review intro to arch

79
EGYPTIAN ARCHITECTURE Buildings: Saqqara, Zoser’s Pyramid Pyramids of Giza

Upload: lec2141

Post on 06-May-2015

873 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Review intro to arch

EGYPTIAN ARCHITECTURE

Buildings:

•Saqqara, Zoser’s Pyramid•Pyramids of Giza

Page 2: Review intro to arch

Saqqara:Zoser’s Pyramid Complex2680 BCImhotep1st generation of pyramids-juxtaposition of steps; no central axis/everything placed near perimeter wall; columns look doric (fluting convex); refined stone carving; 24 columns - 24 regions;

Page 3: Review intro to arch
Page 4: Review intro to arch

Giza: Pyramids of Chefren, Cheops and Mikerinos3rd dynasty; 2570-2500

-located on border of Cairo-no large symetrical axiis-regular geometric shapes specific to each building-compound restored by UNESCO

Page 5: Review intro to arch

GREEK ARCHITECTURE

Buildings:•The Megaron•Treasury of Atreus•Acropolis: (Parthenon, Propylaia, Erechteion, Temple of Athena Nike)

Page 6: Review intro to arch

Megaron plan, Tiryns, late XIII century BC

Page 7: Review intro to arch

Megaron Megaron plan, Tiryns, late XIII (13) century BC

• Architectural predecessor of the classical greek temple. • Considered the earliest architectural act• Constituted of an anteroom, an open 2 column porch, and a main hall • Built in stages: stage 1 rectangular room, stage 2: A famous megaron is in the large reception

hall of the king in the palace of Tiryns• rich and lavish• marble and terracotta decoration (floors & walls)

Page 8: Review intro to arch

Mycene, Treasury of Atreus, 1300-1250

-tholos tomb (=beehive tomb)-built by substracting from the Earth-triangle releases a heavy load on the lintel part + lets light in

Page 9: Review intro to arch

Mycene, Treasury of Atreus, 1300-1250

• A round space deeply underground used for funarial ceremonies. • Main gate; interesting how the pointed arch solves the problem of the roof: block of stone

then triangle that put the weight on each side, on the pilliars. Left open maybe to let light enter in the space.

• The classical shape of greek arch are the achievment of a very long process. • Decoration attached to what is left today: hypothesis of reco truction section/ground plan

(rect: actual tumb) • Inside; very smooth big blocks of stone

Page 10: Review intro to arch

Athens, Acropolis, V century

-destroyed & renovated multiple times-on top of hill-imposing presence of Parthenon (dedicated to Athena)-other smaller temples dedicated to Athena

Page 11: Review intro to arch

ATHENS: ACROPOLIS 5th century • The acropolis: located on the top of a hill in the center of Athens. What we see result of the

different stage of construction and deconstruction,• Acropolis originally a sanctuary: dedicated to the goods, very few number of athenians could

enter, only the citizen. Could enter twice a year 2000 or 3000.

Page 12: Review intro to arch

Propylaia, 437-432, commissoned by Perikles, architect: Mnesikles

Page 13: Review intro to arch

Propylaia, 437-432, commissoned by Perikles, architect: Mnesikles

• The acropolis is accessible through a system of ramps. • The citizens were reaching the acropolis in a prossetion through the propilia:. Structure of

Doric order• very symetrical: central corridor. C shape portical: sense of welcoming. • Building appears more imposing than it actually is because ramp underneath the portical:

size and imposing position. Coming from

Page 14: Review intro to arch

Temple of Athena Nike,extricated from a Turkish bastion in 1835,425

Page 15: Review intro to arch

Temple of aAthena Nike

• Ionic temple first example.• 4 column (tetra style), slender proportions

creating an elegant and refinement usually not encountered in a building of this height.

• Friezes decorated with engraved sculptures in an idealized classical style of the 5th century.

• Temple rather in good shape• Erected on the ruins of a previous temple.

Page 16: Review intro to arch

ERECHTHEION 421 404/5

Page 17: Review intro to arch

West side, tomb of Kekrops , maidens instead of columns

Page 18: Review intro to arch

ERECHTHEION, tomb of Kekrops 421-404/5

• Magestic Doric presence. • Delicate and elegant forms that contrast with

the Parthenon.• Unusually has 2 porches. • 6 female shapped column seem to casually

support the porch weight on their heads. • building was lavishly decorated with wall

frescoes, gilded rosettes, and an array of colored features and low relief sculptures.

Page 19: Review intro to arch

The Parthenon, from 447 to 432,architects: Iktinos and Callicrates

-one of 7 wonders-incarnates perfection (1st back-side-front)-each element stands orthogonally to the ground; placed inwards, platform is not flat, shaped according to curve-complexity of shape makes building look simple

Page 20: Review intro to arch
Page 21: Review intro to arch

The parthenon from 447 to 432,architects: Iktinos and Callicrates

• Use of optical science to make it look straight and imposing. If the column were actually straight, they would appear shrunken in the middle, the stylobate has an upward curvature.

• The columns also are made to incline inward to correct the natural appearance. They are not perpendicular to the ground. Said that they would meet at a distance of a 100 miles from the ground.

• Example of the combination of technical skills and theoretical knowledge. • Columns not shape perpendicularly to the ground• Function: to host the immense statue of athena • Culmination of the doric order

Page 22: Review intro to arch

ROMAN ARCHITECTURE

• Buildings: • Roman city plan• Colosseum• The Basilica• The Domus romanaThe imperial palaces (domus Augustana)• Roman Imperial tombs (Trajan, Augustus, Adrianum)• Tabularium• Forum of Augustus• Pantheon• Caracalla and Diocletian baths• Triumphal arches (Septimius Severus, Costantine)

Page 23: Review intro to arch

Roman city plan

Page 24: Review intro to arch

Roman cities

• Idea present in the hellenic city planning • Orthogonal grid acording to the cardinal

points • Two main street perpendicular intersecting at

the forum which was the center of the commerce.

• Designed to be practical • Fortifications around it for protection

Page 25: Review intro to arch

Colosseum, Flavius’ theater, completed 80 AC617 by 511 feet

Page 26: Review intro to arch

Colosseum, rome second ring

Page 27: Review intro to arch

Colosseum Flavius’ theater, completed 80 AC

• Theater. • the ground floor half columns are doric in style, those

of the second floor are ionic and those of the upper floor Corinthian. Organized with the stable, less decorated at the bottom.

• Elyptical • Velarium to cover the Colosseum• Senator first row, free men, slaves and then women. • Social cohesion again. Circle of conviniency that keep

the society together.

Page 28: Review intro to arch

basilica

Page 29: Review intro to arch

Trier basilica, basilica of constantine

• Impressive size • optical illusion - both the windows of the apse as

well as the niches underneath become progressively smaller towards the middle, thus enhancing the impression of length.

• now nearly empty and austere inside, the Konstantin Basilika was originally embellished with colorful marble inlay, golden mosaics, and statues.

Page 30: Review intro to arch

ROME BASILICA MAXENTIUM 307-312 AD

Page 31: Review intro to arch

ROME BASILICA MAXENTIUM 307-312 AD

• Largest building at the time of construction • Taking from both roman bath and basilica • No columns to support the huge open space in

the central nave. • Entire thing being built with arches. • Built with a folded roof which deceases the

overall weight of the structure, decreasing the forces exerted on the outer arches.

Page 32: Review intro to arch
Page 33: Review intro to arch
Page 34: Review intro to arch
Page 35: Review intro to arch

Domus romana

• No windows all opening to the inside of the court.

• Same pattern no matter the size of the house, and the means of the owner.

• Taberna: shop, atrium, cubiculum, tablinum • Rain water collected in the impluvium.

Page 36: Review intro to arch

Rome palatinum hill, imperial palaces 1 century AD•Domus Augustana •Flavian House

Page 37: Review intro to arch

ROME, IMPERIAL PALACES1 century AD by emperor augustus

• Rome, imperial palaces: Augustus completed in the 31BC. Large vast area located on the top of the palatinun hill. Palace comes from Palatinium hill.

• combination of different buildings put together. Basically a citadel with The hypodrome attached t the palace, library, tablinum (pblic function performed)

• Domus augustus was the emperor luxurious residence, private area. • The expansion of the same sequence and space that exist on a smaller scale of the domus

romana.• private spectacle, public space function as well as private. • Walls covered with marble, frescos or stuck • Hypodrom: social cohesion: emperor connects to the people and vise-versa. The architecture

allows this. • Domus flavia and augustus: built by emperor domitian • Ooverlooking the circus maximus

Page 38: Review intro to arch
Page 39: Review intro to arch
Page 40: Review intro to arch
Page 41: Review intro to arch

Flavian palace (domus flavia) 92 AD

• Completed under Emperor Domitian in 92 AD• Used for purposes of state• Flavian house: the further addition• Has been built later but the sequence in the

interieur is still the same, organized according to the same axis.

• Well known for its grandeur.

Page 42: Review intro to arch

Roman imperial tumb ( trajan augustus, adrianum)

Page 43: Review intro to arch
Page 44: Review intro to arch

Trajan column:

Page 45: Review intro to arch

Trajan column 113 AD

• Famous for it’s spiral bas relief: trajan’s victorious campaign, act as a military propaganda (no blood)

• Enterior of the spiral column is hollow • Associated with empirial power, built to the

glory of the emperor trajan who was later on burried there.

• Viewer has difficulty reading the story: active participation

Page 46: Review intro to arch
Page 47: Review intro to arch

Hadrian tomb

• Hadrian built his own tomb instead of being buried in the augustus mausoleum

• Right bank of the tiber• Decorated cylinder with a garden on top• Conversion into a military fortress, then a catle

Page 48: Review intro to arch

Augustus mausoleum

• Roman emperor have erected their own tomb: Augustus tomb on the map,

• juxtaposition of cylinders with cypress trees planted, cypres trees, Long and slender trees with a symmetrical root the only tree being used in a cemetery because of that.

• Fence to protect the holy ground • During the middle ages became a fort because

of its strong structure.

Page 49: Review intro to arch
Page 50: Review intro to arch
Page 51: Review intro to arch

BASILICA JULIA 54-48 BCE, ROME

• House tribunal/ administrative office• Mostly foundations left, archeological site • stuck covered columns• Largest basilica of the forum • 3 naves, lower walls to let the light in the

central one.

Page 52: Review intro to arch
Page 53: Review intro to arch

ROME, TABULARIUM 78BC

• The city archives of Rome in which the documents of the city were located. Very imposing building.

• very powerful structure that made the hill to stand straight

• Bottom part large and tall fortified wall, • Second floor used of the Doric order, only decoration• Third floor no longer existant had a corynthian order

colonade. • Interior vault of concrete

Page 54: Review intro to arch

Temple of mars the avenger

Page 55: Review intro to arch
Page 56: Review intro to arch
Page 57: Review intro to arch

Rome, pantheon 125 AC

• Result of a compromise or change of program in the construction. Combination of elements that have been reorganized or redesigned

• use diff material according to the level. Gets lighter related to the position; less and less heavy for the construction as well as for the structure itself which then does not have to carry a very large weight

• The vaults in the roof: lacunae, creating a void, lighten the dome. And create a decorative pattern as well.

• Dome with opening: even lighter •

Page 58: Review intro to arch

Bath of Caracalla 212-216 AC

Page 59: Review intro to arch

Bath of Caracalla 212-216 AC

• Huge complex, with large frescoed vaults • Seats for more than 1600 persons• Public library within the complex• A complex water distribution system ensured

a constant flow of water from the Aqua Marcia aqueduct. Very modern system

Page 60: Review intro to arch

Bath of Diocletianfrom 298 AC

Page 61: Review intro to arch

Bath of Diocletianfrom 298 AC

• Grandest of the public baths largest, most somptious. • The frigidarium• The caldarium• the use of external buttresses for the cross vaults were considered by some to be the

first example of the scientific system of thrusts and counter-thrusts in architecture• the forms of the building were simple and give the impression of a vast amount of

open space.• "manipulation of space• The exterior walls of the bath were encrusted with stucco to give the impression of

stonework.• The interior parts of the bath were supported by vaulting ceilings and arches to

create curvilinear lines.• The structure of the roof is a excellent example of Classical design. Architects used

sloped forms to cover curved extrados (the outer surface of the arch) of the vaulted halls.[2]

Page 62: Review intro to arch
Page 63: Review intro to arch

Arch of constantine 3 AC

• Is a triumphal arch in Rome, situated between the Colosseum and the palatine hill

• to commemorate Constantine I's victory • Modelled after the example of the

Arch of Septimius Severus on the Roman Forum.

• four columns of Corinthian order

Page 64: Review intro to arch

Arch of Septimius Severus, II century

Page 65: Review intro to arch

Arch of Septimius Severus, II century

• Relief narative representing the war• Propaganda• columns of composite order: volutes of the

ionic order with the leaves of the corynthian order.

Page 66: Review intro to arch

Constantinople, Hagia Sophia,532-537Isidoros & Anthemisios

Page 67: Review intro to arch

Constantinople, Hagia Sophia, 532-537 under Justinian,Architects: Isidoros of Miletus& Anthemisios of Tralles

Page 68: Review intro to arch
Page 69: Review intro to arch

Hagia Sophia, 532-537 under Justinian,

Architects: Isidoros of Miletus& Anthemisios of Tralles

• Once a church, then a mosque• Famous for it’s dome the arcade around the dome is unbroken with

40 arched windows to bring the light inside. • he dome is carried on four concave triangular

pendentives that serve to transition from the circular base of the dome to its rectangular base: pendentives never used before.

• hierarchy of dome-headed elements built up to create a vast oblong interior, crowned by the main dome.

• A second interesting fact about the original structure of the dome was how the architects were able to place forty windows around the base of the dome. Hagia Sophia is famous for the mystical quality of light that reflects everywhere in the interior of the nave

• Lavish Mosaic and decorations

Page 70: Review intro to arch
Page 71: Review intro to arch

Carolingian empire, Palace of Aachen 790s charlemagne

• group of buildings with residential, political and religious purposes

• The Constantine Basilica in Trier, Germany was probably used as a model for Aachen's Council Hall

• Shape of a civil basilica with 3 apses • San Vitale Basilica in Ravenna was one of the

models for the Palatine Chapel• columns are topped by Corinthian capitals.

Page 72: Review intro to arch
Page 73: Review intro to arch

Ca 800 germany losch, carolingian monastery gatehouse

• This edifice borrowed its three arch-shaped passageways and its sectioning by means of Classically influenced half-columns from ancient architecture with the corynthian style columns

Page 74: Review intro to arch

Germany, Corvey, Benedectine Abbey, 873-885

Page 75: Review intro to arch

Germany, Corvey, Benedectine Abbey, 873-885

Page 76: Review intro to arch

Lateran palaceRomeConstantine the Great in the 4th centuryretains its original plan:baroque

Page 77: Review intro to arch

• famous medieval architectural drawing of a monastic compound dating from the early 9th century.

• only surviving major architectural drawing from the roughly 700-year period between the fall of the Roman Empire and the 13th century.

• depicts an entire Benedictine monastic compound

• five parchments sewn together

St gall plan 9th century

Page 79: Review intro to arch

San Vitale, Ravenna

The church has an octagonal plan. The building combines Roman elements: the dome, shape of doorways, and stepped towers; with Byzantine elements: polygonal apse, capitals, and narrow bricks. The church is most famous for its wealth of Byzantine mosaics,