reverse -time datuming
DESCRIPTION
REVERSE -TIME DATUMING. M. Zhou Y. Luo (Saudi Aramco). Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah. Outline. Objective How to Implement Examples Conclusions. Accurate. RTM. Expensive. +. Approx. Phase-shift Kirchhoff. Efficient. Objective. Offset (km). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
REVERSE -TIME DATUMINGREVERSE -TIME DATUMING
M. ZhouM. ZhouY. Luo Y. Luo (Saudi Aramco)(Saudi Aramco)
Geology and Geophysics Department Geology and Geophysics Department
University of UtahUniversity of Utah
OutlineOutline• ObjectiveObjective• How to ImplementHow to Implement• ExamplesExamples• ConclusionsConclusions
AccurateAccurateExpensiveExpensiveRTMRTM
ObjectiveObjectiveD
epth
(K
m)
Dep
th (
Km
)
Offset (km)Offset (km)
ComplexComplexRough topographyRough topography
Large velocity variationLarge velocity variation
Less ComplexLess Complex
RTDRTD
Phase-shift Phase-shift KirchhoffKirchhoff EfficientEfficient
Approx.Approx.
++
OutlineOutline• ObjectiveObjective• How to ImplementHow to Implement• ExamplesExamples• ConclusionsConclusions
d(s|r)d(s|r)
DistancDistancee
Dep
thD
epth
RRSS
x’x’ x’’x’’
d(s|x’’)=d(s|x’’)= g*(r|x’’)g*(r|x’’) d(s|r)d(s|r)
d(s|x’’)d(s|x’’)
d(x’|x’’)d(x’|x’’)=g*(s|x’) d(s|x”)=g*(s|x’) d(s|x”)
d(x’|x’’)d(x’|x’’)
d(s|x’’)d(s|x’’)
Implement RTDImplement RTD
d(s|r)d(s|r)
DistancDistancee
Dep
thD
epth
RRSS
x’x’ x’’x’’
Target-oriented RTD Target-oriented RTD (Luo , 2002)(Luo , 2002)
g(s|x’)g(s|x’) g(r|x’’)g(r|x’’)** d(s|r)d(s|r)
= d(x’|x’’)= d(x’|x’’)
== d(x’|x’’)d(x’|x’’)
Implement RTDImplement RTD
OutlineOutline• ObjectiveObjective• ImplementImplement• ExamplesExamples
• ConclusionsConclusions
2-D Salt Model2-D Salt Model Pluto 1.5 (Smarrt Jv.)Pluto 1.5 (Smarrt Jv.)
2-D Salt Model2-D Salt ModelD
epth
(Km
)D
epth
(Km
)
00
33
15151515Offset (km)Offset (km) 00 Offset (km)Offset (km)
Velocity ModelVelocity Model
Zero-offset DataZero-offset Data
After RedatumingAfter RedatumingD
epth
(K
m)
Dep
th (
Km
)
00
33
1515
1515Offset (km)Offset (km)
00 Offset (km)Offset (km)
Velocity ModelVelocity Model
Zero-offset Data Zero-offset Data at datumat datum
2D Salt Model2D Salt ModelD
epth
(K
m)
Dep
th (
Km
)
00 55
22
33
1010 1515Offset (km)Offset (km)
Dep
th (
Km
)D
epth
(K
m)
00 55
22
33
1010 1515Offset (km)Offset (km)
KM Image After RedatumingKM Image After Redatuming
KM Images Before RedatumingKM Images Before RedatumingD
epth
(K
m)
Dep
th (
Km
)
00 55
22
33
1010 1515Offset (km)Offset (km)
KM Image After RedatumingKM Image After Redatuming
Whole Volume RTMWhole Volume RTMD
epth
(K
m)
Dep
th (
Km
)
00 55
22
33
1010 1515Offset (km)Offset (km)
KM Image After RedatumingKM Image After Redatuming
CPU Time ComparisonCPU Time Comparison
Whole volume RTM:Whole volume RTM:
RTD + KMRTD + KM
KM before datumingKM before datuming
13.4 (50832 sec)13.4 (50832 sec)
6.88 (26147 sec)6.88 (26147 sec)
1 (3801 sec)1 (3801 sec)
S1400, 2048MB memoryS1400, 2048MB memory
After RedatumingAfter RedatumingD
epth
(K
m)
Dep
th (
Km
)
00
33
1515
1515Offset (km)Offset (km)
00 Offset (km)Offset (km)
Velocity ModelVelocity Model
Zero-offset Data Zero-offset Data at datumat datum
KM Image After RedatumingKM Image After RedatumingD
epth
(K
m)
Dep
th (
Km
)
00 55
33
33
1010 1515Offset (km)Offset (km)
KMKM
ModelModel
KM Before and After RedatumingKM Before and After RedatumingD
epth
(K
m)
Dep
th (
Km
)
00 55
33
33
1010 1515Offset (km)Offset (km)
KMKMBeforeBefore
KMKMAfterAfter
KM After Redatuming vs. RTMKM After Redatuming vs. RTMD
epth
(K
m)
Dep
th (
Km
)
00 55
33
33
1010 1515Offset (km)Offset (km)
BeforeBefore
KMKMAfterAfter
DatumDatum
Whole Whole volumevolume
RTMRTM
Save Save 40%40% w.r.t whole volume RTM w.r.t whole volume RTM
KM After RedatumingKM After RedatumingD
epth
(K
m)
Dep
th (
Km
)
00 55
33
33
1010 1515Offset (km)Offset (km)
ShallowShallowDatumDatum
DeepDeepDatumDatum
OutlineOutline• ObjectiveObjective• ImplementImplement• ExamplesExamples
• ConclusionsConclusions
2-D Salt Model2-D Salt Model Pluto 1.5 (Smarrt Jv.)Pluto 1.5 (Smarrt Jv.)
SMARRT JV. Pluto 1.5 Vp modelSMARRT JV. Pluto 1.5 Vp model D
epth
(K
m)
Dep
th (
Km
)
99
Distance (km)Distance (km)00 3030
00
Zero-offset DataZero-offset Data
Tim
e (S
ec)
Tim
e (S
ec)
55
Distance (km)Distance (km)55 2525
11
Reflectivity Model Below DatumReflectivity Model Below Datum
Dep
th (
Km
)D
epth
(K
m)
77
Distance (km)Distance (km)1010 2020
55
Tim
e (S
ec)
Tim
e (S
ec)
Zero-offset Data After DatumingZero-offset Data After Datuming
11
00
OutlineOutline• ObjectiveObjective• How to ImplementHow to Implement• ExamplesExamples• ConclusionsConclusions
ConclusionsConclusions• RTD is faster than RTM RTD is faster than RTM
• RTD helps reveal deeper RTD helps reveal deeper structurestructure
• RTD + KM is cost efficient and RTD + KM is cost efficient and provides good depth imageprovides good depth image
ConclusionsConclusions
• RTD introduces artifacts due toRTD introduces artifacts due todata boundarydata boundary
10 km10 km
2000 ms2000 ms
Courtesy of Yi Luo (Saudi Aramco)Courtesy of Yi Luo (Saudi Aramco)
We thank Utah Tomography and We thank Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration ConsortiumModeling/Migration Consortium
sponsors for their financial supportsponsors for their financial support
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements