnin
g pe
riod.
I-42 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
2.1.
2B. R
educ
ing
Cons
truc
tion-
Rela
ted
Pollu
tion
“Rev
ised
con
stru
ctio
n-re
late
d po
llutio
n gu
idel
ines
Chan
ges
to Z
onin
g Co
de, B
uild
ing
Code
and
pr
ojec
t-ba
sed
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
as n
eces
sary
”
Cons
truc
tion
rela
ted
pollu
tion
regu
latio
ns w
ere
enac
ted
as p
art o
f th
e Ci
ty’s
adop
tion
of th
e G
reen
Bui
ldin
g Co
de in
Dec
embe
r 201
0.
Effe
ctiv
e in
ena
ctin
g re
quire
men
ts to
redu
ce
cons
truc
tion-
rela
ted
pollu
tion,
alth
ough
the
adop
tion
of th
e G
reen
Bui
ldin
g Co
de (t
he 2
010
Calif
orni
a G
reen
Bui
ldin
g St
anda
rds)
was
not
en
visio
ned
in th
e pr
evio
us H
ousin
g El
emen
t.
Rem
ove,
as
the
cons
truc
tion-
rela
ted
pollu
tion
redu
ctio
ns h
ave
been
em
bedd
ed in
the
Build
ing
Code
.
2.1.
2C. I
ncre
ase
Acce
ss
to P
arks
, Rec
reat
ion
and
Gre
en S
pace
s
Incr
ease
d ac
cess
ibili
ty
to p
arks
and
ope
n sp
aces
des
igna
ted
in 1
6 Co
mm
unity
Pla
n U
pdat
es
“DCP
and
the
Plan
ning
Com
mis
sion
deve
lope
d “S
tree
ts 4
Peo
ple”
, a
pilo
t pro
gram
to c
reat
e sm
all p
arks
, bic
ycle
faci
litie
s, o
r ped
estr
ian
amen
ities
usin
g ex
cess
righ
t-of
-way
. The
City
has
als
o be
gin
the
crea
tion
of “
park
lets
”, w
hich
invo
lve
exte
ndin
g sid
ewal
ks fo
r pu
blic
sea
ting,
gar
dens
, bik
e pa
rkin
g an
d ot
her a
men
ities
.
6 Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns w
ere
com
plet
ed, e
ach
incl
udin
g po
licie
s an
d pr
ogra
ms
to fa
cilit
ate
acce
ss to
par
ks a
nd o
pen
spac
es.”
Wor
k pr
ogre
ssed
on
all o
f the
ele
men
ts
in th
e pr
ogra
m d
escr
iptio
n. T
he p
rogr
am
was
larg
ely
effe
ctiv
e in
incr
easin
g ac
cess
to
par
ks, r
ecre
atio
n an
d gr
een
spac
e.
Rem
ove
the
prog
ram
, as
it do
es n
ot
dire
ctly
rela
te to
the
Stat
e’s
Hous
ing
Elem
ent r
equi
rem
ents
and
doe
s no
t hav
e qu
antifi
able
obj
ectiv
es.
Add
stat
emen
t to
Polic
y 2.
4.3.
2.2.
1A. Z
onin
g an
d N
eigh
borh
ood
Impl
emen
tatio
n To
ols
for
Mix
ed U
se D
evel
opm
ent
“1,0
00 h
ousin
g un
its in
m
ixed
use
dev
elop
men
t
Iden
tify
targ
ets
in a
ll Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns
Adop
t ord
inan
ces
if ap
prop
riate
”
“At l
east
8 c
ases
wer
e fil
ed fo
r zon
e ch
ange
s to
Res
iden
tial
Acce
ssor
y Se
rvic
es (R
AS)
zon
es, i
nclu
ding
116
1 un
its.
An
enab
ling
Ord
inan
ce c
reat
ing
a ne
w ty
pe o
f sup
plem
enta
l us
e di
stric
t, ca
lled
a Co
mm
unity
Pla
n Im
plem
enta
tion
Ove
rlay
(CPI
O) d
istr
ict w
as a
dopt
ed in
201
2. 5
Com
mun
ity P
lans
w
ere
deve
lope
d, w
hich
con
sider
ed m
ixed
-use
nod
es a
nd
boul
evar
ds a
nd re
quiri
ng m
ixed
-use
(and
/or g
roun
d-flo
or
com
mer
cial
) in
appr
opria
te a
reas
thro
ugh
the
use
of C
PIO
s,
alon
g w
ith d
esig
n st
anda
rds
for m
ixed
-use
dev
elop
men
ts.
DCP
has
rece
ntly
pro
pose
d a
mod
ifica
tion
to R
esid
entia
l Pla
nned
De
velo
pmen
t Dis
tric
ts (P
D), w
hich
wer
e de
signe
d m
ostly
for
mas
ter-
plan
ned
singl
e-fa
mily
nei
ghbo
rhoo
ds. T
he p
ropo
sal i
s to
ac
com
mod
ate
a br
oade
r ran
ge o
f infi
ll an
d m
ixed
-use
dev
elop
men
t.
Mix
ed-U
se O
verla
y Di
stric
ts, a
n ol
der s
uppl
emen
tal
zone
, has
not
bee
n ef
fect
ive
and
has
larg
ely
been
su
ppla
nted
by
RAS
zone
s an
d CP
IOs.”
Effe
ctiv
e in
cre
atin
g a
new
tool
to p
rom
ote
mix
ed-u
se d
evel
opm
ent.
Ano
ther
tool
is
bein
g m
odifi
ed to
faci
litat
e m
ixed
-us
e an
d in
fill d
evel
opm
ent.
Reta
in, g
iven
that
mor
e to
ols
are
bein
g de
velo
ped.
2.2.
1B. H
ealth
y N
eigh
borh
oods
“Ado
pt H
ealth
y N
eigh
borh
ood
Polic
y w
ith g
uide
lines
for
sust
aina
ble
prac
tices
an
d im
plem
ent p
olic
y
30 u
nits
for e
xtre
mel
y lo
w in
com
e (3
0%
AM
I) an
nual
ly
90 u
nits
for v
ery
low
inco
me
(50%
A
MI)
annu
ally
130
units
for a
bove
-m
oder
ate
inco
me
(up
to
200%
AM
I) an
nual
ly”
Prog
ress
on
this
prog
ram
is u
ncle
ar d
ue to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.Ef
fect
iven
ess
is un
know
n, a
nd th
e pr
ogra
m h
as
ende
d w
ith th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
Rem
ove.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-43
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
2.2.
1C. C
hild
care
Fac
ilitie
s
“5 c
hild
care
faci
litie
s an
d 37
5 slo
ts in
re
siden
tial p
roje
cts
6 ch
ildca
re fa
cilit
ies
and
450
slots
in c
omm
erci
al
deve
lopm
ent a
nd/
or n
ear t
rans
it”
“The
resu
lts o
f CRA
/LA’
s Ch
ildca
re F
acili
ties
Polic
y ar
e un
able
to b
e de
term
ined
due
to th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
Rede
velo
pmen
t Age
ncie
s.
DCP
trac
king
of t
he d
evel
opm
ent o
f chi
ldca
re
faci
litie
s ha
s no
t tak
en p
lace
.”
Was
larg
ely
effe
ctiv
e at
mee
ting
prog
ram
ob
ject
ives
unt
il th
e 20
11 d
isso
lutio
n of
CRA
.Re
mov
e, g
iven
the
diss
olut
ion
of th
e CR
A/L
A.
2.2.
2A. M
illio
n Tr
ees
LA –
Pub
lic P
rope
rty
and
Righ
ts-o
f-Way
300,
000
tree
s pl
ante
d on
pub
lic p
rope
rty
and
publ
ic ri
ghts
-of-w
ay
“Sin
ce th
e pr
ogra
m la
unch
in S
epte
mbe
r of 2
006,
M
illio
n Tr
ees
LA (M
TLA)
has
pla
nted
ove
r 330
,000
tree
s in
crea
sing
the
over
all n
ew tr
ee p
lant
ing
rate
by a
s m
uch
as 6
fold
. Prio
r to
the
MTL
A pr
ogra
m, t
he
City
, non
-pro
fits
and
new
dev
elop
men
ts w
as p
lant
ing
appr
oxim
atel
y 10
,000
ann
ually
(bas
ed o
n
City
’s U
rban
For
estr
y Di
visio
n in
form
atio
n).”
Larg
ely
effe
ctiv
e.Co
mbi
ne w
ith o
ther
Mill
ion
Tree
s LA
pro
gram
.
2.2.
2B. W
alka
bilit
y Ch
eckl
ist
Inte
grat
e W
alka
bilit
y Ch
eckl
ist i
nto
the
proj
ect r
evie
w p
roce
ss
The
Wal
kabi
lity
Chec
klis
t was
ado
pted
in N
ovem
ber 2
008
and
is no
w
inte
grat
ed in
to th
e pr
ojec
t rev
iew
pro
cess
for a
ll di
scre
tiona
ry a
ctio
ns.
Prog
ram
has
met
its
obje
ctiv
e.Re
mov
e, a
s th
e pr
ogra
m
has
been
com
plet
ed.
2.2.
2C. U
rban
De
sign
Stud
io
“Est
ablis
h U
rban
Des
ign
Stud
io a
s a
divi
sion
with
in th
e DC
P
Mai
ntai
n U
rban
Des
ign
Stud
io w
ith a
n an
nual
op
erat
ing
budg
et
Incr
ease
sta
ff to
run
Urb
an D
esig
n St
udio
”
The
Urb
an D
esig
n St
udio
has
com
plet
ed C
ityw
ide
Desig
n G
uide
lines
(res
iden
tial,
indu
stria
l and
com
mer
cial
), th
e W
alka
bilit
y Ch
eckl
ist,
Dow
ntow
n De
sign
Gui
delin
es, C
entu
ry
City
Gre
en P
lan,
and
var
ious
oth
er im
port
ant c
ontr
ibut
ions
.
The
Urb
an D
esig
n St
udio
has
bee
n ef
fect
ive
in
prom
otin
g ob
ject
ives
, des
pite
lim
ited
reso
urce
s.Re
tain
, as
the
inte
ntio
n is
to m
aint
ain
the
Urb
an D
esig
n St
udio
.
2.2.
2D. S
torm
wat
er
Colle
ctio
n an
d M
itiga
tion
“Ado
pt o
n-si
te s
torm
wat
er
desig
n gu
idel
ines
Inte
grat
e on
-site
st
orm
wat
er d
esig
n gu
idel
ines
into
pro
ject
re
view
pro
cess
”
The
Low
-Impa
ct D
evel
opm
ent (
LID)
Ord
inan
ce, w
hich
effe
ctiv
ely
repl
aced
the
prev
ious
sto
rmw
ater
col
lect
ion
and
miti
gatio
ns p
rogr
am,
beca
me
effe
ctiv
e an
d ap
plic
able
to m
ost r
elev
ant p
roje
cts
in 2
012.
Mor
e th
at e
ffect
ive,
giv
en th
at th
e or
igin
al p
rogr
am o
bjec
tives
env
ision
ed
only
gui
delin
es a
s th
e go
al.
Reta
in a
nd m
erge
with
oth
er w
ater
pr
ogra
ms
(Gre
en S
tree
ts/M
anag
e W
ater
Res
ourc
es) f
or n
ew p
rogr
am
calle
d St
orm
wat
er M
itiga
tion.
2.2.
2E. G
reen
Str
eets
“Ado
pt s
torm
wat
er
desig
n gu
idel
ines
for
publ
ic ri
ghts
-of-w
ay
Inte
grat
e st
orm
wat
er
desig
n gu
idel
ines
into
pr
ojec
t rev
iew
pro
cess
re
gard
ing
need
ed o
ff-si
te im
prov
emen
ts”
“The
City
ado
pted
des
ign
guid
elin
es to
trea
t and
infil
trat
e st
orm
wat
er
runo
ff fro
m p
ublic
righ
ts o
f way
in re
siden
tial n
eigh
borh
oods
ca
lled
Gre
en S
tree
ts a
nd A
lleys
: Des
ign
Gui
delin
es S
tand
ards
(R
ainw
ater
Har
vest
ing
Prog
ram
). Ad
opte
d 20
09, i
t is
bein
g us
ed in
al
l str
eet c
apita
l im
prov
emen
t pro
ject
s an
d in
clud
es T
ree
Cano
pies
, Ve
geta
ted
Swal
es, I
nfitlr
atio
n (F
low
-Thr
u) P
lant
ers,
Per
viou
s Pa
ving
, In
filtr
atio
n Tr
ench
, Sto
rmw
ater
Cur
b Ex
tens
ions
and
Cur
b In
lets
.
Stor
mw
ater
des
ign
capt
ure
and
trea
tmen
t tec
hniq
ues
have
bee
n in
corp
orat
ed in
to p
roje
ct re
view
pro
cess
thro
ugh
the
LID
Ord
inan
ce.”
Prog
ram
has
met
its
obje
ctiv
es, a
lthou
gh
wor
k on
iden
tifyi
ng p
riorit
y G
reen
Str
eets
pr
ojec
ts, a
nd id
entif
ying
fund
ing
sour
ces
to
carr
y ou
t str
ateg
ic in
terv
entio
ns c
ontin
ues.
Mer
ge w
ith o
ther
wat
ersh
ed-r
elat
ed
prog
ram
s (S
torm
wat
er C
olle
ctio
n an
d M
itiga
tion
and
Man
age
Wat
er R
esou
rces
)
2.2.
2F. L
ands
cape
Des
ign
Inte
grat
e La
ndsc
ape
Ord
inan
ce in
to p
roje
ct
revi
ew p
roce
ss
Land
scap
e O
rdin
ance
con
tinue
d to
be
part
of p
roje
ct re
view
th
roug
hout
the
perio
d. D
CP p
repa
red
a Te
chni
cal B
ulle
tin fo
r DC
P st
aff r
egar
ding
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Ord
inan
ce.
Land
scap
e de
sign
was
inco
rpor
ated
into
pr
ojec
t rev
iew
but
no
signi
fican
t oth
er
impl
emen
tatio
n ac
tions
took
pla
ce.
Reta
in.
I-44 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
2.2.
3A. R
educ
ed
Requ
irem
ents
for
Hous
ing
near
Tra
nsit
“Ado
pt re
vise
d tr
affic
im
pact
stu
dy p
olic
ies
Redu
ce tr
affic
miti
gatio
n re
quire
men
ts fo
r ho
usin
g ne
ar tr
ansi
t”
“In
2011
, the
City
upd
ated
the
Traf
fic S
tudy
Gui
delin
es.
The
new
gui
delin
es c
ontin
ue to
allo
w p
roje
cts
near
tr
ansi
t to
redu
ce th
eir o
vera
ll as
sum
ed
vehi
cle
trip
gen
erat
ion.
Als
o, th
e ne
w g
uide
lines
list
ed p
ossib
le
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res
aim
ed a
t fur
ther
redu
cing
veh
icle
trip
s fo
r re
siden
tial p
roje
cts
that
wou
ld re
sult
in s
igni
fican
t im
pact
s. T
rip
cred
it al
low
ance
has
bee
n w
idel
y us
ed b
y de
velo
pers
par
ticul
arly
in
tran
sit r
obus
t are
as. P
rogr
am h
as s
erve
d as
an
ince
ntiv
e fo
r pr
ojec
ts to
incl
ude
a re
siden
tial c
ompo
nent
for t
he a
dded
cre
dits
.”
The
prog
ram
has
bee
n su
cces
sful
in m
eetin
g its
obj
ectiv
e bu
t can
be
broa
dene
d.
Reta
in b
ut m
onito
r and
adj
ust i
f sup
port
ed
by re
sear
ch-b
ased
dat
a; c
onsid
er a
dditi
onal
cr
edits
for p
roje
cts
with
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g.
2.2.
3B. T
rans
it O
rient
ed
Dist
rict S
tudi
es
“Com
plet
e 10
tran
sit
orie
nted
dis
tric
t stu
dies
Inco
rpor
ate
stud
y re
com
men
datio
ns in
to
the
Com
mun
ity P
lans
”
Com
plet
ed 6
Exp
o Ph
ase
1 TO
D Vi
sion
Plan
s/St
udie
s, a
s w
ell
stud
ies
of G
old
Line
sta
tion
area
s (M
aria
chi,
Soto
, Ind
iana
) and
O
rang
e Li
ne s
tops
(Can
oga,
Res
eda,
Tar
zana
Cro
ssin
g) lo
okin
g at
m
arke
t pot
entia
l, ty
polo
gies
, str
ateg
ies,
etc
- to
be
inco
rpor
ated
in
to C
omm
unity
Pla
n up
date
s, S
peci
fic P
lans
, CPI
Os,
etc
. Als
o co
mpl
eted
pla
nnin
g w
ork
on G
reen
and
Blu
e lin
es (P
roje
ct
REN
EW).
Sign
ifica
nt w
ork
now
taki
ng p
lace
on
11 fu
ture
Tra
nsit
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d Pl
ans
for t
he n
ext t
wo
light
-rai
l lin
es: E
xpo
Phas
e 2
and
Cren
shaw
/LA
X. T
he W
arne
r Cen
ter S
peci
fic P
lan
was
sig
nific
antly
exp
ande
d to
acc
omm
odat
e ad
ditio
nal r
esid
entia
l de
nsity
bas
ed o
n a
mar
ket s
tudy
and
ana
lysis
, and
the
Corn
field
A
rroy
o Sp
ecifi
c Pl
an (C
ASP
) als
o be
nefit
ted
from
mar
ket s
tudi
es.
Very
effe
ctiv
e - m
ore
than
10
TOD
stud
ies
that
ha
ve in
form
ed re
siden
tial p
lann
ing
and
zoni
ng
have
take
n pl
ace
durin
g th
e pl
anni
ng p
erio
d.
Reta
in, w
ith re
new
ed fo
cus
on n
ext T
OD
Plan
s an
d ho
usin
g go
als.
Exp
and
to
inco
rpor
ate
Tran
sit N
eigh
borh
ood
Plan
s.
2.2.
3C. I
nnov
ativ
e Pa
rkin
g St
rate
gies
“Com
plet
e st
udie
s of
pa
rkin
g al
tern
ativ
es
incl
udin
g m
axim
um
and
shar
ed p
arki
ng
feas
ibili
ty s
tudy
Inco
rpor
ate
park
ing
stud
y re
com
men
datio
ns
into
Com
mun
ity P
lans
an
d th
e Zo
ning
Cod
e w
here
app
ropr
iate
”
“The
Mod
ified
Par
king
Req
uire
men
ts (M
PR) O
rdin
ance
pas
sed
the
City
Pla
nnin
g Co
mm
issio
n in
201
1. T
he M
PR c
reat
es s
even
op
tiona
l par
king
requ
irem
ent m
odifi
catio
n to
ols
that
can
be
used
in d
iffer
ent a
reas
of t
he C
ity. T
he O
rdin
ance
wou
ld a
llow
: 1)
cha
nge
of u
se p
arki
ng s
tand
ards
, 2) u
se o
f a n
ew P
arki
ng
Redu
ctio
n Pe
rmit,
3) o
ff-si
te p
arki
ng w
ith 1
500
feet
, 4) d
ecre
ased
pa
rkin
g st
anda
rds,
5) i
ncre
ased
par
king
sta
ndar
ds, 6
)
com
mer
cial
par
king
cre
dits
and
7) m
axim
um p
arki
ng li
mits
.”
Very
effe
ctiv
e at
ena
blin
g th
e cr
eatio
n an
d ut
iliza
tion
of a
ltern
ativ
e pa
rkin
g st
rate
gies
tailo
red
for i
ndiv
idua
l are
as.
Reta
in, w
ith fo
cus
on im
plem
enta
tion.
M
erge
with
oth
er p
arki
ng p
rogr
am
(Off-
Site
Par
king
Opt
ions
)
2.2.
4A. C
onge
stio
n M
anag
emen
t Pro
gram
La
nd U
se S
trat
egy
“Rep
ort o
n al
l pro
ject
s de
velo
ped
and
all
dem
oliti
ons
arou
nd m
ajor
tr
ansi
t sta
tions
and
tran
sit
corr
idor
s an
nual
ly
Cert
ify c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
the
Los
Ang
eles
Cou
nty
Cong
estio
n M
anag
emen
t Pr
ogra
m a
nnua
lly”
The
Cong
estio
n M
anag
emen
t Pro
gram
repo
rt w
as c
ompl
eted
an
d ce
rtifi
ed a
s co
mpl
iant
with
the
Los
Ang
eles
Cou
nty
Cong
estio
n M
anag
emen
t Pro
gram
dur
ing
the
plan
ning
per
iod.
Prog
ram
fulfi
lls a
requ
irem
ent f
or fu
ndin
g an
d he
lps
the
City
trac
k m
ixed
-use
and
tran
sit-
orie
nted
dev
elop
men
t. M
TA is
cur
rent
ly
eval
uatin
g ch
ange
s to
the
CMP
incl
udin
g re
plac
ing
the
debi
t/cr
edit
syst
em w
ith a
Co
unty
wid
e de
velo
pmen
t ass
essm
ent f
ee.
Reta
in. C
ity s
houl
d co
ntin
ue to
mon
itor
and
prov
ide
feed
back
to M
ETRO
on
any
pro
pose
d ch
ange
s to
the
Cong
estio
n M
anag
emen
t Pro
gram
.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-45
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
2.2.
4B. J
obs/
Hous
ing
Bala
nce
Ince
ntiv
es:
Resid
entia
l Exe
mpt
ions
in
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Spec
ific
Plan
s
Add
fee
exem
ptio
n fo
r res
iden
tial u
nits
to
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sp
ecifi
c Pl
ans
that
gov
ern
empl
oym
ent c
ente
rs
Resid
entia
l use
s co
ntin
ue to
be
exem
pted
from
Tra
ffic
Impa
ct F
ees
in th
e fo
llow
ing
jobs
-hea
vy S
peci
fic P
lan
area
s: C
entr
al C
ity W
est,
Coas
tal A
rea
and
Wes
t Los
Ang
eles
. A re
cent
upd
ate
to th
e W
arne
r Ce
nter
Spe
cific
Pla
n re
-intr
oduc
ed fe
es o
n re
siden
tial d
evel
opm
ent i
n or
der t
o ca
ptur
e m
ore
fund
ing
for l
ocal
tran
spor
tatio
n im
prov
emen
ts.
How
ever
the
fees
wer
e ad
just
ed to
be
low
er fo
r mor
e de
nse
hous
ing
proj
ects
, com
pare
d to
less
. An
upda
te to
the
Coas
tal T
rans
port
atio
n Co
rrid
or S
peci
fic P
lan
is cu
rren
tly u
nder
way
. No
new
tran
spor
tatio
n-or
ient
ed S
peci
fic P
lans
wer
e ad
opte
d du
ring
the
plan
ning
per
iod.
The
prog
ram
has
not
bee
n w
holly
suc
cess
ful i
n m
eetin
g th
e ob
ject
ive
of re
tain
ing
resid
entia
l ex
empt
ions
for T
raffi
c Im
pact
Fee
s. T
here
has
al
so b
een
a la
ck o
f act
ivity
rega
rdin
g ne
w
tran
spor
tatio
n-or
ient
ed S
peci
fic P
lans
.
Reta
in a
s th
e pr
ogra
m a
nd it
s ob
ject
ives
re
mai
n im
port
ant t
o ad
dres
sing
the
jobs
-hou
sing
imba
lanc
e. M
odify
de
scrip
tion
to in
clud
e a
prov
ision
re
gard
ing
exem
ptin
g af
ford
able
hou
sing
and/
or T
OD
proj
ects
from
fees
.
2.2.
5A. E
duca
tion
abou
t G
row
th, H
ousin
g N
eed,
M
ixed
-Use
and
Mix
ed-
Inco
me
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
ds
“100
pre
sent
atio
ns
Deve
lop
trai
ning
cu
rric
ulum
Qua
rter
ly tr
aini
ng
wor
ksho
ps th
roug
hout
th
e Ci
ty o
f Los
Ang
eles
100
part
icip
atin
g ne
ighb
orho
od
coun
cil m
embe
rs a
nd
com
mun
ity o
rgan
izat
ion
mem
bers
ann
ually
”
“To
date
HRC
has
con
duct
ed 1
5 pr
esen
tatio
ns a
nd/
or w
orks
hops
to 1
5 di
ffere
nt n
eigh
borh
ood
coun
cils
. A
ppro
xim
atel
y 10
7 st
akeh
olde
rs. 6
NCs
in th
e Va
lley
regi
on,
3-N
E/Ea
st re
gion
, 4-S
outh
regi
on, 2
-Cen
tral
regi
on.
HAC
LA c
ontin
ued
to w
ork
with
Jord
an D
owns
Com
mun
ity A
dvis
ory
Com
mitt
ee a
nd th
e W
ATTS
nei
ghbo
rhoo
d co
unci
l to
prov
ide
trai
ning
an
d in
form
atio
n re
gard
ing
the
rede
velo
pmen
t of J
orda
n Do
wns
w
hich
is p
ropo
sed
to b
e a
mix
ed u
se a
nd m
ix in
com
e ne
ighb
orho
od.
CRA
/LA
cond
ucte
d ov
er 1
0 w
orks
hops
in th
e Ho
llyw
ood
and
East
Hol
lyw
ood
proj
ect a
reas
.
DCP
activ
ity o
n ho
ld p
endi
ng b
udge
t and
sta
ff re
sour
ces.”
Prog
ram
has
not
bee
n su
bsta
ntia
lly e
ffect
ive
in
educ
atin
g co
mm
uniti
es a
bout
gro
wth
, hou
sing
need
and
mix
ed-u
se/in
com
e co
mm
uniti
es. T
he
City
face
s re
sista
nce
on g
row
th is
sues
, eve
n w
hen
it is
bein
g di
rect
ed to
tran
sit-a
djac
ent a
reas
an
d ce
nter
s. A
dditi
onal
edu
catio
n on
hou
sing
and
grow
th is
sues
, in
part
icul
ar, i
s ne
eded
.
Reta
in, w
ith e
xpan
sion
and
re-fo
cus
of o
bjec
tives
.
2.2.
6A. T
arge
ting
Gro
wth
in
Com
mun
ity P
lan
Are
as
“Ide
ntify
targ
eted
gro
wth
ar
eas
and
inco
rpor
ate
appr
opria
te la
nd u
se
desig
natio
ns in
16
Com
mun
ity P
lans
Iden
tify
targ
ets
in a
ll Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns”
Each
of t
he n
ew C
omm
unity
Pla
ns a
lread
y ad
opte
d (1
) or
nea
r ado
ptio
n (5
) inc
lude
s ta
rget
ed g
row
th a
reas
and
in
corp
orat
e ap
prop
riate
land
use
des
igna
tions
.
Com
mun
ity P
lans
hav
e ef
fect
ivel
y di
rect
ed
grow
th to
mee
t the
obj
ectiv
e; h
owev
er n
o ex
plic
it ho
usin
g ta
rget
s w
ere
incl
uded
in n
ew
Com
mun
ity P
lans
. Thi
s pr
ogra
m o
bjec
tive
over
laps
with
cur
rent
pro
gram
Com
mun
ity
Plan
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g Ta
rget
s).
Reta
in, w
ith a
dded
lang
uage
on
need
to tr
y to
pro
tect
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g an
d m
ixed
-us
e/hi
gh-d
ensi
ty h
ousin
g ne
ar tr
ansi
t fro
m
addi
tiona
l fee
s, s
ince
thes
e ca
tego
ries
are
cons
ider
ed e
xem
pt fr
om C
onge
stio
n M
anag
emen
t Pro
gram
cal
cula
tions
.
2.2.
6B. H
ousin
g El
emen
t Re
latio
nshi
p to
Lan
d U
se E
ntitl
emen
t and
Lo
ng-R
ange
Pla
nnin
g
Repo
rt to
City
Pla
nnin
g Co
mm
issio
nTh
ere
has
been
no
activ
ity in
mak
ing
thes
e ty
pes
of re
port
s to
the
City
Pla
nnin
g Co
mm
issio
n.N
ot e
ffect
ive.
Allo
w C
ity P
lann
ing
Com
mis
sion
to
deci
de w
heth
er th
ey w
ant t
o re
ceiv
e th
ese
repo
rts
in th
e fu
ture
.
2.3.
1A. P
riorit
y Pl
an C
heck
an
d Ex
pedi
ted
Perm
ittin
g fo
r Gre
en B
uild
ing
Proj
ects
Redu
ce p
lan
chec
k an
d pe
rmit
proc
ess
time
for a
ny L
EED
-Silv
er
resid
entia
l pro
ject
s
LEED
Silv
er P
roje
cts
had
rece
ived
exp
edite
d pe
rmit
proc
essin
g un
til th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e LA
Gre
en
Build
ing
Code
(i.e
. Cal
Gre
en) i
n Ja
nuar
y 20
11.
Effe
ctiv
e un
til th
e G
reen
Bui
ldin
g Co
de
effe
ctiv
ely
ende
d th
e pr
ogra
m.
Rem
ove
as p
riorit
y no
long
er e
xist
s.
2.3.
1B. E
ntitl
emen
t Ca
se M
anag
emen
t and
Ex
pedi
ting
for G
reen
Bu
ildin
g Pr
ojec
ts
Redu
ce e
ntitl
emen
t pr
oces
sing
time
for
100
LEED
-Silv
er
resid
entia
l pro
ject
s
LEED
Silv
er P
roje
cts
had
rece
ived
exp
edite
d en
title
men
t pro
cess
ing
until
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
LA G
reen
Bui
ldin
g Co
de (i
e. C
al
Gre
en) i
n Ja
nuar
y 20
11. A
ppro
xim
atel
y 30
pro
ject
s re
ceiv
ed e
xped
ited
entit
lem
ent p
roce
ssin
g un
til th
en. N
ow T
ier 1
or 2
pro
ject
s (b
eyon
d m
anda
tory
) are
elig
ible
for e
xped
ited
entit
lem
ent c
ase
proc
essin
g.
Effe
ctiv
e w
hile
pro
gram
was
ope
ratin
g. F
ew, i
f an
y pr
ojec
ts h
ave
opte
d to
take
adv
anta
ge o
f th
e hi
gher
Tie
r 1 a
nd 2
sta
ndar
ds, s
ince
then
.
Cont
inue
with
new
LA
Gre
en B
uild
ing
Code
requ
irem
ents
for e
xped
ited
proc
essin
g. E
xplo
re w
ays
to im
prov
e in
cent
ives
to b
uild
gre
ener
.
I-46 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
2.3.
1C. S
usta
inab
le
Prac
tices
: Gre
en T
eam
“Est
ablis
h G
reen
Tea
m
Esta
blish
and
mai
ntai
n St
anda
rd o
f Sus
tain
abili
ty
Esta
blish
and
mai
ntai
n St
anda
rd o
f Exc
elle
nce
Deve
lop
and
impl
emen
t or
dina
nces
as
nece
ssar
y”
Gre
en T
eam
mee
tings
had
bee
n pr
ior t
o th
e ad
optio
n of
the
LA G
reen
Bu
ildin
g Co
de, w
hen
the
need
was
less
ened
. In
2011
, the
Gre
en T
eam
w
as e
ffect
ivel
y di
scon
tinue
d. A
new
Gre
en D
ivisi
on w
as im
plem
ente
d in
LA
DBS
in 2
011
resp
onsib
le fo
r che
ckin
g G
reen
Cod
e co
mpl
ianc
e.
Gre
en T
eam
was
effe
ctiv
e bu
t no
long
er e
xist
s.Re
mov
e.
2.3.
1D. R
educ
e Im
pedi
men
ts to
In
nova
tive
Desig
n
Impr
oved
and
str
eam
lined
pr
oced
ures
A do
wnt
own
Perm
anen
t Sup
port
ive
Hous
ing
proj
ect t
hat s
eeks
to
empl
oy 1
02 p
re-fa
bric
ated
sta
cked
apa
rtm
ent u
nits
was
per
mitt
ed
in 2
011.
Rob
otic
par
king
str
uctu
res
are
bein
g ap
prov
ed.
Diffi
cult
to m
easu
re s
ucce
ss o
f thi
s pr
ogra
m.
Rem
ove
as p
rogr
am la
cks
spec
ific
obje
ctiv
es o
r a d
efine
d w
ork
prog
ram
.
2.3.
2A. F
inan
cial
In
cent
ives
to
Cons
erve
Wat
er
Inst
alla
tion
of h
igh
effic
ienc
y cl
othe
s w
ashe
rs in
5,0
00
hous
ehol
ds p
er y
ear
Prog
ram
con
tinue
s w
ith a
tota
l of 1
0,94
4 re
siden
tial w
ashe
rs
reba
ted
to L
ADW
P cu
stom
ers
from
200
8 to
201
0.
Prog
ram
has
sig
nific
antly
exc
eede
d its
obj
ectiv
es.
Reta
in.
2.3.
2B. M
anag
e W
ater
Res
ourc
es
“Ado
pt c
hang
es in
pr
oced
ures
as
need
ed to
al
low
sto
rmw
ater
reus
e
Faci
litat
e in
tegr
atio
n of
sto
rmw
ater
cap
ture
in
to s
ite p
lan
revi
ew”
The
Low
-Impa
ct D
evel
opm
ent (
LID)
Ord
inan
ce, w
hich
effe
ctiv
ely
repl
aced
the
prev
ious
sto
rmw
ater
col
lect
ion
and
miti
gatio
ns p
rogr
am,
beca
me
effe
ctiv
e an
d ap
plic
able
to m
ost r
elev
ant p
roje
cts
in 2
012.
Effe
ctiv
e at
mee
ting
goal
s th
roug
h a
stor
mw
ater
ord
inan
ce.
Com
bine
with
Sto
rmw
ater
Col
lect
ion
and
Miti
gatio
n an
d G
reen
Str
eets
.
2.3.
3A. I
ncen
tives
to
Cons
erve
Ene
rgy
“50,
000
low
inco
me
hous
ehol
ds o
btai
n m
ore
ener
gy-e
ffici
ent
refri
gera
tors
2,00
0 ho
useh
old
retir
e no
n-en
ergy
effi
cien
t re
frige
rato
rs a
nnua
lly”
“LA
DWP
repo
rts
the
follo
win
g:
$7.2
M in
ince
ntiv
es/
reba
tes
betw
een
2006
an
d 20
12, t
o ro
ughl
y 14
,500
cus
tom
ers;
80,1
90 R
efrig
erat
ors
exch
ange
d sin
ce p
rogr
am
ince
ptio
n in
200
7:
34,5
44 R
efrig
erat
ors
recy
cled
sin
ce
prog
ram
ince
ptio
n, a
s w
ella
s ap
prox
imat
ely
2,00
0 fre
ezer
s.”
Prog
ram
has
sig
nific
antly
ex
ceed
ed it
s ob
ject
ives
.Re
tain
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-47
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
2.3.
3B. L
oans
for E
nerg
y Co
nser
vatio
n in
Affo
rdab
le
Hous
ing
Deve
lopm
ent
2,90
0 af
ford
able
hou
sing
units
with
ene
rgy
effic
ient
sys
tem
s
“App
roxi
mat
ely
thre
e to
six
gra
nts
a ye
ar w
ere
issu
ed b
y LA
DWP
to fu
nd e
nerg
y co
nser
vatio
n in
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g de
velo
pmen
ts s
ince
200
6 (a
ppro
xiam
tely
$1
mill
ion/
year
).
The
prog
ram
was
dis
cont
inue
d in
201
2 w
hen
the
initi
al
$10
mill
ion
LADW
P al
loca
tion
was
spe
nt. “
Prog
ram
met
its
obje
ctiv
es b
efor
e ru
nnin
g ou
t of f
undi
ng.
Rem
ove
2.3.
3C. E
ncou
rage
En
ergy
Con
serv
atio
n th
roug
h Pr
icin
g
10,0
00 re
siden
tial
cust
omer
s on
the
Tim
e of
Use
(TO
U) r
ate
The
aver
age
mon
thly
ene
rgy
cons
umpt
ion
per s
ingl
e fa
mily
re
duce
d fro
m 5
14 k
Wh/
mon
th in
200
8 to
477
kW
h/m
onth
in
2011
. Res
iden
tial c
usto
mer
s w
hose
mon
thly
ene
rgy
use
exce
eds
3,00
0 kW
h ar
e no
w re
quire
d to
use
TO
U pr
icin
g (e
ncou
rage
s en
ergy
con
serv
atio
n &
can
help
low
er a
cus
tom
er’s
bill)
. Nea
rly
10,0
00 re
siden
tial c
usto
mer
s on
the
TOU
rate
as
of e
nd o
f 201
1.
Prog
ram
met
its
obje
ctiv
es.
Reta
in
2.3.
3D. G
reen
Pow
er
for a
Gre
en L
A
25,0
00 h
ouse
hold
s ch
oosin
g al
tern
ativ
e en
ergy
sou
rces
The
LADW
P re
port
ed a
tota
l of 1
7,04
5 G
reen
Po
wer
Cus
tom
ers
at th
e en
d of
201
1.Pr
ogra
m h
as n
ot fu
lly m
et it
s ob
ject
ives
of 2
5,00
0 ho
useh
olds
. Re
tain
with
gre
ater
em
phas
is on
pu
blic
izin
g th
e pr
ogra
m.
2.3.
3E. M
illio
n Tr
ees
LA –
Priv
ate
Prop
erty
700,
000
shad
e tr
ees
plan
ted
city
wid
e
“Sin
ce th
e pr
ogra
m la
unch
in S
epte
mbe
r of 2
006,
M
illio
n Tr
ees
LA (M
TLA)
has
pla
nted
ove
r 330
,000
tree
s in
crea
sing
the
over
all n
ew tr
ee p
lant
ing
rate
by a
s m
uch
as 6
fold
. Prio
r to
the
MTL
A pr
ogra
m, t
he
City
, non
-pro
fits
and
new
dev
elop
men
ts w
as p
lant
ing
appr
oxim
atel
y 10
,000
ann
ually
(bas
ed o
n
City
’s U
rban
For
estr
y Di
visio
n in
form
atio
n).”
Larg
ely
effe
ctiv
e.Co
mbi
ne w
ith o
ther
Mill
ion
Tree
s LA
pro
gram
.
2.3.
3F. B
uild
ing
Desig
n fo
r Ene
rgy
Effic
ienc
y
“Gui
delin
es d
evel
oped
an
d up
date
d
Inte
grat
e gu
idel
ines
into
al
l pro
ject
revi
ews”
“Gui
delin
es re
gard
ing
ener
gy e
ffici
ency
in re
siden
tial
build
ings
wer
e in
tegr
ated
into
pro
ject
revi
ews
thro
ugh
the
intr
oduc
tion
of th
e LA
Gre
en
Build
ing
Code
on
Janu
ary
1, 2
011
(the
adop
tion
of C
ALG
reen
). In
an
effo
rt to
exp
edite
the
stre
ngth
enin
g of
wat
er a
nd
ener
gy e
ffici
ency
requ
irem
ents
, LA
DWP
esta
blish
ed a
Co
des
and
Stan
dard
s Pr
ogra
m to
add
ress
wat
er a
nd
ener
gy c
onse
rvat
ion
and
sust
aina
bilit
y th
roug
h di
rect
in
volv
emen
t with
the
code
set
ting
bodi
es.
Gui
delin
es c
ontin
ued
to b
e m
ade
avai
labl
e on
-lin
e at
ww
w.e
nviro
nmen
tla.o
rg.”
Requ
irem
ents
for g
reat
er e
nerg
y ef
ficie
ncy
in m
ajor
resid
entia
l pro
ject
s ha
ve g
one
into
effe
ct, m
eetin
g th
e ob
ject
ive.
Reta
in b
ut e
xpan
d bu
ildin
g de
sign
prog
ram
bey
ond
ener
gy e
ffici
ency
, to
incl
ude
air a
nd w
ater
qua
lity.
2.3.
3G. B
uild
ing
Desig
n fo
r Im
prov
ed A
ir Q
ualit
y
“Gui
delin
es d
evel
oped
an
d up
date
d
Inte
grat
e gu
idel
ines
into
al
l pro
ject
revi
ews”
“LEE
D gu
idel
ines
rega
rdin
g in
door
air
qual
ity in
resid
entia
l bui
ldin
gs
wer
e in
tegr
ated
into
pro
ject
revi
ews.
LA
DBS
impl
emen
ts th
e im
prov
ed a
ir qu
ality
sta
ndar
ds fo
und
in th
e ne
w G
reen
Bui
ldin
g Co
de.
Gui
delin
es c
ontin
ued
to b
e m
ade
avai
labl
e on
-line
at
ww
w.e
nviro
nmen
tla.o
rg.”
Requ
irem
ents
for g
reat
er a
ir qu
ality
in
maj
or re
siden
tial p
roje
cts
have
gon
e in
to e
ffect
, mee
ting
the
obje
ctiv
e.
Mer
ge w
ith B
uild
ing
Desig
n fo
r Su
stai
nabi
lity
prog
ram
(was
Bui
ldin
g De
sign
for E
nerg
y Ef
ficie
ncy)
.
2.3.
3H. L
oans
for
Cons
erva
tion
700
loan
s to
hou
seho
lds
for i
nsta
lling
sol
ar s
yste
ms
LADW
P di
d no
t pro
vide
loan
s fo
r sol
ar s
yste
ms.
N
ot e
ffect
ive,
how
ever
ther
e do
es n
ot a
ppea
r to
be a
pre
ssin
g ne
ed fo
r City
-pro
vide
d lo
ans
as th
e m
arke
t has
ple
nty
of s
olar
pro
vide
rs d
oing
that
.Re
mov
e
I-48 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
2.3.
3I. I
ncen
tives
to
Enco
urag
e G
reen
Bu
ildin
g So
lutio
ns in
Ex
istin
g Bu
ildin
gs
Deve
lop
gree
n bu
ildin
g in
cent
ives
pro
gram
for
exis
ting
build
ings
Sinc
e 20
06 L
ADW
P ha
s de
velo
ped
new
gre
en b
uild
ing
ince
ntiv
es
for e
xist
ing
resid
entia
l bui
ldin
gs. T
he re
siden
tial i
ncen
tives
incl
ude
cool
roof
, who
le h
ouse
fan
and
who
le h
ouse
retr
ofit b
onus
reba
tes.
LADW
P ha
s be
en e
ffect
ive
at
deve
lopi
ng g
reen
bui
ldin
g in
cent
ives
fo
r exi
stin
g re
siden
tial b
uild
ings
. Re
tain
2.3.
4A. R
ecyc
le
Cons
truc
tion
Was
te
“Est
ablis
h in
cent
ive
prog
ram
for s
ourc
e se
para
tion
of c
onst
uctio
n an
d de
mol
ition
was
te
Esta
blish
reba
te p
rogr
am
for c
onst
ruct
ion
and
dem
oliti
on w
aste
take
n to
a C
ity-c
ertifi
ed
was
te p
roce
ssor
Adop
t ord
inan
ce to
re
quire
con
stru
ctio
n an
d de
mol
ition
was
te to
be
take
n to
a C
ity-c
ertifi
ed
was
te p
roce
ssor
”
The
City
wid
e Co
nstr
uctio
n an
d De
mol
ition
(C&
D) W
aste
Rec
yclin
g O
rdin
ance
bec
ame
effe
ctiv
e Ja
nuar
y 20
11. R
equi
res
that
all
mix
ed C
&D
was
te g
ener
ated
with
in C
ity li
mits
be
take
n to
City
ce
rtifi
ed C
&D
was
te p
roce
ssor
s (B
OS
is re
spon
sible
). A
ll ha
uler
s an
d co
ntra
ctor
s re
spon
sible
for h
andl
ing
C&D
was
te m
ust
obta
in a
Priv
ate
Solid
Was
te H
aule
r Per
mit
from
BO
S pr
ior t
o co
llect
ing,
hau
ling
and
tran
spor
ting
C&D
was
te a
nd C
&D
was
te
can
only
be
take
n to
City
cer
tified
C&
D pr
oces
sing
faci
litie
s.
Prog
ram
met
its
obje
ctiv
es.
Reta
in.
2.3.
4B. S
usta
inab
le
Build
ing
Mat
eria
ls
“Iss
ue a
nd m
aint
ain
guid
elin
es
Inte
grat
e gu
idel
ines
into
pr
ojec
t rev
iew
pro
cess
”
“The
LA
DBS
and
LADW
P im
plem
ents
the
sust
aina
ble
build
ing
mat
eria
ls re
quire
men
ts o
f the
new
Gre
en B
uild
ing
Code
(effe
ctiv
e Ja
nuar
y 1,
201
1). G
uide
lines
rega
rdin
g su
stai
nabl
e bu
ildin
g m
ater
ials
wer
e in
tegr
ated
into
pro
ject
revi
ews.
LA
DBS
crea
ted
a “”
Man
dato
ry R
equi
rem
ents
Che
cklis
t””
for a
dditi
ons
and
alte
ratio
ns
to re
siden
tial b
uild
ings
to a
ssis
t dev
elop
ers
and
owne
rs in
201
1.
In a
dditi
on to
fulfi
lling
the
(new
) man
dato
ry re
quire
men
ts
of th
e Ci
ty’s
LA G
reen
Bui
ldin
g Co
de, D
CP c
ontin
ues
to
enco
urag
e de
velo
pers
to s
eek
the
volu
ntar
y st
anda
rd o
f su
stai
nabl
e ex
celle
nce
and
take
adv
anta
ge o
f the
pro
cedu
ral
ince
ntiv
es (p
riorit
y pr
oces
sing
of d
iscr
etio
nary
cas
es) a
fford
ed
at th
e LE
ED S
ilver
, or h
ighe
r, U
SGBC
cer
tifica
tion
ratin
g.”
Requ
irem
ents
for t
he u
se o
f mor
e su
stai
nabl
e bu
ildin
g m
ater
ials
in m
ajor
resid
entia
l pro
ject
s ha
ve g
one
into
effe
ct, m
eetin
g th
e ob
ject
ive.
Reta
in, h
owev
er in
clud
e su
stai
nabl
e bu
ildin
g pr
actic
es in
this
prog
ram
as
wel
l.
2.3.
4C. R
ecyc
ling
Colle
ctio
n in
Res
iden
tial
Deve
lopm
ent
Prov
ide
on-s
ite re
cycl
ing
bins
and
wee
kly
pick
-up
for a
ll re
siden
tial
deve
lopm
ents
“The
City
of L
os A
ngel
es c
olle
cts
a va
riety
of r
ecyc
labl
es
from
ove
r 750
,000
hou
seho
lds
ever
y w
eek.
AB3
41 re
quire
s m
anda
tory
com
mer
cial
recy
clin
g in
Ca
lifor
nia
begi
nnin
g Ju
ly 1
, 201
2. M
ulti-
fam
ily d
wel
lings
of
5 u
nits
or m
ore
will
be
requ
ired
to re
cycl
e.”
Mee
ting
obje
ctiv
es.
Reta
in.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-49
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
2.3.
5A. I
nfor
mat
ion
and
Refe
rral
and
Tec
hnic
al
Ass
ista
nce
Rega
rdin
g Su
stai
nabl
e Pr
actic
es
“Dev
elop
and
mai
ntai
n an
out
reac
h w
ebsi
te
1,00
0 re
siden
tial
deve
lopm
ent s
take
hold
ers
(arc
hite
cts,
eng
inee
rs,
deve
lope
rs, g
ener
al
cont
ract
ors,
and
oth
ers)
tr
aine
d in
sus
tain
able
pr
actic
es a
nnua
lly
Prod
uce
Gre
en B
uild
ing
Repo
rt C
ard
annu
ally
”
“The
LA
DWP
web
site
(LA
DWP.
com
) now
incl
udes
tip
s pa
ges
for c
onse
rvat
ion,
wat
er e
ffici
ent
land
scap
e sy
stem
s an
d ca
lcul
ator
s fo
r ene
rgy
cons
umpt
ion.
Info
rmat
ion
is pr
ovid
ed fo
r the
Sol
ar In
cent
ive
Prog
ram
, Fee
d-In
Tar
iff, a
nd e
lect
ric v
ehic
les.
The
LA
DWP
web
site
has
bee
n up
date
d to
pro
vide
info
rmat
ion
rega
rdin
g th
e G
reen
Bui
ldin
g In
itiat
ives
. Inf
orm
atio
n is
prov
ided
rega
rdin
g th
e tr
ansi
tion
from
LEE
D to
the
new
sta
te g
reen
cod
e (C
ALG
reen
) an
d th
e LA
Gre
en B
uild
ing
Code
. The
Cal
Gre
en T
ips
page
s ar
e pr
ovid
ed fo
r bot
h co
mm
erci
al a
nd re
siden
tial c
onst
ruct
ions
type
s w
ith d
etai
led
info
rmat
ion
rega
rdin
g, p
lum
bing
, mec
hani
cal a
nd
elec
tric
al c
ode
requ
irem
ents
for c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith th
e bu
ildin
g co
des,
gre
en c
odes
and
the
Wat
er E
ffici
ency
Ord
inan
ce. D
etai
led
info
rmat
ion
is pr
ovid
ed fo
r res
iden
tial g
rayw
ater
col
lect
ion
and
reus
e sy
stem
s no
w re
cogn
ized
by
the
code
. Web
site
link
s ar
e pr
ovid
ed fo
r the
gre
en b
uild
ing
requ
irem
ents
, gra
ywat
er, a
s w
ell
as li
nks
pert
aini
ng to
oth
er T
echn
ical
Ass
ista
nce
Prog
ram
s.”
Som
ewha
t effe
ctiv
e. O
utre
ach
web
site
s w
ere
mai
ntai
ned,
alth
ough
it is
diffi
cult
to k
now
w
heth
er th
e go
al o
f tra
inin
g of
1,0
00 re
siden
tial
deve
lopm
ent s
take
hold
ers
in s
usta
inab
le
prac
tices
ann
ually
occ
urre
d th
roug
h si
te. A
Gre
en
Build
ing
Repo
rt C
ard
was
nev
er p
rodu
ced.
Mer
ge w
ith S
usta
inab
le B
uild
ing
Prac
tices
. Refl
ect a
dopt
ion
of
LA G
reen
Bui
ldin
g Co
de.
2.3.
5B. S
usta
inab
le
Prac
tices
Dem
onst
ratio
n Pr
ojec
ts
One
mul
ti-fa
mily
de
mon
stra
tion
proj
ect a
nd fi
ve s
ingl
e fa
mily
dem
onst
ratio
n pr
ojec
ts a
nnua
ly
Prog
ram
rem
aine
d on
hol
d th
roug
hout
the
plan
ning
per
iod.
Not
effe
ctiv
e. D
isso
lutio
n of
CRA
/LA
has
end
ed th
is pr
ogra
m.
Rem
ove.
2.4.
1A. N
eigh
borh
ood
Stab
iliza
tion
Prog
ram
“6 re
siden
tial
neig
hbor
hood
s se
rved
by
prog
ram
Adop
tion
of n
ew
Com
mun
ity P
lans
”
“Pro
gres
s of
CRA
/LA
com
pone
nt u
nabl
e to
be
obta
ined
to
dis
solu
tion
of R
edev
elop
men
t Age
ncie
s.
6 Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns in
dev
elop
men
t, w
hich
incl
ude
land
use
an
d ur
ban
desig
n ch
apte
rs to
hel
p pr
otec
t nei
ghbo
rhoo
d ch
arac
ter.
Plan
s al
so in
clud
e po
licie
s to
enc
oura
ge a
nd
ince
ntiv
ize
incr
ease
d su
ppor
t and
bet
ter s
ervi
ces
(suc
h as
he
alth
y fo
od s
tore
s an
d pa
rks)
in u
nder
serv
ed a
reas
. “
The
prog
ram
has
effe
ctiv
ely
ende
d w
ith
the
diss
olut
ion
of th
e CR
A/L
ARe
mov
e
2.4.
1B. S
ervi
ces
in
Publ
ic H
ousin
g
“50
resid
entia
l clie
nts
serv
ed b
y ed
ucat
iona
l as
sista
nce
prog
ram
s
100
resid
entia
l clie
nts
serv
ed b
y co
mpu
ter
trai
ning
pro
gram
s
100
yout
h se
rved
by
recr
eatio
nal,
educ
atio
nal
and
cultu
ral p
rogr
ams
1,60
0 re
siden
tial
clie
nts
serv
ed b
y ca
reer
as
sista
nce
prog
ram
s”
“Thr
ough
the
wor
k of
the
Resid
ent S
ervi
ces
Sect
ion,
the
HAC
LA
cont
inue
s to
pro
vide
resid
ents
with
a v
arie
ty o
f pro
gram
s an
d su
ppor
t ser
vice
s to
pro
mot
e se
lf-su
ffici
ency
. Pro
gram
s an
d se
rvic
es o
ffere
d to
resid
ents
incl
ude:
job
read
ines
s; jo
b tr
aini
ng, G
ED c
ompl
etio
n, c
ompu
ter l
itera
cy, f
amily
cou
nsel
ing,
af
ter-s
choo
l pro
gram
s, a
nd h
ealth
ser
vice
s. 3
0,00
0 re
peat
cu
stom
ers
rece
ived
em
ploy
men
t, co
mpu
ter o
r edu
catio
nal
serv
ices
. HAC
LA s
ucce
ssfu
lly e
nrol
led
and
plac
ed 4
99
clie
nts
for t
he S
outh
Bay
Wor
kfor
ce in
vest
men
t Boa
rd (S
BWIB
) Tr
ansi
tiona
l Sub
sidiz
ed E
mpl
oym
ent P
rogr
am (T
SE).
The
Hous
ing
Auth
ority
rees
tabl
ished
the
Kids
Pro
gres
s In
c. (K
PI) t
o ra
ise
fund
s to
dev
elop
and
impl
emen
t pro
gram
s an
d se
rvic
es to
hel
p pu
blic
hou
sing
resid
ents
. The
Hou
sing
Auth
ority
is im
plem
entin
g a
com
preh
ensi
ve H
uman
Cap
ital D
evel
opm
ent i
nitia
tive
at
Jord
an D
owns
, als
o kn
own
as “
Fam
ily F
irst I
nitia
tive”
. “
Effe
ctiv
e. T
he H
ousin
g Au
thor
ity w
ill c
ontin
ue
to e
xpan
d su
ch s
ervi
ces
pend
ing
the
avai
labi
lity
of fi
nanc
ial r
esou
rces
and
phy
sical
spa
ce.
Reta
in
I-50 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
2.4.
2A. I
mpr
oved
Str
eet
Stan
dard
s, S
tree
tsca
pes
and
Land
scap
ing
Adop
t new
str
eet
stan
dard
s
City
con
tinue
s to
ado
pt n
ew s
tree
t sta
ndar
ds th
at p
rovi
de a
n en
hanc
ed b
alan
ce b
etw
een
traf
fic fl
ow a
nd o
ther
impo
rtan
t st
reet
func
tions
incl
udin
g tr
ansi
t rou
tes,
ped
estr
ian
envi
ronm
ents
, bi
cycl
e ro
utes
, bui
ldin
g de
sign,
etc
. New
sta
ndar
ds h
ave
been
ado
pted
in D
ownt
own
and
Holly
woo
d, a
nd a
re p
endi
ng
in s
ever
al C
omm
unity
Pla
ns c
urre
ntly
bei
ng u
pdat
ed.
The
prog
ram
has
bee
n su
cces
sful
in
mee
ting
its o
bjec
tive.
Rem
ove
as p
rogr
am d
oes
not d
irect
ly
rela
te to
spe
cific
hou
sing
obje
ctiv
es.
2.4.
2B. I
mpr
oved
Q
ualit
y of
Bic
ycle
and
Pe
dest
rian
Path
s
“Ado
pt p
olic
ies
in B
icyc
le
Plan
, Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Elem
ent a
nd C
omm
unity
Pl
ans
that
pro
mot
e pe
dest
rian
and
bicy
cle
tran
sit l
inka
ges
10 b
icyc
le ro
ute
segm
ents
co
nstr
ucte
d/im
prov
ed
100
pede
stria
n pa
ths
impr
oved
”
“The
City
’s 20
10 B
icyc
le P
lan
was
ado
pted
by
City
Cou
ncil
in
Mar
ch 2
011,
with
mor
e th
an 1
20 m
iles
of b
ike
faci
litie
s in
stal
led
since
ado
ptio
n. In
add
ition
to th
e Pl
an, a
Fiv
e-Ye
ar Im
plem
enta
tion
Stra
tegy
and
Tec
hnic
al H
andb
ook
was
ado
pted
at t
hat t
ime
as w
ell.
Furt
herm
ore,
qua
rter
ly re
port
s on
the
Plan
hav
e be
en p
ublis
hed
since
ado
ptio
n. P
hase
I of
the
impl
emen
tatio
n pl
an h
as b
egun
th
e pr
oces
s fo
r app
rova
l in
2012
-201
3. K
ey re
com
men
datio
ns
of th
e pl
an h
ave
also
bee
n im
plem
ente
d in
clud
ing
crea
tion
of a
Bik
e Pl
an T
rust
Fun
d an
d in
stal
latio
n of
bik
e co
rral
s.
The
City
’s W
alka
bilit
y Ch
eckl
ist,
adop
ted
in 2
008,
co
ntin
ued
to b
e us
ed fo
r enc
oura
ging
ped
estr
ian-
orie
ntat
ion
in n
ew d
iscr
etio
nary
pro
ject
s.
The
City
’s M
obili
ty E
lem
ent h
as b
een
proc
eedi
ng s
ince
20
10. I
t is
proj
ecte
d to
be
appr
oved
in 2
014.
”
Sign
ifica
nt p
rogr
ess
has
been
mad
e in
impr
ove
the
City
’s bi
cycl
e an
d pe
dest
rian
path
s.
Prog
ram
has
met
its
prim
ary
obje
ctiv
es.
Rem
ove,
as
obje
ctiv
es a
re n
ot
dire
ctly
rela
ted
to h
ousin
g.
2.4.
2C. U
rban
De
sign
Stan
dard
s
Adop
t urb
an d
esig
n st
anda
rds
in 1
6 Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns
“City
wid
e De
sign
Gui
delin
es fo
r all
proj
ects
wer
e co
mpl
eted
in
2011
, inc
ludi
ng s
peci
fic g
uide
lines
for m
ulti-
fam
ily d
evel
opm
ent,
com
mer
cial
dev
elop
men
t and
indu
stria
l dev
elop
men
t. A
n O
rdin
ance
to
impl
emen
t req
uire
d Fi
ndin
gs u
tiliz
ing
the
Gui
delin
es a
s pa
rt
of d
iscr
etio
nary
act
ions
is b
efor
e th
e Ci
ty C
ounc
il in
201
3.
In a
dditi
on, 6
Com
mun
ity P
lans
are
in d
evel
opm
ent,
whi
ch e
ach
incl
ude
a La
nd U
se a
nd U
rban
Des
ign
chap
ter,
whi
ch w
ill h
elp
addr
ess
spec
ific
desig
n co
ncer
ns fo
r res
iden
tial d
evel
opm
ent.”
Prog
ram
has
exc
eede
d ob
ject
ives
by
putt
ing
City
wid
e De
sign
Gui
delin
es in
to p
lace
.Re
mov
e, a
s pr
ogra
m h
as m
et it
s ob
ject
ives
.
2.4.
2D. B
icyc
le F
acili
ties
“Est
ablis
h gu
idel
ines
and
de
velo
pmen
t sta
ndar
ds
40 b
icyc
le fa
cilit
ies
deve
lope
d in
resid
entia
l pr
ojec
ts a
nnua
lly”
“On
Sept
embe
r 30,
201
1, th
e Ci
ty C
ounc
il ap
prov
ed
DCP’
s pr
opos
ed o
rdin
ance
to e
xpan
d bi
cycl
e pa
rkin
g re
quire
men
ts th
roug
hout
the
City
. The
actio
ns w
ill e
xpan
d bi
cycl
e pa
rkin
g re
quire
men
ts
to c
over
mul
ti-fa
mily
resid
entia
l dev
elop
men
ts w
ith
mor
e th
an th
ree
units
or m
ore
than
five
gue
st
room
s; in
clud
e co
mm
erci
al, i
ndus
tria
l, an
d m
anuf
actu
ring
uses
of
less
than
10,
000
squa
re fe
et; i
ncre
ase
the
leve
ls of
bic
ycle
par
king
re
quire
d un
der t
he c
urre
nt c
ode
for c
omm
erci
al, i
nstit
utio
nal,
and
indu
stria
l pro
ject
s; d
efine
acc
epta
ble
loca
tions
for b
icyc
le
park
ing;
requ
ire th
at b
oth
shor
t-ter
m a
nd lo
ng-t
erm
bic
ycle
pa
rkin
g be
pro
vide
d; im
prov
e de
sign
stan
dard
s; a
men
d th
e am
ount
of b
icyc
le p
arki
ng th
at m
ay b
e su
bstit
uted
for a
utom
obile
pa
rkin
g, a
nd p
rovi
de ru
les
for t
he in
stal
latio
n of
bic
ycle
par
king
w
ithin
the
publ
ic ri
ght-
of-w
ay b
y pr
ivat
e bu
sines
ses.”
Prog
ram
has
met
its
obje
ctiv
es o
f est
ablis
hing
gu
idel
ines
and
dev
elop
men
t sta
ndar
ds fo
r bic
ycle
fa
cilit
ies
deve
lope
d in
resid
entia
l pro
ject
s.Re
mov
e, a
s pr
ogra
m h
as m
et it
s ob
ject
ives
.
2.4.
3A. R
espo
nse
to D
evel
opm
ent
Opp
ortu
nitie
s
20 d
evel
oper
s an
d pr
oper
ty o
wne
rs
prov
ided
with
tech
nica
l as
sista
nce
annu
ally
CRA
/LA
outr
each
is u
nkno
wn
due
to th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
Rede
velo
pmen
t Age
ncie
s.
Ove
rall
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
the
prog
ram
is
not a
ble
to b
e de
term
ined
due
to
the
diss
olut
ion
of th
e CR
A/L
A.
Rem
ove.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-51
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
2.4.
3B. P
lann
ing
for
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
ds
“16
upda
ted
Com
mun
ity P
lans
Impl
emen
tatio
n to
ols
as a
ppro
pria
te”
6 Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns in
dev
elop
men
t, w
ith o
ne P
lan
(Hol
lyw
ood)
ad
opte
d in
201
2. N
ew C
omm
unity
Pla
ns fo
r Wes
t Ada
ms-
Bald
win
Hi
lls-L
eim
ert P
ark,
Sou
th L
A, S
outh
east
LA
, San
Ped
ro, G
rana
da
Hills
and
Syl
mar
are
in a
n ad
vanc
ed p
hase
of d
evel
opm
ent a
nd
plan
to b
e in
trod
uced
in 2
013.
The
Pla
ns w
ill in
clud
e he
ight
ened
im
plem
enta
tion
mea
sure
s fo
r urb
an d
esig
n an
d la
nd u
se th
roug
h th
e us
e of
a n
ew to
ol d
evel
oped
dur
ing
the
plan
ning
per
iod,
cal
led
a Co
mm
unity
Pla
n Im
plem
enta
tion
Ove
rlay
dist
rict (
CPIO
).
Effe
ctiv
e at
intr
oduc
ing
impl
emen
tatio
n to
ols
into
com
mun
ity p
lann
ing
proc
ess.
Reta
in, b
ut re
nam
e to
refle
ct fo
cus
of th
is pr
ogra
m o
n pr
omot
ing
neig
hbor
hood
cha
ract
er.
2.4.
3C. C
omm
unity
and
N
eigh
borh
ood
Coun
cil
Deve
lopm
ent R
evie
w
“Dup
licat
e ca
se fi
les
prov
ided
to C
NCs
for
prop
osed
pro
ject
s
Not
ifica
tions
to C
NCs
for
filed
app
licat
ions
bi-w
eekl
y
Case
filin
g ac
tivity
pos
ted
on D
CP w
ebsi
te b
i-wee
kly
Case
act
ivity
map
s po
sted
on
DCP
web
site
qua
rter
ly”
DCP
cont
inue
d bi
-wee
kly
web
pos
ting
and
emai
ling
of c
ases
fil
ed b
y N
eigh
borh
ood
Coun
cil a
nd C
omm
unity
Pla
n ar
eas.
DCP
co
ntin
ued
to p
rovi
de d
uplic
ate
copi
es o
f cas
es fi
led
to C
NCs
. In
2011
DCP
intr
oduc
ed a
new
“N
eigh
borh
ood
Liaa
son”
pos
ition
, w
hich
is m
eant
to b
e th
e po
int o
f con
tact
for c
omm
unity
and
ne
ighb
orho
od g
roup
s se
ekin
g m
ore
info
rmat
ion
abou
t pla
nnin
g pr
oces
ses
or p
endi
ng p
lans
and
pro
ject
s. 2
011
also
saw
the
begi
nnin
g of
DCP
’s ne
w P
ublic
Par
ticip
atio
n Po
licy,
whi
ch
incr
ease
d to
60
days
the
time
the
publ
ic h
as to
revi
ew p
relim
inar
y re
port
s be
fore
the
City
Pla
nnin
g Co
mm
issio
n (C
PC) m
eets
.
Effe
ctiv
e at
pro
vidi
ng o
ppor
tuni
ties
for c
omm
unity
and
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d Co
unci
ls to
pro
vide
thei
r inp
ut. N
o ca
se a
ctiv
ity m
aps
wer
e cr
eate
d.
Reta
in
2.4.
3D. S
urve
yLA
– Th
e Lo
s A
ngel
es H
isto
ric
Reso
urce
s Su
rvey
“Com
plet
e ci
tyw
ide
surv
ey
Publ
ish re
sults
”
“Sur
veyL
A fie
ld s
urve
ys a
re b
eing
con
duct
ed o
ver a
mul
ti-ye
ar p
erio
d by
Com
mun
ity P
lan
Are
a (C
PA).
As
each
are
a is
com
plet
ed, t
he re
sults
are
com
pile
d in
repo
rt fo
rmat
and
po
sted
on
this
web
pag
e by
CPA
nam
e. A
s of
May
1, 2
013
the
follo
win
g Su
rvey
s ha
ve b
een
rele
ased
: Can
oga
Park
- W
inne
tka
- Woo
dlan
d Hi
lls -
Wes
t Hill
s, C
entr
al C
ity N
orth
, Enc
ino-
Tarz
ana,
Har
bor G
atew
ay, H
olly
woo
d, N
orth
Hol
lyw
ood-
Valle
y Vi
llage
, Nor
thea
st L
os A
ngel
es R
iver
Rev
italiz
atio
n A
rea,
Palm
s - M
ar V
ista
- De
l Rey
, San
Ped
ro, S
herm
an O
aks
- Stu
dio
City
- To
luca
Lak
e - C
ahue
nga
Pass
, Sou
th L
os A
ngel
es,
Sout
heas
t Los
Ang
eles
, Wes
t Ada
ms
- Bal
dwin
Hill
s - L
eim
ert,
Wes
t Los
Ang
eles
and
Wilm
ingt
on -
Harb
or C
ity.
The
resu
lts a
re p
ublis
hed
on p
roje
ct s
ite: h
ttp:
//pr
eser
vatio
n.la
city
.org
/sur
vey.”
Very
effe
ctiv
e, a
lthou
gh w
ork
cont
inue
s.
Reta
in a
nd u
pdat
e to
refle
ct
post
201
3 w
ork
prog
ram
.
2.4.
3E. A
nti
Man
sioni
zatio
n Re
gula
tions
“Ado
pt a
n or
dina
nce
to
regu
late
new
sin
gle-
fam
ily h
ome
cons
truc
tion
in fl
atla
nd a
reas
Adop
t an
ordi
nanc
e to
re
gula
te n
ew s
ingl
e-fa
mily
hom
e co
nstr
uctio
n in
hlls
ide
area
s”
City
Cou
ncil
adop
ted
the
perm
anen
t Bas
elin
e M
ansio
niza
tion
Ord
inan
ce in
Feb
ruar
y 20
11. T
he O
rdin
ance
is in
tend
ed
to c
urb
the
cons
truc
tion
of h
omes
that
are
exc
essi
vely
la
rge
and
thus
out
-of-s
cale
with
nea
rby
hom
es in
the
City
’s va
rious
sin
gle-
fam
ily re
siden
tial z
ones
.
Effe
ctiv
e, m
et o
bjec
tives
. Re
mov
e, m
et o
bjec
tives
.
2.4.
3F. N
eigh
borh
ood
Pres
erva
tion
– Do
wnz
onin
g
Rezo
ne a
ppro
pria
te a
reas
in
16
Com
mun
ity P
lans
1 Co
mm
unity
Pla
n w
as c
ompl
eted
(Hol
lyw
ood)
and
5 a
re n
ear
adop
tion
as o
f Mar
ch 2
013.
Hol
lyw
ood
prop
osed
som
e ta
rget
ed
dow
nzon
ing
to p
rese
rve
neig
hbor
hood
cha
ract
er. T
he p
ropo
sed
dow
nzon
ing
was
bal
ance
d w
ith u
pzon
ing
in a
reas
with
goo
d tr
ansi
t ac
cess
. The
sam
e ge
nera
l app
roac
h is
bein
g ta
ken
in o
ther
are
as.
Effe
ctiv
e, a
lthou
gh b
eing
beh
ind
sche
dule
. Pro
gram
obj
ectiv
es o
verla
p w
ith s
ever
al o
ther
rela
ted
prog
ram
s.
Reta
in.
I-52 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
2.4.
4A. H
omeo
wne
rshi
p Pr
oper
ties
Acqu
isitio
n De
mon
stra
tion
Proj
ect
150
affo
rdab
le u
nits
so
ld to
mod
erat
e in
com
e fa
mili
es
Prog
ress
on
this
prog
ram
is u
ncle
ar d
ue to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.Ef
fect
iven
ess
is un
know
n, a
nd th
e pr
ogra
m h
as
ende
d w
ith th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
Rem
ove.
2.4.
4B. H
ome
Ow
ners
hip
on L
arge
Lot
s in
Pac
oim
a1
pilo
t pro
ject
in P
acoi
ma
Prog
ress
on
this
prog
ram
is u
ncle
ar d
ue to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
.Ef
fect
iven
ess
is un
know
n, a
nd th
e pr
ogra
m h
as
ende
d w
ith th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
CRA
/LA
Rem
ove.
3.1.
1A. R
easo
nabl
e Ac
com
mod
atio
n
“Tra
in D
CP s
taff
on
proc
essin
g Re
ason
able
Ac
com
mod
atio
n re
ques
ts
Prod
uce
and
diss
emin
ate
mat
eria
ls re
gard
ing
Reas
onab
le
Acco
mm
odat
ion
proc
ess”
DCP
has
proc
esse
d 35
Rea
sona
ble
Acco
mm
odat
ion
requ
ests
in
volv
ing
plan
ning
or z
onin
g is
sues
sin
ce 2
006.
The
re h
as n
ot b
een
muc
h pr
ogre
ss in
pro
duci
ng a
nd d
isse
min
atin
g m
ater
ials
rega
rdin
g th
e pr
oces
s. S
taff
trai
ning
has
take
n pl
ace
in a
n ad
-hoc
bas
is.
Larg
ely
effe
ctiv
e, a
lthou
gh m
ore
can
be d
one
to p
rom
ote
the
Reas
onab
le A
ccom
mod
atio
n op
tion
and
trai
n st
aff t
o id
entif
y ar
eas
whe
re it
may
app
ly a
nd h
ow to
han
dle
requ
ests
. Obj
ectiv
es re
mai
n re
leva
nt.
Reta
in.
3.1.
1B. A
DA C
ompl
ianc
e O
ffice
r(s)
Reas
onab
le
acco
mm
odat
ion
prov
ided
in
all
appr
opria
te a
nd
cove
red
faci
litie
s an
d pr
ogra
ms
incl
udin
g re
siden
tial s
helte
rs
DO
D w
orke
d w
ith C
ity D
epar
tmen
ts to
ens
ure
reas
onab
le
acco
mm
odat
ion
was
pro
vide
d in
faci
litie
s an
d pr
ogra
ms.
Effe
ctiv
e, h
owev
er p
rogr
am la
cks
spec
ific
obje
ctiv
es a
nd o
verla
ps w
ith o
ther
Re
ason
able
Acc
omm
odat
ion
prog
ram
.
Mer
ge w
ith R
easo
nabl
e Ac
com
mod
atio
n ab
ove.
3.1.
1C. O
ffice
of t
he
City
Att
orne
y Di
sput
e Re
solu
tion
Prog
ram
(DRP
)
Refe
r and
reso
lve
50
hous
ing
disp
utes
rela
tead
to
per
sons
with
dis
abili
ties
DO
D Co
mpu
teriz
ed In
form
atio
n an
d Re
ferr
al C
ente
r pro
vide
d fo
ur d
irect
refe
rral
s to
the
DRP
for l
andl
ord/
tena
nt d
isput
es
in e
ach
of th
e tw
o ye
ars
whe
re d
ata
is av
aila
ble.
The
maj
ority
of
CIC
hou
sing
disp
utes
wer
e re
ferr
ed to
the
Evic
tion
Cent
er
and
Hous
ing
Righ
ts C
ente
r due
to th
e im
med
iate
cris
is w
ith ti
me
rest
rain
ts a
nd h
igh
risk
of h
omel
essn
ess.
Larg
ely
effe
ctiv
e in
pro
vidi
ng a
foru
m to
se
ttle
hou
sing-
rela
ted
disp
utes
bet
wee
n la
ndlo
rds
and
tena
nts,
or b
etw
een
prop
erty
ow
ners
and
the
City
. How
ever
the
num
ber o
f re
ferr
als
rela
ted
to p
erso
ns w
ith d
isab
ilitie
s ha
s be
en lo
wer
than
exp
ecte
d.
Reta
in
3.1.
1D. C
ityw
ide
Fair
Hous
ing
Prog
ram
“Rec
eive
600
fair
hous
ing
inqu
iries
ann
ually
Reso
lve
480
fair
hous
ing
inve
stig
atio
ns a
nnua
lly
Cond
uct 6
7 fa
ir ho
usin
g tr
aini
ng s
essio
ns a
nnua
lly
Trai
n 35
new
fair
hous
ing
test
ers
annu
ally
Ans
wer
1,4
00 c
alls
rega
rdin
g fa
ir ho
usin
g is
sues
ann
ually
thro
ugh
the
Fair
Hous
ing/
Pred
ator
y Le
ndin
g Ho
tline
”
“ The
HCID
LA m
aint
aine
d a
cont
ract
with
the
Hous
ing
Righ
ts C
ente
r (H
RC) t
o pe
rfor
m F
air H
ousin
g ev
alua
tions
. In
the
year
s 20
10-2
011,
HR
C ha
s re
ceiv
ed 1
,999
fair
hous
ing
inqu
iries
; res
olve
d 10
14 fa
ir ho
usin
g in
vest
igat
ions
; con
duct
ed 2
30 fa
ir ho
usin
g tr
aini
ng s
essio
ns;
trai
ned
138
new
fair
hous
ing
test
ers;
and
rece
ived
16,
169
Fair
Hous
ing/
Pred
ator
y Le
ndin
g Ho
tline
cal
ls th
at in
clud
ed te
nant
/land
lord
is
sues
, fai
r hou
sing
conc
erns
, and
hou
sing/
pred
ator
y le
ndin
g ca
lls.”
The
City
wid
e Fa
ir Ho
usin
g Pr
ogra
m h
as p
rovi
ded
esse
ntia
l ser
vice
s to
Los
Ang
eles
Hou
seho
lds
faci
ng h
ousin
g di
scrim
inat
ion
and
to e
duca
te
hous
ing
prov
ider
s ab
out F
eder
al a
nd S
tate
fa
ir ho
usin
g la
w. T
he C
ityw
ide
Fair
Hous
ing
Prog
ram
CDB
G b
udge
t was
cut
by
$110
,000
(1
4% o
f the
City
’s fu
ndin
g) in
201
2-13
.
Reta
in
3.1.
2A. C
omm
unity
Re
inve
stm
ent
Impl
emen
t a
dem
onst
ratio
n pr
ogra
m
in a
t lea
st o
ne lo
w
or m
oder
ate
inco
me
neig
hbor
hood
Stat
us o
f CRA
/LA
proj
ects
was
una
ble
to b
e ob
tain
ed d
ue to
th
e St
ate’
s di
ssol
utio
n of
the
Rede
velo
pmen
t Age
ncie
s.
Effe
ctiv
enes
s is
unkn
own,
and
the
prog
ram
has
en
ded
with
the
diss
olut
ion
of th
e CR
A/L
ARe
mov
e
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-53
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
3.1.
2B. R
espo
nsib
le
Lend
ing
Trai
ning
with
Fi
nanc
ial I
nstit
utio
ns
Impl
emen
t a
dem
onst
ratio
n ou
trea
ch
and
trai
ning
pro
gram
No
dem
onst
ratio
n ou
trea
ch a
nd tr
aini
ng p
rogr
am w
as d
evel
oped
.N
ot e
ffect
ive.
Re
mov
e.
3.2.
1A. H
ousin
g In
form
atio
n Cl
earin
ghou
se
Esta
blish
a c
onso
lidat
ed
hous
ing
info
rmat
ion
data
base
on
the
City
’s w
ebsi
te
No
coor
dina
ted
hous
ing
info
rmat
ion
data
base
has
bee
n cr
eate
d. H
owev
er C
ity D
epar
tmen
ts h
ave
coor
dina
ted
and
shar
ed in
form
atio
n on
hou
sing
for t
he C
ityw
ide
Hous
ing
Prod
uctio
n Sy
stem
(CHP
S) d
atab
ase.
HAC
LA c
ontin
ues
to
use
Soci
al S
erve
for p
rope
rty
listin
gs in
201
1 as
wel
l.
Onl
y so
mew
hat e
ffect
ive.
Re
tain
pro
gram
on
com
pilin
g a
data
base
of a
ssis
ted
hous
ing
units
.
3.2.
1B. H
ousin
g In
form
atio
n Se
rvic
es
Iden
tify
aven
ues
to d
istr
ibut
e an
d di
ssem
inat
e in
form
atio
n
“HAC
LA c
ontin
ued
to c
ondu
ct v
ouch
er is
suan
ce
sess
ions
, wor
ked
with
pro
gram
par
tner
s to
dis
sem
inat
e in
form
atio
n an
d us
ed S
ocia
l Ser
ve fo
r
prop
erty
list
ings
.
CRA
/LA
com
pone
nt w
as n
ot a
ble
to b
e co
llect
ed. “
Som
ewha
t effe
ctiv
e. P
rogr
am o
verla
ps w
ith
Hous
ing
Info
rmat
ion
Clea
ringh
ouse
and
CR
A/L
A pa
rtic
ipat
ion
no lo
nger
exi
sts.
Mer
ge w
ith H
ousin
g In
form
atio
n Cl
earin
ghou
se.
3.2.
1C. D
on’t
Borr
ow
Trou
ble:
Edu
catio
n ag
ains
t Ho
me
Equi
ty F
raud
and
Pr
edat
ory
Lend
ing
Scam
s
Ans
wer
60
DBT/
pred
ator
y le
ndin
g ca
lls a
nnua
lly
thro
ugh
the
Fair
Hous
ing/
Pred
ator
y Le
ndin
g Ho
tline
Don’
t Bor
row
Tro
uble
doe
s no
t exi
st a
s a
stan
d-al
one
prog
ram
; rat
her a
ll ca
llers
with
pre
dato
ry le
ndin
g in
quiri
es
are
assis
ted
and
refe
rred
to a
ppro
pria
te re
sour
ces.
This
serv
ice
is va
luab
le a
nd
assis
ts c
alle
rs e
ach
year
.
Reta
in th
e fu
nctio
n bu
t inc
lude
it in
th
e Ci
tyw
ide
Fair
Hous
ing
prog
ram
de
scrip
tion,
not
a s
tand
alo
ne p
rogr
am.
3.2.
1D. E
duca
tion
for
Buye
rs a
nd H
omeo
wne
rs3,
000
indi
vidu
als
assis
ted
annu
ally
Ove
r 3,0
00 in
divi
dual
s at
tend
ed h
omeb
uyer
s ed
ucat
ion
clas
ses
annu
ally.
This
prog
ram
has
met
its
obje
ctiv
e.
Rem
ove
- The
hom
ebuy
er e
duca
tion
is pr
ovid
ed b
y co
mm
unity
bas
ed o
rgan
izat
ions
in
the
City
. The
HCI
DLA
requ
ires
it fo
r th
e ho
meb
uyer
ass
ista
nce
prog
ram
s, b
ut
does
not
pro
vide
or f
und
the
trai
ning
.
3.2.
1E. E
duca
tion
for
Prop
erty
Ow
ners
Prov
ide
educ
atio
n ab
out
hous
ing
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
and
regu
latio
ns
and
prom
ote
know
ledg
e of
hou
sing
right
s
Stat
us o
f CRA
/LA
proj
ects
was
una
ble
to b
e ob
tain
ed d
ue to
th
e St
ate’
s di
ssol
utio
n of
the
Rede
velo
pmen
t Age
ncie
s.
Effe
ctiv
enes
s is
unkn
own,
and
the
prog
ram
has
en
ded
with
the
diss
olut
ion
of th
e CR
A/L
ARe
mov
e.
3.2.
1F. R
SO T
enan
t/La
ndlo
rd O
utre
ach
and
Educ
atio
n Pr
ogra
m
Deve
lop
mec
hani
sm
to a
ssur
e di
sclo
sure
RFP
& $1
50,0
00 c
ontr
act f
or d
evel
opm
ent o
f lan
dlor
d-te
nant
ou
trea
ch p
rogr
am h
as b
een
com
plet
ed. E
xpan
ded
outr
each
&
trai
ning
is u
nder
way
to p
rom
ote
awar
enes
s of
RSO
tena
nt/
land
lord
righ
ts &
resp
onsib
ilitie
s. S
ever
al o
utre
ach
com
pone
nts
have
bee
n im
plem
ente
d pe
r the
out
reac
h pl
an, s
uch
as
mon
thly
info
rmat
iona
l wor
ksho
ps h
eld
city
wid
e be
gan
in
2011
, and
incl
uded
wor
ksho
ps c
ondu
cted
in S
pani
sh. A
to
tal o
f 78
mon
thly
wor
ksho
ps h
ave
been
con
duct
ed.
Prog
ram
mee
ts o
bjec
tives
.Re
tain
.
3.2.
2A. F
air H
ousin
g Aw
aren
ess
Trai
ning
Pr
ogra
m (N
eigh
borh
ood
Coun
cils)
“Est
ablis
h fa
ir ho
usin
g ed
ucat
ion
prog
ram
s
Purs
ue fu
ndin
g fo
r tr
aini
ng in
itiat
ives
”
Prog
ram
has
rem
aine
d on
hol
d pe
ndin
g bu
dget
and
sta
ff re
sour
ces.
Has
not m
et o
bjec
tives
due
to a
lack
of
bud
get a
nd s
taff
reso
urce
s.
Rem
ove.
3.2.
3A. F
air H
ousin
g Re
sear
ch
“Com
plet
e th
e A
I
Iden
tify
and
impl
emen
t ac
tion
item
s”
A co
ntra
ctor
was
sel
ecte
d in
late
201
1 to
dev
elop
a n
ew A
naly
sis
of Im
pedi
men
ts to
Fai
r Hou
sing
Choi
ce (A
I) fo
r the
City
. A d
raft
AI w
as p
oste
d on
the
HCID
LA’s
web
site
for p
ublic
com
men
t in
the
Sprin
g of
201
2. T
he d
ocum
ent w
ill b
e co
mpl
eted
in e
arly
201
3.
Exte
nsiv
e co
nsul
tatio
ns a
nd re
sear
ch w
ere
cond
ucte
d to
dev
elop
the
new
ana
lysis
. In
form
atio
n fro
m th
e dr
aft A
I has
bee
n us
eful
for t
he n
ew F
ive
Year
Con
solid
ated
Pl
an c
urre
ntly
und
er d
evel
opm
ent.
Reta
in
I-54 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
4.1.
1A. D
omes
tic V
iole
nce
Shel
ter P
rogr
am
“Pro
vide
2,8
50 in
divi
dual
s w
ith a
cces
s to
pub
lic
serv
ices
ann
ually
Mai
ntai
n up
to 1
,006
sh
elte
r and
tran
sitio
nal
beds
ann
ually
for d
omes
tic
viol
ence
vic
tims”
“148
8 in
divi
dual
s w
ere
prov
ided
acc
ess
to p
ublic
ser
vice
s fo
r Pr
ogra
m Y
ear b
egin
ning
in A
pril
2012
. Dat
a is
thro
ugh
Feb.
201
3.
587
shel
ter a
nd tr
ansi
tiona
l bed
s pr
ovid
ed”
Prog
ram
con
tinue
s to
be
effe
ctiv
e. S
ince
the
time
the
Hous
ing
Elem
ent w
as fi
rst d
raft
ed, a
nu
mbe
r of b
eds
have
bee
n lo
st d
ue to
clo
sure
of
a co
uple
of s
helte
rs. F
utur
e go
als
shou
ld b
e m
ore
in li
ne w
ith 2
011
and
2012
ann
ual p
erfo
rman
ce.
Cont
inue
, how
ever
dec
reas
e nu
mer
ical
ob
ject
ives
to re
flect
clo
sure
of a
fe
w s
helte
rs in
rece
nt y
ears
4.1.
1B. H
OPW
A Em
erge
ncy
Shel
ter a
nd T
rans
ition
al
Hous
ing
Prog
ram
“20
exis
ting
HIV/
AID
S em
erge
ncy
shel
ter b
eds
fund
ed a
nnua
lly
152
exis
ting
HIV/
AID
S tr
ansi
tiona
l hou
sing
beds
fund
ed a
nnua
lly
30 n
ew H
IV/A
IDS
tran
sitio
nal h
ousin
g be
ds fu
nded
ann
ually
”
Durin
g 20
06-2
012,
1,2
95 h
ouse
hold
s w
ere
assis
ted.
In 2
011-
2012
ther
e w
ere
48 e
mer
genc
y an
d 12
7 tr
ansi
tiona
l bed
s.
This
is th
e fir
st s
tep
into
get
ting
clie
nts
into
per
man
ent h
ousin
g. T
here
is a
ne
ed fo
r mor
e tr
ansi
tiona
l hou
sing.
Mod
ify th
e ex
istin
g 6
HOPW
A ca
tego
ries
to th
e fo
llow
ing:
1) H
ousin
g Su
bsid
y A
ssis
tanc
e, 2
) Sup
port
ive
Serv
ices
, 3) P
erm
anen
t Sup
port
ive
Hous
ing
Deve
lopm
ent,
4) H
ousin
g Pl
acem
ent A
ssis
tanc
e Ac
tiviti
es
4.1.
1C. S
helte
r an
d Tr
ansi
tiona
l Ho
usin
g Fa
cilit
ies
“829
exi
stin
g em
erge
ncy
shel
ter b
eds
fund
ed a
nnua
lly
2,88
0 ex
istin
g tr
ansi
tiona
l hou
sing
beds
fund
ed a
nnua
lly”
The
Los
Ang
eles
Con
tinuu
m o
f Car
e ha
s 5,
892
emer
genc
y ho
usin
g be
ds, i
nclu
ding
1,4
92 w
inte
r she
lter b
eds,
1,3
07
beds
for f
amili
es, a
nd 3
,183
bed
s fo
r ind
ivid
uals
. Pr
ogra
m e
xcee
ded
obje
ctiv
es.
Reta
in
4.1.
1D. O
vern
ight
She
lter
(Win
ter S
helte
r and
Ye
ar-R
ound
She
lter)
“954
tem
pora
ry s
helte
r be
ds y
ear r
ound
Serv
e 30
or m
ore
fam
ilies
by
vou
cher
s in
the
Year
Ro
und
Shel
ter P
rogr
am
1,76
8 te
mpo
rary
w
inte
r she
lter b
eds
Serv
e 20
0 or
mor
e fa
mili
es
and
15 o
r mor
e in
divi
dual
s by
vou
cher
s in
the
Win
ter
Shel
ter P
rogr
am”
The
Los
Ang
eles
Con
tinuu
m o
f Car
e ha
s 5,
892
emer
genc
y ho
usin
g be
ds, i
nclu
ding
1,4
92 w
inte
r she
lter b
eds,
1,3
07
beds
for f
amili
es, a
nd 3
,183
bed
s fo
r ind
ivid
uals
. La
rgel
y m
et o
bjec
tives
.Re
tain
4.1.
1E. R
esou
rces
fo
r She
lters
Dist
ribut
e go
ods
to 2
20
or m
ore
hom
eles
s se
rvic
e ag
enci
es a
nd h
ousin
g pr
ovid
ers
annu
ally
City
is n
ot in
volv
ed in
this
prog
ram
. Are
a or
gani
zatio
n (S
helte
r Pa
rtne
rshi
p) c
ontin
ues
to c
oord
inat
e th
e pr
ovisi
on o
f goo
ds
to h
omel
ess
serv
ice
agen
cies
and
hou
sing
prov
ider
s.
Effe
ctiv
e, b
ut w
ithou
t act
ive
City
par
ticip
atio
n.
Rem
ove
as C
ity is
no
long
er
invo
lved
in p
rogr
am.
4.1.
2A. P
riorit
y O
ccup
ancy
fo
r Hom
eles
s Pe
rson
s
Adop
t city
wid
e po
licy
and
amen
d ci
ty c
odes
and
re
gula
tions
to fa
cilit
ate
prio
rity
hous
ing
occu
panc
y fo
r hom
eles
s an
d sp
ecia
l ne
eds
hous
ehol
ds
Prog
ram
doe
s no
t app
ear t
o ha
ve p
rogr
esse
d.
Not
effe
ctiv
e. C
RA/L
A w
as le
ad a
genc
y.
Rem
ove,
as
CRA
is go
ne. A
com
mitm
ent
to in
clud
e 30
% o
f all
new
affo
rdab
le
rent
al h
ousin
g as
per
man
ent s
uppo
rtiv
e ho
usin
g is
incl
uded
in n
ew p
rogr
am N
ew
Prod
uctio
n of
Affo
rdab
le H
ousin
g.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-55
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
4.1.
3A. C
omm
unity
Ba
sed
Deve
lopm
ent
Org
aniz
atio
n (C
BDO
)
Prov
ide
educ
atio
nal/
voca
tiona
l tra
inin
g an
d em
ploy
men
t pla
cem
ent/
rete
ntio
n se
rvic
es to
280
ho
mel
ess
pers
ons
annu
ally
“Ove
r an
18 m
onth
per
iod
from
201
1-20
12:
Com
plet
ed E
duca
tiona
l/Voc
atio
nal T
rain
ing:
2,1
01 p
erso
ns
Obt
aine
d Em
ploy
men
t: 81
9 pe
rson
s
Reta
ined
Em
ploy
men
t: 81
9 pe
rson
s”
Exce
eded
obj
ectiv
es.
App
ropr
iate
to c
ontin
ue. C
hang
e na
me
to “
Job
Trai
ning
and
Pla
cem
ent
for H
omel
ess
Indi
vidu
als.”
4.1.
3B. H
OPW
A Su
ppor
tive
Serv
ices
for P
erso
ns
Livi
ng w
ith H
IV/A
IDS
Prov
ide
13,5
00 c
lient
s w
ith s
uppo
rtiv
e se
rvic
es a
nnua
llyDu
ring
2006
-201
2, 9
,047
hou
seho
lds
wer
e as
siste
d.
Supp
ortiv
e Se
rvic
es in
clud
e ho
usin
g sp
ecia
list,
men
tal h
ealth
and
sub
stan
ce s
ervi
ces,
food
se
rvic
es, l
egal
ser
vice
s an
d an
imal
sup
port
Re
tain
4.1.
3C. R
enta
l Ass
ista
nce
for H
omel
ess
Pers
ons
Dist
ribut
e 4,
000
Hous
ing
Choi
ce
Vouc
hers
to h
omel
ess
hous
ehol
ds a
nnua
lly
HAC
LA in
crea
sed
the
tota
l of t
enan
t-ba
sed
vouc
hers
set
asid
e fo
r the
hom
eles
s in
200
8 by
1,0
00 to
401
1. H
ACLA
add
ed a
50
0 vo
uche
r set
asid
e fo
r the
Chr
onic
ally
Hom
eles
s in
201
2.Ve
ry e
ffect
ive,
exc
eedi
ng o
bjec
tive.
Prog
ram
s sh
ould
con
tinue
as-
is du
e to
the
trem
endo
us n
eed
in th
e co
mm
unity
. Sub
ject
to
futu
re re
view
of H
ACLA
reso
urce
s.
Repl
ace
“per
sons
” w
ith “
hous
ehol
ds”.
4.1.
3D. R
enta
l Ass
ista
nce
for H
omel
ess
Pers
ons
with
Dis
abili
ties
Mai
ntai
n ho
usin
g of
2,0
00
hom
eles
s ho
useh
olds
w
ith d
isab
ilitie
s an
nual
ly
As
of 2
012,
HAC
LA h
ad 3
,073
uni
ts o
f sup
port
ive
hous
ing
allo
cate
d fo
r the
hom
eles
s w
ith d
isab
ling
cond
ition
s.Ve
ry e
ffect
ive,
exc
eedi
ng o
bjec
tive.
Prog
ram
sho
uld
cont
inue
as-
is, w
ith
grea
ter e
mph
asis
on p
erm
anen
t su
ppor
tive
hous
ing.
Rep
lace
“p
erso
ns”
with
“ho
useh
olds
”.
4.1.
3E. H
OPW
A Re
ntal
A
ssis
tanc
e fo
r Per
sons
Li
ving
with
HIV
/AID
S
“63
extr
emel
y lo
w
inco
me
and
21 v
ery
low
inco
me
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ive
TRA
annu
ally
13 e
xtre
mel
y lo
w
inco
me
and
18 v
ery
low
inco
me
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ive
PBRA
ann
ually
305
low
inco
me
hous
ehol
ds re
ceiv
e ST
RMU
assis
tanc
e an
nual
ly”
Durin
g 20
06-2
012,
242
hou
seho
lds
wer
e as
siste
d. T
he m
ajor
ity o
f th
ese
hous
ehol
ds a
re e
xtre
mel
y lo
w in
com
e. 8
0 ho
useh
olds
wer
e as
siste
d w
ith p
roje
ct b
ased
and
sca
tter
ed s
ite m
aste
r lea
sing
hous
ing.
77
0 ho
useh
olds
wer
e as
siste
d w
ith s
hort
term
rent
al m
ortg
age
and
utili
ty (S
TRM
U) g
rant
s w
hich
hel
p th
em m
aint
ain
thei
r hou
sing
Very
effe
ctiv
e. T
he T
enan
t Bas
ed R
enta
l A
ssis
tanc
e (T
BRA)
pro
gram
is p
rovi
ded
by
the
Hous
ing
Auth
oriti
es a
nd a
llow
s cl
ient
s to
tr
ansi
tion
into
the
Hous
ing
Choi
ce V
ouch
er
prog
ram
whi
ch is
the
perm
anen
t hou
sing.
Th
e pr
ogra
m is
bei
ng m
odifi
ed to
ens
ure
clie
nts
in th
e TB
RA re
ceiv
e su
ppor
tive
serv
ice
so th
ey c
an m
aint
ain
thei
r hou
sing.
Cont
inue
pro
gram
with
pro
pose
d m
odifi
catio
n. R
epla
ce “
pers
ons”
w
ith “
hous
ehol
ds”.
4.1.
3F. C
ityw
ide
Rent
-to-
Prev
ent-
Evic
tion
Prog
ram
Ass
ist 1
10-1
25 in
divi
dual
s or
fam
ilies
at r
isk o
f ho
mel
essn
ess
annu
ally
In th
e la
st y
ear o
f the
pro
gram
(201
0), 1
15 a
dults
wer
e as
siste
d, a
s w
ell a
s 88
hou
seho
lds
(fam
ilies
).
Prog
ram
had
bee
n m
eetin
g its
obj
ectiv
es
until
CDB
G fu
ndin
g ex
pire
d in
201
1,
leav
ing
the
prog
ram
with
no
fund
ing.
Re
mov
e, g
iven
lack
of f
undi
ng.
4.1.
3G. N
ew R
esou
rces
fo
r Ren
tal A
ssis
tanc
e
Incr
ease
the
fund
ing
base
fo
r ren
tal a
ssis
tanc
e fo
r ho
mel
ess
hous
ehol
ds
and
hous
ehol
ds a
t hig
h ris
k of
hom
eles
snes
s
“The
CRA
/LA
deve
lope
d re
sour
ces
for r
enta
l ass
ista
nce,
bu
t the
tota
l pro
gres
s is
unab
le to
be
retr
ieve
d du
e to
th
e di
ssol
utio
n of
the
Rede
velo
pmen
t Age
ncie
s.
LAHS
A is
fund
ing
activ
ities
thro
ugh
its E
SG
gran
t. A
ll HP
RP fu
nds
fully
exp
ende
d.”
Som
ewha
t effe
ctiv
e.Re
tain
.
4.1.
3H. H
OPW
A Ho
usin
g De
velo
pmen
t for
Per
sons
Li
ving
with
HIV
/AID
S
Fina
ncin
g co
mm
itmen
t to
, at m
inim
um, o
ne
hous
ing
deve
lopm
ent p
er
year
ded
icat
ed to
ser
ving
pe
rson
s liv
ing
with
HIV
/A
IDS
and
thei
r fam
ilies
Sinc
e 20
06, 3
1 HO
PWA
units
hav
e be
en fi
nanc
ed
as p
erm
anen
t sup
port
ive
hous
ing.
Som
ewha
t effe
ctiv
e.
Reta
in
I-56 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
4.1.
3I. P
erm
anen
t Su
ppor
tive
Hous
ing
Prog
ram
2,22
4 pe
rman
ent
supp
ortiv
e ho
usin
g un
its fi
nanc
ed fo
r ho
mel
ess
hous
ehol
ds
From
sta
rt o
f the
PSH
P to
pre
sent
, 35
proj
ects
ha
ve b
een
fund
ed c
reat
ing
2,17
8 un
its.
Effe
ctiv
e an
d th
e Ci
ty w
ill c
ontin
ue
to fu
lly s
uppo
rt th
e PS
HP.
Reta
in
4.1.
3J. N
ew R
esou
rces
fo
r Hou
sing
Serv
ing
the
Men
tally
Ill
Purs
ue fu
ndin
g to
war
ds
perm
anen
t hou
sing
units
for h
omel
ess
men
tally
ill a
nnua
lly
“Sin
ce th
e re
leas
e of
the
Fede
ral S
trat
egic
Pla
n to
End
Hom
eles
snes
s &
the
loca
l Hom
e fo
r Goo
d pl
an, L
AHS
A is
taki
ng a
targ
eted
ap
proa
ch to
ass
essin
g ne
ed a
nd s
ettin
g re
gion
al p
riorit
ies
for
CH, V
ets,
fam
ilies
& y
outh
. Bas
ed o
n ou
r 201
1 Ho
mel
ess
Coun
t, ap
prox
imat
ely
35%
are
sev
erel
y m
enta
lly il
l. RF
Ps fo
r new
fund
ing
unde
r the
Sup
erN
OFA
app
licat
ion
targ
et th
ese
grou
ps. I
n ad
ditio
n,
the
Year
Rou
nd P
rogr
am a
lso
targ
ets
thes
e gr
oups
. LA
HSA
will
als
o co
ntin
ue to
fund
the
two
safe
hav
ens
of w
hich
one
is lo
cate
d in
Ski
d Ro
w a
nd p
rovi
des
50 b
eds
to in
divi
dual
s w
ith s
ever
e m
enta
l illn
ess.
“
Larg
ely
effe
ctiv
e, a
lthou
gh d
ifficu
lt to
mea
sure
ef
fect
iven
ess
give
n la
ck o
f pre
cise
obj
ectiv
es.
Reta
in w
ithou
t the
wor
k “N
ew”
in ti
tle.
The
City
will
con
tinue
its
wor
k w
ith
inte
rest
ed s
take
hold
ers,
par
ticul
arly
at t
he
Coun
ty le
vel,
to fu
nd a
fford
able
hou
sing
with
inte
nsiv
e, w
rap-
arou
nd s
ervi
ces.
4.1.
3K. P
erm
anen
t Ho
usin
g (fo
r per
sons
w
ith d
isab
ilitie
s)
Mai
ntai
n 1,
477
perm
anen
t su
ppor
tive
hous
ing
units
for h
omel
es
hous
ehol
ds a
nnua
lly
The
mos
t rec
ent d
ata
avai
labl
e (fr
om 2
012)
, ind
icat
es
that
a to
tal o
f 1,1
20 p
erm
anen
t sup
port
ive
hous
ing
units
fo
r per
sons
with
Dis
abili
ties
is be
ing
mai
ntai
ned.
La
rgel
y ef
fect
ive
at m
eetin
g go
al.
Reta
in a
nd a
dd L
AHS
A as
an
agen
cy.
4.1.
3L. L
os A
ngel
es
Supp
ortiv
e Ho
usin
g Ac
quisi
tion
Fund
Supp
ort s
ite a
cqui
sitio
n an
d pr
e-de
velo
pmen
t of
up to
1,5
00 h
ousin
g un
its
Sinc
e its
ince
ptio
n in
200
8, th
e Ci
ty o
f Los
Ang
eles
Sup
port
ive
Hous
ing
Loan
Fun
d ha
s fin
ance
d th
e de
velo
pmen
t of a
lmos
t 1,5
00
units
of s
uppo
rtiv
e ho
usin
g. T
he fu
nd a
llow
s no
npro
fit o
rgan
izat
ions
to
com
pete
suc
cess
fully
for s
carc
e la
nd b
y pr
ovid
ing
fund
s qu
ickl
y,
and
incr
easin
g ef
ficie
ncy
thro
ugh
a on
e-st
op s
ourc
e fo
r acq
uisi
tion
and
pred
evel
opm
ent c
apita
l whi
le s
ecur
ing
perm
anen
t fina
ncin
g.
Effe
ctiv
e. P
erm
anen
t Sup
port
ive
Hous
ing
Prog
ram
(PSH
P) is
coo
rdin
atin
g w
ith H
ACLA
, TC
AC a
nd D
ept.
of M
enta
l Hea
lth S
ervi
ces.
To
max
imiz
e ef
fect
iven
ess
HCID
LA h
as
alig
ned
this
fund
with
the
perm
anen
t fun
ding
so
urce
s av
aila
ble
to th
ese
proj
ects
.
Reta
in b
ut m
erge
with
larg
er A
fford
able
Ho
usin
g Pr
oduc
tion
prog
ram
, whe
reas
30%
of
all
units
will
be
supp
ortiv
e ho
usin
g un
its.
Util
izes
the
Supp
rort
ive
Hous
ing
Loan
Fun
d.
4.1.
4A. H
omel
ess
Hous
ing
and
Serv
ices
Coo
rdin
atio
n
“City
wid
e an
d su
b-re
gion
al p
lans
to
redu
ce a
nd e
nd
hom
eles
snes
s ad
opte
d by
the
City
Cou
ncil
Regu
lar r
epor
ts o
n fin
anci
al m
anag
emen
t
Regu
alr r
epor
ts o
n co
ntra
ct m
anag
emen
t and
pr
ogra
m im
plem
enta
tion”
“Fol
low
ing
the
Fede
ral S
trat
egic
Pla
n, O
peni
ng D
oors
, the
LA
Cont
inuu
m o
f Car
e (C
oC) h
as p
riorit
ized
thre
e ke
y go
als:
end
ing
chro
nic
hom
eles
snes
s; p
reve
ntin
g an
d en
ding
vet
eran
hom
eles
snes
s;
and
prev
entin
g an
d en
ding
hom
eles
snes
s fo
r fam
ilies
, you
th, a
nd
child
ren.
As
note
d ab
ove,
LA
HSA
requ
ires
all a
pplic
ants
for n
ew C
oC
fund
ing
to a
lloca
te 1
00%
of t
heir
units
to th
e ch
roni
cally
hom
eles
s.
The
CoC’
s m
ost r
ecen
t pla
n, H
ome
For G
ood,
was
fo
rmal
ly a
dopt
ed in
201
0. H
owev
er, t
he C
oC’s
stra
tegy
is c
ontin
uing
to e
volv
e th
roug
h de
velo
pmen
t of p
lace
-bas
ed
com
mun
ity p
lans
alig
ned
with
the
Fede
ral S
trat
egic
Pla
n an
d Ho
me
for G
ood.
A to
tal o
f 10
com
mun
ity p
lans
will
be
deve
lope
d an
d in
corp
orat
ed in
to th
e Co
C’s
stra
tegi
c ef
fort
s ov
er th
e ne
xt fi
ve y
ears
.”
Effe
ctiv
eRe
tain
, upd
ate
with
em
phas
is on
Hom
es fo
r Goo
d Pl
an.
4.1.
4B. A
cces
s N
ew
Reso
urce
s an
d Se
rvic
es
for t
he H
omel
ess
Perio
dic
repo
rts
on s
tate
an
d co
unty
legi
slativ
e an
d bu
dget
ary
inita
tives
“The
City
and
LA
HSA
have
issu
ed p
erio
dic
repo
rts
on S
tate
and
Co
unty
legi
slativ
e an
d bu
dget
ary
initi
ativ
es th
at c
ould
ben
efit
prog
ram
s se
rvin
g th
e ho
mel
ess.
Thi
s in
clud
ed o
ffici
al C
ity
supp
ort f
or H
.R. 8
40 in
200
7-20
08 -
the
Hom
eles
s Em
erge
ncy
Ass
ista
nce
and
Rapi
d Tr
ansi
tion
to H
ousin
g (H
EART
H) A
ct o
f 200
7.”
The
City
has
bee
n re
lativ
ely
effe
ctiv
e at
ac
cess
ing
new
reso
urce
s an
d se
rvic
es
for t
he h
omel
ess
popu
latio
n.
Reta
in.
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-57
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
4.1.
4C. H
ousin
g an
d Se
rvic
es P
lann
ing
for P
erso
ns L
ivin
g w
ith H
IV/A
IDS
Regu
larly
upd
ated
pl
an fo
r the
use
of
HOPW
A gr
ant f
unds
The
Hous
ing
Opp
ortu
nitie
s fo
r Per
sons
livi
ng w
ith A
IDS
(HO
PWA)
Req
uest
For
Pro
posa
ls (R
FP) i
nclu
ded
inpu
t fro
m fo
cus
grou
ps w
ith p
rovi
ders
; hel
d an
d st
affe
d bi
mon
thly
mee
tings
w
/ Los
Ang
eles
Cou
nty
HIV/
AID
S Co
mm
ittee
(LAC
HAC
); HO
PWA
tech
nica
l ser
vice
s pr
ovid
er c
ompl
eted
ass
essm
ent o
f th
e Ho
tel/F
ood
Vouc
her P
rogr
am a
nd H
ousin
g Ca
se M
anag
er
posi
tion,
and
reco
mm
enda
tions
for c
hang
es to
pro
gram
s.
Effe
ctiv
e Re
tain
4.1.
4D. C
ity H
omel
ess
Coor
dina
tor
Perio
dic
repo
rts
on
hom
eles
s ho
usin
g an
d se
rvic
e de
liver
y an
d re
com
men
datio
ns
for i
mpr
ovem
ent
No
prog
ress
has
bee
n m
ade
in h
iring
a C
ity H
omel
ess
Coor
dina
tor.
How
ever
, as
the
lead
for t
he L
os A
ngel
es C
ontin
uum
of C
are,
LA
HSA
, con
duct
s qu
arte
rly m
eetin
gs to
dis
cuss
effo
rts
on h
ow to
co
mba
t hom
eles
snes
s ef
fect
ivel
y an
d ef
ficie
ntly.
Att
ende
es in
clud
e Ci
ty a
nd C
ount
y re
pres
enta
tives
to e
nsur
e a
info
rmat
ion
shar
ing
and
coor
dina
ted
proc
ess.
Eac
h ye
ar, t
here
are
app
roxi
mat
ely
20 C
ontin
uum
mee
tings
feat
urin
g ov
er 4
50 h
omel
ess
serv
ice
prov
ider
s, c
ity a
nd c
ount
y re
pres
enta
tives
, sch
ool d
istr
icts
, po
licy
mak
ers,
faith
bas
ed a
nd g
rass
root
s or
gani
zatio
ns, a
nd
othe
r hom
eles
s st
akeh
olde
rs. I
n ad
ditio
n, o
n a
mon
thly
bas
is,
LAHS
A pr
ovid
es fi
nanc
ial a
nd c
ontr
act m
anag
emen
t rep
orts
to
des
igna
ted
Com
mitt
ees
of th
e LA
HSA
Com
mis
sion.
Effe
ctiv
e de
spite
the
lack
of o
ne o
vera
ll co
ordi
nato
r pos
ition
to a
ct a
s a
liais
on
betw
een
LAHS
A, C
ity A
genc
ies,
the
Coun
ty a
nd o
ther
regi
onal
bod
ies.
.
Reta
in
4.1.
5A. T
empo
rary
Ho
usin
g Fa
cilit
ies
for
Disa
ster
Res
pons
e
120
site
s av
aila
ble
thro
ugho
ut th
e Ci
ty
with
in 2
4 ho
urs
of a
na
tura
l dis
aste
r
“The
City
is u
nder
taki
ng R
egio
nal D
isas
ter H
ousin
g Pl
anni
ng a
ctiv
ities
fund
ed b
y th
e Re
gion
al
Cata
stro
phic
Pla
nnin
g G
rant
Pro
gram
(RCP
GP)
aw
ards
from
the
Fede
ral E
mer
genc
y
Man
agem
ent A
genc
y (F
EMA)
. The
pla
nnin
g ac
tiviti
es
incl
ude
a di
sast
er w
orki
ng g
roup
com
pris
ed o
f loc
al
hous
ing
indu
stry
repr
esen
tativ
es a
s w
ell a
s st
ate
and
fede
ral h
ousin
g an
d di
sast
er p
lann
ing
expe
rts.
Co
ntac
ts a
re b
eing
mad
e w
ith th
e lo
cal
Emer
genc
y N
etw
ork
Los
Ang
eles
, a c
olla
bora
tive
grou
p of
non
-pro
fits
that
are
vol
unta
ry
orga
niza
tions
act
ive
in d
isas
ters
(VO
ADs
). “
Effe
ctiv
e. S
ince
pos
t-di
sast
er h
ousin
g av
aila
bilit
y is
a se
rious
pro
blem
and
affe
cts
the
mos
t vu
lner
able
City
resid
ents
, thi
s is
a ke
y ar
ea o
f co
ordi
natio
n th
at n
eeds
to b
e ex
pand
ed.
Reta
in.
4.1.
5B. O
utre
ach
and
Trai
ning
for E
mer
genc
y Pr
epar
edne
ss a
nd
Resp
onse
“4 fa
irs d
urin
g Em
erge
ncy
Prep
ared
enss
M
onth
ann
ually
2 N
eigh
borh
ood
Prep
ared
enss
A
mba
ssad
ors
Trai
ning
s an
nual
ly
Out
reac
h to
nei
ghbo
rhoo
d an
d co
mm
unity
gro
ups
as re
ques
ted”
“The
City
is u
nder
taki
ng R
egio
nal D
isas
ter H
ousin
g Pl
anni
ng a
ctiv
ities
fund
ed b
y th
e Re
gion
al
Cata
stro
phic
Pla
nnin
g G
rant
Pro
gram
(RCP
GP)
aw
ards
from
the
Fede
ral E
mer
genc
y
Man
agem
ent A
genc
y (F
EMA)
. The
pla
nnin
g ac
tiviti
es
incl
ude
a di
sast
er w
orki
ng g
roup
com
pris
ed o
f loc
al
hous
ing
indu
stry
repr
esen
tativ
es a
s w
ell a
s st
ate
and
fede
ral h
ousin
g an
d di
sast
er p
lann
ing
expe
rts.
Co
ntac
ts a
re b
eing
mad
e w
ith th
e lo
cal
Emer
genc
y N
etw
ork
Los
Ang
eles
, a c
olla
bora
tive
grou
p of
non
-pro
fits
that
are
vol
unta
ry
orga
niza
tions
act
ive
in d
isas
ters
(VO
ADs
). “
Effe
ctiv
e. S
ince
pos
t-di
sast
er h
ousin
g av
aila
bilit
y is
a se
rious
pro
blem
and
affe
cts
the
mos
t vu
lner
able
City
resid
ents
, thi
s is
a ke
y ar
ea o
f co
ordi
natio
n th
at n
eeds
to b
e ex
pand
ed.
Reta
in
I-58 Adopted December 3, 2013 Los Angeles Department of City Planning
Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
4.1.
6A. S
iting
Hom
eles
s Ho
usin
g an
d Se
rvic
es
“Ide
ntify
loca
tions
fo
r hou
sing
with
su
ppor
tive
serv
ices
in
16 C
omm
unity
Pla
ns
Iden
tify
targ
ets
in a
ll Co
mm
unity
Pla
ns”
The
new
Com
mun
ity P
lans
hav
e no
t bee
n id
entif
ying
spe
cific
lo
catio
ns fo
r hou
sing
with
sup
port
ive
serv
ices
. How
ever
sin
gle-
room
occ
upan
cy (S
RO),
tran
sitio
nal,
and
supp
ortiv
e ho
usin
g ar
e co
nsid
ered
the
sam
e as
mul
ti-fa
mily
hou
sing
and
are
perm
itted
whe
reve
r mul
ti-fa
mily
is p
erm
itted
.
Not
effe
ctiv
e bu
t als
o so
mew
hat u
nnec
essa
ry
give
n th
at n
o sp
ecia
lized
loca
tions
are
requ
ired
to s
ite s
uch
hous
ing
in L
os A
ngel
es.
Rem
ove
4.1.
6B. Z
onin
g an
d De
velo
pmen
t Sta
ndar
ds
for S
helte
rs
Adop
t am
endm
ent t
o Zo
ning
Cod
e to
faci
litat
e by
-rig
ht s
iting
of
shel
ter a
nd tr
ansi
tiona
l ho
usin
g fa
cilit
ies
A Co
mm
unity
Car
e Fa
cilit
ies
Ord
inan
ce h
as b
een
prop
osed
, w
hich
see
ks to
am
end
the
City
Cod
e to
be
cons
iste
nt w
ith
the
Calif
orni
a Co
mm
unity
Car
e Fa
cilit
ies
Act.
The
Ord
inan
ce
is lik
ely
to a
ffect
cer
tain
tran
sitio
nal h
ousin
g fa
cilit
ies
in
the
City
. In
early
201
3, th
e O
rdin
ance
had
bee
n se
nt to
a
wor
king
gro
up to
furt
her fl
esh
out t
he re
leva
nt is
sues
.
Som
ewha
t effe
ctiv
e. A
Zon
ing
Code
am
endm
ent h
as b
een
prop
osed
but
som
e of
the
polic
y di
rect
ions
rem
ain
uncl
ear.
Reta
in.
4.1.
6C. Z
onin
g fo
r He
alth
Fac
ilitie
s
Adop
t am
endm
ent
to Z
onin
g Co
de to
re
mov
e re
stric
tions
on
loca
tions
of p
ublic
he
alth
and
trea
tmen
t pr
ogra
m fa
cilit
ies
A Co
mm
unity
Car
e Fa
cilit
ies
Ord
inan
ce h
as b
een
prop
osed
, whi
ch
seek
s to
am
end
the
City
Cod
e to
be
cons
iste
nt w
ith th
e Ca
lifor
nia
Com
mun
ity C
are
Faci
litie
s Ac
t. Th
e O
rdin
ance
is li
kely
to a
ffect
ce
rtai
n ty
pes
of tr
eatm
ent f
acili
ties
as w
ell a
s re
siden
tial c
are
faci
litie
s fo
r the
eld
erly
in th
e Ci
ty. I
n ea
rly 2
013,
the
Ord
inan
ce h
ad
been
sen
t to
a w
orki
ng g
roup
to fu
rthe
r fles
h ou
t the
rele
vant
issu
es.
Som
ewha
t effe
ctiv
e. A
Zon
ing
Code
am
endm
ent
has
been
pro
pose
d bu
t som
e of
the
polic
y di
rect
ions
on
the
trea
tmen
t of h
ealth
and
tr
eatm
ent f
acili
ties
rem
ain
uncl
ear.
Reta
in.
4.2.
1A. A
ssis
tanc
e fo
r Hom
eles
s Pe
rson
s in
Acc
essin
g Ho
usin
g an
d Se
rvic
es
“Con
tinue
fund
ing
1 or
gani
zatio
n to
re
ach
300
or m
ore
hom
eles
s in
divi
dual
s
Expl
ore
expa
ndin
g ou
trea
ch fu
ndin
g to
com
mun
ity-
base
d or
gani
zatio
ns
with
in th
e Ci
ty”
A to
tal o
f 2,4
65 h
omel
ess
pers
ons
have
bee
n re
ache
d th
roug
h LA
HSA’
s Em
erge
ncy
Resp
onse
Tea
ms.
In re
cent
yea
rs, L
AHS
A ha
s be
en im
plem
entin
g va
rious
pro
gram
s to
ens
ure
that
out
reac
h is
expa
nded
. LA
HSA
, in
colla
bora
tion
with
the
City
and
Cou
nty
of
Los
Ang
eles
is b
uild
ing
regi
onal
sys
tem
s of
car
e th
at w
ill p
rovi
de
coor
dina
ted
asse
ssm
ents
for r
ecei
pt o
f hom
eles
s se
rvic
es, p
reve
nts
hom
eles
snes
s by
hel
ping
fam
ilies
rem
ain
with
in th
eir c
omm
uniti
es
and
reta
in th
eir c
urre
nt n
on-s
helte
r hou
sing,
or d
iver
ts p
eopl
e to
hou
sing
optio
ns o
ther
than
hom
eles
s sh
elte
rs. T
he fi
rst s
tep
in th
is pr
oces
s w
as th
e Fa
mily
Tra
nsiti
ons
Proj
ect (
FTP)
, whi
ch
stre
amlin
ed in
take
of h
omel
ess
fam
ilies
see
king
mot
el v
ouch
ers
durin
g th
e w
inte
r mon
ths,
resu
lting
in im
prov
ed c
oord
inat
ion
and
mor
e fa
mili
es b
eing
div
erte
d aw
ay fr
om h
omel
essn
ess
and
bein
g ra
pidl
y re
hous
ed in
per
man
ent h
ousin
g. B
uild
ing
on th
e su
cces
s of
the
FTP,
LA
HSA
, in
part
ners
hip
with
the
City
and
Cou
nty
of L
os
Ang
eles
, is
pool
ing
reso
urce
s to
fund
the
Fam
ily S
olut
ions
Cen
ters
(F
SC),
whi
ch w
ill p
rovi
de c
oord
inat
ed e
ntry
, int
ake
asse
ssm
ent,
and
hous
ing
and
supp
ortiv
e se
rvic
es in
terv
entio
ns to
hom
eles
s fa
mili
es a
nd fa
mili
es a
t-ris
k of
hom
eles
snes
s ac
ross
the
vario
us
regi
ons
of L
os A
ngel
es C
ount
y. In
col
labo
ratio
n w
ith m
ains
trea
m
reso
urce
s an
d ta
rget
ed h
omel
ess
reso
urce
s, th
is ne
w in
tegr
ated
Co
unty
wid
e sy
stem
will
pro
vide
the
appr
opria
te le
vel o
f ser
vice
s an
d ho
usin
g to
eac
h fa
mily
in n
eed.
The
ulti
mat
e go
als
of th
is co
ordi
nate
d sy
stem
will
be
to d
iver
t fam
ilies
from
bec
omin
g ho
mel
ess
and
to e
nd fa
mili
es’ h
omel
essn
ess
as ra
pidl
y as
pos
sible
.
Very
effe
ctiv
e. A
lthou
gh th
e pr
ogra
m
can
be m
erge
d w
ith a
new
spe
cial
ized
pr
ogra
m th
at m
eets
its
obje
ctiv
es.
Rem
ove,
com
bine
with
new
pro
gram
(F
amily
Sol
utio
ns C
ente
r).
Los Angeles Department of City Planning Adopted December 3, 2013 I-59
Housing Element 2013–2021 - Appendices Appendix i Evaluation of the 2006-2013 Housing Element Policies and Programs
Prog
ram
s fr
om H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Obj
ectiv
e/St
rate
gy
as li
sted
in H
ousi
ng
Elem
ent 2
006-
2014
Prog
ress
, Jan
uary
1, 2
006
to P
rese
ntEf
fect
iven
ess
App
ropr
iate
ness
(i.e
. sho
uld
prog
ram
be
reta
ined
or m
odifi
ed)
4.2.
1B. C
ompu
teriz
ed
Info
rmat
ion
Cent
er/
Info
rmat
ion
and
Refe
rral
s fo
r Per
sons
w
ith D
isab
ilitie
s
Ass
ist 1
50 o
r mor
e cl
ient
s se
ekin
g ho
mel
ess
serv
ices
an
d ho
usin
g re
sour
ce
refe
rral
s an
nual
ly
The
CIC
uses
a c
usto
m s
oftw
are
prog
ram
to p
rovi
de in
form
atio
n on
and
refe
rral
to c
ritic
al s
ervi
ces
offe
red
thro
ugho
ut th
e gr
eate
r Lo
s A
ngel
es a
rea.
CIC
sta
ff pr
ovid
e re
ferr
als
to o
ver 1
000
pers
ons
with
dis
abili
ties
and
agen
cies
ann
ually
. The
dat
abas
e re
sour
ces
incl
ude:
hou
sing,
em
erge
ncy
shel
ter,
acce
ssib
le
tran
spor
tatio
n, e
mpl
oym
ent t
rain
ing,
job
plac
emen
t, an
d re
crea
tiona
l opp
ortu
nitie
s. W
e w
ere
not a
ble
to d
eter
min
e th
e nu
mbe
r of h
ousin
g re
ferr
als
mad
e in
from
200
6 to
cur
rent
.
Effe
ctiv
e.
Reta
in
4.2.
1C. H
OPW
A Ce
ntra
lized
Cou
ntyw
ide
Holu
sing
Info
rmat
ion
Serv
ices
Cle
arin
ghou
se
Ass
ist 2
,640
clie
nts
seek
ing
HIV/
AID
S ho
usin
g in
form
atio
n re
ferr
als
The
web
site
has
bee
n re
desig
ned
and
was
rece
ntly
laun
ched
. It
is us
er fr
iend
ly a
nd re
ceiv
es o
ver 5
0,00
0 w
eb h
its e
ach
year
.
The
clea
ring
hous
e pr
ovid
es a
ccur
ate
listin
g fo
r ava
ilabl
e, a
fford
able
and
ap
prop
riate
hou
sing
(ww
w.c
hirp
la.o
rg)
Reta
in
4.2.
2A. A
war
enes
s of
Sp
ecia
l Nee
ds H
ousin
g (N
eigh
borh
ood
Coun
cils)
“Est
ablis
h ou
trea
ch
curr
icul
um
Purs
ue fu
ndin
g fo
r tr
aini
ng p
rogr
am”
“LA
HSA’
s Em
erge
ncy
Resp
onse
Tea
m (E
RT) i
s co
nsid
ered
one
of t
he le
ad O
utre
ach
Prog
ram
s in
Los
A
ngel
es C
ity a
nd C
ount
y. T
he E
RT p
rovi
des
supp
ort t
o Lo
s A
ngel
es C
ount
y an
d Ci
ty D
epar
tmen
ts a
s w
ell a
s El
ecte
d O
ffici
als
offic
es. L
AHS
A co
ntin
ues
its n
etw
orki
ng w
ith o
ther
ou
trea
ch w
orke
rs c
ount
ywid
e. In
201
1, th
ere
was
a fo
cus
prov
idin
g in
form
atio
n an
d tr
aini
ng o
n Lo
s A
ngel
es C
ount
y De
part
men
t of
Heal
th S
ervi
ces
“Hea
lthy
Way
LA”
Pro
gram
, and
par
ticip
atio
n in
th
e U
nite
d W
ay’s
“Hom
e fo
r Goo
d” O
utre
ach
Prog
ram
s Su
rvey
. LA
HSA
also
ass
ista
nce
and
supp
orte
d lo
cal o
utre
ach
team
s on
co
nduc
ting
spec
ial p
roje
cts.
Thi
s ye
ar, s
peci
al o
utre
ach
proj
ects
in
clud
ed th
e Ha
nsen
Dam
/Sun
land
-Tuj
unga
regi
on, L
AC/U
SC
Med
ical
Cen
ter E
mer
genc
y Ro
om O
utre
ach,
Ven
ice
Beac
h an
d W
estc
hest
er O
utre
ach,
Occ
upy
LA H
omel
ess
Part
icip
ant O
utre
ach,
CE
O/L
ASD
/LA
HSA
Out
reac
h Pr
otoc
ol P
roje
ct, a
nd th
e Sk
id R
ow
Fam
ilies
Out
reac
h Pr
ojec
t. LA
HSA’
s ER
T al
so c
ontin
ues
to w
ork
with
LA
City
Dep
t. of
Pub
lic W
orks
- Bu
reau
of S
tree
t Ser
vice
s In
vest
igat
ion
and
Enfo
rcem
ent D
ivisi
on (S
SIED
) by
prov
idin
g ou
trea
ch
and
notifi
catio
n se
rvic
es to
enc
ampm
ent d
wel
lers
to e
nsur
ing
they
re
ceiv
e as
sista
nce
with
acc
essin
g sh
elte
r and
rela
ted
serv
ices
”
A lo
t of o
utre
ach
occu
rred
, but
not
ne
cess
arily
tow
ards
nei
ghbo
rhoo
d co
unci
ls,
the
inte
nded
targ
et o
f the
pro
gram
.
Reta
in, b
ut b
road
en p
rogr
am
beyo
nd n
eigh
borh
ood
coun
cils
. Ad
d “N
eigh
borh
ood:
to ti
tle
befo
re “
Awar
enes
s.”
4.2.
2B. H
omel
ess
Nee
ds O
utre
ach
Diss
emin
ate
info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
hou
sing
need
s of
sp
ecia
l nee
ds p
opul
atio
ns
to 2
,000
peo
ple
LAHS
A pr
ovid
es in
form
atio
n an
d re
ferr
al s
ervi
ces
to o
ver 2
,500
pe
rson
s pe
r yea
r. Th
is in
clud
es c
alls
rece
ived
for h
omel
ess
assis
tanc
e. T
his
incl
udes
dire
ct re
ques
ts fo
r ass
ista
nce
rece
ived
th
roug
h th
e em
erge
ncy
serv
ices
line
, by
emai
l, an
d by
enc
ount
ers
and
enga
gem
ents
mad
e w
ith h
omel
ess
indi
vidu
als
and
fam
ilies
at
loca
tions
thro
ugho
ut L
os A
ngel
es C
ity a
nd C
ount
y.
Effe
ctiv
eRe
tain
4.2.
3A. T
echn
ical
A
ssis
tanc
e to
Hom
eles
s Ho
usin
g Pr
ovid
ers
Tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce
prov
ided
to 2
0 pr
ovid
ers
annu
ally
Data
not
ava
ilabl
e.Do
es n
ot a
ppea
r to
have
bee
n ef
fect
ive.
No
fund
ing.
Re
mov
e.
4.2.
4A. “
Proj
ect 5
0” P
ilot
Prog
ram
Tar
getin
g th
e Ch
roni
cally
Hom
eles
s
50 lo
ng-t
erm
ch
roni
cally
hom
eles
s in
divi
dual
s ho
used
Proj
ect 5
0 w
as c
ompl
eted
, and
hou
sed
43 o
f the
initi
al 5
0 ch
roni
cally
hom
eles
s in
divi
dual
s th
at w
ere
iden
tified
.Ef
fecc
ctiv
e, h
owev
er th
e pi
lot p
rogr
am h
as e
nded
. Re
mov
e.