review isolation and characterization of bioactive compounds from plant resources
TRANSCRIPT
G
P
R
IT
Ga
b
ARAA
KENAtDT
C
1
npswE
v
0h
ARTICLE IN PRESS Model
BA-9001; No. of Pages 11
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis xxx (2013) xxx– xxx
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
jou rn al hom e page: www.elsev ier .com/ locate / jpba
eview
solation and characterization of bioactive compounds from plant resources:he role of analysis in the ethnopharmacological approach
. Brusotti a,b,∗, I. Cesari a,b, A. Dentamaroa,b, G. Caccialanzaa,b, G. Massolinia,b
Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, ItalyCenter for Studies and Researches in Ethnopharmacy (C.I.St.R.E.), University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o
rticle history:eceived 6 March 2013ccepted 11 March 2013vailable online xxx
eywords:thnopharmacological approach
a b s t r a c t
The phytochemical research based on ethnopharmacology is considered an effective approach in thediscovery of novel chemicals entities with potential as drug leads. Plants/plant extracts/decoctions, usedby folklore traditions for treating several diseases, represent a source of chemical entities but no infor-mation are available on their nature. Starting from this viewpoint, the aim of this review is to addressnatural-products chemists to the choice of the best methodologies, which include the combination ofextraction/sample preparation tools and analytical techniques, for isolating and characterizing bioactive
atural sources deriving compoundsctivity-oriented separation hyphenated
echniquesrug discoveryraditional medicines
secondary metabolites from plants, as potential lead compounds in the drug discovery process. The workis distributed according to the different steps involved in the ethnopharmacological approach (extrac-tion, sample preparation, biological screening, etc.), discussing the analytical techniques employed forthe isolation and identification of compound/s responsible for the biological activity claimed in the tradi-tional use (separation, spectroscopic, hyphenated techniques, etc.). Particular emphasis will be on herbalmedicines applications and developments achieved from 2010 up to date.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
ontents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 002. Extraction techniques and sample preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00
2.1. Extraction techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 002.2. Sample preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00
3. Biological screening and separation activity-oriented . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 004. Hyphenated chromatographic techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 005. Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00
Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00
. Introduction
Plants, animals and micro-organisms represent a reservoir of
medicines represent the primary health care system for the 60%of the world’s population, the plant species with possible biolog-
Please cite this article in press as: G. Brusotti, et al., Isolation and charactanalysis in the ethnopharmacological approach, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2
atural products, the so called “natural sources deriving com-ounds”. Particularly, the plant kingdom offers a variety of speciestill used as remedies for several diseases in many parts of theorld such as Asia [1,2], Africa [3–6] and South America [7].
ven if, as reported by World Health Organization [8], traditional
∗ Corresponding author at: Department of Drug Sciences, Viale Taramelli 12, Uni-ersity of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. Tel.: +39 0382987174; fax: +39 0382422975.
E-mail address: [email protected] (G. Brusotti).
731-7085/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
ical activity remain largely unexplored [9]. As stated by Newmanand Cragg in a recent review [10]: “natural product and/or natu-ral product structures continued to play a highly significant role inthe drug discovery and development process”. Thus, biodiversityrepresents an unlimited source of novel chemicals entities (NCE)with potential as drug leads. These NCE are secondary metabolites,synthesized by plants as defence against herbivores and pathogens
erization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
or attraction of pollinating agent, and can be grouped in three mainchemical families: alkaloids, terpenoids and phenolic compounds.
A review from Kashani et al. [11] recently highlights the phar-macological properties of some well known secondary metabolites
ARTICLE IN PRESSG Model
PBA-9001; No. of Pages 11
2 G. Brusotti et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis xxx (2013) xxx– xxx
Phytocomplex/
singl e
molecule
Plant
material
Biological
assay
Sample
preparation
Activit y or ient ed
separation
Structu re
elucidation Extraction
Convention al
techniques
•Mace ration
•Infusion
•Decoction
•Boiling under refl ux
Non conventional
techniques
•Microwave assisted
extraction
•Ult ras oun d assi sted
extraction
•Supercritical fluid
extraction
•Press urized liqu id
extraction
•Hydrotropic extraction
•Enzy me-as siste d
extraction
In vitro•Anti bacterial
/antifungal assays
•Chemical assays
•Enzymatic assay
Genera l pret reatment
•Liquid-liquid extraction
•Soli d p hase extr action
•Gel filtration
•Phase-trafficking
Pre-concentration for
specific classes
ofcompounds
•Gel filtration
•Soli d p hase extraction
•Molec ularly imprin ted
polymers
•Macroporous
absorption resin
Off -line
•Preparative scale bio-
guided fractionation
•HPLC micro -
fractio nati on
On-line
•HPLC post-column
(bio)chemical detection
•Biochromatography
•Elect rophoretic enzyme
assays
Off -line
•UV -DAD
•MS
•NMR
Hyphen ated
techniques
•HPLC-UV-DAD
•HPLC-MSn
•GC-MS
•HPLC -SPE -NMR
•UPLC -DAD-TOF -MS
in the
akpncqcea[bpsttas
tdhSCbarsp
ctmcpt
toeitad
Fig. 1. Methodologies involved
nd many recent papers report the activity of new and/or lessnown alkaloids [12–14], terpenoids [15,16] and phenolic com-ounds [17–19] giving a direct evidence of the crucial role ofatural products as potential sources of various modern pharma-euticals. However, secondary metabolites are often present in lowuantity in plant material and their extraction, purification andharacterization still remain a great challenge in the drug discov-ry process. Several reviews have been recently published givingn overview on sample preparations [20–22] and characterization23–25]. Although exhaustive in the treated field, these reviewsasically deal with the chemotaxonomy-oriented approach: thelant species selected for screening are known to contain specificecondary metabolites (alkaloids, steroids, amino acids, etc.); thus,he choice of the more appropriate extraction methodology andhe more suitable analytical technique is performed in order tochieve the best extraction/purification/separation of the desiredecondary metabolite.
In the ethnopharmacological approach, the main requirement ishe knowledge of the plant parts traditionally employed as reme-ies. The two main traditional medicines, Chinese and Ayurveda,ave their ancient texts in the Chinese Materia Medica written byhizhen at the time of the Ming Dynasty [26] and the ayurvedicharaka Samhita written in Sanskrit probably around 400–200efore the common era, respectively. Both texts are now availables English version [27,28] and still used as references for herbalemedies [29–31]. Where tests are not available, the ethnobotanicalurvey is the only method for acquiring information on medicinallants traditional use.
The phytochemical research based on ethnopharmacology isonsidered an effective approach in NCE discovery, however inhis case no information are available on the nature of secondary
etabolite; thus all the extraction/purification/separation pro-esses are performed in order to “find and follow” the supposedharmacological activity with the final aim to isolate and identifyhe bioactive compound/s.
Starting from the ethnopharmacological approach, the aim ofhis review is to address natural-products chemists to the choicef the best methodologies, which include the combination ofxtraction/sample preparation tools and analytical techniques, for
Please cite this article in press as: G. Brusotti, et al., Isolation and charactanalysis in the ethnopharmacological approach, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2
solating and characterizing bioactive NCE from plants, as poten-ial lead compounds in the drug discovery process. A particularttention will be focused on herbal medicines applications andevelopments achieved from 2010 up to date.
ethnopharmacology approach.
An overview on the methodologies (extractive, biological, ana-lytical) involved in the selected approach is shown in Fig. 1.
2. Extraction techniques and sample preparation
2.1. Extraction techniques
Extraction is the first step in the drug discovery process fromplants. Several general procedures have been proposed for obtain-ing extracts representing a range of polarity [32] and/or enrichedof the most common secondary metabolites such as alkaloids [33]and saponins [34].
Beyond the traditional solid–liquid extraction methodologies,such as maceration, infusion, decoction and boiling under reflux,a wide range of modern techniques have been introduced in thepast decades. These include microwave-assisted extraction (MAE),ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE), supercritical fluid extraction(SFE), and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE).
In the MAE, for example, microwaves are combined with tra-ditional solvent extraction; this non conventional heating systemmay enhance the penetration of solvent into the plant powder pro-moting the dissolution of the bioactive compounds, as described byZhang et al. [35]. Similarly, in the UAE, the ultrasonic waves breakthe cell walls promoting the release of bioactive natural productsinto the solvent [36]. In a recent review Chang et al. [37] reporteda comparison between MAE, UAE and conventional methodolo-gies which highlights the advantages of MAE and UAE concerningextraction time (shorter) and extraction yield of bioactive com-ponents (higher). In this review the recent advancements in thedevelopment of MAE techniques also are reported. High pressureMAE (HPMAE), nitrogen protected MAE (NPMAE), vacuum MAE(VMAE), ultrasonic MAE (UMAE), solvent free MAE (SFMAE) anddynamic MAE (DMAE) are described and guidelines for selectingsuitable techniques are well tabulated.
DMAE is particularly interesting since can be arranged for anon-line coupling with different chromatographic systems. Tonget al. developed an on-line method for the extraction and isola-tion of bioactive constituents from Lyeicnotus pauciflorus Maxim, a
erization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
plant used in the traditional Chinese medicine for treating severaldiseases. Particularly, the coupling of DMAE with high-speed-counter-current chromatography allowed a continuous isolationof the major active constituent nevadensin, in higher yield and
ING Model
P
al and
pGDdrhtoU
stsmtfp
cuaotaptoptcc
tlaebHsif
ossthtapscbSac
vfhemi[fp
ARTICLEBA-9001; No. of Pages 11
G. Brusotti et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutic
urity and shorter time compared with conventional methods [38].ao et al. [39] illustrated the application of an on-line systemMAE-high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for theetermination of lipophilic constituents in roots of Salvia milthior-hiza Bunge. In this recent research article, an aqueous solution ofydrophilic ionic liquid (IL) was selected as extraction solvent andhe proposed on-line DMAE was compared with the correspondingff-line DMAE and with other extraction methods IL-based, such asAE and maceration.
After optimization of the opportune operating parameters, noignificant differences were highlighted concerning the extrac-ion’s yield; however, since IL can be used as green solvents ineveral steps linked to extraction and separation of secondaryetabolites from natural sources, due to their unique proper-
ies [40], the automatic on-line system proposed may be suitableor faster extraction and isolation of secondary metabolites fromlants.
The modern extraction methods include also the use of SFE,alled carbon dioxide extraction (SC-CO2) when carbon dioxide issed as main solvent, and PLE. Herrero et al. [41] illustrated thepplication of SFE during the period 2007–2009 giving a summaryf the interesting compounds obtained, their biological activi-ies and corresponding references. Different operating conditionsre reported since several factors may influence the extractionrocess with carbon dioxide. The main advantage of SC-CO2 ishe ability to operate at low temperature and in the absencef oxygen and light, avoiding thermal degradation and decom-osition of possible labile compounds. The main disadvantage,he low polarity of carbon dioxide, can be bypassed by adding ao-solvent such as ethanol, which allows the extraction of polarompounds.
Liza et al. [42] described the use of SC-CO2 and ethanol inhe extraction of bioactive flavonoids from Strobilanthes crispuseaves, known in ethnopharmacology for their antihyperglycemicnd antilipidemic activities. The paper shows an optimization of thexperimental conditions for SC-CO2 flavonoids extraction followedy the identification and determination of the main flavonoids byPLC. A comparison of the obtained results with those of Soxhlet
olvent extraction highlights how SC-CO2 can reach higher yieldsn less time and less solvent consumption, being a suitable methodor industrial purpose.
The main application of SC-CO2 still remains the extractionf essential oils (EOs) from plants and herbs. Monoterpenes,esquiterpenes and their oxygenated derivatives are lipophilic sub-tances responsible for the characteristic aroma of the EOs and forhe biological activity that is often associated to them. Stem andydro-distillation are commonly used for EOs extraction but, sincehese compounds are volatiles and thermolabiles, the high temper-ture needed for the distillation process (usually water’s boilingoint) may cause a chemical alteration of the whole EO compo-ition. The use of supercritical fluid extraction, particularly witharbon dioxide as solvent, can avoid this problem, as describedy Fornari et al. [43]. The authors underlined the advantages ofC-CO2, particularly concerning the better quality and biologicalctivity gained, compared with those of EOs obtained by means ofonventional methods.
A recent application of SC-CO2 in the extraction of bioactiveolatiles is, for example, the extraction of aromatic turmeronerom Curcuma longa Linn., which induces apoptosis in the humanepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2, as reported by Chengt al. [44]. In this research article SC-CO2 is selected as extractionethodology on the basis of a previous work [45], demonstrating
Please cite this article in press as: G. Brusotti, et al., Isolation and charactanalysis in the ethnopharmacological approach, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2
ts efficiency in completely extract the turmeric oil. Hsieh et al.46] described the SC-CO2 extraction of non-polar constituentsrom Toona sinensis Roem leaves which seem to have antidiabeticroperties. Since Toona sinensis Roem leaves are basically known as
PRESS Biomedical Analysis xxx (2013) xxx– xxx 3
nutritious vegetable, the SC-CO2 was selected being recognized assafe and green methodology.
PLE was introduced by Dionex corporation in 1995 and theoryand principles are well illustrated by Henry and Yonker in a reviewdated 2006 [47]. The use of solvents environmental friendly, suchas alcohols or alkanes, and the possibility to operate at temperatureabove the boiling points of the employed solvents, enhancing thesolubility of analytes, are the main advantages of this technique.Several parameters such as pressure, solvent and temperature, mayinfluence the PLE extraction process, as described for example byMustafa et al. [48], in the extraction of phenolic compounds, lignansand carotenoids, secondary metabolites frequently present in foodsand plants. PLE is reported as “first choice” extraction method for itsgreen technology associated with higher yield, less time and lowersolvent consumption, compared to conventional methods.
Recent research articles report the use of PLE in the extrac-tion of pharmacologically active compounds. Skalicka-Wozniakand Glowniak [49], for example, evaluated two parameters, sol-vent and temperature, in order to improve the extraction offuranocoumarins from Heracleum leskowii. Solvent of differentpolarities and four temperatures were tested; no significant differ-ences were found in the yield of coumarins increasing the solventpolarity while increasing the temperature, the amount of somecoumarins increased in lipophilic solvents. Dichloromethane andmethanol and 100 ◦C were selected as optimum parameters. Liuet al. [50] described a new method for the isolation and identifica-tion of capsaicinoid in extracts of Capsicum annuum. The efficiencyof PLE extraction was compared with UAE, MAE and soxhlet. Afteroptimization of extraction conditions, PLE in methanol at 100 ◦Cgave rise to higher yields in shorter time. The coupling with liq-uid chromatography (LC)–mass spectrometry (MS)–MS allowedthe rapid identification and determination of the selected cap-saicinoids, well known for their pharmaceutical and antioxidantproperties.
Flavonoids, secondary metabolites responsible for several bio-logical activities, besides by SC-CO2 [42] can be easily extracted byPLE as reported by Wu et al. [51]. Rutin and quercetin, two mainflavonoids present in four plants used in the traditional ChineseMedicine, were extracted by PLE and analyzed by HPLC. Two nov-elties are well described in this paper: the use of ILs, as pressurizedsolvents, and the chemiluminescence (CL) detection instead of theusual UV. IL, as previously described, are green solvents with uniqueproperties but have significant absorption in the UV region: thechemiluminescence detection avoids this problem allowing to per-form extraction and analysis in a coupling system IL-PLE-HPLC-CL.Results obtained after the optimization of the experimental condi-tions highlighted once again the suitability of PLE in the extractionof natural products.
When water, the most recognized friendly and green solvent, isused, PLE becomes pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE). Teoet al. in 2010 published a review [52] where principles, parametersand application of PHWE are well described. Particularly, the reviewreports an interesting table: the PHWE of bioactives from differ-ent plant parts and foods is compared with conventional methodsand the corresponding references are given. Recently, Gil-Ramírezet al. [53] reported the application of PHWE for improving theextraction’s yield of isoxanthohumol, one of the most abundantprenylated flavonoids in Humulus lupus. Isoxanthohumol seems tohave antiinflammatory properties [54] and to inhibit PDK1 andPKC protein kinases in vitro [55], thus the importance of findingmethods which may give rise to enriched extract.
Among the modern and green extraction methodologies
erization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
presented, two low exploited techniques deserve a mention:hydrotropic and enzyme-assisted extraction.
Hydrotropes are highly water soluble organic salts able toincrease the solubility in water of other organic substances,
ARTICLE IN PRESSG Model
PBA-9001; No. of Pages 11
4 G. Brusotti et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis xxx (2013) xxx– xxx
MeO H
Ground plant mater ial
Residue
Residue
Residue
Hexane
CH2Cl2
EtOAc
Hexane extr act
Concentrated under
vacuum
CH2Cl2 extr act
Concentr ated und er
vacuum
Concentr ated und er
vacuum
Exhausted Residue
Concentr ated under
vacuum
EtOAc extr act
Wate r extr act
Lyophilized
Exhausted Residue
Ground plant mater ial
ecoct
nvPtirbt
eyhrf
genfntta
uclbi
mhted
Fig. 2. Flowchart of conventional extraction process (maceration, d
ormally insoluble. When amphiphilic salts, are employed as sol-ents, the extraction is called hydrotropic extraction. Desai andarikh recently reported the hydrotropic extraction of citral fromhe leaves of Cymbopogon flexuosus (Steud.) Wats. [56]. Sodium sal-cylate and sodium cumene sulfonate were used as solvents; theesults obtained after optimization of the experimental conditionsy means of the opportune statistical and kinetic studies, confirmedhe feasibility of the proposed method.
Aqueous solution of sodium cumene sulfonate allowed a fasterxtraction of reserpine from Rauwolfia vomitoria roots and higherield, compared to the conventional extraction with methanol [57];owever, the authors underlined the need of further studies sinceeserpine crystals obtained with hydrotropic solvent showed dif-erent morphology respect to those obtained with methanol.
Enzyme-assisted extraction is a promising and biotechnolo-ical alternative extraction methodology. In a recent review Purit al. [58] reported the use of enzymes, such as cellulases, pecti-ases and hemicellulase, in the extraction of bioactive compounds
rom plants highlighting advantages and disadvantages of this tech-ique, compared with the conventional. The main disadvantage ishe need to find specific enzymes for specific substrates thus fur-her studies are necessary for increasing the feasibility of enzymessisted extraction.
Although each non-conventional extraction technique hasndeniable advantages, this overview clearly points out that nonean be defined “universal”. When the nature of secondary metabo-ites is known, (we know what we are looking for) the choiceecomes easier since easier is the selection of the parameters affect-
ng the extraction process and their later optimization.When nothing or little is known about the nature of secondary
etabolites, as in the ethnopharmacological approach (we only
Please cite this article in press as: G. Brusotti, et al., Isolation and charactanalysis in the ethnopharmacological approach, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2
ave an hypothesis on the biological activity), all extracts are poten-ially of biological interest and the selection of the more appropriatextraction method is performed in order to “mimic” the herbalrugs, as described in the traditional remedies.
MeOH extr act
ion, reflux, soxhlet) in water and in solvents of increasing polarity.
Accordingly, conventional solid liquid extraction techniquescome “back to the future” and water maceration and/or decoc-tion represents the first choice since traditional healers commonlyuse water as solvent. Further extractions with solvents of increas-ing polarity, such as n-hexane, methanol, ethyl acetate anddichloromethane, are necessary for a preliminary separation basedon the hydro/lipophilic properties of the biologically active com-pounds, as demonstrated in our previous works [5,59]. A briefsummary of the conventional extraction (maceration, decoction,reflux, soxhlet) in water and in solvents of increasing polarity isshown in Fig. 2.
Once a chemical class and/or compound/s responsible for thebiological activity assessed have been identified, the extractionprocess can be changed/modified in order to improve the extrac-tion yield of the desired secondary metabolites. The application ofchemometrics, permitting the simultaneous evaluation of the mostinfluential variables, the assessment of their mutual influence andtheir influence on the overall process, will allow the selection of themost focused technique and the optimization of the experimentalconditions affording the targeted secondary metabolite/s in highestyield and shortest time.
2.2. Sample preparation
Before going through with biological assays and chemical anal-yses, a pre-treatment of crude extracts is often necessary in orderto recognize and remove interfering common metabolites, suchas lipids, pigment and tannins. Traditional liquid–liquid parti-tion, solid phase extraction (SPE) and gel filtration on SephadexLH-20 can be used either for removing most of the undesiredmolecules either for pre-concentrating specific secondary metabo-
erization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
lites [60–62].When no data are available on the chemical composition
of crude extracts, a preliminary purification can be carried outbased on the lipophilic/hydrophilic and/or acidic/basic properties.
ING Model
P
al and
TapprwrfdiCcacttpsmHttoccpct
inpi
fTspirnpi
sywctidel
mmrpomspaoas
ARTICLEBA-9001; No. of Pages 11
G. Brusotti et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutic
raditional SPE, includes reverse, normal and ion-exchange phases,re used to this purpose. For example, aqueous extracts can beartially purified by passage through a reverse phase column:olar constituents will be easily eluted while the non polar will beetained and successively eluted with non aqueous solvent. A step-ise series of solvents with increasing polarity may be applied,
ather than a single elution step, for promoting a preliminaryractionation of complex plants extracts. Using this approach theichloromethane extract of Diospyros bipindensis (Gürke), a medic-
nal plant used by Baka Pygmies, was quickly pre-fractionated byesari et al. [59] and subjected to a bio-guided purification pro-ess. Araya et al. [63] developed a simultaneous phase-traffickingpproach for rapid and selective isolation of neutral, basic and acidomponents from plants extract using ion-exchange resins. Withhis improved catch-and-release methodology the author achievedhe purification of three unprecedented purine-containing com-ounds from the methanolic extract of ginger rhizomes [64]. Whenpecific secondary metabolites are detected in the extracts, aore selective enrichment protocols can be followed: for example,agerman [65] described the selective purification of condensed
annins from non tannin compounds by Sephadex LH-20 gel filtra-ion; Long et al. [66] reported a non aqueous solid phase extractionf alkaloids from Scopalia tangutica Maxim. Silica based strongation exchange (SCX) was chosen in alternative to resin matri-es, due to its weaker non specific hydrophobic interaction. Theurification of the crude extract with this non aqueous method,ompared to aqueous one, seems to allow a more selective reten-ion of alkaloids compounds, minimizing interferences.
Xu et al. [67] illustrated the basic concept of molecular imprint-ng polymers (MIPs) application in solid phase extraction fromatural matrices, particularly highlighting the ability to selectivelyre-concentrate anti-tumours or anti-Hepatitis C virus natural
nhibitors from Chinese traditional herbs.In a recent work Bi et al. [68] proposed an off-line SPE method
or the separation of phenolic acids from natural plant extract.he authors developed a molecular imprinting anion-exchangeolid phase extraction using ionic liquid as molecularly imprintedolymers (MIPs). The sorbent material was obtained polymer-
zing different functional and co-functional monomers and theesulting polymers enabled a selective structure recognition of phe-olic acids from Salicornia herbacea. The proposed method showedotential to be widely applied for the fast, convenient, and efficient
solation of various organic acids from plant extracts.The use of resins is known since the third decade of 1900s [69];
everal progress and modifications have been carried out during theears, giving rise to the modern macroporous resin. Their history isell described by Li and Chase [70] in a recent review and the appli-
ation of adsorptive macroporous resin chromatography to theargeted purification of pharmacologically active natural productss particularly highlighted. The use of these separation materialsramatically increased and relies on their unique adsorption prop-rties and advantages including good stability, low operational cost,ess solvent consumption and easy regeneration.
Some critical considerations have to be done for choosing theore appropriate sample preparations. RP18-SPE is the most com-on preliminary purification for crude extracts either when the
emoval of chlorophyll and resins is the target of the separationrocess, either when there is a lack of information on the naturef the bioactive compounds: the versatility of RP-18 allows a fastacroscopic separation between hydrophilic and lipophilic sub-
tances. On the other hand, SPE based on ionic exchange stationaryhases can be used either for a rough separation between acidic
Please cite this article in press as: G. Brusotti, et al., Isolation and charactanalysis in the ethnopharmacological approach, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2
nd basic compounds either for a selective separation of alkaloidsnce their presence is assessed in the extract. More information arevailable on the nature of secondary metabolites, more refined theeparation technique becomes.
PRESS Biomedical Analysis xxx (2013) xxx– xxx 5
3. Biological screening and separation activity-oriented
Since biological activity is the ethnopharmacological approach’sleading thread, its evaluation is necessary to validate the traditionaluse (water extract) and to look for the most active extracts. Thus,crude and/or partially purified extracts undergo biological tests,selected on the basis of the supposed bioactivity.
In vitro bioassays are faster (ideal for High ThroughputScreening) and require very small amounts of compound. Even ifthey might not be relevant to clinical conditions, they are specific,sensitive and widely used; in addition most of them are microplate-based and can be carried out in full or semi-automation [71]. Thecomplexity of the bioassay must be defined by laboratory facilitiesand quality available personnel [72] thus the “easy to use” antimi-crobial and antifungal assays are broadly employed as “on/off” testfor only give an idea of the presence or absence of active substances.Generally, a crude extract and a pure compound are consideredinteresting if the IC50 values are below 100 �g/ml and below 25 �M,respectively [73]. Enzymatic and chemical assays, based on spec-trophotometric measurements, can also be used for assessing thepresence of compounds with specific activities [74–76].
Once a biological activity has been determined, the complexmixture needs to be purified in order to isolate the bioactivecompound/s. The integration of different separation methods aregenerally required: principle aspects and practical applications ofthe main separation techniques are comprehensively reviewed bySticher [77].
Bioassay-guided fractionation has been the state-of-the artmethod for identifying bioactive natural products for many years.This approach involves repetitive preparative-scale fractionationand assessment of biological activity up to the isolation of pureconstituents with the selected biological activity.
A recent application is described by Cesari et al. [59]. Followingthe procedure reported in Fig. 2, five extracts were obtained fromD. bipindensis (Gürke), an African medicinal plants used by BakaPygmies for the treatment of respiratory disorders, and their bio-logical properties evaluated. Since the activity was found in almostall the extracts, a chromatographic fingerprinting were carried outby means of reverse phase high performance liquid chromatog-raphy (RP-HPLC) affording a metabolite profile (Fig. 3) for eachextract. The comparison of the chromatograms highlighted thepresence of common peaks that may likely belong to the bioactivecompounds. Thus, the most active dichloromethane extract (DME)was further purified through repetitive preparative HPLC followedby evaluation of the biological activity of the obtained fractions.The bio-guided fractionation allowed the full characterization ofDME together with the validation of D. bipindensis traditional usesince the identified bioactive constituents were found also in waterextract, even if too low to be detected in a given bioassay.
Even if this classical methodology has provided a good meansto the targeted isolation of bioactive constituents from com-plex extracts [78–80], the huge amount of biological materialrequired and the risk of losing the activity during the isolationprocess, because of dilution or decomposition processes, limit theattractiveness of this approach, which is perceived as expensive,time-consuming and labour-intensive.
Micro-fractionation bioactivity-integrated fingerprints repre-sents the miniaturized of conventional bio-guided fractionation.A comprehensive understanding of the chemical composition ofplant extracts with the advantages of utilizing less material thantraditional bioassay-guided method, represents the strength pointof this modern approach. Using HPLC micro-fractionation, the com-
erization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
ponents of crude extracts can be fractionated and collected into 96well microplates, ready for further biological screening. The activityobserved in the microplate wells can be directly connected to thecorresponding component in the chromatogram, allowing a rapid
ARTICLE IN PRESSG Model
PBA-9001; No. of Pages 11
6 G. Brusotti et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis xxx (2013) xxx– xxx
min0 10 20 30 40 50 60
HE
min0 10 20 30 40 50 60
EAE
min0 10 20 30 40 50 60
DME
min0 10 20 30 40 50 60
ME
min0 10 20 30 40 50 60
WE
F m wa(
liaiwc(tfebpowlecs
rpitai2(uaeadMh(gtse
ig. 3. Chromatographic fingerprinting of Diospyros bipindensis extracts obtained froDME), ethyl acetate (EAE), methanol (ME).
ocalization and a further scale-up purification. Furthermore, thentegrated platform can conduce to the on-line identification of thective component, avoiding the time-consuming and less interest-ng isolation of known compounds [81–83]. To prevent the tedious
ork associated with activity guided fractionation, techniquesombining the efficient HPLC separation with a fast post-columnbio)chemical detection step have been developed. Recent applica-ions of on-line biochemical detection methods for drug discoveryrom plant extracts are illustrated by Malherbe et al. [84] and Shit al. [85]. Compared to microplate-based approach, where theioactivity is determined off-line after evaporation of HPLC mobilehase, the on-line bio-chemical screening evaluates the bioactivityf single HPLC peaks directly in a post-column reaction chamber,ithout the need of solvent removal. The configuration of most on-
ine biochemical assays includes a flow-splitter: one aliquot of theluent is directed to in vitro assay, while the second aliquot can beonnected, directly or indirectly by means of a second separationtep, to additional detectors for the chemical identification.
The wide range of available bioassay systems enables aapid screening and identification of compounds from com-lex mixtures, without prior purification and collection. They
nclude antioxidant activity assays, enzyme activity and recep-or affinity detection. Practical applications of continuous-flowssay systems for the rapid identification of antioxidant peaksn chromatograms are reviewed by Niederländer et al. [86].,2′-Azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) and1,1)-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical are commonlysed for the measurement of radical scavenging activity. The stablend coloured radical reagent can be added post-column to the HPLCluate by an extra pump system and individual radical scavengingctivity can be monitored by a UV-vis detector as a negative peak,ue to the conversion of radicals to their uncoloured reduced form.razek et al. [87] determined the antioxidant properties of twenty
erbal samples by means of conventional and simple flow injectionFI)-spectrophotometric DPPH antioxidant assays. Both methods
Please cite this article in press as: G. Brusotti, et al., Isolation and charactanalysis in the ethnopharmacological approach, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2
ave accurate and reproducible results but FI resulted faster andhus more suitable for antioxidants screening of large number ofamples. Besides ABTS and DPPH, the antioxidant activity of plantxtracts can be determined by the flow injection analysis-luminol
ter (WE) and from solvents of increasing polarity: n-hexane (HE), dichloromethane
chemiluminescence (FIA-CL), as recently reported by Küc ükboyaciet al. [88].
Concerning the on-line enzyme activity assays, in 2006 de Jonget al. [89] described a novel screening strategy for the detection ofacetylcholinesterase inhibitors in natural extracts. In the proposedmethod the bioactivity is directly determined by monitoring theconcentration of both acetylcholine (substrate) and choline (prod-uct) using electrospray MS. Moreover, compared to the continuousflow-assay based on fluorescence detection, previously reported byRhee et al. [90] no addition of modified substrates is needed.
Biochromatography is an on-line biochemical detectionmethod, based on the biological interactions among active com-ponents and immobilized targets (proteins, enzymes, receptors,cell membranes and biomimetic membranes) coupled with con-ventional chromatography. In a recent review Wang et al. [91]reported a classification of biochromatographic models basedon the different properties of the stationary phases and theconsequently different applications field.
Cell membrane chromatography (CMC), for example, is a biolog-ical affinity chromatographic technique useful for screening activecomponents from complex matrices, such as herbal medicines, andfor investigating binding interactions between drugs and recep-tors. Silica coated with opportune active cell membranes is used asstationary phase usually following a two-dimensional liquid chro-matography (2D-LC) approach. A large number of CMC coupledwith online HPLC–MS have been applied to the screening of naturalcompounds from plant extracts [92–95].
A 2D biochromatography system has been also applied to theseparation of active compounds from Schisandra chinenses, usedin the TCM for several diseases, as reported by Wang et al. [96].Immobilized liposome stationary phase was employed in the firstdimension for evaluating the affinity of S. chinenses constituentswith the coated liposome while a C18 monolithic column in thesecond dimension for the analysis of the fractions eluted.
A recent example of enzymatic stationary phase application is
erization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
reported by da Silva et al. [97]. The authors described the screeningof 21 coumarin derivatives by means of acetylcholinesterase cap-illary enzyme reactor. This method allows the biological screeningof potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors originating from
ARTICLE IN PRESSG Model
PBA-9001; No. of Pages 11
G. Brusotti et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis xxx (2013) xxx– xxx 7
Table 1Off-line and on-line methods and strategies applied to activity-oriented separation.
Activity-oriented separation
Techniques Strategy
Off-line methodsBio-guided fractionation Repetitive preparative-scale fractionation combined with off-line biological assaysMicro-fractionation bioactivity-integrated fingerprint Low resolution and target collection of HPLC peaks followed by microplate assays
On-line methodsHPLC biochemical detection Complex mixture separation and on-line activity assessment of HPLC eluate in a
post -column reaction chamberBiochromatography Affinity chromatography separation based on the biological interactions among
active components and immobilized targetsInim
cm
ecvcelfiaplcamctsafdcis
4
wtton
lstfiprpEscnsBmqt
Electrophoretic enzyme assays
omplex mixture, such as plant extracts, and the evaluation of theirechanism of action without the need of pre-fractionation.Capillary electrophoresis (CE), known for its versatility, high-
fficiency separation, short analysis times, and low sampleonsumption [98], over the past decade, has been proven to beery useful for studying enzymatic reactions, validating its appli-ation for biological screening of plant extracts [99]. In particular,lectrophoretically mediated microanalysis (EMMA) and immobi-ized capillary enzyme reactors (ICERs) have been extensively usedor enzyme study and inhibitor screening. In EMMA, the capillarys used both as a microbioreactor and for separation of substratend products, while in ICERs mode the substrate is injected in are-treated capillary where an enzyme was previously immobi-
ized. Compared with EMMA, ICERs can greatly reduce analysisost, because the immobilized enzyme is reusable and stable. Inddition, no extra mixing procedure is necessary. A variety ofethods have been reported for ICER, either in the format of
apillaries or microfluidic chips [100]. Kang’s group developedwo CE-based methods including EMMA [101] and ICERs [102] forcreening natural products for AChE inhibition. A CE method withn electrophoretically mediated microanalysis (EMMA) techniqueor screening of Xanthine Oxidase inhibitors in natural extracts waseveloped [103], as well as a method involving an immobilizedapillary adenosine deaminase microreactor for inhibitor screeningn natural extracts [104]. Techniques and strategies applied in theeparation activity-oriented are summarized in Table 1.
. Hyphenated chromatographic techniques
The combination of sensitive and rapid analytical techniquesith on-line spectroscopic methods, the so-called “hyphenated
echniques”, generating simultaneously both chemical and bioac-ivity information, plays an increasingly important role in the studyf the effects of phytopharmaceuticals and in the quality control ofatural remedies.
Currently, these methods may be dedicated to the rapid on-ine identification of known components (dereplication), or to thetandardization or the quality control of a complex extract. In par-icular, HPLC is widely used for natural products profiling andngerprinting, for quantitative analyses, and for quality controlurposes. HPLC can be coupled with simple detectors used forecording chromatographic traces, for profiling or quantificationurposes (e.g., (UV), Evaporative Light Scattering Detector (ELSD),lectron Capture Detector (ECD)), or detectors for hyphenatedystems that generate multidimensional data for online identifi-ation and dereplication purposes (e.g., UV-diode array (DAD), MS,uclear magnetic resonance (NMR)) [105]. Most fingerprint analy-is has been developed with Reverse Phase-LC using a UV detector.
Please cite this article in press as: G. Brusotti, et al., Isolation and charactanalysis in the ethnopharmacological approach, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2
eing simple and inexpensive, HPLC-UV is used in several phar-acopoeias for the quantification of individual compounds in the
uality control of herbal drugs or phytopreparations. The addi-ional UV–vis spectral information of DAD, which can also record
capillary-screening of enzymatic reactions (being the biological target eithermobilized or not) by separation of products and remaining reactants
a series of chromatograms at a wide range of wavelengths, allowsqualitative and quantitative analysis of peaks in a fingerprint chro-matogram [106–108]. Another detector for liquid chromatographyis ELSD and it has been used mainly for the detection of compoundswith weak chromophores, such as terpenes, in both aglycone andglycosidic forms, saponins, and some alkaloids [109], and usuallyin parallel with other techniques (i.e. MS, UV–vis) [110–112].
When vegetable matrix is particularly complex an high-resolution metabolite profiling and rapid fingerprinting of crudeplant extracts can be achieved by means of ultra-high pressure liq-uid chromatography (UHPLC). This well known technique [113],compared to other analytical approaches, increases speed of anal-ysis, allows higher separation efficiency and resolution, highersensitivity and much lower solvent consumption. A recent applica-tion of UHPLC-DAD–TOF-MS in the study of the metabolite profilingof Brazilian Lippia species has been described by Funari et al. [114].
More attention has been paid to the development of fingerprintanalysis with MS. Beside gas chromatography (GC)–MS, widelyused to construct the fingerprint for volatile compounds [115–117],LC–MS plays a prominent role for the detection and identifica-tion of pharmacologically active and/or reactive metabolites [118].LC–MS can also avoid the repetitive isolation of known compoundsby rapidly identifying them, on the basis of structural informationdeduced from their fragmentation pattern generated by collision-induced dissociation (CID) in MS–MS experiments, and focus onthe targeted isolation of compounds generating characteristic frag-ment ions. The rapid identification of known compounds fromnatural product extracts (also called dereplication) is an importantstep in an efficiently run drug discovery programme, which allowsresources and efforts to be focused only on the most promisinglead [119]. Applications of LC coupled with different detection sys-tems for the fingerprinting or quality control of herbal remedieshave been recently reported by many authors. For example, Jinget al. [120] developed an on-line HPLC-DAD–ESI-MS for the chro-matographic fingerprinting of Radix Scrophulariae; Zhou et al. [121]employed LC-DAD–MSn to establish a chromatographic finger-printing of Desmodium styracifolium and Yang et al. [122] developedchromatographic fingerprints for authentication of S. scandens andS. vulgaris and many other papers dealing with chromatographicfingerprints by means of LC–MS are summarized in a recent review[25].
Multiple chromatographic techniques can be combined toimprove the “chromatographic fingerprint” of herbal medicines.The 2D fingerprint analysis, obtained by multiple detections or sep-arations, allows the acquisition of more chemical information onthe whole chemical composition [123]. Principal component anal-ysis (PCA), a well-known chemometric method, is used to describethe variation in data, and facilitates the discovery of groups or clas-
erization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
sification of the fingerprints. 2D information extracted from DADdata can also be constructed using PCA [124].
Since efficient commercial MS–MS databases are not alwaysavailable, the dereplication process may require additional
ARTICLE IN PRESSG Model
PBA-9001; No. of Pages 11
8 G. Brusotti et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis xxx (2013) xxx– xxx
Table 2Hyphenated chromatographic techniques.
Advantages Disadvantages Applications
HPLC-UV - ease of use- widespread- low cost- linearity- versatility
- requires mobile phase with low UV- cut-offs- not applicable to compounds withoutchromophores- not very selective
All compounds with chromophores(i.e. flavonoids, terpenes, alkaloids,coumarins, alkamides, and polyacetylene)
HPLC-DAD - ease of use- limited on-line structural information- assessment of peak purity- can compensate the low sensitivityby choosing a wavelength with thehighest extinction coefficient- moderate low cost
- requires mobile phase with low UV- cut-offs- not applicable to compounds withoutchromophores
All compounds with chromophores(i.e. polyphenols, alkaloids, quinones, andxanthones)
HPLC-ELSD - universal- ease of use- widespread- low cost- specific- sensitive- compatible with gradient elution
- not compatible with non volatile buffer- poor reproducibility- quantification inaccessible- non-linear response- need optimization of gas flow and- drift tube temperature
All natural products, mainly used fordetection of non-chromophoriccompounds (i.e. saponins, terpenes, in bothaglycone and glycosidic forms, saponins,and some alkaloids)
HPLC–MS - universal- sensitive- specific- widespread- structural information (MW,molecular formula and diagnosticfragments)
- expensive- usually not compatible with non volatilebuffer- eluent modifiers can cause ionsuppression- compound-dependent response
All natural productsUseful information mainly for glycosidesand polyphenols by fragment generation
HPLC-NMR - universal- full structural information
- expensive- need of deuterated mobile phase
tivesolvenitivity
All natural productsUseful for labile compounds or molecules
surt[tissloHaliscaai
5
eortwr
stft
- stereochemical information - non selec- need for
- low sens
pectroscopic information to confirm the identity of known nat-ral products or to partially identify unknown metabolites. In thisespect, HPLC-NMR can yield important complementary informa-ion or even a complete structural assignment of natural products125–127]. HPLC-NMR should ideally enable the complete struc-ural characterization of any molecule directly in an extract, ifts corresponding LC peak is clearly resolved. However, there areeveral limiting factors of online HPLC-NMR, in particular lowensitivity and the need for solvent suppression, that cause ana-yte signals localized under the solvent resonances to be lost. Inrder to circumvent these problems, approaches as SPE-NMR, orPLC microfractionation of the extract followed by concentrationnd re-injection in deuterated solvent by using microflow capil-ary HPLC-NMR (CapNMR), are successfully applied [128,129]. Thenstruments are usually operated in on flow (continuous flow) ortop flow modes. Applications of on-flow HPLC-NMR analyses torude extract profiling have been recently reported for example forlkaloids [130] and terpenes [131]. A summary of advantages, dis-dvantages, and application of the hyphenated techniques is shownn Table 2.
. Conclusion
The “one disease one drug” paradigm, the key theory of the mod-rn drug discovery, seems to have lost sheen because of the growthf multigenic diseases. From this viewpoint traditional medicinesepresent a source of multitarget therapeutics; in fact, very oftenhe secondary metabolites contained in complex plant extractsork synergistically and rarely a single molecule/metabolite is
esponsible for the biological activity found.Due to the chemo-diversity of secondary metabolites and
Please cite this article in press as: G. Brusotti, et al., Isolation and charactanalysis in the ethnopharmacological approach, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2
ince any kind of pharmacological activity might be found,he role of analysis in the ethnopharmacological approach isundamental. As highlighted in this review, several extrac-ion/purification/separation processes can be applied but the
t suppression.that might epimerize or interconvert as aresult of their isolation
choice of the best methodologies has to be done in order to “find andfollow” the supposed pharmacological activity that might be linkedto one or more compound/s. Thanks to the innovation in analyticaltechnology, identification, separation and detection of secondarymetabolites dramatically improved. Particularly, hyphenated tech-niques and biochromatography represent an important tool forhigh-throughput screening allowing the rapid identification ofcompounds from crude extract coupled with an on-line activitymeasurement. However, conventional bio-guided fractionationsfollowed by off-line biological activity determination still remainmandatory when these advanced apparatus are not available oron-line measurements are not feasible.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by a grant from the Italian Ministerodell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica (grant no. 2009Z8YTYC).
References
[1] V. Duraipandiyan, M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu, Antimicrobial activity of someethnomedicinal plants used by Palyar tribe from Tamil Nadu, India, BMCComplement. Altern. Med. 6 (2006) 35–41.
[2] J.K. Grover, S. Yadav, V. Vats, Medicinal plants of India with antidiabetic poten-tial, J. Ethnopharmacol. 81 (2002) 81–100.
[3] A. Jurg, T. Tomas, J. Pividal, Antimalarial activity of some plant remedies in usein Marracuene, southern Mozambique, J. Ethnopharmacol. 33 (1991) 79–83.
[4] T.A. Ngueyem, G. Brusotti, G. Marrubini, P. Grisoli, C. Dacarro, G. Vidari, P. VitaFinzi, G. Caccialanza, Validation of use of a traditional remedy from Brideliagrandis (Pierre ex Hutch) stem bark against oral Streptococci, J. Ethnophar-macol. 120 (2008) 13–16.
[5] G. Brusotti, I. Cesari, G. Frassà, P. Grisoli, C. Dacarro, G. Caccialanza, Antimicro-bial properties of stem bark extracts from Phyllanthus muellerianus (Kuntze)Excell, J. Ethnopharmacol. 135 (2011) 797–800.
[6] H. Khalid, W.E. Abdalla, H. Abdelgadir, T. Opatz, T. Efferth, Gems from tra-
erization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
ditional north-African medicine: medicinal and aromatic plants from Sudan,Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2 (2012) 92–103.
[7] V. da Silva Bolzani, M. Valli, M. Pivatto, C. Viegas Jr., Natural products fromBrazilian biodiversity as a source of new models for medicinal chemistry, PureAppl. Chem. 84 (2012) 1837–1846.
ING Model
P
al and
ARTICLEBA-9001; No. of Pages 11
G. Brusotti et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutic
[8] WHO-AFRO, African Traditional Medicine Day. 31 August 2010. Special issue.The African Health Monitor, 2010.
[9] J.W.-H. Li, J.C. Vederas, Drug discovery and natural products: end of an era oran endless frontier? Science 325 (2009) 161–165.
[10] D.J. Newman, G.M. Cragg, Natural products as sources of new drugs over the30 years from 1981 to 2010, J. Nat. Prod. 75 (2012) 311–355.
[11] I.H.H. Kashani, E.S. Hoseini, H. Nikzad, M.H. Aarabi, Pharmacological proper-ties of medicinal herbs by focus on secondary metabolites, Life Sci. J. 9 (2012)509–519.
[12] J.P. de Andrade, N.B. Pigni, L. Torras-Claveria, S. Berkov, C. Codina, F. Vilado-mat, J. Bastida, Bioactive alkaloid extracts from Narcissus broussonetii: massspectral studies, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 70 (2012) 13–25.
[13] S. Jahn, B. Seiwert, S. Kretzing, G. Abraham, R. Regenthal, U. Karst, Metabolicstudies of the Amaryllidaceous alkaloids galantamine and lycorine based onelectrochemical simulation in addition to in vivo and in vitro models, Anal.Chim. Acta 756 (2012) 60–72.
[14] M. Kitajima, Search for alkaloids having biological activities from medicinalplant resources, J. Trad. Med. 29 (2012) 41–45.
[15] V. Sarala, M. Radhakrishnan, R. Balagurunathan, Inhibitory activity of ter-penoids from the medicinal plant Andrographis paniculata against Biofoulingbacteria, Int. J. ChemTech. Res. 3 (2011) 1225–1231.
[16] G. Brusotti, I. Cesari, G. Gilardoni, S. Tosi, P. Grisoli, A.M. Picco, G. Caccialanza,Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Phyllanthus muellerianus(Kuntze) Excel essential oil, J. Ethnopharmacol. 142 (2012) 657–662.
[17] G. Brusotti, T.A. Ngueyem, R. Biesuz, G. Caccialanza, Optimum extractionprocess of polyphenols from Bridelia grandis stem bark using experimentaldesign, J. Sep. Sci. 33 (2010) 1692–1697.
[18] R.K. Choudhary, P.L. Swarnkar, Antioxidant activity of phenolic and flavonoidcompounds in some medicinal plants of India, Nat. Prod. Res. 25 (2011)1101–1109.
[19] L. Zhang, A.S. Ravipati, S.R. Koyyalamudi, S.C. Jeong, N. Reddy, P.T. Smith,J. Bartlett, K. Shanmugam, G. Münch, M.J. Wu, Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of selected medicinal plants containing phenolic andflavonoid compounds, J. Agric. Food Chem. 59 (2011) 12361–12367.
[20] C. Chan, R. Yusoff, G. Ngoh, F.W. Kung, Microwave-assisted extrac-tions of active ingredients from plants, J. Chromatogr. A 1218 (2011)6213–6225.
[21] H. Winjngard, M.B. Hossain, D.K. Rai, N. Brunton, Techniques to extract bioac-tive compounds from food by-products of plant origin, Food Res. Int. 46 (2012)505–513.
[22] B. Tang, W. Bi, M. Tian, K.H. Row, Application of ionic liquid for extraction andseparation of bioactive compounds from plant, J. Chromatogr. B 904 (2012)1–21.
[23] Ł. Ciesla, Biological fingerprinting of herbal samples by means of liquid chro-matography, Chromatogr. Res. Int. (2012) 1–9, Article ID 532418.
[24] W.F. Smyth, T.J.P. Smyth, V.N. Ramachandran, F. O Donnell, P. Brooks, Derepli-cation of phytochemicals in plants by LC–ESI-MS and ESI-MSn, Trends Anal.Chem. 33 (2012) 46–54.
[25] H. Wu, J. Guo, S. Chen, X. Liu, Y. Zhou, X. Zhang, X. Xu, Recent developmentsin qualitative and quantitative analysis of phytochemical constituents andtheir metabolites using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, J. Pharm.Biomed. Anal. 72 (2013) 267–291.
[26] L. Shizen Compendium of Materia Medica (1596 A.D.).[27] L. Shizen, L. Xiwen, Compendium of Materia Medica (Bencao Gangmu), For-
eign Languages Press, 2004.[28] C. Samhita, (P.V. Sharma, Trans.) Chaukhamba Orientalia, Varanasi, India, 4
vols., 1981ix–xxxii.[29] C.C. Chang, S.-T. Huang, Is traditional Chinese medicine effective for reducing
hyperthyroidism? J. Altern. Complement. Med. 16 (2010) 1217–1220.[30] O. Seyfried, J. Hester, Opioids and endocrine dysfunction, Brit. J. Pain 6 (2012)
7–24.[31] R. Devanathan, A review on swarna makshika, Int. Res. J. Pharm. 2 (2011) 1–5.[32] M.E. Wall, M.C. Wani, D.M. Brown, F. Fullas, J.B. Olwald, F.F. Josephson,
N.M. Thornton, J.M. Pezzuto, C.W.W. Beecher, N.R. Farnsworth, G.A. Cordell,A.D. Kinghorn, Effect of tannins on screening of plant extracts for enzymeinhibitory activity and techniques for their removal, Phytomedicine 3 (1996)281–285.
[33] G.A. Cordell, Introduction to the Alkaloids: A Biogenetic Approach, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1981.
[34] K. Hostettmann, M. Hostettmann, A. Marston, Saponins, in: B.V. Charlwood,D.V. Banthorpe (Eds.), Methods in Plant Biochemistry, Terpenoids, vol. 7, Aca-demic Press, San Diego, CA, 1991, pp. 435–471.
[35] H.-F. Zhang, X.-H. Yang, Y. Wang, Microwave assisted extraction of secondarymetabolites from plants: current status and future directions, Trends FoodSci. Tech. 22 (2011) 672–688.
[36] L. Paniwnyk, H. Cai, S. Albu, T.J. Mason, R. Cole, The enhancement and scale upof the extraction of anti-oxidants from Rosmarinus officinalis using ultrasound,Ultrason. Sonochem. 16 (2009) 287–292.
[37] C.H. Chang, R. Yusoff, G.C. Ngoh, F.W. Kung, Microwave assisted extractionsof active ingredients from plants, J. Chromatogr. A 1218 (2011) 6213–6225.
[38] X. Tong, X. Xiao, G. Li, On-line coupling of dynamic microwave-assisted
Please cite this article in press as: G. Brusotti, et al., Isolation and charactanalysis in the ethnopharmacological approach, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2
extraction-high speed counter-current chromatography for continuous iso-lation of nevadensin from Lyeicnotus pauciflorus Maxim, J. Chromatogr. B 879(2011) 2397–2402.
[39] S. Gao, W. Yu, X. Yang, Z. Liu, Y. Jia, H. Zhang, On-line ionic liquid-based dynamic microwave-assisted extraction-high performance liquid
PRESS Biomedical Analysis xxx (2013) xxx– xxx 9
chromatography for the determination of lipophilic constituents in root ofSalvia miltiorrhiza Bunge, J. Sep. Sci. 35 (2012) 2813–2821.
[40] B. Tang, W. Bi, M. Tian, K.H. Row, Application of ionic liquid for extraction andseparation of bioactive compounds from plants, J. Chromatogr. B 904 (2012)1–21.
[41] M. Herrero, J.A. Mendiola, A. Cifuentes, E. Ibanez, Supercritical fluid extrac-tion: recent advances and application, J. Chromatogr. A 1217 (2010)2495–2511.
[42] M.S. Liza, R. Abdul Rahman, B. Mandana, S. Jinap, A. Rahmat, I.S.M. Zaidul, A.Hamid, Supercritical fluid extraction of bioactive flavonoid from Strobilanthescrispus (pecah kaca) and its comparison with solvent extraction, Int. Food Res.J. 19 (2012) 503–508.
[43] T. Fornari, G. Vicente, E. Vazquez, M.R. Garcia-Risco, G. Reglero, Isolation ofessential oil from different plants and herbs by supercritical fluid extraction,J. Chromatogr. A 1250 (2012) 34–48.
[44] S.B. Cheng, L.C. Wu, Y.C. Hsieh, C.H. Wu, Y.J. Chan, L.H. Chang, C.Mi. J. Chang,S.L. Hsu, C.L. Teng, C.C. Wu, Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of aromaticturmerone from Curcuma longa Linn. induces apoptosis through reactiveoxygen species-triggered intrinsic and extrinsic pathways in human hepa-tocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells, J. Agric. Food Chem. 60 (2012) 9620–9630.
[45] L. Chang, T. Jong, H. Huang, Y. Nien, C. Chang, Supercritical carbon diox-ide extraction of turmeric oil from Curcuma longa Linn and purification ofturmerones, Sep. Purif. Technol. 47 (2006) 119–125.
[46] T.J. Hsieh, Y.H. Tsai, M.C. Liao, Y.C. Du, P.J. Lien, C.C. Sun, F.R. Chang, Y.C. Wu,Anti-diabetic properties of non-polar Toona sinensis Roem extract preparedby supercritical-CO2 fluid, Food Chem. Toxicol. 50 (2012) 779–789.
[47] M.C. Henry, C.R. Yonker, Supercritical fluid chromatography, pressurizedliquid extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction, Anal. Chem. 78 (2006)3909–3916.
[48] A. Mustafa, C. Turner, Pressurized liquid extraction as a green approach infood and herbal plants extraction: A review, Anal. Chim. Acta 703 (2011) 8–18.
[49] K. Skalicka-Wozniak, K. Glowniak, Pressurized liquid extraction of coumarinsfrom fruits of Heracleum leskowii with application of solvents with dif-ferent polarity under increasing temperature, Molecules 17 (2012) 4133–4141.
[50] A. Liu, C. Han, X. Zhou, Z. Zhu, F. Huang, Y. Shen, Determination of three capsai-cinoids in Capsicum annuum by pressurized liquid extraction combined withLC–MS/MS, J. Sep. Sci. 00 (2013) 1–6.
[51] H. Wu, M. Chen, Y. Fan, F. Elsebaei, Y. Zhu, Determination of rutin andquercetin in Chinese herbal medicine by ionic liquid-based pressurized liquidextraction-liquid chromatography-chemiluminescence detection, Talanta 88(2012) 222–229.
[52] C.C. Teo, S.N. Tan, J.W.H. Yong, C.S. Hew, E.S. Ong, Pressurized hot waterextraction (PHWE), J. Chromatogr. A 1217 (2010) 2484–2494.
[53] A. Gil-Ramírez, J.A. Mendiola, E. Arranz, A. Ruíz-Rodríguez, G. Reglero, E.Ibánez, F.R. Marín, Highly isoxanthohumol enriched hop extract obtained bypressurized hot water extraction (PHWE). Chemical and functional charac-terization, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. 16 (2012) 54–60.
[54] J.J. Ho, K.J. Sun, K.S. Sik, S.K. Ho, C.H. Wook, K.H. Pyo, Anti-inflammatory andanti-arthritic activity of total flavonoids of the roots of Sophora flavescens, J.Ethnopharmacol. 127 (2010) 589–595.
[55] G. Lauro, M. Masullo, S. Piacente, R. Riccio, G. Bifulco, Inverse virtual screeningallows the discovery of the biological activity of natural compounds, Bioorg.Med. Chem. 20 (2012) 3596–3602.
[56] M.A. Desai, J. Parikh, Hydrotropic extraction of citral from Cymbopogon flexu-osus (Steud.)Wats, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 (2012) 3750–3757.
[57] R.A. Sharma, V.G. Gaikar, Hydrotropic extraction of reserpine from Rauwolfiavomitoria Roots, Sep. Sci. Technol. 47 (2012) 827–833.
[58] M. Puri, D. Sharma, C.J. Barrow, Enzyme-assisted extraction of bioactives fromplants, Trends Biotechnol. 30 (2012) 37–44.
[59] I. Cesari, M. Hoerlé, C. Simoes-Pires, P. Grisoli, E.F. Queiroz, C. Dacarro, L. Mar-court, P.F. Moundipa, P.A. Carrupt, M. Cuendet, G. Caccialanza, J.L. Wolfender,G. Brusotti, Anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities ofDiospyros bipindensis (Gürke) extracts and its main constituents, J. Ethnophar-macol. 1 (2013) 264–270.
[60] J.H. Fu, X.H. Sun, J.D. Wang, J.F. Chu, C.Y. Yan, Progress in quantitative analysisof plant hormones, Plant Physiol. 56 (2011) 355–366.
[61] E. Skrzypczak-Pietraszeka, J. Pietraszek, Chemical profile and seasonal vari-ation of phenolic acid content in bastard balm (Melittis melissophyllum L.,Lamiaceae), J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 66 (2012) 154–161.
[62] A.O. Ghafoor, H.K. Qadir, N.A. Fakhri, Analysis of phenolic compounds inextracts of Ziziphus spina-christi using RPHPLC method, J. Chem. Pharm. Res.4 (2012) 3158–3163.
[63] J.J. Araya, G. Montenegro, L.A. Mitscher, B.N. Timmermann, Application ofphase-trafficking methods to natural products research, J. Nat. Prod. 73 (2010)1568–1572.
[64] J.J. Araya, H. Zhang, T.E. Prisinzano, L.A. Mitscher, B.N. Timmermann, Iden-tification of unprecedented purine-containing compounds, the zingerines,from ginger rhizomes (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) using a phase-traffickingapproach, Phytochemistry 72 (2011) 935–941.
erization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
[65] A.E. Hagerman, Tannin Handbook, Miami University, Ohio, 1995.[66] Z. Long, C. Wang, Z. Guo, X. Zhang, L. Nordahl, J. Zeng, J. Zeng, X. Liang, A
non-aqueous solid phase extraction method for alkaloid enrichment and itsapplication in the determination of hyoscyamine and scopolamine, Analyst137 (2012) 1451–1457.
ING Model
P
1 al and
ARTICLEBA-9001; No. of Pages 11
0 G. Brusotti et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutic
[67] X. Xu, L. Zhu, L. Chen, Separation and screening of compounds of biologicalorigin using molecularly imprinted polymers, J. Chromatogr. B 804 (2004)61–69.
[68] W. Bi, M. Tian, K.H. Row, Separation of phenolic acids from natural plantextracts using molecularly imprinted anion-exchange polymer confined ionicliquids, J. Chromatogr. A 1232 (2012) 37–42.
[69] B.A. Adams, E.L. Holmes, Synthetic ion exchange resins, J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 54(1935) 1T.
[70] J. Li, H.A. Chase, Development of adsorptive (non-ionic) macroporous resinsand their uses in the purification of pharmacologically-active natural prod-ucts from plant sources, Nat. Prod. Rep. 27 (2010) 1493–1510.
[71] S.D. Sarker, Z. Latif, A.I. Gray, Natural products isolation: an overview, in: S.D.Sarker, Z. Latif, A.I. Gray (Eds.), Natural Products Isolation, vol. 20, 2nd ed.,Humana Press Inc, Totowa, NJ, 2005, pp. 1–25.
[72] C. Valgas, S. Machado de Souza, E.F.A. Smânia, A. Smânia Jr., Screening meth-ods to determine antibacterial activity of natural products, Braz. J. Microbiol.38 (2007) 369–380.
[73] P. Cos, A.J. Vlietinck, D. Vanden Berghe, L. Maes, Anti-infective potential ofnatural products: how to develop a stronger in vitro ‘proof-of-concept’, J.Ethnopharmacol. 106 (2006) 290–302.
[74] G.L. Ellman, K.D. Courtney, V. Andres Jr., R.M. Feather-Stone, A new andrapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity, Biochem.Pharmacol. 7 (1961) 88–95.
[75] M. Pohanka, M. Hrabinova, K. Kuca, J.-P. Simonato, Assessment of acetyl-cholinesterase activity using indoxylacetate and comparison with thestandard Ellman’s method, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12 (2011) 2631–2640.
[76] G. Beretta, R.M. Facino, Recent advances in the assessment of the antioxidantcapacity of pharmaceutical drugs: from in vitro to in vivo evidence, Anal.Bioanal. Chem. 398 (2010) 67–75.
[77] O. Sticher, Natural product isolation, Nat. Prod. Rep. 25 (2008) 517–554.[78] J. Bero, V. Hannaert, G. Chataigné, M.F. Hérent, J. Quetin-Leclercq, In vitro
antitrypanosomal and antileishmanial activity of plants used in Benin in tra-ditional medicine and bio-guided fractionation of the most active extract, J.Ethnopharmacol. 137 (2011) 998–1002.
[79] D. Manvar, M. Mishra, S. Kumar, V.N. Pandey, Identification and evaluationof anti Hepatitis C virus phytochemicals from Eclipta alba, J. Ethnopharmacol.144 (2012) 545–554.
[80] T. Michel, E. Destandau, V. Pecher, I. Renimel, L. Pasquier, P. André, C. Elfakir,Two-step Centrifugal Partition Chromatography (CPC) fractionation of Buteamonosperma (Lam.) biomarkers, Sep. Purif. Technol. 80 (2011) 32–37.
[81] Y. Hou, X. Cao, L. Wang, B. Cheng, L. Dong, X. Luo, G. Bai, W. Gao,Microfractionation bioactivity-based ultra performance liquid chromatog-raphy/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the identification ofnuclear factor-�B inhibitors and �(2) adrenergic receptor agonists in an alka-loidal extract of the folk herb Alstonia scholaris, J. Chromatogr. B 908 (2012)98–104.
[82] S. Challal, N. Bohni, O.E. Buenafe, C.V. Esguerra, P.A.M. de Witte, J.L. Wolfender,A.D. Crawford, Zebrafish Bioassay-guided microfractionation for the rapidin vivo identification of pharmacologically active natural products, Chimia66 (2012) 229–232.
[83] C. Grosso, A.K. Jäger, D. Staerk, Coupling of a high-resolution monoamineoxidase-A inhibitor assay and HPLC-SPE-NMR for advanced bioactivity pro-filing of plant extracts, Phytochem. Anal. 24 (2013) 141–147.
[84] C.J. Malherbe, D. de Beer, E. Joubert, Development of On-Line High Perfor-mance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)-Biochemical Detection Methods astools in the identification of bioactives, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13 (2012) 3101–3133.
[85] S.-Y. Shi, H.-H. Zhou, Y.-P. Zhang, X.-Y. Jiang, X.-Q. Chen, K.-L. Huang, Cou-pling HPLC to on-line, post-column (bio)chemical assays for high-resolutionscreening of bioactive compounds from complex mixtures, Trends Anal.Chem. 28 (2009) 865–877.
[86] H.A.G. Niederländer, T.A. van Beek, A. Bartasiute, I.I. Koleva, Antioxidant activ-ity assays on-line with liquid chromatography, J. Chromatogr. A 1210 (2008)121–134.
[87] N. Mrazek, K. Watla-iad, S. Deachathai, S. Suteerapataranon, Rapid antioxidantcapacity screening in herbal extracts using a simple flow injection-spectrophotometric system, Food Chem. 132 (2012) 544–548.
[88] N. Küc ükboyaci, A. Güvenc , N.N. Turan, A. Aydin, Antioxidant activity and totalphenolic content of aqueous extract from Raphanus Raphanistrum L., Turk. J.Pharm. Sci. 9 (2012) 93–100.
[89] C.F. de Jong, R.J.E. Derks, B. Bruyneel, W. Niessen, H. Irth, High-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry-based acetyl-cholinesterase assay for the screening of inhibitors in natural extracts, J.Chromatogr. A 1112 (2006) 303–310.
[90] I.K. Rhee, N. Appels, T. Luijendijk, H. Irth, R. Verpoorte, Determining acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitory activity in plant extracts using a fluorimetric flowassay, Phytochem. Anal. 14 (2003) 145–149.
[91] B. Wang, J. Deng, Y. Gao, L. Zhu, R. He, Y. Xu, The screening toolbox of bioactivesubstances from natural products, Fitoterapia 82 (2011) 1141–1151.
[92] L. Wang, J. Ren, M. Sun, S. Wang, A combined cell membrane chromatographyand online HPLC/MS method for screening compounds from Radix Caulophylliacting on the human �1A-adrenoceptor, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 51 (2010)
Please cite this article in press as: G. Brusotti, et al., Isolation and charactanalysis in the ethnopharmacological approach, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2
1032–1036.[93] T. Zhang, S. Han, J. Huang, S. Wang, Combined fibroblast growth factor recep-
tor 4 cell membrane chromatography online with high performance liquidchromatography/mass spectrometry to screen active compounds in Brassicaalbla, J. Chromatogr. B 912 (2013) 85–92.
PRESS Biomedical Analysis xxx (2013) xxx– xxx
[94] J. Liu, J. Yang, S. Wang, J. Sun, J. Shi, G. Rao, A. Li, J. Gou, Combining humanperiodontal ligament cell membrane chromatography with online HPLC/MSfor screening osteoplastic active compounds from Coptidis Rhizoma, J. Chro-matogr. B 904 (2012) 115–120.
[95] X. Chen, Y. Cao, D. Lv, Z. Zhu, J. Zhang, Y. Chai, Comprehensivetwo-dimensional HepG2/cell membrane chromatography/monolithiccolumn/time-of-flight mass spectrometry system for screening anti-tumorcomponents from herbal medicines, J. Chromatogr. A 1242 (2012) 67–74.
[96] S. Wang, C. Wang, X. Zhao, S. Mao, Y. Wu, G. Fan, Comprehensivetwo-dimensional high performance liquid chromatography system withimmobilized liposome chromatography column and monolithic column forseparation of the traditional Chinese medicine Schisandra chinensis, Anal.Chim. Acta 713 (2012) 121–129.
[97] J.I. da Silva, M.C. de Moraes, L.C. Curcino Vieira, A.G. Correa, Q.B. Cass, C.L.Cardoso, Acetylcholinesterase capillary enzyme reactor for screening andcharacterization of selective inhibitors, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 73 (2013)44–52.
[98] H.R. Rabanes, A.M. Guidote Jr., J.P. Quirino, Capillary electrophoresis of naturalproducts: highlights of the last five years (2006–2010), Electrophoresis 33(2012) 180–195.
[99] J. Zhang, J. Hoogmartens, A. Van Schepdael, Recent developments and appli-cations of EMMA in enzymatic and derivatization reactions, Electrophoresis31 (2010) 65–73.
[100] W. Min, W. Wang, J. Chen, A. Wang, Z. Hu, On-line immobilized acetyl-cholinesterase microreactor for screening of inhibitors from natural extractsby capillary electrophoresis, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 404 (2012) 2397–2405.
[101] Z.M. Tang, J.W. Kang, Screening of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in naturalextracts by CE with electrophoretically mediated microanalysis technique,Electrophoresis 28 (2007) 360–365.
[102] Z.M. Tang, T. Wang, J. Kang, Immobilized capillary enzyme reactor based onlayer-by-layer assembling acetylcholinesterase for inhibitor screening by CE,Electrophoresis 28 (2007) 2981–2987.
[103] L. Zhang, K. Hu, X. Li, S. Zhao, CE method with partial filling techniques forscreening of xanthine oxidase inhibitor in traditional Chinese medicine, Chro-matographia 73 (2011) 583–587.
[104] X. Ji, F. Ye, P. Lin, S. Zhao, Immobilized capillary adenosine deaminase microre-actor for inhibitor screening in natural extracts by capillary electrophoresis,Talanta 82 (2010) 1170–1174.
[105] J.L. Wolfender, HPLC in natural product analysis: the detection issue, PlantaMed. 75 (2009) 719–734.
[106] Y. Zhang, G. Cao, J. Ji, X. Cong, S. Wang, B. Cai, Simultaneous chemical finger-printing and quantitative analysis of crude and processed Radix Scrophulariaefrom different locations in China by HPLC, J. Sep. Sci. 34 (2011) 1429–1436.
[107] L.S. Soares e Silva, L.S. da Santos da Silva, L. Brumano, P.C. Stringheta, M.Aparecida de Oliveira Pinto, L.O. Moreira Dias, C. de Sá Martins Muller, E.Scio, R.L. Fabri, H.C. Castro, M. da Penha Henriques do Amaral, Preparation ofdry extract of Mikania glomerata Sprengel (Guaco) and determination of itscoumarin levels by spectrophotometry and HPLC-UV, Molecules 17 (2012)10344–10354.
[108] P. Costa, S. Gonc alves, P. Valentão, P.B. Andrade, N. Coelho, A. Romano, Thy-mus lotocephalus wild plants and in vitro cultures produce different profilesof phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity, Food Chem. 135 (2012)1253–1260.
[109] N. Adnani, C.R. Michel, T.S. Bugni, Universal quantification of structurallydiverse natural products using an evaporative light scattering detector, J. Nat.Prod. 75 (2012) 802–806.
[110] Q. You, F. Chen, J.L. Sharp, X. Wang, Y. You, C. Zhang, High-performance liquidchromatography-mass spectrometry and evaporative light-scattering detec-tor to compare phenolic profiles of muscadine grapes, J. Chromatogr. A 1240(2012) 96–103.
[111] M. Slavin, L.L. Yu, A single extraction and HPLC procedure for simultaneousanalysis of phytosterols, tocopherols and lutein in soybeans, Food Chem. 135(2012) 2789–2795.
[112] Y. Liu, X.W. Shi, E.H. Liu, L.S. Sheng, L.W. Qi, P. Li, More accurate matrix-matched quantification using standard superposition method for herbalmedicines, J. Chromatogr. A 1254 (2012) 43–50.
[113] E. Grata, J. Boccard, D. Guillarme, G. Glauser, P.A. Carrupt, E.E. Farmer, J.L.Wolfender, S. Rudaz, UPLC-TOF-MS for plant metabolomics: a sequentialapproach for wound marker analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana, J. Chromatogr. B871 (2008) 261.
[114] C.S. Funari, P.J. Eugster, S. Martel, P.-A. Carrupt, J.-L. Wolfender, D.H.S. Silva,High resolution ultra high pressure liquid chromatography-time-of-flightmass spectrometry dereplication strategy for the metabolite profiling ofBrazilian Lippia species, J. Chromatogr. A 1259 (2012) 167–178.
[115] Y. Wang, L. Chang, X. Zhao, X. Meng, Y. Liu, Gas chromatography-mass spec-trometry analysis on compounds in volatile oils extracted from Yuan Zhi(radix polygalae) and Shi Chang Pu (acorus tatarinowii) by supercritical CO2,J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 32 (2012) 459–464.
[116] H.C. Huang, H.F. Wang, K.H. Yih, L.Z. Chang, T.M. Chang, Dual bioactivities ofessential oil extracted from the leaves of Artemisia argyi as an antimelanogenic
erization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
versus antioxidant agent and chemical composition analysis by GC/MS, Int. J.Mol. Sci. 13 (2012) 14679–14697.
[117] C. Formisano, D. Rigano, F. Senatore, F.M. Raimondo, A. Maggio, M. Bruno,Essential oil composition and antibacterial activity of Anthemis mixta and A.tomentosa (Asteraceae), Nat. Prod. Commun. 7 (2012) 1379–1382.
ING Model
P
al and
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
extraction-nuclear magnetic resonance: new strategies going beyond the
ARTICLEBA-9001; No. of Pages 11
G. Brusotti et al. / Journal of Pharmaceutic
118] J. Xing, C.F. Xie, H.X. Lou, Recent applications of liquid chromatography-massspectrometry in natural products bioanalysis, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 44(2007) 368–378.
119] K.V. Sashidhara, J.N. Rosaiah, Various dereplication strategies using LC–MSfor rapid natural product lead identification and drug discovery, Nat. Prod.Commun. 2 (2007) 193–202.
120] J. Jing, C.O. Chan, L. Xu, D.P. Jin, X.W. Cao, D.K.W. Mok, H.S. Parekh, S.B.Chen, Development of an in-line HPLC fingerprint ion-trap mass spectro-metric method for identification and quality control of Radix Scrophulariae,J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 56 (2011) 830–835.
121] C. Zhou, J.G. Luo, L.Y. Kong, Quality evaluation of Desmodium styraci-folium using high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiodearray detection and electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry, Phy-tochem. Anal. 23 (2012) 240–247.
122] X.J. Yang, L. Yang, A.Z. Xiong, D.X. Li, Z.T. Wang, Authentication of Senecio scan-dens and S. vulgaris based on the comprehensive secondary metabolic patternsgained by UPLC-DAD/ESI-MS, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 56 (2011) 165–172.
123] X.M. Liang, Y. Jin, Y.P. Wang, G.W. Jin, Q. Fu, Y.S. Xiao, Qualitative and quantita-tive analysis in quality control of traditional Chinese medicines, J. Chromatogr.
Please cite this article in press as: G. Brusotti, et al., Isolation and charactanalysis in the ethnopharmacological approach, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. (2
A 1216 (2009) 2033–2044.124] H.B. Zou, A.Q. Du, X.L. Zhang, P.H. Wei, W.J. Lu, G.S. Yang, Y.A.E. Hassan, Quality
control methodology and their application in analysis on HPLC fingerprintspectra of herbal medicines, Chromatogr. Res. Int. (2012) 1–12, Article ID851792.
PRESS Biomedical Analysis xxx (2013) xxx– xxx 11
[125] J.L. Wolfender, E.F. Queiroz, K. Hostettmann, The importance of hyphenatedtechniques in the discovery of new lead compounds from nature, Expert Opin.Drug Discov. 1 (2006) 237–260.
[126] J.W. Jaroszewski, Hyphenated NMR methods in natural products research,Part 1: Direct hyphenation, Planta Med. 71 (2005) 691–700.
[127] Z. Yang, Online hyphenated liquid chromatography-nuclear magnetic reso-nance spectroscopy for drug metabolite and nature product analysis, J. Pharm.Biomed. Anal. 40 (2006) 516–527.
[128] J.F. Hu, E. Garo, H.D. Yoo, P.A. Cremin, L. Zeng, M.G. Goering, Applicationof capillary-scale NMR for the structure determination of phytochemicals,Phytochem. Anal. 16 (2005) 127–133.
[129] G. Glauser, D. Guillarme, E. Grata, J. Boccard, A. Thiocone, P.A. Carrupt,Optimized liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry approach for the iso-lation of minor stress biomarkers in plant extracts and their identificationby capillary nuclear magnetic resonance, J. Chromatogr. A 1180 (2008)90–98.
[130] K.T. Johansen, S.J. Ebild, S.B. Christensen, M. Godejohann, J.W. Jaroszewski,Alkaloid analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography-solid phase
erization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.03.007
standard, J. Chromatogr. A 1270 (2012) 171–177.[131] S.G. Wubshet, K.T. Johansen, N.T. Nyberg, J.W. Jaroszewski, Direct 13C NMR
detection in HPLC hyphenation mode: analysis of Ganoderma lucidum ter-penoids, J. Nat. Prod. 75 (2012) 876–882.